about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,272 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Associates degrees awarded in Education and the second variable is Air pollution in Cleveland.  The chart goes from 2011 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of Education Associates degrees decreased, there were fewer students blowing off steam, leading to a reduction in overall city-wide stress levels. This lower stress meant fewer people idling in traffic or revving their engines in fits of frustration, ultimately contributing to a decrease in air pollution in Cleveland. Remember, a calmer city is a cleaner city!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ Symbolism ] Create an image of a serene classroom corridor in Cleveland, where the floors are lined with fallen leaves in various shades of blue and green. The corridor's walls are adorned with murals of peaceful, flowing rivers, symbolizing the diminishing stress levels of the city. Show the hallways fading into a peaceful, misty horizon that merges with the skyline of Cleveland, now free from the haze of pollution. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Associates degrees awarded in Education and Air pollution in Cleveland. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Symbolism Scalar art Hyper-realistic Oragami Symbolism
ChatGPT: Symbolism

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Associates degrees awarded in Education and Air pollution in Cleveland, in the following situation: As the number of Education Associates degrees decreased, there were fewer students blowing off steam, leading to a reduction in overall city-wide stress levels. This lower stress meant fewer people idling in traffic or revving their engines in fits of frustration, ultimately contributing to a decrease in air pollution in Cleveland. Remember, a calmer city is a cleaner city!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: As the number of Education Associates degrees awarded in Cleveland decreased, the classroom corridors grew quieter. With fewer students blowing off steam, the city's stress levels noticeably subsided. Consequently, the once-congested streets experienced a decrease in frustrated drivers idling in traffic and revving their engines. The calmer atmosphere led to a reduction in air pollution, as Cleveland's skyline appeared clearer and cleaner than before.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Symbolism ] and depicting this scene: As the number of Education Associates degrees awarded in Cleveland decreased, the classroom corridors grew quieter. With fewer students blowing off steam, the city's stress levels noticeably subsided. Consequently, the once-congested streets experienced a decrease in frustrated drivers idling in traffic and revving their engines. The calmer atmosphere led to a reduction in air pollution, as Cleveland's skyline appeared clearer and cleaner than before. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ Symbolism ] Create an image of a serene classroom corridor in Cleveland, where the floors are lined with fallen leaves in various shades of blue and green. The corridor's walls are adorned with murals of peaceful, flowing rivers, symbolizing the diminishing stress levels of the city. Show the hallways fading into a peaceful, misty horizon that merges with the skyline of Cleveland, now free from the haze of pollution.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Associates degrees awarded in Education caused Air pollution in Cleveland to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Breath of Fresh Careers: The Link Between Associates Degrees in Education and Air Pollution in Cleveland

The Journal of Comical Environmental Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Education and Air pollution in Cleveland. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from National Center for Education Statistics and Environmental Protection Agency to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9322510 and p < 0.01 for 2011 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Breath of Fresh Careers: The Link Between Associates Degrees in Education and Air Pollution in Cleveland

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we explore the fascinating and unexpected correlation between the awarding of Associates degrees in Education and the levels of air pollution in Cleveland, Ohio. While awarding degrees might bring fresh career opportunities, it also seems to have an impact on the fresh air quality. Our research team analyzed a decade's worth of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Environmental Protection Agency to uncover this peculiar relationship.

Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9322510 with p < 0.01, indicating a strong and statistically significant association between the two variables from 2011 to 2021. This surprising connection raises questions about the unintended consequences of educational pursuits on environmental factors. It seems that the pursuit of knowledge may not always lead to cleaner air, at least in the Cleveland area.

In conclusion, our study sheds light on an unconventional relationship between academia and air quality, proving once again that the world of research is full of unexpected correlations – just like a dad joke that catches you off guard.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Education and Air pollution in Cleveland. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Breath of Fresh Careers: The Link Between Associates Degrees in Education and Air Pollution in Cleveland

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we explore the fascinating and unexpected correlation between the awarding of Associates degrees in Education and the levels of air pollution in Cleveland, Ohio. While awarding degrees might bring fresh career opportunities, it also seems to have an impact on the fresh air quality. Our research team analyzed a decade's worth of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Environmental Protection Agency to uncover this peculiar relationship.

Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9322510 with p < 0.01, indicating a strong and statistically significant association between the two variables from 2011 to 2021. This surprising connection raises questions about the unintended consequences of educational pursuits on environmental factors. It seems that the pursuit of knowledge may not always lead to cleaner air, at least in the Cleveland area.

In conclusion, our study sheds light on an unconventional relationship between academia and air quality, proving once again that the world of research is full of unexpected correlations – just like a dad joke that catches you off guard.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

As the famous saying goes, "Teaching is the profession that teaches all the other professions." And as it turns out, it may also be the profession that contributes to the air pollution levels in Cleveland. But before we dive into the nitty-gritty of this unexpected connection, let's clear the air with a little dad joke: Why did the statistician go to school? Because they love to learn the mean-ing of life! Ah, the beauty of data humor – it's statistically significant, trust me.

Our study delves into the enigmatic relationship between the awarding of Associates degrees in Education and the atmospheric conditions in Cleveland, Ohio. While it may seem like these two variables have as much in common as chalk and cheese, our research has uncovered a surprising link that is nothing to sneeze at.

The pursuit of education is often associated with opening doors to new opportunities, but in the case of air pollution in Cleveland, it appears to be opening windows to some not-so-fresh air. Picture this: in the academic world, you'd expect degrees in Education to promote a breath of fresh careers, but here we are, uncovering a different kind of "breath of fresh air."

Now, let's address the elephant in the room – or should I say, the elephant in the atmosphere? Our data analysis, spanning a decade from 2011 to 2021, has revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9322510 with p < 0.01. In simpler terms, there's a strong and statistically significant relationship between the number of Education degrees awarded and the levels of air pollution in Cleveland. It's a correlation so strong, it's practically doing push-ups in the gym of statistical significance.

But before we get too carried away with our findings, let's tread with caution. Correlation does not always imply causation, as any seasoned researcher will tell you. Just like the correlation between the increase in ice cream sales and shark attacks – no, ice cream doesn't attract sharks, despite what the data might suggest. It's a classic case of "correlation doesn't equal causation," and it never fails to bring a chuckle in the world of research humor.

In light of this unexpected correlation, we're left pondering the unintended consequences of educational pursuits on environmental factors. Who would have thought that the quest for knowledge could potentially leave a trail of carbon footnotes in the air? It's a reminder that in the intricate tapestry of academia and environmental influences, every variable carries its own weight – even if that weight happens to be carbon emissions.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Education and Air pollution in Cleveland. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Breath of Fresh Careers: The Link Between Associates Degrees in Education and Air Pollution in Cleveland

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we explore the fascinating and unexpected correlation between the awarding of Associates degrees in Education and the levels of air pollution in Cleveland, Ohio. While awarding degrees might bring fresh career opportunities, it also seems to have an impact on the fresh air quality. Our research team analyzed a decade's worth of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Environmental Protection Agency to uncover this peculiar relationship.

Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9322510 with p < 0.01, indicating a strong and statistically significant association between the two variables from 2011 to 2021. This surprising connection raises questions about the unintended consequences of educational pursuits on environmental factors. It seems that the pursuit of knowledge may not always lead to cleaner air, at least in the Cleveland area.

In conclusion, our study sheds light on an unconventional relationship between academia and air quality, proving once again that the world of research is full of unexpected correlations – just like a dad joke that catches you off guard.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the famous saying goes, "Teaching is the profession that teaches all the other professions." And as it turns out, it may also be the profession that contributes to the air pollution levels in Cleveland. But before we dive into the nitty-gritty of this unexpected connection, let's clear the air with a little dad joke: Why did the statistician go to school? Because they love to learn the mean-ing of life! Ah, the beauty of data humor – it's statistically significant, trust me.
Our study delves into the enigmatic relationship between the awarding of Associates degrees in Education and the atmospheric conditions in Cleveland, Ohio. While it may seem like these two variables have as much in common as chalk and cheese, our research has uncovered a surprising link that is nothing to sneeze at.
The pursuit of education is often associated with opening doors to new opportunities, but in the case of air pollution in Cleveland, it appears to be opening windows to some not-so-fresh air. Picture this: in the academic world, you'd expect degrees in Education to promote a breath of fresh careers, but here we are, uncovering a different kind of "breath of fresh air."
Now, let's address the elephant in the room – or should I say, the elephant in the atmosphere? Our data analysis, spanning a decade from 2011 to 2021, has revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9322510 with p < 0.01. In simpler terms, there's a strong and statistically significant relationship between the number of Education degrees awarded and the levels of air pollution in Cleveland. It's a correlation so strong, it's practically doing push-ups in the gym of statistical significance.
But before we get too carried away with our findings, let's tread with caution. Correlation does not always imply causation, as any seasoned researcher will tell you. Just like the correlation between the increase in ice cream sales and shark attacks – no, ice cream doesn't attract sharks, despite what the data might suggest. It's a classic case of "correlation doesn't equal causation," and it never fails to bring a chuckle in the world of research humor.
In light of this unexpected correlation, we're left pondering the unintended consequences of educational pursuits on environmental factors. Who would have thought that the quest for knowledge could potentially leave a trail of carbon footnotes in the air? It's a reminder that in the intricate tapestry of academia and environmental influences, every variable carries its own weight – even if that weight happens to be carbon emissions.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Smith et al. (2015) conducted a comprehensive study on the societal impact of Associates degrees in Education, focusing on career prospects and socioeconomic development. Their findings emphasized the positive correlation between educational attainment and upward mobility, echoing the widely held belief that knowledge is indeed power. However, what their study failed to mention is the potential downside of this upward mobility – and by downside, I mean the downward trajectory of air quality levels in Cleveland.

Adding to the discourse, Doe and Jones (2018) explored the environmental implications of educational pursuits, highlighting the sustainability initiatives undertaken by educational institutions. While their work uncovered commendable efforts to reduce carbon footprint within university campuses, it overlooked the unsuspected chain reaction beyond the campus gates. It's like focusing on eliminating candy wrappers at a theme park while neglecting the cotton candy-induced sugar rush – the impact is felt far and wide.

In "The Air We Breathe: A Comprehensive Analysis of Urban Air Quality" by Clean Air Institute (2019), a thorough examination of air pollution in urban environments is presented. The study offers insights into the sources and consequences of air pollution, with a specific focus on Cleveland. While the authors diligently outline the usual suspects of pollution – vehicular emissions, industrial discharge, and the occasional overly enthusiastic smoke machine at a rock concert – the correlation with Education degrees remains conspicuously absent.

Turning to non-fiction literature with a tangential connection to education and environment, we cannot overlook "The Lorax" by Dr. Seuss (1971), a timeless tale of environmental conservation and the perils of unchecked industrialization. The protagonist, the Lorax, speaks for the trees and warns against the consequences of ecological negligence. While Dr. Seuss may not have explicitly delved into the impact of Education degrees on air quality, the Lorax's cautionary tale speaks volumes about the interconnectedness of our actions and their environmental repercussions.

On the fictional front, "Ozone: A Love Story" by Bella Aire (2005) stands out as a whimsical portrayal of a romance blossoming in the midst of environmental activism. While the novel may be more focused on the heartwarming interactions between the protagonists than on the scientific intricacies of air pollution, it's a reminder that love can thrive even in oxygen-deprived settings. Okay, maybe this one is stretching the thematic relevance a bit, but who doesn't love a good love story in times of atmospheric distress?

Venturing into the realm of unconventional sources, a thorough analysis of CVS receipts was also conducted in the process of this literature review. Though initially met with raised eyebrows and the occasional quizzical stare from the cashier, the exhaustive examination of paper lengths, ink compositions, and the potential for recycling shed unexpected light on the educational and environmental crossroads. The results of this unconventional study remain unpublished, but rest assured, the receipt revelations were nothing short of eye-opening.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Education and Air pollution in Cleveland. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Environmental Protection Agency . You used data from 2011 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Breath of Fresh Careers: The Link Between Associates Degrees in Education and Air Pollution in Cleveland

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we explore the fascinating and unexpected correlation between the awarding of Associates degrees in Education and the levels of air pollution in Cleveland, Ohio. While awarding degrees might bring fresh career opportunities, it also seems to have an impact on the fresh air quality. Our research team analyzed a decade's worth of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Environmental Protection Agency to uncover this peculiar relationship.

Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9322510 with p < 0.01, indicating a strong and statistically significant association between the two variables from 2011 to 2021. This surprising connection raises questions about the unintended consequences of educational pursuits on environmental factors. It seems that the pursuit of knowledge may not always lead to cleaner air, at least in the Cleveland area.

In conclusion, our study sheds light on an unconventional relationship between academia and air quality, proving once again that the world of research is full of unexpected correlations – just like a dad joke that catches you off guard.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the famous saying goes, "Teaching is the profession that teaches all the other professions." And as it turns out, it may also be the profession that contributes to the air pollution levels in Cleveland. But before we dive into the nitty-gritty of this unexpected connection, let's clear the air with a little dad joke: Why did the statistician go to school? Because they love to learn the mean-ing of life! Ah, the beauty of data humor – it's statistically significant, trust me.
Our study delves into the enigmatic relationship between the awarding of Associates degrees in Education and the atmospheric conditions in Cleveland, Ohio. While it may seem like these two variables have as much in common as chalk and cheese, our research has uncovered a surprising link that is nothing to sneeze at.
The pursuit of education is often associated with opening doors to new opportunities, but in the case of air pollution in Cleveland, it appears to be opening windows to some not-so-fresh air. Picture this: in the academic world, you'd expect degrees in Education to promote a breath of fresh careers, but here we are, uncovering a different kind of "breath of fresh air."
Now, let's address the elephant in the room – or should I say, the elephant in the atmosphere? Our data analysis, spanning a decade from 2011 to 2021, has revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9322510 with p < 0.01. In simpler terms, there's a strong and statistically significant relationship between the number of Education degrees awarded and the levels of air pollution in Cleveland. It's a correlation so strong, it's practically doing push-ups in the gym of statistical significance.
But before we get too carried away with our findings, let's tread with caution. Correlation does not always imply causation, as any seasoned researcher will tell you. Just like the correlation between the increase in ice cream sales and shark attacks – no, ice cream doesn't attract sharks, despite what the data might suggest. It's a classic case of "correlation doesn't equal causation," and it never fails to bring a chuckle in the world of research humor.
In light of this unexpected correlation, we're left pondering the unintended consequences of educational pursuits on environmental factors. Who would have thought that the quest for knowledge could potentially leave a trail of carbon footnotes in the air? It's a reminder that in the intricate tapestry of academia and environmental influences, every variable carries its own weight – even if that weight happens to be carbon emissions.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the mysterious dance between Associates degrees in Education and air pollution in Cleveland, we employed a combination of research methods that would make even the most rigid of statisticians chuckle – or at least crack a small smile. Our data collection spanned a range of sources, including the National Center for Education Statistics and the Environmental Protection Agency, because when it comes to research, it's essential to cast a wide net – like a particularly ambitious angler searching for the catch of the day.

First, we gathered data on the number of Associates degrees awarded in Education from 2011 to 2021, treating every data point with the care and attention usually reserved for a beloved family heirloom – after all, each data point has a storied past and an uncertain future, much like Aunt Mildred's antique vase. Our team then harnessed the formidable power of statistical analysis, using the tried and tested methods of correlation and regression to tease out the intricate relationship between this educational variable and the levels of air pollution in Cleveland.

We then donned our metaphorical lab coats and protective eyewear as we delved into the chemistry of air quality data, examining factors such as particulate matter, carbon monoxide, and ozone levels to ascertain the atmospheric conditions with a precision akin to a chemist crafting the perfect concoction. It was a bit like cooking up a scientific stew – but instead of seasoning, we were adding variables and control groups to the mix, bringing new meaning to the phrase "culinary experimentation."

Our analytical approach involved an intricate dance of statistical software and computing power, reminiscent of a grand waltz in the ballroom of data analysis. We calculated correlation coefficients, performed regression analyses, and conducted hypothesis testing with all the finesse of a seasoned conductor leading a symphony of statistical significance. It was a true spectacle of number-crunching prowess, with each statistical test and procedure performing its own solo – though we omitted the dramatic flair of a virtuoso violinist to maintain scientific rigor.

In addition, to account for potential confounding variables such as industrial emissions and seasonal variations, we employed sophisticated modeling techniques that would impress even the most discerning of data skeptics. Our models were as carefully constructed as a proverbial house of cards, yet robust enough to withstand the statistical winds of scrutiny without collapsing like, well, a house of cards in a gusty breeze.

In our quest to uncover the secrets of this peculiar relationship, we navigated the labyrinth of data with the precision of a seasoned cartographer charting unexplored territories. Our meticulous approach ensured that no statistical stone was left unturned, leaving no room for error – unless, of course, you count the inevitable typo in a line of code, which, let's face it, always finds a way to sneak in like a mischievous statistical gremlin.

With our analytical toolbox brimming with methods and our data sets curated with the utmost care, we embarked on our journey to unearth the unexpected connection between educational pursuits and atmospheric revelations in Cleveland. Armed with statistical prowess and a healthy dose of research humor, we navigated the twists and turns of correlation, causation, and academic intrigue, all in the name of shedding light on this enigmatic association. After all, in the world of research, every unexpected correlation is like a surprise punchline – it leaves you wondering, "What's the statistical probability of that?"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Education and Air pollution in Cleveland. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Environmental Protection Agency .

For the time period 2011 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9322510, r-squared of 0.8690919, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Breath of Fresh Careers: The Link Between Associates Degrees in Education and Air Pollution in Cleveland

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we explore the fascinating and unexpected correlation between the awarding of Associates degrees in Education and the levels of air pollution in Cleveland, Ohio. While awarding degrees might bring fresh career opportunities, it also seems to have an impact on the fresh air quality. Our research team analyzed a decade's worth of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Environmental Protection Agency to uncover this peculiar relationship.

Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9322510 with p < 0.01, indicating a strong and statistically significant association between the two variables from 2011 to 2021. This surprising connection raises questions about the unintended consequences of educational pursuits on environmental factors. It seems that the pursuit of knowledge may not always lead to cleaner air, at least in the Cleveland area.

In conclusion, our study sheds light on an unconventional relationship between academia and air quality, proving once again that the world of research is full of unexpected correlations – just like a dad joke that catches you off guard.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As the famous saying goes, "Teaching is the profession that teaches all the other professions." And as it turns out, it may also be the profession that contributes to the air pollution levels in Cleveland. But before we dive into the nitty-gritty of this unexpected connection, let's clear the air with a little dad joke: Why did the statistician go to school? Because they love to learn the mean-ing of life! Ah, the beauty of data humor – it's statistically significant, trust me.
Our study delves into the enigmatic relationship between the awarding of Associates degrees in Education and the atmospheric conditions in Cleveland, Ohio. While it may seem like these two variables have as much in common as chalk and cheese, our research has uncovered a surprising link that is nothing to sneeze at.
The pursuit of education is often associated with opening doors to new opportunities, but in the case of air pollution in Cleveland, it appears to be opening windows to some not-so-fresh air. Picture this: in the academic world, you'd expect degrees in Education to promote a breath of fresh careers, but here we are, uncovering a different kind of "breath of fresh air."
Now, let's address the elephant in the room – or should I say, the elephant in the atmosphere? Our data analysis, spanning a decade from 2011 to 2021, has revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9322510 with p < 0.01. In simpler terms, there's a strong and statistically significant relationship between the number of Education degrees awarded and the levels of air pollution in Cleveland. It's a correlation so strong, it's practically doing push-ups in the gym of statistical significance.
But before we get too carried away with our findings, let's tread with caution. Correlation does not always imply causation, as any seasoned researcher will tell you. Just like the correlation between the increase in ice cream sales and shark attacks – no, ice cream doesn't attract sharks, despite what the data might suggest. It's a classic case of "correlation doesn't equal causation," and it never fails to bring a chuckle in the world of research humor.
In light of this unexpected correlation, we're left pondering the unintended consequences of educational pursuits on environmental factors. Who would have thought that the quest for knowledge could potentially leave a trail of carbon footnotes in the air? It's a reminder that in the intricate tapestry of academia and environmental influences, every variable carries its own weight – even if that weight happens to be carbon emissions.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our analysis revealed a striking correlation between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Education and the levels of air pollution in Cleveland from 2011 to 2021. It seems that as the number of degrees awarded goes up, so does the level of air pollution in this bustling Ohio city. It's as if the pursuit of education is leaving a somewhat smoggy trail behind – talk about unintentional environmental impact!

In Fig. 1, the scatterplot clearly illustrates the strong positive correlation between the two variables. Now, I know what you're thinking – "What do you get when you cross a snowman and a vampire? Frostbite!" – but let's not cool down the excitement just yet. It's important to note that while correlation doesn't necessarily imply causation, this relationship is too big to brush off as mere coincidence.

Our analysis yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9322510, indicating a very close relationship between the two variables. In statistical terms, this correlation is about as robust as a weightlifter at a barbell convention. The r-squared value of 0.8690919 further solidifies the strength of this association, showing that a substantial portion of the variation in air pollution levels can be explained by the number of Education degrees awarded. It's like finding out that opening more books might unfortunately also open more windows for air pollutants to sneak in.

Now, p < 0.01. What does this mean? Well, in simple terms, it means that the likelihood of observing such a strong correlation purely by chance is less than 1%. In other words, this relationship is statistically significant – it's not just a random fluke. It's as real and meaningful as the relief of finally getting tenure after years of academic pursuit.

This unexpected connection between academia and air pollution in Cleveland poses intriguing questions about the broader impact of educational pursuits on environmental factors. It seems that as we educate our minds, we may be inadvertently contributing to the haze in the skies. It's a reminder that every action, even earning a degree, can have consequences that reach beyond what meets the eye – or in this case, what meets the air quality monitor.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Education and Air pollution in Cleveland. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Breath of Fresh Careers: The Link Between Associates Degrees in Education and Air Pollution in Cleveland

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we explore the fascinating and unexpected correlation between the awarding of Associates degrees in Education and the levels of air pollution in Cleveland, Ohio. While awarding degrees might bring fresh career opportunities, it also seems to have an impact on the fresh air quality. Our research team analyzed a decade's worth of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Environmental Protection Agency to uncover this peculiar relationship.

Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9322510 with p < 0.01, indicating a strong and statistically significant association between the two variables from 2011 to 2021. This surprising connection raises questions about the unintended consequences of educational pursuits on environmental factors. It seems that the pursuit of knowledge may not always lead to cleaner air, at least in the Cleveland area.

In conclusion, our study sheds light on an unconventional relationship between academia and air quality, proving once again that the world of research is full of unexpected correlations – just like a dad joke that catches you off guard.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Smith et al. (2015) conducted a comprehensive study on the societal impact of Associates degrees in Education, focusing on career prospects and socioeconomic development. Their findings emphasized the positive correlation between educational attainment and upward mobility, echoing the widely held belief that knowledge is indeed power. However, what their study failed to mention is the potential downside of this upward mobility – and by downside, I mean the downward trajectory of air quality levels in Cleveland.
Adding to the discourse, Doe and Jones (2018) explored the environmental implications of educational pursuits, highlighting the sustainability initiatives undertaken by educational institutions. While their work uncovered commendable efforts to reduce carbon footprint within university campuses, it overlooked the unsuspected chain reaction beyond the campus gates. It's like focusing on eliminating candy wrappers at a theme park while neglecting the cotton candy-induced sugar rush – the impact is felt far and wide.
In "The Air We Breathe: A Comprehensive Analysis of Urban Air Quality" by Clean Air Institute (2019), a thorough examination of air pollution in urban environments is presented. The study offers insights into the sources and consequences of air pollution, with a specific focus on Cleveland. While the authors diligently outline the usual suspects of pollution – vehicular emissions, industrial discharge, and the occasional overly enthusiastic smoke machine at a rock concert – the correlation with Education degrees remains conspicuously absent.
Turning to non-fiction literature with a tangential connection to education and environment, we cannot overlook "The Lorax" by Dr. Seuss (1971), a timeless tale of environmental conservation and the perils of unchecked industrialization. The protagonist, the Lorax, speaks for the trees and warns against the consequences of ecological negligence. While Dr. Seuss may not have explicitly delved into the impact of Education degrees on air quality, the Lorax's cautionary tale speaks volumes about the interconnectedness of our actions and their environmental repercussions.
On the fictional front, "Ozone: A Love Story" by Bella Aire (2005) stands out as a whimsical portrayal of a romance blossoming in the midst of environmental activism. While the novel may be more focused on the heartwarming interactions between the protagonists than on the scientific intricacies of air pollution, it's a reminder that love can thrive even in oxygen-deprived settings. Okay, maybe this one is stretching the thematic relevance a bit, but who doesn't love a good love story in times of atmospheric distress?
Venturing into the realm of unconventional sources, a thorough analysis of CVS receipts was also conducted in the process of this literature review. Though initially met with raised eyebrows and the occasional quizzical stare from the cashier, the exhaustive examination of paper lengths, ink compositions, and the potential for recycling shed unexpected light on the educational and environmental crossroads. The results of this unconventional study remain unpublished, but rest assured, the receipt revelations were nothing short of eye-opening.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a striking correlation between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Education and the levels of air pollution in Cleveland from 2011 to 2021. It seems that as the number of degrees awarded goes up, so does the level of air pollution in this bustling Ohio city. It's as if the pursuit of education is leaving a somewhat smoggy trail behind – talk about unintentional environmental impact!
In Fig. 1, the scatterplot clearly illustrates the strong positive correlation between the two variables. Now, I know what you're thinking – "What do you get when you cross a snowman and a vampire? Frostbite!" – but let's not cool down the excitement just yet. It's important to note that while correlation doesn't necessarily imply causation, this relationship is too big to brush off as mere coincidence.
Our analysis yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9322510, indicating a very close relationship between the two variables. In statistical terms, this correlation is about as robust as a weightlifter at a barbell convention. The r-squared value of 0.8690919 further solidifies the strength of this association, showing that a substantial portion of the variation in air pollution levels can be explained by the number of Education degrees awarded. It's like finding out that opening more books might unfortunately also open more windows for air pollutants to sneak in.
Now, p < 0.01. What does this mean? Well, in simple terms, it means that the likelihood of observing such a strong correlation purely by chance is less than 1%. In other words, this relationship is statistically significant – it's not just a random fluke. It's as real and meaningful as the relief of finally getting tenure after years of academic pursuit.
This unexpected connection between academia and air pollution in Cleveland poses intriguing questions about the broader impact of educational pursuits on environmental factors. It seems that as we educate our minds, we may be inadvertently contributing to the haze in the skies. It's a reminder that every action, even earning a degree, can have consequences that reach beyond what meets the eye – or in this case, what meets the air quality monitor.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings align with previous research that emphasized the positive correlation between educational attainment and upward mobility, hinting at the potential downsides, or should I say "downwind" consequences, that come with it. Smith et al.'s study serves as a launchpad for our investigation, highlighting the unintended impact of education on the environment. It's like finding out that pursuing degrees in Education is a breath of fresh career opportunities but also a whiff of polluted air – talk about a paradoxical whiff!

Moreover, Doe and Jones' exploration of sustainability initiatives within educational institutions inadvertently set the stage for our discoveries, shedding light on the limited scope of previous environmental assessments. It seems they were so focused on reducing the carbon footprint that they missed the larger, atmospheric footprint accompanying educational pursuits. It's like trying to eliminate data outliers in a regression analysis but failing to spot the elephant in the room – or should I say the smog in the classroom?

Our results confirmed a strong positive correlation between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Education and air pollution levels in Cleveland, uncovering a "highly educated smokescreen" effect that cannot be ignored. The correlation coefficient of 0.9322510 may as well be the academic equivalent of a "knock, knock" joke – it's hard to miss, and it's guaranteed to elicit a reaction. This robust association underscores the tangible link between educational achievements and environmental ramifications, akin to the chemical bond between carbon and oxygen – scientifically sound and in this case, a bit suffocating.

While correlation does not imply causation, the statistical significance of this relationship, indicated by p < 0.01, suggests that there's more than meets the eye – or, in this case, more than meets the respiratory system. It's as compelling as understanding the causative effects of air pollution as trying to explain a complex statistical model at a family dinner – your relatives might not get it, but it's important nonetheless.

In conclusion, our unexpected findings underscore the need for further investigation into the environmental consequences of educational pursuits. Education may empower individuals, but we must also consider the powering up of pollutants that accompanies this pursuit. It's as paradoxical as a skydiver ascending to descend. As we delve deeper into this connection, we must remain vigilant, keeping our focus as sharp as Occam's razor, to unravel the complex web of relationships between education and its unintended environmental outcomes.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Education and Air pollution in Cleveland. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Breath of Fresh Careers: The Link Between Associates Degrees in Education and Air Pollution in Cleveland

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we explore the fascinating and unexpected correlation between the awarding of Associates degrees in Education and the levels of air pollution in Cleveland, Ohio. While awarding degrees might bring fresh career opportunities, it also seems to have an impact on the fresh air quality. Our research team analyzed a decade's worth of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Environmental Protection Agency to uncover this peculiar relationship.

Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9322510 with p < 0.01, indicating a strong and statistically significant association between the two variables from 2011 to 2021. This surprising connection raises questions about the unintended consequences of educational pursuits on environmental factors. It seems that the pursuit of knowledge may not always lead to cleaner air, at least in the Cleveland area.

In conclusion, our study sheds light on an unconventional relationship between academia and air quality, proving once again that the world of research is full of unexpected correlations – just like a dad joke that catches you off guard.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
As the famous saying goes, "Teaching is the profession that teaches all the other professions." And as it turns out, it may also be the profession that contributes to the air pollution levels in Cleveland. But before we dive into the nitty-gritty of this unexpected connection, let's clear the air with a little dad joke: Why did the statistician go to school? Because they love to learn the mean-ing of life! Ah, the beauty of data humor – it's statistically significant, trust me.
Our study delves into the enigmatic relationship between the awarding of Associates degrees in Education and the atmospheric conditions in Cleveland, Ohio. While it may seem like these two variables have as much in common as chalk and cheese, our research has uncovered a surprising link that is nothing to sneeze at.
The pursuit of education is often associated with opening doors to new opportunities, but in the case of air pollution in Cleveland, it appears to be opening windows to some not-so-fresh air. Picture this: in the academic world, you'd expect degrees in Education to promote a breath of fresh careers, but here we are, uncovering a different kind of "breath of fresh air."
Now, let's address the elephant in the room – or should I say, the elephant in the atmosphere? Our data analysis, spanning a decade from 2011 to 2021, has revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9322510 with p < 0.01. In simpler terms, there's a strong and statistically significant relationship between the number of Education degrees awarded and the levels of air pollution in Cleveland. It's a correlation so strong, it's practically doing push-ups in the gym of statistical significance.
But before we get too carried away with our findings, let's tread with caution. Correlation does not always imply causation, as any seasoned researcher will tell you. Just like the correlation between the increase in ice cream sales and shark attacks – no, ice cream doesn't attract sharks, despite what the data might suggest. It's a classic case of "correlation doesn't equal causation," and it never fails to bring a chuckle in the world of research humor.
In light of this unexpected correlation, we're left pondering the unintended consequences of educational pursuits on environmental factors. Who would have thought that the quest for knowledge could potentially leave a trail of carbon footnotes in the air? It's a reminder that in the intricate tapestry of academia and environmental influences, every variable carries its own weight – even if that weight happens to be carbon emissions.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a striking correlation between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Education and the levels of air pollution in Cleveland from 2011 to 2021. It seems that as the number of degrees awarded goes up, so does the level of air pollution in this bustling Ohio city. It's as if the pursuit of education is leaving a somewhat smoggy trail behind – talk about unintentional environmental impact!
In Fig. 1, the scatterplot clearly illustrates the strong positive correlation between the two variables. Now, I know what you're thinking – "What do you get when you cross a snowman and a vampire? Frostbite!" – but let's not cool down the excitement just yet. It's important to note that while correlation doesn't necessarily imply causation, this relationship is too big to brush off as mere coincidence.
Our analysis yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9322510, indicating a very close relationship between the two variables. In statistical terms, this correlation is about as robust as a weightlifter at a barbell convention. The r-squared value of 0.8690919 further solidifies the strength of this association, showing that a substantial portion of the variation in air pollution levels can be explained by the number of Education degrees awarded. It's like finding out that opening more books might unfortunately also open more windows for air pollutants to sneak in.
Now, p < 0.01. What does this mean? Well, in simple terms, it means that the likelihood of observing such a strong correlation purely by chance is less than 1%. In other words, this relationship is statistically significant – it's not just a random fluke. It's as real and meaningful as the relief of finally getting tenure after years of academic pursuit.
This unexpected connection between academia and air pollution in Cleveland poses intriguing questions about the broader impact of educational pursuits on environmental factors. It seems that as we educate our minds, we may be inadvertently contributing to the haze in the skies. It's a reminder that every action, even earning a degree, can have consequences that reach beyond what meets the eye – or in this case, what meets the air quality monitor.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has unraveled a tantalizing connection between the awarding of Associates degrees in Education and the levels of air pollution in Cleveland. It seems that while education may bring fresh career opportunities, it also brings about a breath of not-so-fresh air – quite literally. It's like education is inadvertently majoring in "Air Quality Management," with an unexpected emphasis on "pollution studies"!

Our findings, with a correlation coefficient as strong as a cup of espresso, underscore the need to recognize the unforeseen impact of educational pursuits on environmental variables. It's like realizing that your pursuit of knowledge is accompanied by a side of unintended smog – talk about a curriculum surprising!

As we wrap up this eye-opening journey through the maze of statistics and air particles, let's remember the wise words of a seasoned researcher: "Correlation does not imply causation, but it can imply a good laugh – just like a well-timed dad joke!" The unexpected connections in our results serve as a reminder that in the world of research, every correlation is like a surprise party– you never quite know what you're going to get, but there's always a good punchline.

And now, it's time to close the chapter on this peculiar pairing of academic pursuits and air quality. In the ever-unfolding narrative of research, this study stands as a testament to the quirky, uncharted territories waiting to be explored. Just like how Bob Ross never needed to paint another happy little tree, it's safe to say that no more research is needed in this area. The link between Associates degrees in Education and air pollution in Cleveland has been explored, and we can all breathe a little easier knowing the unexpected connection has been uncovered.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Breath of Fresh Careers: The Link Between Associates Degrees in Education and Air Pollution in Cleveland. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Comical Environmental Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Breath of Fresh Careers: The Link Between Associates Degrees in Education and Air Pollution in Cleveland. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Environmental Education and Career Development


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Breath of Fresh Careers: The Link Between Associates Degrees in Education and Air Pollution in Cleveland with an abstract of In this paper, we explore the fascinating and unexpected correlation between the awarding of Associates degrees in Education and the levels of air pollution in Cleveland, Ohio. While awarding degrees might bring fresh career opportunities, it also seems to have an impact on the fresh air quality. Our research team analyzed a decade's worth of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Environmental Protection Agency to uncover this peculiar relationship.
Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9322510 with p < 0.01, indicating a strong and statistically significant association between the two variables from 2011 to 2021. This surprising connection raises questions about the unintended consequences of educational pursuits on environmental factors. It seems that the pursuit of knowledge may not always lead to cleaner air, at least in the Cleveland area.
In conclusion, our study sheds light on an unconventional relationship between academia and air quality, proving once again that the world of research is full of unexpected correlations – just like a dad joke that catches you off guard.

ChatGPT:

Associates degrees in Education, air pollution, Cleveland, correlation, National Center for Education Statistics, Environmental Protection Agency, educational pursuits, environmental factors, academia, research, unexpected correlations

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Associates degrees awarded in Education
Detailed data title: Associate's degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions with a field of study of Education
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
See what else correlates with Associates degrees awarded in Education

Air pollution in Cleveland
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with moderate or worse air quality in Cleveland-Elyria, OH
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Cleveland

Correlation r = 0.9322510 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8690919 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 86.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Air pollution in Cleveland) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Associates degrees awarded in Education) over the 11 years from 2011 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.91E-5. 0.0000290942592145375600000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.93 in 0.00291% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 34,371 random variables You don't actually need 34 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.75, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Associates degrees awarded in Education (Degrees awarded)2046020762187441760517178170321660316180162101617918144
Air pollution in Cleveland (Bad air quality days)71.232971.038358.356250.684957.260344.535542.191844.383649.315139.617552.6027




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([20460,20762,18744,17605,17178,17032,16603,16180,16210,16179,18144,])
array_2 = np.array([71.2329,71.0383,58.3562,50.6849,57.2603,44.5355,42.1918,44.3836,49.3151,39.6175,52.6027,])
array_1_name = "Associates degrees awarded in Education"
array_2_name = "Air pollution in Cleveland"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for shining a light on this correlation!


Correlation ID: 4272 · Black Variable ID: 1223 · Red Variable ID: 20475
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0