Download png, svg
AI explanation
As the air cleared in Keene, people could finally drop it like it's hot outdoors without fear of smog dogging their every move. With fewer pollutants to inhale, residents were no longer feeling gin and juice-sed, leading to a decrease in the need to snoop around for Snoop Dogg. It's a breath of fresh air for both the environment and the rap game!Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image depicting a brutalist-style park in Keene, New Hampshire, with clear skies and a decrease in air pollution. Show people joyfully gathered in the park, dancing and celebrating the clean air. The scene should exude a sense of newfound freedom and joy as residents revel in the opportunity to enjoy the outdoors, free from the fear of smog. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Keene, New Hampshire and Google searches for 'snoop dog'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: a funny image macro Oragami A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie Brutalism
ChatGPT: Brutalism
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Keene, New Hampshire and Google searches for 'snoop dog', in the following situation: As the air cleared in Keene, people could finally drop it like it's hot outdoors without fear of smog dogging their every move. With fewer pollutants to inhale, residents were no longer feeling gin and juice-sed, leading to a decrease in the need to snoop around for Snoop Dogg. It's a breath of fresh air for both the environment and the rap game!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Keene, New Hampshire, the skies clear up as the air pollution decreases. People joyfully gather in parks, dropping it like it's hot without the fear of smog. Meanwhile, fewer residents are searching for "Snoop Dogg" on Google, as they celebrate the clean air and newfound freedom to enjoy the outdoors.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Brutalism ] and depicting this scene: In Keene, New Hampshire, the skies clear up as the air pollution decreases. People joyfully gather in parks, dropping it like it's hot without the fear of smog. Meanwhile, fewer residents are searching for "Snoop Dogg" on Google, as they celebrate the clean air and newfound freedom to enjoy the outdoors. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image depicting a brutalist-style park in Keene, New Hampshire, with clear skies and a decrease in air pollution. Show people joyfully gathered in the park, dancing and celebrating the clean air. The scene should exude a sense of newfound freedom and joy as residents revel in the opportunity to enjoy the outdoors, free from the fear of smog.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Air pollution in Keene, New Hampshire caused snoop dog (Google searches for 'snoop dog') to decrease. Include one good pun.
AI academic paper
Snoop Doggling for Connection: Air Pollution in Keene, New Hampshire and Google Searches for 'Snoop Dog' The Journal of Environmental Behavior and Ecological Connections Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Keene, New Hampshire and Google searches for 'snoop dog'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Include a pun in the title.
Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8379994 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2021.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Snoop Doggling for Connection: Air Pollution in Keene, New Hampshire and Google Searches for 'Snoop Dog'
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we Snoop Doggled into the curious correlation between air pollution levels in Keene, New Hampshire, and Google searches for 'Snoop Dog'. Drawing on data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we embarked on an unconventional quest to unravel this eyebrow-raising relationship. Our results displayed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8379994 and p < 0.01, covering the period from 2004 to 2021. Our findings not only add a touch of whimsy to the field of environmental research but also hint at the unexpected ways in which human behavior might intertwine with atmospheric conditions. So, the next time you're pondering the link between air quality and hip-hop culture, just remember that sometimes, the truth is "Doggystyle."
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Keene, New Hampshire and Google searches for 'snoop dog'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Snoop Doggling for Connection: Air Pollution in Keene, New Hampshire and Google Searches for 'Snoop Dog'
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we Snoop Doggled into the curious correlation between air pollution levels in Keene, New Hampshire, and Google searches for 'Snoop Dog'. Drawing on data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we embarked on an unconventional quest to unravel this eyebrow-raising relationship. Our results displayed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8379994 and p < 0.01, covering the period from 2004 to 2021. Our findings not only add a touch of whimsy to the field of environmental research but also hint at the unexpected ways in which human behavior might intertwine with atmospheric conditions. So, the next time you're pondering the link between air quality and hip-hop culture, just remember that sometimes, the truth is "Doggystyle."
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Hip-hop hooray! Get ready to drop some statistical beats and unmask the mysterious dance between air pollution and our good ol' pal, Snoop D-O-Double-G. In this paper, we'll take you on a wild research ride to uncover the peculiar relationship between air pollution levels in Keene, New Hampshire, and the frequency of Google searches for the legendary rapper, Snoop Dogg.
Who would have thought that the serene town of Keene, known for its picturesque New England charm, would be entangled in a statistical tango with the LBC's finest? Well, prepare to be bamboozled by the unexpected twists and turns of this research adventure.
Now, before you start scratching your head (or your turntables), you might be pondering, "What led this team of intrepid researchers to embark on such an unexpected expedition?" As aficionados of both science and snazzy tunes, we couldn't resist the allure of exploring uncharted statistical territories. And what better way to infuse some funky freshness into environmental research than by shaking things up with a dash of hip-hop charm?
But hang tight - before we dive into the nitty-gritty of our data analysis, let's take a moment to appreciate the unique synergy between seemingly disparate variables. It's not every day that air quality metrics and lyrical genius collide in the realm of statistical significance. Still, as venerable scientists, we're not afraid to break the mold and uncover correlations that might raise a quizzical eyebrow or two.
So, grab your lab coat and your rhyming dictionary, because it's time to unravel the enigma of Keene's air pollution and a flurry of searches for the Doggfather himself. Let's flip the script on conventional research and embrace the unexpected revelations that emerge from our journey through the data. Get ready to flip the switch, drop the mic, and discover the uncharted territories where science and musical prowess intersect. As Snoop Dogg would say, it's gonna be "foshizzle"!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Keene, New Hampshire and Google searches for 'snoop dog'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Snoop Doggling for Connection: Air Pollution in Keene, New Hampshire and Google Searches for 'Snoop Dog'
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we Snoop Doggled into the curious correlation between air pollution levels in Keene, New Hampshire, and Google searches for 'Snoop Dog'. Drawing on data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we embarked on an unconventional quest to unravel this eyebrow-raising relationship. Our results displayed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8379994 and p < 0.01, covering the period from 2004 to 2021. Our findings not only add a touch of whimsy to the field of environmental research but also hint at the unexpected ways in which human behavior might intertwine with atmospheric conditions. So, the next time you're pondering the link between air quality and hip-hop culture, just remember that sometimes, the truth is "Doggystyle."
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Hip-hop hooray! Get ready to drop some statistical beats and unmask the mysterious dance between air pollution and our good ol' pal, Snoop D-O-Double-G. In this paper, we'll take you on a wild research ride to uncover the peculiar relationship between air pollution levels in Keene, New Hampshire, and the frequency of Google searches for the legendary rapper, Snoop Dogg.
Who would have thought that the serene town of Keene, known for its picturesque New England charm, would be entangled in a statistical tango with the LBC's finest? Well, prepare to be bamboozled by the unexpected twists and turns of this research adventure.
Now, before you start scratching your head (or your turntables), you might be pondering, "What led this team of intrepid researchers to embark on such an unexpected expedition?" As aficionados of both science and snazzy tunes, we couldn't resist the allure of exploring uncharted statistical territories. And what better way to infuse some funky freshness into environmental research than by shaking things up with a dash of hip-hop charm?
But hang tight - before we dive into the nitty-gritty of our data analysis, let's take a moment to appreciate the unique synergy between seemingly disparate variables. It's not every day that air quality metrics and lyrical genius collide in the realm of statistical significance. Still, as venerable scientists, we're not afraid to break the mold and uncover correlations that might raise a quizzical eyebrow or two.
So, grab your lab coat and your rhyming dictionary, because it's time to unravel the enigma of Keene's air pollution and a flurry of searches for the Doggfather himself. Let's flip the script on conventional research and embrace the unexpected revelations that emerge from our journey through the data. Get ready to flip the switch, drop the mic, and discover the uncharted territories where science and musical prowess intersect. As Snoop Dogg would say, it's gonna be "foshizzle"!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al." explored the impact of air pollution on public behavior, shedding light on the often unforeseen ways in which atmospheric conditions intertwine with human inclination. The study, which delved into the correlation between airborne particulate matter and internet search trends, laid the groundwork for our exploration of a peculiar linkage between environmental factors and cultural references. Similarly, "Doe and Jones" investigated the psychological effects of environmental stressors, offering valuable insights into the subtle yet profound ways in which air quality might influence online search habits.
Transitioning from the realm of environmental science to the domain of pop culture, "Air Pollution and Hip-Hop Harmonies" by Lorem Ipsum delved into the intriguing connection between urban air quality and musical preferences. While the subject matter may sound novel, the authors found that atmospheric conditions could shape the collective mood of a community, potentially influencing the choice of music to which individuals are drawn. This unexpected fusion of air pollution and hip-hop culture provides an intriguing backdrop for our investigation into the association between Keene's air quality and Google searches for 'Snoop Dog'.
On the more lighthearted side of literature, works like "The Fresh Air of Rap: A Study in Rhyme and Pollution" and "Smog and Lyrics: An Ode to Urban Beats" by celebrated fiction authors Jane Wordsmith and Edgar Aircraft showcase the intersection of environmental elements and artistic expression. These tongue-in-cheek yet thought-provoking narratives serve as a whimsical backdrop to our exploration, gifting the melding of air pollution and musicality with an air of wonder and laughter.
Moreover, popular internet memes such as "Snoop Dogg's Air Quality Playlist" and "When the Smog Clears, Snoop Dogg Appears" have permeated online culture, humorously hinting at the unexpected ways in which air pollution levels and musical influences intersect. These humorous digital phenomena, although playful in nature, reflect a broader societal awareness of the unanticipated connections between environmental conditions and cultural icons.
In weaving together these eclectic influences, the stage is set for our eclectic journey into the correlation between air pollution in Keene, New Hampshire, and Google searches for 'Snoop Dog'. What emerges is a unique and unconventional narrative, blending scientific inquiry with the infectious rhythm of hip-hop culture, culminating in a symphony of statistical intrigue and musical musings.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Keene, New Hampshire and Google searches for 'snoop dog'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2021
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Snoop Doggling for Connection: Air Pollution in Keene, New Hampshire and Google Searches for 'Snoop Dog'
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we Snoop Doggled into the curious correlation between air pollution levels in Keene, New Hampshire, and Google searches for 'Snoop Dog'. Drawing on data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we embarked on an unconventional quest to unravel this eyebrow-raising relationship. Our results displayed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8379994 and p < 0.01, covering the period from 2004 to 2021. Our findings not only add a touch of whimsy to the field of environmental research but also hint at the unexpected ways in which human behavior might intertwine with atmospheric conditions. So, the next time you're pondering the link between air quality and hip-hop culture, just remember that sometimes, the truth is "Doggystyle."
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Hip-hop hooray! Get ready to drop some statistical beats and unmask the mysterious dance between air pollution and our good ol' pal, Snoop D-O-Double-G. In this paper, we'll take you on a wild research ride to uncover the peculiar relationship between air pollution levels in Keene, New Hampshire, and the frequency of Google searches for the legendary rapper, Snoop Dogg.
Who would have thought that the serene town of Keene, known for its picturesque New England charm, would be entangled in a statistical tango with the LBC's finest? Well, prepare to be bamboozled by the unexpected twists and turns of this research adventure.
Now, before you start scratching your head (or your turntables), you might be pondering, "What led this team of intrepid researchers to embark on such an unexpected expedition?" As aficionados of both science and snazzy tunes, we couldn't resist the allure of exploring uncharted statistical territories. And what better way to infuse some funky freshness into environmental research than by shaking things up with a dash of hip-hop charm?
But hang tight - before we dive into the nitty-gritty of our data analysis, let's take a moment to appreciate the unique synergy between seemingly disparate variables. It's not every day that air quality metrics and lyrical genius collide in the realm of statistical significance. Still, as venerable scientists, we're not afraid to break the mold and uncover correlations that might raise a quizzical eyebrow or two.
So, grab your lab coat and your rhyming dictionary, because it's time to unravel the enigma of Keene's air pollution and a flurry of searches for the Doggfather himself. Let's flip the script on conventional research and embrace the unexpected revelations that emerge from our journey through the data. Get ready to flip the switch, drop the mic, and discover the uncharted territories where science and musical prowess intersect. As Snoop Dogg would say, it's gonna be "foshizzle"!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
"To unravel the intricate dance between air pollution and Snoop Dogg's online presence, we concocted a methodological brew that combines equal parts scientific rigor and a pinch of whimsy. Our data collection and analysis resembled a scientific stew, simmering with the flavors of statistical sorcery, internet tracking, and a dash of lyrical finesse.
First off, our data collection process involved a deep dive into the Environmental Protection Agency's treasure trove of air quality metrics. We didn't just skim the surface, no, we jumped headfirst into the pollution pool, braving the murky waters of PM2.5, ozone levels, and other atmospheric acrobatics. Armed with a keen eye for detail and an insatiable thirst for knowledge, we meticulously gathered pollution data from Keene, New Hampshire, like bees gathering nectar from the statistical flora.
On the flip side, we waded into the vast digital expanse of Google Trends to track the rise and fall of searches for our illustrious subject, Snoop Dogg. It was a hunt for the holy grail of internet queries, sifting through a sea of search terms to uncover the kernels of truth buried within the virtual haystack. We set sail on the choppy waves of internet data, navigating the currents of search trends with the precision of a sextant-wielding statistician.
Now, here's where things get a bit spicier. We combined these disparate datasets like a mad scientist concocting an otherworldly elixir, merging air pollution readings with Snoop Dogg search frequencies to create a flavorful statistical fusion. We stirred the pot, sprinkled a dash of correlation analysis, and let the flavors mingle until a clear pattern emerged from the bubbling cauldron of data.
Our statistical incantations revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8379994 and p < 0.01, signaling a robust relationship that even the most skeptical of onlookers couldn't ignore. It was a eureka moment, a scientific "Gin and Juice" toast to the unexpected intertwining of atmospheric conditions and hip-hop curiosity.
In the end, our methodology wasn't just a recipe for scientific discovery; it was a kaleidoscope of statistical flavors, a Windex for the murky windows of conventional research, and a testament to the colorful intersections of science and culture. So, as we traverse the uncharted territories of data analysis, let's not forget to savor the quirky flavors that emerge from the blend of science and statistical shenanigans. After all, research is not just about uncovering truths – it's also about embracing the unexpected, the offbeat, and the unapologetically funky."
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Keene, New Hampshire and Google searches for 'snoop dog'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends .
For the time period 2004 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.8379994, r-squared of 0.7022429, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Snoop Doggling for Connection: Air Pollution in Keene, New Hampshire and Google Searches for 'Snoop Dog'
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we Snoop Doggled into the curious correlation between air pollution levels in Keene, New Hampshire, and Google searches for 'Snoop Dog'. Drawing on data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we embarked on an unconventional quest to unravel this eyebrow-raising relationship. Our results displayed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8379994 and p < 0.01, covering the period from 2004 to 2021. Our findings not only add a touch of whimsy to the field of environmental research but also hint at the unexpected ways in which human behavior might intertwine with atmospheric conditions. So, the next time you're pondering the link between air quality and hip-hop culture, just remember that sometimes, the truth is "Doggystyle."
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Hip-hop hooray! Get ready to drop some statistical beats and unmask the mysterious dance between air pollution and our good ol' pal, Snoop D-O-Double-G. In this paper, we'll take you on a wild research ride to uncover the peculiar relationship between air pollution levels in Keene, New Hampshire, and the frequency of Google searches for the legendary rapper, Snoop Dogg.
Who would have thought that the serene town of Keene, known for its picturesque New England charm, would be entangled in a statistical tango with the LBC's finest? Well, prepare to be bamboozled by the unexpected twists and turns of this research adventure.
Now, before you start scratching your head (or your turntables), you might be pondering, "What led this team of intrepid researchers to embark on such an unexpected expedition?" As aficionados of both science and snazzy tunes, we couldn't resist the allure of exploring uncharted statistical territories. And what better way to infuse some funky freshness into environmental research than by shaking things up with a dash of hip-hop charm?
But hang tight - before we dive into the nitty-gritty of our data analysis, let's take a moment to appreciate the unique synergy between seemingly disparate variables. It's not every day that air quality metrics and lyrical genius collide in the realm of statistical significance. Still, as venerable scientists, we're not afraid to break the mold and uncover correlations that might raise a quizzical eyebrow or two.
So, grab your lab coat and your rhyming dictionary, because it's time to unravel the enigma of Keene's air pollution and a flurry of searches for the Doggfather himself. Let's flip the script on conventional research and embrace the unexpected revelations that emerge from our journey through the data. Get ready to flip the switch, drop the mic, and discover the uncharted territories where science and musical prowess intersect. As Snoop Dogg would say, it's gonna be "foshizzle"!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
When it comes to unexpected correlations, our findings might just be music to your ears. Our data analysis revealed a hair-raising correlation coefficient of 0.8379994 between air pollution levels in Keene, New Hampshire, and the frequency of Google searches for the one and only 'Snoop Dogg'. If that doesn't make you want to drop everything and dust off your old CD collection, I don't know what will.
In addition to this eyebrow-raising correlation, our r-squared value of 0.7022429 indicates that a whopping 70.2% of the variation in Google searches for 'Snoop Dogg' can be explained by changes in air pollution. It seems like the residents of Keene weren't just searching for fresh air - they were also on the hunt for some classic Snoop tunes. Who knew air pollution and hip-hop could be such a dynamic duo?
Furthermore, our p-value of less than 0.01 adds statistical weight to this unexpected relationship, indicating that the correlation is not just a fluke. It seems there's a real, meaningful connection between the atmospheric conditions of Keene and the urge to listen to some smooth rap beats.
Now, to visually solidify this mind-boggling correlation, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot depicting the undeniable link between air pollution levels and 'Snoop Dogg' searches. Who would have thought that a scatterplot could be so fly?
These results not only add a note of whimsy to the field of environmental research but also suggest that human behaviors may find surprising ways to intertwine with atmospheric conditions. So, the next time someone asks about the impact of air quality on pop culture, just remember that sometimes, statistics can be "Doggystyle."
Our findings prompt a new appreciation for the interplay between seemingly unrelated variables and serve as a testament to the unexpected journeys that data analysis can take us on. It's proof that, in the world of statistics, truth can be stranger than fiction - and certainly funkier.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Keene, New Hampshire and Google searches for 'snoop dog'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
Snoop Doggling for Connection: Air Pollution in Keene, New Hampshire and Google Searches for 'Snoop Dog'
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we Snoop Doggled into the curious correlation between air pollution levels in Keene, New Hampshire, and Google searches for 'Snoop Dog'. Drawing on data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we embarked on an unconventional quest to unravel this eyebrow-raising relationship. Our results displayed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8379994 and p < 0.01, covering the period from 2004 to 2021. Our findings not only add a touch of whimsy to the field of environmental research but also hint at the unexpected ways in which human behavior might intertwine with atmospheric conditions. So, the next time you're pondering the link between air quality and hip-hop culture, just remember that sometimes, the truth is "Doggystyle."
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al." explored the impact of air pollution on public behavior, shedding light on the often unforeseen ways in which atmospheric conditions intertwine with human inclination. The study, which delved into the correlation between airborne particulate matter and internet search trends, laid the groundwork for our exploration of a peculiar linkage between environmental factors and cultural references. Similarly, "Doe and Jones" investigated the psychological effects of environmental stressors, offering valuable insights into the subtle yet profound ways in which air quality might influence online search habits.
Transitioning from the realm of environmental science to the domain of pop culture, "Air Pollution and Hip-Hop Harmonies" by Lorem Ipsum delved into the intriguing connection between urban air quality and musical preferences. While the subject matter may sound novel, the authors found that atmospheric conditions could shape the collective mood of a community, potentially influencing the choice of music to which individuals are drawn. This unexpected fusion of air pollution and hip-hop culture provides an intriguing backdrop for our investigation into the association between Keene's air quality and Google searches for 'Snoop Dog'.
On the more lighthearted side of literature, works like "The Fresh Air of Rap: A Study in Rhyme and Pollution" and "Smog and Lyrics: An Ode to Urban Beats" by celebrated fiction authors Jane Wordsmith and Edgar Aircraft showcase the intersection of environmental elements and artistic expression. These tongue-in-cheek yet thought-provoking narratives serve as a whimsical backdrop to our exploration, gifting the melding of air pollution and musicality with an air of wonder and laughter.
Moreover, popular internet memes such as "Snoop Dogg's Air Quality Playlist" and "When the Smog Clears, Snoop Dogg Appears" have permeated online culture, humorously hinting at the unexpected ways in which air pollution levels and musical influences intersect. These humorous digital phenomena, although playful in nature, reflect a broader societal awareness of the unanticipated connections between environmental conditions and cultural icons.
In weaving together these eclectic influences, the stage is set for our eclectic journey into the correlation between air pollution in Keene, New Hampshire, and Google searches for 'Snoop Dog'. What emerges is a unique and unconventional narrative, blending scientific inquiry with the infectious rhythm of hip-hop culture, culminating in a symphony of statistical intrigue and musical musings.
[[RESULTS]]
When it comes to unexpected correlations, our findings might just be music to your ears. Our data analysis revealed a hair-raising correlation coefficient of 0.8379994 between air pollution levels in Keene, New Hampshire, and the frequency of Google searches for the one and only 'Snoop Dogg'. If that doesn't make you want to drop everything and dust off your old CD collection, I don't know what will.
In addition to this eyebrow-raising correlation, our r-squared value of 0.7022429 indicates that a whopping 70.2% of the variation in Google searches for 'Snoop Dogg' can be explained by changes in air pollution. It seems like the residents of Keene weren't just searching for fresh air - they were also on the hunt for some classic Snoop tunes. Who knew air pollution and hip-hop could be such a dynamic duo?
Furthermore, our p-value of less than 0.01 adds statistical weight to this unexpected relationship, indicating that the correlation is not just a fluke. It seems there's a real, meaningful connection between the atmospheric conditions of Keene and the urge to listen to some smooth rap beats.
Now, to visually solidify this mind-boggling correlation, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot depicting the undeniable link between air pollution levels and 'Snoop Dogg' searches. Who would have thought that a scatterplot could be so fly?
These results not only add a note of whimsy to the field of environmental research but also suggest that human behaviors may find surprising ways to intertwine with atmospheric conditions. So, the next time someone asks about the impact of air quality on pop culture, just remember that sometimes, statistics can be "Doggystyle."
Our findings prompt a new appreciation for the interplay between seemingly unrelated variables and serve as a testament to the unexpected journeys that data analysis can take us on. It's proof that, in the world of statistics, truth can be stranger than fiction - and certainly funkier.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
In the words of Snoop Doggy Dogg himself, "I got my mind on my money, and my money on my mind," but in this case, it seems the citizens of Keene, New Hampshire got their search queries on Snoop Dogg and their air pollution on their mind. Our findings not only support the prior research by Smith et al. and Doe and Jones but also add a quirky twist to the notion of air quality and its surprising influence on online activities.
The striking correlation we uncovered between air pollution levels and Google searches for 'Snoop Dogg' provides a fresh perspective on the multifaceted ways in which atmospheric conditions might sway human behaviors. It seems that when the air gets hazy, Keene residents turn to the smooth sounds of Snoop's rhymes - a true testament to the unexpected influence of air pollution on cultural references. Who would have thought that the words "Let's drop it like it's hot" might also inspire a statistical pursuit?
Our results bolster the scientific notion that even seemingly unrelated variables have the potential to rock the research boat with their unexpected interconnections. Like an unforeseen mixtape, the fusion of air pollution and hip-hop culture in our data analysis adds a hip-hop hue to the typically staid world of environmental research. It appears that when the smog clears, a whole new dimension of statistical peculiarities come to light.
It's worth reiterating that our correlation coefficient and r-squared value paint a clear picture of the substantial influence of air pollution on Snoop Dogg searches, capturing an astounding 70.2% of the variation in online queries. Are we witnessing the birth of a new subfield – atmospheric sonics? Our findings serve as a testament to the unexpected journeys that data analysis can take us on. It's proof that, in the world of statistics, truth can be stranger than fiction – and certainly funkier.
In closing, this study highlights the often unforeseen and amusing connections that science, statistics, and pop culture can uncover. Who knows, maybe the next research endeavor will reveal a correlation between carbon emissions and Beyoncé playlists? As the saying goes, "Ain't no fun if the homies can't have none," and it seems that applies to both research and Snoop Dogg alike!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Keene, New Hampshire and Google searches for 'snoop dog'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Snoop Doggling for Connection: Air Pollution in Keene, New Hampshire and Google Searches for 'Snoop Dog'
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we Snoop Doggled into the curious correlation between air pollution levels in Keene, New Hampshire, and Google searches for 'Snoop Dog'. Drawing on data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we embarked on an unconventional quest to unravel this eyebrow-raising relationship. Our results displayed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8379994 and p < 0.01, covering the period from 2004 to 2021. Our findings not only add a touch of whimsy to the field of environmental research but also hint at the unexpected ways in which human behavior might intertwine with atmospheric conditions. So, the next time you're pondering the link between air quality and hip-hop culture, just remember that sometimes, the truth is "Doggystyle."
[[INTRDUCTION]]
Hip-hop hooray! Get ready to drop some statistical beats and unmask the mysterious dance between air pollution and our good ol' pal, Snoop D-O-Double-G. In this paper, we'll take you on a wild research ride to uncover the peculiar relationship between air pollution levels in Keene, New Hampshire, and the frequency of Google searches for the legendary rapper, Snoop Dogg.
Who would have thought that the serene town of Keene, known for its picturesque New England charm, would be entangled in a statistical tango with the LBC's finest? Well, prepare to be bamboozled by the unexpected twists and turns of this research adventure.
Now, before you start scratching your head (or your turntables), you might be pondering, "What led this team of intrepid researchers to embark on such an unexpected expedition?" As aficionados of both science and snazzy tunes, we couldn't resist the allure of exploring uncharted statistical territories. And what better way to infuse some funky freshness into environmental research than by shaking things up with a dash of hip-hop charm?
But hang tight - before we dive into the nitty-gritty of our data analysis, let's take a moment to appreciate the unique synergy between seemingly disparate variables. It's not every day that air quality metrics and lyrical genius collide in the realm of statistical significance. Still, as venerable scientists, we're not afraid to break the mold and uncover correlations that might raise a quizzical eyebrow or two.
So, grab your lab coat and your rhyming dictionary, because it's time to unravel the enigma of Keene's air pollution and a flurry of searches for the Doggfather himself. Let's flip the script on conventional research and embrace the unexpected revelations that emerge from our journey through the data. Get ready to flip the switch, drop the mic, and discover the uncharted territories where science and musical prowess intersect. As Snoop Dogg would say, it's gonna be "foshizzle"!
[[RESULTS]]
When it comes to unexpected correlations, our findings might just be music to your ears. Our data analysis revealed a hair-raising correlation coefficient of 0.8379994 between air pollution levels in Keene, New Hampshire, and the frequency of Google searches for the one and only 'Snoop Dogg'. If that doesn't make you want to drop everything and dust off your old CD collection, I don't know what will.
In addition to this eyebrow-raising correlation, our r-squared value of 0.7022429 indicates that a whopping 70.2% of the variation in Google searches for 'Snoop Dogg' can be explained by changes in air pollution. It seems like the residents of Keene weren't just searching for fresh air - they were also on the hunt for some classic Snoop tunes. Who knew air pollution and hip-hop could be such a dynamic duo?
Furthermore, our p-value of less than 0.01 adds statistical weight to this unexpected relationship, indicating that the correlation is not just a fluke. It seems there's a real, meaningful connection between the atmospheric conditions of Keene and the urge to listen to some smooth rap beats.
Now, to visually solidify this mind-boggling correlation, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot depicting the undeniable link between air pollution levels and 'Snoop Dogg' searches. Who would have thought that a scatterplot could be so fly?
These results not only add a note of whimsy to the field of environmental research but also suggest that human behaviors may find surprising ways to intertwine with atmospheric conditions. So, the next time someone asks about the impact of air quality on pop culture, just remember that sometimes, statistics can be "Doggystyle."
Our findings prompt a new appreciation for the interplay between seemingly unrelated variables and serve as a testament to the unexpected journeys that data analysis can take us on. It's proof that, in the world of statistics, truth can be stranger than fiction - and certainly funkier.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our groovy investigation into the correlation between air pollution in Keene, New Hampshire, and Google searches for 'Snoop Dogg' has unveiled a statistical symphony that is truly music to our ears. We've demonstrated that the link between environmental quality and hip-hop appeal is not just a figment of the imagination – it's as real as Snoop Lion's career reinvention.
Our results have rocked the research boat, pushing the boundaries of conventional statistical analysis and adding some zest to the world of environmental research. It's a reminder that sometimes, science can be as unexpected as a surprise feature in a rap album.
Now, as this research draws to a funky close, we assert that no further exploration is needed in this area. Our findings are as clear as the Notorious B.I.G.'s lyrics – the connection between air pollution and Snoop Dogg searches is as robust as a solid bassline. So, let's drop the mic on this topic and leave it to linger in the air like a well-executed rhyme.
As we bid farewell to this wacky statistical escapade, we hope it serves as a reminder that in the world of research, even the most unrelated variables can come together in an unexpected duet. And, just like a classic hip-hop track, sometimes the most breathtaking beats are found in the unlikeliest of places.
Until next time, keep your data funky and your hypotheses fresh. Remember, in the words of Snoop Dogg himself, "Science ain't a one-time thing – it's a journey, baby!"
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Snoop Doggling for Connection: Air Pollution in Keene, New Hampshire and Google Searches for 'Snoop Dog'. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Environmental Behavior and Ecological Connections
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Snoop Doggling for Connection: Air Pollution in Keene, New Hampshire and Google Searches for 'Snoop Dog'. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Hilarity in Environmental Science Association
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Snoop Doggling for Connection: Air Pollution in Keene, New Hampshire and Google Searches for 'Snoop Dog' with an abstract of In this study, we Snoop Doggled into the curious correlation between air pollution levels in Keene, New Hampshire, and Google searches for 'Snoop Dog'. Drawing on data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we embarked on an unconventional quest to unravel this eyebrow-raising relationship. Our results displayed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8379994 and p < 0.01, covering the period from 2004 to 2021. Our findings not only add a touch of whimsy to the field of environmental research but also hint at the unexpected ways in which human behavior might intertwine with atmospheric conditions. So, the next time you're pondering the link between air quality and hip-hop culture, just remember that sometimes, the truth is "Doggystyle.
ChatGPT:
"Snoop Dogg", air pollution, Keene New Hampshire, correlation, environmental research, atmospheric conditions, Google Trends, Environmental Protection Agency, hip-hop culture, human behavior, correlation coefficient
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Air pollution in Keene, New HampshireDetailed data title: Percentage of days with air quality at 'unhealthy for sensitive groups' or worse in Keene, NH
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Keene, New Hampshire
Google searches for 'snoop dog'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'snoop dog' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)
See what else correlates with Google searches for 'snoop dog'
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.7022429 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 70.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'snoop dog') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Keene, New Hampshire) over the 18 years from 2004 through 2021.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.4E-5. 0.0000141581903738783410000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.84 in 0.0014% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 70,630 random variables You don't actually need 70 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 17 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 17 because we have two variables measured over a period of 18 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.61, 0.94 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | |
Air pollution in Keene, New Hampshire (Bad air quality days) | 1.46341 | 1.88679 | 0.934579 | 2.35849 | 1.03448 | 0.555556 | 0.273973 | 1.09589 | 0.546448 | 0.821918 | 0.273973 | 0.273973 | 0.273224 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.274725 |
Google searches for 'snoop dog' (Rel. search volume) | 50.8333 | 67.9167 | 40.5833 | 38.5 | 32.9167 | 24.3333 | 21.25 | 24.6667 | 17.75 | 13.5833 | 17.5 | 17.9167 | 15.25 | 11.25 | 9.41667 | 8.91667 | 9.41667 | 8.75 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1.46341,1.88679,0.934579,2.35849,1.03448,0.555556,0.273973,1.09589,0.546448,0.821918,0.273973,0.273973,0.273224,0,0,0,0,0.274725,])
array_2 = np.array([50.8333,67.9167,40.5833,38.5,32.9167,24.3333,21.25,24.6667,17.75,13.5833,17.5,17.9167,15.25,11.25,9.41667,8.91667,9.41667,8.75,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Keene, New Hampshire"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'snoop dog'"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Air pollution in Keene, New Hampshire
- Line chart for only Google searches for 'snoop dog'
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Snoop Doggling for Connection: Air Pollution in Keene, New Hampshire and Google Searches for 'Snoop Dog'
Your rating skills are top-notch!
Correlation ID: 4270 · Black Variable ID: 20771 · Red Variable ID: 1526