Download png, svg
AI explanation
The fresh, clean air in Watertown inspired a surge in magazine production nationwide. It's amazing what a breath of fresh air can do for the publishing industry!Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a futuristic cityscape set in Watertown, New York, with advanced high-tech elements. The city is surrounded by pristine mountains and features clear blue skies. In the foreground, high-tech printing presses line the skyline, emitting futuristic light and activity. The city is bustling with energy and innovation as countless magazines float up into the sky, blending with the clean air and inspiring a surge in magazine production across the country. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air quality in Watertown, New York and Number of active magazines in the United States. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Concept art High-tech Symbolism Cute 2D animation Brutalism
ChatGPT: High-tech
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air quality in Watertown, New York and Number of active magazines in the United States, in the following situation: The fresh, clean air in Watertown inspired a surge in magazine production nationwide. It's amazing what a breath of fresh air can do for the publishing industry!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Watertown, New York, the air is crisp and clean, with the distant mountains visible in the background. The skyline is dotted with bustling printing presses, churning out countless magazines that float up into the clear blue sky. The aroma of freshly printed pages hangs in the air, mingling with the refreshing breeze, inspiring a surge in magazine production across the country.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ High-tech ] and depicting this scene: In Watertown, New York, the air is crisp and clean, with the distant mountains visible in the background. The skyline is dotted with bustling printing presses, churning out countless magazines that float up into the clear blue sky. The aroma of freshly printed pages hangs in the air, mingling with the refreshing breeze, inspiring a surge in magazine production across the country. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a futuristic cityscape set in Watertown, New York, with advanced high-tech elements. The city is surrounded by pristine mountains and features clear blue skies. In the foreground, high-tech printing presses line the skyline, emitting futuristic light and activity. The city is bustling with energy and innovation as countless magazines float up into the sky, blending with the clean air and inspiring a surge in magazine production across the country.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Air quality in Watertown, New York caused Number of active magazines in the United States to increase. Add a funny one-liner at the end.
AI academic paper
Air Quality and Magazine Boom: Unraveling the Link Between Watertown, New York and the United States' Magazine Industry The Journal of Quirky Urban Connections Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Watertown, New York and Number of active magazines in the United States. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title seem clever.
Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Stat Investor to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9206682 and p < 0.01 for 2002 to 2016.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Air Quality and Magazine Boom: Unraveling the Link Between Watertown, New York and the United States' Magazine Industry
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the whimsical world of air quality and its unexpected linkage to the bustling magazine industry. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Stat Investor, we embarked on a journey to unravel the mysterious connection between the air quality in Watertown, New York and the number of active magazines in the United States. To our surprise, a correlation coefficient of 0.9206682 and p < 0.01 for the years 2002 to 2016 emerged, revealing a compelling relationship. Striking a balance between humor and scientific rigor, we explore the implications of this unexpected association and offer a breath of fresh air to the world of environmental and economic studies. Join us as we dig deep into the findings that leave us breathless, and the puns that are sure to take your breath away!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Watertown, New York and Number of active magazines in the United States. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Air Quality and Magazine Boom: Unraveling the Link Between Watertown, New York and the United States' Magazine Industry
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the whimsical world of air quality and its unexpected linkage to the bustling magazine industry. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Stat Investor, we embarked on a journey to unravel the mysterious connection between the air quality in Watertown, New York and the number of active magazines in the United States. To our surprise, a correlation coefficient of 0.9206682 and p < 0.01 for the years 2002 to 2016 emerged, revealing a compelling relationship. Striking a balance between humor and scientific rigor, we explore the implications of this unexpected association and offer a breath of fresh air to the world of environmental and economic studies. Join us as we dig deep into the findings that leave us breathless, and the puns that are sure to take your breath away!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
Introduction
Welcome, esteemed readers, to this intriguing exploration of the unlikeliest of connections—air quality in Watertown, New York, and the number of active magazines in the United States. As researchers, we often find ourselves lost in the mystifying world of correlations and causations, but few studies have taken us to the whimsical realm where environmental air quality mingles with the glossy pages of the magazine industry. Yes, you read that right! We are about to embark on a fascinating journey that promises to leave you breathless—in more ways than one!
As we embark on this quest to unravel the inexplicable and delightful link between air quality and the magazine boom, we find ourselves straddling the realms of environmental studies and economic dynamics. Who would have thought that the air we breathe and the magazines we flip through could be entangled in such an unexpected embrace? Well, hold on to your oxygen masks, dear readers, because the results are not just statistically significant, but also remarkably amusing.
So, take a deep breath and get ready to dive headfirst into the intriguing world of environmental statistics and economic whimsy. Along the way, we'll present you with findings that will blow your mind, and if we do say so ourselves, we'll sprinkle in some puns and jokes that are sure to tickle your statistical funny bone.
Get ready to be pleasantly surprised by the connection between Watertown's air quality and the number of active magazines in the United States. This is one academic paper that promises to oxygenate your mind and breathe new life into the world of scholarly research. Buckle up, dear readers, for a ride filled with correlation, causation, and the unexpected connection that will leave you gasping for more!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Watertown, New York and Number of active magazines in the United States. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Air Quality and Magazine Boom: Unraveling the Link Between Watertown, New York and the United States' Magazine Industry
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the whimsical world of air quality and its unexpected linkage to the bustling magazine industry. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Stat Investor, we embarked on a journey to unravel the mysterious connection between the air quality in Watertown, New York and the number of active magazines in the United States. To our surprise, a correlation coefficient of 0.9206682 and p < 0.01 for the years 2002 to 2016 emerged, revealing a compelling relationship. Striking a balance between humor and scientific rigor, we explore the implications of this unexpected association and offer a breath of fresh air to the world of environmental and economic studies. Join us as we dig deep into the findings that leave us breathless, and the puns that are sure to take your breath away!
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
Welcome, esteemed readers, to this intriguing exploration of the unlikeliest of connections—air quality in Watertown, New York, and the number of active magazines in the United States. As researchers, we often find ourselves lost in the mystifying world of correlations and causations, but few studies have taken us to the whimsical realm where environmental air quality mingles with the glossy pages of the magazine industry. Yes, you read that right! We are about to embark on a fascinating journey that promises to leave you breathless—in more ways than one!
As we embark on this quest to unravel the inexplicable and delightful link between air quality and the magazine boom, we find ourselves straddling the realms of environmental studies and economic dynamics. Who would have thought that the air we breathe and the magazines we flip through could be entangled in such an unexpected embrace? Well, hold on to your oxygen masks, dear readers, because the results are not just statistically significant, but also remarkably amusing.
So, take a deep breath and get ready to dive headfirst into the intriguing world of environmental statistics and economic whimsy. Along the way, we'll present you with findings that will blow your mind, and if we do say so ourselves, we'll sprinkle in some puns and jokes that are sure to tickle your statistical funny bone.
Get ready to be pleasantly surprised by the connection between Watertown's air quality and the number of active magazines in the United States. This is one academic paper that promises to oxygenate your mind and breathe new life into the world of scholarly research. Buckle up, dear readers, for a ride filled with correlation, causation, and the unexpected connection that will leave you gasping for more!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The investigation into the correlation between air quality in Watertown, New York, and the number of active magazines in the United States is a journey that has taken us through the annals of literature and research, exploring the intriguing, the mundane, and even the downright bizarre. As we examined the whimsical connection between environmental conditions and the world of glossy publications, we stumbled upon a plethora of studies and writings that at first seemed to be all business and no play. However, as it turns out, there's plenty of room for humor and unexpected twists even in the most serious of academic domains.
Smith (2010) provides a comprehensive analysis of air quality in small towns, focusing on the impact of industrial activities on local environmental conditions. Surprisingly, buried within the statistical analyses and environmental assessments lies a subtle nod to the potential ripple effects on seemingly unrelated industries. Meanwhile, Doe (2014) delves into the economic dynamics of niche markets, offering insights into the magazine publishing sector. Little did we expect that nestled within discussions of market trends and consumer behavior, there would be a glimmer of a link to the very air we breathe.
Jones (2018) presents a qualitative study on community development and local economies, shedding light on the unique characteristics of towns like Watertown and their economic ecosystems. Amidst discussions of job creation and small-scale entrepreneurship, we couldn't help but notice the potential connections to the health of the local magazine industry. Each of these studies hints at something more, something inexplicably intertwined, and our quest to uncover the truth has led us to unexpected places.
Turning to the realm of non-fiction books, "The Air We Breathe: Environmental Impacts on Everyday Life" by Green (2015) provides a detailed exploration of air quality and its implications for human well-being. However, hidden within the chapters on pollution and public health is a subtle thread that connects the air we breathe to the media we consume. "Print Media and Society: A Cultural Analysis" by Blue (2012) delves into the societal influences of print media, yet beneath the sociological dissections lies the hint of a connection between local environmental conditions and the vitality of printed publications.
In the world of fiction, "The Magazine Mysteries" by Red (2019) introduces an unsuspecting detective entangled in a web of intrigue within the magazine industry. While purely fictional, the novel's whimsical take on uncovering the unexpected ties between seemingly disparate elements resonates with our own academic journey. "The Air Affair" by Yellow (2016) presents a lighthearted romp through a world where air quality has a direct impact on the success of magazine businesses, weaving a tale that is as amusing as it is improbable.
As we wandered further into the realm of popular culture, our research took us to unexpected places. TV shows such as "Newsroom Detectives" and "Print Wars: Battle of the Magazines" offered a glimpse into the inner workings of the media landscape, allowing us to draw parallels between the dramatic twists and turns on screen and the unexpected connections we were unraveling in our own scholarly pursuits.
So, dear readers, as we navigate the often serious and occasionally surreal world of academic literature and popular culture, we invite you to join us in our quest to uncover the unexpected links between air quality in Watertown, New York, and the thriving ecosystem of magazines in the United States. The evidence may at first seem improbable, but as we peel back the layers of research and creativity, you will find that the connection is not just significant—it's downright amusing. Prepare to inhale the insights and exhale the laughter as we delve into findings that are as refreshing as a breath of clean, crisp air.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Watertown, New York and Number of active magazines in the United States. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Stat Investor . You used data from 2002 to 2016
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Air Quality and Magazine Boom: Unraveling the Link Between Watertown, New York and the United States' Magazine Industry
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the whimsical world of air quality and its unexpected linkage to the bustling magazine industry. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Stat Investor, we embarked on a journey to unravel the mysterious connection between the air quality in Watertown, New York and the number of active magazines in the United States. To our surprise, a correlation coefficient of 0.9206682 and p < 0.01 for the years 2002 to 2016 emerged, revealing a compelling relationship. Striking a balance between humor and scientific rigor, we explore the implications of this unexpected association and offer a breath of fresh air to the world of environmental and economic studies. Join us as we dig deep into the findings that leave us breathless, and the puns that are sure to take your breath away!
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
Welcome, esteemed readers, to this intriguing exploration of the unlikeliest of connections—air quality in Watertown, New York, and the number of active magazines in the United States. As researchers, we often find ourselves lost in the mystifying world of correlations and causations, but few studies have taken us to the whimsical realm where environmental air quality mingles with the glossy pages of the magazine industry. Yes, you read that right! We are about to embark on a fascinating journey that promises to leave you breathless—in more ways than one!
As we embark on this quest to unravel the inexplicable and delightful link between air quality and the magazine boom, we find ourselves straddling the realms of environmental studies and economic dynamics. Who would have thought that the air we breathe and the magazines we flip through could be entangled in such an unexpected embrace? Well, hold on to your oxygen masks, dear readers, because the results are not just statistically significant, but also remarkably amusing.
So, take a deep breath and get ready to dive headfirst into the intriguing world of environmental statistics and economic whimsy. Along the way, we'll present you with findings that will blow your mind, and if we do say so ourselves, we'll sprinkle in some puns and jokes that are sure to tickle your statistical funny bone.
Get ready to be pleasantly surprised by the connection between Watertown's air quality and the number of active magazines in the United States. This is one academic paper that promises to oxygenate your mind and breathe new life into the world of scholarly research. Buckle up, dear readers, for a ride filled with correlation, causation, and the unexpected connection that will leave you gasping for more!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Now, let's delve into the zany and convoluted methods we employed to unravel the enigmatic link between air quality in Watertown, New York and the number of active magazines in the United States. Our approach was a fusion of madcap scientific rigor and whimsical data wrangling that could make even the most stoic statistician crack a smile.
Data Collection:
To kick off this merry adventure, we scoured the vast expanse of the internet, sifting through cyberspace like intrepid treasure hunters in search of elusive data gems. Our primary sources were the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Stat Investor, where we harvested a bountiful crop of air quality indices for Watertown and the number of active magazines across the United States. It was a digital safari through the virtual jungle of information, with occasional detours into the labyrinthine corridors of statistical databases. We gathered data from the years 2002 to 2016, a period marked by substantial changes in both air quality and the magazine industry.
Oh, the thrill of extracting numbers and indices from the digital ether! It was a bit like unraveling a mathematical mystery novel, with each data point offering tantalizing clues to the grand puzzle that lay ahead. We must confess, there were moments of exuberant celebration and the occasional frustrated face-palm as we wrangled with spreadsheets and databases. But that's the whimsical dance of scientific inquiry, isn't it?
Data Analysis:
Once we amassed our treasure trove of data, it was time to unleash the full might of statistical analysis upon it. Enter the grand wizards of data crunching, armed with an arsenal of complex algorithms and statistical sorcery. We set out to measure the air quality in Watertown using the Air Quality Index (AQI) and the number of active magazines in the United States. Our trusty statistical companions, namely Pearson correlation coefficients and p-values, were summoned to discern patterns, associations, and hints of causality hidden within the labyrinth of numbers.
As the data danced through our statistical models, revealing its secrets and quirks, we held our breath in anticipation. That's right, we were quite literally holding our breath, for the air quality in Watertown had us captivated in more ways than one. With bated breath, we scrutinized the statistical outputs, reveling in the dance of p-values and the dramatic flourish of significant correlations.
Limitations:
No scientific quest is without its perilous pitfalls and limitations, and ours was no exception. We must candidly acknowledge the limitations of our study, such as the constraints imposed by the data sources and the inherent complexities of drawing causative inferences from correlational analyses. Moreover, the distinction between correlation and causation, much like a mirage in the desert of statistical inquiry, eluded our grasp at times. Yet, armed with humility and statistical rigor, we soldiered on, exploring this peculiar and delightful linkage with the gusto of intrepid explorers charting uncharted territories.
In closing, our methodology was a whimsical orchestration of data wrangling, statistical wizardry, and a dash of scientific humor. With our trusty spreadsheets and statistical models as our companions, we set forth on a merry journey to untangle the surprising association between Watertown's air quality and the booming world of magazines in the United States. As the data unveiled its secrets, we reveled in the sheer absurdity and delight of this unlikely correlation, blending scientific rigor with the sheer whimsy of unearthing hidden connections.
Next stop, the thrilling realm of results and discussions, where we promise to serve up a grand feast of statistical revelry and pun-laden revelations! So, buckle up, dear readers, for the exhilarating ride that lies ahead as we unearth the stirring connection between air quality and the magazine boom. Stay tuned for more statistical surprises and a touch of whimsy in the chapters to come!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Watertown, New York and Number of active magazines in the United States. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Stat Investor .
For the time period 2002 to 2016, you found a correlation 0.9206682, r-squared of 0.8476299, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Air Quality and Magazine Boom: Unraveling the Link Between Watertown, New York and the United States' Magazine Industry
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the whimsical world of air quality and its unexpected linkage to the bustling magazine industry. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Stat Investor, we embarked on a journey to unravel the mysterious connection between the air quality in Watertown, New York and the number of active magazines in the United States. To our surprise, a correlation coefficient of 0.9206682 and p < 0.01 for the years 2002 to 2016 emerged, revealing a compelling relationship. Striking a balance between humor and scientific rigor, we explore the implications of this unexpected association and offer a breath of fresh air to the world of environmental and economic studies. Join us as we dig deep into the findings that leave us breathless, and the puns that are sure to take your breath away!
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Introduction
Welcome, esteemed readers, to this intriguing exploration of the unlikeliest of connections—air quality in Watertown, New York, and the number of active magazines in the United States. As researchers, we often find ourselves lost in the mystifying world of correlations and causations, but few studies have taken us to the whimsical realm where environmental air quality mingles with the glossy pages of the magazine industry. Yes, you read that right! We are about to embark on a fascinating journey that promises to leave you breathless—in more ways than one!
As we embark on this quest to unravel the inexplicable and delightful link between air quality and the magazine boom, we find ourselves straddling the realms of environmental studies and economic dynamics. Who would have thought that the air we breathe and the magazines we flip through could be entangled in such an unexpected embrace? Well, hold on to your oxygen masks, dear readers, because the results are not just statistically significant, but also remarkably amusing.
So, take a deep breath and get ready to dive headfirst into the intriguing world of environmental statistics and economic whimsy. Along the way, we'll present you with findings that will blow your mind, and if we do say so ourselves, we'll sprinkle in some puns and jokes that are sure to tickle your statistical funny bone.
Get ready to be pleasantly surprised by the connection between Watertown's air quality and the number of active magazines in the United States. This is one academic paper that promises to oxygenate your mind and breathe new life into the world of scholarly research. Buckle up, dear readers, for a ride filled with correlation, causation, and the unexpected connection that will leave you gasping for more!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The moment of truth has arrived, ladies and gentlemen! After much anticipation, we are thrilled to present the monumental findings of our study on the correlation between air quality in Watertown, New York, and the number of active magazines in the United States. Brace yourselves for a rollercoaster ride of statistical marvel, where the air is fresh, and the magazines are aplenty!
With bated breath, we unveil a jaw-dropping correlation coefficient of 0.9206682, an r-squared value of 0.8476299, and p < 0.01 for the years 2002 to 2016. If you're not jumping for joy yet, you'll be breathless when you see the robust relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables.
In Fig. 1, our scatterplot showcases this astonishing correlation, leaving no room for doubt that there's more to this relationship than meets the eye. The data points are so in sync, you'd think they were harmonizing in an environmental-economic choir!
Now, taking a moment to let the air in, it's essential to note that these results point to a striking connection between the air quality in Watertown, New York, and the thriving magazine industry across the nation. Who would have thought that the oxygen-rich air of Watertown could have such an invigorating effect on the publication of magazines? It's like the magazines are breathing in the fresh air and exhaling vibrant issues of knowledge and entertainment!
If you're not already reaching for a copy of "Air Quality and Magazine Mechanics: A Tale of Two Phenomena," then perhaps a whiff of the evidence behind this surprising correlation will change your mind.
In conclusion, our research has not only unearthed a significant correlation but has also brought to light an unexpected interplay between air quality and the magazine industry. We've laid the groundwork for a breath of fresh air in both environmental and economic studies, and we can't wait to share more puns and thrilling findings as we unravel this fascinating connection. So, take a deep breath, dear readers, and get ready to join us in this unparalleled exploration of the unexpected intersection of fresh air and fresh reads!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Watertown, New York and Number of active magazines in the United States. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
Air Quality and Magazine Boom: Unraveling the Link Between Watertown, New York and the United States' Magazine Industry
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the whimsical world of air quality and its unexpected linkage to the bustling magazine industry. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Stat Investor, we embarked on a journey to unravel the mysterious connection between the air quality in Watertown, New York and the number of active magazines in the United States. To our surprise, a correlation coefficient of 0.9206682 and p < 0.01 for the years 2002 to 2016 emerged, revealing a compelling relationship. Striking a balance between humor and scientific rigor, we explore the implications of this unexpected association and offer a breath of fresh air to the world of environmental and economic studies. Join us as we dig deep into the findings that leave us breathless, and the puns that are sure to take your breath away!
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The investigation into the correlation between air quality in Watertown, New York, and the number of active magazines in the United States is a journey that has taken us through the annals of literature and research, exploring the intriguing, the mundane, and even the downright bizarre. As we examined the whimsical connection between environmental conditions and the world of glossy publications, we stumbled upon a plethora of studies and writings that at first seemed to be all business and no play. However, as it turns out, there's plenty of room for humor and unexpected twists even in the most serious of academic domains.
Smith (2010) provides a comprehensive analysis of air quality in small towns, focusing on the impact of industrial activities on local environmental conditions. Surprisingly, buried within the statistical analyses and environmental assessments lies a subtle nod to the potential ripple effects on seemingly unrelated industries. Meanwhile, Doe (2014) delves into the economic dynamics of niche markets, offering insights into the magazine publishing sector. Little did we expect that nestled within discussions of market trends and consumer behavior, there would be a glimmer of a link to the very air we breathe.
Jones (2018) presents a qualitative study on community development and local economies, shedding light on the unique characteristics of towns like Watertown and their economic ecosystems. Amidst discussions of job creation and small-scale entrepreneurship, we couldn't help but notice the potential connections to the health of the local magazine industry. Each of these studies hints at something more, something inexplicably intertwined, and our quest to uncover the truth has led us to unexpected places.
Turning to the realm of non-fiction books, "The Air We Breathe: Environmental Impacts on Everyday Life" by Green (2015) provides a detailed exploration of air quality and its implications for human well-being. However, hidden within the chapters on pollution and public health is a subtle thread that connects the air we breathe to the media we consume. "Print Media and Society: A Cultural Analysis" by Blue (2012) delves into the societal influences of print media, yet beneath the sociological dissections lies the hint of a connection between local environmental conditions and the vitality of printed publications.
In the world of fiction, "The Magazine Mysteries" by Red (2019) introduces an unsuspecting detective entangled in a web of intrigue within the magazine industry. While purely fictional, the novel's whimsical take on uncovering the unexpected ties between seemingly disparate elements resonates with our own academic journey. "The Air Affair" by Yellow (2016) presents a lighthearted romp through a world where air quality has a direct impact on the success of magazine businesses, weaving a tale that is as amusing as it is improbable.
As we wandered further into the realm of popular culture, our research took us to unexpected places. TV shows such as "Newsroom Detectives" and "Print Wars: Battle of the Magazines" offered a glimpse into the inner workings of the media landscape, allowing us to draw parallels between the dramatic twists and turns on screen and the unexpected connections we were unraveling in our own scholarly pursuits.
So, dear readers, as we navigate the often serious and occasionally surreal world of academic literature and popular culture, we invite you to join us in our quest to uncover the unexpected links between air quality in Watertown, New York, and the thriving ecosystem of magazines in the United States. The evidence may at first seem improbable, but as we peel back the layers of research and creativity, you will find that the connection is not just significant—it's downright amusing. Prepare to inhale the insights and exhale the laughter as we delve into findings that are as refreshing as a breath of clean, crisp air.
[[RESULTS]]
The moment of truth has arrived, ladies and gentlemen! After much anticipation, we are thrilled to present the monumental findings of our study on the correlation between air quality in Watertown, New York, and the number of active magazines in the United States. Brace yourselves for a rollercoaster ride of statistical marvel, where the air is fresh, and the magazines are aplenty!
With bated breath, we unveil a jaw-dropping correlation coefficient of 0.9206682, an r-squared value of 0.8476299, and p < 0.01 for the years 2002 to 2016. If you're not jumping for joy yet, you'll be breathless when you see the robust relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables.
In Fig. 1, our scatterplot showcases this astonishing correlation, leaving no room for doubt that there's more to this relationship than meets the eye. The data points are so in sync, you'd think they were harmonizing in an environmental-economic choir!
Now, taking a moment to let the air in, it's essential to note that these results point to a striking connection between the air quality in Watertown, New York, and the thriving magazine industry across the nation. Who would have thought that the oxygen-rich air of Watertown could have such an invigorating effect on the publication of magazines? It's like the magazines are breathing in the fresh air and exhaling vibrant issues of knowledge and entertainment!
If you're not already reaching for a copy of "Air Quality and Magazine Mechanics: A Tale of Two Phenomena," then perhaps a whiff of the evidence behind this surprising correlation will change your mind.
In conclusion, our research has not only unearthed a significant correlation but has also brought to light an unexpected interplay between air quality and the magazine industry. We've laid the groundwork for a breath of fresh air in both environmental and economic studies, and we can't wait to share more puns and thrilling findings as we unravel this fascinating connection. So, take a deep breath, dear readers, and get ready to join us in this unparalleled exploration of the unexpected intersection of fresh air and fresh reads!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
Well, well, well, it looks like we've stumbled upon a discovery as refreshing as a cool, crisp breeze on a hot summer day—there's a whale of a correlation between air quality in Watertown, New York, and the number of active magazines in these United States! Who would have thought that the air could be so influential in the world of glossy pages and catchy headlines? But here we are, not merely blowing hot air, but providing some seriously cool insights.
Before we get carried away in the winds of excitement, let's take a moment to appreciate the surreal yet significant links we've uncovered. Remember when we were chuckling over those whimsical details from Smith (2010), Doe (2014), and Jones (2018) about the potential domino effects of air quality on unexpected industries? Well, guess what? Our results have given those seemingly outlandish musings a breath of life! It turns out that these quirky leads were onto something after all.
Just as the pages of "The Air We Breathe" and "Print Media and Society" seemed to tease out the idea of a connection between air and media, we've now breathed life into those intriguing hints and discovered a tangible association. And what about the fictional exploits in "The Magazine Mysteries" and "The Air Affair"? Who would have thought that these frolicsome flights of fancy could have a grain of truth to them? Perhaps fiction isn't so far-fetched after all!
Our findings support the wild theories and zany premises that we once brushed off as nothing more than comedic relief. Science, it seems, has a sense of humor too—proving once again that sometimes, truth is stranger than fiction.
But seriously, folks, our results have shown that there's more to this fresh air phenomenon than meets the eye. The correlation coefficient and r-squared value aren't just playing statistical tricks on us. They're telling us that there's a potent relationship at play here, and it's nothing to sneeze at.
As we continue to unpack the implications of these findings, it's clear that we're onto something big. This curious connection isn't just a tempest in a teapot—it's a full-blown whirlwind of intrigue. So, let's hold onto our hats and ride this gust of discovery, because the winds of science are blowing in some unexpectedly delightful directions!
And with that, dear readers, we invite you to join us on this comically enlightening exploration of the uncharted territories where air quality and magazine magnificence collide. Let's inhale the excitement and exhale the hilarity—because who knew that science could be this much fun? So buckle up, take a deep breath, and let's soar into the breezy world of improbable yet undeniable correlations!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Watertown, New York and Number of active magazines in the United States. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Air Quality and Magazine Boom: Unraveling the Link Between Watertown, New York and the United States' Magazine Industry
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the whimsical world of air quality and its unexpected linkage to the bustling magazine industry. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Stat Investor, we embarked on a journey to unravel the mysterious connection between the air quality in Watertown, New York and the number of active magazines in the United States. To our surprise, a correlation coefficient of 0.9206682 and p < 0.01 for the years 2002 to 2016 emerged, revealing a compelling relationship. Striking a balance between humor and scientific rigor, we explore the implications of this unexpected association and offer a breath of fresh air to the world of environmental and economic studies. Join us as we dig deep into the findings that leave us breathless, and the puns that are sure to take your breath away!
[[INTRDUCTION]]
Introduction
Welcome, esteemed readers, to this intriguing exploration of the unlikeliest of connections—air quality in Watertown, New York, and the number of active magazines in the United States. As researchers, we often find ourselves lost in the mystifying world of correlations and causations, but few studies have taken us to the whimsical realm where environmental air quality mingles with the glossy pages of the magazine industry. Yes, you read that right! We are about to embark on a fascinating journey that promises to leave you breathless—in more ways than one!
As we embark on this quest to unravel the inexplicable and delightful link between air quality and the magazine boom, we find ourselves straddling the realms of environmental studies and economic dynamics. Who would have thought that the air we breathe and the magazines we flip through could be entangled in such an unexpected embrace? Well, hold on to your oxygen masks, dear readers, because the results are not just statistically significant, but also remarkably amusing.
So, take a deep breath and get ready to dive headfirst into the intriguing world of environmental statistics and economic whimsy. Along the way, we'll present you with findings that will blow your mind, and if we do say so ourselves, we'll sprinkle in some puns and jokes that are sure to tickle your statistical funny bone.
Get ready to be pleasantly surprised by the connection between Watertown's air quality and the number of active magazines in the United States. This is one academic paper that promises to oxygenate your mind and breathe new life into the world of scholarly research. Buckle up, dear readers, for a ride filled with correlation, causation, and the unexpected connection that will leave you gasping for more!
[[RESULTS]]
The moment of truth has arrived, ladies and gentlemen! After much anticipation, we are thrilled to present the monumental findings of our study on the correlation between air quality in Watertown, New York, and the number of active magazines in the United States. Brace yourselves for a rollercoaster ride of statistical marvel, where the air is fresh, and the magazines are aplenty!
With bated breath, we unveil a jaw-dropping correlation coefficient of 0.9206682, an r-squared value of 0.8476299, and p < 0.01 for the years 2002 to 2016. If you're not jumping for joy yet, you'll be breathless when you see the robust relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables.
In Fig. 1, our scatterplot showcases this astonishing correlation, leaving no room for doubt that there's more to this relationship than meets the eye. The data points are so in sync, you'd think they were harmonizing in an environmental-economic choir!
Now, taking a moment to let the air in, it's essential to note that these results point to a striking connection between the air quality in Watertown, New York, and the thriving magazine industry across the nation. Who would have thought that the oxygen-rich air of Watertown could have such an invigorating effect on the publication of magazines? It's like the magazines are breathing in the fresh air and exhaling vibrant issues of knowledge and entertainment!
If you're not already reaching for a copy of "Air Quality and Magazine Mechanics: A Tale of Two Phenomena," then perhaps a whiff of the evidence behind this surprising correlation will change your mind.
In conclusion, our research has not only unearthed a significant correlation but has also brought to light an unexpected interplay between air quality and the magazine industry. We've laid the groundwork for a breath of fresh air in both environmental and economic studies, and we can't wait to share more puns and thrilling findings as we unravel this fascinating connection. So, take a deep breath, dear readers, and get ready to join us in this unparalleled exploration of the unexpected intersection of fresh air and fresh reads!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
Ah, the thrilling ride of scientific discovery has brought us to an exhilirating conclusion, dear readers! We've uncovered a correlation so strong, it's like the air quality in Watertown and the magazine industry are two peas in a pod, or should we say, two pollutants in a haze? This unexpected connection has left us gasping for more, and we hope it's left you equally breathless!
So, what does our research tell us? Well, for starters, the air quality of Watertown seems to have breathed new life into the magazine industry across the United States. It's like the magazines are taking in the crisp Watertown air and belting out issue after issue of cutting-edge content. It's a tale as old as time – fresh air leads to fresh reads! Who knew clean air could be so inspiring, right?
We've delved deep into the lighthearted intersection of environmental and economic studies, showing that sometimes, the most surprising connections are the most robust. It's like a statistical magic show, where the real trick is finding correlations where you least expect them. And boy, have we found a doozy!
As we prepare to bid adieu, we're also planting our flag firmly in the ground: No more research is needed in this area. We've conquered the correlation between air quality and the magazine industry, and we're riding off into the sunset of scholarly satisfaction. It's been a gas, dear readers, and we hope you've enjoyed this wild romp through the unexpected link between air quality in Watertown, New York, and the number of active magazines in the United States. Keep breathing easy, and keep flipping through those pages – there's more to every breath than meets the eye!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Air Quality and Magazine Boom: Unraveling the Link Between Watertown, New York and the United States' Magazine Industry. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Quirky Urban Connections
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Air Quality and Magazine Boom: Unraveling the Link Between Watertown, New York and the United States' Magazine Industry. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
Institute for Environmental Laughter Studies
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Air Quality and Magazine Boom: Unraveling the Link Between Watertown, New York and the United States' Magazine Industry with an abstract of In this study, we delve into the whimsical world of air quality and its unexpected linkage to the bustling magazine industry. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Stat Investor, we embarked on a journey to unravel the mysterious connection between the air quality in Watertown, New York and the number of active magazines in the United States. To our surprise, a correlation coefficient of 0.9206682 and p < 0.01 for the years 2002 to 2016 emerged, revealing a compelling relationship. Striking a balance between humor and scientific rigor, we explore the implications of this unexpected association and offer a breath of fresh air to the world of environmental and economic studies. Join us as we dig deep into the findings that leave us breathless, and the puns that are sure to take your breath away!
ChatGPT:
Watertown air quality, United States magazine industry, correlation air quality magazines, Watertown New York EPA data, magazine industry statistics, air quality economic impact, environmental studies, air quality research, magazine industry growth, economic implications air quality magazine industry
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Air quality in Watertown, New YorkDetailed data title: Percentage of days with good or moderate air quality in Watertown-Fort Drum, NY
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air quality in Watertown, New York
Number of active magazines in the United States
Source: Stat Investor
See what else correlates with Number of active magazines in the United States
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.8476299 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 84.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Number of active magazines in the United States) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air quality in Watertown, New York) over the 15 years from 2002 through 2016.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.1E-6. 0.0000011383951215456675000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.92 in 0.00011% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 878,430 random variables You don't actually need 878 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 14 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 14 because we have two variables measured over a period of 15 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.77, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | |
Air quality in Watertown, New York (Good air quality) | 0.882609 | 0.923077 | 0.981481 | 0.921659 | 0.978166 | 0.934426 | 0.986254 | 0.990741 | 0.97191 | 0.99169 | 0.972376 | 1 | 0.997245 | 1 | 0.993976 |
Number of active magazines in the United States (Magazines) | 5340 | 6234 | 7188 | 6325 | 6734 | 6809 | 7383 | 7110 | 7163 | 7179 | 7390 | 7240 | 7289 | 7293 | 7216 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.882609,0.923077,0.981481,0.921659,0.978166,0.934426,0.986254,0.990741,0.97191,0.99169,0.972376,1,0.997245,1,0.993976,])
array_2 = np.array([5340,6234,7188,6325,6734,6809,7383,7110,7163,7179,7390,7240,7289,7293,7216,])
array_1_name = "Air quality in Watertown, New York"
array_2_name = "Number of active magazines in the United States"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Air quality in Watertown, New York
- Line chart for only Number of active magazines in the United States
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Air Quality and Magazine Boom: Unraveling the Link Between Watertown, New York and the United States' Magazine Industry
Thanks for being the explorer we needed!
Correlation ID: 4266 · Black Variable ID: 21888 · Red Variable ID: 382