about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,265 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is How insightful Mark Rober YouTube video titles are and the second variable is Rain in San Antonio.  The chart goes from 2011 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The rain in San Antonio increases the insightful nature of Mark Rober's YouTube video titles because the pitter-patter of the raindrops creates harmonious vibrations that directly stimulate the creative centers of his brain, leading to an influx of brilliant ideas for video content. As the petrichor permeates the air, it inexplicably triggers a surge of wisdom and ingenuity within Mark Rober, inspiring him to craft exceptionally thought-provoking titles that captivate and enlighten audiences. Remember, when it drizzles in Texas, it drizzles inspiration in Mark Rober's mind, ultimately leading to an outpouring of remarkably insightful video titles that leave viewers both amazed and educated.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [Realistic] Using the scene as inspiration, prompt DALL·E-3 to generate an image of Mark Rober sitting at his desk, surrounded by the gentle pitter-patter of rain as the misty San Antonio skyline looms outside the window. The soft light of the rainy day should create a contemplative ambiance as Mark gazes out, showing a focused expression as if deep in creative thought. The raindrops hitting the window should be visible, and the ambiance within the room should convey the soothing, inspiring feeling of the petrichor in the air. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: How insightful Mark Rober YouTube video titles are and Rain in San Antonio. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie Realistic Steampunk Celtic art Parallax art
ChatGPT: Realistic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both How insightful Mark Rober YouTube video titles are and Rain in San Antonio, in the following situation: The rain in San Antonio increases the insightful nature of Mark Rober's YouTube video titles because the pitter-patter of the raindrops creates harmonious vibrations that directly stimulate the creative centers of his brain, leading to an influx of brilliant ideas for video content. As the petrichor permeates the air, it inexplicably triggers a surge of wisdom and ingenuity within Mark Rober, inspiring him to craft exceptionally thought-provoking titles that captivate and enlighten audiences. Remember, when it drizzles in Texas, it drizzles inspiration in Mark Rober's mind, ultimately leading to an outpouring of remarkably insightful video titles that leave viewers both amazed and educated.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: Mark Rober sits at his desk, the gentle pitter-patter of rain hitting the window creating a soothing ambiance. As he gazes out at the misty San Antonio skyline, the rhythmic sound of the raindrops seems to awaken his creative senses. The petrichor fills the air, and with each breath, Mark feels a surge of inspiration and insight. With a focused expression, he begins crafting YouTube video titles that are not only captivating but also deeply insightful, each one a testament to the creative power unleashed by the rain.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Realistic ] and depicting this scene: Mark Rober sits at his desk, the gentle pitter-patter of rain hitting the window creating a soothing ambiance. As he gazes out at the misty San Antonio skyline, the rhythmic sound of the raindrops seems to awaken his creative senses. The petrichor fills the air, and with each breath, Mark feels a surge of inspiration and insight. With a focused expression, he begins crafting YouTube video titles that are not only captivating but also deeply insightful, each one a testament to the creative power unleashed by the rain. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [Realistic] Using the scene as inspiration, prompt DALL·E-3 to generate an image of Mark Rober sitting at his desk, surrounded by the gentle pitter-patter of rain as the misty San Antonio skyline looms outside the window. The soft light of the rainy day should create a contemplative ambiance as Mark gazes out, showing a focused expression as if deep in creative thought. The raindrops hitting the window should be visible, and the ambiance within the room should convey the soothing, inspiring feeling of the petrichor in the air.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in How insightful Mark Rober YouTube video titles are caused Rain in San Antonio to increase.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Rain or Shine: Mark Rober's YouTube Titles Forecasting Precipitation in San Antonio

Journal of Meteorological Technology and Popular Culture

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How insightful Mark Rober YouTube video titles are and Rain in San Antonio. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and NOAA National Climate Data Center to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8244203 and p < 0.01 for 2011 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Rain or Shine: Mark Rober's YouTube Titles Forecasting Precipitation in San Antonio"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we explore the unexpected connection between the insightful video titles of YouTube sensation Mark Rober and the occurrence of rain in San Antonio. Utilizing AI analysis of Mark Rober's YouTube video titles and data from the NOAA National Climate Data Center, we aimed to determine if there was a correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8244203 and p < 0.01 for the years 2011 to 2022, we unveil the surprising link between Mark Rober's video titles and rainy weather in San Antonio.

Much to our surprise, our analysis revealed a statistically significant relationship between the insights shared in Mark Rober's video titles and the likelihood of precipitation in San Antonio. One might even say that Mark Rober's titles have a "forecast like" accuracy when it comes to predicting rainfall.

Our findings highlight the potential for unconventional sources of information to provide valuable insights in unexpected areas of study. We hope this research inspires further investigation into the intersection of online content and meteorological phenomena. After all, it's always fun to look at data from a new angle - especially when it leads to a "shower" of unexpected correlations!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How insightful Mark Rober YouTube video titles are and Rain in San Antonio. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Rain or Shine: Mark Rober's YouTube Titles Forecasting Precipitation in San Antonio"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we explore the unexpected connection between the insightful video titles of YouTube sensation Mark Rober and the occurrence of rain in San Antonio. Utilizing AI analysis of Mark Rober's YouTube video titles and data from the NOAA National Climate Data Center, we aimed to determine if there was a correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8244203 and p < 0.01 for the years 2011 to 2022, we unveil the surprising link between Mark Rober's video titles and rainy weather in San Antonio.

Much to our surprise, our analysis revealed a statistically significant relationship between the insights shared in Mark Rober's video titles and the likelihood of precipitation in San Antonio. One might even say that Mark Rober's titles have a "forecast like" accuracy when it comes to predicting rainfall.

Our findings highlight the potential for unconventional sources of information to provide valuable insights in unexpected areas of study. We hope this research inspires further investigation into the intersection of online content and meteorological phenomena. After all, it's always fun to look at data from a new angle - especially when it leads to a "shower" of unexpected correlations!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

When one thinks of predicting the weather, YouTube may not be the first place that comes to mind. However, the rise of social media has opened new avenues for obtaining and analyzing data. In the case of Mark Rober, a former NASA engineer turned YouTube personality, his video titles have proven to be surprisingly insightful - and perhaps even meteorologically prophetic!

In our quest to uncover the mysterious link between Mark Rober's video titles and rainfall in San Antonio, we were both amused and puzzled by the potential implications of this unexpected association. After all, who would have thought that the catchy titles of science-based YouTube videos could hold the key to atmospheric conditions in a specific geographical region? It seems Mother Nature herself couldn't resist clicking on a Mark Rober video titled "The Super-Incredible Mark Rober Weather Contraption, Giant Mousetrap and a Duck!" - I mean, who wouldn't want to see that?

As researchers, we understand the importance of rigorous data analysis and statistical validation. However, the correlation we observed between Mark Rober's video titles and rainy days in San Antonio truly rains on the parade of traditional scientific preconceptions. One might say that we were caught in a "phenomenon" of unexpected discovery!

The significance of this study extends beyond mere curiosity. It prompts us to critically evaluate the potential impact of non-traditional data sources in informing our understanding of atmospheric patterns. Who knows, perhaps the key to unravelling other meteorological mysteries lies in the catchy titles of viral videos. It appears that sometimes, the forecast for groundbreaking insights can be found in the unlikeliest of places - maybe even in the "cloud" of YouTube content!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How insightful Mark Rober YouTube video titles are and Rain in San Antonio. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Rain or Shine: Mark Rober's YouTube Titles Forecasting Precipitation in San Antonio"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we explore the unexpected connection between the insightful video titles of YouTube sensation Mark Rober and the occurrence of rain in San Antonio. Utilizing AI analysis of Mark Rober's YouTube video titles and data from the NOAA National Climate Data Center, we aimed to determine if there was a correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8244203 and p < 0.01 for the years 2011 to 2022, we unveil the surprising link between Mark Rober's video titles and rainy weather in San Antonio.

Much to our surprise, our analysis revealed a statistically significant relationship between the insights shared in Mark Rober's video titles and the likelihood of precipitation in San Antonio. One might even say that Mark Rober's titles have a "forecast like" accuracy when it comes to predicting rainfall.

Our findings highlight the potential for unconventional sources of information to provide valuable insights in unexpected areas of study. We hope this research inspires further investigation into the intersection of online content and meteorological phenomena. After all, it's always fun to look at data from a new angle - especially when it leads to a "shower" of unexpected correlations!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
When one thinks of predicting the weather, YouTube may not be the first place that comes to mind. However, the rise of social media has opened new avenues for obtaining and analyzing data. In the case of Mark Rober, a former NASA engineer turned YouTube personality, his video titles have proven to be surprisingly insightful - and perhaps even meteorologically prophetic!
In our quest to uncover the mysterious link between Mark Rober's video titles and rainfall in San Antonio, we were both amused and puzzled by the potential implications of this unexpected association. After all, who would have thought that the catchy titles of science-based YouTube videos could hold the key to atmospheric conditions in a specific geographical region? It seems Mother Nature herself couldn't resist clicking on a Mark Rober video titled "The Super-Incredible Mark Rober Weather Contraption, Giant Mousetrap and a Duck!" - I mean, who wouldn't want to see that?
As researchers, we understand the importance of rigorous data analysis and statistical validation. However, the correlation we observed between Mark Rober's video titles and rainy days in San Antonio truly rains on the parade of traditional scientific preconceptions. One might say that we were caught in a "phenomenon" of unexpected discovery!
The significance of this study extends beyond mere curiosity. It prompts us to critically evaluate the potential impact of non-traditional data sources in informing our understanding of atmospheric patterns. Who knows, perhaps the key to unravelling other meteorological mysteries lies in the catchy titles of viral videos. It appears that sometimes, the forecast for groundbreaking insights can be found in the unlikeliest of places - maybe even in the "cloud" of YouTube content!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Recent studies have brought to light the unexpected relationships between seemingly unrelated phenomena. In "Smith and Jones' Meteorological Musings," the authors find correlations between internet memes and temperature trends. Similarly, Doe and Smith examine the connection between cat videos and barometric pressure in "The Feline Factor: Exploring Internet Culture and Weather Patterns." These studies underscore the dynamic nature of contemporary research, where unorthodox data sources reveal compelling associations - a trend that "purr-sists" throughout various domains of inquiry.

Turning to the realm of popular non-fiction, the works of Malcolm Gladwell in "Outliers" and Daniel Kahneman's "Thinking, Fast and Slow" delve into the intriguing concept of unconventional predictors and the psychology of decision-making. While these texts do not directly address the intersection of YouTube titles and precipitation, they offer valuable insights into the potential influence of unanticipated factors on real-world outcomes. One could even say they provide a "Gladwellian" perspective on the matter.

In the fiction domain, novels such as "Cloud Atlas" by David Mitchell and "The Weathering" by Meaghan O'Connell explore themes of interconnectedness and serendipitous events, mirroring the fortuitous alignment of Mark Rober's video titles and rainfall in San Antonio. These literary works invoke a sense of whimsy and wonder, paralleling the delight we experienced in uncovering the correlation between internet content and weather phenomena. As they say, truth can be stranger than fiction - and sometimes, it even has a "novel" twist.

Game theory, a prominent field in economics and decision science, offers another perspective on unanticipated connections. The popular board game "Clue" challenges players to deduce complex relationships between characters, locations, and weapons, reflecting the intrigue of unexpected correlations that our research has unveiled. Additionally, the game "Sushi Go!" compels players to strategize and anticipate the value of different combinations of cards, akin to our efforts in discerning patterns in seemingly disparate data. In the same vein, our exploration of Mark Rober's video titles and rainfall trends can be likened to a scientific game of "Connect Four-casts."

Ultimately, our investigation unveils surprising alignments between Mark Rober's content and meteorological phenomena, echoing the unforeseen connections observed in diverse areas of study. Amidst the scientific rigour of our research, we find joy in the amusement and delight that arise from discovering these unexpected links. By embracing the unexpected, we can "weather" the storms of conventional thinking and open the floodgates to new avenues of inquiry. After all, who said that serious research can't have a little "rain" of humor and whimsey?

As the literature and our own findings suggest, it's clear that the insightfulness of Mark Rober's video titles may not just be limited to the realm of entertainment and education. In the words of Mark Twain, "Climate is what we expect, weather is what we get." And who would have thought that we'd get such "weather-ly" insights from YouTube video titles?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How insightful Mark Rober YouTube video titles are and Rain in San Antonio. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and NOAA National Climate Data Center . You used data from 2011 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Rain or Shine: Mark Rober's YouTube Titles Forecasting Precipitation in San Antonio"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we explore the unexpected connection between the insightful video titles of YouTube sensation Mark Rober and the occurrence of rain in San Antonio. Utilizing AI analysis of Mark Rober's YouTube video titles and data from the NOAA National Climate Data Center, we aimed to determine if there was a correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8244203 and p < 0.01 for the years 2011 to 2022, we unveil the surprising link between Mark Rober's video titles and rainy weather in San Antonio.

Much to our surprise, our analysis revealed a statistically significant relationship between the insights shared in Mark Rober's video titles and the likelihood of precipitation in San Antonio. One might even say that Mark Rober's titles have a "forecast like" accuracy when it comes to predicting rainfall.

Our findings highlight the potential for unconventional sources of information to provide valuable insights in unexpected areas of study. We hope this research inspires further investigation into the intersection of online content and meteorological phenomena. After all, it's always fun to look at data from a new angle - especially when it leads to a "shower" of unexpected correlations!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
When one thinks of predicting the weather, YouTube may not be the first place that comes to mind. However, the rise of social media has opened new avenues for obtaining and analyzing data. In the case of Mark Rober, a former NASA engineer turned YouTube personality, his video titles have proven to be surprisingly insightful - and perhaps even meteorologically prophetic!
In our quest to uncover the mysterious link between Mark Rober's video titles and rainfall in San Antonio, we were both amused and puzzled by the potential implications of this unexpected association. After all, who would have thought that the catchy titles of science-based YouTube videos could hold the key to atmospheric conditions in a specific geographical region? It seems Mother Nature herself couldn't resist clicking on a Mark Rober video titled "The Super-Incredible Mark Rober Weather Contraption, Giant Mousetrap and a Duck!" - I mean, who wouldn't want to see that?
As researchers, we understand the importance of rigorous data analysis and statistical validation. However, the correlation we observed between Mark Rober's video titles and rainy days in San Antonio truly rains on the parade of traditional scientific preconceptions. One might say that we were caught in a "phenomenon" of unexpected discovery!
The significance of this study extends beyond mere curiosity. It prompts us to critically evaluate the potential impact of non-traditional data sources in informing our understanding of atmospheric patterns. Who knows, perhaps the key to unravelling other meteorological mysteries lies in the catchy titles of viral videos. It appears that sometimes, the forecast for groundbreaking insights can be found in the unlikeliest of places - maybe even in the "cloud" of YouTube content!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To examine the connection between Mark Rober's YouTube video titles and rainfall in San Antonio, we employed a multi-faceted approach that combined data analysis, machine learning, and a sprinkle of lighthearted optimism. First, we utilized AI algorithms to parse through the linguistic nuances and thematic content of Mark Rober's video titles. It was essential to "shower" these algorithms with relevant data to ensure a thorough understanding of the intricate and, at times, pun-filled nature of Mark Rober's content. After all, we didn't want to miss any subtle hints that could be "rainmakers" in our analysis.

Once we had successfully extracted and encoded the informational essence of the video titles, we then employed advanced statistical techniques to quantify the level of insights and scientific themes present in each title. The goal was to determine if there was a discernible pattern or predictive element to the themes presented in the titles, akin to the way a meteorologist might discern atmospheric conditions from subtle weather patterns. Our approach, much like Mark Rober's creative inventions, was filled with a dash of innovation and a strong belief that even the most unconventional methodologies can yield valuable results.

Simultaneously, we gathered historical precipitation data from the NOAA National Climate Data Center for San Antonio covering the years 2011 to 2022. This data was the rain that nourished our investigation, providing the empirical evidence needed to validate the potential connection between Mark Rober's titles and actual rainfall events. We meticulously scrutinized the timing and frequency of rain in San Antonio, ensuring that our analysis was as thorough as the meticulous planning that goes into creating a perfectly orchestrated Rube Goldberg machine.

Next, we employed a rigorous statistical analysis, including both univariate and multivariate regression models, to assess the correlation between the linguistic characteristics of Mark Rober's video titles and the occurrence of rain in San Antonio. By embracing this statistical deluge, we sought to quench the thirst for knowledge and, in a sense, create our own "forecast" for the potential relationship between seemingly unrelated phenomena. We were determined to leave no statistical stone unturned, even if it meant wading through an academic "downpour" of numbers and probabilities.

Finally, we evaluated the significance of our findings using standard statistical tests and reported the correlation coefficient and associated p-values. We ensured that our methods were as robust as a well-built "contraption," standing firm against any skeptics who may doubt the intriguing link we uncovered.

Surely, our methodology may sound as unexpected as a rain shower in the desert, but rest assured, it was designed with the utmost rigor, creativity, and humor. After all, when it comes to research, a bit of lightheartedness never hurt anyone - especially when it yields fascinating and unexpected findings, much like Mark Rober's own ingenious creations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How insightful Mark Rober YouTube video titles are and Rain in San Antonio. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and NOAA National Climate Data Center .

For the time period 2011 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8244203, r-squared of 0.6796689, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Rain or Shine: Mark Rober's YouTube Titles Forecasting Precipitation in San Antonio"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we explore the unexpected connection between the insightful video titles of YouTube sensation Mark Rober and the occurrence of rain in San Antonio. Utilizing AI analysis of Mark Rober's YouTube video titles and data from the NOAA National Climate Data Center, we aimed to determine if there was a correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8244203 and p < 0.01 for the years 2011 to 2022, we unveil the surprising link between Mark Rober's video titles and rainy weather in San Antonio.

Much to our surprise, our analysis revealed a statistically significant relationship between the insights shared in Mark Rober's video titles and the likelihood of precipitation in San Antonio. One might even say that Mark Rober's titles have a "forecast like" accuracy when it comes to predicting rainfall.

Our findings highlight the potential for unconventional sources of information to provide valuable insights in unexpected areas of study. We hope this research inspires further investigation into the intersection of online content and meteorological phenomena. After all, it's always fun to look at data from a new angle - especially when it leads to a "shower" of unexpected correlations!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
When one thinks of predicting the weather, YouTube may not be the first place that comes to mind. However, the rise of social media has opened new avenues for obtaining and analyzing data. In the case of Mark Rober, a former NASA engineer turned YouTube personality, his video titles have proven to be surprisingly insightful - and perhaps even meteorologically prophetic!
In our quest to uncover the mysterious link between Mark Rober's video titles and rainfall in San Antonio, we were both amused and puzzled by the potential implications of this unexpected association. After all, who would have thought that the catchy titles of science-based YouTube videos could hold the key to atmospheric conditions in a specific geographical region? It seems Mother Nature herself couldn't resist clicking on a Mark Rober video titled "The Super-Incredible Mark Rober Weather Contraption, Giant Mousetrap and a Duck!" - I mean, who wouldn't want to see that?
As researchers, we understand the importance of rigorous data analysis and statistical validation. However, the correlation we observed between Mark Rober's video titles and rainy days in San Antonio truly rains on the parade of traditional scientific preconceptions. One might say that we were caught in a "phenomenon" of unexpected discovery!
The significance of this study extends beyond mere curiosity. It prompts us to critically evaluate the potential impact of non-traditional data sources in informing our understanding of atmospheric patterns. Who knows, perhaps the key to unravelling other meteorological mysteries lies in the catchy titles of viral videos. It appears that sometimes, the forecast for groundbreaking insights can be found in the unlikeliest of places - maybe even in the "cloud" of YouTube content!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data revealed a strong positive correlation between the insightful video titles of YouTube sensation Mark Rober and the occurrence of rain in San Antonio. The correlation coefficient of 0.8244203 indicates a robust relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. This finding suggests that Mark Rober's video titles possess a peculiar predictive power over the precipitation patterns in San Antonio, prompting us to ponder the possibility of weather forecasts in the form of YouTube thumbnails.

It seems that Mark Rober's titles are not just informative, but "precipitation predictors" as well - quite the dual talent for a YouTube video title! Who knew that "Making Sandals out of Used Tires" could also be a subtle hint for carrying an umbrella in San Antonio?

The scatterplot in Fig. 1 depicts the distribution of the observed data points, showing a visually evident pattern that substantiates the statistical correlation. It's like connecting the dots between Mark Rober's genius and the gentle pitter-patter of rainfall in San Antonio - truly a picture-perfect union of science and nature.

The r-squared value of 0.6796689 further reinforces the strength of the relationship, indicating that approximately 68% of the variation in San Antonio's rainfall can be explained by the insights contained in Mark Rober's video titles. This is a result that stands out more than a bright yellow rain slicker in a sudden downpour!

With a significance level of p < 0.01, our findings are not a product of mere coincidence, but rather a robust statistical relationship that warrants further investigation and contemplation. It's clear that this unexpected connection is not something to brush off - it has all the makings of a "frontal system" of intrigue and curiosity!

In conclusion, our analysis not only establishes a striking association between Mark Rober's YouTube video titles and rainy weather in San Antonio but also opens the door to a whimsical realm of unconventional data sources and their potential applications in meteorological studies. Perhaps the next time you're contemplating the forecast, a quick glance at the latest Mark Rober video title could provide some "weather wisdom" in an unexpected package!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How insightful Mark Rober YouTube video titles are and Rain in San Antonio. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Rain or Shine: Mark Rober's YouTube Titles Forecasting Precipitation in San Antonio"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we explore the unexpected connection between the insightful video titles of YouTube sensation Mark Rober and the occurrence of rain in San Antonio. Utilizing AI analysis of Mark Rober's YouTube video titles and data from the NOAA National Climate Data Center, we aimed to determine if there was a correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8244203 and p < 0.01 for the years 2011 to 2022, we unveil the surprising link between Mark Rober's video titles and rainy weather in San Antonio.

Much to our surprise, our analysis revealed a statistically significant relationship between the insights shared in Mark Rober's video titles and the likelihood of precipitation in San Antonio. One might even say that Mark Rober's titles have a "forecast like" accuracy when it comes to predicting rainfall.

Our findings highlight the potential for unconventional sources of information to provide valuable insights in unexpected areas of study. We hope this research inspires further investigation into the intersection of online content and meteorological phenomena. After all, it's always fun to look at data from a new angle - especially when it leads to a "shower" of unexpected correlations!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Recent studies have brought to light the unexpected relationships between seemingly unrelated phenomena. In "Smith and Jones' Meteorological Musings," the authors find correlations between internet memes and temperature trends. Similarly, Doe and Smith examine the connection between cat videos and barometric pressure in "The Feline Factor: Exploring Internet Culture and Weather Patterns." These studies underscore the dynamic nature of contemporary research, where unorthodox data sources reveal compelling associations - a trend that "purr-sists" throughout various domains of inquiry.
Turning to the realm of popular non-fiction, the works of Malcolm Gladwell in "Outliers" and Daniel Kahneman's "Thinking, Fast and Slow" delve into the intriguing concept of unconventional predictors and the psychology of decision-making. While these texts do not directly address the intersection of YouTube titles and precipitation, they offer valuable insights into the potential influence of unanticipated factors on real-world outcomes. One could even say they provide a "Gladwellian" perspective on the matter.
In the fiction domain, novels such as "Cloud Atlas" by David Mitchell and "The Weathering" by Meaghan O'Connell explore themes of interconnectedness and serendipitous events, mirroring the fortuitous alignment of Mark Rober's video titles and rainfall in San Antonio. These literary works invoke a sense of whimsy and wonder, paralleling the delight we experienced in uncovering the correlation between internet content and weather phenomena. As they say, truth can be stranger than fiction - and sometimes, it even has a "novel" twist.
Game theory, a prominent field in economics and decision science, offers another perspective on unanticipated connections. The popular board game "Clue" challenges players to deduce complex relationships between characters, locations, and weapons, reflecting the intrigue of unexpected correlations that our research has unveiled. Additionally, the game "Sushi Go!" compels players to strategize and anticipate the value of different combinations of cards, akin to our efforts in discerning patterns in seemingly disparate data. In the same vein, our exploration of Mark Rober's video titles and rainfall trends can be likened to a scientific game of "Connect Four-casts."
Ultimately, our investigation unveils surprising alignments between Mark Rober's content and meteorological phenomena, echoing the unforeseen connections observed in diverse areas of study. Amidst the scientific rigour of our research, we find joy in the amusement and delight that arise from discovering these unexpected links. By embracing the unexpected, we can "weather" the storms of conventional thinking and open the floodgates to new avenues of inquiry. After all, who said that serious research can't have a little "rain" of humor and whimsey?
As the literature and our own findings suggest, it's clear that the insightfulness of Mark Rober's video titles may not just be limited to the realm of entertainment and education. In the words of Mark Twain, "Climate is what we expect, weather is what we get." And who would have thought that we'd get such "weather-ly" insights from YouTube video titles?

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a strong positive correlation between the insightful video titles of YouTube sensation Mark Rober and the occurrence of rain in San Antonio. The correlation coefficient of 0.8244203 indicates a robust relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. This finding suggests that Mark Rober's video titles possess a peculiar predictive power over the precipitation patterns in San Antonio, prompting us to ponder the possibility of weather forecasts in the form of YouTube thumbnails.
It seems that Mark Rober's titles are not just informative, but "precipitation predictors" as well - quite the dual talent for a YouTube video title! Who knew that "Making Sandals out of Used Tires" could also be a subtle hint for carrying an umbrella in San Antonio?
The scatterplot in Fig. 1 depicts the distribution of the observed data points, showing a visually evident pattern that substantiates the statistical correlation. It's like connecting the dots between Mark Rober's genius and the gentle pitter-patter of rainfall in San Antonio - truly a picture-perfect union of science and nature.
The r-squared value of 0.6796689 further reinforces the strength of the relationship, indicating that approximately 68% of the variation in San Antonio's rainfall can be explained by the insights contained in Mark Rober's video titles. This is a result that stands out more than a bright yellow rain slicker in a sudden downpour!
With a significance level of p < 0.01, our findings are not a product of mere coincidence, but rather a robust statistical relationship that warrants further investigation and contemplation. It's clear that this unexpected connection is not something to brush off - it has all the makings of a "frontal system" of intrigue and curiosity!
In conclusion, our analysis not only establishes a striking association between Mark Rober's YouTube video titles and rainy weather in San Antonio but also opens the door to a whimsical realm of unconventional data sources and their potential applications in meteorological studies. Perhaps the next time you're contemplating the forecast, a quick glance at the latest Mark Rober video title could provide some "weather wisdom" in an unexpected package!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study markedly bolster the prior research in unearthing unexpected correlations between seemingly unrelated phenomena, like discovering a hidden treasure trove of jokes in your grandfather's old sock drawer. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8244203, our findings not only confirm but enhance the notion that unconventional sources can serve as harbingers of substantial insights, much like finding a surprising punchline in the midst of a serious conversation.

The relationship we uncovered between the enlightening titles in Mark Rober's YouTube videos and the rainy weather in San Antonio follows the footsteps of prior investigations that have elucidated unfathomable connections, akin to stumbling upon a comedic gem that elevates the mundane. Our research mirrors the delightful surprise one gets from a well-placed dad joke – unexpected and yet remarkably fitting.

Our findings also align with the tradition of delving into the unforeseen influence of unorthodox predictors, as articulated in the quirky works of Malcolm Gladwell and Daniel Kahneman – a testament to the profound impact of unexpected factors, not unlike finding a delightfully terrible pun in a high-stakes business meeting.

Reinforcing our results with a significance level of p < 0.01, our study further fortifies the hypothesis that mesmerizing video titles from Mark Rober can offer weather-related "precipitation predictions" with impressive accuracy, much like guessing the punchline of a well-timed joke. The breadth of the relationship depicted by the r-squared value of 0.6796689 is nothing short of staggering, similar to the comedic effect of a perfectly executed dad joke – it leaves an indelible mark on the audience.

In essence, our research inextricably ties the insightful brilliance of Mark Rober's video titles to the meteorological events in San Antonio, endorsing the entertaining blend of humor and scientific inquiry, not unlike discovering a treasure map hidden in a prized family heirloom – it's an unexpected and exhilarating journey into uncharted territories.

In light of these findings, our investigation doesn't just herald the captivating unpredictability of the natural world but also underscores the potential for seemingly unrelated domains to intertwine in harmonious and unexpected ways, akin to the joy of finding delightfully fitting dad jokes in the most unexpected places – it's a blending of worlds that prompts laughter and contemplation in equal measure.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How insightful Mark Rober YouTube video titles are and Rain in San Antonio. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Rain or Shine: Mark Rober's YouTube Titles Forecasting Precipitation in San Antonio"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we explore the unexpected connection between the insightful video titles of YouTube sensation Mark Rober and the occurrence of rain in San Antonio. Utilizing AI analysis of Mark Rober's YouTube video titles and data from the NOAA National Climate Data Center, we aimed to determine if there was a correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8244203 and p < 0.01 for the years 2011 to 2022, we unveil the surprising link between Mark Rober's video titles and rainy weather in San Antonio.

Much to our surprise, our analysis revealed a statistically significant relationship between the insights shared in Mark Rober's video titles and the likelihood of precipitation in San Antonio. One might even say that Mark Rober's titles have a "forecast like" accuracy when it comes to predicting rainfall.

Our findings highlight the potential for unconventional sources of information to provide valuable insights in unexpected areas of study. We hope this research inspires further investigation into the intersection of online content and meteorological phenomena. After all, it's always fun to look at data from a new angle - especially when it leads to a "shower" of unexpected correlations!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
When one thinks of predicting the weather, YouTube may not be the first place that comes to mind. However, the rise of social media has opened new avenues for obtaining and analyzing data. In the case of Mark Rober, a former NASA engineer turned YouTube personality, his video titles have proven to be surprisingly insightful - and perhaps even meteorologically prophetic!
In our quest to uncover the mysterious link between Mark Rober's video titles and rainfall in San Antonio, we were both amused and puzzled by the potential implications of this unexpected association. After all, who would have thought that the catchy titles of science-based YouTube videos could hold the key to atmospheric conditions in a specific geographical region? It seems Mother Nature herself couldn't resist clicking on a Mark Rober video titled "The Super-Incredible Mark Rober Weather Contraption, Giant Mousetrap and a Duck!" - I mean, who wouldn't want to see that?
As researchers, we understand the importance of rigorous data analysis and statistical validation. However, the correlation we observed between Mark Rober's video titles and rainy days in San Antonio truly rains on the parade of traditional scientific preconceptions. One might say that we were caught in a "phenomenon" of unexpected discovery!
The significance of this study extends beyond mere curiosity. It prompts us to critically evaluate the potential impact of non-traditional data sources in informing our understanding of atmospheric patterns. Who knows, perhaps the key to unravelling other meteorological mysteries lies in the catchy titles of viral videos. It appears that sometimes, the forecast for groundbreaking insights can be found in the unlikeliest of places - maybe even in the "cloud" of YouTube content!

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a strong positive correlation between the insightful video titles of YouTube sensation Mark Rober and the occurrence of rain in San Antonio. The correlation coefficient of 0.8244203 indicates a robust relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. This finding suggests that Mark Rober's video titles possess a peculiar predictive power over the precipitation patterns in San Antonio, prompting us to ponder the possibility of weather forecasts in the form of YouTube thumbnails.
It seems that Mark Rober's titles are not just informative, but "precipitation predictors" as well - quite the dual talent for a YouTube video title! Who knew that "Making Sandals out of Used Tires" could also be a subtle hint for carrying an umbrella in San Antonio?
The scatterplot in Fig. 1 depicts the distribution of the observed data points, showing a visually evident pattern that substantiates the statistical correlation. It's like connecting the dots between Mark Rober's genius and the gentle pitter-patter of rainfall in San Antonio - truly a picture-perfect union of science and nature.
The r-squared value of 0.6796689 further reinforces the strength of the relationship, indicating that approximately 68% of the variation in San Antonio's rainfall can be explained by the insights contained in Mark Rober's video titles. This is a result that stands out more than a bright yellow rain slicker in a sudden downpour!
With a significance level of p < 0.01, our findings are not a product of mere coincidence, but rather a robust statistical relationship that warrants further investigation and contemplation. It's clear that this unexpected connection is not something to brush off - it has all the makings of a "frontal system" of intrigue and curiosity!
In conclusion, our analysis not only establishes a striking association between Mark Rober's YouTube video titles and rainy weather in San Antonio but also opens the door to a whimsical realm of unconventional data sources and their potential applications in meteorological studies. Perhaps the next time you're contemplating the forecast, a quick glance at the latest Mark Rober video title could provide some "weather wisdom" in an unexpected package!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has humorously drenched the scientific community with the unexpected revelation of the correlation between Mark Rober's YouTube video titles and rainy weather in San Antonio. It seems that Mark Rober's creativity extends beyond making gadgets and into meteorological foreshadowing - he's a real "rain-maker," if you will! Our study not only highlights the unconventional potential of YouTube content as a weather oracle but also hints at the "cloudy" intersection of entertainment and forecasting.

With a correlation coefficient akin to a sturdy umbrella in a storm, our findings suggest that Mark Rober's video titles have a knack for meteorological anticipation. This correlation is not just a drizzle of coincidence but a veritable downpour of statistical significance. You could say that our research has uncovered a "typhoon" of unexpected connections!

It's clear that no more research is needed in this area – we've wrung out every drop of insight from this unlikely pairing!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Rain or Shine: Mark Rober's YouTube Titles Forecasting Precipitation in San Antonio. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Meteorological Technology and Popular Culture


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Rain or Shine: Mark Rober's YouTube Titles Forecasting Precipitation in San Antonio. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Weather-You-Like-It-or-Not Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Rain or Shine: Mark Rober's YouTube Titles Forecasting Precipitation in San Antonio with an abstract of In this paper, we explore the unexpected connection between the insightful video titles of YouTube sensation Mark Rober and the occurrence of rain in San Antonio. Utilizing AI analysis of Mark Rober's YouTube video titles and data from the NOAA National Climate Data Center, we aimed to determine if there was a correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8244203 and p < 0.01 for the years 2011 to 2022, we unveil the surprising link between Mark Rober's video titles and rainy weather in San Antonio.
Much to our surprise, our analysis revealed a statistically significant relationship between the insights shared in Mark Rober's video titles and the likelihood of precipitation in San Antonio. One might even say that Mark Rober's titles have a "forecast like" accuracy when it comes to predicting rainfall.
Our findings highlight the potential for unconventional sources of information to provide valuable insights in unexpected areas of study. We hope this research inspires further investigation into the intersection of online content and meteorological phenomena. After all, it's always fun to look at data from a new angle - especially when it leads to a "shower" of unexpected correlations!

ChatGPT:

Mark Rober, YouTube titles, precipitation, San Antonio, AI analysis, NOAA National Climate Data Center, correlation coefficient, statistical significance, rainfall prediction, unconventional sources, online content, meteorological phenomena, data analysis

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

How insightful Mark Rober YouTube video titles are
Detailed data title: How insightful Mark Rober YouTube video titles are, as rated by an AI.
Source: AI analysis of YouTube video titles
Additional Info: I asked a large language model, 'On a scale of 1-10, how _______ do you think this YouTube video title is?' for every video.

See what else correlates with How insightful Mark Rober YouTube video titles are

Rain in San Antonio
Detailed data title: Number of days with >= 0.01 inch/0.254 millimeter precipitation in the year at SAN ANTONIO STINSON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT, TX US
Source: NOAA National Climate Data Center
See what else correlates with Rain in San Antonio

Correlation r = 0.8244203 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6796689 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 68% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Rain in San Antonio) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., How insightful Mark Rober YouTube video titles are) over the 12 years from 2011 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.000971. 0.0009707616355385279000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.82 in 0.0971% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,030 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 11 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 11 because we have two variables measured over a period of 12 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.48, 0.95 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
How insightful Mark Rober YouTube video titles are (Insightful score (out of 10))4.54.65.77785.66676.756.33336.77786.90917.44446.46.83336.3333
Rain in San Antonio (Precipitation days)445460508484698883748555




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([4.5,4.6,5.7778,5.6667,6.75,6.3333,6.7778,6.9091,7.4444,6.4,6.8333,6.3333,])
array_2 = np.array([44,54,60,50,84,84,69,88,83,74,85,55,])
array_1_name = "How insightful Mark Rober YouTube video titles are"
array_2_name = "Rain in San Antonio"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Bravo! Your evaluation rocks!


Correlation ID: 4265 · Black Variable ID: 25573 · Red Variable ID: 25397
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0