about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,238 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Shane and the second variable is Arson in Georgia.  The chart goes from 1985 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the popularity of the name Shane decreased, there were fewer people shouting "Shane! Shane! Fire's not the answer!" in Georgia, leading to a decrease in arson. It seems like there was a correlation between the name Shane and the flame game in Georgia. Who knew that the key to fire prevention lay in the name of the game itself? It's a conundrum as perplexing as a riddle in a burning building!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a bustling cityscape on the planet Georgia from 'Star Wars', with fewer individuals named Shane in the foreground and reduced arson incidents in the background. The city shows fewer outbursts of fiery incidents with droids and beings commuting peacefully. The scene captures the intriguing correlation between the decline of the name Shane and the decrease in fiery incidents in the city. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Shane and Arson in Georgia. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Futuristic Cutsy graphics Vaporwave Symbolism An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars'
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars'

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Shane and Arson in Georgia, in the following situation: As the popularity of the name Shane decreased, there were fewer people shouting "Shane! Shane! Fire's not the answer!" in Georgia, leading to a decrease in arson. It seems like there was a correlation between the name Shane and the flame game in Georgia. Who knew that the key to fire prevention lay in the name of the game itself? It's a conundrum as perplexing as a riddle in a burning building!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Georgia, as the popularity of the first name Shane decreased, there were fewer people shouting "Shane! Shane! Fire's not the answer!" amidst a backdrop of fewer arson incidents. The sight of fewer people named Shane and a decrease in fiery incidents created a curious correlation.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' ] and depicting this scene: In Georgia, as the popularity of the first name Shane decreased, there were fewer people shouting "Shane! Shane! Fire's not the answer!" amidst a backdrop of fewer arson incidents. The sight of fewer people named Shane and a decrease in fiery incidents created a curious correlation. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a bustling cityscape on the planet Georgia from 'Star Wars', with fewer individuals named Shane in the foreground and reduced arson incidents in the background. The city shows fewer outbursts of fiery incidents with droids and beings commuting peacefully. The scene captures the intriguing correlation between the decline of the name Shane and the decrease in fiery incidents in the city.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Popularity of the first name Shane caused Arson in Georgia to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Shane Effect: Shaping the Spectrum of Arson in Georgia

The Journal of Deviant Behavior Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Shane and Arson in Georgia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9675130 and p < 0.01 for 1985 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Shane Effect: Shaping the Spectrum of Arson in Georgia

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the extraordinary world of nomenclature and criminal mischief, exploring the curious correlation between the popularity of the first name Shane and incidents of arson in the state of Georgia. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we embarked on a statistical escapade to uncover the potential link between Shane and flame.

Our research team unearthed a remarkably strong positive association, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9675130 and a compelling p-value less than 0.01, spanning the years 1985 to 2022. The findings lead to sizzling insights, suggesting an intriguing resonance between the prevalence of the name Shane and the propensity for fiery felonies in Georgia.

With these scorching results, we challenge the scholarly community to ponder whether Shane's popularity ignites a fiery passion for arson or if it merely sets the stage for coincidental conflagrations. This research ignites a flame of curiosity, highlighting the need for further exploration of the Shane Effect and its incendiary influence on criminal behavior.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Shane and Arson in Georgia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Shane Effect: Shaping the Spectrum of Arson in Georgia

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the extraordinary world of nomenclature and criminal mischief, exploring the curious correlation between the popularity of the first name Shane and incidents of arson in the state of Georgia. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we embarked on a statistical escapade to uncover the potential link between Shane and flame.

Our research team unearthed a remarkably strong positive association, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9675130 and a compelling p-value less than 0.01, spanning the years 1985 to 2022. The findings lead to sizzling insights, suggesting an intriguing resonance between the prevalence of the name Shane and the propensity for fiery felonies in Georgia.

With these scorching results, we challenge the scholarly community to ponder whether Shane's popularity ignites a fiery passion for arson or if it merely sets the stage for coincidental conflagrations. This research ignites a flame of curiosity, highlighting the need for further exploration of the Shane Effect and its incendiary influence on criminal behavior.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The field of criminology has long been fascinated with identifying the myriad factors that contribute to criminal behavior. From socioeconomic status to psychological predispositions, researchers have tirelessly sought to unravel the tangled web of influences that drive individuals to engage in illicit activities. However, amidst this labyrinth of causation, one peculiar and often overlooked variable has emerged from the shadows – the first name "Shane."

In this paper, we embark on an ardent quest to explore the enigmatic connection between the popularity of the first name Shane and the incidence of arson in the charming state of Georgia. While the idea may initially kindle skepticism, our preliminary investigation has uncovered a promising avenue for inquiry into this seemingly innocuous moniker and its potential combustion with criminal propensity.

Popularity has a certain allure, as evident from the cult-like following of certain trends, memes, and even baby names. Could it be that the name Shane, with its melodic brevity and charismatic charm, holds a formidable sway over the subconscious minds of its bearers, manifesting in an unexpected penchant for pyromania? Or is this correlation merely an auspicious alignment of statistical coincidence, akin to a fortuitous alignment of stars in a fiery constellation?

Our inquiry into this uncharted territory is spurred by the intriguing findings of a substantiated correlation coefficient of 0.9675130, accompanied by a p-value as compelling as the allure of a resonant bonfire – less than 0.01. The time period under scrutiny spans the years from 1985 to 2022, capturing the ebb and flow of Shane's popularity and its entwining with the patterns of arson in Georgia. The scorching insights derived from this analysis beckon us towards a deeper understanding of the Shane Effect, prompting us to question the incendiary undercurrents that lie beneath the seemingly innocuous surface of a name.

As we traverse this uncharted terrain with the torch of statistical rigor illuminating our path, we invite the scholarly community to join us in pondering the perplexing question: does the name Shane stoke the flames of arson, or does it stand as a hapless bystander in the conflagration of causation, a mere statistical casualty caught in the blaze of correlation?

This study endeavors to ignite a spark of curiosity and foster a flame of contemplation, compelling further inquiry into the Shane Effect and its potential to illuminate the hidden tinderbox of influences that shape criminal behavior.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Shane and Arson in Georgia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Shane Effect: Shaping the Spectrum of Arson in Georgia

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the extraordinary world of nomenclature and criminal mischief, exploring the curious correlation between the popularity of the first name Shane and incidents of arson in the state of Georgia. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we embarked on a statistical escapade to uncover the potential link between Shane and flame.

Our research team unearthed a remarkably strong positive association, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9675130 and a compelling p-value less than 0.01, spanning the years 1985 to 2022. The findings lead to sizzling insights, suggesting an intriguing resonance between the prevalence of the name Shane and the propensity for fiery felonies in Georgia.

With these scorching results, we challenge the scholarly community to ponder whether Shane's popularity ignites a fiery passion for arson or if it merely sets the stage for coincidental conflagrations. This research ignites a flame of curiosity, highlighting the need for further exploration of the Shane Effect and its incendiary influence on criminal behavior.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The field of criminology has long been fascinated with identifying the myriad factors that contribute to criminal behavior. From socioeconomic status to psychological predispositions, researchers have tirelessly sought to unravel the tangled web of influences that drive individuals to engage in illicit activities. However, amidst this labyrinth of causation, one peculiar and often overlooked variable has emerged from the shadows – the first name "Shane."
In this paper, we embark on an ardent quest to explore the enigmatic connection between the popularity of the first name Shane and the incidence of arson in the charming state of Georgia. While the idea may initially kindle skepticism, our preliminary investigation has uncovered a promising avenue for inquiry into this seemingly innocuous moniker and its potential combustion with criminal propensity.
Popularity has a certain allure, as evident from the cult-like following of certain trends, memes, and even baby names. Could it be that the name Shane, with its melodic brevity and charismatic charm, holds a formidable sway over the subconscious minds of its bearers, manifesting in an unexpected penchant for pyromania? Or is this correlation merely an auspicious alignment of statistical coincidence, akin to a fortuitous alignment of stars in a fiery constellation?
Our inquiry into this uncharted territory is spurred by the intriguing findings of a substantiated correlation coefficient of 0.9675130, accompanied by a p-value as compelling as the allure of a resonant bonfire – less than 0.01. The time period under scrutiny spans the years from 1985 to 2022, capturing the ebb and flow of Shane's popularity and its entwining with the patterns of arson in Georgia. The scorching insights derived from this analysis beckon us towards a deeper understanding of the Shane Effect, prompting us to question the incendiary undercurrents that lie beneath the seemingly innocuous surface of a name.
As we traverse this uncharted terrain with the torch of statistical rigor illuminating our path, we invite the scholarly community to join us in pondering the perplexing question: does the name Shane stoke the flames of arson, or does it stand as a hapless bystander in the conflagration of causation, a mere statistical casualty caught in the blaze of correlation?
This study endeavors to ignite a spark of curiosity and foster a flame of contemplation, compelling further inquiry into the Shane Effect and its potential to illuminate the hidden tinderbox of influences that shape criminal behavior.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Smith (2008) first investigated the potential connections between first names and criminal behavior, focusing on the prevalence of monikers among perpetrators of various felonies. Meanwhile, Doe (2015) delved into the impact of societal trends and naming conventions on individuals’ psychological development, offering compelling insights into the subtle influences exerted by nomenclature. Expanding on this line of inquiry, Jones (2020) explored the relationship between popular names and regional variations in crime rates, shedding light on the nuanced interplay between nomenclature and criminal tendencies.

In "The Name Game: Unraveling the Mysteries of Monikers," the authors delve into the intricate web of nomenclature and its potential ramifications on behavioral proclivities. This illuminating work provides a comprehensive overview of the social and psychological dynamics underlying the selection and impact of names, offering tantalizing prospects for the exploration of unconventional name-behavior connections. Furthermore, "Labels and Lawlessness: A Sociocultural Analysis" by the same author, ventures into the darker undercurrents of nomenclature, teasing apart the tangled nuances that underlie the relationship between names and criminal activities.

On the fictional front, "Inferno Infatuation: A Tale of Fire and Folly" by Blaze Writer captures the enthralling allure of flames and the human propensity for incendiary action. This dramatic tale weaves a narrative tapestry of intrigue, arson, and the enigmatic allure of the name Shane, evoking a dizzying dance of mystery and mischief. Conversely, "Sparks and Spunk: The Adventures of Shane the Firestarter" by Ember Enthusiast, offers a lighthearted exploration of the energetic escapades of a protagonist with an insatiable passion for flames, blending humor and hinting at the potential inspirations for fiery inclinations.

In a research-adjacent endeavor, the TV shows "Firestarter Frenzy" and "Blazing Beauties: Tales of Arson and Intrigue" present captivating narratives that explore the captivating world of fires and the enigmatic allure of those named Shane. These shows present an array of characters and scenarios that paint a vivid portrait of the potential interplay between nomenclature and incendiary inclinations, providing a tapestry of inspiration for further explorations in this field.

As the literature demonstrates, the complex interplay between nomenclature and criminal behavior offers a rich tapestry of possibilities and provocations. While the initial studies may have been rooted in earnest inquiry, it is essential to approach the topic with a hint of humor and a spark of curiosity to illuminate the enigmatic nexus between Shane and the incendiary undercurrents of arson in Georgia.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Shane and Arson in Georgia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services . You used data from 1985 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Shane Effect: Shaping the Spectrum of Arson in Georgia

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the extraordinary world of nomenclature and criminal mischief, exploring the curious correlation between the popularity of the first name Shane and incidents of arson in the state of Georgia. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we embarked on a statistical escapade to uncover the potential link between Shane and flame.

Our research team unearthed a remarkably strong positive association, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9675130 and a compelling p-value less than 0.01, spanning the years 1985 to 2022. The findings lead to sizzling insights, suggesting an intriguing resonance between the prevalence of the name Shane and the propensity for fiery felonies in Georgia.

With these scorching results, we challenge the scholarly community to ponder whether Shane's popularity ignites a fiery passion for arson or if it merely sets the stage for coincidental conflagrations. This research ignites a flame of curiosity, highlighting the need for further exploration of the Shane Effect and its incendiary influence on criminal behavior.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The field of criminology has long been fascinated with identifying the myriad factors that contribute to criminal behavior. From socioeconomic status to psychological predispositions, researchers have tirelessly sought to unravel the tangled web of influences that drive individuals to engage in illicit activities. However, amidst this labyrinth of causation, one peculiar and often overlooked variable has emerged from the shadows – the first name "Shane."
In this paper, we embark on an ardent quest to explore the enigmatic connection between the popularity of the first name Shane and the incidence of arson in the charming state of Georgia. While the idea may initially kindle skepticism, our preliminary investigation has uncovered a promising avenue for inquiry into this seemingly innocuous moniker and its potential combustion with criminal propensity.
Popularity has a certain allure, as evident from the cult-like following of certain trends, memes, and even baby names. Could it be that the name Shane, with its melodic brevity and charismatic charm, holds a formidable sway over the subconscious minds of its bearers, manifesting in an unexpected penchant for pyromania? Or is this correlation merely an auspicious alignment of statistical coincidence, akin to a fortuitous alignment of stars in a fiery constellation?
Our inquiry into this uncharted territory is spurred by the intriguing findings of a substantiated correlation coefficient of 0.9675130, accompanied by a p-value as compelling as the allure of a resonant bonfire – less than 0.01. The time period under scrutiny spans the years from 1985 to 2022, capturing the ebb and flow of Shane's popularity and its entwining with the patterns of arson in Georgia. The scorching insights derived from this analysis beckon us towards a deeper understanding of the Shane Effect, prompting us to question the incendiary undercurrents that lie beneath the seemingly innocuous surface of a name.
As we traverse this uncharted terrain with the torch of statistical rigor illuminating our path, we invite the scholarly community to join us in pondering the perplexing question: does the name Shane stoke the flames of arson, or does it stand as a hapless bystander in the conflagration of causation, a mere statistical casualty caught in the blaze of correlation?
This study endeavors to ignite a spark of curiosity and foster a flame of contemplation, compelling further inquiry into the Shane Effect and its potential to illuminate the hidden tinderbox of influences that shape criminal behavior.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To elucidate the perplexing correlation between the popularity of the first name Shane and the incidence of arson in Georgia, our research team embarked on a methodological odyssey that aimed to tease apart the intertwined nuances of nomenclature and misdemeanor. Leveraging the vast repositories of data from the US Social Security Administration and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we meticulously crafted a multifaceted approach to disentangle the potential link between Shane and flame.

First, we delved into the annals of the US Social Security Administration's treasure trove of baby names to systematically quantify the prevalence of the name Shane across the years 1985 to 2022. This entailed sifting through countless digital birth records with the precision of an alchemist seeking the elusive philosopher's stone, meticulously tallying the frequency of Shane's appearance in the tapestry of nomenclature.

Simultaneously, we harnessed the formidable data reservoir of the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, meticulously unraveling the intricate tapestry of arson incidents across the peach-laden landscape of Georgia. Our intrepid pursuit involved sifting through the labyrinthine records of flaming infractions with the tenacity of a bloodhound on the scent of larceny, endeavoring to capture the essence of combustible transgressions and their potential proximity to the presence of Shane.

With both datasets in hand, we embarked on a rigorous curation process akin to sculpting a neoclassical masterpiece, meticulously aligning the temporal evolution of Shane's popularity with the ebbs and flows of arson incidents in Georgia. This meticulous alignment gave rise to a trove of data ripe for quantitative analysis, providing the foundation for our statistical escapade into the enigmatic nexus of Shane and arson.

Employing advanced statistical methods that would make even the most ardent data aficionado quiver with delight, we computed correlation coefficients with the precision of a seasoned alchemist balancing the elemental constituents of a transformative elixir. Our analysis traversed the hallowed grounds of hypothesis testing, culminating in the unveiling of a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9675130, accompanied by a p-value reminiscent of a rare gem – shimmering at less than 0.01.

Through this convoluted and full-bodied methodology, we sought to illuminate the flickering interplay between Shane's popularity and the smoldering embers of arson in Georgia, paving the way for a scintillating adventure through the fiery labyrinth of correlation and causation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Shane and Arson in Georgia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services .

For the time period 1985 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9675130, r-squared of 0.9360814, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Shane Effect: Shaping the Spectrum of Arson in Georgia

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the extraordinary world of nomenclature and criminal mischief, exploring the curious correlation between the popularity of the first name Shane and incidents of arson in the state of Georgia. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we embarked on a statistical escapade to uncover the potential link between Shane and flame.

Our research team unearthed a remarkably strong positive association, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9675130 and a compelling p-value less than 0.01, spanning the years 1985 to 2022. The findings lead to sizzling insights, suggesting an intriguing resonance between the prevalence of the name Shane and the propensity for fiery felonies in Georgia.

With these scorching results, we challenge the scholarly community to ponder whether Shane's popularity ignites a fiery passion for arson or if it merely sets the stage for coincidental conflagrations. This research ignites a flame of curiosity, highlighting the need for further exploration of the Shane Effect and its incendiary influence on criminal behavior.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The field of criminology has long been fascinated with identifying the myriad factors that contribute to criminal behavior. From socioeconomic status to psychological predispositions, researchers have tirelessly sought to unravel the tangled web of influences that drive individuals to engage in illicit activities. However, amidst this labyrinth of causation, one peculiar and often overlooked variable has emerged from the shadows – the first name "Shane."
In this paper, we embark on an ardent quest to explore the enigmatic connection between the popularity of the first name Shane and the incidence of arson in the charming state of Georgia. While the idea may initially kindle skepticism, our preliminary investigation has uncovered a promising avenue for inquiry into this seemingly innocuous moniker and its potential combustion with criminal propensity.
Popularity has a certain allure, as evident from the cult-like following of certain trends, memes, and even baby names. Could it be that the name Shane, with its melodic brevity and charismatic charm, holds a formidable sway over the subconscious minds of its bearers, manifesting in an unexpected penchant for pyromania? Or is this correlation merely an auspicious alignment of statistical coincidence, akin to a fortuitous alignment of stars in a fiery constellation?
Our inquiry into this uncharted territory is spurred by the intriguing findings of a substantiated correlation coefficient of 0.9675130, accompanied by a p-value as compelling as the allure of a resonant bonfire – less than 0.01. The time period under scrutiny spans the years from 1985 to 2022, capturing the ebb and flow of Shane's popularity and its entwining with the patterns of arson in Georgia. The scorching insights derived from this analysis beckon us towards a deeper understanding of the Shane Effect, prompting us to question the incendiary undercurrents that lie beneath the seemingly innocuous surface of a name.
As we traverse this uncharted terrain with the torch of statistical rigor illuminating our path, we invite the scholarly community to join us in pondering the perplexing question: does the name Shane stoke the flames of arson, or does it stand as a hapless bystander in the conflagration of causation, a mere statistical casualty caught in the blaze of correlation?
This study endeavors to ignite a spark of curiosity and foster a flame of contemplation, compelling further inquiry into the Shane Effect and its potential to illuminate the hidden tinderbox of influences that shape criminal behavior.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The scorching inquiry into the correlation between the prevalence of the first name Shane and incidents of arson in Georgia yielded a remarkably strong positive association. The correlation coefficient of 0.9675130 illuminated a tantalizing connection that beckons the scholarly community to gaze into the fiery depths of statistical intrigue. The findings of this study suggest that the popularity of the name Shane may hold an unexpected influence over the proclivity for pyromania in the state of Georgia.

The r-squared value of 0.9360814 further bolsters the robustness of this association, highlighting the captivation of the first name Shane in the constellation of arson in Georgia. The results of this investigation stand as a beacon, heralding the emergence of a captivating relationship between nomenclature and criminal mischief and igniting a spirited quest for further exploration.

The compelling p-value, less than 0.01, adds fuel to the fire of statistical significance, underscoring the resounding impact of the Shane Effect on the spectrum of arson in Georgia. This glowing endorsement of the connection between Shane and flames raises thought-provoking questions about the potential influence of names on criminal behavior and invites contemplation on the underlying mechanisms that may fuel this incendiary relationship.

The single figure included in this study is a scatterplot, depicted as Figure 1, which visually portrays the robust correlation between the prevalence of the first name Shane and incidents of arson in Georgia. The figure provides a striking visual representation of the tantalizing association and serves as a captivating catalyst for further deliberation on the Shane Effect and its enigmatic resonance with criminal behavior.

In conclusion, the scorching insights gleaned from this investigation prompt us to rekindle our curiosity about the interplay of nomenclature and criminal activities, paving the way for future explorations into the fiery allure of the first name Shane and its potential to shape the fiery landscape of arson in Georgia.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Shane and Arson in Georgia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Shane Effect: Shaping the Spectrum of Arson in Georgia

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the extraordinary world of nomenclature and criminal mischief, exploring the curious correlation between the popularity of the first name Shane and incidents of arson in the state of Georgia. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we embarked on a statistical escapade to uncover the potential link between Shane and flame.

Our research team unearthed a remarkably strong positive association, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9675130 and a compelling p-value less than 0.01, spanning the years 1985 to 2022. The findings lead to sizzling insights, suggesting an intriguing resonance between the prevalence of the name Shane and the propensity for fiery felonies in Georgia.

With these scorching results, we challenge the scholarly community to ponder whether Shane's popularity ignites a fiery passion for arson or if it merely sets the stage for coincidental conflagrations. This research ignites a flame of curiosity, highlighting the need for further exploration of the Shane Effect and its incendiary influence on criminal behavior.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Smith (2008) first investigated the potential connections between first names and criminal behavior, focusing on the prevalence of monikers among perpetrators of various felonies. Meanwhile, Doe (2015) delved into the impact of societal trends and naming conventions on individuals’ psychological development, offering compelling insights into the subtle influences exerted by nomenclature. Expanding on this line of inquiry, Jones (2020) explored the relationship between popular names and regional variations in crime rates, shedding light on the nuanced interplay between nomenclature and criminal tendencies.
In "The Name Game: Unraveling the Mysteries of Monikers," the authors delve into the intricate web of nomenclature and its potential ramifications on behavioral proclivities. This illuminating work provides a comprehensive overview of the social and psychological dynamics underlying the selection and impact of names, offering tantalizing prospects for the exploration of unconventional name-behavior connections. Furthermore, "Labels and Lawlessness: A Sociocultural Analysis" by the same author, ventures into the darker undercurrents of nomenclature, teasing apart the tangled nuances that underlie the relationship between names and criminal activities.
On the fictional front, "Inferno Infatuation: A Tale of Fire and Folly" by Blaze Writer captures the enthralling allure of flames and the human propensity for incendiary action. This dramatic tale weaves a narrative tapestry of intrigue, arson, and the enigmatic allure of the name Shane, evoking a dizzying dance of mystery and mischief. Conversely, "Sparks and Spunk: The Adventures of Shane the Firestarter" by Ember Enthusiast, offers a lighthearted exploration of the energetic escapades of a protagonist with an insatiable passion for flames, blending humor and hinting at the potential inspirations for fiery inclinations.
In a research-adjacent endeavor, the TV shows "Firestarter Frenzy" and "Blazing Beauties: Tales of Arson and Intrigue" present captivating narratives that explore the captivating world of fires and the enigmatic allure of those named Shane. These shows present an array of characters and scenarios that paint a vivid portrait of the potential interplay between nomenclature and incendiary inclinations, providing a tapestry of inspiration for further explorations in this field.
As the literature demonstrates, the complex interplay between nomenclature and criminal behavior offers a rich tapestry of possibilities and provocations. While the initial studies may have been rooted in earnest inquiry, it is essential to approach the topic with a hint of humor and a spark of curiosity to illuminate the enigmatic nexus between Shane and the incendiary undercurrents of arson in Georgia.

[[RESULTS]]
The scorching inquiry into the correlation between the prevalence of the first name Shane and incidents of arson in Georgia yielded a remarkably strong positive association. The correlation coefficient of 0.9675130 illuminated a tantalizing connection that beckons the scholarly community to gaze into the fiery depths of statistical intrigue. The findings of this study suggest that the popularity of the name Shane may hold an unexpected influence over the proclivity for pyromania in the state of Georgia.
The r-squared value of 0.9360814 further bolsters the robustness of this association, highlighting the captivation of the first name Shane in the constellation of arson in Georgia. The results of this investigation stand as a beacon, heralding the emergence of a captivating relationship between nomenclature and criminal mischief and igniting a spirited quest for further exploration.
The compelling p-value, less than 0.01, adds fuel to the fire of statistical significance, underscoring the resounding impact of the Shane Effect on the spectrum of arson in Georgia. This glowing endorsement of the connection between Shane and flames raises thought-provoking questions about the potential influence of names on criminal behavior and invites contemplation on the underlying mechanisms that may fuel this incendiary relationship.
The single figure included in this study is a scatterplot, depicted as Figure 1, which visually portrays the robust correlation between the prevalence of the first name Shane and incidents of arson in Georgia. The figure provides a striking visual representation of the tantalizing association and serves as a captivating catalyst for further deliberation on the Shane Effect and its enigmatic resonance with criminal behavior.
In conclusion, the scorching insights gleaned from this investigation prompt us to rekindle our curiosity about the interplay of nomenclature and criminal activities, paving the way for future explorations into the fiery allure of the first name Shane and its potential to shape the fiery landscape of arson in Georgia.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of this scorching investigation into the connection between the popularity of the first name Shane and incidents of arson in Georgia have ignited a spirited debate on the potential influence of nomenclature on criminal behavior. Our findings not only add fuel to the fire of existing research but also provide a compelling validation of prior studies exploring the complex interplay between names and criminal inclinations.

Firstly, our results corroborate the pioneering work of Smith (2008), who initially delved into the potential connections between first names and criminal behavior. While the idea of a name shaping criminal propensities may initially seem as improbable as a fire-breathing dragon, our findings suggest a robust association between the prevalence of the name Shane and the fiery felonies in the state of Georgia. This supports Smith's early speculations and sets the stage for a deeper exploration of the Shane Effect on the spectrum of arson.

Furthermore, our results align with the intriguing insights offered by Doe (2015), shedding light on the subtle influences exerted by nomenclature. The compelling positive association between the popularity of the name Shane and the propensity for arson in Georgia offers a tantalizing glimpse into the potential impacts of naming conventions on criminal tendencies. Truly, the flames of statistical significance illuminate the path toward understanding the intricate dynamics at play, as described by Doe, and affirm the relevance of societal trends and naming conventions in shaping behavioral proclivities.

In addition, our findings mirror the thought-provoking exploration by Jones (2020) into the relationship between popular names and regional variations in crime rates. The scorching insights gleaned from our investigation raise thought-provoking questions about the potential influence of names on criminal behavior, echoing the nuanced interplay highlighted by Jones. Our results reignite the fiery curiosity surrounding the enigmatic nexus between nomenclature and criminal inclinations, inviting further contemplation on the underlying mechanisms that fuel this incendiary relationship, as elucidated by Jones.

The emergence of a robust correlation between the prevalence of the first name Shane and incidents of arson in Georgia, as evidenced by our findings, bolsters the existing literature and kindles a burning desire for additional inquiries into the Shane Effect and its potential to shape the fiery landscape of arson. Our research has paved the way for a more incisive exploration of the interplay between nomenclature and criminal activities, casting a radiant spotlight on the captivating world of names and their unforeseen influences on behavior.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Shane and Arson in Georgia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Shane Effect: Shaping the Spectrum of Arson in Georgia

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the extraordinary world of nomenclature and criminal mischief, exploring the curious correlation between the popularity of the first name Shane and incidents of arson in the state of Georgia. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we embarked on a statistical escapade to uncover the potential link between Shane and flame.

Our research team unearthed a remarkably strong positive association, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9675130 and a compelling p-value less than 0.01, spanning the years 1985 to 2022. The findings lead to sizzling insights, suggesting an intriguing resonance between the prevalence of the name Shane and the propensity for fiery felonies in Georgia.

With these scorching results, we challenge the scholarly community to ponder whether Shane's popularity ignites a fiery passion for arson or if it merely sets the stage for coincidental conflagrations. This research ignites a flame of curiosity, highlighting the need for further exploration of the Shane Effect and its incendiary influence on criminal behavior.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The field of criminology has long been fascinated with identifying the myriad factors that contribute to criminal behavior. From socioeconomic status to psychological predispositions, researchers have tirelessly sought to unravel the tangled web of influences that drive individuals to engage in illicit activities. However, amidst this labyrinth of causation, one peculiar and often overlooked variable has emerged from the shadows – the first name "Shane."
In this paper, we embark on an ardent quest to explore the enigmatic connection between the popularity of the first name Shane and the incidence of arson in the charming state of Georgia. While the idea may initially kindle skepticism, our preliminary investigation has uncovered a promising avenue for inquiry into this seemingly innocuous moniker and its potential combustion with criminal propensity.
Popularity has a certain allure, as evident from the cult-like following of certain trends, memes, and even baby names. Could it be that the name Shane, with its melodic brevity and charismatic charm, holds a formidable sway over the subconscious minds of its bearers, manifesting in an unexpected penchant for pyromania? Or is this correlation merely an auspicious alignment of statistical coincidence, akin to a fortuitous alignment of stars in a fiery constellation?
Our inquiry into this uncharted territory is spurred by the intriguing findings of a substantiated correlation coefficient of 0.9675130, accompanied by a p-value as compelling as the allure of a resonant bonfire – less than 0.01. The time period under scrutiny spans the years from 1985 to 2022, capturing the ebb and flow of Shane's popularity and its entwining with the patterns of arson in Georgia. The scorching insights derived from this analysis beckon us towards a deeper understanding of the Shane Effect, prompting us to question the incendiary undercurrents that lie beneath the seemingly innocuous surface of a name.
As we traverse this uncharted terrain with the torch of statistical rigor illuminating our path, we invite the scholarly community to join us in pondering the perplexing question: does the name Shane stoke the flames of arson, or does it stand as a hapless bystander in the conflagration of causation, a mere statistical casualty caught in the blaze of correlation?
This study endeavors to ignite a spark of curiosity and foster a flame of contemplation, compelling further inquiry into the Shane Effect and its potential to illuminate the hidden tinderbox of influences that shape criminal behavior.

[[RESULTS]]
The scorching inquiry into the correlation between the prevalence of the first name Shane and incidents of arson in Georgia yielded a remarkably strong positive association. The correlation coefficient of 0.9675130 illuminated a tantalizing connection that beckons the scholarly community to gaze into the fiery depths of statistical intrigue. The findings of this study suggest that the popularity of the name Shane may hold an unexpected influence over the proclivity for pyromania in the state of Georgia.
The r-squared value of 0.9360814 further bolsters the robustness of this association, highlighting the captivation of the first name Shane in the constellation of arson in Georgia. The results of this investigation stand as a beacon, heralding the emergence of a captivating relationship between nomenclature and criminal mischief and igniting a spirited quest for further exploration.
The compelling p-value, less than 0.01, adds fuel to the fire of statistical significance, underscoring the resounding impact of the Shane Effect on the spectrum of arson in Georgia. This glowing endorsement of the connection between Shane and flames raises thought-provoking questions about the potential influence of names on criminal behavior and invites contemplation on the underlying mechanisms that may fuel this incendiary relationship.
The single figure included in this study is a scatterplot, depicted as Figure 1, which visually portrays the robust correlation between the prevalence of the first name Shane and incidents of arson in Georgia. The figure provides a striking visual representation of the tantalizing association and serves as a captivating catalyst for further deliberation on the Shane Effect and its enigmatic resonance with criminal behavior.
In conclusion, the scorching insights gleaned from this investigation prompt us to rekindle our curiosity about the interplay of nomenclature and criminal activities, paving the way for future explorations into the fiery allure of the first name Shane and its potential to shape the fiery landscape of arson in Georgia.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In culmination, our incendiary exploration into the enthralling nexus of the first name Shane and arson in Georgia has illuminated a remarkable correlation that sets the statistical landscape ablaze. With a scorching correlation coefficient of 0.9675130 and a p-value that glows brighter than a blazing bonfire, our findings scintillate with certainty in showcasing the tantalizing connection between Shane and flames.

The r-squared value of 0.9360814 further bolsters the robustness of this association, leaving no ember of doubt about the captivating influence of the name Shane on the fiery spectrum of arson in Georgia. The scorching insights derived from this study gesture toward a captivating relationship that beckons the scholarly community to dive deeper into the perplexing question: does Shane spark the penchant for pyromania, or are we merely witnessing a statistical conflagration that ignites our theories?

Our solitary figure, the luminous scatterplot adorning Figure 1, visually encapsulates the mesmerizing rapport between the prevalence of the name Shane and the incidents of arson in Georgia, serving as a blazing beacon for further contemplation and curiosity.

In reflection, this research kindles a spirited quest for understanding the enigmatic Shane Effect and its potential to inflame criminal proclivities. However, given the scorching nature of our findings, we confidently assert that no further research in this domain is warranted. After all, we have already sparked quite the inferno of inquiry with our statistical revelations!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Shane Effect: Shaping the Spectrum of Arson in Georgia. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Deviant Behavior Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Shane Effect: Shaping the Spectrum of Arson in Georgia. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Foundation for Advancement in Pyrokinetic Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Shane Effect: Shaping the Spectrum of Arson in Georgia with an abstract of This study delves into the extraordinary world of nomenclature and criminal mischief, exploring the curious correlation between the popularity of the first name Shane and incidents of arson in the state of Georgia. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we embarked on a statistical escapade to uncover the potential link between Shane and flame.
Our research team unearthed a remarkably strong positive association, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9675130 and a compelling p-value less than 0.01, spanning the years 1985 to 2022. The findings lead to sizzling insights, suggesting an intriguing resonance between the prevalence of the name Shane and the propensity for fiery felonies in Georgia.
With these scorching results, we challenge the scholarly community to ponder whether Shane's popularity ignites a fiery passion for arson or if it merely sets the stage for coincidental conflagrations. This research ignites a flame of curiosity, highlighting the need for further exploration of the Shane Effect and its incendiary influence on criminal behavior.

ChatGPT:

Shane, arson, Georgia, nomenclature, criminal mischief, correlation, US Social Security Administration, FBI CJIS, statistical analysis, correlation coefficient, p-value, 1985-2022, felony, scholarly community, criminal behavior.

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Shane
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Shane
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Shane

Arson in Georgia
Detailed data title: The arson rate per 100,000 residents in Georgia
Source: FBI Criminal Justice Information Services
See what else correlates with Arson in Georgia

Correlation r = 0.9675130 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9360814 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 93.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Arson in Georgia) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Shane) over the 38 years from 1985 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.3E-23. 0.0000000000000000000000432143
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.97 in 4.3E-21% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 23,140,488,218,020,421,828,608 random variables You don't actually need 23 sextillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 37 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 37 because we have two variables measured over a period of 38 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.94, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19851986198719881989199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Popularity of the first name Shane (Babies born)46365010538252344922534451964910449841393687353933523204328233023143306628362510249223052275233621641899166814971409131412311084933889746578615589
Arson in Georgia (Arson rate)20.127.326.925.827.525.627.124.623.121.322.422.516.81714.615.315.416.415.214.3161516.616.813.812.312.612.511.210.58.610.58.97.66.16.46.96.6




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([4636,5010,5382,5234,4922,5344,5196,4910,4498,4139,3687,3539,3352,3204,3282,3302,3143,3066,2836,2510,2492,2305,2275,2336,2164,1899,1668,1497,1409,1314,1231,1084,933,889,746,578,615,589,])
array_2 = np.array([20.1,27.3,26.9,25.8,27.5,25.6,27.1,24.6,23.1,21.3,22.4,22.5,16.8,17,14.6,15.3,15.4,16.4,15.2,14.3,16,15,16.6,16.8,13.8,12.3,12.6,12.5,11.2,10.5,8.6,10.5,8.9,7.6,6.1,6.4,6.9,6.6,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Shane"
array_2_name = "Arson in Georgia"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're a rater extraordinaire!


Correlation ID: 4238 · Black Variable ID: 2181 · Red Variable ID: 20081
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0