about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,228 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in corn grown in South Dakota and the second variable is The number of correctional officers and jailers in South Dakota.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The corn started exhibiting stalky behavior, leading to a rise in kernel delinquency. It seems the GMOs were just adding a-maize-ing levels of resistibility! The increase in correctional officers and jailers was simply a-llama-nting. Corny as it may sound, it's a-maize-ing what can happen in the husk of time.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a South Dakota cornfield where genetically modified corn grows tall and strong. The scene should show determined resistance as the stalks stand their ground. Among the rows, kernels misbehave, breaking free from the ears and causing a commotion. Additionally, depict South Dakota correctional facilities with additional officers and jailers hurriedly responding to the growing unrest, noticeably focused on maintaining order in the face of unexpected disturbances. Both scenes should illustrate a pushback against unruliness - the GM corn's surprising resilience and the increase in officers reflecting the need for control. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in corn grown in South Dakota and The number of correctional officers and jailers in South Dakota. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cute 2D animation Futuristic Futuristic Parallax art A scene from Skyrim
ChatGPT: A scene from Skyrim

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in corn grown in South Dakota and The number of correctional officers and jailers in South Dakota, in the following situation: The corn started exhibiting stalky behavior, leading to a rise in kernel delinquency. It seems the GMOs were just adding a-maize-ing levels of resistibility! The increase in correctional officers and jailers was simply a-llama-nting. Corny as it may sound, it's a-maize-ing what can happen in the husk of time.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a South Dakota cornfield, genetically modified corn grows tall and strong. The stalks display a determined resistance, almost as if they're standing their ground. Among the rows, kernels seem to misbehave, breaking free from the ears and causing a bit of a commotion. Meanwhile, in South Dakota's correctional facilities, additional officers and jailers hurriedly respond to the growing unrest. Their presence is noticeable and their efforts are focused on maintaining order. Both scenes illustrate a pushback against unruliness - in the cornfield, the GM corn shows surprising resilience, while the increase in correctional officers and jailers highlights the need for control in the face of unexpected disturbances.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A scene from Skyrim ] and depicting this scene: In a South Dakota cornfield, genetically modified corn grows tall and strong. The stalks display a determined resistance, almost as if they're standing their ground. Among the rows, kernels seem to misbehave, breaking free from the ears and causing a bit of a commotion. Meanwhile, in South Dakota's correctional facilities, additional officers and jailers hurriedly respond to the growing unrest. Their presence is noticeable and their efforts are focused on maintaining order. Both scenes illustrate a pushback against unruliness - in the cornfield, the GM corn shows surprising resilience, while the increase in correctional officers and jailers highlights the need for control in the face of unexpected disturbances. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a South Dakota cornfield where genetically modified corn grows tall and strong. The scene should show determined resistance as the stalks stand their ground. Among the rows, kernels misbehave, breaking free from the ears and causing a commotion. Additionally, depict South Dakota correctional facilities with additional officers and jailers hurriedly responding to the growing unrest, noticeably focused on maintaining order in the face of unexpected disturbances. Both scenes should illustrate a pushback against unruliness - the GM corn's surprising resilience and the increase in officers reflecting the need for control.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in corn grown in South Dakota caused The number of correctional officers and jailers in South Dakota to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Stalk-ing the Connection: GMO Corn and the Corn-nectional Officers

The Journal of Genetically Modified Organisms and Agricultural Connections

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in South Dakota and The number of correctional officers and jailers in South Dakota. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from USDA and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9221169 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Stalk-ing the Connection: GMO Corn and the Corn-nectional Officers"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the potential link between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in South Dakota and the number of correctional officers and jailers in the same area. Utilizing data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team conducted a thorough analysis covering the period from 2003 to 2022. The analysis yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9221169 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant relationship between the variables. Despite the serious nature of the topic, the findings of this study may "corn-fuse" some, as it sheds light on a rather unexpected association between agricultural practices and law enforcement personnel. This paper aims to stimulate further discussions and research in the field of crop-based criminology.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in South Dakota and The number of correctional officers and jailers in South Dakota. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Stalk-ing the Connection: GMO Corn and the Corn-nectional Officers"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the potential link between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in South Dakota and the number of correctional officers and jailers in the same area. Utilizing data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team conducted a thorough analysis covering the period from 2003 to 2022. The analysis yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9221169 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant relationship between the variables. Despite the serious nature of the topic, the findings of this study may "corn-fuse" some, as it sheds light on a rather unexpected association between agricultural practices and law enforcement personnel. This paper aims to stimulate further discussions and research in the field of crop-based criminology.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) have been the subject of fervent debate and intense scrutiny for decades, yet their connection to the number of correctional officers and jailers in South Dakota has been largely overlooked. In this paper, we delve into the "stalky" world of GMO corn and its potential impact on the staffing levels of law enforcement in the Cornhusker State. The relationship between agriculture and crime may seem as improbable as a kernel of corn sprouting into a towering stalk overnight, but our analysis uncovers a statistically significant correlation that cannot be brushed aside like errant husks on a harvest day.

While the topic at hand may initially appear as obscure as a cobweb-covered cornstalk in the dead of winter, the findings of this study have the potential to "ear" up the field of criminology and agricultural economics. By embracing the statistical maze that leads us from the cornfields to the correctional facilities, we are led to consider the possibility that the very corn grown in South Dakota may be exerting an influence on the availability of those responsible for maintaining law and order. This unexpected connection could "corn-fuse" even the most seasoned researchers, challenging our preconceived notions about the factors that shape the labor force and social order.

Through a rigorous, data-driven approach, we aim to peel back the layers of this seemingly incongruous relationship and sow the seeds for further exploration of agricultural influences on crime and law enforcement. As we embark on this endeavor, we must remain cognizant of the "kernels" of truth buried within the vast fields of data, ready to be harvested by those willing to sift through the statistical chaff.

In the ensuing sections of this paper, we will plow through the methodological details and findings that have germinated from our analysis, shedding light on the surprisingly fertile ground linking GMO corn cultivation and the presence of correctional officers and jailers in South Dakota. Prepare to cultivate a newfound appreciation for the interconnectedness of agribusiness and law enforcement as we embark on this "ear"-resistible journey into the world of corn-nectional officers.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in South Dakota and The number of correctional officers and jailers in South Dakota. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Stalk-ing the Connection: GMO Corn and the Corn-nectional Officers"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the potential link between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in South Dakota and the number of correctional officers and jailers in the same area. Utilizing data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team conducted a thorough analysis covering the period from 2003 to 2022. The analysis yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9221169 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant relationship between the variables. Despite the serious nature of the topic, the findings of this study may "corn-fuse" some, as it sheds light on a rather unexpected association between agricultural practices and law enforcement personnel. This paper aims to stimulate further discussions and research in the field of crop-based criminology.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) have been the subject of fervent debate and intense scrutiny for decades, yet their connection to the number of correctional officers and jailers in South Dakota has been largely overlooked. In this paper, we delve into the "stalky" world of GMO corn and its potential impact on the staffing levels of law enforcement in the Cornhusker State. The relationship between agriculture and crime may seem as improbable as a kernel of corn sprouting into a towering stalk overnight, but our analysis uncovers a statistically significant correlation that cannot be brushed aside like errant husks on a harvest day.
While the topic at hand may initially appear as obscure as a cobweb-covered cornstalk in the dead of winter, the findings of this study have the potential to "ear" up the field of criminology and agricultural economics. By embracing the statistical maze that leads us from the cornfields to the correctional facilities, we are led to consider the possibility that the very corn grown in South Dakota may be exerting an influence on the availability of those responsible for maintaining law and order. This unexpected connection could "corn-fuse" even the most seasoned researchers, challenging our preconceived notions about the factors that shape the labor force and social order.
Through a rigorous, data-driven approach, we aim to peel back the layers of this seemingly incongruous relationship and sow the seeds for further exploration of agricultural influences on crime and law enforcement. As we embark on this endeavor, we must remain cognizant of the "kernels" of truth buried within the vast fields of data, ready to be harvested by those willing to sift through the statistical chaff.
In the ensuing sections of this paper, we will plow through the methodological details and findings that have germinated from our analysis, shedding light on the surprisingly fertile ground linking GMO corn cultivation and the presence of correctional officers and jailers in South Dakota. Prepare to cultivate a newfound appreciation for the interconnectedness of agribusiness and law enforcement as we embark on this "ear"-resistible journey into the world of corn-nectional officers.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Previous research has laid the groundwork for our investigation into the potential connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in South Dakota and the employment levels of correctional officers and jailers in the same region. Smith et al. (2015) have examined the agricultural practices of corn cultivation, while Doe and Jones (2018) have explored the staffing dynamics of law enforcement agencies in rural areas. Building upon this foundation, our study aims to shed light on the unexpected relationship between these seemingly disparate fields.

While our inquiry may appear as unconventional as a GMO-modified, glow-in-the-dark ear of corn, the literature is not devoid of relevant discussions. In "The Corn Identity: Unraveling the Enigma of GMOs" by Green Thumb (2020), the author delves into the complexities of genetically engineered crops, providing a comprehensive overview of the agricultural landscape. Furthermore, "Field of Genes: A Tale of Agricultural Alchemy" by Agri-Wizard (2019) offers insights into the societal impact of GMO cultivation, touching upon the underexplored intersection with law enforcement.

However, the literary landscape extends beyond non-fiction works, venturing into the realm of fiction that may hold kernels of truth, albeit in a more metaphorical sense. The dystopian novel "Brave New Stalk" by Aldous Cornley (1932) presents a speculative vision of a world shaped by genetic engineering and its unforeseen consequences, much like the potential ramifications of GMO corn cultivation on the criminal justice system. Similarly, "The Maze Corrunner" by Cornelia Funke (2005) weaves a tale of mystery and discovery within the confines of a cornfield, drawing parallels to the labyrinthine quest to unravel the connection between agriculture and law enforcement.

In addition, popular board games such as "Agricola" and "Harvest Island" might offer indirect inspiration for our exploratory study, as they simulate agricultural management and resource allocation, providing an analogous framework for understanding the intricate relationship between corn production and the staffing levels of correctional facilities.

Thus, our literature review unveils a diverse tapestry of scholarly works and creative endeavors that encapsulate the breadth and depth of the discourse surrounding GMO corn and its potential influence on the presence of correctional officers and jailers in South Dakota. As we proceed to analyze the empirical findings, it becomes evident that the corn-nectional officers' saga unfolds in a domain as rich and varied as the golden fields of the Midwest.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in South Dakota and The number of correctional officers and jailers in South Dakota. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2003 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Stalk-ing the Connection: GMO Corn and the Corn-nectional Officers"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the potential link between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in South Dakota and the number of correctional officers and jailers in the same area. Utilizing data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team conducted a thorough analysis covering the period from 2003 to 2022. The analysis yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9221169 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant relationship between the variables. Despite the serious nature of the topic, the findings of this study may "corn-fuse" some, as it sheds light on a rather unexpected association between agricultural practices and law enforcement personnel. This paper aims to stimulate further discussions and research in the field of crop-based criminology.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) have been the subject of fervent debate and intense scrutiny for decades, yet their connection to the number of correctional officers and jailers in South Dakota has been largely overlooked. In this paper, we delve into the "stalky" world of GMO corn and its potential impact on the staffing levels of law enforcement in the Cornhusker State. The relationship between agriculture and crime may seem as improbable as a kernel of corn sprouting into a towering stalk overnight, but our analysis uncovers a statistically significant correlation that cannot be brushed aside like errant husks on a harvest day.
While the topic at hand may initially appear as obscure as a cobweb-covered cornstalk in the dead of winter, the findings of this study have the potential to "ear" up the field of criminology and agricultural economics. By embracing the statistical maze that leads us from the cornfields to the correctional facilities, we are led to consider the possibility that the very corn grown in South Dakota may be exerting an influence on the availability of those responsible for maintaining law and order. This unexpected connection could "corn-fuse" even the most seasoned researchers, challenging our preconceived notions about the factors that shape the labor force and social order.
Through a rigorous, data-driven approach, we aim to peel back the layers of this seemingly incongruous relationship and sow the seeds for further exploration of agricultural influences on crime and law enforcement. As we embark on this endeavor, we must remain cognizant of the "kernels" of truth buried within the vast fields of data, ready to be harvested by those willing to sift through the statistical chaff.
In the ensuing sections of this paper, we will plow through the methodological details and findings that have germinated from our analysis, shedding light on the surprisingly fertile ground linking GMO corn cultivation and the presence of correctional officers and jailers in South Dakota. Prepare to cultivate a newfound appreciation for the interconnectedness of agribusiness and law enforcement as we embark on this "ear"-resistible journey into the world of corn-nectional officers.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Data Acquisition:
The research team harvested an extensive dataset from the fields of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, culminating in a bountiful yield of information spanning the years 2003 to 2022. The cornucopia of data sources provided a robust foundation for our analysis, allowing us to navigate the intricate web of statistical relationships with the precision of a seasoned farmer tending to rows of genetically modified corn.

Variable Selection:
The variables under scrutiny included the utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in South Dakota and the fluctuating population of correctional officers and jailers within the same geographical domain. The choice of these variables stemmed from the recognition of their potential to "kernal"-late a narrative of interconnection that transcends the boundaries of traditional agricultural and law enforcement paradigms. With keen precision, we aimed to juxtapose the growth of GMO corn with the staffing levels in correctional facilities, plowing through the furrows of data to uncover any latent associations.

Statistical Analysis:
Employing a diverse array of statistical tools and methods, including but not limited to regression analysis, correlation tests, and time series modeling, our research team sought to distill the essence of the interplay between GMO corn production and the cadre of correctional officers and jailers. Like alchemists transmuting base elements into gold, we meticulously crafted regression models to delineate the potency of the relationship, bearing in mind the imperative to account for confounding variables that could "stalk" our findings with spurious inferences.

Control Measures:
To mitigate the potential influence of extraneous factors on the relationship under investigation, robust control measures were instituted to weed out any spurious correlations that might have spouted amidst the fertile soil of our data. These measures, akin to agricultural pesticides safeguarding precious crops, served to fortify the internal validity of our analysis, ensuring that the observed associations were not merely errant weeds masquerading as significant insights.

Validation and Sensitivity Analysis:
Validation of our findings was meticulously executed through sensitivity analyses and robustness checks, akin to subjecting a particularly mesmerizing corn maze to the scrutiny of multiple keen-eyed navigators. Sensitivity analyses provided a means to gauge the stability of our results in the face of potential data perturbations, reinforcing the robustness of our conclusions beyond a shadow of statistical doubt.

Ethical Considerations:
As custodians of scientific inquiry, ethical considerations permeated every facet of our research endeavor. Ensuring the confidentiality and anonymity of the data sources, as ethically imperative as safeguarding the sanctity of the farmer's faithful old scarecrow, was of paramount importance in upholding the integrity of our investigation.

Through the multifaceted application of these methodological tenets, our research team endeavored to cultivate a comprehensive understanding of the "corn-nection" between GMO corn production and the presence of correctional officers and jailers in South Dakota, reaping a harvest of insights that may compel scholars to ponder the uncharted dimensions of agricultural influence on law enforcement dynamics.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in South Dakota and The number of correctional officers and jailers in South Dakota. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2003 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9221169, r-squared of 0.8502995, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Stalk-ing the Connection: GMO Corn and the Corn-nectional Officers"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the potential link between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in South Dakota and the number of correctional officers and jailers in the same area. Utilizing data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team conducted a thorough analysis covering the period from 2003 to 2022. The analysis yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9221169 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant relationship between the variables. Despite the serious nature of the topic, the findings of this study may "corn-fuse" some, as it sheds light on a rather unexpected association between agricultural practices and law enforcement personnel. This paper aims to stimulate further discussions and research in the field of crop-based criminology.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) have been the subject of fervent debate and intense scrutiny for decades, yet their connection to the number of correctional officers and jailers in South Dakota has been largely overlooked. In this paper, we delve into the "stalky" world of GMO corn and its potential impact on the staffing levels of law enforcement in the Cornhusker State. The relationship between agriculture and crime may seem as improbable as a kernel of corn sprouting into a towering stalk overnight, but our analysis uncovers a statistically significant correlation that cannot be brushed aside like errant husks on a harvest day.
While the topic at hand may initially appear as obscure as a cobweb-covered cornstalk in the dead of winter, the findings of this study have the potential to "ear" up the field of criminology and agricultural economics. By embracing the statistical maze that leads us from the cornfields to the correctional facilities, we are led to consider the possibility that the very corn grown in South Dakota may be exerting an influence on the availability of those responsible for maintaining law and order. This unexpected connection could "corn-fuse" even the most seasoned researchers, challenging our preconceived notions about the factors that shape the labor force and social order.
Through a rigorous, data-driven approach, we aim to peel back the layers of this seemingly incongruous relationship and sow the seeds for further exploration of agricultural influences on crime and law enforcement. As we embark on this endeavor, we must remain cognizant of the "kernels" of truth buried within the vast fields of data, ready to be harvested by those willing to sift through the statistical chaff.
In the ensuing sections of this paper, we will plow through the methodological details and findings that have germinated from our analysis, shedding light on the surprisingly fertile ground linking GMO corn cultivation and the presence of correctional officers and jailers in South Dakota. Prepare to cultivate a newfound appreciation for the interconnectedness of agribusiness and law enforcement as we embark on this "ear"-resistible journey into the world of corn-nectional officers.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in South Dakota and the number of correctional officers and jailers in the same region yielded intriguing results. The correlation coefficient of 0.9221169 points to a strong positive relationship between the variables, indicating that as the use of GMO corn increased, so did the number of personnel involved in correctional facilities. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.8502995 further underscores the robustness of this association, explaining approximately 85% of the variation in the number of correctional officers and jailers based on the use of GMO corn.

The statistical significance of this relationship, with a p-value of less than 0.01, adds weight to the findings, suggesting that the observed correlation is unlikely to have occurred purely by chance. This surprising connection between agricultural practices and the staffing levels of law enforcement facilities may "corn-fuse" some, challenging traditional notions of causality and offering a "stalk-ing" revelation in the realm of criminology and agricultural economics.

A scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually illustrates the strong positive correlation between the use of GMO corn and the number of correctional officers and jailers in South Dakota, providing a striking visual representation of the unexpected interconnectedness of these seemingly disparate variables.

The robustness of the statistical findings invites further exploration and discourse in the field of crop-based criminology and underscores the importance of considering unconventional factors in shaping labor markets and social dynamics. The "corn-nection" between GMO corn and correctional officers invites a deeper delve into the complex interactions between agricultural practices and law enforcement. These findings serve as a kernel of insight in the vast cornfield of criminological inquiry, offering a fresh perspective and sowing the seeds for future research endeavors.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in South Dakota and The number of correctional officers and jailers in South Dakota. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Stalk-ing the Connection: GMO Corn and the Corn-nectional Officers"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the potential link between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in South Dakota and the number of correctional officers and jailers in the same area. Utilizing data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team conducted a thorough analysis covering the period from 2003 to 2022. The analysis yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9221169 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant relationship between the variables. Despite the serious nature of the topic, the findings of this study may "corn-fuse" some, as it sheds light on a rather unexpected association between agricultural practices and law enforcement personnel. This paper aims to stimulate further discussions and research in the field of crop-based criminology.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Previous research has laid the groundwork for our investigation into the potential connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in South Dakota and the employment levels of correctional officers and jailers in the same region. Smith et al. (2015) have examined the agricultural practices of corn cultivation, while Doe and Jones (2018) have explored the staffing dynamics of law enforcement agencies in rural areas. Building upon this foundation, our study aims to shed light on the unexpected relationship between these seemingly disparate fields.
While our inquiry may appear as unconventional as a GMO-modified, glow-in-the-dark ear of corn, the literature is not devoid of relevant discussions. In "The Corn Identity: Unraveling the Enigma of GMOs" by Green Thumb (2020), the author delves into the complexities of genetically engineered crops, providing a comprehensive overview of the agricultural landscape. Furthermore, "Field of Genes: A Tale of Agricultural Alchemy" by Agri-Wizard (2019) offers insights into the societal impact of GMO cultivation, touching upon the underexplored intersection with law enforcement.
However, the literary landscape extends beyond non-fiction works, venturing into the realm of fiction that may hold kernels of truth, albeit in a more metaphorical sense. The dystopian novel "Brave New Stalk" by Aldous Cornley (1932) presents a speculative vision of a world shaped by genetic engineering and its unforeseen consequences, much like the potential ramifications of GMO corn cultivation on the criminal justice system. Similarly, "The Maze Corrunner" by Cornelia Funke (2005) weaves a tale of mystery and discovery within the confines of a cornfield, drawing parallels to the labyrinthine quest to unravel the connection between agriculture and law enforcement.
In addition, popular board games such as "Agricola" and "Harvest Island" might offer indirect inspiration for our exploratory study, as they simulate agricultural management and resource allocation, providing an analogous framework for understanding the intricate relationship between corn production and the staffing levels of correctional facilities.
Thus, our literature review unveils a diverse tapestry of scholarly works and creative endeavors that encapsulate the breadth and depth of the discourse surrounding GMO corn and its potential influence on the presence of correctional officers and jailers in South Dakota. As we proceed to analyze the empirical findings, it becomes evident that the corn-nectional officers' saga unfolds in a domain as rich and varied as the golden fields of the Midwest.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in South Dakota and the number of correctional officers and jailers in the same region yielded intriguing results. The correlation coefficient of 0.9221169 points to a strong positive relationship between the variables, indicating that as the use of GMO corn increased, so did the number of personnel involved in correctional facilities. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.8502995 further underscores the robustness of this association, explaining approximately 85% of the variation in the number of correctional officers and jailers based on the use of GMO corn.
The statistical significance of this relationship, with a p-value of less than 0.01, adds weight to the findings, suggesting that the observed correlation is unlikely to have occurred purely by chance. This surprising connection between agricultural practices and the staffing levels of law enforcement facilities may "corn-fuse" some, challenging traditional notions of causality and offering a "stalk-ing" revelation in the realm of criminology and agricultural economics.
A scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually illustrates the strong positive correlation between the use of GMO corn and the number of correctional officers and jailers in South Dakota, providing a striking visual representation of the unexpected interconnectedness of these seemingly disparate variables.
The robustness of the statistical findings invites further exploration and discourse in the field of crop-based criminology and underscores the importance of considering unconventional factors in shaping labor markets and social dynamics. The "corn-nection" between GMO corn and correctional officers invites a deeper delve into the complex interactions between agricultural practices and law enforcement. These findings serve as a kernel of insight in the vast cornfield of criminological inquiry, offering a fresh perspective and sowing the seeds for future research endeavors.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of the present study support the underlying notion that there exists a statistically significant relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in South Dakota and the number of correctional officers and jailers in the same region. Such a revelation may seem as improbable as a corn cob having ears, yet our findings align with the earlier work of Smith et al. (2015) and Doe and Jones (2018), who laid the groundwork for the exploration of this unexpected nexus. While our findings might have prompted skepticism akin to the skepticism surrounding the existence of "cornspiracies," the robust statistical evidence affirms the existence of this peculiar association.

The correlation coefficient of 0.9221169 and the coefficient of determination of 0.8502995, both indicating a strong positive relationship between the variables, are as clear as day, or shall we say, as clear as the sunny fields of South Dakota. This statistical robustness provides a strong foundation for highlighting the connection between agricultural practices and staffing dynamics in correctional facilities, without shucking away from the astonishing implications of our findings.

The literature review, while whimsically alluding to dystopian novels and board games, also provides a scholarly backdrop to the unexpected tangents explored in this study. The metaphorical kernels of truth embedded in fictional works such as "Brave New Stalk" (Cornley, 1932) and "The Maze Corrunner" (Funke, 2005) strangely resonate with the empirical kernels we have unearthed in our analysis. Additionally, the works of Green Thumb (2020) and Agri-Wizard (2019) offer a substantive canvas upon which our study can be situated, ensuring that our research is grounded, much like the roots of a meticulously cultivated cornfield.

Our results, illustrated through the visually striking scatterplot, not only corroborate the previous literature but also open new avenues for discourse and investigation. The unexpected interconnectedness of these variables, as visually depicted in Figure 1, is as clear as the difference between cornmeal and polenta – a subtle distinction, yet one that significantly alters the final outcome.

In essence, our study offers a "stalk-ing" revelation, affirming the significance of unconventional agricultural factors in shaping labor markets and law enforcement dynamics. The "corn-nection" that emerges from our analysis challenges traditional notions of causality, urging scholars to venture into the uncharted terrain of crop-based criminology. These findings, with their unexpected twists and husky charm, serve as a kernel of insight in an otherwise vast field, demonstrating the potential for unearthing unexpected correlations in the rich soil of interdisciplinary research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in South Dakota and The number of correctional officers and jailers in South Dakota. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Stalk-ing the Connection: GMO Corn and the Corn-nectional Officers"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the potential link between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in South Dakota and the number of correctional officers and jailers in the same area. Utilizing data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team conducted a thorough analysis covering the period from 2003 to 2022. The analysis yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9221169 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant relationship between the variables. Despite the serious nature of the topic, the findings of this study may "corn-fuse" some, as it sheds light on a rather unexpected association between agricultural practices and law enforcement personnel. This paper aims to stimulate further discussions and research in the field of crop-based criminology.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) have been the subject of fervent debate and intense scrutiny for decades, yet their connection to the number of correctional officers and jailers in South Dakota has been largely overlooked. In this paper, we delve into the "stalky" world of GMO corn and its potential impact on the staffing levels of law enforcement in the Cornhusker State. The relationship between agriculture and crime may seem as improbable as a kernel of corn sprouting into a towering stalk overnight, but our analysis uncovers a statistically significant correlation that cannot be brushed aside like errant husks on a harvest day.
While the topic at hand may initially appear as obscure as a cobweb-covered cornstalk in the dead of winter, the findings of this study have the potential to "ear" up the field of criminology and agricultural economics. By embracing the statistical maze that leads us from the cornfields to the correctional facilities, we are led to consider the possibility that the very corn grown in South Dakota may be exerting an influence on the availability of those responsible for maintaining law and order. This unexpected connection could "corn-fuse" even the most seasoned researchers, challenging our preconceived notions about the factors that shape the labor force and social order.
Through a rigorous, data-driven approach, we aim to peel back the layers of this seemingly incongruous relationship and sow the seeds for further exploration of agricultural influences on crime and law enforcement. As we embark on this endeavor, we must remain cognizant of the "kernels" of truth buried within the vast fields of data, ready to be harvested by those willing to sift through the statistical chaff.
In the ensuing sections of this paper, we will plow through the methodological details and findings that have germinated from our analysis, shedding light on the surprisingly fertile ground linking GMO corn cultivation and the presence of correctional officers and jailers in South Dakota. Prepare to cultivate a newfound appreciation for the interconnectedness of agribusiness and law enforcement as we embark on this "ear"-resistible journey into the world of corn-nectional officers.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in South Dakota and the number of correctional officers and jailers in the same region yielded intriguing results. The correlation coefficient of 0.9221169 points to a strong positive relationship between the variables, indicating that as the use of GMO corn increased, so did the number of personnel involved in correctional facilities. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.8502995 further underscores the robustness of this association, explaining approximately 85% of the variation in the number of correctional officers and jailers based on the use of GMO corn.
The statistical significance of this relationship, with a p-value of less than 0.01, adds weight to the findings, suggesting that the observed correlation is unlikely to have occurred purely by chance. This surprising connection between agricultural practices and the staffing levels of law enforcement facilities may "corn-fuse" some, challenging traditional notions of causality and offering a "stalk-ing" revelation in the realm of criminology and agricultural economics.
A scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually illustrates the strong positive correlation between the use of GMO corn and the number of correctional officers and jailers in South Dakota, providing a striking visual representation of the unexpected interconnectedness of these seemingly disparate variables.
The robustness of the statistical findings invites further exploration and discourse in the field of crop-based criminology and underscores the importance of considering unconventional factors in shaping labor markets and social dynamics. The "corn-nection" between GMO corn and correctional officers invites a deeper delve into the complex interactions between agricultural practices and law enforcement. These findings serve as a kernel of insight in the vast cornfield of criminological inquiry, offering a fresh perspective and sowing the seeds for future research endeavors.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, the "stalk-ing" results of our investigation have "corn-firmed" a strong positive correlation between the cultivation of GMO corn in South Dakota and the number of correctional officers and jailers in the region. This unexpected relationship serves as a timely reminder that the world of statistical analysis can be as unpredictable as a corn maze in a thunderstorm. While the "ear-resistible" findings of this study may "corn-fuse" some, the robustness of the correlation coefficient and the statistical significance of the relationship cannot be brushed aside like chaff in the wind.

These intriguing results challenge traditional conceptions of causality and offer a "stalk-ing" revelation in the field of crop-based criminology. As we wrap up this "corn-ucopia" of insights, it becomes evident that the influence of agricultural practices on law enforcement staffing provides fertile ground for further exploration. However, it's "corntemptible" to overlook the possibility of other unaccounted variables "popping up" and affecting the observed relationship. Nonetheless, it is safe to say that the findings of this study serve as an important "kernel" of insight in the field, highlighting the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated sectors.

The unexpected connection between GMO corn and correctional officers in South Dakota creates a "kernels" of opportunity for future research endeavors. However, it is our firm belief that the "corn-nection" has been sufficiently highlighted, and there is no need for further research in this specific area. Let's leave this particular "cornfield" to the next generation of researchers to "husk" out.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Stalk-ing the Connection: GMO Corn and the Corn-nectional Officers. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Genetically Modified Organisms and Agricultural Connections


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Stalk-ing the Connection: GMO Corn and the Corn-nectional Officers. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Agricultural Anomalies Research and Study (CAARS)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Stalk-ing the Connection: GMO Corn and the Corn-nectional Officers with an abstract of This research paper investigates the potential link between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in South Dakota and the number of correctional officers and jailers in the same area. Utilizing data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team conducted a thorough analysis covering the period from 2003 to 2022. The analysis yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9221169 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant relationship between the variables. Despite the serious nature of the topic, the findings of this study may "corn-fuse" some, as it sheds light on a rather unexpected association between agricultural practices and law enforcement personnel. This paper aims to stimulate further discussions and research in the field of crop-based criminology.

ChatGPT:

GMO corn, South Dakota, genetically modified organisms, USDA data, Bureau of Labor Statistics, correlation coefficient, p-value, law enforcement personnel, crop-based criminology, agricultural practices, jailers, correctional officers

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in corn grown in South Dakota
Detailed data title: Percent of all corn planted in South Dakota that is genetically modified
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in corn grown in South Dakota

The number of correctional officers and jailers in South Dakota
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of correctional officers and jailers in South Dakota
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of correctional officers and jailers in South Dakota

Correlation r = 0.9221169 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8502995 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 85% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of correctional officers and jailers in South Dakota) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in corn grown in South Dakota) over the 20 years from 2003 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 7.5E-9. 0.0000000075291832346516230000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.92 in 7.5E-7% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 132,816,531 random variables You don't actually need 132 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.81, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
GMO use in corn grown in South Dakota (GMO corn %)7579838693959695969496979798979694959495
The number of correctional officers and jailers in South Dakota (Laborers)9901000113011801220124012701290134013201390140013601350132013301360133014101300




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([75,79,83,86,93,95,96,95,96,94,96,97,97,98,97,96,94,95,94,95,])
array_2 = np.array([990,1000,1130,1180,1220,1240,1270,1290,1340,1320,1390,1400,1360,1350,1320,1330,1360,1330,1410,1300,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in corn grown in South Dakota"
array_2_name = "The number of correctional officers and jailers in South Dakota"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation rating is out of this world!


Correlation ID: 4228 · Black Variable ID: 763 · Red Variable ID: 14276
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0