about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,130 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Buffalo and the second variable is Hydopower energy generated in Denmark.  The chart goes from 1980 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

The decrease in air pollution in Buffalo led to a decrease in wind patterns, which in turn affected the efficiency of wind turbines in Denmark, ultimately reducing hydropower energy generation. Looks like even the smallest emissions can have a big fan-impact! Or perhaps, it's just a lot of hot air traveling overseas!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Create an image that portrays the contrasting impact of reduced air pollution on wind patterns through two scenes: a shrouded and smog-filled skyline of Buffalo, where the cityscape is barely visible due to heavy pollution, and a tranquil Danish coastal landscape with wind turbines spinning at a slower pace than usual due to the lack of wind power. The hazy, polluted skyline and the calm, still waves by the coast should visually capture the impact of reduced air pollution on energy generation. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Buffalo and Hydopower energy generated in Denmark. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Data cyber art An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie Cyberpunk A Discovery magazine cover image Hyper-realistic
ChatGPT: A Discovery magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Buffalo and Hydopower energy generated in Denmark, in the following situation: The decrease in air pollution in Buffalo led to a decrease in wind patterns, which in turn affected the efficiency of wind turbines in Denmark, ultimately reducing hydropower energy generation. Looks like even the smallest emissions can have a big fan-impact! Or perhaps, it's just a lot of hot air traveling overseas!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Buffalo, the city skyline is shrouded in smog, with thick gray clouds lingering over the horizon. The air appears heavy and hazy, and the view is hindered by the pollution. Meanwhile, in Denmark, a series of large wind turbines stand in a vast open landscape by the coast. But instead of catching robust winds, the blades of the turbines turn slowly, showing a lack of wind power. The usually brisk waves of the nearby sea are calm and still. Both scenes depict the impact of reduced air pollution on wind patterns, leading to decreased hydropower energy generation.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In Buffalo, the city skyline is shrouded in smog, with thick gray clouds lingering over the horizon. The air appears heavy and hazy, and the view is hindered by the pollution. Meanwhile, in Denmark, a series of large wind turbines stand in a vast open landscape by the coast. But instead of catching robust winds, the blades of the turbines turn slowly, showing a lack of wind power. The usually brisk waves of the nearby sea are calm and still. Both scenes depict the impact of reduced air pollution on wind patterns, leading to decreased hydropower energy generation. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Create an image that portrays the contrasting impact of reduced air pollution on wind patterns through two scenes: a shrouded and smog-filled skyline of Buffalo, where the cityscape is barely visible due to heavy pollution, and a tranquil Danish coastal landscape with wind turbines spinning at a slower pace than usual due to the lack of wind power. The hazy, polluted skyline and the calm, still waves by the coast should visually capture the impact of reduced air pollution on energy generation.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Air pollution in Buffalo caused Hydopower energy generated in Denmark to decrease. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Air-ly Connection: Exploring the Correlation between Air Pollution in Buffalo and Hydropower Energy Generated in Denmark

The International Journal of Atmospheric Energies

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Buffalo and Hydopower energy generated in Denmark. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8024181 and p < 0.01 for 1980 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Air-ly Connection: Exploring the Correlation between Air Pollution in Buffalo and Hydropower Energy Generated in Denmark

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the intriguing correlation between air pollution levels in Buffalo, New York, and the generation of hydropower energy in Denmark. Through the utilization of environmental data from the Environmental Protection Agency and energy data from the Energy Information Administration, a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8024181 with a statistical significance of p<0.01 was observed for the period spanning from 1980 to 2021. The findings of this investigation shed light on the unexpected intertwining of environmental factors across distant regions, highlighting the potential transboundary impacts of air quality on renewable energy resources. Additionally, this study raises the question of whether air pollution in Buffalo may unknowingly be fueling the hydropower endeavors in Denmark, a whimsical notion with profound implications. Further exploration of this peculiar relationship may yield valuable insights into the interconnectedness of global environmental phenomena.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Buffalo and Hydopower energy generated in Denmark. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Air-ly Connection: Exploring the Correlation between Air Pollution in Buffalo and Hydropower Energy Generated in Denmark

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the intriguing correlation between air pollution levels in Buffalo, New York, and the generation of hydropower energy in Denmark. Through the utilization of environmental data from the Environmental Protection Agency and energy data from the Energy Information Administration, a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8024181 with a statistical significance of p<0.01 was observed for the period spanning from 1980 to 2021. The findings of this investigation shed light on the unexpected intertwining of environmental factors across distant regions, highlighting the potential transboundary impacts of air quality on renewable energy resources. Additionally, this study raises the question of whether air pollution in Buffalo may unknowingly be fueling the hydropower endeavors in Denmark, a whimsical notion with profound implications. Further exploration of this peculiar relationship may yield valuable insights into the interconnectedness of global environmental phenomena.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
The intersection of environmental factors and energy production has long been a subject of keen interest and continued exploration. In this study, we delve into the unexpected and eyebrow-raising correlation between air pollution levels in Buffalo, New York, and the generation of hydropower energy in Denmark. The seemingly disparate locales of Buffalo and Denmark belie a hidden connection, one that challenges conventional wisdom and tickles the fancy of the inquisitive mind. As we embark on this scholarly journey, we aim to unravel the enigmatic relationship between air quality in Buffalo and the hydropower endeavors in Denmark, with the hope of shedding light on the serendipitous intertwining of these seemingly unrelated entities.

The context of this investigation is rife with intrigue, prompting us to ponder the whimsical notion of air pollution in Buffalo surreptitiously fueling the hydropower aspirations in Denmark. This almost farcical scenario, though tinged with a hint of incredulity, beckons us to consider the broader implications of such an improbable connection. Could the winds carrying pollutants from Buffalo be whimsically whispering the secrets of energy generation to the turbines of Denmark? The prospect, though lighthearted in its presentation, invites us to contemplate the profound interplay of environmental phenomena across vast distances, weaving a narrative of connectedness in the tapestry of our global ecosystem.

The gravity of this study's findings is underscored by the statistical robustness of the correlation coefficient, which stands at an impressive 0.8024181 with a statistical significance of p<0.01 for the period spanning from 1980 to 2021. What at first may appear as a flippant pursuit of regional curiosities is firmly grounded in empirical evidence, providing a solid foundation for our examination of this unanticipated correlation. The implications of this correlation extend beyond mere academic curiosity, as they prompt us to contemplate the potential transboundary impacts of air quality on renewable energy resources and the intricate dance of environmental influences across geographic boundaries.

As we navigate through the intricacies of this study, we invite our scholarly counterparts to join us in this vibrant pursuit of knowledge and to share in the wry amusement elicited by the unlikely connection between air pollution in Buffalo and hydropower energy in Denmark. Our exploration seeks not only to enlighten but to entertain, as we unravel the tangled web of environmental factors and their unexpected repercussions on energy production. With a twinkle in our eye and academic rigor in our approach, we embark on this investigation with the hope of uncovering the delightful quirkiness and consequential implications of this air-ly connection.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Buffalo and Hydopower energy generated in Denmark. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Air-ly Connection: Exploring the Correlation between Air Pollution in Buffalo and Hydropower Energy Generated in Denmark

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the intriguing correlation between air pollution levels in Buffalo, New York, and the generation of hydropower energy in Denmark. Through the utilization of environmental data from the Environmental Protection Agency and energy data from the Energy Information Administration, a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8024181 with a statistical significance of p<0.01 was observed for the period spanning from 1980 to 2021. The findings of this investigation shed light on the unexpected intertwining of environmental factors across distant regions, highlighting the potential transboundary impacts of air quality on renewable energy resources. Additionally, this study raises the question of whether air pollution in Buffalo may unknowingly be fueling the hydropower endeavors in Denmark, a whimsical notion with profound implications. Further exploration of this peculiar relationship may yield valuable insights into the interconnectedness of global environmental phenomena.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of environmental factors and energy production has long been a subject of keen interest and continued exploration. In this study, we delve into the unexpected and eyebrow-raising correlation between air pollution levels in Buffalo, New York, and the generation of hydropower energy in Denmark. The seemingly disparate locales of Buffalo and Denmark belie a hidden connection, one that challenges conventional wisdom and tickles the fancy of the inquisitive mind. As we embark on this scholarly journey, we aim to unravel the enigmatic relationship between air quality in Buffalo and the hydropower endeavors in Denmark, with the hope of shedding light on the serendipitous intertwining of these seemingly unrelated entities.
The context of this investigation is rife with intrigue, prompting us to ponder the whimsical notion of air pollution in Buffalo surreptitiously fueling the hydropower aspirations in Denmark. This almost farcical scenario, though tinged with a hint of incredulity, beckons us to consider the broader implications of such an improbable connection. Could the winds carrying pollutants from Buffalo be whimsically whispering the secrets of energy generation to the turbines of Denmark? The prospect, though lighthearted in its presentation, invites us to contemplate the profound interplay of environmental phenomena across vast distances, weaving a narrative of connectedness in the tapestry of our global ecosystem.
The gravity of this study's findings is underscored by the statistical robustness of the correlation coefficient, which stands at an impressive 0.8024181 with a statistical significance of p<0.01 for the period spanning from 1980 to 2021. What at first may appear as a flippant pursuit of regional curiosities is firmly grounded in empirical evidence, providing a solid foundation for our examination of this unanticipated correlation. The implications of this correlation extend beyond mere academic curiosity, as they prompt us to contemplate the potential transboundary impacts of air quality on renewable energy resources and the intricate dance of environmental influences across geographic boundaries.
As we navigate through the intricacies of this study, we invite our scholarly counterparts to join us in this vibrant pursuit of knowledge and to share in the wry amusement elicited by the unlikely connection between air pollution in Buffalo and hydropower energy in Denmark. Our exploration seeks not only to enlighten but to entertain, as we unravel the tangled web of environmental factors and their unexpected repercussions on energy production. With a twinkle in our eye and academic rigor in our approach, we embark on this investigation with the hope of uncovering the delightful quirkiness and consequential implications of this air-ly connection.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Several scholarly works have contributed to the discourse surrounding air pollution and its unforeseen effects on energy generation. In "Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics," Smith and Doe elucidate the complex interactions between air pollutants and climatic processes, offering valuable insights into the potential far-reaching impacts of airborne particles. Similarly, Jones et al., in "Environmental Science and Technology," explore the intricate dynamics of air quality and its intersecting influences on renewable energy resources, laying the groundwork for further investigations in this domain. These rigorous empirical studies set the stage for our examination of the remarkable correlation between air pollution in Buffalo and hydropower energy generation in Denmark.

In our quest for understanding this peculiar linkage, we draw inspiration from non-fiction works such as "The Big Necessity: The Unmentionable World of Human Waste and Why It Matters" by Rose George, which underscores the unexpected connections in environmental systems. Furthermore, "Tales of the Unexpected" by Roald Dahl piques our imagination with its whimsical tales, reminding us of the unexpected twists and turns that can emerge in seemingly unrelated phenomena. Another thought-provoking narrative is "The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle" by Haruki Murakami, which, while not directly related to our study, serves as a poignant reminder of the enigmatic connections that permeate our world.

In considering the potential undercurrents of this correlation, we are prompted to explore the world of board games, specifically "Power Grid," which, although a fictional simulation, provides a playful analogy for the intricate web of energy production and the surprising influences that shape its trajectory. The game "Photosynthesis" also offers a lighthearted perspective on the interplay between environmental factors and energy dynamics, albeit in a simulated setting.

With these eclectic sources as our backdrop, we approach our investigation with a blend of scholarly rigor and lighthearted curiosity, recognizing the multifaceted dimensions of this captivating relationship between air pollution in Buffalo and hydropower energy generation in Denmark. As we delve into the annals of literature, we are mindful of the unexpected gems that may offer glimpses into the improbable yet consequential interplay of these seemingly disparate environmental phenomena.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Buffalo and Hydopower energy generated in Denmark. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 1980 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Air-ly Connection: Exploring the Correlation between Air Pollution in Buffalo and Hydropower Energy Generated in Denmark

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the intriguing correlation between air pollution levels in Buffalo, New York, and the generation of hydropower energy in Denmark. Through the utilization of environmental data from the Environmental Protection Agency and energy data from the Energy Information Administration, a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8024181 with a statistical significance of p<0.01 was observed for the period spanning from 1980 to 2021. The findings of this investigation shed light on the unexpected intertwining of environmental factors across distant regions, highlighting the potential transboundary impacts of air quality on renewable energy resources. Additionally, this study raises the question of whether air pollution in Buffalo may unknowingly be fueling the hydropower endeavors in Denmark, a whimsical notion with profound implications. Further exploration of this peculiar relationship may yield valuable insights into the interconnectedness of global environmental phenomena.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of environmental factors and energy production has long been a subject of keen interest and continued exploration. In this study, we delve into the unexpected and eyebrow-raising correlation between air pollution levels in Buffalo, New York, and the generation of hydropower energy in Denmark. The seemingly disparate locales of Buffalo and Denmark belie a hidden connection, one that challenges conventional wisdom and tickles the fancy of the inquisitive mind. As we embark on this scholarly journey, we aim to unravel the enigmatic relationship between air quality in Buffalo and the hydropower endeavors in Denmark, with the hope of shedding light on the serendipitous intertwining of these seemingly unrelated entities.
The context of this investigation is rife with intrigue, prompting us to ponder the whimsical notion of air pollution in Buffalo surreptitiously fueling the hydropower aspirations in Denmark. This almost farcical scenario, though tinged with a hint of incredulity, beckons us to consider the broader implications of such an improbable connection. Could the winds carrying pollutants from Buffalo be whimsically whispering the secrets of energy generation to the turbines of Denmark? The prospect, though lighthearted in its presentation, invites us to contemplate the profound interplay of environmental phenomena across vast distances, weaving a narrative of connectedness in the tapestry of our global ecosystem.
The gravity of this study's findings is underscored by the statistical robustness of the correlation coefficient, which stands at an impressive 0.8024181 with a statistical significance of p<0.01 for the period spanning from 1980 to 2021. What at first may appear as a flippant pursuit of regional curiosities is firmly grounded in empirical evidence, providing a solid foundation for our examination of this unanticipated correlation. The implications of this correlation extend beyond mere academic curiosity, as they prompt us to contemplate the potential transboundary impacts of air quality on renewable energy resources and the intricate dance of environmental influences across geographic boundaries.
As we navigate through the intricacies of this study, we invite our scholarly counterparts to join us in this vibrant pursuit of knowledge and to share in the wry amusement elicited by the unlikely connection between air pollution in Buffalo and hydropower energy in Denmark. Our exploration seeks not only to enlighten but to entertain, as we unravel the tangled web of environmental factors and their unexpected repercussions on energy production. With a twinkle in our eye and academic rigor in our approach, we embark on this investigation with the hope of uncovering the delightful quirkiness and consequential implications of this air-ly connection.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Data Collection:
The data utilized in this investigation was primarily obtained from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for air pollution levels in Buffalo, New York, and from the Energy Information Administration (EIA) for the hydropower energy generation in Denmark. The data spanned the years 1980 to 2021, capturing a substantial timeframe to discern potential correlations despite the temporal and spatial disparities between the two phenomena.

Quantitative Analysis:
The gathered data underwent meticulous quantitative analysis to ascertain the potential relationship between air pollution in Buffalo and hydropower energy generation in Denmark. Utilizing sophisticated statistical methods and software, the research team painstakingly computed correlation coefficients and conducted regression analyses to illuminate the intricate web of associations between these seemingly unrelated variables.

Time-Series Analysis:
In addition to conventional correlation analyses, a time-series approach was adopted to discern any temporal patterns or long-term trends in the data. This method allowed for the exploration of potential lag effects or delayed influences, recognizing that the whims of environmental forces may not always conform to the tidy expectations of instantaneous cause and effect.

Geospatial Mapping:
To further visualize the interconnectedness of air pollution in Buffalo and hydropower energy generation in Denmark, geospatial mapping techniques were employed. Through the creation of visually captivating maps, the juxtaposition of Buffalo's air quality indices with Denmark's hydropower infrastructure sought to illustrate the geographical dance of environmental forces across continental boundaries.

Multivariate Regression:
To account for potential confounding factors and variables that may exert influence on air pollution levels and energy generation, multivariate regression analyses were conducted. This comprehensive approach aimed to disentangle the complex interplay of environmental, economic, and social factors that could underpin the observed correlation, adding layers of intricacy to the investigation.

Sensitivity Analysis:
Recognizing the inherent complexities and nuances of environmental and energy data, sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the findings. Sensitivity tests probed the stability of the correlation results under varying assumptions and perturbations, ensuring that the observed air-ly connection was not merely a flight of statistical fancy.

Overall, the methodology employed in this research endeavor combined rigorous quantitative analyses with an imaginative exploration of the whimsical relationship between air pollution in Buffalo and hydropower energy in Denmark. The adoption of multifaceted analytical approaches aimed to capture the full spectrum of this surprising correlation, infusing the scholarly pursuit with a touch of unfathomable charm.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Buffalo and Hydopower energy generated in Denmark. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 1980 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.8024181, r-squared of 0.6438748, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Air-ly Connection: Exploring the Correlation between Air Pollution in Buffalo and Hydropower Energy Generated in Denmark

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the intriguing correlation between air pollution levels in Buffalo, New York, and the generation of hydropower energy in Denmark. Through the utilization of environmental data from the Environmental Protection Agency and energy data from the Energy Information Administration, a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8024181 with a statistical significance of p<0.01 was observed for the period spanning from 1980 to 2021. The findings of this investigation shed light on the unexpected intertwining of environmental factors across distant regions, highlighting the potential transboundary impacts of air quality on renewable energy resources. Additionally, this study raises the question of whether air pollution in Buffalo may unknowingly be fueling the hydropower endeavors in Denmark, a whimsical notion with profound implications. Further exploration of this peculiar relationship may yield valuable insights into the interconnectedness of global environmental phenomena.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intersection of environmental factors and energy production has long been a subject of keen interest and continued exploration. In this study, we delve into the unexpected and eyebrow-raising correlation between air pollution levels in Buffalo, New York, and the generation of hydropower energy in Denmark. The seemingly disparate locales of Buffalo and Denmark belie a hidden connection, one that challenges conventional wisdom and tickles the fancy of the inquisitive mind. As we embark on this scholarly journey, we aim to unravel the enigmatic relationship between air quality in Buffalo and the hydropower endeavors in Denmark, with the hope of shedding light on the serendipitous intertwining of these seemingly unrelated entities.
The context of this investigation is rife with intrigue, prompting us to ponder the whimsical notion of air pollution in Buffalo surreptitiously fueling the hydropower aspirations in Denmark. This almost farcical scenario, though tinged with a hint of incredulity, beckons us to consider the broader implications of such an improbable connection. Could the winds carrying pollutants from Buffalo be whimsically whispering the secrets of energy generation to the turbines of Denmark? The prospect, though lighthearted in its presentation, invites us to contemplate the profound interplay of environmental phenomena across vast distances, weaving a narrative of connectedness in the tapestry of our global ecosystem.
The gravity of this study's findings is underscored by the statistical robustness of the correlation coefficient, which stands at an impressive 0.8024181 with a statistical significance of p<0.01 for the period spanning from 1980 to 2021. What at first may appear as a flippant pursuit of regional curiosities is firmly grounded in empirical evidence, providing a solid foundation for our examination of this unanticipated correlation. The implications of this correlation extend beyond mere academic curiosity, as they prompt us to contemplate the potential transboundary impacts of air quality on renewable energy resources and the intricate dance of environmental influences across geographic boundaries.
As we navigate through the intricacies of this study, we invite our scholarly counterparts to join us in this vibrant pursuit of knowledge and to share in the wry amusement elicited by the unlikely connection between air pollution in Buffalo and hydropower energy in Denmark. Our exploration seeks not only to enlighten but to entertain, as we unravel the tangled web of environmental factors and their unexpected repercussions on energy production. With a twinkle in our eye and academic rigor in our approach, we embark on this investigation with the hope of uncovering the delightful quirkiness and consequential implications of this air-ly connection.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The examination of the correlation between air pollution levels in Buffalo, New York, and the generation of hydropower energy in Denmark yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.8024181, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. The r-squared value of 0.6438748 further confirms the robustness of this correlation, suggesting that approximately 64.39% of the variability in hydropower energy generation in Denmark can be explained by the air pollution levels in Buffalo. The statistical significance of p < 0.01 provides compelling evidence to support the strength of this association, firmly establishing the validity of our findings.

Fig. 1 displays a scatterplot illustrating the compelling correlation between air pollution in Buffalo and hydropower energy generation in Denmark. The scatterplot visually encapsulates the strong positive relationship between these two variables, offering a striking portrayal of the interconnectedness of environmental factors across geographic boundaries. The convergence of data points on the scatterplot conveys the coherence of this unexpected relationship, prompting contemplation of the serendipitous intertwining of air quality in Buffalo with the generation of hydropower energy in Denmark.

The magnitude of the correlation coefficient, r-squared value, and the statistical significance of this association underscore the significance of our findings, inviting further exploration of the transboundary impacts of air pollution on renewable energy resources. The whimsical notion of air pollution from Buffalo clandestinely influencing hydropower endeavors in Denmark, though lighthearted in its presentation, invites contemplation of the broader implications of interconnected environmental phenomena.

In conclusion, our study illuminates the unforeseen correlation between air pollution in Buffalo and hydropower energy generation in Denmark, engendering a deeper appreciation for the intricacies of environmental interplay on a global scale. The implications of this air-ly connection extend far beyond the confines of conventional wisdom, inviting scholarly contemplation and perhaps a chuckle at the whimsical dance of environmental influences on energy production.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Buffalo and Hydopower energy generated in Denmark. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Air-ly Connection: Exploring the Correlation between Air Pollution in Buffalo and Hydropower Energy Generated in Denmark

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the intriguing correlation between air pollution levels in Buffalo, New York, and the generation of hydropower energy in Denmark. Through the utilization of environmental data from the Environmental Protection Agency and energy data from the Energy Information Administration, a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8024181 with a statistical significance of p<0.01 was observed for the period spanning from 1980 to 2021. The findings of this investigation shed light on the unexpected intertwining of environmental factors across distant regions, highlighting the potential transboundary impacts of air quality on renewable energy resources. Additionally, this study raises the question of whether air pollution in Buffalo may unknowingly be fueling the hydropower endeavors in Denmark, a whimsical notion with profound implications. Further exploration of this peculiar relationship may yield valuable insights into the interconnectedness of global environmental phenomena.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Several scholarly works have contributed to the discourse surrounding air pollution and its unforeseen effects on energy generation. In "Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics," Smith and Doe elucidate the complex interactions between air pollutants and climatic processes, offering valuable insights into the potential far-reaching impacts of airborne particles. Similarly, Jones et al., in "Environmental Science and Technology," explore the intricate dynamics of air quality and its intersecting influences on renewable energy resources, laying the groundwork for further investigations in this domain. These rigorous empirical studies set the stage for our examination of the remarkable correlation between air pollution in Buffalo and hydropower energy generation in Denmark.
In our quest for understanding this peculiar linkage, we draw inspiration from non-fiction works such as "The Big Necessity: The Unmentionable World of Human Waste and Why It Matters" by Rose George, which underscores the unexpected connections in environmental systems. Furthermore, "Tales of the Unexpected" by Roald Dahl piques our imagination with its whimsical tales, reminding us of the unexpected twists and turns that can emerge in seemingly unrelated phenomena. Another thought-provoking narrative is "The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle" by Haruki Murakami, which, while not directly related to our study, serves as a poignant reminder of the enigmatic connections that permeate our world.
In considering the potential undercurrents of this correlation, we are prompted to explore the world of board games, specifically "Power Grid," which, although a fictional simulation, provides a playful analogy for the intricate web of energy production and the surprising influences that shape its trajectory. The game "Photosynthesis" also offers a lighthearted perspective on the interplay between environmental factors and energy dynamics, albeit in a simulated setting.
With these eclectic sources as our backdrop, we approach our investigation with a blend of scholarly rigor and lighthearted curiosity, recognizing the multifaceted dimensions of this captivating relationship between air pollution in Buffalo and hydropower energy generation in Denmark. As we delve into the annals of literature, we are mindful of the unexpected gems that may offer glimpses into the improbable yet consequential interplay of these seemingly disparate environmental phenomena.

[[RESULTS]]
The examination of the correlation between air pollution levels in Buffalo, New York, and the generation of hydropower energy in Denmark yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.8024181, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. The r-squared value of 0.6438748 further confirms the robustness of this correlation, suggesting that approximately 64.39% of the variability in hydropower energy generation in Denmark can be explained by the air pollution levels in Buffalo. The statistical significance of p < 0.01 provides compelling evidence to support the strength of this association, firmly establishing the validity of our findings.
Fig. 1 displays a scatterplot illustrating the compelling correlation between air pollution in Buffalo and hydropower energy generation in Denmark. The scatterplot visually encapsulates the strong positive relationship between these two variables, offering a striking portrayal of the interconnectedness of environmental factors across geographic boundaries. The convergence of data points on the scatterplot conveys the coherence of this unexpected relationship, prompting contemplation of the serendipitous intertwining of air quality in Buffalo with the generation of hydropower energy in Denmark.
The magnitude of the correlation coefficient, r-squared value, and the statistical significance of this association underscore the significance of our findings, inviting further exploration of the transboundary impacts of air pollution on renewable energy resources. The whimsical notion of air pollution from Buffalo clandestinely influencing hydropower endeavors in Denmark, though lighthearted in its presentation, invites contemplation of the broader implications of interconnected environmental phenomena.
In conclusion, our study illuminates the unforeseen correlation between air pollution in Buffalo and hydropower energy generation in Denmark, engendering a deeper appreciation for the intricacies of environmental interplay on a global scale. The implications of this air-ly connection extend far beyond the confines of conventional wisdom, inviting scholarly contemplation and perhaps a chuckle at the whimsical dance of environmental influences on energy production.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The robust correlation coefficient of 0.8024181 between air pollution levels in Buffalo and hydropower energy generation in Denmark, alongside the statistical significance of p<0.01, underscores the compelling connection between these seemingly unrelated variables. This finding aligns with the earlier work of Smith and Doe, who delved into the intricate interplay of air pollutants and climatic processes. The unexpected but significant relationship we have uncovered resonates with the whimsical tales from "Tales of the Unexpected" by Roald Dahl, reminding us of the serendipitous twists that can emerge in environmental phenomena.

Our results echo the insights of Jones et al., underscoring the remarkable intersection of air quality and renewable energy resources. The valuable contributions of such scholarly works have paved the way for our investigation, shedding light on the potential far-reaching impacts of air pollution. Furthermore, the playful analogy provided by the board game "Power Grid" finds resonance in our findings, as it playfully reflects the intricate web of energy production and the surprising influences that shape its trajectory.

The compelling correlation coefficient and r-squared value in our study lend empirical support to the unconventional yet consequential relationship between air pollution in Buffalo and hydropower energy generation in Denmark. The scatterplot visually encapsulates this unexpected interconnection, reminiscent of the delightful twists in a Roald Dahl narrative, prompting a whimsical contemplation of the enigmatic links between geographic regions.

As we ponder the implications of this air-ly connection, we are reminded of the improbable yet consequential interplay of seemingly disparate environmental phenomena. Our investigation offers a lighthearted perspective on the interconnectedness of global environmental factors, inviting scholarly contemplation, and perhaps a chuckle at the whimsical dance of environmental influences on energy production. This unexpected linkage beckons us to delve further into the annals of literature, recognizing the delightful surprises that may be concealed within the multifaceted dimensions of environmental relationships.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Buffalo and Hydopower energy generated in Denmark. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Air-ly Connection: Exploring the Correlation between Air Pollution in Buffalo and Hydropower Energy Generated in Denmark

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the intriguing correlation between air pollution levels in Buffalo, New York, and the generation of hydropower energy in Denmark. Through the utilization of environmental data from the Environmental Protection Agency and energy data from the Energy Information Administration, a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8024181 with a statistical significance of p<0.01 was observed for the period spanning from 1980 to 2021. The findings of this investigation shed light on the unexpected intertwining of environmental factors across distant regions, highlighting the potential transboundary impacts of air quality on renewable energy resources. Additionally, this study raises the question of whether air pollution in Buffalo may unknowingly be fueling the hydropower endeavors in Denmark, a whimsical notion with profound implications. Further exploration of this peculiar relationship may yield valuable insights into the interconnectedness of global environmental phenomena.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intersection of environmental factors and energy production has long been a subject of keen interest and continued exploration. In this study, we delve into the unexpected and eyebrow-raising correlation between air pollution levels in Buffalo, New York, and the generation of hydropower energy in Denmark. The seemingly disparate locales of Buffalo and Denmark belie a hidden connection, one that challenges conventional wisdom and tickles the fancy of the inquisitive mind. As we embark on this scholarly journey, we aim to unravel the enigmatic relationship between air quality in Buffalo and the hydropower endeavors in Denmark, with the hope of shedding light on the serendipitous intertwining of these seemingly unrelated entities.
The context of this investigation is rife with intrigue, prompting us to ponder the whimsical notion of air pollution in Buffalo surreptitiously fueling the hydropower aspirations in Denmark. This almost farcical scenario, though tinged with a hint of incredulity, beckons us to consider the broader implications of such an improbable connection. Could the winds carrying pollutants from Buffalo be whimsically whispering the secrets of energy generation to the turbines of Denmark? The prospect, though lighthearted in its presentation, invites us to contemplate the profound interplay of environmental phenomena across vast distances, weaving a narrative of connectedness in the tapestry of our global ecosystem.
The gravity of this study's findings is underscored by the statistical robustness of the correlation coefficient, which stands at an impressive 0.8024181 with a statistical significance of p<0.01 for the period spanning from 1980 to 2021. What at first may appear as a flippant pursuit of regional curiosities is firmly grounded in empirical evidence, providing a solid foundation for our examination of this unanticipated correlation. The implications of this correlation extend beyond mere academic curiosity, as they prompt us to contemplate the potential transboundary impacts of air quality on renewable energy resources and the intricate dance of environmental influences across geographic boundaries.
As we navigate through the intricacies of this study, we invite our scholarly counterparts to join us in this vibrant pursuit of knowledge and to share in the wry amusement elicited by the unlikely connection between air pollution in Buffalo and hydropower energy in Denmark. Our exploration seeks not only to enlighten but to entertain, as we unravel the tangled web of environmental factors and their unexpected repercussions on energy production. With a twinkle in our eye and academic rigor in our approach, we embark on this investigation with the hope of uncovering the delightful quirkiness and consequential implications of this air-ly connection.

[[RESULTS]]
The examination of the correlation between air pollution levels in Buffalo, New York, and the generation of hydropower energy in Denmark yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.8024181, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. The r-squared value of 0.6438748 further confirms the robustness of this correlation, suggesting that approximately 64.39% of the variability in hydropower energy generation in Denmark can be explained by the air pollution levels in Buffalo. The statistical significance of p < 0.01 provides compelling evidence to support the strength of this association, firmly establishing the validity of our findings.
Fig. 1 displays a scatterplot illustrating the compelling correlation between air pollution in Buffalo and hydropower energy generation in Denmark. The scatterplot visually encapsulates the strong positive relationship between these two variables, offering a striking portrayal of the interconnectedness of environmental factors across geographic boundaries. The convergence of data points on the scatterplot conveys the coherence of this unexpected relationship, prompting contemplation of the serendipitous intertwining of air quality in Buffalo with the generation of hydropower energy in Denmark.
The magnitude of the correlation coefficient, r-squared value, and the statistical significance of this association underscore the significance of our findings, inviting further exploration of the transboundary impacts of air pollution on renewable energy resources. The whimsical notion of air pollution from Buffalo clandestinely influencing hydropower endeavors in Denmark, though lighthearted in its presentation, invites contemplation of the broader implications of interconnected environmental phenomena.
In conclusion, our study illuminates the unforeseen correlation between air pollution in Buffalo and hydropower energy generation in Denmark, engendering a deeper appreciation for the intricacies of environmental interplay on a global scale. The implications of this air-ly connection extend far beyond the confines of conventional wisdom, inviting scholarly contemplation and perhaps a chuckle at the whimsical dance of environmental influences on energy production.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, the research findings robustly establish a surprising and strong positive correlation between air pollution in Buffalo, New York, and the generation of hydropower energy in Denmark. The substantial correlation coefficient of 0.8024181 and the r-squared value of 0.6438748, along with the statistical significance of p < 0.01, underscore the coherence of this unanticipated relationship. Our exploration sheds light on the whimsical notion of air pollution in Buffalo surreptitiously fueling the hydropower aspirations in Denmark, a notion that, while sparking curiosity, exudes a sense of lighthearted incredulity. Further investigation of this improbable yet captivating connection may reveal valuable insights into the interconnectedness of global environmental phenomena, all while providing a moment of levity in the often-serious realm of scholarly inquiry.

The scatterplot, depicted in Fig. 1, visually encapsulates the compelling correlation, offering a whimsical portrayal of the intertwined nature of air quality in Buffalo with the generation of hydropower energy in Denmark. The convergence of data points prompts contemplation of the serendipitous interplay of these seemingly unrelated variables, inviting scholarly mirth and a touch of bemusement at the unexpected dance of environmental influences on energy production.

With the emergence of these findings, one might playfully envision the wind carrying a whispered secret from Buffalo to the turbines of Denmark, spinning not only the blades of a turbine but also the yarns of this charmingly improbable connection. However, despite the entertaining nature of this unforeseen correlation, the implications extend beyond the realms of light-hearted contemplation, prodding us to delve further into the potential transboundary impacts of air pollution on renewable energy resources.

In light of these conclusive findings, it is evident that no further research is warranted in this area. The quirky and genuinely surprising nature of the correlation between air pollution in Buffalo and hydropower energy generation in Denmark has been sufficiently illuminated, serving as both a scholarly revelation and a source of scholarly amusement. Therefore, we assert with a wry, academic chuckle that this air-ly connection has been thoroughly explored, and its profound implications and whimsical charm have been deftly handled with a touch of scholarly finesse.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Air-ly Connection: Exploring the Correlation between Air Pollution in Buffalo and Hydropower Energy Generated in Denmark. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The International Journal of Atmospheric Energies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Air-ly Connection: Exploring the Correlation between Air Pollution in Buffalo and Hydropower Energy Generated in Denmark. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Environmental Emissions and Renewable Energy Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Air-ly Connection: Exploring the Correlation between Air Pollution in Buffalo and Hydropower Energy Generated in Denmark with an abstract of This study investigates the intriguing correlation between air pollution levels in Buffalo, New York, and the generation of hydropower energy in Denmark. Through the utilization of environmental data from the Environmental Protection Agency and energy data from the Energy Information Administration, a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8024181 with a statistical significance of p<0.01 was observed for the period spanning from 1980 to 2021. The findings of this investigation shed light on the unexpected intertwining of environmental factors across distant regions, highlighting the potential transboundary impacts of air quality on renewable energy resources. Additionally, this study raises the question of whether air pollution in Buffalo may unknowingly be fueling the hydropower endeavors in Denmark, a whimsical notion with profound implications. Further exploration of this peculiar relationship may yield valuable insights into the interconnectedness of global environmental phenomena.

ChatGPT:

air pollution Buffalo New York, hydropower energy Denmark, correlation, environmental data, Energy Information Administration, air quality, renewable energy resources, transboundary impacts, global environmental phenomena

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Buffalo
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with air quality at 'unhealthy for sensitive groups' or worse in Buffalo-Cheektowaga-Niagara Falls, NY
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Buffalo

Hydopower energy generated in Denmark
Detailed data title: Total hydopower energy generated in Denmark in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Hydopower energy generated in Denmark

Correlation r = 0.8024181 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6438748 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 64.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Hydopower energy generated in Denmark) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Buffalo) over the 42 years from 1980 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.7E-10. 0.0000000001660731734143254300
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.8 in 1.7E-8% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 6,021,442,112 random variables You don't actually need 6 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 41 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 41 because we have two variables measured over a period of 42 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.66, 0.89 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Air pollution in Buffalo (Bad air quality days)10.92910.4118.7671210.4118.743179.315079.3150712.328812.84157.945216.301378.493153.278694.109596.02744.931513.551912.739739.8630110.4113.005468.7671211.50685.205484.9180310.4114.109599.315072.732240.8219182.465751.917813.825141.095890.2739731.095891.639340.2739730.82191800.5464480.547945
Hydopower energy generated in Denmark (Billion kWh)0.030.0310.0280.0360.0280.0270.0290.0290.0320.0270.0270.0260.0280.0270.0330.030.0190.0190.026730.0310.030.0280.0320.0210.0270.0230.0230.0280.0260.0190.0210.0170.0170.0130.0150.018030.019270.0178710.01486210.01721710.0170640.016295




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([10.929,10.411,8.76712,10.411,8.74317,9.31507,9.31507,12.3288,12.8415,7.94521,6.30137,8.49315,3.27869,4.10959,6.0274,4.93151,3.55191,2.73973,9.86301,10.411,3.00546,8.76712,11.5068,5.20548,4.91803,10.411,4.10959,9.31507,2.73224,0.821918,2.46575,1.91781,3.82514,1.09589,0.273973,1.09589,1.63934,0.273973,0.821918,0,0.546448,0.547945,])
array_2 = np.array([0.03,0.031,0.028,0.036,0.028,0.027,0.029,0.029,0.032,0.027,0.027,0.026,0.028,0.027,0.033,0.03,0.019,0.019,0.02673,0.031,0.03,0.028,0.032,0.021,0.027,0.023,0.023,0.028,0.026,0.019,0.021,0.017,0.017,0.013,0.015,0.01803,0.01927,0.017871,0.0148621,0.0172171,0.017064,0.016295,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Buffalo"
array_2_name = "Hydopower energy generated in Denmark"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation inspection deserves a standing ovation!


Correlation ID: 4130 · Black Variable ID: 20391 · Red Variable ID: 23627
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0