about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,118 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Number of Miss World delegates and the second variable is Jet fuel used in Denmark.  The chart goes from 1980 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

As the number of Miss World delegates increases, so does the demand for specially chartered private jets to transport them to the competition. These jets, adorned with extravagant beauty queen decals, consume copious amounts of jet fuel as they crisscross the globe to pick up the delegates, making Denmark a frequent refueling stop. It's a high-flying competition for both the title of Miss World and the title of 'Top Jet Fuel Consumer in Denmark'!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a bustling airport in Denmark, where a fleet of private jets adorned with vibrant beauty queen decals lines the tarmac. More jets can be seen joining the lineup as Miss World delegates continue to arrive. The jets are illustrated in a retro comic-book style with muted colors, and the scene is filled with the excitement of the competition. The dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s adds a vintage feel to the image, capturing the constant comings and goings of the specially chartered jets and the high demand for jet fuel in Denmark. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Number of Miss World delegates and Jet fuel used in Denmark. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Futuristic A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s Psychedelic Cutsy art illustration Celtic art
ChatGPT: A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Number of Miss World delegates and Jet fuel used in Denmark, in the following situation: As the number of Miss World delegates increases, so does the demand for specially chartered private jets to transport them to the competition. These jets, adorned with extravagant beauty queen decals, consume copious amounts of jet fuel as they crisscross the globe to pick up the delegates, making Denmark a frequent refueling stop. It's a high-flying competition for both the title of Miss World and the title of 'Top Jet Fuel Consumer in Denmark'!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling airport in Denmark, a fleet of private jets with vibrant beauty queen decals lines the tarmac. As the number of Miss World delegates increases, more jets join the lineup, eagerly awaiting their glamorous passengers. The constant comings and goings of these specially chartered jets contribute to the high demand for jet fuel in Denmark. The air is filled with the buzz of excitement and the scent of jet fuel as the beauty queens arrive to compete for the crown.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling airport in Denmark, a fleet of private jets with vibrant beauty queen decals lines the tarmac. As the number of Miss World delegates increases, more jets join the lineup, eagerly awaiting their glamorous passengers. The constant comings and goings of these specially chartered jets contribute to the high demand for jet fuel in Denmark. The air is filled with the buzz of excitement and the scent of jet fuel as the beauty queens arrive to compete for the crown. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a bustling airport in Denmark, where a fleet of private jets adorned with vibrant beauty queen decals lines the tarmac. More jets can be seen joining the lineup as Miss World delegates continue to arrive. The jets are illustrated in a retro comic-book style with muted colors, and the scene is filled with the excitement of the competition. The dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s adds a vintage feel to the image, capturing the constant comings and goings of the specially chartered jets and the high demand for jet fuel in Denmark.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Number of Miss World delegates caused Jet fuel used in Denmark to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Beauty and the Beastly Expenses: Exploring the Relationship Between Number of Miss World Delegates and Jet Fuel Consumption in Denmark

The International Journal of Extravagant Economics

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of Miss World delegates and Jet fuel used in Denmark. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from Wikipedia and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7934629 and p < 0.01 for 1980 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Beauty and the Beastly Expenses: Exploring the Relationship Between Number of Miss World Delegates and Jet Fuel Consumption in Denmark"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the rather unexpected association between the number of Miss World delegates and the jet fuel used in Denmark. One might say we are breaking new ground here, both figuratively and literally! Our research team utilized data from Wikipedia and the Energy Information Administration to meticulously evaluate this peculiar linkage, just to see if there's any substance to it.

Our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7934629 and a p-value of less than 0.01, stretching from the years 1980 to 2021. Some might argue that this correlation is purely coincidental, but we believe it's more than just a flight of fancy. It's as if these Miss World delegates bring not just their charm, but also a fueling force that can't be ignored. Did someone say jet-setters?

In conclusion, our study sheds light on an unexpected relationship between the glitz and glamour of beauty pageants and the down-to-earth reality of fuel consumption. This connection might just be an example of "jet fuel with a twist".


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of Miss World delegates and Jet fuel used in Denmark. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Beauty and the Beastly Expenses: Exploring the Relationship Between Number of Miss World Delegates and Jet Fuel Consumption in Denmark"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the rather unexpected association between the number of Miss World delegates and the jet fuel used in Denmark. One might say we are breaking new ground here, both figuratively and literally! Our research team utilized data from Wikipedia and the Energy Information Administration to meticulously evaluate this peculiar linkage, just to see if there's any substance to it.

Our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7934629 and a p-value of less than 0.01, stretching from the years 1980 to 2021. Some might argue that this correlation is purely coincidental, but we believe it's more than just a flight of fancy. It's as if these Miss World delegates bring not just their charm, but also a fueling force that can't be ignored. Did someone say jet-setters?

In conclusion, our study sheds light on an unexpected relationship between the glitz and glamour of beauty pageants and the down-to-earth reality of fuel consumption. This connection might just be an example of "jet fuel with a twist".

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The study of bizarre and seemingly unrelated phenomena has long been a hallmark of scientific exploration. It is within this spirit of scientific curiosity that we present our research on the connection between the number of Miss World delegates and the jet fuel consumed in Denmark. One might say we're redefining the phrase "jet-setting lifestyle" in a rather unconventional way. If you think this alliance is a stretch, just wait until we dive into the statistics - it's sure to "propel" your interest!

Speaking of unlikely pairs, it's time to introduce our research variables. On one hand, we have the glitz and glamour of the international Miss World pageant, where grace and beauty take the stage. On the other, we have the unassuming yet essential commodity of jet fuel, keeping the engines of global travel running. It's like comparing apples and oranges, but in this case, one might just be fueling the other in a rather unexpected twist of fate.

As we embark on this scientific endeavor, it's important to note that correlation does not imply causation. However, as we've seen in previous studies, sometimes correlation can lead to unexpected and delightful insights. It's like stumbling upon a pun in a research paper - a pleasant surprise that leaves you pondering the unexpected humor in science.

Now, let's not "fuel" any doubts - we're not grasping at straws here. The statistical analysis conducted in this study has been as thorough and meticulous as a scientist's notebook. We're not just blowing hot air; we've crunched the numbers and analyzed the data with the precision of a well-engineered jet engine.

With that said, let's not "delay" any further in unveiling the results of our findings. But don't worry, we'll keep you "grounded" in the scientific truth amidst the clouds of speculation. After all, we wouldn't want to "jet" off into conclusions without solid evidence to support our claims - that would just be "plane" wrong!

So, buckle up and prepare for takeoff as we journey into the realm of unexpected connections and statistical surprises. As we navigate through the skies of data analysis, we'll be sure to keep our eyes on the runway of scientific integrity.

Get ready to soar into the realm of unconventional correlations and unearth the unexpected relationship between beauty pageants and fuel consumption. After all, in the world of statistics, the most unlikely connections can sometimes be the most illuminating.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of Miss World delegates and Jet fuel used in Denmark. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Beauty and the Beastly Expenses: Exploring the Relationship Between Number of Miss World Delegates and Jet Fuel Consumption in Denmark"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the rather unexpected association between the number of Miss World delegates and the jet fuel used in Denmark. One might say we are breaking new ground here, both figuratively and literally! Our research team utilized data from Wikipedia and the Energy Information Administration to meticulously evaluate this peculiar linkage, just to see if there's any substance to it.

Our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7934629 and a p-value of less than 0.01, stretching from the years 1980 to 2021. Some might argue that this correlation is purely coincidental, but we believe it's more than just a flight of fancy. It's as if these Miss World delegates bring not just their charm, but also a fueling force that can't be ignored. Did someone say jet-setters?

In conclusion, our study sheds light on an unexpected relationship between the glitz and glamour of beauty pageants and the down-to-earth reality of fuel consumption. This connection might just be an example of "jet fuel with a twist".

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The study of bizarre and seemingly unrelated phenomena has long been a hallmark of scientific exploration. It is within this spirit of scientific curiosity that we present our research on the connection between the number of Miss World delegates and the jet fuel consumed in Denmark. One might say we're redefining the phrase "jet-setting lifestyle" in a rather unconventional way. If you think this alliance is a stretch, just wait until we dive into the statistics - it's sure to "propel" your interest!
Speaking of unlikely pairs, it's time to introduce our research variables. On one hand, we have the glitz and glamour of the international Miss World pageant, where grace and beauty take the stage. On the other, we have the unassuming yet essential commodity of jet fuel, keeping the engines of global travel running. It's like comparing apples and oranges, but in this case, one might just be fueling the other in a rather unexpected twist of fate.
As we embark on this scientific endeavor, it's important to note that correlation does not imply causation. However, as we've seen in previous studies, sometimes correlation can lead to unexpected and delightful insights. It's like stumbling upon a pun in a research paper - a pleasant surprise that leaves you pondering the unexpected humor in science.
Now, let's not "fuel" any doubts - we're not grasping at straws here. The statistical analysis conducted in this study has been as thorough and meticulous as a scientist's notebook. We're not just blowing hot air; we've crunched the numbers and analyzed the data with the precision of a well-engineered jet engine.
With that said, let's not "delay" any further in unveiling the results of our findings. But don't worry, we'll keep you "grounded" in the scientific truth amidst the clouds of speculation. After all, we wouldn't want to "jet" off into conclusions without solid evidence to support our claims - that would just be "plane" wrong!
So, buckle up and prepare for takeoff as we journey into the realm of unexpected connections and statistical surprises. As we navigate through the skies of data analysis, we'll be sure to keep our eyes on the runway of scientific integrity.
Get ready to soar into the realm of unconventional correlations and unearth the unexpected relationship between beauty pageants and fuel consumption. After all, in the world of statistics, the most unlikely connections can sometimes be the most illuminating.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In their seminal work, "The Impact of Beauty Pageants on Environmental Resources," Smith and Doe explore the ripple effects of beauty pageants on various environmental factors, including energy consumption. While their focus is primarily on electricity usage and water consumption, their findings prompt us to consider the potential influence of international pageants on jet fuel consumption as well. It's as if beauty pageants are leaving a trail of environmental impact, one catwalk at a time.

Turning to the economic perspective, Jones and Smith, in their study "Global Beauty Pageants: Economic and Environmental Ramifications," delve into the broader implications of beauty pageants on both economic and environmental systems. Their analysis hints at a web of interconnectedness that extends beyond what meets the eye, or in this case, the runway. It's like peeling back the layers of a royal Danish pastry to reveal unexpected ingredients.

As we sift through the pages of non-fiction works related to global travel and environmental impact, "The Economics of Jet Fuel" by John Smith and "Sustainable Beauty: Navigating Environmental Impact in the Fashion Industry" by Jane Doe offer enlightening perspectives on our research subject. These sources not only provide valuable insights but also serve as a reminder that the intersection of beauty, travel, and sustainability is indeed a multifaceted topic.

On the more imaginative side, the fictional works "The Secret Life of Miss World Delegates" by A. R. Author and "Jet Fuel Mysteries: Tales of Travel and Intrigue" by M. Writer offer a whimsical take on the interplay between beauty pageants and fuel consumption. While these works may not contribute empirical evidence, they inject a dose of creativity into our exploration, much like a sprinkle of fairy dust in an otherwise factual endeavor.

Drawing inspiration from unlikely sources, the board game "Ticket to Ride: Nordic Countries" offers an intriguing parallel to our research topic, as players strategically manage train routes in the Nordic region. Just as the game requires careful consideration of logistical connections, our study navigates the tangle of associations between beauty pageants and fuel consumption. It's almost like comparing the precision of planning a cross-country journey to the nuanced analysis of statistical relationships.

In essence, the literature surrounding our research topic not only offers valuable insights but also embodies the notion that unexpected connections can yield illuminating perspectives. It's as if these diverse sources are beckoning us to embrace the uncharted territories of unconventional correlations and statistical surprises. After all, in the realm of academic inquiry, a touch of humor and imagination can infuse scholarly pursuits with a delightful twist.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of Miss World delegates and Jet fuel used in Denmark. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Wikipedia and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 1980 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Beauty and the Beastly Expenses: Exploring the Relationship Between Number of Miss World Delegates and Jet Fuel Consumption in Denmark"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the rather unexpected association between the number of Miss World delegates and the jet fuel used in Denmark. One might say we are breaking new ground here, both figuratively and literally! Our research team utilized data from Wikipedia and the Energy Information Administration to meticulously evaluate this peculiar linkage, just to see if there's any substance to it.

Our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7934629 and a p-value of less than 0.01, stretching from the years 1980 to 2021. Some might argue that this correlation is purely coincidental, but we believe it's more than just a flight of fancy. It's as if these Miss World delegates bring not just their charm, but also a fueling force that can't be ignored. Did someone say jet-setters?

In conclusion, our study sheds light on an unexpected relationship between the glitz and glamour of beauty pageants and the down-to-earth reality of fuel consumption. This connection might just be an example of "jet fuel with a twist".

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The study of bizarre and seemingly unrelated phenomena has long been a hallmark of scientific exploration. It is within this spirit of scientific curiosity that we present our research on the connection between the number of Miss World delegates and the jet fuel consumed in Denmark. One might say we're redefining the phrase "jet-setting lifestyle" in a rather unconventional way. If you think this alliance is a stretch, just wait until we dive into the statistics - it's sure to "propel" your interest!
Speaking of unlikely pairs, it's time to introduce our research variables. On one hand, we have the glitz and glamour of the international Miss World pageant, where grace and beauty take the stage. On the other, we have the unassuming yet essential commodity of jet fuel, keeping the engines of global travel running. It's like comparing apples and oranges, but in this case, one might just be fueling the other in a rather unexpected twist of fate.
As we embark on this scientific endeavor, it's important to note that correlation does not imply causation. However, as we've seen in previous studies, sometimes correlation can lead to unexpected and delightful insights. It's like stumbling upon a pun in a research paper - a pleasant surprise that leaves you pondering the unexpected humor in science.
Now, let's not "fuel" any doubts - we're not grasping at straws here. The statistical analysis conducted in this study has been as thorough and meticulous as a scientist's notebook. We're not just blowing hot air; we've crunched the numbers and analyzed the data with the precision of a well-engineered jet engine.
With that said, let's not "delay" any further in unveiling the results of our findings. But don't worry, we'll keep you "grounded" in the scientific truth amidst the clouds of speculation. After all, we wouldn't want to "jet" off into conclusions without solid evidence to support our claims - that would just be "plane" wrong!
So, buckle up and prepare for takeoff as we journey into the realm of unexpected connections and statistical surprises. As we navigate through the skies of data analysis, we'll be sure to keep our eyes on the runway of scientific integrity.
Get ready to soar into the realm of unconventional correlations and unearth the unexpected relationship between beauty pageants and fuel consumption. After all, in the world of statistics, the most unlikely connections can sometimes be the most illuminating.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To explore the eyebrow-raising relationship between the number of Miss World delegates and the jet fuel consumption in Denmark, our research team embarked on a data-gathering journey with the precision of a GPS-guided aircraft. Our data collection spanned from the year 1980 to 2021, ensuring a comprehensive examination of this peculiar pairing. We made sure to source information from reliable sources, including Wikipedia and the Energy Information Administration, ensuring that our dataset was as sturdy as a well-engineered propeller.

To begin, we diligently recorded the annual number of Miss World delegates, capturing the essence of beauty and grace in numerical form. We then tallied the jet fuel consumption in Denmark for each corresponding year, scrutinizing Energy Information Administration reports like scholarly aviators on a mission.

Quick fact: Did you know that statistics is not just a science but also an art? Much like the delicate balance of poise and elegance in a beauty pageant, statistical analysis requires both skill and finesse. And just like a dad joke, a well-crafted statistical model can bring unexpected smiles to faces.

With our data at the ready, we took to the skies of statistical analysis, employing robust methods such as Pearson correlation coefficients and linear regression models. It was like navigating through turbulent weather patterns, but our rigorous approach ensured that our findings stayed steady as a seasoned pilot's hand.

In the spirit of transparency, it's worth mentioning that our statistical models were as meticulously calibrated as a precision instrument, accounting for potential confounding variables and outliers with the attentiveness of an air traffic controller. We wanted to ensure that our results were as clear and dependable as a runway free from fog.

Speaking of fog, let's not cloud the issue with uncertainty. Our study aimed to unravel the potential link between the glitzy world of beauty pageants and the down-to-earth reality of fuel consumption. With our statistical compass pointed towards truth, we ventured forth into the unknown skies of unconventional correlations.

In conclusion, our methodology was as thorough as a pre-flight inspection, ensuring that our data was as sturdy as the wings of a Boeing 747. From meticulous data collection to sophisticated statistical analysis, our approach was as reliable as an autopilot system, guiding us through the turbulence of unexpected correlations and bringing us to the solid ground of scientific discovery.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of Miss World delegates and Jet fuel used in Denmark. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Wikipedia and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 1980 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.7934629, r-squared of 0.6295834, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Beauty and the Beastly Expenses: Exploring the Relationship Between Number of Miss World Delegates and Jet Fuel Consumption in Denmark"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the rather unexpected association between the number of Miss World delegates and the jet fuel used in Denmark. One might say we are breaking new ground here, both figuratively and literally! Our research team utilized data from Wikipedia and the Energy Information Administration to meticulously evaluate this peculiar linkage, just to see if there's any substance to it.

Our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7934629 and a p-value of less than 0.01, stretching from the years 1980 to 2021. Some might argue that this correlation is purely coincidental, but we believe it's more than just a flight of fancy. It's as if these Miss World delegates bring not just their charm, but also a fueling force that can't be ignored. Did someone say jet-setters?

In conclusion, our study sheds light on an unexpected relationship between the glitz and glamour of beauty pageants and the down-to-earth reality of fuel consumption. This connection might just be an example of "jet fuel with a twist".

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The study of bizarre and seemingly unrelated phenomena has long been a hallmark of scientific exploration. It is within this spirit of scientific curiosity that we present our research on the connection between the number of Miss World delegates and the jet fuel consumed in Denmark. One might say we're redefining the phrase "jet-setting lifestyle" in a rather unconventional way. If you think this alliance is a stretch, just wait until we dive into the statistics - it's sure to "propel" your interest!
Speaking of unlikely pairs, it's time to introduce our research variables. On one hand, we have the glitz and glamour of the international Miss World pageant, where grace and beauty take the stage. On the other, we have the unassuming yet essential commodity of jet fuel, keeping the engines of global travel running. It's like comparing apples and oranges, but in this case, one might just be fueling the other in a rather unexpected twist of fate.
As we embark on this scientific endeavor, it's important to note that correlation does not imply causation. However, as we've seen in previous studies, sometimes correlation can lead to unexpected and delightful insights. It's like stumbling upon a pun in a research paper - a pleasant surprise that leaves you pondering the unexpected humor in science.
Now, let's not "fuel" any doubts - we're not grasping at straws here. The statistical analysis conducted in this study has been as thorough and meticulous as a scientist's notebook. We're not just blowing hot air; we've crunched the numbers and analyzed the data with the precision of a well-engineered jet engine.
With that said, let's not "delay" any further in unveiling the results of our findings. But don't worry, we'll keep you "grounded" in the scientific truth amidst the clouds of speculation. After all, we wouldn't want to "jet" off into conclusions without solid evidence to support our claims - that would just be "plane" wrong!
So, buckle up and prepare for takeoff as we journey into the realm of unexpected connections and statistical surprises. As we navigate through the skies of data analysis, we'll be sure to keep our eyes on the runway of scientific integrity.
Get ready to soar into the realm of unconventional correlations and unearth the unexpected relationship between beauty pageants and fuel consumption. After all, in the world of statistics, the most unlikely connections can sometimes be the most illuminating.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the relationship between the number of Miss World delegates and jet fuel consumption in Denmark revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.7934629, indicating that as the number of Miss World delegates increased, so did the jet fuel consumption. It seems that the beauty and the fly have more in common than meets the eye! Speaking of eyes, did you hear about the optometrist who fell into a lens grinder and made a spectacle of himself?

Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.6295834 suggests that approximately 63% of the variance in jet fuel consumption can be explained by the variance in the number of Miss World delegates. It's as if these delegates bring not just their charisma, but also a considerable share of the fuel consumption variance. It's almost like a beauty pageant for statistical relevance!

In addition, the p-value of less than 0.01 indicates that the observed correlation is statistically significant, ruling out the possibility of this finding being merely a fluke. This relationship is as real as the force that keeps those airplanes cruising through the skies. It's not just a flight of fancy; it's a statistically grounded observation that can't be dismissed as mere coincidence. This is truly "jet set" in stone.

Furthermore (no pun intended), the figure (Fig. 1) illustrates the scatterplot depicting the positive linear relationship between the variables, showcasing the substantial correlation we observed. It's clear as day - or should we say, clear as a perfectly sunny day for a smooth takeoff. This figure is not just a visual aid; it's a testament to the unexpected connections that can be unveiled through meticulous analysis of even the most unconventional variables.

In conclusion, our findings provide compelling evidence of a notable association between the number of Miss World delegates and jet fuel consumption in Denmark. This unexpected connection hints at a complex interplay of factors that extend beyond the realms of traditional statistical inquiry. It's almost like finding a statistical diamond in the rough, and who can resist the allure of an unexpected gem?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of Miss World delegates and Jet fuel used in Denmark. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Beauty and the Beastly Expenses: Exploring the Relationship Between Number of Miss World Delegates and Jet Fuel Consumption in Denmark"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the rather unexpected association between the number of Miss World delegates and the jet fuel used in Denmark. One might say we are breaking new ground here, both figuratively and literally! Our research team utilized data from Wikipedia and the Energy Information Administration to meticulously evaluate this peculiar linkage, just to see if there's any substance to it.

Our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7934629 and a p-value of less than 0.01, stretching from the years 1980 to 2021. Some might argue that this correlation is purely coincidental, but we believe it's more than just a flight of fancy. It's as if these Miss World delegates bring not just their charm, but also a fueling force that can't be ignored. Did someone say jet-setters?

In conclusion, our study sheds light on an unexpected relationship between the glitz and glamour of beauty pageants and the down-to-earth reality of fuel consumption. This connection might just be an example of "jet fuel with a twist".

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their seminal work, "The Impact of Beauty Pageants on Environmental Resources," Smith and Doe explore the ripple effects of beauty pageants on various environmental factors, including energy consumption. While their focus is primarily on electricity usage and water consumption, their findings prompt us to consider the potential influence of international pageants on jet fuel consumption as well. It's as if beauty pageants are leaving a trail of environmental impact, one catwalk at a time.
Turning to the economic perspective, Jones and Smith, in their study "Global Beauty Pageants: Economic and Environmental Ramifications," delve into the broader implications of beauty pageants on both economic and environmental systems. Their analysis hints at a web of interconnectedness that extends beyond what meets the eye, or in this case, the runway. It's like peeling back the layers of a royal Danish pastry to reveal unexpected ingredients.
As we sift through the pages of non-fiction works related to global travel and environmental impact, "The Economics of Jet Fuel" by John Smith and "Sustainable Beauty: Navigating Environmental Impact in the Fashion Industry" by Jane Doe offer enlightening perspectives on our research subject. These sources not only provide valuable insights but also serve as a reminder that the intersection of beauty, travel, and sustainability is indeed a multifaceted topic.
On the more imaginative side, the fictional works "The Secret Life of Miss World Delegates" by A. R. Author and "Jet Fuel Mysteries: Tales of Travel and Intrigue" by M. Writer offer a whimsical take on the interplay between beauty pageants and fuel consumption. While these works may not contribute empirical evidence, they inject a dose of creativity into our exploration, much like a sprinkle of fairy dust in an otherwise factual endeavor.
Drawing inspiration from unlikely sources, the board game "Ticket to Ride: Nordic Countries" offers an intriguing parallel to our research topic, as players strategically manage train routes in the Nordic region. Just as the game requires careful consideration of logistical connections, our study navigates the tangle of associations between beauty pageants and fuel consumption. It's almost like comparing the precision of planning a cross-country journey to the nuanced analysis of statistical relationships.
In essence, the literature surrounding our research topic not only offers valuable insights but also embodies the notion that unexpected connections can yield illuminating perspectives. It's as if these diverse sources are beckoning us to embrace the uncharted territories of unconventional correlations and statistical surprises. After all, in the realm of academic inquiry, a touch of humor and imagination can infuse scholarly pursuits with a delightful twist.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between the number of Miss World delegates and jet fuel consumption in Denmark revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.7934629, indicating that as the number of Miss World delegates increased, so did the jet fuel consumption. It seems that the beauty and the fly have more in common than meets the eye! Speaking of eyes, did you hear about the optometrist who fell into a lens grinder and made a spectacle of himself?
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.6295834 suggests that approximately 63% of the variance in jet fuel consumption can be explained by the variance in the number of Miss World delegates. It's as if these delegates bring not just their charisma, but also a considerable share of the fuel consumption variance. It's almost like a beauty pageant for statistical relevance!
In addition, the p-value of less than 0.01 indicates that the observed correlation is statistically significant, ruling out the possibility of this finding being merely a fluke. This relationship is as real as the force that keeps those airplanes cruising through the skies. It's not just a flight of fancy; it's a statistically grounded observation that can't be dismissed as mere coincidence. This is truly "jet set" in stone.
Furthermore (no pun intended), the figure (Fig. 1) illustrates the scatterplot depicting the positive linear relationship between the variables, showcasing the substantial correlation we observed. It's clear as day - or should we say, clear as a perfectly sunny day for a smooth takeoff. This figure is not just a visual aid; it's a testament to the unexpected connections that can be unveiled through meticulous analysis of even the most unconventional variables.
In conclusion, our findings provide compelling evidence of a notable association between the number of Miss World delegates and jet fuel consumption in Denmark. This unexpected connection hints at a complex interplay of factors that extend beyond the realms of traditional statistical inquiry. It's almost like finding a statistical diamond in the rough, and who can resist the allure of an unexpected gem?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our research has unearthed a compelling relationship between the number of Miss World delegates and jet fuel consumption in Denmark, shedding light on an unexpected correlation that defies conventional expectations. It seems the beauty and the beastly expenses are intertwined in ways that go beyond mere coincidence. It's as if these beauty queens are not just global ambassadors of charm, but also inadvertent influencers of fuel consumption patterns. The results of our study have not only validated the prior research but have also brought to the forefront a statistically significant relationship that demands further exploration.

In alignment with the proposition put forth by Smith and Doe, our findings add empirical weight to the idea that beauty pageants exert a considerable impact on environmental resources, extending to the realm of jet fuel consumption. It's almost as if the eco-footprint of beauty pageants spans far and wide, spanning from energy usage to fuel consumption. It's like a global catwalk with environmental reverberations. Did you hear about the fashion designer who fell into a textile machine? He made a denim impression.

Drawing from the whimsical yet insightful tale of "Jet Fuel Mysteries: Tales of Travel and Intrigue" by M. Writer, our study brings to light the real-world intrigue behind the interplay of beauty pageants and fuel consumption. What may seem like a mystery at first glance turns out to be a statistically grounded revelation, akin to unraveling a statistical whodunit. It's as if our findings are not just statistical connections but a narrative of intrigue and astonishment.

Furthermore, the strong correlation coefficient and the statistically significant p-value corroborate the speculation put forth by Jones and Smith, indicating that the economic and environmental ramifications of beauty pageants extend beyond what meets the eye. It's like peeling back the layers of a Danish pastry to reveal a sweet and unexpected statistical confection. Speaking of pastries, did you hear about the statistician who drowned crossing a river? It was a Bayesian mishap.

Our results not only support the existing literature but also emphasize the need for a nuanced understanding of the multifaceted impacts of beauty pageants on the environment and economy. It's as if these seemingly disparate variables have orchestrated a statistical ballet, showcasing the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings are a testament to the unexpected connections that can be uncovered through steadfast statistical analysis. It's almost like finding a needle in a haystack, or in this case, a correlation in a scatterplot.

In essence, our study adds a touch of statistical sparkle to the oft-overlooked area of unconventional correlations, promising valuable insights into the interwoven tapestry of beauty pageants and environmental impact. It's as if the statistical playbook has just added a new and unforeseen chapter, offering a fresh perspective on the uncharted territories of statistical inquiry. The unanticipated confluence of beauty and fuel consumption may just be the opening act of a statistical pageant that is bound to captivate researchers and statisticians alike.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of Miss World delegates and Jet fuel used in Denmark. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Beauty and the Beastly Expenses: Exploring the Relationship Between Number of Miss World Delegates and Jet Fuel Consumption in Denmark"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the rather unexpected association between the number of Miss World delegates and the jet fuel used in Denmark. One might say we are breaking new ground here, both figuratively and literally! Our research team utilized data from Wikipedia and the Energy Information Administration to meticulously evaluate this peculiar linkage, just to see if there's any substance to it.

Our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7934629 and a p-value of less than 0.01, stretching from the years 1980 to 2021. Some might argue that this correlation is purely coincidental, but we believe it's more than just a flight of fancy. It's as if these Miss World delegates bring not just their charm, but also a fueling force that can't be ignored. Did someone say jet-setters?

In conclusion, our study sheds light on an unexpected relationship between the glitz and glamour of beauty pageants and the down-to-earth reality of fuel consumption. This connection might just be an example of "jet fuel with a twist".

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The study of bizarre and seemingly unrelated phenomena has long been a hallmark of scientific exploration. It is within this spirit of scientific curiosity that we present our research on the connection between the number of Miss World delegates and the jet fuel consumed in Denmark. One might say we're redefining the phrase "jet-setting lifestyle" in a rather unconventional way. If you think this alliance is a stretch, just wait until we dive into the statistics - it's sure to "propel" your interest!
Speaking of unlikely pairs, it's time to introduce our research variables. On one hand, we have the glitz and glamour of the international Miss World pageant, where grace and beauty take the stage. On the other, we have the unassuming yet essential commodity of jet fuel, keeping the engines of global travel running. It's like comparing apples and oranges, but in this case, one might just be fueling the other in a rather unexpected twist of fate.
As we embark on this scientific endeavor, it's important to note that correlation does not imply causation. However, as we've seen in previous studies, sometimes correlation can lead to unexpected and delightful insights. It's like stumbling upon a pun in a research paper - a pleasant surprise that leaves you pondering the unexpected humor in science.
Now, let's not "fuel" any doubts - we're not grasping at straws here. The statistical analysis conducted in this study has been as thorough and meticulous as a scientist's notebook. We're not just blowing hot air; we've crunched the numbers and analyzed the data with the precision of a well-engineered jet engine.
With that said, let's not "delay" any further in unveiling the results of our findings. But don't worry, we'll keep you "grounded" in the scientific truth amidst the clouds of speculation. After all, we wouldn't want to "jet" off into conclusions without solid evidence to support our claims - that would just be "plane" wrong!
So, buckle up and prepare for takeoff as we journey into the realm of unexpected connections and statistical surprises. As we navigate through the skies of data analysis, we'll be sure to keep our eyes on the runway of scientific integrity.
Get ready to soar into the realm of unconventional correlations and unearth the unexpected relationship between beauty pageants and fuel consumption. After all, in the world of statistics, the most unlikely connections can sometimes be the most illuminating.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between the number of Miss World delegates and jet fuel consumption in Denmark revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.7934629, indicating that as the number of Miss World delegates increased, so did the jet fuel consumption. It seems that the beauty and the fly have more in common than meets the eye! Speaking of eyes, did you hear about the optometrist who fell into a lens grinder and made a spectacle of himself?
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.6295834 suggests that approximately 63% of the variance in jet fuel consumption can be explained by the variance in the number of Miss World delegates. It's as if these delegates bring not just their charisma, but also a considerable share of the fuel consumption variance. It's almost like a beauty pageant for statistical relevance!
In addition, the p-value of less than 0.01 indicates that the observed correlation is statistically significant, ruling out the possibility of this finding being merely a fluke. This relationship is as real as the force that keeps those airplanes cruising through the skies. It's not just a flight of fancy; it's a statistically grounded observation that can't be dismissed as mere coincidence. This is truly "jet set" in stone.
Furthermore (no pun intended), the figure (Fig. 1) illustrates the scatterplot depicting the positive linear relationship between the variables, showcasing the substantial correlation we observed. It's clear as day - or should we say, clear as a perfectly sunny day for a smooth takeoff. This figure is not just a visual aid; it's a testament to the unexpected connections that can be unveiled through meticulous analysis of even the most unconventional variables.
In conclusion, our findings provide compelling evidence of a notable association between the number of Miss World delegates and jet fuel consumption in Denmark. This unexpected connection hints at a complex interplay of factors that extend beyond the realms of traditional statistical inquiry. It's almost like finding a statistical diamond in the rough, and who can resist the allure of an unexpected gem?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has uncovered a surprising and robust relationship between the number of Miss World delegates and the jet fuel consumption in Denmark. The correlation coefficient of 0.7934629 and a p-value of less than 0.01 provide strong evidence of this unexpected connection. It seems that the presence of beauty queens is not just enchanting, but also fueling the Danish skies with statistical significance. It's almost as if they're reigning supreme, both on the runway and in the realm of regression analysis!

This unexpected correlation may have many implications for future research and policy considerations. One could say it's a "runway" for new ideas and investigations, fueling the discourse in both the scientific and pageantry worlds. However, as we've touched the skies with our statistical findings, we'll leave you with a classic dad joke: "Did you hear about the mathematician who's afraid of negative numbers? He would stop at nothing to avoid them!"

Nonetheless, it's clear that this study has contributed to our understanding of the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate variables. As we've witnessed, statistics can sometimes lead us to the most unexpected and delightful discoveries, much like finding a "p-value" in a field of data. Nonetheless, with these findings, we can confidently assert that no further research is needed in this area – this beauty and beastly connection has been thoroughly unveiled, and it's time to let this statistical Cinderella story take its well-deserved rest.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Beauty and the Beastly Expenses: Exploring the Relationship Between Number of Miss World Delegates and Jet Fuel Consumption in Denmark. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The International Journal of Extravagant Economics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Beauty and the Beastly Expenses: Exploring the Relationship Between Number of Miss World Delegates and Jet Fuel Consumption in Denmark. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Sustainable Beauty Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Beauty and the Beastly Expenses: Exploring the Relationship Between Number of Miss World Delegates and Jet Fuel Consumption in Denmark with an abstract of In this paper, we delve into the rather unexpected association between the number of Miss World delegates and the jet fuel used in Denmark. One might say we are breaking new ground here, both figuratively and literally! Our research team utilized data from Wikipedia and the Energy Information Administration to meticulously evaluate this peculiar linkage, just to see if there's any substance to it.
Our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7934629 and a p-value of less than 0.01, stretching from the years 1980 to 2021. Some might argue that this correlation is purely coincidental, but we believe it's more than just a flight of fancy. It's as if these Miss World delegates bring not just their charm, but also a fueling force that can't be ignored. Did someone say jet-setters?
In conclusion, our study sheds light on an unexpected relationship between the glitz and glamour of beauty pageants and the down-to-earth reality of fuel consumption. This connection might just be an example of "jet fuel with a twist".

ChatGPT:

Miss World delegates, beauty pageants, jet fuel consumption, Denmark, correlation analysis, relationship study, unexpected associations, fuel consumption data, p-value, correlation coefficient, environmental impact, transportation emissions

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Number of Miss World delegates
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Number of Miss World delegates

Jet fuel used in Denmark
Detailed data title: Volume of jet fuel used consumed in Denmark in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Jet fuel used in Denmark

Correlation r = 0.7934629 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6295834 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 63% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Jet fuel used in Denmark) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Number of Miss World delegates) over the 42 years from 1980 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.7E-10. 0.0000000003686252218001592600
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.79 in 3.7E-8% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 2,712,782,362 random variables You don't actually need 2 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 41 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 41 because we have two variables measured over a period of 42 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.65, 0.88 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Number of Miss World delegates (Delegates)6767687272787778847881788381878488868694959388106107102104106109112115113116127121114117118118111097
Jet fuel used in Denmark (Million Barrels/Day)1714111211.557411.805512.282213.271214.226815.61114.983613.841114.032815.156216.147916.617.614817.057517.421918.632917.521918.241116.106815.865818.923520.115119.430120.230119.480917.271218.172618.958918.472718.846619.986319.435621.308721.704121.756222.49048.040989.82192




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.
  5. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
  6. Outlandish outliers: There are "outliers" in this data. In concept, "outlier" just means "way different than the rest of your dataset." When calculating a correlation like this, they are particularly impactful because a single outlier can substantially increase your correlation.

    For the purposes of this project, I counted a point as an outlier if it the residual was two standard deviations from the mean.

    (This bullet point only shows up in the details page on charts that do, in fact, have outliers.)
    They stand out on the scatterplot above: notice the dots that are far away from any other dots. I intentionally mishandeled outliers, which makes the correlation look extra strong.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([67,67,68,72,72,78,77,78,84,78,81,78,83,81,87,84,88,86,86,94,95,93,88,106,107,102,104,106,109,112,115,113,116,127,121,114,117,118,118,111,0,97,])
array_2 = np.array([17,14,11,12,11.5574,11.8055,12.2822,13.2712,14.2268,15.611,14.9836,13.8411,14.0328,15.1562,16.1479,16.6,17.6148,17.0575,17.4219,18.6329,17.5219,18.2411,16.1068,15.8658,18.9235,20.1151,19.4301,20.2301,19.4809,17.2712,18.1726,18.9589,18.4727,18.8466,19.9863,19.4356,21.3087,21.7041,21.7562,22.4904,8.04098,9.82192,])
array_1_name = "Number of Miss World delegates"
array_2_name = "Jet fuel used in Denmark"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is pure awesomeness!


Correlation ID: 4118 · Black Variable ID: 76 · Red Variable ID: 24350
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0