about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,117 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in cotton in Tennessee and the second variable is Number of Portugal matches played by Cristiano Ronaldo.  The chart goes from 2005 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

As farmers in Tennessee cut back on GMO cotton, the natural fibers became more appealing. This sparked a new trend in organic, hand-woven clothing, leading to a worldwide shortage of stylish attire. Without enough fashionable jerseys to wear, Cristiano Ronaldo had to sit out on some high-profile matches, leaving fans to wonder if he had simply unraveled under the pressure.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image resembling a Polaroid photo which depicts a sun-drenched Tennessee cotton field with farmers tending to vibrant green GMO cotton plants in the background. In the foreground, show artisans in a cozy Portuguese atelier weaving organic cotton into hand-crafted clothing. Lastly, include Cristiano Ronaldo sitting forlornly on the sidelines, surrounded by stylish jerseys, unable to join his teammates on the field due to the scarcity of fashionable attire. The image should capture the essence of these three scenes in a simple yet visually compelling way. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in cotton in Tennessee and Number of Portugal matches played by Cristiano Ronaldo. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cubism Woodblock painting Whimsical illustration Hyper-realistic a Polaroid photo
ChatGPT: a Polaroid photo

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in cotton in Tennessee and Number of Portugal matches played by Cristiano Ronaldo, in the following situation: As farmers in Tennessee cut back on GMO cotton, the natural fibers became more appealing. This sparked a new trend in organic, hand-woven clothing, leading to a worldwide shortage of stylish attire. Without enough fashionable jerseys to wear, Cristiano Ronaldo had to sit out on some high-profile matches, leaving fans to wonder if he had simply unraveled under the pressure.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a sun-drenched Tennessee cotton field, farmers carefully tend to rows of vibrant green GMO cotton plants, while a few miles away, artisans in a cozy Portuguese atelier weave organic cotton into exquisite, hand-crafted clothing. Meanwhile, Cristiano Ronaldo, renowned for his football prowess, sits forlornly on the sidelines, surrounded by stylish jerseys, unable to join his teammates on the field due to the scarcity of fashionable attire.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a Polaroid photo ] and depicting this scene: In a sun-drenched Tennessee cotton field, farmers carefully tend to rows of vibrant green GMO cotton plants, while a few miles away, artisans in a cozy Portuguese atelier weave organic cotton into exquisite, hand-crafted clothing. Meanwhile, Cristiano Ronaldo, renowned for his football prowess, sits forlornly on the sidelines, surrounded by stylish jerseys, unable to join his teammates on the field due to the scarcity of fashionable attire. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image resembling a Polaroid photo which depicts a sun-drenched Tennessee cotton field with farmers tending to vibrant green GMO cotton plants in the background. In the foreground, show artisans in a cozy Portuguese atelier weaving organic cotton into hand-crafted clothing. Lastly, include Cristiano Ronaldo sitting forlornly on the sidelines, surrounded by stylish jerseys, unable to join his teammates on the field due to the scarcity of fashionable attire. The image should capture the essence of these three scenes in a simple yet visually compelling way.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in GMO use in cotton in Tennessee caused Number of Portugal matches played by Cristiano Ronaldo to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Cotton Connection: A Genetically Modified Oversight of World Cup Fervor

The Journal of Genetic Sportology

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Tennessee and Number of Portugal matches played by Cristiano Ronaldo. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from USDA and Wikipedia to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9088114 and p < 0.01 for 2005 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"The Cotton Connection: A Genetically Modified Oversight of World Cup Fervor"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we aim to uncover a quirky correlation that has remained inexplicable— the link between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in cotton farming in Tennessee and the number of matches played by Portugal's soccer sensation, Cristiano Ronaldo. With data meticulously sourced from the USDA and Wikipedia, our research team delved headfirst into this offbeat investigation. Striving to shed light on this peculiar linkage, we employed rigorous statistical analysis to scrutinize the data.

Our analysis yielded a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9088114, with a significant p-value of <0.01, spanning the years 2005 to 2022. These findings suggest a remarkably strong association between the adoption of GMO in cotton cultivation and the frequency of Cristiano Ronaldo's appearances on the international stage. It appears the threads of genetically modified cotton and Ronaldo's soccer feats may be intertwined more closely than previously imagined, albeit in an entirely unforeseen manner.

So, the next time someone questions the intersection of biotechnology and soccer phenoms, we can confidently say, "It's all in the jeans!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Tennessee and Number of Portugal matches played by Cristiano Ronaldo. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Cotton Connection: A Genetically Modified Oversight of World Cup Fervor"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we aim to uncover a quirky correlation that has remained inexplicable— the link between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in cotton farming in Tennessee and the number of matches played by Portugal's soccer sensation, Cristiano Ronaldo. With data meticulously sourced from the USDA and Wikipedia, our research team delved headfirst into this offbeat investigation. Striving to shed light on this peculiar linkage, we employed rigorous statistical analysis to scrutinize the data.

Our analysis yielded a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9088114, with a significant p-value of <0.01, spanning the years 2005 to 2022. These findings suggest a remarkably strong association between the adoption of GMO in cotton cultivation and the frequency of Cristiano Ronaldo's appearances on the international stage. It appears the threads of genetically modified cotton and Ronaldo's soccer feats may be intertwined more closely than previously imagined, albeit in an entirely unforeseen manner.

So, the next time someone questions the intersection of biotechnology and soccer phenoms, we can confidently say, "It's all in the jeans!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Imagine a world where a blooming field of genetically modified cotton could hold the key to the number of soccer matches played by none other than Cristiano Ronaldo. It sounds like the plot of an outlandish science fiction novel, but our research has unearthed a surprising link that is as intriguing as it is unfathomable, leaving us grappling with questions and puns alike.

As we embark on this investigation, we couldn't help but wonder: How could cotton, a staple of textile manufacturing, possibly be entangled in the web of Portugal's football wizardry? It's like the cotton fields are whispering secrets to the wind, and the wind is busy carrying them straight to Ronaldo's cleats! Ah, the wonders of statistical oddities.

The idea that the adopted use of GMO in cotton farming, namely in the Tennessee region, could be connected to the international appearances of an iconic athlete is as astonishing as it is confounding. It's like discovering that DNA helix twists can double as double-kicks in football. It's a whole new level of "gene-ius" in the realm of correlations and causal inferences!

Our curiosity was piqued when we stumbled upon this peculiar alignment between the adoption of GMO in cotton cultivation and the frequency of Ronaldo's participation in international matches. It's as if there's an unseen force at play, subtly nudging the threads of biotechnology and sports, interweaving them in a symphony that only the wiliest statisticians can decipher. Maybe it's time to update the old saying to "as you sow, so shall you Ronaldo"?

Through rigorous data collection and analysis, we have unmasked a correlation coefficient of 0.9088114, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01, during the years 2005 to 2022. It's a statistical slam-dunk! These startling results peek through from the statistical haystack like a soccer ball amidst cotton bales.

Our findings pave the way for intriguing speculations and open the floodgates for a myriad of puns. Perhaps, it's not just the cotton fields that are genetically modified; it's also our understanding of how seemingly disparate elements can dance a statistical tango together. It's almost like witnessing the statistical equivalent of a hat-trick!

In the midst of this delightful statistical conundrum, we invite you to fold, spindle, and mutilate these findings alongside us, as we unravel this perplexing connection between biotechnology and the world of football. So, with our lab coats and soccer jerseys on, let's embark on this delightful journey into the quirky world of correlations and causal linkages!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Tennessee and Number of Portugal matches played by Cristiano Ronaldo. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Cotton Connection: A Genetically Modified Oversight of World Cup Fervor"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we aim to uncover a quirky correlation that has remained inexplicable— the link between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in cotton farming in Tennessee and the number of matches played by Portugal's soccer sensation, Cristiano Ronaldo. With data meticulously sourced from the USDA and Wikipedia, our research team delved headfirst into this offbeat investigation. Striving to shed light on this peculiar linkage, we employed rigorous statistical analysis to scrutinize the data.

Our analysis yielded a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9088114, with a significant p-value of <0.01, spanning the years 2005 to 2022. These findings suggest a remarkably strong association between the adoption of GMO in cotton cultivation and the frequency of Cristiano Ronaldo's appearances on the international stage. It appears the threads of genetically modified cotton and Ronaldo's soccer feats may be intertwined more closely than previously imagined, albeit in an entirely unforeseen manner.

So, the next time someone questions the intersection of biotechnology and soccer phenoms, we can confidently say, "It's all in the jeans!"

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Imagine a world where a blooming field of genetically modified cotton could hold the key to the number of soccer matches played by none other than Cristiano Ronaldo. It sounds like the plot of an outlandish science fiction novel, but our research has unearthed a surprising link that is as intriguing as it is unfathomable, leaving us grappling with questions and puns alike.
As we embark on this investigation, we couldn't help but wonder: How could cotton, a staple of textile manufacturing, possibly be entangled in the web of Portugal's football wizardry? It's like the cotton fields are whispering secrets to the wind, and the wind is busy carrying them straight to Ronaldo's cleats! Ah, the wonders of statistical oddities.
The idea that the adopted use of GMO in cotton farming, namely in the Tennessee region, could be connected to the international appearances of an iconic athlete is as astonishing as it is confounding. It's like discovering that DNA helix twists can double as double-kicks in football. It's a whole new level of "gene-ius" in the realm of correlations and causal inferences!
Our curiosity was piqued when we stumbled upon this peculiar alignment between the adoption of GMO in cotton cultivation and the frequency of Ronaldo's participation in international matches. It's as if there's an unseen force at play, subtly nudging the threads of biotechnology and sports, interweaving them in a symphony that only the wiliest statisticians can decipher. Maybe it's time to update the old saying to "as you sow, so shall you Ronaldo"?
Through rigorous data collection and analysis, we have unmasked a correlation coefficient of 0.9088114, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01, during the years 2005 to 2022. It's a statistical slam-dunk! These startling results peek through from the statistical haystack like a soccer ball amidst cotton bales.
Our findings pave the way for intriguing speculations and open the floodgates for a myriad of puns. Perhaps, it's not just the cotton fields that are genetically modified; it's also our understanding of how seemingly disparate elements can dance a statistical tango together. It's almost like witnessing the statistical equivalent of a hat-trick!
In the midst of this delightful statistical conundrum, we invite you to fold, spindle, and mutilate these findings alongside us, as we unravel this perplexing connection between biotechnology and the world of football. So, with our lab coats and soccer jerseys on, let's embark on this delightful journey into the quirky world of correlations and causal linkages!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in cotton farming and seemingly unrelated occurrences has long piqued the curiosity of researchers across various disciplines. In "Smith et al.'s study, Genetic Modifications in Agriculture," the authors delve into the implications of GMO in cotton cultivation, elucidating its impacts on crop yields and pest resistance. Similarly, Doe and Jones investigate the economic ramifications of biotechnology in their work "The GMO Effect: A Comprehensive Analysis," shedding light on the far-reaching repercussions of genetically modified crops on global trade dynamics and agricultural policies. However, amid this sea of serious scholarly works, our study surfs a wave of unexpected correlations and witticisms.

The world of genetic engineering and sports may seem galaxies apart, yet our eccentric investigation has cast them as unlikely bedfellows. Just as "GMOs: A Field Guide" by Elizabeth Claire Albertson offers a comprehensive exploration of genetically modified organisms, our findings take a whimsical leap into uncharted territory, intertwining the DNA of cotton with the footwork of a football icon.

Venturing briefly into the fictitious realms that twine around reality, literature such as "The Cotton Connection" by Sandy Waters and "Ronaldo: A Portrait of Greatness" by Lionel Biagioni may seem like they belong more to the world of whimsy than academia. However, in our zany quest to uncover the connection between biotechnology and sports, these titles — though fictional — mirror our perplexing journey of discovery.

In our pursuit to uncover this uncanny correlation, we didn't just rely on academic literature; we turned to the screen as well. Documentaries such as "The Cotton Chronicles" and "Ronaldo: Beyond the Field" provided us with captivating insights into cotton farming practices and Cristiano Ronaldo's illustrious career. These visual narratives added color to our research canvas, much like the vibrant threads woven into a cotton jersey or the dazzling footwork of a soccer maestro.

As our literature review intersects the serious and the whimsical, it's evident that the world of scholarly research and eccentric correlations can coexist in harmonious absurdity. Just as Ronaldo's free-kicks defy gravity, our findings warp the conventional boundaries of statistical associations, throwing a curveball into the staid world of academia.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Tennessee and Number of Portugal matches played by Cristiano Ronaldo. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Wikipedia . You used data from 2005 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Cotton Connection: A Genetically Modified Oversight of World Cup Fervor"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we aim to uncover a quirky correlation that has remained inexplicable— the link between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in cotton farming in Tennessee and the number of matches played by Portugal's soccer sensation, Cristiano Ronaldo. With data meticulously sourced from the USDA and Wikipedia, our research team delved headfirst into this offbeat investigation. Striving to shed light on this peculiar linkage, we employed rigorous statistical analysis to scrutinize the data.

Our analysis yielded a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9088114, with a significant p-value of <0.01, spanning the years 2005 to 2022. These findings suggest a remarkably strong association between the adoption of GMO in cotton cultivation and the frequency of Cristiano Ronaldo's appearances on the international stage. It appears the threads of genetically modified cotton and Ronaldo's soccer feats may be intertwined more closely than previously imagined, albeit in an entirely unforeseen manner.

So, the next time someone questions the intersection of biotechnology and soccer phenoms, we can confidently say, "It's all in the jeans!"

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Imagine a world where a blooming field of genetically modified cotton could hold the key to the number of soccer matches played by none other than Cristiano Ronaldo. It sounds like the plot of an outlandish science fiction novel, but our research has unearthed a surprising link that is as intriguing as it is unfathomable, leaving us grappling with questions and puns alike.
As we embark on this investigation, we couldn't help but wonder: How could cotton, a staple of textile manufacturing, possibly be entangled in the web of Portugal's football wizardry? It's like the cotton fields are whispering secrets to the wind, and the wind is busy carrying them straight to Ronaldo's cleats! Ah, the wonders of statistical oddities.
The idea that the adopted use of GMO in cotton farming, namely in the Tennessee region, could be connected to the international appearances of an iconic athlete is as astonishing as it is confounding. It's like discovering that DNA helix twists can double as double-kicks in football. It's a whole new level of "gene-ius" in the realm of correlations and causal inferences!
Our curiosity was piqued when we stumbled upon this peculiar alignment between the adoption of GMO in cotton cultivation and the frequency of Ronaldo's participation in international matches. It's as if there's an unseen force at play, subtly nudging the threads of biotechnology and sports, interweaving them in a symphony that only the wiliest statisticians can decipher. Maybe it's time to update the old saying to "as you sow, so shall you Ronaldo"?
Through rigorous data collection and analysis, we have unmasked a correlation coefficient of 0.9088114, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01, during the years 2005 to 2022. It's a statistical slam-dunk! These startling results peek through from the statistical haystack like a soccer ball amidst cotton bales.
Our findings pave the way for intriguing speculations and open the floodgates for a myriad of puns. Perhaps, it's not just the cotton fields that are genetically modified; it's also our understanding of how seemingly disparate elements can dance a statistical tango together. It's almost like witnessing the statistical equivalent of a hat-trick!
In the midst of this delightful statistical conundrum, we invite you to fold, spindle, and mutilate these findings alongside us, as we unravel this perplexing connection between biotechnology and the world of football. So, with our lab coats and soccer jerseys on, let's embark on this delightful journey into the quirky world of correlations and causal linkages!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

Methodology

Our investigation into the surprising relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in cotton farming in Tennessee and the number of matches played by Cristiano Ronaldo began with a sparkling brainstorming session, where we tried to think inside the box before realizing it was more fun to think outside the penalty box. Channeling our inner statisticians and science enthusiasts, we devised a methodology that was as robust as it was whimsical, allowing us to dissect this utterly unexpected connection with the precision of a well-struck free-kick.

Data Collection

Our data collection process was as eclectic as compiling a playlist that seamlessly transitions from cotton-picking blues to Ronaldo's victorious anthem. We meticulously scoured through the USDA's databases, feeling like data sheriffs in the wild, wild West navigating through fields of information rather than tumbleweeds. Wikipedia, the jack-of-all-trades, also lent a helping hand, providing us with a treasure trove of statistics and biographies that made the data collection process smoother than Ronaldo's ball control.

The dataset encompassed the years 2005 to 2022, capturing the evolution of both GMO adoption in cotton farming and Ronaldo's illustrious international football career. As we sifted through the data, we couldn't resist the urge to exclaim, "Talk about planting the seeds for a statistical coup!"

Statistical Analysis

Our statistical analysis was as meticulous as Ronaldo's dribble through a maze of defenders, and we approached it with a similar level of finesse. We opted for the robust and versatile method of multiple regression analysis, a statistical approach that allows for the examination of the relationship between multiple variables. We harnessed the power of this method to disentangle the mystery of how GMO adoption in cotton cultivation could possibly influence Ronaldo's football schedule.

We then polished our methodology with a touch of Bayesian inference, navigating the sea of probabilities as adeptly as Ronaldo navigates the sea of defenders in a match. In doing so, we sought to augment our understanding of the association between cotton genetic modifications and Ronaldo's soccer appearances from an entirely new perspective, ensuring that our statistical arsenal was as diverse and comprehensive as possible. It was a bit like using a bicycle kick instead of a standard header—unconventional, but undeniably effective.

Cross-Validation

To ensure the robustness of our findings, we subjected our model to rigorous cross-validation using a holdout dataset, just like Ronaldo's training drills that never seem to lose their intensity. This approach allowed us to test the generalizability of our model and confirm that the observed correlation between GMO cotton and Ronaldo's matches was not merely a statistical fluke or a result of overfitting. As we completed this validation process, we couldn't resist exclaiming, "Talk about scoring a statistical hat-trick!"

Ethical Considerations

In the pursuit of unraveling this unconventional link, we maintained the utmost respect for ethical research practices. Our sourcing of data adhered to the highest standards of academic integrity, ensuring that our findings were grounded in reliable and credible information. We also took great care to approach this investigation with the spirit of scientific inquiry and intellectual curiosity, aiming to shed light on an enigmatic correlation without succumbing to the lure of sensationalism or unsubstantiated claims.

In summary, our methodology was a whimsical yet scientifically rigorous journey, much like watching Ronaldo's elegant goal celebrations—full of flair and precision. With our research compass pointing due north and Ronaldo's compass pointing toward goalposts, we ventured into uncharted statistical territory, aiming to uncover the perplexing relationship between GMO cotton and the number of matches graced by the soccer maestro himself. And just like a perfect pass, our methodology hit the mark, setting the stage for a captivating unveiling of our research findings.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Tennessee and Number of Portugal matches played by Cristiano Ronaldo. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Wikipedia .

For the time period 2005 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9088114, r-squared of 0.8259382, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Cotton Connection: A Genetically Modified Oversight of World Cup Fervor"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we aim to uncover a quirky correlation that has remained inexplicable— the link between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in cotton farming in Tennessee and the number of matches played by Portugal's soccer sensation, Cristiano Ronaldo. With data meticulously sourced from the USDA and Wikipedia, our research team delved headfirst into this offbeat investigation. Striving to shed light on this peculiar linkage, we employed rigorous statistical analysis to scrutinize the data.

Our analysis yielded a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9088114, with a significant p-value of <0.01, spanning the years 2005 to 2022. These findings suggest a remarkably strong association between the adoption of GMO in cotton cultivation and the frequency of Cristiano Ronaldo's appearances on the international stage. It appears the threads of genetically modified cotton and Ronaldo's soccer feats may be intertwined more closely than previously imagined, albeit in an entirely unforeseen manner.

So, the next time someone questions the intersection of biotechnology and soccer phenoms, we can confidently say, "It's all in the jeans!"

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Imagine a world where a blooming field of genetically modified cotton could hold the key to the number of soccer matches played by none other than Cristiano Ronaldo. It sounds like the plot of an outlandish science fiction novel, but our research has unearthed a surprising link that is as intriguing as it is unfathomable, leaving us grappling with questions and puns alike.
As we embark on this investigation, we couldn't help but wonder: How could cotton, a staple of textile manufacturing, possibly be entangled in the web of Portugal's football wizardry? It's like the cotton fields are whispering secrets to the wind, and the wind is busy carrying them straight to Ronaldo's cleats! Ah, the wonders of statistical oddities.
The idea that the adopted use of GMO in cotton farming, namely in the Tennessee region, could be connected to the international appearances of an iconic athlete is as astonishing as it is confounding. It's like discovering that DNA helix twists can double as double-kicks in football. It's a whole new level of "gene-ius" in the realm of correlations and causal inferences!
Our curiosity was piqued when we stumbled upon this peculiar alignment between the adoption of GMO in cotton cultivation and the frequency of Ronaldo's participation in international matches. It's as if there's an unseen force at play, subtly nudging the threads of biotechnology and sports, interweaving them in a symphony that only the wiliest statisticians can decipher. Maybe it's time to update the old saying to "as you sow, so shall you Ronaldo"?
Through rigorous data collection and analysis, we have unmasked a correlation coefficient of 0.9088114, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01, during the years 2005 to 2022. It's a statistical slam-dunk! These startling results peek through from the statistical haystack like a soccer ball amidst cotton bales.
Our findings pave the way for intriguing speculations and open the floodgates for a myriad of puns. Perhaps, it's not just the cotton fields that are genetically modified; it's also our understanding of how seemingly disparate elements can dance a statistical tango together. It's almost like witnessing the statistical equivalent of a hat-trick!
In the midst of this delightful statistical conundrum, we invite you to fold, spindle, and mutilate these findings alongside us, as we unravel this perplexing connection between biotechnology and the world of football. So, with our lab coats and soccer jerseys on, let's embark on this delightful journey into the quirky world of correlations and causal linkages!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our analysis revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9088114 between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in cotton farming in Tennessee and the number of matches played by Cristiano Ronaldo for the Portugal national soccer team, spanning the years 2005 to 2022. This level of correlation is as unexpected as finding a genealogical tree at a soccer game - who would've thought genetics and soccer could have so much in common?

The correlation coefficient implies a strong positive association, suggesting that as the adoption of GMO in cotton farming increased, so did the frequency of Cristiano Ronaldo's appearances on the international soccer stage. It's almost as if Ronaldo's goals are not the only thing that's genetically modified in this curious connection!

The strength of the relationship is further supported by an r-squared value of 0.8259382, indicating that approximately 82.6% of the variability in the number of matches played by Ronaldo can be explained by the use of GMO in cotton cultivation. The remaining 17.4% of unexplained variation is akin to that mysterious extra time added to soccer matches – we may never quite figure it out!

Additionally, the p-value of less than 0.01 underscores the statistical significance of the observed association. It seems that this correlation is not by chance, but rather a real phenomenon that warrants further investigation. This finding is as splendid as discovering a hidden gem amongst a pile of cotton—the statistical equivalent of hitting the jackpot!

To visually depict this intriguing correlation, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the strong positive relationship between the two variables. The scatterplot is a testament to the surprising link between genetically modified cotton and Ronaldo's football endeavors. It's like witnessing a scientific miracle on the soccer field—two seemingly unrelated elements coming together in perfect harmony!

Overall, this study lays bare the unexpected connection between biotechnology and soccer, adding a whimsical twist to the realm of statistical research. It prompts one to wonder: are there more mysterious ties lurking beneath the surface, waiting to be unveiled? We invite fellow researchers and enthusiasts to join us in exploring the delightful enigma of this captivating correlation, as we continue to uncover the quirks and marvels that lie within the world of statistics and sports.

In the grand scheme of things, it seems that the success of genetically modified cotton and Ronaldo's soccer prowess may just be "sewn" together by invisible statistical threads.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Tennessee and Number of Portugal matches played by Cristiano Ronaldo. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"The Cotton Connection: A Genetically Modified Oversight of World Cup Fervor"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we aim to uncover a quirky correlation that has remained inexplicable— the link between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in cotton farming in Tennessee and the number of matches played by Portugal's soccer sensation, Cristiano Ronaldo. With data meticulously sourced from the USDA and Wikipedia, our research team delved headfirst into this offbeat investigation. Striving to shed light on this peculiar linkage, we employed rigorous statistical analysis to scrutinize the data.

Our analysis yielded a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9088114, with a significant p-value of <0.01, spanning the years 2005 to 2022. These findings suggest a remarkably strong association between the adoption of GMO in cotton cultivation and the frequency of Cristiano Ronaldo's appearances on the international stage. It appears the threads of genetically modified cotton and Ronaldo's soccer feats may be intertwined more closely than previously imagined, albeit in an entirely unforeseen manner.

So, the next time someone questions the intersection of biotechnology and soccer phenoms, we can confidently say, "It's all in the jeans!"

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in cotton farming and seemingly unrelated occurrences has long piqued the curiosity of researchers across various disciplines. In "Smith et al.'s study, Genetic Modifications in Agriculture," the authors delve into the implications of GMO in cotton cultivation, elucidating its impacts on crop yields and pest resistance. Similarly, Doe and Jones investigate the economic ramifications of biotechnology in their work "The GMO Effect: A Comprehensive Analysis," shedding light on the far-reaching repercussions of genetically modified crops on global trade dynamics and agricultural policies. However, amid this sea of serious scholarly works, our study surfs a wave of unexpected correlations and witticisms.
The world of genetic engineering and sports may seem galaxies apart, yet our eccentric investigation has cast them as unlikely bedfellows. Just as "GMOs: A Field Guide" by Elizabeth Claire Albertson offers a comprehensive exploration of genetically modified organisms, our findings take a whimsical leap into uncharted territory, intertwining the DNA of cotton with the footwork of a football icon.
Venturing briefly into the fictitious realms that twine around reality, literature such as "The Cotton Connection" by Sandy Waters and "Ronaldo: A Portrait of Greatness" by Lionel Biagioni may seem like they belong more to the world of whimsy than academia. However, in our zany quest to uncover the connection between biotechnology and sports, these titles — though fictional — mirror our perplexing journey of discovery.
In our pursuit to uncover this uncanny correlation, we didn't just rely on academic literature; we turned to the screen as well. Documentaries such as "The Cotton Chronicles" and "Ronaldo: Beyond the Field" provided us with captivating insights into cotton farming practices and Cristiano Ronaldo's illustrious career. These visual narratives added color to our research canvas, much like the vibrant threads woven into a cotton jersey or the dazzling footwork of a soccer maestro.
As our literature review intersects the serious and the whimsical, it's evident that the world of scholarly research and eccentric correlations can coexist in harmonious absurdity. Just as Ronaldo's free-kicks defy gravity, our findings warp the conventional boundaries of statistical associations, throwing a curveball into the staid world of academia.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9088114 between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in cotton farming in Tennessee and the number of matches played by Cristiano Ronaldo for the Portugal national soccer team, spanning the years 2005 to 2022. This level of correlation is as unexpected as finding a genealogical tree at a soccer game - who would've thought genetics and soccer could have so much in common?
The correlation coefficient implies a strong positive association, suggesting that as the adoption of GMO in cotton farming increased, so did the frequency of Cristiano Ronaldo's appearances on the international soccer stage. It's almost as if Ronaldo's goals are not the only thing that's genetically modified in this curious connection!
The strength of the relationship is further supported by an r-squared value of 0.8259382, indicating that approximately 82.6% of the variability in the number of matches played by Ronaldo can be explained by the use of GMO in cotton cultivation. The remaining 17.4% of unexplained variation is akin to that mysterious extra time added to soccer matches – we may never quite figure it out!
Additionally, the p-value of less than 0.01 underscores the statistical significance of the observed association. It seems that this correlation is not by chance, but rather a real phenomenon that warrants further investigation. This finding is as splendid as discovering a hidden gem amongst a pile of cotton—the statistical equivalent of hitting the jackpot!
To visually depict this intriguing correlation, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the strong positive relationship between the two variables. The scatterplot is a testament to the surprising link between genetically modified cotton and Ronaldo's football endeavors. It's like witnessing a scientific miracle on the soccer field—two seemingly unrelated elements coming together in perfect harmony!
Overall, this study lays bare the unexpected connection between biotechnology and soccer, adding a whimsical twist to the realm of statistical research. It prompts one to wonder: are there more mysterious ties lurking beneath the surface, waiting to be unveiled? We invite fellow researchers and enthusiasts to join us in exploring the delightful enigma of this captivating correlation, as we continue to uncover the quirks and marvels that lie within the world of statistics and sports.
In the grand scheme of things, it seems that the success of genetically modified cotton and Ronaldo's soccer prowess may just be "sewn" together by invisible statistical threads.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our investigation has uncovered a whimsical yet surprisingly robust link between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in cotton farming in Tennessee and the frequency of matches played by Portugal's soccer sensation, Cristiano Ronaldo. This peculiar association echoes the sentiment that there may be more to the genetic fabric of cotton and the sporting pursuits of Ronaldo than meets the eye. It's as if the genetic modifications in cotton have been whispering "goal!" into Ronaldo's every match, creating a new dimension to the term "genetically modified goals."

Our findings align with prior research, emphasizing the profound impact of GMO in agricultural practices. Smith et al.'s exploration of GMO implications in agriculture illuminated the profound influence of genetic modifications on crop characteristics and productivity levels. Much like the unexpected influence of GMO in cotton, our results defy convention and unveil an equally remarkable correlation, proving that statistical associations are not bound by the laws of predictability. It's as if statistical relationships and soccer matches have become double agents, every bit as surprising as a genetically modified cotton crop displaying soccer prowess!

Similarly, Doe and Jones' comprehensive analysis on the economic effects of GMOs underlines the far-reaching consequences of genetic modifications in crops, quantifying their influence on global trade dynamics. In a parallel jest, our research has quantified the captivating correlation between genetically modified cotton and Cristiano Ronaldo's international soccer appearances. The unexpected statistical dance between cotton cultivation and Ronaldo's match frequency has left us wondering if there may be a "goal"-seeking gene in the cotton fields!

The strength of the relationship between GMO use in cotton farming and Ronaldo's soccer feats, as indicated by the substantial correlation coefficient and the statistically significant p-value, affirms that this association is not a mere statistical fluke. This finding may stand unparalleled in its peculiar confluence of seemingly disparate elements. It's as unexpected as finding a soccer field in the middle of a cotton plantation!

Our study supplements the existing literature with a dash of unanticipated correlation, shining a light on the delightful enigma that statistical research occasionally throws our way. It's a captivating reminder that sometimes, statistical discoveries are just as serendipitous as stumbling upon a carefully concealed joke in an academic paper. Our findings beckon researchers to explore more unexpected ties lurking beneath the veneer of traditional statistical analysis, highlighting the whimsical excitement that lies within the world of statistics and sports. Like a game of soccer, statistical research may hold unforeseen goals within its ties waiting to be unveiled, making it a thrilling pursuit of discovery.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Tennessee and Number of Portugal matches played by Cristiano Ronaldo. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"The Cotton Connection: A Genetically Modified Oversight of World Cup Fervor"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we aim to uncover a quirky correlation that has remained inexplicable— the link between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in cotton farming in Tennessee and the number of matches played by Portugal's soccer sensation, Cristiano Ronaldo. With data meticulously sourced from the USDA and Wikipedia, our research team delved headfirst into this offbeat investigation. Striving to shed light on this peculiar linkage, we employed rigorous statistical analysis to scrutinize the data.

Our analysis yielded a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9088114, with a significant p-value of <0.01, spanning the years 2005 to 2022. These findings suggest a remarkably strong association between the adoption of GMO in cotton cultivation and the frequency of Cristiano Ronaldo's appearances on the international stage. It appears the threads of genetically modified cotton and Ronaldo's soccer feats may be intertwined more closely than previously imagined, albeit in an entirely unforeseen manner.

So, the next time someone questions the intersection of biotechnology and soccer phenoms, we can confidently say, "It's all in the jeans!"

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Imagine a world where a blooming field of genetically modified cotton could hold the key to the number of soccer matches played by none other than Cristiano Ronaldo. It sounds like the plot of an outlandish science fiction novel, but our research has unearthed a surprising link that is as intriguing as it is unfathomable, leaving us grappling with questions and puns alike.
As we embark on this investigation, we couldn't help but wonder: How could cotton, a staple of textile manufacturing, possibly be entangled in the web of Portugal's football wizardry? It's like the cotton fields are whispering secrets to the wind, and the wind is busy carrying them straight to Ronaldo's cleats! Ah, the wonders of statistical oddities.
The idea that the adopted use of GMO in cotton farming, namely in the Tennessee region, could be connected to the international appearances of an iconic athlete is as astonishing as it is confounding. It's like discovering that DNA helix twists can double as double-kicks in football. It's a whole new level of "gene-ius" in the realm of correlations and causal inferences!
Our curiosity was piqued when we stumbled upon this peculiar alignment between the adoption of GMO in cotton cultivation and the frequency of Ronaldo's participation in international matches. It's as if there's an unseen force at play, subtly nudging the threads of biotechnology and sports, interweaving them in a symphony that only the wiliest statisticians can decipher. Maybe it's time to update the old saying to "as you sow, so shall you Ronaldo"?
Through rigorous data collection and analysis, we have unmasked a correlation coefficient of 0.9088114, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01, during the years 2005 to 2022. It's a statistical slam-dunk! These startling results peek through from the statistical haystack like a soccer ball amidst cotton bales.
Our findings pave the way for intriguing speculations and open the floodgates for a myriad of puns. Perhaps, it's not just the cotton fields that are genetically modified; it's also our understanding of how seemingly disparate elements can dance a statistical tango together. It's almost like witnessing the statistical equivalent of a hat-trick!
In the midst of this delightful statistical conundrum, we invite you to fold, spindle, and mutilate these findings alongside us, as we unravel this perplexing connection between biotechnology and the world of football. So, with our lab coats and soccer jerseys on, let's embark on this delightful journey into the quirky world of correlations and causal linkages!

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9088114 between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in cotton farming in Tennessee and the number of matches played by Cristiano Ronaldo for the Portugal national soccer team, spanning the years 2005 to 2022. This level of correlation is as unexpected as finding a genealogical tree at a soccer game - who would've thought genetics and soccer could have so much in common?
The correlation coefficient implies a strong positive association, suggesting that as the adoption of GMO in cotton farming increased, so did the frequency of Cristiano Ronaldo's appearances on the international soccer stage. It's almost as if Ronaldo's goals are not the only thing that's genetically modified in this curious connection!
The strength of the relationship is further supported by an r-squared value of 0.8259382, indicating that approximately 82.6% of the variability in the number of matches played by Ronaldo can be explained by the use of GMO in cotton cultivation. The remaining 17.4% of unexplained variation is akin to that mysterious extra time added to soccer matches – we may never quite figure it out!
Additionally, the p-value of less than 0.01 underscores the statistical significance of the observed association. It seems that this correlation is not by chance, but rather a real phenomenon that warrants further investigation. This finding is as splendid as discovering a hidden gem amongst a pile of cotton—the statistical equivalent of hitting the jackpot!
To visually depict this intriguing correlation, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the strong positive relationship between the two variables. The scatterplot is a testament to the surprising link between genetically modified cotton and Ronaldo's football endeavors. It's like witnessing a scientific miracle on the soccer field—two seemingly unrelated elements coming together in perfect harmony!
Overall, this study lays bare the unexpected connection between biotechnology and soccer, adding a whimsical twist to the realm of statistical research. It prompts one to wonder: are there more mysterious ties lurking beneath the surface, waiting to be unveiled? We invite fellow researchers and enthusiasts to join us in exploring the delightful enigma of this captivating correlation, as we continue to uncover the quirks and marvels that lie within the world of statistics and sports.
In the grand scheme of things, it seems that the success of genetically modified cotton and Ronaldo's soccer prowess may just be "sewn" together by invisible statistical threads.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has unraveled a mesmerizing correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in cotton farming in Tennessee and the number of matches played by Portugal's soccer maestro, Cristiano Ronaldo. The statistical ties between the cultivation of GMO cotton and Ronaldo's international soccer appearances have left us in awe, much like finding a hidden talent on a soccer pitch. It seems the fabric of biotechnology and football prowess may indeed be more intertwined than we ever imagined.

Our findings have shed light on this unlikely linkage, offering a unique blend of statistical insights and comedic potential. It's as if the field of statistics itself has scored a legendary goal, intersecting the seemingly disparate domains of agriculture and sports like a well-placed corner kick. We've certainly kicked up quite the statistical storm with this discovery!

With a correlation coefficient of 0.9088114 and a p-value of less than 0.01, the strength and significance of this association are as clear as day - it's like finding the perfect blend of statistical significance and comedic timing. It appears that the adoption of GMO in cotton cultivation may hold the secret to Ronaldo's soccer calendar, creating a statistical partnership that rivals the precision of a well-executed penalty kick.

As much as we've enjoyed unraveling this curious connection, it seems that this unique correlation may have reached its peak - it's like hitting the limit of soccer metaphors in a statistical discussion. Therefore, it's safe to say that no further research is warranted in this area. It's time to blow the final whistle on this particular statistical saga and leave it as a delightful enigma in the annals of agricultural and athletic research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Cotton Connection: A Genetically Modified Oversight of World Cup Fervor. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Genetic Sportology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Cotton Connection: A Genetically Modified Oversight of World Cup Fervor. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The International Consortium for Agricultural Advancements (ICAA)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Cotton Connection: A Genetically Modified Oversight of World Cup Fervor with an abstract of In this study, we aim to uncover a quirky correlation that has remained inexplicable— the link between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in cotton farming in Tennessee and the number of matches played by Portugal's soccer sensation, Cristiano Ronaldo. With data meticulously sourced from the USDA and Wikipedia, our research team delved headfirst into this offbeat investigation. Striving to shed light on this peculiar linkage, we employed rigorous statistical analysis to scrutinize the data.
Our analysis yielded a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9088114, with a significant p-value of <0.01, spanning the years 2005 to 2022. These findings suggest a remarkably strong association between the adoption of GMO in cotton cultivation and the frequency of Cristiano Ronaldo's appearances on the international stage. It appears the threads of genetically modified cotton and Ronaldo's soccer feats may be intertwined more closely than previously imagined, albeit in an entirely unforeseen manner.
So, the next time someone questions the intersection of biotechnology and soccer phenoms, we can confidently say, "It's all in the jeans!

ChatGPT:

Cotton farming, genetically modified organisms (GMO), Tennessee, soccer, Cristiano Ronaldo, USDA, Wikipedia, statistical analysis, correlation coefficient, p-value, international stage, cotton cultivation, biotechnology

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in cotton in Tennessee
Detailed data title: Percent of cotton planted in Tennessee that is genetically modified to be insect-resistant (Bt), but not herbicide-tolerant (HT)
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in cotton in Tennessee

Number of Portugal matches played by Cristiano Ronaldo
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Number of Portugal matches played by Cristiano Ronaldo

Correlation r = 0.9088114 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8259382 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 82.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Number of Portugal matches played by Cristiano Ronaldo) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in cotton in Tennessee) over the 18 years from 2005 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.8001E-7. 0.0000001800085207001154100000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.91 in 1.8001E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 5,555,293 random variables You don't actually need 5 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 17 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 17 because we have two variables measured over a period of 18 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.77, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
GMO use in cotton in Tennessee (GMO cotton %)1316101078974211211111
Number of Portugal matches played by Cristiano Ronaldo (Match played)1114108711857620202441




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([13,16,10,10,7,8,9,7,4,2,1,1,2,1,1,1,1,1,])
array_2 = np.array([11,14,10,8,7,11,8,5,7,6,2,0,2,0,2,4,4,1,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in cotton in Tennessee"
array_2_name = "Number of Portugal matches played by Cristiano Ronaldo"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the correlation whisperer we needed!


Correlation ID: 4117 · Black Variable ID: 775 · Red Variable ID: 250
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0