about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,096 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Spenser and the second variable is Air pollution in Rockland, Maine.  The chart goes from 1986 to 2010, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

Fewer people were requesting customized airbrushed license plates for their cars, leading to a decrease in overall vehicle emissions in the area.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image depicting a TIME magazine cover featuring a suburban street in Rockland, Maine. The image should showcase a diminishing number of cars decorated with airbrushed license plates reading "Spenser." Additionally, it should illustrate the improvement in air quality through a scene of clearer skies and improved visibility, highlighting the decrease in pollution. The composition should emphasize the contrast between the declining popularity of the personalized license plates and the improving environmental conditions in the town. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Spenser and Air pollution in Rockland, Maine. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cubism Surrealism An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' Symbolism A TIME magazine cover image
ChatGPT: A TIME magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Spenser and Air pollution in Rockland, Maine, in the following situation: Fewer people were requesting customized airbrushed license plates for their cars, leading to a decrease in overall vehicle emissions in the area.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Rockland, Maine, a fewer number of cars adorned with airbrushed license plates reading "Spenser" were seen on the streets, indicating a decreasing trend in popularity. Meanwhile, the crisp air in the town showed signs of reduced pollution, with less hazy skies and clearer visibility.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A TIME magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In Rockland, Maine, a fewer number of cars adorned with airbrushed license plates reading "Spenser" were seen on the streets, indicating a decreasing trend in popularity. Meanwhile, the crisp air in the town showed signs of reduced pollution, with less hazy skies and clearer visibility. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image depicting a TIME magazine cover featuring a suburban street in Rockland, Maine. The image should showcase a diminishing number of cars decorated with airbrushed license plates reading "Spenser." Additionally, it should illustrate the improvement in air quality through a scene of clearer skies and improved visibility, highlighting the decrease in pollution. The composition should emphasize the contrast between the declining popularity of the personalized license plates and the improving environmental conditions in the town.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Popularity of the first name Spenser caused Air pollution in Rockland, Maine to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Spenser's Senser: Is There a Link Between Name Popularity and Air Pollution in Rockland, Maine?

The Journal of Socio-Environmental Trends

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Spenser and Air pollution in Rockland, Maine. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8096253 and p < 0.01 for 1986 to 2010.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Spenser's Senser: Is There a Link Between Name Popularity and Air Pollution in Rockland, Maine?"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This captivating study delves into the connection between the prevalence of the first name Spenser and the ambient air pollution in Rockland, Maine. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team embarked on a scholarly endeavor to unravel this enigmatic correlation, probing the depths of empirical evidence to address this beguiling question. Our findings uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8096253 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 1986 to 2010. This study not only sheds light on an intriguing aspect of nomenclature dynamics but also offers a refreshing perspective on the interplay between personal nomenclature and environmental vicissitudes.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Spenser and Air pollution in Rockland, Maine. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Spenser's Senser: Is There a Link Between Name Popularity and Air Pollution in Rockland, Maine?"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This captivating study delves into the connection between the prevalence of the first name Spenser and the ambient air pollution in Rockland, Maine. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team embarked on a scholarly endeavor to unravel this enigmatic correlation, probing the depths of empirical evidence to address this beguiling question. Our findings uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8096253 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 1986 to 2010. This study not only sheds light on an intriguing aspect of nomenclature dynamics but also offers a refreshing perspective on the interplay between personal nomenclature and environmental vicissitudes.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The enchanting confluence of nomenclature dynamics and environmental vicissitudes has long intrigued scholars and laymen alike. While the associations between certain names and socio-cultural phenomena have been a subject of popular discourse, the nexus between a specific name's prevalence and ambient air pollution represents a fertile ground that has hitherto remained largely unexplored. In this vein, the present study endeavors to untangle the enigmatic threads of this correlation by delving into the intricate tapestry of empirical data pertaining to the first name Spenser and the ambient air quality in Rockland, Maine.

The choice of Rockland, Maine as the geographical locus of investigation was not arbitrary; rather, it was grounded in the intricate interplay between its demography and the idiosyncrasies of its environmental dynamics. Additionally, the first name 'Spenser' was selected as a focal point not merely due to its melodic resonance, but also owing to its relatively modest yet discernible prevalence in the social fabric. As such, our scholarly endeavor aspired to transcend the quotidian boundaries of nomenclature studies, venturing into uncharted territory where whimsy dances with empirical rigor.

Amidst the burgeoning literature on environmental epidemiology and sociolinguistics, the present inquiry strives to add a touch of whimsical intrigue while adhering to the robust standards of scholarly investigation. Drawing from the inexhaustible wellspring of data made available by the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team meticulously plumbed the depths of numeric archives and textual records, reflecting a tenacious commitment to disentangling the strands of the utterly unexpected yet undeniably captivating correlation.

In the ensuing pages, we invite the reader to join us on a scholarly odyssey that promises to offer both intellectual stimulation and a dash of levity. Through our methodological exegesis and empirical findings, we aim to not only elevate the discourse on the influence of nomenclature dynamics on environmental realities but also to infuse the corridors of academia with a lighthearted mirth that often eludes the parchment-dry tomes of scholarly literature. Thus, with pens poised and minds open, let us embark on this scholarly sojourn that melds statistical analysis with a dose of whimsy, as we seek to unravel the mystical connection between the popularity of the name Spenser and the atmospheric ballet of Rockland's air pollutants.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Spenser and Air pollution in Rockland, Maine. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Spenser's Senser: Is There a Link Between Name Popularity and Air Pollution in Rockland, Maine?"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This captivating study delves into the connection between the prevalence of the first name Spenser and the ambient air pollution in Rockland, Maine. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team embarked on a scholarly endeavor to unravel this enigmatic correlation, probing the depths of empirical evidence to address this beguiling question. Our findings uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8096253 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 1986 to 2010. This study not only sheds light on an intriguing aspect of nomenclature dynamics but also offers a refreshing perspective on the interplay between personal nomenclature and environmental vicissitudes.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The enchanting confluence of nomenclature dynamics and environmental vicissitudes has long intrigued scholars and laymen alike. While the associations between certain names and socio-cultural phenomena have been a subject of popular discourse, the nexus between a specific name's prevalence and ambient air pollution represents a fertile ground that has hitherto remained largely unexplored. In this vein, the present study endeavors to untangle the enigmatic threads of this correlation by delving into the intricate tapestry of empirical data pertaining to the first name Spenser and the ambient air quality in Rockland, Maine.
The choice of Rockland, Maine as the geographical locus of investigation was not arbitrary; rather, it was grounded in the intricate interplay between its demography and the idiosyncrasies of its environmental dynamics. Additionally, the first name 'Spenser' was selected as a focal point not merely due to its melodic resonance, but also owing to its relatively modest yet discernible prevalence in the social fabric. As such, our scholarly endeavor aspired to transcend the quotidian boundaries of nomenclature studies, venturing into uncharted territory where whimsy dances with empirical rigor.
Amidst the burgeoning literature on environmental epidemiology and sociolinguistics, the present inquiry strives to add a touch of whimsical intrigue while adhering to the robust standards of scholarly investigation. Drawing from the inexhaustible wellspring of data made available by the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team meticulously plumbed the depths of numeric archives and textual records, reflecting a tenacious commitment to disentangling the strands of the utterly unexpected yet undeniably captivating correlation.
In the ensuing pages, we invite the reader to join us on a scholarly odyssey that promises to offer both intellectual stimulation and a dash of levity. Through our methodological exegesis and empirical findings, we aim to not only elevate the discourse on the influence of nomenclature dynamics on environmental realities but also to infuse the corridors of academia with a lighthearted mirth that often eludes the parchment-dry tomes of scholarly literature. Thus, with pens poised and minds open, let us embark on this scholarly sojourn that melds statistical analysis with a dose of whimsy, as we seek to unravel the mystical connection between the popularity of the name Spenser and the atmospheric ballet of Rockland's air pollutants.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The authors begin this section with a comprehensive review of the existing literature on the intersection of nomenclature dynamics and environmental vicissitudes, priming the reader for the ensuing interplay of empirical evidence and scholarly whimsy.

Smith et al. present a lucid exposition on the statistical nuances of name popularity and its sociocultural ramifications in their seminal work "Title of Smith's Serious Study." Their scholarly disquisition serves as a touchstone for our discussion, laying the groundwork for a more nuanced understanding of the complexities of personal nomenclature dynamics. However, the authors build upon this foundation, venturing into uncharted territory where whimsy dances with empirical rigor, straying beyond the parched confines of traditional academic discourse.

Doe provides a thought-provoking analysis in "Doe's Data Digest," unraveling the intricacies of environmental vicissitudes and their manifold implications for public health. Though Doe's scholarly discourse delves into the tangible repercussions of air pollution, our inquiry takes a whimsical turn, transcending the quotidian boundaries of environmental epidemiology to tread the hitherto unexplored terrain of nomenclature dynamics.

Jones contributes to the literature with a meticulous investigation into the sociolinguistic connotations of names in "Jones's Journal of Jovial Juxtapositions," offering a captivating portrayal of the intersection between nomenclature and societal constructs. As our investigation unfolds, the reader will find a departure from the conventional scholarly lexicon, infusing the corridors of academia with a lighthearted mirth that often eludes the parchment-dry tomes of scholarly literature.

Transitioning beyond the traditional lexicon of scholarly articles, the authors draw from a diverse array of non-fiction and fiction works to imbue this discourse with a zestful colloquy of empirical findings and whimsical musings.

Works such as "The Namesake" and "Name Drop" by Jhumpa Lahiri and Ross Petras & Kathryn Petras, respectively, present captivating narratives that tangentially mirror the profound themes underpinning our scholarly inquiry.

Furthermore, fictional narratives such as "The Air Pollution Mysteries" and "Spenser and the Peculiar Pollutants" underscore the palpable allure of this mysterious correlation, inviting the reader to peer into the realm where statistical analyses intertwine with absurdity in a delightfully perplexing dance.

In a cheeky departure from conventional scholarly discourse, the authors shamelessly divulge that the literature review was complemented by perusing discarded grocery lists and the esoteric annals of CVS receipts, yielding unexpected insights into the whimsical and offbeat aspects of this enthralling correlation.

Thus, the authors have artfully interwoven the hallowed traditions of scholarly literature with a vibrant tapestry of whimsy and scholarly intrigue, setting the stage for a discourse that exudes intellectual stimulation while fostering a sense of merriment that transcends the staid confines of academic exegesis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Spenser and Air pollution in Rockland, Maine. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency . You used data from 1986 to 2010

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Spenser's Senser: Is There a Link Between Name Popularity and Air Pollution in Rockland, Maine?"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This captivating study delves into the connection between the prevalence of the first name Spenser and the ambient air pollution in Rockland, Maine. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team embarked on a scholarly endeavor to unravel this enigmatic correlation, probing the depths of empirical evidence to address this beguiling question. Our findings uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8096253 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 1986 to 2010. This study not only sheds light on an intriguing aspect of nomenclature dynamics but also offers a refreshing perspective on the interplay between personal nomenclature and environmental vicissitudes.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The enchanting confluence of nomenclature dynamics and environmental vicissitudes has long intrigued scholars and laymen alike. While the associations between certain names and socio-cultural phenomena have been a subject of popular discourse, the nexus between a specific name's prevalence and ambient air pollution represents a fertile ground that has hitherto remained largely unexplored. In this vein, the present study endeavors to untangle the enigmatic threads of this correlation by delving into the intricate tapestry of empirical data pertaining to the first name Spenser and the ambient air quality in Rockland, Maine.
The choice of Rockland, Maine as the geographical locus of investigation was not arbitrary; rather, it was grounded in the intricate interplay between its demography and the idiosyncrasies of its environmental dynamics. Additionally, the first name 'Spenser' was selected as a focal point not merely due to its melodic resonance, but also owing to its relatively modest yet discernible prevalence in the social fabric. As such, our scholarly endeavor aspired to transcend the quotidian boundaries of nomenclature studies, venturing into uncharted territory where whimsy dances with empirical rigor.
Amidst the burgeoning literature on environmental epidemiology and sociolinguistics, the present inquiry strives to add a touch of whimsical intrigue while adhering to the robust standards of scholarly investigation. Drawing from the inexhaustible wellspring of data made available by the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team meticulously plumbed the depths of numeric archives and textual records, reflecting a tenacious commitment to disentangling the strands of the utterly unexpected yet undeniably captivating correlation.
In the ensuing pages, we invite the reader to join us on a scholarly odyssey that promises to offer both intellectual stimulation and a dash of levity. Through our methodological exegesis and empirical findings, we aim to not only elevate the discourse on the influence of nomenclature dynamics on environmental realities but also to infuse the corridors of academia with a lighthearted mirth that often eludes the parchment-dry tomes of scholarly literature. Thus, with pens poised and minds open, let us embark on this scholarly sojourn that melds statistical analysis with a dose of whimsy, as we seek to unravel the mystical connection between the popularity of the name Spenser and the atmospheric ballet of Rockland's air pollutants.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To embark upon this captivating odyssey of scholarly investigation, our research team employed an innovative and robust methodological framework that melded empirical data collection with a keen eye for whimsical inquiries. Our primary sources of data were the US Social Security Administration's comprehensive records of baby names and the Environmental Protection Agency's meticulous monitoring of air quality in Rockland, Maine. The period from 1986 to 2010 served as the temporal canvas onto which we unfurled our methodological tapestry, seeking to illuminate the elusive threads of correlation between name popularity and air pollution.

In the first phase of our methodological expedition, we surreptitiously combed through the labyrinthine archives of the US Social Security Administration, deftly extracting the occurrences of the enchanting moniker "Spenser" amidst the cacophony of baby names that reverberated across the annals of time. Our meticulous extraction process involved a medley of sophisticated algorithms and an unabashed fondness for peculiar nomenclature, ensuring that every instance of "Spenser" was meticulously cataloged and preserved for subsequent analysis.

Simultaneously, in a display of scholarly agility, we pirouetted into the realm of environmental data, where the Environmental Protection Agency's records of air pollutant concentrations orbited like celestial bodies in the firmament of empirical inquiry. With an unwavering resolve reminiscent of the explorer setting sail for uncharted shores, we meticulously garnered the data on ambient air pollution levels in the ethereal confines of Rockland, Maine, deftly capturing the rhythmic crescendos and diminuendos of atmospheric pollutants that danced in harmony with the ebb and flow of temporal epochs.

Having amassed these prodigious troves of data, we brought them into a harmonious liaison, weaving an intricate web of statistical analyses that sought to derive resplendent patterns from the seemingly disparate strands of nomenclature dynamics and atmospheric oscillations. Our methodological imbroglio involved a symphony of statistical tests, including linear regression and correlation analyses, which deftly unravelled the entwined enigma of Spenser's resonance and the capricious warblings of air pollutants.

Moreover, we deployed the eminent statistical software packages of our scholarly repertoire, erecting the castle of inferential analyses upon the bedrock of empirical evidence. Through the ritualistic incantations of p-values and correlation coefficients, we endeavored to illuminate the intrinsically delightful relationship between the popularity of the name Spenser and the atmospheric ballet of Rockland's air pollutants, uncovering a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8096253 and a p-value that gleamed like a lustrous gemstone, standing resolute at less than 0.01.

Such methodological acrobatics, executed with a deft blend of empirical rigor and scholarly whimsy, form the prelude to our captivating findings elucidated in the following sections. These methodological chronicles not only attest to the scholarly verve coursing through our research endeavor but also serve as a testament to the spirit of intellectual inquiry that is adorned with the beguiling allure of name dynamics and environmental oscillations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Spenser and Air pollution in Rockland, Maine. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency .

For the time period 1986 to 2010, you found a correlation 0.8096253, r-squared of 0.6554931, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Spenser's Senser: Is There a Link Between Name Popularity and Air Pollution in Rockland, Maine?"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This captivating study delves into the connection between the prevalence of the first name Spenser and the ambient air pollution in Rockland, Maine. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team embarked on a scholarly endeavor to unravel this enigmatic correlation, probing the depths of empirical evidence to address this beguiling question. Our findings uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8096253 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 1986 to 2010. This study not only sheds light on an intriguing aspect of nomenclature dynamics but also offers a refreshing perspective on the interplay between personal nomenclature and environmental vicissitudes.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The enchanting confluence of nomenclature dynamics and environmental vicissitudes has long intrigued scholars and laymen alike. While the associations between certain names and socio-cultural phenomena have been a subject of popular discourse, the nexus between a specific name's prevalence and ambient air pollution represents a fertile ground that has hitherto remained largely unexplored. In this vein, the present study endeavors to untangle the enigmatic threads of this correlation by delving into the intricate tapestry of empirical data pertaining to the first name Spenser and the ambient air quality in Rockland, Maine.
The choice of Rockland, Maine as the geographical locus of investigation was not arbitrary; rather, it was grounded in the intricate interplay between its demography and the idiosyncrasies of its environmental dynamics. Additionally, the first name 'Spenser' was selected as a focal point not merely due to its melodic resonance, but also owing to its relatively modest yet discernible prevalence in the social fabric. As such, our scholarly endeavor aspired to transcend the quotidian boundaries of nomenclature studies, venturing into uncharted territory where whimsy dances with empirical rigor.
Amidst the burgeoning literature on environmental epidemiology and sociolinguistics, the present inquiry strives to add a touch of whimsical intrigue while adhering to the robust standards of scholarly investigation. Drawing from the inexhaustible wellspring of data made available by the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team meticulously plumbed the depths of numeric archives and textual records, reflecting a tenacious commitment to disentangling the strands of the utterly unexpected yet undeniably captivating correlation.
In the ensuing pages, we invite the reader to join us on a scholarly odyssey that promises to offer both intellectual stimulation and a dash of levity. Through our methodological exegesis and empirical findings, we aim to not only elevate the discourse on the influence of nomenclature dynamics on environmental realities but also to infuse the corridors of academia with a lighthearted mirth that often eludes the parchment-dry tomes of scholarly literature. Thus, with pens poised and minds open, let us embark on this scholarly sojourn that melds statistical analysis with a dose of whimsy, as we seek to unravel the mystical connection between the popularity of the name Spenser and the atmospheric ballet of Rockland's air pollutants.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8096253 and an r-squared value of 0.6554931, indicating a substantial association between the prevalence of the first name Spenser and ambient air pollution levels in Rockland, Maine. The p-value of less than 0.01 further corroborates the robustness of this connection, lending credence to the notion that the resonance of the name Spenser may indeed echo in the atmospheric ethers of Rockland.

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) depicts the compelling relationship between the two variables, visually accentuating the fervent embrace between nomenclature dynamics and environmental vicissitudes. The points in the scatterplot coalesce into a remarkably linear pattern, reminiscent of the harmonious interplay of consonants and vowels in a mellifluous name, juxtaposed against the discordant notes of environmental pollutants.

These findings invite us to contemplate the possibility of an ethereal linkage between the eponymous resonance of the name Spenser and the atmospheric composition of Rockland. While the mechanisms engendering this correlation remain shrouded in mystique, the empirical evidence presented in this study lays the foundation for future explorations into the whimsical interplay of nomenclature and environmental realities. Indeed, one cannot help but marvel at the serendipitous dance of statistical significance and linguistic charm that underpins this curious correlation.

In essence, the enthralling saga of Spenser's senser unfolds as a saga that unearths the hitherto uncharted realms where the quotidian world of nomenclature intersects with the atmospheric ballet of environmental forces, offering a tantalizing glimpse into the enchanting fusion of empirical inquiry and whimsical reverie.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Spenser and Air pollution in Rockland, Maine. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Spenser's Senser: Is There a Link Between Name Popularity and Air Pollution in Rockland, Maine?"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This captivating study delves into the connection between the prevalence of the first name Spenser and the ambient air pollution in Rockland, Maine. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team embarked on a scholarly endeavor to unravel this enigmatic correlation, probing the depths of empirical evidence to address this beguiling question. Our findings uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8096253 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 1986 to 2010. This study not only sheds light on an intriguing aspect of nomenclature dynamics but also offers a refreshing perspective on the interplay between personal nomenclature and environmental vicissitudes.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The authors begin this section with a comprehensive review of the existing literature on the intersection of nomenclature dynamics and environmental vicissitudes, priming the reader for the ensuing interplay of empirical evidence and scholarly whimsy.
Smith et al. present a lucid exposition on the statistical nuances of name popularity and its sociocultural ramifications in their seminal work "Title of Smith's Serious Study." Their scholarly disquisition serves as a touchstone for our discussion, laying the groundwork for a more nuanced understanding of the complexities of personal nomenclature dynamics. However, the authors build upon this foundation, venturing into uncharted territory where whimsy dances with empirical rigor, straying beyond the parched confines of traditional academic discourse.
Doe provides a thought-provoking analysis in "Doe's Data Digest," unraveling the intricacies of environmental vicissitudes and their manifold implications for public health. Though Doe's scholarly discourse delves into the tangible repercussions of air pollution, our inquiry takes a whimsical turn, transcending the quotidian boundaries of environmental epidemiology to tread the hitherto unexplored terrain of nomenclature dynamics.
Jones contributes to the literature with a meticulous investigation into the sociolinguistic connotations of names in "Jones's Journal of Jovial Juxtapositions," offering a captivating portrayal of the intersection between nomenclature and societal constructs. As our investigation unfolds, the reader will find a departure from the conventional scholarly lexicon, infusing the corridors of academia with a lighthearted mirth that often eludes the parchment-dry tomes of scholarly literature.
Transitioning beyond the traditional lexicon of scholarly articles, the authors draw from a diverse array of non-fiction and fiction works to imbue this discourse with a zestful colloquy of empirical findings and whimsical musings.
Works such as "The Namesake" and "Name Drop" by Jhumpa Lahiri and Ross Petras & Kathryn Petras, respectively, present captivating narratives that tangentially mirror the profound themes underpinning our scholarly inquiry.
Furthermore, fictional narratives such as "The Air Pollution Mysteries" and "Spenser and the Peculiar Pollutants" underscore the palpable allure of this mysterious correlation, inviting the reader to peer into the realm where statistical analyses intertwine with absurdity in a delightfully perplexing dance.
In a cheeky departure from conventional scholarly discourse, the authors shamelessly divulge that the literature review was complemented by perusing discarded grocery lists and the esoteric annals of CVS receipts, yielding unexpected insights into the whimsical and offbeat aspects of this enthralling correlation.
Thus, the authors have artfully interwoven the hallowed traditions of scholarly literature with a vibrant tapestry of whimsy and scholarly intrigue, setting the stage for a discourse that exudes intellectual stimulation while fostering a sense of merriment that transcends the staid confines of academic exegesis.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8096253 and an r-squared value of 0.6554931, indicating a substantial association between the prevalence of the first name Spenser and ambient air pollution levels in Rockland, Maine. The p-value of less than 0.01 further corroborates the robustness of this connection, lending credence to the notion that the resonance of the name Spenser may indeed echo in the atmospheric ethers of Rockland.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) depicts the compelling relationship between the two variables, visually accentuating the fervent embrace between nomenclature dynamics and environmental vicissitudes. The points in the scatterplot coalesce into a remarkably linear pattern, reminiscent of the harmonious interplay of consonants and vowels in a mellifluous name, juxtaposed against the discordant notes of environmental pollutants.
These findings invite us to contemplate the possibility of an ethereal linkage between the eponymous resonance of the name Spenser and the atmospheric composition of Rockland. While the mechanisms engendering this correlation remain shrouded in mystique, the empirical evidence presented in this study lays the foundation for future explorations into the whimsical interplay of nomenclature and environmental realities. Indeed, one cannot help but marvel at the serendipitous dance of statistical significance and linguistic charm that underpins this curious correlation.
In essence, the enthralling saga of Spenser's senser unfolds as a saga that unearths the hitherto uncharted realms where the quotidian world of nomenclature intersects with the atmospheric ballet of environmental forces, offering a tantalizing glimpse into the enchanting fusion of empirical inquiry and whimsical reverie.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The present study has sought to shine a light on the enthralling correlation between the prevalence of the name Spenser and the ambient air pollution levels in the idyllic locale of Rockland, Maine. Leveraging robust statistical analyses, our investigation has unearthed a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8096253, complete with a p-value of less than 0.01, signaling a robust association between nomenclature and atmospheric vicissitudes.

Our findings resonate with the whimsical underpinnings of prior research, as we concur with Smith et al.'s serendipitous musings on the charming intricacies of name popularity. Much like the whimsical anecdote from "Title of Smith's Serious Study" where Smith stumbled upon a statistically significant affinity between names and societal connotations, our study has stumbled upon an enchanting union between nomenclature and atmospheric phenomena. The correlation coefficient manifests a pervasive echo of statistical significance, akin to the mellifluous resonance of the name Spenser reverberating through the atmospheric ethers of Rockland.

Furthermore, our results align with the fanciful inclinations of Doe's "Data Digest," despite veering into the unconventional realm where statistical whimsy dances with empirical rigor. Just as Doe unraveled the tangible repercussions of air pollution, our study corroborates the veracity of this environmental entanglement, albeit through a prism that basks in the lighthearted embrace of nomenclature dynamics. The scatterplot, a visual paragon of this felicitous correlation, presents a tableau that juxtaposes the harmonious interplay of consonants and vowels in a name against the discordant notes of environmental pollutants, evoking a whimsical reverie that animates empirical phenomena with a delightful charm.

In a playful divergence from conventional scholarly tenets, our study embraces the eclectic spirit of "the Air Pollution Mysteries" and "Spenser and the Peculiar Pollutants," as the empirical evidence weaves a whimsical tapestry of statistical intrigue. This convolution of statistical significance and linguistic charm fosters a discourse that exudes intellectual stimulation while sowing the seeds of merriment, transcending the staid confines of academic exegesis.

In summary, our findings showcase the tantalizing saga of Spenser's senser as a fascinating exploration into the uncharted realms where nomenclature intersects with environmental forces, perpetuating the enchanting fusion of empirical inquiry and whimsical reverie. This research opens the door to a world where statistical significance and linguistic allure coalesce, inviting future explorations to unravel the mystique of the name Spenser and its ethereal resonance in the atmospheric ballet of Rockland, Maine.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Spenser and Air pollution in Rockland, Maine. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Spenser's Senser: Is There a Link Between Name Popularity and Air Pollution in Rockland, Maine?"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This captivating study delves into the connection between the prevalence of the first name Spenser and the ambient air pollution in Rockland, Maine. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team embarked on a scholarly endeavor to unravel this enigmatic correlation, probing the depths of empirical evidence to address this beguiling question. Our findings uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8096253 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 1986 to 2010. This study not only sheds light on an intriguing aspect of nomenclature dynamics but also offers a refreshing perspective on the interplay between personal nomenclature and environmental vicissitudes.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The enchanting confluence of nomenclature dynamics and environmental vicissitudes has long intrigued scholars and laymen alike. While the associations between certain names and socio-cultural phenomena have been a subject of popular discourse, the nexus between a specific name's prevalence and ambient air pollution represents a fertile ground that has hitherto remained largely unexplored. In this vein, the present study endeavors to untangle the enigmatic threads of this correlation by delving into the intricate tapestry of empirical data pertaining to the first name Spenser and the ambient air quality in Rockland, Maine.
The choice of Rockland, Maine as the geographical locus of investigation was not arbitrary; rather, it was grounded in the intricate interplay between its demography and the idiosyncrasies of its environmental dynamics. Additionally, the first name 'Spenser' was selected as a focal point not merely due to its melodic resonance, but also owing to its relatively modest yet discernible prevalence in the social fabric. As such, our scholarly endeavor aspired to transcend the quotidian boundaries of nomenclature studies, venturing into uncharted territory where whimsy dances with empirical rigor.
Amidst the burgeoning literature on environmental epidemiology and sociolinguistics, the present inquiry strives to add a touch of whimsical intrigue while adhering to the robust standards of scholarly investigation. Drawing from the inexhaustible wellspring of data made available by the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team meticulously plumbed the depths of numeric archives and textual records, reflecting a tenacious commitment to disentangling the strands of the utterly unexpected yet undeniably captivating correlation.
In the ensuing pages, we invite the reader to join us on a scholarly odyssey that promises to offer both intellectual stimulation and a dash of levity. Through our methodological exegesis and empirical findings, we aim to not only elevate the discourse on the influence of nomenclature dynamics on environmental realities but also to infuse the corridors of academia with a lighthearted mirth that often eludes the parchment-dry tomes of scholarly literature. Thus, with pens poised and minds open, let us embark on this scholarly sojourn that melds statistical analysis with a dose of whimsy, as we seek to unravel the mystical connection between the popularity of the name Spenser and the atmospheric ballet of Rockland's air pollutants.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8096253 and an r-squared value of 0.6554931, indicating a substantial association between the prevalence of the first name Spenser and ambient air pollution levels in Rockland, Maine. The p-value of less than 0.01 further corroborates the robustness of this connection, lending credence to the notion that the resonance of the name Spenser may indeed echo in the atmospheric ethers of Rockland.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) depicts the compelling relationship between the two variables, visually accentuating the fervent embrace between nomenclature dynamics and environmental vicissitudes. The points in the scatterplot coalesce into a remarkably linear pattern, reminiscent of the harmonious interplay of consonants and vowels in a mellifluous name, juxtaposed against the discordant notes of environmental pollutants.
These findings invite us to contemplate the possibility of an ethereal linkage between the eponymous resonance of the name Spenser and the atmospheric composition of Rockland. While the mechanisms engendering this correlation remain shrouded in mystique, the empirical evidence presented in this study lays the foundation for future explorations into the whimsical interplay of nomenclature and environmental realities. Indeed, one cannot help but marvel at the serendipitous dance of statistical significance and linguistic charm that underpins this curious correlation.
In essence, the enthralling saga of Spenser's senser unfolds as a saga that unearths the hitherto uncharted realms where the quotidian world of nomenclature intersects with the atmospheric ballet of environmental forces, offering a tantalizing glimpse into the enchanting fusion of empirical inquiry and whimsical reverie.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our whimsical yet rigorous investigation has illuminated a captivating correlation between the prevalence of the first name Spenser and ambient air pollution levels in Rockland, Maine. The robust correlation coefficient and the statistically significant p-value underscore the enthralling interplay between nomenclature dynamics and environmental vicissitudes in this idyllic coastal town. The beguiling alliance of statistical significance and linguistic charm that underpins this correlation beckons us to venture further into the enigmatic realms of nomenclature studies and environmental epidemiology.

This study not only enriches the scholarly discourse on the influence of names on environmental realities but also injects a refreshing dose of whimsy into the austere corridors of academia. As we bask in the glow of this unexpected correlation, one cannot help but ponder the potential ramifications of these findings. Could there be an ethereal connection between the melodic resonance of the name Spenser and the atmospheric symphony of Rockland's air pollutants? While the mechanisms remain shrouded in mystery, our empirical evidence serves as a delightful catalyst for future explorations into this enchanting intersection of empirical inquiry and linguistic charm.

Alas, the saga of Spenser's senser has unfolded its tantalizing secrets, leaving us pondering the enigmatic dance of statistical significance and nomenclature dynamics. As the scholarly curtains draw to a close, we assert that no further inquiry is warranted in this realm, for our findings stand as a testament to the whimsical serendipity that infuses the fathomless depths of empirical research. May the resonance of Spenser's name linger in the ambient ethers of Rockland, Maine, as a whimsical reminder of the captivating fusion of scholarly rigor and lighthearted mirth.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Spenser's Senser: Is There a Link Between Name Popularity and Air Pollution in Rockland, Maine?. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Socio-Environmental Trends


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Spenser's Senser: Is There a Link Between Name Popularity and Air Pollution in Rockland, Maine?. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Name-Environment Research and Analysis (SNERA)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Spenser's Senser: Is There a Link Between Name Popularity and Air Pollution in Rockland, Maine? with an abstract of This captivating study delves into the connection between the prevalence of the first name Spenser and the ambient air pollution in Rockland, Maine. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team embarked on a scholarly endeavor to unravel this enigmatic correlation, probing the depths of empirical evidence to address this beguiling question. Our findings uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8096253 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 1986 to 2010. This study not only sheds light on an intriguing aspect of nomenclature dynamics but also offers a refreshing perspective on the interplay between personal nomenclature and environmental vicissitudes.

ChatGPT:

Spenser name popularity, air pollution, Rockland Maine, correlation, US Social Security Administration data, Environmental Protection Agency data, correlation coefficient, nomenclature dynamics, personal names, environmental impact, empirical evidence

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Spenser
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Spenser
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Spenser

Air pollution in Rockland, Maine
Detailed data title: Percentage of days 'unhealthy' or worse air quality in Rockland, ME
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Rockland, Maine

Correlation r = 0.8096253 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6554931 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 65.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Air pollution in Rockland, Maine) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Spenser) over the 25 years from 1986 through 2010.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 9.5E-7. 0.0000009486851719410277000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.81 in 9.5E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,054,090 random variables You don't actually need 1 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 24 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 24 because we have two variables measured over a period of 25 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.61, 0.91 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1986198719881989199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010
Popularity of the first name Spenser (Babies born)93265359293250213197136150193152127112919075715640352231211814
Air pollution in Rockland, Maine (Bad air quality days)0.0260870.04733730.09417040.02409640.0331950.05928850.0360.01526720.0156250.02531650.004166670.02016130.0118110.0083333300.02830190.0256410.0049261100.0061728400.0111732000.00471698




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([93,265,359,293,250,213,197,136,150,193,152,127,112,91,90,75,71,56,40,35,22,31,21,18,14,])
array_2 = np.array([0.026087,0.0473373,0.0941704,0.0240964,0.033195,0.0592885,0.036,0.0152672,0.015625,0.0253165,0.00416667,0.0201613,0.011811,0.00833333,0,0.0283019,0.025641,0.00492611,0,0.00617284,0,0.0111732,0,0,0.00471698,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Spenser"
array_2_name = "Air pollution in Rockland, Maine"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation rating is out of this world!


Correlation ID: 4096 · Black Variable ID: 4021 · Red Variable ID: 21864
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0