about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,068 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Annual US household spending on floor coverings and the second variable is Arson in Hawaii.  The chart goes from 2000 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

It seems that as the demand for rugs and carpets went down, so did the number of hot deals. With fewer people wanting to cover their floors, the urge to start fires just couldn't gain traction. It's a case of less carpet leading to less, well, fire-laying. Just goes to show, when it comes to preventing arson, the floor is lava-ble!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ Refinement ] Immerse into a surreal world where reality and imagination blend seamlessly. Generate an image capturing the eerie juxtaposition of a serene living room featuring an opulent, Persian rug draped across the floor, against a backdrop of a neighborhood in Hawaii beset by scattered fires. Ensure the opulence of the rug is emphasized, while the small fires in the background are depicted with a muted, haunting quality. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Annual US household spending on floor coverings and Arson in Hawaii. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Pop art Concept art a meme Concept art Cutsy graphics
ChatGPT: Concept art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Annual US household spending on floor coverings and Arson in Hawaii, in the following situation: Because as floor coverings became more expensive, households turned to arson to collect insurance money for replacement, inadvertently causing a spike in arson cases in Hawaii.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a living room, a beautiful and expensive rug covers the floor, while in the background, a series of small fires break out in different areas of a neighborhood in Hawaii.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Concept art ] and depicting this scene: In a living room, a beautiful and expensive rug covers the floor, while in the background, a series of small fires break out in different areas of a neighborhood in Hawaii. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ Refinement ] Immerse into a surreal world where reality and imagination blend seamlessly. Generate an image capturing the eerie juxtaposition of a serene living room featuring an opulent, Persian rug draped across the floor, against a backdrop of a neighborhood in Hawaii beset by scattered fires. Ensure the opulence of the rug is emphasized, while the small fires in the background are depicted with a muted, haunting quality.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Annual US household spending on floor coverings caused Arson in Hawaii to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Carpeting the Crime Scene: Exploring the Link between Annual US Household Spending on Floor Coverings and Arson in Hawaii

Journal of Quirky Economic Analysis

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on floor coverings and Arson in Hawaii. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Labor Statistics and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8043700 and p < 0.01 for 2000 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Carpeting the Crime Scene: Exploring the Link between Annual US Household Spending on Floor Coverings and Arson in Hawaii

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing relationship between annual US household spending on floor coverings and the occurrence of arson in the picturesque state of Hawaii. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team sought to shed light on this unlikely pairing. Using statistical analyses, we established a correlation coefficient of 0.8043700 and a strikingly low p-value of less than 0.01 for the time frame spanning 2000 to 2022.

Despite the seemingly disparate nature of these variables, our findings suggest a robust and noteworthy association between the two. One can't help but ponder the connection between the soft embrace of plush rugs and the fiery allure of criminal activities. While the causative mechanisms remain elusive and open to further investigation, our results prompt a whimsical consideration of the potential influence of interior décor choices on criminal behavior in tropical paradises. So, the next time you're contemplating a flooring upgrade, perhaps consider its potential impact on fire-related incidents in distant, sunny locales. After all, feng shui might be a more potent force than we ever suspected.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on floor coverings and Arson in Hawaii. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Carpeting the Crime Scene: Exploring the Link between Annual US Household Spending on Floor Coverings and Arson in Hawaii

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing relationship between annual US household spending on floor coverings and the occurrence of arson in the picturesque state of Hawaii. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team sought to shed light on this unlikely pairing. Using statistical analyses, we established a correlation coefficient of 0.8043700 and a strikingly low p-value of less than 0.01 for the time frame spanning 2000 to 2022.

Despite the seemingly disparate nature of these variables, our findings suggest a robust and noteworthy association between the two. One can't help but ponder the connection between the soft embrace of plush rugs and the fiery allure of criminal activities. While the causative mechanisms remain elusive and open to further investigation, our results prompt a whimsical consideration of the potential influence of interior décor choices on criminal behavior in tropical paradises. So, the next time you're contemplating a flooring upgrade, perhaps consider its potential impact on fire-related incidents in distant, sunny locales. After all, feng shui might be a more potent force than we ever suspected.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In the realm of research, one often encounters peculiar and unexpected relationships between seemingly unrelated variables. Our investigation centers on the enthralling enigma of the connection between annual US household spending on floor coverings and the incidence of arson in the alluring state of Hawaii. This unusual pairing sparked our curiosity, leading us to explore the statistical interplay between furnishing expenditures and fiery felonies.

As explorers in this academic landscape, we embarked on a statistical odyssey utilizing data extracted from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services. The ensuing treasure trove of information guided us through a labyrinth of analysis, ultimately revealing intriguing patterns and surprising associations.

Blending the art of statistics with the flair of observation, we stumbled upon a correlation coefficient of 0.8043700 and a p-value so small, it would need a magnifying glass to be seen. These statistical titans pointed us towards a compelling relationship, one that defies conventional expectations.

In this paper, we present our adventure in unraveling this unexpected tapestry of data, offering a whimsical lens to view the quirkier aspects of behavioral statistics. Join us as we traverse the landscape of lavish carpets, sleek hardwoods, and the enigmatic allure of arson in Hawaii. But be forewarned, the journey may spark delightful musings about the hidden influences of home décor on criminal proclivities, and perhaps, persuade you to ponder the incendiary potential of your flooring choices. After all, when it comes to research, sometimes the most unexpected correlations lie beneath the surface, waiting to be discovered.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on floor coverings and Arson in Hawaii. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Carpeting the Crime Scene: Exploring the Link between Annual US Household Spending on Floor Coverings and Arson in Hawaii

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing relationship between annual US household spending on floor coverings and the occurrence of arson in the picturesque state of Hawaii. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team sought to shed light on this unlikely pairing. Using statistical analyses, we established a correlation coefficient of 0.8043700 and a strikingly low p-value of less than 0.01 for the time frame spanning 2000 to 2022.

Despite the seemingly disparate nature of these variables, our findings suggest a robust and noteworthy association between the two. One can't help but ponder the connection between the soft embrace of plush rugs and the fiery allure of criminal activities. While the causative mechanisms remain elusive and open to further investigation, our results prompt a whimsical consideration of the potential influence of interior décor choices on criminal behavior in tropical paradises. So, the next time you're contemplating a flooring upgrade, perhaps consider its potential impact on fire-related incidents in distant, sunny locales. After all, feng shui might be a more potent force than we ever suspected.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the realm of research, one often encounters peculiar and unexpected relationships between seemingly unrelated variables. Our investigation centers on the enthralling enigma of the connection between annual US household spending on floor coverings and the incidence of arson in the alluring state of Hawaii. This unusual pairing sparked our curiosity, leading us to explore the statistical interplay between furnishing expenditures and fiery felonies.
As explorers in this academic landscape, we embarked on a statistical odyssey utilizing data extracted from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services. The ensuing treasure trove of information guided us through a labyrinth of analysis, ultimately revealing intriguing patterns and surprising associations.
Blending the art of statistics with the flair of observation, we stumbled upon a correlation coefficient of 0.8043700 and a p-value so small, it would need a magnifying glass to be seen. These statistical titans pointed us towards a compelling relationship, one that defies conventional expectations.
In this paper, we present our adventure in unraveling this unexpected tapestry of data, offering a whimsical lens to view the quirkier aspects of behavioral statistics. Join us as we traverse the landscape of lavish carpets, sleek hardwoods, and the enigmatic allure of arson in Hawaii. But be forewarned, the journey may spark delightful musings about the hidden influences of home décor on criminal proclivities, and perhaps, persuade you to ponder the incendiary potential of your flooring choices. After all, when it comes to research, sometimes the most unexpected correlations lie beneath the surface, waiting to be discovered.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Rug Trends and Crime Rates: A Statistical Analysis" by Smith, the authors find a surprising correlation between annual US household spending on floor coverings and the incidence of arson in Hawaii. This study piqued our interest and prompted a deeper exploration into this unorthodox relationship.

The work of Doe et al. in "Data Carpets: Uncovering Unconventional Correlations" further bolstered our curiosity with their revelation of a statistically significant association between interior décor choices and criminal activities in tropical settings. As we delved into the annals of statistical literature, the findings of Jones in "The Flaming Carpet: Exploring Home Furnishings and Arson" served as a catalyst for our research, igniting our determination to unearth the underlying mechanisms of this perplexing connection.

Drawing from the realms of non-fiction, noteworthy publications such as "The Economics of Home Improvement" by Smithson shed light on the economic implications of household expenditures, offering a foundation for our exploration of consumer behavior in relation to arson. Additionally, "The Psychology of Arson" by Johnson and "Forensic Interior Design: Unraveling Clues through Carpets and Curtains" by Haversham provided valuable insights into the psychological and investigative aspects of our subject matter, albeit in an unintended comical fashion.

From the realm of fiction, works such as "The Arsonist's Ambition" by Firestone and "Murder on the Oriental Rug Express" by Carpetson captivated our imagination with their intriguing, albeit purely fictional, portrayal of the intimate connection between household furnishing choices and criminal inclinations. These works, though far from scholarly, showcased the pervasive allure of this topic, extending its influence even into the realm of literary entertainment.

In a peculiar twist, our musings were also influenced by the enigmatic intricacies of board games, particularly "Clue: The Floor Covering Edition" and "Arson Island Adventure." While these diversions may seem unrelated to our scholarly pursuit, they nonetheless served as lighthearted sources of inspiration, reminding us that even the most unconventional correlations can spark curiosity and amusement in unexpected ways.

As we embark on this scholarly journey, it is essential to maintain a balance between academic rigor and lighthearted exploration, for the mysteries of statistical associations often harbor delightful surprises and unexpected laughter.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on floor coverings and Arson in Hawaii. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Labor Statistics and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services . You used data from 2000 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Carpeting the Crime Scene: Exploring the Link between Annual US Household Spending on Floor Coverings and Arson in Hawaii

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing relationship between annual US household spending on floor coverings and the occurrence of arson in the picturesque state of Hawaii. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team sought to shed light on this unlikely pairing. Using statistical analyses, we established a correlation coefficient of 0.8043700 and a strikingly low p-value of less than 0.01 for the time frame spanning 2000 to 2022.

Despite the seemingly disparate nature of these variables, our findings suggest a robust and noteworthy association between the two. One can't help but ponder the connection between the soft embrace of plush rugs and the fiery allure of criminal activities. While the causative mechanisms remain elusive and open to further investigation, our results prompt a whimsical consideration of the potential influence of interior décor choices on criminal behavior in tropical paradises. So, the next time you're contemplating a flooring upgrade, perhaps consider its potential impact on fire-related incidents in distant, sunny locales. After all, feng shui might be a more potent force than we ever suspected.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the realm of research, one often encounters peculiar and unexpected relationships between seemingly unrelated variables. Our investigation centers on the enthralling enigma of the connection between annual US household spending on floor coverings and the incidence of arson in the alluring state of Hawaii. This unusual pairing sparked our curiosity, leading us to explore the statistical interplay between furnishing expenditures and fiery felonies.
As explorers in this academic landscape, we embarked on a statistical odyssey utilizing data extracted from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services. The ensuing treasure trove of information guided us through a labyrinth of analysis, ultimately revealing intriguing patterns and surprising associations.
Blending the art of statistics with the flair of observation, we stumbled upon a correlation coefficient of 0.8043700 and a p-value so small, it would need a magnifying glass to be seen. These statistical titans pointed us towards a compelling relationship, one that defies conventional expectations.
In this paper, we present our adventure in unraveling this unexpected tapestry of data, offering a whimsical lens to view the quirkier aspects of behavioral statistics. Join us as we traverse the landscape of lavish carpets, sleek hardwoods, and the enigmatic allure of arson in Hawaii. But be forewarned, the journey may spark delightful musings about the hidden influences of home décor on criminal proclivities, and perhaps, persuade you to ponder the incendiary potential of your flooring choices. After all, when it comes to research, sometimes the most unexpected correlations lie beneath the surface, waiting to be discovered.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To delve into the perplexing connection between annual US household spending on floor coverings and the incidence of arson in the tropical haven of Hawaii, our research team embarked on a remarkable methodological voyage. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we conducted a dazzling dance of statistical analysis to unravel this enigmatic relationship.

In this riveting excursion, we compiled data on annual US household spending on floor coverings and the frequency of arson incidents in the Hawaiian archipelago from the years 2000 to 2022. We were drawn to the allure of this unusual pairing, imagining a whimsical dialogue between plush carpets and the fiery passion of criminal activity under the Hawaiian sun.

Our team employed a mix of quantitative and qualitative techniques to tease out the underlying patterns and associations. We ran regression models, correlation analyses, and even dabbled in some advanced statistical wizardry to discern the intricate interplay between flooring grandeur and criminal ardor. With bated breath, we awaited the emergence of statistical revelations, akin to uncovering hidden treasure amid a sea of data.

In resistance to the dry and unyielding nature of traditional statistical methods, we infused our analytical journey with a dash of creativity and irreverence. Our data exploration felt akin to navigating uncharted waters, with unexpected twists and turns that piqued our curiosity and elicited a chuckle or two. After all, statistics need not be serious business all the time – a sprinkle of levity can add a touch of playfulness to the pursuit of knowledge.

In the spirit of open-minded inquiry, we welcome fellow adventurers to join us in our analytical escapade. For it is in the unlikeliest of places, amidst the tapestry of data, that hidden connections and correlations wait to be unearthed. So, buckle up and grab your statistical compass; we're about to embark on a journey to uncover the unexpected relationship between household flooring and criminal flames in the charming environs of Hawaii.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on floor coverings and Arson in Hawaii. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Labor Statistics and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services .

For the time period 2000 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8043700, r-squared of 0.6470110, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Carpeting the Crime Scene: Exploring the Link between Annual US Household Spending on Floor Coverings and Arson in Hawaii

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing relationship between annual US household spending on floor coverings and the occurrence of arson in the picturesque state of Hawaii. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team sought to shed light on this unlikely pairing. Using statistical analyses, we established a correlation coefficient of 0.8043700 and a strikingly low p-value of less than 0.01 for the time frame spanning 2000 to 2022.

Despite the seemingly disparate nature of these variables, our findings suggest a robust and noteworthy association between the two. One can't help but ponder the connection between the soft embrace of plush rugs and the fiery allure of criminal activities. While the causative mechanisms remain elusive and open to further investigation, our results prompt a whimsical consideration of the potential influence of interior décor choices on criminal behavior in tropical paradises. So, the next time you're contemplating a flooring upgrade, perhaps consider its potential impact on fire-related incidents in distant, sunny locales. After all, feng shui might be a more potent force than we ever suspected.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the realm of research, one often encounters peculiar and unexpected relationships between seemingly unrelated variables. Our investigation centers on the enthralling enigma of the connection between annual US household spending on floor coverings and the incidence of arson in the alluring state of Hawaii. This unusual pairing sparked our curiosity, leading us to explore the statistical interplay between furnishing expenditures and fiery felonies.
As explorers in this academic landscape, we embarked on a statistical odyssey utilizing data extracted from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services. The ensuing treasure trove of information guided us through a labyrinth of analysis, ultimately revealing intriguing patterns and surprising associations.
Blending the art of statistics with the flair of observation, we stumbled upon a correlation coefficient of 0.8043700 and a p-value so small, it would need a magnifying glass to be seen. These statistical titans pointed us towards a compelling relationship, one that defies conventional expectations.
In this paper, we present our adventure in unraveling this unexpected tapestry of data, offering a whimsical lens to view the quirkier aspects of behavioral statistics. Join us as we traverse the landscape of lavish carpets, sleek hardwoods, and the enigmatic allure of arson in Hawaii. But be forewarned, the journey may spark delightful musings about the hidden influences of home décor on criminal proclivities, and perhaps, persuade you to ponder the incendiary potential of your flooring choices. After all, when it comes to research, sometimes the most unexpected correlations lie beneath the surface, waiting to be discovered.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis of the relationship between annual US household spending on floor coverings and the incidence of arson in Hawaii yielded fascinating results. Over the period from 2000 to 2022, we observed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8043700, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. This correlation was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.6470110, highlighting the substantial proportion of variance in arson explained by annual floor covering expenditure.

As illustrated in Fig. 1, the scatterplot vividly portrays the significant correlation between these variables, with each data point therein serving as a silent witness to the peculiar dance of consumerism and criminality. Whether the lush carpets or gleaming hardwoods bear any direct influence on the incidence of arson remains to be seen, but the statistical bond we observed cannot be denied.

The p-value of less than 0.01 lends support to the robustness of our findings, suggesting that the observed relationship is unlikely to have occurred by mere chance. This calls for a deeper exploration into the potential mechanisms underlying this unexpected connection. The sheer unlikelihood of this association prompts an enchanting contemplation of the clandestine forces at play, where the allure of sumptuous floor coverings meets the enigma of incendiary acts.

While our findings may elicit a chuckle or two, they also serve as a poignant reminder of the whimsical nature of statistical discovery. As we venture forth into the depths of this unexpected correlation, we invite fellow researchers and enthusiasts to join us in this lighthearted exploration of the intertwined realms of consumer behavior and criminal tendencies. After all, in the vast tapestry of data, one never knows where the next surprise may lie.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on floor coverings and Arson in Hawaii. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Carpeting the Crime Scene: Exploring the Link between Annual US Household Spending on Floor Coverings and Arson in Hawaii

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing relationship between annual US household spending on floor coverings and the occurrence of arson in the picturesque state of Hawaii. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team sought to shed light on this unlikely pairing. Using statistical analyses, we established a correlation coefficient of 0.8043700 and a strikingly low p-value of less than 0.01 for the time frame spanning 2000 to 2022.

Despite the seemingly disparate nature of these variables, our findings suggest a robust and noteworthy association between the two. One can't help but ponder the connection between the soft embrace of plush rugs and the fiery allure of criminal activities. While the causative mechanisms remain elusive and open to further investigation, our results prompt a whimsical consideration of the potential influence of interior décor choices on criminal behavior in tropical paradises. So, the next time you're contemplating a flooring upgrade, perhaps consider its potential impact on fire-related incidents in distant, sunny locales. After all, feng shui might be a more potent force than we ever suspected.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Rug Trends and Crime Rates: A Statistical Analysis" by Smith, the authors find a surprising correlation between annual US household spending on floor coverings and the incidence of arson in Hawaii. This study piqued our interest and prompted a deeper exploration into this unorthodox relationship.
The work of Doe et al. in "Data Carpets: Uncovering Unconventional Correlations" further bolstered our curiosity with their revelation of a statistically significant association between interior décor choices and criminal activities in tropical settings. As we delved into the annals of statistical literature, the findings of Jones in "The Flaming Carpet: Exploring Home Furnishings and Arson" served as a catalyst for our research, igniting our determination to unearth the underlying mechanisms of this perplexing connection.
Drawing from the realms of non-fiction, noteworthy publications such as "The Economics of Home Improvement" by Smithson shed light on the economic implications of household expenditures, offering a foundation for our exploration of consumer behavior in relation to arson. Additionally, "The Psychology of Arson" by Johnson and "Forensic Interior Design: Unraveling Clues through Carpets and Curtains" by Haversham provided valuable insights into the psychological and investigative aspects of our subject matter, albeit in an unintended comical fashion.
From the realm of fiction, works such as "The Arsonist's Ambition" by Firestone and "Murder on the Oriental Rug Express" by Carpetson captivated our imagination with their intriguing, albeit purely fictional, portrayal of the intimate connection between household furnishing choices and criminal inclinations. These works, though far from scholarly, showcased the pervasive allure of this topic, extending its influence even into the realm of literary entertainment.
In a peculiar twist, our musings were also influenced by the enigmatic intricacies of board games, particularly "Clue: The Floor Covering Edition" and "Arson Island Adventure." While these diversions may seem unrelated to our scholarly pursuit, they nonetheless served as lighthearted sources of inspiration, reminding us that even the most unconventional correlations can spark curiosity and amusement in unexpected ways.
As we embark on this scholarly journey, it is essential to maintain a balance between academic rigor and lighthearted exploration, for the mysteries of statistical associations often harbor delightful surprises and unexpected laughter.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the relationship between annual US household spending on floor coverings and the incidence of arson in Hawaii yielded fascinating results. Over the period from 2000 to 2022, we observed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8043700, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. This correlation was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.6470110, highlighting the substantial proportion of variance in arson explained by annual floor covering expenditure.
As illustrated in Fig. 1, the scatterplot vividly portrays the significant correlation between these variables, with each data point therein serving as a silent witness to the peculiar dance of consumerism and criminality. Whether the lush carpets or gleaming hardwoods bear any direct influence on the incidence of arson remains to be seen, but the statistical bond we observed cannot be denied.
The p-value of less than 0.01 lends support to the robustness of our findings, suggesting that the observed relationship is unlikely to have occurred by mere chance. This calls for a deeper exploration into the potential mechanisms underlying this unexpected connection. The sheer unlikelihood of this association prompts an enchanting contemplation of the clandestine forces at play, where the allure of sumptuous floor coverings meets the enigma of incendiary acts.
While our findings may elicit a chuckle or two, they also serve as a poignant reminder of the whimsical nature of statistical discovery. As we venture forth into the depths of this unexpected correlation, we invite fellow researchers and enthusiasts to join us in this lighthearted exploration of the intertwined realms of consumer behavior and criminal tendencies. After all, in the vast tapestry of data, one never knows where the next surprise may lie.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our study has uncovered a remarkable association between annual US household spending on floor coverings and the incidence of arson in Hawaii, offering a tantalizing glimpse into the whimsical interplay of consumer behavior and criminal activities. Despite the initially unanticipated nature of this relationship, our findings seamlessly align with prior research, underpinning the unexpected revelations from the literature review and further solidifying the enigmatic bond between seemingly distant variables.

The study by Smith in "Rug Trends and Crime Rates" provided an intriguing spark for our investigation, igniting our curiosity with its revelation of the unexpected correlation between floor covering expenditure and arson. This meticulously crafted analysis paved the way for our own exploration, propelling us into the uncharted territory where interior design and criminality converge. The work of Doe et al. in "Data Carpets: Uncovering Unconventional Correlations" further emboldened our pursuit, exemplifying the pervasive allure of unconventional statistical connections and reinforcing our determination to unravel this perplexing relationship.

Moreover, the peculiar influence of fictional works, exemplified by "The Arsonist's Ambition" by Firestone and "Murder on the Oriental Rug Express" by Carpetson, reflects the pervasiveness of this unlikely pairing even in the world of literary entertainment. These whimsical narratives, although purely fictional, underscore the captivating nature of the topic and its enduring influence.

Understanding consumer behavior and its potential link to criminal tendencies in the context of household furnishing choices holds intriguing implications beyond the confines of our study. While the causative mechanisms underlying this association remain shrouded in mystery, our findings, consistent with prior research, compel a whimsical consideration of the potential influence of interior décor choices on criminal behavior in tropical paradises. It seems that the allure of plush rugs and the fiery tempts of criminal activities may not be as disconnected as one would assume.

Our results not only highlight the statistical significance of this unlikely relationship but also beckon forth a lighthearted exploration of the intertwined realms of consumer behavior and criminal inclinations. They serve as a whimsical reminder of the humorous nature of statistical discovery, urging fellow researchers and enthusiasts to indulge in the delightful surprises and unexpected laughter that can emerge from the annals of unconventional correlations. After all, in the expansive tapestry of data, one might stumble upon unforeseen connections that transcend the boundaries of traditional associations.

As we delve deeper into this compelling correlation, we invite our scholarly compatriots to join us in embracing the curious surprises that arise from the amusing interplay of consumer choices and criminal pursuits. In this delightful pursuit, who knows what unexpected revelations and intrigues await amidst the juxtaposition of sumptuous floor coverings and the enigma of incendiary acts. For now, the seemingly improbable link between our variables stands as a humorous enigma waiting to be unraveled.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on floor coverings and Arson in Hawaii. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Carpeting the Crime Scene: Exploring the Link between Annual US Household Spending on Floor Coverings and Arson in Hawaii

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing relationship between annual US household spending on floor coverings and the occurrence of arson in the picturesque state of Hawaii. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team sought to shed light on this unlikely pairing. Using statistical analyses, we established a correlation coefficient of 0.8043700 and a strikingly low p-value of less than 0.01 for the time frame spanning 2000 to 2022.

Despite the seemingly disparate nature of these variables, our findings suggest a robust and noteworthy association between the two. One can't help but ponder the connection between the soft embrace of plush rugs and the fiery allure of criminal activities. While the causative mechanisms remain elusive and open to further investigation, our results prompt a whimsical consideration of the potential influence of interior décor choices on criminal behavior in tropical paradises. So, the next time you're contemplating a flooring upgrade, perhaps consider its potential impact on fire-related incidents in distant, sunny locales. After all, feng shui might be a more potent force than we ever suspected.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the realm of research, one often encounters peculiar and unexpected relationships between seemingly unrelated variables. Our investigation centers on the enthralling enigma of the connection between annual US household spending on floor coverings and the incidence of arson in the alluring state of Hawaii. This unusual pairing sparked our curiosity, leading us to explore the statistical interplay between furnishing expenditures and fiery felonies.
As explorers in this academic landscape, we embarked on a statistical odyssey utilizing data extracted from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services. The ensuing treasure trove of information guided us through a labyrinth of analysis, ultimately revealing intriguing patterns and surprising associations.
Blending the art of statistics with the flair of observation, we stumbled upon a correlation coefficient of 0.8043700 and a p-value so small, it would need a magnifying glass to be seen. These statistical titans pointed us towards a compelling relationship, one that defies conventional expectations.
In this paper, we present our adventure in unraveling this unexpected tapestry of data, offering a whimsical lens to view the quirkier aspects of behavioral statistics. Join us as we traverse the landscape of lavish carpets, sleek hardwoods, and the enigmatic allure of arson in Hawaii. But be forewarned, the journey may spark delightful musings about the hidden influences of home décor on criminal proclivities, and perhaps, persuade you to ponder the incendiary potential of your flooring choices. After all, when it comes to research, sometimes the most unexpected correlations lie beneath the surface, waiting to be discovered.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the relationship between annual US household spending on floor coverings and the incidence of arson in Hawaii yielded fascinating results. Over the period from 2000 to 2022, we observed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8043700, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. This correlation was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.6470110, highlighting the substantial proportion of variance in arson explained by annual floor covering expenditure.
As illustrated in Fig. 1, the scatterplot vividly portrays the significant correlation between these variables, with each data point therein serving as a silent witness to the peculiar dance of consumerism and criminality. Whether the lush carpets or gleaming hardwoods bear any direct influence on the incidence of arson remains to be seen, but the statistical bond we observed cannot be denied.
The p-value of less than 0.01 lends support to the robustness of our findings, suggesting that the observed relationship is unlikely to have occurred by mere chance. This calls for a deeper exploration into the potential mechanisms underlying this unexpected connection. The sheer unlikelihood of this association prompts an enchanting contemplation of the clandestine forces at play, where the allure of sumptuous floor coverings meets the enigma of incendiary acts.
While our findings may elicit a chuckle or two, they also serve as a poignant reminder of the whimsical nature of statistical discovery. As we venture forth into the depths of this unexpected correlation, we invite fellow researchers and enthusiasts to join us in this lighthearted exploration of the intertwined realms of consumer behavior and criminal tendencies. After all, in the vast tapestry of data, one never knows where the next surprise may lie.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has revealed a remarkable and somewhat flamboyant association between annual US household spending on floor coverings and the occurrence of arson in Hawaii. The correlation coefficient of 0.8043700 and minuscule p-value of less than 0.01 have left us unable to sweep these findings under the rug, even if it was a Persian one. While the causative link between cozy carpets and criminal flames remains shrouded in mystery, our results tantalizingly tease at the possibility of an unsuspected connection – it seems that the warmth of a plush rug and the fiery allure of criminality have an inexplicable bond, much like the chemical attractions in a science experiment gone awry.

Despite our serious demeanor, we can't help but grin in amusement at the statistical romp we've had through this unconventional correlation. One can't deny the subtle comedy of observing the potential influence of interior décor choices on criminal behavior in the Aloha State. We've learned that in the world of statistics, just like in life, the unexpected can be the most illuminating. It's with a warm and fuzzy feeling in our hearts that we assert that further research in this whimsical domain may be as surplus as a shag carpet in a sleek, modern apartment – or, in other words, unnecessary.

After all, as we bid adieu to this offbeat statistical escapade, we're left with the alluring thought that perhaps, in the realm of correlations, there's always more than meets the eye, just like a well-placed rug that ties the room together. But for now, it seems the mysterious dance of consumerism and criminal proclivities in the land of pineapples and hula dancers shall remain a delightful statistical enigma – one that will undoubtedly spark many a quirky conversation at academic soirées.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Carpeting the Crime Scene: Exploring the Link between Annual US Household Spending on Floor Coverings and Arson in Hawaii. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Quirky Economic Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Carpeting the Crime Scene: Exploring the Link between Annual US Household Spending on Floor Coverings and Arson in Hawaii. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Domestic Interiors and Criminology Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Carpeting the Crime Scene: Exploring the Link between Annual US Household Spending on Floor Coverings and Arson in Hawaii with an abstract of This study delves into the intriguing relationship between annual US household spending on floor coverings and the occurrence of arson in the picturesque state of Hawaii. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team sought to shed light on this unlikely pairing. Using statistical analyses, we established a correlation coefficient of 0.8043700 and a strikingly low p-value of less than 0.01 for the time frame spanning 2000 to 2022.
Despite the seemingly disparate nature of these variables, our findings suggest a robust and noteworthy association between the two. One can't help but ponder the connection between the soft embrace of plush rugs and the fiery allure of criminal activities. While the causative mechanisms remain elusive and open to further investigation, our results prompt a whimsical consideration of the potential influence of interior décor choices on criminal behavior in tropical paradises. So, the next time you're contemplating a flooring upgrade, perhaps consider its potential impact on fire-related incidents in distant, sunny locales. After all, feng shui might be a more potent force than we ever suspected.

ChatGPT:

household spending, floor coverings, annual spending, arson, Hawaii, statistical analysis, correlation coefficient, p-value, Bureau of Labor Statistics, FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, interior décor, criminal behavior, tropical paradises, feng shui, causative mechanisms

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Annual US household spending on floor coverings
Detailed data title: Average annual household spend on floor coverings
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
See what else correlates with Annual US household spending on floor coverings

Arson in Hawaii
Detailed data title: The arson rate per 100,000 residents in Hawaii
Source: FBI Criminal Justice Information Services
See what else correlates with Arson in Hawaii

Correlation r = 0.8043700 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6470110 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 64.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Arson in Hawaii) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Annual US household spending on floor coverings) over the 23 years from 2000 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.7E-6. 0.0000037316502688994430000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.8 in 0.00037% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 267,978 random variables You don't actually need 267 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 22 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 22 because we have two variables measured over a period of 23 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.59, 0.91 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Annual US household spending on floor coverings (Household spend)4440405252564846453036201620181820302525303334
Arson in Hawaii (Arson rate)33.441.342.540.841.951.853.743.239.538.732.325.922.415.810.429.133.935.630.329.235.228.124.9




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([44,40,40,52,52,56,48,46,45,30,36,20,16,20,18,18,20,30,25,25,30,33,34,])
array_2 = np.array([33.4,41.3,42.5,40.8,41.9,51.8,53.7,43.2,39.5,38.7,32.3,25.9,22.4,15.8,10.4,29.1,33.9,35.6,30.3,29.2,35.2,28.1,24.9,])
array_1_name = "Annual US household spending on floor coverings"
array_2_name = "Arson in Hawaii"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Bravo! Your evaluation rocks!


Correlation ID: 4068 · Black Variable ID: 19918 · Red Variable ID: 20039
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0