about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,050 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Deming, New Mexico and the second variable is NCAA Women's Softball Championship (Div I) Final Score Difference Between Winners and Runner-Up.  The chart goes from 1987 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The increase in air pollution in Deming, New Mexico led to stronger winds, creating a home run derby-like environment on the softball field. This resulted in a higher final score difference between the winners and runner-up of the NCAA Women's Softball Championship (Div I) as the winning team managed to hit an unprecedented number of smog-assisted home runs, leaving their opponents in a hazy daze.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate an image in the style of a Polaroid photo, capturing the NCAA Women's Softball Championship in Deming, New Mexico amidst hazy skies from air pollution. Emphasize the altered trajectory of softballs due to the density of the air, highlighting the winning team's advantage in hitting and pitching. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Deming, New Mexico and NCAA Women's Softball Championship (Div I) Final Score Difference Between Winners and Runner-Up. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Celtic art Macabre Cyberpunk Oragami a Polaroid photo
ChatGPT: a Polaroid photo

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Deming, New Mexico and NCAA Women's Softball Championship (Div I) Final Score Difference Between Winners and Runner-Up, in the following situation: because changes in air pollution in Deming, New Mexico altered the density of the air, affecting the trajectory of softballs in the championship game, giving the winners a slight advantage in hitting and pitching.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Deming, New Mexico, the NCAA Women's Softball Championship took place amidst the hazy sky caused by air pollution. The final score difference between the winners and the runner-up was influenced by the altered trajectory of the softballs, giving the winning team a slight advantage in hitting and pitching due to the density of the air.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a Polaroid photo ] and depicting this scene: In Deming, New Mexico, the NCAA Women's Softball Championship took place amidst the hazy sky caused by air pollution. The final score difference between the winners and the runner-up was influenced by the altered trajectory of the softballs, giving the winning team a slight advantage in hitting and pitching due to the density of the air. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate an image in the style of a Polaroid photo, capturing the NCAA Women's Softball Championship in Deming, New Mexico amidst hazy skies from air pollution. Emphasize the altered trajectory of softballs due to the density of the air, highlighting the winning team's advantage in hitting and pitching.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Air pollution in Deming, New Mexico caused NCAA Women's Softball Championship (Div I) Final Score Difference Between Winners and Runner-Up to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Air-Raising Research: The Air Pollution Effect on NCAA Women's Softball Championship Final Scores in Deming, New Mexico

International Journal of Environmental Athletic Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Deming, New Mexico and NCAA Women's Softball Championship (Div I) Final Score Difference Between Winners and Runner-Up. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and NCAA to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.5598291 and p < 0.01 for 1987 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Air-Raising Research: The Air Pollution Effect on NCAA Women's Softball Championship Final Scores in Deming, New Mexico

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing connection between air pollution levels in Deming, New Mexico, and the outcome of the NCAA Women's Softball Championship (Div I) Final. Using data provided by the Environmental Protection Agency and NCAA, we employ statistical analysis to investigate a potential relationship between air quality and the final score difference between the championship winners and the runners-up. Remarkably, our analysis reveals a correlation coefficient of 0.5598291 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 1987 to 2022. The results, though unexpected, provide a refreshing perspective on the interplay between environmental variables and sports performance. This paper offers valuable insights into the potential impact of air pollution on athletic outcomes, emphasizing the importance of considering non-traditional factors in the pursuit of sporting success.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Deming, New Mexico and NCAA Women's Softball Championship (Div I) Final Score Difference Between Winners and Runner-Up. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Air-Raising Research: The Air Pollution Effect on NCAA Women's Softball Championship Final Scores in Deming, New Mexico

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing connection between air pollution levels in Deming, New Mexico, and the outcome of the NCAA Women's Softball Championship (Div I) Final. Using data provided by the Environmental Protection Agency and NCAA, we employ statistical analysis to investigate a potential relationship between air quality and the final score difference between the championship winners and the runners-up. Remarkably, our analysis reveals a correlation coefficient of 0.5598291 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 1987 to 2022. The results, though unexpected, provide a refreshing perspective on the interplay between environmental variables and sports performance. This paper offers valuable insights into the potential impact of air pollution on athletic outcomes, emphasizing the importance of considering non-traditional factors in the pursuit of sporting success.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The world of sports is rife with tales of triumph, heartbreak, and the occasional underdog upset. Yet, as enthusiasts and analysts, we often fixate on the visible elements that shape these outcomes -- the training regimens, coaching strategies, player talent, and sheer determination. However, beneath the diamond dust and outfield grass lies a realm of potential influencers that are often overlooked or dismissed as mere background noise.

In this study, we embark on an unconventional journey to explore the curious relationship between air pollution levels in the charming town of Deming, New Mexico, and the nail-biting, adrenaline-pumping final scores of the NCAA Women's Softball Championship. While one might raise an eyebrow at the seemingly improbable link between atmospheric contaminants and athletic prowess, the depths of statistical analysis often bring forth unexpected treasures.

As we delve into this uncharted territory, it is crucial to acknowledge the multifaceted nature of sports performance. The players may be the stars on the field, but outside forces, including those floating through the air, can indeed sway the tides of victory and defeat. Our aim is to shed light on this unexplored facet of the sports arena and, in doing so, enhance our understanding of the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate variables.

To lift the veil on this intriguing phenomenon, we have harnessed the power of datasets from the Environmental Protection Agency, entwining them with the rich tapestry of NCAA softball championship history. Through the skilled artistry of statistical analysis, we shall unravel the potential impact of air quality on the final score difference between championship winners and the runners-up. Brace yourself, for we might just discover that there's more than meets the eye when it comes to the miasma of athletic triumph.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Deming, New Mexico and NCAA Women's Softball Championship (Div I) Final Score Difference Between Winners and Runner-Up. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Air-Raising Research: The Air Pollution Effect on NCAA Women's Softball Championship Final Scores in Deming, New Mexico

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing connection between air pollution levels in Deming, New Mexico, and the outcome of the NCAA Women's Softball Championship (Div I) Final. Using data provided by the Environmental Protection Agency and NCAA, we employ statistical analysis to investigate a potential relationship between air quality and the final score difference between the championship winners and the runners-up. Remarkably, our analysis reveals a correlation coefficient of 0.5598291 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 1987 to 2022. The results, though unexpected, provide a refreshing perspective on the interplay between environmental variables and sports performance. This paper offers valuable insights into the potential impact of air pollution on athletic outcomes, emphasizing the importance of considering non-traditional factors in the pursuit of sporting success.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of sports is rife with tales of triumph, heartbreak, and the occasional underdog upset. Yet, as enthusiasts and analysts, we often fixate on the visible elements that shape these outcomes -- the training regimens, coaching strategies, player talent, and sheer determination. However, beneath the diamond dust and outfield grass lies a realm of potential influencers that are often overlooked or dismissed as mere background noise.
In this study, we embark on an unconventional journey to explore the curious relationship between air pollution levels in the charming town of Deming, New Mexico, and the nail-biting, adrenaline-pumping final scores of the NCAA Women's Softball Championship. While one might raise an eyebrow at the seemingly improbable link between atmospheric contaminants and athletic prowess, the depths of statistical analysis often bring forth unexpected treasures.
As we delve into this uncharted territory, it is crucial to acknowledge the multifaceted nature of sports performance. The players may be the stars on the field, but outside forces, including those floating through the air, can indeed sway the tides of victory and defeat. Our aim is to shed light on this unexplored facet of the sports arena and, in doing so, enhance our understanding of the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate variables.
To lift the veil on this intriguing phenomenon, we have harnessed the power of datasets from the Environmental Protection Agency, entwining them with the rich tapestry of NCAA softball championship history. Through the skilled artistry of statistical analysis, we shall unravel the potential impact of air quality on the final score difference between championship winners and the runners-up. Brace yourself, for we might just discover that there's more than meets the eye when it comes to the miasma of athletic triumph.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In their seminal work, Smith and Doe (2015) examined the effects of air pollution on athletic performance, focusing primarily on track and field events. While their findings were thought-provoking and certainly took the discussion of environmental influences in sports to new heights, little attention was given to the world of softball. Jones et al. (2018), building on this foundation, explored the link between air quality and various collegiate sports, citing correlations in basketball and soccer. However, the tantalizing intersection of air pollution and NCAA Women's Softball Championship final scores remained uncharted territory until now.

Turning to the world of non-fiction literature, "The Air We Breathe: A Comprehensive Study of Environmental Pollution" by Green and White (2019) provides a comprehensive overview of air quality concerns and their potential ramifications. While not directly addressing sports outcomes, the book offers a breath of fresh air, pardon the pun, in understanding the broader context of our research. Similarly, "Environmental Epidemiology: Understanding the Effects of Pollution on Human Health" by Grey (2017) offers insights into the health implications of air pollution, which indirectly contribute to the rationale behind investigating its impact on athletic performance.

In the realm of fiction, the works of Ozone (2005) and Smog (2013) present imaginative tales of atmospheric intrigue and environmental perils. While these narratives are far from scholarly, they certainly ignite the imagination and reinforce the notion that the air we breathe is not to be underestimated.

Furthermore, considering the permeating influence of childhood memories and pop culture, it would be remiss not to mention the formative impact of cartoons and children's shows. The adventures of Captain Planet and the Planeteers, an animated series from the 1990s, instilled early awareness of environmental issues in many young minds, echoing the importance of clean air for a healthy world. Additionally, the whimsical antics of the Care Bears and their quest to protect the environment in "Care Bears: The Quest for Clean Air" (1986) underscore the enduring resonance of environmental consciousness in the cultural landscape.

Amidst the wealth of literature and creative media, it is imperative to approach our investigation with scholarly rigor, tempered with a sprinkle of wit and a lungful of fresh air.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Deming, New Mexico and NCAA Women's Softball Championship (Div I) Final Score Difference Between Winners and Runner-Up. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and NCAA . You used data from 1987 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Air-Raising Research: The Air Pollution Effect on NCAA Women's Softball Championship Final Scores in Deming, New Mexico

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing connection between air pollution levels in Deming, New Mexico, and the outcome of the NCAA Women's Softball Championship (Div I) Final. Using data provided by the Environmental Protection Agency and NCAA, we employ statistical analysis to investigate a potential relationship between air quality and the final score difference between the championship winners and the runners-up. Remarkably, our analysis reveals a correlation coefficient of 0.5598291 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 1987 to 2022. The results, though unexpected, provide a refreshing perspective on the interplay between environmental variables and sports performance. This paper offers valuable insights into the potential impact of air pollution on athletic outcomes, emphasizing the importance of considering non-traditional factors in the pursuit of sporting success.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of sports is rife with tales of triumph, heartbreak, and the occasional underdog upset. Yet, as enthusiasts and analysts, we often fixate on the visible elements that shape these outcomes -- the training regimens, coaching strategies, player talent, and sheer determination. However, beneath the diamond dust and outfield grass lies a realm of potential influencers that are often overlooked or dismissed as mere background noise.
In this study, we embark on an unconventional journey to explore the curious relationship between air pollution levels in the charming town of Deming, New Mexico, and the nail-biting, adrenaline-pumping final scores of the NCAA Women's Softball Championship. While one might raise an eyebrow at the seemingly improbable link between atmospheric contaminants and athletic prowess, the depths of statistical analysis often bring forth unexpected treasures.
As we delve into this uncharted territory, it is crucial to acknowledge the multifaceted nature of sports performance. The players may be the stars on the field, but outside forces, including those floating through the air, can indeed sway the tides of victory and defeat. Our aim is to shed light on this unexplored facet of the sports arena and, in doing so, enhance our understanding of the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate variables.
To lift the veil on this intriguing phenomenon, we have harnessed the power of datasets from the Environmental Protection Agency, entwining them with the rich tapestry of NCAA softball championship history. Through the skilled artistry of statistical analysis, we shall unravel the potential impact of air quality on the final score difference between championship winners and the runners-up. Brace yourself, for we might just discover that there's more than meets the eye when it comes to the miasma of athletic triumph.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unearth the hidden relationship between air pollution levels in Deming, New Mexico, and the outcome of the NCAA Women's Softball Championship, our research team embarked on a quest akin to Indiana Jones seeking the lost ark of statistical truth. With our trusty laptops and a background soundtrack of inspirational sports anthems, we dived into the depths of data collection and analysis.

Data Collection
The primary sources for our data collection were the Environmental Protection Agency, where air quality measurements were recorded with meticulous precision, and the NCAA, which provided us with a treasure trove of softball championship final scores dating back to 1987. We combed through endless spreadsheets and databases, feeling not unlike intrepid adventurers in search of the holy grail of correlation.

Criteria for Inclusion
Our selection process for air pollution data was as stringent as a referee's whistle during the final moments of a championship match. We focused our attention on Deming, New Mexico, seeking atmospheric measurements that corresponded to the period of the NCAA Women's Softball Championship each year. Only the most reliable and high-quality data points made the cut, as we aimed to ensure that our analysis was as solid as the swing of a power hitter.

Statistical Analysis
With our datasets in hand, we turned to the arsenal of statistical tools at our disposal. Utilizing the formidable power of correlation analysis, we sought to unravel the potential connection between air pollution levels and the final score difference between the championship winners and the runners-up. Our statistical methods were as sharp as a well-placed line drive, ensuring that our findings were not a mere statistical foul ball.

Variable Considerations
Accounting for potential confounding factors, such as weather conditions and team performance, we meticulously examined the relationship between air pollution and championship outcomes. Our analysis aimed to encompass the full spectrum of factors that could influence the final score difference, revealing a complex web of interactions not unlike the intricate plays of a championship match.

Robustness Checks
To fortify the reliability of our findings, we subjected our analysis to rigorous sensitivity tests and robustness checks. Much like championship contenders honing their skills through grueling training sessions, our statistical models underwent intense scrutiny to ensure that our conclusions were resilient to alternative specifications and assumptions.

Limitations
As with any daring expedition, our research was not without its limitations. The inherent complexities of teasing out causality from correlation in observational data posed a formidable challenge. Nevertheless, we proceeded with the unwavering spirit of intrepid explorers, seeking to illuminate a unique facet of the sporting world.

In sum, our methodology entailed a convergence of rigorous data collection, meticulous statistical analysis, and unyielding determination in our quest to unravel the potential impact of air pollution on the final score difference in the NCAA Women's Softball Championship. Through this methodical approach, we aim to shed light on a captivating nexus between environmental influences and athletic outcomes, adding a new chapter to the annals of sports research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Deming, New Mexico and NCAA Women's Softball Championship (Div I) Final Score Difference Between Winners and Runner-Up. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and NCAA .

For the time period 1987 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.5598291, r-squared of 0.3134087, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Air-Raising Research: The Air Pollution Effect on NCAA Women's Softball Championship Final Scores in Deming, New Mexico

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing connection between air pollution levels in Deming, New Mexico, and the outcome of the NCAA Women's Softball Championship (Div I) Final. Using data provided by the Environmental Protection Agency and NCAA, we employ statistical analysis to investigate a potential relationship between air quality and the final score difference between the championship winners and the runners-up. Remarkably, our analysis reveals a correlation coefficient of 0.5598291 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 1987 to 2022. The results, though unexpected, provide a refreshing perspective on the interplay between environmental variables and sports performance. This paper offers valuable insights into the potential impact of air pollution on athletic outcomes, emphasizing the importance of considering non-traditional factors in the pursuit of sporting success.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The world of sports is rife with tales of triumph, heartbreak, and the occasional underdog upset. Yet, as enthusiasts and analysts, we often fixate on the visible elements that shape these outcomes -- the training regimens, coaching strategies, player talent, and sheer determination. However, beneath the diamond dust and outfield grass lies a realm of potential influencers that are often overlooked or dismissed as mere background noise.
In this study, we embark on an unconventional journey to explore the curious relationship between air pollution levels in the charming town of Deming, New Mexico, and the nail-biting, adrenaline-pumping final scores of the NCAA Women's Softball Championship. While one might raise an eyebrow at the seemingly improbable link between atmospheric contaminants and athletic prowess, the depths of statistical analysis often bring forth unexpected treasures.
As we delve into this uncharted territory, it is crucial to acknowledge the multifaceted nature of sports performance. The players may be the stars on the field, but outside forces, including those floating through the air, can indeed sway the tides of victory and defeat. Our aim is to shed light on this unexplored facet of the sports arena and, in doing so, enhance our understanding of the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate variables.
To lift the veil on this intriguing phenomenon, we have harnessed the power of datasets from the Environmental Protection Agency, entwining them with the rich tapestry of NCAA softball championship history. Through the skilled artistry of statistical analysis, we shall unravel the potential impact of air quality on the final score difference between championship winners and the runners-up. Brace yourself, for we might just discover that there's more than meets the eye when it comes to the miasma of athletic triumph.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Upon delving into the labyrinth of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the NCAA, we stumbled upon a surprising revelation. Our examination of the years 1987 to 2022 uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.5598291 between air pollution levels in Deming, New Mexico, and the final score difference between the winners and the runners-up of the NCAA Women's Softball Championship. Not only that, but our analysis also yielded an r-squared value of 0.3134087, along with a tantalizing p-value of less than 0.01.

Upon witnessing these statistical phenomena, our research team was left dumbfounded, much like a batter watching an unexpected curveball. It appears that the murky tendrils of air pollution may indeed extend their ephemeral reach into the domain of athletic competition, leaving an unsuspecting trail of statistical breadcrumbs.

Behold, Figure 1, a scatterplot that meticulously captures the magnetic correlation between these seemingly incongruous variables. Like a game-winning grand slam, this figure serves as a visual testament to the robustness of the relationship we uncovered. It stands as a silent witness to the captivating dance between air quality and the fierce battles unfolding on the softball diamond.

In conclusion, our findings hint at the notion that the invisible hand of air pollution might exert a peculiar influence over the ebb and flow of championship final scores. This poses a thought-provoking conundrum for sports aficionados and environmental enthusiasts alike. As we continue to unravel the enigmatic fusion of athletic excellence and atmospheric circumstances, it becomes increasingly apparent that the scoreboards of sports history may have more tales to tell than we initially thought, with air pollution adding an unexpected twist to the saga of sporting triumphs and challenges.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Deming, New Mexico and NCAA Women's Softball Championship (Div I) Final Score Difference Between Winners and Runner-Up. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Air-Raising Research: The Air Pollution Effect on NCAA Women's Softball Championship Final Scores in Deming, New Mexico

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing connection between air pollution levels in Deming, New Mexico, and the outcome of the NCAA Women's Softball Championship (Div I) Final. Using data provided by the Environmental Protection Agency and NCAA, we employ statistical analysis to investigate a potential relationship between air quality and the final score difference between the championship winners and the runners-up. Remarkably, our analysis reveals a correlation coefficient of 0.5598291 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 1987 to 2022. The results, though unexpected, provide a refreshing perspective on the interplay between environmental variables and sports performance. This paper offers valuable insights into the potential impact of air pollution on athletic outcomes, emphasizing the importance of considering non-traditional factors in the pursuit of sporting success.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their seminal work, Smith and Doe (2015) examined the effects of air pollution on athletic performance, focusing primarily on track and field events. While their findings were thought-provoking and certainly took the discussion of environmental influences in sports to new heights, little attention was given to the world of softball. Jones et al. (2018), building on this foundation, explored the link between air quality and various collegiate sports, citing correlations in basketball and soccer. However, the tantalizing intersection of air pollution and NCAA Women's Softball Championship final scores remained uncharted territory until now.
Turning to the world of non-fiction literature, "The Air We Breathe: A Comprehensive Study of Environmental Pollution" by Green and White (2019) provides a comprehensive overview of air quality concerns and their potential ramifications. While not directly addressing sports outcomes, the book offers a breath of fresh air, pardon the pun, in understanding the broader context of our research. Similarly, "Environmental Epidemiology: Understanding the Effects of Pollution on Human Health" by Grey (2017) offers insights into the health implications of air pollution, which indirectly contribute to the rationale behind investigating its impact on athletic performance.
In the realm of fiction, the works of Ozone (2005) and Smog (2013) present imaginative tales of atmospheric intrigue and environmental perils. While these narratives are far from scholarly, they certainly ignite the imagination and reinforce the notion that the air we breathe is not to be underestimated.
Furthermore, considering the permeating influence of childhood memories and pop culture, it would be remiss not to mention the formative impact of cartoons and children's shows. The adventures of Captain Planet and the Planeteers, an animated series from the 1990s, instilled early awareness of environmental issues in many young minds, echoing the importance of clean air for a healthy world. Additionally, the whimsical antics of the Care Bears and their quest to protect the environment in "Care Bears: The Quest for Clean Air" (1986) underscore the enduring resonance of environmental consciousness in the cultural landscape.
Amidst the wealth of literature and creative media, it is imperative to approach our investigation with scholarly rigor, tempered with a sprinkle of wit and a lungful of fresh air.

[[RESULTS]]
Upon delving into the labyrinth of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the NCAA, we stumbled upon a surprising revelation. Our examination of the years 1987 to 2022 uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.5598291 between air pollution levels in Deming, New Mexico, and the final score difference between the winners and the runners-up of the NCAA Women's Softball Championship. Not only that, but our analysis also yielded an r-squared value of 0.3134087, along with a tantalizing p-value of less than 0.01.
Upon witnessing these statistical phenomena, our research team was left dumbfounded, much like a batter watching an unexpected curveball. It appears that the murky tendrils of air pollution may indeed extend their ephemeral reach into the domain of athletic competition, leaving an unsuspecting trail of statistical breadcrumbs.
Behold, Figure 1, a scatterplot that meticulously captures the magnetic correlation between these seemingly incongruous variables. Like a game-winning grand slam, this figure serves as a visual testament to the robustness of the relationship we uncovered. It stands as a silent witness to the captivating dance between air quality and the fierce battles unfolding on the softball diamond.
In conclusion, our findings hint at the notion that the invisible hand of air pollution might exert a peculiar influence over the ebb and flow of championship final scores. This poses a thought-provoking conundrum for sports aficionados and environmental enthusiasts alike. As we continue to unravel the enigmatic fusion of athletic excellence and atmospheric circumstances, it becomes increasingly apparent that the scoreboards of sports history may have more tales to tell than we initially thought, with air pollution adding an unexpected twist to the saga of sporting triumphs and challenges.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The correlation between air pollution levels in Deming, New Mexico, and the final score difference in the NCAA Women's Softball Championship has left us feeling like we've been thrown a curveball. Our findings bring to light a previously unnoticed relationship that highlights the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate factors in the realm of athletic competition. It's as if the winds of fate have blown a gust of unexpected statistical significance into the world of sports.

Drawing from the existing literature, our results align with the groundbreaking work of Smith and Doe (2015) who first ventured into the complex terrain of air pollution effects on athletic performance. These pioneering researchers laid the groundwork for our exploration, and our findings extend the conversation to the diamond of softball. Similarly, the imaginative tales of atmospheric intrigue in the works of Ozone (2005) and Smog (2013) may not have been scholarly, but they have ultimately found a place at the table of our investigation, reminding us that the strange and unexpected can often inform our understanding.

The statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.5598291 and the r-squared value of 0.3134087 hold up a mirror to the unexpected ways in which environmental variables potentially intertwine with athletic outcomes. It's as though the invisible hand of air pollution has been surreptitiously directing the flow of wins and losses on the diamond, adding an unforeseen layer of complexity to the game.

The scatterplot presented in Figure 1 serves as a visual testament to the robustness of this unlikely relationship, akin to a perfectly executed double play. It captures the elusive dynamic between air quality and the final showdowns of the NCAA Women's Softball Championship, offering a glimpse into a parallel universe where environmental conditions hold sway over the course of sporting events.

In conclusion, our research presents a fresh perspective on the multifaceted influences at play in the world of sports. The intertwining of air pollution levels and championship final scores in Deming, New Mexico reminds us that the realm of athletic competition is not immune to the whims of the environment. As we unmask this unexpected connection, one can't help but marvel at the enigmatic dance between atmospheric circumstances and sporting achievements, proving that statistical analysis doesn't always fit within the neat confines of our expectations. This leads us to ponder the whimsical ways in which the unseen forces of nature may shape the outcome of our most beloved pastimes, leaving us with a renewed appreciation for the intricacies of the game.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Deming, New Mexico and NCAA Women's Softball Championship (Div I) Final Score Difference Between Winners and Runner-Up. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Air-Raising Research: The Air Pollution Effect on NCAA Women's Softball Championship Final Scores in Deming, New Mexico

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing connection between air pollution levels in Deming, New Mexico, and the outcome of the NCAA Women's Softball Championship (Div I) Final. Using data provided by the Environmental Protection Agency and NCAA, we employ statistical analysis to investigate a potential relationship between air quality and the final score difference between the championship winners and the runners-up. Remarkably, our analysis reveals a correlation coefficient of 0.5598291 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 1987 to 2022. The results, though unexpected, provide a refreshing perspective on the interplay between environmental variables and sports performance. This paper offers valuable insights into the potential impact of air pollution on athletic outcomes, emphasizing the importance of considering non-traditional factors in the pursuit of sporting success.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The world of sports is rife with tales of triumph, heartbreak, and the occasional underdog upset. Yet, as enthusiasts and analysts, we often fixate on the visible elements that shape these outcomes -- the training regimens, coaching strategies, player talent, and sheer determination. However, beneath the diamond dust and outfield grass lies a realm of potential influencers that are often overlooked or dismissed as mere background noise.
In this study, we embark on an unconventional journey to explore the curious relationship between air pollution levels in the charming town of Deming, New Mexico, and the nail-biting, adrenaline-pumping final scores of the NCAA Women's Softball Championship. While one might raise an eyebrow at the seemingly improbable link between atmospheric contaminants and athletic prowess, the depths of statistical analysis often bring forth unexpected treasures.
As we delve into this uncharted territory, it is crucial to acknowledge the multifaceted nature of sports performance. The players may be the stars on the field, but outside forces, including those floating through the air, can indeed sway the tides of victory and defeat. Our aim is to shed light on this unexplored facet of the sports arena and, in doing so, enhance our understanding of the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate variables.
To lift the veil on this intriguing phenomenon, we have harnessed the power of datasets from the Environmental Protection Agency, entwining them with the rich tapestry of NCAA softball championship history. Through the skilled artistry of statistical analysis, we shall unravel the potential impact of air quality on the final score difference between championship winners and the runners-up. Brace yourself, for we might just discover that there's more than meets the eye when it comes to the miasma of athletic triumph.

[[RESULTS]]
Upon delving into the labyrinth of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the NCAA, we stumbled upon a surprising revelation. Our examination of the years 1987 to 2022 uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.5598291 between air pollution levels in Deming, New Mexico, and the final score difference between the winners and the runners-up of the NCAA Women's Softball Championship. Not only that, but our analysis also yielded an r-squared value of 0.3134087, along with a tantalizing p-value of less than 0.01.
Upon witnessing these statistical phenomena, our research team was left dumbfounded, much like a batter watching an unexpected curveball. It appears that the murky tendrils of air pollution may indeed extend their ephemeral reach into the domain of athletic competition, leaving an unsuspecting trail of statistical breadcrumbs.
Behold, Figure 1, a scatterplot that meticulously captures the magnetic correlation between these seemingly incongruous variables. Like a game-winning grand slam, this figure serves as a visual testament to the robustness of the relationship we uncovered. It stands as a silent witness to the captivating dance between air quality and the fierce battles unfolding on the softball diamond.
In conclusion, our findings hint at the notion that the invisible hand of air pollution might exert a peculiar influence over the ebb and flow of championship final scores. This poses a thought-provoking conundrum for sports aficionados and environmental enthusiasts alike. As we continue to unravel the enigmatic fusion of athletic excellence and atmospheric circumstances, it becomes increasingly apparent that the scoreboards of sports history may have more tales to tell than we initially thought, with air pollution adding an unexpected twist to the saga of sporting triumphs and challenges.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In the immortal words of Bob Dylan, "The answer, my friend, is blowin' in Deming, New Mexico." Our investigation into the curious kinship between air pollution levels and NCAA Women's Softball Championship final score differentials has uncovered a riveting tale of unseen forces at play. While it may initially seem like a stretch to draw a line from hazy skies to the diamond's derring-do, our statistical spelunking has revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.5598291 that refuses to be ignored.

As we approach the denouement of this academic escapade, one can't help but wonder about the potential implications of our findings. Could it be that the winds of change, laced with atmospheric contaminants, are unwittingly influencing the grand narrative of athletic battles? Dare we say that the softball diamond is not just a stage for sporting prowess, but also an arena where the unseen currents of air pollution intermingle? These questions, much like a high fastball, hang in the air, begging for a crackling response.

In the grand tapestry of statistical exploration, our foray into the interwoven realms of environmental quality and sports drama stands as a testament to the unpredictable wonders that await the curious mind. The gusts of probability have blown our research ship onto unexpected shores, where the mist of air pollution seems to blur the lines between victory and defeat.

This leads us to the firm assertion that additional investigations into this perplexing connection between air pollution in Deming, New Mexico, and the NCAA Women's Softball Championship Final Score Difference Between Winners and Runner-Up are not warranted. The combination of our p-value of less than 0.01 and the delightful correlation coefficient of 0.5598291 provides a compelling, albeit unanticipated, conclusion. It seems that the wind has spoken, and the grand softball symphony has an unlikely contender: air pollution.

As the curtain falls on this act of statistical inquiry, we urge fellow researchers to keep their eyes and minds open to the whimsical dances of variables, both observable and hidden, in the captivating theater of sports. While the winds of athletic destiny may blow unpredictably, our role as intrepid scholars is to hoist our sails and navigate the ever-shifting seas of knowledge, occasionally encountering surprising connections that add an extra element of fun and astonishment to the world of academic investigation. Let us revel in the unexpected, for as we have seen, sometimes the most compelling revelations emerge from the most unexpected avenues.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Air-Raising Research: The Air Pollution Effect on NCAA Women's Softball Championship Final Scores in Deming, New Mexico. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

International Journal of Environmental Athletic Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Air-Raising Research: The Air Pollution Effect on NCAA Women's Softball Championship Final Scores in Deming, New Mexico. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

Society for the Advancement of Zany Ecological Studies (SAZES)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Air-Raising Research: The Air Pollution Effect on NCAA Women's Softball Championship Final Scores in Deming, New Mexico with an abstract of This study delves into the intriguing connection between air pollution levels in Deming, New Mexico, and the outcome of the NCAA Women's Softball Championship (Div I) Final. Using data provided by the Environmental Protection Agency and NCAA, we employ statistical analysis to investigate a potential relationship between air quality and the final score difference between the championship winners and the runners-up. Remarkably, our analysis reveals a correlation coefficient of 0.5598291 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 1987 to 2022. The results, though unexpected, provide a refreshing perspective on the interplay between environmental variables and sports performance. This paper offers valuable insights into the potential impact of air pollution on athletic outcomes, emphasizing the importance of considering non-traditional factors in the pursuit of sporting success.

ChatGPT:

air pollution, NCAA Women's Softball Championship, final scores, Deming, New Mexico, statistical analysis, environmental variables, sports performance, air quality, correlation coefficient, p-value, athletic outcomes, EPA data, NCAA data

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Deming, New Mexico
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with air quality at 'unhealthy for sensitive groups' or worse in Deming, NM
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Deming, New Mexico

NCAA Women's Softball Championship (Div I) Final Score Difference Between Winners and Runner-Up
Source: NCAA
See what else correlates with NCAA Women's Softball Championship (Div I) Final Score Difference Between Winners and Runner-Up

Correlation r = 0.5598291 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.3134087 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 31.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., NCAA Women's Softball Championship (Div I) Final Score Difference Between Winners and Runner-Up) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Deming, New Mexico) over the 36 years from 1987 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00038. 0.0003849597546321997600000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.56 in 0.038% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 2,598 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 35 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 35 because we have two variables measured over a period of 36 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.28, 0.75 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
198719881989199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Air pollution in Deming, New Mexico (Bad air quality days)0.0039062500000000000000000000.002739730.06557380.002747250.01095890.02465750.03021980.0301370.01098900.008333330.01388890.008403360.005540170.002824860.008287290.0251397
NCAA Women's Softball Championship (Div I) Final Score Difference Between Winners and Runner-Up (Score)3312421222811216123551116514331151049




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.00390625,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0.00273973,0.0655738,0.00274725,0.0109589,0.0246575,0.0302198,0.030137,0.010989,0,0.00833333,0.0138889,0.00840336,0.00554017,0.00282486,0.00828729,0.0251397,])
array_2 = np.array([3,3,1,2,4,2,1,2,2,2,8,1,1,2,1,6,1,2,3,5,5,11,1,6,5,1,4,3,3,1,1,5,1,0,4,9,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Deming, New Mexico"
array_2_name = "NCAA Women's Softball Championship (Div I) Final Score Difference Between Winners and Runner-Up"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm grateful for your review!


Correlation ID: 4050 · Black Variable ID: 21806 · Red Variable ID: 242
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0