about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,043 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Robbie and the second variable is Air pollution in Tucson, Arizona.  The chart goes from 1980 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

Fewer Robbies meant fewer robot dance-offs, which in turn meant fewer malfunctioning disco balls. With the disco balls being used less, the overall demand for electricity in Tucson decreased, leading to a reduction in air pollution. It seems the era of Robbies truly was a breath of fresh air for Tucson!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: "Generate an image of a futuristic garage in a quiet Tucson, Arizona neighborhood. The garage is the meeting place for a small group of friends known as "The Robbies." The electric guitars that once adorned the walls now lay dormant, covered in dust. Illustrate a scene where the declining popularity of the name Robbie has resulted in the friends no longer feeling the need to start a rock band of the same name. The reduced energy consumption from fewer guitars being played has contributed to decreased air pollution in the clear Tucson air. The visual should capture the serene atmosphere of the new, less music-filled space." The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Robbie and Air pollution in Tucson, Arizona. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Psychedelic a funny image you would see on reddit Pop art Futuristic A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s
ChatGPT: Futuristic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Robbie and Air pollution in Tucson, Arizona, in the following situation: Because as the popularity of the name Robbie decreased, fewer people were inspired to impulsively start a rock band named The Robbies, leading to a decline in electric guitar sales. With fewer electric guitars being manufactured, there was a reduction in energy consumption, resulting in decreased air pollution in Tucson, Arizona.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a quiet Tucson, Arizona, neighborhood, a small group of friends gathered in a garage. The sign on the door read "The Robbies." With the declining popularity of the name Robbie, the friends no longer felt compelled to start a rock band of the same name. The electric guitars that once lined the walls now collected dust. In the clear Tucson air, fewer guitars being played meant reduced energy consumption, leading to decreased air pollution.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Futuristic ] and depicting this scene: In a quiet Tucson, Arizona, neighborhood, a small group of friends gathered in a garage. The sign on the door read "The Robbies." With the declining popularity of the name Robbie, the friends no longer felt compelled to start a rock band of the same name. The electric guitars that once lined the walls now collected dust. In the clear Tucson air, fewer guitars being played meant reduced energy consumption, leading to decreased air pollution. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: "Generate an image of a futuristic garage in a quiet Tucson, Arizona neighborhood. The garage is the meeting place for a small group of friends known as "The Robbies." The electric guitars that once adorned the walls now lay dormant, covered in dust. Illustrate a scene where the declining popularity of the name Robbie has resulted in the friends no longer feeling the need to start a rock band of the same name. The reduced energy consumption from fewer guitars being played has contributed to decreased air pollution in the clear Tucson air. The visual should capture the serene atmosphere of the new, less music-filled space."

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Popularity of the first name Robbie caused Air pollution in Tucson, Arizona to decrease. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Robbie-ringing the Alarm: The Name Game and Air Pollution in Tucson, Arizona

The Journal of Ecological Epiphanies

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Robbie and Air pollution in Tucson, Arizona. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.5023917 and p < 0.01 for 1980 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Robbie-ringing the Alarm: The Name Game and Air Pollution in Tucson, Arizona"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the quirky world of nomenclature and air quality, examining the potential link between the popularity of the first name Robbie and air pollution levels in the sunny city of Tucson, Arizona. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team embarked on a journey to unravel this enigmatic connection. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.5023917 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 1980 to 2021. Our findings not only shed light on the intriguing relationship between a moniker and atmospheric pollutants but also contribute to the colorful tapestry of urban sociology. The implications of this study may reach beyond mere coincidence, offering a whimsical yet thought-provoking lens through which to view the complex interplay of human behavior and environmental variables. As we present these findings, we invite readers to ponder the possibility that the ebb and flow of air quality might just be tied to the rise and fall of certain names in this fascinating desert locale.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Robbie and Air pollution in Tucson, Arizona. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Robbie-ringing the Alarm: The Name Game and Air Pollution in Tucson, Arizona"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the quirky world of nomenclature and air quality, examining the potential link between the popularity of the first name Robbie and air pollution levels in the sunny city of Tucson, Arizona. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team embarked on a journey to unravel this enigmatic connection. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.5023917 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 1980 to 2021. Our findings not only shed light on the intriguing relationship between a moniker and atmospheric pollutants but also contribute to the colorful tapestry of urban sociology. The implications of this study may reach beyond mere coincidence, offering a whimsical yet thought-provoking lens through which to view the complex interplay of human behavior and environmental variables. As we present these findings, we invite readers to ponder the possibility that the ebb and flow of air quality might just be tied to the rise and fall of certain names in this fascinating desert locale.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The intersection of human behavior and environmental factors has long captivated researchers seeking to unravel the intricate web of influences shaping our daily lives. From the whimsical to the weighty, patterns emerge from the most unexpected places, and today, we delve into the peculiar realm of nomenclature and air quality in the scenic city of Tucson, Arizona.

While the notion of a relationship between a person's name and atmospheric pollutants may initially strike one as fanciful, our study sets out to earnestly explore this intriguing possibility. Specifically, we address the potential correlation between the popularity of the first name Robbie and air pollution levels in the sun-drenched environs of Tucson. The stage is set for a delightful romp through the annals of social and environmental data, accompanied by a touch of statistical rigor and a dash of levity.

The genesis of this investigation lies in the observation of societal trends and the curious ebb and flow of names that grace birth certificates. As an amalgamation of tradition, cultural currents, and perhaps a sprinkle of parental whimsy, the selection of a name carries a peculiar weight in the fabric of human existence. With the aid of data from the US Social Security Administration, we aim to uncover any discernible association between the ascendancy of the name Robbie and the atmospheric nuances of the Tucson locale.

In the realm of environmental quality, the desert metropolis of Tucson offers a fascinating backdrop. While its arid climate and scenic vistas may conjure images of untouched tranquility, the city also contends with the nuanced matter of air pollution. Here, the dance of industry, transportation, and meteorological idiosyncrasies composes a unique symphony of chemical compounds wafting through the desert air.

As we embark on this intellectual escapade, our study endeavors to reconcile the seemingly disparate realms of names and air quality. Through diligent analysis of data from the Environmental Protection Agency, our team has endeavored to unravel potential connections between the popularization of the appellation Robbie and the fluctuations in air pollution levels over the past four decades.

In the coming pages, we present our findings tinged with both amusement and scientific scrutiny. As we journey through the data, we invite our readers to accompany us on a whimsical exploration, for in the inquisitive interplay of nomenclature and atmospheric constituents, one might just find a touch of serendipitous insight. So, let us tarry no longer and venture forth into the curious junction of names and air pollution, for it is a delightful pursuit of knowledge that we undertake, peppered with the charming allure of statistical intrigue and perhaps a dash of name-related banter.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Robbie and Air pollution in Tucson, Arizona. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Robbie-ringing the Alarm: The Name Game and Air Pollution in Tucson, Arizona"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the quirky world of nomenclature and air quality, examining the potential link between the popularity of the first name Robbie and air pollution levels in the sunny city of Tucson, Arizona. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team embarked on a journey to unravel this enigmatic connection. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.5023917 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 1980 to 2021. Our findings not only shed light on the intriguing relationship between a moniker and atmospheric pollutants but also contribute to the colorful tapestry of urban sociology. The implications of this study may reach beyond mere coincidence, offering a whimsical yet thought-provoking lens through which to view the complex interplay of human behavior and environmental variables. As we present these findings, we invite readers to ponder the possibility that the ebb and flow of air quality might just be tied to the rise and fall of certain names in this fascinating desert locale.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of human behavior and environmental factors has long captivated researchers seeking to unravel the intricate web of influences shaping our daily lives. From the whimsical to the weighty, patterns emerge from the most unexpected places, and today, we delve into the peculiar realm of nomenclature and air quality in the scenic city of Tucson, Arizona.
While the notion of a relationship between a person's name and atmospheric pollutants may initially strike one as fanciful, our study sets out to earnestly explore this intriguing possibility. Specifically, we address the potential correlation between the popularity of the first name Robbie and air pollution levels in the sun-drenched environs of Tucson. The stage is set for a delightful romp through the annals of social and environmental data, accompanied by a touch of statistical rigor and a dash of levity.
The genesis of this investigation lies in the observation of societal trends and the curious ebb and flow of names that grace birth certificates. As an amalgamation of tradition, cultural currents, and perhaps a sprinkle of parental whimsy, the selection of a name carries a peculiar weight in the fabric of human existence. With the aid of data from the US Social Security Administration, we aim to uncover any discernible association between the ascendancy of the name Robbie and the atmospheric nuances of the Tucson locale.
In the realm of environmental quality, the desert metropolis of Tucson offers a fascinating backdrop. While its arid climate and scenic vistas may conjure images of untouched tranquility, the city also contends with the nuanced matter of air pollution. Here, the dance of industry, transportation, and meteorological idiosyncrasies composes a unique symphony of chemical compounds wafting through the desert air.
As we embark on this intellectual escapade, our study endeavors to reconcile the seemingly disparate realms of names and air quality. Through diligent analysis of data from the Environmental Protection Agency, our team has endeavored to unravel potential connections between the popularization of the appellation Robbie and the fluctuations in air pollution levels over the past four decades.
In the coming pages, we present our findings tinged with both amusement and scientific scrutiny. As we journey through the data, we invite our readers to accompany us on a whimsical exploration, for in the inquisitive interplay of nomenclature and atmospheric constituents, one might just find a touch of serendipitous insight. So, let us tarry no longer and venture forth into the curious junction of names and air pollution, for it is a delightful pursuit of knowledge that we undertake, peppered with the charming allure of statistical intrigue and perhaps a dash of name-related banter.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Social scientists and environmental researchers alike have long probed the curious connections between human behavior and atmospheric phenomena, on both a serious and whimsical note. In "Name Game: The Influence of Names on Societal Dynamics," Smith et al. explore the ripple effects of nomenclature on various aspects of human society, offering thought-provoking insights that extend beyond the realm of mere nomenclature. Likewise, Doe's seminal work, "Atmospheric Anomalies and Unusual Correlations," delves into the ways in which seemingly unrelated variables can unexpectedly intertwine, prompting a reconsideration of conventional research paradigms.

Expanding our purview to more divergent source material, we encounter the non-fiction enlightenments of "The Air We Breathe: A Sociology of Urban Environmental Concerns" by Jones, a treatise that dissects the multifaceted interactions among urban inhabitants, their choices of names, and the quality of the air they respire. Moreover, "Tucson Tales: A Deep Dive into Southwest Sociology" by Johnson and "Desert Dwellers and their Demographics" by Garcia not only paint vivid portraits of Tucson's societal tapestry but also beckon us to contemplate the intricate dance of names and environmental surroundings in the context of the sun-drenched city.

However, as we venture further into the realm of potential influences on air quality and human nomenclature, a rather whimsical cross-pollination of source material emerges. The fictitious but intriguing "Breezy Babes and Robbie: A Tale of Two Gales" by Lighthearted is, at first glance, an improbable source of enlightenment. Nevertheless, its exploration of name-centric meteorological oddities in the fictional setting of "Tucson Tornadoes and Tête-à-Têtes" proves unexpectedly illuminating, offering a charmingly absurd yet oddly instructive perspective.

Going still further down the rabbit hole of literature review, it is with a mixture of earnestness and playful curiosity that we admit to having perused the backs of various household product containers, including shampoo bottles, hoping to chance upon a hint or whimsical tidbit that might unveil an unforeseen connection between the popularity of the name Robbie and air pollution levels in Tucson, Arizona. While it may seem undeniably peculiar, we are nonetheless compelled to divulge our findings, for in the lighthearted pursuit of scientific inquiry, one occasionally encounters unexpected corners of insight.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Robbie and Air pollution in Tucson, Arizona. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency . You used data from 1980 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Robbie-ringing the Alarm: The Name Game and Air Pollution in Tucson, Arizona"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the quirky world of nomenclature and air quality, examining the potential link between the popularity of the first name Robbie and air pollution levels in the sunny city of Tucson, Arizona. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team embarked on a journey to unravel this enigmatic connection. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.5023917 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 1980 to 2021. Our findings not only shed light on the intriguing relationship between a moniker and atmospheric pollutants but also contribute to the colorful tapestry of urban sociology. The implications of this study may reach beyond mere coincidence, offering a whimsical yet thought-provoking lens through which to view the complex interplay of human behavior and environmental variables. As we present these findings, we invite readers to ponder the possibility that the ebb and flow of air quality might just be tied to the rise and fall of certain names in this fascinating desert locale.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of human behavior and environmental factors has long captivated researchers seeking to unravel the intricate web of influences shaping our daily lives. From the whimsical to the weighty, patterns emerge from the most unexpected places, and today, we delve into the peculiar realm of nomenclature and air quality in the scenic city of Tucson, Arizona.
While the notion of a relationship between a person's name and atmospheric pollutants may initially strike one as fanciful, our study sets out to earnestly explore this intriguing possibility. Specifically, we address the potential correlation between the popularity of the first name Robbie and air pollution levels in the sun-drenched environs of Tucson. The stage is set for a delightful romp through the annals of social and environmental data, accompanied by a touch of statistical rigor and a dash of levity.
The genesis of this investigation lies in the observation of societal trends and the curious ebb and flow of names that grace birth certificates. As an amalgamation of tradition, cultural currents, and perhaps a sprinkle of parental whimsy, the selection of a name carries a peculiar weight in the fabric of human existence. With the aid of data from the US Social Security Administration, we aim to uncover any discernible association between the ascendancy of the name Robbie and the atmospheric nuances of the Tucson locale.
In the realm of environmental quality, the desert metropolis of Tucson offers a fascinating backdrop. While its arid climate and scenic vistas may conjure images of untouched tranquility, the city also contends with the nuanced matter of air pollution. Here, the dance of industry, transportation, and meteorological idiosyncrasies composes a unique symphony of chemical compounds wafting through the desert air.
As we embark on this intellectual escapade, our study endeavors to reconcile the seemingly disparate realms of names and air quality. Through diligent analysis of data from the Environmental Protection Agency, our team has endeavored to unravel potential connections between the popularization of the appellation Robbie and the fluctuations in air pollution levels over the past four decades.
In the coming pages, we present our findings tinged with both amusement and scientific scrutiny. As we journey through the data, we invite our readers to accompany us on a whimsical exploration, for in the inquisitive interplay of nomenclature and atmospheric constituents, one might just find a touch of serendipitous insight. So, let us tarry no longer and venture forth into the curious junction of names and air pollution, for it is a delightful pursuit of knowledge that we undertake, peppered with the charming allure of statistical intrigue and perhaps a dash of name-related banter.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

Methodology:

Sampling Strategy:
To commence our examination of the potential correlation between the ubiquity of the first name Robbie and air pollution levels in Tucson, Arizona, we utilized a comprehensive sampling strategy. Our data collection spanned the years 1980 to 2021, encompassing a diverse array of societal and environmental data. We drew from the US Social Security Administration's repository of names and birth records, seizing the opportunity to unravel the intriguing narrative woven by monikers over time. Simultaneously, we accessed air quality data from the Environmental Protection Agency, capturing the whimsical dance of atmospheric pollutants in the desert environs of Tucson.

Data Analysis:
With a twinkle of statistical jocularity, our team forged ahead into the labyrinthine realm of data analysis. Leveraging robust statistical techniques, including regression analysis and cross-correlation methods, we undertook the task of unraveling potential connections between the popularity of the name Robbie and the fluctuations in air pollution levels. This analytical odyssey allowed us to derive a coefficient of determination and a p-value, providing vital insights into the enigmatic relationship at play.

Controls and Variables:
In our pursuit of scholarly mirth and scientific discernment, we diligently accounted for confounding variables and controls in our analyses. Age, gender, socioeconomic factors, and environmental regulations were among the facets we carefully considered in our examination of the quixotic interplay between nomenclature and atmospheric constituents. This conscientious effort ensured that our findings retained the quirky yet credible touch of empirical rigor.

Ethical Considerations:
Amidst the whimsy of our exploration, we remained steadfast in upholding ethical principles, safeguarding the anonymity and privacy of individuals whose names formed the bedrock of our investigation. Our engagement with public domain data was governed by the utmost respect for ethical guidelines, ensuring that the inherent joviality of our study did not compromise the integrity of our scholarly pursuits.

Statistical Software:
To traverse the circuitous contours of statistical analysis, we employed an arsenal of refined software tools, including but not limited to R, Python, and Stata. These formidable allies guided our journey through the labyrinth of data, equipping us with the means to unravel the potential nexus of nomenclature and air quality with acumen and aplomb.

Limitations:
In the spirit of scholarly candor and a hint of whimsical reflection, we acknowledge the limitations inherent in our study. While our findings entwine statistical robustness with a touch of levity, they are confined to the specific locale of Tucson, Arizona, and may not readily generalize to other geographical or cultural contexts. Furthermore, the capricious nature of societal trends and environmental dynamics presents an inherent challenge in establishing causality within the context of our study.

In summary, our methodology encapsulates a whimsical yet methodically sound foray into the interplay of human nomenclature and atmospheric dalliances. With the mirthful spirit of scholarly pursuit and the rigors of empirical inquiry, we embarked on this expedition to unravel the unexpected connection between the name Robbie and the atmospheric tapestry of Tucson.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Robbie and Air pollution in Tucson, Arizona. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency .

For the time period 1980 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.5023917, r-squared of 0.2523974, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Robbie-ringing the Alarm: The Name Game and Air Pollution in Tucson, Arizona"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the quirky world of nomenclature and air quality, examining the potential link between the popularity of the first name Robbie and air pollution levels in the sunny city of Tucson, Arizona. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team embarked on a journey to unravel this enigmatic connection. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.5023917 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 1980 to 2021. Our findings not only shed light on the intriguing relationship between a moniker and atmospheric pollutants but also contribute to the colorful tapestry of urban sociology. The implications of this study may reach beyond mere coincidence, offering a whimsical yet thought-provoking lens through which to view the complex interplay of human behavior and environmental variables. As we present these findings, we invite readers to ponder the possibility that the ebb and flow of air quality might just be tied to the rise and fall of certain names in this fascinating desert locale.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intersection of human behavior and environmental factors has long captivated researchers seeking to unravel the intricate web of influences shaping our daily lives. From the whimsical to the weighty, patterns emerge from the most unexpected places, and today, we delve into the peculiar realm of nomenclature and air quality in the scenic city of Tucson, Arizona.
While the notion of a relationship between a person's name and atmospheric pollutants may initially strike one as fanciful, our study sets out to earnestly explore this intriguing possibility. Specifically, we address the potential correlation between the popularity of the first name Robbie and air pollution levels in the sun-drenched environs of Tucson. The stage is set for a delightful romp through the annals of social and environmental data, accompanied by a touch of statistical rigor and a dash of levity.
The genesis of this investigation lies in the observation of societal trends and the curious ebb and flow of names that grace birth certificates. As an amalgamation of tradition, cultural currents, and perhaps a sprinkle of parental whimsy, the selection of a name carries a peculiar weight in the fabric of human existence. With the aid of data from the US Social Security Administration, we aim to uncover any discernible association between the ascendancy of the name Robbie and the atmospheric nuances of the Tucson locale.
In the realm of environmental quality, the desert metropolis of Tucson offers a fascinating backdrop. While its arid climate and scenic vistas may conjure images of untouched tranquility, the city also contends with the nuanced matter of air pollution. Here, the dance of industry, transportation, and meteorological idiosyncrasies composes a unique symphony of chemical compounds wafting through the desert air.
As we embark on this intellectual escapade, our study endeavors to reconcile the seemingly disparate realms of names and air quality. Through diligent analysis of data from the Environmental Protection Agency, our team has endeavored to unravel potential connections between the popularization of the appellation Robbie and the fluctuations in air pollution levels over the past four decades.
In the coming pages, we present our findings tinged with both amusement and scientific scrutiny. As we journey through the data, we invite our readers to accompany us on a whimsical exploration, for in the inquisitive interplay of nomenclature and atmospheric constituents, one might just find a touch of serendipitous insight. So, let us tarry no longer and venture forth into the curious junction of names and air pollution, for it is a delightful pursuit of knowledge that we undertake, peppered with the charming allure of statistical intrigue and perhaps a dash of name-related banter.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our investigation reveal a peculiar yet compelling connection between the popularity of the first name Robbie and air pollution levels in Tucson, Arizona. Our analysis, which encompassed the period from 1980 to 2021, unearths a correlation coefficient of 0.5023917, a r-squared value of 0.2523974, and a p-value less than 0.01. These statistical indicators point to a noteworthy relationship worthy of exploration.

Figure 1 depicts the scatterplot illustrating the robust correlation between the prevalence of the name Robbie and air pollution levels in Tucson. The figure serves as a visual testament to the surprising alignment between the two variables. It's rather "air-ie" that the name Robbie seems to be floating amidst the atmospheric pollutants, isn't it?

Our findings imply a potential resonance between the eponymous moniker and the atmospheric dynamics of Tucson. It's as if the name Robbie carries with it an ethereal aura, mingling with the very molecules that comprise the city's air. This unexpected bond adds a whimsical twist to the intricate fabric of urban sociology and leaves us pondering the mysterious ways in which human behavior intersects with environmental phenomena.

The implications of our study extend beyond the realms of mere coincidence, beckoning us to contemplate the lighthearted yet thought-provoking interplay of nomenclature and atmospheric variables. Could it be that the fluctuations in air quality mirror the rise and fall of certain names, lending a touch of caprice to the scientific study of urban environments?

In the light of these intriguing findings, we invite our esteemed readers to join us in embracing the enchanting prospect that air quality may indeed be influenced by the ascendancy of particular names. Our study adds a splash of levity to the serious domain of environmental research, as we marvel at the delightful dance between statistical significance and the charming enigma of nomenclature.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Robbie and Air pollution in Tucson, Arizona. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Robbie-ringing the Alarm: The Name Game and Air Pollution in Tucson, Arizona"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the quirky world of nomenclature and air quality, examining the potential link between the popularity of the first name Robbie and air pollution levels in the sunny city of Tucson, Arizona. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team embarked on a journey to unravel this enigmatic connection. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.5023917 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 1980 to 2021. Our findings not only shed light on the intriguing relationship between a moniker and atmospheric pollutants but also contribute to the colorful tapestry of urban sociology. The implications of this study may reach beyond mere coincidence, offering a whimsical yet thought-provoking lens through which to view the complex interplay of human behavior and environmental variables. As we present these findings, we invite readers to ponder the possibility that the ebb and flow of air quality might just be tied to the rise and fall of certain names in this fascinating desert locale.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Social scientists and environmental researchers alike have long probed the curious connections between human behavior and atmospheric phenomena, on both a serious and whimsical note. In "Name Game: The Influence of Names on Societal Dynamics," Smith et al. explore the ripple effects of nomenclature on various aspects of human society, offering thought-provoking insights that extend beyond the realm of mere nomenclature. Likewise, Doe's seminal work, "Atmospheric Anomalies and Unusual Correlations," delves into the ways in which seemingly unrelated variables can unexpectedly intertwine, prompting a reconsideration of conventional research paradigms.
Expanding our purview to more divergent source material, we encounter the non-fiction enlightenments of "The Air We Breathe: A Sociology of Urban Environmental Concerns" by Jones, a treatise that dissects the multifaceted interactions among urban inhabitants, their choices of names, and the quality of the air they respire. Moreover, "Tucson Tales: A Deep Dive into Southwest Sociology" by Johnson and "Desert Dwellers and their Demographics" by Garcia not only paint vivid portraits of Tucson's societal tapestry but also beckon us to contemplate the intricate dance of names and environmental surroundings in the context of the sun-drenched city.
However, as we venture further into the realm of potential influences on air quality and human nomenclature, a rather whimsical cross-pollination of source material emerges. The fictitious but intriguing "Breezy Babes and Robbie: A Tale of Two Gales" by Lighthearted is, at first glance, an improbable source of enlightenment. Nevertheless, its exploration of name-centric meteorological oddities in the fictional setting of "Tucson Tornadoes and Tête-à-Têtes" proves unexpectedly illuminating, offering a charmingly absurd yet oddly instructive perspective.
Going still further down the rabbit hole of literature review, it is with a mixture of earnestness and playful curiosity that we admit to having perused the backs of various household product containers, including shampoo bottles, hoping to chance upon a hint or whimsical tidbit that might unveil an unforeseen connection between the popularity of the name Robbie and air pollution levels in Tucson, Arizona. While it may seem undeniably peculiar, we are nonetheless compelled to divulge our findings, for in the lighthearted pursuit of scientific inquiry, one occasionally encounters unexpected corners of insight.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation reveal a peculiar yet compelling connection between the popularity of the first name Robbie and air pollution levels in Tucson, Arizona. Our analysis, which encompassed the period from 1980 to 2021, unearths a correlation coefficient of 0.5023917, a r-squared value of 0.2523974, and a p-value less than 0.01. These statistical indicators point to a noteworthy relationship worthy of exploration.
Figure 1 depicts the scatterplot illustrating the robust correlation between the prevalence of the name Robbie and air pollution levels in Tucson. The figure serves as a visual testament to the surprising alignment between the two variables. It's rather "air-ie" that the name Robbie seems to be floating amidst the atmospheric pollutants, isn't it?
Our findings imply a potential resonance between the eponymous moniker and the atmospheric dynamics of Tucson. It's as if the name Robbie carries with it an ethereal aura, mingling with the very molecules that comprise the city's air. This unexpected bond adds a whimsical twist to the intricate fabric of urban sociology and leaves us pondering the mysterious ways in which human behavior intersects with environmental phenomena.
The implications of our study extend beyond the realms of mere coincidence, beckoning us to contemplate the lighthearted yet thought-provoking interplay of nomenclature and atmospheric variables. Could it be that the fluctuations in air quality mirror the rise and fall of certain names, lending a touch of caprice to the scientific study of urban environments?
In the light of these intriguing findings, we invite our esteemed readers to join us in embracing the enchanting prospect that air quality may indeed be influenced by the ascendancy of particular names. Our study adds a splash of levity to the serious domain of environmental research, as we marvel at the delightful dance between statistical significance and the charming enigma of nomenclature.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The uncanny correlation between the popularity of the first name Robbie and air pollution levels in Tucson, Arizona has brought a breath of fresh, albeit polluted, air to the esoteric field of urban sociology and environmental research. Building upon the whimsical musings and seemingly spurious connections unearthed in the literature review, our findings add a splash of levity to the traditionally serious and sometimes austere world of academe.

The robust statistical correlation coefficient of 0.5023917 and a p-value less than 0.01 serve as a testament to the surprising resonance between the eponymous moniker and atmospheric pollutants. Our results not only align with prior work that delved into the potential influences of nomenclature on societal dynamics but also hint at the intriguing ways in which seemingly unrelated variables can intertwine, echoing Doe's notions of "atmospheric anomalies and unusual correlations."

The whimsical sources alluded to in our literature review, particularly the fictitious yet oddly instructive "Breezy Babes and Robbie: A Tale of Two Gales" by Lighthearted, appear to have sparked unforeseen insights, highlighting the potential for unlikely sources to shed light on the enigmatic connection between human behavior and environmental variables. While it might initially appear improbable, our findings suggest that the ebb and flow of air quality may indeed mirror the rise and fall of certain names, infusing a touch of caprice into the scientific study of urban environments.

Thus, our study not only supports the prior research on the influence of names on societal dynamics but also introduces a delightful twist, inviting contemplation of the lighthearted yet thought-provoking interplay of nomenclature and atmospheric variables. As we beckon our esteemed readers to embrace the enchanting prospect that air quality may indeed be influenced by the ascendancy of particular names, we stress the importance of embracing unexpected findings with open minds and perhaps a hint of humor. After all, it's rather "air-ie" that a seemingly unrelated variable like a name could bear a connection to something as tangible and vital as air pollution.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Robbie and Air pollution in Tucson, Arizona. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Robbie-ringing the Alarm: The Name Game and Air Pollution in Tucson, Arizona"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the quirky world of nomenclature and air quality, examining the potential link between the popularity of the first name Robbie and air pollution levels in the sunny city of Tucson, Arizona. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team embarked on a journey to unravel this enigmatic connection. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.5023917 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 1980 to 2021. Our findings not only shed light on the intriguing relationship between a moniker and atmospheric pollutants but also contribute to the colorful tapestry of urban sociology. The implications of this study may reach beyond mere coincidence, offering a whimsical yet thought-provoking lens through which to view the complex interplay of human behavior and environmental variables. As we present these findings, we invite readers to ponder the possibility that the ebb and flow of air quality might just be tied to the rise and fall of certain names in this fascinating desert locale.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intersection of human behavior and environmental factors has long captivated researchers seeking to unravel the intricate web of influences shaping our daily lives. From the whimsical to the weighty, patterns emerge from the most unexpected places, and today, we delve into the peculiar realm of nomenclature and air quality in the scenic city of Tucson, Arizona.
While the notion of a relationship between a person's name and atmospheric pollutants may initially strike one as fanciful, our study sets out to earnestly explore this intriguing possibility. Specifically, we address the potential correlation between the popularity of the first name Robbie and air pollution levels in the sun-drenched environs of Tucson. The stage is set for a delightful romp through the annals of social and environmental data, accompanied by a touch of statistical rigor and a dash of levity.
The genesis of this investigation lies in the observation of societal trends and the curious ebb and flow of names that grace birth certificates. As an amalgamation of tradition, cultural currents, and perhaps a sprinkle of parental whimsy, the selection of a name carries a peculiar weight in the fabric of human existence. With the aid of data from the US Social Security Administration, we aim to uncover any discernible association between the ascendancy of the name Robbie and the atmospheric nuances of the Tucson locale.
In the realm of environmental quality, the desert metropolis of Tucson offers a fascinating backdrop. While its arid climate and scenic vistas may conjure images of untouched tranquility, the city also contends with the nuanced matter of air pollution. Here, the dance of industry, transportation, and meteorological idiosyncrasies composes a unique symphony of chemical compounds wafting through the desert air.
As we embark on this intellectual escapade, our study endeavors to reconcile the seemingly disparate realms of names and air quality. Through diligent analysis of data from the Environmental Protection Agency, our team has endeavored to unravel potential connections between the popularization of the appellation Robbie and the fluctuations in air pollution levels over the past four decades.
In the coming pages, we present our findings tinged with both amusement and scientific scrutiny. As we journey through the data, we invite our readers to accompany us on a whimsical exploration, for in the inquisitive interplay of nomenclature and atmospheric constituents, one might just find a touch of serendipitous insight. So, let us tarry no longer and venture forth into the curious junction of names and air pollution, for it is a delightful pursuit of knowledge that we undertake, peppered with the charming allure of statistical intrigue and perhaps a dash of name-related banter.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation reveal a peculiar yet compelling connection between the popularity of the first name Robbie and air pollution levels in Tucson, Arizona. Our analysis, which encompassed the period from 1980 to 2021, unearths a correlation coefficient of 0.5023917, a r-squared value of 0.2523974, and a p-value less than 0.01. These statistical indicators point to a noteworthy relationship worthy of exploration.
Figure 1 depicts the scatterplot illustrating the robust correlation between the prevalence of the name Robbie and air pollution levels in Tucson. The figure serves as a visual testament to the surprising alignment between the two variables. It's rather "air-ie" that the name Robbie seems to be floating amidst the atmospheric pollutants, isn't it?
Our findings imply a potential resonance between the eponymous moniker and the atmospheric dynamics of Tucson. It's as if the name Robbie carries with it an ethereal aura, mingling with the very molecules that comprise the city's air. This unexpected bond adds a whimsical twist to the intricate fabric of urban sociology and leaves us pondering the mysterious ways in which human behavior intersects with environmental phenomena.
The implications of our study extend beyond the realms of mere coincidence, beckoning us to contemplate the lighthearted yet thought-provoking interplay of nomenclature and atmospheric variables. Could it be that the fluctuations in air quality mirror the rise and fall of certain names, lending a touch of caprice to the scientific study of urban environments?
In the light of these intriguing findings, we invite our esteemed readers to join us in embracing the enchanting prospect that air quality may indeed be influenced by the ascendancy of particular names. Our study adds a splash of levity to the serious domain of environmental research, as we marvel at the delightful dance between statistical significance and the charming enigma of nomenclature.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation has unveiled a captivating correlation between the popularity of the first name Robbie and air pollution levels in Tucson, Arizona. The statistical indicators, including the correlation coefficient of 0.5023917 and a p-value less than 0.01, point to a discernible relationship that is at once surprising and amusing. It seems that the name Robbie may indeed be more than just a label; it appears to be floating amidst the atmospheric pollutants, adding a touch of whimsy to the empirical tapestry of urban sociology.
As we reflect on these findings, we are reminded of the curious, unpredictable nature of human behavior and its potential influence on environmental variables. The delightful twist in this tale suggests that the ebb and flow of air quality might just be tied to the rise and fall of certain names, a notion that invites both amusement and contemplation.
Yet, as we bask in the revelry of this fascinating association, we must acknowledge that more research is not warranted. The quirky world of nomenclature and air quality has been thoroughly Robbie-ringed, and it's time to bid adieu to this charming oddity. After all, too much of a good (and goofy) thing can be, well, a bit too much.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Robbie-ringing the Alarm: The Name Game and Air Pollution in Tucson, Arizona. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Ecological Epiphanies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Robbie-ringing the Alarm: The Name Game and Air Pollution in Tucson, Arizona. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Applied Linguistic Environmental Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Robbie-ringing the Alarm: The Name Game and Air Pollution in Tucson, Arizona with an abstract of In this study, we delve into the quirky world of nomenclature and air quality, examining the potential link between the popularity of the first name Robbie and air pollution levels in the sunny city of Tucson, Arizona. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team embarked on a journey to unravel this enigmatic connection. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.5023917 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 1980 to 2021. Our findings not only shed light on the intriguing relationship between a moniker and atmospheric pollutants but also contribute to the colorful tapestry of urban sociology. The implications of this study may reach beyond mere coincidence, offering a whimsical yet thought-provoking lens through which to view the complex interplay of human behavior and environmental variables. As we present these findings, we invite readers to ponder the possibility that the ebb and flow of air quality might just be tied to the rise and fall of certain names in this fascinating desert locale.

ChatGPT:

Robbie, first name popularity, air pollution, Tucson, Arizona, nomenclature, statistical analysis, correlation coefficient, p-value, US Social Security Administration, Environmental Protection Agency, urban sociology, atmospheric pollutants, human behavior, environmental variables, coincidence, air quality, desert locale

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Robbie
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Robbie
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Robbie

Air pollution in Tucson, Arizona
Detailed data title: Percentage of days 'unhealthy' or worse air quality in Tucson, AZ
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Tucson, Arizona

Correlation r = 0.5023917 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.2523974 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 25.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Air pollution in Tucson, Arizona) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Robbie) over the 42 years from 1980 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0007. 0.0006980815466816059000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.5 in 0.07% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,432 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 41 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 41 because we have two variables measured over a period of 42 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.23, 0.7 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Popularity of the first name Robbie (Babies born)4544353983452372852902282672462291892011911451621601171131291221041069687859076808478789685707973888669109101
Air pollution in Tucson, Arizona (Bad air quality days)0.5464480.2739731.095890.82191800.821918000.54644800.27397300.2732240.27397300.8219180000.273973000.2739730.27397300.5479450000.2739730000.8219180000000.2732240.273973




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([454,435,398,345,237,285,290,228,267,246,229,189,201,191,145,162,160,117,113,129,122,104,106,96,87,85,90,76,80,84,78,78,96,85,70,79,73,88,86,69,109,101,])
array_2 = np.array([0.546448,0.273973,1.09589,0.821918,0,0.821918,0,0,0.546448,0,0.273973,0,0.273224,0.273973,0,0.821918,0,0,0,0.273973,0,0,0.273973,0.273973,0,0.547945,0,0,0,0.273973,0,0,0,0.821918,0,0,0,0,0,0,0.273224,0.273973,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Robbie"
array_2_name = "Air pollution in Tucson, Arizona"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is much appreciated!


Correlation ID: 4043 · Black Variable ID: 3948 · Red Variable ID: 21354
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0