AI explanation
As the air cleared, people could finally see clearly and realized they didn't actually want to do the horsey dance anymore. With each breath of fresh, clean air, their desire to gallop along to K-pop just dwindled away. It turns out, when you can breathe without wheezing, Gangnam Style just isn't as catchy. The smog had been the invisible force keeping those dance moves alive, but once it lifted, so did the urge to groove Gangnam-style.Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a park in Wichita with a hyper-realistic style. In the scene, the sky is a vibrant shade of blue, and the air feels fresh and invigorating. People are casually sprawled out on the lush green grass, engaged in leisurely activities. Children in the distance can be seen excitedly flying kites, their colorful strings trailing behind in the wind. A small group is gathered for a picnic, their spread of food and beverages creating a cozy atmosphere. The focal point of the scene is a large digital billboard displaying a graph illustrating the decline in Google searches for 'Gangnam Style', casting a sense of nostalgia and humor over the setting. The serene and tranquil ambiance of the park captures the essence of relaxation and contentment amidst a dynamic world. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Wichita and Google searches for 'Gangnam Style'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: 3D Pixar Style Cute 2D animation Low poly Hyper-realistic Cybernetic art
ChatGPT: Hyper-realistic
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Wichita and Google searches for 'Gangnam Style', in the following situation: Well, you see, as the air pollution decreased in Wichita, people started to "breathe easy" and worry less about "air itation", leading to a decline in stress-related Google searches like "Gangnam Style". The clean air simply "swept away" the urge to dance like Psy!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a park in Wichita, the sky is clear and the air is fresh. People are sitting on the grass, relaxing and enjoying the clean air. Children are flying kites, and a small group is having a picnic. Nearby, a large digital billboard shows a graph depicting the decrease in Google searches for 'Gangnam Style'. The clean air seems to have swept away the stress and brought a sense of calm to the scene.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Hyper-realistic ] and depicting this scene: In a park in Wichita, the sky is clear and the air is fresh. People are sitting on the grass, relaxing and enjoying the clean air. Children are flying kites, and a small group is having a picnic. Nearby, a large digital billboard shows a graph depicting the decrease in Google searches for 'Gangnam Style'. The clean air seems to have swept away the stress and brought a sense of calm to the scene. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a park in Wichita with a hyper-realistic style. In the scene, the sky is a vibrant shade of blue, and the air feels fresh and invigorating. People are casually sprawled out on the lush green grass, engaged in leisurely activities. Children in the distance can be seen excitedly flying kites, their colorful strings trailing behind in the wind. A small group is gathered for a picnic, their spread of food and beverages creating a cozy atmosphere. The focal point of the scene is a large digital billboard displaying a graph illustrating the decline in Google searches for 'Gangnam Style', casting a sense of nostalgia and humor over the setting. The serene and tranquil ambiance of the park captures the essence of relaxation and contentment amidst a dynamic world.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Air pollution in Wichita caused Gangnam Style (Google searches for 'Gangnam Style') to decrease.
AI academic paper
Uncovering the Rhythmic Connection: Air Pollution and Google Searches for 'Gangnam Style' in Wichita The International Journal of Ecological Jams and Urban Trends Jan 2024 |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Wichita and Google searches for 'Gangnam Style'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title seem clever.
Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9130463 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2023.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Uncovering the Rhythmic Connection: Air Pollution and Google Searches for 'Gangnam Style' in Wichita
[[ABSTRACT]]
The seemingly disparate topics of air pollution and global sensation 'Gangnam Style' have long captivated the minds of researchers. In this paper, we delve into the unexpected relationship between these two phenomena, utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends. Our analysis, covering the years 2012 to 2023, unearthed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9130463 with a p-value less than 0.01, showcasing a robust statistical connection between air quality in Wichita and the public's search interest in this iconic Korean pop hit. Our findings not only underscore the interplay between environmental factors and cultural trends but also provide a whimsical lens through which to view the profound impact of air pollution on societal behavior. As we cha-cha our way through the data, we invite readers to consider the unanticipated charm of this correlation and explore its implications for interdisciplinary research.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Wichita and Google searches for 'Gangnam Style'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Uncovering the Rhythmic Connection: Air Pollution and Google Searches for 'Gangnam Style' in Wichita
[[ABSTRACT]]
The seemingly disparate topics of air pollution and global sensation 'Gangnam Style' have long captivated the minds of researchers. In this paper, we delve into the unexpected relationship between these two phenomena, utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends. Our analysis, covering the years 2012 to 2023, unearthed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9130463 with a p-value less than 0.01, showcasing a robust statistical connection between air quality in Wichita and the public's search interest in this iconic Korean pop hit. Our findings not only underscore the interplay between environmental factors and cultural trends but also provide a whimsical lens through which to view the profound impact of air pollution on societal behavior. As we cha-cha our way through the data, we invite readers to consider the unanticipated charm of this correlation and explore its implications for interdisciplinary research.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the annals of interdisciplinary research, it is not uncommon to stumble upon peculiar correlations that challenge conventional wisdom and spark curiosity. Here, we meander through the unlikely intersection of air pollution and the global phenomenon known as 'Gangnam Style', perpetuating the tradition of weaving together seemingly unrelated threads in the fabric of academic inquiry.
The 2012 release of the South Korean musician PSY's 'Gangnam Style' music video brought with it an infectious dance, catchy beats, and an irresistible urge to gallop like an over-caffeinated stallion. Simultaneously, Wichita, Kansas grappled with air pollution issues, adding an aura of intrigue to our investigation. As the saying goes, "Where there's smog, there's psy-nergy!”
We embarked on this study with the air of detectives, employing data from the Environmental Protection Agency to scrutinize air quality indices alongside Google Trends' records of public interest in 'Gangnam Style' from 2012 to 2023. The resulting tango of statistical analyses revealed a compelling correlation coefficient of 0.9130463, accompanied by a p-value less than the conventional alpha level of 0.01. So, it appears that the synergy between air pollution and 'Gangnam Style' is not merely a flight of fancy – it’s statistically sound, even if it sounds like an absurd parody.
As we waltz through our findings, we invite the erudite reader to join this merry promenade and relish the whimsy of unearthing an unexpected concurrence between environmental metrics and pop culture quirks. By shedding light on this unanticipated harmony, we set the stage for an intellectually stimulating discourse that transcends traditional disciplinary boundaries, demonstrating that academic investigation can be as lively as, dare we say, a Korean pop sensation. So, let's dust off our dancing shoes and rumba through the corridors of this peculiar correlation, finding joy in the surprising symphony of air pollution and 'Gangnam Style' interest.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Wichita and Google searches for 'Gangnam Style'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Uncovering the Rhythmic Connection: Air Pollution and Google Searches for 'Gangnam Style' in Wichita
[[ABSTRACT]]
The seemingly disparate topics of air pollution and global sensation 'Gangnam Style' have long captivated the minds of researchers. In this paper, we delve into the unexpected relationship between these two phenomena, utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends. Our analysis, covering the years 2012 to 2023, unearthed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9130463 with a p-value less than 0.01, showcasing a robust statistical connection between air quality in Wichita and the public's search interest in this iconic Korean pop hit. Our findings not only underscore the interplay between environmental factors and cultural trends but also provide a whimsical lens through which to view the profound impact of air pollution on societal behavior. As we cha-cha our way through the data, we invite readers to consider the unanticipated charm of this correlation and explore its implications for interdisciplinary research.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the annals of interdisciplinary research, it is not uncommon to stumble upon peculiar correlations that challenge conventional wisdom and spark curiosity. Here, we meander through the unlikely intersection of air pollution and the global phenomenon known as 'Gangnam Style', perpetuating the tradition of weaving together seemingly unrelated threads in the fabric of academic inquiry.
The 2012 release of the South Korean musician PSY's 'Gangnam Style' music video brought with it an infectious dance, catchy beats, and an irresistible urge to gallop like an over-caffeinated stallion. Simultaneously, Wichita, Kansas grappled with air pollution issues, adding an aura of intrigue to our investigation. As the saying goes, "Where there's smog, there's psy-nergy!”
We embarked on this study with the air of detectives, employing data from the Environmental Protection Agency to scrutinize air quality indices alongside Google Trends' records of public interest in 'Gangnam Style' from 2012 to 2023. The resulting tango of statistical analyses revealed a compelling correlation coefficient of 0.9130463, accompanied by a p-value less than the conventional alpha level of 0.01. So, it appears that the synergy between air pollution and 'Gangnam Style' is not merely a flight of fancy – it’s statistically sound, even if it sounds like an absurd parody.
As we waltz through our findings, we invite the erudite reader to join this merry promenade and relish the whimsy of unearthing an unexpected concurrence between environmental metrics and pop culture quirks. By shedding light on this unanticipated harmony, we set the stage for an intellectually stimulating discourse that transcends traditional disciplinary boundaries, demonstrating that academic investigation can be as lively as, dare we say, a Korean pop sensation. So, let's dust off our dancing shoes and rumba through the corridors of this peculiar correlation, finding joy in the surprising symphony of air pollution and 'Gangnam Style' interest.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Smith and Doe (2015) conducted a comprehensive analysis of air quality and its potential impact on public behavior. Their study focused on urban centers in the Midwest, including Wichita, Kansas, and provided valuable insights into the environmental factors influencing societal trends. The authors found a clear association between elevated pollution levels and shifts in online search patterns, hinting at a nuanced relationship between air quality and digital behavior. Similarly, Jones (2017) examined the psychological ramifications of exposure to environmental pollutants, highlighting the interconnected nature of physical surroundings and cognitive processes.
Turning to the cultural phenomenon of 'Gangnam Style,' the work of Kim and Park (2013) offers a compelling exploration of the music video's impact on global popular culture. Their research delves into the infectious nature of the song's rhythm, the psychology behind its widespread appeal, and its lasting imprint on societal norms. In a similar vein, the groundbreaking analysis by Psy (2012) himself, the mastermind behind 'Gangnam Style,' provides an illuminating perspective on the artistic vision and creative influences that propelled the song to stratospheric levels of fame.
Venturing beyond academic studies, non-fiction works such as "The Air We Breathe" by Ansell (2019) and "Pop Goes Korea" by Russell (2009) offer supplementary insights into the confluence of environmental and cultural dynamics. In the realm of fiction, the thematic resonance of environmental challenges can be gleaned from novels like "The Overstory" by Richard Powers and "The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle" by Haruki Murakami. These literary explorations echo the intricate interplay between ecology and human experience, adding a layer of depth to our understanding of the connections at play.
In the virtual realm, internet memes like the 'PSY-gotiated Settlement' and 'Smognam Style' have humorously captured the public imagination, juxtaposing air pollution concerns with the enduring popularity of the iconic dance. These memes, while lighthearted in nature, reflect a collective awareness of the unlikely pairing, serving as contemporary markers of the cultural zeitgeist.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Wichita and Google searches for 'Gangnam Style'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends . You used data from 2012 to 2023
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Uncovering the Rhythmic Connection: Air Pollution and Google Searches for 'Gangnam Style' in Wichita
[[ABSTRACT]]
The seemingly disparate topics of air pollution and global sensation 'Gangnam Style' have long captivated the minds of researchers. In this paper, we delve into the unexpected relationship between these two phenomena, utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends. Our analysis, covering the years 2012 to 2023, unearthed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9130463 with a p-value less than 0.01, showcasing a robust statistical connection between air quality in Wichita and the public's search interest in this iconic Korean pop hit. Our findings not only underscore the interplay between environmental factors and cultural trends but also provide a whimsical lens through which to view the profound impact of air pollution on societal behavior. As we cha-cha our way through the data, we invite readers to consider the unanticipated charm of this correlation and explore its implications for interdisciplinary research.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the annals of interdisciplinary research, it is not uncommon to stumble upon peculiar correlations that challenge conventional wisdom and spark curiosity. Here, we meander through the unlikely intersection of air pollution and the global phenomenon known as 'Gangnam Style', perpetuating the tradition of weaving together seemingly unrelated threads in the fabric of academic inquiry.
The 2012 release of the South Korean musician PSY's 'Gangnam Style' music video brought with it an infectious dance, catchy beats, and an irresistible urge to gallop like an over-caffeinated stallion. Simultaneously, Wichita, Kansas grappled with air pollution issues, adding an aura of intrigue to our investigation. As the saying goes, "Where there's smog, there's psy-nergy!”
We embarked on this study with the air of detectives, employing data from the Environmental Protection Agency to scrutinize air quality indices alongside Google Trends' records of public interest in 'Gangnam Style' from 2012 to 2023. The resulting tango of statistical analyses revealed a compelling correlation coefficient of 0.9130463, accompanied by a p-value less than the conventional alpha level of 0.01. So, it appears that the synergy between air pollution and 'Gangnam Style' is not merely a flight of fancy – it’s statistically sound, even if it sounds like an absurd parody.
As we waltz through our findings, we invite the erudite reader to join this merry promenade and relish the whimsy of unearthing an unexpected concurrence between environmental metrics and pop culture quirks. By shedding light on this unanticipated harmony, we set the stage for an intellectually stimulating discourse that transcends traditional disciplinary boundaries, demonstrating that academic investigation can be as lively as, dare we say, a Korean pop sensation. So, let's dust off our dancing shoes and rumba through the corridors of this peculiar correlation, finding joy in the surprising symphony of air pollution and 'Gangnam Style' interest.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
To unearth the rhythmic connection between air pollution in Wichita and Google searches for 'Gangnam Style', we embarked on a methodological odyssey that would make even the most seasoned researchers do a double take. Our approach was as meticulously orchestrated as the choreography in a K-pop music video, blending traditional statistical analyses with a dash of whimsy.
First and foremost, we harnessed the data prowess of the Environmental Protection Agency, tapping into air quality indices from various monitoring stations across Wichita. This treasure trove of pollution metrics offered a comprehensive snapshot of the city's atmospheric conditions, allowing us to gauge the ebb and flow of airborne contaminants with the precision of a maestro leading a symphony.
Simultaneously, we turned to the data juggernaut that is Google Trends, honing in on the search interest for 'Gangnam Style' within the confines of Wichita's digital landscape. The search volume index, much like a catchy tune, fluctuated over time, echoing the peaks and valleys of public intrigue in this cultural sensation.
With these datasets in hand, we indulged in a tango of statistical analyses, channeling the spirit of hypothesis testing to discern any semblance of a meaningful relationship between air pollution and 'Gangnam Style' searches. Our toolset included Pearson's correlation coefficient, a humble yet powerful ally in quantifying the strength and direction of association, and the fabled p-value, serving as an arbiter of statistical significance.
To ensure the veracity of our findings, we executed a rigorous time series analysis, pirouetting through the temporal dynamics of air pollution and search interest in 'Gangnam Style' from 2012 to 2023. This temporal lens allowed us to unravel the nuanced interplay between these seemingly incongruous variables, capturing the cadence of their correlation as it unfolded over the years.
In the spirit of scientific camaraderie, we also welcomed the assistance of cross-validation techniques, aptly named for their knack for cross-referencing and validating our initial insights. Through this cross-validation pas de deux, we buttressed the reliability of our correlation discovery, ensuring that our results were not a fluke but rather a bona fide coupling of environmental and cultural elements.
Ultimately, our methodological escapade veered at times into the realm of whimsy, akin to an impromptu dance-off between traditional research norms and avant-garde creativity. This harmonious merger produced a one-of-a-kind investigation that aims to tantalize the intellect while simultaneously raising a knowing smile. So, without further ado, let us pirouette through the corridors of our methodological design and revel in the fanciful journey that led to the unveiling of the rhythmic connection between air pollution and 'Gangnam Style' searches in Wichita.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Wichita and Google searches for 'Gangnam Style'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends .
For the time period 2012 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.9130463, r-squared of 0.8336535, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Uncovering the Rhythmic Connection: Air Pollution and Google Searches for 'Gangnam Style' in Wichita
[[ABSTRACT]]
The seemingly disparate topics of air pollution and global sensation 'Gangnam Style' have long captivated the minds of researchers. In this paper, we delve into the unexpected relationship between these two phenomena, utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends. Our analysis, covering the years 2012 to 2023, unearthed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9130463 with a p-value less than 0.01, showcasing a robust statistical connection between air quality in Wichita and the public's search interest in this iconic Korean pop hit. Our findings not only underscore the interplay between environmental factors and cultural trends but also provide a whimsical lens through which to view the profound impact of air pollution on societal behavior. As we cha-cha our way through the data, we invite readers to consider the unanticipated charm of this correlation and explore its implications for interdisciplinary research.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the annals of interdisciplinary research, it is not uncommon to stumble upon peculiar correlations that challenge conventional wisdom and spark curiosity. Here, we meander through the unlikely intersection of air pollution and the global phenomenon known as 'Gangnam Style', perpetuating the tradition of weaving together seemingly unrelated threads in the fabric of academic inquiry.
The 2012 release of the South Korean musician PSY's 'Gangnam Style' music video brought with it an infectious dance, catchy beats, and an irresistible urge to gallop like an over-caffeinated stallion. Simultaneously, Wichita, Kansas grappled with air pollution issues, adding an aura of intrigue to our investigation. As the saying goes, "Where there's smog, there's psy-nergy!”
We embarked on this study with the air of detectives, employing data from the Environmental Protection Agency to scrutinize air quality indices alongside Google Trends' records of public interest in 'Gangnam Style' from 2012 to 2023. The resulting tango of statistical analyses revealed a compelling correlation coefficient of 0.9130463, accompanied by a p-value less than the conventional alpha level of 0.01. So, it appears that the synergy between air pollution and 'Gangnam Style' is not merely a flight of fancy – it’s statistically sound, even if it sounds like an absurd parody.
As we waltz through our findings, we invite the erudite reader to join this merry promenade and relish the whimsy of unearthing an unexpected concurrence between environmental metrics and pop culture quirks. By shedding light on this unanticipated harmony, we set the stage for an intellectually stimulating discourse that transcends traditional disciplinary boundaries, demonstrating that academic investigation can be as lively as, dare we say, a Korean pop sensation. So, let's dust off our dancing shoes and rumba through the corridors of this peculiar correlation, finding joy in the surprising symphony of air pollution and 'Gangnam Style' interest.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis yielded a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9130463, indicating a remarkably strong relationship between air pollution in Wichita and Google searches for 'Gangnam Style'. The r-squared value of 0.8336535 further accentuates the robustness of this connection, explaining approximately 83.37% of the variation in 'Gangnam Style' searches attributed to changes in air pollution levels. With a p-value of less than 0.01, we can confidently discard the possibility of this association being a mere fluke, much like the viral dance moves of the Gangnam Style era.
The association is vividly showcased in the scatterplot depicted in Figure 1, wherein each data point pirouettes elegantly along the trend line, encapsulating the synchronous rise and fall of air pollution levels and 'Gangnam Style' searches. It’s as if the environmental quality of Wichita plays the bass notes to the melody of internet searches, producing a harmonious duet that transcends conventional scientific boundaries.
These results not only affirm the statistical significance of the link between air pollution and 'Gangnam Style' interest but also serve as a whimsical testament to the unexpected synergies woven into the fabric of societal phenomena. As we sway through the rhythm of these findings, we invite the reader to savor the delightful irony of unearthing a melodic correlation between serious environmental metrics and the lighthearted pop culture craze. The unexpected nature of this connection should prompt us to reconsider the potential imprint of air quality on public behavior. After all, who would have thought that amidst the haze of environmental concerns, we’d find ourselves dancing to the tune of 'Gangnam Style'?
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Wichita and Google searches for 'Gangnam Style'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
Uncovering the Rhythmic Connection: Air Pollution and Google Searches for 'Gangnam Style' in Wichita
[[ABSTRACT]]
The seemingly disparate topics of air pollution and global sensation 'Gangnam Style' have long captivated the minds of researchers. In this paper, we delve into the unexpected relationship between these two phenomena, utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends. Our analysis, covering the years 2012 to 2023, unearthed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9130463 with a p-value less than 0.01, showcasing a robust statistical connection between air quality in Wichita and the public's search interest in this iconic Korean pop hit. Our findings not only underscore the interplay between environmental factors and cultural trends but also provide a whimsical lens through which to view the profound impact of air pollution on societal behavior. As we cha-cha our way through the data, we invite readers to consider the unanticipated charm of this correlation and explore its implications for interdisciplinary research.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Smith and Doe (2015) conducted a comprehensive analysis of air quality and its potential impact on public behavior. Their study focused on urban centers in the Midwest, including Wichita, Kansas, and provided valuable insights into the environmental factors influencing societal trends. The authors found a clear association between elevated pollution levels and shifts in online search patterns, hinting at a nuanced relationship between air quality and digital behavior. Similarly, Jones (2017) examined the psychological ramifications of exposure to environmental pollutants, highlighting the interconnected nature of physical surroundings and cognitive processes.
Turning to the cultural phenomenon of 'Gangnam Style,' the work of Kim and Park (2013) offers a compelling exploration of the music video's impact on global popular culture. Their research delves into the infectious nature of the song's rhythm, the psychology behind its widespread appeal, and its lasting imprint on societal norms. In a similar vein, the groundbreaking analysis by Psy (2012) himself, the mastermind behind 'Gangnam Style,' provides an illuminating perspective on the artistic vision and creative influences that propelled the song to stratospheric levels of fame.
Venturing beyond academic studies, non-fiction works such as "The Air We Breathe" by Ansell (2019) and "Pop Goes Korea" by Russell (2009) offer supplementary insights into the confluence of environmental and cultural dynamics. In the realm of fiction, the thematic resonance of environmental challenges can be gleaned from novels like "The Overstory" by Richard Powers and "The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle" by Haruki Murakami. These literary explorations echo the intricate interplay between ecology and human experience, adding a layer of depth to our understanding of the connections at play.
In the virtual realm, internet memes like the 'PSY-gotiated Settlement' and 'Smognam Style' have humorously captured the public imagination, juxtaposing air pollution concerns with the enduring popularity of the iconic dance. These memes, while lighthearted in nature, reflect a collective awareness of the unlikely pairing, serving as contemporary markers of the cultural zeitgeist.
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis yielded a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9130463, indicating a remarkably strong relationship between air pollution in Wichita and Google searches for 'Gangnam Style'. The r-squared value of 0.8336535 further accentuates the robustness of this connection, explaining approximately 83.37% of the variation in 'Gangnam Style' searches attributed to changes in air pollution levels. With a p-value of less than 0.01, we can confidently discard the possibility of this association being a mere fluke, much like the viral dance moves of the Gangnam Style era.
The association is vividly showcased in the scatterplot depicted in Figure 1, wherein each data point pirouettes elegantly along the trend line, encapsulating the synchronous rise and fall of air pollution levels and 'Gangnam Style' searches. It’s as if the environmental quality of Wichita plays the bass notes to the melody of internet searches, producing a harmonious duet that transcends conventional scientific boundaries.
These results not only affirm the statistical significance of the link between air pollution and 'Gangnam Style' interest but also serve as a whimsical testament to the unexpected synergies woven into the fabric of societal phenomena. As we sway through the rhythm of these findings, we invite the reader to savor the delightful irony of unearthing a melodic correlation between serious environmental metrics and the lighthearted pop culture craze. The unexpected nature of this connection should prompt us to reconsider the potential imprint of air quality on public behavior. After all, who would have thought that amidst the haze of environmental concerns, we’d find ourselves dancing to the tune of 'Gangnam Style'?
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The findings of our study not only contribute to the growing body of research on the impact of environmental factors on human behavior but also shed light on the delightful confluence of seemingly unrelated phenomena. The robust correlation between air pollution in Wichita and Google searches for 'Gangnam Style' underscores the intricate interplay between environmental quality and cultural preferences. This correlation cements the findings of prior studies, such as the work by Smith and Doe (2015), who hinted at the subtle yet significant influence of air quality on digital behavior.
Moreover, the infectious rhythm of 'Gangnam Style' identified by Kim and Park (2013) seems to have resonated beyond the confines of musical appreciation into the realm of public querying behavior, providing unexpected insight into the cultural impact of environmental variability. The whimsical memes surrounding 'Gangnam Style' and air pollution, such as 'PSY-gotiated Settlement' and 'Smognam Style', reflect a collective awareness of this unlikely pairing, illustrating the evolving cultural dynamics influenced by environmental concerns. It appears that the public's engagement with environmental issues is not merely a grave matter but also takes on a bouncy, dance-worthy dimension.
The statistical significance of our correlation coefficient, coupled with the dance-like elegance of our scatterplot, underscores a sophisticated yet entertaining interplay. As if performing a duet, air pollution and 'Gangnam Style' searches seem to waltz hand-in-hand, renewing our appreciation for the light-hearted, whimsical aspect of societal trends. The unanticipated nature of this connection highlights the playful paradox inherent in scholarly pursuits and prompts us to reconsider the profound impact of air quality on societal behavior. After all, who would have thought that amidst air pollution concerns, we would find ourselves tapping our feet to the rhythmic allure of 'Gangnam Style'?
Our study not only unravels an unexpected correlation but also beckons researchers to embrace the exuberant and imaginative potential lurking in seemingly disparate variables. As we continue to unravel the melodic mysteries of societal phenomena, we are reminded that even in the staid world of academia, there is room for a little cha-cha-cha.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Wichita and Google searches for 'Gangnam Style'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Uncovering the Rhythmic Connection: Air Pollution and Google Searches for 'Gangnam Style' in Wichita
[[ABSTRACT]]
The seemingly disparate topics of air pollution and global sensation 'Gangnam Style' have long captivated the minds of researchers. In this paper, we delve into the unexpected relationship between these two phenomena, utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends. Our analysis, covering the years 2012 to 2023, unearthed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9130463 with a p-value less than 0.01, showcasing a robust statistical connection between air quality in Wichita and the public's search interest in this iconic Korean pop hit. Our findings not only underscore the interplay between environmental factors and cultural trends but also provide a whimsical lens through which to view the profound impact of air pollution on societal behavior. As we cha-cha our way through the data, we invite readers to consider the unanticipated charm of this correlation and explore its implications for interdisciplinary research.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the annals of interdisciplinary research, it is not uncommon to stumble upon peculiar correlations that challenge conventional wisdom and spark curiosity. Here, we meander through the unlikely intersection of air pollution and the global phenomenon known as 'Gangnam Style', perpetuating the tradition of weaving together seemingly unrelated threads in the fabric of academic inquiry.
The 2012 release of the South Korean musician PSY's 'Gangnam Style' music video brought with it an infectious dance, catchy beats, and an irresistible urge to gallop like an over-caffeinated stallion. Simultaneously, Wichita, Kansas grappled with air pollution issues, adding an aura of intrigue to our investigation. As the saying goes, "Where there's smog, there's psy-nergy!”
We embarked on this study with the air of detectives, employing data from the Environmental Protection Agency to scrutinize air quality indices alongside Google Trends' records of public interest in 'Gangnam Style' from 2012 to 2023. The resulting tango of statistical analyses revealed a compelling correlation coefficient of 0.9130463, accompanied by a p-value less than the conventional alpha level of 0.01. So, it appears that the synergy between air pollution and 'Gangnam Style' is not merely a flight of fancy – it’s statistically sound, even if it sounds like an absurd parody.
As we waltz through our findings, we invite the erudite reader to join this merry promenade and relish the whimsy of unearthing an unexpected concurrence between environmental metrics and pop culture quirks. By shedding light on this unanticipated harmony, we set the stage for an intellectually stimulating discourse that transcends traditional disciplinary boundaries, demonstrating that academic investigation can be as lively as, dare we say, a Korean pop sensation. So, let's dust off our dancing shoes and rumba through the corridors of this peculiar correlation, finding joy in the surprising symphony of air pollution and 'Gangnam Style' interest.
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis yielded a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9130463, indicating a remarkably strong relationship between air pollution in Wichita and Google searches for 'Gangnam Style'. The r-squared value of 0.8336535 further accentuates the robustness of this connection, explaining approximately 83.37% of the variation in 'Gangnam Style' searches attributed to changes in air pollution levels. With a p-value of less than 0.01, we can confidently discard the possibility of this association being a mere fluke, much like the viral dance moves of the Gangnam Style era.
The association is vividly showcased in the scatterplot depicted in Figure 1, wherein each data point pirouettes elegantly along the trend line, encapsulating the synchronous rise and fall of air pollution levels and 'Gangnam Style' searches. It’s as if the environmental quality of Wichita plays the bass notes to the melody of internet searches, producing a harmonious duet that transcends conventional scientific boundaries.
These results not only affirm the statistical significance of the link between air pollution and 'Gangnam Style' interest but also serve as a whimsical testament to the unexpected synergies woven into the fabric of societal phenomena. As we sway through the rhythm of these findings, we invite the reader to savor the delightful irony of unearthing a melodic correlation between serious environmental metrics and the lighthearted pop culture craze. The unexpected nature of this connection should prompt us to reconsider the potential imprint of air quality on public behavior. After all, who would have thought that amidst the haze of environmental concerns, we’d find ourselves dancing to the tune of 'Gangnam Style'?
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our research has uncovered a captivating rhythmic connection between air pollution in Wichita and Google searches for 'Gangnam Style'. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9130463, coupled with a compelling p-value, unequivocally validates the statistical significance of this unforeseen relationship. The symphony of our findings resonates with the amusing notion that environmental factors may influence societal interests, much like the beat of a catchy tune infiltrates our subconscious. As we twirl through the implications of our discovery, we invite the academic community to savor the delightful irony and whimsy of this unanticipated harmony, echoing the sentiment that sometimes, in the realm of scholarly inquiry, one must be prepared to cha-cha outside the confines of conventional wisdom.
Furthermore, our results illuminate the need for interdisciplinary perspectives in exploring the intricate interplay of cultural phenomena and environmental variables. The unexpected charm of this correlation underscores the serendipitous nature of academic inquiry, reminding us that the pursuit of knowledge is not merely a waltz through established paradigms but a merry jig through uncharted territories.
Owing to the resounding statistical support and the sheer entertainment value of this spectacle, we assert that no further research is needed in this area. As the curtains draw to a close on our investigation, the unexpected allure of the link between air pollution and 'Gangnam Style' serves as a testament to the whimsical corridors of academic exploration. After all, as we bid adieu to this peculiar dance, we must recognize that in the realm of scholarly inquiry, sometimes, the most bizarre correlations can also be the most enlightening - much like the unexpected allure of a catchy Korean pop sensation.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Uncovering the Rhythmic Connection: Air Pollution and Google Searches for 'Gangnam Style' in Wichita. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The International Journal of Ecological Jams and Urban Trends
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Uncovering the Rhythmic Connection: Air Pollution and Google Searches for 'Gangnam Style' in Wichita. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Center for Urban Air Quality and Pop Culture Trends
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Uncovering the Rhythmic Connection: Air Pollution and Google Searches for 'Gangnam Style' in Wichita with an abstract of The seemingly disparate topics of air pollution and global sensation 'Gangnam Style' have long captivated the minds of researchers. In this paper, we delve into the unexpected relationship between these two phenomena, utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends. Our analysis, covering the years 2012 to 2023, unearthed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9130463 with a p-value less than 0.01, showcasing a robust statistical connection between air quality in Wichita and the public's search interest in this iconic Korean pop hit. Our findings not only underscore the interplay between environmental factors and cultural trends but also provide a whimsical lens through which to view the profound impact of air pollution on societal behavior. As we cha-cha our way through the data, we invite readers to consider the unanticipated charm of this correlation and explore its implications for interdisciplinary research.
ChatGPT:
"Air pollution, Gangnam Style, Wichita, correlation coefficient, Google Trends, Environmental Protection Agency, societal behavior, cultural trends, interdisciplinary research"
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Air pollution in WichitaDetailed data title: Percentage of days with air quality at 'unhealthy for sensitive groups' or worse in Wichita, KS
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Wichita
Google searches for 'Gangnam Style'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'Gangnam Style' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)
See what else correlates with Google searches for 'Gangnam Style'
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.8336535 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 83.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'Gangnam Style') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Wichita) over the 12 years from 2012 through 2023.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.4E-5. 0.0000337823240962083000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.91 in 0.0034% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 29,601 random variables You don't actually need 29 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 11 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 11 because we have two variables measured over a period of 12 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.71, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | |
Air pollution in Wichita (Bad air quality days) | 9.28962 | 2.19178 | 1.09589 | 0 | 0.273224 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.63934 | 1.36986 | 1.36986 | 1.10497 |
Google searches for 'Gangnam Style' (Rel. search volume) | 36.9 | 20.3333 | 4.66667 | 2.83333 | 1.33333 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([9.28962,2.19178,1.09589,0,0.273224,0,0,0,1.63934,1.36986,1.36986,1.10497,])
array_2 = np.array([36.9,20.3333,4.66667,2.83333,1.33333,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Wichita"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'Gangnam Style'"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Air pollution in Wichita
- Line chart for only Google searches for 'Gangnam Style'
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Uncovering the Rhythmic Connection: Air Pollution and Google Searches for 'Gangnam Style' in Wichita
Bravo! Your evaluation rocks!
Correlation ID: 4037 · Black Variable ID: 21446 · Red Variable ID: 1442