about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,033 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of private detectives in Nevada and the second variable is Google searches for 'unicorns'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

The private detectives were hired to uncover the truth behind unicorn sightings, leading to a surge in unicorn-related news and social media posts, sparking public interest and subsequent Google searches for these elusive creatures. It's a case of mystical investigations captivating the imaginations of the masses, creating a horn-rifically popular trend!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate an image that illustrates the bustling streets of a Nevada city, with a diverse group of curious individuals huddled around a smartphone. They are fervently conducting a Google search for 'unicorns,' their eager eyes reflecting the newfound interest in mysteries and the quest to uncover mythical creatures. The scene should capture a sense of excitement and camaraderie among the group, as well as a hint of magic and wonder in the air. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of private detectives in Nevada and Google searches for 'unicorns'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Sci-fi fantacy inspired by bauhaus Oragami Glitch art Magic realism
ChatGPT: Magic realism

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of private detectives in Nevada and Google searches for 'unicorns', in the following situation: As the number of private detectives in Nevada increased, more people became interested in solving mysteries, leading them to search for mythical creatures like unicorns as a way to test their detective skills and impress their peers with their ability to find elusive beings.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling Nevada city, the number of private detectives has risen. A group of curious individuals, fueled by the rise in detective work, gather around a smartphone to search for 'unicorns' on Google. Their eager eyes reflect the newfound interest in solving mysteries and the quest to uncover mythical creatures in their quest to impress their peers.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Magic realism ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling Nevada city, the number of private detectives has risen. A group of curious individuals, fueled by the rise in detective work, gather around a smartphone to search for 'unicorns' on Google. Their eager eyes reflect the newfound interest in solving mysteries and the quest to uncover mythical creatures in their quest to impress their peers. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate an image that illustrates the bustling streets of a Nevada city, with a diverse group of curious individuals huddled around a smartphone. They are fervently conducting a Google search for 'unicorns,' their eager eyes reflecting the newfound interest in mysteries and the quest to uncover mythical creatures. The scene should capture a sense of excitement and camaraderie among the group, as well as a hint of magic and wonder in the air.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in The number of private detectives in Nevada positively influenced unicorns (Google searches for 'unicorns').

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Private Detectives in Nevada and the Peculiar Popularity of 'Unicorns'

The Journal of Cryptic Investigations

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of private detectives in Nevada and Google searches for 'unicorns'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7573089 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Private Detectives in Nevada and the Peculiar Popularity of 'Unicorns'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the peculiar correlation between the number of private detectives in Nevada and the Google searches for 'unicorns'. Combining data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, our research team uncovered an unexpected relationship that blends the world of mystery with the magic of mythical creatures. Our findings reveal a significant correlation coefficient of 0.7573089 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2004 to 2022.

We delve into the realm of quirky queries and clandestine pursuits to unravel the enigmatic connection between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Whether it's a case of sleuths seeking elusive evidence or curious minds yearning for enchanting equines, our research sheds light on this whimsical intersection. Join us as we embark on a journey through the investigative underworld and the realm of fairy-tale curiosities to untangle the mystifying bond between the number of private detectives in Nevada and the enduring allure of 'unicorns'.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of private detectives in Nevada and Google searches for 'unicorns'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Private Detectives in Nevada and the Peculiar Popularity of 'Unicorns'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the peculiar correlation between the number of private detectives in Nevada and the Google searches for 'unicorns'. Combining data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, our research team uncovered an unexpected relationship that blends the world of mystery with the magic of mythical creatures. Our findings reveal a significant correlation coefficient of 0.7573089 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2004 to 2022.

We delve into the realm of quirky queries and clandestine pursuits to unravel the enigmatic connection between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Whether it's a case of sleuths seeking elusive evidence or curious minds yearning for enchanting equines, our research sheds light on this whimsical intersection. Join us as we embark on a journey through the investigative underworld and the realm of fairy-tale curiosities to untangle the mystifying bond between the number of private detectives in Nevada and the enduring allure of 'unicorns'.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

The world of academia often brings together seemingly unrelated phenomena, inviting us to explore the unexpected connections that lie beneath the surface. In that spirit, we present our investigation into the intriguing relationship between the number of private detectives in Nevada and the Google searches for 'unicorns'. While one may initially assume that these two subjects have as much in common as a magnifying glass and a mythical horn, our research has uncovered a correlation that could pique the interest of both sleuths and fairy-tale enthusiasts alike.

As any good detective knows, a key to solving a mystery is to follow the evidence, and in this case, the evidence points to a surprising connection between the world of investigations and the mythical realm. With a significant correlation coefficient of 0.7573089 and a p-value that would make even the most seasoned statistician raise an eyebrow, our findings raise more questions than they answer--much like discovering a secret passageway in a labyrinthine mansion.

Our quest to unravel this enigma has led us through the digital trails of Google searches, where we have witnessed the ebb and flow of interest in unicorns over the years. Meanwhile, we have delved into the data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to track the movements of private detectives in the Silver State. The result? A confluence of clandestine pursuits and whimsical curiosities, worthy of a tale spun by the most imaginative of storytellers.

In the pages ahead, we invite our readers to join us on this investigative odyssey, where we journey through the world of unforeseen correlations and surreal juxtapositions. From the alleyways of Las Vegas to the virtual pastures of the internet, our research aims to shed light on the enigmatic bond that ties together the number of private detectives in Nevada and the enduring allure of 'unicorns'. So, grab your detective hat and pack your imagination; we're about to embark on a venture that blurs the lines between the mysterious and the magical.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of private detectives in Nevada and Google searches for 'unicorns'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Private Detectives in Nevada and the Peculiar Popularity of 'Unicorns'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the peculiar correlation between the number of private detectives in Nevada and the Google searches for 'unicorns'. Combining data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, our research team uncovered an unexpected relationship that blends the world of mystery with the magic of mythical creatures. Our findings reveal a significant correlation coefficient of 0.7573089 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2004 to 2022.

We delve into the realm of quirky queries and clandestine pursuits to unravel the enigmatic connection between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Whether it's a case of sleuths seeking elusive evidence or curious minds yearning for enchanting equines, our research sheds light on this whimsical intersection. Join us as we embark on a journey through the investigative underworld and the realm of fairy-tale curiosities to untangle the mystifying bond between the number of private detectives in Nevada and the enduring allure of 'unicorns'.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The world of academia often brings together seemingly unrelated phenomena, inviting us to explore the unexpected connections that lie beneath the surface. In that spirit, we present our investigation into the intriguing relationship between the number of private detectives in Nevada and the Google searches for 'unicorns'. While one may initially assume that these two subjects have as much in common as a magnifying glass and a mythical horn, our research has uncovered a correlation that could pique the interest of both sleuths and fairy-tale enthusiasts alike.
As any good detective knows, a key to solving a mystery is to follow the evidence, and in this case, the evidence points to a surprising connection between the world of investigations and the mythical realm. With a significant correlation coefficient of 0.7573089 and a p-value that would make even the most seasoned statistician raise an eyebrow, our findings raise more questions than they answer--much like discovering a secret passageway in a labyrinthine mansion.
Our quest to unravel this enigma has led us through the digital trails of Google searches, where we have witnessed the ebb and flow of interest in unicorns over the years. Meanwhile, we have delved into the data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to track the movements of private detectives in the Silver State. The result? A confluence of clandestine pursuits and whimsical curiosities, worthy of a tale spun by the most imaginative of storytellers.
In the pages ahead, we invite our readers to join us on this investigative odyssey, where we journey through the world of unforeseen correlations and surreal juxtapositions. From the alleyways of Las Vegas to the virtual pastures of the internet, our research aims to shed light on the enigmatic bond that ties together the number of private detectives in Nevada and the enduring allure of 'unicorns'. So, grab your detective hat and pack your imagination; we're about to embark on a venture that blurs the lines between the mysterious and the magical.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The enigmatic correlation between the number of private detectives in Nevada and the Google searches for 'unicorns' has elicited both astonishment and amusement among researchers. While the initial connection may seem as elusive as a unicorn itself, our inquiry into the existing literature surrounding these disparate yet strangely entwined topics has revealed a tapestry of surprising insights.

In their study, Smith et al. (2015) examined the proliferation of private detectives in various U.S. states, aiming to elucidate the factors contributing to regional discrepancies. In an unexpected turn, their findings hinted at a potential link between the abundance of private investigators in Nevada and the enigmatic allure of mythical creatures such as unicorns. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones (2018) delved into the psychology of internet search behavior, uncovering intriguing patterns in online queries related to fantastical beings. Their work echoed the underlying intrigue of our own investigation, hinting at a parallel fascination with the elusive nature of both clandestine investigations and mystical creatures.

Beyond the realm of academic studies, our exploration led us to the periphery of related works that veered into the realm of whimsy and wonder. "The Detective's Handbook: A Comprehensive Guide to the Art of Sleuthing" by Investigator I.M. Curious presented a tongue-in-cheek take on the world of private investigation, offering astute advice alongside lighthearted anecdotes that resonated with our own musings on this conundrum. Furthermore, "Unicorns and Unexplained Phenomena: A Field Guide to Mythical Creatures" by A. Lee Cornweaver beckoned with its allure of fantastical exploration, mirroring the arcane allure of our investigative puzzle.

In the world of fiction, the works of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, particularly the adventures of Sherlock Holmes, served as a touchstone for the inquisitive nature of our research. The meticulous attention to detail and the unraveling of perplexing mysteries within Doyle's stories parallel the very essence of our quest to decipher the curious connection between private detectives and unicorns. Meanwhile, the whimsical realm of J.K. Rowling's "Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them" hinted at the tantalizing prospect of uncovering magical creatures in the most unexpected of places, much like our own discovery of a statistical correlation between private detectives and Google searches for 'unicorns'.

Drawing inspiration from unlikely sources, such as the board game "Clue" with its blend of mystery and whimsy, we found ourselves embracing the unconventional allure of our investigation. Just as the game entices players to navigate a web of clues and misdirection, our research beckons us to navigate a labyrinth of statistical data and enchanting queries. Through the unearthing of unexpected parallels and the wry amusement that accompanies our findings, we invite our readers to join us in unraveling the clandestine connection that intertwines private detectives in Nevada with the captivating charm of 'unicorns'.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of private detectives in Nevada and Google searches for 'unicorns'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Private Detectives in Nevada and the Peculiar Popularity of 'Unicorns'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the peculiar correlation between the number of private detectives in Nevada and the Google searches for 'unicorns'. Combining data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, our research team uncovered an unexpected relationship that blends the world of mystery with the magic of mythical creatures. Our findings reveal a significant correlation coefficient of 0.7573089 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2004 to 2022.

We delve into the realm of quirky queries and clandestine pursuits to unravel the enigmatic connection between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Whether it's a case of sleuths seeking elusive evidence or curious minds yearning for enchanting equines, our research sheds light on this whimsical intersection. Join us as we embark on a journey through the investigative underworld and the realm of fairy-tale curiosities to untangle the mystifying bond between the number of private detectives in Nevada and the enduring allure of 'unicorns'.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The world of academia often brings together seemingly unrelated phenomena, inviting us to explore the unexpected connections that lie beneath the surface. In that spirit, we present our investigation into the intriguing relationship between the number of private detectives in Nevada and the Google searches for 'unicorns'. While one may initially assume that these two subjects have as much in common as a magnifying glass and a mythical horn, our research has uncovered a correlation that could pique the interest of both sleuths and fairy-tale enthusiasts alike.
As any good detective knows, a key to solving a mystery is to follow the evidence, and in this case, the evidence points to a surprising connection between the world of investigations and the mythical realm. With a significant correlation coefficient of 0.7573089 and a p-value that would make even the most seasoned statistician raise an eyebrow, our findings raise more questions than they answer--much like discovering a secret passageway in a labyrinthine mansion.
Our quest to unravel this enigma has led us through the digital trails of Google searches, where we have witnessed the ebb and flow of interest in unicorns over the years. Meanwhile, we have delved into the data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to track the movements of private detectives in the Silver State. The result? A confluence of clandestine pursuits and whimsical curiosities, worthy of a tale spun by the most imaginative of storytellers.
In the pages ahead, we invite our readers to join us on this investigative odyssey, where we journey through the world of unforeseen correlations and surreal juxtapositions. From the alleyways of Las Vegas to the virtual pastures of the internet, our research aims to shed light on the enigmatic bond that ties together the number of private detectives in Nevada and the enduring allure of 'unicorns'. So, grab your detective hat and pack your imagination; we're about to embark on a venture that blurs the lines between the mysterious and the magical.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

As much as we would have loved to send fleets of unicorns on covert missions to tail private detectives through the neon-lit streets of Nevada, our methodology involved a slightly less fantastical approach. Our research team gathered data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to track the employment figures for private detectives in Nevada from 2004 to 2022. The meticulous detective work involved in compiling this dataset rivaled that of the most astute gumshoe, ensuring that no lead was left unturned in our pursuit of statistical clarity.

Simultaneously, we harnessed the power of Google Trends to monitor the zeitgeist of unicorn-related searches across the same time frame. While we certainly entertained the thought of training a unicorn to browse the internet and record its search history, we ultimately opted for the less whimsical, albeit more practical, method of harnessing Google's search trend data. This allowed us to gauge the fluctuations in public interest surrounding these mythical creatures, revealing patterns that mirrored the ebb and flow of intrigue in the world of enigmatic equines.

To analyze the relationship between the number of private detectives in Nevada and the Google searches for 'unicorns', we employed robust statistical methods, much like assembling a meticulous case file. Using advanced regression techniques, we teased out the complex interplay between these seemingly incongruent variables, unraveling a web of statistical intrigue that would make even the most seasoned statistician don their metaphorical detective hat.

In the realm of statistical significance, we duly assessed the correlation between private detective employment and unicorn-themed searches. By calculating the correlation coefficient and appraising the p-value, we sought to establish the veracity of the detected relationship, akin to scrutinizing a piece of evidence under the harsh light of a forensic laboratory. Any spurious correlations attempting to veil themselves as substantive findings were met with rigorous scrutiny, ensuring that our conclusions stood firm against the gusts of skepticism blowing through the halls of academia.

In summary, our methodology combined the precision of statistical analysis with the digital sleuthing akin to traversing shadowy back alleys, ultimately shedding light on the unexpected kinship between private detectives in Nevada and the captivating allure of 'unicorns'. So, rest assured that no unicorns were harmed in the making of this research, and the private detectives of Nevada were left undisturbed to pursue their clandestine endeavors while we pursued our statistically whimsical investigation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of private detectives in Nevada and Google searches for 'unicorns'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.7573089, r-squared of 0.5735167, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Private Detectives in Nevada and the Peculiar Popularity of 'Unicorns'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the peculiar correlation between the number of private detectives in Nevada and the Google searches for 'unicorns'. Combining data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, our research team uncovered an unexpected relationship that blends the world of mystery with the magic of mythical creatures. Our findings reveal a significant correlation coefficient of 0.7573089 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2004 to 2022.

We delve into the realm of quirky queries and clandestine pursuits to unravel the enigmatic connection between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Whether it's a case of sleuths seeking elusive evidence or curious minds yearning for enchanting equines, our research sheds light on this whimsical intersection. Join us as we embark on a journey through the investigative underworld and the realm of fairy-tale curiosities to untangle the mystifying bond between the number of private detectives in Nevada and the enduring allure of 'unicorns'.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
The world of academia often brings together seemingly unrelated phenomena, inviting us to explore the unexpected connections that lie beneath the surface. In that spirit, we present our investigation into the intriguing relationship between the number of private detectives in Nevada and the Google searches for 'unicorns'. While one may initially assume that these two subjects have as much in common as a magnifying glass and a mythical horn, our research has uncovered a correlation that could pique the interest of both sleuths and fairy-tale enthusiasts alike.
As any good detective knows, a key to solving a mystery is to follow the evidence, and in this case, the evidence points to a surprising connection between the world of investigations and the mythical realm. With a significant correlation coefficient of 0.7573089 and a p-value that would make even the most seasoned statistician raise an eyebrow, our findings raise more questions than they answer--much like discovering a secret passageway in a labyrinthine mansion.
Our quest to unravel this enigma has led us through the digital trails of Google searches, where we have witnessed the ebb and flow of interest in unicorns over the years. Meanwhile, we have delved into the data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to track the movements of private detectives in the Silver State. The result? A confluence of clandestine pursuits and whimsical curiosities, worthy of a tale spun by the most imaginative of storytellers.
In the pages ahead, we invite our readers to join us on this investigative odyssey, where we journey through the world of unforeseen correlations and surreal juxtapositions. From the alleyways of Las Vegas to the virtual pastures of the internet, our research aims to shed light on the enigmatic bond that ties together the number of private detectives in Nevada and the enduring allure of 'unicorns'. So, grab your detective hat and pack your imagination; we're about to embark on a venture that blurs the lines between the mysterious and the magical.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis of the data revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the number of private detectives in Nevada and the Google searches for 'unicorns' over the period from 2004 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.7573089 indicates a robust positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, suggesting that as the number of private detectives in Nevada changes, so do the Google searches for 'unicorns'.

The scatterplot in Fig. 1 visually demonstrates this unexpected connection, with the data points forming a clearly discernible pattern that defies conventional expectations. It seems that the mysteries being pursued by detectives and the enchanting allure of unicorns have become intertwined in ways that continue to evade easy explanation.

With an r-squared value of 0.5735167, our analysis indicates that approximately 57.35% of the variability in Google searches for 'unicorns' can be explained by the variability in the number of private detectives in Nevada. This finding underscores the substantial influence that the activities of private detectives may exert on the collective curiosity surrounding unicorns, akin to a mysterious cloak of influence woven through the fabric of online inquiry.

The significance level, denoted by p < 0.01, further emphasizes the strength of the relationship uncovered in our analysis. The probability of observing such a strong correlation merely by chance is less than 1%, lending further support to the legitimacy of the association between these two ostensibly disparate phenomena.

These findings not only enrich our understanding of the enigmatic bond between the world of investigations and the realm of mystical creatures but also stimulate further inquiry into the whimsical intersections that lie at the nexus of seemingly unrelated domains. Our results beckon researchers and enthusiasts alike to ponder the intricate tapestry of connections that weaves together the rational and the fantastical, stirring the pot of imagination in the cauldron of statistical analysis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of private detectives in Nevada and Google searches for 'unicorns'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Private Detectives in Nevada and the Peculiar Popularity of 'Unicorns'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the peculiar correlation between the number of private detectives in Nevada and the Google searches for 'unicorns'. Combining data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, our research team uncovered an unexpected relationship that blends the world of mystery with the magic of mythical creatures. Our findings reveal a significant correlation coefficient of 0.7573089 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2004 to 2022.

We delve into the realm of quirky queries and clandestine pursuits to unravel the enigmatic connection between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Whether it's a case of sleuths seeking elusive evidence or curious minds yearning for enchanting equines, our research sheds light on this whimsical intersection. Join us as we embark on a journey through the investigative underworld and the realm of fairy-tale curiosities to untangle the mystifying bond between the number of private detectives in Nevada and the enduring allure of 'unicorns'.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The enigmatic correlation between the number of private detectives in Nevada and the Google searches for 'unicorns' has elicited both astonishment and amusement among researchers. While the initial connection may seem as elusive as a unicorn itself, our inquiry into the existing literature surrounding these disparate yet strangely entwined topics has revealed a tapestry of surprising insights.
In their study, Smith et al. (2015) examined the proliferation of private detectives in various U.S. states, aiming to elucidate the factors contributing to regional discrepancies. In an unexpected turn, their findings hinted at a potential link between the abundance of private investigators in Nevada and the enigmatic allure of mythical creatures such as unicorns. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones (2018) delved into the psychology of internet search behavior, uncovering intriguing patterns in online queries related to fantastical beings. Their work echoed the underlying intrigue of our own investigation, hinting at a parallel fascination with the elusive nature of both clandestine investigations and mystical creatures.
Beyond the realm of academic studies, our exploration led us to the periphery of related works that veered into the realm of whimsy and wonder. "The Detective's Handbook: A Comprehensive Guide to the Art of Sleuthing" by Investigator I.M. Curious presented a tongue-in-cheek take on the world of private investigation, offering astute advice alongside lighthearted anecdotes that resonated with our own musings on this conundrum. Furthermore, "Unicorns and Unexplained Phenomena: A Field Guide to Mythical Creatures" by A. Lee Cornweaver beckoned with its allure of fantastical exploration, mirroring the arcane allure of our investigative puzzle.
In the world of fiction, the works of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, particularly the adventures of Sherlock Holmes, served as a touchstone for the inquisitive nature of our research. The meticulous attention to detail and the unraveling of perplexing mysteries within Doyle's stories parallel the very essence of our quest to decipher the curious connection between private detectives and unicorns. Meanwhile, the whimsical realm of J.K. Rowling's "Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them" hinted at the tantalizing prospect of uncovering magical creatures in the most unexpected of places, much like our own discovery of a statistical correlation between private detectives and Google searches for 'unicorns'.
Drawing inspiration from unlikely sources, such as the board game "Clue" with its blend of mystery and whimsy, we found ourselves embracing the unconventional allure of our investigation. Just as the game entices players to navigate a web of clues and misdirection, our research beckons us to navigate a labyrinth of statistical data and enchanting queries. Through the unearthing of unexpected parallels and the wry amusement that accompanies our findings, we invite our readers to join us in unraveling the clandestine connection that intertwines private detectives in Nevada with the captivating charm of 'unicorns'.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the number of private detectives in Nevada and the Google searches for 'unicorns' over the period from 2004 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.7573089 indicates a robust positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, suggesting that as the number of private detectives in Nevada changes, so do the Google searches for 'unicorns'.
The scatterplot in Fig. 1 visually demonstrates this unexpected connection, with the data points forming a clearly discernible pattern that defies conventional expectations. It seems that the mysteries being pursued by detectives and the enchanting allure of unicorns have become intertwined in ways that continue to evade easy explanation.
With an r-squared value of 0.5735167, our analysis indicates that approximately 57.35% of the variability in Google searches for 'unicorns' can be explained by the variability in the number of private detectives in Nevada. This finding underscores the substantial influence that the activities of private detectives may exert on the collective curiosity surrounding unicorns, akin to a mysterious cloak of influence woven through the fabric of online inquiry.
The significance level, denoted by p < 0.01, further emphasizes the strength of the relationship uncovered in our analysis. The probability of observing such a strong correlation merely by chance is less than 1%, lending further support to the legitimacy of the association between these two ostensibly disparate phenomena.
These findings not only enrich our understanding of the enigmatic bond between the world of investigations and the realm of mystical creatures but also stimulate further inquiry into the whimsical intersections that lie at the nexus of seemingly unrelated domains. Our results beckon researchers and enthusiasts alike to ponder the intricate tapestry of connections that weaves together the rational and the fantastical, stirring the pot of imagination in the cauldron of statistical analysis.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings unquestionably validate the bizarre yet compelling connection between the number of private detectives in Nevada and the Google searches for 'unicorns'. It seems as though these seemingly incongruous realms have become entangled in an enigmatic dance, where the pursuit of truth intertwines with the allure of the fantastical. This revelation brings Sherlock Holmes' deduction "Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth" to a whole new level - who knew that the improbable truth involved mythical creatures?

Building upon the literature review, which playfully hinted at the uncanny parallels between private detectives and unicorns, our results endorse and extend these earlier suppositions. Smith et al.'s work hinting at a potential link between the abundance of private investigators in Nevada and the allure of mythical creatures now seems less whimsical and more empirical, thanks to our robust correlation coefficient of 0.7573089. Furthermore, the psychological underpinnings of internet search behavior, as unearthed by Doe and Jones, take on a whole new dimension of intrigue as our analysis quantifiably supports the premise of a parallel fascination with enigmatic inquiries and fantastical beings.

The scatterplot in Figure 1 confirms the unanticipated pattern we observed, akin to a detective following a trail of clues through a mysterious case. The r-squared value of 0.5735167 underscores the meaningful influence of private detectives on the collective curiosity surrounding unicorns, as if they are leaving breadcrumbs in the digital forest for us to follow. The p-value of less than 0.01 reiterates that this correlation is not a mere fluke – it’s as real as a unicorn in a fairytale meadow.

These results invite us to ponder the implications of this correlation. Perhaps the clandestine nature of private investigations has sparked a collective fascination with elusive beings like unicorns, or maybe the allure of the unknown drives people to seek out both real and mythical mysteries. Regardless, our study opens a new chapter in the annals of quirky correlations, illustrating the unexpected ways in which disparate domains can intertwine, leaving us to contemplate the whimsical intersections of life with a twinkle in our eyes and a sense of wonder in our hearts.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of private detectives in Nevada and Google searches for 'unicorns'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Private Detectives in Nevada and the Peculiar Popularity of 'Unicorns'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the peculiar correlation between the number of private detectives in Nevada and the Google searches for 'unicorns'. Combining data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, our research team uncovered an unexpected relationship that blends the world of mystery with the magic of mythical creatures. Our findings reveal a significant correlation coefficient of 0.7573089 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2004 to 2022.

We delve into the realm of quirky queries and clandestine pursuits to unravel the enigmatic connection between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Whether it's a case of sleuths seeking elusive evidence or curious minds yearning for enchanting equines, our research sheds light on this whimsical intersection. Join us as we embark on a journey through the investigative underworld and the realm of fairy-tale curiosities to untangle the mystifying bond between the number of private detectives in Nevada and the enduring allure of 'unicorns'.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The world of academia often brings together seemingly unrelated phenomena, inviting us to explore the unexpected connections that lie beneath the surface. In that spirit, we present our investigation into the intriguing relationship between the number of private detectives in Nevada and the Google searches for 'unicorns'. While one may initially assume that these two subjects have as much in common as a magnifying glass and a mythical horn, our research has uncovered a correlation that could pique the interest of both sleuths and fairy-tale enthusiasts alike.
As any good detective knows, a key to solving a mystery is to follow the evidence, and in this case, the evidence points to a surprising connection between the world of investigations and the mythical realm. With a significant correlation coefficient of 0.7573089 and a p-value that would make even the most seasoned statistician raise an eyebrow, our findings raise more questions than they answer--much like discovering a secret passageway in a labyrinthine mansion.
Our quest to unravel this enigma has led us through the digital trails of Google searches, where we have witnessed the ebb and flow of interest in unicorns over the years. Meanwhile, we have delved into the data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to track the movements of private detectives in the Silver State. The result? A confluence of clandestine pursuits and whimsical curiosities, worthy of a tale spun by the most imaginative of storytellers.
In the pages ahead, we invite our readers to join us on this investigative odyssey, where we journey through the world of unforeseen correlations and surreal juxtapositions. From the alleyways of Las Vegas to the virtual pastures of the internet, our research aims to shed light on the enigmatic bond that ties together the number of private detectives in Nevada and the enduring allure of 'unicorns'. So, grab your detective hat and pack your imagination; we're about to embark on a venture that blurs the lines between the mysterious and the magical.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the number of private detectives in Nevada and the Google searches for 'unicorns' over the period from 2004 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.7573089 indicates a robust positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, suggesting that as the number of private detectives in Nevada changes, so do the Google searches for 'unicorns'.
The scatterplot in Fig. 1 visually demonstrates this unexpected connection, with the data points forming a clearly discernible pattern that defies conventional expectations. It seems that the mysteries being pursued by detectives and the enchanting allure of unicorns have become intertwined in ways that continue to evade easy explanation.
With an r-squared value of 0.5735167, our analysis indicates that approximately 57.35% of the variability in Google searches for 'unicorns' can be explained by the variability in the number of private detectives in Nevada. This finding underscores the substantial influence that the activities of private detectives may exert on the collective curiosity surrounding unicorns, akin to a mysterious cloak of influence woven through the fabric of online inquiry.
The significance level, denoted by p < 0.01, further emphasizes the strength of the relationship uncovered in our analysis. The probability of observing such a strong correlation merely by chance is less than 1%, lending further support to the legitimacy of the association between these two ostensibly disparate phenomena.
These findings not only enrich our understanding of the enigmatic bond between the world of investigations and the realm of mystical creatures but also stimulate further inquiry into the whimsical intersections that lie at the nexus of seemingly unrelated domains. Our results beckon researchers and enthusiasts alike to ponder the intricate tapestry of connections that weaves together the rational and the fantastical, stirring the pot of imagination in the cauldron of statistical analysis.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

CONCLUSION

In unraveling the enigmatic connection between the number of private detectives in Nevada and the Google searches for 'unicorns,' our findings have shed light on this unanticipated correlation that blends the world of mystery with the magic of mythical creatures. It seems that as private detectives go about their investigative pursuits, the allure of unicorns captivates the digital landscape in a manner both befuddling and intriguing.

So, is the mystical nature of unicorns a prime source of intrigue for private eyes, or do these elusive equines hold the key to unlocking cryptic cases? While our research leaves these questions dangling like a carrot before a curious unicorn, it undeniably highlights the curious juncture of the whimsical and the investigative. It's as if Sherlock Holmes decided to chase clues through a forest of rainbows and sparkles!

With an r-squared value that explains over half of the variability in Google searches for 'unicorns' based on the number of private detectives in Nevada, it's clear that this connection is not just a fluke – it's as real as a unicorn sighting in the Nevada desert! The significance level further cements this peculiar correlation, leaving us to ponder the notion of unicorn sleuths and clandestine equine encounters.

As we conclude our odyssey through this unexpected amalgamation of data, we can assert with a chuckle and a hearty nod to statistical significance that no further investigations into the correlation between the number of private detectives in Nevada and the Google fascination with 'unicorns' are required. The intriguing bond between the rational pursuit of truth and the whimsical lure of the unknown has been deciphered, leaving us with a statistical tale worth recounting at any mythical watering hole.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Private Detectives in Nevada and the Peculiar Popularity of 'Unicorns'. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Cryptic Investigations


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Private Detectives in Nevada and the Peculiar Popularity of 'Unicorns'. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Eccentric Inquiry and Mysterious Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Private Detectives in Nevada and the Peculiar Popularity of 'Unicorns' with an abstract of This paper investigates the peculiar correlation between the number of private detectives in Nevada and the Google searches for 'unicorns'. Combining data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, our research team uncovered an unexpected relationship that blends the world of mystery with the magic of mythical creatures. Our findings reveal a significant correlation coefficient of 0.7573089 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2004 to 2022.
We delve into the realm of quirky queries and clandestine pursuits to unravel the enigmatic connection between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Whether it's a case of sleuths seeking elusive evidence or curious minds yearning for enchanting equines, our research sheds light on this whimsical intersection. Join us as we embark on a journey through the investigative underworld and the realm of fairy-tale curiosities to untangle the mystifying bond between the number of private detectives in Nevada and the enduring allure of 'unicorns'.

ChatGPT:

private detectives, Nevada, Google searches, unicorns, correlation, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Google Trends, mysterious phenomena, clandestine pursuits, whimsical intersection, investigative underworld, fairy-tale curiosities

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of private detectives in Nevada
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of private detectives and investigators in Nevada
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of private detectives in Nevada

Google searches for 'unicorns'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'unicorns' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'unicorns'

Correlation r = 0.7573089 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.5735167 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 57.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'unicorns') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of private detectives in Nevada) over the 19 years from 2004 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00017. 0.0001735845418082503800000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.76 in 0.017% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 5,761 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 18 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 18 because we have two variables measured over a period of 19 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.46, 0.9 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
The number of private detectives in Nevada (Laborers)390510290210170170190210200220180210260460460340140100340
Google searches for 'unicorns' (Rel. search volume)83.666767.833350.333333.666727.524.7527.083336.2538.916743.7550.083359.7553.666765.583374.560.7548.7536.416738.6667




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([390,510,290,210,170,170,190,210,200,220,180,210,260,460,460,340,140,100,340,])
array_2 = np.array([83.6667,67.8333,50.3333,33.6667,27.5,24.75,27.0833,36.25,38.9167,43.75,50.0833,59.75,53.6667,65.5833,74.5,60.75,48.75,36.4167,38.6667,])
array_1_name = "The number of private detectives in Nevada"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'unicorns'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Bravo! Your evaluation rocks!


Correlation ID: 4033 · Black Variable ID: 11169 · Red Variable ID: 1481
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0