about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,031 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of biological technicians in South Dakota and the second variable is Kerosene used in Turkmenistan.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

As the biological technicians in South Dakota conducted their experiments and trials, they inadvertently created a new strain of super corn. This super corn, when processed, yielded a byproduct that surprisingly enhanced the efficiency of kerosene production in Turkmenistan. It's a-maize-ing how this unforeseen connection has sparked a kernel of truth in the fuel industry!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [Realistic] Generate an image that portrays the contrast between a group of biological technicians meticulously attending to lush corn fields in South Dakota, and couples delighting in romantic candlelit dinners amidst the desert dunes in Turkmenistan. Emphasize the vibrant growth of the corn crops and the serene desert landscape, with the warm glow of the candles creating an inviting ambiance. Depict the technicians engrossed in their agricultural work, while the couples enjoy intimate moments, all set against the backdrop of their respective environments. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of biological technicians in South Dakota and Kerosene used in Turkmenistan. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Macabre Low poly a meme Realistic A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s
ChatGPT: Realistic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of biological technicians in South Dakota and Kerosene used in Turkmenistan, in the following situation: The influx of biological technicians in South Dakota led to a surge in corn production, causing a surplus. This surplus was then converted into kerosene, creating a demand in Turkmenistan for romantic candlelit desert dinners, thus increasing kerosene usage.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In South Dakota, a group of biological technicians busy at work in the fields, overseeing the abundant growth of corn crops. Meanwhile, in Turkmenistan, couples enjoy romantic candlelit dinners in the desert, with the soft glow illuminating the warm, sandy surroundings, leading to an increase in the use of kerosene.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Realistic ] and depicting this scene: In South Dakota, a group of biological technicians busy at work in the fields, overseeing the abundant growth of corn crops. Meanwhile, in Turkmenistan, couples enjoy romantic candlelit dinners in the desert, with the soft glow illuminating the warm, sandy surroundings, leading to an increase in the use of kerosene. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [Realistic] Generate an image that portrays the contrast between a group of biological technicians meticulously attending to lush corn fields in South Dakota, and couples delighting in romantic candlelit dinners amidst the desert dunes in Turkmenistan. Emphasize the vibrant growth of the corn crops and the serene desert landscape, with the warm glow of the candles creating an inviting ambiance. Depict the technicians engrossed in their agricultural work, while the couples enjoy intimate moments, all set against the backdrop of their respective environments.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in The number of biological technicians in South Dakota caused Kerosene used in Turkmenistan to increase. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Bio-Kero Connections: Investigating the Correlation Between Biological Technicians in South Dakota and Kerosene Usage in Turkmenistan

Journal of Cross-Cultural Biofuels Research

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of biological technicians in South Dakota and Kerosene used in Turkmenistan. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7803288 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Bio-Kero Connections: Investigating the Correlation Between Biological Technicians in South Dakota and Kerosene Usage in Turkmenistan

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the fascinating and unexpected connections between the number of biological technicians in South Dakota and the usage of kerosene in Turkmenistan. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team undertook a statistical analysis to tackle this peculiar relationship.

The correlation coefficient of 0.7803288 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2003 to 2021 provides robust evidence of the surprising association between these seemingly unrelated variables. While we initially expected to encounter unrelated data points, our findings took us by surprise and left us pondering the mysterious ways in which the world operates.

Our investigation led us to speculate on potential mechanisms underlying this unexpected correlation. Could it be that the activities of biological technicians in the heart of South Dakota are somehow influencing the consumption of kerosene thousands of miles away in Turkmenistan? Or could it be a mere coincidence that has eluded our understanding?

This study not only highlights the unexpected correlations that can emerge from statistical analysis but also serves as a reminder that even the most unlikely connections may hold valuable insights. As researchers, we must remain open to the possibility that the world operates in ways that defy conventional expectations, and that even the most obscure relationships are worthy of investigation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of biological technicians in South Dakota and Kerosene used in Turkmenistan. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Bio-Kero Connections: Investigating the Correlation Between Biological Technicians in South Dakota and Kerosene Usage in Turkmenistan

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the fascinating and unexpected connections between the number of biological technicians in South Dakota and the usage of kerosene in Turkmenistan. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team undertook a statistical analysis to tackle this peculiar relationship.

The correlation coefficient of 0.7803288 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2003 to 2021 provides robust evidence of the surprising association between these seemingly unrelated variables. While we initially expected to encounter unrelated data points, our findings took us by surprise and left us pondering the mysterious ways in which the world operates.

Our investigation led us to speculate on potential mechanisms underlying this unexpected correlation. Could it be that the activities of biological technicians in the heart of South Dakota are somehow influencing the consumption of kerosene thousands of miles away in Turkmenistan? Or could it be a mere coincidence that has eluded our understanding?

This study not only highlights the unexpected correlations that can emerge from statistical analysis but also serves as a reminder that even the most unlikely connections may hold valuable insights. As researchers, we must remain open to the possibility that the world operates in ways that defy conventional expectations, and that even the most obscure relationships are worthy of investigation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In the world of academic research, we often find ourselves delving into the depths of data, seeking out the hidden connections and unexpected relationships that challenge our preconceptions. Our latest foray into the realm of statistical analysis has led us on a rather unexpected journey, as we bring to light the peculiar and enigmatic link between the number of biological technicians in South Dakota and the usage of kerosene in Turkmenistan.

Now, you may be wondering, "What in the world do biological technicians in South Dakota have to do with kerosene in Turkmenistan?" And to that, we say, "Ah, therein lies the mystery that has captivated our research team!"

As we embarked on this investigation, we couldn't help but marvel at the sheer absurdity of the initial hypothesis. It seemed like the statistical equivalent of finding a polar bear in the Sahara – utterly improbable, yet strangely intriguing. But as the saying goes, "Fortune favors the bold," and armed with our datasets from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we fearlessly plunged into the world of numbers, determined to unlock the secrets of this baffling correlation.

The sheer magnitude of the correlation coefficient, a staggering 0.7803288 with a p-value of less than 0.01, left us dumbfounded. We couldn't help but exchange bewildered glances and mutter incredulous remarks as we grappled with the implications of our findings. It was as if we had stumbled upon a cosmic joke, one that had been meticulously concealed within the annals of statistical records, awaiting the curious minds daring enough to uncover it.

As academics, we pride ourselves on unraveling the intricacies of the world, but this mind-boggling correlation has humbled us, reminding us that the universe is filled with surprises, some of which are more unexpected than a penguin in the tropics.

This paper aims to not only shed light on the statistical correlation between biological technicians in South Dakota and kerosene usage in Turkmenistan but also to serve as a testament to the limitless marvels that can emerge from rigorous analysis. So, fasten your seatbelts, dear readers, as we embark on a journey that promises both statistical insights and a healthy dose of bewildering amusement!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of biological technicians in South Dakota and Kerosene used in Turkmenistan. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Bio-Kero Connections: Investigating the Correlation Between Biological Technicians in South Dakota and Kerosene Usage in Turkmenistan

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the fascinating and unexpected connections between the number of biological technicians in South Dakota and the usage of kerosene in Turkmenistan. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team undertook a statistical analysis to tackle this peculiar relationship.

The correlation coefficient of 0.7803288 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2003 to 2021 provides robust evidence of the surprising association between these seemingly unrelated variables. While we initially expected to encounter unrelated data points, our findings took us by surprise and left us pondering the mysterious ways in which the world operates.

Our investigation led us to speculate on potential mechanisms underlying this unexpected correlation. Could it be that the activities of biological technicians in the heart of South Dakota are somehow influencing the consumption of kerosene thousands of miles away in Turkmenistan? Or could it be a mere coincidence that has eluded our understanding?

This study not only highlights the unexpected correlations that can emerge from statistical analysis but also serves as a reminder that even the most unlikely connections may hold valuable insights. As researchers, we must remain open to the possibility that the world operates in ways that defy conventional expectations, and that even the most obscure relationships are worthy of investigation.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the world of academic research, we often find ourselves delving into the depths of data, seeking out the hidden connections and unexpected relationships that challenge our preconceptions. Our latest foray into the realm of statistical analysis has led us on a rather unexpected journey, as we bring to light the peculiar and enigmatic link between the number of biological technicians in South Dakota and the usage of kerosene in Turkmenistan.
Now, you may be wondering, "What in the world do biological technicians in South Dakota have to do with kerosene in Turkmenistan?" And to that, we say, "Ah, therein lies the mystery that has captivated our research team!"
As we embarked on this investigation, we couldn't help but marvel at the sheer absurdity of the initial hypothesis. It seemed like the statistical equivalent of finding a polar bear in the Sahara – utterly improbable, yet strangely intriguing. But as the saying goes, "Fortune favors the bold," and armed with our datasets from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we fearlessly plunged into the world of numbers, determined to unlock the secrets of this baffling correlation.
The sheer magnitude of the correlation coefficient, a staggering 0.7803288 with a p-value of less than 0.01, left us dumbfounded. We couldn't help but exchange bewildered glances and mutter incredulous remarks as we grappled with the implications of our findings. It was as if we had stumbled upon a cosmic joke, one that had been meticulously concealed within the annals of statistical records, awaiting the curious minds daring enough to uncover it.
As academics, we pride ourselves on unraveling the intricacies of the world, but this mind-boggling correlation has humbled us, reminding us that the universe is filled with surprises, some of which are more unexpected than a penguin in the tropics.
This paper aims to not only shed light on the statistical correlation between biological technicians in South Dakota and kerosene usage in Turkmenistan but also to serve as a testament to the limitless marvels that can emerge from rigorous analysis. So, fasten your seatbelts, dear readers, as we embark on a journey that promises both statistical insights and a healthy dose of bewildering amusement!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "The Correlation Chronicles," Smith et al. uncover the link between seemingly unconnected variables, urging researchers to venture into the unexplored territories of statistical analysis. While the field of correlations has long been dominated by logically linked variables, the authors highlight the potential for unanticipated connections to emerge from the depths of data analysis, much like the unexpected bond between the number of biological technicians in South Dakota and the usage of kerosene in Turkmenistan.

Doe and Jones, in their groundbreaking work "Statistical Surprises," further emphasize the need for researchers to embrace the bizarre and the improbable in their quest for understanding. Little did the authors know that their words would ring true in the context of our own research, as we unearthed the remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.7803288 with a p-value of less than 0.01, serving as a testimony to the unpredictability of statistical relationships.

As we venture beyond the realm of non-fiction literature, we are compelled to consider the implications of fictional works that, albeit tangentially, elicit thoughts on our peculiar investigation. In "The Enigma of Unlikely Bonds," a fictitious account of improbable connections by an anonymous author, the themes of serendipitous correlations mirror our own findings, albeit in a convoluted and whimsical context. Likewise, "The Statistical Serendipity" by A. Researcher offers a narrative that blurs the line between statistical reality and fantasy, challenging the boundaries of plausibility much like our own research endeavors.

Drawing inspiration from unexpected sources, we turn to the world of board games, where the game of "Six Degrees of Separation" takes on a whole new meaning. Could it be that there are only six degrees of separation between biological technicians in South Dakota and the consumption of kerosene in Turkmenistan? Our findings compel us to consider the tantalizing possibility that the web of interconnectedness extends far beyond what conventional wisdom would suggest.

In the midst of this whimsical journey, we are reminded of the words of the great economist, M. Marx, who famously quipped, "History repeats itself, first as tragedy, second as farce." While our research may not be a tragedy, it certainly stands as a farcical testament to the whimsicality of statistical analysis and the unexpected correlations that lie waiting to be discovered.

This literature review, although filled with jest and amusement, underscores the genuine revelations that can arise from the unlikeliest of pairings. Our investigation, in all its astounding absurdity, serves as a reminder that the world of statistical associations is rife with enigmatic marvels, waiting to be unravelled by the intrepid minds willing to embrace the unexpected.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of biological technicians in South Dakota and Kerosene used in Turkmenistan. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2003 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Bio-Kero Connections: Investigating the Correlation Between Biological Technicians in South Dakota and Kerosene Usage in Turkmenistan

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the fascinating and unexpected connections between the number of biological technicians in South Dakota and the usage of kerosene in Turkmenistan. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team undertook a statistical analysis to tackle this peculiar relationship.

The correlation coefficient of 0.7803288 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2003 to 2021 provides robust evidence of the surprising association between these seemingly unrelated variables. While we initially expected to encounter unrelated data points, our findings took us by surprise and left us pondering the mysterious ways in which the world operates.

Our investigation led us to speculate on potential mechanisms underlying this unexpected correlation. Could it be that the activities of biological technicians in the heart of South Dakota are somehow influencing the consumption of kerosene thousands of miles away in Turkmenistan? Or could it be a mere coincidence that has eluded our understanding?

This study not only highlights the unexpected correlations that can emerge from statistical analysis but also serves as a reminder that even the most unlikely connections may hold valuable insights. As researchers, we must remain open to the possibility that the world operates in ways that defy conventional expectations, and that even the most obscure relationships are worthy of investigation.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the world of academic research, we often find ourselves delving into the depths of data, seeking out the hidden connections and unexpected relationships that challenge our preconceptions. Our latest foray into the realm of statistical analysis has led us on a rather unexpected journey, as we bring to light the peculiar and enigmatic link between the number of biological technicians in South Dakota and the usage of kerosene in Turkmenistan.
Now, you may be wondering, "What in the world do biological technicians in South Dakota have to do with kerosene in Turkmenistan?" And to that, we say, "Ah, therein lies the mystery that has captivated our research team!"
As we embarked on this investigation, we couldn't help but marvel at the sheer absurdity of the initial hypothesis. It seemed like the statistical equivalent of finding a polar bear in the Sahara – utterly improbable, yet strangely intriguing. But as the saying goes, "Fortune favors the bold," and armed with our datasets from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we fearlessly plunged into the world of numbers, determined to unlock the secrets of this baffling correlation.
The sheer magnitude of the correlation coefficient, a staggering 0.7803288 with a p-value of less than 0.01, left us dumbfounded. We couldn't help but exchange bewildered glances and mutter incredulous remarks as we grappled with the implications of our findings. It was as if we had stumbled upon a cosmic joke, one that had been meticulously concealed within the annals of statistical records, awaiting the curious minds daring enough to uncover it.
As academics, we pride ourselves on unraveling the intricacies of the world, but this mind-boggling correlation has humbled us, reminding us that the universe is filled with surprises, some of which are more unexpected than a penguin in the tropics.
This paper aims to not only shed light on the statistical correlation between biological technicians in South Dakota and kerosene usage in Turkmenistan but also to serve as a testament to the limitless marvels that can emerge from rigorous analysis. So, fasten your seatbelts, dear readers, as we embark on a journey that promises both statistical insights and a healthy dose of bewildering amusement!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To untangle the perplexing connection between the number of biological technicians in the heart of South Dakota and the usage of kerosene in the distant lands of Turkmenistan, our research team employed a combination of data collection, statistical analysis, and a dash of good-natured curiosity. With a data range spanning from 2003 to 2021, we scoured the digital landscape, which may or may not have included a few detours into conspiracy-theory rabbit holes, and gathered information primarily from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration.

The first step in our methodological escapade involved procuring the relevant employment figures for biological technicians in South Dakota. Much like intrepid treasure hunters, we navigated the bureaucratic labyrinths of data repositories, employing time-tested cipher-cracking techniques to extract the necessary data. Akin to seeking buried treasure, the process was filled with unexpected twists and turns, and an unfathomable amount of spreadsheets.

Upon securing the employment data, we set our sights across the globe to Turkmenistan, in pursuit of the statistics on kerosene usage. Navigating the virtual terrain, we traversed the choppy seas of online databases and confronted the bewildering array of statistical metrics, occasionally encountering statistical beacons in the form of line graphs and pie charts, guiding us toward the coveted kerosene usage figures.

With our quivers full of data in hand, we turned to the holy grail of statistical analysis – the calculation of the correlation coefficient. Armed with formulas and an unwavering determination, our team retreated to the hallowed halls of statistical software, fervently chanting incantations of R-squared values and covariance matrices as we performed the mystical rites of correlation analysis.

The results that emerged from this arcane ritual presented us with a correlation coefficient of 0.7803288, accompanied by a p-value strikingly lower than 0.01. As we beheld these numerical marvels, we couldn't help but revel in a moment of statistical awe, contemplating the whims of fate that had led us to this improbable juncture of biological technicians and kerosene usage.

With the statistical copulation complete, our analysis ventured further into the realm of speculation, as we dared to ponder the underlying mechanisms governing this beguiling correlation. Could it be a cosmic dance of unforeseen forces? A statistical quirk of nature designed to confound the rational mind? Or perhaps an obscure cosmic joke that statistical records had been harboring all along?

In conclusion, our research methodology combined elements of perseverance, data acquisition acrobatics, and a healthy dose of statistical sorcery to unravel the entwined fates of biological technicians in South Dakota and the consumption of kerosene in Turkmenistan. This foray into the world of statistical analysis has not only revealed an unanticipated correlation but has also reinforced the notion that within the labyrinth of data, even the most inconceivable relationships can unveil themselves, leaving us both perplexed and enlightened.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of biological technicians in South Dakota and Kerosene used in Turkmenistan. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2003 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.7803288, r-squared of 0.6089130, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Bio-Kero Connections: Investigating the Correlation Between Biological Technicians in South Dakota and Kerosene Usage in Turkmenistan

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the fascinating and unexpected connections between the number of biological technicians in South Dakota and the usage of kerosene in Turkmenistan. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team undertook a statistical analysis to tackle this peculiar relationship.

The correlation coefficient of 0.7803288 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2003 to 2021 provides robust evidence of the surprising association between these seemingly unrelated variables. While we initially expected to encounter unrelated data points, our findings took us by surprise and left us pondering the mysterious ways in which the world operates.

Our investigation led us to speculate on potential mechanisms underlying this unexpected correlation. Could it be that the activities of biological technicians in the heart of South Dakota are somehow influencing the consumption of kerosene thousands of miles away in Turkmenistan? Or could it be a mere coincidence that has eluded our understanding?

This study not only highlights the unexpected correlations that can emerge from statistical analysis but also serves as a reminder that even the most unlikely connections may hold valuable insights. As researchers, we must remain open to the possibility that the world operates in ways that defy conventional expectations, and that even the most obscure relationships are worthy of investigation.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the world of academic research, we often find ourselves delving into the depths of data, seeking out the hidden connections and unexpected relationships that challenge our preconceptions. Our latest foray into the realm of statistical analysis has led us on a rather unexpected journey, as we bring to light the peculiar and enigmatic link between the number of biological technicians in South Dakota and the usage of kerosene in Turkmenistan.
Now, you may be wondering, "What in the world do biological technicians in South Dakota have to do with kerosene in Turkmenistan?" And to that, we say, "Ah, therein lies the mystery that has captivated our research team!"
As we embarked on this investigation, we couldn't help but marvel at the sheer absurdity of the initial hypothesis. It seemed like the statistical equivalent of finding a polar bear in the Sahara – utterly improbable, yet strangely intriguing. But as the saying goes, "Fortune favors the bold," and armed with our datasets from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we fearlessly plunged into the world of numbers, determined to unlock the secrets of this baffling correlation.
The sheer magnitude of the correlation coefficient, a staggering 0.7803288 with a p-value of less than 0.01, left us dumbfounded. We couldn't help but exchange bewildered glances and mutter incredulous remarks as we grappled with the implications of our findings. It was as if we had stumbled upon a cosmic joke, one that had been meticulously concealed within the annals of statistical records, awaiting the curious minds daring enough to uncover it.
As academics, we pride ourselves on unraveling the intricacies of the world, but this mind-boggling correlation has humbled us, reminding us that the universe is filled with surprises, some of which are more unexpected than a penguin in the tropics.
This paper aims to not only shed light on the statistical correlation between biological technicians in South Dakota and kerosene usage in Turkmenistan but also to serve as a testament to the limitless marvels that can emerge from rigorous analysis. So, fasten your seatbelts, dear readers, as we embark on a journey that promises both statistical insights and a healthy dose of bewildering amusement!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis of the relationship between the number of biological technicians in South Dakota and the usage of kerosene in Turkmenistan yielded remarkably intriguing results. From the period of 2003 to 2021, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7803288, an r-squared value of 0.6089130, and a p-value of less than 0.01. These findings not only surpassed our expectations but also left us scratching our heads in disbelief at the sheer absurdity of the connection between these two seemingly unrelated variables.

Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot that encapsulates the shocking correlation between the number of biological technicians and kerosene usage. If an image is worth a thousand words, then this figure is akin to a visual riddle that beckons observers to ponder the whimsical dance of data points from the heart of South Dakota to the lands of Turkmenistan.

As we marveled at the strength of this unexpected correlation, we couldn't help but conjure up fanciful scenarios to explain the inexplicable bond between biological technicians and kerosene consumption. Perhaps the industrious activities of the technicians were inadvertently influencing the kerosene preferences in distant Turkmenistan, or maybe there existed an esoteric connection that eluded our understanding.

The robustness of the correlation coefficient and the compelling nature of the p-value have left us with more questions than answers, reminding us that statistical analysis is often akin to deciphering a convoluted joke – the punchline eludes us until we dare to contemplate the improbable.

This investigation challenges our conventional notions of causality and correlation, urging us to embrace the delightful chaos of statistical relationships. Who would have thought that the realm of biological technicians and kerosene consumption would converge in such a baffling and amusing manner? This peculiarity not only underscores the capriciousness of statistical patterns but also affirms that even the most incongruous connections are ripe for scholarly exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of biological technicians in South Dakota and Kerosene used in Turkmenistan. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Bio-Kero Connections: Investigating the Correlation Between Biological Technicians in South Dakota and Kerosene Usage in Turkmenistan

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the fascinating and unexpected connections between the number of biological technicians in South Dakota and the usage of kerosene in Turkmenistan. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team undertook a statistical analysis to tackle this peculiar relationship.

The correlation coefficient of 0.7803288 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2003 to 2021 provides robust evidence of the surprising association between these seemingly unrelated variables. While we initially expected to encounter unrelated data points, our findings took us by surprise and left us pondering the mysterious ways in which the world operates.

Our investigation led us to speculate on potential mechanisms underlying this unexpected correlation. Could it be that the activities of biological technicians in the heart of South Dakota are somehow influencing the consumption of kerosene thousands of miles away in Turkmenistan? Or could it be a mere coincidence that has eluded our understanding?

This study not only highlights the unexpected correlations that can emerge from statistical analysis but also serves as a reminder that even the most unlikely connections may hold valuable insights. As researchers, we must remain open to the possibility that the world operates in ways that defy conventional expectations, and that even the most obscure relationships are worthy of investigation.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "The Correlation Chronicles," Smith et al. uncover the link between seemingly unconnected variables, urging researchers to venture into the unexplored territories of statistical analysis. While the field of correlations has long been dominated by logically linked variables, the authors highlight the potential for unanticipated connections to emerge from the depths of data analysis, much like the unexpected bond between the number of biological technicians in South Dakota and the usage of kerosene in Turkmenistan.
Doe and Jones, in their groundbreaking work "Statistical Surprises," further emphasize the need for researchers to embrace the bizarre and the improbable in their quest for understanding. Little did the authors know that their words would ring true in the context of our own research, as we unearthed the remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.7803288 with a p-value of less than 0.01, serving as a testimony to the unpredictability of statistical relationships.
As we venture beyond the realm of non-fiction literature, we are compelled to consider the implications of fictional works that, albeit tangentially, elicit thoughts on our peculiar investigation. In "The Enigma of Unlikely Bonds," a fictitious account of improbable connections by an anonymous author, the themes of serendipitous correlations mirror our own findings, albeit in a convoluted and whimsical context. Likewise, "The Statistical Serendipity" by A. Researcher offers a narrative that blurs the line between statistical reality and fantasy, challenging the boundaries of plausibility much like our own research endeavors.
Drawing inspiration from unexpected sources, we turn to the world of board games, where the game of "Six Degrees of Separation" takes on a whole new meaning. Could it be that there are only six degrees of separation between biological technicians in South Dakota and the consumption of kerosene in Turkmenistan? Our findings compel us to consider the tantalizing possibility that the web of interconnectedness extends far beyond what conventional wisdom would suggest.
In the midst of this whimsical journey, we are reminded of the words of the great economist, M. Marx, who famously quipped, "History repeats itself, first as tragedy, second as farce." While our research may not be a tragedy, it certainly stands as a farcical testament to the whimsicality of statistical analysis and the unexpected correlations that lie waiting to be discovered.
This literature review, although filled with jest and amusement, underscores the genuine revelations that can arise from the unlikeliest of pairings. Our investigation, in all its astounding absurdity, serves as a reminder that the world of statistical associations is rife with enigmatic marvels, waiting to be unravelled by the intrepid minds willing to embrace the unexpected.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the relationship between the number of biological technicians in South Dakota and the usage of kerosene in Turkmenistan yielded remarkably intriguing results. From the period of 2003 to 2021, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7803288, an r-squared value of 0.6089130, and a p-value of less than 0.01. These findings not only surpassed our expectations but also left us scratching our heads in disbelief at the sheer absurdity of the connection between these two seemingly unrelated variables.
Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot that encapsulates the shocking correlation between the number of biological technicians and kerosene usage. If an image is worth a thousand words, then this figure is akin to a visual riddle that beckons observers to ponder the whimsical dance of data points from the heart of South Dakota to the lands of Turkmenistan.
As we marveled at the strength of this unexpected correlation, we couldn't help but conjure up fanciful scenarios to explain the inexplicable bond between biological technicians and kerosene consumption. Perhaps the industrious activities of the technicians were inadvertently influencing the kerosene preferences in distant Turkmenistan, or maybe there existed an esoteric connection that eluded our understanding.
The robustness of the correlation coefficient and the compelling nature of the p-value have left us with more questions than answers, reminding us that statistical analysis is often akin to deciphering a convoluted joke – the punchline eludes us until we dare to contemplate the improbable.
This investigation challenges our conventional notions of causality and correlation, urging us to embrace the delightful chaos of statistical relationships. Who would have thought that the realm of biological technicians and kerosene consumption would converge in such a baffling and amusing manner? This peculiarity not only underscores the capriciousness of statistical patterns but also affirms that even the most incongruous connections are ripe for scholarly exploration.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our investigation into the correlation between the number of biological technicians in South Dakota and the usage of kerosene in Turkmenistan have left us astounded, amused, and with a hint of bewilderment. Our findings not only support the prior research on unexpected correlations but also add a touch of whimsy to the academic discourse on statistical relationships.

Building on the work of Smith et al., our study exemplifies the potential for unanticipated connections to emerge from the depths of data analysis. This peculiar coupling between biological technicians and kerosene usage serves as a delightful testament to the unpredictability of statistical relationships, reinforcing the notion that the world of statistical associations is rife with enigmatic marvels waiting to be discovered.

Doe and Jones, in their groundbreaking work "Statistical Surprises," would undoubtedly marvel at our discovery of a correlation coefficient of 0.7803288 with a p-value of less than 0.01, a true testimony to the whimsicality of statistical analysis and the unexpected correlations that lie waiting to be discovered.

Our findings also echo the sentiment expressed in "The Statistical Serendipity" by A. Researcher, challenging the boundaries of plausibility and embracing the bizarre and the improbable in the quest for understanding. Little did the author know that our own research would embody the essence of statistical serendipity, highlighting the value of unconventional investigations into seemingly unrelated variables.

Drawing inspiration from the board game "Six Degrees of Separation," we are compelled to consider the tantalizing possibility that there are indeed only six degrees of separation between biological technicians in South Dakota and the consumption of kerosene in Turkmenistan. Our findings beckon us to ponder the whimsical dance of data points across geographical boundaries, infusing a sense of playfulness into the scholarly pursuit of statistical relationships.

In line with M. Marx's quip that "History repeats itself, first as tragedy, second as farce," our research stands as a farcical testament to the whimsicality of statistical analysis and the unexpected correlations that lie waiting to be discovered. Our investigation underscores the genuine revelations that can arise from the unlikeliest of pairings, serving as a reminder that the world of statistical associations is rife with enigmatic marvels, waiting to be unraveled by intrepid minds willing to embrace the unexpected.

The capriciousness of statistical patterns revealed by our study not only challenges conventional notions of causality and correlation but also affirms that even the most incongruous connections are ripe for scholarly exploration. Our investigation, in all its astounding absurdity, serves as a reminder that statistical analysis is often akin to deciphering a convoluted joke – the punchline eludes us until we dare to contemplate the improbable.

In essence, our research is a reminder that the world operates in ways that defy conventional expectations, and that even the most obscure relationships are worthy of investigation. Ultimately, this investigation into the bio-kero connections stands as a farcical and whimsical journey that, in its amusement, offers genuine insights into the depths of statistical marvels.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of biological technicians in South Dakota and Kerosene used in Turkmenistan. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Bio-Kero Connections: Investigating the Correlation Between Biological Technicians in South Dakota and Kerosene Usage in Turkmenistan

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the fascinating and unexpected connections between the number of biological technicians in South Dakota and the usage of kerosene in Turkmenistan. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team undertook a statistical analysis to tackle this peculiar relationship.

The correlation coefficient of 0.7803288 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2003 to 2021 provides robust evidence of the surprising association between these seemingly unrelated variables. While we initially expected to encounter unrelated data points, our findings took us by surprise and left us pondering the mysterious ways in which the world operates.

Our investigation led us to speculate on potential mechanisms underlying this unexpected correlation. Could it be that the activities of biological technicians in the heart of South Dakota are somehow influencing the consumption of kerosene thousands of miles away in Turkmenistan? Or could it be a mere coincidence that has eluded our understanding?

This study not only highlights the unexpected correlations that can emerge from statistical analysis but also serves as a reminder that even the most unlikely connections may hold valuable insights. As researchers, we must remain open to the possibility that the world operates in ways that defy conventional expectations, and that even the most obscure relationships are worthy of investigation.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the world of academic research, we often find ourselves delving into the depths of data, seeking out the hidden connections and unexpected relationships that challenge our preconceptions. Our latest foray into the realm of statistical analysis has led us on a rather unexpected journey, as we bring to light the peculiar and enigmatic link between the number of biological technicians in South Dakota and the usage of kerosene in Turkmenistan.
Now, you may be wondering, "What in the world do biological technicians in South Dakota have to do with kerosene in Turkmenistan?" And to that, we say, "Ah, therein lies the mystery that has captivated our research team!"
As we embarked on this investigation, we couldn't help but marvel at the sheer absurdity of the initial hypothesis. It seemed like the statistical equivalent of finding a polar bear in the Sahara – utterly improbable, yet strangely intriguing. But as the saying goes, "Fortune favors the bold," and armed with our datasets from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we fearlessly plunged into the world of numbers, determined to unlock the secrets of this baffling correlation.
The sheer magnitude of the correlation coefficient, a staggering 0.7803288 with a p-value of less than 0.01, left us dumbfounded. We couldn't help but exchange bewildered glances and mutter incredulous remarks as we grappled with the implications of our findings. It was as if we had stumbled upon a cosmic joke, one that had been meticulously concealed within the annals of statistical records, awaiting the curious minds daring enough to uncover it.
As academics, we pride ourselves on unraveling the intricacies of the world, but this mind-boggling correlation has humbled us, reminding us that the universe is filled with surprises, some of which are more unexpected than a penguin in the tropics.
This paper aims to not only shed light on the statistical correlation between biological technicians in South Dakota and kerosene usage in Turkmenistan but also to serve as a testament to the limitless marvels that can emerge from rigorous analysis. So, fasten your seatbelts, dear readers, as we embark on a journey that promises both statistical insights and a healthy dose of bewildering amusement!

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the relationship between the number of biological technicians in South Dakota and the usage of kerosene in Turkmenistan yielded remarkably intriguing results. From the period of 2003 to 2021, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7803288, an r-squared value of 0.6089130, and a p-value of less than 0.01. These findings not only surpassed our expectations but also left us scratching our heads in disbelief at the sheer absurdity of the connection between these two seemingly unrelated variables.
Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot that encapsulates the shocking correlation between the number of biological technicians and kerosene usage. If an image is worth a thousand words, then this figure is akin to a visual riddle that beckons observers to ponder the whimsical dance of data points from the heart of South Dakota to the lands of Turkmenistan.
As we marveled at the strength of this unexpected correlation, we couldn't help but conjure up fanciful scenarios to explain the inexplicable bond between biological technicians and kerosene consumption. Perhaps the industrious activities of the technicians were inadvertently influencing the kerosene preferences in distant Turkmenistan, or maybe there existed an esoteric connection that eluded our understanding.
The robustness of the correlation coefficient and the compelling nature of the p-value have left us with more questions than answers, reminding us that statistical analysis is often akin to deciphering a convoluted joke – the punchline eludes us until we dare to contemplate the improbable.
This investigation challenges our conventional notions of causality and correlation, urging us to embrace the delightful chaos of statistical relationships. Who would have thought that the realm of biological technicians and kerosene consumption would converge in such a baffling and amusing manner? This peculiarity not only underscores the capriciousness of statistical patterns but also affirms that even the most incongruous connections are ripe for scholarly exploration.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has unraveled the perplexing connection between the number of biological technicians in South Dakota and kerosene usage in Turkmenistan. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.7803288 and p-value of less than 0.01 have left us in awe of the whimsical ways in which statistical relationships unfold. It's as if the data itself has a wicked sense of humor, playing a grand joke on unsuspecting researchers.

The sheer absurdity of this correlation has not only challenged our conventional understanding of causality but has also imbued our hearts with a newfound appreciation for the enigmatic dance of numbers. As we ponder the inexplicable bond between biological technicians and kerosene consumption, we can't help but marvel at the cosmic wit that seems to permeate the world of data.

Perhaps there exists a parallel universe where biological technicians moonlight as kerosene connoisseurs, or where kerosene fumes possess an uncanny allure for the denizens of Turkmenistan. Alas, we may never grasp the true essence of this arcane connection, but that's the beauty of statistical analysis – it's a perpetual source of amusement and perplexity.

As we bid adieu to this bewildering correlation, we can't help but chuckle at the notion that statistical analysis is the ultimate cosmic jest, teasing us with the improbable and delighting in our befuddlement. And so, dear readers, we assert with utmost confidence that no further research is needed in this area. For the Bio-Kero connection shall forever remain a whimsical enigma, a testament to the capricious nature of statistical relationships that never fail to astonish and amuse.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Bio-Kero Connections: Investigating the Correlation Between Biological Technicians in South Dakota and Kerosene Usage in Turkmenistan. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Cross-Cultural Biofuels Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Bio-Kero Connections: Investigating the Correlation Between Biological Technicians in South Dakota and Kerosene Usage in Turkmenistan. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Ecological and Technological Advancements (SETA)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Bio-Kero Connections: Investigating the Correlation Between Biological Technicians in South Dakota and Kerosene Usage in Turkmenistan with an abstract of This paper delves into the fascinating and unexpected connections between the number of biological technicians in South Dakota and the usage of kerosene in Turkmenistan. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team undertook a statistical analysis to tackle this peculiar relationship.
The correlation coefficient of 0.7803288 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2003 to 2021 provides robust evidence of the surprising association between these seemingly unrelated variables. While we initially expected to encounter unrelated data points, our findings took us by surprise and left us pondering the mysterious ways in which the world operates.
Our investigation led us to speculate on potential mechanisms underlying this unexpected correlation. Could it be that the activities of biological technicians in the heart of South Dakota are somehow influencing the consumption of kerosene thousands of miles away in Turkmenistan? Or could it be a mere coincidence that has eluded our understanding?
This study not only highlights the unexpected correlations that can emerge from statistical analysis but also serves as a reminder that even the most unlikely connections may hold valuable insights. As researchers, we must remain open to the possibility that the world operates in ways that defy conventional expectations, and that even the most obscure relationships are worthy of investigation.

ChatGPT:

biological technicians, South Dakota, kerosene, Turkmenistan, correlation, statistical analysis, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Energy Information Administration, correlation coefficient, data analysis, research paper

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of biological technicians in South Dakota
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of biological technicians in South Dakota
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of biological technicians in South Dakota

Kerosene used in Turkmenistan
Detailed data title: Volume of kerosene used consumed in Turkmenistan in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Kerosene used in Turkmenistan

Correlation r = 0.7803288 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6089130 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 60.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Kerosene used in Turkmenistan) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of biological technicians in South Dakota) over the 19 years from 2003 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 8.1E-5. 0.0000810346260987542000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.78 in 0.0081% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 12,340 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 18 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 18 because we have two variables measured over a period of 19 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.51, 0.91 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
The number of biological technicians in South Dakota (Biological Technicians)30190250280270300340360290300270280210210230270270270190
Kerosene used in Turkmenistan (Million Barrels/Day)02.956832.964932.753152.541373.168032.964933.812053.176712.956832.964933.17671333.25893.25893.25893.25893.2589




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([30,190,250,280,270,300,340,360,290,300,270,280,210,210,230,270,270,270,190,])
array_2 = np.array([0,2.95683,2.96493,2.75315,2.54137,3.16803,2.96493,3.81205,3.17671,2.95683,2.96493,3.17671,3,3,3.2589,3.2589,3.2589,3.2589,3.2589,])
array_1_name = "The number of biological technicians in South Dakota"
array_2_name = "Kerosene used in Turkmenistan"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for being the explorer we needed!


Correlation ID: 4031 · Black Variable ID: 14215 · Red Variable ID: 25021
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0