about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,022 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of food scientists and technologists in North Carolina and the second variable is Total Federal Construction Expenditure in the United States.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As more food scientists and technologists flocked to North Carolina, they inadvertently discovered a way to use biscuit dough as a sustainable and surprisingly sturdy building material. This led to a nationwide shift in construction practices, with federal projects now embracing the cost-effective and deliciously aromatic approach to building everything from government offices to infrastructure. The flaky yet structurally sound nature of these biscuit buildings has revolutionized the construction industry, creating a ripple effect of buttery innovation and giving a whole new meaning to the term "built to taste." It's a biscuit bonanza that's taken the nation by storm, proving once and for all that in the world of construction, it's not just about the dough – it's about the rising impact of food scientists on federal expenditure.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ Concept art ] A high-tech laboratory in North Carolina bustles with activity as a team of food scientists and technologists work on groundbreaking culinary inventions. The laboratory is sleek and modern, filled with state-of-the-art equipment and cutting-edge technology. The scientists are depicted surrounded by a stunning array of futuristic food creation tools and instruments, engaged in dynamic and compelling actions, emphasizing the creativity and innovation at the heart of their work. In the background, large construction projects are visible, illustrating the nationwide impact of their creations. The landscape is dotted with construction crews erecting new facilities and expanding existing ones to meet the surging demand ignited by the team's culinary innovations. This vibrant scene emphasizes the intersection of culinary science, technology, and the profound impact of their creations on a national scale. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of food scientists and technologists in North Carolina and Total Federal Construction Expenditure in the United States. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cyber folk a meme Concept art a meme Art nouveau
ChatGPT: Concept art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of food scientists and technologists in North Carolina and Total Federal Construction Expenditure in the United States, in the following situation: Because the food scientists and technologists in North Carolina cooked up some groundbreaking innovations that caused a stir in the food industry, leading to a rise in demand. This surge in demand resulted in a construction spree as businesses scrambled to expand their facilities and infrastructure to keep up with the food frenzy. It's a classic case of culinary creations paving the way for a construction carnival!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In North Carolina, a bustling hub of food science and technology, a team of innovative food scientists and technologists are seen in a state-of-the-art laboratory, creating groundbreaking culinary inventions. As word of their achievements spreads, the demand for their products skyrockets, prompting a flurry of construction activities across the United States. In the background, construction crews are seen erecting new facilities and expanding existing ones to keep up with the surging demand, a tangible result of the culinary creations that have sparked a construction carnival nationwide.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Concept art ] and depicting this scene: In North Carolina, a bustling hub of food science and technology, a team of innovative food scientists and technologists are seen in a state-of-the-art laboratory, creating groundbreaking culinary inventions. As word of their achievements spreads, the demand for their products skyrockets, prompting a flurry of construction activities across the United States. In the background, construction crews are seen erecting new facilities and expanding existing ones to keep up with the surging demand, a tangible result of the culinary creations that have sparked a construction carnival nationwide. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ Concept art ] A high-tech laboratory in North Carolina bustles with activity as a team of food scientists and technologists work on groundbreaking culinary inventions. The laboratory is sleek and modern, filled with state-of-the-art equipment and cutting-edge technology. The scientists are depicted surrounded by a stunning array of futuristic food creation tools and instruments, engaged in dynamic and compelling actions, emphasizing the creativity and innovation at the heart of their work. In the background, large construction projects are visible, illustrating the nationwide impact of their creations. The landscape is dotted with construction crews erecting new facilities and expanding existing ones to meet the surging demand ignited by the team's culinary innovations. This vibrant scene emphasizes the intersection of culinary science, technology, and the profound impact of their creations on a national scale.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in The number of food scientists and technologists in North Carolina caused Total Federal Construction Expenditure in the United States to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Analyzing the Palate and the Cranes: The Correlation between Food Scientists in North Carolina and Federal Construction Expenditure in the United States

The Journal of Gastronomic Economics and Infrastructure Development

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of food scientists and technologists in North Carolina and Total Federal Construction Expenditure in the United States. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Statista to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8444636 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Analyzing the Palate and the Cranes: The Correlation between Food Scientists in North Carolina and Federal Construction Expenditure in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intersection of gastronomic innovation and infrastructural development by investigating the relationship between the number of food scientists and technologists in North Carolina and the total federal construction expenditure in the United States. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Statista, our research team embarked on a statistical odyssey to unravel this enigmatic connection. The findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8444636 with a captivating p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning 2004 to 2022. As we untangled the web of data, it became evident that the presence of food scientists in the Tar Heel State exerts a substantial influence on federal construction spending, leading to a delectably high correlation. This unexpected culinary twist in the economic landscape serves as a flavorful reminder that the recipe for sustainable development may involve more than just concrete and steel.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of food scientists and technologists in North Carolina and Total Federal Construction Expenditure in the United States. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Analyzing the Palate and the Cranes: The Correlation between Food Scientists in North Carolina and Federal Construction Expenditure in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intersection of gastronomic innovation and infrastructural development by investigating the relationship between the number of food scientists and technologists in North Carolina and the total federal construction expenditure in the United States. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Statista, our research team embarked on a statistical odyssey to unravel this enigmatic connection. The findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8444636 with a captivating p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning 2004 to 2022. As we untangled the web of data, it became evident that the presence of food scientists in the Tar Heel State exerts a substantial influence on federal construction spending, leading to a delectably high correlation. This unexpected culinary twist in the economic landscape serves as a flavorful reminder that the recipe for sustainable development may involve more than just concrete and steel.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The convergence of culinary arts and construction economics may seem as unlikely as a sushi-flavored ice cream, but our research has unveiled a surprising connection between the number of food scientists and technologists in North Carolina and the total federal construction expenditure in the United States. These seemingly disparate fields coalesce in a statistical feast that promises to tantalize the taste buds of both gastronomes and infrastructure connoisseurs.

As the culinary scene in North Carolina continues to percolate with innovation, it is undeniable that the proliferation of food scientists and technologists has contributed to the state's flavorful repertoire of culinary creations. This study seeks to expand upon the traditional palate of economic research by investigating the nuanced relationship between the gastronomic prowess of North Carolina and the behemoth of federal construction expenditure.

While our initial foray into this delectable odyssey may appear to be a whimsical indulgence, the underlying statistical analyses have yielded compelling evidence that demands careful consideration. The sumptuous statistical correlation coefficient of 0.8444636, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01, beckons us to explore the intriguing interplay between the sizzle of culinary innovation and the concrete foundations of construction spending.

Fulfilling the appetite for empirical rigor, our research team embarked on a data-driven exploration, unraveling the complex tapestry of food science and federal construction expenditure. As we sliced through the dataset, an unexpected aroma wafted through the corridors of economic theory, hinting at a savory interdependence that surpasses the conventional boundaries of industry sectors.

The savory revelations presented within these pages invite readers to savor the unconventional flavors of economic analysis and to embrace the notion that the recipe for expansive growth may indeed include a dash of culinary expertise. Our investigation serves as a culinary adventure in the realm of economic research, offering a refreshing platter of empirical insights to invigorate the scholarly palate and stimulate discussions on the unconventional influences shaping our economic landscape.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of food scientists and technologists in North Carolina and Total Federal Construction Expenditure in the United States. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Analyzing the Palate and the Cranes: The Correlation between Food Scientists in North Carolina and Federal Construction Expenditure in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intersection of gastronomic innovation and infrastructural development by investigating the relationship between the number of food scientists and technologists in North Carolina and the total federal construction expenditure in the United States. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Statista, our research team embarked on a statistical odyssey to unravel this enigmatic connection. The findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8444636 with a captivating p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning 2004 to 2022. As we untangled the web of data, it became evident that the presence of food scientists in the Tar Heel State exerts a substantial influence on federal construction spending, leading to a delectably high correlation. This unexpected culinary twist in the economic landscape serves as a flavorful reminder that the recipe for sustainable development may involve more than just concrete and steel.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The convergence of culinary arts and construction economics may seem as unlikely as a sushi-flavored ice cream, but our research has unveiled a surprising connection between the number of food scientists and technologists in North Carolina and the total federal construction expenditure in the United States. These seemingly disparate fields coalesce in a statistical feast that promises to tantalize the taste buds of both gastronomes and infrastructure connoisseurs.
As the culinary scene in North Carolina continues to percolate with innovation, it is undeniable that the proliferation of food scientists and technologists has contributed to the state's flavorful repertoire of culinary creations. This study seeks to expand upon the traditional palate of economic research by investigating the nuanced relationship between the gastronomic prowess of North Carolina and the behemoth of federal construction expenditure.
While our initial foray into this delectable odyssey may appear to be a whimsical indulgence, the underlying statistical analyses have yielded compelling evidence that demands careful consideration. The sumptuous statistical correlation coefficient of 0.8444636, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01, beckons us to explore the intriguing interplay between the sizzle of culinary innovation and the concrete foundations of construction spending.
Fulfilling the appetite for empirical rigor, our research team embarked on a data-driven exploration, unraveling the complex tapestry of food science and federal construction expenditure. As we sliced through the dataset, an unexpected aroma wafted through the corridors of economic theory, hinting at a savory interdependence that surpasses the conventional boundaries of industry sectors.
The savory revelations presented within these pages invite readers to savor the unconventional flavors of economic analysis and to embrace the notion that the recipe for expansive growth may indeed include a dash of culinary expertise. Our investigation serves as a culinary adventure in the realm of economic research, offering a refreshing platter of empirical insights to invigorate the scholarly palate and stimulate discussions on the unconventional influences shaping our economic landscape.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The scholarly pursuit of understanding the correlation between gastronomic innovation and infrastructural development has led researchers to explore a diverse array of perspectives, ranging from the statistical analyses of economic data to the anecdotal musings of social media. In "The Culinary Paradox: Unraveling the Mysteries of Economically Flavorful Creations," Smith et al. delve into the enigmatic connection between food science and economic dynamics, laying the groundwork for our current investigation. Their insights provide a robust foundation for our exploration, although they overlooked the potential impact of tamales on infrastructure spending.

Doe and Jones, in "Feasts for Thought: Culinary Arts as a Catalyst for Economic Growth," offer a comprehensive analysis of the cultural and economic significance of gastronomy. The authors discern a significant correlation between culinary innovation and regional economic development, emphasizing the role of food scientists in shaping economic landscapes. However, their oversight of the potential influence of cheeseburger construction on federal expenditure in the United States leaves a significant knowledge gap yet to be explored.

Turning to non-fiction works related to the subject matter, "Food Chemistry and Economic Alchemy" by Culinary Chemist, and "Concrete Foundations: A Culinary Perspective" by Architectural Chef, shed light on the interdisciplinary nature of the culinary and construction domains. These works provide valuable insights into the potential interplay between food science and infrastructure development, albeit failing to recognize the impact of pastry architecture on federal construction outlays.

In the fictional realm, works such as "The Pizza Equation: Unveiling the Mysteries of Economic Sauciness" by Novel Nomad and "The Muffin Matrix: A Tale of Construction and Confectionery" by Fictional Engineer offer imaginative narratives that weave gastronomy and construction into vibrant tapestries of storytelling. While these works serve as entertaining diversions, they fall short of supplying empirical evidence for our analytical pursuits, leaving us hungry for substantial empirical findings.

In a surprising turn of events, social media posts such as "Construction Crews' Secret Recipes for Economic Success" and "Food Science: The Blueprint for Fiscal Prosperity" on Twitter have begun to shed light on the public discourse surrounding the intersection of food science and federal construction expenditure. While these informal sources lack the rigor of academic scholarship, they present intriguing perspectives that mirror the fusion of humor and inquiry we are seeking in our investigation.

As we navigate through this eclectic assortment of literature, it becomes apparent that the nexus between food scientists and technologists in North Carolina and the total federal construction expenditure in the United States is a complex and tantalizing subject that demands further exploration. The road to understanding this enigmatic correlation is peppered with both scholarly analyses and whimsical musings, reflecting the dynamic essence of the interplay between culinary innovation and infrastructure development.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of food scientists and technologists in North Carolina and Total Federal Construction Expenditure in the United States. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Statista . You used data from 2004 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Analyzing the Palate and the Cranes: The Correlation between Food Scientists in North Carolina and Federal Construction Expenditure in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intersection of gastronomic innovation and infrastructural development by investigating the relationship between the number of food scientists and technologists in North Carolina and the total federal construction expenditure in the United States. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Statista, our research team embarked on a statistical odyssey to unravel this enigmatic connection. The findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8444636 with a captivating p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning 2004 to 2022. As we untangled the web of data, it became evident that the presence of food scientists in the Tar Heel State exerts a substantial influence on federal construction spending, leading to a delectably high correlation. This unexpected culinary twist in the economic landscape serves as a flavorful reminder that the recipe for sustainable development may involve more than just concrete and steel.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The convergence of culinary arts and construction economics may seem as unlikely as a sushi-flavored ice cream, but our research has unveiled a surprising connection between the number of food scientists and technologists in North Carolina and the total federal construction expenditure in the United States. These seemingly disparate fields coalesce in a statistical feast that promises to tantalize the taste buds of both gastronomes and infrastructure connoisseurs.
As the culinary scene in North Carolina continues to percolate with innovation, it is undeniable that the proliferation of food scientists and technologists has contributed to the state's flavorful repertoire of culinary creations. This study seeks to expand upon the traditional palate of economic research by investigating the nuanced relationship between the gastronomic prowess of North Carolina and the behemoth of federal construction expenditure.
While our initial foray into this delectable odyssey may appear to be a whimsical indulgence, the underlying statistical analyses have yielded compelling evidence that demands careful consideration. The sumptuous statistical correlation coefficient of 0.8444636, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01, beckons us to explore the intriguing interplay between the sizzle of culinary innovation and the concrete foundations of construction spending.
Fulfilling the appetite for empirical rigor, our research team embarked on a data-driven exploration, unraveling the complex tapestry of food science and federal construction expenditure. As we sliced through the dataset, an unexpected aroma wafted through the corridors of economic theory, hinting at a savory interdependence that surpasses the conventional boundaries of industry sectors.
The savory revelations presented within these pages invite readers to savor the unconventional flavors of economic analysis and to embrace the notion that the recipe for expansive growth may indeed include a dash of culinary expertise. Our investigation serves as a culinary adventure in the realm of economic research, offering a refreshing platter of empirical insights to invigorate the scholarly palate and stimulate discussions on the unconventional influences shaping our economic landscape.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unearth the hidden connections between the prowess of food scientists in North Carolina and the behemoth of federal construction expenditure, a multidimensional approach was crafted, blending the flavors of statistical analysis, data mining, and economic modeling – not unlike concocting a complex recipe that brings out the harmonious interplay of diverse ingredients.

Data on the number of food scientists and technologists in North Carolina were procured from the esteemed Bureau of Labor Statistics. Our research team sifted through the digital cornucopia of information from 2004 to 2022, carefully selecting the ripest and most relevant data points to weave a comprehensive narrative of the culinary landscape within the state.

Meanwhile, to capture the grand scale of federal construction expenditure in the United States, data from Statista was utilized as the cornerstone ingredient. Much like a chef meticulously curating the finest ingredients for a culinary masterpiece, our researchers harmonized data spanning nearly two decades, ensuring that the temporal depth of the analysis would encapsulate the evolving palates and cranes of the economic landscape.

The statistical feast commenced with the calculation of Pearson's correlation coefficient, stirring the data to reveal the hidden relationships between the delicacies of food science and the robustness of federal construction investment. This quantitative exploration was complemented by a meticulous examination of p-values, savoring the significance of our findings as one would relish the unexpected burst of flavors in a dish.

Simultaneously, a regression analysis was employed as the culinary canvas upon which the association between food scientists in North Carolina and federal construction expenditure was painted. This methodological artistry allowed for the identification of any nuanced patterns or trendlines interwoven within the fabric of our data, enriching the research with a depth and complexity akin to a finely aged wine.

Our model also integrated control variables, capturing the medley of external factors that may influence both the gourmet expertise of North Carolina and the monumental construction investments on the federal stage. Through an assortment of sensitivity analyses, we sought to adjust the seasoning of our statistical concoction, ensuring that the flavors of our findings would resonate with the diversity of economic climates and urban development dynamics.

Moreover, to infuse a dash of qualitative insight into our study, a series of interviews with food scientists, industry experts, and construction professionals were conducted. These discussions provided a tapestry of firsthand perspectives, adding a nuanced flavor profile to our research that cannot be captured through quantitative data alone.

In summary, the methodology embraced in this study was a vibrant amalgamation of quantitative and qualitative techniques, cultivated with a keen awareness of the complexities inherent in unraveling the enigmatic ties between the culinary arts and construction economics. This methodological feast beckons readers to indulge in the succulent blend of data-driven analyses and expert insights, offering a confluence of flavors that transcends the traditional boundaries of scholarly research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of food scientists and technologists in North Carolina and Total Federal Construction Expenditure in the United States. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Statista .

For the time period 2004 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8444636, r-squared of 0.7131187, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Analyzing the Palate and the Cranes: The Correlation between Food Scientists in North Carolina and Federal Construction Expenditure in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intersection of gastronomic innovation and infrastructural development by investigating the relationship between the number of food scientists and technologists in North Carolina and the total federal construction expenditure in the United States. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Statista, our research team embarked on a statistical odyssey to unravel this enigmatic connection. The findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8444636 with a captivating p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning 2004 to 2022. As we untangled the web of data, it became evident that the presence of food scientists in the Tar Heel State exerts a substantial influence on federal construction spending, leading to a delectably high correlation. This unexpected culinary twist in the economic landscape serves as a flavorful reminder that the recipe for sustainable development may involve more than just concrete and steel.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The convergence of culinary arts and construction economics may seem as unlikely as a sushi-flavored ice cream, but our research has unveiled a surprising connection between the number of food scientists and technologists in North Carolina and the total federal construction expenditure in the United States. These seemingly disparate fields coalesce in a statistical feast that promises to tantalize the taste buds of both gastronomes and infrastructure connoisseurs.
As the culinary scene in North Carolina continues to percolate with innovation, it is undeniable that the proliferation of food scientists and technologists has contributed to the state's flavorful repertoire of culinary creations. This study seeks to expand upon the traditional palate of economic research by investigating the nuanced relationship between the gastronomic prowess of North Carolina and the behemoth of federal construction expenditure.
While our initial foray into this delectable odyssey may appear to be a whimsical indulgence, the underlying statistical analyses have yielded compelling evidence that demands careful consideration. The sumptuous statistical correlation coefficient of 0.8444636, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01, beckons us to explore the intriguing interplay between the sizzle of culinary innovation and the concrete foundations of construction spending.
Fulfilling the appetite for empirical rigor, our research team embarked on a data-driven exploration, unraveling the complex tapestry of food science and federal construction expenditure. As we sliced through the dataset, an unexpected aroma wafted through the corridors of economic theory, hinting at a savory interdependence that surpasses the conventional boundaries of industry sectors.
The savory revelations presented within these pages invite readers to savor the unconventional flavors of economic analysis and to embrace the notion that the recipe for expansive growth may indeed include a dash of culinary expertise. Our investigation serves as a culinary adventure in the realm of economic research, offering a refreshing platter of empirical insights to invigorate the scholarly palate and stimulate discussions on the unconventional influences shaping our economic landscape.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Upon conducting the analysis, our research team uncovered a remarkably strong correlation between the number of food scientists and technologists in North Carolina and the total federal construction expenditure in the United States. The correlation coefficient, computed to be 0.8444636, exceeded our initial expectations and served as a flavorful reminder that sometimes, the most unexpected pairings yield the most intriguing results.

The relationship between these two apparently unrelated variables was further underscored by an r-squared value of 0.7131187, indicating that a substantial portion of the variability in federal construction expenditure can be elucidated by the number of food scientists and technologists nestled in the Tar Heel State. This statistical insight has left us with a taste of academic satisfaction that is as satisfying as a well-prepared dish after a laborious cooking process.

The p-value of less than 0.01 lent strong support to the observed correlation, illuminating the robustness of the relationship and leaving us with a sense of statistical satiation akin to the fulfillment one experiences after enjoying a hearty meal.

Furthermore, as evidenced by the provided scatterplot (Fig. 1), the visual representation of the data vividly illustrates the substantial alignment between the number of food scientists in North Carolina and the total federal construction expenditure. The points on the plot seemed to arrange themselves in the culinary equivalent of a harmonious flavor pairing, showcasing a delightful synchronicity that paralleled our statistical findings – a reminder that sometimes, the most unexpected pairings yield the most compelling results.

These empirical findings beckon us to contemplate the nuanced interplay between gastronomic expertise and infrastructural development and encourage a broader recognition of the multifaceted influences that shape our economic landscape.

In conclusion, this delectable venture into the intertwining realms of culinary expertise and federal construction expenditure has left us with a newfound appreciation for the unanticipated connections that permeate our economic fabric. Our results serve as a savory reminder that in the intricate recipe of economic growth, the infusion of unexpected flavors may hold the key to a more flavorful and sustainable future.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of food scientists and technologists in North Carolina and Total Federal Construction Expenditure in the United States. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Analyzing the Palate and the Cranes: The Correlation between Food Scientists in North Carolina and Federal Construction Expenditure in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intersection of gastronomic innovation and infrastructural development by investigating the relationship between the number of food scientists and technologists in North Carolina and the total federal construction expenditure in the United States. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Statista, our research team embarked on a statistical odyssey to unravel this enigmatic connection. The findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8444636 with a captivating p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning 2004 to 2022. As we untangled the web of data, it became evident that the presence of food scientists in the Tar Heel State exerts a substantial influence on federal construction spending, leading to a delectably high correlation. This unexpected culinary twist in the economic landscape serves as a flavorful reminder that the recipe for sustainable development may involve more than just concrete and steel.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The scholarly pursuit of understanding the correlation between gastronomic innovation and infrastructural development has led researchers to explore a diverse array of perspectives, ranging from the statistical analyses of economic data to the anecdotal musings of social media. In "The Culinary Paradox: Unraveling the Mysteries of Economically Flavorful Creations," Smith et al. delve into the enigmatic connection between food science and economic dynamics, laying the groundwork for our current investigation. Their insights provide a robust foundation for our exploration, although they overlooked the potential impact of tamales on infrastructure spending.
Doe and Jones, in "Feasts for Thought: Culinary Arts as a Catalyst for Economic Growth," offer a comprehensive analysis of the cultural and economic significance of gastronomy. The authors discern a significant correlation between culinary innovation and regional economic development, emphasizing the role of food scientists in shaping economic landscapes. However, their oversight of the potential influence of cheeseburger construction on federal expenditure in the United States leaves a significant knowledge gap yet to be explored.
Turning to non-fiction works related to the subject matter, "Food Chemistry and Economic Alchemy" by Culinary Chemist, and "Concrete Foundations: A Culinary Perspective" by Architectural Chef, shed light on the interdisciplinary nature of the culinary and construction domains. These works provide valuable insights into the potential interplay between food science and infrastructure development, albeit failing to recognize the impact of pastry architecture on federal construction outlays.
In the fictional realm, works such as "The Pizza Equation: Unveiling the Mysteries of Economic Sauciness" by Novel Nomad and "The Muffin Matrix: A Tale of Construction and Confectionery" by Fictional Engineer offer imaginative narratives that weave gastronomy and construction into vibrant tapestries of storytelling. While these works serve as entertaining diversions, they fall short of supplying empirical evidence for our analytical pursuits, leaving us hungry for substantial empirical findings.
In a surprising turn of events, social media posts such as "Construction Crews' Secret Recipes for Economic Success" and "Food Science: The Blueprint for Fiscal Prosperity" on Twitter have begun to shed light on the public discourse surrounding the intersection of food science and federal construction expenditure. While these informal sources lack the rigor of academic scholarship, they present intriguing perspectives that mirror the fusion of humor and inquiry we are seeking in our investigation.
As we navigate through this eclectic assortment of literature, it becomes apparent that the nexus between food scientists and technologists in North Carolina and the total federal construction expenditure in the United States is a complex and tantalizing subject that demands further exploration. The road to understanding this enigmatic correlation is peppered with both scholarly analyses and whimsical musings, reflecting the dynamic essence of the interplay between culinary innovation and infrastructure development.

[[RESULTS]]
Upon conducting the analysis, our research team uncovered a remarkably strong correlation between the number of food scientists and technologists in North Carolina and the total federal construction expenditure in the United States. The correlation coefficient, computed to be 0.8444636, exceeded our initial expectations and served as a flavorful reminder that sometimes, the most unexpected pairings yield the most intriguing results.
The relationship between these two apparently unrelated variables was further underscored by an r-squared value of 0.7131187, indicating that a substantial portion of the variability in federal construction expenditure can be elucidated by the number of food scientists and technologists nestled in the Tar Heel State. This statistical insight has left us with a taste of academic satisfaction that is as satisfying as a well-prepared dish after a laborious cooking process.
The p-value of less than 0.01 lent strong support to the observed correlation, illuminating the robustness of the relationship and leaving us with a sense of statistical satiation akin to the fulfillment one experiences after enjoying a hearty meal.
Furthermore, as evidenced by the provided scatterplot (Fig. 1), the visual representation of the data vividly illustrates the substantial alignment between the number of food scientists in North Carolina and the total federal construction expenditure. The points on the plot seemed to arrange themselves in the culinary equivalent of a harmonious flavor pairing, showcasing a delightful synchronicity that paralleled our statistical findings – a reminder that sometimes, the most unexpected pairings yield the most compelling results.
These empirical findings beckon us to contemplate the nuanced interplay between gastronomic expertise and infrastructural development and encourage a broader recognition of the multifaceted influences that shape our economic landscape.
In conclusion, this delectable venture into the intertwining realms of culinary expertise and federal construction expenditure has left us with a newfound appreciation for the unanticipated connections that permeate our economic fabric. Our results serve as a savory reminder that in the intricate recipe of economic growth, the infusion of unexpected flavors may hold the key to a more flavorful and sustainable future.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our investigation into the intricate relationship between food scientists in North Carolina and federal construction expenditure in the United States has served up a tantalizing array of findings, revealing a surprisingly robust connection between these seemingly disparate domains. The unearthing of a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8444636 and a delectable p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2004 to 2022 not only endorses prior scholarly expositions but also opens a delightful avenue for further exploration.

Our analysis, like a well-crafted recipe, has blended the ingredients of statistical rigor and empirical data to unveil the savory bond between gastronomic ingenuity and infrastructural investment. The literature review, although seasoned with a dash of whimsy, guided us through the diverse perspectives surrounding this nexus. We were particularly inspired by the oversight of the potential impact of tamales on infrastructure spending in "The Culinary Paradox." Our findings have inadvertently shed light on the unrecognized influence of this culinary delight on the economic terrain, proving that even the most unexpected flavors can spice up the economic playbook.

Similarly, the scholarly oversight of the potential impact of cheeseburger construction on federal expenditure, as highlighted in "Feasts for Thought," prompted us to delve deeper into the unexplored territory of culinary creation's resonance with economic development. Our results have tangibly demonstrated the substantial influence of cheeseburger construction on federal outlays, a reminder that in the intricate dance of economic dynamics, even the humble cheeseburger can play a meaty role in shaping our financial landscape.

The scholarly and whimsical literature alike painted a vivid canvas of culinary construction, mirroring the dynamic essence of our investigation. These diverse perspectives allowed us to appreciate the multifaceted influences that converge in our economic fabric, reaffirming the eclectic nature of our research.

The unexpected pairing of food science and federal construction expenditure, akin to an unlikely fusion dish, underscores the importance of considering unorthodox relationships in advancing our understanding of economic dynamics. The statistical feast we have uncovered with our robust correlation coefficient and p-value serves as a flavorful nod to the potential impact of culinary expertise on infrastructural spending, reminding us that sometimes the most unexpected pairings yield the most flavorful insights.

In essence, our investigation blends the flavors of gastronomic innovation with the rigors of economic analysis, serving up a newfound appreciation for the unforeseen connections that pepper our economic landscape. Our results compel us to savor the nuanced interplay between culinary expertise and infrastructural development and beckon us to recognize the intricate recipe that drives sustainable economic growth.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of food scientists and technologists in North Carolina and Total Federal Construction Expenditure in the United States. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Analyzing the Palate and the Cranes: The Correlation between Food Scientists in North Carolina and Federal Construction Expenditure in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intersection of gastronomic innovation and infrastructural development by investigating the relationship between the number of food scientists and technologists in North Carolina and the total federal construction expenditure in the United States. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Statista, our research team embarked on a statistical odyssey to unravel this enigmatic connection. The findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8444636 with a captivating p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning 2004 to 2022. As we untangled the web of data, it became evident that the presence of food scientists in the Tar Heel State exerts a substantial influence on federal construction spending, leading to a delectably high correlation. This unexpected culinary twist in the economic landscape serves as a flavorful reminder that the recipe for sustainable development may involve more than just concrete and steel.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The convergence of culinary arts and construction economics may seem as unlikely as a sushi-flavored ice cream, but our research has unveiled a surprising connection between the number of food scientists and technologists in North Carolina and the total federal construction expenditure in the United States. These seemingly disparate fields coalesce in a statistical feast that promises to tantalize the taste buds of both gastronomes and infrastructure connoisseurs.
As the culinary scene in North Carolina continues to percolate with innovation, it is undeniable that the proliferation of food scientists and technologists has contributed to the state's flavorful repertoire of culinary creations. This study seeks to expand upon the traditional palate of economic research by investigating the nuanced relationship between the gastronomic prowess of North Carolina and the behemoth of federal construction expenditure.
While our initial foray into this delectable odyssey may appear to be a whimsical indulgence, the underlying statistical analyses have yielded compelling evidence that demands careful consideration. The sumptuous statistical correlation coefficient of 0.8444636, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01, beckons us to explore the intriguing interplay between the sizzle of culinary innovation and the concrete foundations of construction spending.
Fulfilling the appetite for empirical rigor, our research team embarked on a data-driven exploration, unraveling the complex tapestry of food science and federal construction expenditure. As we sliced through the dataset, an unexpected aroma wafted through the corridors of economic theory, hinting at a savory interdependence that surpasses the conventional boundaries of industry sectors.
The savory revelations presented within these pages invite readers to savor the unconventional flavors of economic analysis and to embrace the notion that the recipe for expansive growth may indeed include a dash of culinary expertise. Our investigation serves as a culinary adventure in the realm of economic research, offering a refreshing platter of empirical insights to invigorate the scholarly palate and stimulate discussions on the unconventional influences shaping our economic landscape.

[[RESULTS]]
Upon conducting the analysis, our research team uncovered a remarkably strong correlation between the number of food scientists and technologists in North Carolina and the total federal construction expenditure in the United States. The correlation coefficient, computed to be 0.8444636, exceeded our initial expectations and served as a flavorful reminder that sometimes, the most unexpected pairings yield the most intriguing results.
The relationship between these two apparently unrelated variables was further underscored by an r-squared value of 0.7131187, indicating that a substantial portion of the variability in federal construction expenditure can be elucidated by the number of food scientists and technologists nestled in the Tar Heel State. This statistical insight has left us with a taste of academic satisfaction that is as satisfying as a well-prepared dish after a laborious cooking process.
The p-value of less than 0.01 lent strong support to the observed correlation, illuminating the robustness of the relationship and leaving us with a sense of statistical satiation akin to the fulfillment one experiences after enjoying a hearty meal.
Furthermore, as evidenced by the provided scatterplot (Fig. 1), the visual representation of the data vividly illustrates the substantial alignment between the number of food scientists in North Carolina and the total federal construction expenditure. The points on the plot seemed to arrange themselves in the culinary equivalent of a harmonious flavor pairing, showcasing a delightful synchronicity that paralleled our statistical findings – a reminder that sometimes, the most unexpected pairings yield the most compelling results.
These empirical findings beckon us to contemplate the nuanced interplay between gastronomic expertise and infrastructural development and encourage a broader recognition of the multifaceted influences that shape our economic landscape.
In conclusion, this delectable venture into the intertwining realms of culinary expertise and federal construction expenditure has left us with a newfound appreciation for the unanticipated connections that permeate our economic fabric. Our results serve as a savory reminder that in the intricate recipe of economic growth, the infusion of unexpected flavors may hold the key to a more flavorful and sustainable future.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has presented a statistically robust and flavorsome connection between the number of food scientists and technologists in North Carolina and the total federal construction expenditure in the United States. The tasteful correlation coefficient of 0.8444636, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01, serves as a delectable reminder that sometimes, the most unexpected ingredients yield the most delightful results. The r-squared value of 0.7131187 further emphasizes the substantial influence of culinary expertise on the variability in federal construction expenditure, leaving us with a sense of empirical satisfaction comparable to savoring a well-prepared dish. The scatterplot not only visually encapsulates this harmonious pairing but also serves as a gentle reminder that amid the complexities of economic analysis, unexpected pairings can yield the most palatable outcomes.

This research has not only expanded the palate of economic analysis but has also seasoned our understanding of the intricate interplay between gastronomic innovation and infrastructural development. As we put a lid on this culinary adventure in the realm of economic research, we are convinced that the recipe for sustainable economic growth may indeed include a dash of culinary expertise. The implications of our findings not only tease the scholarly palate but also beckon us to explore the multifaceted influences that shape our economic landscape. We hereby assert that no further research in this area is necessary; our findings have seasoned this field enough for now.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Analyzing the Palate and the Cranes: The Correlation between Food Scientists in North Carolina and Federal Construction Expenditure in the United States. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Gastronomic Economics and Infrastructure Development


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Analyzing the Palate and the Cranes: The Correlation between Food Scientists in North Carolina and Federal Construction Expenditure in the United States. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Gastronomic Advancement and Infrastructure Analysis (SGAIA)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Analyzing the Palate and the Cranes: The Correlation between Food Scientists in North Carolina and Federal Construction Expenditure in the United States with an abstract of This study delves into the intersection of gastronomic innovation and infrastructural development by investigating the relationship between the number of food scientists and technologists in North Carolina and the total federal construction expenditure in the United States. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Statista, our research team embarked on a statistical odyssey to unravel this enigmatic connection. The findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8444636 with a captivating p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning 2004 to 2022. As we untangled the web of data, it became evident that the presence of food scientists in the Tar Heel State exerts a substantial influence on federal construction spending, leading to a delectably high correlation. This unexpected culinary twist in the economic landscape serves as a flavorful reminder that the recipe for sustainable development may involve more than just concrete and steel.

ChatGPT:

food scientists, technologists, North Carolina, federal construction expenditure, United States, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Statista, statistical analysis, correlation coefficient, p-value, infrastructure development, sustainable development

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of food scientists and technologists in North Carolina
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of food scientists and technologists in North Carolina
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of food scientists and technologists in North Carolina

Total Federal Construction Expenditure in the United States
Source: Statista
See what else correlates with Total Federal Construction Expenditure in the United States

Correlation r = 0.8444636 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7131187 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 71.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Total Federal Construction Expenditure in the United States) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of food scientists and technologists in North Carolina) over the 19 years from 2004 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 5.4E-6. 0.0000054378049524237215000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.84 in 0.00054% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 183,898 random variables You don't actually need 183 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 18 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 18 because we have two variables measured over a period of 19 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.63, 0.94 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
The number of food scientists and technologists in North Carolina (Laborers)8090100100350360390310310280200230200170160180330360360
Total Federal Construction Expenditure in the United States (Dollars)18340000000000173000000000001756000000000020580000000000237300000000002844000000000031130000000000316500000000002693000000000023730000000000224200000000002255000000000022240000000000212700000000002198000000000026280000000000289600000000002484000000000027140000000000




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([80,90,100,100,350,360,390,310,310,280,200,230,200,170,160,180,330,360,360,])
array_2 = np.array([18340000000000,17300000000000,17560000000000,20580000000000,23730000000000,28440000000000,31130000000000,31650000000000,26930000000000,23730000000000,22420000000000,22550000000000,22240000000000,21270000000000,21980000000000,26280000000000,28960000000000,24840000000000,27140000000000,])
array_1_name = "The number of food scientists and technologists in North Carolina"
array_2_name = "Total Federal Construction Expenditure in the United States"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your dedication to rating warms my heart!


Correlation ID: 4022 · Black Variable ID: 17260 · Red Variable ID: 215
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0