about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,012 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Rachel and the second variable is Arson in Connecticut.  The chart goes from 1985 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Fewer Rachels meant fewer fiery mixtapes dropping, leading to a decrease in ignitable mixtape-related incidents in Connecticut. You could say the Rachels were really setting the charts on fire, but thankfully, they've toned down their hot streak.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a serene and quaint Connecticut town. In the foreground, display a bulletin board featuring a line graph depicting the declining popularity of the name Rachel. Beside the graph, depict a small group of individuals named Rachel, enjoying the peaceful atmosphere. In the background, illustrate a chart showing a decreasing trend in arson incidents, with a group of smiling firefighters acknowledging the positive change. Ensure the scene exudes a sense of tranquility and diminishing fire-related incidents. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Rachel and Arson in Connecticut. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: a Polaroid photo An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie Cyber folk A TIME magazine cover image Macabre
ChatGPT: A TIME magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Rachel and Arson in Connecticut, in the following situation: Because as the popularity of the name Rachel decreased, there were fewer people left to "set the world on fire" in Connecticut. This led to a decrease in arson incidents as the potential arsonists dwindled, leaving the state a little less "hot" in terms of fire-related crimes.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a peaceful Connecticut town, a line graph showing the decreasing popularity of the name Rachel is hung on a bulletin board. A smaller number of people named Rachel are depicted near the graph, some enjoying a gentle breeze. In the background, a group of firefighters smile and nod to each other as they notice a decreasing trend in arson incidents on a chart next to the popularity graph. The town remains tranquil, with fewer fire-related incidents.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A TIME magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In a peaceful Connecticut town, a line graph showing the decreasing popularity of the name Rachel is hung on a bulletin board. A smaller number of people named Rachel are depicted near the graph, some enjoying a gentle breeze. In the background, a group of firefighters smile and nod to each other as they notice a decreasing trend in arson incidents on a chart next to the popularity graph. The town remains tranquil, with fewer fire-related incidents. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a serene and quaint Connecticut town. In the foreground, display a bulletin board featuring a line graph depicting the declining popularity of the name Rachel. Beside the graph, depict a small group of individuals named Rachel, enjoying the peaceful atmosphere. In the background, illustrate a chart showing a decreasing trend in arson incidents, with a group of smiling firefighters acknowledging the positive change. Ensure the scene exudes a sense of tranquility and diminishing fire-related incidents.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Popularity of the first name Rachel caused Arson in Connecticut to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Playing with Fire: The Rachel Arson Correlation Conundrum

The Journal of Unpredictable Investigations

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Rachel and Arson in Connecticut. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9754469 and p < 0.01 for 1985 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Playing with Fire: The Rachel Arson Correlation Conundrum

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the curious case of the correlation between the popularity of the first name Rachel and the incidence of arson in Connecticut. Using data from the US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team conducted a thorough analysis covering the years 1985 to 2022. Surprisingly, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9754469 and p < 0.01, indicating a remarkably strong association between the two variables. While it may seem like a mere coincidence, this study sheds light on the peculiar relationship between the choice of moniker and propensity for pyromania in the Nutmeg State. We offer a lighthearted yet thought-provoking discussion on the potential psychological and sociological factors influencing this curious correlation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Rachel and Arson in Connecticut. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Playing with Fire: The Rachel Arson Correlation Conundrum

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the curious case of the correlation between the popularity of the first name Rachel and the incidence of arson in Connecticut. Using data from the US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team conducted a thorough analysis covering the years 1985 to 2022. Surprisingly, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9754469 and p < 0.01, indicating a remarkably strong association between the two variables. While it may seem like a mere coincidence, this study sheds light on the peculiar relationship between the choice of moniker and propensity for pyromania in the Nutmeg State. We offer a lighthearted yet thought-provoking discussion on the potential psychological and sociological factors influencing this curious correlation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The link between the popularity of baby names and various societal phenomena has been a topic of both fascination and amusement for researchers and laypeople alike. From the curious case of the "Jennifer Aniston Effect" on hair care product sales to the "Madison Avenue Influence" on advertising, the correlation between nomenclature and real-world outcomes continues to captivate the curious minds of scholars and statisticians.

In this paper, we turn our attention to the intriguing relationship between the prevalence of the first name Rachel and incidents of arson in the state of Connecticut. This unlikely pairing may seem as incongruous as mixing fire and ice, but our investigation aims to unravel the enigma and shed light on this peculiarity.

Before delving into our findings, it is crucial to acknowledge the initially implausible nature of this research topic. The association between a seemingly innocuous moniker and the criminal act of arson may appear far-fetched, bordering on preposterous. However, as the saying goes, "Where there's smoke, there's fire," and our initial analysis has ignited our curiosity to explore this uncanny correlation further.

With a mix of statistical rigour and a healthy dose of good-humored curiosity, we are prepared to unravel the mystery of the Rachel Arson Correlation Conundrum. So, let us embark on this whimsical yet scholarly journey into the world of nomenclature and nefarious fire-related behavior.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Rachel and Arson in Connecticut. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Playing with Fire: The Rachel Arson Correlation Conundrum

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the curious case of the correlation between the popularity of the first name Rachel and the incidence of arson in Connecticut. Using data from the US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team conducted a thorough analysis covering the years 1985 to 2022. Surprisingly, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9754469 and p < 0.01, indicating a remarkably strong association between the two variables. While it may seem like a mere coincidence, this study sheds light on the peculiar relationship between the choice of moniker and propensity for pyromania in the Nutmeg State. We offer a lighthearted yet thought-provoking discussion on the potential psychological and sociological factors influencing this curious correlation.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The link between the popularity of baby names and various societal phenomena has been a topic of both fascination and amusement for researchers and laypeople alike. From the curious case of the "Jennifer Aniston Effect" on hair care product sales to the "Madison Avenue Influence" on advertising, the correlation between nomenclature and real-world outcomes continues to captivate the curious minds of scholars and statisticians.
In this paper, we turn our attention to the intriguing relationship between the prevalence of the first name Rachel and incidents of arson in the state of Connecticut. This unlikely pairing may seem as incongruous as mixing fire and ice, but our investigation aims to unravel the enigma and shed light on this peculiarity.
Before delving into our findings, it is crucial to acknowledge the initially implausible nature of this research topic. The association between a seemingly innocuous moniker and the criminal act of arson may appear far-fetched, bordering on preposterous. However, as the saying goes, "Where there's smoke, there's fire," and our initial analysis has ignited our curiosity to explore this uncanny correlation further.
With a mix of statistical rigour and a healthy dose of good-humored curiosity, we are prepared to unravel the mystery of the Rachel Arson Correlation Conundrum. So, let us embark on this whimsical yet scholarly journey into the world of nomenclature and nefarious fire-related behavior.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The potential linkage between the popularity of the first name Rachel and the occurrence of arson in Connecticut has elicited a mix of incredulity and intrigue within academic circles. Within the field of nomenclature-related phenomena, Smith et al. (2018) propound the theory of "Name-Claim Fame," asserting that individuals with certain popular names may experience an unconscious predisposition to engage in activities that align with societal perceptions of the characteristics associated with said moniker. Meanwhile, Doe's (2016) study, "Moniker Monikers: The Psychology of Names," delves into the notion of nominative determinism, wherein individuals subconsciously gravitate towards activities or behaviors that are consonant with the sounds or meanings of their given names.

However, as we move beyond the realm of straightforward scholarly insights, we encounter a plethora of tangentially related non-fiction literature. Titles such as "The Arsonist's Guide to Writers' Homes in New England" by Brock Clarke and "Playing with Fire: The 1968 Election and the Transformation of American Politics" by Lawrence O'Donnell intriguingly explore fire-related themes, yet veer away from the specific issue at hand. On the other hand, the enchanting world of fiction offers glimpses of relevance in works such as "The Girl on the Train" by Paula Hawkins and "Girl with a Pearl Earring" by Tracy Chevalier, where narratives of varying degrees of combustibility and intrigue unfold, albeit with no direct link to the Rachel arson correlation conundrum.

Venturing into the realm of popular culture, the nostalgic cartoons "The Powerpuff Girls" and "The Magic School Bus" both feature episodes involving fiery mishaps and lessons on fire safety, although regrettably, they provide no empirical insights into our current conundrum. Furthermore, the timeless children's classic television show "Sesame Street" presents episodes on fire safety, yet neglects to address the potential connection between the first name Rachel and proclivities for igniting conflagrations.

In summary, the existing literature provides a mixed bag of serious academic inquiry, tangentially related non-fiction works, and fictional narratives that hint at fire-related themes. However, despite the breadth of exploration, the direct correlation between the popularity of the first name Rachel and incidents of arson in Connecticut remains an understudied and enigmatic quandary that demands further investigation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Rachel and Arson in Connecticut. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services . You used data from 1985 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Playing with Fire: The Rachel Arson Correlation Conundrum

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the curious case of the correlation between the popularity of the first name Rachel and the incidence of arson in Connecticut. Using data from the US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team conducted a thorough analysis covering the years 1985 to 2022. Surprisingly, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9754469 and p < 0.01, indicating a remarkably strong association between the two variables. While it may seem like a mere coincidence, this study sheds light on the peculiar relationship between the choice of moniker and propensity for pyromania in the Nutmeg State. We offer a lighthearted yet thought-provoking discussion on the potential psychological and sociological factors influencing this curious correlation.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The link between the popularity of baby names and various societal phenomena has been a topic of both fascination and amusement for researchers and laypeople alike. From the curious case of the "Jennifer Aniston Effect" on hair care product sales to the "Madison Avenue Influence" on advertising, the correlation between nomenclature and real-world outcomes continues to captivate the curious minds of scholars and statisticians.
In this paper, we turn our attention to the intriguing relationship between the prevalence of the first name Rachel and incidents of arson in the state of Connecticut. This unlikely pairing may seem as incongruous as mixing fire and ice, but our investigation aims to unravel the enigma and shed light on this peculiarity.
Before delving into our findings, it is crucial to acknowledge the initially implausible nature of this research topic. The association between a seemingly innocuous moniker and the criminal act of arson may appear far-fetched, bordering on preposterous. However, as the saying goes, "Where there's smoke, there's fire," and our initial analysis has ignited our curiosity to explore this uncanny correlation further.
With a mix of statistical rigour and a healthy dose of good-humored curiosity, we are prepared to unravel the mystery of the Rachel Arson Correlation Conundrum. So, let us embark on this whimsical yet scholarly journey into the world of nomenclature and nefarious fire-related behavior.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the correlation between the popularity of the first name Rachel and incidents of arson in Connecticut, our research team utilized a blend of traditional and unconventional methodologies. The data collection process involved extracting information from the vast archives of the US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services. We wrangled with data from birth certificates and criminal records, turning our attention to the period spanning from 1985 to 2022.

Our initial approach involved a whimsical ritual of scanning countless birth records, akin to thumbing through an unwieldy library of baby name histories. Through this process, we painstakingly compiled the frequency of occurrences for the moniker "Rachel" within the designated timeframe. This step required meticulous attention to detail, as we navigated the labyrinthine database of nomenclature with the precision of a name-seeking sleuth.

To complement our venture into the domain of nomenclature, we delved into the annals of arson-related incidents in the state of Connecticut. This entailed sifting through a smoldering heap of criminal records, where each case served as a potential piece in our pyrotechnic puzzle. Much like a fire investigator meticulously scrutinizing charred remnants for clues, our team meticulously cataloged the occurrence and prevalence of arson incidents, juxtaposing these records with the frequency of the first name Rachel.

Following this intensive data collection phase, we proceeded to perform a series of statistical analyses to discern any potential correlation between the eponymous frequency and fiery misdeeds. Leveraging statistical software akin to wielding a magnifying glass for subtle patterns amidst the statistical underbrush, we calculated correlation coefficients and conducted hypothesis testing to illuminate the strength and significance of the association.

In our statistical inferno, we employed the venerable Pearson correlation coefficient to quantify the degree of linear relationship between the prevalence of the name Rachel and the incidence of arson. By scrutinizing the resulting coefficient with the scrutiny of a discerning connoisseur assessing the vintage of a fine wine, we unraveled a strikingly strong correlation, defying the expectations of conventional wisdom.

Furthermore, we conducted a series of robustness checks and sensitivity analyses to ensure the resilience of our findings under various scenarios, akin to stress-testing the durability of a fire-resistant material. Through these multifaceted probing techniques, we aimed to fortify the veracity of our correlation in the face of potential statistical smoke and mirrors.

In summary, our methodological journey encompassed a whimsical convergence of data spelunking, statistical craftsmanship, and a touch of pyromaniacal intrigue. With the precision of an investigative maestro and the flair of statistical pyrotechnics, we navigated the labyrinth of nomenclature and arson with scholarly curiosity and a wry sense of academic humor.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Rachel and Arson in Connecticut. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services .

For the time period 1985 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9754469, r-squared of 0.9514966, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Playing with Fire: The Rachel Arson Correlation Conundrum

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the curious case of the correlation between the popularity of the first name Rachel and the incidence of arson in Connecticut. Using data from the US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team conducted a thorough analysis covering the years 1985 to 2022. Surprisingly, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9754469 and p < 0.01, indicating a remarkably strong association between the two variables. While it may seem like a mere coincidence, this study sheds light on the peculiar relationship between the choice of moniker and propensity for pyromania in the Nutmeg State. We offer a lighthearted yet thought-provoking discussion on the potential psychological and sociological factors influencing this curious correlation.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The link between the popularity of baby names and various societal phenomena has been a topic of both fascination and amusement for researchers and laypeople alike. From the curious case of the "Jennifer Aniston Effect" on hair care product sales to the "Madison Avenue Influence" on advertising, the correlation between nomenclature and real-world outcomes continues to captivate the curious minds of scholars and statisticians.
In this paper, we turn our attention to the intriguing relationship between the prevalence of the first name Rachel and incidents of arson in the state of Connecticut. This unlikely pairing may seem as incongruous as mixing fire and ice, but our investigation aims to unravel the enigma and shed light on this peculiarity.
Before delving into our findings, it is crucial to acknowledge the initially implausible nature of this research topic. The association between a seemingly innocuous moniker and the criminal act of arson may appear far-fetched, bordering on preposterous. However, as the saying goes, "Where there's smoke, there's fire," and our initial analysis has ignited our curiosity to explore this uncanny correlation further.
With a mix of statistical rigour and a healthy dose of good-humored curiosity, we are prepared to unravel the mystery of the Rachel Arson Correlation Conundrum. So, let us embark on this whimsical yet scholarly journey into the world of nomenclature and nefarious fire-related behavior.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

In our investigation of the correlation between the popularity of the first name Rachel and incidents of arson in Connecticut, we uncovered a surprisingly robust relationship. The correlation coefficient of 0.9754469 indicates an exceptionally strong positive correlation, suggesting a compelling association between the two variables. With an r-squared value of 0.9514966, we can confidently assert that approximately 95% of the variability in arson incidents can be explained by the popularity of the name Rachel. The p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies the statistical significance of this correlation, rendering it highly improbable to have occurred by chance.

As we carefully examined the data spanning from 1985 to 2022, the connection between the frequency of the name Rachel and incidents of arson became undeniably conspicuous. Despite the initial incredulity surrounding this peculiar pairing, the strength of the correlation cannot be dismissed as mere happenstance.

The figure (Fig. 1) illustrates the compelling relationship between the popularity of the name Rachel and the incidence of arson in Connecticut, displaying a remarkably tight clustering of data points that unmistakably support our findings. The scatterplot serves as a visual testament to the surprising connection we have unveiled through our rigorous analysis.

Our results not only raise eyebrows but also spark intriguing questions about the potential influence of nomenclature on behavioral inclinations. While we acknowledge the whimsical nature of this research inquiry, the statistical evidence speaks for itself, leaving us to ponder the underlying mechanisms driving this curious correlation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Rachel and Arson in Connecticut. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Playing with Fire: The Rachel Arson Correlation Conundrum

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the curious case of the correlation between the popularity of the first name Rachel and the incidence of arson in Connecticut. Using data from the US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team conducted a thorough analysis covering the years 1985 to 2022. Surprisingly, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9754469 and p < 0.01, indicating a remarkably strong association between the two variables. While it may seem like a mere coincidence, this study sheds light on the peculiar relationship between the choice of moniker and propensity for pyromania in the Nutmeg State. We offer a lighthearted yet thought-provoking discussion on the potential psychological and sociological factors influencing this curious correlation.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The potential linkage between the popularity of the first name Rachel and the occurrence of arson in Connecticut has elicited a mix of incredulity and intrigue within academic circles. Within the field of nomenclature-related phenomena, Smith et al. (2018) propound the theory of "Name-Claim Fame," asserting that individuals with certain popular names may experience an unconscious predisposition to engage in activities that align with societal perceptions of the characteristics associated with said moniker. Meanwhile, Doe's (2016) study, "Moniker Monikers: The Psychology of Names," delves into the notion of nominative determinism, wherein individuals subconsciously gravitate towards activities or behaviors that are consonant with the sounds or meanings of their given names.
However, as we move beyond the realm of straightforward scholarly insights, we encounter a plethora of tangentially related non-fiction literature. Titles such as "The Arsonist's Guide to Writers' Homes in New England" by Brock Clarke and "Playing with Fire: The 1968 Election and the Transformation of American Politics" by Lawrence O'Donnell intriguingly explore fire-related themes, yet veer away from the specific issue at hand. On the other hand, the enchanting world of fiction offers glimpses of relevance in works such as "The Girl on the Train" by Paula Hawkins and "Girl with a Pearl Earring" by Tracy Chevalier, where narratives of varying degrees of combustibility and intrigue unfold, albeit with no direct link to the Rachel arson correlation conundrum.
Venturing into the realm of popular culture, the nostalgic cartoons "The Powerpuff Girls" and "The Magic School Bus" both feature episodes involving fiery mishaps and lessons on fire safety, although regrettably, they provide no empirical insights into our current conundrum. Furthermore, the timeless children's classic television show "Sesame Street" presents episodes on fire safety, yet neglects to address the potential connection between the first name Rachel and proclivities for igniting conflagrations.
In summary, the existing literature provides a mixed bag of serious academic inquiry, tangentially related non-fiction works, and fictional narratives that hint at fire-related themes. However, despite the breadth of exploration, the direct correlation between the popularity of the first name Rachel and incidents of arson in Connecticut remains an understudied and enigmatic quandary that demands further investigation.

[[RESULTS]]
In our investigation of the correlation between the popularity of the first name Rachel and incidents of arson in Connecticut, we uncovered a surprisingly robust relationship. The correlation coefficient of 0.9754469 indicates an exceptionally strong positive correlation, suggesting a compelling association between the two variables. With an r-squared value of 0.9514966, we can confidently assert that approximately 95% of the variability in arson incidents can be explained by the popularity of the name Rachel. The p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies the statistical significance of this correlation, rendering it highly improbable to have occurred by chance.
As we carefully examined the data spanning from 1985 to 2022, the connection between the frequency of the name Rachel and incidents of arson became undeniably conspicuous. Despite the initial incredulity surrounding this peculiar pairing, the strength of the correlation cannot be dismissed as mere happenstance.
The figure (Fig. 1) illustrates the compelling relationship between the popularity of the name Rachel and the incidence of arson in Connecticut, displaying a remarkably tight clustering of data points that unmistakably support our findings. The scatterplot serves as a visual testament to the surprising connection we have unveiled through our rigorous analysis.
Our results not only raise eyebrows but also spark intriguing questions about the potential influence of nomenclature on behavioral inclinations. While we acknowledge the whimsical nature of this research inquiry, the statistical evidence speaks for itself, leaving us to ponder the underlying mechanisms driving this curious correlation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study support the earlier work by Smith et al. (2018) on "Name-Claim Fame," which posited that individuals with popular names may exhibit unconscious behavioral predilections. Our research has uncovered a compelling correlation between the frequency of the name Rachel and incidents of arson in Connecticut, aligning with the notion that nomenclature may subtly influence behavioral tendencies. Additionally, our results align with Doe's (2016) exploration of nominative determinism, as they suggest a potential subconscious gravitation towards fire-related activities for individuals bearing the name Rachel.

Intriguingly, our study sheds light on the connection between the choice of moniker and propensity for pyromania in the Nutmeg State, providing empirical support for the tangentially related non-fiction literature and popular culture references outlined in our literature review. Although our findings might appear whimsical at first glance, the statistical robustness of the correlation coefficient and the r-squared value firmly substantiate the existence of this correlation.

The scatterplot presented in Figure 1 serves as a visual testament to the striking relationship between the popularity of the name Rachel and the incidence of arson in Connecticut, confirming the pronounced clustering of data points and bolstering the validity of our results. This visual representation echoes the thematic intricacies of the literature we reviewed, offering a serious but playful visual exploration of the correlation conundrum.

Our findings open up an avenue for further multidisciplinary inquiry into the psychological and sociological factors that may underpin this correlation. While our study may elicit chuckles and raised eyebrows, it has also ignited novel questions about the potential influence of nomenclature on behavioral inclinations. In essence, while our investigation may have begun as a lighthearted query, the results demand a more profound exploration of the underlying mechanisms driving this curious correlation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Rachel and Arson in Connecticut. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Playing with Fire: The Rachel Arson Correlation Conundrum

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the curious case of the correlation between the popularity of the first name Rachel and the incidence of arson in Connecticut. Using data from the US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team conducted a thorough analysis covering the years 1985 to 2022. Surprisingly, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9754469 and p < 0.01, indicating a remarkably strong association between the two variables. While it may seem like a mere coincidence, this study sheds light on the peculiar relationship between the choice of moniker and propensity for pyromania in the Nutmeg State. We offer a lighthearted yet thought-provoking discussion on the potential psychological and sociological factors influencing this curious correlation.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The link between the popularity of baby names and various societal phenomena has been a topic of both fascination and amusement for researchers and laypeople alike. From the curious case of the "Jennifer Aniston Effect" on hair care product sales to the "Madison Avenue Influence" on advertising, the correlation between nomenclature and real-world outcomes continues to captivate the curious minds of scholars and statisticians.
In this paper, we turn our attention to the intriguing relationship between the prevalence of the first name Rachel and incidents of arson in the state of Connecticut. This unlikely pairing may seem as incongruous as mixing fire and ice, but our investigation aims to unravel the enigma and shed light on this peculiarity.
Before delving into our findings, it is crucial to acknowledge the initially implausible nature of this research topic. The association between a seemingly innocuous moniker and the criminal act of arson may appear far-fetched, bordering on preposterous. However, as the saying goes, "Where there's smoke, there's fire," and our initial analysis has ignited our curiosity to explore this uncanny correlation further.
With a mix of statistical rigour and a healthy dose of good-humored curiosity, we are prepared to unravel the mystery of the Rachel Arson Correlation Conundrum. So, let us embark on this whimsical yet scholarly journey into the world of nomenclature and nefarious fire-related behavior.

[[RESULTS]]
In our investigation of the correlation between the popularity of the first name Rachel and incidents of arson in Connecticut, we uncovered a surprisingly robust relationship. The correlation coefficient of 0.9754469 indicates an exceptionally strong positive correlation, suggesting a compelling association between the two variables. With an r-squared value of 0.9514966, we can confidently assert that approximately 95% of the variability in arson incidents can be explained by the popularity of the name Rachel. The p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies the statistical significance of this correlation, rendering it highly improbable to have occurred by chance.
As we carefully examined the data spanning from 1985 to 2022, the connection between the frequency of the name Rachel and incidents of arson became undeniably conspicuous. Despite the initial incredulity surrounding this peculiar pairing, the strength of the correlation cannot be dismissed as mere happenstance.
The figure (Fig. 1) illustrates the compelling relationship between the popularity of the name Rachel and the incidence of arson in Connecticut, displaying a remarkably tight clustering of data points that unmistakably support our findings. The scatterplot serves as a visual testament to the surprising connection we have unveiled through our rigorous analysis.
Our results not only raise eyebrows but also spark intriguing questions about the potential influence of nomenclature on behavioral inclinations. While we acknowledge the whimsical nature of this research inquiry, the statistical evidence speaks for itself, leaving us to ponder the underlying mechanisms driving this curious correlation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation into the correlation between the popularity of the first name Rachel and incidents of arson in Connecticut has illuminated a rather unexpected relationship. The remarkably strong positive correlation prompts us to ponder whether there might be some fiery, yet to be revealed, characteristics associated with the name Rachel. Perhaps there's a burning passion for justice, a sizzling sense of adventure, or a smoldering desire for attention that influences individuals bearing this name to engage in flame-fueled activities.

While it may seem like a whimsical line of inquiry, our rigorous analysis leaves little room for doubt regarding the statistical significance of this correlation. Our findings not only stoke the flames of curiosity but also kindle a newfound appreciation for the curious quirkiness of human behavior.

It is important to acknowledge that correlation does not imply causation, and we cannot definitively assert that the name Rachel directly incites arson. However, the strength of the association between the two variables invites further contemplation and speculation, much like a crackling campfire captivating its audience.

In light of these findings, we must recognize the unignorable allure of the Rachel Arson Correlation Conundrum. However, we assert that no further research is needed in this area, as we wouldn't want to fan the flames of frivolous inquiry. Let's allow this peculiar correlation to simmer on the back burner of academic curiosities, adding a touch of intellectual spice to the world of research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Playing with Fire: The Rachel Arson Correlation Conundrum. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Unpredictable Investigations


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Playing with Fire: The Rachel Arson Correlation Conundrum. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Alliance for Fire Dynamics Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Playing with Fire: The Rachel Arson Correlation Conundrum with an abstract of This paper investigates the curious case of the correlation between the popularity of the first name Rachel and the incidence of arson in Connecticut. Using data from the US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team conducted a thorough analysis covering the years 1985 to 2022. Surprisingly, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9754469 and p < 0.01, indicating a remarkably strong association between the two variables. While it may seem like a mere coincidence, this study sheds light on the peculiar relationship between the choice of moniker and propensity for pyromania in the Nutmeg State. We offer a lighthearted yet thought-provoking discussion on the potential psychological and sociological factors influencing this curious correlation.

ChatGPT:

Rachel, arson, correlation, Connecticut, US Social Security Administration, FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, 1985-2022, correlation coefficient, psychology, sociology, moniker, pyromania, Nutmeg State

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Rachel
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Rachel
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Rachel

Arson in Connecticut
Detailed data title: The arson rate per 100,000 residents in Connecticut
Source: FBI Criminal Justice Information Services
See what else correlates with Arson in Connecticut

Correlation r = 0.9754469 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9514966 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 95.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Arson in Connecticut) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Rachel) over the 38 years from 1985 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.0E-25. 0.0000000000000000000000002985
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.98 in 3.0E-23% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 3,350,083,752,093,802,383,278,080 random variables You don't actually need 3 septillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 37 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 37 because we have two variables measured over a period of 38 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.95, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19851986198719881989199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Popularity of the first name Rachel (Babies born)164391551215707154071546315749163731586415999155151607516143138211222811648106979562895780046952623155454843408835913020266124242321209319361879161915621547130312691247
Arson in Connecticut (Arson rate)37.633.231.13333.130.432.939.63133.639.534.524.927.624.719.119.417.916.115.51415.114.214.311.51211117.78.5811.69.66.66.16.54.85.3




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([16439,15512,15707,15407,15463,15749,16373,15864,15999,15515,16075,16143,13821,12228,11648,10697,9562,8957,8004,6952,6231,5545,4843,4088,3591,3020,2661,2424,2321,2093,1936,1879,1619,1562,1547,1303,1269,1247,])
array_2 = np.array([37.6,33.2,31.1,33,33.1,30.4,32.9,39.6,31,33.6,39.5,34.5,24.9,27.6,24.7,19.1,19.4,17.9,16.1,15.5,14,15.1,14.2,14.3,11.5,12,11,11,7.7,8.5,8,11.6,9.6,6.6,6.1,6.5,4.8,5.3,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Rachel"
array_2_name = "Arson in Connecticut"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Kudos for rating!


Correlation ID: 4012 · Black Variable ID: 2006 · Red Variable ID: 20078
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0