about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,978 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Courtland and the second variable is Chicago Bulls Win Percentage Progression.  The chart goes from 1975 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the popularity of the name Courtland increased, so did the number of babies with a natural talent for shooting hoops. It's like they were born to be ballers!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a vibrant basketball court filled with energetic young players wearing Courtland jerseys, confidently shooting hoops and dribbling with determination. The scene is surrounded by a jubilant Chicago Bulls team, exhilarated by the surge of Courtland-inspired players, celebrating their rising win percentage with triumphant cheers. The atmosphere is filled with the electric energy of the game and the infectious spirit of competition. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Courtland and Chicago Bulls Win Percentage Progression. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: 3D Pixar Style Concept art A Discovery magazine cover image A photo-realistic image Magic realism
ChatGPT: A Discovery magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Courtland and Chicago Bulls Win Percentage Progression, in the following situation: As the popularity of the name Courtland rose, more parents were inspired by the "court" aspect, leading to a surge in young basketball players. These players, fueled by the spirit of Courtland, channeled their inner bulls, resulting in the Chicago Bulls' win percentage progression. It's all about that "court" advantage!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A basketball court buzzing with energy as young players with the name Courtland shoot hoops and dribble with determination. The Chicago Bulls team, emboldened by the surge of Courtland-inspired players, celebrates their rising win percentage with triumphant cheers.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: A basketball court buzzing with energy as young players with the name Courtland shoot hoops and dribble with determination. The Chicago Bulls team, emboldened by the surge of Courtland-inspired players, celebrates their rising win percentage with triumphant cheers. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a vibrant basketball court filled with energetic young players wearing Courtland jerseys, confidently shooting hoops and dribbling with determination. The scene is surrounded by a jubilant Chicago Bulls team, exhilarated by the surge of Courtland-inspired players, celebrating their rising win percentage with triumphant cheers. The atmosphere is filled with the electric energy of the game and the infectious spirit of competition.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Popularity of the first name Courtland positively influenced Chicago Bulls Win Percentage Progression. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Swishing Success: The Courtland Conundrum - Exploring the Relationship Between Name Popularity and NBA Performance

The Journal of Athlete Moniker Metrics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Courtland and Chicago Bulls Win Percentage Progression. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and NBA to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.6165073 and p < 0.01 for 1975 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Swishing Success: The Courtland Conundrum - Exploring the Relationship Between Name Popularity and NBA Performance"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The intersection of sports and societal trends has long captivated academic and popular interest alike, and our study offers a unique perspective, merging the worlds of basketball and baby names. By examining the popularity of the first name Courtland in conjunction with the win percentage progression of the Chicago Bulls, we delve into uncharted territory to uncover surprising correlations. Our research team utilized data from the US Social Security Administration and the NBA, bridging the realms of demography and athletics to shed light on this quirky connection.

Intriguingly, our findings reveal a significant correlation coefficient of 0.6165073 and p < 0.01, spanning a period from 1975 to 2022. This robust statistical linkage suggests a striking relationship between the popularity of the name Courtland and the Chicago Bulls' win percentage progression over nearly five decades. The implications of this association are as thought-provoking as they are unexpected, offering a fresh perspective on the influence of naming trends on the sporting arena.

Moreover, our study brings a new dimension to the notion of "court advantage," demonstrating how the ebb and flow of a name's popularity may mirror the fluctuations of a team's performance. As the saying goes, "There's no court like home court," and our research uncovers a parallel between the rise and fall in the frequency of the moniker Courtland and the Chicago Bulls' triumphs and trials. It seems that this connection is truly a slam dunk, exemplifying the unexpected intersections that deepen our understanding of the world around us.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Courtland and Chicago Bulls Win Percentage Progression. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Swishing Success: The Courtland Conundrum - Exploring the Relationship Between Name Popularity and NBA Performance"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The intersection of sports and societal trends has long captivated academic and popular interest alike, and our study offers a unique perspective, merging the worlds of basketball and baby names. By examining the popularity of the first name Courtland in conjunction with the win percentage progression of the Chicago Bulls, we delve into uncharted territory to uncover surprising correlations. Our research team utilized data from the US Social Security Administration and the NBA, bridging the realms of demography and athletics to shed light on this quirky connection.

Intriguingly, our findings reveal a significant correlation coefficient of 0.6165073 and p < 0.01, spanning a period from 1975 to 2022. This robust statistical linkage suggests a striking relationship between the popularity of the name Courtland and the Chicago Bulls' win percentage progression over nearly five decades. The implications of this association are as thought-provoking as they are unexpected, offering a fresh perspective on the influence of naming trends on the sporting arena.

Moreover, our study brings a new dimension to the notion of "court advantage," demonstrating how the ebb and flow of a name's popularity may mirror the fluctuations of a team's performance. As the saying goes, "There's no court like home court," and our research uncovers a parallel between the rise and fall in the frequency of the moniker Courtland and the Chicago Bulls' triumphs and trials. It seems that this connection is truly a slam dunk, exemplifying the unexpected intersections that deepen our understanding of the world around us.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The thrill of victory and the agony of the less-than-stellar win-loss record - such is the rollercoaster ride of being a sports fan. And just when you think you've seen it all, along comes our study to add a new twist to the game. At the intersection of the exhilarating world of basketball and the often surprising realm of baby naming trends, we present our investigation into the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the first name Courtland and the win percentage progression of none other than the Chicago Bulls.

It seems the correlation between naming trends and sports performance is not just a name-dropping exercise! As we delve into the depths of this Courtland conundrum, our study aims to demonstrate that there might just be more to a name than meets the eye. With a statistical correlation coefficient of 0.6165073 and a p-value of less than 0.01, we're not just shooting airballs here - our findings indicate a robust and surprising link between the ebb and flow of the name Courtland's popularity and the Chicago Bulls' on-court successes and setbacks.

The age-old question of "what's in a name" takes on a whole new meaning as we uncover this unexpected connection. It's almost as if the name Courtland is making a court-side appearance, cheering on the Bulls from the stands of statistical significance! Perhaps one could even say that this unexpected correlation is a real slam dunk in the world of sports research - a statistical alley-oop, if you will!

But fear not, dear reader, for we are not merely spectators in this game of numbers and names. Through our study, we hope to illuminate the often overlooked influence of societal trends on the world of sports, offering a fresh perspective that challenges conventional thinking. After all, it's not every day that statistical analysis leads us to the crossroads where baby names and basketball meet. This is one game where everyone's a winner, especially if you enjoy a good pun or two!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Courtland and Chicago Bulls Win Percentage Progression. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Swishing Success: The Courtland Conundrum - Exploring the Relationship Between Name Popularity and NBA Performance"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The intersection of sports and societal trends has long captivated academic and popular interest alike, and our study offers a unique perspective, merging the worlds of basketball and baby names. By examining the popularity of the first name Courtland in conjunction with the win percentage progression of the Chicago Bulls, we delve into uncharted territory to uncover surprising correlations. Our research team utilized data from the US Social Security Administration and the NBA, bridging the realms of demography and athletics to shed light on this quirky connection.

Intriguingly, our findings reveal a significant correlation coefficient of 0.6165073 and p < 0.01, spanning a period from 1975 to 2022. This robust statistical linkage suggests a striking relationship between the popularity of the name Courtland and the Chicago Bulls' win percentage progression over nearly five decades. The implications of this association are as thought-provoking as they are unexpected, offering a fresh perspective on the influence of naming trends on the sporting arena.

Moreover, our study brings a new dimension to the notion of "court advantage," demonstrating how the ebb and flow of a name's popularity may mirror the fluctuations of a team's performance. As the saying goes, "There's no court like home court," and our research uncovers a parallel between the rise and fall in the frequency of the moniker Courtland and the Chicago Bulls' triumphs and trials. It seems that this connection is truly a slam dunk, exemplifying the unexpected intersections that deepen our understanding of the world around us.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The thrill of victory and the agony of the less-than-stellar win-loss record - such is the rollercoaster ride of being a sports fan. And just when you think you've seen it all, along comes our study to add a new twist to the game. At the intersection of the exhilarating world of basketball and the often surprising realm of baby naming trends, we present our investigation into the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the first name Courtland and the win percentage progression of none other than the Chicago Bulls.
It seems the correlation between naming trends and sports performance is not just a name-dropping exercise! As we delve into the depths of this Courtland conundrum, our study aims to demonstrate that there might just be more to a name than meets the eye. With a statistical correlation coefficient of 0.6165073 and a p-value of less than 0.01, we're not just shooting airballs here - our findings indicate a robust and surprising link between the ebb and flow of the name Courtland's popularity and the Chicago Bulls' on-court successes and setbacks.
The age-old question of "what's in a name" takes on a whole new meaning as we uncover this unexpected connection. It's almost as if the name Courtland is making a court-side appearance, cheering on the Bulls from the stands of statistical significance! Perhaps one could even say that this unexpected correlation is a real slam dunk in the world of sports research - a statistical alley-oop, if you will!
But fear not, dear reader, for we are not merely spectators in this game of numbers and names. Through our study, we hope to illuminate the often overlooked influence of societal trends on the world of sports, offering a fresh perspective that challenges conventional thinking. After all, it's not every day that statistical analysis leads us to the crossroads where baby names and basketball meet. This is one game where everyone's a winner, especially if you enjoy a good pun or two!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In the landmark study by Smith and Doe (2010), the authors find a correlation between the frequency of basketball-themed names and NBA team performance over time. Building upon this foundation, Jones (2015) further extends the inquiry into the influence of naming trends on sports outcomes, shedding light on the unexpected associations between popular baby names and athletic achievements. However, it is our unique study that takes a bold step forward, delving into the captivating correlation between the prevalence of the first name Courtland and the win percentage progression of the esteemed Chicago Bulls.

As we venture into this unexplored territory, it becomes clear that the Courtland conundrum holds many surprises and delights. Much like a well-executed jump shot, our findings offer insight into the unexpected twists and turns of societal trends and sports successes. It's almost as if the statistical analysis is dribbling its way into the world of baby names, performing an unexpected crossover that leaves us pondering the profound influence of nomenclature on athletic endeavors. One might even say that this curious connection is a real "slam-pun-k" in the world of statistical correlations - a triple-double of unexpected and entertaining revelations, if you will!

Turning to the realm of literature, "The Baby Name Wizard" by Laura Wattenberg and "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner offer intriguing perspectives on the social significance of naming trends, laying a foundation for our exploration of the Courtland-Bulls linkage. Meanwhile, fictional works such as "The Namesake" by Jhumpa Lahiri and "A Court of Thorns and Roses" by Sarah J. Maas beckon with their tantalizing titles, evoking the whimsical interplay between names and narrative, a theme that resonates with our own unexpected findings.

In the online domain, the popular meme "Michael Jordan's 'Crying Jordan' Meme" humorously captures the ups and downs of basketball fandom, providing a lighthearted parallel to our study's investigation of the ebbs and flows in the popularity of the name Courtland and the Chicago Bulls' win percentages. It's as if the meme-worthiness of this surprising correlation adds an extra layer of entertainment to our statistical journey, reminding us that even the most unexpected connections can bring a smile to our faces.

Therefore, as we embark on this exploration of the Courtland conundrum, we invite readers to join us in reveling in the unexpected intersections of naming trends and athletic achievements, all while enjoying the occasional dad joke or pun along the way. After all, who said statistical analysis can't bring a bit of whimsy to the table?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Courtland and Chicago Bulls Win Percentage Progression. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and NBA . You used data from 1975 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Swishing Success: The Courtland Conundrum - Exploring the Relationship Between Name Popularity and NBA Performance"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The intersection of sports and societal trends has long captivated academic and popular interest alike, and our study offers a unique perspective, merging the worlds of basketball and baby names. By examining the popularity of the first name Courtland in conjunction with the win percentage progression of the Chicago Bulls, we delve into uncharted territory to uncover surprising correlations. Our research team utilized data from the US Social Security Administration and the NBA, bridging the realms of demography and athletics to shed light on this quirky connection.

Intriguingly, our findings reveal a significant correlation coefficient of 0.6165073 and p < 0.01, spanning a period from 1975 to 2022. This robust statistical linkage suggests a striking relationship between the popularity of the name Courtland and the Chicago Bulls' win percentage progression over nearly five decades. The implications of this association are as thought-provoking as they are unexpected, offering a fresh perspective on the influence of naming trends on the sporting arena.

Moreover, our study brings a new dimension to the notion of "court advantage," demonstrating how the ebb and flow of a name's popularity may mirror the fluctuations of a team's performance. As the saying goes, "There's no court like home court," and our research uncovers a parallel between the rise and fall in the frequency of the moniker Courtland and the Chicago Bulls' triumphs and trials. It seems that this connection is truly a slam dunk, exemplifying the unexpected intersections that deepen our understanding of the world around us.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The thrill of victory and the agony of the less-than-stellar win-loss record - such is the rollercoaster ride of being a sports fan. And just when you think you've seen it all, along comes our study to add a new twist to the game. At the intersection of the exhilarating world of basketball and the often surprising realm of baby naming trends, we present our investigation into the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the first name Courtland and the win percentage progression of none other than the Chicago Bulls.
It seems the correlation between naming trends and sports performance is not just a name-dropping exercise! As we delve into the depths of this Courtland conundrum, our study aims to demonstrate that there might just be more to a name than meets the eye. With a statistical correlation coefficient of 0.6165073 and a p-value of less than 0.01, we're not just shooting airballs here - our findings indicate a robust and surprising link between the ebb and flow of the name Courtland's popularity and the Chicago Bulls' on-court successes and setbacks.
The age-old question of "what's in a name" takes on a whole new meaning as we uncover this unexpected connection. It's almost as if the name Courtland is making a court-side appearance, cheering on the Bulls from the stands of statistical significance! Perhaps one could even say that this unexpected correlation is a real slam dunk in the world of sports research - a statistical alley-oop, if you will!
But fear not, dear reader, for we are not merely spectators in this game of numbers and names. Through our study, we hope to illuminate the often overlooked influence of societal trends on the world of sports, offering a fresh perspective that challenges conventional thinking. After all, it's not every day that statistical analysis leads us to the crossroads where baby names and basketball meet. This is one game where everyone's a winner, especially if you enjoy a good pun or two!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To delve into the Courtland conundrum and unravel the enigmatic correlation between the popularity of this name and the win percentage progression of the Chicago Bulls, our research team embarked on a data collection journey that would make even the most seasoned statistician raise an eyebrow. With a combination of determination, tenacity, and a healthy dose of dad jokes, we navigated the labyrinth of information sources to gather the necessary data for our analysis. It’s every bit as adventurous as Michael Jordan’s 1991 NBA Finals performance – a real slam dunk!

We harnessed the power of archival data from the US Social Security Administration to track the frequency of the name Courtland across different years, marveling at the subtle nuances and fluctuations as if they were buzzer-beater shots at the end of a game. Meanwhile, we turned to the NBA's treasure troves of past and present win percentage data for the Chicago Bulls, arming ourselves with a statistical playbook to navigate the intricacies of on-court performance. It was like conducting a post-game analysis, but instead of scrutinizing player statistics, we were diving into the popularity of baby names!

After assembling our arsenal of data, we took to the statistical court with a series of analyses that would make even the most seasoned quantitative experts think twice. Employing a robust time-series analysis approach, we charted the progression of the Chicago Bulls' win percentage over the years, seeking patterns and trends with the same vigor as a coach reviewing game tapes. Simultaneously, we meticulously examined the ebbs and flows of the name Courtland's popularity, teasing out meaningful insights and connections like a true basketball aficionado calling out plays from the sidelines.

Of course, no statistical analysis would be complete without a touch of regression magic, and we incorporated advanced regression models to uncover the underlying relationship between the popularity of the name Courtland and the win percentage progression of the Chicago Bulls. It was a bit like executing a flawless pick-and-roll play in the world of data analysis – seamlessly combining variables to reveal the hidden dynamics at play.

Finally, to validate the robustness of our findings and ensure that our conclusions were nothing short of a slam dunk, we conducted rigorous sensitivity analyses and model diagnostics. We left no stone unturned in our quest for statistical clarity, scrutinizing our models with the same precision as a referee reviewing game-changing calls. In the end, our methodology not only upheld the rigors of academic inquiry but also paid homage to the thrilling unpredictability of the sports world – a testament to the inherent excitement of academic research with a dash of sporting flair!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Courtland and Chicago Bulls Win Percentage Progression. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and NBA .

For the time period 1975 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.6165073, r-squared of 0.3800812, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Swishing Success: The Courtland Conundrum - Exploring the Relationship Between Name Popularity and NBA Performance"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The intersection of sports and societal trends has long captivated academic and popular interest alike, and our study offers a unique perspective, merging the worlds of basketball and baby names. By examining the popularity of the first name Courtland in conjunction with the win percentage progression of the Chicago Bulls, we delve into uncharted territory to uncover surprising correlations. Our research team utilized data from the US Social Security Administration and the NBA, bridging the realms of demography and athletics to shed light on this quirky connection.

Intriguingly, our findings reveal a significant correlation coefficient of 0.6165073 and p < 0.01, spanning a period from 1975 to 2022. This robust statistical linkage suggests a striking relationship between the popularity of the name Courtland and the Chicago Bulls' win percentage progression over nearly five decades. The implications of this association are as thought-provoking as they are unexpected, offering a fresh perspective on the influence of naming trends on the sporting arena.

Moreover, our study brings a new dimension to the notion of "court advantage," demonstrating how the ebb and flow of a name's popularity may mirror the fluctuations of a team's performance. As the saying goes, "There's no court like home court," and our research uncovers a parallel between the rise and fall in the frequency of the moniker Courtland and the Chicago Bulls' triumphs and trials. It seems that this connection is truly a slam dunk, exemplifying the unexpected intersections that deepen our understanding of the world around us.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The thrill of victory and the agony of the less-than-stellar win-loss record - such is the rollercoaster ride of being a sports fan. And just when you think you've seen it all, along comes our study to add a new twist to the game. At the intersection of the exhilarating world of basketball and the often surprising realm of baby naming trends, we present our investigation into the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the first name Courtland and the win percentage progression of none other than the Chicago Bulls.
It seems the correlation between naming trends and sports performance is not just a name-dropping exercise! As we delve into the depths of this Courtland conundrum, our study aims to demonstrate that there might just be more to a name than meets the eye. With a statistical correlation coefficient of 0.6165073 and a p-value of less than 0.01, we're not just shooting airballs here - our findings indicate a robust and surprising link between the ebb and flow of the name Courtland's popularity and the Chicago Bulls' on-court successes and setbacks.
The age-old question of "what's in a name" takes on a whole new meaning as we uncover this unexpected connection. It's almost as if the name Courtland is making a court-side appearance, cheering on the Bulls from the stands of statistical significance! Perhaps one could even say that this unexpected correlation is a real slam dunk in the world of sports research - a statistical alley-oop, if you will!
But fear not, dear reader, for we are not merely spectators in this game of numbers and names. Through our study, we hope to illuminate the often overlooked influence of societal trends on the world of sports, offering a fresh perspective that challenges conventional thinking. After all, it's not every day that statistical analysis leads us to the crossroads where baby names and basketball meet. This is one game where everyone's a winner, especially if you enjoy a good pun or two!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our study revealed a statistically significant correlation between the popularity of the first name Courtland and the win percentage progression of the Chicago Bulls. Our analysis, spanning the years 1975 to 2022, yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.6165073, indicating a moderately strong positive relationship between these two variables. This suggests that as the popularity of the name Courtland waxed and waned, the Chicago Bulls' win percentage experienced corresponding fluctuations. It seems that the name Courtland may have been shouting "You miss 100% of the shots you don't take" from the sidelines!

The r-squared value of 0.3800812 further supports our findings, indicating that approximately 38% of the variability in the Chicago Bulls' win percentage progression can be explained by the popularity of the name Courtland. It's as if the name Courtland was not just a mere spectator in the stands of statistical significance, but a key player influencing the game from the sidelines!

In addition to the correlation coefficient and r-squared value, our analysis also revealed a p-value of less than 0.01, cementing the statistical significance of the relationship found. This implies that the likelihood of observing such a strong relationship due to chance alone is less than 0.01. It seems that this unexpected correlation is indeed a three-pointer in the world of statistical analysis!

Fig. 1 displays a scatterplot depicting the relationship between the popularity of the first name Courtland and the Chicago Bulls' win percentage progression. The figure clearly illustrates the consistent pattern of the two variables moving in tandem over the years, further bolstering the robustness of our findings. It's as if the name Courtland was coaching the Bulls to victory, one statistical trend at a time!

In summary, our research uncovers an unexpected and intriguing connection between the popularity of the first name Courtland and the performance of the Chicago Bulls. This association adds a new layer of complexity to the understanding of the interplay between societal trends and sports performance. It seems that when it comes to the name Courtland, there's more than meets the eye – a true case of unexpected statistical swish!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Courtland and Chicago Bulls Win Percentage Progression. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Swishing Success: The Courtland Conundrum - Exploring the Relationship Between Name Popularity and NBA Performance"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The intersection of sports and societal trends has long captivated academic and popular interest alike, and our study offers a unique perspective, merging the worlds of basketball and baby names. By examining the popularity of the first name Courtland in conjunction with the win percentage progression of the Chicago Bulls, we delve into uncharted territory to uncover surprising correlations. Our research team utilized data from the US Social Security Administration and the NBA, bridging the realms of demography and athletics to shed light on this quirky connection.

Intriguingly, our findings reveal a significant correlation coefficient of 0.6165073 and p < 0.01, spanning a period from 1975 to 2022. This robust statistical linkage suggests a striking relationship between the popularity of the name Courtland and the Chicago Bulls' win percentage progression over nearly five decades. The implications of this association are as thought-provoking as they are unexpected, offering a fresh perspective on the influence of naming trends on the sporting arena.

Moreover, our study brings a new dimension to the notion of "court advantage," demonstrating how the ebb and flow of a name's popularity may mirror the fluctuations of a team's performance. As the saying goes, "There's no court like home court," and our research uncovers a parallel between the rise and fall in the frequency of the moniker Courtland and the Chicago Bulls' triumphs and trials. It seems that this connection is truly a slam dunk, exemplifying the unexpected intersections that deepen our understanding of the world around us.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In the landmark study by Smith and Doe (2010), the authors find a correlation between the frequency of basketball-themed names and NBA team performance over time. Building upon this foundation, Jones (2015) further extends the inquiry into the influence of naming trends on sports outcomes, shedding light on the unexpected associations between popular baby names and athletic achievements. However, it is our unique study that takes a bold step forward, delving into the captivating correlation between the prevalence of the first name Courtland and the win percentage progression of the esteemed Chicago Bulls.
As we venture into this unexplored territory, it becomes clear that the Courtland conundrum holds many surprises and delights. Much like a well-executed jump shot, our findings offer insight into the unexpected twists and turns of societal trends and sports successes. It's almost as if the statistical analysis is dribbling its way into the world of baby names, performing an unexpected crossover that leaves us pondering the profound influence of nomenclature on athletic endeavors. One might even say that this curious connection is a real "slam-pun-k" in the world of statistical correlations - a triple-double of unexpected and entertaining revelations, if you will!
Turning to the realm of literature, "The Baby Name Wizard" by Laura Wattenberg and "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner offer intriguing perspectives on the social significance of naming trends, laying a foundation for our exploration of the Courtland-Bulls linkage. Meanwhile, fictional works such as "The Namesake" by Jhumpa Lahiri and "A Court of Thorns and Roses" by Sarah J. Maas beckon with their tantalizing titles, evoking the whimsical interplay between names and narrative, a theme that resonates with our own unexpected findings.
In the online domain, the popular meme "Michael Jordan's 'Crying Jordan' Meme" humorously captures the ups and downs of basketball fandom, providing a lighthearted parallel to our study's investigation of the ebbs and flows in the popularity of the name Courtland and the Chicago Bulls' win percentages. It's as if the meme-worthiness of this surprising correlation adds an extra layer of entertainment to our statistical journey, reminding us that even the most unexpected connections can bring a smile to our faces.
Therefore, as we embark on this exploration of the Courtland conundrum, we invite readers to join us in reveling in the unexpected intersections of naming trends and athletic achievements, all while enjoying the occasional dad joke or pun along the way. After all, who said statistical analysis can't bring a bit of whimsy to the table?

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our study revealed a statistically significant correlation between the popularity of the first name Courtland and the win percentage progression of the Chicago Bulls. Our analysis, spanning the years 1975 to 2022, yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.6165073, indicating a moderately strong positive relationship between these two variables. This suggests that as the popularity of the name Courtland waxed and waned, the Chicago Bulls' win percentage experienced corresponding fluctuations. It seems that the name Courtland may have been shouting "You miss 100% of the shots you don't take" from the sidelines!
The r-squared value of 0.3800812 further supports our findings, indicating that approximately 38% of the variability in the Chicago Bulls' win percentage progression can be explained by the popularity of the name Courtland. It's as if the name Courtland was not just a mere spectator in the stands of statistical significance, but a key player influencing the game from the sidelines!
In addition to the correlation coefficient and r-squared value, our analysis also revealed a p-value of less than 0.01, cementing the statistical significance of the relationship found. This implies that the likelihood of observing such a strong relationship due to chance alone is less than 0.01. It seems that this unexpected correlation is indeed a three-pointer in the world of statistical analysis!
Fig. 1 displays a scatterplot depicting the relationship between the popularity of the first name Courtland and the Chicago Bulls' win percentage progression. The figure clearly illustrates the consistent pattern of the two variables moving in tandem over the years, further bolstering the robustness of our findings. It's as if the name Courtland was coaching the Bulls to victory, one statistical trend at a time!
In summary, our research uncovers an unexpected and intriguing connection between the popularity of the first name Courtland and the performance of the Chicago Bulls. This association adds a new layer of complexity to the understanding of the interplay between societal trends and sports performance. It seems that when it comes to the name Courtland, there's more than meets the eye – a true case of unexpected statistical swish!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our study has delved into the realm of statistical curiosity, unearthing a compelling connection between the popularity of the first name Courtland and the win percentage progression of the iconic Chicago Bulls. The substantial correlation coefficient of 0.6165073 and p-value of less than 0.01 present a resounding affirmation of the unexpected relationship between these variables, offering a slam dunk of statistical significance. It's as if the name Courtland has been whispering "assist" to the Chicago Bulls' performance all along!

Our findings align with the existing literature, echoing the research by Smith and Doe (2010) and Jones (2015) that explored the influence of naming trends on sports outcomes. The Courtland conundrum stoutly supports and extends these prior investigations, cementing the significance of quirky correlations that tease the boundaries of statistical analysis. The unexpected nature of this connection seems to embody the playful unpredictability of a basketball game, reminding us that statistical inquiries can often mirror the twists and turns of athletic ventures.

Drawing from the whimsical literature review, it is undeniable that the Courtland-Bulls linkage adds a fresh twist to the intriguing interplay between societal trends and sports successes. As Levitt and Dubner would mirthfully observe, it appears that the unusual association uncovered in our study is nothing short of a "freakonomic" marvel, underscoring the delightful and unexpected relationships that statistics can unveil. It's as if the name Courtland has been performing a statistical crossover, leaving us all bemused and enchanted in the process.

The r-squared value of 0.3800812 underscores the substantial impact of the popularity of the name Courtland on explaining the variability in the Chicago Bulls' win percentage progression, infusing an unmistakable sense of statistical clout into this intriguing correlation. It's almost as if the name Courtland has been the unsung hero of the Bulls' statistical playbook all along, deftly guiding their performance with each fluctuation in its popularity.

The scatterplot vividly illustrates the consistent pattern of the two variables moving in unison, casting a compelling image of the name Courtland coaching the Chicago Bulls to statistical victory. It's as though the name Courtland were the steadfast sixth player on the court – not physically present, yet undeniably shaping the team's performance through the years. One might even say that this unexpected correlation is a "court-side" spectacle worthy of the largest of smiles!

In closing, our study demonstrates that the correlation between the popularity of the first name Courtland and the performance of the Chicago Bulls is a statistical marvel that cannot be easily dismissed. This unexpected association opens a new chapter in the exploration of the whimsical interactions between societal trends and sports achievements, presenting a playfully unexpected addition to the unfolding narrative of statistical inquiry. After all, who could have guessed that a name could hold the key to decoding the statistical performance of an iconic sports team?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Courtland and Chicago Bulls Win Percentage Progression. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Swishing Success: The Courtland Conundrum - Exploring the Relationship Between Name Popularity and NBA Performance"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The intersection of sports and societal trends has long captivated academic and popular interest alike, and our study offers a unique perspective, merging the worlds of basketball and baby names. By examining the popularity of the first name Courtland in conjunction with the win percentage progression of the Chicago Bulls, we delve into uncharted territory to uncover surprising correlations. Our research team utilized data from the US Social Security Administration and the NBA, bridging the realms of demography and athletics to shed light on this quirky connection.

Intriguingly, our findings reveal a significant correlation coefficient of 0.6165073 and p < 0.01, spanning a period from 1975 to 2022. This robust statistical linkage suggests a striking relationship between the popularity of the name Courtland and the Chicago Bulls' win percentage progression over nearly five decades. The implications of this association are as thought-provoking as they are unexpected, offering a fresh perspective on the influence of naming trends on the sporting arena.

Moreover, our study brings a new dimension to the notion of "court advantage," demonstrating how the ebb and flow of a name's popularity may mirror the fluctuations of a team's performance. As the saying goes, "There's no court like home court," and our research uncovers a parallel between the rise and fall in the frequency of the moniker Courtland and the Chicago Bulls' triumphs and trials. It seems that this connection is truly a slam dunk, exemplifying the unexpected intersections that deepen our understanding of the world around us.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The thrill of victory and the agony of the less-than-stellar win-loss record - such is the rollercoaster ride of being a sports fan. And just when you think you've seen it all, along comes our study to add a new twist to the game. At the intersection of the exhilarating world of basketball and the often surprising realm of baby naming trends, we present our investigation into the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the first name Courtland and the win percentage progression of none other than the Chicago Bulls.
It seems the correlation between naming trends and sports performance is not just a name-dropping exercise! As we delve into the depths of this Courtland conundrum, our study aims to demonstrate that there might just be more to a name than meets the eye. With a statistical correlation coefficient of 0.6165073 and a p-value of less than 0.01, we're not just shooting airballs here - our findings indicate a robust and surprising link between the ebb and flow of the name Courtland's popularity and the Chicago Bulls' on-court successes and setbacks.
The age-old question of "what's in a name" takes on a whole new meaning as we uncover this unexpected connection. It's almost as if the name Courtland is making a court-side appearance, cheering on the Bulls from the stands of statistical significance! Perhaps one could even say that this unexpected correlation is a real slam dunk in the world of sports research - a statistical alley-oop, if you will!
But fear not, dear reader, for we are not merely spectators in this game of numbers and names. Through our study, we hope to illuminate the often overlooked influence of societal trends on the world of sports, offering a fresh perspective that challenges conventional thinking. After all, it's not every day that statistical analysis leads us to the crossroads where baby names and basketball meet. This is one game where everyone's a winner, especially if you enjoy a good pun or two!

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our study revealed a statistically significant correlation between the popularity of the first name Courtland and the win percentage progression of the Chicago Bulls. Our analysis, spanning the years 1975 to 2022, yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.6165073, indicating a moderately strong positive relationship between these two variables. This suggests that as the popularity of the name Courtland waxed and waned, the Chicago Bulls' win percentage experienced corresponding fluctuations. It seems that the name Courtland may have been shouting "You miss 100% of the shots you don't take" from the sidelines!
The r-squared value of 0.3800812 further supports our findings, indicating that approximately 38% of the variability in the Chicago Bulls' win percentage progression can be explained by the popularity of the name Courtland. It's as if the name Courtland was not just a mere spectator in the stands of statistical significance, but a key player influencing the game from the sidelines!
In addition to the correlation coefficient and r-squared value, our analysis also revealed a p-value of less than 0.01, cementing the statistical significance of the relationship found. This implies that the likelihood of observing such a strong relationship due to chance alone is less than 0.01. It seems that this unexpected correlation is indeed a three-pointer in the world of statistical analysis!
Fig. 1 displays a scatterplot depicting the relationship between the popularity of the first name Courtland and the Chicago Bulls' win percentage progression. The figure clearly illustrates the consistent pattern of the two variables moving in tandem over the years, further bolstering the robustness of our findings. It's as if the name Courtland was coaching the Bulls to victory, one statistical trend at a time!
In summary, our research uncovers an unexpected and intriguing connection between the popularity of the first name Courtland and the performance of the Chicago Bulls. This association adds a new layer of complexity to the understanding of the interplay between societal trends and sports performance. It seems that when it comes to the name Courtland, there's more than meets the eye – a true case of unexpected statistical swish!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has boldly ventured into uncharted and unexpected territory, shedding light on the unexpected but statistically robust connection between the popularity of the name Courtland and the win percentage progression of the Chicago Bulls. Our findings suggest that there's more to success on the court than meets the eye, and perhaps a name does carry some slam-dunk significance after all. It's as if every time Courtland's popularity surged, the Bulls' winning streak soared to new heights – talk about a court-side cheerleader!

Our statistical correlation coefficient of 0.6165073 and the p-value of less than 0.01 provide strong evidence of this quirky relationship. It's not every day you come across such a memorable statistical slam-dunk – or should we say, a "surname" slam-dunk? It's as if Courtland was calling the shots from the sidelines, proving that even in the world of statistics, there's no "i" in team, but there is one in Courtland!

With these unexpected findings in mind, it's safe to say that our study has not only broadened the horizons of sports research but also added a touch of whimsy to the realm of statistical analysis. It's as if Courtland's popularity has been the X-factor all along, whispering "name your kids Courtland for a winning streak" to superstitious Bulls fans everywhere. But fear not, for we need not delve further into the courtly conundrum of Courtland and the Bulls' performance – we've dribbled this long enough. It seems that this unexpected statistical alley-oop leaves us with no need for further research in this area. It's as if we've taken the final shot and made it count!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Swishing Success: The Courtland Conundrum - Exploring the Relationship Between Name Popularity and NBA Performance. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Athlete Moniker Metrics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Swishing Success: The Courtland Conundrum - Exploring the Relationship Between Name Popularity and NBA Performance. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Nameology Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Swishing Success: The Courtland Conundrum - Exploring the Relationship Between Name Popularity and NBA Performance with an abstract of The intersection of sports and societal trends has long captivated academic and popular interest alike, and our study offers a unique perspective, merging the worlds of basketball and baby names. By examining the popularity of the first name Courtland in conjunction with the win percentage progression of the Chicago Bulls, we delve into uncharted territory to uncover surprising correlations. Our research team utilized data from the US Social Security Administration and the NBA, bridging the realms of demography and athletics to shed light on this quirky connection.
Intriguingly, our findings reveal a significant correlation coefficient of 0.6165073 and p < 0.01, spanning a period from 1975 to 2022. This robust statistical linkage suggests a striking relationship between the popularity of the name Courtland and the Chicago Bulls' win percentage progression over nearly five decades. The implications of this association are as thought-provoking as they are unexpected, offering a fresh perspective on the influence of naming trends on the sporting arena.
Moreover, our study brings a new dimension to the notion of "court advantage," demonstrating how the ebb and flow of a name's popularity may mirror the fluctuations of a team's performance. As the saying goes, "There's no court like home court," and our research uncovers a parallel between the rise and fall in the frequency of the moniker Courtland and the Chicago Bulls' triumphs and trials. It seems that this connection is truly a slam dunk, exemplifying the unexpected intersections that deepen our understanding of the world around us.

ChatGPT:

name popularity, NBA performance, Courtland, Chicago Bulls, win percentage, correlation coefficient, Social Security Administration, NBA data, baby names, sports sociology, demography, athletic performance, home court advantage

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Courtland
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Courtland
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Courtland

Chicago Bulls Win Percentage Progression
Source: NBA
See what else correlates with Chicago Bulls Win Percentage Progression

Correlation r = 0.6165073 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.3800812 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 38% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Chicago Bulls Win Percentage Progression) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Courtland) over the 48 years from 1975 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.08E-6. 0.0000030778500750517800000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.62 in 0.000308% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 324,902 random variables You don't actually need 324 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 47 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 47 because we have two variables measured over a period of 48 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.4, 0.77 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
197519761977197819791980198119821983198419851986198719881989199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Popularity of the first name Courtland (Babies born)24263823474541322738574768806087125115132110109137138103747259534641443750404433654647404746354836313142
Chicago Bulls Win Percentage Progression (Percentage)57.329.353.748.837.836.654.941.534.132.946.336.648.86157.367.174.481.769.567.157.387.884.275.62620.718.325.636.62857.35059.840.2505075.675.854.958.56151.25032.926.833.843.156.1




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([24,26,38,23,47,45,41,32,27,38,57,47,68,80,60,87,125,115,132,110,109,137,138,103,74,72,59,53,46,41,44,37,50,40,44,33,65,46,47,40,47,46,35,48,36,31,31,42,])
array_2 = np.array([57.3,29.3,53.7,48.8,37.8,36.6,54.9,41.5,34.1,32.9,46.3,36.6,48.8,61,57.3,67.1,74.4,81.7,69.5,67.1,57.3,87.8,84.2,75.6,26,20.7,18.3,25.6,36.6,28,57.3,50,59.8,40.2,50,50,75.6,75.8,54.9,58.5,61,51.2,50,32.9,26.8,33.8,43.1,56.1,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Courtland"
array_2_name = "Chicago Bulls Win Percentage Progression"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the rating guru we've been waiting for!


Correlation ID: 3978 · Black Variable ID: 4164 · Red Variable ID: 320
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0