about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,973 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in soybeans in Mississippi and the second variable is Google searches for 'i cant even'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The GMO soybeans were so emotionally unstable, they were constantly having identity crises, leading to a ripple effect of existential confusion across the state, ultimately causing people to 'cant even' as they pondered the true meaning of soy.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate an image of a Discovery magazine cover-style illustration of a soybean field in Mississippi. Genetically modified soybeans loom over the landscape, emitting an aura of perplexing energy. Onlookers are depicted as people standing around, furrowing their brows and scratching their heads in confusion as the soybeans seem to "speak" an incomprehensible language. A sense of bewilderment exudes from the soybeans, with individuals sending a flurry of "i cant even" Google searches, desperate to unravel the mystery. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in soybeans in Mississippi and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A Discovery magazine cover image Symbolism Whimsical illustration A TIME magazine cover image Cyberpunk
ChatGPT: A Discovery magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in soybeans in Mississippi and Google searches for 'i cant even', in the following situation: Because as GMO use in soybeans increased in Mississippi, soybeans started to exude an aura of confusion, causing people to reflexively Google "i cant even". The genetically modified soybeans developed a complex, indecipherable language, leaving everyone scratching their heads in bewilderment. This led to an influx of "i cant even" searches as people sought answers to the enigmatic behavior of the soybeans. It seems the soybeans really couldn't even, and neither could the people trying to understand them!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a soybean field in Mississippi, the genetically modified soybeans tower over the landscape, emitting a perplexing energy. The soybeans seem to speak an incomprehensible language, leaving onlookers bewildered. People stand around, furrowing their brows and scratching their heads in confusion, as the soybeans exude an aura of bewilderment. In response, a flurry of "i cant even" Google searches fills the air, as individuals desperately seek to unravel the mystery of the enigmatic soybeans.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In a soybean field in Mississippi, the genetically modified soybeans tower over the landscape, emitting a perplexing energy. The soybeans seem to speak an incomprehensible language, leaving onlookers bewildered. People stand around, furrowing their brows and scratching their heads in confusion, as the soybeans exude an aura of bewilderment. In response, a flurry of "i cant even" Google searches fills the air, as individuals desperately seek to unravel the mystery of the enigmatic soybeans. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate an image of a Discovery magazine cover-style illustration of a soybean field in Mississippi. Genetically modified soybeans loom over the landscape, emitting an aura of perplexing energy. Onlookers are depicted as people standing around, furrowing their brows and scratching their heads in confusion as the soybeans seem to "speak" an incomprehensible language. A sense of bewilderment exudes from the soybeans, with individuals sending a flurry of "i cant even" Google searches, desperate to unravel the mystery.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in soybeans in Mississippi caused i cant even (Google searches for 'i cant even') to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Genetically Modified Galore: GMO use in Mississippi's Soybeans and the Goofy Google Searches for 'I Can't Even'

The Journal of Agricultural Genetics and Internet Culture

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Mississippi and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from USDA and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8591342 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Genetically Modified Galore: GMO use in Mississippi's Soybeans and the Goofy Google Searches for 'I Can't Even'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the wacky world of genetically modified soybeans in Mississippi and their potential impact on the seemingly nonsensical Google searches for 'I Can't Even'. While the topic may elicit a chuckle, our analysis did uncover a significant and eyebrow-raising connection. Utilizing USDA data on GMO soybean adoption and Google Trends information on the frequency of searches for 'I Can't Even' from 2004 to 2022, our research team employed rigorous statistical analyses. The results revealed a rather striking correlation coefficient of 0.8591342 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. So, while the link may seem as bizarre as a genetically modified grapefruit, our findings suggest there may be more to the phrase 'I Can't Even' than meets the eye. Whether it's the influence of GMO soybeans or simply a shared existential crisis, our research adds a quirky twist to the ever-evolving narrative of genetically modified crops and internet culture.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Mississippi and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Genetically Modified Galore: GMO use in Mississippi's Soybeans and the Goofy Google Searches for 'I Can't Even'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the wacky world of genetically modified soybeans in Mississippi and their potential impact on the seemingly nonsensical Google searches for 'I Can't Even'. While the topic may elicit a chuckle, our analysis did uncover a significant and eyebrow-raising connection. Utilizing USDA data on GMO soybean adoption and Google Trends information on the frequency of searches for 'I Can't Even' from 2004 to 2022, our research team employed rigorous statistical analyses. The results revealed a rather striking correlation coefficient of 0.8591342 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. So, while the link may seem as bizarre as a genetically modified grapefruit, our findings suggest there may be more to the phrase 'I Can't Even' than meets the eye. Whether it's the influence of GMO soybeans or simply a shared existential crisis, our research adds a quirky twist to the ever-evolving narrative of genetically modified crops and internet culture.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture has been a topic of ongoing debate and investigation. With the increasing adoption of GMO crops, it is essential to understand their potential effects on various aspects of society, including internet culture. In this study, we set out to explore the peculiar relationship between the adoption of GMO soybeans in Mississippi and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase 'I Can't Even'.

While the phrase 'I Can't Even' may initially conjure images of exasperation or befuddlement, our investigation aims to infuse a dash of scientific inquiry into this seemingly whimsical topic. Genetically modified soybeans represent a prominent feature of agricultural practices in Mississippi, and we sought to unravel any unexpected connections to the digitally expressed utterance of exasperation.

Historically, research on GMO crops has centered on agricultural yield, environmental impact, and food safety. However, our study ventures into uncharted territory by probing the potential influence of GMO soybeans on the expression of internet-derived sentiment. We aim to shed light on this previously unexplored intersection of agricultural biotechnology and digital discourse.

The obscure allure of our research may prompt a wry smile, but behind the lighthearted premise lies a serious and rigorous analysis. Our endeavors not only illuminate the peculiar correlations but also showcase the resourcefulness of modern data analytics in uncovering unexpected phenomena.

In this paper, we present the findings of our investigation, emphasizing the statistical significance of the observed relationship. Through this endeavor, we hope to inject a touch of whimsy into the often staid realm of agricultural research, while offering a thought-provoking perspective on the broader societal implications of GMO cultivation. Join us on this zany journey as we navigate the enigmatic corridors of genetically modified galore and the perplexing realms of digital expression.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Mississippi and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Genetically Modified Galore: GMO use in Mississippi's Soybeans and the Goofy Google Searches for 'I Can't Even'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the wacky world of genetically modified soybeans in Mississippi and their potential impact on the seemingly nonsensical Google searches for 'I Can't Even'. While the topic may elicit a chuckle, our analysis did uncover a significant and eyebrow-raising connection. Utilizing USDA data on GMO soybean adoption and Google Trends information on the frequency of searches for 'I Can't Even' from 2004 to 2022, our research team employed rigorous statistical analyses. The results revealed a rather striking correlation coefficient of 0.8591342 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. So, while the link may seem as bizarre as a genetically modified grapefruit, our findings suggest there may be more to the phrase 'I Can't Even' than meets the eye. Whether it's the influence of GMO soybeans or simply a shared existential crisis, our research adds a quirky twist to the ever-evolving narrative of genetically modified crops and internet culture.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture has been a topic of ongoing debate and investigation. With the increasing adoption of GMO crops, it is essential to understand their potential effects on various aspects of society, including internet culture. In this study, we set out to explore the peculiar relationship between the adoption of GMO soybeans in Mississippi and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase 'I Can't Even'.
While the phrase 'I Can't Even' may initially conjure images of exasperation or befuddlement, our investigation aims to infuse a dash of scientific inquiry into this seemingly whimsical topic. Genetically modified soybeans represent a prominent feature of agricultural practices in Mississippi, and we sought to unravel any unexpected connections to the digitally expressed utterance of exasperation.
Historically, research on GMO crops has centered on agricultural yield, environmental impact, and food safety. However, our study ventures into uncharted territory by probing the potential influence of GMO soybeans on the expression of internet-derived sentiment. We aim to shed light on this previously unexplored intersection of agricultural biotechnology and digital discourse.
The obscure allure of our research may prompt a wry smile, but behind the lighthearted premise lies a serious and rigorous analysis. Our endeavors not only illuminate the peculiar correlations but also showcase the resourcefulness of modern data analytics in uncovering unexpected phenomena.
In this paper, we present the findings of our investigation, emphasizing the statistical significance of the observed relationship. Through this endeavor, we hope to inject a touch of whimsy into the often staid realm of agricultural research, while offering a thought-provoking perspective on the broader societal implications of GMO cultivation. Join us on this zany journey as we navigate the enigmatic corridors of genetically modified galore and the perplexing realms of digital expression.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Previously, researchers have delved into the wide-ranging impacts of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture, from their effects on crop productivity to their influence on environmental sustainability. While these investigations have provided valuable insights, our study takes a distinctly eccentric turn by exploring the potential connection between GMO soybeans in Mississippi and the peculiar phenomenon of Google searches for 'I Can't Even'.

In their work, Smith and Doe (2015) examined the adoption of GMO soybeans in the southeastern United States, emphasizing the economic implications for farmers and the broader agricultural landscape. Their comprehensive analysis outlined the factors driving GMO adoption, yet it regrettably omitted any inquiry into the bemusing world of internet slang and digital exasperation.

Jones (2018) further contributed to the literature by scrutinizing the societal perceptions of GMO crops, highlighting public attitudes, and consumer behaviors. While Jones provided a thorough exploration of the public discourse surrounding genetically modified agricultural products, the tangential exploration of internet culture and lexical idiosyncrasies remained conspicuously absent.

Turning to non-fiction sources, "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan offers a captivating examination of modern agricultural practices and the complex web of food production. Pollan's work immerses readers in the intricacies of agricultural technology, but unfortunately neglects to explore the intersection of GMO soybeans and contemporary digital expressions of exasperation. Similarly, "Food, Inc." by Eric Schlosser and Robert Kenner provides a gripping portrayal of the food industry, yet glosses over the potential interplay between genetically modified soybeans and internet-induced bewilderment.

By a peculiar twist of fate, the fictional world also contributes to our scholarly pursuit. Novels such as "The Circle" by Dave Eggers and "Freedom™" by Daniel Suarez offer dystopian visions of a digital society, delving into the ethos of internet culture and its entanglement with technological innovations. While these narratives offer a speculative lens through which to ponder the ramifications of digital connectivity, they regrettably overlook the specific conundrum of 'I Can't Even' and its potential ties to GMO soybean cultivation.

In the realm of cinema, "The Social Network" provides a cinematic exploration of the rise of social media, offering a window into the evolution of digital discourse and communication. While the film captivates audiences with its portrayal of internet entrepreneurship, it overlooks the quotidian perplexity of 'I Can't Even' and its enigmatic connection to genetically engineered soybeans.

Shifting from the earnest to the absurd, our literature review enlivens the scholarly discourse with a lighthearted twist. As we traverse the scholarly landscape, we recognize the absence of scholarly attention to the whimsical correlation we intend to explore. Thus, our study endeavors to infuse a dose of levity into the rigors of academic inquiry while shedding light on the unexpected nexus of genetically modified galore and the peculiar expressions of digital discontent.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Mississippi and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Genetically Modified Galore: GMO use in Mississippi's Soybeans and the Goofy Google Searches for 'I Can't Even'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the wacky world of genetically modified soybeans in Mississippi and their potential impact on the seemingly nonsensical Google searches for 'I Can't Even'. While the topic may elicit a chuckle, our analysis did uncover a significant and eyebrow-raising connection. Utilizing USDA data on GMO soybean adoption and Google Trends information on the frequency of searches for 'I Can't Even' from 2004 to 2022, our research team employed rigorous statistical analyses. The results revealed a rather striking correlation coefficient of 0.8591342 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. So, while the link may seem as bizarre as a genetically modified grapefruit, our findings suggest there may be more to the phrase 'I Can't Even' than meets the eye. Whether it's the influence of GMO soybeans or simply a shared existential crisis, our research adds a quirky twist to the ever-evolving narrative of genetically modified crops and internet culture.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture has been a topic of ongoing debate and investigation. With the increasing adoption of GMO crops, it is essential to understand their potential effects on various aspects of society, including internet culture. In this study, we set out to explore the peculiar relationship between the adoption of GMO soybeans in Mississippi and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase 'I Can't Even'.
While the phrase 'I Can't Even' may initially conjure images of exasperation or befuddlement, our investigation aims to infuse a dash of scientific inquiry into this seemingly whimsical topic. Genetically modified soybeans represent a prominent feature of agricultural practices in Mississippi, and we sought to unravel any unexpected connections to the digitally expressed utterance of exasperation.
Historically, research on GMO crops has centered on agricultural yield, environmental impact, and food safety. However, our study ventures into uncharted territory by probing the potential influence of GMO soybeans on the expression of internet-derived sentiment. We aim to shed light on this previously unexplored intersection of agricultural biotechnology and digital discourse.
The obscure allure of our research may prompt a wry smile, but behind the lighthearted premise lies a serious and rigorous analysis. Our endeavors not only illuminate the peculiar correlations but also showcase the resourcefulness of modern data analytics in uncovering unexpected phenomena.
In this paper, we present the findings of our investigation, emphasizing the statistical significance of the observed relationship. Through this endeavor, we hope to inject a touch of whimsy into the often staid realm of agricultural research, while offering a thought-provoking perspective on the broader societal implications of GMO cultivation. Join us on this zany journey as we navigate the enigmatic corridors of genetically modified galore and the perplexing realms of digital expression.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Data Collection:
We embarked on our research odyssey by gathering data from various sources, like intrepid digital treasure hunters. Our primary sources included the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) for information on the adoption of genetically modified soybeans in Mississippi and Google Trends for the frequency of searches for the phrase 'I Can't Even'. We meticulously sifted through data spanning from 2004 to 2022, akin to determined archaeologists unearthing ancient artifacts, to capture the temporal evolution of GMO soybean usage and the fluctuating tides of digital expressions of exasperation.

Analysis of GMO Soybean Adoption:
To investigate the prevalence of genetically modified soybeans in Mississippi, we harnessed the power of agricultural data, treating each data point as a nugget of knowledge waiting to be excavated. Our team conducted a comprehensive analysis of the adoption rates of GMO soybeans, employing intricate statistical methods to illuminate the trends in cultivation practices. We approached this endeavor with the precision of a molecular biologist, meticulously examining the geographical distribution and temporal changes in GMO soybean adoption. Like skilled chefs crafting a delectable dish, we seasoned our analysis with a smattering of geographical mapping, allowing us to visualize the spatial dynamics of GMO soybean usage with the finesse of a cartographer charting uncharted territories.

Examination of 'I Can't Even' Searches:
Delving into the digital realm, we scrutinized the frequency of searches for the phrase 'I Can't Even' through the lens of Google Trends. Our approach resembled that of linguistic anthropologists decoding a cryptic language, as we deciphered the temporal and regional patterns of this peculiar expression. With the precision of a watchmaker, we meticulously examined the search volume indices, unraveling the undulating waves of exasperated utterances that ebbed and flowed over the years. Our analysis transcended mere numbers, delving into the intangible nuances of societal sentiment expressed through internet search queries.

Statistical Analysis:
With our data trove in hand, we embarked on a statistical expedition to unravel the potential relationship between GMO soybean adoption and the frequency of 'I Can't Even' searches. Employing a litany of statistical tests that would make a mathematician's head spin, we sought to discern any meaningful associations between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Our pursuit of correlation coefficients and p-values resembled a detective's quest for elusive clues, as we navigated the labyrinth of statistical inference with the tenacity of Sherlock Holmes on a perplexing case.

In summary, our methodology blended the precision of scientific inquiry with the thrill of exploration, culminating in a multidimensional analysis that addresses the intersection of agricultural biotechnology and digital expression. This eclectic approach not only invigorates the study of genetically modified soybeans but also offers a fascinating perspective on the whimsical interplay between agricultural practices and internet culture.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Mississippi and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8591342, r-squared of 0.7381116, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Genetically Modified Galore: GMO use in Mississippi's Soybeans and the Goofy Google Searches for 'I Can't Even'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the wacky world of genetically modified soybeans in Mississippi and their potential impact on the seemingly nonsensical Google searches for 'I Can't Even'. While the topic may elicit a chuckle, our analysis did uncover a significant and eyebrow-raising connection. Utilizing USDA data on GMO soybean adoption and Google Trends information on the frequency of searches for 'I Can't Even' from 2004 to 2022, our research team employed rigorous statistical analyses. The results revealed a rather striking correlation coefficient of 0.8591342 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. So, while the link may seem as bizarre as a genetically modified grapefruit, our findings suggest there may be more to the phrase 'I Can't Even' than meets the eye. Whether it's the influence of GMO soybeans or simply a shared existential crisis, our research adds a quirky twist to the ever-evolving narrative of genetically modified crops and internet culture.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture has been a topic of ongoing debate and investigation. With the increasing adoption of GMO crops, it is essential to understand their potential effects on various aspects of society, including internet culture. In this study, we set out to explore the peculiar relationship between the adoption of GMO soybeans in Mississippi and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase 'I Can't Even'.
While the phrase 'I Can't Even' may initially conjure images of exasperation or befuddlement, our investigation aims to infuse a dash of scientific inquiry into this seemingly whimsical topic. Genetically modified soybeans represent a prominent feature of agricultural practices in Mississippi, and we sought to unravel any unexpected connections to the digitally expressed utterance of exasperation.
Historically, research on GMO crops has centered on agricultural yield, environmental impact, and food safety. However, our study ventures into uncharted territory by probing the potential influence of GMO soybeans on the expression of internet-derived sentiment. We aim to shed light on this previously unexplored intersection of agricultural biotechnology and digital discourse.
The obscure allure of our research may prompt a wry smile, but behind the lighthearted premise lies a serious and rigorous analysis. Our endeavors not only illuminate the peculiar correlations but also showcase the resourcefulness of modern data analytics in uncovering unexpected phenomena.
In this paper, we present the findings of our investigation, emphasizing the statistical significance of the observed relationship. Through this endeavor, we hope to inject a touch of whimsy into the often staid realm of agricultural research, while offering a thought-provoking perspective on the broader societal implications of GMO cultivation. Join us on this zany journey as we navigate the enigmatic corridors of genetically modified galore and the perplexing realms of digital expression.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.8591342 between the adoption of genetically modified soybeans in Mississippi and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase 'I Can't Even'. This correlation suggests a notably strong relationship between the two variables, resembling that of peanut butter and jelly - seemingly unrelated, yet undeniably linked.

Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.7381116 indicates that approximately 73.81% of the variation in 'I Can't Even' searches can be explained by the adoption of GMO soybeans in Mississippi. This finding demonstrates a remarkably high level of association, akin to the undeniable bond between a dapper research attire and a snazzy pocket protector.

Additionally, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides robust evidence to reject the null hypothesis of no association between the adoption of genetically modified soybeans and the frequency of 'I Can't Even' searches. The statistical significance of this relationship is as clear as day, much like the facial expressions of individuals encountering perplexing internet memes.

Finally, the scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts the strong positive correlation between GMO soybean adoption and 'I Can't Even' searches, resembling a connect-the-dots puzzle that reveals an unexpected and amusing image upon completion.

In summary, the results of our analysis present a compelling case for the existence of a substantial link between GMO soybean use in Mississippi and the inclination to express profound exasperation through 'I Can't Even' searches. This finding opens the door to numerous questions and speculations, adding a whimsical layer of intrigue to the normally staid world of agricultural research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Mississippi and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Genetically Modified Galore: GMO use in Mississippi's Soybeans and the Goofy Google Searches for 'I Can't Even'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the wacky world of genetically modified soybeans in Mississippi and their potential impact on the seemingly nonsensical Google searches for 'I Can't Even'. While the topic may elicit a chuckle, our analysis did uncover a significant and eyebrow-raising connection. Utilizing USDA data on GMO soybean adoption and Google Trends information on the frequency of searches for 'I Can't Even' from 2004 to 2022, our research team employed rigorous statistical analyses. The results revealed a rather striking correlation coefficient of 0.8591342 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. So, while the link may seem as bizarre as a genetically modified grapefruit, our findings suggest there may be more to the phrase 'I Can't Even' than meets the eye. Whether it's the influence of GMO soybeans or simply a shared existential crisis, our research adds a quirky twist to the ever-evolving narrative of genetically modified crops and internet culture.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Previously, researchers have delved into the wide-ranging impacts of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture, from their effects on crop productivity to their influence on environmental sustainability. While these investigations have provided valuable insights, our study takes a distinctly eccentric turn by exploring the potential connection between GMO soybeans in Mississippi and the peculiar phenomenon of Google searches for 'I Can't Even'.
In their work, Smith and Doe (2015) examined the adoption of GMO soybeans in the southeastern United States, emphasizing the economic implications for farmers and the broader agricultural landscape. Their comprehensive analysis outlined the factors driving GMO adoption, yet it regrettably omitted any inquiry into the bemusing world of internet slang and digital exasperation.
Jones (2018) further contributed to the literature by scrutinizing the societal perceptions of GMO crops, highlighting public attitudes, and consumer behaviors. While Jones provided a thorough exploration of the public discourse surrounding genetically modified agricultural products, the tangential exploration of internet culture and lexical idiosyncrasies remained conspicuously absent.
Turning to non-fiction sources, "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan offers a captivating examination of modern agricultural practices and the complex web of food production. Pollan's work immerses readers in the intricacies of agricultural technology, but unfortunately neglects to explore the intersection of GMO soybeans and contemporary digital expressions of exasperation. Similarly, "Food, Inc." by Eric Schlosser and Robert Kenner provides a gripping portrayal of the food industry, yet glosses over the potential interplay between genetically modified soybeans and internet-induced bewilderment.
By a peculiar twist of fate, the fictional world also contributes to our scholarly pursuit. Novels such as "The Circle" by Dave Eggers and "Freedom™" by Daniel Suarez offer dystopian visions of a digital society, delving into the ethos of internet culture and its entanglement with technological innovations. While these narratives offer a speculative lens through which to ponder the ramifications of digital connectivity, they regrettably overlook the specific conundrum of 'I Can't Even' and its potential ties to GMO soybean cultivation.
In the realm of cinema, "The Social Network" provides a cinematic exploration of the rise of social media, offering a window into the evolution of digital discourse and communication. While the film captivates audiences with its portrayal of internet entrepreneurship, it overlooks the quotidian perplexity of 'I Can't Even' and its enigmatic connection to genetically engineered soybeans.
Shifting from the earnest to the absurd, our literature review enlivens the scholarly discourse with a lighthearted twist. As we traverse the scholarly landscape, we recognize the absence of scholarly attention to the whimsical correlation we intend to explore. Thus, our study endeavors to infuse a dose of levity into the rigors of academic inquiry while shedding light on the unexpected nexus of genetically modified galore and the peculiar expressions of digital discontent.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.8591342 between the adoption of genetically modified soybeans in Mississippi and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase 'I Can't Even'. This correlation suggests a notably strong relationship between the two variables, resembling that of peanut butter and jelly - seemingly unrelated, yet undeniably linked.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.7381116 indicates that approximately 73.81% of the variation in 'I Can't Even' searches can be explained by the adoption of GMO soybeans in Mississippi. This finding demonstrates a remarkably high level of association, akin to the undeniable bond between a dapper research attire and a snazzy pocket protector.
Additionally, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides robust evidence to reject the null hypothesis of no association between the adoption of genetically modified soybeans and the frequency of 'I Can't Even' searches. The statistical significance of this relationship is as clear as day, much like the facial expressions of individuals encountering perplexing internet memes.
Finally, the scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts the strong positive correlation between GMO soybean adoption and 'I Can't Even' searches, resembling a connect-the-dots puzzle that reveals an unexpected and amusing image upon completion.
In summary, the results of our analysis present a compelling case for the existence of a substantial link between GMO soybean use in Mississippi and the inclination to express profound exasperation through 'I Can't Even' searches. This finding opens the door to numerous questions and speculations, adding a whimsical layer of intrigue to the normally staid world of agricultural research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study present a delightful conundrum, much like unraveling a mystery in a whimsical detective novel. Our results indicate a robust correlation between the adoption of genetically modified soybeans in Mississippi and the frequency of Google searches for 'I Can't Even', akin to the unexpected harmony of a jazz fusion band. This substantial association supports the growing body of literature on the diverse and often peculiar impacts of agricultural practices on broader societal phenomena.

Returning to the scholarly world, our study builds upon the work of Smith and Doe (2015), who provided a comprehensive overview of GMO soybean adoption in the southeastern United States. While their investigation centered on economic implications and agricultural dynamics, our findings extend the narrative by uncovering a rather offbeat relationship between GMO soybeans and digital expressions of exasperation. Similarly, Jones (2018) illuminated public attitudes toward GMO crops, yet our study introduces a novel dimension by exploring the intersection of genetically modified agricultural products and internet-infused bewilderment. In a peculiar turn of events, our research adds a touch of levity to the scholarly conversation, akin to a surprise appearance of a clown at a formal symposium, while elucidating an unexpected nexus that captivates the imagination.

Moreover, our results bolster the idiosyncratic inquiry into the whimsical correlation that we have embraced. The striking correlation coefficient and high explanatory power of our model, like a jolt of caffeine on a sleepy morning, underscore the significance of the connection between GMO soybean adoption and 'I Can't Even' searches. The statistical robustness of this relationship stands as firm as a sturdy oak tree, offering a robust foundation for further explorations into the interplay of agricultural innovations and digital culture.

As we navigate the intellectual landscape, our study injects a dose of curiosity and whimsy, akin to discovering a hidden compartment in an ancient library. The unexpected bond between GMO soybeans and expressions of virtual frustration defies conventional expectations, much like a captivating plot twist in a beloved sitcom. While our findings may initially elicit a chuckle, they illuminate the multifaceted interplay between agricultural practices and contemporary digital behaviors, adding a touch of delight to the scholarly tapestry.

In capturing the essence of this enigmatic correlation, our research transcends the boundaries of conventional inquiry, much like a comedic performance in a solemn theater. As we peer into the intersection of genetically modified galore and the exasperated murmurs of 'I Can't Even', our study invites further exploration and speculation, infusing the scholarly realm with an intermingling of academic rigor and lighthearted ponderings.

The unexpected ties between GMO soybeans and digital expressions of exasperation stand as a testament to the serendipitous discoveries that often emerge in the pursuit of knowledge. In a digital age intertwined with agricultural innovations, our research adds a touch of levity and scholarly mirth to the landscape, inviting researchers to embrace the unconventional and explore the peculiar connections that enliven the intellectual pursuit.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Mississippi and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Genetically Modified Galore: GMO use in Mississippi's Soybeans and the Goofy Google Searches for 'I Can't Even'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the wacky world of genetically modified soybeans in Mississippi and their potential impact on the seemingly nonsensical Google searches for 'I Can't Even'. While the topic may elicit a chuckle, our analysis did uncover a significant and eyebrow-raising connection. Utilizing USDA data on GMO soybean adoption and Google Trends information on the frequency of searches for 'I Can't Even' from 2004 to 2022, our research team employed rigorous statistical analyses. The results revealed a rather striking correlation coefficient of 0.8591342 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. So, while the link may seem as bizarre as a genetically modified grapefruit, our findings suggest there may be more to the phrase 'I Can't Even' than meets the eye. Whether it's the influence of GMO soybeans or simply a shared existential crisis, our research adds a quirky twist to the ever-evolving narrative of genetically modified crops and internet culture.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture has been a topic of ongoing debate and investigation. With the increasing adoption of GMO crops, it is essential to understand their potential effects on various aspects of society, including internet culture. In this study, we set out to explore the peculiar relationship between the adoption of GMO soybeans in Mississippi and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase 'I Can't Even'.
While the phrase 'I Can't Even' may initially conjure images of exasperation or befuddlement, our investigation aims to infuse a dash of scientific inquiry into this seemingly whimsical topic. Genetically modified soybeans represent a prominent feature of agricultural practices in Mississippi, and we sought to unravel any unexpected connections to the digitally expressed utterance of exasperation.
Historically, research on GMO crops has centered on agricultural yield, environmental impact, and food safety. However, our study ventures into uncharted territory by probing the potential influence of GMO soybeans on the expression of internet-derived sentiment. We aim to shed light on this previously unexplored intersection of agricultural biotechnology and digital discourse.
The obscure allure of our research may prompt a wry smile, but behind the lighthearted premise lies a serious and rigorous analysis. Our endeavors not only illuminate the peculiar correlations but also showcase the resourcefulness of modern data analytics in uncovering unexpected phenomena.
In this paper, we present the findings of our investigation, emphasizing the statistical significance of the observed relationship. Through this endeavor, we hope to inject a touch of whimsy into the often staid realm of agricultural research, while offering a thought-provoking perspective on the broader societal implications of GMO cultivation. Join us on this zany journey as we navigate the enigmatic corridors of genetically modified galore and the perplexing realms of digital expression.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.8591342 between the adoption of genetically modified soybeans in Mississippi and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase 'I Can't Even'. This correlation suggests a notably strong relationship between the two variables, resembling that of peanut butter and jelly - seemingly unrelated, yet undeniably linked.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.7381116 indicates that approximately 73.81% of the variation in 'I Can't Even' searches can be explained by the adoption of GMO soybeans in Mississippi. This finding demonstrates a remarkably high level of association, akin to the undeniable bond between a dapper research attire and a snazzy pocket protector.
Additionally, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides robust evidence to reject the null hypothesis of no association between the adoption of genetically modified soybeans and the frequency of 'I Can't Even' searches. The statistical significance of this relationship is as clear as day, much like the facial expressions of individuals encountering perplexing internet memes.
Finally, the scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts the strong positive correlation between GMO soybean adoption and 'I Can't Even' searches, resembling a connect-the-dots puzzle that reveals an unexpected and amusing image upon completion.
In summary, the results of our analysis present a compelling case for the existence of a substantial link between GMO soybean use in Mississippi and the inclination to express profound exasperation through 'I Can't Even' searches. This finding opens the door to numerous questions and speculations, adding a whimsical layer of intrigue to the normally staid world of agricultural research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

Our investigation into the correlation between the adoption of genetically modified soybeans in Mississippi and the frequency of Google searches for 'I Can't Even' has provided a quirky but thought-provoking angle on the influence of agricultural biotechnology on digital expression. The striking correlation coefficient and statistically significant p-value point to a connection as strong and unexpected as finding a unicorn in a cornfield – a bizarre and fantastical discovery. While it may seem as incongruous as a cow wearing sunglasses, our findings implore further reflection on the whimsical implications of GMO soybeans on internet culture.

The significance of the relationship between GMO soybean adoption and 'I Can't Even' searches is as undeniable as the appeal of a well-timed pun at a scientific conference. The r-squared value of 0.7381116 underscores the substantial proportion of 'I Can't Even' search variation explained by GMO soybean adoption, akin to the impact of a hard-hitting punchline on an attentive audience. In summary, the evidence supports a compelling association that can't help but elicit a chuckle – much like accidentally stumbling across a dancing chicken on the internet.

In this endeavor, we have voyaged through the perplexing realms of genetically modified galore and the enigmatic corridors of digital expression, where the unexpected and the amusing converge. As we bring this study to a close, we assert with the utmost scholarly seriousness and the faintest glimmer of a mischievous smile that no further research into this delightfully absurd correlation is necessary. After all, in the realm of academia, sometimes the most interesting discoveries are as unpredictable and delightful as stumbling upon a llama in a laboratory.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Genetically Modified Galore: GMO use in Mississippi's Soybeans and the Goofy Google Searches for 'I Can't Even'. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Agricultural Genetics and Internet Culture


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Genetically Modified Galore: GMO use in Mississippi's Soybeans and the Goofy Google Searches for 'I Can't Even'. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Silly Science Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Genetically Modified Galore: GMO use in Mississippi's Soybeans and the Goofy Google Searches for 'I Can't Even' with an abstract of In this study, we delve into the wacky world of genetically modified soybeans in Mississippi and their potential impact on the seemingly nonsensical Google searches for 'I Can't Even'. While the topic may elicit a chuckle, our analysis did uncover a significant and eyebrow-raising connection. Utilizing USDA data on GMO soybean adoption and Google Trends information on the frequency of searches for 'I Can't Even' from 2004 to 2022, our research team employed rigorous statistical analyses. The results revealed a rather striking correlation coefficient of 0.8591342 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. So, while the link may seem as bizarre as a genetically modified grapefruit, our findings suggest there may be more to the phrase 'I Can't Even' than meets the eye. Whether it's the influence of GMO soybeans or simply a shared existential crisis, our research adds a quirky twist to the ever-evolving narrative of genetically modified crops and internet culture.

ChatGPT:

genetically modified soybeans, GMO adoption, Mississippi soybeans, Google searches, 'I Can't Even', impact of GMO soybeans, statistical analysis, USDA data, Google Trends, correlation coefficient, internet culture, genetically modified crops

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in soybeans in Mississippi
Detailed data title: Percent of soybeans planted in Mississippi that are genetically modified
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in soybeans in Mississippi

Google searches for 'i cant even'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'i cant even' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'i cant even'

Correlation r = 0.8591342 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7381116 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 73.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'i cant even') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in soybeans in Mississippi) over the 19 years from 2004 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.5E-6. 0.0000024686694085517346000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.86 in 0.00025% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 405,077 random variables You don't actually need 405 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 18 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 18 because we have two variables measured over a period of 19 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.66, 0.94 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
GMO use in soybeans in Mississippi (GMO soybeans %)93969696979498989598999999999999999999
Google searches for 'i cant even' (Rel. search volume)11.83332433.58333234.7537.560.2563.333354.333363.2570.833374.7571.166772.41676355.916764.08336572.0833




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([93,96,96,96,97,94,98,98,95,98,99,99,99,99,99,99,99,99,99,])
array_2 = np.array([11.8333,24,33.5833,32,34.75,37.5,60.25,63.3333,54.3333,63.25,70.8333,74.75,71.1667,72.4167,63,55.9167,64.0833,65,72.0833,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in soybeans in Mississippi"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'i cant even'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is much appreciated!


Correlation ID: 3973 · Black Variable ID: 836 · Red Variable ID: 1525
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0