about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,961 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of cartographers in New Hampshire and the second variable is Fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

As more cartographers flocked to New Hampshire, they inadvertently unearthed a secret map leading to an abundant reserve of dinosaur bones, leading to a surge in fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines for the necessary excavation and transportation.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that embodies the essence of minimalism, portraying a group of cartographers huddled in a vibrant office in New Hampshire, examining maps and charts. Simultaneously, depict heavy machinery excavating dinosaur bones in a Saint Vincent/Grenadines reserve. This minimalist scene should capture the essence of bustling energy in the office and the powerful, earthy atmosphere of the excavation site. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of cartographers in New Hampshire and Fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: a meme Scalar art Hyper-realistic An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' Minimalism
ChatGPT: Minimalism

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of cartographers in New Hampshire and Fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines, in the following situation: As more cartographers flocked to New Hampshire, they inadvertently unearthed a secret map leading to an abundant reserve of dinosaur bones, leading to a surge in fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines for the necessary excavation and transportation.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A group of cartographers is gathered in a bustling office in New Hampshire, pouring over maps and charts. Meanwhile, in Saint Vincent/Grenadines, heavy machinery is being used to excavate dinosaur bones from a newly discovered reserve. The air is filled with the sound of drilling and the scent of fossil fuels as the valuable fossils are being unearthed.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Minimalism ] and depicting this scene: A group of cartographers is gathered in a bustling office in New Hampshire, pouring over maps and charts. Meanwhile, in Saint Vincent/Grenadines, heavy machinery is being used to excavate dinosaur bones from a newly discovered reserve. The air is filled with the sound of drilling and the scent of fossil fuels as the valuable fossils are being unearthed. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that embodies the essence of minimalism, portraying a group of cartographers huddled in a vibrant office in New Hampshire, examining maps and charts. Simultaneously, depict heavy machinery excavating dinosaur bones in a Saint Vincent/Grenadines reserve. This minimalist scene should capture the essence of bustling energy in the office and the powerful, earthy atmosphere of the excavation site.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide humerus responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else. Your responses should be able to be used as the title for a funny post, or the top comment on a thread explaining the connection.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in The number of cartographers in New Hampshire caused Fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines to increase. Go right to the goofy explanation, make it silly and fun, and two sentences long. Do not start with 'well' or 'you see' or similar statements.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Cartographers and Carbon: Exploring the Correlation Between Cartographer Counts in New Hampshire and Fossil Fuel Use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines

The Journal of Geospatial Extravaganza

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of cartographers in New Hampshire and Fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7978469 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Cartographers and Carbon: Exploring the Correlation Between Cartographer Counts in New Hampshire and Fossil Fuel Use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines

[[ABSTRACT]]
As the saying goes, "You can't have too many maps or too little pollution!" In this groundbreaking research, we delve into the unforeseen relationship between cartographers in New Hampshire and fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7978469 and p < 0.01 over the period from 2003 to 2021. Our findings reveal a surprisingly strong link between the number of cartographers in the quaint state of New Hampshire and the level of fossil fuel consumption in the tropical paradise of Saint Vincent/Grenadines.

While this connection may seem as unlikely as finding a map in a lost treasure chest, our statistical analysis leaves no room for doubt. The empirical evidence prompts us to consider that the proliferation of cartographers in New Hampshire may have an unforeseen impact on the energy choices of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. As the debate surrounding climate change heats up, it's truly a-mapping how this overlooked aspect could influence global environmental efforts! Let's just say, we're putting the "map" in "climate map-ters" with these unexpected results!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of cartographers in New Hampshire and Fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Cartographers and Carbon: Exploring the Correlation Between Cartographer Counts in New Hampshire and Fossil Fuel Use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines

[[ABSTRACT]]
As the saying goes, "You can't have too many maps or too little pollution!" In this groundbreaking research, we delve into the unforeseen relationship between cartographers in New Hampshire and fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7978469 and p < 0.01 over the period from 2003 to 2021. Our findings reveal a surprisingly strong link between the number of cartographers in the quaint state of New Hampshire and the level of fossil fuel consumption in the tropical paradise of Saint Vincent/Grenadines.

While this connection may seem as unlikely as finding a map in a lost treasure chest, our statistical analysis leaves no room for doubt. The empirical evidence prompts us to consider that the proliferation of cartographers in New Hampshire may have an unforeseen impact on the energy choices of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. As the debate surrounding climate change heats up, it's truly a-mapping how this overlooked aspect could influence global environmental efforts! Let's just say, we're putting the "map" in "climate map-ters" with these unexpected results!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Cartography, the art and science of map-making, plays a pivotal role in our understanding of the world around us. As the famous cartographer once said, "I’m a firm believer in the presence of a map where no man has ever trod!" The intriguing relationship between the number of cartographers in New Hampshire and fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines has long been overlooked, like a hidden treasure waiting to be discovered. Our research aims to shed light on this uncommon association and unveil the unexpected influence of map-makers on environmental choices.

Picture this: as cartographers diligently chart the landscapes of New Hampshire, they may unknowingly be charting a course for the energy decisions of an entire tropical nation. It's as if these map-makers are leaving their mark not just on paper, but also on global carbon footprints! Who would've thought that the humble cartographer holds such power in the realm of environmental impact?

The idea may sound like a tall tale, but as researchers, we're always up for a good map-stery to unravel. So, we embarked on a data expedition, armed with statistical compasses and regression sextants, to navigate our way through the correlations and sail to the heart of this peculiar phenomenon. Together, we charted the uncharted territories of statistical analysis to uncover the hidden linkages between seemingly unrelated variables.

As we delved into the depths of this unlikely connection, we unearthed correlations that were as strong as bedrock and piqued our curiosity like buried treasure. The statistical correlation coefficient of 0.7978469 between cartographer counts and fossil fuel use left us feeling as if we struck gold in the world of data mining! It was a statistical revelation that could make even the most seasoned geographer do a double-take.

In our study, we used data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to track the number of cartographers in New Hampshire and obtained information on fossil fuel consumption in Saint Vincent/Grenadines from the Energy Information Administration. The data from these sources not only provided solid ground for our analysis but also added depth to our understanding of the complex interplay between geographic information and energy choices.

With our findings exceeding all expectations and painting an unexpected picture of intercontinental influence, it's safe to say that we're indeed navigating uncharted waters in the field of environmental research. It seems that while a "map-a-day" may keep the disorientation away, it could also have unsuspected implications for global carbon emissions. As we set out to share our discoveries, we hope this research sparks conversations in both the realms of cartography and climate action. After all, who knew that the secret to reducing carbon emissions might just lie in the humble hands of those drawing lines on a map?

So, as you delve into the depths of our research, we invite you to join us on this voy-age of discovery, as we uncover the enigmatic links between the underappreciated heroes of cartography and the environmental landscape of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. For, in the words of a wise cartographer, "To learn, we need to be willing to not-know!" And in the spirit of learning, let's set sail on this map-tastic journey together!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of cartographers in New Hampshire and Fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Cartographers and Carbon: Exploring the Correlation Between Cartographer Counts in New Hampshire and Fossil Fuel Use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines

[[ABSTRACT]]
As the saying goes, "You can't have too many maps or too little pollution!" In this groundbreaking research, we delve into the unforeseen relationship between cartographers in New Hampshire and fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7978469 and p < 0.01 over the period from 2003 to 2021. Our findings reveal a surprisingly strong link between the number of cartographers in the quaint state of New Hampshire and the level of fossil fuel consumption in the tropical paradise of Saint Vincent/Grenadines.

While this connection may seem as unlikely as finding a map in a lost treasure chest, our statistical analysis leaves no room for doubt. The empirical evidence prompts us to consider that the proliferation of cartographers in New Hampshire may have an unforeseen impact on the energy choices of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. As the debate surrounding climate change heats up, it's truly a-mapping how this overlooked aspect could influence global environmental efforts! Let's just say, we're putting the "map" in "climate map-ters" with these unexpected results!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Cartography, the art and science of map-making, plays a pivotal role in our understanding of the world around us. As the famous cartographer once said, "I’m a firm believer in the presence of a map where no man has ever trod!" The intriguing relationship between the number of cartographers in New Hampshire and fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines has long been overlooked, like a hidden treasure waiting to be discovered. Our research aims to shed light on this uncommon association and unveil the unexpected influence of map-makers on environmental choices.

Picture this: as cartographers diligently chart the landscapes of New Hampshire, they may unknowingly be charting a course for the energy decisions of an entire tropical nation. It's as if these map-makers are leaving their mark not just on paper, but also on global carbon footprints! Who would've thought that the humble cartographer holds such power in the realm of environmental impact?

The idea may sound like a tall tale, but as researchers, we're always up for a good map-stery to unravel. So, we embarked on a data expedition, armed with statistical compasses and regression sextants, to navigate our way through the correlations and sail to the heart of this peculiar phenomenon. Together, we charted the uncharted territories of statistical analysis to uncover the hidden linkages between seemingly unrelated variables.

As we delved into the depths of this unlikely connection, we unearthed correlations that were as strong as bedrock and piqued our curiosity like buried treasure. The statistical correlation coefficient of 0.7978469 between cartographer counts and fossil fuel use left us feeling as if we struck gold in the world of data mining! It was a statistical revelation that could make even the most seasoned geographer do a double-take.

In our study, we used data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to track the number of cartographers in New Hampshire and obtained information on fossil fuel consumption in Saint Vincent/Grenadines from the Energy Information Administration. The data from these sources not only provided solid ground for our analysis but also added depth to our understanding of the complex interplay between geographic information and energy choices.

With our findings exceeding all expectations and painting an unexpected picture of intercontinental influence, it's safe to say that we're indeed navigating uncharted waters in the field of environmental research. It seems that while a "map-a-day" may keep the disorientation away, it could also have unsuspected implications for global carbon emissions. As we set out to share our discoveries, we hope this research sparks conversations in both the realms of cartography and climate action. After all, who knew that the secret to reducing carbon emissions might just lie in the humble hands of those drawing lines on a map?

So, as you delve into the depths of our research, we invite you to join us on this voy-age of discovery, as we uncover the enigmatic links between the underappreciated heroes of cartography and the environmental landscape of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. For, in the words of a wise cartographer, "To learn, we need to be willing to not-know!" And in the spirit of learning, let's set sail on this map-tastic journey together!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "The Geographic and Economic Impact of Cartographers in Modern Society," Smith et al. explore the multifaceted role of cartographers in shaping not only geographic knowledge but also influencing economic and environmental decisions. The study delves into the potential ripple effects of cartographers' work on a global scale, hinting at the broader implications of their craft.

Now, let's not get lost in the details, but the connection between the number of cartographers in New Hampshire and fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines stands out like a map legend in bold. It's as if every stroke of the cartographer's pen in the Granite State sends ripples across the ocean to the idyllic isles of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, impacting their energy choices in unforeseen ways. Who knew that map-making could hold such far-reaching influence, right? It's a real "carto-graphic" representation of interconnectedness!

Doe's "Geospatial Trends in the 21st Century" offers a comprehensive analysis of the evolving landscape of geospatial technologies and their impact on global trends. While the primary focus of the study is on technological advancements, it indirectly hints at the potential effects of cartographic activities on environmental decision-making. It's as if the ink on the maps is leaving a lasting imprint not just on paper, but on the energy roadmap of Saint Vincent/Grenadines.

Now, let's take a brief diversion and consider some non-fiction works that are tangentially related to our study. "Longitude: The True Story of a Lone Genius Who Solved the Greatest Scientific Problem of His Time" by Dava Sobel, and "The Mapmaker's Wife: A True Tale of Love, Murder, and Survival in the Amazon" by Robert Whitaker are both captivating reads that shed light on the intriguing world of maps and exploration. While these books may not directly address our specific research question, they do capture the essence of map-making and the adventures that lie within, much like the unexpected connections we're unraveling between cartographers and carbon footprints!

In "The Lord of the Rings" by J.R.R. Tolkien and "Pirate Latitudes" by Michael Crichton, we encounter fictional tales of epic journeys and uncharted terrains. While these works are more in the realm of fantasy and adventure, their thematic elements of exploration and discovery resonate with our own quest to uncover the hidden ties between cartographers in New Hampshire and fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines. It's as if we're embarking on a literary adventure of our own, with statistical analysis as our trusty compass and correlation coefficients as our treasure map!

And just to add a dash of whimsy to our literature review, let's not overlook the literary goldmine that is the back of shampoo bottles. Who knew that while lathering up, we may stumble upon hidden knowledge that could enrich our understanding of the interplay between cartographers and carbon? After all, it's always good to keep an eye out for unexpected sources of insight in the unlikeliest of places!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of cartographers in New Hampshire and Fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2003 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Cartographers and Carbon: Exploring the Correlation Between Cartographer Counts in New Hampshire and Fossil Fuel Use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines

[[ABSTRACT]]
As the saying goes, "You can't have too many maps or too little pollution!" In this groundbreaking research, we delve into the unforeseen relationship between cartographers in New Hampshire and fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7978469 and p < 0.01 over the period from 2003 to 2021. Our findings reveal a surprisingly strong link between the number of cartographers in the quaint state of New Hampshire and the level of fossil fuel consumption in the tropical paradise of Saint Vincent/Grenadines.

While this connection may seem as unlikely as finding a map in a lost treasure chest, our statistical analysis leaves no room for doubt. The empirical evidence prompts us to consider that the proliferation of cartographers in New Hampshire may have an unforeseen impact on the energy choices of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. As the debate surrounding climate change heats up, it's truly a-mapping how this overlooked aspect could influence global environmental efforts! Let's just say, we're putting the "map" in "climate map-ters" with these unexpected results!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Cartography, the art and science of map-making, plays a pivotal role in our understanding of the world around us. As the famous cartographer once said, "I’m a firm believer in the presence of a map where no man has ever trod!" The intriguing relationship between the number of cartographers in New Hampshire and fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines has long been overlooked, like a hidden treasure waiting to be discovered. Our research aims to shed light on this uncommon association and unveil the unexpected influence of map-makers on environmental choices.

Picture this: as cartographers diligently chart the landscapes of New Hampshire, they may unknowingly be charting a course for the energy decisions of an entire tropical nation. It's as if these map-makers are leaving their mark not just on paper, but also on global carbon footprints! Who would've thought that the humble cartographer holds such power in the realm of environmental impact?

The idea may sound like a tall tale, but as researchers, we're always up for a good map-stery to unravel. So, we embarked on a data expedition, armed with statistical compasses and regression sextants, to navigate our way through the correlations and sail to the heart of this peculiar phenomenon. Together, we charted the uncharted territories of statistical analysis to uncover the hidden linkages between seemingly unrelated variables.

As we delved into the depths of this unlikely connection, we unearthed correlations that were as strong as bedrock and piqued our curiosity like buried treasure. The statistical correlation coefficient of 0.7978469 between cartographer counts and fossil fuel use left us feeling as if we struck gold in the world of data mining! It was a statistical revelation that could make even the most seasoned geographer do a double-take.

In our study, we used data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to track the number of cartographers in New Hampshire and obtained information on fossil fuel consumption in Saint Vincent/Grenadines from the Energy Information Administration. The data from these sources not only provided solid ground for our analysis but also added depth to our understanding of the complex interplay between geographic information and energy choices.

With our findings exceeding all expectations and painting an unexpected picture of intercontinental influence, it's safe to say that we're indeed navigating uncharted waters in the field of environmental research. It seems that while a "map-a-day" may keep the disorientation away, it could also have unsuspected implications for global carbon emissions. As we set out to share our discoveries, we hope this research sparks conversations in both the realms of cartography and climate action. After all, who knew that the secret to reducing carbon emissions might just lie in the humble hands of those drawing lines on a map?

So, as you delve into the depths of our research, we invite you to join us on this voy-age of discovery, as we uncover the enigmatic links between the underappreciated heroes of cartography and the environmental landscape of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. For, in the words of a wise cartographer, "To learn, we need to be willing to not-know!" And in the spirit of learning, let's set sail on this map-tastic journey together!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the tantalizingly mysterious connection between the number of map-making mavericks in New Hampshire and the fossil fuel fervor in Saint Vincent/Grenadines, our research team embarked on a data adventure that would make Indiana Jones proud. Armed with an arsenal of statistical tools worthy of a treasure hunt, we utilized a combination of enchanting statistical analyses and data exploration techniques to dig deep into this uncharted territory of intercontinental correlations.

First, our intrepid team scoured the Bureau of Labor Statistics for the elusive figures of cartographer populations in the charming state of New Hampshire. We combed through this wealth of information like eager treasure hunters, seeking to unveil the true magnitude of map-making mastery in the Granite State. With each data point we discovered, it was as if we were unearthing hidden chests of data gems, shining brighter than a glistening compass under the radiant sun.

We then turned our attention to the Energy Information Administration's trove of data on fossil fuel consumption in the pristine lands of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, where the allure of carbon emissions data proved to be as captivating as a legendary pirate's treasure map. These meticulous records allowed us to quantify the carbonic conundrum in the tropical paradise, providing the crucial pieces to complete the map of our investigation.

Armed with this plethora of data, we summoned the mystical powers of statistical analysis to conjure a robust framework for our research. We employed a series of spellbinding techniques, including regression analysis, correlation tests, and time series modeling, to navigate the treacherous seas of data points and chart the course of our investigation. It was a statistical odyssey that would have left even Odysseus in awe!

Our quest for correlation led us to calculate the Pearson correlation coefficient, unveiling a striking relationship with a coefficient of 0.7978469 and a p-value of less than 0.01. This finding was as noteworthy as discovering a rare fossil in the midst of a sprawling archaeological dig – a statistical revelation that could make even a seasoned statistician raise an eyebrow in disbelief.

As we emerged from the labyrinth of statistical analyses, we remained vigilant in our efforts to account for temporal trends and potential confounding variables. Our unyielding commitment to methodological rigor was akin to the perseverance of a determined explorer conquering uncharted lands. Through rigorous model validation and sensitivity analyses, we ensured that our findings held steadfast, like a well-crafted map surviving the test of time.

In the spirit of scientific thoroughness, we also conducted robustness checks and sensitivity analyses to corroborate the reliability of our findings. Just as a seasoned cartographer meticulously verifies the accuracy of each contour line on a map, we scrutinized our results from every conceivable angle, leaving no stone unturned in our pursuit of scientific integrity.

With our methodological treasure map in hand, we step forward to unveil the remarkable, if not outlandish, connections we've uncovered. It seems that the often underappreciated art of cartography might just hold the key to navigating the intricate dynamics of global environmental influences. And hey, when it comes to cracking the code of unconventional correlations, it takes more than just a map and a compass - it takes a healthy dose of statistical wizardry!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of cartographers in New Hampshire and Fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2003 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.7978469, r-squared of 0.6365597, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Cartographers and Carbon: Exploring the Correlation Between Cartographer Counts in New Hampshire and Fossil Fuel Use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines

[[ABSTRACT]]
As the saying goes, "You can't have too many maps or too little pollution!" In this groundbreaking research, we delve into the unforeseen relationship between cartographers in New Hampshire and fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7978469 and p < 0.01 over the period from 2003 to 2021. Our findings reveal a surprisingly strong link between the number of cartographers in the quaint state of New Hampshire and the level of fossil fuel consumption in the tropical paradise of Saint Vincent/Grenadines.

While this connection may seem as unlikely as finding a map in a lost treasure chest, our statistical analysis leaves no room for doubt. The empirical evidence prompts us to consider that the proliferation of cartographers in New Hampshire may have an unforeseen impact on the energy choices of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. As the debate surrounding climate change heats up, it's truly a-mapping how this overlooked aspect could influence global environmental efforts! Let's just say, we're putting the "map" in "climate map-ters" with these unexpected results!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Cartography, the art and science of map-making, plays a pivotal role in our understanding of the world around us. As the famous cartographer once said, "I’m a firm believer in the presence of a map where no man has ever trod!" The intriguing relationship between the number of cartographers in New Hampshire and fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines has long been overlooked, like a hidden treasure waiting to be discovered. Our research aims to shed light on this uncommon association and unveil the unexpected influence of map-makers on environmental choices.

Picture this: as cartographers diligently chart the landscapes of New Hampshire, they may unknowingly be charting a course for the energy decisions of an entire tropical nation. It's as if these map-makers are leaving their mark not just on paper, but also on global carbon footprints! Who would've thought that the humble cartographer holds such power in the realm of environmental impact?

The idea may sound like a tall tale, but as researchers, we're always up for a good map-stery to unravel. So, we embarked on a data expedition, armed with statistical compasses and regression sextants, to navigate our way through the correlations and sail to the heart of this peculiar phenomenon. Together, we charted the uncharted territories of statistical analysis to uncover the hidden linkages between seemingly unrelated variables.

As we delved into the depths of this unlikely connection, we unearthed correlations that were as strong as bedrock and piqued our curiosity like buried treasure. The statistical correlation coefficient of 0.7978469 between cartographer counts and fossil fuel use left us feeling as if we struck gold in the world of data mining! It was a statistical revelation that could make even the most seasoned geographer do a double-take.

In our study, we used data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to track the number of cartographers in New Hampshire and obtained information on fossil fuel consumption in Saint Vincent/Grenadines from the Energy Information Administration. The data from these sources not only provided solid ground for our analysis but also added depth to our understanding of the complex interplay between geographic information and energy choices.

With our findings exceeding all expectations and painting an unexpected picture of intercontinental influence, it's safe to say that we're indeed navigating uncharted waters in the field of environmental research. It seems that while a "map-a-day" may keep the disorientation away, it could also have unsuspected implications for global carbon emissions. As we set out to share our discoveries, we hope this research sparks conversations in both the realms of cartography and climate action. After all, who knew that the secret to reducing carbon emissions might just lie in the humble hands of those drawing lines on a map?

So, as you delve into the depths of our research, we invite you to join us on this voy-age of discovery, as we uncover the enigmatic links between the underappreciated heroes of cartography and the environmental landscape of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. For, in the words of a wise cartographer, "To learn, we need to be willing to not-know!" And in the spirit of learning, let's set sail on this map-tastic journey together!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis of the data collected from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration has revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the number of cartographers in New Hampshire and fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. It's as if these cartographers were drawing a line straight to the energy choices of a distant island nation! Who would have guessed that the humble act of map-making could have such far-reaching implications? It's like the "map-ters" of the universe have conspired to reveal this unexpected link!

The correlation coefficient of 0.7978469 indicates a robust positive relationship between the two variables, suggesting that as the number of cartographers in New Hampshire increases, so does the usage of fossil fuels in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. You could say that these findings really "map out" an unconventional pathway for environmental influence!

The r-squared value of 0.6365597 further reinforces the strength of this association, explaining approximately 64% of the variation in fossil fuel use based on the number of cartographers. Talk about a correlation that's as clear as a cartographer's map lines!

With a p-value less than 0.01, our results are statistically significant, indicating that the observed correlation is unlikely to be a result of random chance. It's like finding a rare gem hidden within a mountain of statistical data – this correlation is as real as it gets!

A scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts this strong correlation, showcasing a trend that's as undeniable as the North Star. This unexpected connection between cartographers and carbon footprint levels is a true "chart-topper" in the realm of environmental research!

Overall, our findings have unearthed a fascinating relationship that not only defies conventional wisdom but also offers a new perspective on the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate elements. It's like discovering a hidden map within a blank parchment – these results have truly charted a new course for environmental analysis!

The implications of this research stretch further than the eye can map, offering a fresh outlook on the potential influences of geographic information on global environmental decisions. Who would've thought that the scientific study of maps could cast such a wide net of influence? It's enough to make us believe in the power of "carto-graphic" destiny!

In conclusion, our research has illuminated an unexpected correlation between the number of cartographers in New Hampshire and fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, paving the way for further exploration of the intricate links between cartography and environmental choices. As we navigate uncharted territories in the realm of environmental research, these findings serve as a guiding star, pointing us toward new dimensions of inquiry and discovery.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of cartographers in New Hampshire and Fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Cartographers and Carbon: Exploring the Correlation Between Cartographer Counts in New Hampshire and Fossil Fuel Use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines

[[ABSTRACT]]
As the saying goes, "You can't have too many maps or too little pollution!" In this groundbreaking research, we delve into the unforeseen relationship between cartographers in New Hampshire and fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7978469 and p < 0.01 over the period from 2003 to 2021. Our findings reveal a surprisingly strong link between the number of cartographers in the quaint state of New Hampshire and the level of fossil fuel consumption in the tropical paradise of Saint Vincent/Grenadines.

While this connection may seem as unlikely as finding a map in a lost treasure chest, our statistical analysis leaves no room for doubt. The empirical evidence prompts us to consider that the proliferation of cartographers in New Hampshire may have an unforeseen impact on the energy choices of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. As the debate surrounding climate change heats up, it's truly a-mapping how this overlooked aspect could influence global environmental efforts! Let's just say, we're putting the "map" in "climate map-ters" with these unexpected results!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "The Geographic and Economic Impact of Cartographers in Modern Society," Smith et al. explore the multifaceted role of cartographers in shaping not only geographic knowledge but also influencing economic and environmental decisions. The study delves into the potential ripple effects of cartographers' work on a global scale, hinting at the broader implications of their craft.
Now, let's not get lost in the details, but the connection between the number of cartographers in New Hampshire and fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines stands out like a map legend in bold. It's as if every stroke of the cartographer's pen in the Granite State sends ripples across the ocean to the idyllic isles of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, impacting their energy choices in unforeseen ways. Who knew that map-making could hold such far-reaching influence, right? It's a real "carto-graphic" representation of interconnectedness!
Doe's "Geospatial Trends in the 21st Century" offers a comprehensive analysis of the evolving landscape of geospatial technologies and their impact on global trends. While the primary focus of the study is on technological advancements, it indirectly hints at the potential effects of cartographic activities on environmental decision-making. It's as if the ink on the maps is leaving a lasting imprint not just on paper, but on the energy roadmap of Saint Vincent/Grenadines.
Now, let's take a brief diversion and consider some non-fiction works that are tangentially related to our study. "Longitude: The True Story of a Lone Genius Who Solved the Greatest Scientific Problem of His Time" by Dava Sobel, and "The Mapmaker's Wife: A True Tale of Love, Murder, and Survival in the Amazon" by Robert Whitaker are both captivating reads that shed light on the intriguing world of maps and exploration. While these books may not directly address our specific research question, they do capture the essence of map-making and the adventures that lie within, much like the unexpected connections we're unraveling between cartographers and carbon footprints!
In "The Lord of the Rings" by J.R.R. Tolkien and "Pirate Latitudes" by Michael Crichton, we encounter fictional tales of epic journeys and uncharted terrains. While these works are more in the realm of fantasy and adventure, their thematic elements of exploration and discovery resonate with our own quest to uncover the hidden ties between cartographers in New Hampshire and fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines. It's as if we're embarking on a literary adventure of our own, with statistical analysis as our trusty compass and correlation coefficients as our treasure map!
And just to add a dash of whimsy to our literature review, let's not overlook the literary goldmine that is the back of shampoo bottles. Who knew that while lathering up, we may stumble upon hidden knowledge that could enrich our understanding of the interplay between cartographers and carbon? After all, it's always good to keep an eye out for unexpected sources of insight in the unlikeliest of places!

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data collected from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration has revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the number of cartographers in New Hampshire and fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. It's as if these cartographers were drawing a line straight to the energy choices of a distant island nation! Who would have guessed that the humble act of map-making could have such far-reaching implications? It's like the "map-ters" of the universe have conspired to reveal this unexpected link!
The correlation coefficient of 0.7978469 indicates a robust positive relationship between the two variables, suggesting that as the number of cartographers in New Hampshire increases, so does the usage of fossil fuels in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. You could say that these findings really "map out" an unconventional pathway for environmental influence!
The r-squared value of 0.6365597 further reinforces the strength of this association, explaining approximately 64% of the variation in fossil fuel use based on the number of cartographers. Talk about a correlation that's as clear as a cartographer's map lines!
With a p-value less than 0.01, our results are statistically significant, indicating that the observed correlation is unlikely to be a result of random chance. It's like finding a rare gem hidden within a mountain of statistical data – this correlation is as real as it gets!
A scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts this strong correlation, showcasing a trend that's as undeniable as the North Star. This unexpected connection between cartographers and carbon footprint levels is a true "chart-topper" in the realm of environmental research!
Overall, our findings have unearthed a fascinating relationship that not only defies conventional wisdom but also offers a new perspective on the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate elements. It's like discovering a hidden map within a blank parchment – these results have truly charted a new course for environmental analysis!
The implications of this research stretch further than the eye can map, offering a fresh outlook on the potential influences of geographic information on global environmental decisions. Who would've thought that the scientific study of maps could cast such a wide net of influence? It's enough to make us believe in the power of "carto-graphic" destiny!
In conclusion, our research has illuminated an unexpected correlation between the number of cartographers in New Hampshire and fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, paving the way for further exploration of the intricate links between cartography and environmental choices. As we navigate uncharted territories in the realm of environmental research, these findings serve as a guiding star, pointing us toward new dimensions of inquiry and discovery.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our investigation has revealed an astonishingly robust correlation between the number of cartographers in New Hampshire and fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. This connection is as unexpected as finding a treasure map in a bottle of rum – it's both intriguing and a little mysterious, isn't it? Our statistical analysis has lent credibility to the idea that the proliferation of cartographers in the Granite State may be exerting a tangible influence on the energy decisions of a distant island nation. It's almost like the maps themselves are whispering their secrets to the winds and guiding the fuel choices of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. All we can say is, "map-tastic!"

Our findings align with the work of Smith et al., who hinted at the far-reaching implications of cartographic activities on global decisions. It's as if every stroke of the cartographer's pen in New Hampshire sparks a chain reaction that travels across the sea, shaping the energy landscape of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. We owe it to them to be sure to include cartographers in all our future climate discussions, don't you think? After all, who knew that the fate of a tropical paradise could be intertwined with ink on paper!

The strength of our correlation coefficient and the statistical significance of our results reaffirm the seriousness of this unexpected connection. It's as if the data itself is telling us, "Don't brush this off – the relationship is as clear as 20/20 vision!" This discovery isn't just a blip on the radar; it's a seismic shift in how we perceive the potential reach of cartographic influence.

The r-squared value of 0.6365597 further supports the solidity of this association, confirming that approximately 64% of the variation in fossil fuel use can be attributed to the number of cartographers. It's as if these variables were destined to be connected, like a well-drawn map and a clear path home! And speaking of maps, the scatterplot visually illustrates this correlation, proving that this unexpected relationship is no illusion – it's as palpable as the feeling of finding your way in a maze.

Our results may seem as improbable as navigating through a labyrinth with only a map and a flashlight, but they beckon us to rethink the scope of environmental influence. It's not every day that statistical analysis leads us down an unexplored path, but when it does, we must follow the evidence, even if it feels like a journey into uncharted territory. This discovery may just be the "X" that marks the spot in understanding the unseen ties between cartography and carbon footprints. After all, who would've thought that the humble craft of map-making could have such a global impact? It's like unearthing a treasure trove of environmental insights hidden in plain sight!

Overall, our unexpected yet compelling findings unveil a newfound dimension to the role of cartographers in shaping environmental decisions. It's as if the carts of the cartographers have not only mapped out topographic features but have also etched their influence on the energy maps of a distant land. These results have truly steered us in the direction of a new frontier, inviting further exploration of the intricate connections between the art of map-making and environmental choices. As we venture into uncharted territories in the realm of environmental research, this discovery serves as a compass guiding us toward a deeper understanding of the puzzling interplay between cartography and carbon footprints. And we have to say, it's a journey worth taking – who knows what other unexpected connections we might uncover along the way!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of cartographers in New Hampshire and Fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Cartographers and Carbon: Exploring the Correlation Between Cartographer Counts in New Hampshire and Fossil Fuel Use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines

[[ABSTRACT]]
As the saying goes, "You can't have too many maps or too little pollution!" In this groundbreaking research, we delve into the unforeseen relationship between cartographers in New Hampshire and fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7978469 and p < 0.01 over the period from 2003 to 2021. Our findings reveal a surprisingly strong link between the number of cartographers in the quaint state of New Hampshire and the level of fossil fuel consumption in the tropical paradise of Saint Vincent/Grenadines.

While this connection may seem as unlikely as finding a map in a lost treasure chest, our statistical analysis leaves no room for doubt. The empirical evidence prompts us to consider that the proliferation of cartographers in New Hampshire may have an unforeseen impact on the energy choices of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. As the debate surrounding climate change heats up, it's truly a-mapping how this overlooked aspect could influence global environmental efforts! Let's just say, we're putting the "map" in "climate map-ters" with these unexpected results!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Cartography, the art and science of map-making, plays a pivotal role in our understanding of the world around us. As the famous cartographer once said, "I’m a firm believer in the presence of a map where no man has ever trod!" The intriguing relationship between the number of cartographers in New Hampshire and fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines has long been overlooked, like a hidden treasure waiting to be discovered. Our research aims to shed light on this uncommon association and unveil the unexpected influence of map-makers on environmental choices.

Picture this: as cartographers diligently chart the landscapes of New Hampshire, they may unknowingly be charting a course for the energy decisions of an entire tropical nation. It's as if these map-makers are leaving their mark not just on paper, but also on global carbon footprints! Who would've thought that the humble cartographer holds such power in the realm of environmental impact?

The idea may sound like a tall tale, but as researchers, we're always up for a good map-stery to unravel. So, we embarked on a data expedition, armed with statistical compasses and regression sextants, to navigate our way through the correlations and sail to the heart of this peculiar phenomenon. Together, we charted the uncharted territories of statistical analysis to uncover the hidden linkages between seemingly unrelated variables.

As we delved into the depths of this unlikely connection, we unearthed correlations that were as strong as bedrock and piqued our curiosity like buried treasure. The statistical correlation coefficient of 0.7978469 between cartographer counts and fossil fuel use left us feeling as if we struck gold in the world of data mining! It was a statistical revelation that could make even the most seasoned geographer do a double-take.

In our study, we used data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to track the number of cartographers in New Hampshire and obtained information on fossil fuel consumption in Saint Vincent/Grenadines from the Energy Information Administration. The data from these sources not only provided solid ground for our analysis but also added depth to our understanding of the complex interplay between geographic information and energy choices.

With our findings exceeding all expectations and painting an unexpected picture of intercontinental influence, it's safe to say that we're indeed navigating uncharted waters in the field of environmental research. It seems that while a "map-a-day" may keep the disorientation away, it could also have unsuspected implications for global carbon emissions. As we set out to share our discoveries, we hope this research sparks conversations in both the realms of cartography and climate action. After all, who knew that the secret to reducing carbon emissions might just lie in the humble hands of those drawing lines on a map?

So, as you delve into the depths of our research, we invite you to join us on this voy-age of discovery, as we uncover the enigmatic links between the underappreciated heroes of cartography and the environmental landscape of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. For, in the words of a wise cartographer, "To learn, we need to be willing to not-know!" And in the spirit of learning, let's set sail on this map-tastic journey together!

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data collected from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration has revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the number of cartographers in New Hampshire and fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. It's as if these cartographers were drawing a line straight to the energy choices of a distant island nation! Who would have guessed that the humble act of map-making could have such far-reaching implications? It's like the "map-ters" of the universe have conspired to reveal this unexpected link!
The correlation coefficient of 0.7978469 indicates a robust positive relationship between the two variables, suggesting that as the number of cartographers in New Hampshire increases, so does the usage of fossil fuels in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. You could say that these findings really "map out" an unconventional pathway for environmental influence!
The r-squared value of 0.6365597 further reinforces the strength of this association, explaining approximately 64% of the variation in fossil fuel use based on the number of cartographers. Talk about a correlation that's as clear as a cartographer's map lines!
With a p-value less than 0.01, our results are statistically significant, indicating that the observed correlation is unlikely to be a result of random chance. It's like finding a rare gem hidden within a mountain of statistical data – this correlation is as real as it gets!
A scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts this strong correlation, showcasing a trend that's as undeniable as the North Star. This unexpected connection between cartographers and carbon footprint levels is a true "chart-topper" in the realm of environmental research!
Overall, our findings have unearthed a fascinating relationship that not only defies conventional wisdom but also offers a new perspective on the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate elements. It's like discovering a hidden map within a blank parchment – these results have truly charted a new course for environmental analysis!
The implications of this research stretch further than the eye can map, offering a fresh outlook on the potential influences of geographic information on global environmental decisions. Who would've thought that the scientific study of maps could cast such a wide net of influence? It's enough to make us believe in the power of "carto-graphic" destiny!
In conclusion, our research has illuminated an unexpected correlation between the number of cartographers in New Hampshire and fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, paving the way for further exploration of the intricate links between cartography and environmental choices. As we navigate uncharted territories in the realm of environmental research, these findings serve as a guiding star, pointing us toward new dimensions of inquiry and discovery.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our findings illuminate an unexpected and robust correlation between the number of cartographers in New Hampshire and fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. It's as if these map-makers are laying down a roadmap for environmental decisions in a faraway land! Who knew that sketching lines on paper could have such a profound impact on carbon footprints?

The statistical results we've uncovered are as solid as a bedrock and could make even a seasoned geographer do a double-take! With a correlation coefficient of 0.7978469 and an r-squared value of 0.6365597, this connection between cartographers and carbon footprints is as clear as a well-drawn map line. It's almost like the statistical universe decided to map out this unexpected pathway for environmental influence!

Plus, with a p-value less than 0.01, our results are a rare gem hidden within a mountain of statistical data – this correlation is as real as it gets! The scatterplot visually depicting this strong correlation is a "chart-topper" in the realm of environmental research – a visual testament to the unexpected intertwining of cartographers and carbon footprints.

The implications of our research extend beyond what the eye can map, offering a fresh outlook on the potential influences of geographic information on global environmental decisions. It's enough to make us believe in the power of "carto-graphic" destiny!

In the spirit of all good map-related jokes, we confidently assert that there is no need for further research in this area. We've already rummaged through enough data to rival any buried treasure, and these findings are the "X" that marks the spot of unexpected environmental influence. It's time to sail off into new academic seas and unearth other uncharted correlations waiting to be discovered!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Cartographers and Carbon: Exploring the Correlation Between Cartographer Counts in New Hampshire and Fossil Fuel Use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Geospatial Extravaganza


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Cartographers and Carbon: Exploring the Correlation Between Cartographer Counts in New Hampshire and Fossil Fuel Use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

Society for Geographical Inquiry and Environmental Assessment


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Cartographers and Carbon: Exploring the Correlation Between Cartographer Counts in New Hampshire and Fossil Fuel Use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines with an abstract of As the saying goes, "You can't have too many maps or too little pollution!" In this groundbreaking research, we delve into the unforeseen relationship between cartographers in New Hampshire and fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7978469 and p < 0.01 over the period from 2003 to 2021. Our findings reveal a surprisingly strong link between the number of cartographers in the quaint state of New Hampshire and the level of fossil fuel consumption in the tropical paradise of Saint Vincent/Grenadines.
While this connection may seem as unlikely as finding a map in a lost treasure chest, our statistical analysis leaves no room for doubt. The empirical evidence prompts us to consider that the proliferation of cartographers in New Hampshire may have an unforeseen impact on the energy choices of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. As the debate surrounding climate change heats up, it's truly a-mapping how this overlooked aspect could influence global environmental efforts! Let's just say, we're putting the "map" in "climate map-ters" with these unexpected results!

ChatGPT:

cartographers, fossil fuel use, correlation, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Energy Information Administration, New Hampshire, Saint Vincent, Grenadines, climate change

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of cartographers in New Hampshire
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of cartographers and photogrammetrists in New Hampshire
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of cartographers in New Hampshire

Fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines
Detailed data title: Total fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines

Correlation r = 0.7978469 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6365597 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 63.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of cartographers in New Hampshire) over the 19 years from 2003 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.3E-5. 0.0000426404898189279900000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.8 in 0.0043% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 23,452 random variables You don't actually need 23 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 18 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 18 because we have two variables measured over a period of 19 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.54, 0.92 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
The number of cartographers in New Hampshire (Laborers)40401008090701007090601109010012011012090110110
Fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines (Billion kWh)0.0820.0870.0998380.1040.1112760.1085290.1090.110.1070.1070.1120.1217010.1209080.1280570.1211970.1175090.120.1139360.121228




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([40,40,100,80,90,70,100,70,90,60,110,90,100,120,110,120,90,110,110,])
array_2 = np.array([0.082,0.087,0.099838,0.104,0.111276,0.108529,0.109,0.11,0.107,0.107,0.112,0.121701,0.120908,0.128057,0.121197,0.117509,0.12,0.113936,0.121228,])
array_1_name = "The number of cartographers in New Hampshire"
array_2_name = "Fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for being the explorer we needed!


Correlation ID: 3961 · Black Variable ID: 11297 · Red Variable ID: 23937
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0