about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,952 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Houston and the second variable is Viewership count for Days of Our Lives.  The chart goes from 1980 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

As the air quality improved, people in Houston felt energized and no longer felt the need to stay indoors and watch daytime television. This led to a decrease in viewership for Days of Our Lives. Additionally, with cleaner air, residents were more inclined to engage in outdoor activities and socialize instead of being cooped up at home, tuning in to the show.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie depicting this scene: The smog that usually hung heavily over Houston has cleared, revealing a blue sky and clean air. As people go about their day, their faces show relief as they no longer need to cover their mouths and noses. Meanwhile, the TV viewership for Days of Our Lives has declined, as the lack of dramatic coughing fits has reduced the suspense and interest in the show. The depiction shows a colorful cityscape of Houston with vibrant blues and greens. People can be seen outside, smiling and breathing in the fresh air. The sky is clear and bright, with a few fluffy white clouds. The setting exudes a sense of joy and relief as the characters interact in this newfound atmosphere of clean air. The scene captures the essence of hope and positivity, reminiscent of a heartwarming Pixar movie. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Houston and Viewership count for Days of Our Lives. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: inspired by bauhaus Sci-fi fantacy a meme Photorealism An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Houston and Viewership count for Days of Our Lives, in the following situation: Because fewer air pollutants meant fewer suspenseful, dramatic coughing fits, which led to decreased interest in the dramatic coughing fits on Days of Our Lives.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: The smog that usually hung heavily over Houston has cleared, revealing a blue sky and clean air. As people go about their day, their faces show relief as they no longer need to cover their mouths and noses. Meanwhile, the TV viewership for Days of Our Lives has declined, as the lack of dramatic coughing fits has reduced the suspense and interest in the show.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie ] and depicting this scene: The smog that usually hung heavily over Houston has cleared, revealing a blue sky and clean air. As people go about their day, their faces show relief as they no longer need to cover their mouths and noses. Meanwhile, the TV viewership for Days of Our Lives has declined, as the lack of dramatic coughing fits has reduced the suspense and interest in the show. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie depicting this scene: The smog that usually hung heavily over Houston has cleared, revealing a blue sky and clean air. As people go about their day, their faces show relief as they no longer need to cover their mouths and noses. Meanwhile, the TV viewership for Days of Our Lives has declined, as the lack of dramatic coughing fits has reduced the suspense and interest in the show. The depiction shows a colorful cityscape of Houston with vibrant blues and greens. People can be seen outside, smiling and breathing in the fresh air. The sky is clear and bright, with a few fluffy white clouds. The setting exudes a sense of joy and relief as the characters interact in this newfound atmosphere of clean air. The scene captures the essence of hope and positivity, reminiscent of a heartwarming Pixar movie.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Air pollution in Houston caused Viewership count for Days of Our Lives to decrease. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Clearing the Air: An Air Pollution Study and Soap Opera Viewership in Houston

The Journal of Environmental Drama Studies

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Houston and Viewership count for Days of Our Lives. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8377522 and p < 0.01 for 1980 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Clearing the Air: An Air Pollution Study and Soap Opera Viewership in Houston"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we delve into the unexpected correlation between air pollution levels in Houston and the viewership count for the long-running soap opera "Days of Our Lives." Drawing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, our research team uncovered a surprising connection that soap opera enthusiasts will find quite soapy! We calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.8377522 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 1980 to 2021. This study not only provides an intriguing twist in the world of environmental and entertainment research but also showcases the remarkable interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena. So, put on your best dramatic face and get ready for some "Days of Our Lives" dramatic irony as we explore the curious ties between smog and soap operas.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Houston and Viewership count for Days of Our Lives. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Clearing the Air: An Air Pollution Study and Soap Opera Viewership in Houston"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we delve into the unexpected correlation between air pollution levels in Houston and the viewership count for the long-running soap opera "Days of Our Lives." Drawing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, our research team uncovered a surprising connection that soap opera enthusiasts will find quite soapy! We calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.8377522 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 1980 to 2021. This study not only provides an intriguing twist in the world of environmental and entertainment research but also showcases the remarkable interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena. So, put on your best dramatic face and get ready for some "Days of Our Lives" dramatic irony as we explore the curious ties between smog and soap operas.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
Introduction

As Dorothy Gale famously observed in the Wizard of Oz, "Toto, I've a feeling we're not in Kansas anymore." In the case of our research, we find ourselves not in Salem, but in Houston, scrutinizing the peculiar association between air pollution levels and the fervent viewership of the long-running daytime drama, "Days of Our Lives." While Dorothy may have been caught in a tornado, we are certainly swirling in a whirlwind of unexpected and bewildering findings in the world of environmental and entertainment research.

The Houston metropolitan area, with its thriving energy industry and bustling cityscape, has long been subject to the ebb and flow of air pollution levels. And amidst the smog and haze, an unlikely correlation has emerged, drawing a curious link between the quality of the air we breathe and the avid viewership of melodramatic plotlines and amorous entanglements on our small screens.

Just as the characters in "Days of Our Lives" navigate through a labyrinth of love triangles and family feuds, our research team has embarked on a journey to unravel the enigmatic entwining of air pollution and soap opera viewership. Our quest has led us to crunching numbers, scrutinizing statistical patterns, and unraveling the drama behind the data – all in the pursuit of unlocking the secrets behind this unconventional association.

So, fasten your seatbelts and get ready for a rollercoaster ride through the smoggy skies and melodramatic storylines. In this paper, we present our findings on the correlation between air pollution in Houston and the compelling world of "Days of Our Lives" – a study that is sure to leave you breathless and perhaps a little bit soapy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Houston and Viewership count for Days of Our Lives. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Clearing the Air: An Air Pollution Study and Soap Opera Viewership in Houston"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we delve into the unexpected correlation between air pollution levels in Houston and the viewership count for the long-running soap opera "Days of Our Lives." Drawing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, our research team uncovered a surprising connection that soap opera enthusiasts will find quite soapy! We calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.8377522 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 1980 to 2021. This study not only provides an intriguing twist in the world of environmental and entertainment research but also showcases the remarkable interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena. So, put on your best dramatic face and get ready for some "Days of Our Lives" dramatic irony as we explore the curious ties between smog and soap operas.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
As Dorothy Gale famously observed in the Wizard of Oz, "Toto, I've a feeling we're not in Kansas anymore." In the case of our research, we find ourselves not in Salem, but in Houston, scrutinizing the peculiar association between air pollution levels and the fervent viewership of the long-running daytime drama, "Days of Our Lives." While Dorothy may have been caught in a tornado, we are certainly swirling in a whirlwind of unexpected and bewildering findings in the world of environmental and entertainment research.
The Houston metropolitan area, with its thriving energy industry and bustling cityscape, has long been subject to the ebb and flow of air pollution levels. And amidst the smog and haze, an unlikely correlation has emerged, drawing a curious link between the quality of the air we breathe and the avid viewership of melodramatic plotlines and amorous entanglements on our small screens.
Just as the characters in "Days of Our Lives" navigate through a labyrinth of love triangles and family feuds, our research team has embarked on a journey to unravel the enigmatic entwining of air pollution and soap opera viewership. Our quest has led us to crunching numbers, scrutinizing statistical patterns, and unraveling the drama behind the data – all in the pursuit of unlocking the secrets behind this unconventional association.
So, fasten your seatbelts and get ready for a rollercoaster ride through the smoggy skies and melodramatic storylines. In this paper, we present our findings on the correlation between air pollution in Houston and the compelling world of "Days of Our Lives" – a study that is sure to leave you breathless and perhaps a little bit soapy.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The study of air pollution's impact on human behavior is a vibrant area, albeit not as vibrant as the hue of smog that hangs over Houston. Smith et al. (2015) found a strong correlation between air quality and respiratory illnesses, emphasizing the detrimental effects of pollution on physical health. In a similar vein, Doe and Jones (2018) delved into the psychological effects of pollution, highlighting its potential to cause stress and anxiety among urban dwellers.

Turning to the realm of entertainment and media consumption, Lorem and Ipsum (2020) explored the influence of environmental factors on television viewership, touching upon the potential connection between air quality and audience engagement. Drawing from theories of cognitive dissonance, they posited that individuals exposed to poor air quality may seek solace in familiar and comforting entertainment choices, such as soap operas.

However, it is important to note that our paper ventures into uncharted territory, as we merge these disparate strands of research to unveil the striking relationship between air pollution in Houston and the cult following of "Days of Our Lives." We are stepping into a world where science and melodrama coalesce, akin to the fusion of physics and philosophy in "The Dancing Wu Li Masters" by Gary Zukav. While we may not be delving into quantum mechanics, the interplay between air pollution and soap opera viewership is just as enigmatic and full of twists and turns.

Additionally, our exploration is reminiscent of the intertwining narratives in "A Tale of Two Cities" by Charles Dickens, where the disparate worlds of London and Paris converge in unexpected ways. Similarly, we witness the convergence of environmental data and television ratings, entwined in a narrative that is as captivating and convoluted as the plotlines of "Days of Our Lives."

Indeed, as we embark on our eccentric journey, we are reminded of the suspense and strategy found in the board game "Clue." The puzzle of air pollution's influence on soap opera viewership is akin to unraveling a thrilling mystery, with unexpected revelations and perhaps a dash of melodramatic flair.

In the next section, we delve into the methods and findings of our empirical investigation, shedding light on the mesmerizing correlation between air pollution levels and the avid fandom of "Days of Our Lives." Prepare to be swept away in a maelstrom of scientific inquiry and soap opera intrigue!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Houston and Viewership count for Days of Our Lives. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia . You used data from 1980 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Clearing the Air: An Air Pollution Study and Soap Opera Viewership in Houston"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we delve into the unexpected correlation between air pollution levels in Houston and the viewership count for the long-running soap opera "Days of Our Lives." Drawing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, our research team uncovered a surprising connection that soap opera enthusiasts will find quite soapy! We calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.8377522 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 1980 to 2021. This study not only provides an intriguing twist in the world of environmental and entertainment research but also showcases the remarkable interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena. So, put on your best dramatic face and get ready for some "Days of Our Lives" dramatic irony as we explore the curious ties between smog and soap operas.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
As Dorothy Gale famously observed in the Wizard of Oz, "Toto, I've a feeling we're not in Kansas anymore." In the case of our research, we find ourselves not in Salem, but in Houston, scrutinizing the peculiar association between air pollution levels and the fervent viewership of the long-running daytime drama, "Days of Our Lives." While Dorothy may have been caught in a tornado, we are certainly swirling in a whirlwind of unexpected and bewildering findings in the world of environmental and entertainment research.
The Houston metropolitan area, with its thriving energy industry and bustling cityscape, has long been subject to the ebb and flow of air pollution levels. And amidst the smog and haze, an unlikely correlation has emerged, drawing a curious link between the quality of the air we breathe and the avid viewership of melodramatic plotlines and amorous entanglements on our small screens.
Just as the characters in "Days of Our Lives" navigate through a labyrinth of love triangles and family feuds, our research team has embarked on a journey to unravel the enigmatic entwining of air pollution and soap opera viewership. Our quest has led us to crunching numbers, scrutinizing statistical patterns, and unraveling the drama behind the data – all in the pursuit of unlocking the secrets behind this unconventional association.
So, fasten your seatbelts and get ready for a rollercoaster ride through the smoggy skies and melodramatic storylines. In this paper, we present our findings on the correlation between air pollution in Houston and the compelling world of "Days of Our Lives" – a study that is sure to leave you breathless and perhaps a little bit soapy.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To embark on our quixotic quest, we engaged in a merry dance with data collection and analysis that rivals the intricate plot twists in "Days of Our Lives." Our research team utilized a blend of quantitative and qualitative methods, with a touch of whimsy and a smidgen of statistical sorcery, to delve into the hazy depths of air pollution and soap opera fandom.

First and foremost, we enlisted the aid of the Environmental Protection Agency's treasure trove of air quality measurements in the Houston metropolitan area. Armed with this arsenal of atmospheric observations, we bravely confronted the labyrinthine nuances of air pollutants such as ozone, particulate matter, nitrogen dioxide, and sulfur dioxide. Much like the characters in a soap opera, these pollutants played leading roles in our study, each with their own distinctive flair and impact on the stage of Houston's skyline.

In parallel, the epic saga of "Days of Our Lives" and its viewership count unfolded before our very eyes. We delved into the archives of fan forums, digital ratings databases, and online discussions to capture the undulating waves of soap opera fanaticism. With each keystroke, we waded through the tempestuous waters of soap-operatic fervor, navigating through the trials and tribulations of characters, plotlines, and the timeless battle between love and intrigue.

Following this, our data wranglers worked their magic, harmonizing the temporal rhythms and geographic scales of air pollution levels and soap opera viewership counts. An ensemble of statistical algorithms and modeling prodigies lent their expertise, revealing the astonishing correlation between the two seemingly incongruous phenomena. This partnership of numbers, charts, and whimsy brought forth a statistically significant correlation coefficient, dancing harmoniously to the tune of 0.8377522, accompanied by the resounding applause of a p-value less than 0.01.

Additionally, the merriment continued as we embraced a qualitative analysis, sprinkling our quantitative findings with the rich seasoning of contextual understanding and narrative exploration. Through the lens of qualitative inquiry, we harnessed the power of anecdotes, interviews, and personal reflections to grasp the nuances of how air pollution and soap opera allure intertwine in the tapestry of Houston's vibrant populace.

Finally, amid the fervor of data interpretation, we upheld the principles of rigor and reliability, ensuring that our findings were as robust as the enduring plotlines of "Days of Our Lives." Our study conducted a thorough examination of potential confounding variables, spicing up our analysis with flavors of regional demographics, socioeconomic factors, and cultural influences. Every potential avenue of inquiry was enthusiastically pursued, leaving no stone unturned, no subplot unexplored.

In this unconventional amalgamation of quantitative, qualitative, and the occasional poetic license, our research team unfurled the baffling tapestry of Houston's air pollution and "Days of Our Lives" viewership. With equal measures of curiosity and jest, we pressed onward, striving to unveil the remarkable ties between smog and soap operatics. So, with good humor and a nod to the dramatic flair of our subject matter, we present the findings of our zany expedition – a scholarly soiree between air pollution and daytime drama.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Houston and Viewership count for Days of Our Lives. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia .

For the time period 1980 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.8377522, r-squared of 0.7018288, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Clearing the Air: An Air Pollution Study and Soap Opera Viewership in Houston"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we delve into the unexpected correlation between air pollution levels in Houston and the viewership count for the long-running soap opera "Days of Our Lives." Drawing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, our research team uncovered a surprising connection that soap opera enthusiasts will find quite soapy! We calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.8377522 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 1980 to 2021. This study not only provides an intriguing twist in the world of environmental and entertainment research but also showcases the remarkable interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena. So, put on your best dramatic face and get ready for some "Days of Our Lives" dramatic irony as we explore the curious ties between smog and soap operas.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Introduction
As Dorothy Gale famously observed in the Wizard of Oz, "Toto, I've a feeling we're not in Kansas anymore." In the case of our research, we find ourselves not in Salem, but in Houston, scrutinizing the peculiar association between air pollution levels and the fervent viewership of the long-running daytime drama, "Days of Our Lives." While Dorothy may have been caught in a tornado, we are certainly swirling in a whirlwind of unexpected and bewildering findings in the world of environmental and entertainment research.
The Houston metropolitan area, with its thriving energy industry and bustling cityscape, has long been subject to the ebb and flow of air pollution levels. And amidst the smog and haze, an unlikely correlation has emerged, drawing a curious link between the quality of the air we breathe and the avid viewership of melodramatic plotlines and amorous entanglements on our small screens.
Just as the characters in "Days of Our Lives" navigate through a labyrinth of love triangles and family feuds, our research team has embarked on a journey to unravel the enigmatic entwining of air pollution and soap opera viewership. Our quest has led us to crunching numbers, scrutinizing statistical patterns, and unraveling the drama behind the data – all in the pursuit of unlocking the secrets behind this unconventional association.
So, fasten your seatbelts and get ready for a rollercoaster ride through the smoggy skies and melodramatic storylines. In this paper, we present our findings on the correlation between air pollution in Houston and the compelling world of "Days of Our Lives" – a study that is sure to leave you breathless and perhaps a little bit soapy.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

We found a remarkably strong correlation (r = 0.8377522) between air pollution levels and the viewership count for "Days of Our Lives" in Houston over the period from 1980 to 2021. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.7018288 further reinforces the strength of this relationship. With a p-value of less than 0.01, these results are statistically significant, indicating that the association we've uncovered is more than just a soap opera plot twist - it's the real deal!

Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot illustrating the robust correlation between these seemingly disparate variables, with air pollution levels on the x-axis and "Days of Our Lives" viewership count on the y-axis. The plot showcases the clear trend of increasing soap opera interest as air pollution levels rise, demonstrating a fascinating pattern that not even the most convoluted soap opera storyline could match.

The implications of these findings are, quite frankly, breathtaking. Our research not only sheds light on the surprising interconnectedness of smog and soap operas but also paves the way for a new era in environmental and entertainment research. As the saying goes, "Where there's smog, there's soap drama!"

In summary, our study provides compelling evidence of the unanticipated relationship between air pollution and soap opera viewership in Houston. Through our rigorous analysis, we've uncovered a captivating correlation that adds a whole new dimension to the dialogue on air quality and audience preferences. So, grab your popcorn and air purifier, because this research has truly taken environmental studies to a theatrical level!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Houston and Viewership count for Days of Our Lives. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Clearing the Air: An Air Pollution Study and Soap Opera Viewership in Houston"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we delve into the unexpected correlation between air pollution levels in Houston and the viewership count for the long-running soap opera "Days of Our Lives." Drawing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, our research team uncovered a surprising connection that soap opera enthusiasts will find quite soapy! We calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.8377522 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 1980 to 2021. This study not only provides an intriguing twist in the world of environmental and entertainment research but also showcases the remarkable interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena. So, put on your best dramatic face and get ready for some "Days of Our Lives" dramatic irony as we explore the curious ties between smog and soap operas.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The study of air pollution's impact on human behavior is a vibrant area, albeit not as vibrant as the hue of smog that hangs over Houston. Smith et al. (2015) found a strong correlation between air quality and respiratory illnesses, emphasizing the detrimental effects of pollution on physical health. In a similar vein, Doe and Jones (2018) delved into the psychological effects of pollution, highlighting its potential to cause stress and anxiety among urban dwellers.
Turning to the realm of entertainment and media consumption, Lorem and Ipsum (2020) explored the influence of environmental factors on television viewership, touching upon the potential connection between air quality and audience engagement. Drawing from theories of cognitive dissonance, they posited that individuals exposed to poor air quality may seek solace in familiar and comforting entertainment choices, such as soap operas.
However, it is important to note that our paper ventures into uncharted territory, as we merge these disparate strands of research to unveil the striking relationship between air pollution in Houston and the cult following of "Days of Our Lives." We are stepping into a world where science and melodrama coalesce, akin to the fusion of physics and philosophy in "The Dancing Wu Li Masters" by Gary Zukav. While we may not be delving into quantum mechanics, the interplay between air pollution and soap opera viewership is just as enigmatic and full of twists and turns.
Additionally, our exploration is reminiscent of the intertwining narratives in "A Tale of Two Cities" by Charles Dickens, where the disparate worlds of London and Paris converge in unexpected ways. Similarly, we witness the convergence of environmental data and television ratings, entwined in a narrative that is as captivating and convoluted as the plotlines of "Days of Our Lives."
Indeed, as we embark on our eccentric journey, we are reminded of the suspense and strategy found in the board game "Clue." The puzzle of air pollution's influence on soap opera viewership is akin to unraveling a thrilling mystery, with unexpected revelations and perhaps a dash of melodramatic flair.
In the next section, we delve into the methods and findings of our empirical investigation, shedding light on the mesmerizing correlation between air pollution levels and the avid fandom of "Days of Our Lives." Prepare to be swept away in a maelstrom of scientific inquiry and soap opera intrigue!

[[RESULTS]]
We found a remarkably strong correlation (r = 0.8377522) between air pollution levels and the viewership count for "Days of Our Lives" in Houston over the period from 1980 to 2021. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.7018288 further reinforces the strength of this relationship. With a p-value of less than 0.01, these results are statistically significant, indicating that the association we've uncovered is more than just a soap opera plot twist - it's the real deal!
Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot illustrating the robust correlation between these seemingly disparate variables, with air pollution levels on the x-axis and "Days of Our Lives" viewership count on the y-axis. The plot showcases the clear trend of increasing soap opera interest as air pollution levels rise, demonstrating a fascinating pattern that not even the most convoluted soap opera storyline could match.
The implications of these findings are, quite frankly, breathtaking. Our research not only sheds light on the surprising interconnectedness of smog and soap operas but also paves the way for a new era in environmental and entertainment research. As the saying goes, "Where there's smog, there's soap drama!"
In summary, our study provides compelling evidence of the unanticipated relationship between air pollution and soap opera viewership in Houston. Through our rigorous analysis, we've uncovered a captivating correlation that adds a whole new dimension to the dialogue on air quality and audience preferences. So, grab your popcorn and air purifier, because this research has truly taken environmental studies to a theatrical level!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

In the context of Houston's air pollution and soap opera viewership, our results not only confirmed, but also dramatically expanded upon the prior research. The correlation we uncovered between air pollution levels and the viewership count for "Days of Our Lives" aligns with the findings of Lorem and Ipsum (2020), who hypothesized that poor air quality may drive individuals to seek comfort in familiar television programming. It seems that amidst Houston's smog, the allure of soap opera dramatics becomes irresistible. We have established a strong statistical association, akin to the gripping suspense and dramatic flair of a soap opera narrative.

The linkage between air quality and human behavior has been illuminated by various studies, just as the smog over Houston brightens the city lights. Smith et al. (2015) and Doe and Jones (2018) detailed the adverse physical and psychological effects of pollution, shedding light on how environmental factors can influence human well-being. Our research, however, adds a twist to this narrative - it suggests that air pollution may not only affect health but also entertainment choices. Imagine a world where pollution levels play a role in shaping plot twists and character developments on "Days of Our Lives"! Our findings have uplifted the field of entertainment research to unparalleled melodramatic heights.

Just as "A Tale of Two Cities" explores the intertwined destinies of its characters, our study unravels the interwoven fates of air pollution and soap opera viewership in Houston. The correlation coefficient we calculated is as strong as the bond between the characters of a long-running soap opera. Viewership count rises with an increase in air pollution, almost like the rising action of a soap opera episode. It's as if the smog is becoming the ultimate soap opera villain, influencing viewers to tune in and experience vicarious drama.

The scatterplot from our results displays a clear trend, akin to a storytelling device from the soap opera world itself. The ascent of "Days of Our Lives" viewership count alongside rising smog levels paints a picture more riveting than any telenovela. It's a plot twist worthy of the most compelling soap opera episode, a twist that viewers couldn't possibly see coming.

In conclusion, our study delves into the intersection of environmental data and entertainment consumption, painting a captivating narrative that defies the conventional boundaries of both fields. Ultimately, the evidence we've uncovered highlights the unanticipated relationship between air pollution and soap opera viewership, showcasing a correlation that adds a melodramatic dimension to the discourse on air quality and audience preferences. Our study provides a riveting and unexpected contribution to the literature, further underscoring the significance of environmental influences on entertainment choices. The drama of our findings is palpable, making the connection between smog and soap operas a storyline worthy of the most devoted viewer.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Houston and Viewership count for Days of Our Lives. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Clearing the Air: An Air Pollution Study and Soap Opera Viewership in Houston"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we delve into the unexpected correlation between air pollution levels in Houston and the viewership count for the long-running soap opera "Days of Our Lives." Drawing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, our research team uncovered a surprising connection that soap opera enthusiasts will find quite soapy! We calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.8377522 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 1980 to 2021. This study not only provides an intriguing twist in the world of environmental and entertainment research but also showcases the remarkable interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena. So, put on your best dramatic face and get ready for some "Days of Our Lives" dramatic irony as we explore the curious ties between smog and soap operas.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Introduction
As Dorothy Gale famously observed in the Wizard of Oz, "Toto, I've a feeling we're not in Kansas anymore." In the case of our research, we find ourselves not in Salem, but in Houston, scrutinizing the peculiar association between air pollution levels and the fervent viewership of the long-running daytime drama, "Days of Our Lives." While Dorothy may have been caught in a tornado, we are certainly swirling in a whirlwind of unexpected and bewildering findings in the world of environmental and entertainment research.
The Houston metropolitan area, with its thriving energy industry and bustling cityscape, has long been subject to the ebb and flow of air pollution levels. And amidst the smog and haze, an unlikely correlation has emerged, drawing a curious link between the quality of the air we breathe and the avid viewership of melodramatic plotlines and amorous entanglements on our small screens.
Just as the characters in "Days of Our Lives" navigate through a labyrinth of love triangles and family feuds, our research team has embarked on a journey to unravel the enigmatic entwining of air pollution and soap opera viewership. Our quest has led us to crunching numbers, scrutinizing statistical patterns, and unraveling the drama behind the data – all in the pursuit of unlocking the secrets behind this unconventional association.
So, fasten your seatbelts and get ready for a rollercoaster ride through the smoggy skies and melodramatic storylines. In this paper, we present our findings on the correlation between air pollution in Houston and the compelling world of "Days of Our Lives" – a study that is sure to leave you breathless and perhaps a little bit soapy.

[[RESULTS]]
We found a remarkably strong correlation (r = 0.8377522) between air pollution levels and the viewership count for "Days of Our Lives" in Houston over the period from 1980 to 2021. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.7018288 further reinforces the strength of this relationship. With a p-value of less than 0.01, these results are statistically significant, indicating that the association we've uncovered is more than just a soap opera plot twist - it's the real deal!
Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot illustrating the robust correlation between these seemingly disparate variables, with air pollution levels on the x-axis and "Days of Our Lives" viewership count on the y-axis. The plot showcases the clear trend of increasing soap opera interest as air pollution levels rise, demonstrating a fascinating pattern that not even the most convoluted soap opera storyline could match.
The implications of these findings are, quite frankly, breathtaking. Our research not only sheds light on the surprising interconnectedness of smog and soap operas but also paves the way for a new era in environmental and entertainment research. As the saying goes, "Where there's smog, there's soap drama!"
In summary, our study provides compelling evidence of the unanticipated relationship between air pollution and soap opera viewership in Houston. Through our rigorous analysis, we've uncovered a captivating correlation that adds a whole new dimension to the dialogue on air quality and audience preferences. So, grab your popcorn and air purifier, because this research has truly taken environmental studies to a theatrical level!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has not only connected the dots between smog and soap drama but has also given a breath of fresh air to the world of environmental and entertainment studies. Who would have thought that the city's hazy skies could have such a sudsy effect on television viewership? It seems that the more pollution fills the air, the more viewers are drawn to the tantalizing plotlines of "Days of Our Lives." Perhaps we should rename the show to "Haze of Our Lives," given the compelling correlation we've uncovered!

As for the practical implications, it's clear that air pollution control may inadvertently impact the television ratings in Houston. Imagine a future where urban planners and TV producers hold joint meetings to discuss air quality forecasts and character development to ensure maximum audience engagement – now that's what we call interdisciplinary collaboration at its finest!

While our findings are certainly captivating, it seems safe to say that no more research is needed in this area. We've unraveled the mystery behind the smog-soap opera connection, leaving us with a storyline that could rival the most dramatic daytime TV plot twists. So, let's bid farewell to this peculiar pairing and shift our focus to new research frontiers. After all, there are plenty more unexpected links waiting to be discovered in the vast and soapy world of correlations!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Clearing the Air: An Air Pollution Study and Soap Opera Viewership in Houston. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Environmental Drama Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Clearing the Air: An Air Pollution Study and Soap Opera Viewership in Houston. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Investigating Quirky Correlations in Environmental and Entertainment Preferences


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Clearing the Air: An Air Pollution Study and Soap Opera Viewership in Houston with an abstract of In this research paper, we delve into the unexpected correlation between air pollution levels in Houston and the viewership count for the long-running soap opera "Days of Our Lives." Drawing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, our research team uncovered a surprising connection that soap opera enthusiasts will find quite soapy! We calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.8377522 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 1980 to 2021. This study not only provides an intriguing twist in the world of environmental and entertainment research but also showcases the remarkable interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena. So, put on your best dramatic face and get ready for some "Days of Our Lives" dramatic irony as we explore the curious ties between smog and soap operas.

ChatGPT:

air pollution levels, soap opera viewership, Houston, correlation, Environmental Protection Agency, EPA data, soap opera, "Days of Our Lives", Houston pollution, air quality, television viewership, pollutant levels, Houston air pollution, soap opera fans, air pollution research, entertainment research

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Houston
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with air quality at 'unhealthy for sensitive groups' or worse in Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Houston

Viewership count for Days of Our Lives
Detailed data title: Metered viewership count for Days of Our Lives
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Viewership count for Days of Our Lives

Correlation r = 0.8377522 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7018288 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 70.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Viewership count for Days of Our Lives) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Houston) over the 42 years from 1980 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.6E-12. 0.0000000000045719647806534750
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.84 in 4.6E-10% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 218,724,344,560 random variables You don't actually need 218 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 41 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 41 because we have two variables measured over a period of 42 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.72, 0.91 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Air pollution in Houston (Bad air quality days)35.98933.150732.602738.904131.147532.328829.315131.780833.606620.27425.479521.095917.759616.986323.561627.945216.666722.739724.657527.397324.043723.287718.904121.369920.218627.823721.643815.068512.60278.7671212.054815.616413.11486.575343.8356212.32886.284156.849329.589048.493156.557388.21918
Viewership count for Days of Our Lives (Nielson share)560000055000005700000710000071000007200000700000071000006500000540000052000005400000490000056000005300000580000058000005100000580000042000003800000360000031000003100000270000026000002300000210000022000002200000200000020000002100000190000020500001800000160000016000001600000140000012000001200000




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([35.989,33.1507,32.6027,38.9041,31.1475,32.3288,29.3151,31.7808,33.6066,20.274,25.4795,21.0959,17.7596,16.9863,23.5616,27.9452,16.6667,22.7397,24.6575,27.3973,24.0437,23.2877,18.9041,21.3699,20.2186,27.8237,21.6438,15.0685,12.6027,8.76712,12.0548,15.6164,13.1148,6.57534,3.83562,12.3288,6.28415,6.84932,9.58904,8.49315,6.55738,8.21918,])
array_2 = np.array([5600000,5500000,5700000,7100000,7100000,7200000,7000000,7100000,6500000,5400000,5200000,5400000,4900000,5600000,5300000,5800000,5800000,5100000,5800000,4200000,3800000,3600000,3100000,3100000,2700000,2600000,2300000,2100000,2200000,2200000,2000000,2000000,2100000,1900000,2050000,1800000,1600000,1600000,1600000,1400000,1200000,1200000,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Houston"
array_2_name = "Viewership count for Days of Our Lives"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the rating guru we've been waiting for!


Correlation ID: 3952 · Black Variable ID: 20721 · Red Variable ID: 87
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0