about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,918 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Rylee and the second variable is GMO use in soybeans in Missouri.  The chart goes from 2000 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

As the name Rylee gained traction, more and more parents were drawn to unique, modern monikers. This trend led to an overall surge in interest towards innovative and unconventional things, including genetically modified organisms. It's like they say, when it comes to naming babies, the Rylee-er, the better! Before we knew it, the demand for GMO soybeans in Missouri was sowing as fast as... well, a beanstalk! It just goes to show, the secret to agricultural advancement may very well lie in the popularity of baby names. Who would have thought that Rylee could have such a soy-ful impact on the farming industry? It's certainly a 'soy'-prise for the ages!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a bustling Missouri farm market with a minimalist touch, featuring a sign displaying "Rylee's Soy Stand" in colorful letters, against a backdrop of vast soybean fields. The scene should showcase the name "Rylee" prominently featured on the stand, drawing a crowd of people. In the background, depict farmers using advanced machinery to cultivate genetically modified soybeans, meeting the increased demand driven by Rylee's popularity and the surge in trendy soy-based diets. The image should be simplified, focusing on essential elements while highlighting the vibrant atmosphere of the market. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Rylee and GMO use in soybeans in Missouri. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: inspired by bauhaus Minimalism a funny image you would see on reddit Symbolism Cyber folk
ChatGPT: Minimalism

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Rylee and GMO use in soybeans in Missouri, in the following situation: Because the rise of Rylee led to a surge in trendy soy-based diets, driving up demand for soybeans in Missouri and prompting farmers to use more GMOs to meet the demand.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A bustling Missouri farm market with a sign displaying "Rylee's Soy Stand" in colorful letters, surrounded by fields of soybeans. The name "Rylee" is prominently featured on the stand, drawing a crowd of people. In the background, farmers can be seen using advanced machinery to cultivate the genetically modified soybeans, meeting the increased demand driven by Rylee's popularity and the surge in trendy soy-based diets.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Minimalism ] and depicting this scene: A bustling Missouri farm market with a sign displaying "Rylee's Soy Stand" in colorful letters, surrounded by fields of soybeans. The name "Rylee" is prominently featured on the stand, drawing a crowd of people. In the background, farmers can be seen using advanced machinery to cultivate the genetically modified soybeans, meeting the increased demand driven by Rylee's popularity and the surge in trendy soy-based diets. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a bustling Missouri farm market with a minimalist touch, featuring a sign displaying "Rylee's Soy Stand" in colorful letters, against a backdrop of vast soybean fields. The scene should showcase the name "Rylee" prominently featured on the stand, drawing a crowd of people. In the background, depict farmers using advanced machinery to cultivate genetically modified soybeans, meeting the increased demand driven by Rylee's popularity and the surge in trendy soy-based diets. The image should be simplified, focusing on essential elements while highlighting the vibrant atmosphere of the market.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Rylee caused GMO use in soybeans in Missouri to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Rylee Renaissance: Investigating the Relationship between Rylee's Rising Popularity and Soybean GMO Adoption in Missouri

The Journal of Agro-Pop Culture

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Rylee and GMO use in soybeans in Missouri. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and USDA to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9062870 and p < 0.01 for 2000 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"The Rylee Renaissance: Investigating the Relationship between Rylee's Rising Popularity and Soybean GMO Adoption in Missouri"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In recent years, the popularity of the name Rylee has experienced a renaissance, capturing the attention of social scientists and agricultural enthusiasts alike. This study delves into the curious correlation between the ascension of this nomenclatural wonder and the widespread adoption of genetically modified soybeans in the state of Missouri. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the United States Department of Agriculture, our research team applied sophisticated statistical methods to unravel this enigmatic association. Surprisingly, our analysis revealed a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9062870 and p < 0.01, spanning the years 2000 to 2022. While these findings raise more questions than answers, they highlight the compelling interplay between cultural trends and agricultural practices. Our research proposes that the burgeoning appeal of the name Rylee carries implications beyond the realm of nomenclature, possibly resonating with the complex landscape of soybean cultivation in the Midwest. This paper not only sheds light on this curious phenomenon but also ignites a fervent curiosity to explore the whimsical intricacies of human behavior and agricultural advancement.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Rylee and GMO use in soybeans in Missouri. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Rylee Renaissance: Investigating the Relationship between Rylee's Rising Popularity and Soybean GMO Adoption in Missouri"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In recent years, the popularity of the name Rylee has experienced a renaissance, capturing the attention of social scientists and agricultural enthusiasts alike. This study delves into the curious correlation between the ascension of this nomenclatural wonder and the widespread adoption of genetically modified soybeans in the state of Missouri. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the United States Department of Agriculture, our research team applied sophisticated statistical methods to unravel this enigmatic association. Surprisingly, our analysis revealed a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9062870 and p < 0.01, spanning the years 2000 to 2022. While these findings raise more questions than answers, they highlight the compelling interplay between cultural trends and agricultural practices. Our research proposes that the burgeoning appeal of the name Rylee carries implications beyond the realm of nomenclature, possibly resonating with the complex landscape of soybean cultivation in the Midwest. This paper not only sheds light on this curious phenomenon but also ignites a fervent curiosity to explore the whimsical intricacies of human behavior and agricultural advancement.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The intriguing conundrum of names and nomenclature has often captivated the minds of scholars and individuals alike. Names are not just arbitrary labels; they carry subtle nuances and can be reflective of societal trends and fads. Moreover, the agricultural landscape, particularly the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs), presents a fertile ground for exploration, interwoven with debates on sustainability and technological innovation. But what happens when these two disparate domains, the cultural and the agricultural, evidently collide? Enter Rylee, a name that has not only been steadily ascending in popularity but has also sparked curiosity in its uncanny relationship with genetically modified soybeans in Missouri.

As we embark on this quest, we are compelled to first take a step back and ponder the profound impact of a name. Rylee, with its melodic rhythm and captivating charm, seems to have caught the attention and admiration of many. The resurgence of this enigmatic name has not gone unnoticed and has piqued the interest of parents-to-be, linguists, and cultural enthusiasts alike. A name can be likened to a seed—planted and nurtured in the soil of tradition and modernity, entwined with the hopes and aspirations of individuals. Yet, like the growth of a plant, its popularity remains an intricate enigma, influenced by an array of societal, cultural, and even agricultural factors.

On the other end of the spectrum lies the domain of agriculture, where the use of genetically modified soybeans has been a subject of both fervent support and vehement opposition. The implementation of GMOs has transformed the agricultural landscape, promising increased yields and resilience against pests and environmental stressors. Soybeans, in particular, have emerged as a pivotal crop in this genetic engineering saga. However, as with any technological advancement, the adoption of GMOs warrants a closer examination of its implications for the environment, food security, and beyond.

In the midst of these divergent realms lies our research endeavor—an earnest attempt to unravel the entwined fate of Rylee and genetically modified soybeans in the heartlands of Missouri. The whimsical juxtaposition of a name’s popularity and the agricultural practices of soybean cultivation presents an opportunity to delve into the uncharted territories of cultural influence and ecosystem transformations. As we delve into this offbeat correlation, we cannot help but marvel at the quirks of human behavior and the intricate dance between societal preferences and agricultural innovation. By peering into this idiosyncratic phenomenon, we may stumble upon unexpected insights that could challenge our perceptions of interconnectedness and illuminate the paradoxes that reside in the interstices of human culture and agricultural progress.

In light of these musings and contemplations, our paper not only seeks to untangle the curious association between Rylee’s resurgence and the prevalence of genetically modified soybeans but also strives to instigate an intellectual odyssey that celebrates the art of unraveling the charming eccentricities of our world. As we move forward, traversing the verdant fields of curiosity and academic inquiry, we invite our readers to join us in this whimsical voyage—a journey that promises both amusement and enlightenment, all encapsulated within the remarkable nexus of Rylee and soybeans in Missouri.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Rylee and GMO use in soybeans in Missouri. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Rylee Renaissance: Investigating the Relationship between Rylee's Rising Popularity and Soybean GMO Adoption in Missouri"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In recent years, the popularity of the name Rylee has experienced a renaissance, capturing the attention of social scientists and agricultural enthusiasts alike. This study delves into the curious correlation between the ascension of this nomenclatural wonder and the widespread adoption of genetically modified soybeans in the state of Missouri. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the United States Department of Agriculture, our research team applied sophisticated statistical methods to unravel this enigmatic association. Surprisingly, our analysis revealed a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9062870 and p < 0.01, spanning the years 2000 to 2022. While these findings raise more questions than answers, they highlight the compelling interplay between cultural trends and agricultural practices. Our research proposes that the burgeoning appeal of the name Rylee carries implications beyond the realm of nomenclature, possibly resonating with the complex landscape of soybean cultivation in the Midwest. This paper not only sheds light on this curious phenomenon but also ignites a fervent curiosity to explore the whimsical intricacies of human behavior and agricultural advancement.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intriguing conundrum of names and nomenclature has often captivated the minds of scholars and individuals alike. Names are not just arbitrary labels; they carry subtle nuances and can be reflective of societal trends and fads. Moreover, the agricultural landscape, particularly the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs), presents a fertile ground for exploration, interwoven with debates on sustainability and technological innovation. But what happens when these two disparate domains, the cultural and the agricultural, evidently collide? Enter Rylee, a name that has not only been steadily ascending in popularity but has also sparked curiosity in its uncanny relationship with genetically modified soybeans in Missouri.
As we embark on this quest, we are compelled to first take a step back and ponder the profound impact of a name. Rylee, with its melodic rhythm and captivating charm, seems to have caught the attention and admiration of many. The resurgence of this enigmatic name has not gone unnoticed and has piqued the interest of parents-to-be, linguists, and cultural enthusiasts alike. A name can be likened to a seed—planted and nurtured in the soil of tradition and modernity, entwined with the hopes and aspirations of individuals. Yet, like the growth of a plant, its popularity remains an intricate enigma, influenced by an array of societal, cultural, and even agricultural factors.
On the other end of the spectrum lies the domain of agriculture, where the use of genetically modified soybeans has been a subject of both fervent support and vehement opposition. The implementation of GMOs has transformed the agricultural landscape, promising increased yields and resilience against pests and environmental stressors. Soybeans, in particular, have emerged as a pivotal crop in this genetic engineering saga. However, as with any technological advancement, the adoption of GMOs warrants a closer examination of its implications for the environment, food security, and beyond.
In the midst of these divergent realms lies our research endeavor—an earnest attempt to unravel the entwined fate of Rylee and genetically modified soybeans in the heartlands of Missouri. The whimsical juxtaposition of a name’s popularity and the agricultural practices of soybean cultivation presents an opportunity to delve into the uncharted territories of cultural influence and ecosystem transformations. As we delve into this offbeat correlation, we cannot help but marvel at the quirks of human behavior and the intricate dance between societal preferences and agricultural innovation. By peering into this idiosyncratic phenomenon, we may stumble upon unexpected insights that could challenge our perceptions of interconnectedness and illuminate the paradoxes that reside in the interstices of human culture and agricultural progress.
In light of these musings and contemplations, our paper not only seeks to untangle the curious association between Rylee’s resurgence and the prevalence of genetically modified soybeans but also strives to instigate an intellectual odyssey that celebrates the art of unraveling the charming eccentricities of our world. As we move forward, traversing the verdant fields of curiosity and academic inquiry, we invite our readers to join us in this whimsical voyage—a journey that promises both amusement and enlightenment, all encapsulated within the remarkable nexus of Rylee and soybeans in Missouri.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In elucidating the enigmatic relationship between the resurgence of the name Rylee and the adoption of genetically modified soybeans in Missouri, we commence our scholarly interrogation by immersing ourselves in the ocean of literature where the currents of nomenclature and agricultural innovations converge.

Smith and Doe (2015) explored the societal dynamics of naming trends, postulating that the popularity of certain names may mirror broader cultural shifts and zeitgeist. Their meticulous analysis traced the ebb and flow of distinct monikers and their resonance with societal periods, offering a nuanced examination of how names serve as mirrors reflecting the fads and whims of their time. This authoritative exploration serves as a compass to navigate the labyrinthine complexities of nomenclatural inclinations.

Additionally, Jones (2018) conducted a comprehensive study on the adoption of genetically modified crops, shedding light on the multifaceted considerations and implications accompanying such agricultural transformations. The nuanced exploration of genetically modified organisms' influence on agricultural landscapes and food systems underscores the significance of understanding the far-reaching ramifications of technological interventions in the delicate tapestry of nature and society.

Building upon this solid foundation of scholarly inquiry, our perusal extends further into the annals of literature, embracing an interdisciplinary terrain that navigates the intersection of cultural phenomena and agricultural innovations.

Drawing inspiration from non-fiction works, such as "The Omnivore's Dilemma" (Pollan, 2006) and "Seeds of Change: The Story of Quaker and GMO Soybeans" (Hymowitz, 2015), we are beckoned into the intricate web of agricultural history and the saga of genetically modified crop adoption. These literary odysseys provide a compelling backdrop to contemplate the complex relationships between human dietary choices, agricultural practices, and the broader enigmas of food production systems.

Embarking on a whimsical detour, we cast a humorous glance at fiction works that seemingly resonate with the thematic tapestry of our investigation. Works such as "The Name of the Rose" (Eco, 1980) and "Soybean and Sensibility" (Austen, 1811) whimsically tug at the threads of nomenclature and agricultural musings, offering lighthearted yet uncannily relevant perspectives that interlace with our inquiry.

As our scholarly pursuit takes an unexpected turn, we must confess a less conventional source of literature review - the perplexing assortment of CVS receipts, unexpectedly offering snippets of human behavior and everyday purchases. While ostensibly unrelated to our investigation, these mundane and often absurd scrolls provide glimpses into the whims and fancies of the populace, perhaps unravelling subtle hints about the perplexing popularity of the name Rylee and its uncanny correlation with agricultural trends.

Following this unconventional foray, we now stand poised on the precipice of knowledge, armed with a motley assemblage of literature, ready to decipher the entwined fate of Rylee and GMO soybeans in Missouri.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Rylee and GMO use in soybeans in Missouri. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and USDA . You used data from 2000 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Rylee Renaissance: Investigating the Relationship between Rylee's Rising Popularity and Soybean GMO Adoption in Missouri"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In recent years, the popularity of the name Rylee has experienced a renaissance, capturing the attention of social scientists and agricultural enthusiasts alike. This study delves into the curious correlation between the ascension of this nomenclatural wonder and the widespread adoption of genetically modified soybeans in the state of Missouri. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the United States Department of Agriculture, our research team applied sophisticated statistical methods to unravel this enigmatic association. Surprisingly, our analysis revealed a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9062870 and p < 0.01, spanning the years 2000 to 2022. While these findings raise more questions than answers, they highlight the compelling interplay between cultural trends and agricultural practices. Our research proposes that the burgeoning appeal of the name Rylee carries implications beyond the realm of nomenclature, possibly resonating with the complex landscape of soybean cultivation in the Midwest. This paper not only sheds light on this curious phenomenon but also ignites a fervent curiosity to explore the whimsical intricacies of human behavior and agricultural advancement.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intriguing conundrum of names and nomenclature has often captivated the minds of scholars and individuals alike. Names are not just arbitrary labels; they carry subtle nuances and can be reflective of societal trends and fads. Moreover, the agricultural landscape, particularly the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs), presents a fertile ground for exploration, interwoven with debates on sustainability and technological innovation. But what happens when these two disparate domains, the cultural and the agricultural, evidently collide? Enter Rylee, a name that has not only been steadily ascending in popularity but has also sparked curiosity in its uncanny relationship with genetically modified soybeans in Missouri.
As we embark on this quest, we are compelled to first take a step back and ponder the profound impact of a name. Rylee, with its melodic rhythm and captivating charm, seems to have caught the attention and admiration of many. The resurgence of this enigmatic name has not gone unnoticed and has piqued the interest of parents-to-be, linguists, and cultural enthusiasts alike. A name can be likened to a seed—planted and nurtured in the soil of tradition and modernity, entwined with the hopes and aspirations of individuals. Yet, like the growth of a plant, its popularity remains an intricate enigma, influenced by an array of societal, cultural, and even agricultural factors.
On the other end of the spectrum lies the domain of agriculture, where the use of genetically modified soybeans has been a subject of both fervent support and vehement opposition. The implementation of GMOs has transformed the agricultural landscape, promising increased yields and resilience against pests and environmental stressors. Soybeans, in particular, have emerged as a pivotal crop in this genetic engineering saga. However, as with any technological advancement, the adoption of GMOs warrants a closer examination of its implications for the environment, food security, and beyond.
In the midst of these divergent realms lies our research endeavor—an earnest attempt to unravel the entwined fate of Rylee and genetically modified soybeans in the heartlands of Missouri. The whimsical juxtaposition of a name’s popularity and the agricultural practices of soybean cultivation presents an opportunity to delve into the uncharted territories of cultural influence and ecosystem transformations. As we delve into this offbeat correlation, we cannot help but marvel at the quirks of human behavior and the intricate dance between societal preferences and agricultural innovation. By peering into this idiosyncratic phenomenon, we may stumble upon unexpected insights that could challenge our perceptions of interconnectedness and illuminate the paradoxes that reside in the interstices of human culture and agricultural progress.
In light of these musings and contemplations, our paper not only seeks to untangle the curious association between Rylee’s resurgence and the prevalence of genetically modified soybeans but also strives to instigate an intellectual odyssey that celebrates the art of unraveling the charming eccentricities of our world. As we move forward, traversing the verdant fields of curiosity and academic inquiry, we invite our readers to join us in this whimsical voyage—a journey that promises both amusement and enlightenment, all encapsulated within the remarkable nexus of Rylee and soybeans in Missouri.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To illuminate the enigmatic association between the burgeoning popularity of the name Rylee and the adoption of genetically modified soybeans in Missouri, our research employed a multifaceted approach rooted in meticulous data collection and advanced statistical analyses. Our investigation drew upon data sourced primarily from the United States Social Security Administration (SSA) for Rylee's name popularity trends and the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) for soybean cultivation and GMO adoption rates. The years of interest spanned from 2000 to 2022, encompassing a considerable timeframe to capture the evolution of both the name Rylee and the prevalence of GMO soybeans.

The data procurement process, while not without its share of challenges, could be likened to navigating a labyrinth of digital archives and repositories, akin to searching for a needle in a haystack, or perhaps in this context, a soybean in a sprawling field of data. Delving deep into the annals of the SSA's historical name records, our team meticulously gathered and curated the prevalence and popularity of the name Rylee across different geographic regions. We encountered intriguing peaks and troughs in the adoption of this nomenclature, revealing a landscape reminiscent of undulating agrarian fields, sown with the whims of cultural preference.

Simultaneously, in the pursuit of agricultural insights, we immersed ourselves in the USDA's rich reservoir of soybean cultivation data, navigating complex datasets teeming with genetic jargon and agrarian intricacies. Surfacing from this deep dive, our team emerged with a trove of information on GMO adoption rates and soybean cultivation practices in Missouri, akin to intrepid explorers returning from an expedition, laden with captivating tales from the frontier of agricultural innovation.

Once the data was secured, our statistical analyses unfolded as a captivating dance of numbers and hypotheses, akin to the choreography of algorithmic waltzes and analytical ballets. Employing advanced statistical techniques such as correlation analysis and multivariate regression models, we endeavored to unearth the concealed interplay between the meteoric rise of Rylee's popularity and the prevalence of GMO soybeans. Our statistical forays were not without their fair share of computational acrobatics and intellectual pirouettes, yet they ultimately yielded a captivating symphony of numeric revelations.

The statistical results, bearing testament to the intrinsic elegance and precision of mathematical inquiry, unraveled a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9062870 and p < 0.01, amplifying the symphonic melody of our analytical odyssey. Embedded within this statistical concerto lay the crux of our findings, highlighting the serendipitous connection between the cultural sway of Rylee and the agricultural embrace of genetically modified soybeans, akin to a harmonious duet resonating across the domains of human nomenclature and agricultural innovation.

In the midst of these methodological exploits, our research team consistently navigated the nuanced interplay of empirical rigor and whimsical curiosity, transmuting the data into a vehicle for unraveling the captivating mosaic of Rylee's resurgence and soybean GMO adoption. As we move forward into the grand expanse of our findings, we are not only informed by the precision of statistical inquisitions but also by the spirit of intellectual adventure, infused with an unyielding ardor for unraveling the enchanting interplay between nomenclature and agriculture.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Rylee and GMO use in soybeans in Missouri. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and USDA .

For the time period 2000 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9062870, r-squared of 0.8213562, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Rylee Renaissance: Investigating the Relationship between Rylee's Rising Popularity and Soybean GMO Adoption in Missouri"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In recent years, the popularity of the name Rylee has experienced a renaissance, capturing the attention of social scientists and agricultural enthusiasts alike. This study delves into the curious correlation between the ascension of this nomenclatural wonder and the widespread adoption of genetically modified soybeans in the state of Missouri. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the United States Department of Agriculture, our research team applied sophisticated statistical methods to unravel this enigmatic association. Surprisingly, our analysis revealed a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9062870 and p < 0.01, spanning the years 2000 to 2022. While these findings raise more questions than answers, they highlight the compelling interplay between cultural trends and agricultural practices. Our research proposes that the burgeoning appeal of the name Rylee carries implications beyond the realm of nomenclature, possibly resonating with the complex landscape of soybean cultivation in the Midwest. This paper not only sheds light on this curious phenomenon but also ignites a fervent curiosity to explore the whimsical intricacies of human behavior and agricultural advancement.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intriguing conundrum of names and nomenclature has often captivated the minds of scholars and individuals alike. Names are not just arbitrary labels; they carry subtle nuances and can be reflective of societal trends and fads. Moreover, the agricultural landscape, particularly the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs), presents a fertile ground for exploration, interwoven with debates on sustainability and technological innovation. But what happens when these two disparate domains, the cultural and the agricultural, evidently collide? Enter Rylee, a name that has not only been steadily ascending in popularity but has also sparked curiosity in its uncanny relationship with genetically modified soybeans in Missouri.
As we embark on this quest, we are compelled to first take a step back and ponder the profound impact of a name. Rylee, with its melodic rhythm and captivating charm, seems to have caught the attention and admiration of many. The resurgence of this enigmatic name has not gone unnoticed and has piqued the interest of parents-to-be, linguists, and cultural enthusiasts alike. A name can be likened to a seed—planted and nurtured in the soil of tradition and modernity, entwined with the hopes and aspirations of individuals. Yet, like the growth of a plant, its popularity remains an intricate enigma, influenced by an array of societal, cultural, and even agricultural factors.
On the other end of the spectrum lies the domain of agriculture, where the use of genetically modified soybeans has been a subject of both fervent support and vehement opposition. The implementation of GMOs has transformed the agricultural landscape, promising increased yields and resilience against pests and environmental stressors. Soybeans, in particular, have emerged as a pivotal crop in this genetic engineering saga. However, as with any technological advancement, the adoption of GMOs warrants a closer examination of its implications for the environment, food security, and beyond.
In the midst of these divergent realms lies our research endeavor—an earnest attempt to unravel the entwined fate of Rylee and genetically modified soybeans in the heartlands of Missouri. The whimsical juxtaposition of a name’s popularity and the agricultural practices of soybean cultivation presents an opportunity to delve into the uncharted territories of cultural influence and ecosystem transformations. As we delve into this offbeat correlation, we cannot help but marvel at the quirks of human behavior and the intricate dance between societal preferences and agricultural innovation. By peering into this idiosyncratic phenomenon, we may stumble upon unexpected insights that could challenge our perceptions of interconnectedness and illuminate the paradoxes that reside in the interstices of human culture and agricultural progress.
In light of these musings and contemplations, our paper not only seeks to untangle the curious association between Rylee’s resurgence and the prevalence of genetically modified soybeans but also strives to instigate an intellectual odyssey that celebrates the art of unraveling the charming eccentricities of our world. As we move forward, traversing the verdant fields of curiosity and academic inquiry, we invite our readers to join us in this whimsical voyage—a journey that promises both amusement and enlightenment, all encapsulated within the remarkable nexus of Rylee and soybeans in Missouri.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our investigation into the correlation between the rising popularity of the name Rylee and the adoption of genetically modified soybeans in Missouri from 2000 to 2022 uncovered some truly fascinating findings. Through meticulous data analysis and statistical wizardry, we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9062870, denoting a remarkably strong positive relationship. The r-squared value of 0.8213562 further emphasized the robustness of this correlation, implying that approximately 82% of the variation in GMO soybean adoption can be explained by the popularity of the name Rylee. Not to mention, with a p-value of less than 0.01, our results are about as statistically significant as finding a needle in a haystack—well, perhaps in this case, a genetically modified needle in a soybean field.

Visualizing the connection between Rylee's ascent and soybean GMO adoption is our trusty companion, Fig. 1. The scatterplot encapsulates the essence of our findings, showcasing the striking co-movement between these seemingly disparate variables. It's a bit like witnessing an unexpected tango between a cultural phenomenon and an agricultural innovation—certainly a dance floor we hadn't anticipated finding ourselves on.

These results not only reaffirm the compelling nature of our initial inquiry but also challenge us to contemplate the whimsical interconnectedness of human inclinations and agricultural practices. The Rylee renaissance, it seems, not only has captivated parents seeking a melodious moniker for their little ones but also has sent ripples through the fields of soybean cultivation, echoing a curious symphony of societal and agricultural dynamics.

Intriguingly, our findings beckon us to ponder the possibility of a linguistic and agricultural zeitgeist, where the ebb and flow of names harmonize with the metamorphosis of crops. While causality remains a convoluted matter—naming your child Rylee won't lead to the spontaneous sprouting of GMO soybeans in your backyard—the resonance between these phenomena invites a spirited exploration of the idiosyncrasies that thread through the tapestry of human culture and agricultural progress.

Overall, our results not only reflect the statistical potency of the Rylee-soybean alliance but also awaken our intellectual curiosity, urging us to unearth the buried treasures of correlation and causation. As we celebrate the enchanting synchronicity between a name and a crop, we invite readers to partake in this whimsical endeavor, where the unexpected thrives and the peculiar beckons us to revel in the delightful absurdity of our world.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Rylee and GMO use in soybeans in Missouri. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"The Rylee Renaissance: Investigating the Relationship between Rylee's Rising Popularity and Soybean GMO Adoption in Missouri"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In recent years, the popularity of the name Rylee has experienced a renaissance, capturing the attention of social scientists and agricultural enthusiasts alike. This study delves into the curious correlation between the ascension of this nomenclatural wonder and the widespread adoption of genetically modified soybeans in the state of Missouri. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the United States Department of Agriculture, our research team applied sophisticated statistical methods to unravel this enigmatic association. Surprisingly, our analysis revealed a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9062870 and p < 0.01, spanning the years 2000 to 2022. While these findings raise more questions than answers, they highlight the compelling interplay between cultural trends and agricultural practices. Our research proposes that the burgeoning appeal of the name Rylee carries implications beyond the realm of nomenclature, possibly resonating with the complex landscape of soybean cultivation in the Midwest. This paper not only sheds light on this curious phenomenon but also ignites a fervent curiosity to explore the whimsical intricacies of human behavior and agricultural advancement.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In elucidating the enigmatic relationship between the resurgence of the name Rylee and the adoption of genetically modified soybeans in Missouri, we commence our scholarly interrogation by immersing ourselves in the ocean of literature where the currents of nomenclature and agricultural innovations converge.
Smith and Doe (2015) explored the societal dynamics of naming trends, postulating that the popularity of certain names may mirror broader cultural shifts and zeitgeist. Their meticulous analysis traced the ebb and flow of distinct monikers and their resonance with societal periods, offering a nuanced examination of how names serve as mirrors reflecting the fads and whims of their time. This authoritative exploration serves as a compass to navigate the labyrinthine complexities of nomenclatural inclinations.
Additionally, Jones (2018) conducted a comprehensive study on the adoption of genetically modified crops, shedding light on the multifaceted considerations and implications accompanying such agricultural transformations. The nuanced exploration of genetically modified organisms' influence on agricultural landscapes and food systems underscores the significance of understanding the far-reaching ramifications of technological interventions in the delicate tapestry of nature and society.
Building upon this solid foundation of scholarly inquiry, our perusal extends further into the annals of literature, embracing an interdisciplinary terrain that navigates the intersection of cultural phenomena and agricultural innovations.
Drawing inspiration from non-fiction works, such as "The Omnivore's Dilemma" (Pollan, 2006) and "Seeds of Change: The Story of Quaker and GMO Soybeans" (Hymowitz, 2015), we are beckoned into the intricate web of agricultural history and the saga of genetically modified crop adoption. These literary odysseys provide a compelling backdrop to contemplate the complex relationships between human dietary choices, agricultural practices, and the broader enigmas of food production systems.
Embarking on a whimsical detour, we cast a humorous glance at fiction works that seemingly resonate with the thematic tapestry of our investigation. Works such as "The Name of the Rose" (Eco, 1980) and "Soybean and Sensibility" (Austen, 1811) whimsically tug at the threads of nomenclature and agricultural musings, offering lighthearted yet uncannily relevant perspectives that interlace with our inquiry.
As our scholarly pursuit takes an unexpected turn, we must confess a less conventional source of literature review - the perplexing assortment of CVS receipts, unexpectedly offering snippets of human behavior and everyday purchases. While ostensibly unrelated to our investigation, these mundane and often absurd scrolls provide glimpses into the whims and fancies of the populace, perhaps unravelling subtle hints about the perplexing popularity of the name Rylee and its uncanny correlation with agricultural trends.
Following this unconventional foray, we now stand poised on the precipice of knowledge, armed with a motley assemblage of literature, ready to decipher the entwined fate of Rylee and GMO soybeans in Missouri.

[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation into the correlation between the rising popularity of the name Rylee and the adoption of genetically modified soybeans in Missouri from 2000 to 2022 uncovered some truly fascinating findings. Through meticulous data analysis and statistical wizardry, we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9062870, denoting a remarkably strong positive relationship. The r-squared value of 0.8213562 further emphasized the robustness of this correlation, implying that approximately 82% of the variation in GMO soybean adoption can be explained by the popularity of the name Rylee. Not to mention, with a p-value of less than 0.01, our results are about as statistically significant as finding a needle in a haystack—well, perhaps in this case, a genetically modified needle in a soybean field.
Visualizing the connection between Rylee's ascent and soybean GMO adoption is our trusty companion, Fig. 1. The scatterplot encapsulates the essence of our findings, showcasing the striking co-movement between these seemingly disparate variables. It's a bit like witnessing an unexpected tango between a cultural phenomenon and an agricultural innovation—certainly a dance floor we hadn't anticipated finding ourselves on.
These results not only reaffirm the compelling nature of our initial inquiry but also challenge us to contemplate the whimsical interconnectedness of human inclinations and agricultural practices. The Rylee renaissance, it seems, not only has captivated parents seeking a melodious moniker for their little ones but also has sent ripples through the fields of soybean cultivation, echoing a curious symphony of societal and agricultural dynamics.
Intriguingly, our findings beckon us to ponder the possibility of a linguistic and agricultural zeitgeist, where the ebb and flow of names harmonize with the metamorphosis of crops. While causality remains a convoluted matter—naming your child Rylee won't lead to the spontaneous sprouting of GMO soybeans in your backyard—the resonance between these phenomena invites a spirited exploration of the idiosyncrasies that thread through the tapestry of human culture and agricultural progress.
Overall, our results not only reflect the statistical potency of the Rylee-soybean alliance but also awaken our intellectual curiosity, urging us to unearth the buried treasures of correlation and causation. As we celebrate the enchanting synchronicity between a name and a crop, we invite readers to partake in this whimsical endeavor, where the unexpected thrives and the peculiar beckons us to revel in the delightful absurdity of our world.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The profoundly peculiar correlation discovered between the soaring popularity of the name Rylee and the rapid adoption of genetically modified soybeans in Missouri from 2000 to 2022 certainly serves as a testament to the mesmerizing intricacies that encircle human cultural inclinations and the agricultural domain. Our findings not only corroborate the wide-ranging influence of names as mirrors reflecting societal preferences and zeitgeist, as proposed by Smith and Doe (2015), but also place an accentuated spotlight on the resonating impact of linguistic trends on agricultural practices.

As one may recall from our literature review, which fearlessly journeyed into the labyrinthine confluence of naming trends and agricultural innovations, the unforeseen parallels drawn from fiction works such as "The Name of the Rose" (Eco, 1980) and "Soybean and Sensibility" (Austen, 1811) were not merely whimsical flights of fancy. These seemingly unrelated literary forays now infuse our revelations with an uncanny air of possibility, as if the whimsical musings of fictional worlds have surreptitiously woven themselves into the fabric of real-life occurrences.

The statistical robustness of our correlation, epitomized by the strikingly high correlation coefficient and r-squared value, not only aligns with the ruminations of agricultural scholars like Jones (2018) on the far-reaching implications of genetically modified crop adoption but also impels us to embrace the capricious cadence of human nomenclature. It's akin to witnessing a ballet between the linguistic and the agricultural, a choreography of cultural resonance and ecological transformations that feature Rylee as the prima ballerina and soybeans as her steadfast partner, swaying to the enchanting rhythm of societal and agricultural evolution.

Furthermore, our results deliver an ardent invitation to contemplate the possibility of a linguistic and agricultural zeitgeist, where the ebb and flow of names harmonize with the metamorphosis of crops, akin to a harmonious symphony that neither name nor soybean would have composed alone. The resounding echoes of societal and agricultural dynamics captured within our findings urge us to embark on a whimsical endeavor, where the unexpected thrives, and the peculiar beckons us to revel in the delightful absurdity of our world.

In essence, our study not only unravels the dance between a name and a crop but also evokes lively curiosity, challenging us to unearth the buried treasures of correlation and causation. As such, we laud the enchanting synchronicity between Rylee and soybeans, and we extend an open invitation to fellow researchers to join us in capturing the essence of this unexpected tango between nomenclature and agriculture.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Rylee and GMO use in soybeans in Missouri. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"The Rylee Renaissance: Investigating the Relationship between Rylee's Rising Popularity and Soybean GMO Adoption in Missouri"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In recent years, the popularity of the name Rylee has experienced a renaissance, capturing the attention of social scientists and agricultural enthusiasts alike. This study delves into the curious correlation between the ascension of this nomenclatural wonder and the widespread adoption of genetically modified soybeans in the state of Missouri. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the United States Department of Agriculture, our research team applied sophisticated statistical methods to unravel this enigmatic association. Surprisingly, our analysis revealed a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9062870 and p < 0.01, spanning the years 2000 to 2022. While these findings raise more questions than answers, they highlight the compelling interplay between cultural trends and agricultural practices. Our research proposes that the burgeoning appeal of the name Rylee carries implications beyond the realm of nomenclature, possibly resonating with the complex landscape of soybean cultivation in the Midwest. This paper not only sheds light on this curious phenomenon but also ignites a fervent curiosity to explore the whimsical intricacies of human behavior and agricultural advancement.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intriguing conundrum of names and nomenclature has often captivated the minds of scholars and individuals alike. Names are not just arbitrary labels; they carry subtle nuances and can be reflective of societal trends and fads. Moreover, the agricultural landscape, particularly the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs), presents a fertile ground for exploration, interwoven with debates on sustainability and technological innovation. But what happens when these two disparate domains, the cultural and the agricultural, evidently collide? Enter Rylee, a name that has not only been steadily ascending in popularity but has also sparked curiosity in its uncanny relationship with genetically modified soybeans in Missouri.
As we embark on this quest, we are compelled to first take a step back and ponder the profound impact of a name. Rylee, with its melodic rhythm and captivating charm, seems to have caught the attention and admiration of many. The resurgence of this enigmatic name has not gone unnoticed and has piqued the interest of parents-to-be, linguists, and cultural enthusiasts alike. A name can be likened to a seed—planted and nurtured in the soil of tradition and modernity, entwined with the hopes and aspirations of individuals. Yet, like the growth of a plant, its popularity remains an intricate enigma, influenced by an array of societal, cultural, and even agricultural factors.
On the other end of the spectrum lies the domain of agriculture, where the use of genetically modified soybeans has been a subject of both fervent support and vehement opposition. The implementation of GMOs has transformed the agricultural landscape, promising increased yields and resilience against pests and environmental stressors. Soybeans, in particular, have emerged as a pivotal crop in this genetic engineering saga. However, as with any technological advancement, the adoption of GMOs warrants a closer examination of its implications for the environment, food security, and beyond.
In the midst of these divergent realms lies our research endeavor—an earnest attempt to unravel the entwined fate of Rylee and genetically modified soybeans in the heartlands of Missouri. The whimsical juxtaposition of a name’s popularity and the agricultural practices of soybean cultivation presents an opportunity to delve into the uncharted territories of cultural influence and ecosystem transformations. As we delve into this offbeat correlation, we cannot help but marvel at the quirks of human behavior and the intricate dance between societal preferences and agricultural innovation. By peering into this idiosyncratic phenomenon, we may stumble upon unexpected insights that could challenge our perceptions of interconnectedness and illuminate the paradoxes that reside in the interstices of human culture and agricultural progress.
In light of these musings and contemplations, our paper not only seeks to untangle the curious association between Rylee’s resurgence and the prevalence of genetically modified soybeans but also strives to instigate an intellectual odyssey that celebrates the art of unraveling the charming eccentricities of our world. As we move forward, traversing the verdant fields of curiosity and academic inquiry, we invite our readers to join us in this whimsical voyage—a journey that promises both amusement and enlightenment, all encapsulated within the remarkable nexus of Rylee and soybeans in Missouri.

[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation into the correlation between the rising popularity of the name Rylee and the adoption of genetically modified soybeans in Missouri from 2000 to 2022 uncovered some truly fascinating findings. Through meticulous data analysis and statistical wizardry, we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9062870, denoting a remarkably strong positive relationship. The r-squared value of 0.8213562 further emphasized the robustness of this correlation, implying that approximately 82% of the variation in GMO soybean adoption can be explained by the popularity of the name Rylee. Not to mention, with a p-value of less than 0.01, our results are about as statistically significant as finding a needle in a haystack—well, perhaps in this case, a genetically modified needle in a soybean field.
Visualizing the connection between Rylee's ascent and soybean GMO adoption is our trusty companion, Fig. 1. The scatterplot encapsulates the essence of our findings, showcasing the striking co-movement between these seemingly disparate variables. It's a bit like witnessing an unexpected tango between a cultural phenomenon and an agricultural innovation—certainly a dance floor we hadn't anticipated finding ourselves on.
These results not only reaffirm the compelling nature of our initial inquiry but also challenge us to contemplate the whimsical interconnectedness of human inclinations and agricultural practices. The Rylee renaissance, it seems, not only has captivated parents seeking a melodious moniker for their little ones but also has sent ripples through the fields of soybean cultivation, echoing a curious symphony of societal and agricultural dynamics.
Intriguingly, our findings beckon us to ponder the possibility of a linguistic and agricultural zeitgeist, where the ebb and flow of names harmonize with the metamorphosis of crops. While causality remains a convoluted matter—naming your child Rylee won't lead to the spontaneous sprouting of GMO soybeans in your backyard—the resonance between these phenomena invites a spirited exploration of the idiosyncrasies that thread through the tapestry of human culture and agricultural progress.
Overall, our results not only reflect the statistical potency of the Rylee-soybean alliance but also awaken our intellectual curiosity, urging us to unearth the buried treasures of correlation and causation. As we celebrate the enchanting synchronicity between a name and a crop, we invite readers to partake in this whimsical endeavor, where the unexpected thrives and the peculiar beckons us to revel in the delightful absurdity of our world.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has unearthed a captivating correlation between the growing popularity of the name Rylee and the adoption of genetically modified soybeans in Missouri. The statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9062870 leaves us as astounded as discovering a soybean-shaped needle in a GMO haystack. Our findings suggest a whimsical tango between societal naming trends and agricultural innovations, echoing a symphony of interconnectedness that challenges conventional perceptions of causality. While our results do not imply that naming a child Rylee will yield a soybean harvest, they do ignite a fervent curiosity to explore the quirky intricacies of human behavior and agricultural advancement.

The implications of our findings extend beyond the statistical realm, delving into the enigmatic interplay of cultural trends and agricultural practices. It seems that the Rylee renaissance has not only resonated with parents seeking a melodious moniker but has also infiltrated the fields of soybean cultivation, offering an unexpected glimpse into the interwoven fate of nomenclature and agricultural progress.

Having illuminated this delightful correlation, we propose that no further research in this area is necessary. The Rylee-soybean alliance stands as a remarkable example of the serendipitous dalliance between the cultural and agricultural spheres. As we bid adieu to this merry exploration, we leave you with a newfound appreciation for the unpredictably amusing intricacies that infuse our world with both amusement and enlightenment.

No more research is needed—let’s celebrate the quirky synergy of Rylee and soybeans in Missouri!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Rylee Renaissance: Investigating the Relationship between Rylee's Rising Popularity and Soybean GMO Adoption in Missouri. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Agro-Pop Culture


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Rylee Renaissance: Investigating the Relationship between Rylee's Rising Popularity and Soybean GMO Adoption in Missouri. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Agricultural Trend Analysis and Policy Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Rylee Renaissance: Investigating the Relationship between Rylee's Rising Popularity and Soybean GMO Adoption in Missouri with an abstract of In recent years, the popularity of the name Rylee has experienced a renaissance, capturing the attention of social scientists and agricultural enthusiasts alike. This study delves into the curious correlation between the ascension of this nomenclatural wonder and the widespread adoption of genetically modified soybeans in the state of Missouri. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the United States Department of Agriculture, our research team applied sophisticated statistical methods to unravel this enigmatic association. Surprisingly, our analysis revealed a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9062870 and p < 0.01, spanning the years 2000 to 2022. While these findings raise more questions than answers, they highlight the compelling interplay between cultural trends and agricultural practices. Our research proposes that the burgeoning appeal of the name Rylee carries implications beyond the realm of nomenclature, possibly resonating with the complex landscape of soybean cultivation in the Midwest. This paper not only sheds light on this curious phenomenon but also ignites a fervent curiosity to explore the whimsical intricacies of human behavior and agricultural advancement.

ChatGPT:

Rylee, popularity, name trend, naming fad, soybean GMO adoption, Missouri, correlation, agriculture, cultural trend, social sciences, statistical analysis, correlation coefficient, US Social Security Administration, United States Department of Agriculture, genetically modified soybeans, Midwest, human behavior, agricultural practices

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Rylee
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Rylee
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Rylee

GMO use in soybeans in Missouri
Detailed data title: Percent of soybeans planted in Missouri that are genetically modified
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in soybeans in Missouri

Correlation r = 0.9062870 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8213562 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 82.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., GMO use in soybeans in Missouri) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Rylee) over the 23 years from 2000 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.6E-9. 0.0000000026317750973342275000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.91 in 2.6E-7% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 379,971,678 random variables You don't actually need 379 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 22 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 22 because we have two variables measured over a period of 23 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.79, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Popularity of the first name Rylee (Babies born)12361484178722232607278028592895324631083297318430553111302428633134298830222878282228412686
GMO use in soybeans in Missouri (GMO soybeans %)6269728387899391928994919190918789879194959396




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1236,1484,1787,2223,2607,2780,2859,2895,3246,3108,3297,3184,3055,3111,3024,2863,3134,2988,3022,2878,2822,2841,2686,])
array_2 = np.array([62,69,72,83,87,89,93,91,92,89,94,91,91,90,91,87,89,87,91,94,95,93,96,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Rylee"
array_2_name = "GMO use in soybeans in Missouri"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Kudos for rating!


Correlation ID: 3918 · Black Variable ID: 2982 · Red Variable ID: 837
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0