about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,917 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and the second variable is Google searches for 'i cant even'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The GMO corn in Ohio developed a protein that, when consumed by humans, inadvertently mimicked the linguistic centers of the brain, leading to an epidemic of people being unable to even. As a result, the state saw a surge in 'i cant even' Google searches as perplexed individuals tried to make sense of their newfound inability to odd. It seems that in this case, the corn was not just genetically modified, but also genetically moodified.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a vast Ohio cornfield stretching into the horizon under a bright sunny sky. The rows of genetically modified corn are prominently featured, with the glowing golden stalks creating an otherworldly feel. Amidst the corn, scattered computer screens are daintily placed, their illuminated screens displaying a Google search for "i cant even." The users behind the screens are struggling to comprehend the overwhelming influx of corn-related confusion. The collision of the digital world and the natural landscape creates a perplexing and intriguing visual depiction. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Futuristic An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' Cute 2D animation Cutsy graphics Data cyber art
ChatGPT: Data cyber art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and Google searches for 'i cant even', in the following situation: As GMO corn production increased in Ohio, the corn found a way to infiltrate the internet, causing widespread confusion. People were so corn-fused by the GMO onslaught that they just couldn't even anymore, leading to a surge in "i cant even" Google searches. Corn-veniently, the correlation is clear as day!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a sprawling Ohio cornfield, rows of genetically modified corn stretch as far as the eye can see. Amidst the golden stalks, scattered computer screens display a Google search for "i cant even," their users struggling to comprehend the overwhelming influx of corn-related confusion. The two phenomena collide, as the digital world becomes inundated with the perplexity of GMO corn, while the fields continue to grow under the bright Ohio sun.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Data cyber art ] and depicting this scene: In a sprawling Ohio cornfield, rows of genetically modified corn stretch as far as the eye can see. Amidst the golden stalks, scattered computer screens display a Google search for "i cant even," their users struggling to comprehend the overwhelming influx of corn-related confusion. The two phenomena collide, as the digital world becomes inundated with the perplexity of GMO corn, while the fields continue to grow under the bright Ohio sun. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a vast Ohio cornfield stretching into the horizon under a bright sunny sky. The rows of genetically modified corn are prominently featured, with the glowing golden stalks creating an otherworldly feel. Amidst the corn, scattered computer screens are daintily placed, their illuminated screens displaying a Google search for "i cant even." The users behind the screens are struggling to comprehend the overwhelming influx of corn-related confusion. The collision of the digital world and the natural landscape creates a perplexing and intriguing visual depiction.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in corn grown in Ohio caused i cant even (Google searches for 'i cant even') to increase.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Maizey Genetics: The GMO Connection to I Can't Even Search Queries in Ohio

The Journal of Genetically Modified Organism Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from USDA and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8911674 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Maizey Genetics: The GMO Connection to "I Can't Even" Search Queries in Ohio

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the often overlooked association between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Ohio and the prevalence of "I Can't Even" search queries on Google. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, a rigorous statistical analysis was conducted to investigate this peculiar linkage. Our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8911674 and statistical significance at p < 0.01, spanning the years 2004 to 2023. The implications of this unexpected relationship are discussed in the context of agricultural practices and societal trends, shedding light on the fascinating interplay between genetic modifications in maize and linguistic expressions of exasperation in the digital realm.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Maizey Genetics: The GMO Connection to "I Can't Even" Search Queries in Ohio

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the often overlooked association between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Ohio and the prevalence of "I Can't Even" search queries on Google. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, a rigorous statistical analysis was conducted to investigate this peculiar linkage. Our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8911674 and statistical significance at p < 0.01, spanning the years 2004 to 2023. The implications of this unexpected relationship are discussed in the context of agricultural practices and societal trends, shedding light on the fascinating interplay between genetic modifications in maize and linguistic expressions of exasperation in the digital realm.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The symbiotic relationship between agricultural practices and societal trends has long been a subject of scholarly inquiry. As the cultivation and utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) continue to permeate the agricultural landscape, it becomes increasingly important to examine their potential impacts on diverse aspects of human life. This study delves into the uncharted territory of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and the prevalence of "I Can't Even" search queries on the omnipresent platform of Google. While the notion of such a correlation may initially elicit a wry smile or a skeptical furrow of the brow, the statistical evidence that underpins this investigation elevates it from the realm of mere curiosity to one of substantive inquiry.

The use of GMOs, particularly in the cultivation of maize, has been a point of contention among scholars, policymakers, and the public at large. Proponents extol the virtues of enhanced crop productivity and resilience, while detractors raise concerns about environmental impacts and potential health risks. Amidst these fervent debates, the impact of GMOs on linguistic expressions in the digital sphere has largely escaped scrutiny. This study aims to rectify this lacuna and shed light on a heretofore overlooked dimension of the GMO discourse.

The impetus for investigating the connection between GMO use in corn and "I Can't Even" search queries stems from a confluence of societal and technological shifts. The emergence of the digital age has transformed the way individuals communicate, seek information, and express their emotions. As online platforms like Google become repositories of collective sentiments and inquiries, they offer a window into the zeitgeist of a given population. Meanwhile, the spread of GMO cultivation has altered the agricultural landscape, raising questions about its broader impacts on human behavior and language use. Thus, the intersection of these phenomena provides fertile ground for exploration, offering a glimpse into the complex interplay between technological advancements, agricultural practices, and linguistic peculiarities.

Now, as we peel back the layers of this unexpected association, it is essential to approach the topic with the rigor and sobriety that befit scholarly inquiry. While the juxtaposition of GMOs and colloquial expressions may evoke a chuckle, the empirical analysis that follows demands a steadfast commitment to methodological rigor and statistical integrity. This paper presents the findings of a comprehensive investigation into the intertwined realms of maize genetics and digital exasperation, offering a nuanced perspective on the uncanny interrelationship between these seemingly disparate domains.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Maizey Genetics: The GMO Connection to "I Can't Even" Search Queries in Ohio

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the often overlooked association between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Ohio and the prevalence of "I Can't Even" search queries on Google. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, a rigorous statistical analysis was conducted to investigate this peculiar linkage. Our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8911674 and statistical significance at p < 0.01, spanning the years 2004 to 2023. The implications of this unexpected relationship are discussed in the context of agricultural practices and societal trends, shedding light on the fascinating interplay between genetic modifications in maize and linguistic expressions of exasperation in the digital realm.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The symbiotic relationship between agricultural practices and societal trends has long been a subject of scholarly inquiry. As the cultivation and utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) continue to permeate the agricultural landscape, it becomes increasingly important to examine their potential impacts on diverse aspects of human life. This study delves into the uncharted territory of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and the prevalence of "I Can't Even" search queries on the omnipresent platform of Google. While the notion of such a correlation may initially elicit a wry smile or a skeptical furrow of the brow, the statistical evidence that underpins this investigation elevates it from the realm of mere curiosity to one of substantive inquiry.
The use of GMOs, particularly in the cultivation of maize, has been a point of contention among scholars, policymakers, and the public at large. Proponents extol the virtues of enhanced crop productivity and resilience, while detractors raise concerns about environmental impacts and potential health risks. Amidst these fervent debates, the impact of GMOs on linguistic expressions in the digital sphere has largely escaped scrutiny. This study aims to rectify this lacuna and shed light on a heretofore overlooked dimension of the GMO discourse.
The impetus for investigating the connection between GMO use in corn and "I Can't Even" search queries stems from a confluence of societal and technological shifts. The emergence of the digital age has transformed the way individuals communicate, seek information, and express their emotions. As online platforms like Google become repositories of collective sentiments and inquiries, they offer a window into the zeitgeist of a given population. Meanwhile, the spread of GMO cultivation has altered the agricultural landscape, raising questions about its broader impacts on human behavior and language use. Thus, the intersection of these phenomena provides fertile ground for exploration, offering a glimpse into the complex interplay between technological advancements, agricultural practices, and linguistic peculiarities.
Now, as we peel back the layers of this unexpected association, it is essential to approach the topic with the rigor and sobriety that befit scholarly inquiry. While the juxtaposition of GMOs and colloquial expressions may evoke a chuckle, the empirical analysis that follows demands a steadfast commitment to methodological rigor and statistical integrity. This paper presents the findings of a comprehensive investigation into the intertwined realms of maize genetics and digital exasperation, offering a nuanced perspective on the uncanny interrelationship between these seemingly disparate domains.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The growing body of literature on genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture and linguistic patterns in digital communication provides valuable insights into the potential link between these seemingly disparate realms. Smith and Doe (2018) investigated the impacts of GMO cultivation on crop yields and environmental sustainability, offering a comprehensive analysis of the agronomic and ecological dimensions of genetic modifications in maize cultivation. Their findings underscore the complex interplay between genetic alterations and agricultural outcomes, laying the groundwork for our exploration of the unexpected connection to linguistic expressions.

Moreover, Jones et al. (2019) conducted a thorough investigation into the linguistic nuances of digital communication, focusing on the evolution of colloquial expressions in online search queries. By analyzing the frequency and context of common phrases, they revealed intriguing trends in the digital lexicon, providing fertile ground for our inquiry into the prevalence of "I Can't Even" search queries in relation to GMO use in corn cultivation.

In "The GMO Dilemma: Fear, Science, and Public Understanding" by Caruso (2017), a comprehensive analysis of the societal perceptions and public discourse surrounding GMOs elucidates the multifaceted dimensions of this contentious issue. As societal attitudes and linguistic expressions are intertwined, this work sets the stage for our exploration of the unexpected association between GMOs and digital expressions of exasperation.

Transitioning from non-fiction literature to the realm of fiction, the works of Atwood, in "Oryx and Crake" (2003), and Crichton, in "Jurassic Park" (1990), symbolize the imaginative and speculative dimensions of genetic engineering and its potential consequences. While these works may seem far removed from the empirical underpinnings of our investigation, they serve to underscore the pervasive influence of genetic modifications in popular culture and the public imagination.

Furthermore, delving into the fringes of scholarly exploration, the authors conducted an exhaustive review of diverse sources, including but not limited to blog posts, social media discussions, and even whimsically perusing the enigmatic collective knowledge contained in the seemingly mundane artifacts of CVS receipts. While these unconventional sources may raise an eyebrow, they offer intriguing glimpses into the vernacular expressions and societal musings that transcend traditional academic discourse.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Maizey Genetics: The GMO Connection to "I Can't Even" Search Queries in Ohio

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the often overlooked association between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Ohio and the prevalence of "I Can't Even" search queries on Google. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, a rigorous statistical analysis was conducted to investigate this peculiar linkage. Our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8911674 and statistical significance at p < 0.01, spanning the years 2004 to 2023. The implications of this unexpected relationship are discussed in the context of agricultural practices and societal trends, shedding light on the fascinating interplay between genetic modifications in maize and linguistic expressions of exasperation in the digital realm.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The symbiotic relationship between agricultural practices and societal trends has long been a subject of scholarly inquiry. As the cultivation and utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) continue to permeate the agricultural landscape, it becomes increasingly important to examine their potential impacts on diverse aspects of human life. This study delves into the uncharted territory of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and the prevalence of "I Can't Even" search queries on the omnipresent platform of Google. While the notion of such a correlation may initially elicit a wry smile or a skeptical furrow of the brow, the statistical evidence that underpins this investigation elevates it from the realm of mere curiosity to one of substantive inquiry.
The use of GMOs, particularly in the cultivation of maize, has been a point of contention among scholars, policymakers, and the public at large. Proponents extol the virtues of enhanced crop productivity and resilience, while detractors raise concerns about environmental impacts and potential health risks. Amidst these fervent debates, the impact of GMOs on linguistic expressions in the digital sphere has largely escaped scrutiny. This study aims to rectify this lacuna and shed light on a heretofore overlooked dimension of the GMO discourse.
The impetus for investigating the connection between GMO use in corn and "I Can't Even" search queries stems from a confluence of societal and technological shifts. The emergence of the digital age has transformed the way individuals communicate, seek information, and express their emotions. As online platforms like Google become repositories of collective sentiments and inquiries, they offer a window into the zeitgeist of a given population. Meanwhile, the spread of GMO cultivation has altered the agricultural landscape, raising questions about its broader impacts on human behavior and language use. Thus, the intersection of these phenomena provides fertile ground for exploration, offering a glimpse into the complex interplay between technological advancements, agricultural practices, and linguistic peculiarities.
Now, as we peel back the layers of this unexpected association, it is essential to approach the topic with the rigor and sobriety that befit scholarly inquiry. While the juxtaposition of GMOs and colloquial expressions may evoke a chuckle, the empirical analysis that follows demands a steadfast commitment to methodological rigor and statistical integrity. This paper presents the findings of a comprehensive investigation into the intertwined realms of maize genetics and digital exasperation, offering a nuanced perspective on the uncanny interrelationship between these seemingly disparate domains.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

The methodology employed in this study hinges upon the aggregation and analysis of data from disparate sources to elucidate the connection between GMO use in corn cultivated in Ohio and the frequency of "I Can't Even" search queries on Google. The research team gleaned data spanning the years 2004 to 2023, encompassing a thorough exploration of temporal trends in both GMO cultivation and internet search behavior. The primary sources of data included the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) for insights into maize cultivation and genetic modification practices and Google Trends for the quantification of search queries pertaining to exasperation.

Initial data collection entailed a comprehensive survey of USDA archives, encompassing reports, publications, and databases documenting the prevalence of GMO corn cultivation in Ohio over the specified period. This process, while devoid of dramatic flair, involved navigating a labyrinthine array of agroecological records and genetic modification reports – a veritable maize of information, if you will. The confluence of diverse datasets within the USDA archives facilitated the meticulous documentation of biochemical alterations in cultivated maize, enabling the team to ascertain the prevalence and temporal dynamics of GMO use.

Simultaneously, the research team extracted search query data from Google Trends, a repository of linguistic proclivities and digital exasperations. This involved scrutinizing the search volume index for the enigmatic phrase "I Can't Even" within the geographic confines of Ohio. The steady rhythm of typing fingers and exasperated sighs reverberated through the virtual realm as the search query data materialized, rendering visible the ebb and flow of linguistic vexation in the Buckeye State.

Following the procurement of these quixotic datasets, a rigorous statistical analysis was undertaken to discern potential correlations between GMO use in corn and the frequency of "I Can't Even" search queries. The statistical toolbox enlisted for this purpose comprised Pearson's correlation coefficient and multiple regression analysis, serving as the stalwart instruments in disentangling the enigmatic association under scrutiny. The empirical underpinnings of this investigation were fortified by the deployment of statistical software, ushering the research team into the esoteric domain of p-values and coefficient estimates.

Upon completing the statistical exegesis, the substantive findings were juxtaposed with theoretical frameworks from relevant literature, weaving a tapestry of empirical insights and conceptual elucidations. This synthesis serves to transcend the prosaic limitations of data analysis and elevate the discussion to a realm of nuanced interpretation, where the interplay between agricultural biotechnology and linguistic expressions assumes its rightful place in the scholarly discourse.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.8911674, r-squared of 0.7941794, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Maizey Genetics: The GMO Connection to "I Can't Even" Search Queries in Ohio

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the often overlooked association between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Ohio and the prevalence of "I Can't Even" search queries on Google. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, a rigorous statistical analysis was conducted to investigate this peculiar linkage. Our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8911674 and statistical significance at p < 0.01, spanning the years 2004 to 2023. The implications of this unexpected relationship are discussed in the context of agricultural practices and societal trends, shedding light on the fascinating interplay between genetic modifications in maize and linguistic expressions of exasperation in the digital realm.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The symbiotic relationship between agricultural practices and societal trends has long been a subject of scholarly inquiry. As the cultivation and utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) continue to permeate the agricultural landscape, it becomes increasingly important to examine their potential impacts on diverse aspects of human life. This study delves into the uncharted territory of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and the prevalence of "I Can't Even" search queries on the omnipresent platform of Google. While the notion of such a correlation may initially elicit a wry smile or a skeptical furrow of the brow, the statistical evidence that underpins this investigation elevates it from the realm of mere curiosity to one of substantive inquiry.
The use of GMOs, particularly in the cultivation of maize, has been a point of contention among scholars, policymakers, and the public at large. Proponents extol the virtues of enhanced crop productivity and resilience, while detractors raise concerns about environmental impacts and potential health risks. Amidst these fervent debates, the impact of GMOs on linguistic expressions in the digital sphere has largely escaped scrutiny. This study aims to rectify this lacuna and shed light on a heretofore overlooked dimension of the GMO discourse.
The impetus for investigating the connection between GMO use in corn and "I Can't Even" search queries stems from a confluence of societal and technological shifts. The emergence of the digital age has transformed the way individuals communicate, seek information, and express their emotions. As online platforms like Google become repositories of collective sentiments and inquiries, they offer a window into the zeitgeist of a given population. Meanwhile, the spread of GMO cultivation has altered the agricultural landscape, raising questions about its broader impacts on human behavior and language use. Thus, the intersection of these phenomena provides fertile ground for exploration, offering a glimpse into the complex interplay between technological advancements, agricultural practices, and linguistic peculiarities.
Now, as we peel back the layers of this unexpected association, it is essential to approach the topic with the rigor and sobriety that befit scholarly inquiry. While the juxtaposition of GMOs and colloquial expressions may evoke a chuckle, the empirical analysis that follows demands a steadfast commitment to methodological rigor and statistical integrity. This paper presents the findings of a comprehensive investigation into the intertwined realms of maize genetics and digital exasperation, offering a nuanced perspective on the uncanny interrelationship between these seemingly disparate domains.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Analyzing the data collected from the USDA and Google Trends, a statistically significant correlation was found between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Ohio and the frequency of "I Can't Even" search queries on Google. The correlation coefficient of 0.8911674 indicates a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. Additionally, the r-squared value of 0.7941794 suggests that approximately 79.4% of the variability in "I Can't Even" search queries can be explained by the variation in GMO use in corn grown in Ohio.

The observed correlation persisted over the 20-year period from 2004 to 2023, encompassing a broad range of technological and societal changes. Despite the inherent absurdity of the association, the robustness of the statistical findings cannot be dismissed lightly. The p-value of less than 0.01 further bolsters the confidence in the significance of this correlation, indicating that the likelihood of obtaining such a strong relationship by random chance is extremely low.

In order to visually represent this unexpected correlation, a scatterplot (Fig. 1) was constructed to illustrate the salient relationship between GMO use in corn cultivation and "I Can't Even" search queries. This graphical representation unmistakably highlights the pronounced positive correlation between these variables, embodying the paradoxical juxtaposition of agricultural genetics and societal frustrations.

The implications of these findings extend beyond the realm of statistical curiosity, nudging us to contemplate the deeper undercurrents of human behavior and language evolution in the era of technological advancement and agricultural innovation. As such, future research may unravel the intricate mechanisms through which agricultural practices permeate digital discourse, shaping the linguistic landscape in ways that defy conventional expectations.

This unexpected correlation raises intriguing questions that transcend the boundaries of traditional scholarly domains, inviting us to ponder the subtle and often whimsical connections that underpin the tapestry of human experience.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Maizey Genetics: The GMO Connection to "I Can't Even" Search Queries in Ohio

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the often overlooked association between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Ohio and the prevalence of "I Can't Even" search queries on Google. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, a rigorous statistical analysis was conducted to investigate this peculiar linkage. Our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8911674 and statistical significance at p < 0.01, spanning the years 2004 to 2023. The implications of this unexpected relationship are discussed in the context of agricultural practices and societal trends, shedding light on the fascinating interplay between genetic modifications in maize and linguistic expressions of exasperation in the digital realm.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The growing body of literature on genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture and linguistic patterns in digital communication provides valuable insights into the potential link between these seemingly disparate realms. Smith and Doe (2018) investigated the impacts of GMO cultivation on crop yields and environmental sustainability, offering a comprehensive analysis of the agronomic and ecological dimensions of genetic modifications in maize cultivation. Their findings underscore the complex interplay between genetic alterations and agricultural outcomes, laying the groundwork for our exploration of the unexpected connection to linguistic expressions.
Moreover, Jones et al. (2019) conducted a thorough investigation into the linguistic nuances of digital communication, focusing on the evolution of colloquial expressions in online search queries. By analyzing the frequency and context of common phrases, they revealed intriguing trends in the digital lexicon, providing fertile ground for our inquiry into the prevalence of "I Can't Even" search queries in relation to GMO use in corn cultivation.
In "The GMO Dilemma: Fear, Science, and Public Understanding" by Caruso (2017), a comprehensive analysis of the societal perceptions and public discourse surrounding GMOs elucidates the multifaceted dimensions of this contentious issue. As societal attitudes and linguistic expressions are intertwined, this work sets the stage for our exploration of the unexpected association between GMOs and digital expressions of exasperation.
Transitioning from non-fiction literature to the realm of fiction, the works of Atwood, in "Oryx and Crake" (2003), and Crichton, in "Jurassic Park" (1990), symbolize the imaginative and speculative dimensions of genetic engineering and its potential consequences. While these works may seem far removed from the empirical underpinnings of our investigation, they serve to underscore the pervasive influence of genetic modifications in popular culture and the public imagination.
Furthermore, delving into the fringes of scholarly exploration, the authors conducted an exhaustive review of diverse sources, including but not limited to blog posts, social media discussions, and even whimsically perusing the enigmatic collective knowledge contained in the seemingly mundane artifacts of CVS receipts. While these unconventional sources may raise an eyebrow, they offer intriguing glimpses into the vernacular expressions and societal musings that transcend traditional academic discourse.

[[RESULTS]]
Analyzing the data collected from the USDA and Google Trends, a statistically significant correlation was found between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Ohio and the frequency of "I Can't Even" search queries on Google. The correlation coefficient of 0.8911674 indicates a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. Additionally, the r-squared value of 0.7941794 suggests that approximately 79.4% of the variability in "I Can't Even" search queries can be explained by the variation in GMO use in corn grown in Ohio.
The observed correlation persisted over the 20-year period from 2004 to 2023, encompassing a broad range of technological and societal changes. Despite the inherent absurdity of the association, the robustness of the statistical findings cannot be dismissed lightly. The p-value of less than 0.01 further bolsters the confidence in the significance of this correlation, indicating that the likelihood of obtaining such a strong relationship by random chance is extremely low.
In order to visually represent this unexpected correlation, a scatterplot (Fig. 1) was constructed to illustrate the salient relationship between GMO use in corn cultivation and "I Can't Even" search queries. This graphical representation unmistakably highlights the pronounced positive correlation between these variables, embodying the paradoxical juxtaposition of agricultural genetics and societal frustrations.
The implications of these findings extend beyond the realm of statistical curiosity, nudging us to contemplate the deeper undercurrents of human behavior and language evolution in the era of technological advancement and agricultural innovation. As such, future research may unravel the intricate mechanisms through which agricultural practices permeate digital discourse, shaping the linguistic landscape in ways that defy conventional expectations.
This unexpected correlation raises intriguing questions that transcend the boundaries of traditional scholarly domains, inviting us to ponder the subtle and often whimsical connections that underpin the tapestry of human experience.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings presented in this study shed light on the unexpected yet compelling connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Ohio and the prevalence of "I Can't Even" search queries on Google. The remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8911674 provides robust evidence of a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, affirming the validity of our initial hypothesis. These results are in line with the broader literature on the impacts of genetic modifications in agriculture and linguistic patterns in digital communication.

The investigation by Smith and Doe (2018) into the impacts of GMO cultivation on crop yields and environmental sustainability offered foundational insights into the agronomic and ecological dimensions of GMO use, laying the groundwork for our exploration of this unexpected association. Similarly, the work of Jones et al. (2019) on the linguistic nuances of digital communication provided fertile ground for our inquiry into the prevalence of "I Can't Even" search queries in relation to GMO use in corn cultivation. While these connections may have initially seemed far-fetched, our findings have lent empirical support to the intriguing trends identified in previous research.

Additionally, the inclusion of seemingly unconventional sources, as alluded to in the literature review, played a vital role in broadening the scope of our inquiry. The whimsical perusal of CVS receipts and other less traditional sources offered intriguing glimpses into the vernacular expressions and societal musings that transcend traditional academic discourse, eventually contributing to a deeper understanding of the unexpected relationship between GMOs and linguistic expressions of exasperation.

The robustness and statistical significance of the observed correlation suggest that the interplay between genetic modifications in maize cultivation and digital expressions of frustration deserves further attention. While the inherent absurdity of this association may raise eyebrows, the rigorous statistical analyses support the presence of a notable linkage. It is essential to acknowledge that these findings challenge conventional expectations, prompting us to reconsider the multifaceted interconnections that underpin agricultural and societal dynamics.

Despite the scholarly demeanor that is typically maintained in academic discussions, it is crucial to acknowledge the whimsical nature of uncovering such an unexpected association. As we continue to contemplate the deeper implications of this correlation, we are reminded of the ever-present enigma of human behavior and the often surprising ways in which language evolves in the digital age. This study not only contributes to the scientific discourse on genetic engineering in agriculture but also invites a lighthearted reflection on the unpredictable and at times comical intersections of human experience and technological progress.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Maizey Genetics: The GMO Connection to "I Can't Even" Search Queries in Ohio

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the often overlooked association between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Ohio and the prevalence of "I Can't Even" search queries on Google. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, a rigorous statistical analysis was conducted to investigate this peculiar linkage. Our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8911674 and statistical significance at p < 0.01, spanning the years 2004 to 2023. The implications of this unexpected relationship are discussed in the context of agricultural practices and societal trends, shedding light on the fascinating interplay between genetic modifications in maize and linguistic expressions of exasperation in the digital realm.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The symbiotic relationship between agricultural practices and societal trends has long been a subject of scholarly inquiry. As the cultivation and utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) continue to permeate the agricultural landscape, it becomes increasingly important to examine their potential impacts on diverse aspects of human life. This study delves into the uncharted territory of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and the prevalence of "I Can't Even" search queries on the omnipresent platform of Google. While the notion of such a correlation may initially elicit a wry smile or a skeptical furrow of the brow, the statistical evidence that underpins this investigation elevates it from the realm of mere curiosity to one of substantive inquiry.
The use of GMOs, particularly in the cultivation of maize, has been a point of contention among scholars, policymakers, and the public at large. Proponents extol the virtues of enhanced crop productivity and resilience, while detractors raise concerns about environmental impacts and potential health risks. Amidst these fervent debates, the impact of GMOs on linguistic expressions in the digital sphere has largely escaped scrutiny. This study aims to rectify this lacuna and shed light on a heretofore overlooked dimension of the GMO discourse.
The impetus for investigating the connection between GMO use in corn and "I Can't Even" search queries stems from a confluence of societal and technological shifts. The emergence of the digital age has transformed the way individuals communicate, seek information, and express their emotions. As online platforms like Google become repositories of collective sentiments and inquiries, they offer a window into the zeitgeist of a given population. Meanwhile, the spread of GMO cultivation has altered the agricultural landscape, raising questions about its broader impacts on human behavior and language use. Thus, the intersection of these phenomena provides fertile ground for exploration, offering a glimpse into the complex interplay between technological advancements, agricultural practices, and linguistic peculiarities.
Now, as we peel back the layers of this unexpected association, it is essential to approach the topic with the rigor and sobriety that befit scholarly inquiry. While the juxtaposition of GMOs and colloquial expressions may evoke a chuckle, the empirical analysis that follows demands a steadfast commitment to methodological rigor and statistical integrity. This paper presents the findings of a comprehensive investigation into the intertwined realms of maize genetics and digital exasperation, offering a nuanced perspective on the uncanny interrelationship between these seemingly disparate domains.

[[RESULTS]]
Analyzing the data collected from the USDA and Google Trends, a statistically significant correlation was found between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Ohio and the frequency of "I Can't Even" search queries on Google. The correlation coefficient of 0.8911674 indicates a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. Additionally, the r-squared value of 0.7941794 suggests that approximately 79.4% of the variability in "I Can't Even" search queries can be explained by the variation in GMO use in corn grown in Ohio.
The observed correlation persisted over the 20-year period from 2004 to 2023, encompassing a broad range of technological and societal changes. Despite the inherent absurdity of the association, the robustness of the statistical findings cannot be dismissed lightly. The p-value of less than 0.01 further bolsters the confidence in the significance of this correlation, indicating that the likelihood of obtaining such a strong relationship by random chance is extremely low.
In order to visually represent this unexpected correlation, a scatterplot (Fig. 1) was constructed to illustrate the salient relationship between GMO use in corn cultivation and "I Can't Even" search queries. This graphical representation unmistakably highlights the pronounced positive correlation between these variables, embodying the paradoxical juxtaposition of agricultural genetics and societal frustrations.
The implications of these findings extend beyond the realm of statistical curiosity, nudging us to contemplate the deeper undercurrents of human behavior and language evolution in the era of technological advancement and agricultural innovation. As such, future research may unravel the intricate mechanisms through which agricultural practices permeate digital discourse, shaping the linguistic landscape in ways that defy conventional expectations.
This unexpected correlation raises intriguing questions that transcend the boundaries of traditional scholarly domains, inviting us to ponder the subtle and often whimsical connections that underpin the tapestry of human experience.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, the robust statistical analysis presented in this study unequivocally establishes a significant correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Ohio and the prevalence of "I Can't Even" search queries on Google. While the initial absurdity of this association may provoke a perplexed chuckle, the empirical evidence compels us to recognize the substantive nature of this peculiar interconnection.

The exceptionally high correlation coefficient of 0.8911674 showcases the remarkable concordance between these seemingly disparate variables, hinting at an intricate relationship that transcends the boundaries of traditional scholarly inquiry. The r-squared value of 0.7941794 further accentuates the robustness of this correlation, underscoring the extent to which variations in GMO use in corn grown in Ohio can elucidate the fluctuations in exasperated digital expressions.

It is intriguing to note that this association endured over the 20-year period from 2004 to 2023, capturing the flux of technological advancements and societal transformations. The persistence of this correlation invites us to contemplate the enduring influence of agricultural genetics on the linguistic ethos of the digital age, illuminating the unexpected ways in which GMO cultivation permeates the virtual realm.

The implications of these findings extend beyond the confines of conventional scholarly discourse, beckoning us to probe the enigmatic mechanisms through which agricultural practices intertwine with linguistic phenomena. As we navigate the uncharted terrain of this revelatory correlation, we are reminded of the intricacies of human behavior and the capricious interplay of technological, agricultural, and linguistic forces.

In light of these compelling findings, it is evident that the lingering skepticism regarding the connection between GMO use in corn and "I Can't Even" search queries warrants dismissal. The p-value of less than 0.01 attests to the statistical soundness of this correlation, dispelling any lingering doubts and underscoring the significance of this unanticipated linkage.

As such, this study augments our understanding of the multifaceted dynamics underpinning human interactions with agricultural innovations and digital platforms. The nuanced interplay between GMO use in corn cultivation and expressions of exasperation on Google reflects the intricate tapestry of societal evolution, inviting us to reassess our preconceptions and embrace the bewildering beauty of unexpected correlations.

Therefore, it can be firmly asserted that no further research in this domain is warranted. The evidence presented in this study illuminates the captivating association between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and the prevalence of "I Can't Even" search queries, leaving little room for doubt or equivocation. This unexpected linkage stands as a testament to the whimsical undercurrents that animate our collective human experience, propelling us to recognize the serendipitous symphony of agricultural genetics and digital discourse.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Maizey Genetics: The GMO Connection to I Can't Even Search Queries in Ohio. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Genetically Modified Organism Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Maizey Genetics: The GMO Connection to I Can't Even Search Queries in Ohio. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Agricultural Innovation and Genetic Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Maizey Genetics: The GMO Connection to I Can't Even Search Queries in Ohio with an abstract of This study examines the often overlooked association between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Ohio and the prevalence of "I Can't Even" search queries on Google. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, a rigorous statistical analysis was conducted to investigate this peculiar linkage. Our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8911674 and statistical significance at p < 0.01, spanning the years 2004 to 2023. The implications of this unexpected relationship are discussed in the context of agricultural practices and societal trends, shedding light on the fascinating interplay between genetic modifications in maize and linguistic expressions of exasperation in the digital realm.

ChatGPT:

Maize genetics, GMOs, Ohio, corn cultivation, genetically modified organisms, "I Can't Even", Google Trends, USDA, correlation coefficient, agricultural practices, linguistic expressions, maize cultivation, genetic modifications, societal trends, statistical analysis

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in corn grown in Ohio
Detailed data title: Percent of all corn planted in Ohio genetically modified with both Bt and HT
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in corn grown in Ohio

Google searches for 'i cant even'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'i cant even' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'i cant even'

Correlation r = 0.8911674 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7941794 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 79.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'i cant even') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in corn grown in Ohio) over the 20 years from 2004 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.4E-7. 0.0000001362205229238060500000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.89 in 1.4E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 7,341,038 random variables You don't actually need 7 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.74, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023
GMO use in corn grown in Ohio (GMO corn %)1252037353637436369686666707671708076
Google searches for 'i cant even' (Rel. search volume)11.83332433.58333234.7537.560.2563.333354.333363.2570.833374.7571.166772.41676355.916764.08336572.083382.1111




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1,2,5,20,37,35,36,37,43,63,69,68,66,66,70,76,71,70,80,76,])
array_2 = np.array([11.8333,24,33.5833,32,34.75,37.5,60.25,63.3333,54.3333,63.25,70.8333,74.75,71.1667,72.4167,63,55.9167,64.0833,65,72.0833,82.1111,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in corn grown in Ohio"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'i cant even'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're a rater extraordinaire!


Correlation ID: 3917 · Black Variable ID: 748 · Red Variable ID: 1525
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0