about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,906 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in cotton in Texas and the second variable is Electricity generation in Antigua and Barbuda.  The chart goes from 2000 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The genetically modified cotton plants in Texas have inadvertently developed a special electric charge, leading to an increase in static electricity in the region. This surplus static electricity is being harnessed and transmitted to Antigua and Barbuda, where it is effectively boosting their electricity generation. It's a shocking but unintentional power source that no one could have cottoned on to before!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a whimsical scene where a group of anthropomorphic cotton plants, with goofy expressions, is standing in a vibrant, bustling cotton field in Texas. They are portrayed as larger than life, with arms and legs, and cartoonish faces. A Texan-themed textile factory looms in the background, emitting colorful plumes of smoke. In sunny Antigua and Barbuda, the island is depicted as a tropical paradise, complete with radiant outfits being crafted by industrious workers amidst electrically charged surroundings. The overall aesthetic should be light-hearted and humorous, capturing the essence of a reddit-style funny image. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in cotton in Texas and Electricity generation in Antigua and Barbuda. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Glitch art Data cyber art a funny image you would see on reddit Cyber folk Charcoal
ChatGPT: a funny image you would see on reddit

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in cotton in Texas and Electricity generation in Antigua and Barbuda, in the following situation: Because the increase in GMO use in cotton in Texas led to stronger and more resilient cotton fibers, which in turn allowed for more efficient production of cotton cloth. This increase in cloth production resulted in a higher demand for clothing, leading to a boom in the fashion industry. As a result, more people purchased clothing, leading to a higher demand for electricity to power their sewing machines and other textile manufacturing equipment in Antigua and Barbuda.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling cotton field in Texas, genetically modified cotton plants stand tall, their fibers strengthened by GMO technology. A large textile factory hums with activity as workers weave the sturdy cotton fibers into vibrant cloth. In sunny Antigua and Barbuda, the island is aglow with colorful outfits as the fashion industry booms. Sewing machines whir as workers meticulously craft garments, their energy supplied by the island's electricity generation, which has surged to meet the growing demand.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a funny image you would see on reddit ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling cotton field in Texas, genetically modified cotton plants stand tall, their fibers strengthened by GMO technology. A large textile factory hums with activity as workers weave the sturdy cotton fibers into vibrant cloth. In sunny Antigua and Barbuda, the island is aglow with colorful outfits as the fashion industry booms. Sewing machines whir as workers meticulously craft garments, their energy supplied by the island's electricity generation, which has surged to meet the growing demand. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a whimsical scene where a group of anthropomorphic cotton plants, with goofy expressions, is standing in a vibrant, bustling cotton field in Texas. They are portrayed as larger than life, with arms and legs, and cartoonish faces. A Texan-themed textile factory looms in the background, emitting colorful plumes of smoke. In sunny Antigua and Barbuda, the island is depicted as a tropical paradise, complete with radiant outfits being crafted by industrious workers amidst electrically charged surroundings. The overall aesthetic should be light-hearted and humorous, capturing the essence of a reddit-style funny image.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in cotton in Texas caused Electricity generation in Antigua and Barbuda to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Cotton and Currents Connection: Assessing the Correlation Between GMO Cotton in Texas and Electricity Generation in Antigua and Barbuda

Journal of Agricultural Innovations and Global Energy Dynamics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Texas and Electricity generation in Antigua and Barbuda. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from USDA and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9840847 and p < 0.01 for 2000 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Cotton and Currents Connection: Assessing the Correlation Between GMO Cotton in Texas and Electricity Generation in Antigua and Barbuda

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected relationship between genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton cultivation in Texas and electricity generation in Antigua and Barbuda. Utilizing data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, we sought to answer the lingering question: could there be a potential power surge from planting GMO cotton? Our research team discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9840847 and p < 0.01 between these two seemingly unrelated factors from 2000 to 2021.

Now, before you ask, no, we're not suggesting that cotton bolls are sparking electrical currents. But it seems that the connection between GMO cotton and electricity generation is shockingly real. Our analysis points to a direct link between the increased use of GMO cotton in Texas and a noticeable uptick in electricity generation in Antigua and Barbuda. It looks like Texas may be "watt" we need to give a little "charge" to the tiny twin islands!

Overall, this research sheds light on an unexpected synergy between agricultural practices and energy generation, begging the question: is it time for a new hybrid field of study, "agroclectrics"? As we move forward, it's clear that the "power" of genetically modified cotton may have far-reaching implications beyond the field!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Texas and Electricity generation in Antigua and Barbuda. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Cotton and Currents Connection: Assessing the Correlation Between GMO Cotton in Texas and Electricity Generation in Antigua and Barbuda

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected relationship between genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton cultivation in Texas and electricity generation in Antigua and Barbuda. Utilizing data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, we sought to answer the lingering question: could there be a potential power surge from planting GMO cotton? Our research team discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9840847 and p < 0.01 between these two seemingly unrelated factors from 2000 to 2021.

Now, before you ask, no, we're not suggesting that cotton bolls are sparking electrical currents. But it seems that the connection between GMO cotton and electricity generation is shockingly real. Our analysis points to a direct link between the increased use of GMO cotton in Texas and a noticeable uptick in electricity generation in Antigua and Barbuda. It looks like Texas may be "watt" we need to give a little "charge" to the tiny twin islands!

Overall, this research sheds light on an unexpected synergy between agricultural practices and energy generation, begging the question: is it time for a new hybrid field of study, "agroclectrics"? As we move forward, it's clear that the "power" of genetically modified cotton may have far-reaching implications beyond the field!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The cotton and currents connection has long been considered as distinct as oil and water, quite literally! However, our research team has cottoned on to an electrifying revelation, and it may just leave you feeling positively charged. As the saying goes, what do you call fake spaghetti? An "impasta"! Now, before you start noodling on that, let's delve into the heart of our study.

At first glance, one might wonder if we've gone off the "watt"-er, but fear not, we're about to spin a yarn that's truly electrifying. Our interest in exploring the unexpected synergy between genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton cultivation in Texas and electricity generation in Antigua and Barbuda stemmed from the notion that these two factors could be more than mere "threaded" coincidence.

Imagine our surprise when the data revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9840847 between GMO cotton cultivation in Texas and electricity generation in Antigua and Barbuda! The results were so shocking that we had to re-"volt" from our seats. Some might even say it "Hz" so good to uncover such an unsuspected connection! Speaking of connections, why did the electron break up with the proton? It just couldn't "stay positive" about their relationship.

While it may seem like this research is "current"-ly out of left field, there's a method to our "watt"-ness. The remarkable correlation unearthed in our study prompts us to ponder the far-reaching implications of agriculture on energy generation. Could it be that GMO cotton is the "fabric" of a new era in sustainable energy production? It appears that the seeds sown in Texas could be germinating a power shift in the sunny Caribbean.

With such astonishing findings at hand, it's evident that this research introduces an electrifying new chapter in the field of interdisciplinary studies. From field to kilowatt, the potential impact of GMO cotton in the realm of energy is a revelation that will certainly "amp" up the dialogue about the future of agricultural and energy innovation. And remember, folks, if you're ever feeling down, just remember that a proton walks into a bar, orders a drink, and says, "Hey, bartender, keep the change!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Texas and Electricity generation in Antigua and Barbuda. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Cotton and Currents Connection: Assessing the Correlation Between GMO Cotton in Texas and Electricity Generation in Antigua and Barbuda

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected relationship between genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton cultivation in Texas and electricity generation in Antigua and Barbuda. Utilizing data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, we sought to answer the lingering question: could there be a potential power surge from planting GMO cotton? Our research team discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9840847 and p < 0.01 between these two seemingly unrelated factors from 2000 to 2021.

Now, before you ask, no, we're not suggesting that cotton bolls are sparking electrical currents. But it seems that the connection between GMO cotton and electricity generation is shockingly real. Our analysis points to a direct link between the increased use of GMO cotton in Texas and a noticeable uptick in electricity generation in Antigua and Barbuda. It looks like Texas may be "watt" we need to give a little "charge" to the tiny twin islands!

Overall, this research sheds light on an unexpected synergy between agricultural practices and energy generation, begging the question: is it time for a new hybrid field of study, "agroclectrics"? As we move forward, it's clear that the "power" of genetically modified cotton may have far-reaching implications beyond the field!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The cotton and currents connection has long been considered as distinct as oil and water, quite literally! However, our research team has cottoned on to an electrifying revelation, and it may just leave you feeling positively charged. As the saying goes, what do you call fake spaghetti? An "impasta"! Now, before you start noodling on that, let's delve into the heart of our study.
At first glance, one might wonder if we've gone off the "watt"-er, but fear not, we're about to spin a yarn that's truly electrifying. Our interest in exploring the unexpected synergy between genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton cultivation in Texas and electricity generation in Antigua and Barbuda stemmed from the notion that these two factors could be more than mere "threaded" coincidence.
Imagine our surprise when the data revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9840847 between GMO cotton cultivation in Texas and electricity generation in Antigua and Barbuda! The results were so shocking that we had to re-"volt" from our seats. Some might even say it "Hz" so good to uncover such an unsuspected connection! Speaking of connections, why did the electron break up with the proton? It just couldn't "stay positive" about their relationship.
While it may seem like this research is "current"-ly out of left field, there's a method to our "watt"-ness. The remarkable correlation unearthed in our study prompts us to ponder the far-reaching implications of agriculture on energy generation. Could it be that GMO cotton is the "fabric" of a new era in sustainable energy production? It appears that the seeds sown in Texas could be germinating a power shift in the sunny Caribbean.
With such astonishing findings at hand, it's evident that this research introduces an electrifying new chapter in the field of interdisciplinary studies. From field to kilowatt, the potential impact of GMO cotton in the realm of energy is a revelation that will certainly "amp" up the dialogue about the future of agricultural and energy innovation. And remember, folks, if you're ever feeling down, just remember that a proton walks into a bar, orders a drink, and says, "Hey, bartender, keep the change!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The correlation between agricultural practices and energy generation has been a topic of interest in recent literature. In "Seeds of Energy: Exploring the Agriculture-Energy Nexus," Smith and Doe discuss the potential for agricultural processes to exert influence on energy production. However, none of these studies have delved into the peculiar pairing of GMO cotton cultivation and electricity generation, leaving this electrifying connection largely unexplored.

As we unraveled the unexpected relationship between GMO cotton in Texas and electricity generation in Antigua and Barbuda, we couldn't help but reflect on the timeless words of Thomas Edison: "I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work." Indeed, the staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9840847 and p < 0.01 that we uncovered in our research seems to illuminate a new path in the landscape of agricultural and energy studies.

In "Wired Cotton: Unraveling the Electrifying Effects of Genetically Modified Farming," Jones et al. discuss the potential for GMO cotton to have unintended effects on surrounding ecosystems. While their focus is primarily on ecological impacts, our study provides evidence that the influence of GMO cotton goes beyond environmental factors, extending into the realm of electricity generation.

Now, for a little levity: Why was the math book sad? Because it had too many problems! But back to our serious business. It's clear that the cotton and currents correlation is not a mere "watt" of fancy, but a phenomenon worthy of deeper exploration.

Moving beyond academic literature, we draw inspiration from several non-fiction books that shed light on energy generation and agricultural processes. "The Energy Farms: Cultivating Power from Nature's Bounty" and "The Cotton Revolution: From Plantation to Power Station" offer valuable insights into the intersection of farming and energy. Additionally, works of fiction such as "Electric Fields and Cotton Fields: A Novel of Shocking Discoveries" and "Watt's Up with Cotton?" capture the essence of our surprising findings, albeit in a more imaginative and embellished fashion.

Adding an element of playfulness, the board game "Power Plots and Cotton Crops" simulates the complexities of managing a cotton farm while strategically harnessing energy sources. While not a direct source of scholarly inquiry, this game provides a lighthearted perspective on the interconnectedness of agriculture and energy generation, an irony we find quite "shocking" in the best possible way.

In sum, the literature surrounding agriculture, electricity, and their interplay has set the stage for our revelatory study. As we navigate through scholarly works and even fictional narratives, it becomes evident that the cotton and currents connection is a topic with surprising depth and whimsy. Indeed, the implications of genetically modified cotton on energy generation may be far more electrifying than previously imagined. And speaking of electrifying, did you hear about the scientist who was really good with electricity? He was an "ohm" wrecker!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Texas and Electricity generation in Antigua and Barbuda. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2000 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Cotton and Currents Connection: Assessing the Correlation Between GMO Cotton in Texas and Electricity Generation in Antigua and Barbuda

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected relationship between genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton cultivation in Texas and electricity generation in Antigua and Barbuda. Utilizing data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, we sought to answer the lingering question: could there be a potential power surge from planting GMO cotton? Our research team discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9840847 and p < 0.01 between these two seemingly unrelated factors from 2000 to 2021.

Now, before you ask, no, we're not suggesting that cotton bolls are sparking electrical currents. But it seems that the connection between GMO cotton and electricity generation is shockingly real. Our analysis points to a direct link between the increased use of GMO cotton in Texas and a noticeable uptick in electricity generation in Antigua and Barbuda. It looks like Texas may be "watt" we need to give a little "charge" to the tiny twin islands!

Overall, this research sheds light on an unexpected synergy between agricultural practices and energy generation, begging the question: is it time for a new hybrid field of study, "agroclectrics"? As we move forward, it's clear that the "power" of genetically modified cotton may have far-reaching implications beyond the field!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The cotton and currents connection has long been considered as distinct as oil and water, quite literally! However, our research team has cottoned on to an electrifying revelation, and it may just leave you feeling positively charged. As the saying goes, what do you call fake spaghetti? An "impasta"! Now, before you start noodling on that, let's delve into the heart of our study.
At first glance, one might wonder if we've gone off the "watt"-er, but fear not, we're about to spin a yarn that's truly electrifying. Our interest in exploring the unexpected synergy between genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton cultivation in Texas and electricity generation in Antigua and Barbuda stemmed from the notion that these two factors could be more than mere "threaded" coincidence.
Imagine our surprise when the data revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9840847 between GMO cotton cultivation in Texas and electricity generation in Antigua and Barbuda! The results were so shocking that we had to re-"volt" from our seats. Some might even say it "Hz" so good to uncover such an unsuspected connection! Speaking of connections, why did the electron break up with the proton? It just couldn't "stay positive" about their relationship.
While it may seem like this research is "current"-ly out of left field, there's a method to our "watt"-ness. The remarkable correlation unearthed in our study prompts us to ponder the far-reaching implications of agriculture on energy generation. Could it be that GMO cotton is the "fabric" of a new era in sustainable energy production? It appears that the seeds sown in Texas could be germinating a power shift in the sunny Caribbean.
With such astonishing findings at hand, it's evident that this research introduces an electrifying new chapter in the field of interdisciplinary studies. From field to kilowatt, the potential impact of GMO cotton in the realm of energy is a revelation that will certainly "amp" up the dialogue about the future of agricultural and energy innovation. And remember, folks, if you're ever feeling down, just remember that a proton walks into a bar, orders a drink, and says, "Hey, bartender, keep the change!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

**[[METHODOLOGY]]**

In our study, we took a leap into the "current" of research methodologies to unravel the electrifying connection between GMO cotton cultivation in Texas and electricity generation in Antigua and Barbuda. Our approach combined quantitative analysis with a touch of whimsy to shed light on this unusual relationship. As they say, researching the unexpected can be quite a "shocking" experience!

First and foremost, we acquired comprehensive data on GMO cotton cultivation in Texas and electricity generation in Antigua and Barbuda from 2000 to 2021. Our research team scoured the depths of the internet, navigating through fields of data like Indiana Jones seeking hidden treasures. We mainly utilized information from credible sources such as the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, ensuring that our data were as reliable as an anchor in a sea of statistics.

To tackle the intricacies of our study, we channeled our inner mad scientists and employed a methodological concoction that blended statistical analysis with a dash of creative flair. Picture this: we jotted down equations on one end of the lab bench and did absurd interpretative dances on the other end, all in the name of scientific inquiry. After all, a little bit of theatrics can make even the most electrifying research more engaging!

Our analysis employed a correlation study to unveil the relationship between GMO cotton cultivation in Texas and electricity generation in Antigua and Barbuda. We performed a rigorous statistical analysis to calculate the correlation coefficient and determine the significance of the relationship. It was all very "shocking," you could say.

When it came to checking the credibility of our findings, we did what any self-respecting researcher would do - we crossed our fingers and hoped for the best! Just kidding! We subjected our data to a battery of statistical tests, ensuring that our results weren't just "electric dreams." We verified the robustness of our findings through sensitivity analyses and cross-validation procedures, leaving no "watt" unturned.

In the spirit of thoroughness, we also considered potential confounding variables that could influence the relationship between GMO cotton cultivation in Texas and electricity generation in Antigua and Barbuda. We reviewed factors such as climate patterns, economic indicators, and technological advancements that might play a role in the observed correlation. We even entertained the idea of cosmic rays from solar flares influencing our findings - after all, it's always good to consider the "solar-powered" side of things!

In the end, our research methodology was a blend of scientific rigor and a whimsical touch, much like a well-balanced cocktail. We approached the unexpected connection between GMO cotton and electricity generation with the curiosity of a child and the precision of a seasoned researcher, seeking to unravel the mysteries of this unlikely correlation without losing our sense of humor along the way. And as our study has demonstrated, when it comes to researching the unexpected, a little levity goes a long way in sparking new insights - both in science and in humor! After all, did you hear about the scientist who went to the beach to study sand and waves? He's now known as the "shore" thing in wave research!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Texas and Electricity generation in Antigua and Barbuda. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2000 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9840847, r-squared of 0.9684227, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Cotton and Currents Connection: Assessing the Correlation Between GMO Cotton in Texas and Electricity Generation in Antigua and Barbuda

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected relationship between genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton cultivation in Texas and electricity generation in Antigua and Barbuda. Utilizing data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, we sought to answer the lingering question: could there be a potential power surge from planting GMO cotton? Our research team discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9840847 and p < 0.01 between these two seemingly unrelated factors from 2000 to 2021.

Now, before you ask, no, we're not suggesting that cotton bolls are sparking electrical currents. But it seems that the connection between GMO cotton and electricity generation is shockingly real. Our analysis points to a direct link between the increased use of GMO cotton in Texas and a noticeable uptick in electricity generation in Antigua and Barbuda. It looks like Texas may be "watt" we need to give a little "charge" to the tiny twin islands!

Overall, this research sheds light on an unexpected synergy between agricultural practices and energy generation, begging the question: is it time for a new hybrid field of study, "agroclectrics"? As we move forward, it's clear that the "power" of genetically modified cotton may have far-reaching implications beyond the field!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The cotton and currents connection has long been considered as distinct as oil and water, quite literally! However, our research team has cottoned on to an electrifying revelation, and it may just leave you feeling positively charged. As the saying goes, what do you call fake spaghetti? An "impasta"! Now, before you start noodling on that, let's delve into the heart of our study.
At first glance, one might wonder if we've gone off the "watt"-er, but fear not, we're about to spin a yarn that's truly electrifying. Our interest in exploring the unexpected synergy between genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton cultivation in Texas and electricity generation in Antigua and Barbuda stemmed from the notion that these two factors could be more than mere "threaded" coincidence.
Imagine our surprise when the data revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9840847 between GMO cotton cultivation in Texas and electricity generation in Antigua and Barbuda! The results were so shocking that we had to re-"volt" from our seats. Some might even say it "Hz" so good to uncover such an unsuspected connection! Speaking of connections, why did the electron break up with the proton? It just couldn't "stay positive" about their relationship.
While it may seem like this research is "current"-ly out of left field, there's a method to our "watt"-ness. The remarkable correlation unearthed in our study prompts us to ponder the far-reaching implications of agriculture on energy generation. Could it be that GMO cotton is the "fabric" of a new era in sustainable energy production? It appears that the seeds sown in Texas could be germinating a power shift in the sunny Caribbean.
With such astonishing findings at hand, it's evident that this research introduces an electrifying new chapter in the field of interdisciplinary studies. From field to kilowatt, the potential impact of GMO cotton in the realm of energy is a revelation that will certainly "amp" up the dialogue about the future of agricultural and energy innovation. And remember, folks, if you're ever feeling down, just remember that a proton walks into a bar, orders a drink, and says, "Hey, bartender, keep the change!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our analysis revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the cultivation of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton in Texas and electricity generation in Antigua and Barbuda from 2000 to 2021. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9840847 and an r-squared of 0.9684227, the relationship between these two seemingly disparate factors is as clear as day. It seems that the power of GMO cotton is not to be underestimated, much like a dad's ability to make puns at every opportunity!

The scatterplot presented in Fig. 1 further illustrates the robust association between GMO cotton cultivation and electricity generation. The data points form a clear, upward-sloping trend line, indicating that as GMO cotton cultivation in Texas increased, so did electricity generation in Antigua and Barbuda. It's almost as if the cotton fields are whispering, "Watt" is happening here?

This finding raises important questions about the potential impact of agricultural practices on energy generation. And no, we're not talking about plugging in your cotton harvester! The connection between these two variables hints at a complex interplay between seemingly unrelated sectors. Who would've thought that cotton and currents could be dancing to the same beat?

The statistical significance of the correlation, with p < 0.01, underscores the robustness of our findings. It's striking to think that the cotton fields of Texas could be sowing the seeds for a "shocking" transformation in the energy landscape of Antigua and Barbuda. It's as if the current is cottoning on to a new source of power – excuse the electrifying pun!

In conclusion, this study has unveiled an unexpected relationship between GMO cotton cultivation and electricity generation, highlighting the potential for synergies between agriculture and energy. As researchers, we must remain open to exploring unconventional connections, even if it means traversing from fields to power grids. Who knows what other hidden "currents" are waiting to be unearthed? After all, sometimes the most shocking discoveries are the ones that leave us with a positive charge!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Texas and Electricity generation in Antigua and Barbuda. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Cotton and Currents Connection: Assessing the Correlation Between GMO Cotton in Texas and Electricity Generation in Antigua and Barbuda

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected relationship between genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton cultivation in Texas and electricity generation in Antigua and Barbuda. Utilizing data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, we sought to answer the lingering question: could there be a potential power surge from planting GMO cotton? Our research team discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9840847 and p < 0.01 between these two seemingly unrelated factors from 2000 to 2021.

Now, before you ask, no, we're not suggesting that cotton bolls are sparking electrical currents. But it seems that the connection between GMO cotton and electricity generation is shockingly real. Our analysis points to a direct link between the increased use of GMO cotton in Texas and a noticeable uptick in electricity generation in Antigua and Barbuda. It looks like Texas may be "watt" we need to give a little "charge" to the tiny twin islands!

Overall, this research sheds light on an unexpected synergy between agricultural practices and energy generation, begging the question: is it time for a new hybrid field of study, "agroclectrics"? As we move forward, it's clear that the "power" of genetically modified cotton may have far-reaching implications beyond the field!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The correlation between agricultural practices and energy generation has been a topic of interest in recent literature. In "Seeds of Energy: Exploring the Agriculture-Energy Nexus," Smith and Doe discuss the potential for agricultural processes to exert influence on energy production. However, none of these studies have delved into the peculiar pairing of GMO cotton cultivation and electricity generation, leaving this electrifying connection largely unexplored.
As we unraveled the unexpected relationship between GMO cotton in Texas and electricity generation in Antigua and Barbuda, we couldn't help but reflect on the timeless words of Thomas Edison: "I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work." Indeed, the staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9840847 and p < 0.01 that we uncovered in our research seems to illuminate a new path in the landscape of agricultural and energy studies.
In "Wired Cotton: Unraveling the Electrifying Effects of Genetically Modified Farming," Jones et al. discuss the potential for GMO cotton to have unintended effects on surrounding ecosystems. While their focus is primarily on ecological impacts, our study provides evidence that the influence of GMO cotton goes beyond environmental factors, extending into the realm of electricity generation.
Now, for a little levity: Why was the math book sad? Because it had too many problems! But back to our serious business. It's clear that the cotton and currents correlation is not a mere "watt" of fancy, but a phenomenon worthy of deeper exploration.
Moving beyond academic literature, we draw inspiration from several non-fiction books that shed light on energy generation and agricultural processes. "The Energy Farms: Cultivating Power from Nature's Bounty" and "The Cotton Revolution: From Plantation to Power Station" offer valuable insights into the intersection of farming and energy. Additionally, works of fiction such as "Electric Fields and Cotton Fields: A Novel of Shocking Discoveries" and "Watt's Up with Cotton?" capture the essence of our surprising findings, albeit in a more imaginative and embellished fashion.
Adding an element of playfulness, the board game "Power Plots and Cotton Crops" simulates the complexities of managing a cotton farm while strategically harnessing energy sources. While not a direct source of scholarly inquiry, this game provides a lighthearted perspective on the interconnectedness of agriculture and energy generation, an irony we find quite "shocking" in the best possible way.
In sum, the literature surrounding agriculture, electricity, and their interplay has set the stage for our revelatory study. As we navigate through scholarly works and even fictional narratives, it becomes evident that the cotton and currents connection is a topic with surprising depth and whimsy. Indeed, the implications of genetically modified cotton on energy generation may be far more electrifying than previously imagined. And speaking of electrifying, did you hear about the scientist who was really good with electricity? He was an "ohm" wrecker!

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the cultivation of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton in Texas and electricity generation in Antigua and Barbuda from 2000 to 2021. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9840847 and an r-squared of 0.9684227, the relationship between these two seemingly disparate factors is as clear as day. It seems that the power of GMO cotton is not to be underestimated, much like a dad's ability to make puns at every opportunity!
The scatterplot presented in Fig. 1 further illustrates the robust association between GMO cotton cultivation and electricity generation. The data points form a clear, upward-sloping trend line, indicating that as GMO cotton cultivation in Texas increased, so did electricity generation in Antigua and Barbuda. It's almost as if the cotton fields are whispering, "Watt" is happening here?
This finding raises important questions about the potential impact of agricultural practices on energy generation. And no, we're not talking about plugging in your cotton harvester! The connection between these two variables hints at a complex interplay between seemingly unrelated sectors. Who would've thought that cotton and currents could be dancing to the same beat?
The statistical significance of the correlation, with p < 0.01, underscores the robustness of our findings. It's striking to think that the cotton fields of Texas could be sowing the seeds for a "shocking" transformation in the energy landscape of Antigua and Barbuda. It's as if the current is cottoning on to a new source of power – excuse the electrifying pun!
In conclusion, this study has unveiled an unexpected relationship between GMO cotton cultivation and electricity generation, highlighting the potential for synergies between agriculture and energy. As researchers, we must remain open to exploring unconventional connections, even if it means traversing from fields to power grids. Who knows what other hidden "currents" are waiting to be unearthed? After all, sometimes the most shocking discoveries are the ones that leave us with a positive charge!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study have electrifyingly aligned with the existing literature, providing further support for the unexpected but undeniable correlation between GMO cotton cultivation in Texas and electricity generation in Antigua and Barbuda. It seems that the spark of insight from previous scholars such as Smith and Doe and Jones et al. has ignited a current of curiosity, ultimately leading to the shocking revelation of this captivating connection.

Our findings not only confirm the substantial correlation coefficient of 0.9840847 and p < 0.01, but also shed light on the potentially transformative impact of GMO cotton on energy generation. The correlation, as clear as a lightbulb turning on, suggests that the "power" of GMO cotton goes far beyond boll weevil resistance, making it a real "watt" in the world of energy dynamics. It's almost as if the cotton fields are saying, "Ohm, sweet ohm!"

The implications of this correlation extend beyond the fields of Texas and the power grid of Antigua and Barbuda. As we unravel the intricate threads of this cotton and currents connection, it becomes apparent that the synergy between agricultural practices and energy generation holds significant promise for sustainable development and innovative energy solutions. It seems we've stumbled upon the spark that ignites a new avenue of interdisciplinary exploration, challenging us to consider the broader implications of GMO crops on energy dynamics. It's like discovering the hidden potential of cotton and realizing that the possibilities are as endless as a never-ending cycle of dad jokes!

Overall, our research adds an electrifying layer to the ongoing discourse on agricultural and energy interplay. As we continue along this illuminating path, it's essential to remain open to unconventional connections and unexpected discoveries. After all, sometimes the most "shocking" revelations lead to truly electrifying advancements in our understanding of the world around us. Who knows, maybe the secret to sustainable energy development lies in the cotton fields – a notion that might make even the most skeptical dad crack a smile!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Texas and Electricity generation in Antigua and Barbuda. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Cotton and Currents Connection: Assessing the Correlation Between GMO Cotton in Texas and Electricity Generation in Antigua and Barbuda

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected relationship between genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton cultivation in Texas and electricity generation in Antigua and Barbuda. Utilizing data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, we sought to answer the lingering question: could there be a potential power surge from planting GMO cotton? Our research team discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9840847 and p < 0.01 between these two seemingly unrelated factors from 2000 to 2021.

Now, before you ask, no, we're not suggesting that cotton bolls are sparking electrical currents. But it seems that the connection between GMO cotton and electricity generation is shockingly real. Our analysis points to a direct link between the increased use of GMO cotton in Texas and a noticeable uptick in electricity generation in Antigua and Barbuda. It looks like Texas may be "watt" we need to give a little "charge" to the tiny twin islands!

Overall, this research sheds light on an unexpected synergy between agricultural practices and energy generation, begging the question: is it time for a new hybrid field of study, "agroclectrics"? As we move forward, it's clear that the "power" of genetically modified cotton may have far-reaching implications beyond the field!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The cotton and currents connection has long been considered as distinct as oil and water, quite literally! However, our research team has cottoned on to an electrifying revelation, and it may just leave you feeling positively charged. As the saying goes, what do you call fake spaghetti? An "impasta"! Now, before you start noodling on that, let's delve into the heart of our study.
At first glance, one might wonder if we've gone off the "watt"-er, but fear not, we're about to spin a yarn that's truly electrifying. Our interest in exploring the unexpected synergy between genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton cultivation in Texas and electricity generation in Antigua and Barbuda stemmed from the notion that these two factors could be more than mere "threaded" coincidence.
Imagine our surprise when the data revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9840847 between GMO cotton cultivation in Texas and electricity generation in Antigua and Barbuda! The results were so shocking that we had to re-"volt" from our seats. Some might even say it "Hz" so good to uncover such an unsuspected connection! Speaking of connections, why did the electron break up with the proton? It just couldn't "stay positive" about their relationship.
While it may seem like this research is "current"-ly out of left field, there's a method to our "watt"-ness. The remarkable correlation unearthed in our study prompts us to ponder the far-reaching implications of agriculture on energy generation. Could it be that GMO cotton is the "fabric" of a new era in sustainable energy production? It appears that the seeds sown in Texas could be germinating a power shift in the sunny Caribbean.
With such astonishing findings at hand, it's evident that this research introduces an electrifying new chapter in the field of interdisciplinary studies. From field to kilowatt, the potential impact of GMO cotton in the realm of energy is a revelation that will certainly "amp" up the dialogue about the future of agricultural and energy innovation. And remember, folks, if you're ever feeling down, just remember that a proton walks into a bar, orders a drink, and says, "Hey, bartender, keep the change!"

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the cultivation of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton in Texas and electricity generation in Antigua and Barbuda from 2000 to 2021. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9840847 and an r-squared of 0.9684227, the relationship between these two seemingly disparate factors is as clear as day. It seems that the power of GMO cotton is not to be underestimated, much like a dad's ability to make puns at every opportunity!
The scatterplot presented in Fig. 1 further illustrates the robust association between GMO cotton cultivation and electricity generation. The data points form a clear, upward-sloping trend line, indicating that as GMO cotton cultivation in Texas increased, so did electricity generation in Antigua and Barbuda. It's almost as if the cotton fields are whispering, "Watt" is happening here?
This finding raises important questions about the potential impact of agricultural practices on energy generation. And no, we're not talking about plugging in your cotton harvester! The connection between these two variables hints at a complex interplay between seemingly unrelated sectors. Who would've thought that cotton and currents could be dancing to the same beat?
The statistical significance of the correlation, with p < 0.01, underscores the robustness of our findings. It's striking to think that the cotton fields of Texas could be sowing the seeds for a "shocking" transformation in the energy landscape of Antigua and Barbuda. It's as if the current is cottoning on to a new source of power – excuse the electrifying pun!
In conclusion, this study has unveiled an unexpected relationship between GMO cotton cultivation and electricity generation, highlighting the potential for synergies between agriculture and energy. As researchers, we must remain open to exploring unconventional connections, even if it means traversing from fields to power grids. Who knows what other hidden "currents" are waiting to be unearthed? After all, sometimes the most shocking discoveries are the ones that leave us with a positive charge!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In light of our findings, it seems that GMO cotton cultivation in Texas and electricity generation in Antigua and Barbuda are indeed "watt" one might call an unexpected power couple! This correlation isn't just a "light bulb" moment; it's a full-on power surge of insight into the potential interplay between agricultural practices and energy generation. Our study has shown that the seeds of innovation in cotton cultivation may carry the spark for a bright future in sustainable energy production.

As we wrap up, it's clear that this research plows through new ground, planting the seeds for future exploration into the dynamic relationship between agriculture and energy. The potential implications of this synergy may just be the "shock" that energizes further interdisciplinary collaboration. It's like discovering a new "harvest" of knowledge that can illuminate future paths for sustainable energy.

With these electrifying results in hand, it's safe to say that no more research is needed in this area. We've fully "charged" this topic with our findings and, dare we say, have sparked a newfound interest in the unexpected connections that might be "current"-ly hiding in plain sight. And remember, folks, why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Cotton and Currents Connection: Assessing the Correlation Between GMO Cotton in Texas and Electricity Generation in Antigua and Barbuda. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Agricultural Innovations and Global Energy Dynamics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Cotton and Currents Connection: Assessing the Correlation Between GMO Cotton in Texas and Electricity Generation in Antigua and Barbuda. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Agricultural Innovation and Geoelectromagnetic Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Cotton and Currents Connection: Assessing the Correlation Between GMO Cotton in Texas and Electricity Generation in Antigua and Barbuda with an abstract of This study delves into the unexpected relationship between genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton cultivation in Texas and electricity generation in Antigua and Barbuda. Utilizing data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, we sought to answer the lingering question: could there be a potential power surge from planting GMO cotton? Our research team discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9840847 and p < 0.01 between these two seemingly unrelated factors from 2000 to 2021.
Now, before you ask, no, we're not suggesting that cotton bolls are sparking electrical currents. But it seems that the connection between GMO cotton and electricity generation is shockingly real. Our analysis points to a direct link between the increased use of GMO cotton in Texas and a noticeable uptick in electricity generation in Antigua and Barbuda. It looks like Texas may be "watt" we need to give a little "charge" to the tiny twin islands!
Overall, this research sheds light on an unexpected synergy between agricultural practices and energy generation, begging the question: is it time for a new hybrid field of study, "agroclectrics"? As we move forward, it's clear that the "power" of genetically modified cotton may have far-reaching implications beyond the field!

ChatGPT:

GMO, cotton cultivation, Texas, electricity generation, Antigua and Barbuda, correlation, genetically modified organism, USDA data, Energy Information Administration, power surge, correlation coefficient, agroclectrics, agricultural practices, energy generation, hybrid field of study, GMO cotton, electricity correlation

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in cotton in Texas
Detailed data title: Percent of cotton planted in Texas genetically modified with both Bt and HT
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in cotton in Texas

Electricity generation in Antigua and Barbuda
Detailed data title: Total electricity generation in Antigua and Barbuda in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Electricity generation in Antigua and Barbuda

Correlation r = 0.9840847 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9684227 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 96.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Electricity generation in Antigua and Barbuda) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in cotton in Texas) over the 22 years from 2000 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.8E-16. 0.0000000000000001762253797475
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.98 in 1.8E-14% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 5,674,551,539,811,259 random variables You don't actually need 5 quadrillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 21 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 21 because we have two variables measured over a period of 22 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.96, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
GMO use in cotton in Texas (GMO cotton %)46495153586370807881918691859391909490989395
Electricity generation in Antigua and Barbuda (Billion kWh)0.1410.1610.180.1980.2080.2280.2430.2630.2710.3080.31920.31850.31050.31060.31660.3253550.3280.3291420.3350.3410.3274240.350875




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([46,49,51,53,58,63,70,80,78,81,91,86,91,85,93,91,90,94,90,98,93,95,])
array_2 = np.array([0.141,0.161,0.18,0.198,0.208,0.228,0.243,0.263,0.271,0.308,0.3192,0.3185,0.3105,0.3106,0.3166,0.325355,0.328,0.329142,0.335,0.341,0.327424,0.350875,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in cotton in Texas"
array_2_name = "Electricity generation in Antigua and Barbuda"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm grateful for your review!


Correlation ID: 3906 · Black Variable ID: 811 · Red Variable ID: 23457
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0