about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,891 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Arson in Pennsylvania and the second variable is US birth rates of triplets or more.  The chart goes from 2002 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

There were just fewer hot sparks flying around, so the chances of a three-alarm baby boom went up in smoke! Triple the trouble, triple the chaos - it's like these triplets were just itching to fire up some mischief, but the arson decline extinguished their plans before they could even ignite!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ A photo-realistic image ] Create an image depicting a bustling Pennsylvania city with intense flames engulfing a building, conveying the heat and chaos. Meanwhile, a nearby hospital should be portrayed with nurses and doctors in awe as they witness the birth of three newborns, visually emphasizing the rarity of triplets. The city should later be depicted calming down as the fires diminish, showcasing a cooling effect. Lastly, a subtle nationwide representation of reducing arson cases and the noticeable decrease in the birth rate of triplets or more across the US should be included to reflect the link between the two events. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Arson in Pennsylvania and US birth rates of triplets or more. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie Psychedelic A photo-realistic image Minimalism Cutsy art illustration
ChatGPT: A photo-realistic image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Arson in Pennsylvania and US birth rates of triplets or more, in the following situation: Because arson in Pennsylvania was getting so hot, it was causing too many fahrenheit degrees in the womb, resulting in triplets. With the decrease in arson, the heat wave subsided, leading to a "cooling off" in the birth rate of triplets or more across the US.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling Pennsylvania city, flames engulfed a building, sending the temperature soaring. Inside a nearby hospital, three newborns arrived, surprising everyone with their rare triplet birth. As the arson cases decreased, the city cooled down, and across the US, the birth rate of triplets or more showed a noticeable decrease, reflecting the calming effect of the reduced arson incidents.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A photo-realistic image ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling Pennsylvania city, flames engulfed a building, sending the temperature soaring. Inside a nearby hospital, three newborns arrived, surprising everyone with their rare triplet birth. As the arson cases decreased, the city cooled down, and across the US, the birth rate of triplets or more showed a noticeable decrease, reflecting the calming effect of the reduced arson incidents. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ A photo-realistic image ] Create an image depicting a bustling Pennsylvania city with intense flames engulfing a building, conveying the heat and chaos. Meanwhile, a nearby hospital should be portrayed with nurses and doctors in awe as they witness the birth of three newborns, visually emphasizing the rarity of triplets. The city should later be depicted calming down as the fires diminish, showcasing a cooling effect. Lastly, a subtle nationwide representation of reducing arson cases and the noticeable decrease in the birth rate of triplets or more across the US should be included to reflect the link between the two events.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Arson in Pennsylvania caused US birth rates of triplets or more to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Sparked by Arson: Exploring the Incendiary Connection Between Arson in Pennsylvania and the Birth Rates of Triplets or More in the United States

Journal of Pyrokinetic Epidemiology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Pennsylvania and US birth rates of triplets or more. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and CDC to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9017457 and p < 0.01 for 2002 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Sparked by Arson: Exploring the Incendiary Connection Between Arson in Pennsylvania and the Birth Rates of Triplets or More in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the unexpected correlation between arson incidents in Pennsylvania and the birth rates of triplets or more across the United States. Despite the seemingly incendiary nature of the topic, our study aims to shed light on the curious relationship between these seemingly unrelated events. Leveraging data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, we meticulously analyzed two decades of data from 2002 to 2021.

Surprising as it may seem, our findings unveiled a stunning correlation coefficient of 0.9017457 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, establishing a robust connection between arson in Pennsylvania and the birth rates of triplets or more. While the research is undoubtedly fire, it does not seek to fan the flames of speculation, but instead meticulously examines the correlations while drawing on the inherent spark of curiosity.

Our study offers an illuminating perspective on the intricate interplay of seemingly unrelated events and invites further investigation into the mysterious mechanisms at play. After all, as we embark on this scientific journey, the ignition of unexpected correlations may just lead to the discovery of new frontiers in understanding human behavior and societal dynamics.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Pennsylvania and US birth rates of triplets or more. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Sparked by Arson: Exploring the Incendiary Connection Between Arson in Pennsylvania and the Birth Rates of Triplets or More in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the unexpected correlation between arson incidents in Pennsylvania and the birth rates of triplets or more across the United States. Despite the seemingly incendiary nature of the topic, our study aims to shed light on the curious relationship between these seemingly unrelated events. Leveraging data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, we meticulously analyzed two decades of data from 2002 to 2021.

Surprising as it may seem, our findings unveiled a stunning correlation coefficient of 0.9017457 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, establishing a robust connection between arson in Pennsylvania and the birth rates of triplets or more. While the research is undoubtedly fire, it does not seek to fan the flames of speculation, but instead meticulously examines the correlations while drawing on the inherent spark of curiosity.

Our study offers an illuminating perspective on the intricate interplay of seemingly unrelated events and invites further investigation into the mysterious mechanisms at play. After all, as we embark on this scientific journey, the ignition of unexpected correlations may just lead to the discovery of new frontiers in understanding human behavior and societal dynamics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

Arson: an act of fiery mischief or a statistical matchmaker? While fire is undoubtedly hot and captivating, this study aims to explore the unconventional connection between arson incidents in Pennsylvania and the birth rates of triplets or more across the United States. It takes a spark of curiosity and a dash of statistical analysis to illuminate the seemingly incendiary relationship between these disparate events to uncover whether there is more than meets the eye, or in this case, than meets the heat.

As we embark on this journey of discovery, it is important to remember that correlation does not necessarily imply causation, but it can certainly ignite the flames of speculation. Leveraging data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, our analysis meticulously scrutinizes the convoluted patterns that emerge when arson and triplets converge in the grand scheme of statistical probability.

The allure of this study lies not only in the surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9017457 but also in the statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. These findings compel us to consider the gravity of this correlation, which may just be as scorching as a fire in the statistical world.

While the connection between arson and triplets may seem like a fiery fantasy, our research aims to tread carefully amidst the embers of speculation, kindling the flames of curiosity without being consumed by the heat of conclusive interpretations. After all, in the realm of scientific inquiry, it is crucial to strike a balance between kindling the fire of newfound connections and extinguishing any unwarranted infernos of unwarranted causal claims.

To ignite or not to ignite—that is the question at the heart of this investigation. Whether it uncovers a hidden spark of truth or simply burns out in the blaze of statistical insignificance, this study offers an illuminating glimpse into the unexpected correlations that permeate the fabric of societal and human dynamics. Perhaps, in the pursuit of statistical truth, we may discover that the spark of curiosity and the combustion of data analysis shed light on a new frontier of understanding, where statistical fire meets the fertile ground of unexpected correlations.

In the words of the great statistical maestro William Edward Deming, "In God we trust; all others bring data," and so we have gathered our data to present this scintillating analysis. Let the sparks fly and the numbers dance as we venture into the fiery labyrinth of statistical inquiry, where every unexpected correlation may just lead to a blaze of discovery.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Pennsylvania and US birth rates of triplets or more. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Sparked by Arson: Exploring the Incendiary Connection Between Arson in Pennsylvania and the Birth Rates of Triplets or More in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the unexpected correlation between arson incidents in Pennsylvania and the birth rates of triplets or more across the United States. Despite the seemingly incendiary nature of the topic, our study aims to shed light on the curious relationship between these seemingly unrelated events. Leveraging data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, we meticulously analyzed two decades of data from 2002 to 2021.

Surprising as it may seem, our findings unveiled a stunning correlation coefficient of 0.9017457 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, establishing a robust connection between arson in Pennsylvania and the birth rates of triplets or more. While the research is undoubtedly fire, it does not seek to fan the flames of speculation, but instead meticulously examines the correlations while drawing on the inherent spark of curiosity.

Our study offers an illuminating perspective on the intricate interplay of seemingly unrelated events and invites further investigation into the mysterious mechanisms at play. After all, as we embark on this scientific journey, the ignition of unexpected correlations may just lead to the discovery of new frontiers in understanding human behavior and societal dynamics.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
Arson: an act of fiery mischief or a statistical matchmaker? While fire is undoubtedly hot and captivating, this study aims to explore the unconventional connection between arson incidents in Pennsylvania and the birth rates of triplets or more across the United States. It takes a spark of curiosity and a dash of statistical analysis to illuminate the seemingly incendiary relationship between these disparate events to uncover whether there is more than meets the eye, or in this case, than meets the heat.
As we embark on this journey of discovery, it is important to remember that correlation does not necessarily imply causation, but it can certainly ignite the flames of speculation. Leveraging data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, our analysis meticulously scrutinizes the convoluted patterns that emerge when arson and triplets converge in the grand scheme of statistical probability.
The allure of this study lies not only in the surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9017457 but also in the statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. These findings compel us to consider the gravity of this correlation, which may just be as scorching as a fire in the statistical world.
While the connection between arson and triplets may seem like a fiery fantasy, our research aims to tread carefully amidst the embers of speculation, kindling the flames of curiosity without being consumed by the heat of conclusive interpretations. After all, in the realm of scientific inquiry, it is crucial to strike a balance between kindling the fire of newfound connections and extinguishing any unwarranted infernos of unwarranted causal claims.
To ignite or not to ignite—that is the question at the heart of this investigation. Whether it uncovers a hidden spark of truth or simply burns out in the blaze of statistical insignificance, this study offers an illuminating glimpse into the unexpected correlations that permeate the fabric of societal and human dynamics. Perhaps, in the pursuit of statistical truth, we may discover that the spark of curiosity and the combustion of data analysis shed light on a new frontier of understanding, where statistical fire meets the fertile ground of unexpected correlations.
In the words of the great statistical maestro William Edward Deming, "In God we trust; all others bring data," and so we have gathered our data to present this scintillating analysis. Let the sparks fly and the numbers dance as we venture into the fiery labyrinth of statistical inquiry, where every unexpected correlation may just lead to a blaze of discovery.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The connection between arson incidents in Pennsylvania and the birth rates of triplets or more across the United States has sparked considerable interest among researchers in recent years. While this link may at first seem as improbable as starting a campfire in a rainstorm, empirical evidence suggests that there may indeed be a fiery correlation waiting to be unearthed.

Smith et al. (2018) conducted a comprehensive study on fire-related incidents and their potential societal impacts in rural areas, uncovering unexpected patterns in birth rates. Their findings hint at the possibility of a clandestine relationship between arson and the birth of multiples, igniting the curiosity of researchers and enthusiasts alike.

Doe's seminal work in "Heat Waves and Baby Booms: Exploring Unconventional Correlations" delves into the intricate web of environmental factors and birth rates, unveiling surprising connections that transcend conventional wisdom. In a scorching twist of fate, the author touches upon arson as a potential catalyst for unusual birth patterns, setting the stage for further exploration into this unchartered territory.

Jones et al. (2020) conducted a rigorous analysis of arson reports and demographic data, uncovering a sizzling correlation between the two seemingly disparate phenomena. Their work not only sheds light on the statistical significance of this connection but also kindles the flames of inquiry, inspiring researchers to fan the embers of curiosity without getting burned by unwarranted claims.

Moving beyond the realm of academic literature, several non-fiction books offer intriguing insights into the enigmatic relationship between fire and unusual birth patterns. Lorem's "Flames and Families: A Statistical Odyssey" offers a critical examination of historical arson incidents and their potential impact on demographic shifts, providing a scintillating perspective on the subject matter at hand.

Similarly, Ipsum's "Inferno and Infants: Exploring Uncharted Relationships" provides a captivating exploration of the tumultuous intersection between fiery behavior and unexpected birth trends, inviting readers to embrace the heat of statistical inquiry with open minds and analytical rigor.

In the world of fiction, the work of authors such as Sparkington and Blazeberg delves into the fantastical realm of fire-related phenomena and their potential intersections with societal dynamics. "Pyro Parenting: A Tale of Triplets and Turmoil" by Sparkington and "Blazing Bonds: The Unlikely Connection Between Arson and Multiples" by Blazeberg offer whimsical yet thought-provoking narratives that spark the imagination and ignite the flames of curiosity.

Furthermore, animated series and children's shows have not been immune to themes related to fire and multiples. The cartoon "Flame-Edged Families" and the children's program "The Triplet Tales: Adventures in Arson" subtly weave elements of fire-related incidents and unusual birth phenomena into their engaging storylines, captivating audiences of all ages with their playful yet thought-provoking exploration of the subject matter.

In conclusion, the literature surrounding the connection between arson in Pennsylvania and the birth rates of triplets or more presents a compelling tapestry of academic studies, non-fiction works, and fictional narratives that collectively illuminate the enduring intrigue surrounding this unconventional correlation. As we delve deeper into this thought-provoking landscape, it becomes increasingly evident that the spark of statistical inquiry may just lead to a blaze of unexpected discovery, igniting our curiosity and fueling the flames of scientific exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Pennsylvania and US birth rates of triplets or more. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and CDC . You used data from 2002 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Sparked by Arson: Exploring the Incendiary Connection Between Arson in Pennsylvania and the Birth Rates of Triplets or More in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the unexpected correlation between arson incidents in Pennsylvania and the birth rates of triplets or more across the United States. Despite the seemingly incendiary nature of the topic, our study aims to shed light on the curious relationship between these seemingly unrelated events. Leveraging data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, we meticulously analyzed two decades of data from 2002 to 2021.

Surprising as it may seem, our findings unveiled a stunning correlation coefficient of 0.9017457 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, establishing a robust connection between arson in Pennsylvania and the birth rates of triplets or more. While the research is undoubtedly fire, it does not seek to fan the flames of speculation, but instead meticulously examines the correlations while drawing on the inherent spark of curiosity.

Our study offers an illuminating perspective on the intricate interplay of seemingly unrelated events and invites further investigation into the mysterious mechanisms at play. After all, as we embark on this scientific journey, the ignition of unexpected correlations may just lead to the discovery of new frontiers in understanding human behavior and societal dynamics.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
Arson: an act of fiery mischief or a statistical matchmaker? While fire is undoubtedly hot and captivating, this study aims to explore the unconventional connection between arson incidents in Pennsylvania and the birth rates of triplets or more across the United States. It takes a spark of curiosity and a dash of statistical analysis to illuminate the seemingly incendiary relationship between these disparate events to uncover whether there is more than meets the eye, or in this case, than meets the heat.
As we embark on this journey of discovery, it is important to remember that correlation does not necessarily imply causation, but it can certainly ignite the flames of speculation. Leveraging data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, our analysis meticulously scrutinizes the convoluted patterns that emerge when arson and triplets converge in the grand scheme of statistical probability.
The allure of this study lies not only in the surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9017457 but also in the statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. These findings compel us to consider the gravity of this correlation, which may just be as scorching as a fire in the statistical world.
While the connection between arson and triplets may seem like a fiery fantasy, our research aims to tread carefully amidst the embers of speculation, kindling the flames of curiosity without being consumed by the heat of conclusive interpretations. After all, in the realm of scientific inquiry, it is crucial to strike a balance between kindling the fire of newfound connections and extinguishing any unwarranted infernos of unwarranted causal claims.
To ignite or not to ignite—that is the question at the heart of this investigation. Whether it uncovers a hidden spark of truth or simply burns out in the blaze of statistical insignificance, this study offers an illuminating glimpse into the unexpected correlations that permeate the fabric of societal and human dynamics. Perhaps, in the pursuit of statistical truth, we may discover that the spark of curiosity and the combustion of data analysis shed light on a new frontier of understanding, where statistical fire meets the fertile ground of unexpected correlations.
In the words of the great statistical maestro William Edward Deming, "In God we trust; all others bring data," and so we have gathered our data to present this scintillating analysis. Let the sparks fly and the numbers dance as we venture into the fiery labyrinth of statistical inquiry, where every unexpected correlation may just lead to a blaze of discovery.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

METHODOLOGY

To unravel the enigmatic correlation between arson in Pennsylvania and the birth rates of triplets or more in the United States, our research team utilized a concoction of statistical witchcraft, data alchemy, and a pinch of good ol' scientific curiosity. The data was primarily extracted from the depths of the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, where it lay dormant until our team breathed scientific life into it.

The period of analysis spanned from 2002 to 2021, capturing an era rife with both fiery incidents and the emergence of triplets. We harnessed the power of complex statistical methods, including linear regression and time series analysis, to scrutinize the relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables.

The first step of our mystical journey involved cleaning and preprocessing the data, separating the ashes of extraneous information from the embers of relevance. With careful precision, we sifted through the layers of data using Python, R, and a bit of old-fashioned elbow grease to ensure that our analysis was not contaminated by statistical soot.

Subsequently, we conjured up various statistical models to probe the connection between arson in Pennsylvania and the birth rates of triplets or more. These models were carefully crafted using the arcane arts of multivariate regression and causality testing, aiming to distinguish between mere statistical sparks and the blazing fires of causation.

With the flickering flame of statistical significance guiding our way, we strutted confidently into the domain of hypothesis testing. Armed with t-tests and p-values, we sought to unravel whether the observed correlations between arson and triplets were mere statistical mirages or sturdy infernos of significance.

To cement the credibility of our findings, we applied rigorous sensitivity analyses and diagnostic tests to our models, ensuring that they were robust enough to withstand the arduous scrutiny of peer review. After all, what good is a scientific discovery if it crumbles like a charred log upon closer inspection?

Finally, we fanned the flames of statistical interpretation, drawing on the collective wisdom of the academic community and the power of critical thinking to contextualize our findings within the broader landscape of societal dynamics and human behavior. Our aim was not only to illuminate the peculiar relationship between arson and triplets but also to spark broader conversations about the unexpected intersections of seemingly disparate phenomena.

In essence, our methodology was a concoction of methodical analysis, statistical rigor, and a touch of scientific whimsy, all orchestrated to peel back the layers of statistical uncertainty and reveal the scorching connections hidden within the data. So, with the grinding gears of statistical analysis and the flickering spark of curiosity, we journeyed through the smoky maze of methodology, emerging with a robust understanding of the fiery web that intertwines arson and the birth rates of triplets or more.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Pennsylvania and US birth rates of triplets or more. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and CDC .

For the time period 2002 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9017457, r-squared of 0.8131454, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Sparked by Arson: Exploring the Incendiary Connection Between Arson in Pennsylvania and the Birth Rates of Triplets or More in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the unexpected correlation between arson incidents in Pennsylvania and the birth rates of triplets or more across the United States. Despite the seemingly incendiary nature of the topic, our study aims to shed light on the curious relationship between these seemingly unrelated events. Leveraging data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, we meticulously analyzed two decades of data from 2002 to 2021.

Surprising as it may seem, our findings unveiled a stunning correlation coefficient of 0.9017457 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, establishing a robust connection between arson in Pennsylvania and the birth rates of triplets or more. While the research is undoubtedly fire, it does not seek to fan the flames of speculation, but instead meticulously examines the correlations while drawing on the inherent spark of curiosity.

Our study offers an illuminating perspective on the intricate interplay of seemingly unrelated events and invites further investigation into the mysterious mechanisms at play. After all, as we embark on this scientific journey, the ignition of unexpected correlations may just lead to the discovery of new frontiers in understanding human behavior and societal dynamics.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
Arson: an act of fiery mischief or a statistical matchmaker? While fire is undoubtedly hot and captivating, this study aims to explore the unconventional connection between arson incidents in Pennsylvania and the birth rates of triplets or more across the United States. It takes a spark of curiosity and a dash of statistical analysis to illuminate the seemingly incendiary relationship between these disparate events to uncover whether there is more than meets the eye, or in this case, than meets the heat.
As we embark on this journey of discovery, it is important to remember that correlation does not necessarily imply causation, but it can certainly ignite the flames of speculation. Leveraging data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, our analysis meticulously scrutinizes the convoluted patterns that emerge when arson and triplets converge in the grand scheme of statistical probability.
The allure of this study lies not only in the surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9017457 but also in the statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. These findings compel us to consider the gravity of this correlation, which may just be as scorching as a fire in the statistical world.
While the connection between arson and triplets may seem like a fiery fantasy, our research aims to tread carefully amidst the embers of speculation, kindling the flames of curiosity without being consumed by the heat of conclusive interpretations. After all, in the realm of scientific inquiry, it is crucial to strike a balance between kindling the fire of newfound connections and extinguishing any unwarranted infernos of unwarranted causal claims.
To ignite or not to ignite—that is the question at the heart of this investigation. Whether it uncovers a hidden spark of truth or simply burns out in the blaze of statistical insignificance, this study offers an illuminating glimpse into the unexpected correlations that permeate the fabric of societal and human dynamics. Perhaps, in the pursuit of statistical truth, we may discover that the spark of curiosity and the combustion of data analysis shed light on a new frontier of understanding, where statistical fire meets the fertile ground of unexpected correlations.
In the words of the great statistical maestro William Edward Deming, "In God we trust; all others bring data," and so we have gathered our data to present this scintillating analysis. Let the sparks fly and the numbers dance as we venture into the fiery labyrinth of statistical inquiry, where every unexpected correlation may just lead to a blaze of discovery.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

**RESULTS**

The scorching exploration of the relationship between arson incidents in Pennsylvania and the birth rates of triplets or more across the United States has yielded intriguing results. Our analysis of two decades of data from 2002 to 2021 uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9017457 between these seemingly disparate events. This high correlation coefficient, coupled with an impressive r-squared value of 0.8131454 and a p-value of less than 0.01, attests to the robustness and statistical significance of this unforeseen connection.

To visually capture the intensity of this correlation, we present Fig. 1, a captivating scatterplot that eloquently depicts the strong relationship between arson in Pennsylvania and the birth rates of triplets or more in the United States. As the saying goes, a picture is worth a thousand words, and in this case, it highlights the incendiary nature of the statistical bond we have uncovered.

While the fire of speculation may ignite in the wake of these findings, it is essential to remain cautious and emphasize that correlation does not imply causation. Nevertheless, the fiery statistical dance between arson incidents and the birth rates of triplets or more invites further exploration and meticulous scrutiny.

Our study has illuminated a hitherto overlooked link between the occurrences of arson and the birth rates of triplets or more, raising compelling questions about the underlying factors at play. As we stoke the embers of curiosity and curiosity, we are reminded of the words of the great statistical luminary Nate Silver, who famously quipped, "Good data are like firewood; they bring warmth and light but must be handled carefully." Indeed, in the uncharted territory of unexpected correlations, our findings spark a new frontier of scientific inquiry—where the flicker of statistical connection may lead to a conflagration of understanding.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Pennsylvania and US birth rates of triplets or more. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Sparked by Arson: Exploring the Incendiary Connection Between Arson in Pennsylvania and the Birth Rates of Triplets or More in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the unexpected correlation between arson incidents in Pennsylvania and the birth rates of triplets or more across the United States. Despite the seemingly incendiary nature of the topic, our study aims to shed light on the curious relationship between these seemingly unrelated events. Leveraging data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, we meticulously analyzed two decades of data from 2002 to 2021.

Surprising as it may seem, our findings unveiled a stunning correlation coefficient of 0.9017457 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, establishing a robust connection between arson in Pennsylvania and the birth rates of triplets or more. While the research is undoubtedly fire, it does not seek to fan the flames of speculation, but instead meticulously examines the correlations while drawing on the inherent spark of curiosity.

Our study offers an illuminating perspective on the intricate interplay of seemingly unrelated events and invites further investigation into the mysterious mechanisms at play. After all, as we embark on this scientific journey, the ignition of unexpected correlations may just lead to the discovery of new frontiers in understanding human behavior and societal dynamics.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The connection between arson incidents in Pennsylvania and the birth rates of triplets or more across the United States has sparked considerable interest among researchers in recent years. While this link may at first seem as improbable as starting a campfire in a rainstorm, empirical evidence suggests that there may indeed be a fiery correlation waiting to be unearthed.
Smith et al. (2018) conducted a comprehensive study on fire-related incidents and their potential societal impacts in rural areas, uncovering unexpected patterns in birth rates. Their findings hint at the possibility of a clandestine relationship between arson and the birth of multiples, igniting the curiosity of researchers and enthusiasts alike.
Doe's seminal work in "Heat Waves and Baby Booms: Exploring Unconventional Correlations" delves into the intricate web of environmental factors and birth rates, unveiling surprising connections that transcend conventional wisdom. In a scorching twist of fate, the author touches upon arson as a potential catalyst for unusual birth patterns, setting the stage for further exploration into this unchartered territory.
Jones et al. (2020) conducted a rigorous analysis of arson reports and demographic data, uncovering a sizzling correlation between the two seemingly disparate phenomena. Their work not only sheds light on the statistical significance of this connection but also kindles the flames of inquiry, inspiring researchers to fan the embers of curiosity without getting burned by unwarranted claims.
Moving beyond the realm of academic literature, several non-fiction books offer intriguing insights into the enigmatic relationship between fire and unusual birth patterns. Lorem's "Flames and Families: A Statistical Odyssey" offers a critical examination of historical arson incidents and their potential impact on demographic shifts, providing a scintillating perspective on the subject matter at hand.
Similarly, Ipsum's "Inferno and Infants: Exploring Uncharted Relationships" provides a captivating exploration of the tumultuous intersection between fiery behavior and unexpected birth trends, inviting readers to embrace the heat of statistical inquiry with open minds and analytical rigor.
In the world of fiction, the work of authors such as Sparkington and Blazeberg delves into the fantastical realm of fire-related phenomena and their potential intersections with societal dynamics. "Pyro Parenting: A Tale of Triplets and Turmoil" by Sparkington and "Blazing Bonds: The Unlikely Connection Between Arson and Multiples" by Blazeberg offer whimsical yet thought-provoking narratives that spark the imagination and ignite the flames of curiosity.
Furthermore, animated series and children's shows have not been immune to themes related to fire and multiples. The cartoon "Flame-Edged Families" and the children's program "The Triplet Tales: Adventures in Arson" subtly weave elements of fire-related incidents and unusual birth phenomena into their engaging storylines, captivating audiences of all ages with their playful yet thought-provoking exploration of the subject matter.
In conclusion, the literature surrounding the connection between arson in Pennsylvania and the birth rates of triplets or more presents a compelling tapestry of academic studies, non-fiction works, and fictional narratives that collectively illuminate the enduring intrigue surrounding this unconventional correlation. As we delve deeper into this thought-provoking landscape, it becomes increasingly evident that the spark of statistical inquiry may just lead to a blaze of unexpected discovery, igniting our curiosity and fueling the flames of scientific exploration.

[[RESULTS]]
The scorching exploration of the relationship between arson incidents in Pennsylvania and the birth rates of triplets or more across the United States has yielded intriguing results. Our analysis of two decades of data from 2002 to 2021 uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9017457 between these seemingly disparate events. This high correlation coefficient, coupled with an impressive r-squared value of 0.8131454 and a p-value of less than 0.01, attests to the robustness and statistical significance of this unforeseen connection.
To visually capture the intensity of this correlation, we present Fig. 1, a captivating scatterplot that eloquently depicts the strong relationship between arson in Pennsylvania and the birth rates of triplets or more in the United States. As the saying goes, a picture is worth a thousand words, and in this case, it highlights the incendiary nature of the statistical bond we have uncovered.
While the fire of speculation may ignite in the wake of these findings, it is essential to remain cautious and emphasize that correlation does not imply causation. Nevertheless, the fiery statistical dance between arson incidents and the birth rates of triplets or more invites further exploration and meticulous scrutiny.
Our study has illuminated a hitherto overlooked link between the occurrences of arson and the birth rates of triplets or more, raising compelling questions about the underlying factors at play. As we stoke the embers of curiosity and curiosity, we are reminded of the words of the great statistical luminary Nate Silver, who famously quipped, "Good data are like firewood; they bring warmth and light but must be handled carefully." Indeed, in the uncharted territory of unexpected correlations, our findings spark a new frontier of scientific inquiry—where the flicker of statistical connection may lead to a conflagration of understanding.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The scintillating correlation uncovered in our study between arson incidents in Pennsylvania and the birth rates of triplets or more across the United States is truly an unexpected firework in the realm of statistical inquiry. As we sift through the ashes of data analysis, it becomes evident that our findings not only add fuel to the existing research but also kindle the flames of curiosity regarding the underlying mechanisms at play.

Our results not only singed but also incinerated any doubts about the statistical significance of this connection, with a scorching correlation coefficient of 0.9017457 and a p-value of less than 0.01. In a euphoric dance of empirical evidence, our study not only echoed the sentiments of prior research but also fanned the flames of understanding in this uncharted territory.

Harking back to the smoldering literature, the work of Smith et al. (2018) and Doe's exploration of "Heat Waves and Baby Booms" laid the kindling for our study, offering subtle but poignant hints at the possibility of an incendiary link between arson and the birth of multiples. Our results not only validate but also stoke the flames of curiosity that have been smoldering in the scientific community for years.

While the heat of statistical correlation radiates from our findings, it is crucial to remember that correlation does not imply causation. As we navigate this fiery frontier of unexpected connections, it is imperative to handle the data with as much care as one would handle a lit match near a gas leak.

In conclusion, our study not only provides a blazing illumination of the intricate relationship between arson incidents in Pennsylvania and the birth rates of triplets or more but also ignites a fervent call for further investigation into this enigmatic correlation. As we navigate this inferno of statistical inquiry, we must remember that the flicker of curiosity may just lead to a conflagration of understanding. As the great scientific luminary Isaac Newton once said, "I can calculate the movement of stars, but not the madness of men," and indeed, the unexpected correlations in our findings may just capture the celestial dance of statistical mystery in the realm of human behavior and societal dynamics.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Pennsylvania and US birth rates of triplets or more. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Sparked by Arson: Exploring the Incendiary Connection Between Arson in Pennsylvania and the Birth Rates of Triplets or More in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the unexpected correlation between arson incidents in Pennsylvania and the birth rates of triplets or more across the United States. Despite the seemingly incendiary nature of the topic, our study aims to shed light on the curious relationship between these seemingly unrelated events. Leveraging data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, we meticulously analyzed two decades of data from 2002 to 2021.

Surprising as it may seem, our findings unveiled a stunning correlation coefficient of 0.9017457 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, establishing a robust connection between arson in Pennsylvania and the birth rates of triplets or more. While the research is undoubtedly fire, it does not seek to fan the flames of speculation, but instead meticulously examines the correlations while drawing on the inherent spark of curiosity.

Our study offers an illuminating perspective on the intricate interplay of seemingly unrelated events and invites further investigation into the mysterious mechanisms at play. After all, as we embark on this scientific journey, the ignition of unexpected correlations may just lead to the discovery of new frontiers in understanding human behavior and societal dynamics.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
Arson: an act of fiery mischief or a statistical matchmaker? While fire is undoubtedly hot and captivating, this study aims to explore the unconventional connection between arson incidents in Pennsylvania and the birth rates of triplets or more across the United States. It takes a spark of curiosity and a dash of statistical analysis to illuminate the seemingly incendiary relationship between these disparate events to uncover whether there is more than meets the eye, or in this case, than meets the heat.
As we embark on this journey of discovery, it is important to remember that correlation does not necessarily imply causation, but it can certainly ignite the flames of speculation. Leveraging data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, our analysis meticulously scrutinizes the convoluted patterns that emerge when arson and triplets converge in the grand scheme of statistical probability.
The allure of this study lies not only in the surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9017457 but also in the statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. These findings compel us to consider the gravity of this correlation, which may just be as scorching as a fire in the statistical world.
While the connection between arson and triplets may seem like a fiery fantasy, our research aims to tread carefully amidst the embers of speculation, kindling the flames of curiosity without being consumed by the heat of conclusive interpretations. After all, in the realm of scientific inquiry, it is crucial to strike a balance between kindling the fire of newfound connections and extinguishing any unwarranted infernos of unwarranted causal claims.
To ignite or not to ignite—that is the question at the heart of this investigation. Whether it uncovers a hidden spark of truth or simply burns out in the blaze of statistical insignificance, this study offers an illuminating glimpse into the unexpected correlations that permeate the fabric of societal and human dynamics. Perhaps, in the pursuit of statistical truth, we may discover that the spark of curiosity and the combustion of data analysis shed light on a new frontier of understanding, where statistical fire meets the fertile ground of unexpected correlations.
In the words of the great statistical maestro William Edward Deming, "In God we trust; all others bring data," and so we have gathered our data to present this scintillating analysis. Let the sparks fly and the numbers dance as we venture into the fiery labyrinth of statistical inquiry, where every unexpected correlation may just lead to a blaze of discovery.

[[RESULTS]]
The scorching exploration of the relationship between arson incidents in Pennsylvania and the birth rates of triplets or more across the United States has yielded intriguing results. Our analysis of two decades of data from 2002 to 2021 uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9017457 between these seemingly disparate events. This high correlation coefficient, coupled with an impressive r-squared value of 0.8131454 and a p-value of less than 0.01, attests to the robustness and statistical significance of this unforeseen connection.
To visually capture the intensity of this correlation, we present Fig. 1, a captivating scatterplot that eloquently depicts the strong relationship between arson in Pennsylvania and the birth rates of triplets or more in the United States. As the saying goes, a picture is worth a thousand words, and in this case, it highlights the incendiary nature of the statistical bond we have uncovered.
While the fire of speculation may ignite in the wake of these findings, it is essential to remain cautious and emphasize that correlation does not imply causation. Nevertheless, the fiery statistical dance between arson incidents and the birth rates of triplets or more invites further exploration and meticulous scrutiny.
Our study has illuminated a hitherto overlooked link between the occurrences of arson and the birth rates of triplets or more, raising compelling questions about the underlying factors at play. As we stoke the embers of curiosity and curiosity, we are reminded of the words of the great statistical luminary Nate Silver, who famously quipped, "Good data are like firewood; they bring warmth and light but must be handled carefully." Indeed, in the uncharted territory of unexpected correlations, our findings spark a new frontier of scientific inquiry—where the flicker of statistical connection may lead to a conflagration of understanding.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, our scintillating exploration of the correlation between arson incidents in Pennsylvania and the birth rates of triplets or more across the United States has ignited a fiery debate within the realm of statistical analysis. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9017457, complemented by a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, has certainly sparked intrigue and kindled the embers of curiosity.

While it might be tempting to fan the flames of speculation, it is essential to approach these findings with a cautious mindset. As statisticians, we must extinguish any unwarranted infernos of causal claims despite the captivating allure of this unexpected connection. After all, correlation does not imply causation, and we must tread carefully amidst the statistical firestorm.

As we reflect on this research, the words of Albert Einstein come to mind: "The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the source of all true art and science." In this light, our study offers a remarkable glimpse into the enigmatic web of statistical relationships, where the unexpected thrives and the boundaries of understanding are continually redrawn.

However, it is our firm belief that no further research is needed in this area. The passion for uncovering patterns in data has, in this instance, been well and truly extinguished - rather like putting out a fire. We hope this study has been illuminating and that the unexpected correlations we discovered may serve as tinder for further scientific inquiry. As the flames of curiosity continue to burn bright, we are left to ponder the intricate dance of statistical relationships and the hidden sparks of truth that lie within.

Therefore, let us douse the flames of this particular investigation, for in statistical inquiry, once the fire has been thoroughly examined, it is time to move on to explore new uncharted territory. After all, it is essential to know when to extinguish the flames of statistical curiosity and when to let the ashes of one investigation nurture the ember of the next.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Sparked by Arson: Exploring the Incendiary Connection Between Arson in Pennsylvania and the Birth Rates of Triplets or More in the United States. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Pyrokinetic Epidemiology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Sparked by Arson: Exploring the Incendiary Connection Between Arson in Pennsylvania and the Birth Rates of Triplets or More in the United States. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Arson Studies and Reproductive Trends


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Sparked by Arson: Exploring the Incendiary Connection Between Arson in Pennsylvania and the Birth Rates of Triplets or More in the United States with an abstract of This research paper delves into the unexpected correlation between arson incidents in Pennsylvania and the birth rates of triplets or more across the United States. Despite the seemingly incendiary nature of the topic, our study aims to shed light on the curious relationship between these seemingly unrelated events. Leveraging data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, we meticulously analyzed two decades of data from 2002 to 2021.
Surprising as it may seem, our findings unveiled a stunning correlation coefficient of 0.9017457 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, establishing a robust connection between arson in Pennsylvania and the birth rates of triplets or more. While the research is undoubtedly fire, it does not seek to fan the flames of speculation, but instead meticulously examines the correlations while drawing on the inherent spark of curiosity.
Our study offers an illuminating perspective on the intricate interplay of seemingly unrelated events and invites further investigation into the mysterious mechanisms at play. After all, as we embark on this scientific journey, the ignition of unexpected correlations may just lead to the discovery of new frontiers in understanding human behavior and societal dynamics.

ChatGPT:

arson, Pennsylvania, birth rates, triplets, United States, correlation, FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, data analysis, statistical significance, correlation coefficient, p-value, human behavior, societal dynamics

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Arson in Pennsylvania
Detailed data title: The arson rate per 100,000 residents in Pennsylvania
Source: FBI Criminal Justice Information Services
See what else correlates with Arson in Pennsylvania

US birth rates of triplets or more
Source: CDC
See what else correlates with US birth rates of triplets or more

Correlation r = 0.9017457 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8131454 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 81.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., US birth rates of triplets or more) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Arson in Pennsylvania) over the 20 years from 2002 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 5.6E-8. 0.0000000564752696427317540000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.9 in 5.6E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 17,706,865 random variables You don't actually need 17 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.76, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Arson in Pennsylvania (Arson rate)21.418.417.219.619.719.417.617.216.21413.713.215.114.214.311.611.2910.76.9
US birth rates of triplets or more (Birth rate per 100,000)183186180170156151148152138137124.4119.5113.5103.6101.4101.69387.779.680




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([21.4,18.4,17.2,19.6,19.7,19.4,17.6,17.2,16.2,14,13.7,13.2,15.1,14.2,14.3,11.6,11.2,9,10.7,6.9,])
array_2 = np.array([183,186,180,170,156,151,148,152,138,137,124.4,119.5,113.5,103.6,101.4,101.6,93,87.7,79.6,80,])
array_1_name = "Arson in Pennsylvania"
array_2_name = "US birth rates of triplets or more"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Kudos for rating!


Correlation ID: 3891 · Black Variable ID: 20067 · Red Variable ID: 55
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0