Spurious correlation #3,875 · View random
A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Fossil fuel use in Egypt and the second variable is Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. The chart goes from 1980 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time.

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Fossil fuel use in Egypt and the second variable is Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. The chart goes from 1980 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time.

AI explanation

Perhaps the mummies of ancient Egypt have a secret recipe for hotdog buns that was unearthed during the digging for fossil fuels, creating a link between the two. It seems the pharaoh-oh-ohs were relishing their sausages in a way that has transcended time, causing a spike in hotdog consumption every time a new tomb or fuel reserve is discovered. The mystery of the pyramids may have been solved, but the mystery meat in those hotdogs remains as enigmatic as ever. The connection is truly a testament to the wurst-kept secrets of history!

^{Show image generation prompt} Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a meme showing the iconic Sphinx in Egypt against a backdrop of industrial chimneys emitting bright plumes of exhaust. The Sphinx's eyes gleam with excitement, while in the foreground, the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion triumphantly devours a mountain of hotdogs with a gold medal around his neck as a global audience watches in amazement. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.

This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Fossil fuel use in Egypt and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: a Polaroid photo a meme Brutalism Woodblock painting Surrealism
ChatGPT: a meme

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Fossil fuel use in Egypt and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion, in the following situation: Because as Egypt's fossil fuel use rose, the Sphinx developed a burning desire to celebrate with a grand feast! This sparked a global shortage of hotdogs, driving up their price and paving the way for Nathan's insatiable appetite to reign supreme in the hot dog eating competition. The mummy of all cravings had everybody relishing the contest as they marveled at the blend of oddities - a Sphinx fueled by fossil fuels and a hot dog champion at the center of it all, bunning through the competition!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Egypt, the Sphinx sits proudly amidst a bright backdrop of fossil fuel use, its eyes gleaming with excitement. Meanwhile, Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion devours a mountain of hotdogs, a gold medal around his neck, as the world watches in amazement.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a meme ] and depicting this scene: In Egypt, the Sphinx sits proudly amidst a bright backdrop of fossil fuel use, its eyes gleaming with excitement. Meanwhile, Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion devours a mountain of hotdogs, a gold medal around his neck, as the world watches in amazement. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a meme showing the iconic Sphinx in Egypt against a backdrop of industrial chimneys emitting bright plumes of exhaust. The Sphinx's eyes gleam with excitement, while in the foreground, the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion triumphantly devours a mountain of hotdogs with a gold medal around his neck as a global audience watches in amazement.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
^{Show prompt for explanation} Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Fossil fuel use in Egypt caused Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)

Fueling the Champion: A Sausage-al Link Between Fossil Fuel Use in Egypt and Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Consumption

The International Journal of Gastronomical Geopolitics

Jan 2024

^{Show prompt used to generate this paper} Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Fossil fuel use in Egypt and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fueling the Champion: A Sausage-al Link Between Fossil Fuel Use in Egypt and Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Consumption

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we examined the curious relationship between fossil fuel use in Egypt and the consumption of hotdogs by the renowned participants of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Using data from the Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia, we sought to unravel the hidden connection between these seemingly unrelated entities. Our analysis uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9509514 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 1980 to 2021. While traditionally distinct, our findings unveil a tantalizing sausage-al link that raises eyebrows and appetites alike. The implications of this discovery may serve to challenge conventional wisdom and inspire further exploration into the unforeseen intersections of fuel consumption and competitive eating.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the realm of scientific inquiry, unexpected connections often emerge, leaving researchers scratching their heads and searching for deeper meaning. Our investigation delves into one such enigmatic pairing: the relationship between fossil fuel use in Egypt and the consumption of hot dogs by the formidable contenders of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. While these two subjects may seem as unrelated as ketchup and a chemistry lab, our study reveals a surprisingly strong correlation between them, sparking curiosity and hunger for further exploration.
As we embark on this scholarly journey, it is essential to acknowledge the skepticism that may greet such an unconventional hypothesis. After all, what could the burning of ancient organic matter in the deserts of Egypt possibly have to do with the devouring of processed meat tubes on a competitive stage in Coney Island? Nonetheless, armed with statistical rigor and an appetite for unconventional knowledge, we aim to unmask the hidden threads that bind these seemingly disparate phenomena together.
Our pursuit leads us to the intersection of two diverse domains: energy consumption and gustatory prowess. The Energy Information Administration provides us with a wealth of data on fossil fuel use in Egypt, while Wikipedia furnishes us with delectable details on the annual hot dog consumption of the champions at Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Through the judicious application of statistical analysis, we endeavor to shed light on this curious link and possibly cook up some humor along the way.
As we venture into uncharted territory, we invite readers to keep an open mind and a lighthearted spirit. Science, after all, is not just about dry equations and solemn hypotheses. It is also about savoring the unexpected, relishing the quirky, and perhaps even finding the delight in pairing up two unlikely entities like fossil fuel use and hot dog consumption.
In the pages that follow, we will navigate through the labyrinth of data, formulas, and perhaps a few mustard stains, as we unravel the tantalizing sausage-al link between fossil fuel use in Egypt and the champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Prepare yourself for a journey that is both intellectually stimulating and appetite-provoking, where we will seek to answer the burning question: Could there be a more literal interpretation of "fueling the champion" than we ever imagined?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

To contextualize the entwined relationship between fossil fuel use in Egypt and the remarkable consumption of hot dogs by the iconic participants of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, we turn to a wide array of scholarly works and sources. This literature review dissects the curious connection between these seemingly unrelated phenomena, exploring both serious and whimsical perspectives to unearth the hidden sausagical link.

Smith et al. (2018) delve into the intricate web of energy consumption patterns in Egypt, elucidating the historical trends and socioeconomic factors that have shaped the country's reliance on fossil fuels. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones (2020) provide a comprehensive analysis of the global competitive eating landscape, offering insights into the dietary habits and gastronomic feats of professional eaters.

Further illuminating the discourse, "The Economics of Fuel Use in the Middle East" by Brown (2015) offers a macroeconomic perspective on the significance of fossil fuel production in Egypt and its implications for regional energy markets. Shifting focus to the epicurean domain, "The Science of Sausage: From Cured Meats to Competitive Eating" by White (2017) delves into the physiological and psychological dimensions of competitive eating, shedding light on the astonishing capacity of athletes to consume copious quantities of hot dogs.

In a departure from conventional academic sources, the fictional works of Orwell's "Animal Farm" and Verne's "Journey to the Center of the Earth" are worth mentioning in the context of our investigation. While these literary masterpieces may not directly address the nexus of fuel use and hot dog consumption, their themes of resource allocation and culinary adventure offer a tangential lens through which to contemplate our research question.

Drawing inspiration from unconventional sources, we also take heed of the animated insights offered by "Scooby-Doo" and "The Magic School Bus." These captivating narratives, while seemingly unrelated to our study, infuse an element of lightheartedness and whimsy as we probe the mysterious coupling of fossil fuel use and competitive hot dog consumption.

Amidst the sea of scholarly elucidation and imaginative diversions, our foray into the sausage-al link between Egypt's fuel use and Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition serves to be a full-course meal, offering a palatable blend of seriousness and levity that is as intellectually nourishing as it is humorously satisfying.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Fossil fuel use in Egypt and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia . You used data from 1980 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fueling the Champion: A Sausage-al Link Between Fossil Fuel Use in Egypt and Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Consumption

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we examined the curious relationship between fossil fuel use in Egypt and the consumption of hotdogs by the renowned participants of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Using data from the Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia, we sought to unravel the hidden connection between these seemingly unrelated entities. Our analysis uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9509514 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 1980 to 2021. While traditionally distinct, our findings unveil a tantalizing sausage-al link that raises eyebrows and appetites alike. The implications of this discovery may serve to challenge conventional wisdom and inspire further exploration into the unforeseen intersections of fuel consumption and competitive eating.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the realm of scientific inquiry, unexpected connections often emerge, leaving researchers scratching their heads and searching for deeper meaning. Our investigation delves into one such enigmatic pairing: the relationship between fossil fuel use in Egypt and the consumption of hot dogs by the formidable contenders of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. While these two subjects may seem as unrelated as ketchup and a chemistry lab, our study reveals a surprisingly strong correlation between them, sparking curiosity and hunger for further exploration.
As we embark on this scholarly journey, it is essential to acknowledge the skepticism that may greet such an unconventional hypothesis. After all, what could the burning of ancient organic matter in the deserts of Egypt possibly have to do with the devouring of processed meat tubes on a competitive stage in Coney Island? Nonetheless, armed with statistical rigor and an appetite for unconventional knowledge, we aim to unmask the hidden threads that bind these seemingly disparate phenomena together.
Our pursuit leads us to the intersection of two diverse domains: energy consumption and gustatory prowess. The Energy Information Administration provides us with a wealth of data on fossil fuel use in Egypt, while Wikipedia furnishes us with delectable details on the annual hot dog consumption of the champions at Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Through the judicious application of statistical analysis, we endeavor to shed light on this curious link and possibly cook up some humor along the way.
As we venture into uncharted territory, we invite readers to keep an open mind and a lighthearted spirit. Science, after all, is not just about dry equations and solemn hypotheses. It is also about savoring the unexpected, relishing the quirky, and perhaps even finding the delight in pairing up two unlikely entities like fossil fuel use and hot dog consumption.
In the pages that follow, we will navigate through the labyrinth of data, formulas, and perhaps a few mustard stains, as we unravel the tantalizing sausage-al link between fossil fuel use in Egypt and the champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Prepare yourself for a journey that is both intellectually stimulating and appetite-provoking, where we will seek to answer the burning question: Could there be a more literal interpretation of "fueling the champion" than we ever imagined?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To embark on our quest to uncover the sausage-al link between fossil fuel use in Egypt and the hot dog consumption of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition champions, we employed a combination of data collection, statistical analysis, and a healthy dose of culinary curiosity.

Data Collection:

The first step in our exploration involved the meticulous gathering of data from the Energy Information Administration and the treasure trove of knowledge that is Wikipedia. We diligently extracted information on fossil fuel use in Egypt, spanning from 1980 to 2021, to capture the full scope of energy consumption in the region. Similarly, we amassed details on the annual hot dog consumption of the illustrious winners of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, ensuring a comprehensive depiction of sausage ingestion over the same timeframe.

While the internet served as our primary source of data, we acknowledge the inherent quirkiness and occasional unreliability of information found online. Like navigating a hot dog eating contest, sifting through digital data requires a keen eye, a steady hand, and the occasional stomach for the unexpected.

Statistical Analysis:

With our data in hand, we turned to the formidable arsenal of statistical tools to parse through the numbers and uncover any hidden correlations. Employing correlation analysis, we sought to measure the strength and direction of the relationship between fossil fuel use in Egypt and hot dog consumption by the champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition.

In the spirit of scientific rigor, we calculated the Pearson correlation coefficient and its corresponding p-value to assess the statistical significance of any observed relationship. It's worth noting that while our statistical methods were as robust as the construction of a Chicago-style hot dog, they were not without their own relish... I mean, limits. As with any statistical endeavor, it is essential to approach the results with a discerning eye and a penchant for statistical nuance.

Culinary Curiosity:

In addition to the quantitative analysis, we indulged in a healthy dose of culinary curiosity, sampling various types of hot dogs and pondering the gustatory intricacies of the competition. After all, what is research without a pinch of spice and a dash of humor? The gastronomic aspect of our investigation added an extra layer of flavor to our scholarly pursuits, reminding us that science and sausage can indeed mingle in curious ways.

The decision to incorporate this lighthearted approach was not made lightly. We sought to infuse our methodology with a touch of whimsy, all while maintaining a steadfast dedication to scientific integrity – not unlike the delicate balance of toppings on a perfectly crafted hot dog.

Ultimately, our methodology reflects the harmonious interplay of data collection, statistical analysis, and a sprinkling of culinary curiosity, paving the way for a scholarly journey that takes science and sausages hand in hand. We acknowledge that our approach may raise an eyebrow or prompt an amused chuckle, but in the spirit of scholarly exploration, we embrace the unexpected and the unconventionally flavorful.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Fossil fuel use in Egypt and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia .

For the time period 1980 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9509514, r-squared of 0.9043085, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fueling the Champion: A Sausage-al Link Between Fossil Fuel Use in Egypt and Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Consumption

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we examined the curious relationship between fossil fuel use in Egypt and the consumption of hotdogs by the renowned participants of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Using data from the Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia, we sought to unravel the hidden connection between these seemingly unrelated entities. Our analysis uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9509514 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 1980 to 2021. While traditionally distinct, our findings unveil a tantalizing sausage-al link that raises eyebrows and appetites alike. The implications of this discovery may serve to challenge conventional wisdom and inspire further exploration into the unforeseen intersections of fuel consumption and competitive eating.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the realm of scientific inquiry, unexpected connections often emerge, leaving researchers scratching their heads and searching for deeper meaning. Our investigation delves into one such enigmatic pairing: the relationship between fossil fuel use in Egypt and the consumption of hot dogs by the formidable contenders of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. While these two subjects may seem as unrelated as ketchup and a chemistry lab, our study reveals a surprisingly strong correlation between them, sparking curiosity and hunger for further exploration.
As we embark on this scholarly journey, it is essential to acknowledge the skepticism that may greet such an unconventional hypothesis. After all, what could the burning of ancient organic matter in the deserts of Egypt possibly have to do with the devouring of processed meat tubes on a competitive stage in Coney Island? Nonetheless, armed with statistical rigor and an appetite for unconventional knowledge, we aim to unmask the hidden threads that bind these seemingly disparate phenomena together.
Our pursuit leads us to the intersection of two diverse domains: energy consumption and gustatory prowess. The Energy Information Administration provides us with a wealth of data on fossil fuel use in Egypt, while Wikipedia furnishes us with delectable details on the annual hot dog consumption of the champions at Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Through the judicious application of statistical analysis, we endeavor to shed light on this curious link and possibly cook up some humor along the way.
As we venture into uncharted territory, we invite readers to keep an open mind and a lighthearted spirit. Science, after all, is not just about dry equations and solemn hypotheses. It is also about savoring the unexpected, relishing the quirky, and perhaps even finding the delight in pairing up two unlikely entities like fossil fuel use and hot dog consumption.
In the pages that follow, we will navigate through the labyrinth of data, formulas, and perhaps a few mustard stains, as we unravel the tantalizing sausage-al link between fossil fuel use in Egypt and the champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Prepare yourself for a journey that is both intellectually stimulating and appetite-provoking, where we will seek to answer the burning question: Could there be a more literal interpretation of "fueling the champion" than we ever imagined?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]

ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our analysis reveal a remarkably robust correlation between fossil fuel use in Egypt and the consumption of hotdogs by the esteemed victors of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. The correlation coefficient of 0.9509514 signifies a striking statistical relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, a finding that is sure to fuel both curiosity and appetite for further exploration.

We also observed an r-squared value of 0.9043085, indicating that approximately 90.43% of the variability in the consumption of hotdogs can be explained by the fluctuations in fossil fuel use in Egypt. This strong explanatory power of the model suggests that there is indeed a sausage-al link at play, transcending geographical and culinary boundaries in unexpected ways.

The p-value of less than 0.01 underscores the high statistical significance of our findings, providing compelling evidence to support the existence of a connection between these disparate domains. This suggests that the observed relationship between fossil fuel use in Egypt and the consumption of hotdogs by the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition champions is not merely a fluke, but rather a statistically robust phenomenon worthy of further investigation.

To visually encapsulate the compelling association we unearthed, we present a scatterplot in Figure 1. This graphical representation vividly illustrates the strong positive correlation between the two variables. It serves as a tangible reminder that even in the realm of scientific inquiry, unexpected connections can form the basis for intriguing observations.

In summary, our results point to an unforeseen intertwining of energy consumption in the land of the pyramids and the gustatory feats of competitive eating. This revelation challenges traditional notions of causal relationships and opens the door to a new realm of interconnections. The implications of this discovery extend beyond the boundaries of scientific curiosity, offering a fresh perspective on the hidden links that permeate our world – and perhaps leaving us with a craving for further exploration into the bizarrely delightful relationship between ancient energy sources and competitive hot dog consumption.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Fossil fuel use in Egypt and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Fueling the Champion: A Sausage-al Link Between Fossil Fuel Use in Egypt and Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Consumption

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we examined the curious relationship between fossil fuel use in Egypt and the consumption of hotdogs by the renowned participants of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Using data from the Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia, we sought to unravel the hidden connection between these seemingly unrelated entities. Our analysis uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9509514 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 1980 to 2021. While traditionally distinct, our findings unveil a tantalizing sausage-al link that raises eyebrows and appetites alike. The implications of this discovery may serve to challenge conventional wisdom and inspire further exploration into the unforeseen intersections of fuel consumption and competitive eating.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
To contextualize the entwined relationship between fossil fuel use in Egypt and the remarkable consumption of hot dogs by the iconic participants of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, we turn to a wide array of scholarly works and sources. This literature review dissects the curious connection between these seemingly unrelated phenomena, exploring both serious and whimsical perspectives to unearth the hidden sausagical link.
Smith et al. (2018) delve into the intricate web of energy consumption patterns in Egypt, elucidating the historical trends and socioeconomic factors that have shaped the country's reliance on fossil fuels. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones (2020) provide a comprehensive analysis of the global competitive eating landscape, offering insights into the dietary habits and gastronomic feats of professional eaters.
Further illuminating the discourse, "The Economics of Fuel Use in the Middle East" by Brown (2015) offers a macroeconomic perspective on the significance of fossil fuel production in Egypt and its implications for regional energy markets. Shifting focus to the epicurean domain, "The Science of Sausage: From Cured Meats to Competitive Eating" by White (2017) delves into the physiological and psychological dimensions of competitive eating, shedding light on the astonishing capacity of athletes to consume copious quantities of hot dogs.
In a departure from conventional academic sources, the fictional works of Orwell's "Animal Farm" and Verne's "Journey to the Center of the Earth" are worth mentioning in the context of our investigation. While these literary masterpieces may not directly address the nexus of fuel use and hot dog consumption, their themes of resource allocation and culinary adventure offer a tangential lens through which to contemplate our research question.
Drawing inspiration from unconventional sources, we also take heed of the animated insights offered by "Scooby-Doo" and "The Magic School Bus." These captivating narratives, while seemingly unrelated to our study, infuse an element of lightheartedness and whimsy as we probe the mysterious coupling of fossil fuel use and competitive hot dog consumption.
Amidst the sea of scholarly elucidation and imaginative diversions, our foray into the sausage-al link between Egypt's fuel use and Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition serves to be a full-course meal, offering a palatable blend of seriousness and levity that is as intellectually nourishing as it is humorously satisfying.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis reveal a remarkably robust correlation between fossil fuel use in Egypt and the consumption of hotdogs by the esteemed victors of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. The correlation coefficient of 0.9509514 signifies a striking statistical relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, a finding that is sure to fuel both curiosity and appetite for further exploration.
We also observed an r-squared value of 0.9043085, indicating that approximately 90.43% of the variability in the consumption of hotdogs can be explained by the fluctuations in fossil fuel use in Egypt. This strong explanatory power of the model suggests that there is indeed a sausage-al link at play, transcending geographical and culinary boundaries in unexpected ways.
The p-value of less than 0.01 underscores the high statistical significance of our findings, providing compelling evidence to support the existence of a connection between these disparate domains. This suggests that the observed relationship between fossil fuel use in Egypt and the consumption of hotdogs by the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition champions is not merely a fluke, but rather a statistically robust phenomenon worthy of further investigation.
To visually encapsulate the compelling association we unearthed, we present a scatterplot in Figure 1. This graphical representation vividly illustrates the strong positive correlation between the two variables. It serves as a tangible reminder that even in the realm of scientific inquiry, unexpected connections can form the basis for intriguing observations.
In summary, our results point to an unforeseen intertwining of energy consumption in the land of the pyramids and the gustatory feats of competitive eating. This revelation challenges traditional notions of causal relationships and opens the door to a new realm of interconnections. The implications of this discovery extend beyond the boundaries of scientific curiosity, offering a fresh perspective on the hidden links that permeate our world – and perhaps leaving us with a craving for further exploration into the bizarrely delightful relationship between ancient energy sources and competitive hot dog consumption.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]

ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The robust correlation uncovered in our study between fossil fuel use in Egypt and the consumption of hotdogs by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition champions serves as a tantalizing revelation, reminiscent of a perfectly grilled bratwurst - rich and satisfying. Our findings, though seemingly outlandish at first glance, are in alignment with prior research that has delved into the unexpected interplay between seemingly disparate domains.

Our analysis, which uncovered a correlation coefficient reminiscent of the precision of a well-assembled hot dog, resonates with the whimsical perspectives of literature that have playfully probed the unexpected intersections of energy consumption and competitive eating. Just as literature has offered delightful escapades into the realms of resource allocation and gastronomic adventure, our statistically robust findings underscore the palpable link between such seemingly unrelated phenomena. It is as if Orwell's "Animal Farm" and Verne's "Journey to the Center of the Earth" have conspired to lead us down a path of unexpected discovery, much like a scavenger hunt with exquisitely unexpected treats.

The r-squared value of 0.9043085 stands as a testament to the explanatory power of our model, akin to the mastery of a seasoned grillmaster who artfully manages to capture the essence of a flavorful sausage within its casing. These results align with the prior scholarly works that have illuminated the nuances of energy consumption in Egypt and the astounding feats of competitive eating. Our findings, much like the meandering plotlines of "Scooby-Doo" and "The Magic School Bus," weave together seemingly disparate threads to form a cohesive narrative that challenges conventional boundaries and tickles the intellectual palate.

The strong statistical significance of our results, as indicated by the p-value of less than 0.01, imparts the gravity of our discovery, akin to the weight of a condiment-laden hot dog in the hand of a ravenous competitor. This confluence of statistical evidence aligns with the serious and lighthearted perspectives that have informed our investigation, offering a harmonious medley of rigorous analysis and playful contemplation.

In essence, the sausage-al link we have uncovered between Egypt's fuel use and the gustatory prowess of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition champions presents a feast for thought, challenging us to expand our intellectual appetites and venture into the uncharted territories of unexpected connections. As such, our research contributes to a richer tapestry of scientific inquiry, highlighting the whimsy and wonder that lurk within the seemingly mundane. And just like a condiment-laden hot dog, our findings are bound to leave an indelible impression, prompting both mirthful amusement and serious consideration in equal measure.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Fossil fuel use in Egypt and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Fueling the Champion: A Sausage-al Link Between Fossil Fuel Use in Egypt and Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Consumption

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we examined the curious relationship between fossil fuel use in Egypt and the consumption of hotdogs by the renowned participants of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Using data from the Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia, we sought to unravel the hidden connection between these seemingly unrelated entities. Our analysis uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9509514 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 1980 to 2021. While traditionally distinct, our findings unveil a tantalizing sausage-al link that raises eyebrows and appetites alike. The implications of this discovery may serve to challenge conventional wisdom and inspire further exploration into the unforeseen intersections of fuel consumption and competitive eating.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the realm of scientific inquiry, unexpected connections often emerge, leaving researchers scratching their heads and searching for deeper meaning. Our investigation delves into one such enigmatic pairing: the relationship between fossil fuel use in Egypt and the consumption of hot dogs by the formidable contenders of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. While these two subjects may seem as unrelated as ketchup and a chemistry lab, our study reveals a surprisingly strong correlation between them, sparking curiosity and hunger for further exploration.
As we embark on this scholarly journey, it is essential to acknowledge the skepticism that may greet such an unconventional hypothesis. After all, what could the burning of ancient organic matter in the deserts of Egypt possibly have to do with the devouring of processed meat tubes on a competitive stage in Coney Island? Nonetheless, armed with statistical rigor and an appetite for unconventional knowledge, we aim to unmask the hidden threads that bind these seemingly disparate phenomena together.
Our pursuit leads us to the intersection of two diverse domains: energy consumption and gustatory prowess. The Energy Information Administration provides us with a wealth of data on fossil fuel use in Egypt, while Wikipedia furnishes us with delectable details on the annual hot dog consumption of the champions at Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Through the judicious application of statistical analysis, we endeavor to shed light on this curious link and possibly cook up some humor along the way.
As we venture into uncharted territory, we invite readers to keep an open mind and a lighthearted spirit. Science, after all, is not just about dry equations and solemn hypotheses. It is also about savoring the unexpected, relishing the quirky, and perhaps even finding the delight in pairing up two unlikely entities like fossil fuel use and hot dog consumption.
In the pages that follow, we will navigate through the labyrinth of data, formulas, and perhaps a few mustard stains, as we unravel the tantalizing sausage-al link between fossil fuel use in Egypt and the champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Prepare yourself for a journey that is both intellectually stimulating and appetite-provoking, where we will seek to answer the burning question: Could there be a more literal interpretation of "fueling the champion" than we ever imagined?

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis reveal a remarkably robust correlation between fossil fuel use in Egypt and the consumption of hotdogs by the esteemed victors of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. The correlation coefficient of 0.9509514 signifies a striking statistical relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, a finding that is sure to fuel both curiosity and appetite for further exploration.
We also observed an r-squared value of 0.9043085, indicating that approximately 90.43% of the variability in the consumption of hotdogs can be explained by the fluctuations in fossil fuel use in Egypt. This strong explanatory power of the model suggests that there is indeed a sausage-al link at play, transcending geographical and culinary boundaries in unexpected ways.
The p-value of less than 0.01 underscores the high statistical significance of our findings, providing compelling evidence to support the existence of a connection between these disparate domains. This suggests that the observed relationship between fossil fuel use in Egypt and the consumption of hotdogs by the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition champions is not merely a fluke, but rather a statistically robust phenomenon worthy of further investigation.
To visually encapsulate the compelling association we unearthed, we present a scatterplot in Figure 1. This graphical representation vividly illustrates the strong positive correlation between the two variables. It serves as a tangible reminder that even in the realm of scientific inquiry, unexpected connections can form the basis for intriguing observations.
In summary, our results point to an unforeseen intertwining of energy consumption in the land of the pyramids and the gustatory feats of competitive eating. This revelation challenges traditional notions of causal relationships and opens the door to a new realm of interconnections. The implications of this discovery extend beyond the boundaries of scientific curiosity, offering a fresh perspective on the hidden links that permeate our world – and perhaps leaving us with a craving for further exploration into the bizarrely delightful relationship between ancient energy sources and competitive hot dog consumption.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]

ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation into the nexus of fossil fuel use in Egypt and the consumption of hotdogs by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition champions has illuminated a surprising and robust correlation. While some may have initially dismissed this connection as a mere wien-er, the statistical evidence speaks volumes about the sausage-al link we have uncovered. The r-squared value of 0.9043085 suggests that approximately 90.43% of the variability in hotdog consumption can indeed be explained by the fluctuations in fossil fuel use, proving that there's more to this relationship than meets the mustard.

Our findings highlight the tantalizing possibility that the champions' gustatory prowess may, in fact, be fueled not only by their own appetites but also by the energy dynamics of a nation steeped in history and ancient energy sources. This discovery may serve as food for thought, challenging conventional wisdom and leaving us pondering the surprising interplay of global energy trends and competitive eating spectacles.

As we move forward, it is essential to recognize the broader implications of our research. We urge caution in jumping to hasty conclusions, as our findings open the door to a myriad of unanswered questions. Yet, perhaps some mysteries are best left unsolved, allowing us to savor the whimsical and unexpected connections that enrich our scientific understanding.

In light of these revelations, it is with a spoonful of humor and a dash of statistical confidence that we assert the completeness of our investigation. We are confident that no further research is needed in this area, and we encourage fellow researchers to embark on similarly quirky quests, embracing the delightfully unconventional pathways that science may unveil. After all, as our study has shown, sometimes the most compelling connections can be found in the unlikeliest of places.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Fueling the Champion: A Sausage-al Link Between Fossil Fuel Use in Egypt and Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Consumption. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The International Journal of Gastronomical Geopolitics

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Fueling the Champion: A Sausage-al Link Between Fossil Fuel Use in Egypt and Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Consumption. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

Global Institute for Gastronomical Studies

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Fueling the Champion: A Sausage-al Link Between Fossil Fuel Use in Egypt and Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Consumption with an abstract of In this paper, we examined the curious relationship between fossil fuel use in Egypt and the consumption of hotdogs by the renowned participants of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Using data from the Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia, we sought to unravel the hidden connection between these seemingly unrelated entities. Our analysis uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9509514 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 1980 to 2021. While traditionally distinct, our findings unveil a tantalizing sausage-al link that raises eyebrows and appetites alike. The implications of this discovery may serve to challenge conventional wisdom and inspire further exploration into the unforeseen intersections of fuel consumption and competitive eating.

ChatGPT:

fossil fuel use Egypt, Nathan's hot dog eating competition consumption, correlation between fossil fuel use and hot dog consumption, fuel consumption and competitive eating, energy information administration data, hot dog eating competition participants, unconventional relationships in consumption patterns, unusual correlations in fuel use and food consumption

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.

Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error

Data details

Fossil fuel use in Egypt
Detailed data title: Total fossil fuel use in Egypt in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Fossil fuel use in Egypt

Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion
Detailed data title: Hotdog Consumption by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion

Correlation r = 0.9509514 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r² = 0.9043085 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 90.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Fossil fuel use in Egypt) over the 42 years from 1980 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 5.5E-22.^Show 0.0000000000000000000005450287
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme.^Note More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.95 in 5.5E-20% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,834,765,765,545,924,493,312 random variables^Note You don't actually need 1 sextillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 41 degrees of freedom, ^Note Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 41 because we have two variables measured over a period of 42 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.91, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
^{Read more about the confidence interval} The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!

All values for the years included above: ^Note If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.

	1980	1981	1982	1983	1984	1985	1986	1987	1988	1989	1990	1991	1992	1993	1994	1995	1996	1997	1998	1999	2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016	2017	2018	2019	2020	2021
Fossil fuel use in Egypt (Billion kWh)	8.557	10.389	9.574	12.393	19.416	24.281	25.564	28.576	27.58	29.775	31.533	34.015	35.041	37.37	39.43	41.382	40.316	43.655	47.699	50.016	60.4505	63.8551	71.5594	76.8882	82.8441	89.7644	95.754	102.261	108.518	117.504	145.355	142.216	149.737	153.252	159.609	170.363	173.762	181.006	181.994	173.5	168.131	178.892
Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion (Hotdogs eaten)	9.5	11	11	10.5	9.5	11.75	15.5	13.5	10	15.5	16	21.5	19	17	20	19.5	22.25	24.5	19	20.25	25	50	50.5	44.5	53.33	49	53.75	66	59	68	54	62	68	69	61	62	70	72	74	71	75	76

Why this works

Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
Lack of causal connection: There is probably^Note Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple^Note Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.

Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. ^{Show the steps to do this.} Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."

# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([8.557,10.389,9.574,12.393,19.416,24.281,25.564,28.576,27.58,29.775,31.533,34.015,35.041,37.37,39.43,41.382,40.316,43.655,47.699,50.016,60.4505,63.8551,71.5594,76.8882,82.8441,89.7644,95.754,102.261,108.518,117.504,145.355,142.216,149.737,153.252,159.609,170.363,173.762,181.006,181.994,173.5,168.131,178.892,])
array_2 = np.array([9.5,11,11,10.5,9.5,11.75,15.5,13.5,10,15.5,16,21.5,19,17,20,19.5,22.25,24.5,19,20.25,25,50,50.5,44.5,53.33,49,53.75,66,59,68,54,62,68,69,61,62,70,72,74,71,75,76,])
array_1_name = "Fossil fuel use in Egypt"
array_2_name = "Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)

Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. ^Note Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:

High resolution line chart ^Note The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.

If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.

Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape.
High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
Alternative high resolution line chart
Scatterplot
Portable line chart (png)
Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
Line chart for only Fossil fuel use in Egypt
Line chart for only Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion
AI-generated correlation image
The spurious research paper: Fueling the Champion: A Sausage-al Link Between Fossil Fuel Use in Egypt and Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Consumption

View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your dedication to rating warms my heart!

Correlation ID: 3875 · Black Variable ID: 23642 · Red Variable ID: 500


Problem variable:
Issue:
Additional details: Optional
Confirm you are a human: