about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,857 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Austin and the second variable is Gasoline pumped in Serbia.  The chart goes from 2006 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As air pollution in Austin decreased, the local hipsters found they no longer needed to rely on artisanal, hand-crafted, organic gasoline from Serbia to fuel their vintage airstream trailers. This sudden drop in demand for obscure foreign gasoline put a cap on the need for gasoline pumped in Serbia, leading to a decrease in its production and distribution.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ A photo-realistic image ] Generate an image of a serene landscape in Austin with clear blue skies, vibrant green fields, and birds of various species soaring freely, their wings outstretched, catching the sunlight. The birds migrate across the sky towards Serbia, forming a dramatic and harmonious chorus of chirping, creating a breathtaking display against the pollution-free scenery. The eco-friendly gas station pumps gleam in the sunlight, surrounded by a flock of birds, as they stand as a symbol of the successful transition to cleaner fuel. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Austin and Gasoline pumped in Serbia. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Futuristic Realistic Macabre Macabre A photo-realistic image
ChatGPT: A photo-realistic image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Austin and Gasoline pumped in Serbia, in the following situation: Because as air pollution in Austin decreased, the respiratory health of birds improved, leading them to migrate to Serbia in search of cleaner air. Once in Serbia, the birds formed a union and demanded eco-friendly gasoline, prompting gas stations to switch to more sustainable fuel options. So, a breath of fresh air in one place led to happier chirps and cleaner pumps across the globe!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Austin, the sky clears as pollution decreases, and the birds soar freely, their feathers gleaming in the sunlight. As they migrate to Serbia, they gather in a chorus of chirping, creating a stunning sight against the backdrop of a beautiful, pollution-free landscape. At the gas stations, the pumps stand glistening in the sunlight, now filled with eco-friendly gasoline, as the birds gather around, celebrating their successful demand for cleaner fuel.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A photo-realistic image ] and depicting this scene: In Austin, the sky clears as pollution decreases, and the birds soar freely, their feathers gleaming in the sunlight. As they migrate to Serbia, they gather in a chorus of chirping, creating a stunning sight against the backdrop of a beautiful, pollution-free landscape. At the gas stations, the pumps stand glistening in the sunlight, now filled with eco-friendly gasoline, as the birds gather around, celebrating their successful demand for cleaner fuel. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ A photo-realistic image ] Generate an image of a serene landscape in Austin with clear blue skies, vibrant green fields, and birds of various species soaring freely, their wings outstretched, catching the sunlight. The birds migrate across the sky towards Serbia, forming a dramatic and harmonious chorus of chirping, creating a breathtaking display against the pollution-free scenery. The eco-friendly gas station pumps gleam in the sunlight, surrounded by a flock of birds, as they stand as a symbol of the successful transition to cleaner fuel.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Air pollution in Austin caused Gasoline pumped in Serbia to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Fuming Connections: Uncovering the Surprising Relationship Between Air Pollution in Austin and Gasoline Consumption in Serbia

The Journal of Transcontinental Air Quality and Automotive Epidemiology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Austin and Gasoline pumped in Serbia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8905197 and p < 0.01 for 2006 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Fuming Connections: Uncovering the Surprising Relationship Between Air Pollution in Austin and Gasoline Consumption in Serbia

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the previously unexplored link between air pollution levels in Austin, Texas, and gasoline consumption in the distant realm of Serbia. By utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, our research team applied rigorous statistical methods to analyze the correlation between these seemingly disparate factors. To our astonishment, a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8905197 and a p-value of less than 0.01 emerged, spanning the interval from 2006 to 2021. The findings not only contribute to the understanding of global air quality dynamics but also serve as a potent reminder of the interconnectedness of the world—even in the most unexpected and fuming ways.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Austin and Gasoline pumped in Serbia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fuming Connections: Uncovering the Surprising Relationship Between Air Pollution in Austin and Gasoline Consumption in Serbia

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the previously unexplored link between air pollution levels in Austin, Texas, and gasoline consumption in the distant realm of Serbia. By utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, our research team applied rigorous statistical methods to analyze the correlation between these seemingly disparate factors. To our astonishment, a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8905197 and a p-value of less than 0.01 emerged, spanning the interval from 2006 to 2021. The findings not only contribute to the understanding of global air quality dynamics but also serve as a potent reminder of the interconnectedness of the world—even in the most unexpected and fuming ways.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

As the world becomes increasingly interconnected, it is imperative to uncover the often surprising and unconventional relationships that underpin global phenomena. In this context, our study seeks to shed light on the unexpected ties between air pollution levels in Austin, Texas, and gasoline consumption in the distant land of Serbia. While these two seemingly disparate variables may appear to have little in common at first glance, the fuming connections we have unveiled defy conventional wisdom and offer a fresh perspective on the intricate web of global environmental and economic interactions.

Air pollution is a pressing concern in urban areas across the globe, and Austin, Texas, is no exception. With its burgeoning population and rapid urbanization, the city has encountered challenges in mitigating air pollution levels, drawing attention to the need for innovative approaches to address this complex issue. On the other side of the globe, Serbia has grappled with its own set of challenges, including fluctuations in gasoline consumption influenced by diverse economic and geopolitical factors. By scrutinizing these seemingly unrelated phenomena, our research has unearthed a surprising harmony underlying the fumes and fuels that pervade our modern world.

The linkage between air pollution in Austin and gasoline consumption in Serbia may seem as elusive as a stealthy plume of exhaust, yet our investigation has not only revealed a robust statistical association but also provided a glimpse into the intricate dance of global interconnectedness. As we embark on this journey of discovery, we invite readers to join us in unraveling the enigmatic interplay of pollutants and petrol, knowing that truth often lies in the most unexpected and fuming places.

Our research endeavors to underscore the importance of understanding the broader implications of seemingly disparate variables and to underscore the need for interdisciplinary perspectives in addressing the complex challenges that confront our interconnected world. As we delve into the intricacies of this unconventional relationship, we aim to ignite a spark of curiosity and illuminate the path to uncovering the unexpected connections that permeate our global tapestry. Through this lens of inquiry, we can gain a deeper appreciation for the harmonious symphony of atmospheric and economic forces, even when they manifest in the most unexpected and fuming ways.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Austin and Gasoline pumped in Serbia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fuming Connections: Uncovering the Surprising Relationship Between Air Pollution in Austin and Gasoline Consumption in Serbia

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the previously unexplored link between air pollution levels in Austin, Texas, and gasoline consumption in the distant realm of Serbia. By utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, our research team applied rigorous statistical methods to analyze the correlation between these seemingly disparate factors. To our astonishment, a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8905197 and a p-value of less than 0.01 emerged, spanning the interval from 2006 to 2021. The findings not only contribute to the understanding of global air quality dynamics but also serve as a potent reminder of the interconnectedness of the world—even in the most unexpected and fuming ways.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the world becomes increasingly interconnected, it is imperative to uncover the often surprising and unconventional relationships that underpin global phenomena. In this context, our study seeks to shed light on the unexpected ties between air pollution levels in Austin, Texas, and gasoline consumption in the distant land of Serbia. While these two seemingly disparate variables may appear to have little in common at first glance, the fuming connections we have unveiled defy conventional wisdom and offer a fresh perspective on the intricate web of global environmental and economic interactions.
Air pollution is a pressing concern in urban areas across the globe, and Austin, Texas, is no exception. With its burgeoning population and rapid urbanization, the city has encountered challenges in mitigating air pollution levels, drawing attention to the need for innovative approaches to address this complex issue. On the other side of the globe, Serbia has grappled with its own set of challenges, including fluctuations in gasoline consumption influenced by diverse economic and geopolitical factors. By scrutinizing these seemingly unrelated phenomena, our research has unearthed a surprising harmony underlying the fumes and fuels that pervade our modern world.
The linkage between air pollution in Austin and gasoline consumption in Serbia may seem as elusive as a stealthy plume of exhaust, yet our investigation has not only revealed a robust statistical association but also provided a glimpse into the intricate dance of global interconnectedness. As we embark on this journey of discovery, we invite readers to join us in unraveling the enigmatic interplay of pollutants and petrol, knowing that truth often lies in the most unexpected and fuming places.
Our research endeavors to underscore the importance of understanding the broader implications of seemingly disparate variables and to underscore the need for interdisciplinary perspectives in addressing the complex challenges that confront our interconnected world. As we delve into the intricacies of this unconventional relationship, we aim to ignite a spark of curiosity and illuminate the path to uncovering the unexpected connections that permeate our global tapestry. Through this lens of inquiry, we can gain a deeper appreciation for the harmonious symphony of atmospheric and economic forces, even when they manifest in the most unexpected and fuming ways.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Previous research has laid a strong foundation for understanding the complex dynamics of air pollution and its environmental repercussions. Smith et al. (2015) conducted a comprehensive analysis of air quality in urban areas, providing insights into the contributing factors and potential mitigation strategies. Doe (2018) examined the correlation between vehicular emissions and air pollution, shedding light on the pervasive impact of transportation-related pollutants. Jones (2020) delved into the economic ramifications of air pollution, emphasizing the need for integrated policies to address the multifaceted challenges posed by deteriorating air quality.

While these studies offer valuable insights into the intricate web of atmospheric pollutants, our investigation brings forth a surprising revelation that transcends geographical boundaries and conventional research paradigms. In "The Subtle Art of Not Giving a F*ck" by Mark Manson, the author's unconventional approach to personal development may seem unrelated to our research, but much like the unexpected link between air pollution in Austin and gasoline consumption in Serbia, the book challenges preconceived notions and prompts readers to embrace the unexpected.

Expanding our search beyond non-fiction literature, the thematic parallels become even more unorthodox. "The Air He Breathes" by Brittainy C. Cherry and "Fumes of Death" by Evelyn Smith, while seemingly unrelated to environmental economics, subtly interweave themes that resonate with the unforeseen connections we have uncovered.

In the pursuit of a deeper understanding of air pollution and gasoline consumption, our research team went to great lengths - or rather, great TV screens - to broaden our perspective. Watching shows such as "Breaking Bad" and "The Big Bang Theory" not only provided much-needed respite from data analysis but also encapsulated the essence of unexpected correlations and curious interconnectedness - much like our own fuming discoveries.

As we integrate these diverse sources into our discussion, we open the door to a more comprehensive understanding of the nuanced relationships that shape our world. In doing so, we invite readers to join us in embracing the quirks, curiosities, and unexpected synchronicities that underpin our research and the world at large.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Austin and Gasoline pumped in Serbia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2006 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fuming Connections: Uncovering the Surprising Relationship Between Air Pollution in Austin and Gasoline Consumption in Serbia

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the previously unexplored link between air pollution levels in Austin, Texas, and gasoline consumption in the distant realm of Serbia. By utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, our research team applied rigorous statistical methods to analyze the correlation between these seemingly disparate factors. To our astonishment, a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8905197 and a p-value of less than 0.01 emerged, spanning the interval from 2006 to 2021. The findings not only contribute to the understanding of global air quality dynamics but also serve as a potent reminder of the interconnectedness of the world—even in the most unexpected and fuming ways.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the world becomes increasingly interconnected, it is imperative to uncover the often surprising and unconventional relationships that underpin global phenomena. In this context, our study seeks to shed light on the unexpected ties between air pollution levels in Austin, Texas, and gasoline consumption in the distant land of Serbia. While these two seemingly disparate variables may appear to have little in common at first glance, the fuming connections we have unveiled defy conventional wisdom and offer a fresh perspective on the intricate web of global environmental and economic interactions.
Air pollution is a pressing concern in urban areas across the globe, and Austin, Texas, is no exception. With its burgeoning population and rapid urbanization, the city has encountered challenges in mitigating air pollution levels, drawing attention to the need for innovative approaches to address this complex issue. On the other side of the globe, Serbia has grappled with its own set of challenges, including fluctuations in gasoline consumption influenced by diverse economic and geopolitical factors. By scrutinizing these seemingly unrelated phenomena, our research has unearthed a surprising harmony underlying the fumes and fuels that pervade our modern world.
The linkage between air pollution in Austin and gasoline consumption in Serbia may seem as elusive as a stealthy plume of exhaust, yet our investigation has not only revealed a robust statistical association but also provided a glimpse into the intricate dance of global interconnectedness. As we embark on this journey of discovery, we invite readers to join us in unraveling the enigmatic interplay of pollutants and petrol, knowing that truth often lies in the most unexpected and fuming places.
Our research endeavors to underscore the importance of understanding the broader implications of seemingly disparate variables and to underscore the need for interdisciplinary perspectives in addressing the complex challenges that confront our interconnected world. As we delve into the intricacies of this unconventional relationship, we aim to ignite a spark of curiosity and illuminate the path to uncovering the unexpected connections that permeate our global tapestry. Through this lens of inquiry, we can gain a deeper appreciation for the harmonious symphony of atmospheric and economic forces, even when they manifest in the most unexpected and fuming ways.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the tantalizing connection between air pollution levels in Austin, Texas, and gasoline consumption in Serbia, our research employed a multifaceted approach encompassing data collection, statistical analysis, and a touch of whimsy. The data used in this study were predominantly extracted from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Energy Information Administration (EIA), spanning the years 2006 to 2021.

The first step of our methodology involved meticulously scouring through the virtual labyrinth that is the Internet to collect air pollution and gasoline consumption data. We sifted through countless databases, statistical reports, and EPA publications with the dedication of a connoisseur searching for the perfect vintage. Though not without its challenges, our data collection process was as captivating as a riveting novel, with each click revealing a new piece to the puzzle.

After assembling the data, we set forth to unleash the formidable arsenal of statistical methods upon our treasure trove of information. We harnessed the power of correlation analysis to unveil the hidden threads that tied air pollution in Austin to gasoline consumption in Serbia. Like intrepid explorers navigating uncharted territory, we ventured into the realm of scatterplots and regression models, with the goal of charting the course of an unexpected expedition.

To ensure the robustness of our findings, we performed various sensitivity analyses and cross-validated our results with the scrutiny of an eagle-eyed detective searching for clues. We meticulously scrutinized our statistical models and assumptions, questioning each aspect with the enthusiasm of a detective on the trail of a cunning suspect. This process ensured that our conclusions were as sturdy as a medieval fortress, weathering the scrutiny of peer review and academic interrogation.

Throughout our methodology, we embraced the spirit of inquiry and discovery, recognizing that the most extraordinary revelations often emerge from the unlikeliest of places. By infusing our research process with a blend of diligence and lightheartedness, we hope to convey the sheer delight of unravelling the unexpected connections that permeate our world, even in the fuming midst of air pollution and gasoline consumption.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Austin and Gasoline pumped in Serbia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2006 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.8905197, r-squared of 0.7930254, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fuming Connections: Uncovering the Surprising Relationship Between Air Pollution in Austin and Gasoline Consumption in Serbia

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the previously unexplored link between air pollution levels in Austin, Texas, and gasoline consumption in the distant realm of Serbia. By utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, our research team applied rigorous statistical methods to analyze the correlation between these seemingly disparate factors. To our astonishment, a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8905197 and a p-value of less than 0.01 emerged, spanning the interval from 2006 to 2021. The findings not only contribute to the understanding of global air quality dynamics but also serve as a potent reminder of the interconnectedness of the world—even in the most unexpected and fuming ways.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As the world becomes increasingly interconnected, it is imperative to uncover the often surprising and unconventional relationships that underpin global phenomena. In this context, our study seeks to shed light on the unexpected ties between air pollution levels in Austin, Texas, and gasoline consumption in the distant land of Serbia. While these two seemingly disparate variables may appear to have little in common at first glance, the fuming connections we have unveiled defy conventional wisdom and offer a fresh perspective on the intricate web of global environmental and economic interactions.
Air pollution is a pressing concern in urban areas across the globe, and Austin, Texas, is no exception. With its burgeoning population and rapid urbanization, the city has encountered challenges in mitigating air pollution levels, drawing attention to the need for innovative approaches to address this complex issue. On the other side of the globe, Serbia has grappled with its own set of challenges, including fluctuations in gasoline consumption influenced by diverse economic and geopolitical factors. By scrutinizing these seemingly unrelated phenomena, our research has unearthed a surprising harmony underlying the fumes and fuels that pervade our modern world.
The linkage between air pollution in Austin and gasoline consumption in Serbia may seem as elusive as a stealthy plume of exhaust, yet our investigation has not only revealed a robust statistical association but also provided a glimpse into the intricate dance of global interconnectedness. As we embark on this journey of discovery, we invite readers to join us in unraveling the enigmatic interplay of pollutants and petrol, knowing that truth often lies in the most unexpected and fuming places.
Our research endeavors to underscore the importance of understanding the broader implications of seemingly disparate variables and to underscore the need for interdisciplinary perspectives in addressing the complex challenges that confront our interconnected world. As we delve into the intricacies of this unconventional relationship, we aim to ignite a spark of curiosity and illuminate the path to uncovering the unexpected connections that permeate our global tapestry. Through this lens of inquiry, we can gain a deeper appreciation for the harmonious symphony of atmospheric and economic forces, even when they manifest in the most unexpected and fuming ways.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data collected from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration yielded a surprising revelation. Our examination uncovered a strikingly strong correlation between air pollution levels in Austin, Texas, and gasoline consumption in Serbia. The correlation coefficient of 0.8905197, with an r-squared value of 0.7930254 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicates a significant and robust relationship between these ostensibly unrelated variables.

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts the noteworthy correlation between air pollution in Austin and gasoline consumption in Serbia. As observed from the figure, the points align themselves in such a way that one might believe they were carpooling—a fitting analogy given the subject matter.

The implications of these findings extend beyond a mere statistical association; they serve as a testament to the unforeseen connections that permeate our world. It appears that the fumes wafting through the streets of Austin harmonize with the gasoline guzzling in the byways of Serbia in a manner that defies traditional geographic and atmospheric logic.

In unveiling this unexpected relationship, our research not only enriches the understanding of global air quality dynamics and economic entanglements but also underscores the whimsical and intricate dance of interconnectedness that transcends international boundaries.

The revelation of this curious association serves as a reminder to look beyond the surface and seek the unexpected and fuming connections that underlie the complex tapestry of our intertwined world. The enigmatic interplay of pollutants and petrol continues to fuel our curiosity, inspiring a deeper appreciation for the unforeseen relationships lurking in the atmospheric and economic ethers.

Our investigation, therefore, stands as not only a testament to the surprising correlations within our world but also as a beacon of the uncommon and fuming insights that await those willing to delve into the depths of scientific inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Austin and Gasoline pumped in Serbia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Fuming Connections: Uncovering the Surprising Relationship Between Air Pollution in Austin and Gasoline Consumption in Serbia

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the previously unexplored link between air pollution levels in Austin, Texas, and gasoline consumption in the distant realm of Serbia. By utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, our research team applied rigorous statistical methods to analyze the correlation between these seemingly disparate factors. To our astonishment, a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8905197 and a p-value of less than 0.01 emerged, spanning the interval from 2006 to 2021. The findings not only contribute to the understanding of global air quality dynamics but also serve as a potent reminder of the interconnectedness of the world—even in the most unexpected and fuming ways.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Previous research has laid a strong foundation for understanding the complex dynamics of air pollution and its environmental repercussions. Smith et al. (2015) conducted a comprehensive analysis of air quality in urban areas, providing insights into the contributing factors and potential mitigation strategies. Doe (2018) examined the correlation between vehicular emissions and air pollution, shedding light on the pervasive impact of transportation-related pollutants. Jones (2020) delved into the economic ramifications of air pollution, emphasizing the need for integrated policies to address the multifaceted challenges posed by deteriorating air quality.
While these studies offer valuable insights into the intricate web of atmospheric pollutants, our investigation brings forth a surprising revelation that transcends geographical boundaries and conventional research paradigms. In "The Subtle Art of Not Giving a F*ck" by Mark Manson, the author's unconventional approach to personal development may seem unrelated to our research, but much like the unexpected link between air pollution in Austin and gasoline consumption in Serbia, the book challenges preconceived notions and prompts readers to embrace the unexpected.
Expanding our search beyond non-fiction literature, the thematic parallels become even more unorthodox. "The Air He Breathes" by Brittainy C. Cherry and "Fumes of Death" by Evelyn Smith, while seemingly unrelated to environmental economics, subtly interweave themes that resonate with the unforeseen connections we have uncovered.
In the pursuit of a deeper understanding of air pollution and gasoline consumption, our research team went to great lengths - or rather, great TV screens - to broaden our perspective. Watching shows such as "Breaking Bad" and "The Big Bang Theory" not only provided much-needed respite from data analysis but also encapsulated the essence of unexpected correlations and curious interconnectedness - much like our own fuming discoveries.
As we integrate these diverse sources into our discussion, we open the door to a more comprehensive understanding of the nuanced relationships that shape our world. In doing so, we invite readers to join us in embracing the quirks, curiosities, and unexpected synchronicities that underpin our research and the world at large.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration yielded a surprising revelation. Our examination uncovered a strikingly strong correlation between air pollution levels in Austin, Texas, and gasoline consumption in Serbia. The correlation coefficient of 0.8905197, with an r-squared value of 0.7930254 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicates a significant and robust relationship between these ostensibly unrelated variables.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts the noteworthy correlation between air pollution in Austin and gasoline consumption in Serbia. As observed from the figure, the points align themselves in such a way that one might believe they were carpooling—a fitting analogy given the subject matter.
The implications of these findings extend beyond a mere statistical association; they serve as a testament to the unforeseen connections that permeate our world. It appears that the fumes wafting through the streets of Austin harmonize with the gasoline guzzling in the byways of Serbia in a manner that defies traditional geographic and atmospheric logic.
In unveiling this unexpected relationship, our research not only enriches the understanding of global air quality dynamics and economic entanglements but also underscores the whimsical and intricate dance of interconnectedness that transcends international boundaries.
The revelation of this curious association serves as a reminder to look beyond the surface and seek the unexpected and fuming connections that underlie the complex tapestry of our intertwined world. The enigmatic interplay of pollutants and petrol continues to fuel our curiosity, inspiring a deeper appreciation for the unforeseen relationships lurking in the atmospheric and economic ethers.
Our investigation, therefore, stands as not only a testament to the surprising correlations within our world but also as a beacon of the uncommon and fuming insights that await those willing to delve into the depths of scientific inquiry.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of this study have brought to light a fuming revelation in the realm of air quality and international gasoline consumption. The unexpectedly potent correlation between air pollution in Austin and gasoline consumption in Serbia mirrors the unorthodox connections we encountered in the literature review. While our initial foray into the literature may have seemed lighthearted and tangential, the thematic parallels and unanticipated ties introduced in our discussion prove to be surprisingly prescient.

The strong correlation coefficient of 0.8905197 and the p-value of less than 0.01 not only validate the prior research, but they also add a layer of depth and intrigue to our understanding of atmospheric and economic interactions. Although the thematic resonances with non-academic literature and popular culture may have seemed fanciful at first, they now appear to have foreshadowed the enigmatic relationship between air pollution and gasoline consumption.

During the literature review, Smith et al.'s comprehensive analysis of urban air quality closely echoed the unsuspected correlation we uncovered. Similarly, Doe's exploration of vehicular emissions provided a subtle hint at the interconnectedness of transportation-related pollutants, which seems to reverberate with our findings. The unexpected tie-ins from popular culture and novels, while initially playful and seemingly unrelated, now seem to whimsically underscore the intricate dance of interconnectedness that underpins this research.

Our results not only echo the unexpected connections present in the literature but also serve as a testament to the profound and unforeseen relationships that permeate our globalized world. The scatterplot aligning air pollution in Austin with gasoline consumption in Serbia, as depicted in Figure 1, not only highlights the statistical association but also demonstrates a visual metaphor reminiscent of a whimsical carpooling escapade—albeit one fueled by pollutants and petrol.

In essence, our findings not only validate prior research but also contribute to a deeper understanding of global air quality dynamics and international economic entanglements. As our investigation underscores, the world is indeed a fuming place, teeming with unexpected and interconnected revelations that await those who dive into the depths of scientific inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Austin and Gasoline pumped in Serbia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Fuming Connections: Uncovering the Surprising Relationship Between Air Pollution in Austin and Gasoline Consumption in Serbia

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the previously unexplored link between air pollution levels in Austin, Texas, and gasoline consumption in the distant realm of Serbia. By utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, our research team applied rigorous statistical methods to analyze the correlation between these seemingly disparate factors. To our astonishment, a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8905197 and a p-value of less than 0.01 emerged, spanning the interval from 2006 to 2021. The findings not only contribute to the understanding of global air quality dynamics but also serve as a potent reminder of the interconnectedness of the world—even in the most unexpected and fuming ways.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
As the world becomes increasingly interconnected, it is imperative to uncover the often surprising and unconventional relationships that underpin global phenomena. In this context, our study seeks to shed light on the unexpected ties between air pollution levels in Austin, Texas, and gasoline consumption in the distant land of Serbia. While these two seemingly disparate variables may appear to have little in common at first glance, the fuming connections we have unveiled defy conventional wisdom and offer a fresh perspective on the intricate web of global environmental and economic interactions.
Air pollution is a pressing concern in urban areas across the globe, and Austin, Texas, is no exception. With its burgeoning population and rapid urbanization, the city has encountered challenges in mitigating air pollution levels, drawing attention to the need for innovative approaches to address this complex issue. On the other side of the globe, Serbia has grappled with its own set of challenges, including fluctuations in gasoline consumption influenced by diverse economic and geopolitical factors. By scrutinizing these seemingly unrelated phenomena, our research has unearthed a surprising harmony underlying the fumes and fuels that pervade our modern world.
The linkage between air pollution in Austin and gasoline consumption in Serbia may seem as elusive as a stealthy plume of exhaust, yet our investigation has not only revealed a robust statistical association but also provided a glimpse into the intricate dance of global interconnectedness. As we embark on this journey of discovery, we invite readers to join us in unraveling the enigmatic interplay of pollutants and petrol, knowing that truth often lies in the most unexpected and fuming places.
Our research endeavors to underscore the importance of understanding the broader implications of seemingly disparate variables and to underscore the need for interdisciplinary perspectives in addressing the complex challenges that confront our interconnected world. As we delve into the intricacies of this unconventional relationship, we aim to ignite a spark of curiosity and illuminate the path to uncovering the unexpected connections that permeate our global tapestry. Through this lens of inquiry, we can gain a deeper appreciation for the harmonious symphony of atmospheric and economic forces, even when they manifest in the most unexpected and fuming ways.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration yielded a surprising revelation. Our examination uncovered a strikingly strong correlation between air pollution levels in Austin, Texas, and gasoline consumption in Serbia. The correlation coefficient of 0.8905197, with an r-squared value of 0.7930254 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicates a significant and robust relationship between these ostensibly unrelated variables.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts the noteworthy correlation between air pollution in Austin and gasoline consumption in Serbia. As observed from the figure, the points align themselves in such a way that one might believe they were carpooling—a fitting analogy given the subject matter.
The implications of these findings extend beyond a mere statistical association; they serve as a testament to the unforeseen connections that permeate our world. It appears that the fumes wafting through the streets of Austin harmonize with the gasoline guzzling in the byways of Serbia in a manner that defies traditional geographic and atmospheric logic.
In unveiling this unexpected relationship, our research not only enriches the understanding of global air quality dynamics and economic entanglements but also underscores the whimsical and intricate dance of interconnectedness that transcends international boundaries.
The revelation of this curious association serves as a reminder to look beyond the surface and seek the unexpected and fuming connections that underlie the complex tapestry of our intertwined world. The enigmatic interplay of pollutants and petrol continues to fuel our curiosity, inspiring a deeper appreciation for the unforeseen relationships lurking in the atmospheric and economic ethers.
Our investigation, therefore, stands as not only a testament to the surprising correlations within our world but also as a beacon of the uncommon and fuming insights that await those willing to delve into the depths of scientific inquiry.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has illuminated a fascinating and unexpected correlation between air pollution in Austin and gasoline consumption in Serbia. The robust statistical association between these seemingly disparate variables unveils an intriguing harmony that defies conventional geographic and atmospheric logic. This whimsical dance of interconnectedness underscores the fuming connections that permeate our world, reminding us to look beyond the surface and seek the unexpected relationships lurking in the atmospheric and economic ethers.

As we reflect on the findings of our study, it is impossible to ignore the pun-derful coincidence that the fumes of Austin and the gas consumption in Serbia have come together in such a statistically significant manner. While our research has unveiled the serious connection between these variables, it has also sparked a lighthearted perspective on the unexpected quirks of global interplay.

In light of these findings, it is evident that no further investigation is required in this peculiar area of research. The fuming connections between Austin's air pollution and Serbia's gasoline consumption have been firmly established, leaving no room for doubt or further inquiry. We bid adieu to this charming conundrum with a smile, grateful for the unexpected and fuming journey that has led us to this unusual but enlightening destination.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Fuming Connections: Uncovering the Surprising Relationship Between Air Pollution in Austin and Gasoline Consumption in Serbia. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Transcontinental Air Quality and Automotive Epidemiology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Fuming Connections: Uncovering the Surprising Relationship Between Air Pollution in Austin and Gasoline Consumption in Serbia. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The International Consortium for Atmospheric Veracity Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Fuming Connections: Uncovering the Surprising Relationship Between Air Pollution in Austin and Gasoline Consumption in Serbia with an abstract of This study delves into the previously unexplored link between air pollution levels in Austin, Texas, and gasoline consumption in the distant realm of Serbia. By utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, our research team applied rigorous statistical methods to analyze the correlation between these seemingly disparate factors. To our astonishment, a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8905197 and a p-value of less than 0.01 emerged, spanning the interval from 2006 to 2021. The findings not only contribute to the understanding of global air quality dynamics but also serve as a potent reminder of the interconnectedness of the world—even in the most unexpected and fuming ways.

ChatGPT:

air pollution, gasoline consumption, correlation, air quality, environmental impact, Austin, Texas, Serbia, interconnectedness, statistical analysis

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Austin
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with air quality at 'unhealthy for sensitive groups' or worse in Austin-Round Rock, TX
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Austin

Gasoline pumped in Serbia
Detailed data title: Volume of gasoline pumped consumed in Serbia in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Gasoline pumped in Serbia

Correlation r = 0.8905197 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7930254 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 79.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Gasoline pumped in Serbia) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Austin) over the 16 years from 2006 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.8E-6. 0.0000037675143464062862000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.89 in 0.00038% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 265,427 random variables You don't actually need 265 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 15 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 15 because we have two variables measured over a period of 16 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.71, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Air pollution in Austin (Bad air quality days)9.863012.191783.825141.369862.739733.835622.185791.0958902.739730.2732241.095892.465750.5479450.5464480.273973
Gasoline pumped in Serbia (Million Barrels/Day)25.869714.185513.121312.199111.31110.60999.671999.184369.23119.394689.5589.811869.8709910.09589.277849.74927




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([9.86301,2.19178,3.82514,1.36986,2.73973,3.83562,2.18579,1.09589,0,2.73973,0.273224,1.09589,2.46575,0.547945,0.546448,0.273973,])
array_2 = np.array([25.8697,14.1855,13.1213,12.1991,11.311,10.6099,9.67199,9.18436,9.2311,9.39468,9.558,9.81186,9.87099,10.0958,9.27784,9.74927,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Austin"
array_2_name = "Gasoline pumped in Serbia"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is stellar!


Correlation ID: 3857 · Black Variable ID: 20311 · Red Variable ID: 24887
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0