about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,826 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and the second variable is Google searches for 'i cant even'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The GMO cotton in Arkansas kept dropping sassy remarks like, "You can't pick me out of a lineup!" and "I'm feelin' so fly, I must be ginned cotton!" This led to a surge in people exasperatedly declaring, "I can't even handle this cotton drama!" It seems the situation has been spun into a thread of confusion, leaving everyone in stitches.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Image Generation Prompt: Style: Psychedelic Description: In a surreal dreamscape, a vast cotton field in Arkansas stretches infinitely into the distance. Rows of genetically modified cotton plants, with vibrant, kaleidoscopic patterns and swirling textures, cover the landscape. A subtle mist of glowing, iridescent pheromones emanates from the plants and dances through the air, creating a mesmerizing atmosphere. In the midst of the field, psychedelic insects with translucent wings and neon-colored patterns joyfully respond to the captivating pheromones. Meanwhile, in the surreal town nearby, the glow of computer screens radiates with pulsating, technicolor lights as faceless figures feverishly type 'I can't even' into the Google search bar, sending ripples of vibrant energy through the digital realm. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cutsy art illustration Psychedelic Art nouveau Charcoal Scalar art
ChatGPT: Psychedelic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and Google searches for 'i cant even', in the following situation: Because GMO cotton in Arkansas releases a pheromone that triggers "I can't even" neurons, leading to an increase in Google searches for "I can't even.". Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a vast cotton field in Arkansas, rows of genetically modified cotton plants stretch to the horizon. Amongst the lush green plants, a subtle mist of pheromones emanates, evoking a response from the local insects. In the nearby town, the glow of computer screens illuminates as more and more people frantically type 'I can't even' into the Google search bar, reflecting the trending phenomenon.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Psychedelic ] and depicting this scene: In a vast cotton field in Arkansas, rows of genetically modified cotton plants stretch to the horizon. Amongst the lush green plants, a subtle mist of pheromones emanates, evoking a response from the local insects. In the nearby town, the glow of computer screens illuminates as more and more people frantically type 'I can't even' into the Google search bar, reflecting the trending phenomenon. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Image Generation Prompt: Style: Psychedelic Description: In a surreal dreamscape, a vast cotton field in Arkansas stretches infinitely into the distance. Rows of genetically modified cotton plants, with vibrant, kaleidoscopic patterns and swirling textures, cover the landscape. A subtle mist of glowing, iridescent pheromones emanates from the plants and dances through the air, creating a mesmerizing atmosphere. In the midst of the field, psychedelic insects with translucent wings and neon-colored patterns joyfully respond to the captivating pheromones. Meanwhile, in the surreal town nearby, the glow of computer screens radiates with pulsating, technicolor lights as faceless figures feverishly type 'I can't even' into the Google search bar, sending ripples of vibrant energy through the digital realm.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in cotton in Arkansas caused i cant even (Google searches for 'i cant even') to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
I Can't Even Believe It: The Correlation between GMO Cotton in Arkansas and Google Searches for 'I Can't Even'

The Journal of Agricultural Memetics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from USDA and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8674459 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"I Can't Even Believe It: The Correlation between GMO Cotton in Arkansas and Google Searches for 'I Can't Even'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present the surprising findings of our investigation into the seemingly unrelated realms of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation and the prevalence of the existential expression 'I can't even' in the digital landscape. Utilizing data sourced from the USDA's National Agricultural Statistics Service and Google Trends, we embarked on an unconventional analysis to uncover potential connections between these phenomena. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we discovered a significant correlation between the adoption of GMO cotton in Arkansas and the frequency of "I can't even" Google searches. Our findings reveal a strong positive association, as evidenced by a correlation coefficient of 0.8674459 with a p-value of less than 0.01 over the period spanning from 2004 to 2022. These unexpected results offer a whimsical glimpse into the intricate interplay of agricultural practices and internet culture, shedding light on the potential impact of biotechnological advancements on societal expressions of exasperation. We invite readers to approach this research with a sense of curiosity and humor, as we delve into the peculiar intersection of genetically modified cotton and online musings of exasperation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"I Can't Even Believe It: The Correlation between GMO Cotton in Arkansas and Google Searches for 'I Can't Even'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present the surprising findings of our investigation into the seemingly unrelated realms of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation and the prevalence of the existential expression 'I can't even' in the digital landscape. Utilizing data sourced from the USDA's National Agricultural Statistics Service and Google Trends, we embarked on an unconventional analysis to uncover potential connections between these phenomena. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we discovered a significant correlation between the adoption of GMO cotton in Arkansas and the frequency of "I can't even" Google searches. Our findings reveal a strong positive association, as evidenced by a correlation coefficient of 0.8674459 with a p-value of less than 0.01 over the period spanning from 2004 to 2022. These unexpected results offer a whimsical glimpse into the intricate interplay of agricultural practices and internet culture, shedding light on the potential impact of biotechnological advancements on societal expressions of exasperation. We invite readers to approach this research with a sense of curiosity and humor, as we delve into the peculiar intersection of genetically modified cotton and online musings of exasperation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The intricate web of human behavior and its interconnectedness with various facets of society never ceases to amaze. As researchers, we often find ourselves drawn to unexpected connections and curious correlations, which led us on a journey to explore the enthralling relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation and the popular exclamation, "I can't even." While on the surface, these two phenomena appear to inhabit distinct realms - one rooted in agricultural biotechnology and the other in the digital lexicon of expressive frustration - our investigation uncovered a surprising link that defies conventional expectations.

Now, you might be wondering, "What does cotton have to do with exasperation-induced internet searches?" Indeed, a fair question, but fear not, dear reader, for we are about to unravel the enigmatic bond that intertwines these seemingly disparate subjects. Our research is not only a testament to the joy of discovery but also a testament to the power of data-driven inquiry in uncovering the whimsical and, at times, baffling intersections of human activity.

As we embark on this journey of statistical exploration, we encourage you to keep an open mind and embrace the unexpected, as we embark on a voyage into the uncharted waters where agricultural science and online vernacular converge. Let us delve into the intellectually stimulating yet humorously peculiar realm of our investigation, where cotton and colloquialism collide in a tapestry of statistical correlations and witticisms.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"I Can't Even Believe It: The Correlation between GMO Cotton in Arkansas and Google Searches for 'I Can't Even'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present the surprising findings of our investigation into the seemingly unrelated realms of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation and the prevalence of the existential expression 'I can't even' in the digital landscape. Utilizing data sourced from the USDA's National Agricultural Statistics Service and Google Trends, we embarked on an unconventional analysis to uncover potential connections between these phenomena. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we discovered a significant correlation between the adoption of GMO cotton in Arkansas and the frequency of "I can't even" Google searches. Our findings reveal a strong positive association, as evidenced by a correlation coefficient of 0.8674459 with a p-value of less than 0.01 over the period spanning from 2004 to 2022. These unexpected results offer a whimsical glimpse into the intricate interplay of agricultural practices and internet culture, shedding light on the potential impact of biotechnological advancements on societal expressions of exasperation. We invite readers to approach this research with a sense of curiosity and humor, as we delve into the peculiar intersection of genetically modified cotton and online musings of exasperation.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intricate web of human behavior and its interconnectedness with various facets of society never ceases to amaze. As researchers, we often find ourselves drawn to unexpected connections and curious correlations, which led us on a journey to explore the enthralling relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation and the popular exclamation, "I can't even." While on the surface, these two phenomena appear to inhabit distinct realms - one rooted in agricultural biotechnology and the other in the digital lexicon of expressive frustration - our investigation uncovered a surprising link that defies conventional expectations.
Now, you might be wondering, "What does cotton have to do with exasperation-induced internet searches?" Indeed, a fair question, but fear not, dear reader, for we are about to unravel the enigmatic bond that intertwines these seemingly disparate subjects. Our research is not only a testament to the joy of discovery but also a testament to the power of data-driven inquiry in uncovering the whimsical and, at times, baffling intersections of human activity.
As we embark on this journey of statistical exploration, we encourage you to keep an open mind and embrace the unexpected, as we embark on a voyage into the uncharted waters where agricultural science and online vernacular converge. Let us delve into the intellectually stimulating yet humorously peculiar realm of our investigation, where cotton and colloquialism collide in a tapestry of statistical correlations and witticisms.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Smith et al.," the authors find that genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have been a topic of widespread debate and contention, with proponents touting their potential to enhance crop yields and mitigate environmental damage, while skeptics express concerns about their long-term effects on ecosystems and human health. The utilization of GMOs in agriculture, particularly in cotton cultivation, has elicited both curiosity and apprehension within the scientific community and public discourse at large. Amidst this backdrop of discourse, our investigation takes a curious turn, venturing into the realm of digital exasperation and the internet phenomenon of "I can't even."

The works of Jane Doe offer insights into the modern-day language of exasperation, hinting at a societal shift toward embracing expressions of frustration in a digital landscape that blurs the lines between public and private discourse. As our research transcends the conventional boundaries of agricultural science and internet culture, we take a whimsical departure into the captivating world of pop culture and literature, examining non-fiction titles such as "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan and "The Botany of Desire" by Michael Pollan, which offer compelling perspectives on the intricate relationship between humans and the plant kingdom. On the fictional front, the works of Barbara Kingsolver, particularly "Prodigal Summer" and "Flight Behavior," provide rich narratives interwoven with agricultural themes, offering an unexpected yet fitting backdrop for our exploration.

Amidst the serious scholarly works, we cannot overlook the cultural touchstones that have permeated the digital sphere. Memes such as the "First World Problems" and "This is Fine" dog, though seemingly disparate from our inquiry, underscore the permeation of exasperation as a shared sentiment in online communities, setting the stage for our investigation into the intersection of agricultural practices and internet vernacular.

As our exploration unfolds, we are reminded of the insightful words of Mark Twain, who once remarked, "The reports of my death are greatly exaggerated." In a similar vein, the peculiar correlation we uncover challenges preconceived notions, injecting a sense of levity and intrigue into the discourse surrounding GMO cotton and digital expressions of exasperation. Thus, we invite readers to embark on this journey with an open mind and a willingness to embrace the unexpected, as we delve into the engaging yet lighthearted realm where statistics and humor converge.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"I Can't Even Believe It: The Correlation between GMO Cotton in Arkansas and Google Searches for 'I Can't Even'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present the surprising findings of our investigation into the seemingly unrelated realms of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation and the prevalence of the existential expression 'I can't even' in the digital landscape. Utilizing data sourced from the USDA's National Agricultural Statistics Service and Google Trends, we embarked on an unconventional analysis to uncover potential connections between these phenomena. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we discovered a significant correlation between the adoption of GMO cotton in Arkansas and the frequency of "I can't even" Google searches. Our findings reveal a strong positive association, as evidenced by a correlation coefficient of 0.8674459 with a p-value of less than 0.01 over the period spanning from 2004 to 2022. These unexpected results offer a whimsical glimpse into the intricate interplay of agricultural practices and internet culture, shedding light on the potential impact of biotechnological advancements on societal expressions of exasperation. We invite readers to approach this research with a sense of curiosity and humor, as we delve into the peculiar intersection of genetically modified cotton and online musings of exasperation.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intricate web of human behavior and its interconnectedness with various facets of society never ceases to amaze. As researchers, we often find ourselves drawn to unexpected connections and curious correlations, which led us on a journey to explore the enthralling relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation and the popular exclamation, "I can't even." While on the surface, these two phenomena appear to inhabit distinct realms - one rooted in agricultural biotechnology and the other in the digital lexicon of expressive frustration - our investigation uncovered a surprising link that defies conventional expectations.
Now, you might be wondering, "What does cotton have to do with exasperation-induced internet searches?" Indeed, a fair question, but fear not, dear reader, for we are about to unravel the enigmatic bond that intertwines these seemingly disparate subjects. Our research is not only a testament to the joy of discovery but also a testament to the power of data-driven inquiry in uncovering the whimsical and, at times, baffling intersections of human activity.
As we embark on this journey of statistical exploration, we encourage you to keep an open mind and embrace the unexpected, as we embark on a voyage into the uncharted waters where agricultural science and online vernacular converge. Let us delve into the intellectually stimulating yet humorously peculiar realm of our investigation, where cotton and colloquialism collide in a tapestry of statistical correlations and witticisms.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

The methodology employed in this research was as eclectic as the peculiar connection we set out to explore. Our data collection spanned from 2004 to 2022, capturing a wealth of information from diverse sources, with a primary focus on data from the USDA's National Agricultural Statistics Service and Google Trends. The unique nature of our investigation necessitated a multifaceted approach, blending elements of agricultural analysis and digital trend tracking in a delightful fusion of statistical whimsy.

Firstly, the adoption of genetically modified cotton in Arkansas was meticulously charted, drawing on comprehensive data sourced from the USDA. This involved navigating through the intriguing landscape of cotton cultivation practices, as well as delving into the intricacies of biotechnological advancements that have shaped the agricultural domain. Our team of intrepid researchers dove headfirst into the mosaic of GMO usage, unearthing the nuances that underpin this intriguing facet of modern farming.

Simultaneously, the digital realm beckoned with enigmatic allure, prompting us to turn to Google Trends for insights into the frequency of "I can't even" searches. This venture into the ephemeral musings of internet denizens revealed a captivating tapestry of digital expressions, with our team unraveling the mysteries of exasperation-induced keystrokes and mouse clicks. The dynamic nature of Google Trends provided a treasure trove of data, allowing us to trace the ebbs and flows of online exasperation over the years with a blend of fascination and amusement.

The crux of our methodology lay in the fusion of these disparate datasets, a process that demanded deft statistical acrobatics to discern meaningful patterns from the cacophony of information. Employing advanced statistical techniques, including correlation analysis and time series modeling, we sought to unearth the potential relationship between the adoption of GMO cotton in Arkansas and the prevalence of "I can't even" searches. Our statistical foray wove a captivating narrative of numerical interplay, shedding light on the unexpected harmony between agricultural innovation and online exasperation.

It is important to note that while our methodology may have bordered on the whimsical at times, the rigor and precision of our statistical analyses remained steadfast, grounding our findings in empirical authenticity. Through this methodological medley, we endeavored to capture the essence of our perplexing research subject, infusing our inquiry with a dash of scholarly intrigue and a hint of irreverent charm.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8674459, r-squared of 0.7524625, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"I Can't Even Believe It: The Correlation between GMO Cotton in Arkansas and Google Searches for 'I Can't Even'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present the surprising findings of our investigation into the seemingly unrelated realms of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation and the prevalence of the existential expression 'I can't even' in the digital landscape. Utilizing data sourced from the USDA's National Agricultural Statistics Service and Google Trends, we embarked on an unconventional analysis to uncover potential connections between these phenomena. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we discovered a significant correlation between the adoption of GMO cotton in Arkansas and the frequency of "I can't even" Google searches. Our findings reveal a strong positive association, as evidenced by a correlation coefficient of 0.8674459 with a p-value of less than 0.01 over the period spanning from 2004 to 2022. These unexpected results offer a whimsical glimpse into the intricate interplay of agricultural practices and internet culture, shedding light on the potential impact of biotechnological advancements on societal expressions of exasperation. We invite readers to approach this research with a sense of curiosity and humor, as we delve into the peculiar intersection of genetically modified cotton and online musings of exasperation.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intricate web of human behavior and its interconnectedness with various facets of society never ceases to amaze. As researchers, we often find ourselves drawn to unexpected connections and curious correlations, which led us on a journey to explore the enthralling relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation and the popular exclamation, "I can't even." While on the surface, these two phenomena appear to inhabit distinct realms - one rooted in agricultural biotechnology and the other in the digital lexicon of expressive frustration - our investigation uncovered a surprising link that defies conventional expectations.
Now, you might be wondering, "What does cotton have to do with exasperation-induced internet searches?" Indeed, a fair question, but fear not, dear reader, for we are about to unravel the enigmatic bond that intertwines these seemingly disparate subjects. Our research is not only a testament to the joy of discovery but also a testament to the power of data-driven inquiry in uncovering the whimsical and, at times, baffling intersections of human activity.
As we embark on this journey of statistical exploration, we encourage you to keep an open mind and embrace the unexpected, as we embark on a voyage into the uncharted waters where agricultural science and online vernacular converge. Let us delve into the intellectually stimulating yet humorously peculiar realm of our investigation, where cotton and colloquialism collide in a tapestry of statistical correlations and witticisms.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The data analysis revealed a surprising and robust connection between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in Arkansas and the frequency of Google searches for the expression "I can't even". Our findings unveiled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8674459 and an r-squared of 0.7524625, indicating a strong positive association between these seemingly divergent domains. The p-value of less than 0.01 further substantiates the statistical significance of the observed relationship, affirming that this connection is not merely a fluke or a statistical anomaly.

In a delightful twist of fate, our research indicates that as the adoption of GMO cotton increased over time, so did the occurrence of "I can't even" searches on Google. This unforeseen correlation challenges traditional paradigms and beckons researchers to contemplate the intricate nuances of human expression and its unexpected ties to agricultural practices.

Figure 1 displays a scatterplot that visually portrays the compelling correlation between the prevalence of GMO cotton and the frequency of "I can't even" searches. This graph serves as an aesthetically pleasing testament to the intriguing synergy between two seemingly unrelated phenomena, illustrating how statistical analysis can reveal the hidden threads that weave together the tapestry of human behavior and technological advancement.

The unanticipated nature of our findings adds a whimsical dimension to the scientific discourse, urging scholars to approach our results with a sense of marvel and curiosity. The humorously unexpected connection between GMO cotton in Arkansas and expressions of exasperation on the internet serves as a reminder that the labyrinth of human behavior often leads us down whimsical and surprising paths. Our study invites fellow researchers to embrace the amusing and thought-provoking nature of statistical exploration and to appreciate the delightful caprice of our findings.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"I Can't Even Believe It: The Correlation between GMO Cotton in Arkansas and Google Searches for 'I Can't Even'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present the surprising findings of our investigation into the seemingly unrelated realms of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation and the prevalence of the existential expression 'I can't even' in the digital landscape. Utilizing data sourced from the USDA's National Agricultural Statistics Service and Google Trends, we embarked on an unconventional analysis to uncover potential connections between these phenomena. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we discovered a significant correlation between the adoption of GMO cotton in Arkansas and the frequency of "I can't even" Google searches. Our findings reveal a strong positive association, as evidenced by a correlation coefficient of 0.8674459 with a p-value of less than 0.01 over the period spanning from 2004 to 2022. These unexpected results offer a whimsical glimpse into the intricate interplay of agricultural practices and internet culture, shedding light on the potential impact of biotechnological advancements on societal expressions of exasperation. We invite readers to approach this research with a sense of curiosity and humor, as we delve into the peculiar intersection of genetically modified cotton and online musings of exasperation.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al.," the authors find that genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have been a topic of widespread debate and contention, with proponents touting their potential to enhance crop yields and mitigate environmental damage, while skeptics express concerns about their long-term effects on ecosystems and human health. The utilization of GMOs in agriculture, particularly in cotton cultivation, has elicited both curiosity and apprehension within the scientific community and public discourse at large. Amidst this backdrop of discourse, our investigation takes a curious turn, venturing into the realm of digital exasperation and the internet phenomenon of "I can't even."
The works of Jane Doe offer insights into the modern-day language of exasperation, hinting at a societal shift toward embracing expressions of frustration in a digital landscape that blurs the lines between public and private discourse. As our research transcends the conventional boundaries of agricultural science and internet culture, we take a whimsical departure into the captivating world of pop culture and literature, examining non-fiction titles such as "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan and "The Botany of Desire" by Michael Pollan, which offer compelling perspectives on the intricate relationship between humans and the plant kingdom. On the fictional front, the works of Barbara Kingsolver, particularly "Prodigal Summer" and "Flight Behavior," provide rich narratives interwoven with agricultural themes, offering an unexpected yet fitting backdrop for our exploration.
Amidst the serious scholarly works, we cannot overlook the cultural touchstones that have permeated the digital sphere. Memes such as the "First World Problems" and "This is Fine" dog, though seemingly disparate from our inquiry, underscore the permeation of exasperation as a shared sentiment in online communities, setting the stage for our investigation into the intersection of agricultural practices and internet vernacular.
As our exploration unfolds, we are reminded of the insightful words of Mark Twain, who once remarked, "The reports of my death are greatly exaggerated." In a similar vein, the peculiar correlation we uncover challenges preconceived notions, injecting a sense of levity and intrigue into the discourse surrounding GMO cotton and digital expressions of exasperation. Thus, we invite readers to embark on this journey with an open mind and a willingness to embrace the unexpected, as we delve into the engaging yet lighthearted realm where statistics and humor converge.

[[RESULTS]]
The data analysis revealed a surprising and robust connection between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in Arkansas and the frequency of Google searches for the expression "I can't even". Our findings unveiled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8674459 and an r-squared of 0.7524625, indicating a strong positive association between these seemingly divergent domains. The p-value of less than 0.01 further substantiates the statistical significance of the observed relationship, affirming that this connection is not merely a fluke or a statistical anomaly.
In a delightful twist of fate, our research indicates that as the adoption of GMO cotton increased over time, so did the occurrence of "I can't even" searches on Google. This unforeseen correlation challenges traditional paradigms and beckons researchers to contemplate the intricate nuances of human expression and its unexpected ties to agricultural practices.
Figure 1 displays a scatterplot that visually portrays the compelling correlation between the prevalence of GMO cotton and the frequency of "I can't even" searches. This graph serves as an aesthetically pleasing testament to the intriguing synergy between two seemingly unrelated phenomena, illustrating how statistical analysis can reveal the hidden threads that weave together the tapestry of human behavior and technological advancement.
The unanticipated nature of our findings adds a whimsical dimension to the scientific discourse, urging scholars to approach our results with a sense of marvel and curiosity. The humorously unexpected connection between GMO cotton in Arkansas and expressions of exasperation on the internet serves as a reminder that the labyrinth of human behavior often leads us down whimsical and surprising paths. Our study invites fellow researchers to embrace the amusing and thought-provoking nature of statistical exploration and to appreciate the delightful caprice of our findings.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our study illuminates a fascinating correlation between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in Arkansas and the frequency of Google searches for the expression "I can't even". The strong positive association we observed lends credence to the notion that the proliferation of GMO cotton has had an unforeseen impact on the digital landscape's lexicon of exasperation. Our findings are consonant with prior research that has explored unexpected connections between seemingly disparate phenomena, reminiscent of the intricate relationships portrayed in Barbara Kingsolver's narratives. Just as her characters grapple with unexpected bonds and connections, our study underscores the nuanced interplay between agricultural innovation and the digital expression of exasperation.

Our investigation, while rooted in rigorous statistical analysis, ventures into whimsical territory as it unravels the unexpected threads linking GMO cotton and internet vernacular. The surprising nature of our results echoes Mark Twain's sentiment about the exaggeration of reports, exposing the unanticipated intricacies that underpin seemingly unrelated facets of human existence. As we embrace the peculiar correlation we uncovered, we are reminded of the delightful humor and levity found in the convergence of statistical exploration and unexpected findings, reminiscent of the lighthearted humor in the "First World Problems" meme.

Our research aligns with the contemporary discourse on GMOs, transcending the conventional boundaries of agricultural science to shed light on the multifaceted impact of biotechnological advancements. We urge fellow scholars to approach our findings with a blend of curiosity and amusement, for our study invites a departure from the conventional and an embrace of the capricious and humorous elements inherent in statistical analysis. Just as Michael Pollan's works illuminate the fascinating intricacies of human-plant relationships, our findings offer a playful glimpse into the interconnectedness of agricultural practices and digital expressions. Embracing the unexpected, we invite readers to join us in exploring the delightful convergence of GMO cotton in Arkansas and the ubiquitous refrain of "I can't even" in the digital sphere.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"I Can't Even Believe It: The Correlation between GMO Cotton in Arkansas and Google Searches for 'I Can't Even'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present the surprising findings of our investigation into the seemingly unrelated realms of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation and the prevalence of the existential expression 'I can't even' in the digital landscape. Utilizing data sourced from the USDA's National Agricultural Statistics Service and Google Trends, we embarked on an unconventional analysis to uncover potential connections between these phenomena. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we discovered a significant correlation between the adoption of GMO cotton in Arkansas and the frequency of "I can't even" Google searches. Our findings reveal a strong positive association, as evidenced by a correlation coefficient of 0.8674459 with a p-value of less than 0.01 over the period spanning from 2004 to 2022. These unexpected results offer a whimsical glimpse into the intricate interplay of agricultural practices and internet culture, shedding light on the potential impact of biotechnological advancements on societal expressions of exasperation. We invite readers to approach this research with a sense of curiosity and humor, as we delve into the peculiar intersection of genetically modified cotton and online musings of exasperation.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intricate web of human behavior and its interconnectedness with various facets of society never ceases to amaze. As researchers, we often find ourselves drawn to unexpected connections and curious correlations, which led us on a journey to explore the enthralling relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation and the popular exclamation, "I can't even." While on the surface, these two phenomena appear to inhabit distinct realms - one rooted in agricultural biotechnology and the other in the digital lexicon of expressive frustration - our investigation uncovered a surprising link that defies conventional expectations.
Now, you might be wondering, "What does cotton have to do with exasperation-induced internet searches?" Indeed, a fair question, but fear not, dear reader, for we are about to unravel the enigmatic bond that intertwines these seemingly disparate subjects. Our research is not only a testament to the joy of discovery but also a testament to the power of data-driven inquiry in uncovering the whimsical and, at times, baffling intersections of human activity.
As we embark on this journey of statistical exploration, we encourage you to keep an open mind and embrace the unexpected, as we embark on a voyage into the uncharted waters where agricultural science and online vernacular converge. Let us delve into the intellectually stimulating yet humorously peculiar realm of our investigation, where cotton and colloquialism collide in a tapestry of statistical correlations and witticisms.

[[RESULTS]]
The data analysis revealed a surprising and robust connection between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in Arkansas and the frequency of Google searches for the expression "I can't even". Our findings unveiled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8674459 and an r-squared of 0.7524625, indicating a strong positive association between these seemingly divergent domains. The p-value of less than 0.01 further substantiates the statistical significance of the observed relationship, affirming that this connection is not merely a fluke or a statistical anomaly.
In a delightful twist of fate, our research indicates that as the adoption of GMO cotton increased over time, so did the occurrence of "I can't even" searches on Google. This unforeseen correlation challenges traditional paradigms and beckons researchers to contemplate the intricate nuances of human expression and its unexpected ties to agricultural practices.
Figure 1 displays a scatterplot that visually portrays the compelling correlation between the prevalence of GMO cotton and the frequency of "I can't even" searches. This graph serves as an aesthetically pleasing testament to the intriguing synergy between two seemingly unrelated phenomena, illustrating how statistical analysis can reveal the hidden threads that weave together the tapestry of human behavior and technological advancement.
The unanticipated nature of our findings adds a whimsical dimension to the scientific discourse, urging scholars to approach our results with a sense of marvel and curiosity. The humorously unexpected connection between GMO cotton in Arkansas and expressions of exasperation on the internet serves as a reminder that the labyrinth of human behavior often leads us down whimsical and surprising paths. Our study invites fellow researchers to embrace the amusing and thought-provoking nature of statistical exploration and to appreciate the delightful caprice of our findings.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation into the correlation between GMO cotton in Arkansas and Google searches for 'I Can't Even' has resulted in a fascinating discovery that underscores the whimsical and unexpected ways in which human behavior intersects with agricultural practices and digital discourse. The robust positive association we have uncovered, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8674459 and a p-value of less than 0.01, challenges traditional expectations and invites us to ponder the enigmatic relationship between biotechnological advancements and online expressions of exasperation.

As we reflect on the implications of our findings, it becomes apparent that the integration of genetically modified organisms in cotton cultivation has unleashed a wave of exasperation that reverberates in the digital landscape. The increasing prevalence of 'I Can't Even' searches in conjunction with the adoption of GMO cotton serves as a light-hearted yet thought-provoking reflection of how human sentiments manifest and evolve in response to technological and agricultural developments. This unexpected correlation offers a delightful reminder that statistical analyses can yield not only valuable insights but also humorous and intriguing connections that prompt us to approach our research with a sense of wonder and levity.

Furthermore, our study underscores the enchanting unpredictability of data-driven inquiry, as it unveils the rhapsodic dance between seemingly disparate phenomena. It is evident that our findings contribute to the captivating mosaic of interdisciplinary research, emphasizing the importance of maintaining a lighthearted perspective as we unravel the complex fabric of human behavior and societal trends.

In light of these engaging results, it is with a whimsical flourish that we assert no further research is needed in this area. Our findings, while unexpected and amusing, demonstrate a compelling correlation that highlights the delightful caprice of scientific exploration. We trust that future scholars will embrace the mirthful complexity of our results and appreciate the serendipitous revelations that await in the vast expanse of statistical inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited I Can't Even Believe It: The Correlation between GMO Cotton in Arkansas and Google Searches for 'I Can't Even'. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Agricultural Memetics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited I Can't Even Believe It: The Correlation between GMO Cotton in Arkansas and Google Searches for 'I Can't Even'. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Agricultural Innovation and Behavior Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled I Can't Even Believe It: The Correlation between GMO Cotton in Arkansas and Google Searches for 'I Can't Even' with an abstract of In this paper, we present the surprising findings of our investigation into the seemingly unrelated realms of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation and the prevalence of the existential expression 'I can't even' in the digital landscape. Utilizing data sourced from the USDA's National Agricultural Statistics Service and Google Trends, we embarked on an unconventional analysis to uncover potential connections between these phenomena. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we discovered a significant correlation between the adoption of GMO cotton in Arkansas and the frequency of "I can't even" Google searches. Our findings reveal a strong positive association, as evidenced by a correlation coefficient of 0.8674459 with a p-value of less than 0.01 over the period spanning from 2004 to 2022. These unexpected results offer a whimsical glimpse into the intricate interplay of agricultural practices and internet culture, shedding light on the potential impact of biotechnological advancements on societal expressions of exasperation. We invite readers to approach this research with a sense of curiosity and humor, as we delve into the peculiar intersection of genetically modified cotton and online musings of exasperation.

ChatGPT:

GMO cotton, Arkansas, Google searches, "I can't even", correlation, genetically modified organisms, cotton cultivation, USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service, Google Trends, statistical analysis, correlation coefficient, p-value, biotechnological advancements, societal expressions, exasperation, internet culture, agricultural practices

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in cotton in Arkansas
Detailed data title: Percent of cotton planted in Arkansas genetically modified with both Bt and HT
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in cotton in Arkansas

Google searches for 'i cant even'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'i cant even' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'i cant even'

Correlation r = 0.8674459 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7524625 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 75.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'i cant even') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in cotton in Arkansas) over the 19 years from 2004 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.5E-6. 0.0000015163163276716684000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.87 in 0.00015% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 659,493 random variables You don't actually need 659 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 18 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 18 because we have two variables measured over a period of 19 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.68, 0.95 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
GMO use in cotton in Arkansas (GMO cotton %)94969495989798989998999999999999999999
Google searches for 'i cant even' (Rel. search volume)11.83332433.58333234.7537.560.2563.333354.333363.2570.833374.7571.166772.41676355.916764.08336572.0833




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([94,96,94,95,98,97,98,98,99,98,99,99,99,99,99,99,99,99,99,])
array_2 = np.array([11.8333,24,33.5833,32,34.75,37.5,60.25,63.3333,54.3333,63.25,70.8333,74.75,71.1667,72.4167,63,55.9167,64.0833,65,72.0833,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in cotton in Arkansas"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'i cant even'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for shining a light on this correlation!


Correlation ID: 3826 · Black Variable ID: 803 · Red Variable ID: 1525
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0