about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,817 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Paducah, Kentucky and the second variable is Bristol-Myers Squibb's stock price (BMY).  The chart goes from 2002 to 2012, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The decrease in air pollution in Paducah, Kentucky led to a surplus of clean, crisp air. This air, being exceptionally pure and invigorating, somehow found its way to the Bristol-Myers Squibb headquarters. The employees, accustomed to the usual smoggy atmosphere, were unable to concentrate in this newfound oxygen paradise. Productivity plummeted as they couldn't stop themselves from constantly stepping outside for lungfuls of the pristine air. This ultimately led to a decrease in the company's output and profits, causing a ripple effect that drove down the stock price of Bristol-Myers Squibb. Remember, sometimes even the purest intentions can have unforeseen consequences!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ Symbolism ] Generate an image of a calm and serene Paducah, Kentucky with a clear blue sky. Show a gradual decrease in the emission of smoke from vehicles and factories, while the cityscape reflects a sense of cleaner air. Simultaneously, depict the stock price ticker for Bristol-Myers Squibb with a clear downward trend, symbolizing the reduced demand for their allergy medications due to the improved air quality. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Paducah, Kentucky and Bristol-Myers Squibb's stock price (BMY). Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Magic realism Cybernetic art Art nouveau Cubism Symbolism
ChatGPT: Symbolism

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Paducah, Kentucky and Bristol-Myers Squibb's stock price (BMY), in the following situation: Decrease in Air pollution in Paducah, Kentucky caused Bristol-Myers Squibb's stock price to decrease because cleaner air led to less need for their allergy medications, impacting their revenue.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Paducah, Kentucky, the sky clears as fewer vehicles emit smoke, and factories release less pollution into the air. At the same time, the stock price ticker for Bristol-Myers Squibb shows a downward trend, signaling a decrease in their stock price due to reduced demand for their allergy medications resulting from the cleaner air.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Symbolism ] and depicting this scene: In Paducah, Kentucky, the sky clears as fewer vehicles emit smoke, and factories release less pollution into the air. At the same time, the stock price ticker for Bristol-Myers Squibb shows a downward trend, signaling a decrease in their stock price due to reduced demand for their allergy medications resulting from the cleaner air. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ Symbolism ] Generate an image of a calm and serene Paducah, Kentucky with a clear blue sky. Show a gradual decrease in the emission of smoke from vehicles and factories, while the cityscape reflects a sense of cleaner air. Simultaneously, depict the stock price ticker for Bristol-Myers Squibb with a clear downward trend, symbolizing the reduced demand for their allergy medications due to the improved air quality.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Air pollution in Paducah, Kentucky caused Bristol-Myers Squibb's stock price (BMY) to decrease.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Peculiar Pollution: Paducah, Kentucky and the Perplexing Performance of Bristol-Myers Squibb's Stock Price

The Journal of Eccentric Environmental Economics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Paducah, Kentucky and Bristol-Myers Squibb's stock price (BMY). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9670286 and p < 0.01 for 2002 to 2012.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Peculiar Pollution: Paducah, Kentucky and the Perplexing Performance of Bristol-Myers Squibb's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the curious correlation between air pollution in Paducah, Kentucky and the stock price of pharmaceutical giant Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMY). With a touch of whimsy and a dash of data, we set out to unravel the mysterious link between these seemingly disparate entities. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we embark on a journey to investigate this unconventional relationship. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9670286 and a p-value less than 0.01, spanning the years 2002 to 2012. As we unpack this peculiar puzzle, we invite readers to humor our unconventional exploration and join us in deciphering the whimsical world of stock price fluctuations and atmospheric oddities.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Paducah, Kentucky and Bristol-Myers Squibb's stock price (BMY). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Peculiar Pollution: Paducah, Kentucky and the Perplexing Performance of Bristol-Myers Squibb's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the curious correlation between air pollution in Paducah, Kentucky and the stock price of pharmaceutical giant Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMY). With a touch of whimsy and a dash of data, we set out to unravel the mysterious link between these seemingly disparate entities. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we embark on a journey to investigate this unconventional relationship. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9670286 and a p-value less than 0.01, spanning the years 2002 to 2012. As we unpack this peculiar puzzle, we invite readers to humor our unconventional exploration and join us in deciphering the whimsical world of stock price fluctuations and atmospheric oddities.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Through the annals of academic inquiry, there have been countless studies examining the relationship between various environmental factors and stock prices. However, amidst this sea of scholarly discourse, there remains a peculiar and perplexing puzzle yet to be fully elucidated – the correlation between air pollution in Paducah, Kentucky, and the stock price of Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMY). With a blend of scientific rigor and a pinch of whimsy, we venture into this uncharted territory to uncover the enigmatic bond between these seemingly incongruous elements.

As we embark on this unconventional odyssey, we recognize that causation cannot be definitively established solely from correlation. However, the allure of the unknown beckons us to explore the whimsical world of statistical relationships and dabble in the delight of unlikely connections. Our inquiry stems from the recognition that the interplay between environmental variables and stock prices often harbors unforeseen nuances, akin to the surprising outcomes of a fateful chemistry experiment or the unpredictability of a complex mathematical equation.

The backdrop of Paducah, Kentucky, serves as the stage for our investigation. Nestled along the Ohio River, this quaint city has faced its fair share of environmental challenges, yet it also exudes a charm and character that belie its industrial past. Similarly, the stock price of Bristol-Myers Squibb, a stalwart in the pharmaceutical realm, has traversed its own labyrinthine path through the capricious realm of financial markets. As we seek to unearth the connection between the atmospheric intricacies of Paducah and the stock valuation of Bristol-Myers Squibb, we approach our inquiry with an inquisitive spirit and an open mind, ready to sift through the data with diligent ardor and a hint of scientific whimsy.

This exploration is not merely an exercise in statistical analysis; it is an odyssey into the serendipitous symphony of variables, where chemical compositions and stock market fluctuations converge in a harmonious cacophony of numerical musings. With data sourced from the Environmental Protection Agency and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we wield the tools of empirical inquiry to dissect this improbable correlation. Our findings, encapsulated in a correlation coefficient of 0.9670286 and a p-value less than 0.01 from 2002 to 2012, beckon us to unravel the peculiar dance of molecules in the air and the mercurial dance of stock prices on the exchange floor.

Thus, as we lay the groundwork for this scholarly escapade, we invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in navigating this unconventional terrain, where the language of science and the whimsy of statistical inquiry intertwine in a delightful pas de deux. Embracing the quirks and curiosities of disparate disciplines, we endeavor to shed light on the tangled tapestry of environmental influence and financial outcomes, with a scholarly wink and a nod to the capricious nature of academic exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Paducah, Kentucky and Bristol-Myers Squibb's stock price (BMY). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Peculiar Pollution: Paducah, Kentucky and the Perplexing Performance of Bristol-Myers Squibb's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the curious correlation between air pollution in Paducah, Kentucky and the stock price of pharmaceutical giant Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMY). With a touch of whimsy and a dash of data, we set out to unravel the mysterious link between these seemingly disparate entities. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we embark on a journey to investigate this unconventional relationship. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9670286 and a p-value less than 0.01, spanning the years 2002 to 2012. As we unpack this peculiar puzzle, we invite readers to humor our unconventional exploration and join us in deciphering the whimsical world of stock price fluctuations and atmospheric oddities.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Through the annals of academic inquiry, there have been countless studies examining the relationship between various environmental factors and stock prices. However, amidst this sea of scholarly discourse, there remains a peculiar and perplexing puzzle yet to be fully elucidated – the correlation between air pollution in Paducah, Kentucky, and the stock price of Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMY). With a blend of scientific rigor and a pinch of whimsy, we venture into this uncharted territory to uncover the enigmatic bond between these seemingly incongruous elements.
As we embark on this unconventional odyssey, we recognize that causation cannot be definitively established solely from correlation. However, the allure of the unknown beckons us to explore the whimsical world of statistical relationships and dabble in the delight of unlikely connections. Our inquiry stems from the recognition that the interplay between environmental variables and stock prices often harbors unforeseen nuances, akin to the surprising outcomes of a fateful chemistry experiment or the unpredictability of a complex mathematical equation.
The backdrop of Paducah, Kentucky, serves as the stage for our investigation. Nestled along the Ohio River, this quaint city has faced its fair share of environmental challenges, yet it also exudes a charm and character that belie its industrial past. Similarly, the stock price of Bristol-Myers Squibb, a stalwart in the pharmaceutical realm, has traversed its own labyrinthine path through the capricious realm of financial markets. As we seek to unearth the connection between the atmospheric intricacies of Paducah and the stock valuation of Bristol-Myers Squibb, we approach our inquiry with an inquisitive spirit and an open mind, ready to sift through the data with diligent ardor and a hint of scientific whimsy.
This exploration is not merely an exercise in statistical analysis; it is an odyssey into the serendipitous symphony of variables, where chemical compositions and stock market fluctuations converge in a harmonious cacophony of numerical musings. With data sourced from the Environmental Protection Agency and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we wield the tools of empirical inquiry to dissect this improbable correlation. Our findings, encapsulated in a correlation coefficient of 0.9670286 and a p-value less than 0.01 from 2002 to 2012, beckon us to unravel the peculiar dance of molecules in the air and the mercurial dance of stock prices on the exchange floor.
Thus, as we lay the groundwork for this scholarly escapade, we invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in navigating this unconventional terrain, where the language of science and the whimsy of statistical inquiry intertwine in a delightful pas de deux. Embracing the quirks and curiosities of disparate disciplines, we endeavor to shed light on the tangled tapestry of environmental influence and financial outcomes, with a scholarly wink and a nod to the capricious nature of academic exploration.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In the vast expanse of academic literature, researchers have diligently delved into the intricate interplay between environmental factors and stock prices. Smith et al. conducted a comprehensive analysis of air pollution and its potential impact on financial markets, establishing a framework for understanding the subtle complexities of this relationship. Doe's seminal work highlighted the nuanced nature of environmental variables in shaping stock valuations, setting the stage for a deeper exploration of this captivating conundrum. Jones et al. further advanced our understanding by illuminating the intricate dance of atmospheric components and their whimsical influence on the whims of Wall Street.

Turning to non-fiction literature, "The Air We Breathe: Pollution and Financial Markets" by Dr. A. Breathertrends provides a comprehensive overview of the various pollutants that intertwine with stock prices, offering a profound exploration of airborne oddities and market fluctuations. "Market Mysteries: Unraveling the Enigma of Stock Valuations" by Prof. E. Quation introduces a fascinating perspective on the enigmatic connections between environmental variables and financial outcomes, prompting readers to ponder the whimsy of statistical relationships and the unpredictability of market forces.

In the realm of fiction, "The Pill and the Pollution" by A. Pharmalchemist intricately weaves a tale of pharmaceutical intrigue and environmental enigmas, blurring the boundaries between reality and whimsy in a surreal saga of stock price surprises. "The Peculiar Paducah Paradox" by M. Curious explores the inexplicable link between a small town's pollution and a pharmaceutical giant's stock performance, inviting readers on a whimsical journey through the realm of improbable correlations and unforeseen connections.

Observing children's programming, the cartoon "Chemical Capers" and the educational show "Stock Market Adventures" both offer a whimsical lens through which to view the quirky interplay of chemical compositions and financial fluctuations, inspiring young minds to ponder the fantastical fusion of science and economics.

As the literature unfurls its tapestry of scholarly endeavors and imaginative tales, we are reminded of the whimsical nature of academic exploration and the unexpected avenues of inquiry that beckon us to unravel this peculiar puzzle. With a nod to the scholarly musings and a wink to the whimsy of statistical relationships, we embark on our own idiosyncratic expedition into the curious correlation between Paducah's atmosphere and the stock price gyrations of Bristol-Myers Squibb.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Paducah, Kentucky and Bristol-Myers Squibb's stock price (BMY). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) . You used data from 2002 to 2012

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Peculiar Pollution: Paducah, Kentucky and the Perplexing Performance of Bristol-Myers Squibb's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the curious correlation between air pollution in Paducah, Kentucky and the stock price of pharmaceutical giant Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMY). With a touch of whimsy and a dash of data, we set out to unravel the mysterious link between these seemingly disparate entities. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we embark on a journey to investigate this unconventional relationship. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9670286 and a p-value less than 0.01, spanning the years 2002 to 2012. As we unpack this peculiar puzzle, we invite readers to humor our unconventional exploration and join us in deciphering the whimsical world of stock price fluctuations and atmospheric oddities.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Through the annals of academic inquiry, there have been countless studies examining the relationship between various environmental factors and stock prices. However, amidst this sea of scholarly discourse, there remains a peculiar and perplexing puzzle yet to be fully elucidated – the correlation between air pollution in Paducah, Kentucky, and the stock price of Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMY). With a blend of scientific rigor and a pinch of whimsy, we venture into this uncharted territory to uncover the enigmatic bond between these seemingly incongruous elements.
As we embark on this unconventional odyssey, we recognize that causation cannot be definitively established solely from correlation. However, the allure of the unknown beckons us to explore the whimsical world of statistical relationships and dabble in the delight of unlikely connections. Our inquiry stems from the recognition that the interplay between environmental variables and stock prices often harbors unforeseen nuances, akin to the surprising outcomes of a fateful chemistry experiment or the unpredictability of a complex mathematical equation.
The backdrop of Paducah, Kentucky, serves as the stage for our investigation. Nestled along the Ohio River, this quaint city has faced its fair share of environmental challenges, yet it also exudes a charm and character that belie its industrial past. Similarly, the stock price of Bristol-Myers Squibb, a stalwart in the pharmaceutical realm, has traversed its own labyrinthine path through the capricious realm of financial markets. As we seek to unearth the connection between the atmospheric intricacies of Paducah and the stock valuation of Bristol-Myers Squibb, we approach our inquiry with an inquisitive spirit and an open mind, ready to sift through the data with diligent ardor and a hint of scientific whimsy.
This exploration is not merely an exercise in statistical analysis; it is an odyssey into the serendipitous symphony of variables, where chemical compositions and stock market fluctuations converge in a harmonious cacophony of numerical musings. With data sourced from the Environmental Protection Agency and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we wield the tools of empirical inquiry to dissect this improbable correlation. Our findings, encapsulated in a correlation coefficient of 0.9670286 and a p-value less than 0.01 from 2002 to 2012, beckon us to unravel the peculiar dance of molecules in the air and the mercurial dance of stock prices on the exchange floor.
Thus, as we lay the groundwork for this scholarly escapade, we invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in navigating this unconventional terrain, where the language of science and the whimsy of statistical inquiry intertwine in a delightful pas de deux. Embracing the quirks and curiosities of disparate disciplines, we endeavor to shed light on the tangled tapestry of environmental influence and financial outcomes, with a scholarly wink and a nod to the capricious nature of academic exploration.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unearth the curious connection between air pollution in Paducah, Kentucky and the stock price of Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMY), our research embarked on a data-driven endeavor that danced between the realms of empirical analysis and speculative whimsy. Our investigative framework harnessed the prowess of quantitative analysis, statistical inference, and a sprinkle of scientific serendipity to unravel this unprecedented correlation.

Data Collection:
The first step in our methodological caper involved the procurement of air pollution data from Paducah, Kentucky. To achieve this feat, we harnessed the almighty power of the internet, navigating through the digital expanse like intrepid explorers searching for the fabled data treasure. Our primary source of environmental elucidation was the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the oracle of atmospheric revelations and the guardian of pollution minutiae. Through the EPA’s repository of ambient air quality information, we gathered a trove of pollutant data, including but not limited to ozone, fine particulate matter, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen dioxide. It was a treasure hunt fraught with digital perils and informational labyrinths, yet in the end, our data cartographers emerged victorious, clutching their hard-earned pollution bounty from the virtual wilderness.

Stock Price Extravaganza:
Simultaneously, our intrepid band of researchers set sail in the tempestuous seas of stock market data, aiming to capture the elusive essence of Bristol-Myers Squibb’s stock price fluctuations. We charted our course toward LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), the venerable harbinger of financial insights and the custodian of stock market minutiae. Armed with our statistical sextants and empirical compasses, we navigated the tumultuous waves of market volatility, gathering daily closing stock prices with a fervor that rivaled the antics of adventurers beset by stock market turbulence.

Data Integration and Statistical Jiggery-Pokery:
With our pollution parchment and stock price scrolls in hand, our research team engaged in a merry waltz of data integration, appraising the idiosyncrasies and peculiarities of our disparate data sets. Through the meticulous art of time series analysis, we married the atmospheric cacophony of pollutants with the mercurial dance of stock prices, creating a tango of statistical revelations that would make even the most stoic of mathematicians tap their feet in bemused fascination.

Correlation Calculus:
In order to quantify the enigmatic entwinement between Paducah’s air pollution and BMY’s stock price, we summoned the spectral power of correlation coefficient calculation. Armed with the incantations of Pearson and the spirits of Spearman, we invoked the statistical deities to reveal the degree of association between our two protagonists. Our quantitative incantations unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9670286 – a figure that glimmered with a tantalizing allure, beckoning us further into the labyrinthine intrigue of statistical symbiosis.

Significance Sorcery:
Alongside the correlation conjuring, we conducted a mystical ritual of statistical significance assessment, transcending the ordinary bounds of p-values and hypothesis testing. Through an arcane foray into the whimsy of statistical inference, our findings materialized with a p-value less than 0.01, a resplendent testament to the improbability of our unearthed correlation.

In summary, our methodology sauntered through the misty moors of data collection, pirouetted around the stock market maelstrom, and culminated in a grand symphony of statistical fanfare. This revelatory odyssey, infused with scientific ardor and whimsical wonder, lays the groundwork for our scholarly foray into the captivating conundrum of the Paducah pollution puzzle and Bristol-Myers Squibb’s stock price shake-ups.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Paducah, Kentucky and Bristol-Myers Squibb's stock price (BMY). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) .

For the time period 2002 to 2012, you found a correlation 0.9670286, r-squared of 0.9351443, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Peculiar Pollution: Paducah, Kentucky and the Perplexing Performance of Bristol-Myers Squibb's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the curious correlation between air pollution in Paducah, Kentucky and the stock price of pharmaceutical giant Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMY). With a touch of whimsy and a dash of data, we set out to unravel the mysterious link between these seemingly disparate entities. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we embark on a journey to investigate this unconventional relationship. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9670286 and a p-value less than 0.01, spanning the years 2002 to 2012. As we unpack this peculiar puzzle, we invite readers to humor our unconventional exploration and join us in deciphering the whimsical world of stock price fluctuations and atmospheric oddities.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Through the annals of academic inquiry, there have been countless studies examining the relationship between various environmental factors and stock prices. However, amidst this sea of scholarly discourse, there remains a peculiar and perplexing puzzle yet to be fully elucidated – the correlation between air pollution in Paducah, Kentucky, and the stock price of Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMY). With a blend of scientific rigor and a pinch of whimsy, we venture into this uncharted territory to uncover the enigmatic bond between these seemingly incongruous elements.
As we embark on this unconventional odyssey, we recognize that causation cannot be definitively established solely from correlation. However, the allure of the unknown beckons us to explore the whimsical world of statistical relationships and dabble in the delight of unlikely connections. Our inquiry stems from the recognition that the interplay between environmental variables and stock prices often harbors unforeseen nuances, akin to the surprising outcomes of a fateful chemistry experiment or the unpredictability of a complex mathematical equation.
The backdrop of Paducah, Kentucky, serves as the stage for our investigation. Nestled along the Ohio River, this quaint city has faced its fair share of environmental challenges, yet it also exudes a charm and character that belie its industrial past. Similarly, the stock price of Bristol-Myers Squibb, a stalwart in the pharmaceutical realm, has traversed its own labyrinthine path through the capricious realm of financial markets. As we seek to unearth the connection between the atmospheric intricacies of Paducah and the stock valuation of Bristol-Myers Squibb, we approach our inquiry with an inquisitive spirit and an open mind, ready to sift through the data with diligent ardor and a hint of scientific whimsy.
This exploration is not merely an exercise in statistical analysis; it is an odyssey into the serendipitous symphony of variables, where chemical compositions and stock market fluctuations converge in a harmonious cacophony of numerical musings. With data sourced from the Environmental Protection Agency and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we wield the tools of empirical inquiry to dissect this improbable correlation. Our findings, encapsulated in a correlation coefficient of 0.9670286 and a p-value less than 0.01 from 2002 to 2012, beckon us to unravel the peculiar dance of molecules in the air and the mercurial dance of stock prices on the exchange floor.
Thus, as we lay the groundwork for this scholarly escapade, we invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in navigating this unconventional terrain, where the language of science and the whimsy of statistical inquiry intertwine in a delightful pas de deux. Embracing the quirks and curiosities of disparate disciplines, we endeavor to shed light on the tangled tapestry of environmental influence and financial outcomes, with a scholarly wink and a nod to the capricious nature of academic exploration.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our investigation into the correlation between air pollution in Paducah, Kentucky and the stock price of Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMY) yielded a conundrum wrapped in an enigma, nestled within a puzzle – a correlation coefficient of 0.9670286, an r-squared value of 0.9351443, and a p-value less than 0.01, covering the period from 2002 to 2012.

The correlation coefficient approaching 1 suggests a remarkably strong, nearly linear relationship between the level of air pollution in Paducah and the performance of Bristol-Myers Squibb’s stock. This finding raises eyebrows and inspires a Chuck Norris-level of admiration for the statistical resilience displayed in this data analysis.

Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.9351443 indicates that approximately 93.5% of the variability in BMY stock can be explained by variations in air pollution levels in Paducah. This high r-squared value demonstrates a level of predictability akin to that of impending doom in a B-horror movie – undeniably strong and deeply unsettling.

The p-value of less than 0.01 adds an exclamation point to the significance of our findings, emphasizing that the observed relationship between air pollution in Paducah and Bristol-Myers Squibb's stock price is highly unlikely to have occurred by random chance alone. It’s as if the statistical stars aligned in a cosmic dance, choreographed with an elegance known only to the forces of probability.

Fig. 1 further illustrates the robust correlation between air pollution in Paducah and Bristol-Myers Squibb's stock price, providing a visual representation of this unlikely but striking liaison. It’s as if the scatterplot itself is whispering, "Who knew that smog and stocks could tango so gracefully?"

In summary, our findings illuminate a whimsical and unexpected connection between the atmospheric idiosyncrasies of Paducah, Kentucky and the market performance of Bristol-Myers Squibb. It appears that the air of Paducah, like a mischievous poltergeist, exerts a peculiar influence on the stock price of BMY, leaving researchers and investors alike scratching their heads in delightful bewilderment.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Paducah, Kentucky and Bristol-Myers Squibb's stock price (BMY). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Peculiar Pollution: Paducah, Kentucky and the Perplexing Performance of Bristol-Myers Squibb's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the curious correlation between air pollution in Paducah, Kentucky and the stock price of pharmaceutical giant Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMY). With a touch of whimsy and a dash of data, we set out to unravel the mysterious link between these seemingly disparate entities. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we embark on a journey to investigate this unconventional relationship. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9670286 and a p-value less than 0.01, spanning the years 2002 to 2012. As we unpack this peculiar puzzle, we invite readers to humor our unconventional exploration and join us in deciphering the whimsical world of stock price fluctuations and atmospheric oddities.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In the vast expanse of academic literature, researchers have diligently delved into the intricate interplay between environmental factors and stock prices. Smith et al. conducted a comprehensive analysis of air pollution and its potential impact on financial markets, establishing a framework for understanding the subtle complexities of this relationship. Doe's seminal work highlighted the nuanced nature of environmental variables in shaping stock valuations, setting the stage for a deeper exploration of this captivating conundrum. Jones et al. further advanced our understanding by illuminating the intricate dance of atmospheric components and their whimsical influence on the whims of Wall Street.
Turning to non-fiction literature, "The Air We Breathe: Pollution and Financial Markets" by Dr. A. Breathertrends provides a comprehensive overview of the various pollutants that intertwine with stock prices, offering a profound exploration of airborne oddities and market fluctuations. "Market Mysteries: Unraveling the Enigma of Stock Valuations" by Prof. E. Quation introduces a fascinating perspective on the enigmatic connections between environmental variables and financial outcomes, prompting readers to ponder the whimsy of statistical relationships and the unpredictability of market forces.
In the realm of fiction, "The Pill and the Pollution" by A. Pharmalchemist intricately weaves a tale of pharmaceutical intrigue and environmental enigmas, blurring the boundaries between reality and whimsy in a surreal saga of stock price surprises. "The Peculiar Paducah Paradox" by M. Curious explores the inexplicable link between a small town's pollution and a pharmaceutical giant's stock performance, inviting readers on a whimsical journey through the realm of improbable correlations and unforeseen connections.
Observing children's programming, the cartoon "Chemical Capers" and the educational show "Stock Market Adventures" both offer a whimsical lens through which to view the quirky interplay of chemical compositions and financial fluctuations, inspiring young minds to ponder the fantastical fusion of science and economics.
As the literature unfurls its tapestry of scholarly endeavors and imaginative tales, we are reminded of the whimsical nature of academic exploration and the unexpected avenues of inquiry that beckon us to unravel this peculiar puzzle. With a nod to the scholarly musings and a wink to the whimsy of statistical relationships, we embark on our own idiosyncratic expedition into the curious correlation between Paducah's atmosphere and the stock price gyrations of Bristol-Myers Squibb.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the correlation between air pollution in Paducah, Kentucky and the stock price of Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMY) yielded a conundrum wrapped in an enigma, nestled within a puzzle – a correlation coefficient of 0.9670286, an r-squared value of 0.9351443, and a p-value less than 0.01, covering the period from 2002 to 2012.
The correlation coefficient approaching 1 suggests a remarkably strong, nearly linear relationship between the level of air pollution in Paducah and the performance of Bristol-Myers Squibb’s stock. This finding raises eyebrows and inspires a Chuck Norris-level of admiration for the statistical resilience displayed in this data analysis.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.9351443 indicates that approximately 93.5% of the variability in BMY stock can be explained by variations in air pollution levels in Paducah. This high r-squared value demonstrates a level of predictability akin to that of impending doom in a B-horror movie – undeniably strong and deeply unsettling.
The p-value of less than 0.01 adds an exclamation point to the significance of our findings, emphasizing that the observed relationship between air pollution in Paducah and Bristol-Myers Squibb's stock price is highly unlikely to have occurred by random chance alone. It’s as if the statistical stars aligned in a cosmic dance, choreographed with an elegance known only to the forces of probability.
Fig. 1 further illustrates the robust correlation between air pollution in Paducah and Bristol-Myers Squibb's stock price, providing a visual representation of this unlikely but striking liaison. It’s as if the scatterplot itself is whispering, "Who knew that smog and stocks could tango so gracefully?"
In summary, our findings illuminate a whimsical and unexpected connection between the atmospheric idiosyncrasies of Paducah, Kentucky and the market performance of Bristol-Myers Squibb. It appears that the air of Paducah, like a mischievous poltergeist, exerts a peculiar influence on the stock price of BMY, leaving researchers and investors alike scratching their heads in delightful bewilderment.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]
Our investigation has unearthed an enthralling correlation, akin to a whimsical pas de deux, between the air of Paducah, Kentucky and the fortunes of Bristol-Myers Squibb's stock price. Our results align with previous studies that meticulously laid the groundwork for understanding the enigmatic nexus between environmental whimsy and market caprices. Smith et al.'s comprehensive analysis set the stage for our own foray into this peculiar realm, and we are delighted to report that our findings not only endorsed their framework but also crowned it with a dazzling coronet of statistical significance.

Doe's insightful work on the nuanced nature of environmental variables waltzed hand in hand with our results, as the intricate dance of atmospheric oxygen, nitrogen, and maybe a touch of ozone exhibited a syncopated rhythm that echoed in the undulating trajectory of BMY's stock price. And speaking of dances, Jones et al.'s illumination of atmospheric components seems to have choreographed an ensemble performance with the forces of Wall Street, creating a spectacle of statistical significance that leaves us all in awe.

Our analysis lends credence to the scholarly musings and acclaimed literary works that have teased our curiosity with whimsical whispers and unexpected connections. "The Peculiar Paducah Paradox" by M. Curious and "The Pill and the Pollution" by A. Pharmalchemist may have danced on the edge of whimsy, but our findings suggest that truth is indeed stranger than fiction.

As we peer into the perplexing puzzle of this correlation, it becomes increasingly evident that the air pollution in Paducah possesses a mischievous charm, akin to a sprite oscillating between reality and statistical fancy. The robustness of our correlation coefficient and the r-squared value unveils a predictability that could rival the escapades of Sherlock Holmes – deep, uncanny, and unquestionably spellbinding.

Our results also underscore the statistical sorcery at play, with a p-value less than 0.01 that evokes a sense of awe akin to that experienced by Newton under the falling apple tree. Indeed, the cosmos of statistics seems to have orchestrated a symphony of significance that resonates with the forces of probability.

This unexpected liaison between Paducah's atmospheric aura and the market dance of Bristol-Myers Squibb serves as a whimsical testament to the uncharted territories of statistical exploration. With a nod to the scholarly musings and a wink to the whimsy of statistical relationships, we invite our esteemed readers to revel in the enchanting allure of our findings and join us in embracing the delightful bewilderment that ensues.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Paducah, Kentucky and Bristol-Myers Squibb's stock price (BMY). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Peculiar Pollution: Paducah, Kentucky and the Perplexing Performance of Bristol-Myers Squibb's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the curious correlation between air pollution in Paducah, Kentucky and the stock price of pharmaceutical giant Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMY). With a touch of whimsy and a dash of data, we set out to unravel the mysterious link between these seemingly disparate entities. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we embark on a journey to investigate this unconventional relationship. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9670286 and a p-value less than 0.01, spanning the years 2002 to 2012. As we unpack this peculiar puzzle, we invite readers to humor our unconventional exploration and join us in deciphering the whimsical world of stock price fluctuations and atmospheric oddities.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Through the annals of academic inquiry, there have been countless studies examining the relationship between various environmental factors and stock prices. However, amidst this sea of scholarly discourse, there remains a peculiar and perplexing puzzle yet to be fully elucidated – the correlation between air pollution in Paducah, Kentucky, and the stock price of Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMY). With a blend of scientific rigor and a pinch of whimsy, we venture into this uncharted territory to uncover the enigmatic bond between these seemingly incongruous elements.
As we embark on this unconventional odyssey, we recognize that causation cannot be definitively established solely from correlation. However, the allure of the unknown beckons us to explore the whimsical world of statistical relationships and dabble in the delight of unlikely connections. Our inquiry stems from the recognition that the interplay between environmental variables and stock prices often harbors unforeseen nuances, akin to the surprising outcomes of a fateful chemistry experiment or the unpredictability of a complex mathematical equation.
The backdrop of Paducah, Kentucky, serves as the stage for our investigation. Nestled along the Ohio River, this quaint city has faced its fair share of environmental challenges, yet it also exudes a charm and character that belie its industrial past. Similarly, the stock price of Bristol-Myers Squibb, a stalwart in the pharmaceutical realm, has traversed its own labyrinthine path through the capricious realm of financial markets. As we seek to unearth the connection between the atmospheric intricacies of Paducah and the stock valuation of Bristol-Myers Squibb, we approach our inquiry with an inquisitive spirit and an open mind, ready to sift through the data with diligent ardor and a hint of scientific whimsy.
This exploration is not merely an exercise in statistical analysis; it is an odyssey into the serendipitous symphony of variables, where chemical compositions and stock market fluctuations converge in a harmonious cacophony of numerical musings. With data sourced from the Environmental Protection Agency and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we wield the tools of empirical inquiry to dissect this improbable correlation. Our findings, encapsulated in a correlation coefficient of 0.9670286 and a p-value less than 0.01 from 2002 to 2012, beckon us to unravel the peculiar dance of molecules in the air and the mercurial dance of stock prices on the exchange floor.
Thus, as we lay the groundwork for this scholarly escapade, we invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in navigating this unconventional terrain, where the language of science and the whimsy of statistical inquiry intertwine in a delightful pas de deux. Embracing the quirks and curiosities of disparate disciplines, we endeavor to shed light on the tangled tapestry of environmental influence and financial outcomes, with a scholarly wink and a nod to the capricious nature of academic exploration.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the correlation between air pollution in Paducah, Kentucky and the stock price of Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMY) yielded a conundrum wrapped in an enigma, nestled within a puzzle – a correlation coefficient of 0.9670286, an r-squared value of 0.9351443, and a p-value less than 0.01, covering the period from 2002 to 2012.
The correlation coefficient approaching 1 suggests a remarkably strong, nearly linear relationship between the level of air pollution in Paducah and the performance of Bristol-Myers Squibb’s stock. This finding raises eyebrows and inspires a Chuck Norris-level of admiration for the statistical resilience displayed in this data analysis.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.9351443 indicates that approximately 93.5% of the variability in BMY stock can be explained by variations in air pollution levels in Paducah. This high r-squared value demonstrates a level of predictability akin to that of impending doom in a B-horror movie – undeniably strong and deeply unsettling.
The p-value of less than 0.01 adds an exclamation point to the significance of our findings, emphasizing that the observed relationship between air pollution in Paducah and Bristol-Myers Squibb's stock price is highly unlikely to have occurred by random chance alone. It’s as if the statistical stars aligned in a cosmic dance, choreographed with an elegance known only to the forces of probability.
Fig. 1 further illustrates the robust correlation between air pollution in Paducah and Bristol-Myers Squibb's stock price, providing a visual representation of this unlikely but striking liaison. It’s as if the scatterplot itself is whispering, "Who knew that smog and stocks could tango so gracefully?"
In summary, our findings illuminate a whimsical and unexpected connection between the atmospheric idiosyncrasies of Paducah, Kentucky and the market performance of Bristol-Myers Squibb. It appears that the air of Paducah, like a mischievous poltergeist, exerts a peculiar influence on the stock price of BMY, leaving researchers and investors alike scratching their heads in delightful bewilderment.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our foray into the curious correlation between air pollution in Paducah, Kentucky, and the stock price of Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMY) has unveiled a fascinating tale of statistical intrigue. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9670286 and the r-squared value of 0.9351443 speak to a relationship as strong as the gravitational pull of a black hole – not something to be taken lightly. The p-value less than 0.01 adds an extra flair of significance, akin to stumbling upon a unicorn in the realm of statistical probabilities.

Our findings highlight the unforeseen dance of variables, as if the molecules in Paducah's air and the fluctuations of BMY stock engage in a whimsical waltz, defying conventional expectations. As we navigate this peculiar terrain of research, it becomes clear that the whimsy of statistical exploration knows no bounds, weaving an elaborate tapestry of unexpected connections and unlikely liaisons.

Yet, as we don our academic hats and bid adieu to this playful foray, we assert with utmost confidence that no further research is needed in this realm – for we have unraveled the mystique of Paducah's pollution and its uncanny influence on BMY's stock. It seems that in the realm of statistical whimsy, this unlikely bond has been thoroughly, and dare we say delightfully, unveiled. And with that, we bid farewell to this enigmatic tango of smog and stocks, leaving it to history as a curious footnote in the annals of academic quirkiness.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Peculiar Pollution: Paducah, Kentucky and the Perplexing Performance of Bristol-Myers Squibb's Stock Price. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Eccentric Environmental Economics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Peculiar Pollution: Paducah, Kentucky and the Perplexing Performance of Bristol-Myers Squibb's Stock Price. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Quirky Environmental Economics and Pharmaceutical Finance Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Peculiar Pollution: Paducah, Kentucky and the Perplexing Performance of Bristol-Myers Squibb's Stock Price with an abstract of In this paper, we delve into the curious correlation between air pollution in Paducah, Kentucky and the stock price of pharmaceutical giant Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMY). With a touch of whimsy and a dash of data, we set out to unravel the mysterious link between these seemingly disparate entities. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we embark on a journey to investigate this unconventional relationship. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9670286 and a p-value less than 0.01, spanning the years 2002 to 2012. As we unpack this peculiar puzzle, we invite readers to humor our unconventional exploration and join us in deciphering the whimsical world of stock price fluctuations and atmospheric oddities.

ChatGPT:

Paducah, Kentucky, air pollution, Bristol-Myers Squibb stock price, correlation, Environmental Protection Agency, LSEG Analytics, Refinitiv, correlation coefficient, p-value, stock price fluctuations, atmospheric oddities

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Paducah, Kentucky
Detailed data title: Percentage of days 'unhealthy' or worse air quality in Paducah, KY-IL
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Paducah, Kentucky

Bristol-Myers Squibb's stock price (BMY)
Detailed data title: Opening price of Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) on the first trading day of the year
Source: LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv)
Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function

See what else correlates with Bristol-Myers Squibb's stock price (BMY)

Correlation r = 0.9670286 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9351443 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 93.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Bristol-Myers Squibb's stock price (BMY)) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Paducah, Kentucky) over the 11 years from 2002 through 2012.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.2E-6. 0.0000011978490128150460000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.97 in 0.00012% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 834,830 random variables You don't actually need 834 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.87, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20022003200420052006200720082009201020112012
Air pollution in Paducah, Kentucky (Bad air quality days)3.571430.27397300.273973000000.2739731.36986
Bristol-Myers Squibb's stock price (BMY) (Stock price)50.4723.1628.925.5723.2526.2126.523.2525.4126.6535.33




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([3.57143,0.273973,0,0.273973,0,0,0,0,0,0.273973,1.36986,])
array_2 = np.array([50.47,23.16,28.9,25.57,23.25,26.21,26.5,23.25,25.41,26.65,35.33,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Paducah, Kentucky"
array_2_name = "Bristol-Myers Squibb's stock price (BMY)"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation inspection deserves a standing ovation!


Correlation ID: 3817 · Black Variable ID: 21039 · Red Variable ID: 1616
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0