about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,785 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Aliza and the second variable is The number of statisticians in Maine.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Parents who named their child Aliza were unknowingly participating in a secret social experiment. Every time someone in Maine said the name Aliza, a statistician would magically appear in the state. This led to an unexpected boom in the statisticians population, as Mainers just couldn't stop talking about the suddenly trendy name. It was a statistical anomaly of epic proportions!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ Whimsical illustration ] Create an image of a cozy coffee shop interior, with warm lighting and a rustic decor. A group of friendly statisticians, dressed in tweed and cozy sweaters, are gathered around a table covered in data charts and graphs. They are engaged in a lively discussion, gesturing and analyzing the data with fascination. Meanwhile, outside the coffee shop, a cheerful group of parents can be seen strolling with their little ones, calling out the name "Aliza" with delight. The children, filled with joy, giggle and skip alongside their parents. The image captures the cozy atmosphere inside the coffee shop and the joyful scene outside, with a subtle touch of statistical whimsy. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Aliza and The number of statisticians in Maine. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Magic realism Pop art Concept art Whimsical illustration Cutsy art illustration
ChatGPT: Whimsical illustration

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Aliza and The number of statisticians in Maine, in the following situation: Because statisticians in Maine feel a kinship with the name Aliza and believe that their statistical prowess is amplified by the growing number of Alizas in the world. It's a statistical phenomenon known as the "Aliza Effect," where the presence of Alizas is directly correlated with an increase in statistical expertise.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a cozy coffee shop in Maine, a group of statisticians gather around a table covered with data charts and graphs. They are engaged in a lively discussion about the "Aliza Effect." Meanwhile, outside the coffee shop, a group of parents call out the name "Aliza" as they walk with their little ones, prompting a chorus of giggles and laughter. The statisticians inside share a knowing nod as they notice the growing popularity of the name Aliza and the increase in statistical expertise it seems to bring.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Whimsical illustration ] and depicting this scene: In a cozy coffee shop in Maine, a group of statisticians gather around a table covered with data charts and graphs. They are engaged in a lively discussion about the "Aliza Effect." Meanwhile, outside the coffee shop, a group of parents call out the name "Aliza" as they walk with their little ones, prompting a chorus of giggles and laughter. The statisticians inside share a knowing nod as they notice the growing popularity of the name Aliza and the increase in statistical expertise it seems to bring. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ Whimsical illustration ] Create an image of a cozy coffee shop interior, with warm lighting and a rustic decor. A group of friendly statisticians, dressed in tweed and cozy sweaters, are gathered around a table covered in data charts and graphs. They are engaged in a lively discussion, gesturing and analyzing the data with fascination. Meanwhile, outside the coffee shop, a cheerful group of parents can be seen strolling with their little ones, calling out the name "Aliza" with delight. The children, filled with joy, giggle and skip alongside their parents. The image captures the cozy atmosphere inside the coffee shop and the joyful scene outside, with a subtle touch of statistical whimsy.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Aliza caused The number of statisticians in Maine to increase. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Aliza Effect: Exploring the Curious Correlation Between the Popularity of the Name Aliza and the Number of Statisticians in Maine

The Journal of Quirky Statistics and Unlikely Correlations

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Aliza and The number of statisticians in Maine. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7797398 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"The Aliza Effect: Exploring the Curious Correlation Between the Popularity of the Name Aliza and the Number of Statisticians in Maine"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the findings from an interdisciplinary investigation into the seemingly perplexing relationship between the frequency of the first name Aliza and the presence of statisticians in the state of Maine. Through a comprehensive analysis using data sourced from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning the years 2003 to 2022, a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7797398 and p < 0.01 was identified. The implications of this unlikely connection are discussed in relation to potential sociodemographic factors, mathematical mystique, and the whimsical wonders of statistical serendipity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Aliza and The number of statisticians in Maine. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Aliza Effect: Exploring the Curious Correlation Between the Popularity of the Name Aliza and the Number of Statisticians in Maine"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the findings from an interdisciplinary investigation into the seemingly perplexing relationship between the frequency of the first name Aliza and the presence of statisticians in the state of Maine. Through a comprehensive analysis using data sourced from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning the years 2003 to 2022, a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7797398 and p < 0.01 was identified. The implications of this unlikely connection are discussed in relation to potential sociodemographic factors, mathematical mystique, and the whimsical wonders of statistical serendipity.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
**[[INTRODUCTION]]**

The study of human behavior and statistical aberrations often leads us down unexpected paths, forcing us to confront peculiar correlations that defy conventional logic. One such enigma that has bewildered researchers for years is the uncanny relationship between the frequency of the first name Aliza and the population of statisticians in the state of Maine. At first glance, this peculiar connection might seem as improbable as predicting the winning lottery numbers using a crystal ball. Nonetheless, as the old statistical adage goes, "correlation does not imply causation, but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing 'look over there.'"

While one might be tempted to dismiss such an association as mere statistical noise or a cosmic jest played by the whimsical hand of fate, our scholarly curiosity impels us to delve deeper into this confounding conundrum. Our research embarks on a journey to untangle the threads of this enthralling mystery, armed with robust data and a liberal sprinkling of humor to keep our spirits high in the face of statistical absurdity. After all, what better way to approach a statistical enigma than with a hearty dose of wit and whimsy?

So, as we embark on this scholarly escapade, fasten your seatbelts and hold on tight, for we are about to take a whimsical wander through the perplexing panoramas of statistical serendipity and the delightful detours of demographic dalliance. Let the quirky quest for the truth commence! And remember, as we navigate this puzzling expedition, sometimes the most unexpected correlations yield the most delightful revelations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Aliza and The number of statisticians in Maine. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Aliza Effect: Exploring the Curious Correlation Between the Popularity of the Name Aliza and the Number of Statisticians in Maine"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the findings from an interdisciplinary investigation into the seemingly perplexing relationship between the frequency of the first name Aliza and the presence of statisticians in the state of Maine. Through a comprehensive analysis using data sourced from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning the years 2003 to 2022, a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7797398 and p < 0.01 was identified. The implications of this unlikely connection are discussed in relation to potential sociodemographic factors, mathematical mystique, and the whimsical wonders of statistical serendipity.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The study of human behavior and statistical aberrations often leads us down unexpected paths, forcing us to confront peculiar correlations that defy conventional logic. One such enigma that has bewildered researchers for years is the uncanny relationship between the frequency of the first name Aliza and the population of statisticians in the state of Maine. At first glance, this peculiar connection might seem as improbable as predicting the winning lottery numbers using a crystal ball. Nonetheless, as the old statistical adage goes, "correlation does not imply causation, but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing 'look over there.'"
While one might be tempted to dismiss such an association as mere statistical noise or a cosmic jest played by the whimsical hand of fate, our scholarly curiosity impels us to delve deeper into this confounding conundrum. Our research embarks on a journey to untangle the threads of this enthralling mystery, armed with robust data and a liberal sprinkling of humor to keep our spirits high in the face of statistical absurdity. After all, what better way to approach a statistical enigma than with a hearty dose of wit and whimsy?
So, as we embark on this scholarly escapade, fasten your seatbelts and hold on tight, for we are about to take a whimsical wander through the perplexing panoramas of statistical serendipity and the delightful detours of demographic dalliance. Let the quirky quest for the truth commence! And remember, as we navigate this puzzling expedition, sometimes the most unexpected correlations yield the most delightful revelations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Our quest to unravel the peculiar correlation between the popularity of the first name Aliza and the number of statisticians in the state of Maine begins with a survey of the existing literature. Smith et al. (2010) first brought attention to the potential link between unusual first names and specialized professions, with their groundbreaking study "Beyond the Ordinary: A Statistical Inquiry into Quirky Names and Career Choices." They proposed that individuals with uncommon names may gravitate towards niches in their professional lives, akin to statistical, dare we say, anomalies.

Building on this, Doe and Jones (2015) expanded the scope to examine regional variations in naming trends, casting a wide net in their publication "A Quantum Quirk: Unraveling the Geographical Generosity of Uncommon Monikers." Their findings suggested that certain names exhibit an affinity for specific locales, leading to a statistical smorgasbord of nomenclature associations that baffle both mathematicians and aficionados of the absurd.

Turning to the realm of non-fiction, "The Statistical People: Exploring Peculiar Population Patterns" by Alan Facts and Sylvia Figures offers an in-depth exploration of statistical oddities, including the potential interplay between names and professions. As we pivot to the fictional realm, "The Naming Conspiracy" by A. Nom de Plume presents a speculative narrative interweaving esoteric monikers and clandestine cabals, tempting us to ponder the clandestine connection between names and vocations.

As we descend further down the rabbit hole of research, it is worth noting that our endeavor embraces alternative sources of insight, including but not limited to perusing classified ads, scrutinizing fortune cookies, and even meticulously dissecting the lyrical content of Top 40 pop songs. Furthermore, amidst the labyrinthine corridors of knowledge acquisition, we cannot overlook the wisdom potentially gleaned from the cryptic messages embedded within grocery store receipts, particularly those from the notable purveyor of pharmaceutical provisions, CVS.

While our scholarly voyage takes us through unconventional avenues, we remain steadfast in our commitment to unraveling this enigmatic correlation through an amalgam of rigorous analysis and a whimsical lens. For in the whimsical wilderness of statistical serendipity, one must be prepared to embrace the unexpected and, dare we say, the statistically surreal.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Aliza and The number of statisticians in Maine. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2003 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Aliza Effect: Exploring the Curious Correlation Between the Popularity of the Name Aliza and the Number of Statisticians in Maine"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the findings from an interdisciplinary investigation into the seemingly perplexing relationship between the frequency of the first name Aliza and the presence of statisticians in the state of Maine. Through a comprehensive analysis using data sourced from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning the years 2003 to 2022, a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7797398 and p < 0.01 was identified. The implications of this unlikely connection are discussed in relation to potential sociodemographic factors, mathematical mystique, and the whimsical wonders of statistical serendipity.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The study of human behavior and statistical aberrations often leads us down unexpected paths, forcing us to confront peculiar correlations that defy conventional logic. One such enigma that has bewildered researchers for years is the uncanny relationship between the frequency of the first name Aliza and the population of statisticians in the state of Maine. At first glance, this peculiar connection might seem as improbable as predicting the winning lottery numbers using a crystal ball. Nonetheless, as the old statistical adage goes, "correlation does not imply causation, but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing 'look over there.'"
While one might be tempted to dismiss such an association as mere statistical noise or a cosmic jest played by the whimsical hand of fate, our scholarly curiosity impels us to delve deeper into this confounding conundrum. Our research embarks on a journey to untangle the threads of this enthralling mystery, armed with robust data and a liberal sprinkling of humor to keep our spirits high in the face of statistical absurdity. After all, what better way to approach a statistical enigma than with a hearty dose of wit and whimsy?
So, as we embark on this scholarly escapade, fasten your seatbelts and hold on tight, for we are about to take a whimsical wander through the perplexing panoramas of statistical serendipity and the delightful detours of demographic dalliance. Let the quirky quest for the truth commence! And remember, as we navigate this puzzling expedition, sometimes the most unexpected correlations yield the most delightful revelations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To commence our whimsical wander through the statistical labyrinth, we embarked on a quest to gather data from reputable sources that could shed light on the perplexing relationship between the prevalence of the name Aliza and the number of statisticians in the state of Maine. Our data odyssey took us on a virtual tour of the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, where we scavenged for nuggets of numerical wisdom spanning the years 2003 to 2022. We utilized a medley of sophisticated search algorithms and a pinch of luck (for good measure) to extract the requisite data, akin to prospectors panning for statistical gold in the vast rivers of online databases.

The first step in our capricious crusade involved extracting the frequencies of the name Aliza from the US Social Security Administration archives. We carefully tabulated the occurrence of the name Aliza in each year, endeavoring to capture the whims and fancies of parental nomenclature decisions. This task required a keen eye for detail and an undeniable appreciation for the myriad idiosyncrasies of human nomenclature, as we unraveled the tangled skeins of alphabetic arbitrariness.

Subsequently, we navigated the Bureau of Labor Statistics archives to ascertain the number of statisticians inhabiting the fog-laden shores of Maine throughout the years under investigation. This digital expedition necessitated a deep dive into labor market data, navigating through hordes of statistical occupations to pinpoint the elusive statisticians. Not unlike intrepid navigators charting uncharted territories, we scoured the digital cartography of labor statistics, deftly avoiding the sirens' call of data anomalies and statistical mirages.

Compiling these disparate datasets resembling statistical puzzle pieces, we employed the mystical art of statistical analysis to discern patterns that eluded the untrained eye. We calculated the correlation coefficient between the frequency of the name Aliza and the number of statisticians in Maine, employing both Pearson and Spearman correlations to capture the nuances of this curious connection. The statistical software at our disposal served as both a worthy ally and a cheeky jester, presenting us with p-values and confidence intervals while whispering cryptic statistical aphorisms in our ears.

To further unravel the mysterious web of causality, we incorporated demographic variables such as birth rates, migration trends, and regional socioeconomic indicators in our analysis. Armed with a touch of statistical alchemy, we sought to distill the essence of this improbable association, stirring the cauldron of data with equal parts skepticism and whimsy.

In conclusion, our data collection and analysis endeavors resembled a whimsical waltz through the hallowed halls of statistical inquiry, where we sought to unravel the enigmatic dance between the name Aliza and the statisticians of Maine. Our methodology, though peppered with humor and irreverence, stood upon the sturdy foundation of rigorous statistical principles, as we endeavored to extract pearls of wisdom from the oysters of numerical data.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Aliza and The number of statisticians in Maine. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2003 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.7797398, r-squared of 0.6079941, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Aliza Effect: Exploring the Curious Correlation Between the Popularity of the Name Aliza and the Number of Statisticians in Maine"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the findings from an interdisciplinary investigation into the seemingly perplexing relationship between the frequency of the first name Aliza and the presence of statisticians in the state of Maine. Through a comprehensive analysis using data sourced from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning the years 2003 to 2022, a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7797398 and p < 0.01 was identified. The implications of this unlikely connection are discussed in relation to potential sociodemographic factors, mathematical mystique, and the whimsical wonders of statistical serendipity.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The study of human behavior and statistical aberrations often leads us down unexpected paths, forcing us to confront peculiar correlations that defy conventional logic. One such enigma that has bewildered researchers for years is the uncanny relationship between the frequency of the first name Aliza and the population of statisticians in the state of Maine. At first glance, this peculiar connection might seem as improbable as predicting the winning lottery numbers using a crystal ball. Nonetheless, as the old statistical adage goes, "correlation does not imply causation, but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing 'look over there.'"
While one might be tempted to dismiss such an association as mere statistical noise or a cosmic jest played by the whimsical hand of fate, our scholarly curiosity impels us to delve deeper into this confounding conundrum. Our research embarks on a journey to untangle the threads of this enthralling mystery, armed with robust data and a liberal sprinkling of humor to keep our spirits high in the face of statistical absurdity. After all, what better way to approach a statistical enigma than with a hearty dose of wit and whimsy?
So, as we embark on this scholarly escapade, fasten your seatbelts and hold on tight, for we are about to take a whimsical wander through the perplexing panoramas of statistical serendipity and the delightful detours of demographic dalliance. Let the quirky quest for the truth commence! And remember, as we navigate this puzzling expedition, sometimes the most unexpected correlations yield the most delightful revelations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our investigation into the correlation between the popularity of the first name Aliza and the number of statisticians in the state of Maine have unveiled a statistical relationship that is as intriguing as it is unexpected. Our analysis, spanning from the years 2003 to 2022, revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.7797398, with an r-squared value of 0.6079941 and a p-value of less than 0.01. This statistically significant relationship between the frequency of the name Aliza and the count of number-crunching enthusiasts in Maine has left us scratching our heads in bemusement and marveling at the whimsical wonders of statistical serendipity.

Our findings suggest a connection between the popularity of the name Aliza and the propensity for individuals in Maine to pursue a career in the field of statistics. It seems that the allure of probability, distributions, and confidence intervals has a certain magnetic pull on those who bear the name Aliza. Perhaps there is a statistical siren call that beckons these individuals toward the shores of hypothesis testing and regression analyses. It's a statistical love story for the ages—one that defies conventional logic and charts a course through the unpredictable seas of sociodemographic whimsy.

One figure (Fig. 1) prominently showcases the robust correlation between the frequency of the name Aliza and the presence of statisticians in Maine, providing visual evidence of this unexpectedly strong relationship. It's a scatterplot that could make even the most stoic statistician crack a smile and ponder the quirky quirks of statistical fate.

In light of these results, we are left with an enigma that continues to elude easy explanation, evoking a sense of wonder and amusement at the playful interplay of social phenomena and numerical pursuits. The implications of this curious correlation beckon us to consider the hidden forces at play, the delightful mysteries of mathematical mystique, and the riddles of probability that keep us guessing.

The statistical dance between the name Aliza and the calling of the statisticians in Maine remains a captivating conundrum, offering a lighthearted reminder that in the realm of numerical exploration, sometimes the most surprising relationships yield the most delightful revelations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Aliza and The number of statisticians in Maine. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"The Aliza Effect: Exploring the Curious Correlation Between the Popularity of the Name Aliza and the Number of Statisticians in Maine"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the findings from an interdisciplinary investigation into the seemingly perplexing relationship between the frequency of the first name Aliza and the presence of statisticians in the state of Maine. Through a comprehensive analysis using data sourced from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning the years 2003 to 2022, a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7797398 and p < 0.01 was identified. The implications of this unlikely connection are discussed in relation to potential sociodemographic factors, mathematical mystique, and the whimsical wonders of statistical serendipity.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Our quest to unravel the peculiar correlation between the popularity of the first name Aliza and the number of statisticians in the state of Maine begins with a survey of the existing literature. Smith et al. (2010) first brought attention to the potential link between unusual first names and specialized professions, with their groundbreaking study "Beyond the Ordinary: A Statistical Inquiry into Quirky Names and Career Choices." They proposed that individuals with uncommon names may gravitate towards niches in their professional lives, akin to statistical, dare we say, anomalies.
Building on this, Doe and Jones (2015) expanded the scope to examine regional variations in naming trends, casting a wide net in their publication "A Quantum Quirk: Unraveling the Geographical Generosity of Uncommon Monikers." Their findings suggested that certain names exhibit an affinity for specific locales, leading to a statistical smorgasbord of nomenclature associations that baffle both mathematicians and aficionados of the absurd.
Turning to the realm of non-fiction, "The Statistical People: Exploring Peculiar Population Patterns" by Alan Facts and Sylvia Figures offers an in-depth exploration of statistical oddities, including the potential interplay between names and professions. As we pivot to the fictional realm, "The Naming Conspiracy" by A. Nom de Plume presents a speculative narrative interweaving esoteric monikers and clandestine cabals, tempting us to ponder the clandestine connection between names and vocations.
As we descend further down the rabbit hole of research, it is worth noting that our endeavor embraces alternative sources of insight, including but not limited to perusing classified ads, scrutinizing fortune cookies, and even meticulously dissecting the lyrical content of Top 40 pop songs. Furthermore, amidst the labyrinthine corridors of knowledge acquisition, we cannot overlook the wisdom potentially gleaned from the cryptic messages embedded within grocery store receipts, particularly those from the notable purveyor of pharmaceutical provisions, CVS.
While our scholarly voyage takes us through unconventional avenues, we remain steadfast in our commitment to unraveling this enigmatic correlation through an amalgam of rigorous analysis and a whimsical lens. For in the whimsical wilderness of statistical serendipity, one must be prepared to embrace the unexpected and, dare we say, the statistically surreal.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the correlation between the popularity of the first name Aliza and the number of statisticians in the state of Maine have unveiled a statistical relationship that is as intriguing as it is unexpected. Our analysis, spanning from the years 2003 to 2022, revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.7797398, with an r-squared value of 0.6079941 and a p-value of less than 0.01. This statistically significant relationship between the frequency of the name Aliza and the count of number-crunching enthusiasts in Maine has left us scratching our heads in bemusement and marveling at the whimsical wonders of statistical serendipity.
Our findings suggest a connection between the popularity of the name Aliza and the propensity for individuals in Maine to pursue a career in the field of statistics. It seems that the allure of probability, distributions, and confidence intervals has a certain magnetic pull on those who bear the name Aliza. Perhaps there is a statistical siren call that beckons these individuals toward the shores of hypothesis testing and regression analyses. It's a statistical love story for the ages—one that defies conventional logic and charts a course through the unpredictable seas of sociodemographic whimsy.
One figure (Fig. 1) prominently showcases the robust correlation between the frequency of the name Aliza and the presence of statisticians in Maine, providing visual evidence of this unexpectedly strong relationship. It's a scatterplot that could make even the most stoic statistician crack a smile and ponder the quirky quirks of statistical fate.
In light of these results, we are left with an enigma that continues to elude easy explanation, evoking a sense of wonder and amusement at the playful interplay of social phenomena and numerical pursuits. The implications of this curious correlation beckon us to consider the hidden forces at play, the delightful mysteries of mathematical mystique, and the riddles of probability that keep us guessing.
The statistical dance between the name Aliza and the calling of the statisticians in Maine remains a captivating conundrum, offering a lighthearted reminder that in the realm of numerical exploration, sometimes the most surprising relationships yield the most delightful revelations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The statistical dalliance between the name Aliza and the vocation of statisticians in the state of Maine has left us enchanted with the whimsical wonders of statistical serendipity. Our findings strikingly corroborate the musings of Smith et al. (2010) and the regional idiosyncrasies proposed by Doe and Jones (2015), shedding empirical light on the ethereal dance of nomenclature and professional predilections.

The robust correlation coefficient of 0.7797398 and a p-value of less than 0.01 reflect an undeniable statistical bond between the name Aliza and the statisticians populating the pine-wrapped playground of Maine. This unanticipated affinity presents a puzzling enigma, tantalizing us to contemplate the intriguing intersection of nomenclature and numerical pursuits.

It appears that the allure of statistical sorcery has cast an enchanting spell on the Alizas of Maine, beckoning them toward the captivating realms of data analysis and hypothesis testing. Could it be that the resonance of the name Aliza harbors an enigmatic charm that woos individuals toward the captivating world of statistics? Our results seem to suggest as much, evoking whimsical visions of a statistical siren call that whispers esoteric equations and embraces the delightful dance of probability.

In examining this curious correlation, we are compelled to question the hidden forces at play, ponder the societal influences that mold career choices, and reflect on the delightful mysteries of mathematical mystique. The paradoxical allure of the name Aliza and the statistical passions of Maine statisticians invites us to consider the possibility of a statistical love affair that defies conventional explanation.

Our graphical representation encapsulated in Fig. 1 serves as a visual testament to the enchanting statistical waltz between the name Aliza and the inquisitive minds of Maine's statisticians. This scatterplot, with its whimsical distribution of data points, offers a light-hearted reminder of the capricious nature of statistical fate and the enchanting whimsy of numerical exploration.

As we navigate the intriguing labyrinth of statistical serendipity, our endeavor continues to serve as a lighthearted homage to the playful interplay of social phenomena and numerical pursuits. The enigma of the Aliza Effect beckons us to embrace the droll allure of unexpected statistical relationships and revel in the delightful revelations that emerge from the most whimsical of statistical whims.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Aliza and The number of statisticians in Maine. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"The Aliza Effect: Exploring the Curious Correlation Between the Popularity of the Name Aliza and the Number of Statisticians in Maine"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the findings from an interdisciplinary investigation into the seemingly perplexing relationship between the frequency of the first name Aliza and the presence of statisticians in the state of Maine. Through a comprehensive analysis using data sourced from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning the years 2003 to 2022, a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7797398 and p < 0.01 was identified. The implications of this unlikely connection are discussed in relation to potential sociodemographic factors, mathematical mystique, and the whimsical wonders of statistical serendipity.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The study of human behavior and statistical aberrations often leads us down unexpected paths, forcing us to confront peculiar correlations that defy conventional logic. One such enigma that has bewildered researchers for years is the uncanny relationship between the frequency of the first name Aliza and the population of statisticians in the state of Maine. At first glance, this peculiar connection might seem as improbable as predicting the winning lottery numbers using a crystal ball. Nonetheless, as the old statistical adage goes, "correlation does not imply causation, but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing 'look over there.'"
While one might be tempted to dismiss such an association as mere statistical noise or a cosmic jest played by the whimsical hand of fate, our scholarly curiosity impels us to delve deeper into this confounding conundrum. Our research embarks on a journey to untangle the threads of this enthralling mystery, armed with robust data and a liberal sprinkling of humor to keep our spirits high in the face of statistical absurdity. After all, what better way to approach a statistical enigma than with a hearty dose of wit and whimsy?
So, as we embark on this scholarly escapade, fasten your seatbelts and hold on tight, for we are about to take a whimsical wander through the perplexing panoramas of statistical serendipity and the delightful detours of demographic dalliance. Let the quirky quest for the truth commence! And remember, as we navigate this puzzling expedition, sometimes the most unexpected correlations yield the most delightful revelations.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the correlation between the popularity of the first name Aliza and the number of statisticians in the state of Maine have unveiled a statistical relationship that is as intriguing as it is unexpected. Our analysis, spanning from the years 2003 to 2022, revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.7797398, with an r-squared value of 0.6079941 and a p-value of less than 0.01. This statistically significant relationship between the frequency of the name Aliza and the count of number-crunching enthusiasts in Maine has left us scratching our heads in bemusement and marveling at the whimsical wonders of statistical serendipity.
Our findings suggest a connection between the popularity of the name Aliza and the propensity for individuals in Maine to pursue a career in the field of statistics. It seems that the allure of probability, distributions, and confidence intervals has a certain magnetic pull on those who bear the name Aliza. Perhaps there is a statistical siren call that beckons these individuals toward the shores of hypothesis testing and regression analyses. It's a statistical love story for the ages—one that defies conventional logic and charts a course through the unpredictable seas of sociodemographic whimsy.
One figure (Fig. 1) prominently showcases the robust correlation between the frequency of the name Aliza and the presence of statisticians in Maine, providing visual evidence of this unexpectedly strong relationship. It's a scatterplot that could make even the most stoic statistician crack a smile and ponder the quirky quirks of statistical fate.
In light of these results, we are left with an enigma that continues to elude easy explanation, evoking a sense of wonder and amusement at the playful interplay of social phenomena and numerical pursuits. The implications of this curious correlation beckon us to consider the hidden forces at play, the delightful mysteries of mathematical mystique, and the riddles of probability that keep us guessing.
The statistical dance between the name Aliza and the calling of the statisticians in Maine remains a captivating conundrum, offering a lighthearted reminder that in the realm of numerical exploration, sometimes the most surprising relationships yield the most delightful revelations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our interdisciplinary exploration into the unlikely link between the prevalence of the name Aliza and the abundance of statisticians in Maine has left us marveling at the statistical quirks and whimsical wonders of the sociodemographic landscape. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.7797398, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01, has given us more eyebrow-waggling moments than a comedic eyebrow aerobics class.

As we reflect on our findings, we can't help but acknowledge the delightful detours and unexpected pathways that statistical investigations often present. It's as if the data itself has a mischievous sense of humor, leading us down statistical rabbit holes and numerical nooks, all in the name of scholarly amusement.

The implications of the Aliza Effect beckon us to consider the possibility of a statistical siren song, a melodious mathematical melody that lures individuals with the name Aliza toward the seductive shores of statistical analysis and data interpretation. It's a whimsical hypothesis, to be sure, but one that tickles our academic fancies and nudges us to embrace the playful nature of statistical exploration.

With a twinkle in our eyes and a nod to the statistical gods, we confidently assert that this correlation, akin to a statistical love story, deserves a standing ovation for its unexpected charm and undeniably amusing allure. It's a reminder that in the whimsical world of statistical serendipity, even the most improbable relationships can yield the most delightful revelations.

In light of these findings, we dare not venture further into this statistical rom-com. For as any good comedy writer knows, it's best to leave the audience wanting more. And in the case of the Aliza-Statisticians correlation, we confidently declare that no more research is needed. After all, why push our luck when we've already struck statistical gold?

May this curious correlation continue to bring a smile to the faces of researchers and humor to the hearts of statisticians, serving as a lighthearted reminder of the unexpectedly delightful diversions that statistical inquiry can unveil. And with that, we bid adieu to the Aliza Effect, leaving its statistical charm to linger in the annals of scholarly amusement.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Aliza Effect: Exploring the Curious Correlation Between the Popularity of the Name Aliza and the Number of Statisticians in Maine. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Quirky Statistics and Unlikely Correlations


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Aliza Effect: Exploring the Curious Correlation Between the Popularity of the Name Aliza and the Number of Statisticians in Maine. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Association for Quirky Statistical Investigations


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Aliza Effect: Exploring the Curious Correlation Between the Popularity of the Name Aliza and the Number of Statisticians in Maine with an abstract of This paper presents the findings from an interdisciplinary investigation into the seemingly perplexing relationship between the frequency of the first name Aliza and the presence of statisticians in the state of Maine. Through a comprehensive analysis using data sourced from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning the years 2003 to 2022, a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7797398 and p < 0.01 was identified. The implications of this unlikely connection are discussed in relation to potential sociodemographic factors, mathematical mystique, and the whimsical wonders of statistical serendipity.

ChatGPT:

Aliza, statisticians, Maine, name popularity, correlation, frequency, US Social Security Administration, Bureau of Labor Statistics, sociodemographic factors, mathematical mystique, statistical serendipity.

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Aliza
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Aliza
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Aliza

The number of statisticians in Maine
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of statisticians in Maine
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of statisticians in Maine

Correlation r = 0.7797398 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6079941 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 60.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of statisticians in Maine) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Aliza) over the 20 years from 2003 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 5.04E-5. 0.0000504489261785506100000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.78 in 0.00504% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 19,822 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.51, 0.91 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Popularity of the first name Aliza (Babies born)291332351314343324360325280305276339422424427410427427429381
The number of statisticians in Maine (Statisticians)40806050405060604040407070100609070908080




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([291,332,351,314,343,324,360,325,280,305,276,339,422,424,427,410,427,427,429,381,])
array_2 = np.array([40,80,60,50,40,50,60,60,40,40,40,70,70,100,60,90,70,90,80,80,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Aliza"
array_2_name = "The number of statisticians in Maine"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm grateful for your review!


Correlation ID: 3785 · Black Variable ID: 4017 · Red Variable ID: 8863
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0