Download png, svg
AI explanation
As GMO corn in Indiana became more prevalent, it led to the corn industry branching out and husking for new opportunities. This created a-maize-ing demand for interpreters and translators to help communicate with foreign markets. The corn-y jokes and puns may have also kernel-ed a passion for language, making it the ear-resistible career choice. Plus, with all the cross-pollination of ideas, it's no wonder the language industry started to stalk up on talent. In essence, the GMO use in corn cultivated a growing need for interpreters and translators, proving that when it comes to language, it's all about sow-peaking the right corn-cepts!Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image of a vibrant cornfield in Indiana, with towering stalks of genetically modified corn dominating the landscape. The corn appears to be whispering, with subtle ripples and movements indicating the mysterious messages it is conveying. Surrounding the cornfield, a group of diverse interpreters and translators are gathered, their presence denoted by their distinctive attire and tools of their trade. They are engaged in animated conversation with the perplexed farmers, tirelessly working together to unravel the enigmatic intelligence of the whispering crops. The scene blends the lush green of the cornfield with the diverse ensemble of interpreters and translators, evoking a sense of collaboration and curiosity. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and The number of interpreters and translators in Indiana. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Woodblock painting A scene from Skyrim Glitch art Symbolism Brutalism
ChatGPT: Symbolism
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and The number of interpreters and translators in Indiana, in the following situation: As GMO corn grew bigger, it started whispering complex messages to farmers, who then sought out interpreters and translators to understand the secrets of their now-intelligent crops.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a vast cornfield in Indiana, towering stalks of GMO corn whisper mysterious messages to the farmers. As the farmers puzzled over the meaning of these messages, a group of interpreters and translators arrived to help them understand the newfound intelligence of their crops. The scene is a mix of the vibrant green of the cornfield and the diverse group of interpreters and translators gathered around the curious farmers, all working together to uncover the secrets within the whispering corn.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Symbolism ] and depicting this scene: In a vast cornfield in Indiana, towering stalks of GMO corn whisper mysterious messages to the farmers. As the farmers puzzled over the meaning of these messages, a group of interpreters and translators arrived to help them understand the newfound intelligence of their crops. The scene is a mix of the vibrant green of the cornfield and the diverse group of interpreters and translators gathered around the curious farmers, all working together to uncover the secrets within the whispering corn. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image of a vibrant cornfield in Indiana, with towering stalks of genetically modified corn dominating the landscape. The corn appears to be whispering, with subtle ripples and movements indicating the mysterious messages it is conveying. Surrounding the cornfield, a group of diverse interpreters and translators are gathered, their presence denoted by their distinctive attire and tools of their trade. They are engaged in animated conversation with the perplexed farmers, tirelessly working together to unravel the enigmatic intelligence of the whispering crops. The scene blends the lush green of the cornfield with the diverse ensemble of interpreters and translators, evoking a sense of collaboration and curiosity.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in corn grown in Indiana caused The number of interpreters and translators in Indiana to increase. Include one good pun.
AI academic paper
Maize and Mistranslations: Exploring the Unlikely Relationship Between GMO Corn Cultivation in Indiana and the Surge in Interpretation and Translation Services The Journal of Transgenic Agriculture and Linguistic Anthropology Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and The number of interpreters and translators in Indiana. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title seem clever.
Your research team used data from USDA and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9596221 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2022.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Maize and Mistranslations: Exploring the Unlikely Relationship Between GMO Corn Cultivation in Indiana and the Surge in Interpretation and Translation Services
[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the thought-provoking connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in the state of Indiana and the notable increase in the number of interpreters and translators within the same geographic region. By harnessing data meticulously gathered from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team conducted a rigorous analysis spanning the years 2003 to 2022. The findings reveal an astonishingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9596221, accompanied by a strikingly significant p-value of less than 0.01. Our unexpected results prompt a deeper exploration of the potential mechanisms underpinning this unexpected correlation, shedding light on the extraordinary interconnectedness of seemingly disparate phenomena.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and The number of interpreters and translators in Indiana. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Maize and Mistranslations: Exploring the Unlikely Relationship Between GMO Corn Cultivation in Indiana and the Surge in Interpretation and Translation Services
[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the thought-provoking connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in the state of Indiana and the notable increase in the number of interpreters and translators within the same geographic region. By harnessing data meticulously gathered from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team conducted a rigorous analysis spanning the years 2003 to 2022. The findings reveal an astonishingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9596221, accompanied by a strikingly significant p-value of less than 0.01. Our unexpected results prompt a deeper exploration of the potential mechanisms underpinning this unexpected correlation, shedding light on the extraordinary interconnectedness of seemingly disparate phenomena.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between agricultural practices and linguistic services may seem as incongruous as a cow in a china shop, yet our research has uncovered a surprising connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Indiana and the surge in interpretation and translation services within the state. While this association may initially appear as bewildering as deciphering a cryptic message in a bottle, the correlation coefficients and p-values speak for themselves, leaving us with a conundrum worthy of Sherlock Holmes himself.
The cultivation of GMO corn has become as common as corny jokes at a comedy club, with Indiana emerging as a key player in the production of this genetically enhanced crop. Meanwhile, the demand for interpreters and translators in the state has skyrocketed, causing even the most steadfast skeptics to raise an eyebrow akin to Spock's famous Vulcan salute. As we delve into these two seemingly unrelated phenomena, it becomes evident that there is more to this correlation than meets the eye, much like an iceberg hiding most of its mass beneath the surface of the water.
The purpose of this research is not simply to proclaim, "the corn made them do it!" Rather, our goal is to dissect this improbable connection using rigorous statistical analysis and empirical evidence, akin to dissecting a frog in a high school biology class. Through the utilization of data obtained from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we meticulously combed through a treasure trove of information to untangle this puzzling relationship. The findings we present in this paper thrust the relationship between GMO corn cultivation and the demand for interpreters and translators into the spotlight, much like a captivating performance on the Broadway stage.
In the following sections, we will navigate through the labyrinth of evidence, unveiling the intricacies of this unexpected correlation and exploring potential pathways that may explain this intriguing relationship. This paper will not only add a new layer to the ongoing discourse around GMO cultivation and its societal impacts but also highlight the importance of considering unlikely bedfellows when analyzing economic and agricultural trends. So, without further ado, let us embark on this intellectual journey, armed with our statistical compass and a healthy dose of curiosity.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and The number of interpreters and translators in Indiana. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Maize and Mistranslations: Exploring the Unlikely Relationship Between GMO Corn Cultivation in Indiana and the Surge in Interpretation and Translation Services
[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the thought-provoking connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in the state of Indiana and the notable increase in the number of interpreters and translators within the same geographic region. By harnessing data meticulously gathered from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team conducted a rigorous analysis spanning the years 2003 to 2022. The findings reveal an astonishingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9596221, accompanied by a strikingly significant p-value of less than 0.01. Our unexpected results prompt a deeper exploration of the potential mechanisms underpinning this unexpected correlation, shedding light on the extraordinary interconnectedness of seemingly disparate phenomena.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between agricultural practices and linguistic services may seem as incongruous as a cow in a china shop, yet our research has uncovered a surprising connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Indiana and the surge in interpretation and translation services within the state. While this association may initially appear as bewildering as deciphering a cryptic message in a bottle, the correlation coefficients and p-values speak for themselves, leaving us with a conundrum worthy of Sherlock Holmes himself.
The cultivation of GMO corn has become as common as corny jokes at a comedy club, with Indiana emerging as a key player in the production of this genetically enhanced crop. Meanwhile, the demand for interpreters and translators in the state has skyrocketed, causing even the most steadfast skeptics to raise an eyebrow akin to Spock's famous Vulcan salute. As we delve into these two seemingly unrelated phenomena, it becomes evident that there is more to this correlation than meets the eye, much like an iceberg hiding most of its mass beneath the surface of the water.
The purpose of this research is not simply to proclaim, "the corn made them do it!" Rather, our goal is to dissect this improbable connection using rigorous statistical analysis and empirical evidence, akin to dissecting a frog in a high school biology class. Through the utilization of data obtained from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we meticulously combed through a treasure trove of information to untangle this puzzling relationship. The findings we present in this paper thrust the relationship between GMO corn cultivation and the demand for interpreters and translators into the spotlight, much like a captivating performance on the Broadway stage.
In the following sections, we will navigate through the labyrinth of evidence, unveiling the intricacies of this unexpected correlation and exploring potential pathways that may explain this intriguing relationship. This paper will not only add a new layer to the ongoing discourse around GMO cultivation and its societal impacts but also highlight the importance of considering unlikely bedfellows when analyzing economic and agricultural trends. So, without further ado, let us embark on this intellectual journey, armed with our statistical compass and a healthy dose of curiosity.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Various scholarly studies have examined the impact of agricultural practices on societal trends, albeit with a less comedic lens than the matter at hand. Smith et al. (2015) delved into the economic implications of GMO adoption in maize cultivation, while Doe and Jones (2018) dissected the labor market dynamics within the United States. While these studies offered valuable insights, they failed to unearth the unexpected correlation between GMO corn cultivation and the demand for interpretation and translation services.
In "The Omnivore's Dilemma," Michael Pollan explores the complexities of modern agricultural practices, providing a comprehensive overview of the various factors influencing crop cultivation, albeit with no mention of linguistic services. Similarly, "The Botany of Desire" by the same author intricately examines the relationships between humans and plants, yet neglects to touch upon the surge in interpretation and translation services in agricultural regions.
On a more fictional note, John Grisham's legal thriller "The King of Torts" and Dan Brown's mysterious "The Da Vinci Code" may seem unrelated to our topic at first glance. However, their explorations of intricate puzzles and unexpected connections parallel our own quest to unravel the enigmatic relationship between GMO corn cultivation and interpretation and translation services.
Additionally, the TV show "Breaking Bad," while centered on the production and distribution of a different agricultural product, offers insights into the complexities of illegal enterprises, reminiscent of the mysterious forces driving the unexpected surge in interpretation and translation services. Likewise, the intrigue and unexpected plot twists of "Money Heist" leave viewers pondering unforeseen connections and motivations, mirroring our own perplexity regarding the seemingly unlikely relationship under investigation.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and The number of interpreters and translators in Indiana. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2003 to 2022
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Maize and Mistranslations: Exploring the Unlikely Relationship Between GMO Corn Cultivation in Indiana and the Surge in Interpretation and Translation Services
[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the thought-provoking connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in the state of Indiana and the notable increase in the number of interpreters and translators within the same geographic region. By harnessing data meticulously gathered from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team conducted a rigorous analysis spanning the years 2003 to 2022. The findings reveal an astonishingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9596221, accompanied by a strikingly significant p-value of less than 0.01. Our unexpected results prompt a deeper exploration of the potential mechanisms underpinning this unexpected correlation, shedding light on the extraordinary interconnectedness of seemingly disparate phenomena.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between agricultural practices and linguistic services may seem as incongruous as a cow in a china shop, yet our research has uncovered a surprising connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Indiana and the surge in interpretation and translation services within the state. While this association may initially appear as bewildering as deciphering a cryptic message in a bottle, the correlation coefficients and p-values speak for themselves, leaving us with a conundrum worthy of Sherlock Holmes himself.
The cultivation of GMO corn has become as common as corny jokes at a comedy club, with Indiana emerging as a key player in the production of this genetically enhanced crop. Meanwhile, the demand for interpreters and translators in the state has skyrocketed, causing even the most steadfast skeptics to raise an eyebrow akin to Spock's famous Vulcan salute. As we delve into these two seemingly unrelated phenomena, it becomes evident that there is more to this correlation than meets the eye, much like an iceberg hiding most of its mass beneath the surface of the water.
The purpose of this research is not simply to proclaim, "the corn made them do it!" Rather, our goal is to dissect this improbable connection using rigorous statistical analysis and empirical evidence, akin to dissecting a frog in a high school biology class. Through the utilization of data obtained from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we meticulously combed through a treasure trove of information to untangle this puzzling relationship. The findings we present in this paper thrust the relationship between GMO corn cultivation and the demand for interpreters and translators into the spotlight, much like a captivating performance on the Broadway stage.
In the following sections, we will navigate through the labyrinth of evidence, unveiling the intricacies of this unexpected correlation and exploring potential pathways that may explain this intriguing relationship. This paper will not only add a new layer to the ongoing discourse around GMO cultivation and its societal impacts but also highlight the importance of considering unlikely bedfellows when analyzing economic and agricultural trends. So, without further ado, let us embark on this intellectual journey, armed with our statistical compass and a healthy dose of curiosity.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The methodology employed in this research paper adhered to the highest standards of empirical investigation, akin to a detective meticulously collecting clues at a crime scene. Our research team embarked on a data collection odyssey, navigating the vast expanse of the internet with the precision of a cartographer plotting uncharted territory. While various sources were consulted, the primary repositories of data were the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, akin to relying on trustworthy witnesses in a court of law.
The data spanned the years 2003 to 2022, encompassing a sizable temporal scope comparable to a cinematic epic. For the investigation of GMO corn cultivation, a comprehensive analysis of corn production statistics, including the usage of genetically modified organisms, was conducted with the thoroughness of a forensic accountant poring over financial records. In parallel, the count of interpreters and translators within Indiana was meticulously tabulated, resembling the meticulous cataloging of artifacts in an archaeological dig.
To establish a robust foundation for statistical analysis, a myriad of measures was employed to ensure the integrity and reliability of the data. Quality control protocol was implemented to sift through the digital haystacks, discerning the proverbial needles of pertinent information, much like a diligent bee collecting nectar from a field of flowers. The selected data underwent rigorous validation processes to minimize the likelihood of spurious correlations or misleading interpretations, analogous to a watchful sentry guarding against unwelcome intruders.
The statistical tools utilized in this study included correlation analysis and regression modeling, akin to wielding a compass and map to navigate through uncharted terrain. The correlation coefficients derived from the data presented a portrait of the relationship between GMO corn cultivation and the demand for interpreters and translators, akin to an artist capturing the nuances of a vibrant landscape on a canvas. Moreover, regression models were employed to discern potential causal links and shed light on the underlying dynamics driving this unsuspected correlation.
In synergy with the tenets of empirical inquiry, the data analysis process adhered to the principles of rigor and transparency, akin to a polished diamond emanating clarity and brilliance. The statistical software utilized for this purpose comprised a suite of esteemed tools, ensuring the precision and accuracy of the computations akin to a virtuoso conductor orchestrating a symphony.
The methods adopted in this study conscripted the aid of various statistical and econometric techniques, assembling them into a cohesive framework to tease out the relationship between GMO corn cultivation and the proliferation of interpretation and translation services in Indiana. The ensuing sections will unveil the outcomes of this methodological endeavor, painting a vivid tableau of the improbable connections we have unveiled through our research.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and The number of interpreters and translators in Indiana. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .
For the time period 2003 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9596221, r-squared of 0.9208746, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Maize and Mistranslations: Exploring the Unlikely Relationship Between GMO Corn Cultivation in Indiana and the Surge in Interpretation and Translation Services
[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the thought-provoking connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in the state of Indiana and the notable increase in the number of interpreters and translators within the same geographic region. By harnessing data meticulously gathered from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team conducted a rigorous analysis spanning the years 2003 to 2022. The findings reveal an astonishingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9596221, accompanied by a strikingly significant p-value of less than 0.01. Our unexpected results prompt a deeper exploration of the potential mechanisms underpinning this unexpected correlation, shedding light on the extraordinary interconnectedness of seemingly disparate phenomena.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The relationship between agricultural practices and linguistic services may seem as incongruous as a cow in a china shop, yet our research has uncovered a surprising connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Indiana and the surge in interpretation and translation services within the state. While this association may initially appear as bewildering as deciphering a cryptic message in a bottle, the correlation coefficients and p-values speak for themselves, leaving us with a conundrum worthy of Sherlock Holmes himself.
The cultivation of GMO corn has become as common as corny jokes at a comedy club, with Indiana emerging as a key player in the production of this genetically enhanced crop. Meanwhile, the demand for interpreters and translators in the state has skyrocketed, causing even the most steadfast skeptics to raise an eyebrow akin to Spock's famous Vulcan salute. As we delve into these two seemingly unrelated phenomena, it becomes evident that there is more to this correlation than meets the eye, much like an iceberg hiding most of its mass beneath the surface of the water.
The purpose of this research is not simply to proclaim, "the corn made them do it!" Rather, our goal is to dissect this improbable connection using rigorous statistical analysis and empirical evidence, akin to dissecting a frog in a high school biology class. Through the utilization of data obtained from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we meticulously combed through a treasure trove of information to untangle this puzzling relationship. The findings we present in this paper thrust the relationship between GMO corn cultivation and the demand for interpreters and translators into the spotlight, much like a captivating performance on the Broadway stage.
In the following sections, we will navigate through the labyrinth of evidence, unveiling the intricacies of this unexpected correlation and exploring potential pathways that may explain this intriguing relationship. This paper will not only add a new layer to the ongoing discourse around GMO cultivation and its societal impacts but also highlight the importance of considering unlikely bedfellows when analyzing economic and agricultural trends. So, without further ado, let us embark on this intellectual journey, armed with our statistical compass and a healthy dose of curiosity.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data from 2003 to 2022 revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Indiana and the surge in interpreters and translators within the state. The correlation coefficient of 0.9596221 indicates a nearly perfect positive linear relationship between the two variables, suggesting a connection as seamless as a perfectly stitched seam in a tailored suit. The R-squared value of 0.9208746 further confirms the robustness of this association, explaining approximately 92.1% of the variability in the demand for interpretation and translation services through the fluctuations in GMO corn cultivation. Notably, the p-value of less than 0.01 underscores the statistical significance of this relationship, rendering it as compelling as a plot twist in a mystery novel.
Indeed, our findings illustrate a correlation as conspicuous as a neon sign in Times Square, prompting a deeper contemplation of the potential factors driving this unexpected linkage. The magnitude of this correlation is vividly depicted in Fig. 1, a scatterplot that visually encapsulates the stark positive relationship between GMO corn cultivation and the demand for interpreters and translators within the state of Indiana. The strong clustering of data points along a clear upward trend line serves as a poignant visual representation of this seemingly perplexing association, akin to a piece of abstract art that reveals its hidden message upon closer examination.
The implications of these findings extend beyond the boundaries of traditional agricultural and linguistic domains, offering a thought-provoking insight into the intricate interplay between seemingly unrelated phenomena. This unexpected correlation challenges the conventional boundaries of causation and correlation, compelling us to scrutinize the underlying mechanisms with the same intensity as detectives unraveling a perplexing case. The implications of this unanticipated relationship warrant further exploration, inviting researchers to delve into the rich tapestry of potential explanations and underlying drivers that may elucidate this conundrum.
The comprehensive nature of our analysis establishes a firm foundation for future investigations, signifying the beginning of a rigorous inquiry into the unexplored nexus between GMO corn cultivation and the demand for interpretation and translation services. This unexpected correlation demands an interdisciplinary approach, requiring the integration of agricultural, economic, and sociolinguistic perspectives to unravel its enigmatic nature. As we unravel the threads that weave this intricate connection, we invite scholars from diverse disciplines to join us in this intellectual pursuit, embarking on a journey that promises to unravel one of the most improbable yet captivating relationships in the realm of agricultural and linguistic studies.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and The number of interpreters and translators in Indiana. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
Maize and Mistranslations: Exploring the Unlikely Relationship Between GMO Corn Cultivation in Indiana and the Surge in Interpretation and Translation Services
[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the thought-provoking connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in the state of Indiana and the notable increase in the number of interpreters and translators within the same geographic region. By harnessing data meticulously gathered from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team conducted a rigorous analysis spanning the years 2003 to 2022. The findings reveal an astonishingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9596221, accompanied by a strikingly significant p-value of less than 0.01. Our unexpected results prompt a deeper exploration of the potential mechanisms underpinning this unexpected correlation, shedding light on the extraordinary interconnectedness of seemingly disparate phenomena.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Various scholarly studies have examined the impact of agricultural practices on societal trends, albeit with a less comedic lens than the matter at hand. Smith et al. (2015) delved into the economic implications of GMO adoption in maize cultivation, while Doe and Jones (2018) dissected the labor market dynamics within the United States. While these studies offered valuable insights, they failed to unearth the unexpected correlation between GMO corn cultivation and the demand for interpretation and translation services.
In "The Omnivore's Dilemma," Michael Pollan explores the complexities of modern agricultural practices, providing a comprehensive overview of the various factors influencing crop cultivation, albeit with no mention of linguistic services. Similarly, "The Botany of Desire" by the same author intricately examines the relationships between humans and plants, yet neglects to touch upon the surge in interpretation and translation services in agricultural regions.
On a more fictional note, John Grisham's legal thriller "The King of Torts" and Dan Brown's mysterious "The Da Vinci Code" may seem unrelated to our topic at first glance. However, their explorations of intricate puzzles and unexpected connections parallel our own quest to unravel the enigmatic relationship between GMO corn cultivation and interpretation and translation services.
Additionally, the TV show "Breaking Bad," while centered on the production and distribution of a different agricultural product, offers insights into the complexities of illegal enterprises, reminiscent of the mysterious forces driving the unexpected surge in interpretation and translation services. Likewise, the intrigue and unexpected plot twists of "Money Heist" leave viewers pondering unforeseen connections and motivations, mirroring our own perplexity regarding the seemingly unlikely relationship under investigation.
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data from 2003 to 2022 revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Indiana and the surge in interpreters and translators within the state. The correlation coefficient of 0.9596221 indicates a nearly perfect positive linear relationship between the two variables, suggesting a connection as seamless as a perfectly stitched seam in a tailored suit. The R-squared value of 0.9208746 further confirms the robustness of this association, explaining approximately 92.1% of the variability in the demand for interpretation and translation services through the fluctuations in GMO corn cultivation. Notably, the p-value of less than 0.01 underscores the statistical significance of this relationship, rendering it as compelling as a plot twist in a mystery novel.
Indeed, our findings illustrate a correlation as conspicuous as a neon sign in Times Square, prompting a deeper contemplation of the potential factors driving this unexpected linkage. The magnitude of this correlation is vividly depicted in Fig. 1, a scatterplot that visually encapsulates the stark positive relationship between GMO corn cultivation and the demand for interpreters and translators within the state of Indiana. The strong clustering of data points along a clear upward trend line serves as a poignant visual representation of this seemingly perplexing association, akin to a piece of abstract art that reveals its hidden message upon closer examination.
The implications of these findings extend beyond the boundaries of traditional agricultural and linguistic domains, offering a thought-provoking insight into the intricate interplay between seemingly unrelated phenomena. This unexpected correlation challenges the conventional boundaries of causation and correlation, compelling us to scrutinize the underlying mechanisms with the same intensity as detectives unraveling a perplexing case. The implications of this unanticipated relationship warrant further exploration, inviting researchers to delve into the rich tapestry of potential explanations and underlying drivers that may elucidate this conundrum.
The comprehensive nature of our analysis establishes a firm foundation for future investigations, signifying the beginning of a rigorous inquiry into the unexplored nexus between GMO corn cultivation and the demand for interpretation and translation services. This unexpected correlation demands an interdisciplinary approach, requiring the integration of agricultural, economic, and sociolinguistic perspectives to unravel its enigmatic nature. As we unravel the threads that weave this intricate connection, we invite scholars from diverse disciplines to join us in this intellectual pursuit, embarking on a journey that promises to unravel one of the most improbable yet captivating relationships in the realm of agricultural and linguistic studies.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The profound interconnectedness between the utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Indiana and the surge in interpreters and translators within the state has unveiled a captivating conundrum that challenges conventional wisdom. Our unexpected findings echo the sentiments expressed in the literature review, where our scholarly predecessors unwittingly danced around the fringes of this unexpected nexus. As if out of a mysterious novel, the unanticipated correlation between GMO corn cultivation and the demand for interpretation and translation services has emerged as a compelling storyline, weaving together the seemingly disparate domains of agriculture and linguistics with the finesse of a skilled wordsmith.
The positive linear relationship between GMO corn cultivation and the demand for interpreters and translators, as evidenced by our robust correlation coefficient and remarkable R-squared value, stands as a testament to the seamless interplay of these ostensibly unrelated phenomena. As clear as the plot twists in the literary masterpieces we referenced in our literature review, the statistical significance of this association further underscores its compelling nature, leaving us in awe of the unexpected twists and turns that unfold in the realm of empirical research.
The convergence of agricultural and linguistic forces, as depicted in our vivid scatterplot, mirrors the interwoven complexity of a gripping narrative, compelling us to ponder the underlying mechanisms with the same intensity as a dedicated detective engrossed in solving a perplexing case. The visual representation of this correlation, akin to an enigmatic piece of abstract art, beckons us to decipher its hidden message, reflecting a mysterious allure that transcends the boundaries of conventional academic inquiry.
This unexpected correlation between GMO corn cultivation and interpretation and translation services stands as a captivating enigma that warrants a multidisciplinary approach, prompting us to embark on an intellectual journey akin to the adventures depicted in popular TV series and novels we referenced in our literature review. Just as these fictional narratives captivate our imagination with unforeseen connections and intricate puzzles, our research invites scholars from diverse disciplines to join us in unravelling the threads of this captivating tale, promising an intellectual pursuit as exhilarating as uncovering the unexpected twists in a suspenseful thriller.
In conclusion, our findings not only underscore the profound interconnectedness of seemingly disparate phenomena but also beckon us to explore the uncharted terrain that lies at the intersection of agricultural and linguistic domains. Like a compelling mystery waiting to be unravelled, the unexpected correlation between GMO corn cultivation and the demand for interpretation and translation services invites us to embark on an intellectual journey that promises to broaden our understanding of the intricate tapestry of relationships that shape our world.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and The number of interpreters and translators in Indiana. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Maize and Mistranslations: Exploring the Unlikely Relationship Between GMO Corn Cultivation in Indiana and the Surge in Interpretation and Translation Services
[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the thought-provoking connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in the state of Indiana and the notable increase in the number of interpreters and translators within the same geographic region. By harnessing data meticulously gathered from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team conducted a rigorous analysis spanning the years 2003 to 2022. The findings reveal an astonishingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9596221, accompanied by a strikingly significant p-value of less than 0.01. Our unexpected results prompt a deeper exploration of the potential mechanisms underpinning this unexpected correlation, shedding light on the extraordinary interconnectedness of seemingly disparate phenomena.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
The relationship between agricultural practices and linguistic services may seem as incongruous as a cow in a china shop, yet our research has uncovered a surprising connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Indiana and the surge in interpretation and translation services within the state. While this association may initially appear as bewildering as deciphering a cryptic message in a bottle, the correlation coefficients and p-values speak for themselves, leaving us with a conundrum worthy of Sherlock Holmes himself.
The cultivation of GMO corn has become as common as corny jokes at a comedy club, with Indiana emerging as a key player in the production of this genetically enhanced crop. Meanwhile, the demand for interpreters and translators in the state has skyrocketed, causing even the most steadfast skeptics to raise an eyebrow akin to Spock's famous Vulcan salute. As we delve into these two seemingly unrelated phenomena, it becomes evident that there is more to this correlation than meets the eye, much like an iceberg hiding most of its mass beneath the surface of the water.
The purpose of this research is not simply to proclaim, "the corn made them do it!" Rather, our goal is to dissect this improbable connection using rigorous statistical analysis and empirical evidence, akin to dissecting a frog in a high school biology class. Through the utilization of data obtained from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we meticulously combed through a treasure trove of information to untangle this puzzling relationship. The findings we present in this paper thrust the relationship between GMO corn cultivation and the demand for interpreters and translators into the spotlight, much like a captivating performance on the Broadway stage.
In the following sections, we will navigate through the labyrinth of evidence, unveiling the intricacies of this unexpected correlation and exploring potential pathways that may explain this intriguing relationship. This paper will not only add a new layer to the ongoing discourse around GMO cultivation and its societal impacts but also highlight the importance of considering unlikely bedfellows when analyzing economic and agricultural trends. So, without further ado, let us embark on this intellectual journey, armed with our statistical compass and a healthy dose of curiosity.
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data from 2003 to 2022 revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Indiana and the surge in interpreters and translators within the state. The correlation coefficient of 0.9596221 indicates a nearly perfect positive linear relationship between the two variables, suggesting a connection as seamless as a perfectly stitched seam in a tailored suit. The R-squared value of 0.9208746 further confirms the robustness of this association, explaining approximately 92.1% of the variability in the demand for interpretation and translation services through the fluctuations in GMO corn cultivation. Notably, the p-value of less than 0.01 underscores the statistical significance of this relationship, rendering it as compelling as a plot twist in a mystery novel.
Indeed, our findings illustrate a correlation as conspicuous as a neon sign in Times Square, prompting a deeper contemplation of the potential factors driving this unexpected linkage. The magnitude of this correlation is vividly depicted in Fig. 1, a scatterplot that visually encapsulates the stark positive relationship between GMO corn cultivation and the demand for interpreters and translators within the state of Indiana. The strong clustering of data points along a clear upward trend line serves as a poignant visual representation of this seemingly perplexing association, akin to a piece of abstract art that reveals its hidden message upon closer examination.
The implications of these findings extend beyond the boundaries of traditional agricultural and linguistic domains, offering a thought-provoking insight into the intricate interplay between seemingly unrelated phenomena. This unexpected correlation challenges the conventional boundaries of causation and correlation, compelling us to scrutinize the underlying mechanisms with the same intensity as detectives unraveling a perplexing case. The implications of this unanticipated relationship warrant further exploration, inviting researchers to delve into the rich tapestry of potential explanations and underlying drivers that may elucidate this conundrum.
The comprehensive nature of our analysis establishes a firm foundation for future investigations, signifying the beginning of a rigorous inquiry into the unexplored nexus between GMO corn cultivation and the demand for interpretation and translation services. This unexpected correlation demands an interdisciplinary approach, requiring the integration of agricultural, economic, and sociolinguistic perspectives to unravel its enigmatic nature. As we unravel the threads that weave this intricate connection, we invite scholars from diverse disciplines to join us in this intellectual pursuit, embarking on a journey that promises to unravel one of the most improbable yet captivating relationships in the realm of agricultural and linguistic studies.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our research has uncovered a perplexing and robust correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in the state of Indiana and the surge in the number of interpreters and translators within the same geographic region. The near-perfect positive linear relationship, as evidenced by the remarkably strong correlation coefficient and the strikingly significant p-value, is as surprising as finding a needle in a haystack - or perhaps a corn kernel in a field of wildflowers.
While our findings paint a clear picture of the connection between GMO corn cultivation and the demand for interpretation and translation services, one cannot help but marvel at the unexpected nature of this association. It's like stumbling upon a rare gem in an unlikely place – perhaps akin to discovering a diamond in the rough, or a kernel of truth in a corn maze.
The implications of this unanticipated relationship challenge the boundaries of conventional agricultural and linguistic studies, beckoning researchers to unravel the intricacies of this enigmatic correlation. It's like solving a complex puzzle, where each piece gradually reveals a larger, more captivating picture – much like a mosaic forming from individual tiles.
As our investigation draws to a close, it is evident that this improbable relationship between GMO corn cultivation and the demand for interpretation and translation services is a worthy subject of further exploration. However, with the depth of our analysis, it is safe to say that no further research is needed in this area – at least until the cows come home.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Maize and Mistranslations: Exploring the Unlikely Relationship Between GMO Corn Cultivation in Indiana and the Surge in Interpretation and Translation Services. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Transgenic Agriculture and Linguistic Anthropology
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Maize and Mistranslations: Exploring the Unlikely Relationship Between GMO Corn Cultivation in Indiana and the Surge in Interpretation and Translation Services. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Center for Agricultural Linguistics
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Maize and Mistranslations: Exploring the Unlikely Relationship Between GMO Corn Cultivation in Indiana and the Surge in Interpretation and Translation Services with an abstract of This research paper delves into the thought-provoking connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in the state of Indiana and the notable increase in the number of interpreters and translators within the same geographic region. By harnessing data meticulously gathered from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team conducted a rigorous analysis spanning the years 2003 to 2022. The findings reveal an astonishingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9596221, accompanied by a strikingly significant p-value of less than 0.01. Our unexpected results prompt a deeper exploration of the potential mechanisms underpinning this unexpected correlation, shedding light on the extraordinary interconnectedness of seemingly disparate phenomena.
ChatGPT:
GMO corn, cultivation, Indiana, interpreters, translators, genetically modified organisms, USDA data, Bureau of Labor Statistics, correlation coefficient, p-value, mechanisms, interconnectedness, maize, mistranslations
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
GMO use in corn grown in IndianaDetailed data title: Percent of all corn planted in Indiana that is genetically modified
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in corn grown in Indiana
The number of interpreters and translators in Indiana
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of interpreters and translators in Indiana
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of interpreters and translators in Indiana
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.9208746 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 92.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of interpreters and translators in Indiana) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in corn grown in Indiana) over the 20 years from 2003 through 2022.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.3E-11. 0.0000000000233975338177872160
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.96 in 2.3E-9% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 42,739,547,159 random variables You don't actually need 42 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.9, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |
GMO use in corn grown in Indiana (GMO corn %) | 16 | 21 | 26 | 40 | 59 | 78 | 79 | 83 | 85 | 84 | 85 | 88 | 88 | 86 | 87 | 86 | 87 | 86 | 87 | 87 |
The number of interpreters and translators in Indiana (Laborers) | 130 | 180 | 260 | 480 | 700 | 760 | 880 | 810 | 920 | 870 | 960 | 820 | 800 | 770 | 740 | 870 | 920 | 990 | 920 | 940 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([16,21,26,40,59,78,79,83,85,84,85,88,88,86,87,86,87,86,87,87,])
array_2 = np.array([130,180,260,480,700,760,880,810,920,870,960,820,800,770,740,870,920,990,920,940,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in corn grown in Indiana"
array_2_name = "The number of interpreters and translators in Indiana"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only GMO use in corn grown in Indiana
- Line chart for only The number of interpreters and translators in Indiana
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Maize and Mistranslations: Exploring the Unlikely Relationship Between GMO Corn Cultivation in Indiana and the Surge in Interpretation and Translation Services
Your rating is much appreciated!
Correlation ID: 3777 · Black Variable ID: 754 · Red Variable ID: 7668