about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,716 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in cotton in Louisiana and the second variable is Robberies in Louisiana.  The chart goes from 2000 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As GMO use in cotton decreased, the bolls were no longer attracting as much unwanted attention, leading to a reduction in robberies. Thieves just couldn't cotton on to the idea of stealing from non-GMO fields, and the whole situation was un-boll-eivably effective at reducing crime!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that embodies the concept of brutalist architecture in a scene set in a Louisiana cotton field. Show rows of towering, genetically modified cotton plants in sharp, angular formations. The cotton bolls should be presented as intensely vibrant bursts of yellow fluff, with exaggerated plumpness to convey their artificial origin. Amidst the fields, feature shadowy, indistinct figures lurking with ominous intent. These figures should be menacing and evocative, appearing ready to pounce on the valuable cotton bolls. In the chaotic aftermath, depict stolen threads and a trail of disarray, capturing the sense of thievery and chaos that follows the thieves' spree through the fields. Elevate the imagery to reflect the tension and drama of the scene within the stark style of brutalism. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in cotton in Louisiana and Robberies in Louisiana. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Symbolism An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie Cybernetic art Oragami Brutalism
ChatGPT: Brutalism

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in cotton in Louisiana and Robberies in Louisiana, in the following situation: Robberies in Louisiana increased with the use of GMO cotton because thieves couldn't resist the temptation to "pick" the higher-yielding, "plump and juicy" bolls, leading them to "thread" a path of crime through the fields. The urge to "stitch up" their pockets with the valuable GMO cotton fibers left them "sewing" chaos across the state.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a Louisiana cotton field, rows of genetically modified cotton plants stand tall and abundant. Bright yellow cotton bolls burst with fluff, their plumpness a result of the GMO seeds. Among the fields, shadowy figures lurk, their eyes fixed on the valuable bolls. The thieves can't resist the temptation, sneaking in to "pick" the prized cotton. The scene is marked by a sense of chaos and a trail of stolen "threads" left in the wake of their "sewing" spree through the fields.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Brutalism ] and depicting this scene: In a Louisiana cotton field, rows of genetically modified cotton plants stand tall and abundant. Bright yellow cotton bolls burst with fluff, their plumpness a result of the GMO seeds. Among the fields, shadowy figures lurk, their eyes fixed on the valuable bolls. The thieves can't resist the temptation, sneaking in to "pick" the prized cotton. The scene is marked by a sense of chaos and a trail of stolen "threads" left in the wake of their "sewing" spree through the fields. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that embodies the concept of brutalist architecture in a scene set in a Louisiana cotton field. Show rows of towering, genetically modified cotton plants in sharp, angular formations. The cotton bolls should be presented as intensely vibrant bursts of yellow fluff, with exaggerated plumpness to convey their artificial origin. Amidst the fields, feature shadowy, indistinct figures lurking with ominous intent. These figures should be menacing and evocative, appearing ready to pounce on the valuable cotton bolls. In the chaotic aftermath, depict stolen threads and a trail of disarray, capturing the sense of thievery and chaos that follows the thieves' spree through the fields. Elevate the imagery to reflect the tension and drama of the scene within the stark style of brutalism.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in GMO use in cotton in Louisiana caused Robberies in Louisiana to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
GMO Cotton: Unraveling the Thread of Robberies in Louisiana

Journal of Agro-Criminalistics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Louisiana and Robberies in Louisiana. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.6505549 and p < 0.01 for 2000 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
GMO Cotton: Unraveling the Thread of Robberies in Louisiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the tangled web of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton production in Louisiana and its potential link to the prevalence of robberies in the region. Armed with data from the USDA and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we set out to unravel the mystery behind this curious correlation.

After extensive analysis, we unearthed a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.6505549, with a p-value of less than 0.01, for the period spanning from 2000 to 2022. It appears that the introduction of GMO cotton may be intertwined with a surge in robberies in the state, leading us to ponder the notion of "cotton picking" crime trends.

Our findings paint a comprehensive picture of the potential impact of agricultural practices on societal behavior, shedding light on the unexplored relationship between crop cultivation and criminal activity. As we continue to thread our way through this complex issue, we invite readers to join us in weaving together a greater understanding of the unexpected consequences of biotechnological advancements. After all, when it comes to uncovering the truth, it's essential to stay cottonseed focused!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Louisiana and Robberies in Louisiana. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
GMO Cotton: Unraveling the Thread of Robberies in Louisiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the tangled web of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton production in Louisiana and its potential link to the prevalence of robberies in the region. Armed with data from the USDA and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we set out to unravel the mystery behind this curious correlation.

After extensive analysis, we unearthed a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.6505549, with a p-value of less than 0.01, for the period spanning from 2000 to 2022. It appears that the introduction of GMO cotton may be intertwined with a surge in robberies in the state, leading us to ponder the notion of "cotton picking" crime trends.

Our findings paint a comprehensive picture of the potential impact of agricultural practices on societal behavior, shedding light on the unexplored relationship between crop cultivation and criminal activity. As we continue to thread our way through this complex issue, we invite readers to join us in weaving together a greater understanding of the unexpected consequences of biotechnological advancements. After all, when it comes to uncovering the truth, it's essential to stay cottonseed focused!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

As the saying goes, "When life gives you cotton, make... robbery statistics?" The intricate web of agriculture and crime has long been a subject of fascination, but the potential link between GMO cotton production and the prevalence of robberies in Louisiana brings a whole new meaning to the phrase "planting the seeds of crime."

In recent years, the field of criminology has witnessed an unexpected addition to its arsenal of variables — genetically modified organisms. It seems that the cotton fields of Louisiana might hold more than just lint and bolls; perhaps they also shelter unsuspected connections to criminal behavior. It turns out that unravelling the mystery of crime and agriculture requires more than just a keen eye — it demands a knack for detecting unexpected correlations.

GMO cotton, with its promise of increased yields and improved pest resistance, stands as a testament to human ingenuity in the realm of agricultural biotechnology. However, little did we know that this innovative endeavor might also be sewing the seeds of a surprising statistical relationship. It appears that the growth of one crop might also spur the growth of illicit activities, leaving us to ponder the age-old question: "If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound? And more importantly, does it attract criminals?"

This study aims to explore the interwoven fabric of agricultural practices and criminal behavior, attempting to answer the question of whether the rise of GMO cotton in Louisiana has inadvertently woven a cloth of crime. As we delve deeper into this subject, we invite you to join us in unraveling these peculiar connections and perhaps even find a few unexpected threads of humor along the way. After all, when it comes to understanding the world around us, we must stay alert and keep an ear to the ground, or in this case, an eye on the cotton fields.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Louisiana and Robberies in Louisiana. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
GMO Cotton: Unraveling the Thread of Robberies in Louisiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the tangled web of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton production in Louisiana and its potential link to the prevalence of robberies in the region. Armed with data from the USDA and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we set out to unravel the mystery behind this curious correlation.

After extensive analysis, we unearthed a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.6505549, with a p-value of less than 0.01, for the period spanning from 2000 to 2022. It appears that the introduction of GMO cotton may be intertwined with a surge in robberies in the state, leading us to ponder the notion of "cotton picking" crime trends.

Our findings paint a comprehensive picture of the potential impact of agricultural practices on societal behavior, shedding light on the unexplored relationship between crop cultivation and criminal activity. As we continue to thread our way through this complex issue, we invite readers to join us in weaving together a greater understanding of the unexpected consequences of biotechnological advancements. After all, when it comes to uncovering the truth, it's essential to stay cottonseed focused!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the saying goes, "When life gives you cotton, make... robbery statistics?" The intricate web of agriculture and crime has long been a subject of fascination, but the potential link between GMO cotton production and the prevalence of robberies in Louisiana brings a whole new meaning to the phrase "planting the seeds of crime."
In recent years, the field of criminology has witnessed an unexpected addition to its arsenal of variables — genetically modified organisms. It seems that the cotton fields of Louisiana might hold more than just lint and bolls; perhaps they also shelter unsuspected connections to criminal behavior. It turns out that unravelling the mystery of crime and agriculture requires more than just a keen eye — it demands a knack for detecting unexpected correlations.
GMO cotton, with its promise of increased yields and improved pest resistance, stands as a testament to human ingenuity in the realm of agricultural biotechnology. However, little did we know that this innovative endeavor might also be sewing the seeds of a surprising statistical relationship. It appears that the growth of one crop might also spur the growth of illicit activities, leaving us to ponder the age-old question: "If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound? And more importantly, does it attract criminals?"
This study aims to explore the interwoven fabric of agricultural practices and criminal behavior, attempting to answer the question of whether the rise of GMO cotton in Louisiana has inadvertently woven a cloth of crime. As we delve deeper into this subject, we invite you to join us in unraveling these peculiar connections and perhaps even find a few unexpected threads of humor along the way. After all, when it comes to understanding the world around us, we must stay alert and keep an ear to the ground, or in this case, an eye on the cotton fields.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The relationship between agricultural practices and crime has intrigued researchers for decades, with studies delving into everything from the impact of corn production on jaywalking incidents to the association between wheat fields and white-collar crime. Smith et al. (2010) explored the potential influence of soybean cultivation on vandalism rates, while Doe (2015) investigated the correlation between barley production and bar brawls. Such studies laid the groundwork for our own exploration of the curious relationship between GMO cotton and the rise in robberies in Louisiana.

But enough about serious stuff, let's lighten the mood with a good old dad joke: Why don't we ever tell secrets on a farm? Because the potatoes have eyes and the corn has ears!

Turning our attention to non-fiction literature, books such as "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan and "The World According to Monsanto" by Marie-Monique Robin shed light on the complex world of genetically modified crops and the intricate web of agricultural practices. However, it's fiction books like John Grisham's "The Pelican Brief" and Laura McHugh's "The Weight of Blood" that make us wonder if the cotton fields are secretly hiding more than just fiber and seeds - perhaps a few sneaky robbers too! When it comes to cotton-related crime, the stakes are high and the thread of mystery runs deep.

And now, a quick break from the literature to mention a few movies that may or may not be relevant to our research: "Gone in 60 Seconds" and "Ocean's Eleven." One can't help but wonder if these cinematic masterpieces hold any clues to the enigmatic link between GMO cotton and robberies in Louisiana. After all, sometimes truth is stranger than fiction, and sometimes it's just plain cotton-pickin' peculiar!

Back to the literature, the findings of Jones (2018) on the impact of maize production on loitering incidents offer a compelling parallel to our own investigation, hinting at the interconnected nature of plant-based activities and delinquent behavior. As we wade through this sea of academic research, we are reminded of the words of wisdom: "Why couldn't the bicycle stand up by itself? Because it was two-tired!" Just like a good dad joke, sometimes the unexpected connections in research can leave us pleasantly surprised and slightly amused.

In conclusion, we are on the cusp of unraveling a mystery that could rewrite the narrative of crime and agriculture, and perhaps one day, we’ll look back and fondly remember the days when GMO cotton and robberies in Louisiana were just a punchline waiting to be spun into an unlikely tale of correlation and causation. After all, when it comes to research, a little humor goes a long way – and in this case, it might just lead us to a conclusion that's as comfortable as a well-worn cotton tee.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Louisiana and Robberies in Louisiana. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services . You used data from 2000 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
GMO Cotton: Unraveling the Thread of Robberies in Louisiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the tangled web of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton production in Louisiana and its potential link to the prevalence of robberies in the region. Armed with data from the USDA and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we set out to unravel the mystery behind this curious correlation.

After extensive analysis, we unearthed a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.6505549, with a p-value of less than 0.01, for the period spanning from 2000 to 2022. It appears that the introduction of GMO cotton may be intertwined with a surge in robberies in the state, leading us to ponder the notion of "cotton picking" crime trends.

Our findings paint a comprehensive picture of the potential impact of agricultural practices on societal behavior, shedding light on the unexplored relationship between crop cultivation and criminal activity. As we continue to thread our way through this complex issue, we invite readers to join us in weaving together a greater understanding of the unexpected consequences of biotechnological advancements. After all, when it comes to uncovering the truth, it's essential to stay cottonseed focused!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the saying goes, "When life gives you cotton, make... robbery statistics?" The intricate web of agriculture and crime has long been a subject of fascination, but the potential link between GMO cotton production and the prevalence of robberies in Louisiana brings a whole new meaning to the phrase "planting the seeds of crime."
In recent years, the field of criminology has witnessed an unexpected addition to its arsenal of variables — genetically modified organisms. It seems that the cotton fields of Louisiana might hold more than just lint and bolls; perhaps they also shelter unsuspected connections to criminal behavior. It turns out that unravelling the mystery of crime and agriculture requires more than just a keen eye — it demands a knack for detecting unexpected correlations.
GMO cotton, with its promise of increased yields and improved pest resistance, stands as a testament to human ingenuity in the realm of agricultural biotechnology. However, little did we know that this innovative endeavor might also be sewing the seeds of a surprising statistical relationship. It appears that the growth of one crop might also spur the growth of illicit activities, leaving us to ponder the age-old question: "If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound? And more importantly, does it attract criminals?"
This study aims to explore the interwoven fabric of agricultural practices and criminal behavior, attempting to answer the question of whether the rise of GMO cotton in Louisiana has inadvertently woven a cloth of crime. As we delve deeper into this subject, we invite you to join us in unraveling these peculiar connections and perhaps even find a few unexpected threads of humor along the way. After all, when it comes to understanding the world around us, we must stay alert and keep an ear to the ground, or in this case, an eye on the cotton fields.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To untangle the perplexing relationship between GMO cotton use in Louisiana and the prevalence of robberies, we employed a blend of unconventional methods and traditional statistical analyses. It's safe to say we were spinning quite the web of research techniques for this study. The first step in our investigation involved scouring the internet for data on GMO cotton production in Louisiana. We combed through years of USDA reports, diligently separating the cotton from the chaff, and wheat from the GMO-infused, cotton. It was a cotton-picking good time, if you ask us!

With cotton production data in hand, we then turned our attention to the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services to access detailed records of robbery incidents across the state. We sifted through this treasure trove of crime statistics, carefully extracting the pertinent information vital to our analysis. It was a real "robbery party" - the data, not the actual crimes, of course!

Now, here's where things get a bit zany. To investigate any potential causal relationship between GMO cotton and robberies, we devised an experiment involving a cotton candy-eating contest among a group of farmers. The idea was to observe the farmers' behavior after consuming copious amounts of sugary, fluffy confectionery and note any correlations with their farm-related activities. While the results of this experiment produced no revelatory insights, it did demonstrate the importance of maintaining a light-hearted approach to research, especially when dealing with complex and potentially wacky investigations.

Next, we employed a time-series analysis to examine the trends in GMO cotton production and robbery rates over the years. By plotting these data points on a graph, we hoped to visually discern any discernible patterns or connections. We even considered using a "cotton-based" plot, but decided that joke was too "punny" for scientific literature. It seemed the correlation was as clear as a white cotton shirt after a wash - or so we thought!

In a bid to further probe the potential influence of GMO cotton on criminal activity, we conducted interviews with members of the cotton farming community in Louisiana. These insightful conversations shed light on the farmers' perspectives on the impact of biotechnological advancements in agriculture, though we must admit they were somewhat devoid of specific references to criminal undertakings. Nevertheless, the anecdotes shared by the farmers added a personal touch to our investigation and made us feel like we were part of the "cotton club."

Finally, we employed sophisticated statistical techniques such as regression analysis to measure the strength and direction of the relationship between GMO cotton production and robberies in Louisiana. In doing so, we sought to unravel any hidden bonds between these seemingly unrelated phenomena and determine whether they were truly "woven" together by more than just geographical proximity. It felt like we were navigating through a labyrinth of numbers and theories, trying to find our way to a statistically significant destination, or at least a half-decent pun to lighten the mood.

In the end, our research methodology was a bit like a fabric woven from different strands of inquiry, blending together serious statistical analyses, whimsical experiments, and candid conversations. It was our attempt to showcase that science isn't always a cut-and-dried affair; sometimes, it's a cotton-thistle of approaches that ultimately lead us to untangle the knotty problems of our world.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Louisiana and Robberies in Louisiana. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services .

For the time period 2000 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.6505549, r-squared of 0.4232216, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
GMO Cotton: Unraveling the Thread of Robberies in Louisiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the tangled web of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton production in Louisiana and its potential link to the prevalence of robberies in the region. Armed with data from the USDA and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we set out to unravel the mystery behind this curious correlation.

After extensive analysis, we unearthed a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.6505549, with a p-value of less than 0.01, for the period spanning from 2000 to 2022. It appears that the introduction of GMO cotton may be intertwined with a surge in robberies in the state, leading us to ponder the notion of "cotton picking" crime trends.

Our findings paint a comprehensive picture of the potential impact of agricultural practices on societal behavior, shedding light on the unexplored relationship between crop cultivation and criminal activity. As we continue to thread our way through this complex issue, we invite readers to join us in weaving together a greater understanding of the unexpected consequences of biotechnological advancements. After all, when it comes to uncovering the truth, it's essential to stay cottonseed focused!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As the saying goes, "When life gives you cotton, make... robbery statistics?" The intricate web of agriculture and crime has long been a subject of fascination, but the potential link between GMO cotton production and the prevalence of robberies in Louisiana brings a whole new meaning to the phrase "planting the seeds of crime."
In recent years, the field of criminology has witnessed an unexpected addition to its arsenal of variables — genetically modified organisms. It seems that the cotton fields of Louisiana might hold more than just lint and bolls; perhaps they also shelter unsuspected connections to criminal behavior. It turns out that unravelling the mystery of crime and agriculture requires more than just a keen eye — it demands a knack for detecting unexpected correlations.
GMO cotton, with its promise of increased yields and improved pest resistance, stands as a testament to human ingenuity in the realm of agricultural biotechnology. However, little did we know that this innovative endeavor might also be sewing the seeds of a surprising statistical relationship. It appears that the growth of one crop might also spur the growth of illicit activities, leaving us to ponder the age-old question: "If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound? And more importantly, does it attract criminals?"
This study aims to explore the interwoven fabric of agricultural practices and criminal behavior, attempting to answer the question of whether the rise of GMO cotton in Louisiana has inadvertently woven a cloth of crime. As we delve deeper into this subject, we invite you to join us in unraveling these peculiar connections and perhaps even find a few unexpected threads of humor along the way. After all, when it comes to understanding the world around us, we must stay alert and keep an ear to the ground, or in this case, an eye on the cotton fields.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis revealed a strong and positive correlation between the use of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton in Louisiana and the incidence of robberies in the state over the period from 2000 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.6505549 indicates a moderately strong positive relationship, indicating that as GMO cotton cultivation increased, so did the number of robberies. It seems that the introduction of GMO cotton could not only enhance crop yields but also sow the seeds for a spike in criminal activity. It looks like we've stumbled upon the phenomenon of "stalk" market crime trends!

The r-squared value of 0.4232216 further supports the conclusion that approximately 42.32% of the variation in robbery rates in Louisiana can be explained by the changes in GMO cotton production. This suggests that GMO cotton cultivation may be a significant contributing factor to the fluctuations in robbery incidents in the state. It's as if we've stumbled upon a "bale" of unexpected statistical significance!

Moreover, the p-value of less than 0.01 indicates that the observed correlation is statistically significant, strengthening the validity of our findings. The likelihood of such a strong correlation occurring by chance is less than 1%, rendering our results highly reliable. It seems that the link between GMO cotton and robberies may not be a mere "cotton-picking" coincidence after all!

As depicted in Fig. 1, the scatterplot illustrates the unmistakable pattern of increasing GMO cotton production aligning with a rise in robbery rates. The data points form a visible upward trend, solidifying the evidence for the observed correlation. It's almost as if the data points themselves are shouting, "We're not just spinning tales; there's a tangible connection here!"

In conclusion, our findings unveil a noteworthy connection between GMO cotton cultivation in Louisiana and the prevalence of robberies in the state. This unexpected association raises intriguing questions about the potential societal impact of agricultural practices and prompts a reevaluation of the unexplored consequences of biotechnological advancements. It's clear that when it comes to growing crops and uncovering unforeseen trends, we need to keep an open mind and a watchful eye for the unexpected "cotton-hearted" outcomes!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Louisiana and Robberies in Louisiana. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
GMO Cotton: Unraveling the Thread of Robberies in Louisiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the tangled web of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton production in Louisiana and its potential link to the prevalence of robberies in the region. Armed with data from the USDA and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we set out to unravel the mystery behind this curious correlation.

After extensive analysis, we unearthed a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.6505549, with a p-value of less than 0.01, for the period spanning from 2000 to 2022. It appears that the introduction of GMO cotton may be intertwined with a surge in robberies in the state, leading us to ponder the notion of "cotton picking" crime trends.

Our findings paint a comprehensive picture of the potential impact of agricultural practices on societal behavior, shedding light on the unexplored relationship between crop cultivation and criminal activity. As we continue to thread our way through this complex issue, we invite readers to join us in weaving together a greater understanding of the unexpected consequences of biotechnological advancements. After all, when it comes to uncovering the truth, it's essential to stay cottonseed focused!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The relationship between agricultural practices and crime has intrigued researchers for decades, with studies delving into everything from the impact of corn production on jaywalking incidents to the association between wheat fields and white-collar crime. Smith et al. (2010) explored the potential influence of soybean cultivation on vandalism rates, while Doe (2015) investigated the correlation between barley production and bar brawls. Such studies laid the groundwork for our own exploration of the curious relationship between GMO cotton and the rise in robberies in Louisiana.
But enough about serious stuff, let's lighten the mood with a good old dad joke: Why don't we ever tell secrets on a farm? Because the potatoes have eyes and the corn has ears!
Turning our attention to non-fiction literature, books such as "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan and "The World According to Monsanto" by Marie-Monique Robin shed light on the complex world of genetically modified crops and the intricate web of agricultural practices. However, it's fiction books like John Grisham's "The Pelican Brief" and Laura McHugh's "The Weight of Blood" that make us wonder if the cotton fields are secretly hiding more than just fiber and seeds - perhaps a few sneaky robbers too! When it comes to cotton-related crime, the stakes are high and the thread of mystery runs deep.
And now, a quick break from the literature to mention a few movies that may or may not be relevant to our research: "Gone in 60 Seconds" and "Ocean's Eleven." One can't help but wonder if these cinematic masterpieces hold any clues to the enigmatic link between GMO cotton and robberies in Louisiana. After all, sometimes truth is stranger than fiction, and sometimes it's just plain cotton-pickin' peculiar!
Back to the literature, the findings of Jones (2018) on the impact of maize production on loitering incidents offer a compelling parallel to our own investigation, hinting at the interconnected nature of plant-based activities and delinquent behavior. As we wade through this sea of academic research, we are reminded of the words of wisdom: "Why couldn't the bicycle stand up by itself? Because it was two-tired!" Just like a good dad joke, sometimes the unexpected connections in research can leave us pleasantly surprised and slightly amused.
In conclusion, we are on the cusp of unraveling a mystery that could rewrite the narrative of crime and agriculture, and perhaps one day, we’ll look back and fondly remember the days when GMO cotton and robberies in Louisiana were just a punchline waiting to be spun into an unlikely tale of correlation and causation. After all, when it comes to research, a little humor goes a long way – and in this case, it might just lead us to a conclusion that's as comfortable as a well-worn cotton tee.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis revealed a strong and positive correlation between the use of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton in Louisiana and the incidence of robberies in the state over the period from 2000 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.6505549 indicates a moderately strong positive relationship, indicating that as GMO cotton cultivation increased, so did the number of robberies. It seems that the introduction of GMO cotton could not only enhance crop yields but also sow the seeds for a spike in criminal activity. It looks like we've stumbled upon the phenomenon of "stalk" market crime trends!
The r-squared value of 0.4232216 further supports the conclusion that approximately 42.32% of the variation in robbery rates in Louisiana can be explained by the changes in GMO cotton production. This suggests that GMO cotton cultivation may be a significant contributing factor to the fluctuations in robbery incidents in the state. It's as if we've stumbled upon a "bale" of unexpected statistical significance!
Moreover, the p-value of less than 0.01 indicates that the observed correlation is statistically significant, strengthening the validity of our findings. The likelihood of such a strong correlation occurring by chance is less than 1%, rendering our results highly reliable. It seems that the link between GMO cotton and robberies may not be a mere "cotton-picking" coincidence after all!
As depicted in Fig. 1, the scatterplot illustrates the unmistakable pattern of increasing GMO cotton production aligning with a rise in robbery rates. The data points form a visible upward trend, solidifying the evidence for the observed correlation. It's almost as if the data points themselves are shouting, "We're not just spinning tales; there's a tangible connection here!"
In conclusion, our findings unveil a noteworthy connection between GMO cotton cultivation in Louisiana and the prevalence of robberies in the state. This unexpected association raises intriguing questions about the potential societal impact of agricultural practices and prompts a reevaluation of the unexplored consequences of biotechnological advancements. It's clear that when it comes to growing crops and uncovering unforeseen trends, we need to keep an open mind and a watchful eye for the unexpected "cotton-hearted" outcomes!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our results provide compelling evidence that supports the prior research on the relationship between agricultural practices and criminal activity. Despite the initial skepticism surrounding the notion of a correlation between GMO cotton cultivation and robberies in Louisiana, our findings have brought a new dimension to light, much like the cotton fields basking in the Louisiana sun. It turns out that this unexpected connection is no mere "cotton-picking" coincidence but a statistically significant revelation with tangible implications.

Building on the fertile ground laid by previous studies, the statistical correlation coefficient of 0.6505549 in our research reflects a moderately strong positive relationship between GMO cotton cultivation and robbery rates. We have clearly shown that as GMO cotton production "grows" in Louisiana, so do the robbery rates, demonstrating a noteworthy link that can no longer be "ginned" up as mere happenstance.

Just as a light-hearted aside, remember that old joke about the thief who fell and broke his leg in wet concrete? He became a "hardened" criminal! Well, it seems that the relationship between GMO cotton and robberies in Louisiana is proving to be quite the "concrete" finding.

The r-squared value of 0.4232216 further bolsters our conclusions, indicating that approximately 42.32% of the variation in robbery rates in Louisiana can be attributed to changes in GMO cotton production. This percentage not only reinforces the significance of the relationship but also underscores the substantial influence that agricultural practices can exert on criminal behavior. We're witnessing a "bale" of influential statistical insight here!

Our results, with a p-value of less than 0.01, further emphasize the statistical significance of the observed correlation, solidifying the reliability of our findings. As rare as finding a four-leaf clover in a cotton field, the probability of such a strong correlation occurring by chance is less than 1%, affirming the authenticity of the link between GMO cotton and robberies. It seems we've truly struck "pay-dirt" in unearthing this unexpected nexus.

In summary, our investigation into the potential connection between GMO cotton production in Louisiana and the prevalence of robberies in the state has sown the seeds of discovery, reaping a harvest of insights that challenge conventional wisdom and beckon us to take a closer look at the interplay between agriculture and societal trends. Our journey through this tangled web of research has just begun – and as they say, the plot is definitely "thickening"!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Louisiana and Robberies in Louisiana. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
GMO Cotton: Unraveling the Thread of Robberies in Louisiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the tangled web of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton production in Louisiana and its potential link to the prevalence of robberies in the region. Armed with data from the USDA and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we set out to unravel the mystery behind this curious correlation.

After extensive analysis, we unearthed a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.6505549, with a p-value of less than 0.01, for the period spanning from 2000 to 2022. It appears that the introduction of GMO cotton may be intertwined with a surge in robberies in the state, leading us to ponder the notion of "cotton picking" crime trends.

Our findings paint a comprehensive picture of the potential impact of agricultural practices on societal behavior, shedding light on the unexplored relationship between crop cultivation and criminal activity. As we continue to thread our way through this complex issue, we invite readers to join us in weaving together a greater understanding of the unexpected consequences of biotechnological advancements. After all, when it comes to uncovering the truth, it's essential to stay cottonseed focused!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
As the saying goes, "When life gives you cotton, make... robbery statistics?" The intricate web of agriculture and crime has long been a subject of fascination, but the potential link between GMO cotton production and the prevalence of robberies in Louisiana brings a whole new meaning to the phrase "planting the seeds of crime."
In recent years, the field of criminology has witnessed an unexpected addition to its arsenal of variables — genetically modified organisms. It seems that the cotton fields of Louisiana might hold more than just lint and bolls; perhaps they also shelter unsuspected connections to criminal behavior. It turns out that unravelling the mystery of crime and agriculture requires more than just a keen eye — it demands a knack for detecting unexpected correlations.
GMO cotton, with its promise of increased yields and improved pest resistance, stands as a testament to human ingenuity in the realm of agricultural biotechnology. However, little did we know that this innovative endeavor might also be sewing the seeds of a surprising statistical relationship. It appears that the growth of one crop might also spur the growth of illicit activities, leaving us to ponder the age-old question: "If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound? And more importantly, does it attract criminals?"
This study aims to explore the interwoven fabric of agricultural practices and criminal behavior, attempting to answer the question of whether the rise of GMO cotton in Louisiana has inadvertently woven a cloth of crime. As we delve deeper into this subject, we invite you to join us in unraveling these peculiar connections and perhaps even find a few unexpected threads of humor along the way. After all, when it comes to understanding the world around us, we must stay alert and keep an ear to the ground, or in this case, an eye on the cotton fields.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis revealed a strong and positive correlation between the use of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton in Louisiana and the incidence of robberies in the state over the period from 2000 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.6505549 indicates a moderately strong positive relationship, indicating that as GMO cotton cultivation increased, so did the number of robberies. It seems that the introduction of GMO cotton could not only enhance crop yields but also sow the seeds for a spike in criminal activity. It looks like we've stumbled upon the phenomenon of "stalk" market crime trends!
The r-squared value of 0.4232216 further supports the conclusion that approximately 42.32% of the variation in robbery rates in Louisiana can be explained by the changes in GMO cotton production. This suggests that GMO cotton cultivation may be a significant contributing factor to the fluctuations in robbery incidents in the state. It's as if we've stumbled upon a "bale" of unexpected statistical significance!
Moreover, the p-value of less than 0.01 indicates that the observed correlation is statistically significant, strengthening the validity of our findings. The likelihood of such a strong correlation occurring by chance is less than 1%, rendering our results highly reliable. It seems that the link between GMO cotton and robberies may not be a mere "cotton-picking" coincidence after all!
As depicted in Fig. 1, the scatterplot illustrates the unmistakable pattern of increasing GMO cotton production aligning with a rise in robbery rates. The data points form a visible upward trend, solidifying the evidence for the observed correlation. It's almost as if the data points themselves are shouting, "We're not just spinning tales; there's a tangible connection here!"
In conclusion, our findings unveil a noteworthy connection between GMO cotton cultivation in Louisiana and the prevalence of robberies in the state. This unexpected association raises intriguing questions about the potential societal impact of agricultural practices and prompts a reevaluation of the unexplored consequences of biotechnological advancements. It's clear that when it comes to growing crops and uncovering unforeseen trends, we need to keep an open mind and a watchful eye for the unexpected "cotton-hearted" outcomes!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has woven an intriguing narrative of the interplay between GMO cotton production and the occurrence of robberies in Louisiana. It's as if the cotton fields themselves are whispering tales of unexpected statistical significance, leaving us pondering the profound question: why did the genetically modified cotton cross the road? To get to the other "crime scene"! Undoubtedly, our findings highlight the need to thread carefully when considering the broader societal implications of agricultural innovations.

As we wrap up this investigation, it's clear that the correlation coefficient of 0.6505549 and the p-value of less than 0.01 not only demand attention but also inspire a lighthearted reminder that crime and cotton may indeed be more intertwined than we previously thought. After all, when it comes to understanding unexpected correlations, it's crucial to stay "seamlessly" focused on the data, no matter how "stitched up" the results may appear!

Ultimately, our study unravels the enigmatic relationship between GMO cotton cultivation and the surge in robberies, highlighting the need for a broader perspective when considering the societal impacts of agricultural advancements. With these findings in mind, it's safe to say that when it comes to conducting further research in this area, we've "picked" the data clean, and no more research is needed.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited GMO Cotton: Unraveling the Thread of Robberies in Louisiana. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Agro-Criminalistics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited GMO Cotton: Unraveling the Thread of Robberies in Louisiana. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Agricultural Innovation and Sustainability


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled GMO Cotton: Unraveling the Thread of Robberies in Louisiana with an abstract of In this study, we delve into the tangled web of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton production in Louisiana and its potential link to the prevalence of robberies in the region. Armed with data from the USDA and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we set out to unravel the mystery behind this curious correlation.
After extensive analysis, we unearthed a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.6505549, with a p-value of less than 0.01, for the period spanning from 2000 to 2022. It appears that the introduction of GMO cotton may be intertwined with a surge in robberies in the state, leading us to ponder the notion of "cotton picking" crime trends.
Our findings paint a comprehensive picture of the potential impact of agricultural practices on societal behavior, shedding light on the unexplored relationship between crop cultivation and criminal activity. As we continue to thread our way through this complex issue, we invite readers to join us in weaving together a greater understanding of the unexpected consequences of biotechnological advancements. After all, when it comes to uncovering the truth, it's essential to stay cottonseed focused!

ChatGPT:

GMO cotton, Louisiana, robberies, genetically modified organism, USDA data, FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, correlation coefficient, p-value, 2000-2022, cotton cultivation, criminal activity, agricultural impact, societal behavior, biotechnological advancements, unexpected consequences.

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in cotton in Louisiana
Detailed data title: Percent of cotton planted in Louisiana that is genetically modified to be herbicide-tolerant (HT), but not insect-resistant (Bt)
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in cotton in Louisiana

Robberies in Louisiana
Detailed data title: The robbery rate per 100,000 residents in Louisiana
Source: FBI Criminal Justice Information Services
See what else correlates with Robberies in Louisiana

Correlation r = 0.6505549 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.4232216 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 42.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Robberies in Louisiana) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in cotton in Louisiana) over the 23 years from 2000 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00078. 0.0007763255642432200000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.65 in 0.078% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,288 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 22 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 22 because we have two variables measured over a period of 23 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.33, 0.84 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
GMO use in cotton in Louisiana (GMO cotton %)13149157101311610369161172544626
Robberies in Louisiana (Robbery rate)168.5175.9159.1156145.7118.4138.3147.1141.5136.9116.5114.4118.6119.7123.1119.1119115.398.788.680.76067.3




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([13,14,9,15,7,10,13,11,6,10,3,6,9,16,11,7,2,5,4,4,6,2,6,])
array_2 = np.array([168.5,175.9,159.1,156,145.7,118.4,138.3,147.1,141.5,136.9,116.5,114.4,118.6,119.7,123.1,119.1,119,115.3,98.7,88.6,80.7,60,67.3,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in cotton in Louisiana"
array_2_name = "Robberies in Louisiana"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are top-notch!


Correlation ID: 3716 · Black Variable ID: 783 · Red Variable ID: 20191
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0