about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,706 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of statistical assistants in Colorado and the second variable is Google searches for 'vihart'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The statistical assistants were just too squared away, leaving no room for the irrational and fun-loving Vi Hart! Without them, the data on Vi Hart searches became increasingly scatter-brained, and the correlation coefficient between statistical assistants and Vi Hart searches approached zero. It's a prime example of how when you take away the statisticians, things just don't add up in the world of math celebrities. The absence of these assistants truly subtracted from the Vi Hart hype, creating quite the division among her fans.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a bustling office in Colorado, where a group of statistical assistants are huddled around a computer, watching vihart's mathematical videos with great enthusiasm. The room is filled with futuristic cybernetic elements, such as holographic displays and intricate digital patterns decorating the walls. The statistical assistants are depicted as humanoid figures with elements of cybernetic enhancements, and their fascination with vihart's videos is evident from their expressions and body language. The vihart fever spreading among them is represented by dynamic visual patterns emanating from the computer and enveloping the entire scene. The room captures the intersection of advanced technology and mathematical passion in a visually striking cybernetic art style. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of statistical assistants in Colorado and Google searches for 'vihart'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cybernetic art An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie Macabre A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s Oragami
ChatGPT: Cybernetic art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of statistical assistants in Colorado and Google searches for 'vihart', in the following situation: Because the statistical assistants in Colorado love vihart's mathematical videos so much, their constant chit-chat about her work causes a surge in vihart-related Google searches. As the number of assistants fluctuates, so does the intensity of their vihart fever, leading to the apparent correlation.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling office in Colorado, a group of statistical assistants are huddled around a computer, watching vihart's mathematical videos with great enthusiasm. As they discuss and share their favorite videos, the sound of typing fills the room as their vihart fever spreads. The number of assistants in the room ebbs and flows throughout the day, causing the frequency of vihart-related Google searches to rise and fall accordingly, creating an apparent correlation between the two variables.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cybernetic art ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling office in Colorado, a group of statistical assistants are huddled around a computer, watching vihart's mathematical videos with great enthusiasm. As they discuss and share their favorite videos, the sound of typing fills the room as their vihart fever spreads. The number of assistants in the room ebbs and flows throughout the day, causing the frequency of vihart-related Google searches to rise and fall accordingly, creating an apparent correlation between the two variables. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a bustling office in Colorado, where a group of statistical assistants are huddled around a computer, watching vihart's mathematical videos with great enthusiasm. The room is filled with futuristic cybernetic elements, such as holographic displays and intricate digital patterns decorating the walls. The statistical assistants are depicted as humanoid figures with elements of cybernetic enhancements, and their fascination with vihart's videos is evident from their expressions and body language. The vihart fever spreading among them is represented by dynamic visual patterns emanating from the computer and enveloping the entire scene. The room captures the intersection of advanced technology and mathematical passion in a visually striking cybernetic art style.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in The number of statistical assistants in Colorado caused vihart (Google searches for 'vihart') to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Statistical Assistants of Colorado and ViHart: A Search for Correlation

The Journal of Quirky Statistical Analysis

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of statistical assistants in Colorado and Google searches for 'vihart'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8454549 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Statistical Assistants of Colorado and ViHart: A Search for Correlation

[[ABSTRACT]]
Prepare yourselves for a wild statistical ride as we dive into the uncharted territory of the correlation between the number of statistical assistants in Colorado and Google searches for the mathematical maven ViHart. This study takes a whimsical approach to the serious world of statistical analysis, employing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends to unravel this enigmatic connection.

With a correlation coefficient of 0.8454549 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2004 to 2020, the results point to a strong positive relationship, much like the bond between a dad and his puns - unbreakable! Our findings offer laughs and insights as we ponder the intricacies of this unusual association. So, grab your calculators and be ready to solve for the unexpected, because this paper is no derivative of your typical research study.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of statistical assistants in Colorado and Google searches for 'vihart'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Statistical Assistants of Colorado and ViHart: A Search for Correlation

[[ABSTRACT]]
Prepare yourselves for a wild statistical ride as we dive into the uncharted territory of the correlation between the number of statistical assistants in Colorado and Google searches for the mathematical maven ViHart. This study takes a whimsical approach to the serious world of statistical analysis, employing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends to unravel this enigmatic connection.

With a correlation coefficient of 0.8454549 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2004 to 2020, the results point to a strong positive relationship, much like the bond between a dad and his puns - unbreakable! Our findings offer laughs and insights as we ponder the intricacies of this unusual association. So, grab your calculators and be ready to solve for the unexpected, because this paper is no derivative of your typical research study.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Welcome, fellow explorers of the statistical cosmos! As we embark on this journey of uncovering the mysterious relationship between the number of statistical assistants in Colorado and Google searches for the mathematical phenom ViHart, I can't help but recall the classic dad joke: Why did the statistician go to art school? To learn how to draw his conclusions! A little humor goes a long way, even in the world of academia.

The seemingly unlikely pairing of statistical assistants and ViHart's mathematical musings has puzzled many, much like trying to figure out why the statistician's plant died – it just wasn't making enough "root" calculations! But fear not, brave readers, for we are here to shed light on this peculiar correlation and maybe even crack a few more jokes along the way.

Now, you might be wondering, how did this all come about? Well, it all started with a spark of curiosity, much like the fire under the data analyst's chair – it's burning with statistical significance! Our quest led us to dive into the data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, hoping to unearth any patterns that could illuminate this unconventional link. And just like a good dad joke, the unexpected twist of this investigation has kept us on our toes.

So, join us as we venture into this uncharted territory, where statistical assistants and ViHart converge like two unsuspecting variables in a regression analysis – unexpected, yet undeniably intertwined. It's time to blur the boundaries between numbers and creativity, much like the mathematician who got cold during a winter storm – he just turned up the degrees! So, buckle up and get ready for a statistical rollercoaster, because this paper promises a wild ride full of surprises and, of course, a healthy dose of dad jokes.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of statistical assistants in Colorado and Google searches for 'vihart'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Statistical Assistants of Colorado and ViHart: A Search for Correlation

[[ABSTRACT]]
Prepare yourselves for a wild statistical ride as we dive into the uncharted territory of the correlation between the number of statistical assistants in Colorado and Google searches for the mathematical maven ViHart. This study takes a whimsical approach to the serious world of statistical analysis, employing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends to unravel this enigmatic connection.

With a correlation coefficient of 0.8454549 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2004 to 2020, the results point to a strong positive relationship, much like the bond between a dad and his puns - unbreakable! Our findings offer laughs and insights as we ponder the intricacies of this unusual association. So, grab your calculators and be ready to solve for the unexpected, because this paper is no derivative of your typical research study.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Welcome, fellow explorers of the statistical cosmos! As we embark on this journey of uncovering the mysterious relationship between the number of statistical assistants in Colorado and Google searches for the mathematical phenom ViHart, I can't help but recall the classic dad joke: Why did the statistician go to art school? To learn how to draw his conclusions! A little humor goes a long way, even in the world of academia.
The seemingly unlikely pairing of statistical assistants and ViHart's mathematical musings has puzzled many, much like trying to figure out why the statistician's plant died – it just wasn't making enough "root" calculations! But fear not, brave readers, for we are here to shed light on this peculiar correlation and maybe even crack a few more jokes along the way.
Now, you might be wondering, how did this all come about? Well, it all started with a spark of curiosity, much like the fire under the data analyst's chair – it's burning with statistical significance! Our quest led us to dive into the data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, hoping to unearth any patterns that could illuminate this unconventional link. And just like a good dad joke, the unexpected twist of this investigation has kept us on our toes.
So, join us as we venture into this uncharted territory, where statistical assistants and ViHart converge like two unsuspecting variables in a regression analysis – unexpected, yet undeniably intertwined. It's time to blur the boundaries between numbers and creativity, much like the mathematician who got cold during a winter storm – he just turned up the degrees! So, buckle up and get ready for a statistical rollercoaster, because this paper promises a wild ride full of surprises and, of course, a healthy dose of dad jokes.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In their seminal work, Smith and Doe (2015) delve into the world of statistical assistants, shedding light on the pivotal role these professionals play in the realm of data analysis. They aptly illustrate the symbiotic relationship between statistical assistants and the data they manipulate, much like the bond between a statistician and their calculator – inseparable!

Speaking of statistical relationships, Jones et al. (2018) explore the fascinating realm of internet search trends, uncovering the intricate patterns that govern online behaviors. Their findings reveal the curious peaks and troughs of Google searches, akin to the ebb and flow of statistical significance – always captivating, never quite predictable!

Now, shifting the lens to a more whimsical perspective, we turn to the delightful musings of ViHart in "Mathematical Musings" (2012). Hart's quirky exploration of mathematical concepts captures the imagination and curiosity of many, much like a good dad joke – unexpectedly delightful and utterly unforgettable!

In a more cheery and fantastical realm, we find "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland" by Lewis Carroll (1865) offering a whimsical take on the unexpected and inexplicable, much like the curious correlation we aim to unravel. After all, statistical analysis can sometimes feel as perplexing as navigating a nonsensical tea party!

In a desperate search for any scraps of information related to our unusual correlation, we even delved into the extensive literature of grocery store receipts, hoping to stumble upon some hidden statistical nuggets among the mundane purchase records. Alas, our quest only led to the realization that even mathematical mysteries can't be unraveled from a crumpled CVS receipt – unless, of course, you fancy a statistical analysis of your last shopping trip!

As we wade deeper into this enchanting investigation, the parallels between statistical assistants and ViHart's influence become clearer, much like a well-constructed scatter plot – seemingly disparate at first, but ultimately revealing a harmonious connection, just like a perfectly timed punchline in a dad joke.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of statistical assistants in Colorado and Google searches for 'vihart'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Statistical Assistants of Colorado and ViHart: A Search for Correlation

[[ABSTRACT]]
Prepare yourselves for a wild statistical ride as we dive into the uncharted territory of the correlation between the number of statistical assistants in Colorado and Google searches for the mathematical maven ViHart. This study takes a whimsical approach to the serious world of statistical analysis, employing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends to unravel this enigmatic connection.

With a correlation coefficient of 0.8454549 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2004 to 2020, the results point to a strong positive relationship, much like the bond between a dad and his puns - unbreakable! Our findings offer laughs and insights as we ponder the intricacies of this unusual association. So, grab your calculators and be ready to solve for the unexpected, because this paper is no derivative of your typical research study.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Welcome, fellow explorers of the statistical cosmos! As we embark on this journey of uncovering the mysterious relationship between the number of statistical assistants in Colorado and Google searches for the mathematical phenom ViHart, I can't help but recall the classic dad joke: Why did the statistician go to art school? To learn how to draw his conclusions! A little humor goes a long way, even in the world of academia.
The seemingly unlikely pairing of statistical assistants and ViHart's mathematical musings has puzzled many, much like trying to figure out why the statistician's plant died – it just wasn't making enough "root" calculations! But fear not, brave readers, for we are here to shed light on this peculiar correlation and maybe even crack a few more jokes along the way.
Now, you might be wondering, how did this all come about? Well, it all started with a spark of curiosity, much like the fire under the data analyst's chair – it's burning with statistical significance! Our quest led us to dive into the data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, hoping to unearth any patterns that could illuminate this unconventional link. And just like a good dad joke, the unexpected twist of this investigation has kept us on our toes.
So, join us as we venture into this uncharted territory, where statistical assistants and ViHart converge like two unsuspecting variables in a regression analysis – unexpected, yet undeniably intertwined. It's time to blur the boundaries between numbers and creativity, much like the mathematician who got cold during a winter storm – he just turned up the degrees! So, buckle up and get ready for a statistical rollercoaster, because this paper promises a wild ride full of surprises and, of course, a healthy dose of dad jokes.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Ah, the moment we've all been waiting for – the nitty-gritty details of how we wrangled the data and tamed the statistical beasts! This section will reveal the not-so-secret recipe to our zany research concoction, as we combine the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends data in a manner that would make even the most serious researchers crack a smile. It's time to uncover the method behind the statistical madness, so hold onto your slide rules and let's dive in!

First things first, we gathered data on the number of statistical assistants in the state of Colorado from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, which, let's be honest, felt a bit like piecing together a jigsaw puzzle made of statistical formulas – challenging, yet oddly satisfying, much like solving a perplexing math problem on a lazy Sunday afternoon.

Then, we delved into the world of Google Trends, capturing the search interest for the one and only ViHart – a mathematical maven who has likely inspired countless math enthusiasts to embrace their inner nerdiness in the coolest way possible.

Now, here's where the fun really started! We developed a top-secret algorithm (okay, maybe not that top-secret, but definitely nerdy) to harmonize these disparate datasets, combining them with all the finesse of a mathematician serenading a beautiful equation. It was a bit like choreographing a dance between the statistical assistants and ViHart's mathematical wonders, aiming to uncover the rhythm of their peculiar relationship.

Once we had our intertwined datasets in hand, we embarked on an odyssey of statistical analysis, utilizing a cocktail of regression models, time series analysis, and a touch of magic – alright, maybe not magic, but certainly some wizardry with statistical software. It was like being in a statistical kitchen, concocting a grand feast of analytical techniques, garnished with a hint of quirkiness and a dash of dad jokes.

But of course, our methodology didn't end there. No, it wouldn't be a proper statistical adventure without a sprinkle of unpredictability! We devised a series of sensitivity analyses to test the robustness of our findings, ensuring that our results stood strong amid the statistical winds just like a well-built dad joke in the face of skepticism. We left no statistical stone unturned in our pursuit of understanding this captivating correlation, much like a researcher hunting for the elusive p-value in the wild statistical jungle.

And so, with the methodologies deftly executed, we emerged from the statistical cauldron with findings that not only shed light on the connection between statistical assistants and ViHart, but also managed to pepper the journey with unexpected laughs and, you guessed it, a hearty serving of dad jokes. It's safe to say that this statistical concoction turned out to be quite a treat – a bit like finding a hidden treasure in a sea of data, or maybe just like a good ol' dad joke nestled snugly within a conversation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of statistical assistants in Colorado and Google searches for 'vihart'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.8454549, r-squared of 0.7147941, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Statistical Assistants of Colorado and ViHart: A Search for Correlation

[[ABSTRACT]]
Prepare yourselves for a wild statistical ride as we dive into the uncharted territory of the correlation between the number of statistical assistants in Colorado and Google searches for the mathematical maven ViHart. This study takes a whimsical approach to the serious world of statistical analysis, employing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends to unravel this enigmatic connection.

With a correlation coefficient of 0.8454549 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2004 to 2020, the results point to a strong positive relationship, much like the bond between a dad and his puns - unbreakable! Our findings offer laughs and insights as we ponder the intricacies of this unusual association. So, grab your calculators and be ready to solve for the unexpected, because this paper is no derivative of your typical research study.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Welcome, fellow explorers of the statistical cosmos! As we embark on this journey of uncovering the mysterious relationship between the number of statistical assistants in Colorado and Google searches for the mathematical phenom ViHart, I can't help but recall the classic dad joke: Why did the statistician go to art school? To learn how to draw his conclusions! A little humor goes a long way, even in the world of academia.
The seemingly unlikely pairing of statistical assistants and ViHart's mathematical musings has puzzled many, much like trying to figure out why the statistician's plant died – it just wasn't making enough "root" calculations! But fear not, brave readers, for we are here to shed light on this peculiar correlation and maybe even crack a few more jokes along the way.
Now, you might be wondering, how did this all come about? Well, it all started with a spark of curiosity, much like the fire under the data analyst's chair – it's burning with statistical significance! Our quest led us to dive into the data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, hoping to unearth any patterns that could illuminate this unconventional link. And just like a good dad joke, the unexpected twist of this investigation has kept us on our toes.
So, join us as we venture into this uncharted territory, where statistical assistants and ViHart converge like two unsuspecting variables in a regression analysis – unexpected, yet undeniably intertwined. It's time to blur the boundaries between numbers and creativity, much like the mathematician who got cold during a winter storm – he just turned up the degrees! So, buckle up and get ready for a statistical rollercoaster, because this paper promises a wild ride full of surprises and, of course, a healthy dose of dad jokes.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data revealed a strong positive correlation between the number of statistical assistants in Colorado and Google searches for ViHart. The correlation coefficient of 0.8454549 suggests a robust relationship, akin to the bond between a dad and his puns - unbreakable! This finding has the same level of certainty as a dad's insistence on grilling - it's well done!

Furthermore, the calculated r-squared value of 0.7147941 indicates that approximately 71.5% of the variance in ViHart searches can be explained by the number of statistical assistants in Colorado. That's a higher explanatory power than the dad who swears by his barbecue techniques no matter the weather!

The p-value of less than 0.01 adds another layer of confidence to our results, much like a dad confidently asking, "Who's the coolest dad?" - "Me!" This significant p-value points to the unlikelihood of the observed correlation occurring by chance, providing compelling evidence for the relationship between statistical assistants and ViHart searches.

To visually illustrate this compelling correlation, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot showing the strong positive relationship between the number of statistical assistants in Colorado and Google searches for ViHart. The scatterplot is a sight to behold, much like a dad's legendary backyard barbecue ribs – a masterpiece that's both visually and culinarily satisfying.

In summary, our findings unveil an unexpected yet undeniable connection between statistical assistants and ViHart, offering insights and a sprinkle of humor to the world of statistical analysis. Our results illuminate this peculiar correlation, leaving us with a newfound appreciation for the unpredictability and, of course, the enduring charm of a good dad joke.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of statistical assistants in Colorado and Google searches for 'vihart'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Statistical Assistants of Colorado and ViHart: A Search for Correlation

[[ABSTRACT]]
Prepare yourselves for a wild statistical ride as we dive into the uncharted territory of the correlation between the number of statistical assistants in Colorado and Google searches for the mathematical maven ViHart. This study takes a whimsical approach to the serious world of statistical analysis, employing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends to unravel this enigmatic connection.

With a correlation coefficient of 0.8454549 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2004 to 2020, the results point to a strong positive relationship, much like the bond between a dad and his puns - unbreakable! Our findings offer laughs and insights as we ponder the intricacies of this unusual association. So, grab your calculators and be ready to solve for the unexpected, because this paper is no derivative of your typical research study.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their seminal work, Smith and Doe (2015) delve into the world of statistical assistants, shedding light on the pivotal role these professionals play in the realm of data analysis. They aptly illustrate the symbiotic relationship between statistical assistants and the data they manipulate, much like the bond between a statistician and their calculator – inseparable!
Speaking of statistical relationships, Jones et al. (2018) explore the fascinating realm of internet search trends, uncovering the intricate patterns that govern online behaviors. Their findings reveal the curious peaks and troughs of Google searches, akin to the ebb and flow of statistical significance – always captivating, never quite predictable!
Now, shifting the lens to a more whimsical perspective, we turn to the delightful musings of ViHart in "Mathematical Musings" (2012). Hart's quirky exploration of mathematical concepts captures the imagination and curiosity of many, much like a good dad joke – unexpectedly delightful and utterly unforgettable!
In a more cheery and fantastical realm, we find "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland" by Lewis Carroll (1865) offering a whimsical take on the unexpected and inexplicable, much like the curious correlation we aim to unravel. After all, statistical analysis can sometimes feel as perplexing as navigating a nonsensical tea party!
In a desperate search for any scraps of information related to our unusual correlation, we even delved into the extensive literature of grocery store receipts, hoping to stumble upon some hidden statistical nuggets among the mundane purchase records. Alas, our quest only led to the realization that even mathematical mysteries can't be unraveled from a crumpled CVS receipt – unless, of course, you fancy a statistical analysis of your last shopping trip!
As we wade deeper into this enchanting investigation, the parallels between statistical assistants and ViHart's influence become clearer, much like a well-constructed scatter plot – seemingly disparate at first, but ultimately revealing a harmonious connection, just like a perfectly timed punchline in a dad joke.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a strong positive correlation between the number of statistical assistants in Colorado and Google searches for ViHart. The correlation coefficient of 0.8454549 suggests a robust relationship, akin to the bond between a dad and his puns - unbreakable! This finding has the same level of certainty as a dad's insistence on grilling - it's well done!
Furthermore, the calculated r-squared value of 0.7147941 indicates that approximately 71.5% of the variance in ViHart searches can be explained by the number of statistical assistants in Colorado. That's a higher explanatory power than the dad who swears by his barbecue techniques no matter the weather!
The p-value of less than 0.01 adds another layer of confidence to our results, much like a dad confidently asking, "Who's the coolest dad?" - "Me!" This significant p-value points to the unlikelihood of the observed correlation occurring by chance, providing compelling evidence for the relationship between statistical assistants and ViHart searches.
To visually illustrate this compelling correlation, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot showing the strong positive relationship between the number of statistical assistants in Colorado and Google searches for ViHart. The scatterplot is a sight to behold, much like a dad's legendary backyard barbecue ribs – a masterpiece that's both visually and culinarily satisfying.
In summary, our findings unveil an unexpected yet undeniable connection between statistical assistants and ViHart, offering insights and a sprinkle of humor to the world of statistical analysis. Our results illuminate this peculiar correlation, leaving us with a newfound appreciation for the unpredictability and, of course, the enduring charm of a good dad joke.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

In this whimsical statistical journey, we stumbled upon a correlation that seems as surprising as finding a mathematician at a comedy club – the number of statistical assistants in Colorado is indeed positively correlated with Google searches for ViHart. Our findings resonate with the work of Smith and Doe (2015), who highlighted the indispensable role of statistical assistants, much like the reliance of a dad on his trusty dad jokes – integral and irreplaceable!

The strong positive relationship we uncovered mirrors the captivating peaks and troughs of internet search trends elucidated by Jones et al. (2018). Just as statistical significance ebbs and flows in seemingly unpredictable patterns, the surge in ViHart searches seems to dance to the beat of statistical assistant numbers. It's like watching a magic show – you can't quite explain it, but you can't look away!

As we ventured deeper into this peculiar investigation, we couldn't help but draw parallels between our findings and the whimsical musings of ViHart herself. It's as if our data unfolded before us like the pages of "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland" (Carroll, 1865), revealing a world where statistical relationships and the charm of mathematical exploration collide in unexpected harmony. It's a bit like discovering a piñata at a statistics seminar – an inexplicable but delightful surprise!

The r-squared value of 0.7147941 provides substantial explanatory power for the variance in ViHart searches, much like a dad who insists on explaining the mechanics of his barbecue grill in painstaking detail. It's a testament to the robustness of the relationship we've uncovered, leaving us with as much certainty as the dad who proudly proclaims, "I've got this grillin' thing down to a science!"

Our study lends further credence to the often overlooked influence of statistical assistants in the realm of internet searches and mathematical musings. The significant p-value reinforces the unlikelihood of the observed correlation occurring by chance, akin to a dad confidently asserting, "I didn't get these dad jokes from the internet – I made them all up myself!" This resounding evidence cements the bond between statistical assistants and ViHart searches, leaving us with a level of confidence comparable to a dad who firmly believes his barbecue ribs are second to none.

In conclusion, our findings shine a light on the unexpected yet enchanting correlation between statistical assistants and ViHart, proving that even in the world of statistical analysis, there's always room for a good dad joke. Much like the enduring charm of a well-timed punchline, this correlation adds a sprinkle of humor to the often serious realm of data analysis, leaving us with an appreciation for the delightful surprises that statistical exploration can unveil.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of statistical assistants in Colorado and Google searches for 'vihart'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Statistical Assistants of Colorado and ViHart: A Search for Correlation

[[ABSTRACT]]
Prepare yourselves for a wild statistical ride as we dive into the uncharted territory of the correlation between the number of statistical assistants in Colorado and Google searches for the mathematical maven ViHart. This study takes a whimsical approach to the serious world of statistical analysis, employing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends to unravel this enigmatic connection.

With a correlation coefficient of 0.8454549 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2004 to 2020, the results point to a strong positive relationship, much like the bond between a dad and his puns - unbreakable! Our findings offer laughs and insights as we ponder the intricacies of this unusual association. So, grab your calculators and be ready to solve for the unexpected, because this paper is no derivative of your typical research study.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Welcome, fellow explorers of the statistical cosmos! As we embark on this journey of uncovering the mysterious relationship between the number of statistical assistants in Colorado and Google searches for the mathematical phenom ViHart, I can't help but recall the classic dad joke: Why did the statistician go to art school? To learn how to draw his conclusions! A little humor goes a long way, even in the world of academia.
The seemingly unlikely pairing of statistical assistants and ViHart's mathematical musings has puzzled many, much like trying to figure out why the statistician's plant died – it just wasn't making enough "root" calculations! But fear not, brave readers, for we are here to shed light on this peculiar correlation and maybe even crack a few more jokes along the way.
Now, you might be wondering, how did this all come about? Well, it all started with a spark of curiosity, much like the fire under the data analyst's chair – it's burning with statistical significance! Our quest led us to dive into the data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, hoping to unearth any patterns that could illuminate this unconventional link. And just like a good dad joke, the unexpected twist of this investigation has kept us on our toes.
So, join us as we venture into this uncharted territory, where statistical assistants and ViHart converge like two unsuspecting variables in a regression analysis – unexpected, yet undeniably intertwined. It's time to blur the boundaries between numbers and creativity, much like the mathematician who got cold during a winter storm – he just turned up the degrees! So, buckle up and get ready for a statistical rollercoaster, because this paper promises a wild ride full of surprises and, of course, a healthy dose of dad jokes.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a strong positive correlation between the number of statistical assistants in Colorado and Google searches for ViHart. The correlation coefficient of 0.8454549 suggests a robust relationship, akin to the bond between a dad and his puns - unbreakable! This finding has the same level of certainty as a dad's insistence on grilling - it's well done!
Furthermore, the calculated r-squared value of 0.7147941 indicates that approximately 71.5% of the variance in ViHart searches can be explained by the number of statistical assistants in Colorado. That's a higher explanatory power than the dad who swears by his barbecue techniques no matter the weather!
The p-value of less than 0.01 adds another layer of confidence to our results, much like a dad confidently asking, "Who's the coolest dad?" - "Me!" This significant p-value points to the unlikelihood of the observed correlation occurring by chance, providing compelling evidence for the relationship between statistical assistants and ViHart searches.
To visually illustrate this compelling correlation, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot showing the strong positive relationship between the number of statistical assistants in Colorado and Google searches for ViHart. The scatterplot is a sight to behold, much like a dad's legendary backyard barbecue ribs – a masterpiece that's both visually and culinarily satisfying.
In summary, our findings unveil an unexpected yet undeniable connection between statistical assistants and ViHart, offering insights and a sprinkle of humor to the world of statistical analysis. Our results illuminate this peculiar correlation, leaving us with a newfound appreciation for the unpredictability and, of course, the enduring charm of a good dad joke.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has brought to light the unlikely yet undeniably strong correlation between the number of statistical assistants in Colorado and Google searches for ViHart. The statistical analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8454549, akin to the bond between a dad and his puns - unbreakable! It seems this correlation is as solid as a dad’s dad jokes at a family reunion – always present and impossible to ignore.

Further bolstering our discovery, the r-squared value of 0.7147941 emphasizes the substantial explanatory power of the number of statistical assistants in explaining the variance in ViHart searches. That's more explanatory power than a dad's unwavering belief in his barbecuing skills – and that's saying something, trust me.

With a p-value of less than 0.01, our results indicate that the observed correlation is highly unlikely to be by chance, much like a dad confidently asserting his status as the coolest dad on the block - statistically significant and irrefutable.

Our scatterplot beautifully illustrates this robust relationship, much like a dad's backyard barbecue ribs - visually and statistically satisfying.

In the end, this study not only sheds light on an unexpected correlation but also offers a glimpse into the whimsical world of statistical analysis. And just like a good dad joke, our findings provide both laughter and insights.

It is clear that no more research in this area is needed. The results speak for themselves - much like a dad reaching for the last slice of pizza.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Statistical Assistants of Colorado and ViHart: A Search for Correlation. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Quirky Statistical Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Statistical Assistants of Colorado and ViHart: A Search for Correlation. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Quirky Statistical Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Statistical Assistants of Colorado and ViHart: A Search for Correlation with an abstract of Prepare yourselves for a wild statistical ride as we dive into the uncharted territory of the correlation between the number of statistical assistants in Colorado and Google searches for the mathematical maven ViHart. This study takes a whimsical approach to the serious world of statistical analysis, employing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends to unravel this enigmatic connection.
With a correlation coefficient of 0.8454549 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2004 to 2020, the results point to a strong positive relationship, much like the bond between a dad and his puns - unbreakable! Our findings offer laughs and insights as we ponder the intricacies of this unusual association. So, grab your calculators and be ready to solve for the unexpected, because this paper is no derivative of your typical research study.

ChatGPT:

Statistical assistants, Colorado, ViHart, correlation, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Google Trends, correlation coefficient, p-value, mathematical maven, statistical analysis, relationship, data analysis, statistical research

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of statistical assistants in Colorado
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of statistical assistants in Colorado
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of statistical assistants in Colorado

Google searches for 'vihart'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'vihart' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'vihart'

Correlation r = 0.8454549 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7147941 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 71.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'vihart') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of statistical assistants in Colorado) over the 17 years from 2004 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.9E-5. 0.0000192108585871652300000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.85 in 0.0019% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 52,054 random variables You don't actually need 52 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 16 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 16 because we have two variables measured over a period of 17 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.61, 0.94 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020
The number of statistical assistants in Colorado (Statistical Assistants)160100709090704014020029020023013017018013070
Google searches for 'vihart' (Rel. search volume)7.333333.083332.2513.666671.52.4166719.416738.333342.666728.66671813.3333119.583336.833335.08333




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([160,100,70,90,90,70,40,140,200,290,200,230,130,170,180,130,70,])
array_2 = np.array([7.33333,3.08333,2.25,1,3.66667,1.5,2.41667,19.4167,38.3333,42.6667,28.6667,18,13.3333,11,9.58333,6.83333,5.08333,])
array_1_name = "The number of statistical assistants in Colorado"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'vihart'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is pure awesomeness!


Correlation ID: 3706 · Black Variable ID: 5817 · Red Variable ID: 1492
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0