about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,671 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho and the second variable is Google searches for 'how to immigrate to norway'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the air quality improved in Coeur d'Alene, people's spirits lifted, leading to a newfound zest for life. This unexpected surge in positivity prompted them to rethink their surroundings and consider making a move to Norway for its picturesque landscapes and fresh Nordic air. It's as if the clear skies and pristine environment whispered, "Norway is calling," and sparked a collective interest in starting afresh amidst the fjords. Who knew that a breath of fresh air in Idaho could lead to a whimsical waltz towards the land of the midnight sun!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a serene town nestled in the Coeur d'Alene hills. The sky above is a vibrant, clear blue, with wispy clouds drifting lazily. The town is bustling with people strolling the immaculate streets, grinning from ear to ear. The air is pure, free from any hint of pollution. In the background, visualize a Google search bar showcasing a decline in searches for "how to immigrate to Norway". Capture a sense of contentment and community in this idyllic setting. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho and Google searches for 'how to immigrate to norway'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Realistic Cute cartoon High-tech Charcoal A scene from Skyrim
ChatGPT: A scene from Skyrim

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho and Google searches for 'how to immigrate to norway', in the following situation: Decrease in air pollution in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho caused Google searches for 'how to immigrate to Norway' to decrease. This is because as the air quality improved, the citizens of Coeur d'Alene found themselves less "norway-ed" about the idea of immigrating somewhere with cleaner air, resulting in a decreased interest in relocating to Norway.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A clear blue sky hovers over the picturesque hills of Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, where the air no longer carries the haze of pollution. People are seen strolling the clean streets, with bright smiles on their faces. At the same time, the Google search bar shows a decline in searches for "how to immigrate to Norway," indicating a lessening desire to move to the Scandinavian country from Coeur d'Alene.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A scene from Skyrim ] and depicting this scene: A clear blue sky hovers over the picturesque hills of Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, where the air no longer carries the haze of pollution. People are seen strolling the clean streets, with bright smiles on their faces. At the same time, the Google search bar shows a decline in searches for "how to immigrate to Norway," indicating a lessening desire to move to the Scandinavian country from Coeur d'Alene. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a serene town nestled in the Coeur d'Alene hills. The sky above is a vibrant, clear blue, with wispy clouds drifting lazily. The town is bustling with people strolling the immaculate streets, grinning from ear to ear. The air is pure, free from any hint of pollution. In the background, visualize a Google search bar showcasing a decline in searches for "how to immigrate to Norway". Capture a sense of contentment and community in this idyllic setting.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Air pollution in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho caused how to immigrate to norway (Google searches for 'how to immigrate to norway') to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
A Breath of Fresh Air: Unpacking the Link Between Air Pollution in Coeur d'Alene and Norwegian Immigration Aspirations

The Journal of Eclectic Environmental Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho and Google searches for 'how to immigrate to norway'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7530943 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
A Breath of Fresh Air: Unpacking the Link Between Air Pollution in Coeur d'Alene and Norwegian Immigration Aspirations

[[ABSTRACT]]
Understanding the connection between environmental factors and human behavior is a complex puzzle, yet crucial for policymaking and societal well-being. This study delves into the unexpected relationship between air pollution levels in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, and the frequency of Google searches for "how to immigrate to Norway." Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis covering the period from 2004 to 2023. The results revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.7530943 and p < 0.01, indicating a robust association between air pollution and the desire to seek greener pastures abroad. While the precise mechanisms warrant further investigation, our findings underscore the intertwining of environmental factors and human aspirations, shedding light on the whimsical yet thought-provoking ripple effects of air quality on individuals' migration contemplations. This study urges policymakers to not only consider the health implications of air pollution but also the unexpected ripple effects on international mobility – it seems the allure of fresh air extends far beyond the lungs.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho and Google searches for 'how to immigrate to norway'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A Breath of Fresh Air: Unpacking the Link Between Air Pollution in Coeur d'Alene and Norwegian Immigration Aspirations

[[ABSTRACT]]
Understanding the connection between environmental factors and human behavior is a complex puzzle, yet crucial for policymaking and societal well-being. This study delves into the unexpected relationship between air pollution levels in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, and the frequency of Google searches for "how to immigrate to Norway." Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis covering the period from 2004 to 2023. The results revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.7530943 and p < 0.01, indicating a robust association between air pollution and the desire to seek greener pastures abroad. While the precise mechanisms warrant further investigation, our findings underscore the intertwining of environmental factors and human aspirations, shedding light on the whimsical yet thought-provoking ripple effects of air quality on individuals' migration contemplations. This study urges policymakers to not only consider the health implications of air pollution but also the unexpected ripple effects on international mobility – it seems the allure of fresh air extends far beyond the lungs.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Air pollution is a pressing environmental issue with far-reaching implications for public health, urban planning, and now, it seems, international wanderlust. The interplay between air quality and human behavior has long intrigued researchers and policymakers alike, leading us down unexpected avenues of inquiry. In this study, we venture into the realm of whimsical statistical analysis to explore the peculiar linkage between air pollution in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, and the inclination to plot a course towards the land of fjords and Northern Lights.

While it may seem like an unusual pairing – the industrial emissions of the American heartland and the allure of the Scandinavian utopia – our preliminary analysis suggests a compelling association that may raise eyebrows and air quality monitoring stations alike. The coupling of environmental indicators with sociological phenomena is indeed a venture into uncharted territory, reminiscent of an intrepid explorer navigating the seas of statistical inference and ecological consciousness simultaneously. It compels us to tackle the question: Do particles in the air have the power to sway individuals towards a longing for distant shores and Nordic skies?

Applying the robust tools of correlation analysis and statistical inference to this multifaceted puzzle, we aim to unravel the enigma that lies beneath the surface of Coeur d'Alene's atmospheric layers—a task akin to deciphering an intricate pattern in a tapestry, where threads of environmental influence intertwine with the fabric of human ambition. Our findings promise to not only elucidate the unexpected connections between air pollution and aspirations for migration but also to infuse a breath of fresh insight into the oft-stale realm of environmental and social research. After all, where there's smoke, there may be a statistical fire burning bright in the embers of regression analysis.

As we embark on this academic odyssey, we are mindful of the potential implications for policy and public health practice, which may need to consider the unanticipated ripple effects of air quality on individuals' contemplations of international relocation. The overlap between atmospheric conditions and human aspirations is a particularly potent concoction deserving of our scholarly scrutiny, even if it leads us to embrace a few chuckles and raised eyebrows along the way. So, brace yourselves for a cerebral journey through the haze of air quality and the winds of a whimsical statistical association that seems to blow with the murmurs of "searching how to immigrate to Norway."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho and Google searches for 'how to immigrate to norway'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A Breath of Fresh Air: Unpacking the Link Between Air Pollution in Coeur d'Alene and Norwegian Immigration Aspirations

[[ABSTRACT]]
Understanding the connection between environmental factors and human behavior is a complex puzzle, yet crucial for policymaking and societal well-being. This study delves into the unexpected relationship between air pollution levels in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, and the frequency of Google searches for "how to immigrate to Norway." Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis covering the period from 2004 to 2023. The results revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.7530943 and p < 0.01, indicating a robust association between air pollution and the desire to seek greener pastures abroad. While the precise mechanisms warrant further investigation, our findings underscore the intertwining of environmental factors and human aspirations, shedding light on the whimsical yet thought-provoking ripple effects of air quality on individuals' migration contemplations. This study urges policymakers to not only consider the health implications of air pollution but also the unexpected ripple effects on international mobility – it seems the allure of fresh air extends far beyond the lungs.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Air pollution is a pressing environmental issue with far-reaching implications for public health, urban planning, and now, it seems, international wanderlust. The interplay between air quality and human behavior has long intrigued researchers and policymakers alike, leading us down unexpected avenues of inquiry. In this study, we venture into the realm of whimsical statistical analysis to explore the peculiar linkage between air pollution in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, and the inclination to plot a course towards the land of fjords and Northern Lights.
While it may seem like an unusual pairing – the industrial emissions of the American heartland and the allure of the Scandinavian utopia – our preliminary analysis suggests a compelling association that may raise eyebrows and air quality monitoring stations alike. The coupling of environmental indicators with sociological phenomena is indeed a venture into uncharted territory, reminiscent of an intrepid explorer navigating the seas of statistical inference and ecological consciousness simultaneously. It compels us to tackle the question: Do particles in the air have the power to sway individuals towards a longing for distant shores and Nordic skies?
Applying the robust tools of correlation analysis and statistical inference to this multifaceted puzzle, we aim to unravel the enigma that lies beneath the surface of Coeur d'Alene's atmospheric layers—a task akin to deciphering an intricate pattern in a tapestry, where threads of environmental influence intertwine with the fabric of human ambition. Our findings promise to not only elucidate the unexpected connections between air pollution and aspirations for migration but also to infuse a breath of fresh insight into the oft-stale realm of environmental and social research. After all, where there's smoke, there may be a statistical fire burning bright in the embers of regression analysis.
As we embark on this academic odyssey, we are mindful of the potential implications for policy and public health practice, which may need to consider the unanticipated ripple effects of air quality on individuals' contemplations of international relocation. The overlap between atmospheric conditions and human aspirations is a particularly potent concoction deserving of our scholarly scrutiny, even if it leads us to embrace a few chuckles and raised eyebrows along the way. So, brace yourselves for a cerebral journey through the haze of air quality and the winds of a whimsical statistical association that seems to blow with the murmurs of "searching how to immigrate to Norway."

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Smith (2010) conducted a seminal study on the impact of air pollution on psychological well-being, while Doe and Jones (2015) explored the sociological ramifications of environmental factors on migration patterns. These esteemed researchers laid the groundwork for our investigation into the peculiar correlation between air pollution in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, and the frequency of Google searches for "how to immigrate to Norway."

As we delve into the scholarly ocean of environmental sociology, it is imperative to consider the contributions of several notable non-fiction publications that have shed light on the intricate relationship between environmental factors and human behavior. "The Sixth Extinction" by Elizabeth Kolbert and "This Changes Everything" by Naomi Klein provide invaluable insights into the complexities of environmental degradation and its societal repercussions. Moreover, the fictional realm has not been immune to the allure of environmental themes, as evidenced by the likes of "The Overstory" by Richard Powers and "Barbarian Days" by William Finnegan, which poignantly portray the profound impact of environmental settings on human lives.

In a more unconventional vein, the internet culture has birthed memes that encapsulate the essence of our inquiry, with the "I Should Buy a Boat Cat" meme highlighting the whimsical impulse for seeking new horizons and the "This is fine" meme capturing the peculiar resignation in the face of environmental challenges. These cultural manifestations underscore the omnipresence of the human desire for change and escape in response to environmental stimuli.

As we navigate through this trove of literature and cultural artifacts, we are reminded that the scholarly pursuit of knowledge need not be devoid of levity and unexpected discoveries. Our endeavor to unravel the linkage between Coeur d'Alene's air quality and Norwegian immigration aspirations emboldens us to embrace the serendipitous discoveries that lie beyond the statistical confines, for it is in the embrace of the unpredictable that we may stumble upon the most illuminating insights.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho and Google searches for 'how to immigrate to norway'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A Breath of Fresh Air: Unpacking the Link Between Air Pollution in Coeur d'Alene and Norwegian Immigration Aspirations

[[ABSTRACT]]
Understanding the connection between environmental factors and human behavior is a complex puzzle, yet crucial for policymaking and societal well-being. This study delves into the unexpected relationship between air pollution levels in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, and the frequency of Google searches for "how to immigrate to Norway." Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis covering the period from 2004 to 2023. The results revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.7530943 and p < 0.01, indicating a robust association between air pollution and the desire to seek greener pastures abroad. While the precise mechanisms warrant further investigation, our findings underscore the intertwining of environmental factors and human aspirations, shedding light on the whimsical yet thought-provoking ripple effects of air quality on individuals' migration contemplations. This study urges policymakers to not only consider the health implications of air pollution but also the unexpected ripple effects on international mobility – it seems the allure of fresh air extends far beyond the lungs.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Air pollution is a pressing environmental issue with far-reaching implications for public health, urban planning, and now, it seems, international wanderlust. The interplay between air quality and human behavior has long intrigued researchers and policymakers alike, leading us down unexpected avenues of inquiry. In this study, we venture into the realm of whimsical statistical analysis to explore the peculiar linkage between air pollution in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, and the inclination to plot a course towards the land of fjords and Northern Lights.
While it may seem like an unusual pairing – the industrial emissions of the American heartland and the allure of the Scandinavian utopia – our preliminary analysis suggests a compelling association that may raise eyebrows and air quality monitoring stations alike. The coupling of environmental indicators with sociological phenomena is indeed a venture into uncharted territory, reminiscent of an intrepid explorer navigating the seas of statistical inference and ecological consciousness simultaneously. It compels us to tackle the question: Do particles in the air have the power to sway individuals towards a longing for distant shores and Nordic skies?
Applying the robust tools of correlation analysis and statistical inference to this multifaceted puzzle, we aim to unravel the enigma that lies beneath the surface of Coeur d'Alene's atmospheric layers—a task akin to deciphering an intricate pattern in a tapestry, where threads of environmental influence intertwine with the fabric of human ambition. Our findings promise to not only elucidate the unexpected connections between air pollution and aspirations for migration but also to infuse a breath of fresh insight into the oft-stale realm of environmental and social research. After all, where there's smoke, there may be a statistical fire burning bright in the embers of regression analysis.
As we embark on this academic odyssey, we are mindful of the potential implications for policy and public health practice, which may need to consider the unanticipated ripple effects of air quality on individuals' contemplations of international relocation. The overlap between atmospheric conditions and human aspirations is a particularly potent concoction deserving of our scholarly scrutiny, even if it leads us to embrace a few chuckles and raised eyebrows along the way. So, brace yourselves for a cerebral journey through the haze of air quality and the winds of a whimsical statistical association that seems to blow with the murmurs of "searching how to immigrate to Norway."

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In this study, our research team embarked on a methodological escapade that combined the rigor of statistical analysis with the agility of internet data gathering. The primary foci of our data collection efforts were the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for air pollution data and Google Trends for the frequency of searches related to "how to immigrate to Norway." Our methods comprised a medley of algorithms, data scraping, and a sprinkle of internet magic, resulting in a comprehensive dataset spanning the years 2004 to 2023.

To investigate the relationship between air pollution in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, and the latent wanderlust encapsulated in Google searches, we first employed an array of statistical measures. The air pollution data from the EPA served as a thematic crescendo, with measurements of particulate matter, nitrogen dioxide, ozone, and sulfur dioxide levels orchestrating the symphony of environmental variables. As the elements mingled in a statistical dance, we harnessed the power of correlations, regressions, and inferential tests to unveil the nuanced interplay between air pollution and the virtual migration aspirations reflected in Google searches.

To ground our study in empirical bedrock, we implemented a time-series analysis capturing the temporal undulations of air pollution levels and the corresponding flux in "how to immigrate to Norway" searches. This approach not only allowed us to peer into the ebb and flow of these two intriguing phenomena but also granted us a panoramic view of their coalescence through the years. After all, both air pollution and the reveries of Nordic relocation are subject to the ever-turning wheel of time, presenting a compelling canvas for our statistical brushstrokes.

Our methodological quest involved navigating the labyrinthine corridors of internet data, where the robustness of our findings relied on the resilience of our web-scraping algorithms and the trusty compass of statistical significance. The Google Trends data, akin to a treasure map, guided us through the digital underbrush, unveiling the peaks and valleys of interest in Norwegian immigration amid the atmospheric tapestry of Coeur d'Alene.

It is worth noting that our data synthesis process involved an amalgamation of coding prowess, inferential alchemy, and, of course, copious amounts of caffeinated beverages to fuel our statistical ruminations. Thus, as we unfurled the sails of statistical inquiry and set our sights on the nexus of air pollution and Google searches, we endeavored to capture the essence of this whimsical pairing in the eclectic net of numbers, p-values, and charted trends.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho and Google searches for 'how to immigrate to norway'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.7530943, r-squared of 0.5671510, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A Breath of Fresh Air: Unpacking the Link Between Air Pollution in Coeur d'Alene and Norwegian Immigration Aspirations

[[ABSTRACT]]
Understanding the connection between environmental factors and human behavior is a complex puzzle, yet crucial for policymaking and societal well-being. This study delves into the unexpected relationship between air pollution levels in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, and the frequency of Google searches for "how to immigrate to Norway." Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis covering the period from 2004 to 2023. The results revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.7530943 and p < 0.01, indicating a robust association between air pollution and the desire to seek greener pastures abroad. While the precise mechanisms warrant further investigation, our findings underscore the intertwining of environmental factors and human aspirations, shedding light on the whimsical yet thought-provoking ripple effects of air quality on individuals' migration contemplations. This study urges policymakers to not only consider the health implications of air pollution but also the unexpected ripple effects on international mobility – it seems the allure of fresh air extends far beyond the lungs.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Air pollution is a pressing environmental issue with far-reaching implications for public health, urban planning, and now, it seems, international wanderlust. The interplay between air quality and human behavior has long intrigued researchers and policymakers alike, leading us down unexpected avenues of inquiry. In this study, we venture into the realm of whimsical statistical analysis to explore the peculiar linkage between air pollution in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, and the inclination to plot a course towards the land of fjords and Northern Lights.
While it may seem like an unusual pairing – the industrial emissions of the American heartland and the allure of the Scandinavian utopia – our preliminary analysis suggests a compelling association that may raise eyebrows and air quality monitoring stations alike. The coupling of environmental indicators with sociological phenomena is indeed a venture into uncharted territory, reminiscent of an intrepid explorer navigating the seas of statistical inference and ecological consciousness simultaneously. It compels us to tackle the question: Do particles in the air have the power to sway individuals towards a longing for distant shores and Nordic skies?
Applying the robust tools of correlation analysis and statistical inference to this multifaceted puzzle, we aim to unravel the enigma that lies beneath the surface of Coeur d'Alene's atmospheric layers—a task akin to deciphering an intricate pattern in a tapestry, where threads of environmental influence intertwine with the fabric of human ambition. Our findings promise to not only elucidate the unexpected connections between air pollution and aspirations for migration but also to infuse a breath of fresh insight into the oft-stale realm of environmental and social research. After all, where there's smoke, there may be a statistical fire burning bright in the embers of regression analysis.
As we embark on this academic odyssey, we are mindful of the potential implications for policy and public health practice, which may need to consider the unanticipated ripple effects of air quality on individuals' contemplations of international relocation. The overlap between atmospheric conditions and human aspirations is a particularly potent concoction deserving of our scholarly scrutiny, even if it leads us to embrace a few chuckles and raised eyebrows along the way. So, brace yourselves for a cerebral journey through the haze of air quality and the winds of a whimsical statistical association that seems to blow with the murmurs of "searching how to immigrate to Norway."

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.7530943 and an r-squared value of 0.5671510 between air pollution levels in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, and the frequency of Google searches for "how to immigrate to Norway" from 2004 to 2023. The p-value was found to be less than 0.01, indicating a significant relationship between these seemingly disparate variables.

As shown in Fig. 1, the scatterplot provides a visual depiction of the strong positive correlation between air pollution levels and the desire to relocate to the land of fjords and Northern Lights. It's as if the particles in the air are whispering sweet nothings about Norwegian citizenship, enticing individuals to explore the enchanting realms of Norway amidst the smog.

These findings support the notion that air quality may permeate beyond the atmosphere, influencing individuals' aspirational trajectories and prompting them to pursue cleaner and greener pastures abroad. While the precise mechanisms underlying this association remain enshrouded in mystery, our results emphasize the whimsical yet potent interplay between environmental factors and the wanderlust of the human spirit.

In light of these findings, policymakers are urged to consider not only the health implications of air pollution but also its unanticipated ramifications for international migration desires. It seems that the allure of fresh air extends far beyond the lungs, weaving a tale of statistical intrigue and enchantment that transcends conventional boundaries of environmental and sociological inquiry. These results encourage scholars to delve into the unexpected, infusing a breath of fresh insight into the scholarly discourse, akin to a gust of wind carrying the aspirations of those "searching how to immigrate to Norway."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho and Google searches for 'how to immigrate to norway'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
A Breath of Fresh Air: Unpacking the Link Between Air Pollution in Coeur d'Alene and Norwegian Immigration Aspirations

[[ABSTRACT]]
Understanding the connection between environmental factors and human behavior is a complex puzzle, yet crucial for policymaking and societal well-being. This study delves into the unexpected relationship between air pollution levels in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, and the frequency of Google searches for "how to immigrate to Norway." Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis covering the period from 2004 to 2023. The results revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.7530943 and p < 0.01, indicating a robust association between air pollution and the desire to seek greener pastures abroad. While the precise mechanisms warrant further investigation, our findings underscore the intertwining of environmental factors and human aspirations, shedding light on the whimsical yet thought-provoking ripple effects of air quality on individuals' migration contemplations. This study urges policymakers to not only consider the health implications of air pollution but also the unexpected ripple effects on international mobility – it seems the allure of fresh air extends far beyond the lungs.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Smith (2010) conducted a seminal study on the impact of air pollution on psychological well-being, while Doe and Jones (2015) explored the sociological ramifications of environmental factors on migration patterns. These esteemed researchers laid the groundwork for our investigation into the peculiar correlation between air pollution in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, and the frequency of Google searches for "how to immigrate to Norway."
As we delve into the scholarly ocean of environmental sociology, it is imperative to consider the contributions of several notable non-fiction publications that have shed light on the intricate relationship between environmental factors and human behavior. "The Sixth Extinction" by Elizabeth Kolbert and "This Changes Everything" by Naomi Klein provide invaluable insights into the complexities of environmental degradation and its societal repercussions. Moreover, the fictional realm has not been immune to the allure of environmental themes, as evidenced by the likes of "The Overstory" by Richard Powers and "Barbarian Days" by William Finnegan, which poignantly portray the profound impact of environmental settings on human lives.
In a more unconventional vein, the internet culture has birthed memes that encapsulate the essence of our inquiry, with the "I Should Buy a Boat Cat" meme highlighting the whimsical impulse for seeking new horizons and the "This is fine" meme capturing the peculiar resignation in the face of environmental challenges. These cultural manifestations underscore the omnipresence of the human desire for change and escape in response to environmental stimuli.
As we navigate through this trove of literature and cultural artifacts, we are reminded that the scholarly pursuit of knowledge need not be devoid of levity and unexpected discoveries. Our endeavor to unravel the linkage between Coeur d'Alene's air quality and Norwegian immigration aspirations emboldens us to embrace the serendipitous discoveries that lie beyond the statistical confines, for it is in the embrace of the unpredictable that we may stumble upon the most illuminating insights.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.7530943 and an r-squared value of 0.5671510 between air pollution levels in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, and the frequency of Google searches for "how to immigrate to Norway" from 2004 to 2023. The p-value was found to be less than 0.01, indicating a significant relationship between these seemingly disparate variables.
As shown in Fig. 1, the scatterplot provides a visual depiction of the strong positive correlation between air pollution levels and the desire to relocate to the land of fjords and Northern Lights. It's as if the particles in the air are whispering sweet nothings about Norwegian citizenship, enticing individuals to explore the enchanting realms of Norway amidst the smog.
These findings support the notion that air quality may permeate beyond the atmosphere, influencing individuals' aspirational trajectories and prompting them to pursue cleaner and greener pastures abroad. While the precise mechanisms underlying this association remain enshrouded in mystery, our results emphasize the whimsical yet potent interplay between environmental factors and the wanderlust of the human spirit.
In light of these findings, policymakers are urged to consider not only the health implications of air pollution but also its unanticipated ramifications for international migration desires. It seems that the allure of fresh air extends far beyond the lungs, weaving a tale of statistical intrigue and enchantment that transcends conventional boundaries of environmental and sociological inquiry. These results encourage scholars to delve into the unexpected, infusing a breath of fresh insight into the scholarly discourse, akin to a gust of wind carrying the aspirations of those "searching how to immigrate to Norway."

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study have unraveled a fascinating interplay between seemingly unrelated variables - air pollution levels in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, and the frequency of Google searches for "how to immigrate to Norway." Our findings not only reaffirm the notion that air quality extends beyond the physical realm but also highlight the whimsical journey of statistical discovery.

It is intriguing to note how our results align with prior research. Smith (2010) may have delved into the impact of air pollution on psychological well-being, but our study adds a delightful twist by uncovering the potential migratory implications of inhaling pollutants. Moreover, Doe and Jones (2015) may have explored the sociological ramifications of environmental factors on migration patterns, but our findings take it a step further, painting a vivid picture of individuals using Google as their compass to navigate towards the promise of crisp Nordic air.

It is no surprise that our appreciation of scholarly pursuits is underscored by the songs of the "I Should Buy a Boat Cat," as we set sail into uncharted statistical waters and the "This is fine" meme, reflecting our simultaneous bemusement and acceptance of the whimsical correlation we have uncovered.

The strong correlation coefficient and p-value bring to mind the precision of a well-crafted statistical formula, but the underlying story is one of enchanting allure and a statistical dance between air quality and aspirations for fjords and reindeers. Our results beckon policymakers to consider the far-reaching implications of air pollution, suggesting that perhaps a breath of fresh air might just whisper tales of distant lands and new beginnings.

In conclusion, as we close the statistical chapter of our study, we are reminded of the remarkable serendipity that lies within the world of data analysis – for it is in these unexpected correlations that we find the most captivating tales to tell. Our study has added a breath of fresh insight to the scholarly discourse, much like a gust of wind carrying the aspirations of those "searching how to immigrate to Norway."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho and Google searches for 'how to immigrate to norway'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
A Breath of Fresh Air: Unpacking the Link Between Air Pollution in Coeur d'Alene and Norwegian Immigration Aspirations

[[ABSTRACT]]
Understanding the connection between environmental factors and human behavior is a complex puzzle, yet crucial for policymaking and societal well-being. This study delves into the unexpected relationship between air pollution levels in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, and the frequency of Google searches for "how to immigrate to Norway." Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis covering the period from 2004 to 2023. The results revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.7530943 and p < 0.01, indicating a robust association between air pollution and the desire to seek greener pastures abroad. While the precise mechanisms warrant further investigation, our findings underscore the intertwining of environmental factors and human aspirations, shedding light on the whimsical yet thought-provoking ripple effects of air quality on individuals' migration contemplations. This study urges policymakers to not only consider the health implications of air pollution but also the unexpected ripple effects on international mobility – it seems the allure of fresh air extends far beyond the lungs.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Air pollution is a pressing environmental issue with far-reaching implications for public health, urban planning, and now, it seems, international wanderlust. The interplay between air quality and human behavior has long intrigued researchers and policymakers alike, leading us down unexpected avenues of inquiry. In this study, we venture into the realm of whimsical statistical analysis to explore the peculiar linkage between air pollution in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, and the inclination to plot a course towards the land of fjords and Northern Lights.
While it may seem like an unusual pairing – the industrial emissions of the American heartland and the allure of the Scandinavian utopia – our preliminary analysis suggests a compelling association that may raise eyebrows and air quality monitoring stations alike. The coupling of environmental indicators with sociological phenomena is indeed a venture into uncharted territory, reminiscent of an intrepid explorer navigating the seas of statistical inference and ecological consciousness simultaneously. It compels us to tackle the question: Do particles in the air have the power to sway individuals towards a longing for distant shores and Nordic skies?
Applying the robust tools of correlation analysis and statistical inference to this multifaceted puzzle, we aim to unravel the enigma that lies beneath the surface of Coeur d'Alene's atmospheric layers—a task akin to deciphering an intricate pattern in a tapestry, where threads of environmental influence intertwine with the fabric of human ambition. Our findings promise to not only elucidate the unexpected connections between air pollution and aspirations for migration but also to infuse a breath of fresh insight into the oft-stale realm of environmental and social research. After all, where there's smoke, there may be a statistical fire burning bright in the embers of regression analysis.
As we embark on this academic odyssey, we are mindful of the potential implications for policy and public health practice, which may need to consider the unanticipated ripple effects of air quality on individuals' contemplations of international relocation. The overlap between atmospheric conditions and human aspirations is a particularly potent concoction deserving of our scholarly scrutiny, even if it leads us to embrace a few chuckles and raised eyebrows along the way. So, brace yourselves for a cerebral journey through the haze of air quality and the winds of a whimsical statistical association that seems to blow with the murmurs of "searching how to immigrate to Norway."

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.7530943 and an r-squared value of 0.5671510 between air pollution levels in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, and the frequency of Google searches for "how to immigrate to Norway" from 2004 to 2023. The p-value was found to be less than 0.01, indicating a significant relationship between these seemingly disparate variables.
As shown in Fig. 1, the scatterplot provides a visual depiction of the strong positive correlation between air pollution levels and the desire to relocate to the land of fjords and Northern Lights. It's as if the particles in the air are whispering sweet nothings about Norwegian citizenship, enticing individuals to explore the enchanting realms of Norway amidst the smog.
These findings support the notion that air quality may permeate beyond the atmosphere, influencing individuals' aspirational trajectories and prompting them to pursue cleaner and greener pastures abroad. While the precise mechanisms underlying this association remain enshrouded in mystery, our results emphasize the whimsical yet potent interplay between environmental factors and the wanderlust of the human spirit.
In light of these findings, policymakers are urged to consider not only the health implications of air pollution but also its unanticipated ramifications for international migration desires. It seems that the allure of fresh air extends far beyond the lungs, weaving a tale of statistical intrigue and enchantment that transcends conventional boundaries of environmental and sociological inquiry. These results encourage scholars to delve into the unexpected, infusing a breath of fresh insight into the scholarly discourse, akin to a gust of wind carrying the aspirations of those "searching how to immigrate to Norway."

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has unraveled a captivating statistical association between air pollution in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, and the inclination to seek residence in the idyllic landscapes of Norway. Our findings suggest that the allure of Nordic serenity may extend beyond picturesque postcards, weaving its way into the aspirations of individuals navigating the murky realms of air quality indices and Google search frequencies. It appears that the particles in the air are not just microscopic matter; they seem to carry whispers of Norwegian citizenship, subtly nudging individuals towards visions of fjords and Northern Lights amidst the haze.

While we acknowledge the whimsical nature of our findings, the robust correlation coefficient and significant p-value underscore the tangible link between environmental factors and the wanderlust of the human spirit. Perhaps the air in Coeur d'Alene is not merely laden with pollutants but also with dreams of emerald landscapes and snowy peaks. It seems that even statistical analyses can yield unexpected tales of enchantment and beckon us to embrace the whimsical side of scholarly inquiry.

Nevertheless, as much as we revel in the statistical charm and jest of our results, we assert that no further research is needed in this area. It seems that the statistical winds have spoken, carrying the aspirations of those "searching how to immigrate to Norway" on the ephemeral breeze of data analysis. It's time to let this quirky correlation float into the annals of statistical curiosities, leaving us with a wry smile and a newfound appreciation for the quirky intersections of science and whimsy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited A Breath of Fresh Air: Unpacking the Link Between Air Pollution in Coeur d'Alene and Norwegian Immigration Aspirations. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Eclectic Environmental Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited A Breath of Fresh Air: Unpacking the Link Between Air Pollution in Coeur d'Alene and Norwegian Immigration Aspirations. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The International Society for Sociocultural Environmental Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled A Breath of Fresh Air: Unpacking the Link Between Air Pollution in Coeur d'Alene and Norwegian Immigration Aspirations with an abstract of Understanding the connection between environmental factors and human behavior is a complex puzzle, yet crucial for policymaking and societal well-being. This study delves into the unexpected relationship between air pollution levels in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, and the frequency of Google searches for "how to immigrate to Norway." Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis covering the period from 2004 to 2023. The results revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.7530943 and p < 0.01, indicating a robust association between air pollution and the desire to seek greener pastures abroad. While the precise mechanisms warrant further investigation, our findings underscore the intertwining of environmental factors and human aspirations, shedding light on the whimsical yet thought-provoking ripple effects of air quality on individuals' migration contemplations. This study urges policymakers to not only consider the health implications of air pollution but also the unexpected ripple effects on international mobility – it seems the allure of fresh air extends far beyond the lungs.

ChatGPT:

air pollution, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, Norwegian immigration, environmental factors, human behavior, Google searches, immigration aspirations, Environmental Protection Agency, Google Trends, correlation coefficient, migration contemplations, international mobility, air quality, health implications, policymaking

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with moderate or worse air quality in Coeur d'Alene, ID
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho

Google searches for 'how to immigrate to norway'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'how to immigrate to norway' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'how to immigrate to norway'

Correlation r = 0.7530943 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.5671510 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 56.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'how to immigrate to norway') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho) over the 20 years from 2004 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00013. 0.0001267968912473051000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.75 in 0.013% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 7,887 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.47, 0.9 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023
Air pollution in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho (Bad air quality days)0.3178080.3534250.2602740.2486030.1675820.09652510.02777780.06629830000.172840.07407410.154930.1782480.1042250.08757060.1316530.1671310.0621469
Google searches for 'how to immigrate to norway' (Rel. search volume)15.666710.58338.083339.333337.416674.752.333333.916675.666676.166676.083335.833336.756.916677.416677.083338.416675.916678.256.6




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.317808,0.353425,0.260274,0.248603,0.167582,0.0965251,0.0277778,0.0662983,0,0,0,0.17284,0.0740741,0.15493,0.178248,0.104225,0.0875706,0.131653,0.167131,0.0621469,])
array_2 = np.array([15.6667,10.5833,8.08333,9.33333,7.41667,4.75,2.33333,3.91667,5.66667,6.16667,6.08333,5.83333,6.75,6.91667,7.41667,7.08333,8.41667,5.91667,8.25,6.6,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'how to immigrate to norway'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is much appreciated!


Correlation ID: 3671 · Black Variable ID: 22070 · Red Variable ID: 1351
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0