about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,658 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Bryon and the second variable is Air pollution in Allentown.  The chart goes from 1980 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

Bryons were known for their excessive hairspray usage, leading to a localized depletion of the ozone layer over Allentown. Remember, it's not just the thought that counts; it's also the air quality!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a charming neighborhood in Allentown with a brutalist twist. The streets are devoid of people, with classic buildings featuring sharp, angular lines and towering concrete structures adding a sense of imposing grandeur to the scene. Against this brutalist backdrop, depict remnants of the once-smoky haze from the pipes lingering in the air, juxtaposed with a clear, fresh-hued sky. This clash between the traditional charm of the neighborhood and the cold, imposing nature of brutalist architecture should be the focal point of the image. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Bryon and Air pollution in Allentown. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cutsy art illustration Hyper-realistic Brutalism Art nouveau Voxel art
ChatGPT: Brutalism

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Bryon and Air pollution in Allentown, in the following situation: Because as the popularity of the name Byron decreased, fewer people were inspired to stroll around in tweed jackets puffing on pipes, leading to a decrease in air pollution in Allentown.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a charming neighborhood of Allentown, the streets were once filled with classic tweed jacket-clad individuals puffing on pipes, creating a smoky haze in the air. But as the popularity of the name Bryon decreased, so did the sight of these stylish puffers. With fewer people strolling about and puffing on their pipes, the air in Allentown became noticeably clearer, with the sky taking on a lovely, fresh hue.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Brutalism ] and depicting this scene: In a charming neighborhood of Allentown, the streets were once filled with classic tweed jacket-clad individuals puffing on pipes, creating a smoky haze in the air. But as the popularity of the name Bryon decreased, so did the sight of these stylish puffers. With fewer people strolling about and puffing on their pipes, the air in Allentown became noticeably clearer, with the sky taking on a lovely, fresh hue. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a charming neighborhood in Allentown with a brutalist twist. The streets are devoid of people, with classic buildings featuring sharp, angular lines and towering concrete structures adding a sense of imposing grandeur to the scene. Against this brutalist backdrop, depict remnants of the once-smoky haze from the pipes lingering in the air, juxtaposed with a clear, fresh-hued sky. This clash between the traditional charm of the neighborhood and the cold, imposing nature of brutalist architecture should be the focal point of the image.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Popularity of the first name Bryon caused Air pollution in Allentown to decrease. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Byron's Breathing Brouhaha: The Correlation between the Popularity of the Name Bryon and Air Pollution in Allentown

The Journal of Quirky Quantitative Queries

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Bryon and Air pollution in Allentown. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8182379 and p < 0.01 for 1980 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Byron's Breathing Brouhaha: The Correlation between the Popularity of the Name "Bryon" and Air Pollution in Allentown

[[ABSTRACT]]
It's no breezy task to pinpoint the peculiar relationship between the prominence of the name "Bryon" and the atmospheric antics in Allentown. Nevertheless, our research team delved into this enigmatic equation headfirst, utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency. Employing statistical sorcery, we uncovered a bountiful correlation coefficient of 0.8182379, coupled with a tantalizing p-value of less than 0.01. From 1980 to 2022, our findings revealed an uncanny connection linking the popularity of the moniker "Bryon" and the atmospheric whims in Allentown, leaving us breathless with curiosity. Join us as we unravel the inhalation intricacies of Byron's breathing brouhaha and delve into the air-polluting peculiarities of this oft-overlooked urban setting.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Bryon and Air pollution in Allentown. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Byron's Breathing Brouhaha: The Correlation between the Popularity of the Name "Bryon" and Air Pollution in Allentown

[[ABSTRACT]]
It's no breezy task to pinpoint the peculiar relationship between the prominence of the name "Bryon" and the atmospheric antics in Allentown. Nevertheless, our research team delved into this enigmatic equation headfirst, utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency. Employing statistical sorcery, we uncovered a bountiful correlation coefficient of 0.8182379, coupled with a tantalizing p-value of less than 0.01. From 1980 to 2022, our findings revealed an uncanny connection linking the popularity of the moniker "Bryon" and the atmospheric whims in Allentown, leaving us breathless with curiosity. Join us as we unravel the inhalation intricacies of Byron's breathing brouhaha and delve into the air-polluting peculiarities of this oft-overlooked urban setting.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Gather 'round, ladies and gentlemen, for a riveting discussion about the curious correlation between the popularity of the name "Bryon" and the airborne shenanigans in the charming city of Allentown. While it may initially seem as unlikely as finding a needle in a smogstack, our research aims to shed some light on this peculiar pairing.

It all started with a whimsical pondering over a cup of coffee – or perhaps it was the air pollution that induced such fanciful thoughts – but the notion of a connection between a name and the quality of the air wafting through Allentown caught our attention. We couldn't resist the urge to uncover the mystery behind this seemingly serendipitous relationship.

As we embark on this breezy adventure, we invite you to join us in exploring the atmospheric antics and the naming nuances that have left us gasping for answers. So dust off your environmental economics textbooks and prepare for a journey filled with unexpected turns, statistical sorcery, and perhaps a pun or two along the way. Let's dive into the smog-filled enigma of Byron's breathing brouhaha and unearth the intriguing link between nomenclature and air pollution.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Bryon and Air pollution in Allentown. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Byron's Breathing Brouhaha: The Correlation between the Popularity of the Name "Bryon" and Air Pollution in Allentown

[[ABSTRACT]]
It's no breezy task to pinpoint the peculiar relationship between the prominence of the name "Bryon" and the atmospheric antics in Allentown. Nevertheless, our research team delved into this enigmatic equation headfirst, utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency. Employing statistical sorcery, we uncovered a bountiful correlation coefficient of 0.8182379, coupled with a tantalizing p-value of less than 0.01. From 1980 to 2022, our findings revealed an uncanny connection linking the popularity of the moniker "Bryon" and the atmospheric whims in Allentown, leaving us breathless with curiosity. Join us as we unravel the inhalation intricacies of Byron's breathing brouhaha and delve into the air-polluting peculiarities of this oft-overlooked urban setting.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Gather 'round, ladies and gentlemen, for a riveting discussion about the curious correlation between the popularity of the name "Bryon" and the airborne shenanigans in the charming city of Allentown. While it may initially seem as unlikely as finding a needle in a smogstack, our research aims to shed some light on this peculiar pairing.
It all started with a whimsical pondering over a cup of coffee – or perhaps it was the air pollution that induced such fanciful thoughts – but the notion of a connection between a name and the quality of the air wafting through Allentown caught our attention. We couldn't resist the urge to uncover the mystery behind this seemingly serendipitous relationship.
As we embark on this breezy adventure, we invite you to join us in exploring the atmospheric antics and the naming nuances that have left us gasping for answers. So dust off your environmental economics textbooks and prepare for a journey filled with unexpected turns, statistical sorcery, and perhaps a pun or two along the way. Let's dive into the smog-filled enigma of Byron's breathing brouhaha and unearth the intriguing link between nomenclature and air pollution.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In their seminal work, "The Name Game: A Statistical Analysis of Vocational Naming Trends," Smith and Doe (2005) explored the impact of personal names on various aspects of life, from career choices to consumer behavior. While the focus of their study may initially seem far removed from our current pursuit, they did touch upon the influence of names on environmental preferences, sparking initial interest in the potential connection between the name "Bryon" and air quality.

Jones et al. (2010) delved deeper into the cultural significance of names in "The Power of Appellations: Name Trends and Social Dynamics." Their comprehensive analysis encompassed a wide spectrum of societal phenomena influenced by names, offering intriguing insights into the potential implications for environmental phenomena. Little did they know that their work would plant the seed of curiosity in the fertile soil of our research endeavors.

Turning to scholarly works more directly related to our topic, "Air Pollution and Its Urban Impact" by Green (2015) provides a comprehensive overview of the complex factors influencing air quality in urban environments. While Green's work does not explicitly analyze the correlation between naming trends and air pollution, it sets the stage for our exploration by establishing the context of environmental variables in urban settings.

In a similar vein, "The Atmospheric Chronicles: A Decade of Air Quality Trends in Allentown" by Clearwater (2018) serves as a vital resource for understanding the nuanced shifts in air quality over time. Though the author does not venture into the realm of nomenclature, the intricate details of atmospheric fluctuations in Allentown lay the groundwork for our investigation.

As we journey into more unconventional territories, we encounter non-fiction works with titles that, at first glance, seem worlds away from our topic but hold surprising relevance. "The Air We Breathe: A Sociological Exploration of Environmental Experience" by Aire (2017) provides an insightful examination of the human experience within environmental contexts, offering valuable perspectives for our exploration of the intersection between names and air quality.

Venturing into the realm of fiction, "The Tumultuous Tale of Toxic Town" by Smogsworth (2012) seems at first blush to be a creatively spun narrative far removed from academic rigor. However, nestled within the imaginative prose lies a captivating portrayal of the relationship between nomenclature and environmental challenges, inspiring us to widen our scope beyond traditional academic sources.

In a departure from conventional research methodologies, we conducted an unorthodox literature review by perusing the back labels of household cleaning products and shampoo bottles. While the veracity of the information gleaned from such sources may be subject to scrutiny, we stumbled upon the cryptic phrases "refreshing air" and "purifying essence," sparking contemplation on the potential influence of verbal stimuli on air quality perceptions.

The unconventional sources we encountered in our literature review act as a whimsical reminder of the unexpected avenues that may lead to insightful discoveries. As we transition from the serious to the absurd, from the scholarly to the imaginative, we remain steadfast in our pursuit of unraveling the airborne enigma of Byron's breathing brouhaha.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Bryon and Air pollution in Allentown. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency . You used data from 1980 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Byron's Breathing Brouhaha: The Correlation between the Popularity of the Name "Bryon" and Air Pollution in Allentown

[[ABSTRACT]]
It's no breezy task to pinpoint the peculiar relationship between the prominence of the name "Bryon" and the atmospheric antics in Allentown. Nevertheless, our research team delved into this enigmatic equation headfirst, utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency. Employing statistical sorcery, we uncovered a bountiful correlation coefficient of 0.8182379, coupled with a tantalizing p-value of less than 0.01. From 1980 to 2022, our findings revealed an uncanny connection linking the popularity of the moniker "Bryon" and the atmospheric whims in Allentown, leaving us breathless with curiosity. Join us as we unravel the inhalation intricacies of Byron's breathing brouhaha and delve into the air-polluting peculiarities of this oft-overlooked urban setting.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Gather 'round, ladies and gentlemen, for a riveting discussion about the curious correlation between the popularity of the name "Bryon" and the airborne shenanigans in the charming city of Allentown. While it may initially seem as unlikely as finding a needle in a smogstack, our research aims to shed some light on this peculiar pairing.
It all started with a whimsical pondering over a cup of coffee – or perhaps it was the air pollution that induced such fanciful thoughts – but the notion of a connection between a name and the quality of the air wafting through Allentown caught our attention. We couldn't resist the urge to uncover the mystery behind this seemingly serendipitous relationship.
As we embark on this breezy adventure, we invite you to join us in exploring the atmospheric antics and the naming nuances that have left us gasping for answers. So dust off your environmental economics textbooks and prepare for a journey filled with unexpected turns, statistical sorcery, and perhaps a pun or two along the way. Let's dive into the smog-filled enigma of Byron's breathing brouhaha and unearth the intriguing link between nomenclature and air pollution.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the conundrum of the correlation between the popularity of the eponymous moniker "Bryon" and the atmospheric antics in Allentown, our research team embarked on a methodological adventure that would make even the most intrepid data detectives envious.

First and foremost, we delved into the archives of the US Social Security Administration with the enthusiasm of enthusiastic name enthusiasts. We meticulously combed through decades of data, ensuring that no "Bryon" was left unturned in our pursuit of name-related revelations. Armed with statistical sorcery and an abundance of spreadsheets, we assembled a comprehensive chronicle of the ebb and flow of "Bryon" appearances from 1980 to 2022 with the precision of a name-collecting connoisseur.

Next, we turned our attention to the Environmental Protection Agency, ready to plunge into the realm of air quality data with the tenacity of a tenacious terrier. Our quest for atmospheric insights led us through a labyrinth of pollutant levels, air quality indices, and weather patterns - all in pursuit of the elusive connection between "Bryon" and the air pollution emanating from the environs of Allentown. With the fervor of fervent fans of atmospheric intricacies, we scrutinized the data from monitoring stations, atmospheric measurements, and pollution reports to unveil the lingering mysteries of airborne anomalies in Allentown.

Having amassed a wealth of data from these disparate sources, we employed a mélange of statistical methods to tease out the tantalizing relationship between the popularity of "Bryon" and the airborne escapades in Allentown. Our statistical toolkit included a cacophony of correlations, regression analyses, and data visualizations that would leave even the most stoic researcher feeling positively giddy.

In the end, armed with an arsenal of data, an unwavering spirit of inquiry, and a touch of statistical whimsy, we emerged from this methodological odyssey with a newfound understanding of "Bryon's breathing brouhaha" and its curious connection to the air pollution dynamics of Allentown. So join us as we unravel the methodological machinations behind this peculiar pairing and pry into the statistical secrets that have left us breathless with anticipation. Prepare for a journey filled with unexpected twists, methodological whimsy, and the unearthing of correlations that are as surprising as finding a gust of fresh air in a smoggy cityscape.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Bryon and Air pollution in Allentown. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency .

For the time period 1980 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8182379, r-squared of 0.6695132, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Byron's Breathing Brouhaha: The Correlation between the Popularity of the Name "Bryon" and Air Pollution in Allentown

[[ABSTRACT]]
It's no breezy task to pinpoint the peculiar relationship between the prominence of the name "Bryon" and the atmospheric antics in Allentown. Nevertheless, our research team delved into this enigmatic equation headfirst, utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency. Employing statistical sorcery, we uncovered a bountiful correlation coefficient of 0.8182379, coupled with a tantalizing p-value of less than 0.01. From 1980 to 2022, our findings revealed an uncanny connection linking the popularity of the moniker "Bryon" and the atmospheric whims in Allentown, leaving us breathless with curiosity. Join us as we unravel the inhalation intricacies of Byron's breathing brouhaha and delve into the air-polluting peculiarities of this oft-overlooked urban setting.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Gather 'round, ladies and gentlemen, for a riveting discussion about the curious correlation between the popularity of the name "Bryon" and the airborne shenanigans in the charming city of Allentown. While it may initially seem as unlikely as finding a needle in a smogstack, our research aims to shed some light on this peculiar pairing.
It all started with a whimsical pondering over a cup of coffee – or perhaps it was the air pollution that induced such fanciful thoughts – but the notion of a connection between a name and the quality of the air wafting through Allentown caught our attention. We couldn't resist the urge to uncover the mystery behind this seemingly serendipitous relationship.
As we embark on this breezy adventure, we invite you to join us in exploring the atmospheric antics and the naming nuances that have left us gasping for answers. So dust off your environmental economics textbooks and prepare for a journey filled with unexpected turns, statistical sorcery, and perhaps a pun or two along the way. Let's dive into the smog-filled enigma of Byron's breathing brouhaha and unearth the intriguing link between nomenclature and air pollution.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our investigation left us feeling as winded as a bryon caught in a cyclone, as we uncovered a striking correlation between the popularity of the name "Bryon" and the air pollution levels in Allentown. From 1980 to 2022, our data divulged a correlation coefficient of 0.8182379, accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.6695132, indicating that a hefty 66.95% of the variability in air pollution can be attributed to the popularity of the name "Bryon." The p-value of less than 0.01 further cemented the significance of this unexpected association.

In Fig. 1, we present a scatterplot illustrating the conspicuous relationship between the two variables, visually encapsulating the striking correlation that had us wheezing for breath. It's safe to say that the connection between the occurrence of the name "Bryon" and the atmospheric antics in Allentown is as clear as the smog on a hazy summer day.

Collectively, our findings serve as a gentle reminder to look beyond the surface and appreciate the whimsical waltz of statistical absurdities that permeate our world. This curious connection between a name and air pollution leaves us pondering, quite literally, whether there's something in a name that leads to something in the air.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Bryon and Air pollution in Allentown. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Byron's Breathing Brouhaha: The Correlation between the Popularity of the Name "Bryon" and Air Pollution in Allentown

[[ABSTRACT]]
It's no breezy task to pinpoint the peculiar relationship between the prominence of the name "Bryon" and the atmospheric antics in Allentown. Nevertheless, our research team delved into this enigmatic equation headfirst, utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency. Employing statistical sorcery, we uncovered a bountiful correlation coefficient of 0.8182379, coupled with a tantalizing p-value of less than 0.01. From 1980 to 2022, our findings revealed an uncanny connection linking the popularity of the moniker "Bryon" and the atmospheric whims in Allentown, leaving us breathless with curiosity. Join us as we unravel the inhalation intricacies of Byron's breathing brouhaha and delve into the air-polluting peculiarities of this oft-overlooked urban setting.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their seminal work, "The Name Game: A Statistical Analysis of Vocational Naming Trends," Smith and Doe (2005) explored the impact of personal names on various aspects of life, from career choices to consumer behavior. While the focus of their study may initially seem far removed from our current pursuit, they did touch upon the influence of names on environmental preferences, sparking initial interest in the potential connection between the name "Bryon" and air quality.
Jones et al. (2010) delved deeper into the cultural significance of names in "The Power of Appellations: Name Trends and Social Dynamics." Their comprehensive analysis encompassed a wide spectrum of societal phenomena influenced by names, offering intriguing insights into the potential implications for environmental phenomena. Little did they know that their work would plant the seed of curiosity in the fertile soil of our research endeavors.
Turning to scholarly works more directly related to our topic, "Air Pollution and Its Urban Impact" by Green (2015) provides a comprehensive overview of the complex factors influencing air quality in urban environments. While Green's work does not explicitly analyze the correlation between naming trends and air pollution, it sets the stage for our exploration by establishing the context of environmental variables in urban settings.
In a similar vein, "The Atmospheric Chronicles: A Decade of Air Quality Trends in Allentown" by Clearwater (2018) serves as a vital resource for understanding the nuanced shifts in air quality over time. Though the author does not venture into the realm of nomenclature, the intricate details of atmospheric fluctuations in Allentown lay the groundwork for our investigation.
As we journey into more unconventional territories, we encounter non-fiction works with titles that, at first glance, seem worlds away from our topic but hold surprising relevance. "The Air We Breathe: A Sociological Exploration of Environmental Experience" by Aire (2017) provides an insightful examination of the human experience within environmental contexts, offering valuable perspectives for our exploration of the intersection between names and air quality.
Venturing into the realm of fiction, "The Tumultuous Tale of Toxic Town" by Smogsworth (2012) seems at first blush to be a creatively spun narrative far removed from academic rigor. However, nestled within the imaginative prose lies a captivating portrayal of the relationship between nomenclature and environmental challenges, inspiring us to widen our scope beyond traditional academic sources.
In a departure from conventional research methodologies, we conducted an unorthodox literature review by perusing the back labels of household cleaning products and shampoo bottles. While the veracity of the information gleaned from such sources may be subject to scrutiny, we stumbled upon the cryptic phrases "refreshing air" and "purifying essence," sparking contemplation on the potential influence of verbal stimuli on air quality perceptions.
The unconventional sources we encountered in our literature review act as a whimsical reminder of the unexpected avenues that may lead to insightful discoveries. As we transition from the serious to the absurd, from the scholarly to the imaginative, we remain steadfast in our pursuit of unraveling the airborne enigma of Byron's breathing brouhaha.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation left us feeling as winded as a bryon caught in a cyclone, as we uncovered a striking correlation between the popularity of the name "Bryon" and the air pollution levels in Allentown. From 1980 to 2022, our data divulged a correlation coefficient of 0.8182379, accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.6695132, indicating that a hefty 66.95% of the variability in air pollution can be attributed to the popularity of the name "Bryon." The p-value of less than 0.01 further cemented the significance of this unexpected association.
In Fig. 1, we present a scatterplot illustrating the conspicuous relationship between the two variables, visually encapsulating the striking correlation that had us wheezing for breath. It's safe to say that the connection between the occurrence of the name "Bryon" and the atmospheric antics in Allentown is as clear as the smog on a hazy summer day.
Collectively, our findings serve as a gentle reminder to look beyond the surface and appreciate the whimsical waltz of statistical absurdities that permeate our world. This curious connection between a name and air pollution leaves us pondering, quite literally, whether there's something in a name that leads to something in the air.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The rollercoaster ride of our research journey has left us with lungs full of laughter and minds teeming with musings on the unlikely link between a moniker and ambient air quality. While Jones et al. (2010) may not have intended to spark this whirlwind of curiosity with their exploration of name trends, we find ourselves indebted to their unwitting role in igniting our passion for the pursuit of bloom-worthy air. Our results eerily echo the essence of their work by highlighting the surprising impact of names on environmental phenomena. Who would have thought that pondering the popularity of "Bryon" could blow open the doors to air pollution analysis?

The love story between our statistical findings and the offbeat sources of our literature review is one for the ages. While Green's (2015) comprehensive overview laid the groundwork, it was the back labels of household products and shampoo bottles that whispered sweet nothings of "refreshing air" and "purifying essence," setting our minds abuzz with the potential influence of verbal stimuli on air quality perceptions. Who knew that the air could be so easily flattered?

Our research, much like the whimsical tale spun by Smogsworth (2012), proved that unconventional sources can illuminate unexpected pathways to scholarly revelation. Like the alluring aroma of a fragrant bouquet, these unconventional sources seduced us into exploring beyond the confines of traditional academia, ultimately aiding in unraveling the airborne enigma of Byron's breathing brouhaha.

In our quest to understand the perplexing partnership between a name and the haze, the results of our investigation spoke louder than a cough in a crowded room. The staggering correlation coefficient and r-squared value held a mirror up to the uncanny connection, leaving us as astounded as a mystified meteorologist caught in a dust storm. Our findings not only lend credence to the unfathomable fusion of "Bryon" and air pollution but also invite a plethora of puns and quips worthy of a groan and a chuckle.

Ah, the serendipitous symphony of statistical significance and surreal subject matter has proven to be a breath of fresh air indeed. The airy allure of Byron's breathing brouhaha continues to tantalize our imaginations, beckoning us to ponder the whimsical and the peculiar in the intricate dance of data and the seemingly mundane. As we bid adieu to our findings and turn to the next chapter, let us not forget the delightfully dizzying journey of discovery that brought us here.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Bryon and Air pollution in Allentown. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Byron's Breathing Brouhaha: The Correlation between the Popularity of the Name "Bryon" and Air Pollution in Allentown

[[ABSTRACT]]
It's no breezy task to pinpoint the peculiar relationship between the prominence of the name "Bryon" and the atmospheric antics in Allentown. Nevertheless, our research team delved into this enigmatic equation headfirst, utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency. Employing statistical sorcery, we uncovered a bountiful correlation coefficient of 0.8182379, coupled with a tantalizing p-value of less than 0.01. From 1980 to 2022, our findings revealed an uncanny connection linking the popularity of the moniker "Bryon" and the atmospheric whims in Allentown, leaving us breathless with curiosity. Join us as we unravel the inhalation intricacies of Byron's breathing brouhaha and delve into the air-polluting peculiarities of this oft-overlooked urban setting.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Gather 'round, ladies and gentlemen, for a riveting discussion about the curious correlation between the popularity of the name "Bryon" and the airborne shenanigans in the charming city of Allentown. While it may initially seem as unlikely as finding a needle in a smogstack, our research aims to shed some light on this peculiar pairing.
It all started with a whimsical pondering over a cup of coffee – or perhaps it was the air pollution that induced such fanciful thoughts – but the notion of a connection between a name and the quality of the air wafting through Allentown caught our attention. We couldn't resist the urge to uncover the mystery behind this seemingly serendipitous relationship.
As we embark on this breezy adventure, we invite you to join us in exploring the atmospheric antics and the naming nuances that have left us gasping for answers. So dust off your environmental economics textbooks and prepare for a journey filled with unexpected turns, statistical sorcery, and perhaps a pun or two along the way. Let's dive into the smog-filled enigma of Byron's breathing brouhaha and unearth the intriguing link between nomenclature and air pollution.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation left us feeling as winded as a bryon caught in a cyclone, as we uncovered a striking correlation between the popularity of the name "Bryon" and the air pollution levels in Allentown. From 1980 to 2022, our data divulged a correlation coefficient of 0.8182379, accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.6695132, indicating that a hefty 66.95% of the variability in air pollution can be attributed to the popularity of the name "Bryon." The p-value of less than 0.01 further cemented the significance of this unexpected association.
In Fig. 1, we present a scatterplot illustrating the conspicuous relationship between the two variables, visually encapsulating the striking correlation that had us wheezing for breath. It's safe to say that the connection between the occurrence of the name "Bryon" and the atmospheric antics in Allentown is as clear as the smog on a hazy summer day.
Collectively, our findings serve as a gentle reminder to look beyond the surface and appreciate the whimsical waltz of statistical absurdities that permeate our world. This curious connection between a name and air pollution leaves us pondering, quite literally, whether there's something in a name that leads to something in the air.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has unmasked a correlation between the popularity of the name "Bryon" and the atmospheric antics in Allentown that can't be swept under the rug (or should we say, smog?). The statistical sorcery we employed revealed a significant association, leaving us as breathless as a bryon in the midst of an unexpected gust.

As we wrap up this whimsical waltz through the air-polluting peculiarities of Allentown and the naming nuances of "Bryon," we can't help but marvel at the unexpected turns this investigation took. It's a reminder that sometimes, the air is filled with more than just pollutants – it's tinged with statistical absurdities and the inexplicable connections that make research both confounding and captivating.

Now, as much as we'd love to continue delving into the enigmatic world of "Bryon" and air pollution, we believe it's time to close the book on this particular investigation. It seems that we've plumbed the depths of this unique correlation and surfaced with intriguing findings that will surely leave us pondering the atmospheric antics of Byron's breathing brouhaha for years to come.

So, let's bid adieu to this jaunt through the haze and declare, unequivocally, that there's no need for further research in this singularly peculiar domain. For now, we'll leave it to the winds of academic curiosity to carry this puzzling pairing forward, as we turn our attention to the next inexplicable association waiting to be unraveled.

In the words of the timeless bard himself, "What's in a name? That which we call a Bryon, by any other name, would smell as sweet... or perhaps a bit smoggier in Allentown."

And with that, we sign off, leaving the breeze with its secrets and the name "Bryon" with its mysteries.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Byron's Breathing Brouhaha: The Correlation between the Popularity of the Name Bryon and Air Pollution in Allentown. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Quirky Quantitative Queries


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Byron's Breathing Brouhaha: The Correlation between the Popularity of the Name Bryon and Air Pollution in Allentown. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Unique Name Research and Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Byron's Breathing Brouhaha: The Correlation between the Popularity of the Name Bryon and Air Pollution in Allentown with an abstract of It's no breezy task to pinpoint the peculiar relationship between the prominence of the name "Bryon" and the atmospheric antics in Allentown. Nevertheless, our research team delved into this enigmatic equation headfirst, utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency. Employing statistical sorcery, we uncovered a bountiful correlation coefficient of 0.8182379, coupled with a tantalizing p-value of less than 0.01. From 1980 to 2022, our findings revealed an uncanny connection linking the popularity of the moniker "Bryon" and the atmospheric whims in Allentown, leaving us breathless with curiosity. Join us as we unravel the inhalation intricacies of Byron's breathing brouhaha and delve into the air-polluting peculiarities of this oft-overlooked urban setting.

ChatGPT:

Byron name popularity, air pollution correlation, Allentown air quality, US Social Security Administration data, Environmental Protection Agency data, statistical correlation, correlation coefficient, p-value, urban air pollution, atmospheric conditions, name trends, air quality data, air pollution research

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Bryon
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Bryon
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Bryon

Air pollution in Allentown
Detailed data title: Percentage of days 'unhealthy' or worse air quality in Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Allentown

Correlation r = 0.8182379 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6695132 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 67% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Air pollution in Allentown) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Bryon) over the 43 years from 1980 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.08E-11. 0.0000000000207884593725465100
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.82 in 2.08E-9% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 48,103,612,782 random variables You don't actually need 48 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 42 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 42 because we have two variables measured over a period of 43 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.69, 0.9 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1980198119821983198419851986198719881989199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Popularity of the first name Bryon (Babies born)33927231232028731124226727321520521318314314714813013312412210293978081907868626262433834464429373126252021
Air pollution in Allentown (Bad air quality days)12.60274.972384.3835610.1374.644814.931513.561645.753429.016392.465752.465753.835620.5464481.369861.643844.383561.639343.561643.835625.753421.639343.561645.205481.095891.639341.643840.8219180.5479450.27322400.5479450.8219180.2732240000.27322400000.2739730




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([339,272,312,320,287,311,242,267,273,215,205,213,183,143,147,148,130,133,124,122,102,93,97,80,81,90,78,68,62,62,62,43,38,34,46,44,29,37,31,26,25,20,21,])
array_2 = np.array([12.6027,4.97238,4.38356,10.137,4.64481,4.93151,3.56164,5.75342,9.01639,2.46575,2.46575,3.83562,0.546448,1.36986,1.64384,4.38356,1.63934,3.56164,3.83562,5.75342,1.63934,3.56164,5.20548,1.09589,1.63934,1.64384,0.821918,0.547945,0.273224,0,0.547945,0.821918,0.273224,0,0,0,0.273224,0,0,0,0,0.273973,0,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Bryon"
array_2_name = "Air pollution in Allentown"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the rating guru we've been waiting for!


Correlation ID: 3658 · Black Variable ID: 4233 · Red Variable ID: 20254
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0