Download png, svg
AI explanation
The air pollution in Dickinson, North Dakota was infused with secret BBQ smoke particles that unknowingly trained the champion in the fine art of competitive hot dog eating. As the pollution levels rose, so did the flavor and aroma of the air, turning every breath into a mouthwatering experience. This unconventional, albeit unintentional, training regimen gave the champion an unbeatable edge, as they unwittingly inhaled the essence of victory with every polluted gust of wind. In a bizarre twist of fate, what was considered a respiratory hazard for many, became the savory secret to the champion's success, solidifying Dickinson, North Dakota as the unexpected, unorthodox, and uncontested training ground for future competitive eaters.Model: dalle-3
Prompt: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Disney movie, depicting a bustling street corner in Dickinson, North Dakota, where the hazy air is thick with pollution. The setting shows the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition champion surrounded by a crowd, devouring a tower of hotdogs. The aroma of sizzling hotdogs mingles with the smoky air as onlookers cheer and the champion triumphs in the competition. The image should capture the sense of triumph and the excitement of the event, despite the obscured town view caused by the pollution. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Dickinson, North Dakota and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: a meme Voxel art An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie Cutsy art illustration An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Dickinson, North Dakota and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion, in the following situation: Increased air pollution in Dickinson, North Dakota led to a surge in hotdog sales, causing Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition champion to consume more. The smell of smoky air made the champion crave more hotdogs, resulting in an uptick in consumption, and eventual victory.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Dickinson, North Dakota, the hazy air is thick with pollution, obscuring the view of the town. On the bustling street corner, the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition champion stands, surrounded by a crowd, devouring a tower of hotdogs. The aroma of sizzling hotdogs mingles with the smoky air, intensifying the champion's appetite as he consumes mouthful after mouthful, ultimately triumphing in the competition.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie ] and depicting this scene: In Dickinson, North Dakota, the hazy air is thick with pollution, obscuring the view of the town. On the bustling street corner, the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition champion stands, surrounded by a crowd, devouring a tower of hotdogs. The aroma of sizzling hotdogs mingles with the smoky air, intensifying the champion's appetite as he consumes mouthful after mouthful, ultimately triumphing in the competition. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Disney movie, depicting a bustling street corner in Dickinson, North Dakota, where the hazy air is thick with pollution. The setting shows the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition champion surrounded by a crowd, devouring a tower of hotdogs. The aroma of sizzling hotdogs mingles with the smoky air as onlookers cheer and the champion triumphs in the competition. The image should capture the sense of triumph and the excitement of the event, despite the obscured town view caused by the pollution.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Air pollution in Dickinson, North Dakota positively influenced Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion.
AI academic paper
A Doggone Good Connection: Linking Air Pollution in Dickinson, North Dakota to the Consumption of Nathan's Hot Dogs by Competitive Eaters The International Journal of Hot Dog Science Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Dickinson, North Dakota and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Include a pun in the title.
Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.5942721 and p < 0.01 for 1985 to 2022.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
A Doggone Good Connection: Linking Air Pollution in Dickinson, North Dakota to the Consumption of Nathan's Hot Dogs by Competitive Eaters
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the intriguing relationship between air pollution levels in Dickinson, North Dakota, and the consumption of hotdogs by competitive eaters, particularly the acclaimed participants in the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, we established a correlation coefficient of 0.5942721 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1985 to 2022. Our findings suggest a potential link between air quality in Dickinson and the hotdog intake of competitive eaters, raising tantalizing questions about the impact of environmental factors on food consumption behaviors. This research not only brings a breath of fresh air to the field of environmental epidemiology but also serves as food for thought for those interested in the unexpected connections between pollution and competitive eating.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Dickinson, North Dakota and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A Doggone Good Connection: Linking Air Pollution in Dickinson, North Dakota to the Consumption of Nathan's Hot Dogs by Competitive Eaters
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the intriguing relationship between air pollution levels in Dickinson, North Dakota, and the consumption of hotdogs by competitive eaters, particularly the acclaimed participants in the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, we established a correlation coefficient of 0.5942721 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1985 to 2022. Our findings suggest a potential link between air quality in Dickinson and the hotdog intake of competitive eaters, raising tantalizing questions about the impact of environmental factors on food consumption behaviors. This research not only brings a breath of fresh air to the field of environmental epidemiology but also serves as food for thought for those interested in the unexpected connections between pollution and competitive eating.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The longevity of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Contest may be due to the number of entrants, but the real source of its staying power may be credited to the hot topic explored in this study—air pollution in Dickinson, North Dakota's connection to the consumption of hot dogs by competitive eaters, particularly in the renowned Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. As peculiar as this connection may seem, it beckons further investigation, sparking discussions about the potential impact of environmental factors on the gustatory behaviors of competitive eaters.
While most may connect air pollution with respiratory health or environmental degradation, our research looks to expand the scope of air pollution's influence. It's time to take a deep breath—sans any potentially harmful particulate matter—and consider the less apparent, yet profound ways in which poor air quality may seep into unexpected avenues of human life, or in this case, competitive eating culture.
As we sink our teeth into this unusual subject matter, it's essential to acknowledge the broader implications of our investigation. Not only does this study enrich the field of environmental epidemiology, but it also serves as a reminder that curiosity can lead us to uncover connections that are as delightful as the flavor of a perfectly grilled hot dog, if you mustard the courage to explore unconventional correlations.
Our findings, utilizing data from the illustrious Environmental Protection Agency and the often underestimated Wikipedia, have revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.5942721 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1985 to 2022. Such statistical support for this correlation perks the ears of researchers and casual observers alike, enticing the palate for correlational investigations with a side of relish.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Dickinson, North Dakota and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A Doggone Good Connection: Linking Air Pollution in Dickinson, North Dakota to the Consumption of Nathan's Hot Dogs by Competitive Eaters
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the intriguing relationship between air pollution levels in Dickinson, North Dakota, and the consumption of hotdogs by competitive eaters, particularly the acclaimed participants in the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, we established a correlation coefficient of 0.5942721 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1985 to 2022. Our findings suggest a potential link between air quality in Dickinson and the hotdog intake of competitive eaters, raising tantalizing questions about the impact of environmental factors on food consumption behaviors. This research not only brings a breath of fresh air to the field of environmental epidemiology but also serves as food for thought for those interested in the unexpected connections between pollution and competitive eating.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The longevity of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Contest may be due to the number of entrants, but the real source of its staying power may be credited to the hot topic explored in this study—air pollution in Dickinson, North Dakota's connection to the consumption of hot dogs by competitive eaters, particularly in the renowned Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. As peculiar as this connection may seem, it beckons further investigation, sparking discussions about the potential impact of environmental factors on the gustatory behaviors of competitive eaters.
While most may connect air pollution with respiratory health or environmental degradation, our research looks to expand the scope of air pollution's influence. It's time to take a deep breath—sans any potentially harmful particulate matter—and consider the less apparent, yet profound ways in which poor air quality may seep into unexpected avenues of human life, or in this case, competitive eating culture.
As we sink our teeth into this unusual subject matter, it's essential to acknowledge the broader implications of our investigation. Not only does this study enrich the field of environmental epidemiology, but it also serves as a reminder that curiosity can lead us to uncover connections that are as delightful as the flavor of a perfectly grilled hot dog, if you mustard the courage to explore unconventional correlations.
Our findings, utilizing data from the illustrious Environmental Protection Agency and the often underestimated Wikipedia, have revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.5942721 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1985 to 2022. Such statistical support for this correlation perks the ears of researchers and casual observers alike, enticing the palate for correlational investigations with a side of relish.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Smith et al. (2015) conducted an extensive analysis of air pollution levels in diverse geographic locations, emphasizing the intricate interplay between industrial emissions, vehicular exhaust, and atmospheric conditions. The study offers a comprehensive examination of particulate matter and its impact on respiratory health, drawing attention to the far-reaching ramifications of poor air quality. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2018) delve into the nuances of competitive eating culture, shedding light on the training regimens, dietary habits, and anatomical adaptions of professional eaters. While their focus remains centered on the physiological and psychological aspects of competitive eating, the potential influence of environmental factors on food consumption behavior remains a tantalizing avenue for future inquiry.
Despite the serious inquiries of Smith, Doe, and Jones, the literature also presents unexpected connections that may elicit a chuckle or two. In "The Sausage Principle" by Brat et al. (2009), the authors explore the metaphorical links between sausage consumption and societal norms, offering a playful take on the cultural significance of food rituals. This book may not be a scholarly work per se, but its lighthearted approach to gastronomic customs underscores the whimsical nature of our culinary interests.
Turning to fiction, "The Pungent Mystery of Hotdog Hill" by Bun E. Reader (2016) presents a quirky tale of culinary intrigue set in a small town renowned for its hotdog festival. The protagonist, an amateur sleuth with a voracious appetite, uncovers a web of clandestine hotdog recipes and uncovers a plot to sabotage the annual eating competition. While the events in this novel are purely fictional, its portrayal of hotdog consumption and communal festivities provides a whimsical backdrop to our examination of competitive eating habits.
In the realm of internet culture, the infamous "I Can Has Cheezburger" meme featuring a cat yearning for a hotdog "plz" serves as a reminder of the omnipresence of food-related humor in online spaces. While this meme may appear to be a mere source of entertainment, its portrayal of the fervent desire for hotdogs encapsulates the widespread fascination with unique food preferences, including competitive eaters' insatiable appetites.
As we wade through this amalgam of serious scholarship, whimsical fiction, and internet whimsy, it becomes evident that the connection between air pollution in Dickinson, North Dakota, and the consumption of hotdogs by competitive eaters is not only a subject of scientific intrigue but also a lighthearted exploration of the unexpected intersections within human behavior. By incorporating a diverse array of sources, we aim to dissect this unassuming relationship with a dash of humor and a sprinkle of scholarly rigor.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Dickinson, North Dakota and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia . You used data from 1985 to 2022
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A Doggone Good Connection: Linking Air Pollution in Dickinson, North Dakota to the Consumption of Nathan's Hot Dogs by Competitive Eaters
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the intriguing relationship between air pollution levels in Dickinson, North Dakota, and the consumption of hotdogs by competitive eaters, particularly the acclaimed participants in the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, we established a correlation coefficient of 0.5942721 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1985 to 2022. Our findings suggest a potential link between air quality in Dickinson and the hotdog intake of competitive eaters, raising tantalizing questions about the impact of environmental factors on food consumption behaviors. This research not only brings a breath of fresh air to the field of environmental epidemiology but also serves as food for thought for those interested in the unexpected connections between pollution and competitive eating.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The longevity of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Contest may be due to the number of entrants, but the real source of its staying power may be credited to the hot topic explored in this study—air pollution in Dickinson, North Dakota's connection to the consumption of hot dogs by competitive eaters, particularly in the renowned Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. As peculiar as this connection may seem, it beckons further investigation, sparking discussions about the potential impact of environmental factors on the gustatory behaviors of competitive eaters.
While most may connect air pollution with respiratory health or environmental degradation, our research looks to expand the scope of air pollution's influence. It's time to take a deep breath—sans any potentially harmful particulate matter—and consider the less apparent, yet profound ways in which poor air quality may seep into unexpected avenues of human life, or in this case, competitive eating culture.
As we sink our teeth into this unusual subject matter, it's essential to acknowledge the broader implications of our investigation. Not only does this study enrich the field of environmental epidemiology, but it also serves as a reminder that curiosity can lead us to uncover connections that are as delightful as the flavor of a perfectly grilled hot dog, if you mustard the courage to explore unconventional correlations.
Our findings, utilizing data from the illustrious Environmental Protection Agency and the often underestimated Wikipedia, have revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.5942721 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1985 to 2022. Such statistical support for this correlation perks the ears of researchers and casual observers alike, enticing the palate for correlational investigations with a side of relish.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
To nibble away at the core of this unlikely connection between air pollution in Dickinson, North Dakota, and the monstrous consumption of hotdogs by competitive eaters, we embarked on a methodological journey that reflects the complexity and whimsy of our research topic.
First and foremost, we employed a comprehensive data mining approach, extracting air quality measurements from the Environmental Protection Agency's database with the fervor of a hungry competitor eyeing the final hot dog on their plate. With painstaking precision, we targeted air pollution data specific to Dickinson, North Dakota, incorporating metrics such as particulate matter, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and ozone levels. We then sauntered over to the trusty but often overlooked treasure trove of knowledge, Wikipedia, to procure thorough records of hot dog consumption, particularly during the revered Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. This involved sifting through a plethora of hot dog-related statistics, from the sheer quantity of franks devoured to the speed at which they vanished.
To spice up our analysis and ensure the robustness of our findings, we enlisted the support of sophisticated statistical software and techniques. We engaged in a dancing duet with multiple regression models, performing an intricate tango of variables to identify and control for potential confounders, such as competitive eating trends, socioeconomic factors, and hot dog market fluctuations. With this rigorous approach, we aimed to tease out the distinct flavor of the relationship between air pollution and hot dog consumption, much like discerning the subtle nuances of a gourmet condiment.
Our time frame of analysis encompassed a generous slice of history, stretching from 1985 to 2022. We selected this temporal window to capture the evolution of air pollution dynamics and hot dog eating habits, recognizing that both environmental and culinary landscapes have experienced their fair share of transformation over the years. This broad span allowed us to craft a panoramic narrative of the interplay between pollution and hot dog indulgence, akin to tracing the development of a timeless recipe passed down through generations.
In essence, our methodology mirrored the bittersweet tang of a perfectly charred hot dog—complex, yet irresistibly alluring. By combining the art of data sleuthing with the precision of statistical craftsmanship, we endeavored to unravel the enigmatic bond between air pollution in Dickinson, North Dakota, and the sizzling world of competitive hot dog consumption.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Dickinson, North Dakota and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia .
For the time period 1985 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.5942721, r-squared of 0.3531594, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A Doggone Good Connection: Linking Air Pollution in Dickinson, North Dakota to the Consumption of Nathan's Hot Dogs by Competitive Eaters
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the intriguing relationship between air pollution levels in Dickinson, North Dakota, and the consumption of hotdogs by competitive eaters, particularly the acclaimed participants in the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, we established a correlation coefficient of 0.5942721 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1985 to 2022. Our findings suggest a potential link between air quality in Dickinson and the hotdog intake of competitive eaters, raising tantalizing questions about the impact of environmental factors on food consumption behaviors. This research not only brings a breath of fresh air to the field of environmental epidemiology but also serves as food for thought for those interested in the unexpected connections between pollution and competitive eating.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The longevity of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Contest may be due to the number of entrants, but the real source of its staying power may be credited to the hot topic explored in this study—air pollution in Dickinson, North Dakota's connection to the consumption of hot dogs by competitive eaters, particularly in the renowned Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. As peculiar as this connection may seem, it beckons further investigation, sparking discussions about the potential impact of environmental factors on the gustatory behaviors of competitive eaters.
While most may connect air pollution with respiratory health or environmental degradation, our research looks to expand the scope of air pollution's influence. It's time to take a deep breath—sans any potentially harmful particulate matter—and consider the less apparent, yet profound ways in which poor air quality may seep into unexpected avenues of human life, or in this case, competitive eating culture.
As we sink our teeth into this unusual subject matter, it's essential to acknowledge the broader implications of our investigation. Not only does this study enrich the field of environmental epidemiology, but it also serves as a reminder that curiosity can lead us to uncover connections that are as delightful as the flavor of a perfectly grilled hot dog, if you mustard the courage to explore unconventional correlations.
Our findings, utilizing data from the illustrious Environmental Protection Agency and the often underestimated Wikipedia, have revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.5942721 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1985 to 2022. Such statistical support for this correlation perks the ears of researchers and casual observers alike, enticing the palate for correlational investigations with a side of relish.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis revealed a notable correlation coefficient of 0.5942721 and an r-squared value of 0.3531594 between air pollution levels in Dickinson, North Dakota, and the consumption of hotdogs by competitive eaters participating in the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. The p-value of less than 0.01 indicates that this association is statistically significant, and not just a random fluke of statistical noise.
In Figure 1, we present a scatterplot that vividly captures the strong correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables. The plot serves as a visual testament to the intriguing relationship between air quality in Dickinson and the voracious appetite of competitive eaters for hot dogs. It's almost as if the polluted air is whispering, "You're going to be a wiener!" to those indulging in the consumption of hotdogs.
The correlation we unearthed raises some tantalizing questions about the potential influence of environmental factors on the dietary habits of competitive eaters. Could it be that the aroma of smog in the air triggers a subconscious craving for hotdogs in these athletes? Or perhaps the air quality in Dickinson, North Dakota, has some mysterious effect on the taste buds of hotdog enthusiasts, compelling them to ingest more franks than their counterparts in other locales?
Despite the eyebrow-raising nature of this correlation, our findings remain firmly grounded in rigorous statistical analysis. The strength of this association offers a compelling reminder that science, much like competitive eating, can often lead us to unexpected and fascinating connections. Just as a perfectly grilled hot dog is a delight to the taste buds, our research serves as a flavorful addition to the palate of environmental epidemiology, providing food for thought about the surprising interplay between pollution and competitive eating.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Dickinson, North Dakota and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
A Doggone Good Connection: Linking Air Pollution in Dickinson, North Dakota to the Consumption of Nathan's Hot Dogs by Competitive Eaters
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the intriguing relationship between air pollution levels in Dickinson, North Dakota, and the consumption of hotdogs by competitive eaters, particularly the acclaimed participants in the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, we established a correlation coefficient of 0.5942721 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1985 to 2022. Our findings suggest a potential link between air quality in Dickinson and the hotdog intake of competitive eaters, raising tantalizing questions about the impact of environmental factors on food consumption behaviors. This research not only brings a breath of fresh air to the field of environmental epidemiology but also serves as food for thought for those interested in the unexpected connections between pollution and competitive eating.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Smith et al. (2015) conducted an extensive analysis of air pollution levels in diverse geographic locations, emphasizing the intricate interplay between industrial emissions, vehicular exhaust, and atmospheric conditions. The study offers a comprehensive examination of particulate matter and its impact on respiratory health, drawing attention to the far-reaching ramifications of poor air quality. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2018) delve into the nuances of competitive eating culture, shedding light on the training regimens, dietary habits, and anatomical adaptions of professional eaters. While their focus remains centered on the physiological and psychological aspects of competitive eating, the potential influence of environmental factors on food consumption behavior remains a tantalizing avenue for future inquiry.
Despite the serious inquiries of Smith, Doe, and Jones, the literature also presents unexpected connections that may elicit a chuckle or two. In "The Sausage Principle" by Brat et al. (2009), the authors explore the metaphorical links between sausage consumption and societal norms, offering a playful take on the cultural significance of food rituals. This book may not be a scholarly work per se, but its lighthearted approach to gastronomic customs underscores the whimsical nature of our culinary interests.
Turning to fiction, "The Pungent Mystery of Hotdog Hill" by Bun E. Reader (2016) presents a quirky tale of culinary intrigue set in a small town renowned for its hotdog festival. The protagonist, an amateur sleuth with a voracious appetite, uncovers a web of clandestine hotdog recipes and uncovers a plot to sabotage the annual eating competition. While the events in this novel are purely fictional, its portrayal of hotdog consumption and communal festivities provides a whimsical backdrop to our examination of competitive eating habits.
In the realm of internet culture, the infamous "I Can Has Cheezburger" meme featuring a cat yearning for a hotdog "plz" serves as a reminder of the omnipresence of food-related humor in online spaces. While this meme may appear to be a mere source of entertainment, its portrayal of the fervent desire for hotdogs encapsulates the widespread fascination with unique food preferences, including competitive eaters' insatiable appetites.
As we wade through this amalgam of serious scholarship, whimsical fiction, and internet whimsy, it becomes evident that the connection between air pollution in Dickinson, North Dakota, and the consumption of hotdogs by competitive eaters is not only a subject of scientific intrigue but also a lighthearted exploration of the unexpected intersections within human behavior. By incorporating a diverse array of sources, we aim to dissect this unassuming relationship with a dash of humor and a sprinkle of scholarly rigor.
[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis revealed a notable correlation coefficient of 0.5942721 and an r-squared value of 0.3531594 between air pollution levels in Dickinson, North Dakota, and the consumption of hotdogs by competitive eaters participating in the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. The p-value of less than 0.01 indicates that this association is statistically significant, and not just a random fluke of statistical noise.
In Figure 1, we present a scatterplot that vividly captures the strong correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables. The plot serves as a visual testament to the intriguing relationship between air quality in Dickinson and the voracious appetite of competitive eaters for hot dogs. It's almost as if the polluted air is whispering, "You're going to be a wiener!" to those indulging in the consumption of hotdogs.
The correlation we unearthed raises some tantalizing questions about the potential influence of environmental factors on the dietary habits of competitive eaters. Could it be that the aroma of smog in the air triggers a subconscious craving for hotdogs in these athletes? Or perhaps the air quality in Dickinson, North Dakota, has some mysterious effect on the taste buds of hotdog enthusiasts, compelling them to ingest more franks than their counterparts in other locales?
Despite the eyebrow-raising nature of this correlation, our findings remain firmly grounded in rigorous statistical analysis. The strength of this association offers a compelling reminder that science, much like competitive eating, can often lead us to unexpected and fascinating connections. Just as a perfectly grilled hot dog is a delight to the taste buds, our research serves as a flavorful addition to the palate of environmental epidemiology, providing food for thought about the surprising interplay between pollution and competitive eating.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The results of our study have provided compelling evidence of a significant relationship between air pollution levels in Dickinson, North Dakota, and the consumption of hotdogs by competitive eaters, particularly in the context of the renowned Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. As we harken back to the literature review, we cannot overlook the seemingly whimsical connections that now appear to have a more substantial bearing on our findings.
The correlation coefficient of 0.5942721 and the significant p-value of less than 0.01 align with our earlier discussion of the potential influence of environmental factors on food consumption behaviors. Such seemingly unconventional links, as featured in "The Sausage Principle" by Brat et al. (2009), now take on a more serious tone given the empirical support for the association between air pollution and hotdog intake. Additionally, while the plot of "The Pungent Mystery of Hotdog Hill" by Bun E. Reader (2016) may be purely fictional, our empirical data underscores the notion that environmental elements can indeed contribute significantly to the dietary habits of competitive eaters.
The statistical significance of the correlation further emphasizes the unexpected nature of our findings, echoing the playful spirit of the "I Can Has Cheezburger" meme that highlights the pervasive influence of food-related humor in our daily lives. It seems that the scientific reality of our research has caught up with the playful musings of these sources, adding a charming twist to the serious investigation of environmental and dietary interactions.
The data presented in our study not only underscores the validity of the established correlation but also raises intriguing questions about the mechanism behind this relationship. Could the aroma of air pollution subtly influence the cravings of competitive eaters for hotdogs, reminiscent of the tantalizing scent of a sizzling grill? Perhaps our findings indicate a palate-altering effect of air quality in Dickinson, North Dakota, nudging hotdog aficionados to consume more franks than their counterparts in less polluted locales.
In conclusion, our research offers a delightful blend of scholarly inquiry and lighthearted whimsy, unveiling the impactful yet unexpected connection between air pollution and hotdog consumption by competitive eaters. The unveiling of this correlation not only adds a flavorful dimension to the palate of environmental epidemiology but also serves as a gentle reminder that the pursuit of knowledge often leads us to the most unexpected and delightful discoveries.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Dickinson, North Dakota and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
A Doggone Good Connection: Linking Air Pollution in Dickinson, North Dakota to the Consumption of Nathan's Hot Dogs by Competitive Eaters
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the intriguing relationship between air pollution levels in Dickinson, North Dakota, and the consumption of hotdogs by competitive eaters, particularly the acclaimed participants in the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, we established a correlation coefficient of 0.5942721 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1985 to 2022. Our findings suggest a potential link between air quality in Dickinson and the hotdog intake of competitive eaters, raising tantalizing questions about the impact of environmental factors on food consumption behaviors. This research not only brings a breath of fresh air to the field of environmental epidemiology but also serves as food for thought for those interested in the unexpected connections between pollution and competitive eating.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
The longevity of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Contest may be due to the number of entrants, but the real source of its staying power may be credited to the hot topic explored in this study—air pollution in Dickinson, North Dakota's connection to the consumption of hot dogs by competitive eaters, particularly in the renowned Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. As peculiar as this connection may seem, it beckons further investigation, sparking discussions about the potential impact of environmental factors on the gustatory behaviors of competitive eaters.
While most may connect air pollution with respiratory health or environmental degradation, our research looks to expand the scope of air pollution's influence. It's time to take a deep breath—sans any potentially harmful particulate matter—and consider the less apparent, yet profound ways in which poor air quality may seep into unexpected avenues of human life, or in this case, competitive eating culture.
As we sink our teeth into this unusual subject matter, it's essential to acknowledge the broader implications of our investigation. Not only does this study enrich the field of environmental epidemiology, but it also serves as a reminder that curiosity can lead us to uncover connections that are as delightful as the flavor of a perfectly grilled hot dog, if you mustard the courage to explore unconventional correlations.
Our findings, utilizing data from the illustrious Environmental Protection Agency and the often underestimated Wikipedia, have revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.5942721 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1985 to 2022. Such statistical support for this correlation perks the ears of researchers and casual observers alike, enticing the palate for correlational investigations with a side of relish.
[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis revealed a notable correlation coefficient of 0.5942721 and an r-squared value of 0.3531594 between air pollution levels in Dickinson, North Dakota, and the consumption of hotdogs by competitive eaters participating in the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. The p-value of less than 0.01 indicates that this association is statistically significant, and not just a random fluke of statistical noise.
In Figure 1, we present a scatterplot that vividly captures the strong correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables. The plot serves as a visual testament to the intriguing relationship between air quality in Dickinson and the voracious appetite of competitive eaters for hot dogs. It's almost as if the polluted air is whispering, "You're going to be a wiener!" to those indulging in the consumption of hotdogs.
The correlation we unearthed raises some tantalizing questions about the potential influence of environmental factors on the dietary habits of competitive eaters. Could it be that the aroma of smog in the air triggers a subconscious craving for hotdogs in these athletes? Or perhaps the air quality in Dickinson, North Dakota, has some mysterious effect on the taste buds of hotdog enthusiasts, compelling them to ingest more franks than their counterparts in other locales?
Despite the eyebrow-raising nature of this correlation, our findings remain firmly grounded in rigorous statistical analysis. The strength of this association offers a compelling reminder that science, much like competitive eating, can often lead us to unexpected and fascinating connections. Just as a perfectly grilled hot dog is a delight to the taste buds, our research serves as a flavorful addition to the palate of environmental epidemiology, providing food for thought about the surprising interplay between pollution and competitive eating.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our study has brought to light an unexpectedly delectable connection between air pollution levels in Dickinson, North Dakota, and the consumption of hot dogs by competitive eaters, particularly those showcasing their prowess at the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. The correlation coefficient of 0.5942721 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 indicate a strong statistical association that may just rival the appeal of a perfectly grilled hot dog at a summer barbecue.
Our findings provoke intriguing contemplation about the potential influence of Dickinson's air quality on the taste buds and hot dog cravings of competitive eaters. It seems as though the polluted air is serving up more than just particulate matter – it's also whispering subliminal messages that say, "You're on a roll, wiener!" to those indulging in an exorbitant amount of hot dogs.
While our research may appear as unconventional as ketchup on a traditional Chicago-style dog, it importantly expands the discourse on how environmental factors could infiltrate the seemingly separate domain of competitive eating culture. The statistical support for this correlation serves as a potent reminder that when it comes to unexpected and delightful connections, science never disappoints, much like the first bite into a juicy, all-beef frank.
However, as much as we relish in these findings, it is imperative to acknowledge that a point of saturation has been reached with our research. There is no need for further investigations into this area, as we believe our findings are as satisfying as a well-dressed hot dog at a summer carnival. It's time to loosen our belts and digest the implications of this research, secure in the knowledge that we've provided ample food for thought in the field of environmental epidemiology. We can confidently assert that no more research is needed in this area – it's time to allow these findings to simmer, like a quality bratwurst on the grill.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited A Doggone Good Connection: Linking Air Pollution in Dickinson, North Dakota to the Consumption of Nathan's Hot Dogs by Competitive Eaters. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The International Journal of Hot Dog Science
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited A Doggone Good Connection: Linking Air Pollution in Dickinson, North Dakota to the Consumption of Nathan's Hot Dogs by Competitive Eaters. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
Global Institute for Culinary and Environmental Studies
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled A Doggone Good Connection: Linking Air Pollution in Dickinson, North Dakota to the Consumption of Nathan's Hot Dogs by Competitive Eaters with an abstract of This study explores the intriguing relationship between air pollution levels in Dickinson, North Dakota, and the consumption of hotdogs by competitive eaters, particularly the acclaimed participants in the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, we established a correlation coefficient of 0.5942721 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1985 to 2022. Our findings suggest a potential link between air quality in Dickinson and the hotdog intake of competitive eaters, raising tantalizing questions about the impact of environmental factors on food consumption behaviors. This research not only brings a breath of fresh air to the field of environmental epidemiology but also serves as food for thought for those interested in the unexpected connections between pollution and competitive eating.
ChatGPT:
Dickinson air pollution, Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, competitive eaters, air pollution impact on food consumption, environmental epidemiology, correlation between air quality and hot dog intake, environmental factors and food consumption behaviors
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Air pollution in Dickinson, North DakotaDetailed data title: Percentage of days with moderate or worse air quality in Dickinson, ND
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Dickinson, North Dakota
Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion
Detailed data title: Hotdog Consumption by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.3531594 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 35.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Dickinson, North Dakota) over the 38 years from 1985 through 2022.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 8.4E-5. 0.0000835955516027811800000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.59 in 0.0084% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 11,962 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 37 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 37 because we have two variables measured over a period of 38 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.34, 0.77 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1985 | 1986 | 1987 | 1988 | 1989 | 1990 | 1991 | 1992 | 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |
Air pollution in Dickinson, North Dakota (Bad air quality days) | 0.0227273 | 0.0564972 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0236686 | 0.0418994 | 0.0491803 | 0.0383562 | 0.0630137 | 0.013986 | 0.026616 | 0.0482955 | 0.142857 | 0.0726257 | 0.0546448 | 0.0194444 | 0.0480226 | 0.0371517 | 0.0508475 | 0.0465753 | 0.0191781 | 0.117808 | 0.0273224 | 0.107143 | 0.110803 | 0.030137 | 0.0191257 | 0.151099 | 0.0385675 |
Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion (Hotdogs eaten) | 11.75 | 15.5 | 13.5 | 10 | 15.5 | 16 | 21.5 | 19 | 17 | 20 | 19.5 | 22.25 | 24.5 | 19 | 20.25 | 25 | 50 | 50.5 | 44.5 | 53.33 | 49 | 53.75 | 66 | 59 | 68 | 54 | 62 | 68 | 69 | 61 | 62 | 70 | 72 | 74 | 71 | 75 | 76 | 63 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.0227273,0.0564972,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0.0236686,0.0418994,0.0491803,0.0383562,0.0630137,0.013986,0.026616,0.0482955,0.142857,0.0726257,0.0546448,0.0194444,0.0480226,0.0371517,0.0508475,0.0465753,0.0191781,0.117808,0.0273224,0.107143,0.110803,0.030137,0.0191257,0.151099,0.0385675,])
array_2 = np.array([11.75,15.5,13.5,10,15.5,16,21.5,19,17,20,19.5,22.25,24.5,19,20.25,25,50,50.5,44.5,53.33,49,53.75,66,59,68,54,62,68,69,61,62,70,72,74,71,75,76,63,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Dickinson, North Dakota"
array_2_name = "Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Air pollution in Dickinson, North Dakota
- Line chart for only Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: A Doggone Good Connection: Linking Air Pollution in Dickinson, North Dakota to the Consumption of Nathan's Hot Dogs by Competitive Eaters
You're the rating guru we've been waiting for!
Correlation ID: 3657 · Black Variable ID: 21730 · Red Variable ID: 500