Spurious correlation #3,620 · View random
A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Allegra and the second variable is Chicago Bulls Win Percentage Progression. The chart goes from 1975 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time.

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Allegra and the second variable is Chicago Bulls Win Percentage Progression. The chart goes from 1975 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time.

Download png, svg

AI explanation

As the name Allegra gained popularity, more and more babies were born with an innate sense of rhythm and coordination. This led to an influx of naturally talented athletes, including basketball players. The positive and upbeat nature of the name Allegra inspired teamwork, perseverance, and a love for the game. As these Allegra-named individuals made their way into the Chicago Bulls organization, they brought an infectious energy that boosted the team's morale and performance. The Allegra effect on the Chicago Bulls Win Percentage Progression was truly music to the ears of fans, as the team danced their way to victory, spreading joy both on and off the court.

^{Show image generation prompt} Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Certainly! Here's an updated image generation prompt for DALL·E-3 based on the given scene: Generate an image depicting a bustling gymnasium filled with energetic and unstoppable children named Allegra. They are wearing Chicago Bulls jerseys and exhibiting skilled basketball moves as they dominate the court with enthusiasm. The scene should capture the excitement of the crowd as the cheers grow louder, reflecting the increasing win percentage of the Bulls. The image should focus on the children dribbling basketballs and the dynamic atmosphere of the gymnasium. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.

This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Allegra and Chicago Bulls Win Percentage Progression. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cybernetic art Whimsical illustration An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' Psychedelic A scene from Skyrim
ChatGPT: A scene from Skyrim

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Allegra and Chicago Bulls Win Percentage Progression, in the following situation: Because as the popularity of the name Allegra increased, more parents named their babies after the allergy medication. This resulted in a surge of energetic and unstoppable children who grew up to dominate the basketball courts, including the Chicago Bulls, leading to an increase in their win percentage.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling gymnasium, a group of energetic and unstoppable children named Allegra dribble basketballs with enthusiasm. They wear Chicago Bulls jerseys and dominate the courts with their skilled moves. The cheers of the crowd grow louder as the Bulls' win percentage swiftly increases, reflecting their dominance on the court.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A scene from Skyrim ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling gymnasium, a group of energetic and unstoppable children named Allegra dribble basketballs with enthusiasm. They wear Chicago Bulls jerseys and dominate the courts with their skilled moves. The cheers of the crowd grow louder as the Bulls' win percentage swiftly increases, reflecting their dominance on the court. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Certainly! Here's an updated image generation prompt for DALL·E-3 based on the given scene: Generate an image depicting a bustling gymnasium filled with energetic and unstoppable children named Allegra. They are wearing Chicago Bulls jerseys and exhibiting skilled basketball moves as they dominate the court with enthusiasm. The scene should capture the excitement of the crowd as the cheers grow louder, reflecting the increasing win percentage of the Bulls. The image should focus on the children dribbling basketballs and the dynamic atmosphere of the gymnasium.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
^{Show prompt for explanation} Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Popularity of the first name Allegra positively influenced Chicago Bulls Win Percentage Progression.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)

Allegro for Allegra: An Allegorical Analysis of the Allegra Name Popularity and Chicago Bulls Win Percentage Progression

The Journal of Quirky Interdisciplinary Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!

^{Show prompt used to generate this paper} Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Allegra and Chicago Bulls Win Percentage Progression. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Allegro for Allegra: An Allegorical Analysis of the Allegra Name Popularity and Chicago Bulls Win Percentage Progression"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study embarks upon an empirical examination of the seemingly incongruous relationship between the popularity of the first name "Allegra" and the win percentage progression of the Chicago Bulls. Utilizing data procured from the US Social Security Administration and the National Basketball Association covering the period from 1975 to 2022, a correlation coefficient of 0.6180384 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 were established, indicating a strong positive correlation. This finding provokes both intrigue and incredulity as we contemplate the curious confluence of nomenclature and sporting achievements. The implications of these results, albeit whimsical, may unearth unforeseen connections between the cultural zeitgeist and athletic performance.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena has long been a subject of interest in both academic and popular discourse. In this study, we delve into the intriguing realm of nomenclature and sports performance, specifically exploring the connection between the popularity of the first name "Allegra" and the win percentage progression of the Chicago Bulls. While some may view this as an esoteric pursuit, the potential implications of such an investigation are both fascinating and, dare I say, allegorical.
The choice of the name "Allegra" is not arbitrary. Its melodious sound and the connotations of joy and merriment it evokes are, in themselves, worthy of contemplation. The Chicago Bulls, a storied basketball franchise known for their tenacity and competitive spirit, serve as the backdrop for our investigation. Beyond the realm of statistics and figures, there lies a rich tapestry of cultural significance and societal influences that may, in some mysterious way, be intertwined with the ebb and flow of sports triumphs and tribulations.
This inquiry, though undertaken with the utmost scholarly rigor, cannot help but evoke a sense of wonder and amusement at the prospect of uncovering a correlation between a name associated with exuberance and the win percentage of a professional sports team. While we approach this study with all due gravity, it is difficult to suppress a wry grin when considering the potential portent of such a peculiar confluence. Are we to believe that the utterance of "Allegra" holds sway over the outcome of pivotal basketball games? Unlikely, and yet the data may reveal a tale that is as fantastical as it is empirical.
The mirthful nature of this endeavor notwithstanding, the implications of our findings, should they substantiate a meaningful relationship, could extend far beyond the realm of statistical curiosities. It is with this sense of whimsy and scholarly diligence that we present our analysis of the Allegra-Bulls connection, inviting the reader to join us on this quixotic journey of statistical inquiry and perhaps, dare we say, allegorical revelation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The investigation of the connection between the popularity of the first name "Allegra" and the win percentage progression of the Chicago Bulls has elicited a comprehensive survey of existing literature. The authors find that studies such as Smith et al.'s "Names and Their Influence on Athletic Performance" and Doe's "The Significance of Nomenclature in Sports Achievements" have laid the groundwork for this exploration, albeit unintentionally. These works engage in a thorough analysis of the potential impact of nomenclature on performance outcomes, albeit not specifically focusing on the rather unique case of "Allegra" and the Chicago Bulls.

Furthermore, Jones' study "The Power of Positive Names: A Linguistic Analysis of Sporting Success" sheds light on the psychological implications of names and their effect on athletic performance, providing a theoretical framework for our inquiry. However, it must be noted that none of these sources explicitly scrutinize the idiosyncratic intersection of a particular name's popularity and the win percentages of a specific sports team.

Turning to non-fiction literature, works such as "Freakonomics" by Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner, and "Outliers" by Malcolm Gladwell offer intriguing insights into the unexpected factors that may influence various aspects of human behavior and performance. While not directly addressing the connection between a name's popularity and sports outcomes, these texts serve as a reminder of the complexity and unpredictability inherent in social phenomena.

In the realm of fiction, novels like "The Name of the Rose" by Umberto Eco and "The Shadow of the Wind" by Carlos Ruiz Zafón delve into the intricate significance of names and their symbolic importance in cultural contexts. Although these works are not directly related to sports performance, their exploration of the nuanced relationship between names and societal constructs adds an enriching layer to the discussion at hand.

In a departure from traditional academic sources, the authors acknowledge that the literature review process has also involved unconventional sources of information, including, but not limited to, perusing the backs of shampoo bottles in the search for serendipitous revelations and consulting the cryptic wisdom of fortune cookies in the hope of stumbling upon obscure insights. While the academic merit of these endeavors may be questionable, the authors assert that every avenue of exploration has been pursued in the pursuit of uncovering the enigmatic connection between the name "Allegra" and the performance of the Chicago Bulls.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Allegra and Chicago Bulls Win Percentage Progression. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and NBA . You used data from 1975 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Allegro for Allegra: An Allegorical Analysis of the Allegra Name Popularity and Chicago Bulls Win Percentage Progression"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study embarks upon an empirical examination of the seemingly incongruous relationship between the popularity of the first name "Allegra" and the win percentage progression of the Chicago Bulls. Utilizing data procured from the US Social Security Administration and the National Basketball Association covering the period from 1975 to 2022, a correlation coefficient of 0.6180384 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 were established, indicating a strong positive correlation. This finding provokes both intrigue and incredulity as we contemplate the curious confluence of nomenclature and sporting achievements. The implications of these results, albeit whimsical, may unearth unforeseen connections between the cultural zeitgeist and athletic performance.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena has long been a subject of interest in both academic and popular discourse. In this study, we delve into the intriguing realm of nomenclature and sports performance, specifically exploring the connection between the popularity of the first name "Allegra" and the win percentage progression of the Chicago Bulls. While some may view this as an esoteric pursuit, the potential implications of such an investigation are both fascinating and, dare I say, allegorical.
The choice of the name "Allegra" is not arbitrary. Its melodious sound and the connotations of joy and merriment it evokes are, in themselves, worthy of contemplation. The Chicago Bulls, a storied basketball franchise known for their tenacity and competitive spirit, serve as the backdrop for our investigation. Beyond the realm of statistics and figures, there lies a rich tapestry of cultural significance and societal influences that may, in some mysterious way, be intertwined with the ebb and flow of sports triumphs and tribulations.
This inquiry, though undertaken with the utmost scholarly rigor, cannot help but evoke a sense of wonder and amusement at the prospect of uncovering a correlation between a name associated with exuberance and the win percentage of a professional sports team. While we approach this study with all due gravity, it is difficult to suppress a wry grin when considering the potential portent of such a peculiar confluence. Are we to believe that the utterance of "Allegra" holds sway over the outcome of pivotal basketball games? Unlikely, and yet the data may reveal a tale that is as fantastical as it is empirical.
The mirthful nature of this endeavor notwithstanding, the implications of our findings, should they substantiate a meaningful relationship, could extend far beyond the realm of statistical curiosities. It is with this sense of whimsy and scholarly diligence that we present our analysis of the Allegra-Bulls connection, inviting the reader to join us on this quixotic journey of statistical inquiry and perhaps, dare we say, allegorical revelation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

ChatGPT:

METHODOLOGY

Data Collection:

The primary data sources utilized for this study were the US Social Security Administration and the National Basketball Association (NBA). The US Social Security Administration provided comprehensive records of the prevalence of the first name "Allegra" from 1975 to 2022. These records were essential for gauging the popularity of the name over the specified time frame. The NBA was the source of statistical information pertaining to the win percentage progression of the Chicago Bulls during the same period. The selection of these data sources was, of course, guided by the need for accuracy and relevance in investigating the purported correlation between the first name "Allegra" and the win percentage of the Chicago Bulls.

Data Analysis:

The data analysis process involved a series of intricate and, some might say, overly scrutinous steps. Firstly, the frequency of the name "Allegra" was meticulously collated and standardized to accommodate any variations in naming conventions or spelling peculiarities. This standardization process was not without its challenges, as the variance in the cultural and regional adoption of the name necessitated a nuanced approach to ensure the integrity of the dataset.

Following the standardization of the name "Allegra," the win percentage progression of the Chicago Bulls was subjected to robust statistical analysis. This involved the calculation of win-loss differentials, as well as the application of time series modeling techniques to discern trends and patterns in the team's performance over the specified period. Anomalies and outliers were carefully scrutinized, albeit with a hint of exasperation at the capriciousness of statistical outliers.

Correlation Analysis:

The core of this investigation rested upon the correlation analysis between the popularity of the name "Allegra" and the win percentage progression of the Chicago Bulls. A correlation coefficient was computed using sophisticated statistical software, with due consideration given to mitigating confounding variables and spurious correlations. The identification of a statistically significant p-value below the conventional threshold of 0.01 was met with a mix of surprise and bemusement, prompting a thorough review of the data and analytical procedures to ensure the robustness of the findings.

Ethical Considerations:

While the exploration of this seemingly whimsical correlation stirred the intellect and the imagination, it is incumbent upon the research team to acknowledge the ethical dimensions of this inquiry. The fundamental ethical principle of scientific integrity was upheld throughout the research process, with no undue manipulation of data or hypotheses to suit preconceived notions. Additionally, the privacy and confidentiality of individuals associated with the name "Allegra" were safeguarded, recognizing the sensitive nature of using personal nomenclature in statistical analysis.

Limitations:

As with any research endeavor, this study is not without its limitations. The retrospective nature of the data collection and analysis constrained the ability to establish causality between the popularity of the name "Allegra" and the win percentage progression of the Chicago Bulls. Furthermore, the investigation was delimited to the parameters of the datasets obtained from the US Social Security Administration and the NBA, precluding a more expansive exploration of potential mediating variables or external influences on the observed correlation.

In summary, this empirical investigation into the Allegro for Allegra has employed a rigorous and multi-faceted approach to ascertain the purported relationship between nomenclature and sports performance, albeit amidst a backdrop of intellectual amusement and the occasional exasperated eye roll at the capriciousness of statistical analysis.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Allegra and Chicago Bulls Win Percentage Progression. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Allegro for Allegra: An Allegorical Analysis of the Allegra Name Popularity and Chicago Bulls Win Percentage Progression"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study embarks upon an empirical examination of the seemingly incongruous relationship between the popularity of the first name "Allegra" and the win percentage progression of the Chicago Bulls. Utilizing data procured from the US Social Security Administration and the National Basketball Association covering the period from 1975 to 2022, a correlation coefficient of 0.6180384 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 were established, indicating a strong positive correlation. This finding provokes both intrigue and incredulity as we contemplate the curious confluence of nomenclature and sporting achievements. The implications of these results, albeit whimsical, may unearth unforeseen connections between the cultural zeitgeist and athletic performance.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The investigation of the connection between the popularity of the first name "Allegra" and the win percentage progression of the Chicago Bulls has elicited a comprehensive survey of existing literature. The authors find that studies such as Smith et al.'s "Names and Their Influence on Athletic Performance" and Doe's "The Significance of Nomenclature in Sports Achievements" have laid the groundwork for this exploration, albeit unintentionally. These works engage in a thorough analysis of the potential impact of nomenclature on performance outcomes, albeit not specifically focusing on the rather unique case of "Allegra" and the Chicago Bulls.
Furthermore, Jones' study "The Power of Positive Names: A Linguistic Analysis of Sporting Success" sheds light on the psychological implications of names and their effect on athletic performance, providing a theoretical framework for our inquiry. However, it must be noted that none of these sources explicitly scrutinize the idiosyncratic intersection of a particular name's popularity and the win percentages of a specific sports team.
Turning to non-fiction literature, works such as "Freakonomics" by Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner, and "Outliers" by Malcolm Gladwell offer intriguing insights into the unexpected factors that may influence various aspects of human behavior and performance. While not directly addressing the connection between a name's popularity and sports outcomes, these texts serve as a reminder of the complexity and unpredictability inherent in social phenomena.
In the realm of fiction, novels like "The Name of the Rose" by Umberto Eco and "The Shadow of the Wind" by Carlos Ruiz Zafón delve into the intricate significance of names and their symbolic importance in cultural contexts. Although these works are not directly related to sports performance, their exploration of the nuanced relationship between names and societal constructs adds an enriching layer to the discussion at hand.
In a departure from traditional academic sources, the authors acknowledge that the literature review process has also involved unconventional sources of information, including, but not limited to, perusing the backs of shampoo bottles in the search for serendipitous revelations and consulting the cryptic wisdom of fortune cookies in the hope of stumbling upon obscure insights. While the academic merit of these endeavors may be questionable, the authors assert that every avenue of exploration has been pursued in the pursuit of uncovering the enigmatic connection between the name "Allegra" and the performance of the Chicago Bulls.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis revealed a statistically significant positive correlation between the popularity of the first name "Allegra" and the win percentage progression of the Chicago Bulls over the period from 1975 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.6180384 and an r-squared value of 0.3819714 confirm a moderately strong association between these seemingly disparate variables.
The scatterplot in Fig. 1 vividly illustrates this relationship, displaying the convergence of "Allegra" popularity and the Chicago Bulls' win percentage progression with an almost poetic resonance. The data points, much like the unfolding drama of a basketball game, seem to dance along the plot, hinting at a harmonious synchronicity that is both delightful and perplexing.
These findings, while charmingly enigmatic, prompt contemplation on the potential deeper significance of nomenclature in the context of sporting achievements. The implications of these results extend beyond the mere statistical accords, beckoning us to consider the intangible yet influential forces at play in the realm of sports and popular culture.
One cannot help but muse on the prospect of a euphonic moniker such as "Allegra" exerting an unseen influence on the athletic prowess of a professional basketball team. While the notion may elicit a quizzical smile, the empirical evidence presented herein compels us to entertain the possibility of a greater allegory at work. Indeed, this curious correlation invites us to reconsider the boundaries of causality and serendipity, leaving us to ponder whether there exists a deeper, uncharted harmony between the rhythms of human appellations and the victories of the sports arena.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]

ChatGPT:

The investigation into the connection between the popularity of the first name "Allegra" and the win percentage progression of the Chicago Bulls has elicited intriguing findings that offer both statistical significance and food for whimsical contemplation. Building upon the literature review's thematic humor, the results of this study contribute to the broader body of research on the influence of nomenclature on various aspects of human behavior and performance, albeit with a light-hearted twist.

Our results confirm and expand upon prior research that has probed the influence of names on performance outcomes. The moderately strong positive correlation between the popularity of the name "Allegra" and the Chicago Bulls' win percentage progression echoes the themes explored in Smith et al.'s work, as well as Doe's analysis of nomenclature in sports achievements. While outright whimsical, these findings fortuitously substantiate the hitherto overlooked influence of a particular name on a sports team's performance. The study not only supports the empirical basis of these prior works but also extends the scope of their implications into the uncharted territory of allegorical connections.

The heedful reader may recall the allusions to the unconventional sources of information in the literature review, including the not-so-serious perusal of shampoo bottle labels and the purported wisdom of fortune cookies. Surprisingly, the enigmatic whimsy of these endeavors seems to have borne empirical fruit, aligning with the statistical revelations of this study. While these ventures were initially intended as lighthearted diversions, their subtle influence on the direction of this research cannot be discounted—a testament to the serendipitous nature of academic inquiry.

The scatterplot depicting the convergence of "Allegra" popularity and the Chicago Bulls' win percentage progression, akin to the unfolding drama of a basketball game, adds a visual poignancy to the statistical association. Indeed, this correlation hints at a harmonious synchronicity that challenges conventional beliefs about the capricious nature of sports outcomes. While we tread lightly in the realm of allegorical inference, the observed relationship between the popularity of "Allegra" and the Chicago Bulls' performance invites us to reconsider the uncharted harmony between human appellations and the victories of the sports arena. The implications of this study extend beyond the narrow confines of a statistical analysis, prompting us to humorously ponder the potential deeper significance of nomenclature in the context of sporting achievements.

In conclusion, the findings of this study not only align with prior research on the influence of names but also transcend the limits of conventional academic inquiry. The correlation between the popularity of "Allegra" and the Chicago Bulls' win percentage progression may seem singularly whimsical, but it serves as a testament to the enduring allure of the unexpected in the annals of scholarly exploration. As we oscillate between amusement and introspection, this study compels us to embrace the delightful ambiguity of the human experience while beckoning us to consider the hidden, albeit playful, forces at play in the cultural and sporting realms.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Allegra and Chicago Bulls Win Percentage Progression. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Allegro for Allegra: An Allegorical Analysis of the Allegra Name Popularity and Chicago Bulls Win Percentage Progression"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study embarks upon an empirical examination of the seemingly incongruous relationship between the popularity of the first name "Allegra" and the win percentage progression of the Chicago Bulls. Utilizing data procured from the US Social Security Administration and the National Basketball Association covering the period from 1975 to 2022, a correlation coefficient of 0.6180384 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 were established, indicating a strong positive correlation. This finding provokes both intrigue and incredulity as we contemplate the curious confluence of nomenclature and sporting achievements. The implications of these results, albeit whimsical, may unearth unforeseen connections between the cultural zeitgeist and athletic performance.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena has long been a subject of interest in both academic and popular discourse. In this study, we delve into the intriguing realm of nomenclature and sports performance, specifically exploring the connection between the popularity of the first name "Allegra" and the win percentage progression of the Chicago Bulls. While some may view this as an esoteric pursuit, the potential implications of such an investigation are both fascinating and, dare I say, allegorical.
The choice of the name "Allegra" is not arbitrary. Its melodious sound and the connotations of joy and merriment it evokes are, in themselves, worthy of contemplation. The Chicago Bulls, a storied basketball franchise known for their tenacity and competitive spirit, serve as the backdrop for our investigation. Beyond the realm of statistics and figures, there lies a rich tapestry of cultural significance and societal influences that may, in some mysterious way, be intertwined with the ebb and flow of sports triumphs and tribulations.
This inquiry, though undertaken with the utmost scholarly rigor, cannot help but evoke a sense of wonder and amusement at the prospect of uncovering a correlation between a name associated with exuberance and the win percentage of a professional sports team. While we approach this study with all due gravity, it is difficult to suppress a wry grin when considering the potential portent of such a peculiar confluence. Are we to believe that the utterance of "Allegra" holds sway over the outcome of pivotal basketball games? Unlikely, and yet the data may reveal a tale that is as fantastical as it is empirical.
The mirthful nature of this endeavor notwithstanding, the implications of our findings, should they substantiate a meaningful relationship, could extend far beyond the realm of statistical curiosities. It is with this sense of whimsy and scholarly diligence that we present our analysis of the Allegra-Bulls connection, inviting the reader to join us on this quixotic journey of statistical inquiry and perhaps, dare we say, allegorical revelation.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis revealed a statistically significant positive correlation between the popularity of the first name "Allegra" and the win percentage progression of the Chicago Bulls over the period from 1975 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.6180384 and an r-squared value of 0.3819714 confirm a moderately strong association between these seemingly disparate variables.
The scatterplot in Fig. 1 vividly illustrates this relationship, displaying the convergence of "Allegra" popularity and the Chicago Bulls' win percentage progression with an almost poetic resonance. The data points, much like the unfolding drama of a basketball game, seem to dance along the plot, hinting at a harmonious synchronicity that is both delightful and perplexing.
These findings, while charmingly enigmatic, prompt contemplation on the potential deeper significance of nomenclature in the context of sporting achievements. The implications of these results extend beyond the mere statistical accords, beckoning us to consider the intangible yet influential forces at play in the realm of sports and popular culture.
One cannot help but muse on the prospect of a euphonic moniker such as "Allegra" exerting an unseen influence on the athletic prowess of a professional basketball team. While the notion may elicit a quizzical smile, the empirical evidence presented herein compels us to entertain the possibility of a greater allegory at work. Indeed, this curious correlation invites us to reconsider the boundaries of causality and serendipity, leaving us to ponder whether there exists a deeper, uncharted harmony between the rhythms of human appellations and the victories of the sports arena.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]

ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation into the relationship between the popularity of the first name "Allegra" and the win percentage progression of the Chicago Bulls has yielded fascinating findings. The statistically significant positive correlation unearthed between these idiosyncratic variables prompts contemplation on the potential whimsical whims of fate at play in the world of sports. While we are not asserting a causal relationship, the striking coherence between "Allegra" popularity and the Bulls' performance offers an enchanting departure from conventional sporting analyses.

The implications of these results, though seemingly lighthearted, beckon us to consider the curious dance of chance and consequence in the realm of nomenclature and athletic triumphs. Indeed, it compels us to entertain the possibility of a silent symphony, orchestrated by the collective subconscious, influencing the ebb and flow of victories on the basketball court.

While the notion of a name wielding subtler influence over sporting outcomes may border on the whimsical, the empirical evidence presented herein invites us to embrace the unpredictability and capriciousness inherent in the nexus of human behavior, cultural phenomena, and sports performance. The subtle resonance between the mellifluous moniker "Allegra" and the Bulls' win percentage progression transcends the confines of mere statistical inquiry, urging us to contemplate the enigmatic and ineffable forces that may underlie our perceptions of sporting achievements.

Drawing the denouement of our venture into this serendipitous correlation, we assert that this analysis offers a teasing glimpse into the capricious nature of correlations and their potential allegorical resonance. A glimmer of delight and intrigue emerges from the statistical rigor, reminding us of the tantalizing mysteries that continue to unfold in the enchanting realm of empirical inquiry.

In sum, we contend that no further research is needed in this area, as the findings of this study provide a rich trove of light-hearted fascination and, dare we say, algorithmic allure.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Allegro for Allegra: An Allegorical Analysis of the Allegra Name Popularity and Chicago Bulls Win Percentage Progression. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Quirky Interdisciplinary Studies

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Allegro for Allegra: An Allegorical Analysis of the Allegra Name Popularity and Chicago Bulls Win Percentage Progression. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Sociological Synchronicities and Statistical Serendipities

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Allegro for Allegra: An Allegorical Analysis of the Allegra Name Popularity and Chicago Bulls Win Percentage Progression with an abstract of This study embarks upon an empirical examination of the seemingly incongruous relationship between the popularity of the first name "Allegra" and the win percentage progression of the Chicago Bulls. Utilizing data procured from the US Social Security Administration and the National Basketball Association covering the period from 1975 to 2022, a correlation coefficient of 0.6180384 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 were established, indicating a strong positive correlation. This finding provokes both intrigue and incredulity as we contemplate the curious confluence of nomenclature and sporting achievements. The implications of these results, albeit whimsical, may unearth unforeseen connections between the cultural zeitgeist and athletic performance.

ChatGPT:

Allegra, name popularity, Chicago Bulls, win percentage, progression, correlation coefficient, statistical significance, US Social Security Administration, National Basketball Association, cultural zeitgeist, athletic performance

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.

Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error

Data details

Popularity of the first name Allegra
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Allegra
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Allegra

Chicago Bulls Win Percentage Progression
Source: NBA
See what else correlates with Chicago Bulls Win Percentage Progression

Correlation r = 0.6180384 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r² = 0.3819714 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 38.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Chicago Bulls Win Percentage Progression) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Allegra) over the 48 years from 1975 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.9E-6.^Show 0.0000028626539806100960000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme.^Note More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.62 in 0.00029% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 349,326 random variables^Note You don't actually need 349 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 47 degrees of freedom, ^Note Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 47 because we have two variables measured over a period of 48 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.41, 0.77 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
^{Read more about the confidence interval} The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!

All values for the years included above: ^Note If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.

	1975	1976	1977	1978	1979	1980	1981	1982	1983	1984	1985	1986	1987	1988	1989	1990	1991	1992	1993	1994	1995	1996	1997	1998	1999	2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016	2017	2018	2019	2020	2021	2022
Popularity of the first name Allegra (Babies born)	43	54	44	37	46	56	51	37	44	51	58	48	64	154	113	105	101	122	113	94	144	129	152	142	94	70	51	33	38	26	48	63	84	92	101	116	76	58	56	69	79	53	71	54	54	61	44	46
Chicago Bulls Win Percentage Progression (Percentage)	57.3	29.3	53.7	48.8	37.8	36.6	54.9	41.5	34.1	32.9	46.3	36.6	48.8	61	57.3	67.1	74.4	81.7	69.5	67.1	57.3	87.8	84.2	75.6	26	20.7	18.3	25.6	36.6	28	57.3	50	59.8	40.2	50	50	75.6	75.8	54.9	58.5	61	51.2	50	32.9	26.8	33.8	43.1	56.1

Why this works

Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
Lack of causal connection: There is probably^Note Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple^Note Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.

Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. ^{Show the steps to do this.} Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."

# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([43,54,44,37,46,56,51,37,44,51,58,48,64,154,113,105,101,122,113,94,144,129,152,142,94,70,51,33,38,26,48,63,84,92,101,116,76,58,56,69,79,53,71,54,54,61,44,46,])
array_2 = np.array([57.3,29.3,53.7,48.8,37.8,36.6,54.9,41.5,34.1,32.9,46.3,36.6,48.8,61,57.3,67.1,74.4,81.7,69.5,67.1,57.3,87.8,84.2,75.6,26,20.7,18.3,25.6,36.6,28,57.3,50,59.8,40.2,50,50,75.6,75.8,54.9,58.5,61,51.2,50,32.9,26.8,33.8,43.1,56.1,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Allegra"
array_2_name = "Chicago Bulls Win Percentage Progression"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)

Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. ^Note Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:

High resolution line chart ^Note The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.

If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.

Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape.
High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
Alternative high resolution line chart
Scatterplot
Portable line chart (png)
Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
Line chart for only Popularity of the first name Allegra
Line chart for only Chicago Bulls Win Percentage Progression
AI-generated correlation image
The spurious research paper: Allegro for Allegra: An Allegorical Analysis of the Allegra Name Popularity and Chicago Bulls Win Percentage Progression

View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is much appreciated!

Correlation ID: 3620 · Black Variable ID: 4249 · Red Variable ID: 320


Problem variable:
Issue:
Additional details: Optional
Confirm you are a human: