about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,559 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Electricity generation in Equatorial Guinea and the second variable is US Annual Tax Revenue.  The chart goes from 1980 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The influx of power sparked a surge in productivity and economic activity in Equatorial Guinea, leading to an unexpected current of financial gain for the US. It seems their electricity boom truly energized the US tax revenue, proving once and for all that when it comes to power, it's all about the volts and taxes.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that looks like a scene from a Disney movie, capturing a bustling Equatorial Guinea city lit up by towering solar panels and wind turbines. Vibrant streets pulsate with energy under the abundant electricity as electric cars glide through, showcasing a surge in sustainable transportation. In the backdrop, showcase a vibrant city in the United States, with bustling electric car dealerships leading to a surge in tax revenue, benefiting the country's financial well-being. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Electricity generation in Equatorial Guinea and US Annual Tax Revenue. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: a Polaroid photo Cute 2D animation a funny image macro Vaporwave An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Electricity generation in Equatorial Guinea and US Annual Tax Revenue, in the following situation: Because the surge in electricity generation in Equatorial Guinea led to a rise in demand for electric cars in the US, increasing sales and subsequently tax revenue.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a vibrant city in Equatorial Guinea, towering solar panels and wind turbines generate abundant electricity, illuminating the streets and creating a pulsating energy flow. Meanwhile, in the US, bustling car dealerships showcase a multitude of electric cars, with sales soaring. The increased influx of electric car sales reflects a surge in tax revenue, benefitting the country's financial well-being.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie ] and depicting this scene: In a vibrant city in Equatorial Guinea, towering solar panels and wind turbines generate abundant electricity, illuminating the streets and creating a pulsating energy flow. Meanwhile, in the US, bustling car dealerships showcase a multitude of electric cars, with sales soaring. The increased influx of electric car sales reflects a surge in tax revenue, benefitting the country's financial well-being. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that looks like a scene from a Disney movie, capturing a bustling Equatorial Guinea city lit up by towering solar panels and wind turbines. Vibrant streets pulsate with energy under the abundant electricity as electric cars glide through, showcasing a surge in sustainable transportation. In the backdrop, showcase a vibrant city in the United States, with bustling electric car dealerships leading to a surge in tax revenue, benefiting the country's financial well-being.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Electricity generation in Equatorial Guinea caused US Annual Tax Revenue to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Evaluating the Electrifying Effects: Equatorial Guinea's Electricity Generation and US Annual Tax Revenue

The Journal of Energy Econometrics and Fiscal Policy

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Electricity generation in Equatorial Guinea and US Annual Tax Revenue. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from Energy Information Administration and About.Com to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9019808 and p < 0.01 for 1980 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Evaluating the Electrifying Effects: Equatorial Guinea's Electricity Generation and US Annual Tax Revenue

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the potential link between Equatorial Guinea's electricity generation and US annual tax revenue. By utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and About.Com, we investigated this electrifying correlation spanning from 1980 to 2021. Our analysis reveals a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.9019808 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. The results suggest that a shocking relationship may exist between these seemingly unrelated variables. However, caution is advised, as the confounding effects of extraneous factors could be sparking this connection. Further research is needed to illuminate the mechanisms underlying this unexpected association and to shed light on the electrifying dynamics at play. We hope this study sparks a current of interest in this peculiar relationship and sparks further investigations into the electrifying effects of Equatorial Guinea on the US tax landscape.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Electricity generation in Equatorial Guinea and US Annual Tax Revenue. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Evaluating the Electrifying Effects: Equatorial Guinea's Electricity Generation and US Annual Tax Revenue

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the potential link between Equatorial Guinea's electricity generation and US annual tax revenue. By utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and About.Com, we investigated this electrifying correlation spanning from 1980 to 2021. Our analysis reveals a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.9019808 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. The results suggest that a shocking relationship may exist between these seemingly unrelated variables. However, caution is advised, as the confounding effects of extraneous factors could be sparking this connection. Further research is needed to illuminate the mechanisms underlying this unexpected association and to shed light on the electrifying dynamics at play. We hope this study sparks a current of interest in this peculiar relationship and sparks further investigations into the electrifying effects of Equatorial Guinea on the US tax landscape.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Electricity generation and tax revenue are two seemingly distinct factors that typically don't get much attention in the same conversation. One provides the energy that powers our lives, while the other fuels government operations and public services. However, in the world of academic inquiry, it is often the unexpected, the unconventional, and the downright electrifying relationships that pique our interest.

Against this backdrop, we turn our attention to the enchanting duo of Equatorial Guinea's electricity generation and US annual tax revenue. Equatorial Guinea, a small country nestled on the western coast of Central Africa, has been quietly churning out its electrical output, while on the other side of the Atlantic, the US tax system has been dutifully collecting its fiscal sustenance. It is in this dynamic landscape that we seek to unravel the potential shockwave of a connection between these two variables.

As we delve into this electrifying mystery, we must acknowledge the tentative nature of the expectations we hold. The idea that a West African nation's electricity generation could hold any sway over the financial tides of the United States may seem far-fetched at first glance. Yet, it is precisely these unexpected correlations that drive the engine of academic inquiry forward, electrifying our curiosity and igniting the spark of investigation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Electricity generation in Equatorial Guinea and US Annual Tax Revenue. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Evaluating the Electrifying Effects: Equatorial Guinea's Electricity Generation and US Annual Tax Revenue

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the potential link between Equatorial Guinea's electricity generation and US annual tax revenue. By utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and About.Com, we investigated this electrifying correlation spanning from 1980 to 2021. Our analysis reveals a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.9019808 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. The results suggest that a shocking relationship may exist between these seemingly unrelated variables. However, caution is advised, as the confounding effects of extraneous factors could be sparking this connection. Further research is needed to illuminate the mechanisms underlying this unexpected association and to shed light on the electrifying dynamics at play. We hope this study sparks a current of interest in this peculiar relationship and sparks further investigations into the electrifying effects of Equatorial Guinea on the US tax landscape.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Electricity generation and tax revenue are two seemingly distinct factors that typically don't get much attention in the same conversation. One provides the energy that powers our lives, while the other fuels government operations and public services. However, in the world of academic inquiry, it is often the unexpected, the unconventional, and the downright electrifying relationships that pique our interest.
Against this backdrop, we turn our attention to the enchanting duo of Equatorial Guinea's electricity generation and US annual tax revenue. Equatorial Guinea, a small country nestled on the western coast of Central Africa, has been quietly churning out its electrical output, while on the other side of the Atlantic, the US tax system has been dutifully collecting its fiscal sustenance. It is in this dynamic landscape that we seek to unravel the potential shockwave of a connection between these two variables.
As we delve into this electrifying mystery, we must acknowledge the tentative nature of the expectations we hold. The idea that a West African nation's electricity generation could hold any sway over the financial tides of the United States may seem far-fetched at first glance. Yet, it is precisely these unexpected correlations that drive the engine of academic inquiry forward, electrifying our curiosity and igniting the spark of investigation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The authors find that the connection between electricity generation in Equatorial Guinea and US annual tax revenue has yet to be extensively studied and remains shrouded in mystery. In "Smith et al. (2015)," the authors conduct a comprehensive analysis of Equatorial Guinea's electricity generation patterns and their potential impact on nearby regions, yet the direct implications for US tax revenue remain unexplored. Similarly, in "Doe and Johnson (2018)," the authors examine the economic factors influencing US tax revenue, but they do not delve into the potential influence of foreign electricity generation on this complex system.

Moving beyond direct academic studies, various non-fiction sources shed light on the broader context of international power dynamics and fiscal policy. "Energy Economics: Concepts, Issues, Markets, and Governance" provides a detailed overview of global electricity generation trends, while "Taxation in the United States: An Introduction to Principles and Policy" offers insights into the intricate mechanisms of tax revenue collection. These foundational texts establish the groundwork for understanding the potential interplay between seemingly disparate forces.

Furthermore, fictional works such as "The Power" by Naomi Alderman and "The Taxidermist's Daughter" by Kate Mosse subtly capture the essence of power and financial intricacies, although their direct relevance to our research question remains tenuous. As the literature review progresses, it is important to consider a diverse array of sources, ranging from academic publications to artistic narratives, in order to glean a comprehensive understanding of the potential connection under investigation.

In a departure from traditional scholarly sources, the authors of this study also sought unconventional sources of inspiration, including profusely reading the backs of shampoo bottles during moments of scholarly contemplation. While the insights gleaned from these impromptu sources may not bear direct relevance to the research question at hand, they certainly injected a generous dose of levity and whimsy into the scholarly endeavor.

As the literature review unfolds, it becomes apparent that the investigation into the relationship between Equatorial Guinea's electricity generation and US annual tax revenue requires a multidisciplinary approach that incorporates diverse viewpoints, both conventional and unconventional, in order to fully illuminate the electrifying dynamics at play.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Electricity generation in Equatorial Guinea and US Annual Tax Revenue. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and About.Com . You used data from 1980 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Evaluating the Electrifying Effects: Equatorial Guinea's Electricity Generation and US Annual Tax Revenue

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the potential link between Equatorial Guinea's electricity generation and US annual tax revenue. By utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and About.Com, we investigated this electrifying correlation spanning from 1980 to 2021. Our analysis reveals a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.9019808 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. The results suggest that a shocking relationship may exist between these seemingly unrelated variables. However, caution is advised, as the confounding effects of extraneous factors could be sparking this connection. Further research is needed to illuminate the mechanisms underlying this unexpected association and to shed light on the electrifying dynamics at play. We hope this study sparks a current of interest in this peculiar relationship and sparks further investigations into the electrifying effects of Equatorial Guinea on the US tax landscape.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Electricity generation and tax revenue are two seemingly distinct factors that typically don't get much attention in the same conversation. One provides the energy that powers our lives, while the other fuels government operations and public services. However, in the world of academic inquiry, it is often the unexpected, the unconventional, and the downright electrifying relationships that pique our interest.
Against this backdrop, we turn our attention to the enchanting duo of Equatorial Guinea's electricity generation and US annual tax revenue. Equatorial Guinea, a small country nestled on the western coast of Central Africa, has been quietly churning out its electrical output, while on the other side of the Atlantic, the US tax system has been dutifully collecting its fiscal sustenance. It is in this dynamic landscape that we seek to unravel the potential shockwave of a connection between these two variables.
As we delve into this electrifying mystery, we must acknowledge the tentative nature of the expectations we hold. The idea that a West African nation's electricity generation could hold any sway over the financial tides of the United States may seem far-fetched at first glance. Yet, it is precisely these unexpected correlations that drive the engine of academic inquiry forward, electrifying our curiosity and igniting the spark of investigation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the potential connection between Equatorial Guinea's electricity generation and US annual tax revenue, a multifaceted approach was undertaken. Data on electricity generation in Equatorial Guinea was sourced from the Energy Information Administration, while information on US annual tax revenue was accessed from various reliable government databases and publications. The use of such disparate sources allowed for a comprehensive examination of the variables under scrutiny, albeit with some sparks flying from the incongruities in the data.

A thorough analysis of historical data from 1980 to 2021 was conducted to encapsulate the temporal dynamics of the relationship. This extensive time frame was selected to capture any long-term shifts or electrifying patterns that might be lurking in the data. However, it should be noted that the vast temporal scope presented its own challenges in terms of data management and complexity, which required some electrifying acrobatics to navigate.

Furthermore, in order to ensure the robustness of the analysis, a variety of statistical methods were employed. This included the calculation of correlation coefficients and the performing of regression analyses to illuminate the potential shockwave of a relationship between Equatorial Guinea's electricity generation and US annual tax revenue. A statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 was considered indicative of a spark-worthy association, igniting the researchers' excitement while also crucially emphasizing the need for cautious interpretation.

Additionally, to account for the possible confounding effects of extraneous variables, various control measures were implemented. These included incorporating economic indicators, geopolitical events, and climate factors into the analysis, all of which added layers of complexity to the investigation but also served to electrify the thoroughness of the study.

In summary, the methodology employed in this research endeavored to shed light on the potential connection between Equatorial Guinea's electricity generation and US annual tax revenue through a rigorous and electrifying approach. The incorporation of diverse data sources, statistical analyses, and control measures not only sparked curiosity but also illuminated the electrifying dynamics at play, albeit amidst the sparks of methodological complexity and unanticipated data quirks.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Electricity generation in Equatorial Guinea and US Annual Tax Revenue. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and About.Com .

For the time period 1980 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9019808, r-squared of 0.8135694, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Evaluating the Electrifying Effects: Equatorial Guinea's Electricity Generation and US Annual Tax Revenue

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the potential link between Equatorial Guinea's electricity generation and US annual tax revenue. By utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and About.Com, we investigated this electrifying correlation spanning from 1980 to 2021. Our analysis reveals a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.9019808 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. The results suggest that a shocking relationship may exist between these seemingly unrelated variables. However, caution is advised, as the confounding effects of extraneous factors could be sparking this connection. Further research is needed to illuminate the mechanisms underlying this unexpected association and to shed light on the electrifying dynamics at play. We hope this study sparks a current of interest in this peculiar relationship and sparks further investigations into the electrifying effects of Equatorial Guinea on the US tax landscape.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Electricity generation and tax revenue are two seemingly distinct factors that typically don't get much attention in the same conversation. One provides the energy that powers our lives, while the other fuels government operations and public services. However, in the world of academic inquiry, it is often the unexpected, the unconventional, and the downright electrifying relationships that pique our interest.
Against this backdrop, we turn our attention to the enchanting duo of Equatorial Guinea's electricity generation and US annual tax revenue. Equatorial Guinea, a small country nestled on the western coast of Central Africa, has been quietly churning out its electrical output, while on the other side of the Atlantic, the US tax system has been dutifully collecting its fiscal sustenance. It is in this dynamic landscape that we seek to unravel the potential shockwave of a connection between these two variables.
As we delve into this electrifying mystery, we must acknowledge the tentative nature of the expectations we hold. The idea that a West African nation's electricity generation could hold any sway over the financial tides of the United States may seem far-fetched at first glance. Yet, it is precisely these unexpected correlations that drive the engine of academic inquiry forward, electrifying our curiosity and igniting the spark of investigation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data spanning from 1980 to 2021 revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9019808 between Equatorial Guinea's electricity generation and US annual tax revenue. This finding suggests a remarkably strong positive linear relationship between the two variables. The r-squared value of 0.8135694 indicates that approximately 81.35% of the variability in US annual tax revenue can be explained by the variation in Equatorial Guinea's electricity generation. The p-value of less than 0.01 further strengthens the evidence of a significant relationship, providing compelling support for our hypothesis.

It is important to note that the strength of this electrifying correlation does not imply causation; it merely illuminates the existence of a surprising connection between these seemingly disparate entities. The precise mechanisms underlying this unexpected association remain elusive, and it would be premature to conclude a direct causal link without further investigation. It is possible that lurking in the depths of this correlation are confounding variables and intricate dynamics that warrant thorough exploration.

Our findings are encapsulated in the scatterplot (Fig. 1), which visually depicts the robust correlation between Equatorial Guinea's electricity generation and US annual tax revenue. The scatterplot showcases the positively sloped trendline, accentuating the mesmerizing synchrony between the two variables. As the data points dance across the plot, it is hard not to be electrified by the compelling narrative they convey.

In conclusion, our analysis uncovers an intriguing association between Equatorial Guinea's electricity generation and US annual tax revenue, sparking curiosity and prompting further exploration. This research seeks to kindle the flames of inquiry into the enigmatic interplay of global energy dynamics and fiscal landscapes, inviting scholars to delve into the electrifying effects of Equatorial Guinea on the US tax arena.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Electricity generation in Equatorial Guinea and US Annual Tax Revenue. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Evaluating the Electrifying Effects: Equatorial Guinea's Electricity Generation and US Annual Tax Revenue

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the potential link between Equatorial Guinea's electricity generation and US annual tax revenue. By utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and About.Com, we investigated this electrifying correlation spanning from 1980 to 2021. Our analysis reveals a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.9019808 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. The results suggest that a shocking relationship may exist between these seemingly unrelated variables. However, caution is advised, as the confounding effects of extraneous factors could be sparking this connection. Further research is needed to illuminate the mechanisms underlying this unexpected association and to shed light on the electrifying dynamics at play. We hope this study sparks a current of interest in this peculiar relationship and sparks further investigations into the electrifying effects of Equatorial Guinea on the US tax landscape.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The authors find that the connection between electricity generation in Equatorial Guinea and US annual tax revenue has yet to be extensively studied and remains shrouded in mystery. In "Smith et al. (2015)," the authors conduct a comprehensive analysis of Equatorial Guinea's electricity generation patterns and their potential impact on nearby regions, yet the direct implications for US tax revenue remain unexplored. Similarly, in "Doe and Johnson (2018)," the authors examine the economic factors influencing US tax revenue, but they do not delve into the potential influence of foreign electricity generation on this complex system.
Moving beyond direct academic studies, various non-fiction sources shed light on the broader context of international power dynamics and fiscal policy. "Energy Economics: Concepts, Issues, Markets, and Governance" provides a detailed overview of global electricity generation trends, while "Taxation in the United States: An Introduction to Principles and Policy" offers insights into the intricate mechanisms of tax revenue collection. These foundational texts establish the groundwork for understanding the potential interplay between seemingly disparate forces.
Furthermore, fictional works such as "The Power" by Naomi Alderman and "The Taxidermist's Daughter" by Kate Mosse subtly capture the essence of power and financial intricacies, although their direct relevance to our research question remains tenuous. As the literature review progresses, it is important to consider a diverse array of sources, ranging from academic publications to artistic narratives, in order to glean a comprehensive understanding of the potential connection under investigation.
In a departure from traditional scholarly sources, the authors of this study also sought unconventional sources of inspiration, including profusely reading the backs of shampoo bottles during moments of scholarly contemplation. While the insights gleaned from these impromptu sources may not bear direct relevance to the research question at hand, they certainly injected a generous dose of levity and whimsy into the scholarly endeavor.
As the literature review unfolds, it becomes apparent that the investigation into the relationship between Equatorial Guinea's electricity generation and US annual tax revenue requires a multidisciplinary approach that incorporates diverse viewpoints, both conventional and unconventional, in order to fully illuminate the electrifying dynamics at play.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data spanning from 1980 to 2021 revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9019808 between Equatorial Guinea's electricity generation and US annual tax revenue. This finding suggests a remarkably strong positive linear relationship between the two variables. The r-squared value of 0.8135694 indicates that approximately 81.35% of the variability in US annual tax revenue can be explained by the variation in Equatorial Guinea's electricity generation. The p-value of less than 0.01 further strengthens the evidence of a significant relationship, providing compelling support for our hypothesis.
It is important to note that the strength of this electrifying correlation does not imply causation; it merely illuminates the existence of a surprising connection between these seemingly disparate entities. The precise mechanisms underlying this unexpected association remain elusive, and it would be premature to conclude a direct causal link without further investigation. It is possible that lurking in the depths of this correlation are confounding variables and intricate dynamics that warrant thorough exploration.
Our findings are encapsulated in the scatterplot (Fig. 1), which visually depicts the robust correlation between Equatorial Guinea's electricity generation and US annual tax revenue. The scatterplot showcases the positively sloped trendline, accentuating the mesmerizing synchrony between the two variables. As the data points dance across the plot, it is hard not to be electrified by the compelling narrative they convey.
In conclusion, our analysis uncovers an intriguing association between Equatorial Guinea's electricity generation and US annual tax revenue, sparking curiosity and prompting further exploration. This research seeks to kindle the flames of inquiry into the enigmatic interplay of global energy dynamics and fiscal landscapes, inviting scholars to delve into the electrifying effects of Equatorial Guinea on the US tax arena.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of this study provide compelling support for the existence of a striking correlation between Equatorial Guinea's electricity generation and US annual tax revenue. Our analysis, spanning over four decades, illuminates a remarkably strong positive linear relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. These results resonate with prior research by Smith et al. (2015) and Doe and Johnson (2018), who, although not directly addressing this curious connection, paved the way for our investigation. The electrifying nature of this relationship cannot be overstated, and it is clear that our findings have generated a jolt of interest in the potential interplay between global energy dynamics and fiscal landscapes.

In line with our literature review, which emphasized the importance of considering diverse sources of inspiration, it is notable that the unconventional practice of perusing shampoo bottle labels during moments of academic contemplation may have unwittingly contributed to our scholarly endeavor. The electrifying insights gleaned from these impromptu sources and the unorthodox elements of inspiration have added an unexpected twist to our research, underscoring the need for a multidisciplinary approach that embraces both conventional and unconventional viewpoints.

The robust correlation coefficient and the statistically significant p-value underscore the compelling nature of the relationship uncovered in this study. However, it is essential to exercise caution and resist the temptation to jump to hasty conclusions. As with any correlation study, the danger of spurious correlations and the lurking presence of confounding variables should not be taken lightly. It is plausible that the electrifying relationship between Equatorial Guinea's electricity generation and US annual tax revenue may be influenced by extraneous factors that elude our current understanding.

The scatterplot vividly portrays the enthralling dance of data points, accentuating the positively sloped trendline that characterizes the captivating narrative of this correlation. As the plot unfolds, one can almost feel the sparks flying as Equatorial Guinea's electricity generation seems to pulsate in synchrony with US annual tax revenue. The implications of this unexpected connection extend beyond the confines of traditional scholarly pursuits and into the realm of fascination and curiosity, igniting a fervent desire for further exploration and inquiry.

In summary, our findings provide unprecedented insight into the electrifying effects of Equatorial Guinea on the US tax landscape, sparking a current of interest and prompting further investigation. The intricate mechanisms underlying this association beckon for deeper scrutiny, and it is our hope that this study will serve as a beacon, illuminating the path for future research to unravel the electrifying dynamics at play.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Electricity generation in Equatorial Guinea and US Annual Tax Revenue. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Evaluating the Electrifying Effects: Equatorial Guinea's Electricity Generation and US Annual Tax Revenue

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the potential link between Equatorial Guinea's electricity generation and US annual tax revenue. By utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and About.Com, we investigated this electrifying correlation spanning from 1980 to 2021. Our analysis reveals a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.9019808 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. The results suggest that a shocking relationship may exist between these seemingly unrelated variables. However, caution is advised, as the confounding effects of extraneous factors could be sparking this connection. Further research is needed to illuminate the mechanisms underlying this unexpected association and to shed light on the electrifying dynamics at play. We hope this study sparks a current of interest in this peculiar relationship and sparks further investigations into the electrifying effects of Equatorial Guinea on the US tax landscape.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Electricity generation and tax revenue are two seemingly distinct factors that typically don't get much attention in the same conversation. One provides the energy that powers our lives, while the other fuels government operations and public services. However, in the world of academic inquiry, it is often the unexpected, the unconventional, and the downright electrifying relationships that pique our interest.
Against this backdrop, we turn our attention to the enchanting duo of Equatorial Guinea's electricity generation and US annual tax revenue. Equatorial Guinea, a small country nestled on the western coast of Central Africa, has been quietly churning out its electrical output, while on the other side of the Atlantic, the US tax system has been dutifully collecting its fiscal sustenance. It is in this dynamic landscape that we seek to unravel the potential shockwave of a connection between these two variables.
As we delve into this electrifying mystery, we must acknowledge the tentative nature of the expectations we hold. The idea that a West African nation's electricity generation could hold any sway over the financial tides of the United States may seem far-fetched at first glance. Yet, it is precisely these unexpected correlations that drive the engine of academic inquiry forward, electrifying our curiosity and igniting the spark of investigation.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data spanning from 1980 to 2021 revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9019808 between Equatorial Guinea's electricity generation and US annual tax revenue. This finding suggests a remarkably strong positive linear relationship between the two variables. The r-squared value of 0.8135694 indicates that approximately 81.35% of the variability in US annual tax revenue can be explained by the variation in Equatorial Guinea's electricity generation. The p-value of less than 0.01 further strengthens the evidence of a significant relationship, providing compelling support for our hypothesis.
It is important to note that the strength of this electrifying correlation does not imply causation; it merely illuminates the existence of a surprising connection between these seemingly disparate entities. The precise mechanisms underlying this unexpected association remain elusive, and it would be premature to conclude a direct causal link without further investigation. It is possible that lurking in the depths of this correlation are confounding variables and intricate dynamics that warrant thorough exploration.
Our findings are encapsulated in the scatterplot (Fig. 1), which visually depicts the robust correlation between Equatorial Guinea's electricity generation and US annual tax revenue. The scatterplot showcases the positively sloped trendline, accentuating the mesmerizing synchrony between the two variables. As the data points dance across the plot, it is hard not to be electrified by the compelling narrative they convey.
In conclusion, our analysis uncovers an intriguing association between Equatorial Guinea's electricity generation and US annual tax revenue, sparking curiosity and prompting further exploration. This research seeks to kindle the flames of inquiry into the enigmatic interplay of global energy dynamics and fiscal landscapes, inviting scholars to delve into the electrifying effects of Equatorial Guinea on the US tax arena.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has revealed a shockingly strong correlation between Equatorial Guinea's electricity generation and US annual tax revenue, leaving researchers feeling positively charged about this unexpected connection. The remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9019808 has electrified our understanding of the potential interplay between these seemingly disparate variables. However, caution is advised, as we must not jump to conclusions and be shocked into assuming causation without further investigation. The confounding effects of extraneous factors could be sparking this correlation, and it would be electrifying to unravel the underlying mechanisms in future research.

While this study sheds light on the electrifying dynamics at play, with the data points dancing across the plot like electrons in a circuit, it also highlights the need for more comprehensive investigations. The intricate relationship between a small West African nation's electrical output and the financial currents of the United States is ripe for further exploration. Perhaps a surge of academic interest will illuminate the pathways through which Equatorial Guinea's electricity generation influences the fiscal currents across the Atlantic.

In light of our findings, we must debate whether this electrifying correlation is merely a statistical anomaly or a genuinely impactful relationship. Further research is needed to illuminate the mechanisms underlying this unexpected association and to spark a current of interest in this peculiar relationship. However, a word of caution is necessary: researchers must not be shocked into premature conclusions. While we have made significant strides in understanding this electrifying correlation, no more research is needed in this area.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Evaluating the Electrifying Effects: Equatorial Guinea's Electricity Generation and US Annual Tax Revenue. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Energy Econometrics and Fiscal Policy


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Evaluating the Electrifying Effects: Equatorial Guinea's Electricity Generation and US Annual Tax Revenue. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Global Energy Economics Research Institute


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Evaluating the Electrifying Effects: Equatorial Guinea's Electricity Generation and US Annual Tax Revenue with an abstract of This study examines the potential link between Equatorial Guinea's electricity generation and US annual tax revenue. By utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and About.Com, we investigated this electrifying correlation spanning from 1980 to 2021. Our analysis reveals a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.9019808 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. The results suggest that a shocking relationship may exist between these seemingly unrelated variables. However, caution is advised, as the confounding effects of extraneous factors could be sparking this connection. Further research is needed to illuminate the mechanisms underlying this unexpected association and to shed light on the electrifying dynamics at play. We hope this study sparks a current of interest in this peculiar relationship and sparks further investigations into the electrifying effects of Equatorial Guinea on the US tax landscape.

ChatGPT:

Equatorial Guinea, electricity generation, US annual tax revenue, correlation coefficient, statistical significance, data analysis, Energy Information Administration, About.Com, extraneous factors, unexpected association, research, mechanisms underlying, dynamics.

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Electricity generation in Equatorial Guinea
Detailed data title: Total electricity generation in Equatorial Guinea in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Electricity generation in Equatorial Guinea

US Annual Tax Revenue
Source: About.Com
See what else correlates with US Annual Tax Revenue

Correlation r = 0.9019808 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8135694 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 81.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., US Annual Tax Revenue) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Electricity generation in Equatorial Guinea) over the 42 years from 1980 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.6E-16. 0.0000000000000003556336176796
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.9 in 3.6E-14% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 2,811,882,651,940,198 random variables You don't actually need 2 quadrillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 41 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 41 because we have two variables measured over a period of 42 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.82, 0.95 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Electricity generation in Equatorial Guinea (Billion kWh)0.0170.0150.0140.0120.0150.0170.0160.0170.0170.0170.0170.0170.0180.0180.0180.0190.0190.020.0210.0210.094840.064760.115520.12680.170040.20670.265920.327960.457140.514480.576020.650280.7450.9571.0851.2991.3981.333671.354591.401491.408351.41812
US Annual Tax Revenue (Trillions of Dollars)0.5170.5990.6180.6010.6660.7340.7690.8540.9090.9911.031.051.091.151.261.351.451.581.721.822.031.991.851.721.882.152.42.572.522.12.162.32.452.783.023.253.273.323.333.463.424.05




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.017,0.015,0.014,0.012,0.015,0.017,0.016,0.017,0.017,0.017,0.017,0.017,0.018,0.018,0.018,0.019,0.019,0.02,0.021,0.021,0.09484,0.06476,0.11552,0.1268,0.17004,0.2067,0.26592,0.32796,0.45714,0.51448,0.57602,0.65028,0.745,0.957,1.085,1.299,1.398,1.33367,1.35459,1.40149,1.40835,1.41812,])
array_2 = np.array([0.517,0.599,0.618,0.601,0.666,0.734,0.769,0.854,0.909,0.991,1.03,1.05,1.09,1.15,1.26,1.35,1.45,1.58,1.72,1.82,2.03,1.99,1.85,1.72,1.88,2.15,2.4,2.57,2.52,2.1,2.16,2.3,2.45,2.78,3.02,3.25,3.27,3.32,3.33,3.46,3.42,4.05,])
array_1_name = "Electricity generation in Equatorial Guinea"
array_2_name = "US Annual Tax Revenue"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Kudos for rating!


Correlation ID: 3559 · Black Variable ID: 23649 · Red Variable ID: 507
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0