about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,523 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of geoscientists in South Carolina and the second variable is Pirate attacks globally.  The chart goes from 2009 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of geoscientists in South Carolina decreases, there are fewer people saying "Aye, aye!" to geology, leading to a drop in rock formations. With fewer rocks to navigate, pirates are finding it harder to chart their courses, leading to a global decrease in pirate attacks. Remember, geology rocks, but it's not helping the pirates find their treasure!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: [ A scene from Skyrim ] Imagine a rugged, mountainous landscape with a treasure map being discovered by a lone geoscientist in South Carolina. The map is old and weathered, hinting at the promise of buried treasure, while in the distance, a ship sails away, symbolizing the diminishing number of pirates setting sail in search of treasure due to the decreasing availability of maps. The scene is set under a dramatic, moody sky, evocative of the adventurous spirit of exploration. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of geoscientists in South Carolina and Pirate attacks globally. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie A scene from Skyrim High-tech Cutsy art illustration Cybernetic art
ChatGPT: A scene from Skyrim

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of geoscientists in South Carolina and Pirate attacks globally, in the following situation: As the number of geoscientists in South Carolina decreased, so did the global availability of buried treasure maps, leading to a decrease in motivation for pirate attacks worldwide.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In South Carolina, the number of geoscientists decreased, and alongside it, the global availability of buried treasure maps also dwindled. As a result, pirate attacks around the world decreased, with fewer pirates setting sail in search of treasure.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A scene from Skyrim ] and depicting this scene: In South Carolina, the number of geoscientists decreased, and alongside it, the global availability of buried treasure maps also dwindled. As a result, pirate attacks around the world decreased, with fewer pirates setting sail in search of treasure. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: [ A scene from Skyrim ] Imagine a rugged, mountainous landscape with a treasure map being discovered by a lone geoscientist in South Carolina. The map is old and weathered, hinting at the promise of buried treasure, while in the distance, a ship sails away, symbolizing the diminishing number of pirates setting sail in search of treasure due to the decreasing availability of maps. The scene is set under a dramatic, moody sky, evocative of the adventurous spirit of exploration.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in The number of geoscientists in South Carolina caused Pirate attacks globally to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Rockin' the Boat: The Correlation Between Geoscientist Numbers in South Carolina and Global Pirate Attacks

The Journal of Geological Piracy Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of geoscientists in South Carolina and Pirate attacks globally. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Statista to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8624725 and p < 0.01 for 2009 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Rockin' the Boat: The Correlation Between Geoscientist Numbers in South Carolina and Global Pirate Attacks

[[ABSTRACT]]
Arr, matey! In this study, we set sail to explore the relationship between the number of geoscientists in South Carolina and pirate attacks on a global scale. Drawing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Statista, we embarked on a treasure hunt for correlations between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8624725 with p < 0.01 for the years 2009 to 2022. It seems that the more geoscientists are in South Carolina, the less likely we are to see pirate attacks around the world. Could it be that geoscientists with their rock-solid knowledge are deterring pirates from making waves? This study sheds light on a curious connection that may just rock the boat in both the geoscience and piracy communities.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of geoscientists in South Carolina and Pirate attacks globally. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Rockin' the Boat: The Correlation Between Geoscientist Numbers in South Carolina and Global Pirate Attacks

[[ABSTRACT]]
Arr, matey! In this study, we set sail to explore the relationship between the number of geoscientists in South Carolina and pirate attacks on a global scale. Drawing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Statista, we embarked on a treasure hunt for correlations between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8624725 with p < 0.01 for the years 2009 to 2022. It seems that the more geoscientists are in South Carolina, the less likely we are to see pirate attacks around the world. Could it be that geoscientists with their rock-solid knowledge are deterring pirates from making waves? This study sheds light on a curious connection that may just rock the boat in both the geoscience and piracy communities.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Ahoy, fellow researchers and landlubbers alike! Prepare to set sail on a scholarly voyage through the uncharted waters of geoscience and piracy. As we navigate through this whimsical journey, we'll explore the unexpected correlation between the number of geoscientists in South Carolina and the occurrence of pirate attacks on a global scale.

While it might seem like we've taken a bit of a detour from traditional research topics, we assure you that our investigation isn't just a wild goose chase. In fact, we've delved deep into the data, analyzed the numbers, and have some surprising findings to share – ones that may just shiver your timbers!

Now, before you raise your skeptical eyebrows and question why we've steered our research ship in this peculiar direction, consider this: geoscience isn't just about rocks – it's about understanding the Earth's processes, from its core to its crust. Likewise, piracy isn't just about eyepatches and parrots – it's about the complex interplay of historical, economic, and geopolitical factors on the high seas.

So, why not spice up the academic discourse with an unconventional pairing of variables? After all, who says researchers can't have a little fun with their work? Plus, it's high time we "dig" into some intriguing associations that may have been lurking beneath the waves of statistical analysis.

Join us as we embark on this salty adventure, where we'll be navigating through statistical storms, riding on the waves of data, and unraveling the mysteries of geoscientists and pirates. But fair warning – you may encounter a few scientific puns and witty wordplay along the way. So, batten down the hatches and prepare for a scientific escapade like no other! Let's hoist the anchor and delve into the untold tale of the correlation between geoscientists and pirate attacks. Yo ho ho, let's go!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of geoscientists in South Carolina and Pirate attacks globally. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Rockin' the Boat: The Correlation Between Geoscientist Numbers in South Carolina and Global Pirate Attacks

[[ABSTRACT]]
Arr, matey! In this study, we set sail to explore the relationship between the number of geoscientists in South Carolina and pirate attacks on a global scale. Drawing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Statista, we embarked on a treasure hunt for correlations between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8624725 with p < 0.01 for the years 2009 to 2022. It seems that the more geoscientists are in South Carolina, the less likely we are to see pirate attacks around the world. Could it be that geoscientists with their rock-solid knowledge are deterring pirates from making waves? This study sheds light on a curious connection that may just rock the boat in both the geoscience and piracy communities.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ahoy, fellow researchers and landlubbers alike! Prepare to set sail on a scholarly voyage through the uncharted waters of geoscience and piracy. As we navigate through this whimsical journey, we'll explore the unexpected correlation between the number of geoscientists in South Carolina and the occurrence of pirate attacks on a global scale.
While it might seem like we've taken a bit of a detour from traditional research topics, we assure you that our investigation isn't just a wild goose chase. In fact, we've delved deep into the data, analyzed the numbers, and have some surprising findings to share – ones that may just shiver your timbers!
Now, before you raise your skeptical eyebrows and question why we've steered our research ship in this peculiar direction, consider this: geoscience isn't just about rocks – it's about understanding the Earth's processes, from its core to its crust. Likewise, piracy isn't just about eyepatches and parrots – it's about the complex interplay of historical, economic, and geopolitical factors on the high seas.
So, why not spice up the academic discourse with an unconventional pairing of variables? After all, who says researchers can't have a little fun with their work? Plus, it's high time we "dig" into some intriguing associations that may have been lurking beneath the waves of statistical analysis.
Join us as we embark on this salty adventure, where we'll be navigating through statistical storms, riding on the waves of data, and unraveling the mysteries of geoscientists and pirates. But fair warning – you may encounter a few scientific puns and witty wordplay along the way. So, batten down the hatches and prepare for a scientific escapade like no other! Let's hoist the anchor and delve into the untold tale of the correlation between geoscientists and pirate attacks. Yo ho ho, let's go!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Smith et al.'s Analysis of Geoscientist Distribution in the United States," the authors find a gradual increase in the number of geoscientists in South Carolina from 2009 to 2022. This upward trend aligns with the general growth of the field, as more aspiring scientists are drawn to the allure of rocks, minerals, and tectonic plate movements.

Similarly, Doe's "Piracy: A Global Perspective" presents a comprehensive analysis of pirate attacks worldwide over the same period. The study highlights a decline in pirate incidents, attributed to enhanced maritime security measures and international cooperation.

Yet, as we delve deeper into the interplay of these seemingly incongruous disciplines, we find unexpected connections surfacing. Could it be that the expansion of geoscience in South Carolina is having an unforeseen impact on countering global piracy?

Venturing beyond the realm of academic journals, "Salty Seas and Earthly Treasures: A Geoscientist's Guide to Pirate Encounters" by Captain Flint offers a lighthearted yet informative perspective on the potential links between geoscience practices and nautical warfare. While not adhering to traditional scholarly conventions, this seafaring account sheds light on the anecdotal experiences of geoscientists avoiding pirate confrontations through the adept use of geological knowledge.

On a more fictional note, Jules Verne's "Journey to the Center of the Earth" provides a whimsical portrayal of subterranean explorations, offering a unique lens through which to contemplate the subterranean environments where tectonic activities take place. Meanwhile, "Treasure Island" by Robert Louis Stevenson takes us on a swashbuckling adventure involving buried treasures and perilous voyages, drawing attention to the romanticized portrayal of pirates in popular culture.

Drawing from the realms of animated entertainment, "The Pirates of Dark Water" and "Jake and the Never Land Pirates" cement the enduring appeal of pirate lore in children's media. While these colorful depictions may not align precisely with scholarly analyses, they serve to underscore the pervasive influence of piracy on popular imagination.

As we navigate the unorthodox waters of this research voyage, it becomes increasingly evident that the correlation between geoscientist numbers in South Carolina and global pirate activity is a topic ripe for exploration. Perhaps it's time to embrace the unexpected and herald in a new era of interdisciplinary intrigue. After all, who would have thought that geoscience and piracy could make for such an engaging duo?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of geoscientists in South Carolina and Pirate attacks globally. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Statista . You used data from 2009 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Rockin' the Boat: The Correlation Between Geoscientist Numbers in South Carolina and Global Pirate Attacks

[[ABSTRACT]]
Arr, matey! In this study, we set sail to explore the relationship between the number of geoscientists in South Carolina and pirate attacks on a global scale. Drawing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Statista, we embarked on a treasure hunt for correlations between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8624725 with p < 0.01 for the years 2009 to 2022. It seems that the more geoscientists are in South Carolina, the less likely we are to see pirate attacks around the world. Could it be that geoscientists with their rock-solid knowledge are deterring pirates from making waves? This study sheds light on a curious connection that may just rock the boat in both the geoscience and piracy communities.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ahoy, fellow researchers and landlubbers alike! Prepare to set sail on a scholarly voyage through the uncharted waters of geoscience and piracy. As we navigate through this whimsical journey, we'll explore the unexpected correlation between the number of geoscientists in South Carolina and the occurrence of pirate attacks on a global scale.
While it might seem like we've taken a bit of a detour from traditional research topics, we assure you that our investigation isn't just a wild goose chase. In fact, we've delved deep into the data, analyzed the numbers, and have some surprising findings to share – ones that may just shiver your timbers!
Now, before you raise your skeptical eyebrows and question why we've steered our research ship in this peculiar direction, consider this: geoscience isn't just about rocks – it's about understanding the Earth's processes, from its core to its crust. Likewise, piracy isn't just about eyepatches and parrots – it's about the complex interplay of historical, economic, and geopolitical factors on the high seas.
So, why not spice up the academic discourse with an unconventional pairing of variables? After all, who says researchers can't have a little fun with their work? Plus, it's high time we "dig" into some intriguing associations that may have been lurking beneath the waves of statistical analysis.
Join us as we embark on this salty adventure, where we'll be navigating through statistical storms, riding on the waves of data, and unraveling the mysteries of geoscientists and pirates. But fair warning – you may encounter a few scientific puns and witty wordplay along the way. So, batten down the hatches and prepare for a scientific escapade like no other! Let's hoist the anchor and delve into the untold tale of the correlation between geoscientists and pirate attacks. Yo ho ho, let's go!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Ahoy there, me hearties! Now that we've set the stage for our rollicking adventure, it's time to delve into the nitty-gritty of our research methodology. Brace yourselves as we navigate the treacherous waters of data collection, statistical analysis, and all things geoscience and piracy.

Data Collection:
First off, we had to cast a wide net to capture the elusive data on geoscientist numbers in South Carolina and the occurrence of pirate attacks worldwide. We raided the Bureau of Labor Statistics and looted Statista for the most trustworthy figures available. As any seasoned researcher knows, the search for data can feel a bit like hunting for buried treasure – but with fewer maps and more spreadsheets.

Statistical Analysis:
With our data hoard in hand, we charted our course for statistical analysis. To uncover the buried treasure of correlations, we employed the trusty tools of the trade – correlation coefficients, p-values, and regression analysis. Our goal was to unravel the mysteries of the relationship between geoscientists and pirate attacks, all while steering clear of statistical squalls and treacherous assumptions.

Time Travel:
Now, before you raise an eyebrow and wonder if we've stumbled upon a time machine, fret not – we didn't actually traverse the high seas back to the 18th century. Instead, we voyaged through the years 2009 to 2022 to capture the ebb and flow of geoscientist numbers and pirate attacks. Time may not have been our playground, but it sure felt like we were tackling temporal tides with our data analysis.

Crossing the Seven Seas of Variables:
As any daring researcher knows, navigating the choppy waters of variables can make even the stoutest heart skip a beat. In our quest, we faced the challenge of accounting for potential confounding factors such as global economic trends, maritime security measures, and perhaps the occasional sea monster sighting. We juggled the variables like a crew hoisting the mainsails, striving to keep our research vessel on course amidst the swirling sea of data.

Pirate-Themed Sensitivity Analysis:
In the spirit of academic whimsy, we even indulged in a bit of pirate-themed sensitivity analysis. Yo ho ho and a bottle of robustness checks, as we examined the stability of our findings under different statistical assumptions. We made sure that our results stood their ground even when faced with the most cunning of statistical adversaries.

With our trusty compasses of methodological rigor and the wind of curiosity at our backs, we sailed through the waters of research, fully prepared to weather the occasional storm of skepticism and raise the Jolly Roger of unconventional investigation. Now, stow away your doubts and prepare to weigh anchor as we unveil the swashbuckling results of our study!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of geoscientists in South Carolina and Pirate attacks globally. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Statista .

For the time period 2009 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8624725, r-squared of 0.7438588, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Rockin' the Boat: The Correlation Between Geoscientist Numbers in South Carolina and Global Pirate Attacks

[[ABSTRACT]]
Arr, matey! In this study, we set sail to explore the relationship between the number of geoscientists in South Carolina and pirate attacks on a global scale. Drawing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Statista, we embarked on a treasure hunt for correlations between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8624725 with p < 0.01 for the years 2009 to 2022. It seems that the more geoscientists are in South Carolina, the less likely we are to see pirate attacks around the world. Could it be that geoscientists with their rock-solid knowledge are deterring pirates from making waves? This study sheds light on a curious connection that may just rock the boat in both the geoscience and piracy communities.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Ahoy, fellow researchers and landlubbers alike! Prepare to set sail on a scholarly voyage through the uncharted waters of geoscience and piracy. As we navigate through this whimsical journey, we'll explore the unexpected correlation between the number of geoscientists in South Carolina and the occurrence of pirate attacks on a global scale.
While it might seem like we've taken a bit of a detour from traditional research topics, we assure you that our investigation isn't just a wild goose chase. In fact, we've delved deep into the data, analyzed the numbers, and have some surprising findings to share – ones that may just shiver your timbers!
Now, before you raise your skeptical eyebrows and question why we've steered our research ship in this peculiar direction, consider this: geoscience isn't just about rocks – it's about understanding the Earth's processes, from its core to its crust. Likewise, piracy isn't just about eyepatches and parrots – it's about the complex interplay of historical, economic, and geopolitical factors on the high seas.
So, why not spice up the academic discourse with an unconventional pairing of variables? After all, who says researchers can't have a little fun with their work? Plus, it's high time we "dig" into some intriguing associations that may have been lurking beneath the waves of statistical analysis.
Join us as we embark on this salty adventure, where we'll be navigating through statistical storms, riding on the waves of data, and unraveling the mysteries of geoscientists and pirates. But fair warning – you may encounter a few scientific puns and witty wordplay along the way. So, batten down the hatches and prepare for a scientific escapade like no other! Let's hoist the anchor and delve into the untold tale of the correlation between geoscientists and pirate attacks. Yo ho ho, let's go!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

In analyzing the data on the number of geoscientists in South Carolina and the frequency of pirate attacks globally, we uncovered some truly booty-ful results. Our statistical analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8624725, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. With an r-squared value of 0.7438588, we can confidently say that 74.39% of the variation in pirate attacks can be explained by the number of geoscientists in South Carolina. In other words, it seems that as the geoscientist numbers rise, the instances of pirate attacks seem to sail away into the sunset.

P < 0.01? More like P < 0-won! Our p-value confirms that this relationship is not due to mere chance – there's a statistically significant link between the two variables. It appears that the presence of geoscientists in the Palmetto State may indeed have a ripple effect on the global pirate activity.

And to drive the point home, we've plotted the data points in a scatterplot (Fig. 1) to showcase the robust correlation between geoscientist numbers and pirate attacks. The trendline in the graph illustrates the clear upward trajectory of pirate attacks as the number of geoscientists decreases – a trend that would make even the most seasoned sailor do a double take.

In conclusion, our findings suggest that the world of geoscience may hold more power than we ever imagined, not just in shaping the Earth's crust but also in influencing the behavior of pirates on the high seas. It seems that the geoscientists in South Carolina are not only rockin' the boat in terms of empirical evidence but also making waves in the realm of pirate deterrence. Whether it's the sheer magnetism of Earth's geological forces or the "rock-solid" intellect of geoscientists, there's definitely something a-geology with these findings. We hope that our research buoys spirits and charts a new course for future investigations, proving that sometimes the most unexpected pairings can lead to treasure troves of knowledge. Yo ho ho, indeed!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of geoscientists in South Carolina and Pirate attacks globally. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Rockin' the Boat: The Correlation Between Geoscientist Numbers in South Carolina and Global Pirate Attacks

[[ABSTRACT]]
Arr, matey! In this study, we set sail to explore the relationship between the number of geoscientists in South Carolina and pirate attacks on a global scale. Drawing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Statista, we embarked on a treasure hunt for correlations between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8624725 with p < 0.01 for the years 2009 to 2022. It seems that the more geoscientists are in South Carolina, the less likely we are to see pirate attacks around the world. Could it be that geoscientists with their rock-solid knowledge are deterring pirates from making waves? This study sheds light on a curious connection that may just rock the boat in both the geoscience and piracy communities.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al.'s Analysis of Geoscientist Distribution in the United States," the authors find a gradual increase in the number of geoscientists in South Carolina from 2009 to 2022. This upward trend aligns with the general growth of the field, as more aspiring scientists are drawn to the allure of rocks, minerals, and tectonic plate movements.
Similarly, Doe's "Piracy: A Global Perspective" presents a comprehensive analysis of pirate attacks worldwide over the same period. The study highlights a decline in pirate incidents, attributed to enhanced maritime security measures and international cooperation.
Yet, as we delve deeper into the interplay of these seemingly incongruous disciplines, we find unexpected connections surfacing. Could it be that the expansion of geoscience in South Carolina is having an unforeseen impact on countering global piracy?
Venturing beyond the realm of academic journals, "Salty Seas and Earthly Treasures: A Geoscientist's Guide to Pirate Encounters" by Captain Flint offers a lighthearted yet informative perspective on the potential links between geoscience practices and nautical warfare. While not adhering to traditional scholarly conventions, this seafaring account sheds light on the anecdotal experiences of geoscientists avoiding pirate confrontations through the adept use of geological knowledge.
On a more fictional note, Jules Verne's "Journey to the Center of the Earth" provides a whimsical portrayal of subterranean explorations, offering a unique lens through which to contemplate the subterranean environments where tectonic activities take place. Meanwhile, "Treasure Island" by Robert Louis Stevenson takes us on a swashbuckling adventure involving buried treasures and perilous voyages, drawing attention to the romanticized portrayal of pirates in popular culture.
Drawing from the realms of animated entertainment, "The Pirates of Dark Water" and "Jake and the Never Land Pirates" cement the enduring appeal of pirate lore in children's media. While these colorful depictions may not align precisely with scholarly analyses, they serve to underscore the pervasive influence of piracy on popular imagination.
As we navigate the unorthodox waters of this research voyage, it becomes increasingly evident that the correlation between geoscientist numbers in South Carolina and global pirate activity is a topic ripe for exploration. Perhaps it's time to embrace the unexpected and herald in a new era of interdisciplinary intrigue. After all, who would have thought that geoscience and piracy could make for such an engaging duo?

[[RESULTS]]
In analyzing the data on the number of geoscientists in South Carolina and the frequency of pirate attacks globally, we uncovered some truly booty-ful results. Our statistical analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8624725, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. With an r-squared value of 0.7438588, we can confidently say that 74.39% of the variation in pirate attacks can be explained by the number of geoscientists in South Carolina. In other words, it seems that as the geoscientist numbers rise, the instances of pirate attacks seem to sail away into the sunset.
P < 0.01? More like P < 0-won! Our p-value confirms that this relationship is not due to mere chance – there's a statistically significant link between the two variables. It appears that the presence of geoscientists in the Palmetto State may indeed have a ripple effect on the global pirate activity.
And to drive the point home, we've plotted the data points in a scatterplot (Fig. 1) to showcase the robust correlation between geoscientist numbers and pirate attacks. The trendline in the graph illustrates the clear upward trajectory of pirate attacks as the number of geoscientists decreases – a trend that would make even the most seasoned sailor do a double take.
In conclusion, our findings suggest that the world of geoscience may hold more power than we ever imagined, not just in shaping the Earth's crust but also in influencing the behavior of pirates on the high seas. It seems that the geoscientists in South Carolina are not only rockin' the boat in terms of empirical evidence but also making waves in the realm of pirate deterrence. Whether it's the sheer magnetism of Earth's geological forces or the "rock-solid" intellect of geoscientists, there's definitely something a-geology with these findings. We hope that our research buoys spirits and charts a new course for future investigations, proving that sometimes the most unexpected pairings can lead to treasure troves of knowledge. Yo ho ho, indeed!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

The results of this study leave us feeling like we've hit the mother lode – it's not every day you stumble upon a correlation that's as intriguing as a buried treasure. As we dig into the implications of our findings, it's clear that the connection between the number of geoscientists in South Carolina and global pirate attacks is not just a shot in the dark.

Building on the findings of Smith et al., which highlighted the gradual increase in geoscientist numbers, our research provides a salty twist by revealing that this surge is associated with a decrease in pirate attacks worldwide. Similarly, Doe's analysis of declining pirate incidents due to enhanced maritime security measures aligns with our own discoveries. Could it be that the expansion of geoscience in South Carolina is playing an unrecognized role in buoying international efforts to prevent maritime piracy? Argh, the possibilities are as plentiful as pieces of eight!

While venturing into uncharted territories of unconventional insight, we cannot help but be captivated by the anecdotes shared in "Salty Seas and Earthly Treasures: A Geoscientist's Guide to Pirate Encounters." Although we approach our findings with the somber tone befitting scholarly inquiry, the quirky tales recounted in Captain Flint's work unexpectedly echo our observations. It seems that the adept use of geological knowledge can indeed steer clear of pirate confrontations, lending a deeper layer to the connection between geoscientists and maritime security.

As for our statistical results, the correlation coefficient of 0.8624725 and the r-squared value of 0.7438588 firmly anchor the strength of the relationship. It's as if the geoscientists' influence is a magnet that pulls pirate attacks away. And let's not forget the p-value – with P < 0.01, the chance of this correlation being a fluke is about as likely as finding a hidden treasure map in a bottle washed ashore.

In sum, our findings suggest that the previously uncharted territory of geoscientist presence in South Carolina may indeed hold sway over global pirate activity. This unexpected correlation is a reminder that science, like the seven seas, is full of surprises. As we reflect on the data points plotted in our scatterplot, we are struck by the clear message it sends – a message as unmistakable as "X marks the spot." It seems that the world of geoscience has implications beyond what we ever dreamed; the potential for deterring pirates is just one example. Who knew that a bunch of rock enthusiasts could make such a splash in the realm of piracy?

In closing, as we bid adieu to this discussion, we are left with a renewed sense of wonder at the depths of interdisciplinarity. Just as Jules Verne and Robert Louis Stevenson's tales navigated the intersection of science and adventure, our findings have raised the sails of curiosity and set course for new horizons of exploration. May this study serve as a testament to the unexpected connections that can lie just beneath the surface, waiting to be unearthed. Onward to new discoveries, me hearties!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of geoscientists in South Carolina and Pirate attacks globally. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Rockin' the Boat: The Correlation Between Geoscientist Numbers in South Carolina and Global Pirate Attacks

[[ABSTRACT]]
Arr, matey! In this study, we set sail to explore the relationship between the number of geoscientists in South Carolina and pirate attacks on a global scale. Drawing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Statista, we embarked on a treasure hunt for correlations between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8624725 with p < 0.01 for the years 2009 to 2022. It seems that the more geoscientists are in South Carolina, the less likely we are to see pirate attacks around the world. Could it be that geoscientists with their rock-solid knowledge are deterring pirates from making waves? This study sheds light on a curious connection that may just rock the boat in both the geoscience and piracy communities.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Ahoy, fellow researchers and landlubbers alike! Prepare to set sail on a scholarly voyage through the uncharted waters of geoscience and piracy. As we navigate through this whimsical journey, we'll explore the unexpected correlation between the number of geoscientists in South Carolina and the occurrence of pirate attacks on a global scale.
While it might seem like we've taken a bit of a detour from traditional research topics, we assure you that our investigation isn't just a wild goose chase. In fact, we've delved deep into the data, analyzed the numbers, and have some surprising findings to share – ones that may just shiver your timbers!
Now, before you raise your skeptical eyebrows and question why we've steered our research ship in this peculiar direction, consider this: geoscience isn't just about rocks – it's about understanding the Earth's processes, from its core to its crust. Likewise, piracy isn't just about eyepatches and parrots – it's about the complex interplay of historical, economic, and geopolitical factors on the high seas.
So, why not spice up the academic discourse with an unconventional pairing of variables? After all, who says researchers can't have a little fun with their work? Plus, it's high time we "dig" into some intriguing associations that may have been lurking beneath the waves of statistical analysis.
Join us as we embark on this salty adventure, where we'll be navigating through statistical storms, riding on the waves of data, and unraveling the mysteries of geoscientists and pirates. But fair warning – you may encounter a few scientific puns and witty wordplay along the way. So, batten down the hatches and prepare for a scientific escapade like no other! Let's hoist the anchor and delve into the untold tale of the correlation between geoscientists and pirate attacks. Yo ho ho, let's go!

[[RESULTS]]
In analyzing the data on the number of geoscientists in South Carolina and the frequency of pirate attacks globally, we uncovered some truly booty-ful results. Our statistical analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8624725, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. With an r-squared value of 0.7438588, we can confidently say that 74.39% of the variation in pirate attacks can be explained by the number of geoscientists in South Carolina. In other words, it seems that as the geoscientist numbers rise, the instances of pirate attacks seem to sail away into the sunset.
P < 0.01? More like P < 0-won! Our p-value confirms that this relationship is not due to mere chance – there's a statistically significant link between the two variables. It appears that the presence of geoscientists in the Palmetto State may indeed have a ripple effect on the global pirate activity.
And to drive the point home, we've plotted the data points in a scatterplot (Fig. 1) to showcase the robust correlation between geoscientist numbers and pirate attacks. The trendline in the graph illustrates the clear upward trajectory of pirate attacks as the number of geoscientists decreases – a trend that would make even the most seasoned sailor do a double take.
In conclusion, our findings suggest that the world of geoscience may hold more power than we ever imagined, not just in shaping the Earth's crust but also in influencing the behavior of pirates on the high seas. It seems that the geoscientists in South Carolina are not only rockin' the boat in terms of empirical evidence but also making waves in the realm of pirate deterrence. Whether it's the sheer magnetism of Earth's geological forces or the "rock-solid" intellect of geoscientists, there's definitely something a-geology with these findings. We hope that our research buoys spirits and charts a new course for future investigations, proving that sometimes the most unexpected pairings can lead to treasure troves of knowledge. Yo ho ho, indeed!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

Avast, ye scallywags and scholars! It seems our whimsical quest has uncovered some treasure-worthy insights into the curious connection between geoscientists in South Carolina and pirate attacks on a global scale. Despite the initial skepticism that our voyage might be a mere flight of fancy, our findings have hoisted a whopping correlation coefficient of 0.8624725, leaving no room for doubt – there's something fishy going on in the world of geoscience and piracy!

As we splice the mainbrace and navigate through the stormy seas of statistical analysis, our results have teased out a delightful r-squared value of 0.7438588, showing that 74.39% of piratey antics can be explained by the presence of "rock stars" - the geoscientists. It appears that as the number of geoscientists in South Carolina rises, the instances of pirate attacks take a dive deeper than Davy Jones' locker. No doubt, the pirates are feeling a bit "rocked" by this unforeseen force of geoscientific prowess!

Now, you might think it's all smooth sailing from here. But our findings, anchored by a p-value of < 0.01, reveal that this correlation is no mere fluke – it's a statistically significant phenomenon that certainly doesn't walk the plank of chance. And when we set our sights on the scatterplot (Fig. 1), the clear trendline proves that as geoscientists dwindle, the pirate attacks surge, painting a picture more compelling than a pirate's treasure map.

So, in the end, our study has not only buoyed spirits but also unearthed a fascinating twist in the tale of research. It seems that the geoscientists in South Carolina aren't just rockin' the boat in terms of empirical evidence but are also swashbuckling their way into the world of pirate deterrence. Who would have thought that geological expertise could steer us away from the yo-ho-horrible prospect of pirate encounters?

In light of these bombastic findings, we proclaim with utmost certainty that no further research in this area be needed – we've unraveled the mystery, guys! The barnacles have spoken, and it's clear that the number of geoscientists in South Carolina does indeed have a hand in taming the tempestuous seas of global piracy. But fear not, fellow researchers, for there's always new uncharted territories awaiting our scholarly exploration, and who knows what absurd correlations might yet be discovered on the high seas of science!

Yo ho ho, and a bottle of rum!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Rockin' the Boat: The Correlation Between Geoscientist Numbers in South Carolina and Global Pirate Attacks. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Geological Piracy Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Rockin' the Boat: The Correlation Between Geoscientist Numbers in South Carolina and Global Pirate Attacks. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Association for Geological Piracy Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Rockin' the Boat: The Correlation Between Geoscientist Numbers in South Carolina and Global Pirate Attacks with an abstract of Arr, matey! In this study, we set sail to explore the relationship between the number of geoscientists in South Carolina and pirate attacks on a global scale. Drawing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Statista, we embarked on a treasure hunt for correlations between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8624725 with p < 0.01 for the years 2009 to 2022. It seems that the more geoscientists are in South Carolina, the less likely we are to see pirate attacks around the world. Could it be that geoscientists with their rock-solid knowledge are deterring pirates from making waves? This study sheds light on a curious connection that may just rock the boat in both the geoscience and piracy communities.

ChatGPT:

Geoscientist numbers South Carolina, global pirate attacks, correlation, geoscientist employment statistics, South Carolina geoscientist data, global pirate attacks data, correlation coefficient, geoscience community, piracy community, deterring pirates, geoscientist knowledge, correlation study

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of geoscientists in South Carolina
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of geoscientists, except hydrologists and geographers in South Carolina
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of geoscientists in South Carolina

Pirate attacks globally
Detailed data title: Global Pirate Attack Count
Source: Statista
See what else correlates with Pirate attacks globally

Correlation r = 0.8624725 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7438588 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 74.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Pirate attacks globally) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of geoscientists in South Carolina) over the 14 years from 2009 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 7.2E-5. 0.0000721563584963048000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.86 in 0.0072% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 13,859 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 13 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 13 because we have two variables measured over a period of 14 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.61, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
The number of geoscientists in South Carolina (Laborers)78061048040015040010017023019017017070130
Pirate attacks globally (Number of Attacks)410445439297264245246191180201162195132115




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([780,610,480,400,150,400,100,170,230,190,170,170,70,130,])
array_2 = np.array([410,445,439,297,264,245,246,191,180,201,162,195,132,115,])
array_1_name = "The number of geoscientists in South Carolina"
array_2_name = "Pirate attacks globally"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation inspection deserves a standing ovation!


Correlation ID: 3523 · Black Variable ID: 13983 · Red Variable ID: 488
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0