about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,510 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Lake Charles, Louisiana and the second variable is Arson in United States.  The chart goes from 1985 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the air quality in Lake Charles improved, it led to a decrease in respiratory irritants in the atmosphere. This, in turn, resulted in fewer people coughing and wheezing uncontrollably. As a shocking consequence, there was a noticeable reduction in accidental fire-starting from people struggling to catch their breath and inadvertently creating sparks while gasping for air. This unexpected correlation highlights the interconnectedness of environmental factors and fire safety on a national level. So, in a bizarre twist, cleaner air in one city inadvertently became a breath of fresh air for fire prevention efforts across the country.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image of a camera positioned high above Lake Charles, Louisiana. The city is shrouded in a thick, ominous smog that casts a deep red hue across the sky, emphasizing the polluted air. Industrial chimneys release dark plumes of smoke, contributing to the hazy atmosphere. In the distance, a fierce fire rages, sending billows of black smoke upward. In the midst of this setting, a small group of people are engaged in a heated confrontation, their flushed faces mirroring the fire and anger that permeate the scene. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Lake Charles, Louisiana and Arson in United States. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Hyper-realistic a funny image you would see on reddit A photo-realistic image Realistic Futuristic
ChatGPT: Realistic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Lake Charles, Louisiana and Arson in United States, in the following situation: Changes in air pollution in Lake Charles, Louisiana caused arson in the United States because the smog made people see red - literally! With the air quality going downhill, folks started feeling fired up, but not in a good way. Breathing in all that junk made them want to fight fire with fire, leading to some heated situations. It's like the pollution lit a fire under them, driving them to commit some questionable hot takes. So, next time someone says air pollution isn't a big deal, remind them that it could spark some serious trouble!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Lake Charles, Louisiana, a thick smog hangs over the city, tinting the sky with a hazy red hue. The air pollution is palpable, as dark plumes of smoke rise from industrial chimneys. In the distance, a fire rages, sending billows of black smoke into the atmosphere. Amidst this scene, a group of people, their faces flushed with anger, appear to be engaged in a fiery confrontation, mirroring the heated emotions brought on by the worsening air quality.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Realistic ] and depicting this scene: In Lake Charles, Louisiana, a thick smog hangs over the city, tinting the sky with a hazy red hue. The air pollution is palpable, as dark plumes of smoke rise from industrial chimneys. In the distance, a fire rages, sending billows of black smoke into the atmosphere. Amidst this scene, a group of people, their faces flushed with anger, appear to be engaged in a fiery confrontation, mirroring the heated emotions brought on by the worsening air quality. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image of a camera positioned high above Lake Charles, Louisiana. The city is shrouded in a thick, ominous smog that casts a deep red hue across the sky, emphasizing the polluted air. Industrial chimneys release dark plumes of smoke, contributing to the hazy atmosphere. In the distance, a fierce fire rages, sending billows of black smoke upward. In the midst of this setting, a small group of people are engaged in a heated confrontation, their flushed faces mirroring the fire and anger that permeate the scene.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Air pollution in Lake Charles, Louisiana caused Arson in United States to decrease.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Soot Happens: Investigating the Link Between Air Pollution in Lake Charles, Louisiana and Arson in the United States

The Journal of Environmental Criminology and Atmospheric Chemistry

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Lake Charles, Louisiana and Arson in United States. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7535661 and p < 0.01 for 1985 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Soot Happens: Investigating the Link Between Air Pollution in Lake Charles, Louisiana and Arson in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
Is there a fiery connection between air quality in Lake Charles, Louisiana, and the incidence of arson across the United States? In this study, we embark on an illuminating investigation into the potential relationship, leaving no stone unturned in our quest for answers. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our team of researchers set out to shed light on this burning question.

Our findings reveal a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7535661, with a p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 1985 to 2021. This indicates a strong association between air pollution levels in Lake Charles and the occurrences of arson nationwide. It seems that there may indeed be a smoldering link between the two phenomena, leaving us to ponder, "Is it merely a coincidence, or is there something more combustible at play?"

As we sift through the ashes of our data, we also explore potential variables that could fuel this connection, such as socioeconomic factors, regional climate patterns, and the presence of flammable substances. However, one thing is clear - this research blazes a trail in understanding the unexpected interplay between environmental conditions and criminal behavior.

In conclusion, our study brings to light a previously overlooked relationship between air pollution in Lake Charles, Louisiana, and arson in the United States, sparking further inquiry into the mechanisms at work. As we continue to fan the flames of curiosity in pursuit of knowledge, our findings underscore the importance of considering the multifaceted impact of environmental factors on societal phenomena. As for a dad joke, why did the arson investigator quit his job? He didn't have the spark for it!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Lake Charles, Louisiana and Arson in United States. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Soot Happens: Investigating the Link Between Air Pollution in Lake Charles, Louisiana and Arson in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
Is there a fiery connection between air quality in Lake Charles, Louisiana, and the incidence of arson across the United States? In this study, we embark on an illuminating investigation into the potential relationship, leaving no stone unturned in our quest for answers. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our team of researchers set out to shed light on this burning question.

Our findings reveal a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7535661, with a p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 1985 to 2021. This indicates a strong association between air pollution levels in Lake Charles and the occurrences of arson nationwide. It seems that there may indeed be a smoldering link between the two phenomena, leaving us to ponder, "Is it merely a coincidence, or is there something more combustible at play?"

As we sift through the ashes of our data, we also explore potential variables that could fuel this connection, such as socioeconomic factors, regional climate patterns, and the presence of flammable substances. However, one thing is clear - this research blazes a trail in understanding the unexpected interplay between environmental conditions and criminal behavior.

In conclusion, our study brings to light a previously overlooked relationship between air pollution in Lake Charles, Louisiana, and arson in the United States, sparking further inquiry into the mechanisms at work. As we continue to fan the flames of curiosity in pursuit of knowledge, our findings underscore the importance of considering the multifaceted impact of environmental factors on societal phenomena. As for a dad joke, why did the arson investigator quit his job? He didn't have the spark for it!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

There is a misconception that studying the connection between air pollution and criminal behavior would only lead to hot air. However, in this study, we set out to investigate the potential relationship between air pollution levels in Lake Charles, Louisiana, and the incidence of arson across the United States. While it may seem like a stretch at first, our findings may just kindle a new understanding of the complex interplay between environmental conditions and criminal activities.

The notion of examining the correlation between air quality and arson may initially sound like a match made in jest, but the significance of such a relationship cannot be dismissed outright. As we delved into the data, it became evident that there may be more than meets the eye to this seemingly improbable association. It's enough to make one wonder, did Lake Charles become too coal to handle its own air quality problems?

As we embark on this fiery investigation, it is crucial to acknowledge the potential implications of these findings. If, indeed, there is a substantial link between air pollution in Lake Charles and arson across the country, it ignites a discussion about the broader impact of environmental conditions on criminal behavior. With soot at stake, the implications of this research stretch far beyond the smoke and mirrors of conventional wisdom. And what do you call a fake noodle? An impasta!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Lake Charles, Louisiana and Arson in United States. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Soot Happens: Investigating the Link Between Air Pollution in Lake Charles, Louisiana and Arson in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
Is there a fiery connection between air quality in Lake Charles, Louisiana, and the incidence of arson across the United States? In this study, we embark on an illuminating investigation into the potential relationship, leaving no stone unturned in our quest for answers. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our team of researchers set out to shed light on this burning question.

Our findings reveal a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7535661, with a p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 1985 to 2021. This indicates a strong association between air pollution levels in Lake Charles and the occurrences of arson nationwide. It seems that there may indeed be a smoldering link between the two phenomena, leaving us to ponder, "Is it merely a coincidence, or is there something more combustible at play?"

As we sift through the ashes of our data, we also explore potential variables that could fuel this connection, such as socioeconomic factors, regional climate patterns, and the presence of flammable substances. However, one thing is clear - this research blazes a trail in understanding the unexpected interplay between environmental conditions and criminal behavior.

In conclusion, our study brings to light a previously overlooked relationship between air pollution in Lake Charles, Louisiana, and arson in the United States, sparking further inquiry into the mechanisms at work. As we continue to fan the flames of curiosity in pursuit of knowledge, our findings underscore the importance of considering the multifaceted impact of environmental factors on societal phenomena. As for a dad joke, why did the arson investigator quit his job? He didn't have the spark for it!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
There is a misconception that studying the connection between air pollution and criminal behavior would only lead to hot air. However, in this study, we set out to investigate the potential relationship between air pollution levels in Lake Charles, Louisiana, and the incidence of arson across the United States. While it may seem like a stretch at first, our findings may just kindle a new understanding of the complex interplay between environmental conditions and criminal activities.
The notion of examining the correlation between air quality and arson may initially sound like a match made in jest, but the significance of such a relationship cannot be dismissed outright. As we delved into the data, it became evident that there may be more than meets the eye to this seemingly improbable association. It's enough to make one wonder, did Lake Charles become too coal to handle its own air quality problems?
As we embark on this fiery investigation, it is crucial to acknowledge the potential implications of these findings. If, indeed, there is a substantial link between air pollution in Lake Charles and arson across the country, it ignites a discussion about the broader impact of environmental conditions on criminal behavior. With soot at stake, the implications of this research stretch far beyond the smoke and mirrors of conventional wisdom. And what do you call a fake noodle? An impasta!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "The Fiery Truth: Exploring the Relationship between Air Quality and Arson," Smith et al. (2015) delve deep into the potential link between air pollution in specific regions and subsequent arson incidents. Their study sets aflame the notion that environmental conditions may play a significant role in criminal behavior. As we endeavor to understand this smoldering phenomenon, it is essential to consider a wide array of variables that could fan the flames of connection. And speaking of flames, why was the math book sad? It had too many problems.

In "Burning Issues: A Study of Environmental Factors and Criminal Behavior," Doe (2020) examines the impact of air pollution on criminal activities, drawing attention to the potential influence of regional atmospheric conditions on the prevalence of arson. This incendiary investigation sparks new insights into the intersection of environmental factors and illicit behavior, shedding light on the potential combustible relationship between air quality and criminal acts across the United States. It’s funny how lighters get labeled as “child resistant,” but children can still play with them.

Jones' (2018) extensive work in "Smoke Signals: Exploring the Nexus Between Environmental Factors and Criminal Behavior" examines the nuanced interplay between air pollution and criminal activities, uncovering a potential correlation between specific geographic areas with poor air quality and heightened instances of arson. Their findings kindle a new understanding of the role of environmental conditions in fueling criminal behavior, challenging conventional assumptions and igniting further inquiry into this fiery topic. Although watermelon jokes are good, the opposite has a fruit berry funny.

Furthermore, "Air Pollution and Its Impact on Criminal Behavior" by Environmental Focus (2017) highlights the far-reaching effects of air quality on human behavior, emphasizing the potential influence of environmental conditions on the commission of criminal acts. This study adds fuel to the fire of our research by underscoring the need to consider the impact of air pollution on societal phenomena, paving the way for a deeper exploration of the relationship between environmental factors and criminal activities. And now for a geography joke - I wasn't originally going to get a brain transplant, but then I changed my mind.

In addition to these scholarly works, several non-fiction books have also shed light on the potential connection between environmental conditions and criminal behavior. "The Polluted Path to Perdition" by Clean Air Coalition (2019) delves into the implications of air pollution on societal well-being, raising questions about the unexpected impact of environmental factors on criminal activities. Meanwhile, "Burning Questions: A Study of Fire and Crime" by Arson Awareness Foundation (2016) embarks on an illuminating exploration of the relationship between fire-related incidents and criminal behavior, offering valuable insights into the potential nexus between air pollution and arson.

On a fictional note, literary works such as "Smoke and Shadows" by A. Blaze (2014) and "Inferno: A Tale of Crime and Carbon" by F. Lame (2012) weave narratives that hint at the mysterious connections between environmental conditions and criminal activities, adding an element of intrigue to our understanding of this incendiary topic.

In a surprising turn of events, social media posts have also provided anecdotal evidence of the potential link between air pollution and arson. A tweet from @CleanAirInsights states, "As air quality plummets, so does our concern for crime prevention. A burning issue indeed! #SootySolutions," prompting further contemplation of the hidden sparks between environmental conditions and criminal behavior.

As we navigate through these diverse sources of information, it becomes clear that the potential connection between air pollution in Lake Charles, Louisiana, and arson in the United States is a topic that ignites curiosity and demands further investigation. Let's hope this research doesn't go up in smoke!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Lake Charles, Louisiana and Arson in United States. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services . You used data from 1985 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Soot Happens: Investigating the Link Between Air Pollution in Lake Charles, Louisiana and Arson in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
Is there a fiery connection between air quality in Lake Charles, Louisiana, and the incidence of arson across the United States? In this study, we embark on an illuminating investigation into the potential relationship, leaving no stone unturned in our quest for answers. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our team of researchers set out to shed light on this burning question.

Our findings reveal a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7535661, with a p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 1985 to 2021. This indicates a strong association between air pollution levels in Lake Charles and the occurrences of arson nationwide. It seems that there may indeed be a smoldering link between the two phenomena, leaving us to ponder, "Is it merely a coincidence, or is there something more combustible at play?"

As we sift through the ashes of our data, we also explore potential variables that could fuel this connection, such as socioeconomic factors, regional climate patterns, and the presence of flammable substances. However, one thing is clear - this research blazes a trail in understanding the unexpected interplay between environmental conditions and criminal behavior.

In conclusion, our study brings to light a previously overlooked relationship between air pollution in Lake Charles, Louisiana, and arson in the United States, sparking further inquiry into the mechanisms at work. As we continue to fan the flames of curiosity in pursuit of knowledge, our findings underscore the importance of considering the multifaceted impact of environmental factors on societal phenomena. As for a dad joke, why did the arson investigator quit his job? He didn't have the spark for it!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
There is a misconception that studying the connection between air pollution and criminal behavior would only lead to hot air. However, in this study, we set out to investigate the potential relationship between air pollution levels in Lake Charles, Louisiana, and the incidence of arson across the United States. While it may seem like a stretch at first, our findings may just kindle a new understanding of the complex interplay between environmental conditions and criminal activities.
The notion of examining the correlation between air quality and arson may initially sound like a match made in jest, but the significance of such a relationship cannot be dismissed outright. As we delved into the data, it became evident that there may be more than meets the eye to this seemingly improbable association. It's enough to make one wonder, did Lake Charles become too coal to handle its own air quality problems?
As we embark on this fiery investigation, it is crucial to acknowledge the potential implications of these findings. If, indeed, there is a substantial link between air pollution in Lake Charles and arson across the country, it ignites a discussion about the broader impact of environmental conditions on criminal behavior. With soot at stake, the implications of this research stretch far beyond the smoke and mirrors of conventional wisdom. And what do you call a fake noodle? An impasta!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To explore the potential relationship between air pollution in Lake Charles, Louisiana, and the occurrence of arson across the United States, our research team employed a multidimensional approach that involved gathering and analyzing data from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS). These datasets provided comprehensive information on air quality, arson incidents, and various demographic and socioeconomic variables from the years 1985 to 2021.

First, we accessed air quality measures from the EPA's Air Quality System (AQS), including data on pollutants such as particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), carbon monoxide (CO), and ozone (O3). By scrutinizing these parameters, we aimed to ascertain the extent of air pollution in Lake Charles and its potential impact on the broader atmospheric conditions in the region and beyond. It was truly an air-raising experience!

Using the FBI's Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program, we extracted detailed records of arson offenses reported by law enforcement agencies across the United States. Our analysis focused on both the frequency and geographic distribution of arson incidents, allowing us to discern any discernible patterns or trends that might correlate with air quality variations. It was a monumental task, but we were fired up to take on the challenge!

In addition to these primary data sources, we also incorporated various secondary sources, including demographic data from the U.S. Census Bureau and regional economic indicators, to examine potential confounding variables that could influence the relationship between air pollution and arson. We meticulously combed through these datasets to ensure that our analysis captured the full spectrum of factors that might fuel this fiery correlation.

Utilizing a combination of statistical techniques, including correlation analysis, regression modeling, and geospatial mapping, we sought to untangle the intricate web of connections between air pollution in Lake Charles and arson incidents across the United States. Our approach aimed to illuminate any conspicuous patterns while remaining vigilant for any unforeseen sparks that could shed light on this unexpected relationship. Indeed, our research was a real hotbed of activity!

In presenting our findings, we acknowledge the inherent complexities of studying such an unconventional association, but our team was undeterred in its commitment to rigorously examine this incendiary hypothesis. As we stoked the flames of inquiry, our analysis harnessed the power of empirical evidence to quell any skepticism and illuminate the potential nexus between environmental conditions and criminal behavior. Oh, and what do you get when an arsonist sets a fire in a shoe store? Sole arson!

By integrating diverse datasets and employing a robust analytical framework, our research illuminates a novel intersection between environmental factors and criminal activities, underscoring the need for further investigation and policy consideration. In unraveling the smoky relationship between air pollution in Lake Charles, Louisiana, and arson across the United States, we shone a light on a previously overlooked dimension of social dynamics. Our methodology, while complex, was certainly no smoke and mirrors – it was the real deal!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Lake Charles, Louisiana and Arson in United States. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services .

For the time period 1985 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.7535661, r-squared of 0.5678619, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Soot Happens: Investigating the Link Between Air Pollution in Lake Charles, Louisiana and Arson in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
Is there a fiery connection between air quality in Lake Charles, Louisiana, and the incidence of arson across the United States? In this study, we embark on an illuminating investigation into the potential relationship, leaving no stone unturned in our quest for answers. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our team of researchers set out to shed light on this burning question.

Our findings reveal a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7535661, with a p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 1985 to 2021. This indicates a strong association between air pollution levels in Lake Charles and the occurrences of arson nationwide. It seems that there may indeed be a smoldering link between the two phenomena, leaving us to ponder, "Is it merely a coincidence, or is there something more combustible at play?"

As we sift through the ashes of our data, we also explore potential variables that could fuel this connection, such as socioeconomic factors, regional climate patterns, and the presence of flammable substances. However, one thing is clear - this research blazes a trail in understanding the unexpected interplay between environmental conditions and criminal behavior.

In conclusion, our study brings to light a previously overlooked relationship between air pollution in Lake Charles, Louisiana, and arson in the United States, sparking further inquiry into the mechanisms at work. As we continue to fan the flames of curiosity in pursuit of knowledge, our findings underscore the importance of considering the multifaceted impact of environmental factors on societal phenomena. As for a dad joke, why did the arson investigator quit his job? He didn't have the spark for it!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
There is a misconception that studying the connection between air pollution and criminal behavior would only lead to hot air. However, in this study, we set out to investigate the potential relationship between air pollution levels in Lake Charles, Louisiana, and the incidence of arson across the United States. While it may seem like a stretch at first, our findings may just kindle a new understanding of the complex interplay between environmental conditions and criminal activities.
The notion of examining the correlation between air quality and arson may initially sound like a match made in jest, but the significance of such a relationship cannot be dismissed outright. As we delved into the data, it became evident that there may be more than meets the eye to this seemingly improbable association. It's enough to make one wonder, did Lake Charles become too coal to handle its own air quality problems?
As we embark on this fiery investigation, it is crucial to acknowledge the potential implications of these findings. If, indeed, there is a substantial link between air pollution in Lake Charles and arson across the country, it ignites a discussion about the broader impact of environmental conditions on criminal behavior. With soot at stake, the implications of this research stretch far beyond the smoke and mirrors of conventional wisdom. And what do you call a fake noodle? An impasta!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data gathered from the Environmental Protection Agency and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services revealed a statistically significant correlation between air pollution levels in Lake Charles, Louisiana and the occurrences of arson in the United States. The correlation coefficient of 0.7535661 and an r-squared value of 0.5678619 indicated a strong positive relationship between the two variables, with a p-value of less than 0.01.

As illustrated in Figure 1, the scatterplot visually depicts the substantial correlation between air pollution in Lake Charles and the frequency of arson incidents nationwide. The data points paint a clear picture of the upward trend, affirming our quantitative findings and providing a graphical representation of the incendiary association.

The strength of this correlation prompts us to examine potential factors that may fuel this connection, raising questions about the mechanisms underlying this unexpected relationship. It's like trying to figure out whether it's the arsonist or the air quality that's really fanning the flames of criminal behavior.

This research not only adds fuel to the fire of understanding but also sparks further inquiry into the unforeseen intersections of environmental factors and societal phenomena. The findings of this study suggest that considerations of air pollution may need to be added to the arson investigator's toolkit. After all, when it comes to solving crimes, the more layers of investigation, the better.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Lake Charles, Louisiana and Arson in United States. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Soot Happens: Investigating the Link Between Air Pollution in Lake Charles, Louisiana and Arson in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
Is there a fiery connection between air quality in Lake Charles, Louisiana, and the incidence of arson across the United States? In this study, we embark on an illuminating investigation into the potential relationship, leaving no stone unturned in our quest for answers. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our team of researchers set out to shed light on this burning question.

Our findings reveal a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7535661, with a p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 1985 to 2021. This indicates a strong association between air pollution levels in Lake Charles and the occurrences of arson nationwide. It seems that there may indeed be a smoldering link between the two phenomena, leaving us to ponder, "Is it merely a coincidence, or is there something more combustible at play?"

As we sift through the ashes of our data, we also explore potential variables that could fuel this connection, such as socioeconomic factors, regional climate patterns, and the presence of flammable substances. However, one thing is clear - this research blazes a trail in understanding the unexpected interplay between environmental conditions and criminal behavior.

In conclusion, our study brings to light a previously overlooked relationship between air pollution in Lake Charles, Louisiana, and arson in the United States, sparking further inquiry into the mechanisms at work. As we continue to fan the flames of curiosity in pursuit of knowledge, our findings underscore the importance of considering the multifaceted impact of environmental factors on societal phenomena. As for a dad joke, why did the arson investigator quit his job? He didn't have the spark for it!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "The Fiery Truth: Exploring the Relationship between Air Quality and Arson," Smith et al. (2015) delve deep into the potential link between air pollution in specific regions and subsequent arson incidents. Their study sets aflame the notion that environmental conditions may play a significant role in criminal behavior. As we endeavor to understand this smoldering phenomenon, it is essential to consider a wide array of variables that could fan the flames of connection. And speaking of flames, why was the math book sad? It had too many problems.
In "Burning Issues: A Study of Environmental Factors and Criminal Behavior," Doe (2020) examines the impact of air pollution on criminal activities, drawing attention to the potential influence of regional atmospheric conditions on the prevalence of arson. This incendiary investigation sparks new insights into the intersection of environmental factors and illicit behavior, shedding light on the potential combustible relationship between air quality and criminal acts across the United States. It’s funny how lighters get labeled as “child resistant,” but children can still play with them.
Jones' (2018) extensive work in "Smoke Signals: Exploring the Nexus Between Environmental Factors and Criminal Behavior" examines the nuanced interplay between air pollution and criminal activities, uncovering a potential correlation between specific geographic areas with poor air quality and heightened instances of arson. Their findings kindle a new understanding of the role of environmental conditions in fueling criminal behavior, challenging conventional assumptions and igniting further inquiry into this fiery topic. Although watermelon jokes are good, the opposite has a fruit berry funny.
Furthermore, "Air Pollution and Its Impact on Criminal Behavior" by Environmental Focus (2017) highlights the far-reaching effects of air quality on human behavior, emphasizing the potential influence of environmental conditions on the commission of criminal acts. This study adds fuel to the fire of our research by underscoring the need to consider the impact of air pollution on societal phenomena, paving the way for a deeper exploration of the relationship between environmental factors and criminal activities. And now for a geography joke - I wasn't originally going to get a brain transplant, but then I changed my mind.
In addition to these scholarly works, several non-fiction books have also shed light on the potential connection between environmental conditions and criminal behavior. "The Polluted Path to Perdition" by Clean Air Coalition (2019) delves into the implications of air pollution on societal well-being, raising questions about the unexpected impact of environmental factors on criminal activities. Meanwhile, "Burning Questions: A Study of Fire and Crime" by Arson Awareness Foundation (2016) embarks on an illuminating exploration of the relationship between fire-related incidents and criminal behavior, offering valuable insights into the potential nexus between air pollution and arson.
On a fictional note, literary works such as "Smoke and Shadows" by A. Blaze (2014) and "Inferno: A Tale of Crime and Carbon" by F. Lame (2012) weave narratives that hint at the mysterious connections between environmental conditions and criminal activities, adding an element of intrigue to our understanding of this incendiary topic.
In a surprising turn of events, social media posts have also provided anecdotal evidence of the potential link between air pollution and arson. A tweet from @CleanAirInsights states, "As air quality plummets, so does our concern for crime prevention. A burning issue indeed! #SootySolutions," prompting further contemplation of the hidden sparks between environmental conditions and criminal behavior.
As we navigate through these diverse sources of information, it becomes clear that the potential connection between air pollution in Lake Charles, Louisiana, and arson in the United States is a topic that ignites curiosity and demands further investigation. Let's hope this research doesn't go up in smoke!

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data gathered from the Environmental Protection Agency and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services revealed a statistically significant correlation between air pollution levels in Lake Charles, Louisiana and the occurrences of arson in the United States. The correlation coefficient of 0.7535661 and an r-squared value of 0.5678619 indicated a strong positive relationship between the two variables, with a p-value of less than 0.01.
As illustrated in Figure 1, the scatterplot visually depicts the substantial correlation between air pollution in Lake Charles and the frequency of arson incidents nationwide. The data points paint a clear picture of the upward trend, affirming our quantitative findings and providing a graphical representation of the incendiary association.
The strength of this correlation prompts us to examine potential factors that may fuel this connection, raising questions about the mechanisms underlying this unexpected relationship. It's like trying to figure out whether it's the arsonist or the air quality that's really fanning the flames of criminal behavior.
This research not only adds fuel to the fire of understanding but also sparks further inquiry into the unforeseen intersections of environmental factors and societal phenomena. The findings of this study suggest that considerations of air pollution may need to be added to the arson investigator's toolkit. After all, when it comes to solving crimes, the more layers of investigation, the better.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The red-hot findings of our study illuminate a sizzling connection between air pollution in Lake Charles, Louisiana, and the frequency of arson incidents across the United States. Our results not only add fuel to the fire of existing research but also provide a substantial corroboration of the incendiary links previously hypothesized. To put it simply, there’s smoke, so there might be a fire starter.

Building on the work of Smith et al. (2015), Doe (2020), and Jones (2018), our study provides a robust statistical confirmation of the suggested relationship between air quality and arson. Much like the intensity of a burning building, the strength of the correlation coefficient we observed cannot be extinguished, standing as a beacon of insight into this fiery topic. As our findings unfold, it becomes clear that there’s more to air pollution than meets the eye – it’s quite the spark plug for criminal activities.

The scatterplot depiction of our data conjures an enticing image of the upward trend, akin to the ever-rising flames of curiosity surrounding this association. This visual representation offers a clear snapshot of the ongoing combustion between air pollution levels in Lake Charles, Louisiana, and the occurrences of arson nationwide. It’s quite the sparkler, don’t you think?

Our study underscores the multifaceted nature of environmental factors in driving societal phenomena, and it’s apparent that this connection is smoldering with potential implications for crime prevention and environmental policy. As we continue to stoke the flames of inquiry, it’s imperative to avoid being left in the dark about the notable impact of air pollution on criminal behavior. After all, when it comes to solving crimes, it’s air-son–ally (arson-ally) beneficial to consider all potential ignition sources.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Lake Charles, Louisiana and Arson in United States. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Soot Happens: Investigating the Link Between Air Pollution in Lake Charles, Louisiana and Arson in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
Is there a fiery connection between air quality in Lake Charles, Louisiana, and the incidence of arson across the United States? In this study, we embark on an illuminating investigation into the potential relationship, leaving no stone unturned in our quest for answers. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our team of researchers set out to shed light on this burning question.

Our findings reveal a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7535661, with a p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 1985 to 2021. This indicates a strong association between air pollution levels in Lake Charles and the occurrences of arson nationwide. It seems that there may indeed be a smoldering link between the two phenomena, leaving us to ponder, "Is it merely a coincidence, or is there something more combustible at play?"

As we sift through the ashes of our data, we also explore potential variables that could fuel this connection, such as socioeconomic factors, regional climate patterns, and the presence of flammable substances. However, one thing is clear - this research blazes a trail in understanding the unexpected interplay between environmental conditions and criminal behavior.

In conclusion, our study brings to light a previously overlooked relationship between air pollution in Lake Charles, Louisiana, and arson in the United States, sparking further inquiry into the mechanisms at work. As we continue to fan the flames of curiosity in pursuit of knowledge, our findings underscore the importance of considering the multifaceted impact of environmental factors on societal phenomena. As for a dad joke, why did the arson investigator quit his job? He didn't have the spark for it!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
There is a misconception that studying the connection between air pollution and criminal behavior would only lead to hot air. However, in this study, we set out to investigate the potential relationship between air pollution levels in Lake Charles, Louisiana, and the incidence of arson across the United States. While it may seem like a stretch at first, our findings may just kindle a new understanding of the complex interplay between environmental conditions and criminal activities.
The notion of examining the correlation between air quality and arson may initially sound like a match made in jest, but the significance of such a relationship cannot be dismissed outright. As we delved into the data, it became evident that there may be more than meets the eye to this seemingly improbable association. It's enough to make one wonder, did Lake Charles become too coal to handle its own air quality problems?
As we embark on this fiery investigation, it is crucial to acknowledge the potential implications of these findings. If, indeed, there is a substantial link between air pollution in Lake Charles and arson across the country, it ignites a discussion about the broader impact of environmental conditions on criminal behavior. With soot at stake, the implications of this research stretch far beyond the smoke and mirrors of conventional wisdom. And what do you call a fake noodle? An impasta!

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data gathered from the Environmental Protection Agency and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services revealed a statistically significant correlation between air pollution levels in Lake Charles, Louisiana and the occurrences of arson in the United States. The correlation coefficient of 0.7535661 and an r-squared value of 0.5678619 indicated a strong positive relationship between the two variables, with a p-value of less than 0.01.
As illustrated in Figure 1, the scatterplot visually depicts the substantial correlation between air pollution in Lake Charles and the frequency of arson incidents nationwide. The data points paint a clear picture of the upward trend, affirming our quantitative findings and providing a graphical representation of the incendiary association.
The strength of this correlation prompts us to examine potential factors that may fuel this connection, raising questions about the mechanisms underlying this unexpected relationship. It's like trying to figure out whether it's the arsonist or the air quality that's really fanning the flames of criminal behavior.
This research not only adds fuel to the fire of understanding but also sparks further inquiry into the unforeseen intersections of environmental factors and societal phenomena. The findings of this study suggest that considerations of air pollution may need to be added to the arson investigator's toolkit. After all, when it comes to solving crimes, the more layers of investigation, the better.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study provides compelling evidence of a strong association between air pollution in Lake Charles, Louisiana, and the incidence of arson across the United States. The statistically significant correlation coefficient and the visually striking scatterplot undeniably illuminate a fiery connection that cannot be easily extinguished. It seems that the air in Lake Charles may not be the only thing catching fire.

While it may seem like a stretch, the findings of our research blaze a new trail in understanding the unexpected interplay between environmental conditions and criminal behavior. Indeed, one might say that this study has added a breath of fresh air to the field of criminology, but let's not let it go to our heads.

Our investigation sparks further inquiry into the mechanisms at work, fueling the curiosity of researchers and law enforcement professionals alike. As we continue to stoke the flames of knowledge, it is clear that the multifaceted impact of environmental factors on societal phenomena cannot be overlooked. After all, when it comes to solving crimes, we must consider all possible suspects - even the ones lingering in the air.

As for a dad joke to extinguish the seriousness, why did the arson investigator quit his job? He didn't have the spark for it!

In light of these findings, it is safe to say that no further research on the connection between air pollution in Lake Charles, Louisiana, and arson in the United States is needed. The results of our study are as clear as day, and it's time for everyone to take a breath and enjoy the enlightenment these findings provide.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Soot Happens: Investigating the Link Between Air Pollution in Lake Charles, Louisiana and Arson in the United States. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Environmental Criminology and Atmospheric Chemistry


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Soot Happens: Investigating the Link Between Air Pollution in Lake Charles, Louisiana and Arson in the United States. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Alliance for Atmospheric Anomalies Research (A3R)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Soot Happens: Investigating the Link Between Air Pollution in Lake Charles, Louisiana and Arson in the United States with an abstract of Is there a fiery connection between air quality in Lake Charles, Louisiana, and the incidence of arson across the United States? In this study, we embark on an illuminating investigation into the potential relationship, leaving no stone unturned in our quest for answers. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our team of researchers set out to shed light on this burning question.
Our findings reveal a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7535661, with a p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 1985 to 2021. This indicates a strong association between air pollution levels in Lake Charles and the occurrences of arson nationwide. It seems that there may indeed be a smoldering link between the two phenomena, leaving us to ponder, "Is it merely a coincidence, or is there something more combustible at play?"
As we sift through the ashes of our data, we also explore potential variables that could fuel this connection, such as socioeconomic factors, regional climate patterns, and the presence of flammable substances. However, one thing is clear - this research blazes a trail in understanding the unexpected interplay between environmental conditions and criminal behavior.
In conclusion, our study brings to light a previously overlooked relationship between air pollution in Lake Charles, Louisiana, and arson in the United States, sparking further inquiry into the mechanisms at work. As we continue to fan the flames of curiosity in pursuit of knowledge, our findings underscore the importance of considering the multifaceted impact of environmental factors on societal phenomena. As for a dad joke, why did the arson investigator quit his job? He didn't have the spark for it!

ChatGPT:

air pollution, Lake Charles, Louisiana, arson, United States, correlation coefficient, Environmental Protection Agency, FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, socioeconomic factors, regional climate patterns, flammable substances, criminal behavior

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Lake Charles, Louisiana
Detailed data title: Percentage of days 'unhealthy' or worse air quality in Lake Charles, LA
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Lake Charles, Louisiana

Arson in United States
Detailed data title: The arson rate per 100,000 residents in United States
Source: FBI Criminal Justice Information Services
See what else correlates with Arson in United States

Correlation r = 0.7535661 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.5678619 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 56.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Arson in United States) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Lake Charles, Louisiana) over the 37 years from 1985 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 7.3E-8. 0.0000000732051827573665100000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.75 in 7.3E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 13,660,235 random variables You don't actually need 13 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 36 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 36 because we have two variables measured over a period of 37 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.57, 0.87 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1985198619871988198919901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Air pollution in Lake Charles, Louisiana (Bad air quality days)2.191781.917813.021984.098361.917811.643843.581270.8196721.643841.095891.6438401.923082.739731.369862.185790.82191800.8219180.2732240.8620690.547945000.547945000000.273973000000.273973
Arson in United States (Arson rate)43.646.342.54141.441.74140.837.339.636.734.632.629.728.824.727.726.82523.623.124.422.621.619.518.117.517.614.914.513.714.113.2121113.98.9




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([2.19178,1.91781,3.02198,4.09836,1.91781,1.64384,3.58127,0.819672,1.64384,1.09589,1.64384,0,1.92308,2.73973,1.36986,2.18579,0.821918,0,0.821918,0.273224,0.862069,0.547945,0,0,0.547945,0,0,0,0,0,0.273973,0,0,0,0,0,0.273973,])
array_2 = np.array([43.6,46.3,42.5,41,41.4,41.7,41,40.8,37.3,39.6,36.7,34.6,32.6,29.7,28.8,24.7,27.7,26.8,25,23.6,23.1,24.4,22.6,21.6,19.5,18.1,17.5,17.6,14.9,14.5,13.7,14.1,13.2,12,11,13.9,8.9,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Lake Charles, Louisiana"
array_2_name = "Arson in United States"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is stellar!


Correlation ID: 3510 · Black Variable ID: 20789 · Red Variable ID: 20038
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0