Download png, svg
AI explanation
The smog from Salinas somehow turbocharged the turbines in Guinea, leading to a surge in hydropower production. It was an unexpected cross-continental power boost, but it seems when it comes to generating electricity, the Salinas smog just couldn't keep a low wattage!Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [Concept art] Generate an image that contrasts two different environmental scenes: In the foreground, depict the bustling streets of Salinas, California, filled with futuristic electric cars gliding through smog-filled air. People can be seen walking around wearing face masks. Meanwhile, in the background, showcase the lush landscape of Guinea, with powerful hydropower plants harnessing energy from the rushing river. Let the contrast between the urban pollution and the clean energy generation come through in the visual. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Salinas, California and Hydopower energy generated in Guinea. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: a funny image you would see on reddit Macabre Concept art A photo-realistic image inspired by bauhaus
ChatGPT: Concept art
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Salinas, California and Hydopower energy generated in Guinea, in the following situation: Due to the smoggy skies of Salinas, Californians switched to electric cars, increasing power demand globally. As a result, Guinea's hydropower plants worked overtime, harnessing the flow of cash current for a shocking surge in energy production!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Salinas, California, electric cars fill the streets, with people walking around wearing face masks due to the smoggy air. Meanwhile, in Guinea, hydropower plants are operating at full capacity, generating electricity as the powerful current flows through the rushing river.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Concept art ] and depicting this scene: In Salinas, California, electric cars fill the streets, with people walking around wearing face masks due to the smoggy air. Meanwhile, in Guinea, hydropower plants are operating at full capacity, generating electricity as the powerful current flows through the rushing river. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [Concept art] Generate an image that contrasts two different environmental scenes: In the foreground, depict the bustling streets of Salinas, California, filled with futuristic electric cars gliding through smog-filled air. People can be seen walking around wearing face masks. Meanwhile, in the background, showcase the lush landscape of Guinea, with powerful hydropower plants harnessing energy from the rushing river. Let the contrast between the urban pollution and the clean energy generation come through in the visual.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Air pollution in Salinas, California caused Hydopower energy generated in Guinea to increase. Include one good pun.
AI academic paper
Clearing the Air: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Salinas, California and Hydropower Energy Generated in Guinea Journal of Ecological Dynamics and Global Energy Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Salinas, California and Hydopower energy generated in Guinea. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title seem clever.
Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.6981250 and p < 0.01 for 1980 to 2020.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Clearing the Air: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Salinas, California and Hydropower Energy Generated in Guinea
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the paradoxically interconnected realms of air pollution in Salinas, California, and the generation of hydropower energy in Guinea. Unearthing the mysteries of these seemingly disparate phenomena, we employed data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration to scrutinize their curious and enigmatic relationship.
Our rigorous analysis uncovered a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.6981250 and a strikingly significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning 1980 to 2020. This statistical revelation sheds light on the intricate dance between environmental degradation and renewable energy production, offering a unique insight into the complex interplay of global forces.
Our study not only adds to the growing body of knowledge in environmental and energy economics but also serves as a poignant reminder of the power dynamics at play in our interconnected world. As we navigate the intricacies of environmental stewardship and energy generation, our findings invite further exploration into the whims and fancies of our Earth's intertwined ecosystems, where the currents of air and water conspire in ways that confound and captivate the curious researcher.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Salinas, California and Hydopower energy generated in Guinea. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Clearing the Air: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Salinas, California and Hydropower Energy Generated in Guinea
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the paradoxically interconnected realms of air pollution in Salinas, California, and the generation of hydropower energy in Guinea. Unearthing the mysteries of these seemingly disparate phenomena, we employed data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration to scrutinize their curious and enigmatic relationship.
Our rigorous analysis uncovered a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.6981250 and a strikingly significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning 1980 to 2020. This statistical revelation sheds light on the intricate dance between environmental degradation and renewable energy production, offering a unique insight into the complex interplay of global forces.
Our study not only adds to the growing body of knowledge in environmental and energy economics but also serves as a poignant reminder of the power dynamics at play in our interconnected world. As we navigate the intricacies of environmental stewardship and energy generation, our findings invite further exploration into the whims and fancies of our Earth's intertwined ecosystems, where the currents of air and water conspire in ways that confound and captivate the curious researcher.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The curious relationship between air pollution and hydropower energy has long captivated the minds of researchers and policymakers alike. While the swirling currents of air pollution in Salinas, California may seem worlds apart from the cascading waters that power hydropower energy generation in Guinea, our investigation has uncovered an unexpected and illuminating link.
Air pollution has been a pressing concern in Salinas, with its diverse agricultural activities and growing population. Meanwhile, Guinea's dependency on hydropower for energy production has positioned it as a unique player in the global energy landscape. These seemingly incongruous factors have met at an intriguing crossroads, prompting our meticulous examination of their interplay.
Our inquiry was guided by a desire to unearth the underlying dynamics of this unanticipated connection and to provide a meaningful contribution to the discourse surrounding environmental degradation and renewable energy generation. Leveraging comprehensive data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, our investigation was underpinned by rigorous statistical analysis and a whimsical sense of wonderment.
As we navigate the sophisticated labyrinth of environmental economics, our study stands as a testament to the unexpected entanglements that emerge in our quest to understand the world around us. The revelations that emerge from our exploration not only provoke contemplation but also incite a sense of curiosity, inviting scholars and enthusiasts alike to ponder the intricate ballet of air pollution and hydropower energy with a blend of gravity and lightheartedness.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Salinas, California and Hydopower energy generated in Guinea. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Clearing the Air: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Salinas, California and Hydropower Energy Generated in Guinea
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the paradoxically interconnected realms of air pollution in Salinas, California, and the generation of hydropower energy in Guinea. Unearthing the mysteries of these seemingly disparate phenomena, we employed data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration to scrutinize their curious and enigmatic relationship.
Our rigorous analysis uncovered a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.6981250 and a strikingly significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning 1980 to 2020. This statistical revelation sheds light on the intricate dance between environmental degradation and renewable energy production, offering a unique insight into the complex interplay of global forces.
Our study not only adds to the growing body of knowledge in environmental and energy economics but also serves as a poignant reminder of the power dynamics at play in our interconnected world. As we navigate the intricacies of environmental stewardship and energy generation, our findings invite further exploration into the whims and fancies of our Earth's intertwined ecosystems, where the currents of air and water conspire in ways that confound and captivate the curious researcher.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The curious relationship between air pollution and hydropower energy has long captivated the minds of researchers and policymakers alike. While the swirling currents of air pollution in Salinas, California may seem worlds apart from the cascading waters that power hydropower energy generation in Guinea, our investigation has uncovered an unexpected and illuminating link.
Air pollution has been a pressing concern in Salinas, with its diverse agricultural activities and growing population. Meanwhile, Guinea's dependency on hydropower for energy production has positioned it as a unique player in the global energy landscape. These seemingly incongruous factors have met at an intriguing crossroads, prompting our meticulous examination of their interplay.
Our inquiry was guided by a desire to unearth the underlying dynamics of this unanticipated connection and to provide a meaningful contribution to the discourse surrounding environmental degradation and renewable energy generation. Leveraging comprehensive data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, our investigation was underpinned by rigorous statistical analysis and a whimsical sense of wonderment.
As we navigate the sophisticated labyrinth of environmental economics, our study stands as a testament to the unexpected entanglements that emerge in our quest to understand the world around us. The revelations that emerge from our exploration not only provoke contemplation but also incite a sense of curiosity, inviting scholars and enthusiasts alike to ponder the intricate ballet of air pollution and hydropower energy with a blend of gravity and lightheartedness.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The existing literature addressing the relationship between air pollution in Salinas, California and hydropower energy generated in Guinea presents a variety of perspectives and findings that contribute to our understanding of this perplexing connection. Smith (2015) offers a comprehensive analysis of air pollution patterns in California, highlighting the impacts of anthropogenic activities on air quality. Meanwhile, Doe (2018) delves into the intricate dynamics of hydropower energy generation in the global context, examining the socioeconomic implications of renewable energy sources.
Moving beyond these foundational studies, Jones (2020) introduces a novel framework for understanding the intersection of air pollution and renewable energy, weaving together a narrative of environmental stewardship and technological innovation. Amidst these scholarly endeavors, a diverse array of non-fiction literature – such as "The Shock Doctrine" by Naomi Klein and "Collapse" by Jared Diamond – provides additional context, offering insights into the complexities of environmental degradation and resource management.
Despite the wealth of scholarly and non-fiction works contributing to our understanding of air pollution and hydropower energy, it is worth noting the potential contributions of fictional narratives to this discourse. Works such as "The Water Knife" by Paolo Bacigalupi and "California" by Edan Lepucki offer imaginative explorations of environmental upheaval and societal resilience, prompting reflections on the interplay of natural forces and human ingenuity.
Further adding to the interdisciplinary tapestry of our inquiry, a selection of television series – including "Years of Living Dangerously" and "Planet Earth" – has provided visual and narrative stimuli, offering glimpses into the visceral realities of environmental challenges and the awe-inspiring beauty of Earth's ecosystems. While the academic literature lays the groundwork for our investigation, the integration of fictional and visual narratives lends a multidimensional richness to our exploration of the interconnected phenomena of air pollution and hydropower energy generation.
As we traverse the interwoven landscapes of empirical research, literary exploration, and visual storytelling, our inquiry into the compelling nexus of air pollution in Salinas, California and hydropower energy generated in Guinea seeks to embrace the multifaceted nature of environmental and energy dynamics, blending the rigor of scholarly inquiry with the whimsy of creative interpretation.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Salinas, California and Hydopower energy generated in Guinea. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 1980 to 2020
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Clearing the Air: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Salinas, California and Hydropower Energy Generated in Guinea
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the paradoxically interconnected realms of air pollution in Salinas, California, and the generation of hydropower energy in Guinea. Unearthing the mysteries of these seemingly disparate phenomena, we employed data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration to scrutinize their curious and enigmatic relationship.
Our rigorous analysis uncovered a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.6981250 and a strikingly significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning 1980 to 2020. This statistical revelation sheds light on the intricate dance between environmental degradation and renewable energy production, offering a unique insight into the complex interplay of global forces.
Our study not only adds to the growing body of knowledge in environmental and energy economics but also serves as a poignant reminder of the power dynamics at play in our interconnected world. As we navigate the intricacies of environmental stewardship and energy generation, our findings invite further exploration into the whims and fancies of our Earth's intertwined ecosystems, where the currents of air and water conspire in ways that confound and captivate the curious researcher.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The curious relationship between air pollution and hydropower energy has long captivated the minds of researchers and policymakers alike. While the swirling currents of air pollution in Salinas, California may seem worlds apart from the cascading waters that power hydropower energy generation in Guinea, our investigation has uncovered an unexpected and illuminating link.
Air pollution has been a pressing concern in Salinas, with its diverse agricultural activities and growing population. Meanwhile, Guinea's dependency on hydropower for energy production has positioned it as a unique player in the global energy landscape. These seemingly incongruous factors have met at an intriguing crossroads, prompting our meticulous examination of their interplay.
Our inquiry was guided by a desire to unearth the underlying dynamics of this unanticipated connection and to provide a meaningful contribution to the discourse surrounding environmental degradation and renewable energy generation. Leveraging comprehensive data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, our investigation was underpinned by rigorous statistical analysis and a whimsical sense of wonderment.
As we navigate the sophisticated labyrinth of environmental economics, our study stands as a testament to the unexpected entanglements that emerge in our quest to understand the world around us. The revelations that emerge from our exploration not only provoke contemplation but also incite a sense of curiosity, inviting scholars and enthusiasts alike to ponder the intricate ballet of air pollution and hydropower energy with a blend of gravity and lightheartedness.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Our investigation into the curious linkage between air pollution in Salinas, California and hydropower energy generation in Guinea entailed a meticulously crafted approach that sought to unearth the underlying dynamics of this unexpected connection. Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, our methodology aimed to blend the rigors of statistical analysis with an insatiable sense of curiosity.
To commence our research journey, we first harmonized the disparate datasets relating to air quality in Salinas and hydropower energy generation in Guinea. This process involved an intricate dance of data scrubbing and normalization, akin to taming the unruly currents of air and water to reveal their hidden patterns. Once the datasets were suitably aligned, we conducted a series of exploratory data analyses to coax forth the nuanced narratives they held.
Having coaxed the data into submission, we unleashed a barrage of statistical techniques to tease out the intricate relationship between air pollution in Salinas and hydropower energy generation in Guinea. Our arsenal of statistical methods included bivariate correlation analysis, time series modeling, and spatial econometric techniques to capture the complex interplay of environmental degradation and energy production.
In particular, our use of spatial econometric techniques allowed us to account for the geographic nuances underlying air pollution dynamics in Salinas and their potential impact on hydropower energy generation in Guinea. As we delved into the depths of this intercontinental tango, our statistical toolkit served as both a compass and a telescope, guiding us through the arcane realm of environmental and energy economics.
Furthermore, our scrutiny extended to the temporal dimension, encompassing data from the illustrious decades of the 1980s through the tumultuous years of the 2020s. This expansive time frame provided a panoramic view of the evolving relationship between air pollution in Salinas and hydropower energy generation in Guinea, akin to observing the subtle shifts and eddies of a celestial dance unfolding over the epochs.
Throughout this methodological odyssey, our research team embraced the whims and fancies of the data, a celebratory testament to the captivating elegance of statistical inquiry. Our approach, while rigorous and grounded in empirical analysis, also embodied a spirited sense of adventure, akin to embarking on an intrepid expedition to unravel the mysteries of our interconnected world.
As we navigated the convoluted pathways of data analysis, we marveled at the unexpected insights conjured forth by the statistical alchemy at our disposal. The resulting findings, while steeped in the solemnity of scientific inquiry, also bore the imprint of our unyielding curiosity, offering a vibrant portrayal of the intricate interplay between air pollution and hydropower energy that deftly balanced the earnest and the whimsical.
In retrospect, our methodology encapsulated the essence of our research endeavor – a quest to unravel the enigmatic link between the currents of air and water, infused with the boundless excitement of discovery and the steadfastness of scholarly inquiry. Indeed, our methodological voyage stands as a testament to the indomitable spirit of scientific exploration, where the pursuit of knowledge intertwines with the joy of uncovering the unexpected.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Salinas, California and Hydopower energy generated in Guinea. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration .
For the time period 1980 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.6981250, r-squared of 0.4873785, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Clearing the Air: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Salinas, California and Hydropower Energy Generated in Guinea
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the paradoxically interconnected realms of air pollution in Salinas, California, and the generation of hydropower energy in Guinea. Unearthing the mysteries of these seemingly disparate phenomena, we employed data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration to scrutinize their curious and enigmatic relationship.
Our rigorous analysis uncovered a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.6981250 and a strikingly significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning 1980 to 2020. This statistical revelation sheds light on the intricate dance between environmental degradation and renewable energy production, offering a unique insight into the complex interplay of global forces.
Our study not only adds to the growing body of knowledge in environmental and energy economics but also serves as a poignant reminder of the power dynamics at play in our interconnected world. As we navigate the intricacies of environmental stewardship and energy generation, our findings invite further exploration into the whims and fancies of our Earth's intertwined ecosystems, where the currents of air and water conspire in ways that confound and captivate the curious researcher.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The curious relationship between air pollution and hydropower energy has long captivated the minds of researchers and policymakers alike. While the swirling currents of air pollution in Salinas, California may seem worlds apart from the cascading waters that power hydropower energy generation in Guinea, our investigation has uncovered an unexpected and illuminating link.
Air pollution has been a pressing concern in Salinas, with its diverse agricultural activities and growing population. Meanwhile, Guinea's dependency on hydropower for energy production has positioned it as a unique player in the global energy landscape. These seemingly incongruous factors have met at an intriguing crossroads, prompting our meticulous examination of their interplay.
Our inquiry was guided by a desire to unearth the underlying dynamics of this unanticipated connection and to provide a meaningful contribution to the discourse surrounding environmental degradation and renewable energy generation. Leveraging comprehensive data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, our investigation was underpinned by rigorous statistical analysis and a whimsical sense of wonderment.
As we navigate the sophisticated labyrinth of environmental economics, our study stands as a testament to the unexpected entanglements that emerge in our quest to understand the world around us. The revelations that emerge from our exploration not only provoke contemplation but also incite a sense of curiosity, inviting scholars and enthusiasts alike to ponder the intricate ballet of air pollution and hydropower energy with a blend of gravity and lightheartedness.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis revealed a notable correlation coefficient of 0.6981250 between air pollution in Salinas, California and hydropower energy generated in Guinea over the period from 1980 to 2020. This finding suggests a moderately strong positive linear relationship between the two variables. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.4873785 indicates that approximately 48.74% of the variance in hydropower energy generation can be explained by the variance in air pollution levels in Salinas.
Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 demonstrates the statistical significance of the relationship, providing robust evidence to reject the null hypothesis of no correlation between these disparate elements. To put it simply, the connection between air pollution in Salinas and hydropower energy in Guinea is not just a fluke; it's the real deal - a statistically significant duo dancing across continents and forcing us to reconsider our assumptions about environmental and energy dynamics.
As shown in Fig. 1, the scatterplot depicts the evident upward trend, illustrating the compelling association between air pollution and hydropower energy generation. The points on the plot align so harmoniously that one might even imagine a waltz of data points, gracefully indicating the synchronous rise and fall of these seemingly unrelated phenomena. This charming dance of correlation serves as a visual testament to the unexpected connections that can be uncovered through rigorous analysis and a hint of whimsy.
In conclusion, our findings shed light on the uncharted territory of the atmospheric and hydrological tango, challenging conventional wisdom and inspiring further exploration into the intriguing juxtaposition of air pollution and hydropower energy generation. With a nod to the unexpected collaborations that emerge in the realm of empirical inquiry, this study serves as a testament to the surprises waiting to be unearthed in the most unlikely pairings.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Salinas, California and Hydopower energy generated in Guinea. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
Clearing the Air: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Salinas, California and Hydropower Energy Generated in Guinea
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the paradoxically interconnected realms of air pollution in Salinas, California, and the generation of hydropower energy in Guinea. Unearthing the mysteries of these seemingly disparate phenomena, we employed data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration to scrutinize their curious and enigmatic relationship.
Our rigorous analysis uncovered a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.6981250 and a strikingly significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning 1980 to 2020. This statistical revelation sheds light on the intricate dance between environmental degradation and renewable energy production, offering a unique insight into the complex interplay of global forces.
Our study not only adds to the growing body of knowledge in environmental and energy economics but also serves as a poignant reminder of the power dynamics at play in our interconnected world. As we navigate the intricacies of environmental stewardship and energy generation, our findings invite further exploration into the whims and fancies of our Earth's intertwined ecosystems, where the currents of air and water conspire in ways that confound and captivate the curious researcher.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The existing literature addressing the relationship between air pollution in Salinas, California and hydropower energy generated in Guinea presents a variety of perspectives and findings that contribute to our understanding of this perplexing connection. Smith (2015) offers a comprehensive analysis of air pollution patterns in California, highlighting the impacts of anthropogenic activities on air quality. Meanwhile, Doe (2018) delves into the intricate dynamics of hydropower energy generation in the global context, examining the socioeconomic implications of renewable energy sources.
Moving beyond these foundational studies, Jones (2020) introduces a novel framework for understanding the intersection of air pollution and renewable energy, weaving together a narrative of environmental stewardship and technological innovation. Amidst these scholarly endeavors, a diverse array of non-fiction literature – such as "The Shock Doctrine" by Naomi Klein and "Collapse" by Jared Diamond – provides additional context, offering insights into the complexities of environmental degradation and resource management.
Despite the wealth of scholarly and non-fiction works contributing to our understanding of air pollution and hydropower energy, it is worth noting the potential contributions of fictional narratives to this discourse. Works such as "The Water Knife" by Paolo Bacigalupi and "California" by Edan Lepucki offer imaginative explorations of environmental upheaval and societal resilience, prompting reflections on the interplay of natural forces and human ingenuity.
Further adding to the interdisciplinary tapestry of our inquiry, a selection of television series – including "Years of Living Dangerously" and "Planet Earth" – has provided visual and narrative stimuli, offering glimpses into the visceral realities of environmental challenges and the awe-inspiring beauty of Earth's ecosystems. While the academic literature lays the groundwork for our investigation, the integration of fictional and visual narratives lends a multidimensional richness to our exploration of the interconnected phenomena of air pollution and hydropower energy generation.
As we traverse the interwoven landscapes of empirical research, literary exploration, and visual storytelling, our inquiry into the compelling nexus of air pollution in Salinas, California and hydropower energy generated in Guinea seeks to embrace the multifaceted nature of environmental and energy dynamics, blending the rigor of scholarly inquiry with the whimsy of creative interpretation.
[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis revealed a notable correlation coefficient of 0.6981250 between air pollution in Salinas, California and hydropower energy generated in Guinea over the period from 1980 to 2020. This finding suggests a moderately strong positive linear relationship between the two variables. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.4873785 indicates that approximately 48.74% of the variance in hydropower energy generation can be explained by the variance in air pollution levels in Salinas.
Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 demonstrates the statistical significance of the relationship, providing robust evidence to reject the null hypothesis of no correlation between these disparate elements. To put it simply, the connection between air pollution in Salinas and hydropower energy in Guinea is not just a fluke; it's the real deal - a statistically significant duo dancing across continents and forcing us to reconsider our assumptions about environmental and energy dynamics.
As shown in Fig. 1, the scatterplot depicts the evident upward trend, illustrating the compelling association between air pollution and hydropower energy generation. The points on the plot align so harmoniously that one might even imagine a waltz of data points, gracefully indicating the synchronous rise and fall of these seemingly unrelated phenomena. This charming dance of correlation serves as a visual testament to the unexpected connections that can be uncovered through rigorous analysis and a hint of whimsy.
In conclusion, our findings shed light on the uncharted territory of the atmospheric and hydrological tango, challenging conventional wisdom and inspiring further exploration into the intriguing juxtaposition of air pollution and hydropower energy generation. With a nod to the unexpected collaborations that emerge in the realm of empirical inquiry, this study serves as a testament to the surprises waiting to be unearthed in the most unlikely pairings.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The findings of our study highlight a compelling association between air pollution in Salinas, California and hydropower energy generated in Guinea, bringing to the forefront the intricate interplay of environmental degradation and renewable energy production. Our results not only corroborate the existing literature but also offer a novel perspective on the dynamic relationship between these seemingly disparate elements.
The statistical revelation of a correlation coefficient of 0.6981250 lends substantial support to the prior research, echoing the sentiments put forth by Jones (2020) in his innovative framework for understanding the intersection of air pollution and renewable energy. It is remarkable to see how the whims of the wind in Salinas can sway the hydrological currents across continents, akin to a cosmic choreography of environmental forces.
The connection between air pollution and hydropower energy, while seemingly mystifying at first glance, is fundamentally rooted in the unyielding laws of physics and the capricious nuances of atmospheric and hydrological dynamics. The visual metaphor of a waltz of data points depicted in the scatterplot aptly captures the whimsical yet compelling nature of this relationship, evoking a sense of awe and fascination at the unseen forces shaping our world.
Moreover, the consistent statistical significance of the relationship, as evidenced by the strikingly significant p-value, substantiates the notion that this seemingly unconventional pair is indeed a force to be reckoned with in the realm of environmental and energy economics. As we navigate the complexities of global energy transitions and environmental sustainability, it is imperative to embrace the unexpected revelations that emerge from rigorous empirical analysis, even if they appear to be as improbable as a serendipitous encounter between air molecules and flowing water.
In conclusion, our study invites further exploration into the enigmatic dance between air pollution in Salinas, California and hydropower energy in Guinea, illuminating the whims and fancies of our Earth's interconnected ecosystems. This captivating interplay between environmental degradation and renewable energy generation underscores the need for holistic and interdisciplinary approaches to addressing the multifaceted challenges of environmental stewardship and energy transitions. As we waltz through the data and delve deeper into the statistical symphony of environmental and energy dynamics, we must remain open to the possibility of unexpected collaborations and fortuitous connections, for it is in these serendipitous encounters that we often find the most profound insights.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Salinas, California and Hydopower energy generated in Guinea. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Clearing the Air: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Salinas, California and Hydropower Energy Generated in Guinea
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the paradoxically interconnected realms of air pollution in Salinas, California, and the generation of hydropower energy in Guinea. Unearthing the mysteries of these seemingly disparate phenomena, we employed data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration to scrutinize their curious and enigmatic relationship.
Our rigorous analysis uncovered a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.6981250 and a strikingly significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning 1980 to 2020. This statistical revelation sheds light on the intricate dance between environmental degradation and renewable energy production, offering a unique insight into the complex interplay of global forces.
Our study not only adds to the growing body of knowledge in environmental and energy economics but also serves as a poignant reminder of the power dynamics at play in our interconnected world. As we navigate the intricacies of environmental stewardship and energy generation, our findings invite further exploration into the whims and fancies of our Earth's intertwined ecosystems, where the currents of air and water conspire in ways that confound and captivate the curious researcher.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
The curious relationship between air pollution and hydropower energy has long captivated the minds of researchers and policymakers alike. While the swirling currents of air pollution in Salinas, California may seem worlds apart from the cascading waters that power hydropower energy generation in Guinea, our investigation has uncovered an unexpected and illuminating link.
Air pollution has been a pressing concern in Salinas, with its diverse agricultural activities and growing population. Meanwhile, Guinea's dependency on hydropower for energy production has positioned it as a unique player in the global energy landscape. These seemingly incongruous factors have met at an intriguing crossroads, prompting our meticulous examination of their interplay.
Our inquiry was guided by a desire to unearth the underlying dynamics of this unanticipated connection and to provide a meaningful contribution to the discourse surrounding environmental degradation and renewable energy generation. Leveraging comprehensive data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, our investigation was underpinned by rigorous statistical analysis and a whimsical sense of wonderment.
As we navigate the sophisticated labyrinth of environmental economics, our study stands as a testament to the unexpected entanglements that emerge in our quest to understand the world around us. The revelations that emerge from our exploration not only provoke contemplation but also incite a sense of curiosity, inviting scholars and enthusiasts alike to ponder the intricate ballet of air pollution and hydropower energy with a blend of gravity and lightheartedness.
[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis revealed a notable correlation coefficient of 0.6981250 between air pollution in Salinas, California and hydropower energy generated in Guinea over the period from 1980 to 2020. This finding suggests a moderately strong positive linear relationship between the two variables. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.4873785 indicates that approximately 48.74% of the variance in hydropower energy generation can be explained by the variance in air pollution levels in Salinas.
Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 demonstrates the statistical significance of the relationship, providing robust evidence to reject the null hypothesis of no correlation between these disparate elements. To put it simply, the connection between air pollution in Salinas and hydropower energy in Guinea is not just a fluke; it's the real deal - a statistically significant duo dancing across continents and forcing us to reconsider our assumptions about environmental and energy dynamics.
As shown in Fig. 1, the scatterplot depicts the evident upward trend, illustrating the compelling association between air pollution and hydropower energy generation. The points on the plot align so harmoniously that one might even imagine a waltz of data points, gracefully indicating the synchronous rise and fall of these seemingly unrelated phenomena. This charming dance of correlation serves as a visual testament to the unexpected connections that can be uncovered through rigorous analysis and a hint of whimsy.
In conclusion, our findings shed light on the uncharted territory of the atmospheric and hydrological tango, challenging conventional wisdom and inspiring further exploration into the intriguing juxtaposition of air pollution and hydropower energy generation. With a nod to the unexpected collaborations that emerge in the realm of empirical inquiry, this study serves as a testament to the surprises waiting to be unearthed in the most unlikely pairings.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In the tangled web of environmental and energy dynamics, our investigation has brought to light an illuminating and, dare we say, electrifying correlation between air pollution in Salinas, California and hydropower energy generation in Guinea. The statistically robust linkage we have unraveled not only challenges conventional notions of cause and effect but also hints at the harmonious interplay of disparate elements on a global scale.
The visually captivating waltz of data points in the scatterplot serves as a gentle reminder of the elegant choreography of nature, where air and water perform an intricate dance that defies geographic boundaries and conventional wisdom. One might even imagine a melodious hum in the background as air pollution levels in Salinas and hydropower energy generation in Guinea harmonize in a statistical symphony that beckons further exploration and appreciation.
As we bid adieu to this captivating odyssey through the realms of atmospheric and hydrological interplay, we are left with a renewed sense of awe and a lingering curiosity about the unexpected alliances that await exploration in the vast terrain of empirical inquiry. The enigma of the interconnectedness of environmental degradation and renewable energy production has been momentarily unraveled, revealing a tableau of complexity and wonder that invites discerning minds to ponder and perhaps even waltz along with the data.
With this, we assert that no further research is needed in this beguiling domain, for the results of our investigation stand as a testament to the serendipitous revelations that can emerge when we peer through the lens of rigorous statistical analysis and a touch of whimsy.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Clearing the Air: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Salinas, California and Hydropower Energy Generated in Guinea. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
Journal of Ecological Dynamics and Global Energy
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Clearing the Air: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Salinas, California and Hydropower Energy Generated in Guinea. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Society for Global Environmental Research and Analysis (SGERA)
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Clearing the Air: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Salinas, California and Hydropower Energy Generated in Guinea with an abstract of In this paper, we delve into the paradoxically interconnected realms of air pollution in Salinas, California, and the generation of hydropower energy in Guinea. Unearthing the mysteries of these seemingly disparate phenomena, we employed data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration to scrutinize their curious and enigmatic relationship.
Our rigorous analysis uncovered a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.6981250 and a strikingly significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning 1980 to 2020. This statistical revelation sheds light on the intricate dance between environmental degradation and renewable energy production, offering a unique insight into the complex interplay of global forces.
Our study not only adds to the growing body of knowledge in environmental and energy economics but also serves as a poignant reminder of the power dynamics at play in our interconnected world. As we navigate the intricacies of environmental stewardship and energy generation, our findings invite further exploration into the whims and fancies of our Earth's intertwined ecosystems, where the currents of air and water conspire in ways that confound and captivate the curious researcher.
ChatGPT:
air pollution, Salinas California, hydropower energy, Guinea, correlation coefficient, p-value, Environmental Protection Agency, Energy Information Administration, environmental degradation, renewable energy production, global forces, environmental economics, energy economics, power dynamics, interconnected ecosystems, air and water currents
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Air pollution in Salinas, CaliforniaDetailed data title: Percentage of days 'unhealthy' or worse air quality in Salinas, CA
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Salinas, California
Hydopower energy generated in Guinea
Detailed data title: Total hydopower energy generated in Guinea in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Hydopower energy generated in Guinea
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.4873785 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 48.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Hydopower energy generated in Guinea) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Salinas, California) over the 41 years from 1980 through 2020.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.9E-7. 0.0000003892202641856874500000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.7 in 3.9E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 2,569,239 random variables You don't actually need 2 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 40 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 40 because we have two variables measured over a period of 41 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.5, 0.83 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1980 | 1981 | 1982 | 1983 | 1984 | 1985 | 1986 | 1987 | 1988 | 1989 | 1990 | 1991 | 1992 | 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | |
Air pollution in Salinas, California (Bad air quality days) | 0.819672 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.273973 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.273973 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.273973 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.18579 | 0 | 0.547945 | 0 | 3.00546 |
Hydopower energy generated in Guinea (Billion kWh) | 0.148 | 0.148 | 0.148 | 0.153 | 0.155 | 0.161 | 0.163 | 0.165 | 0.168 | 0.17 | 0.173 | 0.176 | 0.178 | 0.18 | 0.182 | 0.191 | 0.195 | 0.285 | 0.307 | 0.391 | 0.406 | 0.546 | 0.589 | 0.396 | 0.549 | 0.489 | 0.456 | 0.533 | 0.524 | 0.517 | 0.482 | 0.413 | 0.486 | 0.477 | 0.422 | 0.881 | 1.08384 | 1.21205 | 0.741024 | 1.29 | 2.47 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.
- Outlandish outliers: There are "outliers" in this data.
In concept, "outlier" just means "way different than the rest of your dataset." When calculating a correlation like this, they are particularly impactful because a single outlier can substantially increase your correlation.
For the purposes of this project, I counted a point as an outlier if it the residual was two standard deviations from the mean.
(This bullet point only shows up in the details page on charts that do, in fact, have outliers.)
They stand out on the scatterplot above: notice the dots that are far away from any other dots. I intentionally mishandeled outliers, which makes the correlation look extra strong.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.819672,0,0,0,0,0.273973,0,0,0,0.273973,0,0,0,0,0.273973,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,2.18579,0,0.547945,0,3.00546,])
array_2 = np.array([0.148,0.148,0.148,0.153,0.155,0.161,0.163,0.165,0.168,0.17,0.173,0.176,0.178,0.18,0.182,0.191,0.195,0.285,0.307,0.391,0.406,0.546,0.589,0.396,0.549,0.489,0.456,0.533,0.524,0.517,0.482,0.413,0.486,0.477,0.422,0.881,1.08384,1.21205,0.741024,1.29,2.47,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Salinas, California"
array_2_name = "Hydopower energy generated in Guinea"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Air pollution in Salinas, California
- Line chart for only Hydopower energy generated in Guinea
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Clearing the Air: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Salinas, California and Hydropower Energy Generated in Guinea
Thanks for shining a light on this correlation!
Correlation ID: 3509 · Black Variable ID: 21189 · Red Variable ID: 23710