about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,484 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Motor vehicle thefts in Hawaii and the second variable is Google searches for 'cia hotline'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

With fewer cars to hotwire for covert operations, the CIA had to find alternative modes of transportation, like asking nicely for a ride. Remember, car thieves and spies alike know the importance of a smooth getaway.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate a photo-realistic image of a serene Hawaiian beach at sunset. The palm trees sway gently in the breeze, casting long shadows on the sand as the fading sunlight illuminates a row of parked cars in the distance. The tranquil beachgoers chat and laugh, seemingly carefree with their belongings. A solitary figure sits on the sand, peering at their phone while leisurely sipping a tropical drink, feeling secure and at ease. The sound of crashing waves mingles with the occasional chirp of a seagull, creating a sense of calm and security. The absence of any suspicious activity or stolen vehicles reflects the peace and contentment of the scene, diminishing the awareness in covert operations and reducing searches for the 'cia hotline'. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Motor vehicle thefts in Hawaii and Google searches for 'cia hotline'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Surrealism Concept art A photo-realistic image Whimsical illustration Vaporwave
ChatGPT: A photo-realistic image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Motor vehicle thefts in Hawaii and Google searches for 'cia hotline', in the following situation: Decrease in Motor vehicle thefts in Hawaii caused cia hotline (Google searches for 'cia hotline') to decrease because with fewer cars being stolen, there were less opportunities for secret agents to go undercover in covert missions, leading to a decrease in interest and awareness of CIA operations, and therefore a decreased need for the CIA hotline.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: Imagine a serene Hawaiian beach at sunset, with palm trees swaying gently in the breeze. In the distance, a row of parked cars gleam under the fading sunlight, appearing safe and secure. Nearby, a group of relaxed beachgoers chat and laugh, seemingly carefree with their belongings. Meanwhile, a solitary figure sits on the sand, peering at their phone while leisurely sipping a tropical drink. The sound of crashing waves mingles with the occasional chirp of a seagull. In this tranquil setting, the absence of any suspicious activity or stolen vehicles creates a sense of calm and security. As a result, the figure on the beach hasn't felt the need to dial the CIA hotline, and Google searches for it have noticeably decreased, reflecting the diminished interest and awareness in covert operations. The scene embodies the reduced motor vehicle thefts in Hawaii and the consequent decrease in searches for the 'cia hotline', painting a picture of peace and contentment.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A photo-realistic image ] and depicting this scene: Imagine a serene Hawaiian beach at sunset, with palm trees swaying gently in the breeze. In the distance, a row of parked cars gleam under the fading sunlight, appearing safe and secure. Nearby, a group of relaxed beachgoers chat and laugh, seemingly carefree with their belongings. Meanwhile, a solitary figure sits on the sand, peering at their phone while leisurely sipping a tropical drink. The sound of crashing waves mingles with the occasional chirp of a seagull. In this tranquil setting, the absence of any suspicious activity or stolen vehicles creates a sense of calm and security. As a result, the figure on the beach hasn't felt the need to dial the CIA hotline, and Google searches for it have noticeably decreased, reflecting the diminished interest and awareness in covert operations. The scene embodies the reduced motor vehicle thefts in Hawaii and the consequent decrease in searches for the 'cia hotline', painting a picture of peace and contentment. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate a photo-realistic image of a serene Hawaiian beach at sunset. The palm trees sway gently in the breeze, casting long shadows on the sand as the fading sunlight illuminates a row of parked cars in the distance. The tranquil beachgoers chat and laugh, seemingly carefree with their belongings. A solitary figure sits on the sand, peering at their phone while leisurely sipping a tropical drink, feeling secure and at ease. The sound of crashing waves mingles with the occasional chirp of a seagull, creating a sense of calm and security. The absence of any suspicious activity or stolen vehicles reflects the peace and contentment of the scene, diminishing the awareness in covert operations and reducing searches for the 'cia hotline'.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Motor vehicle thefts in Hawaii caused cia hotline (Google searches for 'cia hotline') to decrease. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Hotline Hijinks: Investigating the Quirky Connection Between Motor Vehicle Thefts in Hawaii and Google Searches for 'CIA Hotline'

The Journal of Eccentric Social Patterns

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Motor vehicle thefts in Hawaii and Google searches for 'cia hotline'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8764487 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Hotline Hijinks: Investigating the Quirky Connection Between Motor Vehicle Thefts in Hawaii and Google Searches for 'CIA Hotline'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a surprisingly whimsical investigation into the unexpected relationship between motor vehicle thefts in Hawaii and Google searches for the 'CIA Hotline.' Our research team delved into this curious correlation using data from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Google Trends, spanning from 2004 to 2022. By employing statistical analysis, we uncovered a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8764487 and p < 0.01, eliciting both amusement and astonishment within the scholarly community. Our findings offer a tantalizing glimpse into the whimsical and erratic side of crime trends, demonstrating the potential for even the most eccentric variables to intertwine with real-world phenomena.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Motor vehicle thefts in Hawaii and Google searches for 'cia hotline'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Hotline Hijinks: Investigating the Quirky Connection Between Motor Vehicle Thefts in Hawaii and Google Searches for 'CIA Hotline'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a surprisingly whimsical investigation into the unexpected relationship between motor vehicle thefts in Hawaii and Google searches for the 'CIA Hotline.' Our research team delved into this curious correlation using data from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Google Trends, spanning from 2004 to 2022. By employing statistical analysis, we uncovered a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8764487 and p < 0.01, eliciting both amusement and astonishment within the scholarly community. Our findings offer a tantalizing glimpse into the whimsical and erratic side of crime trends, demonstrating the potential for even the most eccentric variables to intertwine with real-world phenomena.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
Since the dawn of academic inquiry, researchers have sought to unravel the mysteries of seemingly unrelated phenomena that inexplicably intersect in the realms of statistical analysis. One such enigma that has piqued our curiosity is the uncanny connection between motor vehicle thefts in the idyllic paradise of Hawaii and the Google search interest in the 'CIA Hotline'. While this correlation may initially seem as unlikely as a surfing penguin, our investigation has revealed a surprisingly robust and thought-provoking relationship between these seemingly incongruous variables.

The peculiar juxtaposition of a tropical haven plagued by a disproportionate number of stolen vehicles and the clandestine allure of clandestine agency hotlines raises eyebrows and conjures an air of intrigue. As we dive into this unorthodox nexus, one cannot help but wonder if the search for the 'CIA Hotline' is a whimsical diversion for would-be car thieves, a clever ruse concocted by clever criminals, or merely a case of statistical serendipity that tickles the fancy of the scholarly community.

While it may seem as though this investigation veers into the realm of the absurd, the empirical evidence we have amassed offers a compelling case for the genuine relationship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Through a rigorous and methodical analysis of data spanning nearly two decades, we aim to shed light on this convivial correlation with a piquant blend of levity and academic rigor.

Upon embarking on this curious inquiry, one cannot help but be reminded of the whimsical whimsies of Sherlock Holmes as he declares, "The game is afoot!" Indeed, our quest for understanding the underlying dynamics of this whimsical correlation is infused with intellectual curiosity, statistical fortitude, and a dash of mirthful charm. Without further ado, let us journey into the uncharted territory where the 'CIA Hotline' hotline and motor vehicle thefts converge – a place where statistical aberrations meet a merry dance of causality and correlation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Motor vehicle thefts in Hawaii and Google searches for 'cia hotline'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Hotline Hijinks: Investigating the Quirky Connection Between Motor Vehicle Thefts in Hawaii and Google Searches for 'CIA Hotline'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a surprisingly whimsical investigation into the unexpected relationship between motor vehicle thefts in Hawaii and Google searches for the 'CIA Hotline.' Our research team delved into this curious correlation using data from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Google Trends, spanning from 2004 to 2022. By employing statistical analysis, we uncovered a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8764487 and p < 0.01, eliciting both amusement and astonishment within the scholarly community. Our findings offer a tantalizing glimpse into the whimsical and erratic side of crime trends, demonstrating the potential for even the most eccentric variables to intertwine with real-world phenomena.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Since the dawn of academic inquiry, researchers have sought to unravel the mysteries of seemingly unrelated phenomena that inexplicably intersect in the realms of statistical analysis. One such enigma that has piqued our curiosity is the uncanny connection between motor vehicle thefts in the idyllic paradise of Hawaii and the Google search interest in the 'CIA Hotline'. While this correlation may initially seem as unlikely as a surfing penguin, our investigation has revealed a surprisingly robust and thought-provoking relationship between these seemingly incongruous variables.
The peculiar juxtaposition of a tropical haven plagued by a disproportionate number of stolen vehicles and the clandestine allure of clandestine agency hotlines raises eyebrows and conjures an air of intrigue. As we dive into this unorthodox nexus, one cannot help but wonder if the search for the 'CIA Hotline' is a whimsical diversion for would-be car thieves, a clever ruse concocted by clever criminals, or merely a case of statistical serendipity that tickles the fancy of the scholarly community.
While it may seem as though this investigation veers into the realm of the absurd, the empirical evidence we have amassed offers a compelling case for the genuine relationship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Through a rigorous and methodical analysis of data spanning nearly two decades, we aim to shed light on this convivial correlation with a piquant blend of levity and academic rigor.
Upon embarking on this curious inquiry, one cannot help but be reminded of the whimsical whimsies of Sherlock Holmes as he declares, "The game is afoot!" Indeed, our quest for understanding the underlying dynamics of this whimsical correlation is infused with intellectual curiosity, statistical fortitude, and a dash of mirthful charm. Without further ado, let us journey into the uncharted territory where the 'CIA Hotline' hotline and motor vehicle thefts converge – a place where statistical aberrations meet a merry dance of causality and correlation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Smith et al.," the authors find a significant positive correlation between motor vehicle thefts in Hawaii and Google searches for 'CIA Hotline,' raising eyebrows and prompting a cascade of confounded chuckles within the scholarly community. This unexpected correlation, akin to stumbling upon a pineapple wearing sunglasses, has intrigued researchers and ignited a fervent quest to comprehend the inexplicable interplay of these seemingly dissonant variables.

Doe and Jones expanded on this notion, delving further into the whimsical world of statistical anomalies and discovering a spirited association between tropical crime escapades and clandestine hotline inquiries. The juxtaposition of these phenomena evokes a sense of surrealism, not unlike encountering a hula-dancing unicorn on the shores of Waikiki.

Furthermore, "Lorem Ipsum" provides a sobering yet comical analysis of the historical context of motor vehicle thefts in Hawaii, elucidating the gravity of the issue while simultaneously evoking visions of car thieves surfing the waves of statistical peculiarity like a particularly larcenous Moana.

Turning to the broader cultural context, "The Art of War" by Sun Tzu sheds light on the strategic maneuvers and deceptive ploys employed by would-be car thieves, akin to clandestine operatives skulking through the complex web of statistical relevance, while "Steal Like an Artist" by Austin Kleon humorously examines the artistry involved in the pilfering of motor vehicles and the surreptitious search for unconventional hotlines.

In the realm of fiction, the whimsical interplay of the 'CIA Hotline' and motor vehicle thefts brings to mind the audacious exploits of the Hardy Boys in "The Shore Road Mystery," where the intrepid sleuths navigate a labyrinth of clues and capers, much like researchers navigating the convoluted pathway towards understanding this uncanny correlation.

Moreover, the enigmatic world of Carmen Sandiego and her globe-trotting escapades, as depicted in the eponymous children's show, embodies the clandestine allure and sense of adventure that permeates the search for the 'CIA Hotline' amidst the backdrop of motor vehicle thefts in the aloha state.

In a delightful departure from the conventional academic literature landscape, the convergence of statistical quirkiness and whimsical intrigue in this domain fosters a sense of intellectual playfulness and scholarly merriment, prompting researchers to embark on an exhilarating quest to decipher the merry dance of correlation and causality between motor vehicle thefts in Hawaii and Google searches for the 'CIA Hotline.'


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Motor vehicle thefts in Hawaii and Google searches for 'cia hotline'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Hotline Hijinks: Investigating the Quirky Connection Between Motor Vehicle Thefts in Hawaii and Google Searches for 'CIA Hotline'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a surprisingly whimsical investigation into the unexpected relationship between motor vehicle thefts in Hawaii and Google searches for the 'CIA Hotline.' Our research team delved into this curious correlation using data from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Google Trends, spanning from 2004 to 2022. By employing statistical analysis, we uncovered a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8764487 and p < 0.01, eliciting both amusement and astonishment within the scholarly community. Our findings offer a tantalizing glimpse into the whimsical and erratic side of crime trends, demonstrating the potential for even the most eccentric variables to intertwine with real-world phenomena.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Since the dawn of academic inquiry, researchers have sought to unravel the mysteries of seemingly unrelated phenomena that inexplicably intersect in the realms of statistical analysis. One such enigma that has piqued our curiosity is the uncanny connection between motor vehicle thefts in the idyllic paradise of Hawaii and the Google search interest in the 'CIA Hotline'. While this correlation may initially seem as unlikely as a surfing penguin, our investigation has revealed a surprisingly robust and thought-provoking relationship between these seemingly incongruous variables.
The peculiar juxtaposition of a tropical haven plagued by a disproportionate number of stolen vehicles and the clandestine allure of clandestine agency hotlines raises eyebrows and conjures an air of intrigue. As we dive into this unorthodox nexus, one cannot help but wonder if the search for the 'CIA Hotline' is a whimsical diversion for would-be car thieves, a clever ruse concocted by clever criminals, or merely a case of statistical serendipity that tickles the fancy of the scholarly community.
While it may seem as though this investigation veers into the realm of the absurd, the empirical evidence we have amassed offers a compelling case for the genuine relationship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Through a rigorous and methodical analysis of data spanning nearly two decades, we aim to shed light on this convivial correlation with a piquant blend of levity and academic rigor.
Upon embarking on this curious inquiry, one cannot help but be reminded of the whimsical whimsies of Sherlock Holmes as he declares, "The game is afoot!" Indeed, our quest for understanding the underlying dynamics of this whimsical correlation is infused with intellectual curiosity, statistical fortitude, and a dash of mirthful charm. Without further ado, let us journey into the uncharted territory where the 'CIA Hotline' hotline and motor vehicle thefts converge – a place where statistical aberrations meet a merry dance of causality and correlation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To untangle the enigmatic web woven by the quirky correlation between motor vehicle thefts in Hawaii and the Google searches for 'CIA Hotline', our research team embarked on a methodical and whimsically adventurous journey. The data utilized in our investigation were predominantly gleaned from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Google Trends, embracing information spanning from 2004 to 2022.

The first step of our esoteric escapade was to procure comprehensive data on the incidence of motor vehicle thefts in the picturesque archipelago of Hawaii. Through a most serpentine and plunging into the depths of the interwebs, we absconded with a trove of official records from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, purloining data from law enforcement agencies across the islands. This clandestine operation allowed us to meticulously assemble an elaborate mosaic of stolen vehicles, which served as the pivot point for our beguiling investigation.

With our collection of pilfered data in hand, we embarked on a raucous romp through the digital landscape to wrangle the Google search interest for the 'CIA Hotline'. Through the employ of Google Trends – a digital oracle that illuminates the ebbing and flowing tides of search queries – we frolicked through an abundance of peculiar search patterns. The captivating data on the fluctuations of 'CIA Hotline' searches, spanning from the emergence of 2004 to the present day, provided an entrancing window into the capricious hearts and minds of cyber voyagers.

Having snatched this veritable treasure trove of data, we then donned our scholarly spectacles and took to statistical analyses with gusto. Wielding the formidable powers of correlation coefficient calculations and p-values, we sought to disentangle the ebullient entwining of motor vehicle thefts and the 'CIA Hotline' searches. Employing a series of regression analyses, we endeavored to ascertain the extent to which these seemingly unrelated phenomena frolicked together in the whimsical waltz of statistical significance.

Moreover, to safeguard against mischievous confounding variables attempting to hoodwink our meticulous analyses, we conducted a plethora of robustness checks and sensitivity analyses. This ensured that our findings stood firm against the capricious winds of statistical misfortune and remained steadfast in their revelatory whimsy.

With the meticulous examination of these diverse data sources and the spirited application of statistical rigor, we endeavored to pen a scholarly odyssey that not only illuminates the unconventional link between motor vehicle thefts in Hawaii and the search for the 'CIA Hotline' but also imbues the reader with a sense of jovial wonderment at the fascinating quirks of statistical inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Motor vehicle thefts in Hawaii and Google searches for 'cia hotline'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8764487, r-squared of 0.7681623, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Hotline Hijinks: Investigating the Quirky Connection Between Motor Vehicle Thefts in Hawaii and Google Searches for 'CIA Hotline'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a surprisingly whimsical investigation into the unexpected relationship between motor vehicle thefts in Hawaii and Google searches for the 'CIA Hotline.' Our research team delved into this curious correlation using data from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Google Trends, spanning from 2004 to 2022. By employing statistical analysis, we uncovered a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8764487 and p < 0.01, eliciting both amusement and astonishment within the scholarly community. Our findings offer a tantalizing glimpse into the whimsical and erratic side of crime trends, demonstrating the potential for even the most eccentric variables to intertwine with real-world phenomena.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Since the dawn of academic inquiry, researchers have sought to unravel the mysteries of seemingly unrelated phenomena that inexplicably intersect in the realms of statistical analysis. One such enigma that has piqued our curiosity is the uncanny connection between motor vehicle thefts in the idyllic paradise of Hawaii and the Google search interest in the 'CIA Hotline'. While this correlation may initially seem as unlikely as a surfing penguin, our investigation has revealed a surprisingly robust and thought-provoking relationship between these seemingly incongruous variables.
The peculiar juxtaposition of a tropical haven plagued by a disproportionate number of stolen vehicles and the clandestine allure of clandestine agency hotlines raises eyebrows and conjures an air of intrigue. As we dive into this unorthodox nexus, one cannot help but wonder if the search for the 'CIA Hotline' is a whimsical diversion for would-be car thieves, a clever ruse concocted by clever criminals, or merely a case of statistical serendipity that tickles the fancy of the scholarly community.
While it may seem as though this investigation veers into the realm of the absurd, the empirical evidence we have amassed offers a compelling case for the genuine relationship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Through a rigorous and methodical analysis of data spanning nearly two decades, we aim to shed light on this convivial correlation with a piquant blend of levity and academic rigor.
Upon embarking on this curious inquiry, one cannot help but be reminded of the whimsical whimsies of Sherlock Holmes as he declares, "The game is afoot!" Indeed, our quest for understanding the underlying dynamics of this whimsical correlation is infused with intellectual curiosity, statistical fortitude, and a dash of mirthful charm. Without further ado, let us journey into the uncharted territory where the 'CIA Hotline' hotline and motor vehicle thefts converge – a place where statistical aberrations meet a merry dance of causality and correlation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Upon conducting our rigorous statistical analysis, we uncovered an unexpectedly robust correlation between motor vehicle thefts in Hawaii and Google searches for the 'CIA Hotline'. The correlation coefficient of 0.8764487 indicates a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables, garnering both scholarly intrigue and a touch of amusement.

The r-squared value of 0.7681623 suggests that approximately 76.82% of the variance in motor vehicle thefts can be explained by the variance in 'CIA Hotline' searches. This remarkable level of explanation is not unlike stumbling upon a rare tropical bird in the midst of a statistical wilderness – an enlightening discovery that captivates and amuses in equal measure.

Furthermore, the p-value of < 0.01 provides compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis, affirming that the observed correlation is indeed statistically significant. This result invites the scholarly community to engage in a playful dance of deduction and curiosity, reminiscent of a thrilling detective novel where improbable connections lead to fascinating insights.

To visually encapsulate this vivacious correlation, we present a scatterplot (Fig. 1) that graphically illustrates the strong association between motor vehicle thefts in Hawaii and Google searches for the 'CIA Hotline.' This compelling visual representation effectively captures the essence of our findings and invites contemplation as to the whimsical interplay of these eccentric variables.

In summary, our investigation into the enigmatic relationship between motor vehicle thefts in Hawaii and Google searches for the 'CIA Hotline' has yielded a series of statistically significant and decidedly whimsical findings. These results not only add a dash of levity to the realm of statistical analysis but also underscore the delightful intricacies that lie at the intersection of seemingly unrelated phenomena.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Motor vehicle thefts in Hawaii and Google searches for 'cia hotline'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Hotline Hijinks: Investigating the Quirky Connection Between Motor Vehicle Thefts in Hawaii and Google Searches for 'CIA Hotline'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a surprisingly whimsical investigation into the unexpected relationship between motor vehicle thefts in Hawaii and Google searches for the 'CIA Hotline.' Our research team delved into this curious correlation using data from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Google Trends, spanning from 2004 to 2022. By employing statistical analysis, we uncovered a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8764487 and p < 0.01, eliciting both amusement and astonishment within the scholarly community. Our findings offer a tantalizing glimpse into the whimsical and erratic side of crime trends, demonstrating the potential for even the most eccentric variables to intertwine with real-world phenomena.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al.," the authors find a significant positive correlation between motor vehicle thefts in Hawaii and Google searches for 'CIA Hotline,' raising eyebrows and prompting a cascade of confounded chuckles within the scholarly community. This unexpected correlation, akin to stumbling upon a pineapple wearing sunglasses, has intrigued researchers and ignited a fervent quest to comprehend the inexplicable interplay of these seemingly dissonant variables.
Doe and Jones expanded on this notion, delving further into the whimsical world of statistical anomalies and discovering a spirited association between tropical crime escapades and clandestine hotline inquiries. The juxtaposition of these phenomena evokes a sense of surrealism, not unlike encountering a hula-dancing unicorn on the shores of Waikiki.
Furthermore, "Lorem Ipsum" provides a sobering yet comical analysis of the historical context of motor vehicle thefts in Hawaii, elucidating the gravity of the issue while simultaneously evoking visions of car thieves surfing the waves of statistical peculiarity like a particularly larcenous Moana.
Turning to the broader cultural context, "The Art of War" by Sun Tzu sheds light on the strategic maneuvers and deceptive ploys employed by would-be car thieves, akin to clandestine operatives skulking through the complex web of statistical relevance, while "Steal Like an Artist" by Austin Kleon humorously examines the artistry involved in the pilfering of motor vehicles and the surreptitious search for unconventional hotlines.
In the realm of fiction, the whimsical interplay of the 'CIA Hotline' and motor vehicle thefts brings to mind the audacious exploits of the Hardy Boys in "The Shore Road Mystery," where the intrepid sleuths navigate a labyrinth of clues and capers, much like researchers navigating the convoluted pathway towards understanding this uncanny correlation.
Moreover, the enigmatic world of Carmen Sandiego and her globe-trotting escapades, as depicted in the eponymous children's show, embodies the clandestine allure and sense of adventure that permeates the search for the 'CIA Hotline' amidst the backdrop of motor vehicle thefts in the aloha state.
In a delightful departure from the conventional academic literature landscape, the convergence of statistical quirkiness and whimsical intrigue in this domain fosters a sense of intellectual playfulness and scholarly merriment, prompting researchers to embark on an exhilarating quest to decipher the merry dance of correlation and causality between motor vehicle thefts in Hawaii and Google searches for the 'CIA Hotline.'

[[RESULTS]]
Upon conducting our rigorous statistical analysis, we uncovered an unexpectedly robust correlation between motor vehicle thefts in Hawaii and Google searches for the 'CIA Hotline'. The correlation coefficient of 0.8764487 indicates a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables, garnering both scholarly intrigue and a touch of amusement.
The r-squared value of 0.7681623 suggests that approximately 76.82% of the variance in motor vehicle thefts can be explained by the variance in 'CIA Hotline' searches. This remarkable level of explanation is not unlike stumbling upon a rare tropical bird in the midst of a statistical wilderness – an enlightening discovery that captivates and amuses in equal measure.
Furthermore, the p-value of < 0.01 provides compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis, affirming that the observed correlation is indeed statistically significant. This result invites the scholarly community to engage in a playful dance of deduction and curiosity, reminiscent of a thrilling detective novel where improbable connections lead to fascinating insights.
To visually encapsulate this vivacious correlation, we present a scatterplot (Fig. 1) that graphically illustrates the strong association between motor vehicle thefts in Hawaii and Google searches for the 'CIA Hotline.' This compelling visual representation effectively captures the essence of our findings and invites contemplation as to the whimsical interplay of these eccentric variables.
In summary, our investigation into the enigmatic relationship between motor vehicle thefts in Hawaii and Google searches for the 'CIA Hotline' has yielded a series of statistically significant and decidedly whimsical findings. These results not only add a dash of levity to the realm of statistical analysis but also underscore the delightful intricacies that lie at the intersection of seemingly unrelated phenomena.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The robust correlation we uncovered between motor vehicle thefts in Hawaii and Google searches for the 'CIA Hotline' has sent ripples of surprise and amusement through the scholarly community. Our findings not only support the prior research conducted by Smith et al, Doe and Jones, and Lorem Ipsum, but also add a touch of whimsy to the stoic realm of statistical analysis. Similar to how a sunny day can unexpectedly turn into a downpour in the tropics, the unexpected relationship we observed prompts us to reconsider the nature of crime trends and their peculiar interactions with seemingly unrelated variables.

The previous investigations into the correlation between the 'CIA Hotline' searches and motor vehicle thefts in Hawaii were met with raised eyebrows. However, our results have provided substantial validation to these prior inquiries, thereby bolstering the scholarly merit of this quirkily captivating field. The statistical significance of our findings, akin to stumbling upon a buried treasure map in a statistical wilderness, leaves little room for doubt regarding the spirited association between these seemingly unrelated phenomena.

Our results not only raise thought-provoking questions about the underlying mechanisms driving this correlation but also inject a splash of mirth into the otherwise serious discourse on crime trends. The juxtaposition of the mundane crime of motor vehicle thefts with the clandestine allure of a 'CIA Hotline' search paints a vivid tableau of statistical quirkiness that captures the academic imagination like a dramatic plot twist in a detective novel.

Furthermore, the visual representation of our findings in the form of a scatterplot fosters a sense of scholarly playfulness and intellectual engagement. This graphic portrayal, akin to stumbling upon an unexpected sculpture in the midst of a statistical museum, serves as a delightful visual testament to the enchanting interplay of these eccentric variables.

In conclusion, our findings not only stand as a testament to the spirited association between motor vehicle thefts in Hawaii and Google searches for the 'CIA Hotline' but also serve as a lighthearted reminder that statistical analysis can yield unexpected and whimsical insights. This investigation into the delightful quirks of correlation and causality serves as a testament to the curious and merry dance of statistical relevance, prompting scholars to peer into the enigmatic world of crime trends with a gleam of intellectual curiosity and a dash of humor.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Motor vehicle thefts in Hawaii and Google searches for 'cia hotline'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Hotline Hijinks: Investigating the Quirky Connection Between Motor Vehicle Thefts in Hawaii and Google Searches for 'CIA Hotline'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a surprisingly whimsical investigation into the unexpected relationship between motor vehicle thefts in Hawaii and Google searches for the 'CIA Hotline.' Our research team delved into this curious correlation using data from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Google Trends, spanning from 2004 to 2022. By employing statistical analysis, we uncovered a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8764487 and p < 0.01, eliciting both amusement and astonishment within the scholarly community. Our findings offer a tantalizing glimpse into the whimsical and erratic side of crime trends, demonstrating the potential for even the most eccentric variables to intertwine with real-world phenomena.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Since the dawn of academic inquiry, researchers have sought to unravel the mysteries of seemingly unrelated phenomena that inexplicably intersect in the realms of statistical analysis. One such enigma that has piqued our curiosity is the uncanny connection between motor vehicle thefts in the idyllic paradise of Hawaii and the Google search interest in the 'CIA Hotline'. While this correlation may initially seem as unlikely as a surfing penguin, our investigation has revealed a surprisingly robust and thought-provoking relationship between these seemingly incongruous variables.
The peculiar juxtaposition of a tropical haven plagued by a disproportionate number of stolen vehicles and the clandestine allure of clandestine agency hotlines raises eyebrows and conjures an air of intrigue. As we dive into this unorthodox nexus, one cannot help but wonder if the search for the 'CIA Hotline' is a whimsical diversion for would-be car thieves, a clever ruse concocted by clever criminals, or merely a case of statistical serendipity that tickles the fancy of the scholarly community.
While it may seem as though this investigation veers into the realm of the absurd, the empirical evidence we have amassed offers a compelling case for the genuine relationship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Through a rigorous and methodical analysis of data spanning nearly two decades, we aim to shed light on this convivial correlation with a piquant blend of levity and academic rigor.
Upon embarking on this curious inquiry, one cannot help but be reminded of the whimsical whimsies of Sherlock Holmes as he declares, "The game is afoot!" Indeed, our quest for understanding the underlying dynamics of this whimsical correlation is infused with intellectual curiosity, statistical fortitude, and a dash of mirthful charm. Without further ado, let us journey into the uncharted territory where the 'CIA Hotline' hotline and motor vehicle thefts converge – a place where statistical aberrations meet a merry dance of causality and correlation.

[[RESULTS]]
Upon conducting our rigorous statistical analysis, we uncovered an unexpectedly robust correlation between motor vehicle thefts in Hawaii and Google searches for the 'CIA Hotline'. The correlation coefficient of 0.8764487 indicates a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables, garnering both scholarly intrigue and a touch of amusement.
The r-squared value of 0.7681623 suggests that approximately 76.82% of the variance in motor vehicle thefts can be explained by the variance in 'CIA Hotline' searches. This remarkable level of explanation is not unlike stumbling upon a rare tropical bird in the midst of a statistical wilderness – an enlightening discovery that captivates and amuses in equal measure.
Furthermore, the p-value of < 0.01 provides compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis, affirming that the observed correlation is indeed statistically significant. This result invites the scholarly community to engage in a playful dance of deduction and curiosity, reminiscent of a thrilling detective novel where improbable connections lead to fascinating insights.
To visually encapsulate this vivacious correlation, we present a scatterplot (Fig. 1) that graphically illustrates the strong association between motor vehicle thefts in Hawaii and Google searches for the 'CIA Hotline.' This compelling visual representation effectively captures the essence of our findings and invites contemplation as to the whimsical interplay of these eccentric variables.
In summary, our investigation into the enigmatic relationship between motor vehicle thefts in Hawaii and Google searches for the 'CIA Hotline' has yielded a series of statistically significant and decidedly whimsical findings. These results not only add a dash of levity to the realm of statistical analysis but also underscore the delightful intricacies that lie at the intersection of seemingly unrelated phenomena.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation into the quirky correlation between motor vehicle thefts in Hawaii and Google searches for the 'CIA Hotline' has unveiled a delightfully robust relationship that has left the scholarly community simultaneously bemused and intrigued. The statistical dance of deduction has led us on a merry chase through the realms of causality, leaving us with a bouquet of statistical significance wrapped in a whimsical bow.

The substantial correlation coefficient akin to a tropical sun's warmth, and the p-value that gleams like a hidden gem in the statistical underbrush, provide compelling evidence of this unexpected relationship. Our findings evoke the image of a mischievous dolphin playfully leaping through the waves of data, offering a splash of levity amidst the rigors of statistical inquiry.

As we close this chapter of whimsical juxtapositions, it is clear that no further examination of this unexpected correlation is needed. The mystery of the 'CIA Hotline' and motor vehicle thefts in Hawaii has been unveiled, leaving the scholarly community with a lighthearted tale of statistical serendipity to ponder and enjoy. After all, sometimes even in the rigorous realm of academic inquiry, a bit of whimsy adds a dash of excitement to our quest for knowledge.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Hotline Hijinks: Investigating the Quirky Connection Between Motor Vehicle Thefts in Hawaii and Google Searches for 'CIA Hotline'. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Eccentric Social Patterns


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Hotline Hijinks: Investigating the Quirky Connection Between Motor Vehicle Thefts in Hawaii and Google Searches for 'CIA Hotline'. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

Society for the Study of Mysterious Driveway Phenomena


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Hotline Hijinks: Investigating the Quirky Connection Between Motor Vehicle Thefts in Hawaii and Google Searches for 'CIA Hotline' with an abstract of This paper presents a surprisingly whimsical investigation into the unexpected relationship between motor vehicle thefts in Hawaii and Google searches for the 'CIA Hotline.' Our research team delved into this curious correlation using data from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Google Trends, spanning from 2004 to 2022. By employing statistical analysis, we uncovered a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8764487 and p < 0.01, eliciting both amusement and astonishment within the scholarly community. Our findings offer a tantalizing glimpse into the whimsical and erratic side of crime trends, demonstrating the potential for even the most eccentric variables to intertwine with real-world phenomena.

ChatGPT:

motor vehicle thefts, Hawaii, Google searches, CIA Hotline, correlation coefficient, statistical analysis, crime trends, FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, Google Trends

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Motor vehicle thefts in Hawaii
Detailed data title: The motor vehicle theft rate per 100,000 residents in Hawaii
Source: FBI Criminal Justice Information Services
See what else correlates with Motor vehicle thefts in Hawaii

Google searches for 'cia hotline'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'cia hotline' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'cia hotline'

Correlation r = 0.8764487 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7681623 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 76.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'cia hotline') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Motor vehicle thefts in Hawaii) over the 19 years from 2004 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 8.61E-7. 0.0000008609950244328750000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.88 in 8.61E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,161,447 random variables You don't actually need 1 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 18 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 18 because we have two variables measured over a period of 19 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.7, 0.95 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Motor vehicle thefts in Hawaii (Motor Vehicle Theft rate)683717.4602489.6397.1375387.3324.3278323.7390.7379.9384.9370402.5367.7379.8435.1407
Google searches for 'cia hotline' (Rel. search volume)15.166711.754.083332.08333112.333331.166671.083330.6666670.3333331.251.251.250.50.750.58333311.16667




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([683,717.4,602,489.6,397.1,375,387.3,324.3,278,323.7,390.7,379.9,384.9,370,402.5,367.7,379.8,435.1,407,])
array_2 = np.array([15.1667,11.75,4.08333,2.08333,1,1,2.33333,1.16667,1.08333,0.666667,0.333333,1.25,1.25,1.25,0.5,0.75,0.583333,1,1.16667,])
array_1_name = "Motor vehicle thefts in Hawaii"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'cia hotline'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are top-notch!


Correlation ID: 3484 · Black Variable ID: 20148 · Red Variable ID: 1394
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0