about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,482 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of university economics teachers in Idaho and the second variable is Fossil fuel use in Bosnia and Herzegovina.  The chart goes from 2010 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of university economics teachers in Idaho increased, there was a corresponding surge in the discussion of supply and demand. This led to a bizarrely specific focus on the fossil fuel market in Bosnia and Herzegovina during lectures. Students, eager to impress their professors, began organizing random international fossil fuel purchasing events, leading to a peculiarly high demand. This unexpected spike in demand caught Bosnian and Herzegovinian suppliers off guard, prompting them to ramp up production and consumption, ultimately leading to increased fossil fuel use in the region.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate an image that juxtaposes a vibrant college classroom in Idaho with the rolling hills of Bosnia and Herzegovina. In the classroom, eager students actively engage with their economics professor as he explains supply and demand principles, creating an atmosphere of curiosity and understanding. Outside, in the hills of Bosnia and Herzegovina, plumes of smoke rise into the sky as machines and vehicles powered by fossil fuels hum along, reflecting the increased appreciation for fossil fuels driven by a growing understanding of market forces. The scene should capture the stark contrast between the energy of learning and the environmental impact of industry. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of university economics teachers in Idaho and Fossil fuel use in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Parallax art a funny image you would see on reddit Photorealism Oragami Cybernetic art
ChatGPT: a funny image you would see on reddit

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of university economics teachers in Idaho and Fossil fuel use in Bosnia and Herzegovina, in the following situation: Because as the number of university economics teachers in Idaho increases, so does the focus on supply and demand principles, leading to a greater understanding of market forces. With this newfound knowledge, there is a greater appreciation for the value of fossil fuels, which inadvertently encourages their use in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The trickle-down effect of economics education is fueling the fire, quite literally, for fossil fuel consumption in the region.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a vibrant college classroom in Idaho, a group of eager students eagerly listens as their economics professor explains supply and demand principles. The room is filled with the energy of curiosity and understanding. Meanwhile, in the rolling hills of Bosnia and Herzegovina, plumes of smoke rise into the sky as machines and vehicles powered by fossil fuels hum along, a direct result of the increased appreciation for fossil fuels driven by the growing understanding of market forces.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a funny image you would see on reddit ] and depicting this scene: In a vibrant college classroom in Idaho, a group of eager students eagerly listens as their economics professor explains supply and demand principles. The room is filled with the energy of curiosity and understanding. Meanwhile, in the rolling hills of Bosnia and Herzegovina, plumes of smoke rise into the sky as machines and vehicles powered by fossil fuels hum along, a direct result of the increased appreciation for fossil fuels driven by the growing understanding of market forces. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate an image that juxtaposes a vibrant college classroom in Idaho with the rolling hills of Bosnia and Herzegovina. In the classroom, eager students actively engage with their economics professor as he explains supply and demand principles, creating an atmosphere of curiosity and understanding. Outside, in the hills of Bosnia and Herzegovina, plumes of smoke rise into the sky as machines and vehicles powered by fossil fuels hum along, reflecting the increased appreciation for fossil fuels driven by a growing understanding of market forces. The scene should capture the stark contrast between the energy of learning and the environmental impact of industry.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in The number of university economics teachers in Idaho positively influenced Fossil fuel use in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Economics Educators in Idaho and Fossil Fuel Follies in Bosnia and Herzegovina: A Rhyming Correlation

The Journal of Eclectic Economics and Eccentric Energies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university economics teachers in Idaho and Fossil fuel use in Bosnia and Herzegovina. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7693563 and p < 0.01 for 2010 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Economics Educators in Idaho and Fossil Fuel Follies in Bosnia and Herzegovina: A Rhyming Correlation

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to uncover the unexpected connection between the number of university economics teachers in Idaho and the fossil fuel use in Bosnia and Herzegovina. With a diligence that would impress even the most avid hiker, we scoured through data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. To our surprise, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.7693563 and p < 0.01 for the period of 2010 to 2020. It seems that when it comes to economic education and fossil fuel consumption, there's more than meets the eye - or in this case, more than meets the EIA.

Now, onto the good old dad joke. What do you call an economist who's also a magician? An econo-magician! It seems that the correlation we found truly works like a magic trick, but unlike a good magic show, there's no smoke and mirrors involved. Our findings suggest a link between the number of economics teachers and energy choices - a connection that can't simply be dismissed as "fake news." It looks like economics educators in the Gem State might be making waves in the energy sector across the globe, proving that even Idaho's taters aren't the only thing attracting attention internationally.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university economics teachers in Idaho and Fossil fuel use in Bosnia and Herzegovina. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Economics Educators in Idaho and Fossil Fuel Follies in Bosnia and Herzegovina: A Rhyming Correlation

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to uncover the unexpected connection between the number of university economics teachers in Idaho and the fossil fuel use in Bosnia and Herzegovina. With a diligence that would impress even the most avid hiker, we scoured through data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. To our surprise, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.7693563 and p < 0.01 for the period of 2010 to 2020. It seems that when it comes to economic education and fossil fuel consumption, there's more than meets the eye - or in this case, more than meets the EIA.

Now, onto the good old dad joke. What do you call an economist who's also a magician? An econo-magician! It seems that the correlation we found truly works like a magic trick, but unlike a good magic show, there's no smoke and mirrors involved. Our findings suggest a link between the number of economics teachers and energy choices - a connection that can't simply be dismissed as "fake news." It looks like economics educators in the Gem State might be making waves in the energy sector across the globe, proving that even Idaho's taters aren't the only thing attracting attention internationally.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

As the world grapples with the complex interplay of economic and environmental challenges, understanding the interconnected web of factors at play becomes increasingly crucial. The pursuit of knowledge often leads us down unexpected paths, much like how a hike in the woods can reveal a hidden treasure trove of puns. In this study, we sought to untangle the enigmatic relationship between the number of university economics teachers in Idaho and the fossil fuel usage in Bosnia and Herzegovina. While this correlation may seem as unlikely as finding a Yeti in the Idaho wilderness, our findings present a compelling narrative that demands attention.

Speaking of unexpected connections, did you hear about the economist who was also a stand-up comedian? He really knew how to "work the room" – much like how we've sought to uncover the hidden workings at play in the global energy landscape. Our exploration into this peculiar correlation has been anything but a dry, statistical endeavor. Here, we embark upon a journey that promises both insight and amusement, much like a roller coaster ride for the scientifically inclined.

Economics and energy – two seemingly disparate fields – converge in our study with the flair of a daring trapeze act. Our investigation delves into the annals of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, as though we were deciphering a cryptic set of clues in a thrilling adventure novel. Our pursuit of truth may not involve dodging boulders or outrunning ancient traps, but it certainly feels as exhilarating as a scholarly Indiana Jones expedition.

Now, for our next dad joke installment: Why did the economist bring a ladder to the bar? He heard the drinks were on the house! Much like the economist's cunning plan, our analysis aims to raise the bar in understanding the uncharted territory of economic education and energy consumption. The ties we've unraveled between Idaho's economic educators and Bosnia's fuel consumption may seem as improbable as an economist telling bar jokes, but our results speak for themselves.

As we venture forth into this labyrinth of data and correlations, let us remember that even the most obscure connections can shed light on vital global dynamics. Our journey promises not only to uncover unexpected truths but also to sprinkle in a healthy dose of mirth and whimsy amidst the serious pursuit of knowledge – much like finding a hidden Easter egg in a densely coded statistical model.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university economics teachers in Idaho and Fossil fuel use in Bosnia and Herzegovina. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Economics Educators in Idaho and Fossil Fuel Follies in Bosnia and Herzegovina: A Rhyming Correlation

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to uncover the unexpected connection between the number of university economics teachers in Idaho and the fossil fuel use in Bosnia and Herzegovina. With a diligence that would impress even the most avid hiker, we scoured through data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. To our surprise, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.7693563 and p < 0.01 for the period of 2010 to 2020. It seems that when it comes to economic education and fossil fuel consumption, there's more than meets the eye - or in this case, more than meets the EIA.

Now, onto the good old dad joke. What do you call an economist who's also a magician? An econo-magician! It seems that the correlation we found truly works like a magic trick, but unlike a good magic show, there's no smoke and mirrors involved. Our findings suggest a link between the number of economics teachers and energy choices - a connection that can't simply be dismissed as "fake news." It looks like economics educators in the Gem State might be making waves in the energy sector across the globe, proving that even Idaho's taters aren't the only thing attracting attention internationally.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the world grapples with the complex interplay of economic and environmental challenges, understanding the interconnected web of factors at play becomes increasingly crucial. The pursuit of knowledge often leads us down unexpected paths, much like how a hike in the woods can reveal a hidden treasure trove of puns. In this study, we sought to untangle the enigmatic relationship between the number of university economics teachers in Idaho and the fossil fuel usage in Bosnia and Herzegovina. While this correlation may seem as unlikely as finding a Yeti in the Idaho wilderness, our findings present a compelling narrative that demands attention.
Speaking of unexpected connections, did you hear about the economist who was also a stand-up comedian? He really knew how to "work the room" – much like how we've sought to uncover the hidden workings at play in the global energy landscape. Our exploration into this peculiar correlation has been anything but a dry, statistical endeavor. Here, we embark upon a journey that promises both insight and amusement, much like a roller coaster ride for the scientifically inclined.
Economics and energy – two seemingly disparate fields – converge in our study with the flair of a daring trapeze act. Our investigation delves into the annals of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, as though we were deciphering a cryptic set of clues in a thrilling adventure novel. Our pursuit of truth may not involve dodging boulders or outrunning ancient traps, but it certainly feels as exhilarating as a scholarly Indiana Jones expedition.
Now, for our next dad joke installment: Why did the economist bring a ladder to the bar? He heard the drinks were on the house! Much like the economist's cunning plan, our analysis aims to raise the bar in understanding the uncharted territory of economic education and energy consumption. The ties we've unraveled between Idaho's economic educators and Bosnia's fuel consumption may seem as improbable as an economist telling bar jokes, but our results speak for themselves.
As we venture forth into this labyrinth of data and correlations, let us remember that even the most obscure connections can shed light on vital global dynamics. Our journey promises not only to uncover unexpected truths but also to sprinkle in a healthy dose of mirth and whimsy amidst the serious pursuit of knowledge – much like finding a hidden Easter egg in a densely coded statistical model.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "The Economics of Education: Human Capital, Family Background and Inequality," Smith et al. explore the impact of educational resources on economic outcomes. Meanwhile, in "Global Energy Economics and Climate Protection Report," Doe and Jones dissect the intricate relationship between energy usage and environmental conservation. These studies provide essential groundwork for understanding the intersection of economics and environmental policy - much like how a gear shift is crucial for a smooth ride.

Now, entering the realm of non-fiction books, "Energy and Civilization: A History" by Vaclav Smil presents a panoramic view of humanity's energy utilization throughout history. Additionally, "Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything" by Levitt and Dubner challenges traditional economic thinking with surprising insights. These resources offer valuable perspectives that are as illuminating as a well-lit lecture hall.

And then we have "The Fountainhead" by Ayn Rand, a novel that explores individualism and innovation, themes that hold relevance for the economic and energy landscape. "Brave New World" by Aldous Huxley also stirs contemplation of societal structure and technology, akin to the pondering of global economic systems. These works serve as a reminder that even fiction can offer enlightenment, like finding a lamp in a library themed escape room.

Delving further into our unorthodox approach, we draw inspiration from the most unexpected sources. Our literature review includes a thorough analysis of the correlation between the number of university economics teachers in Idaho and fossil fuel use in Bosnia and Herzegovina, as observed in the fine print of countless CVS receipts. Furthermore, we couldn't resist consulting the Oracle of Bacon to uncover any cryptic connections between Kevin Bacon and economic theory. Alas, no tangible link surfaced, proving that even the Oracle has its limitations.

In "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams, we find solace in the absurdity of the universe, a sentiment that resonates with the enigmatic correlation we've uncovered. Finally, "Where's Waldo?" by Martin Handford serves as a metaphor for the elusive nature of this correlation, reminding us that even in the most crowded of landscapes, a keen eye can spot the unexpected – much like how a keen researcher can spot correlations amidst a sea of data.

In conclusion, our literature review spans across the familiar and the whimsical, shedding light on a correlation that may seem as elusive as Waldo himself. Our examination offers not only scholarly insights but also a delightful romp through the quirky corridors of economic and energy dynamics - much like finding a gemstone amidst a minecart of statistical analyses.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university economics teachers in Idaho and Fossil fuel use in Bosnia and Herzegovina. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2010 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Economics Educators in Idaho and Fossil Fuel Follies in Bosnia and Herzegovina: A Rhyming Correlation

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to uncover the unexpected connection between the number of university economics teachers in Idaho and the fossil fuel use in Bosnia and Herzegovina. With a diligence that would impress even the most avid hiker, we scoured through data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. To our surprise, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.7693563 and p < 0.01 for the period of 2010 to 2020. It seems that when it comes to economic education and fossil fuel consumption, there's more than meets the eye - or in this case, more than meets the EIA.

Now, onto the good old dad joke. What do you call an economist who's also a magician? An econo-magician! It seems that the correlation we found truly works like a magic trick, but unlike a good magic show, there's no smoke and mirrors involved. Our findings suggest a link between the number of economics teachers and energy choices - a connection that can't simply be dismissed as "fake news." It looks like economics educators in the Gem State might be making waves in the energy sector across the globe, proving that even Idaho's taters aren't the only thing attracting attention internationally.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the world grapples with the complex interplay of economic and environmental challenges, understanding the interconnected web of factors at play becomes increasingly crucial. The pursuit of knowledge often leads us down unexpected paths, much like how a hike in the woods can reveal a hidden treasure trove of puns. In this study, we sought to untangle the enigmatic relationship between the number of university economics teachers in Idaho and the fossil fuel usage in Bosnia and Herzegovina. While this correlation may seem as unlikely as finding a Yeti in the Idaho wilderness, our findings present a compelling narrative that demands attention.
Speaking of unexpected connections, did you hear about the economist who was also a stand-up comedian? He really knew how to "work the room" – much like how we've sought to uncover the hidden workings at play in the global energy landscape. Our exploration into this peculiar correlation has been anything but a dry, statistical endeavor. Here, we embark upon a journey that promises both insight and amusement, much like a roller coaster ride for the scientifically inclined.
Economics and energy – two seemingly disparate fields – converge in our study with the flair of a daring trapeze act. Our investigation delves into the annals of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, as though we were deciphering a cryptic set of clues in a thrilling adventure novel. Our pursuit of truth may not involve dodging boulders or outrunning ancient traps, but it certainly feels as exhilarating as a scholarly Indiana Jones expedition.
Now, for our next dad joke installment: Why did the economist bring a ladder to the bar? He heard the drinks were on the house! Much like the economist's cunning plan, our analysis aims to raise the bar in understanding the uncharted territory of economic education and energy consumption. The ties we've unraveled between Idaho's economic educators and Bosnia's fuel consumption may seem as improbable as an economist telling bar jokes, but our results speak for themselves.
As we venture forth into this labyrinth of data and correlations, let us remember that even the most obscure connections can shed light on vital global dynamics. Our journey promises not only to uncover unexpected truths but also to sprinkle in a healthy dose of mirth and whimsy amidst the serious pursuit of knowledge – much like finding a hidden Easter egg in a densely coded statistical model.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Our methodology involved a multi-faceted approach designed to wrangle with the elusive relationship between the number of university economics teachers in Idaho and the fossil fuel use in Bosnia and Herzegovina. We began by tapping into the data goldmine of the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, much like prospectors panning for correlations in a river of information. Our team then engaged in an elaborate dance of statistical analysis, utilizing methods as intricate as a flock of starlings assembling over a cityscape.

Much like ensuring that our data remained as pure as a mountain spring, we meticulously filtered through sources to ensure consistency and accuracy. We honed in on the years 2010 to 2020 to capture the nuances of this curious connection, akin to capturing fireflies in a jar to study their twinkling patterns. The interplay between the number of economics educators in Idaho and the fossil fuel use in Bosnia and Herzegovina was subjected to a series of rigorous statistical tests, resembling the careful scrutiny one might lend to a cryptic crossword puzzle.

In order to measure the strength of the relationship, we calculated the correlation coefficient using Pearson's r, which allowed us to quantify the degree of association between these seemingly incongruent variables. This process involved more number crunching than a mathematician at a bakery, but the payoff was worth the toil as we unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.7693563. We also performed a hypothesis test and found a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating that the observed correlation was not just a statistical fluke.

But enough about numbers - let's switch gears for a moment and ponder a different kind of correlation. Did you hear about the economist who kept a thesaurus close at hand? He wanted to find a better 'word' for 'correlation'. Our quest to unravel the link between economics educators in Idaho and energy habits in Bosnia has been as adventurous as searching for synonyms in a dense lexicon. But like a wordplay virtuoso, we used our statistical tools to reveal a correlation that can't simply be brushed aside with clever repartee.

In addition to the numerical analysis, we also engaged in a qualitative examination of the economic landscape in both regions, drawing on insights from scholarly literature and expert opinions. This process involved delving into the economic curricula and energy policies, akin to Sherlock Holmes piecing together clues from cryptic notes. By combining quantitative rigor with qualitative depth, we aimed to paint a comprehensive portrait of this eyebrow-raising correlation.

Now, back to the numbers – we also employed a series of regression analyses to unpack the potential causality between the presence of economics educators in Idaho and the fossil fuel choices in Bosnia and Herzegovina. This step was as pivotal as a conductor orchestrating a symphony, guiding us through the ebbs and flows of causative inference. The picture that emerged was as intriguing as a mystery novel, revealing a tangible relationship that defied conventional wisdom.

Our methodology, with its blend of statistical wizardry and in-depth exploration, allowed us to shed light on this hitherto overlooked connection. It may seem as improbable as finding a statistical needle in a haystack, but as the saying goes, where there's a correlation, there's a way!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university economics teachers in Idaho and Fossil fuel use in Bosnia and Herzegovina. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2010 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.7693563, r-squared of 0.5919091, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Economics Educators in Idaho and Fossil Fuel Follies in Bosnia and Herzegovina: A Rhyming Correlation

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to uncover the unexpected connection between the number of university economics teachers in Idaho and the fossil fuel use in Bosnia and Herzegovina. With a diligence that would impress even the most avid hiker, we scoured through data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. To our surprise, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.7693563 and p < 0.01 for the period of 2010 to 2020. It seems that when it comes to economic education and fossil fuel consumption, there's more than meets the eye - or in this case, more than meets the EIA.

Now, onto the good old dad joke. What do you call an economist who's also a magician? An econo-magician! It seems that the correlation we found truly works like a magic trick, but unlike a good magic show, there's no smoke and mirrors involved. Our findings suggest a link between the number of economics teachers and energy choices - a connection that can't simply be dismissed as "fake news." It looks like economics educators in the Gem State might be making waves in the energy sector across the globe, proving that even Idaho's taters aren't the only thing attracting attention internationally.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As the world grapples with the complex interplay of economic and environmental challenges, understanding the interconnected web of factors at play becomes increasingly crucial. The pursuit of knowledge often leads us down unexpected paths, much like how a hike in the woods can reveal a hidden treasure trove of puns. In this study, we sought to untangle the enigmatic relationship between the number of university economics teachers in Idaho and the fossil fuel usage in Bosnia and Herzegovina. While this correlation may seem as unlikely as finding a Yeti in the Idaho wilderness, our findings present a compelling narrative that demands attention.
Speaking of unexpected connections, did you hear about the economist who was also a stand-up comedian? He really knew how to "work the room" – much like how we've sought to uncover the hidden workings at play in the global energy landscape. Our exploration into this peculiar correlation has been anything but a dry, statistical endeavor. Here, we embark upon a journey that promises both insight and amusement, much like a roller coaster ride for the scientifically inclined.
Economics and energy – two seemingly disparate fields – converge in our study with the flair of a daring trapeze act. Our investigation delves into the annals of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, as though we were deciphering a cryptic set of clues in a thrilling adventure novel. Our pursuit of truth may not involve dodging boulders or outrunning ancient traps, but it certainly feels as exhilarating as a scholarly Indiana Jones expedition.
Now, for our next dad joke installment: Why did the economist bring a ladder to the bar? He heard the drinks were on the house! Much like the economist's cunning plan, our analysis aims to raise the bar in understanding the uncharted territory of economic education and energy consumption. The ties we've unraveled between Idaho's economic educators and Bosnia's fuel consumption may seem as improbable as an economist telling bar jokes, but our results speak for themselves.
As we venture forth into this labyrinth of data and correlations, let us remember that even the most obscure connections can shed light on vital global dynamics. Our journey promises not only to uncover unexpected truths but also to sprinkle in a healthy dose of mirth and whimsy amidst the serious pursuit of knowledge – much like finding a hidden Easter egg in a densely coded statistical model.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our analysis revealed a surprisingly strong positive correlation between the number of university economics teachers in Idaho and fossil fuel use in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The correlation coefficient of 0.7693563 indicates a robust relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. This finding may elicit as much surprise as finding a bear at a picnic, but rest assured, the numbers don't lie – unlike a bear trying to steal your sandwiches.

Fig. 1 shows the scatterplot that illustrates the striking correlation we uncovered. The data points hug the regression line like old friends catching up, demonstrating a clear and compelling relationship between the variables. This correlation is more convincing than a passionate plea from an economic theorist – it's statistically significant and demands attention.

Now, for a quick dad joke to lighten the mood: Why don't economists make good murderers? They just can't commit! Speaking of commitment, we were fully committed to uncovering the truth behind this intriguing connection, and the results speak for themselves.

The r-squared value of 0.5919091 further strengthens the case for this correlation. It indicates that approximately 59.19% of the variability in fossil fuel use in Bosnia and Herzegovina can be explained by the number of economics teachers in Idaho. That's a higher percentage than the likelihood of finding a good joke in an economics research paper – but lo and behold, here we are!

The p-value of less than 0.01 provides further evidence of the statistical significance of this correlation. With a p-value that low, we can confidently reject the null hypothesis and assert that there is a genuine relationship between these two variables. This result is more solid than a newly constructed economic model – it holds up under scrutiny and provides a compelling case for further exploration.

To sum it up, our findings suggest that the presence of economics educators in Idaho has a meaningful impact on the energy choices made in Bosnia and Herzegovina, like a ripple effect of knowledge spreading across international borders. Let's just say that the economic prowess of Idaho has a reach that extends far beyond its famous potatoes - it's as far-reaching as a contagiously good dad joke.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university economics teachers in Idaho and Fossil fuel use in Bosnia and Herzegovina. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Economics Educators in Idaho and Fossil Fuel Follies in Bosnia and Herzegovina: A Rhyming Correlation

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to uncover the unexpected connection between the number of university economics teachers in Idaho and the fossil fuel use in Bosnia and Herzegovina. With a diligence that would impress even the most avid hiker, we scoured through data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. To our surprise, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.7693563 and p < 0.01 for the period of 2010 to 2020. It seems that when it comes to economic education and fossil fuel consumption, there's more than meets the eye - or in this case, more than meets the EIA.

Now, onto the good old dad joke. What do you call an economist who's also a magician? An econo-magician! It seems that the correlation we found truly works like a magic trick, but unlike a good magic show, there's no smoke and mirrors involved. Our findings suggest a link between the number of economics teachers and energy choices - a connection that can't simply be dismissed as "fake news." It looks like economics educators in the Gem State might be making waves in the energy sector across the globe, proving that even Idaho's taters aren't the only thing attracting attention internationally.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "The Economics of Education: Human Capital, Family Background and Inequality," Smith et al. explore the impact of educational resources on economic outcomes. Meanwhile, in "Global Energy Economics and Climate Protection Report," Doe and Jones dissect the intricate relationship between energy usage and environmental conservation. These studies provide essential groundwork for understanding the intersection of economics and environmental policy - much like how a gear shift is crucial for a smooth ride.
Now, entering the realm of non-fiction books, "Energy and Civilization: A History" by Vaclav Smil presents a panoramic view of humanity's energy utilization throughout history. Additionally, "Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything" by Levitt and Dubner challenges traditional economic thinking with surprising insights. These resources offer valuable perspectives that are as illuminating as a well-lit lecture hall.
And then we have "The Fountainhead" by Ayn Rand, a novel that explores individualism and innovation, themes that hold relevance for the economic and energy landscape. "Brave New World" by Aldous Huxley also stirs contemplation of societal structure and technology, akin to the pondering of global economic systems. These works serve as a reminder that even fiction can offer enlightenment, like finding a lamp in a library themed escape room.
Delving further into our unorthodox approach, we draw inspiration from the most unexpected sources. Our literature review includes a thorough analysis of the correlation between the number of university economics teachers in Idaho and fossil fuel use in Bosnia and Herzegovina, as observed in the fine print of countless CVS receipts. Furthermore, we couldn't resist consulting the Oracle of Bacon to uncover any cryptic connections between Kevin Bacon and economic theory. Alas, no tangible link surfaced, proving that even the Oracle has its limitations.
In "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams, we find solace in the absurdity of the universe, a sentiment that resonates with the enigmatic correlation we've uncovered. Finally, "Where's Waldo?" by Martin Handford serves as a metaphor for the elusive nature of this correlation, reminding us that even in the most crowded of landscapes, a keen eye can spot the unexpected – much like how a keen researcher can spot correlations amidst a sea of data.
In conclusion, our literature review spans across the familiar and the whimsical, shedding light on a correlation that may seem as elusive as Waldo himself. Our examination offers not only scholarly insights but also a delightful romp through the quirky corridors of economic and energy dynamics - much like finding a gemstone amidst a minecart of statistical analyses.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a surprisingly strong positive correlation between the number of university economics teachers in Idaho and fossil fuel use in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The correlation coefficient of 0.7693563 indicates a robust relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. This finding may elicit as much surprise as finding a bear at a picnic, but rest assured, the numbers don't lie – unlike a bear trying to steal your sandwiches.
Fig. 1 shows the scatterplot that illustrates the striking correlation we uncovered. The data points hug the regression line like old friends catching up, demonstrating a clear and compelling relationship between the variables. This correlation is more convincing than a passionate plea from an economic theorist – it's statistically significant and demands attention.
Now, for a quick dad joke to lighten the mood: Why don't economists make good murderers? They just can't commit! Speaking of commitment, we were fully committed to uncovering the truth behind this intriguing connection, and the results speak for themselves.
The r-squared value of 0.5919091 further strengthens the case for this correlation. It indicates that approximately 59.19% of the variability in fossil fuel use in Bosnia and Herzegovina can be explained by the number of economics teachers in Idaho. That's a higher percentage than the likelihood of finding a good joke in an economics research paper – but lo and behold, here we are!
The p-value of less than 0.01 provides further evidence of the statistical significance of this correlation. With a p-value that low, we can confidently reject the null hypothesis and assert that there is a genuine relationship between these two variables. This result is more solid than a newly constructed economic model – it holds up under scrutiny and provides a compelling case for further exploration.
To sum it up, our findings suggest that the presence of economics educators in Idaho has a meaningful impact on the energy choices made in Bosnia and Herzegovina, like a ripple effect of knowledge spreading across international borders. Let's just say that the economic prowess of Idaho has a reach that extends far beyond its famous potatoes - it's as far-reaching as a contagiously good dad joke.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our study set out to unravel the intriguing link between the number of university economics teachers in Idaho and fossil fuel use in Bosnia and Herzegovina. With results in hand that are more surprising than finding a clown in an economics symposium, we can confidently assert that our findings align with and expand upon previous research in this burgeoning field of inquiry.

The strong positive correlation coefficient of 0.7693563 and p < 0.01 mirrors the prior work of Smith et al., who emphasized the pivotal role of educational resources in shaping economic outcomes. In a twist as unforeseen as a plot twist in an economic thriller, our findings provide empirical support to the theoretical constructs put forth by these esteemed scholars. Just as an economic paradigm shift uncovers new vistas for exploration, our study challenges traditional assumptions about the interconnectedness of economic education and global energy choices.

Drawing from the unexpected sources highlighted in our literature review, we leveraged the unorthodox to uncover the unanticipated. Much like the rogue economists Levitt and Dubner, our inquiry brings forth clandestine insights that defy convention. It's as if our research is the "Freakonomics" of energy dynamics - shaking up traditional notions with a touch of statistical stardust.

The r-squared value of 0.5919091 further solidifies our findings by bolstering the foundation laid by Vaclav Smil's comprehensive historical perspective on energy utilization. Our results confirm that the presence of economics educators in Idaho exerts a discernible influence on the energy decisions of Bosnia and Herzegovina, echoing the far-reaching implications of changes in human energy utilization throughout the ages. It's like unraveling the secrets of human energy consumption was as thrilling as a good mystery novel.

In consideration of the compelling p-value of less than 0.01, our results lend empirical weight to the abstract notions presented in "The Fountainhead" and "Brave New World." Just as these works probed the boundaries of societal structure and innovation, our study has ventured into uncharted territories of economic influence on global energy dynamics, illuminating a path for future investigations.

In essence, our findings lend credence to the idea that economics educators in Idaho have a tangible impact on energy choices in Bosnia and Herzegovina. It's akin to uncovering a shared melody in a symphony of seemingly disparate notes, reminding us that the harmonic convergence of economics and energy dynamics can yield revelations as delightful as a well-timed punchline in a serious discussion.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university economics teachers in Idaho and Fossil fuel use in Bosnia and Herzegovina. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Economics Educators in Idaho and Fossil Fuel Follies in Bosnia and Herzegovina: A Rhyming Correlation

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to uncover the unexpected connection between the number of university economics teachers in Idaho and the fossil fuel use in Bosnia and Herzegovina. With a diligence that would impress even the most avid hiker, we scoured through data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. To our surprise, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.7693563 and p < 0.01 for the period of 2010 to 2020. It seems that when it comes to economic education and fossil fuel consumption, there's more than meets the eye - or in this case, more than meets the EIA.

Now, onto the good old dad joke. What do you call an economist who's also a magician? An econo-magician! It seems that the correlation we found truly works like a magic trick, but unlike a good magic show, there's no smoke and mirrors involved. Our findings suggest a link between the number of economics teachers and energy choices - a connection that can't simply be dismissed as "fake news." It looks like economics educators in the Gem State might be making waves in the energy sector across the globe, proving that even Idaho's taters aren't the only thing attracting attention internationally.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
As the world grapples with the complex interplay of economic and environmental challenges, understanding the interconnected web of factors at play becomes increasingly crucial. The pursuit of knowledge often leads us down unexpected paths, much like how a hike in the woods can reveal a hidden treasure trove of puns. In this study, we sought to untangle the enigmatic relationship between the number of university economics teachers in Idaho and the fossil fuel usage in Bosnia and Herzegovina. While this correlation may seem as unlikely as finding a Yeti in the Idaho wilderness, our findings present a compelling narrative that demands attention.
Speaking of unexpected connections, did you hear about the economist who was also a stand-up comedian? He really knew how to "work the room" – much like how we've sought to uncover the hidden workings at play in the global energy landscape. Our exploration into this peculiar correlation has been anything but a dry, statistical endeavor. Here, we embark upon a journey that promises both insight and amusement, much like a roller coaster ride for the scientifically inclined.
Economics and energy – two seemingly disparate fields – converge in our study with the flair of a daring trapeze act. Our investigation delves into the annals of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, as though we were deciphering a cryptic set of clues in a thrilling adventure novel. Our pursuit of truth may not involve dodging boulders or outrunning ancient traps, but it certainly feels as exhilarating as a scholarly Indiana Jones expedition.
Now, for our next dad joke installment: Why did the economist bring a ladder to the bar? He heard the drinks were on the house! Much like the economist's cunning plan, our analysis aims to raise the bar in understanding the uncharted territory of economic education and energy consumption. The ties we've unraveled between Idaho's economic educators and Bosnia's fuel consumption may seem as improbable as an economist telling bar jokes, but our results speak for themselves.
As we venture forth into this labyrinth of data and correlations, let us remember that even the most obscure connections can shed light on vital global dynamics. Our journey promises not only to uncover unexpected truths but also to sprinkle in a healthy dose of mirth and whimsy amidst the serious pursuit of knowledge – much like finding a hidden Easter egg in a densely coded statistical model.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a surprisingly strong positive correlation between the number of university economics teachers in Idaho and fossil fuel use in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The correlation coefficient of 0.7693563 indicates a robust relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. This finding may elicit as much surprise as finding a bear at a picnic, but rest assured, the numbers don't lie – unlike a bear trying to steal your sandwiches.
Fig. 1 shows the scatterplot that illustrates the striking correlation we uncovered. The data points hug the regression line like old friends catching up, demonstrating a clear and compelling relationship between the variables. This correlation is more convincing than a passionate plea from an economic theorist – it's statistically significant and demands attention.
Now, for a quick dad joke to lighten the mood: Why don't economists make good murderers? They just can't commit! Speaking of commitment, we were fully committed to uncovering the truth behind this intriguing connection, and the results speak for themselves.
The r-squared value of 0.5919091 further strengthens the case for this correlation. It indicates that approximately 59.19% of the variability in fossil fuel use in Bosnia and Herzegovina can be explained by the number of economics teachers in Idaho. That's a higher percentage than the likelihood of finding a good joke in an economics research paper – but lo and behold, here we are!
The p-value of less than 0.01 provides further evidence of the statistical significance of this correlation. With a p-value that low, we can confidently reject the null hypothesis and assert that there is a genuine relationship between these two variables. This result is more solid than a newly constructed economic model – it holds up under scrutiny and provides a compelling case for further exploration.
To sum it up, our findings suggest that the presence of economics educators in Idaho has a meaningful impact on the energy choices made in Bosnia and Herzegovina, like a ripple effect of knowledge spreading across international borders. Let's just say that the economic prowess of Idaho has a reach that extends far beyond its famous potatoes - it's as far-reaching as a contagiously good dad joke.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has revealed a strikingly strong correlation between the number of university economics teachers in Idaho and fossil fuel use in Bosnia and Herzegovina. It's as if these two variables were engaged in an international tango, with each step perfectly complementing the other. The correlation coefficient of 0.7693563 is more eye-catching than a glittery lab coat, and it certainly has shone a light on this unexpected relationship.

Now for another quick dad joke: Did you hear about the economist who got stuck in quicksand? He was in a liquidity trap! Just like quicksand, our findings have shown that this correlation is not something to be taken lightly. The r-squared value of 0.5919091 seals the deal, indicating that over half of the variability in fossil fuel use in Bosnia and Herzegovina can be attributed to the number of economics teachers in Idaho. It's more explanatory power than a science fiction novel – and yet, it's all too real.

This study's results are as clear as the sun on a cloudless day – and we're not just blowing hot air. With the p-value of less than 0.01, we can confidently say that this correlation is not some statistical fluke. It's more robust than a supercomputer – and it begs the question: what other surprising links might we find in the web of global economics and energy?

In light of these findings, we can confidently assert that further research in this area is unnecessary. We've unraveled the mystery behind the connection between economics educators in Idaho and fossil fuel use in Bosnia and Herzegovina like a pair of savvy detective scientists, and the case is officially closed. It's as conclusive as a period at the end of a sentence – or in this case, the conclusion of a groundbreaking research paper.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Economics Educators in Idaho and Fossil Fuel Follies in Bosnia and Herzegovina: A Rhyming Correlation. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Eclectic Economics and Eccentric Energies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Economics Educators in Idaho and Fossil Fuel Follies in Bosnia and Herzegovina: A Rhyming Correlation. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Global Institute for Social and Economic Research (GISER)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Economics Educators in Idaho and Fossil Fuel Follies in Bosnia and Herzegovina: A Rhyming Correlation with an abstract of In this study, we set out to uncover the unexpected connection between the number of university economics teachers in Idaho and the fossil fuel use in Bosnia and Herzegovina. With a diligence that would impress even the most avid hiker, we scoured through data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. To our surprise, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.7693563 and p < 0.01 for the period of 2010 to 2020. It seems that when it comes to economic education and fossil fuel consumption, there's more than meets the eye - or in this case, more than meets the EIA.
Now, onto the good old dad joke. What do you call an economist who's also a magician? An econo-magician! It seems that the correlation we found truly works like a magic trick, but unlike a good magic show, there's no smoke and mirrors involved. Our findings suggest a link between the number of economics teachers and energy choices - a connection that can't simply be dismissed as "fake news." It looks like economics educators in the Gem State might be making waves in the energy sector across the globe, proving that even Idaho's taters aren't the only thing attracting attention internationally.

ChatGPT:

economics educators Idaho, fossil fuel consumption Bosnia and Herzegovina, correlation coefficient economics education fossil fuel consumption, energy choices correlation economics teachers, Idaho university economics teachers, fossil fuel consumption correlation, Bureau of Labor Statistics economics teachers, Energy Information Administration fossil fuel consumption, economics education impact energy choices, Idaho energy sector impact, Gem State economics teachers, Idaho international attention energy sector.

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of university economics teachers in Idaho
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of economics teachers, postsecondary in Idaho
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of university economics teachers in Idaho

Fossil fuel use in Bosnia and Herzegovina
Detailed data title: Total fossil fuel use in Bosnia and Herzegovina in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Fossil fuel use in Bosnia and Herzegovina

Correlation r = 0.7693563 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.5919091 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 59.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Fossil fuel use in Bosnia and Herzegovina) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of university economics teachers in Idaho) over the 11 years from 2010 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0056. 0.0056327198615269310000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.77 in 0.56% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 178 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.31, 0.94 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20102011201220132014201520162017201820192020
The number of university economics teachers in Idaho (Laborers)3060605040401201001003040
Fossil fuel use in Bosnia and Herzegovina (Billion kWh)8.5521210.23949.274989.60219.61159.4733211.375911.678611.758510.367310.8175




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([30,60,60,50,40,40,120,100,100,30,40,])
array_2 = np.array([8.55212,10.2394,9.27498,9.6021,9.6115,9.47332,11.3759,11.6786,11.7585,10.3673,10.8175,])
array_1_name = "The number of university economics teachers in Idaho"
array_2_name = "Fossil fuel use in Bosnia and Herzegovina"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is pure awesomeness!


Correlation ID: 3482 · Black Variable ID: 18004 · Red Variable ID: 23529
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0