about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,471 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Hydopower energy generated in Dominican Republic and the second variable is Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion.  The chart goes from 1980 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The surge in hydropower energy in the Dominican Republic led to cooler temperatures overall. As a result, hot dog consumption increased globally, including by the reigning Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition champion, who found the weather to be perfect for consuming an impressive quantity of delicious hot dogs.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image depicting a rushing waterfall in the Dominican Republic, where a hydroelectric turbine is powered, producing clean energy. Close by, the country's flag waves in the breeze. Meanwhile, at the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, the champion is surrounded by steaming hotdog buns and overflowing plates of hotdogs, enabled by improved water pressure for boiling. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Hydopower energy generated in Dominican Republic and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Photorealism A TIME magazine cover image inspired by bauhaus Macabre a funny image you would see on reddit
ChatGPT: A TIME magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Hydopower energy generated in Dominican Republic and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion, in the following situation: Because the increase in hydropower energy in the Dominican Republic led to better water pressure, allowing Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition champion to boil more hotdogs at once.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In the Dominican Republic, a rushing waterfall powers a hydroelectric turbine, generating clean energy. Nearby, the country's flag flutters in the breeze. Meanwhile, at the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, the champion is surrounded by steaming hotdog buns and mountains of hotdogs, ready to be devoured thanks to improved water pressure for boiling.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A TIME magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In the Dominican Republic, a rushing waterfall powers a hydroelectric turbine, generating clean energy. Nearby, the country's flag flutters in the breeze. Meanwhile, at the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, the champion is surrounded by steaming hotdog buns and mountains of hotdogs, ready to be devoured thanks to improved water pressure for boiling. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image depicting a rushing waterfall in the Dominican Republic, where a hydroelectric turbine is powered, producing clean energy. Close by, the country's flag waves in the breeze. Meanwhile, at the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, the champion is surrounded by steaming hotdog buns and overflowing plates of hotdogs, enabled by improved water pressure for boiling.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Hydopower energy generated in Dominican Republic caused Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
From Hydropower to Hotdogs: A Statistical Connection Between Energy Generation and Competitive Eating Elation

The Journal of Gastronomic Statistics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Hydopower energy generated in Dominican Republic and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7419660 and p < 0.01 for 1980 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
From Hydropower to Hotdogs: A Statistical Connection Between Energy Generation and Competitive Eating Elation

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the tantalizing tale of hydropower energy generation in the Dominican Republic and its unexpected correlation with the consumption of hotdogs by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. With a spirit of curiosity and a pinch of humor, we use data from the Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia to explore this peculiar relationship. Our findings reveal a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7419660 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1980 to 2021. This study not only sheds light on the potential impact of renewable energy on competitive eating but also serves as a reminder that statistical analysis can uncover delightfully quirky connections in the most unexpected places. So whether you're a fan of hydroelectricity or a connoisseur of frankfurters, this research is sure to leave you with food for thought and a dash of amusement.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Hydopower energy generated in Dominican Republic and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
From Hydropower to Hotdogs: A Statistical Connection Between Energy Generation and Competitive Eating Elation

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the tantalizing tale of hydropower energy generation in the Dominican Republic and its unexpected correlation with the consumption of hotdogs by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. With a spirit of curiosity and a pinch of humor, we use data from the Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia to explore this peculiar relationship. Our findings reveal a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7419660 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1980 to 2021. This study not only sheds light on the potential impact of renewable energy on competitive eating but also serves as a reminder that statistical analysis can uncover delightfully quirky connections in the most unexpected places. So whether you're a fan of hydroelectricity or a connoisseur of frankfurters, this research is sure to leave you with food for thought and a dash of amusement.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

As we embark on this statistical expedition, we find ourselves caught in the whirlpool of hydroelectricity and competitive eating, two seemingly unrelated domains that, upon closer inspection, reveal a surprising connection. While one may initially dismiss this as a mere statistical fluke or, dare I say, a statistical sausage, our study aims to demonstrate that there could be more to this correlation than meets the eye.

The Dominican Republic, with its abundant natural resources and picturesque landscapes, has long been a hub for hydropower generation. On the other hand, the annual Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition in Coney Island, New York, has captured the imaginations (and perhaps the appetites) of competitive eaters and hotdog enthusiasts alike. One might wonder, what on earth could link the serene flow of water-driven turbines with the frenzied consumption of hundreds of hotdogs in a matter of minutes? Fear not, dear reader, for we are here to unravel this enigmatic connection using the power of statistics and a hint of whimsy.

The cornerstone of any statistical adventure is the data, and our journey is no exception. We have meticulously collected and analyzed data from reputable sources such as the Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia to delve into this peculiar correlation. By examining the annual energy generation figures in the Dominican Republic and the number of hotdogs devoured by the reigning Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion, we aim to uncover the underlying relationship between these seemingly disparate variables.

This study is not just a quest for quirky correlations; it embodies the essence of scientific inquiry and statistical exploration. With a correlation coefficient that would make even the staunchest skeptic raise an eyebrow (0.7419660, to be exact), and a p-value that practically screams "statistically significant" at less than 0.01, our findings point to a connection that defies conventional wisdom.

As we embark on this journey, let us remember that the pursuit of knowledge is not always a solemn affair; there is room for levity and surprise in the realm of research. So buckle up, dear reader, for we are about to unravel the statistical tapestry that weaves hydropower and hotdogs into a whimsical web of correlation and causation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Hydopower energy generated in Dominican Republic and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
From Hydropower to Hotdogs: A Statistical Connection Between Energy Generation and Competitive Eating Elation

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the tantalizing tale of hydropower energy generation in the Dominican Republic and its unexpected correlation with the consumption of hotdogs by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. With a spirit of curiosity and a pinch of humor, we use data from the Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia to explore this peculiar relationship. Our findings reveal a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7419660 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1980 to 2021. This study not only sheds light on the potential impact of renewable energy on competitive eating but also serves as a reminder that statistical analysis can uncover delightfully quirky connections in the most unexpected places. So whether you're a fan of hydroelectricity or a connoisseur of frankfurters, this research is sure to leave you with food for thought and a dash of amusement.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As we embark on this statistical expedition, we find ourselves caught in the whirlpool of hydroelectricity and competitive eating, two seemingly unrelated domains that, upon closer inspection, reveal a surprising connection. While one may initially dismiss this as a mere statistical fluke or, dare I say, a statistical sausage, our study aims to demonstrate that there could be more to this correlation than meets the eye.
The Dominican Republic, with its abundant natural resources and picturesque landscapes, has long been a hub for hydropower generation. On the other hand, the annual Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition in Coney Island, New York, has captured the imaginations (and perhaps the appetites) of competitive eaters and hotdog enthusiasts alike. One might wonder, what on earth could link the serene flow of water-driven turbines with the frenzied consumption of hundreds of hotdogs in a matter of minutes? Fear not, dear reader, for we are here to unravel this enigmatic connection using the power of statistics and a hint of whimsy.
The cornerstone of any statistical adventure is the data, and our journey is no exception. We have meticulously collected and analyzed data from reputable sources such as the Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia to delve into this peculiar correlation. By examining the annual energy generation figures in the Dominican Republic and the number of hotdogs devoured by the reigning Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion, we aim to uncover the underlying relationship between these seemingly disparate variables.
This study is not just a quest for quirky correlations; it embodies the essence of scientific inquiry and statistical exploration. With a correlation coefficient that would make even the staunchest skeptic raise an eyebrow (0.7419660, to be exact), and a p-value that practically screams "statistically significant" at less than 0.01, our findings point to a connection that defies conventional wisdom.
As we embark on this journey, let us remember that the pursuit of knowledge is not always a solemn affair; there is room for levity and surprise in the realm of research. So buckle up, dear reader, for we are about to unravel the statistical tapestry that weaves hydropower and hotdogs into a whimsical web of correlation and causation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In the annals of research, the confluence of hydropower energy generation and the consumption of hotdogs may initially raise eyebrows and elicit a few chuckles. However, deep within the folds of statistical analysis, lies a quirky correlation that demands our attention. Smith's seminal work, "Hydropower and Its Implications for Energy Autonomy," lays a solid foundation for understanding the dynamics of energy generation, albeit without a single mention of grilled franks. Similarly, Doe's comprehensive study, "The Competitive Eating Phenomenon: A Statistical Inquiry," provides invaluable insights into the world of competitive eating, yet regrettably overlooks the hydroelectric connection.

But fear not, intrepid reader, for the academic landscape does not solely comprise dry, empirical treatises. The intersection of hydroelectricity and hotdogs has also piqued the interest of authors beyond the confines of traditional scholarly works. In "The Art of Sausage Making" by Jones, while the focus is undoubtedly on culinary craftsmanship, one cannot help but wonder if the hotdog's journey intersects with that of hydropower in some unforeseen manner. Furthermore, "The Watermelon Seed" by Pizzoli, a delightful children's book depicting a watermelon-loving crocodile, offers a playful nod to the concept of consumption, albeit not explicitly in the form of hotdogs.

In the realm of visual media, the television series "Mysteries of the Abandoned" presents an intriguing parallel to our exploratory endeavors. While the show primarily focuses on deserted structures and tumultuous history, its spirit of discovery resonates with our pursuit of uncovering the hidden relationship between hydroelectricity and hotdog consumption. Additionally, the culinary masterpieces showcased in the program "Chef's Table" provide a tantalizing backdrop for pondering the gastronomic feats that may grace the competitive eating arena, albeit not specifically in the realm of hotdogs.

As we navigate this amalgamation of serious scholarly works, whimsical literature, and engaging television content, our pursuit of unearthing the statistical connection between hydropower energy generation in the Dominican Republic and the consumption of hotdogs by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion takes on a multidimensional hue. With a sprinkling of humor and a dash of curiosity, we embark on a journey that transcends the ordinary and delves into the unexpected intricacies of statistical relationships.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Hydopower energy generated in Dominican Republic and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia . You used data from 1980 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
From Hydropower to Hotdogs: A Statistical Connection Between Energy Generation and Competitive Eating Elation

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the tantalizing tale of hydropower energy generation in the Dominican Republic and its unexpected correlation with the consumption of hotdogs by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. With a spirit of curiosity and a pinch of humor, we use data from the Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia to explore this peculiar relationship. Our findings reveal a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7419660 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1980 to 2021. This study not only sheds light on the potential impact of renewable energy on competitive eating but also serves as a reminder that statistical analysis can uncover delightfully quirky connections in the most unexpected places. So whether you're a fan of hydroelectricity or a connoisseur of frankfurters, this research is sure to leave you with food for thought and a dash of amusement.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
As we embark on this statistical expedition, we find ourselves caught in the whirlpool of hydroelectricity and competitive eating, two seemingly unrelated domains that, upon closer inspection, reveal a surprising connection. While one may initially dismiss this as a mere statistical fluke or, dare I say, a statistical sausage, our study aims to demonstrate that there could be more to this correlation than meets the eye.
The Dominican Republic, with its abundant natural resources and picturesque landscapes, has long been a hub for hydropower generation. On the other hand, the annual Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition in Coney Island, New York, has captured the imaginations (and perhaps the appetites) of competitive eaters and hotdog enthusiasts alike. One might wonder, what on earth could link the serene flow of water-driven turbines with the frenzied consumption of hundreds of hotdogs in a matter of minutes? Fear not, dear reader, for we are here to unravel this enigmatic connection using the power of statistics and a hint of whimsy.
The cornerstone of any statistical adventure is the data, and our journey is no exception. We have meticulously collected and analyzed data from reputable sources such as the Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia to delve into this peculiar correlation. By examining the annual energy generation figures in the Dominican Republic and the number of hotdogs devoured by the reigning Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion, we aim to uncover the underlying relationship between these seemingly disparate variables.
This study is not just a quest for quirky correlations; it embodies the essence of scientific inquiry and statistical exploration. With a correlation coefficient that would make even the staunchest skeptic raise an eyebrow (0.7419660, to be exact), and a p-value that practically screams "statistically significant" at less than 0.01, our findings point to a connection that defies conventional wisdom.
As we embark on this journey, let us remember that the pursuit of knowledge is not always a solemn affair; there is room for levity and surprise in the realm of research. So buckle up, dear reader, for we are about to unravel the statistical tapestry that weaves hydropower and hotdogs into a whimsical web of correlation and causation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To uncover the statistical connection between hydropower energy generation in the Dominican Republic and the consumption of hotdogs by the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion, we embarked on a scientific journey that was equal parts rigorous analysis and whimsical exploration. Our methodology combined the precision of statistical analysis with the unbridled spirit of curiosity, resulting in a research approach that is as quirky as the correlation we sought to unravel.

Data Collection:
Our research team scoured the depths of the internet, meticulously combing through data from various sources to assemble the building blocks of our analysis. The primary sources of data were the Energy Information Administration, where we dipped our scientific ladle into the flowing river of hydropower energy generation in the Dominican Republic, and Wikipedia, a digital pantry of hotdog consumption statistics from the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. We amassed a delectable assortment of data spanning the years 1980 to 2021, capturing the ebb and flow of hydropower output and the voracious hotdog consumption habits of competitive eaters.

Quantitative Analysis:
Armed with an arsenal of statistical tools and a penchant for peculiar correlations, we unleashed a barrage of analyses to unravel the mystery that lay at the heart of our research. Our journey began with an exploration of the annual hydropower energy generation in the Dominican Republic, meticulously charting the rise and fall of this renewable energy source with the precision of a seasoned hydrographer. Simultaneously, we delved into the archives of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, tracing the astonishing feats of hotdog consumption by champions with the zeal of a gastronomic historian.

Correlation Computation:
Applying the time-honored art of statistical calculation, we computed the correlation coefficient between hydropower energy generated in the Dominican Republic and the hotdogs devoured by the reigning champion of Nathan's prestigious competition. Our calculations yielded a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7419660, a number that cried out for attention like a sizzling hotdog on a summer grill. Furthermore, the resulting p-value of less than 0.01 added a sprinkle of statistical significance to our findings, affirming that this statistical connection transcended mere coincidence and ventured into the realm of substantial correlation.

Robustness Checks:
In the spirit of scientific rigor, we subjected our findings to a battery of robustness checks, ensuring that our results stood firm against the winds of skepticism and statistical turbulence. Sensitivity analyses, outlier detection, and robust regression models were deployed to fortify the resilience of our correlation and validate the robustness of our quirky statistical discovery.

Ethical Considerations:
As stewards of statistical truth, we upheld the highest ethical standards in the pursuit of knowledge. Our research adhered to the principles of data integrity, transparency, and honesty, ensuring that each statistical morsel presented in this study was derived from reputable sources and handled with the utmost respect for scientific inquiry.

In summary, our methodology dances at the intersection of statistical rigor and whimsical inquiry, blending the precision of quantitative analysis with the enchanting allure of an unexpected correlation. This research methodology lays bare the delightful marriage of science and curiosity, serving as a testament to the endless possibilities that lie within the realm of statistical exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Hydopower energy generated in Dominican Republic and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia .

For the time period 1980 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.7419660, r-squared of 0.5505135, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
From Hydropower to Hotdogs: A Statistical Connection Between Energy Generation and Competitive Eating Elation

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the tantalizing tale of hydropower energy generation in the Dominican Republic and its unexpected correlation with the consumption of hotdogs by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. With a spirit of curiosity and a pinch of humor, we use data from the Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia to explore this peculiar relationship. Our findings reveal a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7419660 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1980 to 2021. This study not only sheds light on the potential impact of renewable energy on competitive eating but also serves as a reminder that statistical analysis can uncover delightfully quirky connections in the most unexpected places. So whether you're a fan of hydroelectricity or a connoisseur of frankfurters, this research is sure to leave you with food for thought and a dash of amusement.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As we embark on this statistical expedition, we find ourselves caught in the whirlpool of hydroelectricity and competitive eating, two seemingly unrelated domains that, upon closer inspection, reveal a surprising connection. While one may initially dismiss this as a mere statistical fluke or, dare I say, a statistical sausage, our study aims to demonstrate that there could be more to this correlation than meets the eye.
The Dominican Republic, with its abundant natural resources and picturesque landscapes, has long been a hub for hydropower generation. On the other hand, the annual Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition in Coney Island, New York, has captured the imaginations (and perhaps the appetites) of competitive eaters and hotdog enthusiasts alike. One might wonder, what on earth could link the serene flow of water-driven turbines with the frenzied consumption of hundreds of hotdogs in a matter of minutes? Fear not, dear reader, for we are here to unravel this enigmatic connection using the power of statistics and a hint of whimsy.
The cornerstone of any statistical adventure is the data, and our journey is no exception. We have meticulously collected and analyzed data from reputable sources such as the Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia to delve into this peculiar correlation. By examining the annual energy generation figures in the Dominican Republic and the number of hotdogs devoured by the reigning Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion, we aim to uncover the underlying relationship between these seemingly disparate variables.
This study is not just a quest for quirky correlations; it embodies the essence of scientific inquiry and statistical exploration. With a correlation coefficient that would make even the staunchest skeptic raise an eyebrow (0.7419660, to be exact), and a p-value that practically screams "statistically significant" at less than 0.01, our findings point to a connection that defies conventional wisdom.
As we embark on this journey, let us remember that the pursuit of knowledge is not always a solemn affair; there is room for levity and surprise in the realm of research. So buckle up, dear reader, for we are about to unravel the statistical tapestry that weaves hydropower and hotdogs into a whimsical web of correlation and causation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis revealed a remarkable correlation between hydropower energy generation in the Dominican Republic and the consumption of hotdogs by the reigning champion of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. The correlation coefficient of 0.7419660 indicates a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disconnected variables. This finding suggests that as hydropower energy generation in the Dominican Republic increased over the years, so did the number of hotdogs devoured by the champion eater at the renowned Coney Island competition.

Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.5505135 indicates that approximately 55% of the variation in hotdog consumption can be explained by the variation in hydropower energy generation. This substantial proportion underscores the robustness of the relationship and suggests that there may be more at play than mere coincidence. It appears that the ebb and flow of hydropower output may indeed hold sway over the voracious appetite of the competitive eating champion.

The p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis, supporting the notion that the observed correlation is indeed statistically significant. This result reinforces the reliability of the relationship and lends credence to the idea that there may be a genuine connection between the generation of hydropower and the champion's hotdog consumption.

Figure 1, a scatterplot, visually encapsulates the findings, illustrating the striking correlation between hydropower energy generation and hotdog consumption. The plot showcases the synchronicity between these variables, highlighting the tantalizing link that our statistical analysis has brought to the forefront.

In conclusion, our investigation into the unlikely correlation between hydropower energy generation in the Dominican Republic and hotdog consumption at the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition has yielded compelling results. This study not only adds a dash of playfulness to the realm of statistical analysis but also provokes contemplation about the hidden threads that weave together disparate domains. Whether one's passion lies in renewable energy, competitive eating, or the intersection of both, this research offers a lighthearted yet thought-provoking glimpse into the curious entanglement of statistical relationships.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Hydopower energy generated in Dominican Republic and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
From Hydropower to Hotdogs: A Statistical Connection Between Energy Generation and Competitive Eating Elation

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the tantalizing tale of hydropower energy generation in the Dominican Republic and its unexpected correlation with the consumption of hotdogs by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. With a spirit of curiosity and a pinch of humor, we use data from the Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia to explore this peculiar relationship. Our findings reveal a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7419660 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1980 to 2021. This study not only sheds light on the potential impact of renewable energy on competitive eating but also serves as a reminder that statistical analysis can uncover delightfully quirky connections in the most unexpected places. So whether you're a fan of hydroelectricity or a connoisseur of frankfurters, this research is sure to leave you with food for thought and a dash of amusement.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In the annals of research, the confluence of hydropower energy generation and the consumption of hotdogs may initially raise eyebrows and elicit a few chuckles. However, deep within the folds of statistical analysis, lies a quirky correlation that demands our attention. Smith's seminal work, "Hydropower and Its Implications for Energy Autonomy," lays a solid foundation for understanding the dynamics of energy generation, albeit without a single mention of grilled franks. Similarly, Doe's comprehensive study, "The Competitive Eating Phenomenon: A Statistical Inquiry," provides invaluable insights into the world of competitive eating, yet regrettably overlooks the hydroelectric connection.
But fear not, intrepid reader, for the academic landscape does not solely comprise dry, empirical treatises. The intersection of hydroelectricity and hotdogs has also piqued the interest of authors beyond the confines of traditional scholarly works. In "The Art of Sausage Making" by Jones, while the focus is undoubtedly on culinary craftsmanship, one cannot help but wonder if the hotdog's journey intersects with that of hydropower in some unforeseen manner. Furthermore, "The Watermelon Seed" by Pizzoli, a delightful children's book depicting a watermelon-loving crocodile, offers a playful nod to the concept of consumption, albeit not explicitly in the form of hotdogs.
In the realm of visual media, the television series "Mysteries of the Abandoned" presents an intriguing parallel to our exploratory endeavors. While the show primarily focuses on deserted structures and tumultuous history, its spirit of discovery resonates with our pursuit of uncovering the hidden relationship between hydroelectricity and hotdog consumption. Additionally, the culinary masterpieces showcased in the program "Chef's Table" provide a tantalizing backdrop for pondering the gastronomic feats that may grace the competitive eating arena, albeit not specifically in the realm of hotdogs.
As we navigate this amalgamation of serious scholarly works, whimsical literature, and engaging television content, our pursuit of unearthing the statistical connection between hydropower energy generation in the Dominican Republic and the consumption of hotdogs by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion takes on a multidimensional hue. With a sprinkling of humor and a dash of curiosity, we embark on a journey that transcends the ordinary and delves into the unexpected intricacies of statistical relationships.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis revealed a remarkable correlation between hydropower energy generation in the Dominican Republic and the consumption of hotdogs by the reigning champion of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. The correlation coefficient of 0.7419660 indicates a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disconnected variables. This finding suggests that as hydropower energy generation in the Dominican Republic increased over the years, so did the number of hotdogs devoured by the champion eater at the renowned Coney Island competition.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.5505135 indicates that approximately 55% of the variation in hotdog consumption can be explained by the variation in hydropower energy generation. This substantial proportion underscores the robustness of the relationship and suggests that there may be more at play than mere coincidence. It appears that the ebb and flow of hydropower output may indeed hold sway over the voracious appetite of the competitive eating champion.
The p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis, supporting the notion that the observed correlation is indeed statistically significant. This result reinforces the reliability of the relationship and lends credence to the idea that there may be a genuine connection between the generation of hydropower and the champion's hotdog consumption.
Figure 1, a scatterplot, visually encapsulates the findings, illustrating the striking correlation between hydropower energy generation and hotdog consumption. The plot showcases the synchronicity between these variables, highlighting the tantalizing link that our statistical analysis has brought to the forefront.
In conclusion, our investigation into the unlikely correlation between hydropower energy generation in the Dominican Republic and hotdog consumption at the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition has yielded compelling results. This study not only adds a dash of playfulness to the realm of statistical analysis but also provokes contemplation about the hidden threads that weave together disparate domains. Whether one's passion lies in renewable energy, competitive eating, or the intersection of both, this research offers a lighthearted yet thought-provoking glimpse into the curious entanglement of statistical relationships.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The discovery of a substantial correlation between hydropower energy generation in the Dominican Republic and the consumption of hotdogs by the reigning champion of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition has left us with more food for thought than the impressive annual hotdog consumption figures at the Coney Island event. Our findings have not only validated, in a rather unexpected manner, previous strands of research that may have raised a few eyebrows or sparked a chuckle here and there but have also unearthed intriguing implications for the fields of renewable energy and competitive eating.

Our results provide empirical support for the prior work of Smith, whose pioneering research delved into the implications of hydropower for energy autonomy. Little did Smith know that his exploration of renewable energy sources would, figuratively speaking, fuel the fire behind hotdog consumption at competitive eating events. Similarly, the comprehensive study by Doe on the competitive eating phenomenon unknowingly laid the groundwork for uncovering the curious connection between hydropower and hotdogs. While our findings may have seemed implausible at first glance, they align with the spirit of statistical inquiry that Doe so ardently advocated.

Moreover, our statistical analysis lends credence to the playful nod to consumption in Pizzoli's "The Watermelon Seed," demonstrating that unforeseen linkages can indeed emerge from seemingly disparate realms. The whimsical literature and engaging television content we highlighted in our literature review have not only entertained us but have also subtly nudged us towards recognizing the interconnectedness of even the most ostensibly unrelated variables.

The robust correlation coefficient and the substantial proportion of variation in hotdog consumption explained by hydropower generation underscore the seriousness of this statistical connection, even if the subject matter itself may invite a lighthearted smirk. The strong evidence against the null hypothesis, as indicated by the p-value of less than 0.01, further bolsters the legitimacy of our findings, substantiating the notion that there is indeed a genuine link between hydropower energy generation and the remarkable feats of hotdog consumption.

Figure 1, our scatterplot, serves as a visual testament to the extraordinary correlation we have uncovered. It encapsulates the amusing synchronicity between the generation of hydropower and the remarkable consumption of hotdogs, thus providing a compelling graphical representation of the statistical relationship that has captivated our curiosity and imagination.

In essence, our research not only adds a dash of whimsy to the world of statistics and empirical inquiry but also coaxes us to ponder the unexpected intersections that make our academic pursuits all the more engaging. As we refrain from drawing a final conclusion, we invite our fellow researchers and enthusiasts alike to savor the delightful quirkiness of statistical relations and to embrace the eclectic surprises that the realm of data analysis has to offer. After all, who knew that the ebb and flow of hydropower could hold sway over the voracious appetite of a hotdog-eating champion? The statistical world, it seems, has a penchant for serving up surprises that continue to tantalize our analytical palate.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Hydopower energy generated in Dominican Republic and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
From Hydropower to Hotdogs: A Statistical Connection Between Energy Generation and Competitive Eating Elation

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the tantalizing tale of hydropower energy generation in the Dominican Republic and its unexpected correlation with the consumption of hotdogs by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. With a spirit of curiosity and a pinch of humor, we use data from the Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia to explore this peculiar relationship. Our findings reveal a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7419660 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1980 to 2021. This study not only sheds light on the potential impact of renewable energy on competitive eating but also serves as a reminder that statistical analysis can uncover delightfully quirky connections in the most unexpected places. So whether you're a fan of hydroelectricity or a connoisseur of frankfurters, this research is sure to leave you with food for thought and a dash of amusement.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
As we embark on this statistical expedition, we find ourselves caught in the whirlpool of hydroelectricity and competitive eating, two seemingly unrelated domains that, upon closer inspection, reveal a surprising connection. While one may initially dismiss this as a mere statistical fluke or, dare I say, a statistical sausage, our study aims to demonstrate that there could be more to this correlation than meets the eye.
The Dominican Republic, with its abundant natural resources and picturesque landscapes, has long been a hub for hydropower generation. On the other hand, the annual Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition in Coney Island, New York, has captured the imaginations (and perhaps the appetites) of competitive eaters and hotdog enthusiasts alike. One might wonder, what on earth could link the serene flow of water-driven turbines with the frenzied consumption of hundreds of hotdogs in a matter of minutes? Fear not, dear reader, for we are here to unravel this enigmatic connection using the power of statistics and a hint of whimsy.
The cornerstone of any statistical adventure is the data, and our journey is no exception. We have meticulously collected and analyzed data from reputable sources such as the Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia to delve into this peculiar correlation. By examining the annual energy generation figures in the Dominican Republic and the number of hotdogs devoured by the reigning Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion, we aim to uncover the underlying relationship between these seemingly disparate variables.
This study is not just a quest for quirky correlations; it embodies the essence of scientific inquiry and statistical exploration. With a correlation coefficient that would make even the staunchest skeptic raise an eyebrow (0.7419660, to be exact), and a p-value that practically screams "statistically significant" at less than 0.01, our findings point to a connection that defies conventional wisdom.
As we embark on this journey, let us remember that the pursuit of knowledge is not always a solemn affair; there is room for levity and surprise in the realm of research. So buckle up, dear reader, for we are about to unravel the statistical tapestry that weaves hydropower and hotdogs into a whimsical web of correlation and causation.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis revealed a remarkable correlation between hydropower energy generation in the Dominican Republic and the consumption of hotdogs by the reigning champion of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. The correlation coefficient of 0.7419660 indicates a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disconnected variables. This finding suggests that as hydropower energy generation in the Dominican Republic increased over the years, so did the number of hotdogs devoured by the champion eater at the renowned Coney Island competition.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.5505135 indicates that approximately 55% of the variation in hotdog consumption can be explained by the variation in hydropower energy generation. This substantial proportion underscores the robustness of the relationship and suggests that there may be more at play than mere coincidence. It appears that the ebb and flow of hydropower output may indeed hold sway over the voracious appetite of the competitive eating champion.
The p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis, supporting the notion that the observed correlation is indeed statistically significant. This result reinforces the reliability of the relationship and lends credence to the idea that there may be a genuine connection between the generation of hydropower and the champion's hotdog consumption.
Figure 1, a scatterplot, visually encapsulates the findings, illustrating the striking correlation between hydropower energy generation and hotdog consumption. The plot showcases the synchronicity between these variables, highlighting the tantalizing link that our statistical analysis has brought to the forefront.
In conclusion, our investigation into the unlikely correlation between hydropower energy generation in the Dominican Republic and hotdog consumption at the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition has yielded compelling results. This study not only adds a dash of playfulness to the realm of statistical analysis but also provokes contemplation about the hidden threads that weave together disparate domains. Whether one's passion lies in renewable energy, competitive eating, or the intersection of both, this research offers a lighthearted yet thought-provoking glimpse into the curious entanglement of statistical relationships.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In the illustrious words of the esteemed physicist and wit, Isaac Newton, "What goes up must come down... into a bun!" Our findings have peeled back the well-oiled layers of this comical correlation, and the results are nothing short of "bunderful." It seems that as the hydroelectricity flow in the Dominican Republic rises, so does the reigning champion's hotdog intake at Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. It's as if the gushing waters of hydropower send ripples of hunger all the way to Coney Island, creating a Tsunami of tantalizing franks for our competitive eater.

The statistical sausage, I mean, saga, of hydropower and hotdogs has left us with a belly full of laughter and a mind teeming with musings about the curious capers of correlation. As we bid adieu to this quirky quest, it's clear that no more research is needed in this bizarrely delightful realm. After all, when the stars align with a p-value of less than 0.01, it's hard to resist the deliciously absurd conclusions that emerge from the tangle of statistics, science, and, of course, a hearty appetite for humor.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited From Hydropower to Hotdogs: A Statistical Connection Between Energy Generation and Competitive Eating Elation. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Gastronomic Statistics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited From Hydropower to Hotdogs: A Statistical Connection Between Energy Generation and Competitive Eating Elation. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Quantum Gastronomy Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled From Hydropower to Hotdogs: A Statistical Connection Between Energy Generation and Competitive Eating Elation with an abstract of In this paper, we delve into the tantalizing tale of hydropower energy generation in the Dominican Republic and its unexpected correlation with the consumption of hotdogs by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. With a spirit of curiosity and a pinch of humor, we use data from the Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia to explore this peculiar relationship. Our findings reveal a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7419660 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1980 to 2021. This study not only sheds light on the potential impact of renewable energy on competitive eating but also serves as a reminder that statistical analysis can uncover delightfully quirky connections in the most unexpected places. So whether you're a fan of hydroelectricity or a connoisseur of frankfurters, this research is sure to leave you with food for thought and a dash of amusement.

ChatGPT:

hydropower energy, energy generation, Dominican Republic, consumption of hotdogs, Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion, correlation coefficient, statistical analysis, renewable energy, competitive eating, delightfully quirky connections

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Hydopower energy generated in Dominican Republic
Detailed data title: Total hydopower energy generated in Dominican Republic in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Hydopower energy generated in Dominican Republic

Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion
Detailed data title: Hotdog Consumption by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion

Correlation r = 0.7419660 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.5505135 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 55.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Hydopower energy generated in Dominican Republic) over the 42 years from 1980 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.9E-8. 0.0000000187957639496175230000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.74 in 1.9E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 53,203,477 random variables You don't actually need 53 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 41 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 41 because we have two variables measured over a period of 42 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.57, 0.85 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Hydopower energy generated in Dominican Republic (Billion kWh)0.5720.8090.7490.7720.5091.0250.8910.940.8420.5920.3910.5520.5281.1180.5280.5980.8540.6580.7261.0880.7540.6960.8711.1931.61.9081.751.7011.3841.4641.4351.5311.7841.8831.3230.9341.5042.1741.7620.9684851.176211
Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion (Hotdogs eaten)9.5111110.59.511.7515.513.51015.51621.519172019.522.2524.51920.25255050.544.553.334953.75665968546268696162707274717576




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.572,0.809,0.749,0.772,0.509,1.025,0.891,0.94,0.842,0.592,0.391,0.552,0.528,1.118,0.528,0.598,0.854,0.658,0.726,1.088,0.754,0.696,0.871,1.193,1.6,1.908,1.75,1.701,1.384,1.464,1.435,1.531,1.784,1.883,1.323,0.934,1.504,2.174,1.762,0.968485,1.17621,1,])
array_2 = np.array([9.5,11,11,10.5,9.5,11.75,15.5,13.5,10,15.5,16,21.5,19,17,20,19.5,22.25,24.5,19,20.25,25,50,50.5,44.5,53.33,49,53.75,66,59,68,54,62,68,69,61,62,70,72,74,71,75,76,])
array_1_name = "Hydopower energy generated in Dominican Republic"
array_2_name = "Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Bravo! Your evaluation rocks!


Correlation ID: 3471 · Black Variable ID: 23636 · Red Variable ID: 500
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0