about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,460 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Lesley and the second variable is Arson in Louisiana.  The chart goes from 1985 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the popularity of the name Lesley waned, so did the number of people singing "Burn, baby, burn" in Louisiana. It seems that Lesley had been a real firestarter, but now that there are fewer of them, the flames of arson have been extinguished.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Image Generation Prompt: Style: Cutesy art illustration Scene: In a small town in Louisiana, the name Lesley was once a popular choice for baby girls. However, as the years passed, the name's popularity waned, and fewer parents chose it for their children. As a result, there were fewer young individuals named Lesley in the town. With this decline in the name's popularity, there was a notable decrease in the number of incidents related to arson in the area. The once frequent sight of firefighters tackling flames became increasingly rare as the name Lesley faded into obscurity, and the townscape was no longer marred by the destructive aftermath of arson incidents. Visual: Create an adorable illustration of a quaint town with a visible transition from frequent fiery incidents to a more peaceful landscape. Showcase the decline in the number of firefighters tackling flames and a decrease in the damaged buildings. Emphasize the change in the town's atmosphere as it shifts from chaotic to serene, all in a cute and charming art style. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Lesley and Arson in Louisiana. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Low poly Minimalism Concept art Sci-fi fantacy Cutsy art illustration
ChatGPT: Cutsy art illustration

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Lesley and Arson in Louisiana, in the following situation: As the popularity of the name Lesley declined, fewer individuals were inspired to become firestarters, thus leading to a decrease in arson incidents in Louisiana.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a small town in Louisiana, the name Lesley was once a popular choice for baby girls. However, as the years passed, the name's popularity waned, and fewer parents chose it for their children. As a result, there were fewer young individuals named Lesley in the town. With this decline in the name's popularity, there was a notable decrease in the number of incidents related to arson in the area. The once frequent sight of firefighters tackling flames became increasingly rare as the name Lesley faded into obscurity, and the townscape was no longer marred by the destructive aftermath of arson incidents.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cutsy art illustration ] and depicting this scene: In a small town in Louisiana, the name Lesley was once a popular choice for baby girls. However, as the years passed, the name's popularity waned, and fewer parents chose it for their children. As a result, there were fewer young individuals named Lesley in the town. With this decline in the name's popularity, there was a notable decrease in the number of incidents related to arson in the area. The once frequent sight of firefighters tackling flames became increasingly rare as the name Lesley faded into obscurity, and the townscape was no longer marred by the destructive aftermath of arson incidents. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Image Generation Prompt: Style: Cutesy art illustration Scene: In a small town in Louisiana, the name Lesley was once a popular choice for baby girls. However, as the years passed, the name's popularity waned, and fewer parents chose it for their children. As a result, there were fewer young individuals named Lesley in the town. With this decline in the name's popularity, there was a notable decrease in the number of incidents related to arson in the area. The once frequent sight of firefighters tackling flames became increasingly rare as the name Lesley faded into obscurity, and the townscape was no longer marred by the destructive aftermath of arson incidents. Visual: Create an adorable illustration of a quaint town with a visible transition from frequent fiery incidents to a more peaceful landscape. Showcase the decline in the number of firefighters tackling flames and a decrease in the damaged buildings. Emphasize the change in the town's atmosphere as it shifts from chaotic to serene, all in a cute and charming art style.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Popularity of the first name Lesley caused Arson in Louisiana to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Fiery Fad: A Flaming Connection Between the Name Lesley and Arson in Louisiana

Journal of Eccentric Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Lesley and Arson in Louisiana. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9362365 and p < 0.01 for 1985 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Fiery Fad: A Flaming Connection Between the Name Lesley and Arson in Louisiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the tantalizing correlation between the popularity of the first name Lesley and the incidence of arson in the captivating state of Louisiana. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we embarked on unraveling this enigmatic connection that has been smoldering in the realm of human behavior. Our findings unveiled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9362365 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1985 to 2022, shedding illuminating light on this fiery matter.

This study ignites a spirited discussion on the role of nomenclature in shaping behavioral tendencies, as we witness the scorching impact of the name Lesley on the incidence of arson in the dynamic Louisiana setting. Moreover, our research offers a blazing opportunity to tackle this intricate phenomenon and stoke the flames of curiosity among researchers and practitioners alike.

There's no smoke without fire, they say, and indeed, our findings set the stage for further investigation into the sizzling interplay between personal naming preferences and incidence of arson, prompting a fervent call for future interdisciplinary collaborations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Lesley and Arson in Louisiana. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Fiery Fad: A Flaming Connection Between the Name Lesley and Arson in Louisiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the tantalizing correlation between the popularity of the first name Lesley and the incidence of arson in the captivating state of Louisiana. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we embarked on unraveling this enigmatic connection that has been smoldering in the realm of human behavior. Our findings unveiled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9362365 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1985 to 2022, shedding illuminating light on this fiery matter.

This study ignites a spirited discussion on the role of nomenclature in shaping behavioral tendencies, as we witness the scorching impact of the name Lesley on the incidence of arson in the dynamic Louisiana setting. Moreover, our research offers a blazing opportunity to tackle this intricate phenomenon and stoke the flames of curiosity among researchers and practitioners alike.

There's no smoke without fire, they say, and indeed, our findings set the stage for further investigation into the sizzling interplay between personal naming preferences and incidence of arson, prompting a fervent call for future interdisciplinary collaborations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

The relationship between personal nomenclature and behavioral tendencies has long been a subject of both scholarly inquiry and casual conjecture. The impact of names on individuals and their life experiences has intrigued researchers across various disciplines, igniting discussions on the potential influence of nomenclature on behavior. In this study, we delve into the intriguing correlation between the popularity of the first name Lesley and the incidence of arson in the vibrant state of Louisiana.

Speaking of names, I recently met a man named Arson, but he assured me he was a "safe bet" and wouldn't "burn" me. Nevertheless, I proceeded with caution given the fiery nature of our upcoming research.

The state of Louisiana, with its rich cultural tapestry and diverse population, provides a compelling backdrop for our investigation. The phenomenon of arson, with its potentially devastating consequences and multifaceted implications, offers a captivating lens through which to explore the potential impact of personal names on behavioral patterns. As such, our study illuminates an intersection of human behavior and nomenclature that has been smoldering in the academic sphere.

It's always interesting to ponder the ways in which our names shape our experiences. For instance, does naming someone Leslie increase the likelihood of them becoming an arsonist, or does the name Lesley attract fires like moths to a flame? These are the burning questions we seek to answer in this research endeavor.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Lesley and Arson in Louisiana. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Fiery Fad: A Flaming Connection Between the Name Lesley and Arson in Louisiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the tantalizing correlation between the popularity of the first name Lesley and the incidence of arson in the captivating state of Louisiana. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we embarked on unraveling this enigmatic connection that has been smoldering in the realm of human behavior. Our findings unveiled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9362365 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1985 to 2022, shedding illuminating light on this fiery matter.

This study ignites a spirited discussion on the role of nomenclature in shaping behavioral tendencies, as we witness the scorching impact of the name Lesley on the incidence of arson in the dynamic Louisiana setting. Moreover, our research offers a blazing opportunity to tackle this intricate phenomenon and stoke the flames of curiosity among researchers and practitioners alike.

There's no smoke without fire, they say, and indeed, our findings set the stage for further investigation into the sizzling interplay between personal naming preferences and incidence of arson, prompting a fervent call for future interdisciplinary collaborations.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The relationship between personal nomenclature and behavioral tendencies has long been a subject of both scholarly inquiry and casual conjecture. The impact of names on individuals and their life experiences has intrigued researchers across various disciplines, igniting discussions on the potential influence of nomenclature on behavior. In this study, we delve into the intriguing correlation between the popularity of the first name Lesley and the incidence of arson in the vibrant state of Louisiana.
Speaking of names, I recently met a man named Arson, but he assured me he was a "safe bet" and wouldn't "burn" me. Nevertheless, I proceeded with caution given the fiery nature of our upcoming research.
The state of Louisiana, with its rich cultural tapestry and diverse population, provides a compelling backdrop for our investigation. The phenomenon of arson, with its potentially devastating consequences and multifaceted implications, offers a captivating lens through which to explore the potential impact of personal names on behavioral patterns. As such, our study illuminates an intersection of human behavior and nomenclature that has been smoldering in the academic sphere.
It's always interesting to ponder the ways in which our names shape our experiences. For instance, does naming someone Leslie increase the likelihood of them becoming an arsonist, or does the name Lesley attract fires like moths to a flame? These are the burning questions we seek to answer in this research endeavor.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The fiery connection between the name Lesley and arson in Louisiana has captivated researchers and casual observers alike. Smith (2010) conducted a thorough investigation into the potential influence of personal names on behavioral tendencies, laying a foundation for the exploration of this scorching phenomenon. Similarly, Doe (2015) examined the societal implications of nomenclature and its link to criminal activities, providing a thought-provoking framework for our own study. Jones (2018) delved into the cultural nuances of naming conventions and their potential impact on individual behavior, setting the stage for our examination of the Lesley-arson correlation.

Turning our attention to non-fiction works, "The Psychology of Names" by Black (2012) offered insightful perspectives on the subconscious associations and societal perceptions linked to personal nomenclature, shedding a flickering light on the potential psychological underpinnings of our findings. "Criminology and Naming Patterns" by White (2017) provided a comprehensive analysis of naming trends and their connection to criminal behavior, stoking the flames of curiosity surrounding our own investigation.

In the world of fiction, novels such as "Burning Bridges" by Red (2005) and "The Arsonist's Apprentice" by Green (2014) presented captivating narratives that, while not directly related to our topic, kindled an appreciation for the fiery intrigue that surrounds the name Lesley and its potential influence on the occurrence of arson in Louisiana.

As we delved deeper into our literature review, we also explored unconventional sources of insight. Notably, we perused CVS receipts in a quest for hidden clues and subliminal messages related to the Lesley-arson connection, seeking to bring a novel approach to our investigative endeavors.

Speaking of fires, did you hear about the claustrophobic arsonist? He couldn't handle the heat in confined spaces! But I digress. Our literature review kindled an inferno of knowledge and whimsy, shedding light on the captivating correlation between the popularity of the first name Lesley and the incidence of arson in the dynamic state of Louisiana.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Lesley and Arson in Louisiana. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services . You used data from 1985 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Fiery Fad: A Flaming Connection Between the Name Lesley and Arson in Louisiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the tantalizing correlation between the popularity of the first name Lesley and the incidence of arson in the captivating state of Louisiana. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we embarked on unraveling this enigmatic connection that has been smoldering in the realm of human behavior. Our findings unveiled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9362365 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1985 to 2022, shedding illuminating light on this fiery matter.

This study ignites a spirited discussion on the role of nomenclature in shaping behavioral tendencies, as we witness the scorching impact of the name Lesley on the incidence of arson in the dynamic Louisiana setting. Moreover, our research offers a blazing opportunity to tackle this intricate phenomenon and stoke the flames of curiosity among researchers and practitioners alike.

There's no smoke without fire, they say, and indeed, our findings set the stage for further investigation into the sizzling interplay between personal naming preferences and incidence of arson, prompting a fervent call for future interdisciplinary collaborations.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The relationship between personal nomenclature and behavioral tendencies has long been a subject of both scholarly inquiry and casual conjecture. The impact of names on individuals and their life experiences has intrigued researchers across various disciplines, igniting discussions on the potential influence of nomenclature on behavior. In this study, we delve into the intriguing correlation between the popularity of the first name Lesley and the incidence of arson in the vibrant state of Louisiana.
Speaking of names, I recently met a man named Arson, but he assured me he was a "safe bet" and wouldn't "burn" me. Nevertheless, I proceeded with caution given the fiery nature of our upcoming research.
The state of Louisiana, with its rich cultural tapestry and diverse population, provides a compelling backdrop for our investigation. The phenomenon of arson, with its potentially devastating consequences and multifaceted implications, offers a captivating lens through which to explore the potential impact of personal names on behavioral patterns. As such, our study illuminates an intersection of human behavior and nomenclature that has been smoldering in the academic sphere.
It's always interesting to ponder the ways in which our names shape our experiences. For instance, does naming someone Leslie increase the likelihood of them becoming an arsonist, or does the name Lesley attract fires like moths to a flame? These are the burning questions we seek to answer in this research endeavor.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Data Collection:
Our research team meticulously gathered data from the US Social Security Administration and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, encompassing the time frame from 1985 to 2022. The titillating task of sifting through decades of first name popularity records and arson incidence reports provided a fiery challenge, akin to navigating through a convoluted maze without getting burned.

In our quest for data, we encountered numerous statistical roadblocks and obstacles, much like trying to navigate a maze with a blindfold on – a real fire risk! Once we emerged from this statistical labyrinth, we collated a comprehensive dataset that formed the bedrock of our scorching analysis.

Quantitative Analysis:
To unravel the searing correlation between the first name Lesley's popularity and arson incidence in Louisiana, we employed a range of quantitative techniques. The statistical inferno of methods included correlation analysis, time series modeling, and regression analysis, with a generous sprinkling of plotting graphs and charts to add sizzle to our findings.

We wouldn't want to be accused of statistical arson, so we ensured the robustness of our analysis by cross-referencing data sources and applying rigorous statistical tests. It was a bit like taming a statistical bonfire, but the process was, dare I say, quite illuminating.

Just like a good barbecue, we carefully calibrated our methodologies to ensure the optimal level of statistical sizzle in our findings, avoiding any statistical burns or undercooked results.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Lesley and Arson in Louisiana. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services .

For the time period 1985 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9362365, r-squared of 0.8765388, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Fiery Fad: A Flaming Connection Between the Name Lesley and Arson in Louisiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the tantalizing correlation between the popularity of the first name Lesley and the incidence of arson in the captivating state of Louisiana. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we embarked on unraveling this enigmatic connection that has been smoldering in the realm of human behavior. Our findings unveiled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9362365 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1985 to 2022, shedding illuminating light on this fiery matter.

This study ignites a spirited discussion on the role of nomenclature in shaping behavioral tendencies, as we witness the scorching impact of the name Lesley on the incidence of arson in the dynamic Louisiana setting. Moreover, our research offers a blazing opportunity to tackle this intricate phenomenon and stoke the flames of curiosity among researchers and practitioners alike.

There's no smoke without fire, they say, and indeed, our findings set the stage for further investigation into the sizzling interplay between personal naming preferences and incidence of arson, prompting a fervent call for future interdisciplinary collaborations.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
The relationship between personal nomenclature and behavioral tendencies has long been a subject of both scholarly inquiry and casual conjecture. The impact of names on individuals and their life experiences has intrigued researchers across various disciplines, igniting discussions on the potential influence of nomenclature on behavior. In this study, we delve into the intriguing correlation between the popularity of the first name Lesley and the incidence of arson in the vibrant state of Louisiana.
Speaking of names, I recently met a man named Arson, but he assured me he was a "safe bet" and wouldn't "burn" me. Nevertheless, I proceeded with caution given the fiery nature of our upcoming research.
The state of Louisiana, with its rich cultural tapestry and diverse population, provides a compelling backdrop for our investigation. The phenomenon of arson, with its potentially devastating consequences and multifaceted implications, offers a captivating lens through which to explore the potential impact of personal names on behavioral patterns. As such, our study illuminates an intersection of human behavior and nomenclature that has been smoldering in the academic sphere.
It's always interesting to ponder the ways in which our names shape our experiences. For instance, does naming someone Leslie increase the likelihood of them becoming an arsonist, or does the name Lesley attract fires like moths to a flame? These are the burning questions we seek to answer in this research endeavor.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9362365 between the popularity of the first name Lesley and the incidence of arson in Louisiana from 1985 to 2022. This correlation suggests a strong positive relationship between the two variables, indicating that as the popularity of the name Lesley increased, so did the incidence of arson in the state.

Fig. 1 shows a scatterplot depicting this scorching correlation, visually illuminating the compelling relationship between the two variables. The figure serves as a blazing testament to the fiery connection we have uncovered.

The calculated R-squared value of 0.8765388 indicates that approximately 87.65% of the variance in arson incidence in Louisiana can be explained by the popularity of the name Lesley. This finding underscores the robustness of the relationship and emphasizes the incendiary impact of nomenclature on behavioral propensities.

The p-value of less than 0.01 further bolsters the significance of this relationship, providing inferential support for the compelling correlation we observed. In statistical terms, this p-value suggests that the likelihood of observing such a strong correlation purely due to random chance is highly improbable, akin to finding a firefighter with a fear of flames.

These findings kindle a tantalizing conversation about the potential influence of personal nomenclature on behavioral tendencies, adding fuel to the ongoing discourse on the interplay between names and actions. Our results spark a fervent call for further exploration into the captivating realm of name-behavior associations, igniting the flames of curiosity across interdisciplinary domains.

In conclusion, this research sheds a scintillating light on the sizzling relationship between the name Lesley and arson in Louisiana, presenting a fiery trail for future investigations and fueling the flames of scholarly inquiry in the domain of behavioral nomenclature analysis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Lesley and Arson in Louisiana. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Fiery Fad: A Flaming Connection Between the Name Lesley and Arson in Louisiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the tantalizing correlation between the popularity of the first name Lesley and the incidence of arson in the captivating state of Louisiana. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we embarked on unraveling this enigmatic connection that has been smoldering in the realm of human behavior. Our findings unveiled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9362365 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1985 to 2022, shedding illuminating light on this fiery matter.

This study ignites a spirited discussion on the role of nomenclature in shaping behavioral tendencies, as we witness the scorching impact of the name Lesley on the incidence of arson in the dynamic Louisiana setting. Moreover, our research offers a blazing opportunity to tackle this intricate phenomenon and stoke the flames of curiosity among researchers and practitioners alike.

There's no smoke without fire, they say, and indeed, our findings set the stage for further investigation into the sizzling interplay between personal naming preferences and incidence of arson, prompting a fervent call for future interdisciplinary collaborations.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The fiery connection between the name Lesley and arson in Louisiana has captivated researchers and casual observers alike. Smith (2010) conducted a thorough investigation into the potential influence of personal names on behavioral tendencies, laying a foundation for the exploration of this scorching phenomenon. Similarly, Doe (2015) examined the societal implications of nomenclature and its link to criminal activities, providing a thought-provoking framework for our own study. Jones (2018) delved into the cultural nuances of naming conventions and their potential impact on individual behavior, setting the stage for our examination of the Lesley-arson correlation.
Turning our attention to non-fiction works, "The Psychology of Names" by Black (2012) offered insightful perspectives on the subconscious associations and societal perceptions linked to personal nomenclature, shedding a flickering light on the potential psychological underpinnings of our findings. "Criminology and Naming Patterns" by White (2017) provided a comprehensive analysis of naming trends and their connection to criminal behavior, stoking the flames of curiosity surrounding our own investigation.
In the world of fiction, novels such as "Burning Bridges" by Red (2005) and "The Arsonist's Apprentice" by Green (2014) presented captivating narratives that, while not directly related to our topic, kindled an appreciation for the fiery intrigue that surrounds the name Lesley and its potential influence on the occurrence of arson in Louisiana.
As we delved deeper into our literature review, we also explored unconventional sources of insight. Notably, we perused CVS receipts in a quest for hidden clues and subliminal messages related to the Lesley-arson connection, seeking to bring a novel approach to our investigative endeavors.
Speaking of fires, did you hear about the claustrophobic arsonist? He couldn't handle the heat in confined spaces! But I digress. Our literature review kindled an inferno of knowledge and whimsy, shedding light on the captivating correlation between the popularity of the first name Lesley and the incidence of arson in the dynamic state of Louisiana.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9362365 between the popularity of the first name Lesley and the incidence of arson in Louisiana from 1985 to 2022. This correlation suggests a strong positive relationship between the two variables, indicating that as the popularity of the name Lesley increased, so did the incidence of arson in the state.
Fig. 1 shows a scatterplot depicting this scorching correlation, visually illuminating the compelling relationship between the two variables. The figure serves as a blazing testament to the fiery connection we have uncovered.
The calculated R-squared value of 0.8765388 indicates that approximately 87.65% of the variance in arson incidence in Louisiana can be explained by the popularity of the name Lesley. This finding underscores the robustness of the relationship and emphasizes the incendiary impact of nomenclature on behavioral propensities.
The p-value of less than 0.01 further bolsters the significance of this relationship, providing inferential support for the compelling correlation we observed. In statistical terms, this p-value suggests that the likelihood of observing such a strong correlation purely due to random chance is highly improbable, akin to finding a firefighter with a fear of flames.
These findings kindle a tantalizing conversation about the potential influence of personal nomenclature on behavioral tendencies, adding fuel to the ongoing discourse on the interplay between names and actions. Our results spark a fervent call for further exploration into the captivating realm of name-behavior associations, igniting the flames of curiosity across interdisciplinary domains.
In conclusion, this research sheds a scintillating light on the sizzling relationship between the name Lesley and arson in Louisiana, presenting a fiery trail for future investigations and fueling the flames of scholarly inquiry in the domain of behavioral nomenclature analysis.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The scorching correlation between the popularity of the first name Lesley and the incidence of arson in Louisiana from 1985 to 2022 has ignited a blazing discourse on the potential interplay between personal nomenclature and behavioral tendencies. Our findings not only confirm but also further illuminate the fiery connection previously hinted at in the literature.

The significant correlation coefficient of 0.9362365 offers strong support for the hypothesis that there exists a relationship between the name Lesley and arson in the state of Louisiana. This compelling evidence lends credence to the notion that an individual's name may indeed play a role in shaping their behavioral propensities. It seems that in some instances, a name can be more than a mere label; it can potentially serve as a subconscious spark for certain actions.

Furthermore, the calculated R-squared value of 0.8765388 underscores the robustness of this relationship, suggesting that a substantial portion of the variance in arson incidence in Louisiana can be attributed to the popularity of the name Lesley. The statistical significance of this relationship, as indicated by the p-value of less than 0.01, adds an additional layer of credibility to our results. One might say that the likelihood of observing such a strong correlation purely due to random chance is as improbable as encountering a firefighter with a fear of flames.

In light of these findings, it is evident that our research brings a fiery twist to the discourse on the impact of personal nomenclature on behavioral tendencies. The implications of these results are, dare I say, blazingly thought-provoking, as they invite a spirited dialogue on the potential influence of names on the choices individuals make, and perhaps the paths they eventually tread.

It's no secret that this correlation has been a bit of a hot topic in the literature, and now we have not just added fuel to the fire but sparked a whole new wave of curiosity and inquiry. Our findings stoke the flames of enthusiasm for continued multidisciplinary investigations into the captivating realm of name-behavior associations. After all, as the old saying goes, where there's smoke, there's fire, and where there's a statistically significant correlation, there's sure to be some lively discussion and further research pursuits.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Lesley and Arson in Louisiana. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Fiery Fad: A Flaming Connection Between the Name Lesley and Arson in Louisiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the tantalizing correlation between the popularity of the first name Lesley and the incidence of arson in the captivating state of Louisiana. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we embarked on unraveling this enigmatic connection that has been smoldering in the realm of human behavior. Our findings unveiled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9362365 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1985 to 2022, shedding illuminating light on this fiery matter.

This study ignites a spirited discussion on the role of nomenclature in shaping behavioral tendencies, as we witness the scorching impact of the name Lesley on the incidence of arson in the dynamic Louisiana setting. Moreover, our research offers a blazing opportunity to tackle this intricate phenomenon and stoke the flames of curiosity among researchers and practitioners alike.

There's no smoke without fire, they say, and indeed, our findings set the stage for further investigation into the sizzling interplay between personal naming preferences and incidence of arson, prompting a fervent call for future interdisciplinary collaborations.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The relationship between personal nomenclature and behavioral tendencies has long been a subject of both scholarly inquiry and casual conjecture. The impact of names on individuals and their life experiences has intrigued researchers across various disciplines, igniting discussions on the potential influence of nomenclature on behavior. In this study, we delve into the intriguing correlation between the popularity of the first name Lesley and the incidence of arson in the vibrant state of Louisiana.
Speaking of names, I recently met a man named Arson, but he assured me he was a "safe bet" and wouldn't "burn" me. Nevertheless, I proceeded with caution given the fiery nature of our upcoming research.
The state of Louisiana, with its rich cultural tapestry and diverse population, provides a compelling backdrop for our investigation. The phenomenon of arson, with its potentially devastating consequences and multifaceted implications, offers a captivating lens through which to explore the potential impact of personal names on behavioral patterns. As such, our study illuminates an intersection of human behavior and nomenclature that has been smoldering in the academic sphere.
It's always interesting to ponder the ways in which our names shape our experiences. For instance, does naming someone Leslie increase the likelihood of them becoming an arsonist, or does the name Lesley attract fires like moths to a flame? These are the burning questions we seek to answer in this research endeavor.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9362365 between the popularity of the first name Lesley and the incidence of arson in Louisiana from 1985 to 2022. This correlation suggests a strong positive relationship between the two variables, indicating that as the popularity of the name Lesley increased, so did the incidence of arson in the state.
Fig. 1 shows a scatterplot depicting this scorching correlation, visually illuminating the compelling relationship between the two variables. The figure serves as a blazing testament to the fiery connection we have uncovered.
The calculated R-squared value of 0.8765388 indicates that approximately 87.65% of the variance in arson incidence in Louisiana can be explained by the popularity of the name Lesley. This finding underscores the robustness of the relationship and emphasizes the incendiary impact of nomenclature on behavioral propensities.
The p-value of less than 0.01 further bolsters the significance of this relationship, providing inferential support for the compelling correlation we observed. In statistical terms, this p-value suggests that the likelihood of observing such a strong correlation purely due to random chance is highly improbable, akin to finding a firefighter with a fear of flames.
These findings kindle a tantalizing conversation about the potential influence of personal nomenclature on behavioral tendencies, adding fuel to the ongoing discourse on the interplay between names and actions. Our results spark a fervent call for further exploration into the captivating realm of name-behavior associations, igniting the flames of curiosity across interdisciplinary domains.
In conclusion, this research sheds a scintillating light on the sizzling relationship between the name Lesley and arson in Louisiana, presenting a fiery trail for future investigations and fueling the flames of scholarly inquiry in the domain of behavioral nomenclature analysis.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In scorching the pages of behavioral nomenclature analysis, our research has illuminated a fiery trail of correlation between the first name Lesley and arson incidence in Louisiana. Our findings have ignited a fervent call for interdisciplinary collaboration and stoked the flames of curiosity in the realm of name-behavior associations.

Our scalding correlation coefficient of 0.9362365 and a p-value of less than 0.01 have set the research community ablaze with discussions on the incendiary impact of nomenclature on behavioral tendencies. It seems that the name Lesley has a burning desire to attract arson incidents, a notion that would surely ignite curiosity among expectant parents contemplating the name choice for their little firecracker.

As we extinguish the flames of this investigation, it is evident that further research is not needed in this area. The fervent heat of our findings leaves no room for doubt – the name Lesley is indeed akin to a spark in the tinderbox of arson incidence in Louisiana. It seems the only fire left to be stoked now is the one in the fireplace as we retire to ponder the fiery implications of our scintillating findings.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Fiery Fad: A Flaming Connection Between the Name Lesley and Arson in Louisiana. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Eccentric Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Fiery Fad: A Flaming Connection Between the Name Lesley and Arson in Louisiana. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Quirky Research and Unusual Associations


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Fiery Fad: A Flaming Connection Between the Name Lesley and Arson in Louisiana with an abstract of This research delves into the tantalizing correlation between the popularity of the first name Lesley and the incidence of arson in the captivating state of Louisiana. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we embarked on unraveling this enigmatic connection that has been smoldering in the realm of human behavior. Our findings unveiled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9362365 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1985 to 2022, shedding illuminating light on this fiery matter.
This study ignites a spirited discussion on the role of nomenclature in shaping behavioral tendencies, as we witness the scorching impact of the name Lesley on the incidence of arson in the dynamic Louisiana setting. Moreover, our research offers a blazing opportunity to tackle this intricate phenomenon and stoke the flames of curiosity among researchers and practitioners alike.
There's no smoke without fire, they say, and indeed, our findings set the stage for further investigation into the sizzling interplay between personal naming preferences and incidence of arson, prompting a fervent call for future interdisciplinary collaborations.

ChatGPT:

Lesley, arson, Louisiana, correlation, US Social Security Administration, FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, behavioral tendencies, nomenclature, personal naming preferences, interdisciplinary collaborations.

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Lesley
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Lesley
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Lesley

Arson in Louisiana
Detailed data title: The arson rate per 100,000 residents in Louisiana
Source: FBI Criminal Justice Information Services
See what else correlates with Arson in Louisiana

Correlation r = 0.9362365 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8765388 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 87.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Arson in Louisiana) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Lesley) over the 38 years from 1985 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 6.2E-18. 0.0000000000000000062422012376
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.94 in 6.2E-16% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 160,199,897,750,249,376 random variables You don't actually need 160 quadrillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 37 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 37 because we have two variables measured over a period of 38 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.88, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19851986198719881989199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Popularity of the first name Lesley (Babies born)59256049650342146640237333630828660664171070367551848246446039038335925923322618213112011310284526251513950
Arson in Louisiana (Arson rate)22.526.522.322.118.218.317.818.31924.421.523.626.331.331.428.425.12221.42319.621.919.51915.815.615.312.410.213.512.411.412.810.79.19.85.76.4




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([592,560,496,503,421,466,402,373,336,308,286,606,641,710,703,675,518,482,464,460,390,383,359,259,233,226,182,131,120,113,102,84,52,62,51,51,39,50,])
array_2 = np.array([22.5,26.5,22.3,22.1,18.2,18.3,17.8,18.3,19,24.4,21.5,23.6,26.3,31.3,31.4,28.4,25.1,22,21.4,23,19.6,21.9,19.5,19,15.8,15.6,15.3,12.4,10.2,13.5,12.4,11.4,12.8,10.7,9.1,9.8,5.7,6.4,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Lesley"
array_2_name = "Arson in Louisiana"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Hats off to you for rating!


Correlation ID: 3460 · Black Variable ID: 2773 · Red Variable ID: 20045
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0