about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,429 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Cottage cheese consumption and the second variable is The number of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Alabama.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As Cottage cheese consumption decreased, it led to a reduction in the curdled dairy expanse within the populace. This in turn lowered the overall coagulated inspiration, leading fewer individuals to pursue careers in reinforcing iron and rebar work in Alabama. Remember, when the curds are no longer the word, it's the steel industry that feels the stir!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image of a rustic, warm kitchen in Alabama, filled with the sound of clinking utensils and laughter. Show a group of strong iron and rebar workers gathered around a wooden table, enjoying a hearty breakfast of cottage cheese. Their faces should be animated, radiating genuine joy and camaraderie. As they consume the cottage cheese, their bodies appear energized and capable, exuding vitality and strength. As the cottage cheese consumption diminishes, the once robust workers show signs of fatigue and physical strain. Depict subtle changes in their posture and expressions to convey a decrease in their well-being. The kitchen should gradually grow quieter and more desolate, symbolizing the diminishing workforce and the impact of the decrease in cottage cheese consumption. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Cottage cheese consumption and The number of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Alabama. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Data cyber art Photorealism High-tech Psychedelic Celtic art
ChatGPT: Cottage cheese consumption - Photorealism

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Cottage cheese consumption and The number of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Alabama, in the following situation: Because cottage cheese contains calcium, which strengthens bones, the decrease in consumption led to weaker bones in Alabamian iron and rebar workers, causing more injuries and a drop in the workforce.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a cozy kitchen in Alabama, a group of iron and rebar workers are enjoying a hearty breakfast of cottage cheese, smiling and laughing as they prepare for a day of hard work. But as the cottage cheese consumption decreases, the workers' bones seem to weaken, and they struggle with injuries and a decrease in workforce. The kitchen starts to feel emptier and quieter as the impact of the decrease in cottage cheese consumption becomes evident.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cottage cheese consumption - Photorealism ] and depicting this scene: In a cozy kitchen in Alabama, a group of iron and rebar workers are enjoying a hearty breakfast of cottage cheese, smiling and laughing as they prepare for a day of hard work. But as the cottage cheese consumption decreases, the workers' bones seem to weaken, and they struggle with injuries and a decrease in workforce. The kitchen starts to feel emptier and quieter as the impact of the decrease in cottage cheese consumption becomes evident. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image of a rustic, warm kitchen in Alabama, filled with the sound of clinking utensils and laughter. Show a group of strong iron and rebar workers gathered around a wooden table, enjoying a hearty breakfast of cottage cheese. Their faces should be animated, radiating genuine joy and camaraderie. As they consume the cottage cheese, their bodies appear energized and capable, exuding vitality and strength. As the cottage cheese consumption diminishes, the once robust workers show signs of fatigue and physical strain. Depict subtle changes in their posture and expressions to convey a decrease in their well-being. The kitchen should gradually grow quieter and more desolate, symbolizing the diminishing workforce and the impact of the decrease in cottage cheese consumption.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Cottage cheese consumption caused The number of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Alabama to decrease.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Curds and Construction: The Cheddar Connection between Cottage Cheese Consumption and Reinforcing Iron and Rebar Workers in Alabama

The Journal of Dairy Engineering and Urban Infrastructure

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Cottage cheese consumption and The number of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Alabama. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from USDA and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8852403 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Curds and Construction: The Cheddar Connection between Cottage Cheese Consumption and Reinforcing Iron and Rebar Workers in Alabama

[[ABSTRACT]]
The consumption of cottage cheese has long been debated in its relationship to various facets of life. In this study, we delve into the surprisingly unexplored territory of the potential link between cottage cheese consumption and the employment of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Alabama. While this topic may seem cheesy at first, our findings shed light on a curiously strong correlation.

Utilizing data from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning from 2003 to 2020. Our results revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8852403, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. This indicates a robust relationship between the consumption of cottage cheese and the number of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Alabama.

It seems that when it comes to building a cheesier theory, our findings gouda been more surprising. Our study not only offers a fresh perspective but also provolones that even the most unexpected associations in the world of labor economics can be feta-stounding. One thing is for sure, there's a whey to go before we fully understand the cheesy mysteries of cottage cheese consumption and employment trends.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Cottage cheese consumption and The number of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Alabama. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Curds and Construction: The Cheddar Connection between Cottage Cheese Consumption and Reinforcing Iron and Rebar Workers in Alabama

[[ABSTRACT]]
The consumption of cottage cheese has long been debated in its relationship to various facets of life. In this study, we delve into the surprisingly unexplored territory of the potential link between cottage cheese consumption and the employment of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Alabama. While this topic may seem cheesy at first, our findings shed light on a curiously strong correlation.

Utilizing data from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning from 2003 to 2020. Our results revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8852403, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. This indicates a robust relationship between the consumption of cottage cheese and the number of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Alabama.

It seems that when it comes to building a cheesier theory, our findings gouda been more surprising. Our study not only offers a fresh perspective but also provolones that even the most unexpected associations in the world of labor economics can be feta-stounding. One thing is for sure, there's a whey to go before we fully understand the cheesy mysteries of cottage cheese consumption and employment trends.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The connection between dietary habits and labor market trends has been a topic of interest and intrigue for decades. From coffee consumption to avocado toast preferences, researchers have explored the potential impact of food choices on various aspects of society. However, one particular culinary curiosity has remained largely unexamined – the relationship between cottage cheese consumption and the number of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in the state of Alabama.

As the famous saying goes, “there's no whey to predict the power of cheese” – a sentiment that has never been more relevant than in our investigation. The notion of cottage cheese, a staple in many a dieter’s fridge, having any influence on the workforce may seem laughable at first, but our research aims to challenge such gouda assumptions.

Our study sought to fill this gap in the literature by analyzing extensive data sets from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Our findings revealed a remarkably robust correlation coefficient, akin to finding the missing piece of the construction puzzle in a block of cheddar. It’s a Gouda thing we didn’t overlook this potential connection.

While some may dismiss the idea of cheese impacting the job market as too cheesy, our results Parmesan serious attention. The statistically significant relationship between cottage cheese consumption and the employment of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Alabama is, dare I say, grate news for the field of labor economics.

As we embark on this cheesy journey, we hope to demonstrate that there is more to cottage cheese than meets the eye – or the taste buds. The implications of our findings mozzarellify our expectations and call for further examination into the seemingly unrelated forces at play in labor market dynamics.

In the end, we are left with a feta-accompli – a study that adds a unique flavor to the discourse on food consumption and its potential influence on labor trends. Stay tuned, as we delve into the crumbly details of this surprising correlation and explore the cheddar aspects of cottage cheese that just may hold the key to understanding the labor market in a whey we never imagined.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Cottage cheese consumption and The number of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Alabama. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Curds and Construction: The Cheddar Connection between Cottage Cheese Consumption and Reinforcing Iron and Rebar Workers in Alabama

[[ABSTRACT]]
The consumption of cottage cheese has long been debated in its relationship to various facets of life. In this study, we delve into the surprisingly unexplored territory of the potential link between cottage cheese consumption and the employment of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Alabama. While this topic may seem cheesy at first, our findings shed light on a curiously strong correlation.

Utilizing data from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning from 2003 to 2020. Our results revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8852403, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. This indicates a robust relationship between the consumption of cottage cheese and the number of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Alabama.

It seems that when it comes to building a cheesier theory, our findings gouda been more surprising. Our study not only offers a fresh perspective but also provolones that even the most unexpected associations in the world of labor economics can be feta-stounding. One thing is for sure, there's a whey to go before we fully understand the cheesy mysteries of cottage cheese consumption and employment trends.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The connection between dietary habits and labor market trends has been a topic of interest and intrigue for decades. From coffee consumption to avocado toast preferences, researchers have explored the potential impact of food choices on various aspects of society. However, one particular culinary curiosity has remained largely unexamined – the relationship between cottage cheese consumption and the number of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in the state of Alabama.
As the famous saying goes, “there's no whey to predict the power of cheese” – a sentiment that has never been more relevant than in our investigation. The notion of cottage cheese, a staple in many a dieter’s fridge, having any influence on the workforce may seem laughable at first, but our research aims to challenge such gouda assumptions.
Our study sought to fill this gap in the literature by analyzing extensive data sets from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Our findings revealed a remarkably robust correlation coefficient, akin to finding the missing piece of the construction puzzle in a block of cheddar. It’s a Gouda thing we didn’t overlook this potential connection.
While some may dismiss the idea of cheese impacting the job market as too cheesy, our results Parmesan serious attention. The statistically significant relationship between cottage cheese consumption and the employment of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Alabama is, dare I say, grate news for the field of labor economics.
As we embark on this cheesy journey, we hope to demonstrate that there is more to cottage cheese than meets the eye – or the taste buds. The implications of our findings mozzarellify our expectations and call for further examination into the seemingly unrelated forces at play in labor market dynamics.
In the end, we are left with a feta-accompli – a study that adds a unique flavor to the discourse on food consumption and its potential influence on labor trends. Stay tuned, as we delve into the crumbly details of this surprising correlation and explore the cheddar aspects of cottage cheese that just may hold the key to understanding the labor market in a whey we never imagined.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In their seminal work, "Cheese and Employment: A Gouda Analysis," Smith et al. (2010) were among the first to consider the potential link between cheese consumption and the labor market. While their study focused on a broader spectrum of cheese types, they provided a foundation for researchers to gratefully explore more specific varieties, such as cottage cheese, and their impact on various industries.

Doe (2015) further contributed to this line of inquiry in "Dairy Dynamics: Exploring the Economic Ripple Effects of Cheese Consumption," where the author delved into the economic ramifications of cheese consumption on regional labor markets. The study, while insightful, sprinkled a hint of uncertainty regarding the specific influence of cottage cheese, leaving room for further investigation.

Jones (2018) expanded on this narrative in "Curds and Careers: A Provolone Perspective" by examining the relationship between cheese preferences and employment patterns. However, much like Doe's work, Jones' exploration did not delve deeply into the unique characteristics of cottage cheese and its potential impact on specific sectors of the labor market.

Turning our attention to more specialized literature, "The Curious Case of Cottage Cheese: From Dairy Farms to Workshops" by White (2020) provides a thorough examination of the cottage cheese industry and its broader economic implications. While the author primarily focuses on production and consumption trends, the work offers valuable insights into the potential ripple effects of cottage cheese commerce on employment dynamics.

Shifting gears, we come to the non-fiction domain, where books like "The Steel Industry in Alabama" by Black (2016) and "Economic Trends in the Southern United States" by Brown (2017) offer valuable context for understanding the labor market landscape in Alabama. These works lay the groundwork for investigating the potential interplay between cottage cheese consumption and employment in specific industries within the state.

In exploring fiction literature that may offer indirect insights, "The Iron Heel" by Jack London and "Steelheart" by Brandon Sanderson present imaginative narratives set in industrial environments, offering a glimpse into the work and lives of laborers. While these works may not directly address cheese consumption, they serve as a reminder that the workforce is a multifaceted tapestry, with potential influences that extend beyond the conventional scope of economic analysis.

Branching into more unconventional sources, the playful antics of "SpongeBob SquarePants" and the team dynamics in "Bob the Builder" offer amusing yet thought-provoking representations of teamwork and construction, shedding light on the intricate dynamics within labor-intensive industries. While not academic in nature, these animated series provide a whimsical lens through which to ponder the nuances of workplace interactions and productivity.

Now that we have laid the foundation with a blend of scholarly and imaginative works, it's time to delve into the gouda details of our quirky investigation and unearth the surprising yet emmental relationship between cottage cheese consumption and the labor market in Alabama. Let's take a feta step into the fromage-filled realm of empirical analysis and, with a hint of cheesy humor, slice through the misconceptions to uncover the cheddar truth.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Cottage cheese consumption and The number of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Alabama. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2003 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Curds and Construction: The Cheddar Connection between Cottage Cheese Consumption and Reinforcing Iron and Rebar Workers in Alabama

[[ABSTRACT]]
The consumption of cottage cheese has long been debated in its relationship to various facets of life. In this study, we delve into the surprisingly unexplored territory of the potential link between cottage cheese consumption and the employment of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Alabama. While this topic may seem cheesy at first, our findings shed light on a curiously strong correlation.

Utilizing data from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning from 2003 to 2020. Our results revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8852403, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. This indicates a robust relationship between the consumption of cottage cheese and the number of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Alabama.

It seems that when it comes to building a cheesier theory, our findings gouda been more surprising. Our study not only offers a fresh perspective but also provolones that even the most unexpected associations in the world of labor economics can be feta-stounding. One thing is for sure, there's a whey to go before we fully understand the cheesy mysteries of cottage cheese consumption and employment trends.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The connection between dietary habits and labor market trends has been a topic of interest and intrigue for decades. From coffee consumption to avocado toast preferences, researchers have explored the potential impact of food choices on various aspects of society. However, one particular culinary curiosity has remained largely unexamined – the relationship between cottage cheese consumption and the number of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in the state of Alabama.
As the famous saying goes, “there's no whey to predict the power of cheese” – a sentiment that has never been more relevant than in our investigation. The notion of cottage cheese, a staple in many a dieter’s fridge, having any influence on the workforce may seem laughable at first, but our research aims to challenge such gouda assumptions.
Our study sought to fill this gap in the literature by analyzing extensive data sets from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Our findings revealed a remarkably robust correlation coefficient, akin to finding the missing piece of the construction puzzle in a block of cheddar. It’s a Gouda thing we didn’t overlook this potential connection.
While some may dismiss the idea of cheese impacting the job market as too cheesy, our results Parmesan serious attention. The statistically significant relationship between cottage cheese consumption and the employment of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Alabama is, dare I say, grate news for the field of labor economics.
As we embark on this cheesy journey, we hope to demonstrate that there is more to cottage cheese than meets the eye – or the taste buds. The implications of our findings mozzarellify our expectations and call for further examination into the seemingly unrelated forces at play in labor market dynamics.
In the end, we are left with a feta-accompli – a study that adds a unique flavor to the discourse on food consumption and its potential influence on labor trends. Stay tuned, as we delve into the crumbly details of this surprising correlation and explore the cheddar aspects of cottage cheese that just may hold the key to understanding the labor market in a whey we never imagined.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

**[[METHODOLOGY]]**

In order to delve into the surprisingly unexplored realm of the potential link between cottage cheese consumption and the employment of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Alabama, our research team employed a range of methods that were as diverse as the selection of cheeses in a turophile’s dream.

First, we collected extensive data from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, spanning the years 2003 to 2020. We skimmed through data sets like a fine cheese cloth, ensuring that our selection was as sharp as a well-aged cheddar. After all, our research demanded nothing but the finest, most mature data – just like a well-aged Gouda.

Next, we utilized a multivariate regression analysis to untangle the thick, knotty web of potential confounding variables. We carefully sifted through the data like a cheese connoisseur examining the nuances of flavor and texture, aiming to extract the purest essence of the relationship between cottage cheese consumption and the employment of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Alabama. We didn’t want any holes in our methodology, unless they were in a block of Swiss.

To address concerns about potential biases in the data, we employed a robust instrumental variable approach akin to the precision required to slice a delicate Brie. This method enabled us to separate the curds from the whey, ensuring that our findings were not merely a result of queso and effect.

Additionally, we performed a series of sensitivity analyses to test the robustness of our findings, much like testing the resilience of a good cheese to various culinary applications. We wanted our results to be as adaptable and enduring as a versatile Mozzarella, standing up to scrutiny and holding their shape under different conditions.

Ultimately, our methodology was designed to slice through the complexities of the research question, aiming to uncover the hidden layers of complexity with the finesse of a master cheesemaker. Because when it comes to studying the potential connection between cottage cheese consumption and employment trends, one has to be prepared for a research process that is both creamy and full of holes - just like a good Swiss.

In summary, our methodology embraced the spirit of cheese - meticulous, diverse, and capable of making even the most serious of researchers crack a smile. After all, there's nothing like a good cheese pun to add some flavor to the academic discourse.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Cottage cheese consumption and The number of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Alabama. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2003 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.8852403, r-squared of 0.7836503, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Curds and Construction: The Cheddar Connection between Cottage Cheese Consumption and Reinforcing Iron and Rebar Workers in Alabama

[[ABSTRACT]]
The consumption of cottage cheese has long been debated in its relationship to various facets of life. In this study, we delve into the surprisingly unexplored territory of the potential link between cottage cheese consumption and the employment of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Alabama. While this topic may seem cheesy at first, our findings shed light on a curiously strong correlation.

Utilizing data from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning from 2003 to 2020. Our results revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8852403, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. This indicates a robust relationship between the consumption of cottage cheese and the number of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Alabama.

It seems that when it comes to building a cheesier theory, our findings gouda been more surprising. Our study not only offers a fresh perspective but also provolones that even the most unexpected associations in the world of labor economics can be feta-stounding. One thing is for sure, there's a whey to go before we fully understand the cheesy mysteries of cottage cheese consumption and employment trends.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The connection between dietary habits and labor market trends has been a topic of interest and intrigue for decades. From coffee consumption to avocado toast preferences, researchers have explored the potential impact of food choices on various aspects of society. However, one particular culinary curiosity has remained largely unexamined – the relationship between cottage cheese consumption and the number of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in the state of Alabama.
As the famous saying goes, “there's no whey to predict the power of cheese” – a sentiment that has never been more relevant than in our investigation. The notion of cottage cheese, a staple in many a dieter’s fridge, having any influence on the workforce may seem laughable at first, but our research aims to challenge such gouda assumptions.
Our study sought to fill this gap in the literature by analyzing extensive data sets from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Our findings revealed a remarkably robust correlation coefficient, akin to finding the missing piece of the construction puzzle in a block of cheddar. It’s a Gouda thing we didn’t overlook this potential connection.
While some may dismiss the idea of cheese impacting the job market as too cheesy, our results Parmesan serious attention. The statistically significant relationship between cottage cheese consumption and the employment of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Alabama is, dare I say, grate news for the field of labor economics.
As we embark on this cheesy journey, we hope to demonstrate that there is more to cottage cheese than meets the eye – or the taste buds. The implications of our findings mozzarellify our expectations and call for further examination into the seemingly unrelated forces at play in labor market dynamics.
In the end, we are left with a feta-accompli – a study that adds a unique flavor to the discourse on food consumption and its potential influence on labor trends. Stay tuned, as we delve into the crumbly details of this surprising correlation and explore the cheddar aspects of cottage cheese that just may hold the key to understanding the labor market in a whey we never imagined.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis of the relationship between cottage cheese consumption and the number of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Alabama revealed a rather gouda correlation (r = 0.8852403, r-squared = 0.7836503, p < 0.01). This association may seem feta-sticulous at first, but it appears that the influence of cottage cheese on the labor market is nothing to brie scoffed at.

Upon plotting the data, as shown in Fig. 1, it became abundantly clear that there's a strong connection between these seemingly unrelated variables. It's almost as if they were cheddar together by fate.

It seems that the consumption of cottage cheese and the employment of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Alabama go hand in hand, much like a cracker and a wedge of cheddar. This connection may seem nacho typical correlation, but it's undoubtedly a major finding in the field of labor economics.

While some may find this association a little cheesy, we can't help but laugh at the dairy irony of it all. As the saying goes, "you gouda brie kidding me!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Cottage cheese consumption and The number of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Alabama. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Curds and Construction: The Cheddar Connection between Cottage Cheese Consumption and Reinforcing Iron and Rebar Workers in Alabama

[[ABSTRACT]]
The consumption of cottage cheese has long been debated in its relationship to various facets of life. In this study, we delve into the surprisingly unexplored territory of the potential link between cottage cheese consumption and the employment of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Alabama. While this topic may seem cheesy at first, our findings shed light on a curiously strong correlation.

Utilizing data from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning from 2003 to 2020. Our results revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8852403, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. This indicates a robust relationship between the consumption of cottage cheese and the number of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Alabama.

It seems that when it comes to building a cheesier theory, our findings gouda been more surprising. Our study not only offers a fresh perspective but also provolones that even the most unexpected associations in the world of labor economics can be feta-stounding. One thing is for sure, there's a whey to go before we fully understand the cheesy mysteries of cottage cheese consumption and employment trends.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their seminal work, "Cheese and Employment: A Gouda Analysis," Smith et al. (2010) were among the first to consider the potential link between cheese consumption and the labor market. While their study focused on a broader spectrum of cheese types, they provided a foundation for researchers to gratefully explore more specific varieties, such as cottage cheese, and their impact on various industries.
Doe (2015) further contributed to this line of inquiry in "Dairy Dynamics: Exploring the Economic Ripple Effects of Cheese Consumption," where the author delved into the economic ramifications of cheese consumption on regional labor markets. The study, while insightful, sprinkled a hint of uncertainty regarding the specific influence of cottage cheese, leaving room for further investigation.
Jones (2018) expanded on this narrative in "Curds and Careers: A Provolone Perspective" by examining the relationship between cheese preferences and employment patterns. However, much like Doe's work, Jones' exploration did not delve deeply into the unique characteristics of cottage cheese and its potential impact on specific sectors of the labor market.
Turning our attention to more specialized literature, "The Curious Case of Cottage Cheese: From Dairy Farms to Workshops" by White (2020) provides a thorough examination of the cottage cheese industry and its broader economic implications. While the author primarily focuses on production and consumption trends, the work offers valuable insights into the potential ripple effects of cottage cheese commerce on employment dynamics.
Shifting gears, we come to the non-fiction domain, where books like "The Steel Industry in Alabama" by Black (2016) and "Economic Trends in the Southern United States" by Brown (2017) offer valuable context for understanding the labor market landscape in Alabama. These works lay the groundwork for investigating the potential interplay between cottage cheese consumption and employment in specific industries within the state.
In exploring fiction literature that may offer indirect insights, "The Iron Heel" by Jack London and "Steelheart" by Brandon Sanderson present imaginative narratives set in industrial environments, offering a glimpse into the work and lives of laborers. While these works may not directly address cheese consumption, they serve as a reminder that the workforce is a multifaceted tapestry, with potential influences that extend beyond the conventional scope of economic analysis.
Branching into more unconventional sources, the playful antics of "SpongeBob SquarePants" and the team dynamics in "Bob the Builder" offer amusing yet thought-provoking representations of teamwork and construction, shedding light on the intricate dynamics within labor-intensive industries. While not academic in nature, these animated series provide a whimsical lens through which to ponder the nuances of workplace interactions and productivity.
Now that we have laid the foundation with a blend of scholarly and imaginative works, it's time to delve into the gouda details of our quirky investigation and unearth the surprising yet emmental relationship between cottage cheese consumption and the labor market in Alabama. Let's take a feta step into the fromage-filled realm of empirical analysis and, with a hint of cheesy humor, slice through the misconceptions to uncover the cheddar truth.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the relationship between cottage cheese consumption and the number of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Alabama revealed a rather gouda correlation (r = 0.8852403, r-squared = 0.7836503, p < 0.01). This association may seem feta-sticulous at first, but it appears that the influence of cottage cheese on the labor market is nothing to brie scoffed at.
Upon plotting the data, as shown in Fig. 1, it became abundantly clear that there's a strong connection between these seemingly unrelated variables. It's almost as if they were cheddar together by fate.
It seems that the consumption of cottage cheese and the employment of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Alabama go hand in hand, much like a cracker and a wedge of cheddar. This connection may seem nacho typical correlation, but it's undoubtedly a major finding in the field of labor economics.
While some may find this association a little cheesy, we can't help but laugh at the dairy irony of it all. As the saying goes, "you gouda brie kidding me!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study have brie-ought to light an intriguing connection between cottage cheese consumption and the employment of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Alabama. It seems that the labor market's affinity for cottage cheese is no laughing matter - unless, of course, you enjoy a good dad joke or two.

Our results align with prior research that hinted at the potential influence of cheese consumption on labor dynamics. Smith et al.'s (2010) groundbreaking work on "Cheese and Employment" paved the whey for our investigation, and despite focusing on a broader range of cheese types, their study laid the foundation for our gouda exploration. Additionally, Jones (2018) and Doe (2015) provided valuable insights into the economic ramifications of cheese consumption on regional labor markets, setting the stage for our more specific examination of cottage cheese. While some may initially feta the significance of these studies, they indeed cheddar light on the need for further exploration into cheese-labor linkages.

The strong correlation coefficient of 0.8852403, coupled with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, lends substantial provolone to our findings. Our results indicate that as cottage cheese consumption increases, so does the employment of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Alabama, which is certainly a gouda outcome for understanding labor market trends.

It's noteworthy that our study supported prior research while also adding a cracker's worth of new insights into the cheese-labor nexus. The surprising strength of the association between cottage cheese consumption and employment trends highlights the pervasiveness of dairy dynamics in shaping labor market patterns. This finding is not just cheesy but also pepperjack-full of implications for understanding the broader influences on labor market dynamics.

Now, one might feta question the practical implications of our findings, but it's essential to remember the impact of cheese consumption goes beyond just taste, having real implications for economic activities. It seems that when it comes to labor economics, the cheese stands alone.

But as much as we'd love to continue waxing poetical about this cheddarific discovery, it's time to bring this discussion to a close. After all, we wouldn't want to overdo the puns and end up with a bit of a bleu conclusion.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Cottage cheese consumption and The number of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Alabama. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Curds and Construction: The Cheddar Connection between Cottage Cheese Consumption and Reinforcing Iron and Rebar Workers in Alabama

[[ABSTRACT]]
The consumption of cottage cheese has long been debated in its relationship to various facets of life. In this study, we delve into the surprisingly unexplored territory of the potential link between cottage cheese consumption and the employment of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Alabama. While this topic may seem cheesy at first, our findings shed light on a curiously strong correlation.

Utilizing data from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning from 2003 to 2020. Our results revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8852403, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. This indicates a robust relationship between the consumption of cottage cheese and the number of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Alabama.

It seems that when it comes to building a cheesier theory, our findings gouda been more surprising. Our study not only offers a fresh perspective but also provolones that even the most unexpected associations in the world of labor economics can be feta-stounding. One thing is for sure, there's a whey to go before we fully understand the cheesy mysteries of cottage cheese consumption and employment trends.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The connection between dietary habits and labor market trends has been a topic of interest and intrigue for decades. From coffee consumption to avocado toast preferences, researchers have explored the potential impact of food choices on various aspects of society. However, one particular culinary curiosity has remained largely unexamined – the relationship between cottage cheese consumption and the number of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in the state of Alabama.
As the famous saying goes, “there's no whey to predict the power of cheese” – a sentiment that has never been more relevant than in our investigation. The notion of cottage cheese, a staple in many a dieter’s fridge, having any influence on the workforce may seem laughable at first, but our research aims to challenge such gouda assumptions.
Our study sought to fill this gap in the literature by analyzing extensive data sets from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Our findings revealed a remarkably robust correlation coefficient, akin to finding the missing piece of the construction puzzle in a block of cheddar. It’s a Gouda thing we didn’t overlook this potential connection.
While some may dismiss the idea of cheese impacting the job market as too cheesy, our results Parmesan serious attention. The statistically significant relationship between cottage cheese consumption and the employment of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Alabama is, dare I say, grate news for the field of labor economics.
As we embark on this cheesy journey, we hope to demonstrate that there is more to cottage cheese than meets the eye – or the taste buds. The implications of our findings mozzarellify our expectations and call for further examination into the seemingly unrelated forces at play in labor market dynamics.
In the end, we are left with a feta-accompli – a study that adds a unique flavor to the discourse on food consumption and its potential influence on labor trends. Stay tuned, as we delve into the crumbly details of this surprising correlation and explore the cheddar aspects of cottage cheese that just may hold the key to understanding the labor market in a whey we never imagined.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the relationship between cottage cheese consumption and the number of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Alabama revealed a rather gouda correlation (r = 0.8852403, r-squared = 0.7836503, p < 0.01). This association may seem feta-sticulous at first, but it appears that the influence of cottage cheese on the labor market is nothing to brie scoffed at.
Upon plotting the data, as shown in Fig. 1, it became abundantly clear that there's a strong connection between these seemingly unrelated variables. It's almost as if they were cheddar together by fate.
It seems that the consumption of cottage cheese and the employment of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Alabama go hand in hand, much like a cracker and a wedge of cheddar. This connection may seem nacho typical correlation, but it's undoubtedly a major finding in the field of labor economics.
While some may find this association a little cheesy, we can't help but laugh at the dairy irony of it all. As the saying goes, "you gouda brie kidding me!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has gouda-shed light on an unexpected yet remarkably robust correlation between cottage cheese consumption and the employment of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Alabama. This finding may seem cheesy, but it emphatically grates through the skepticism surrounding the influence of food preferences on labor market dynamics.

Our results provolone the need for further exploration of the dairy-labor relationship, as the whey in which these variables intertwine remains a tantalizing puzzle. As we wrap up this study, we are reminded of the words of wisdom – "the proof is in the pudding" or should we say, "the cottage cheese."

The implications of this study are not just a trifling matter; they have the potential to ched-darken the conventional understanding of labor economics. It's time to embrace the cheddar complexities of our findings and curd your enthusiasm for future research in this area.

And in the spirit of fathers everywhere, we declare that this discovery is truly "grate," and there's no "brielief" necessary to appreciate the significance of this connection.

So, in the spirit of cheesy humor, let us declare that there's no need for more research in this area – we've already milked this topic for all it's worth. Thank you, and goodnight! *mic drop*


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Curds and Construction: The Cheddar Connection between Cottage Cheese Consumption and Reinforcing Iron and Rebar Workers in Alabama. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Dairy Engineering and Urban Infrastructure


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Curds and Construction: The Cheddar Connection between Cottage Cheese Consumption and Reinforcing Iron and Rebar Workers in Alabama. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Dairy Dynamics and Industrial Infrastructure Integration


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Curds and Construction: The Cheddar Connection between Cottage Cheese Consumption and Reinforcing Iron and Rebar Workers in Alabama with an abstract of The consumption of cottage cheese has long been debated in its relationship to various facets of life. In this study, we delve into the surprisingly unexplored territory of the potential link between cottage cheese consumption and the employment of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Alabama. While this topic may seem cheesy at first, our findings shed light on a curiously strong correlation.
Utilizing data from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning from 2003 to 2020. Our results revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8852403, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. This indicates a robust relationship between the consumption of cottage cheese and the number of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Alabama.
It seems that when it comes to building a cheesier theory, our findings gouda been more surprising. Our study not only offers a fresh perspective but also provolones that even the most unexpected associations in the world of labor economics can be feta-stounding. One thing is for sure, there's a whey to go before we fully understand the cheesy mysteries of cottage cheese consumption and employment trends.

ChatGPT:

cottage cheese consumption, reinforcing iron workers, rebar workers, Alabama, labor economics, USDA data, Bureau of Labor Statistics, cottage cheese consumption correlation with employment, cheese consumption impact on employment, cheese consumption and labor trends

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Cottage cheese consumption
Detailed data title: Per capita consumption of Cottage cheese in the US
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with Cottage cheese consumption

The number of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Alabama
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Alabama
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Alabama

Correlation r = 0.8852403 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7836503 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 78.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Alabama) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Cottage cheese consumption) over the 18 years from 2003 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.05E-6. 0.0000010491514182067178000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.89 in 0.000105% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 953,151 random variables You don't actually need 953 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 17 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 17 because we have two variables measured over a period of 18 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.71, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020
Cottage cheese consumption (Pounds per person)2.62.72.72.62.62.32.42.32.32.32.12.12.12.22.12.12.12
The number of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Alabama (Laborers)50051079074065044034057041042012060801101409040190




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([2.6,2.7,2.7,2.6,2.6,2.3,2.4,2.3,2.3,2.3,2.1,2.1,2.1,2.2,2.1,2.1,2.1,2,])
array_2 = np.array([500,510,790,740,650,440,340,570,410,420,120,60,80,110,140,90,40,190,])
array_1_name = "Cottage cheese consumption"
array_2_name = "The number of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Alabama"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Cheers to you for rating this correlation!


Correlation ID: 3429 · Black Variable ID: 556 · Red Variable ID: 4616
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0