about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,427 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Biomass power generated in Nicaragua and the second variable is US Annual Tax Revenue.  The chart goes from 1980 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The influx of green energy from Nicaragua sparked a surge in economic activity in the US, leading to higher business profits and individual incomes. This caused a photosynthesis of wealth, and as we all know, where there's muck, there's brass! The tax revenue sprouted like weeds in a garden, fertilized by the unexpected growth in the economy. It seems the Nicaraguan biomass power was sowing the seeds of financial prosperity across borders, proving that when it comes to taxes, it's all about plant-ing the right energy sources!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ Concept art ] A captivating scene of contrasting activity: In the foreground, a group of workers in Nicaragua is busy feeding cornhusks into a sleek, high-tech fueling system at a biomass power plant. The machinery emits a soft, green glow as it processes the biomass, conveying a sense of renewable energy in action. Meanwhile, in the background, a serene landscape in the US unfolds, with fields of golden corn gently swaying in the breeze. Far off in the distance, a line of trucks loaded with corn can be seen making their way toward the power plant. As the scene unfolds, the US tax revenue meter steadily climbs higher in the sky, showcasing the tangible impact of Nicaragua's biomass power generation on US annual tax revenue. The illustration captures the harmony between sustainability, industry, and international trade. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Biomass power generated in Nicaragua and US Annual Tax Revenue. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Voxel art A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s Macabre Concept art Hyper-realistic
ChatGPT: Concept art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Biomass power generated in Nicaragua and US Annual Tax Revenue, in the following situation: Because as Nicaragua increased its biomass power generation, they also increased their use of organic material for fuel. This led to an abundance of cornhusks being used, which caused a spike in the demand for corn. The US, being a major exporter of corn, saw an increase in corn sales to Nicaragua, leading to a rise in US annual tax revenue. Looks like Nicaragua really knows how to *corn-tribute* to American taxes!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Nicaragua, a bustling biomass power plant hums with activity as workers feed cornhusks into the fueling system, creating renewable energy. Meanwhile, in the US, fields of corn sway in the breeze as farmers work diligently to meet the increased demand for corn. As shipments of corn make their way to Nicaragua, the US tax revenue meter climbs higher and higher, showcasing the positive impact of Nicaragua's biomass power generation on US annual tax revenue.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Concept art ] and depicting this scene: In Nicaragua, a bustling biomass power plant hums with activity as workers feed cornhusks into the fueling system, creating renewable energy. Meanwhile, in the US, fields of corn sway in the breeze as farmers work diligently to meet the increased demand for corn. As shipments of corn make their way to Nicaragua, the US tax revenue meter climbs higher and higher, showcasing the positive impact of Nicaragua's biomass power generation on US annual tax revenue. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ Concept art ] A captivating scene of contrasting activity: In the foreground, a group of workers in Nicaragua is busy feeding cornhusks into a sleek, high-tech fueling system at a biomass power plant. The machinery emits a soft, green glow as it processes the biomass, conveying a sense of renewable energy in action. Meanwhile, in the background, a serene landscape in the US unfolds, with fields of golden corn gently swaying in the breeze. Far off in the distance, a line of trucks loaded with corn can be seen making their way toward the power plant. As the scene unfolds, the US tax revenue meter steadily climbs higher in the sky, showcasing the tangible impact of Nicaragua's biomass power generation on US annual tax revenue. The illustration captures the harmony between sustainability, industry, and international trade.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Biomass power generated in Nicaragua caused US Annual Tax Revenue to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Biodolla$: The Biomass Bridge Between Nicaragua and US Annual Tax Revenue

Journal of Ecological Economics and Sustainable Development

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Biomass power generated in Nicaragua and US Annual Tax Revenue. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from Energy Information Administration and About.Com to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9093268 and p < 0.01 for 1980 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Biodolla$: The Biomass Bridge Between Nicaragua and US Annual Tax Revenue"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In the realm of renewable energy, the relationship between biomass power generated in Nicaragua and US annual tax revenue has long been a source of speculation. This study aims to shed light on this enigmatic connection and its potential impact using a dataset spanning four decades. Through rigorous statistical analysis, a captivating correlation coefficient of 0.9093268 with a p-value less than 0.01 was revealed, unveiling an intricate link between the two seemingly disparate domains. Our findings not only add a touch of biomass-based humor to the dry world of tax revenue research but also provide valuable insight for policymakers and energy enthusiasts alike. Join us as we venture into the fascinating world of "Biodolla$" and uncover how sustainable power in Nicaragua might just fuel the financial future of the United States.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Biomass power generated in Nicaragua and US Annual Tax Revenue. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Biodolla$: The Biomass Bridge Between Nicaragua and US Annual Tax Revenue"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In the realm of renewable energy, the relationship between biomass power generated in Nicaragua and US annual tax revenue has long been a source of speculation. This study aims to shed light on this enigmatic connection and its potential impact using a dataset spanning four decades. Through rigorous statistical analysis, a captivating correlation coefficient of 0.9093268 with a p-value less than 0.01 was revealed, unveiling an intricate link between the two seemingly disparate domains. Our findings not only add a touch of biomass-based humor to the dry world of tax revenue research but also provide valuable insight for policymakers and energy enthusiasts alike. Join us as we venture into the fascinating world of "Biodolla$" and uncover how sustainable power in Nicaragua might just fuel the financial future of the United States.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

"Good morning, afternoon, or evening, fellow academics, and welcome to the enlightening yet unexpectedly entertaining world of "Biodolla$." Today, we embark on a journey to explore the curious connection between biomass power in Nicaragua and its whimsical dance with US annual tax revenue.

For decades, scholars and enthusiasts alike have pondered the mysterious bond between these two seemingly incongruent entities. But fear not, dear readers, for the veil of ambiguity shall be lifted as we delve into the depths of data, statistics, and a generous sprinkling of puns.

As we skeptically set sail on this maiden voyage, envision yourself as the intrepid researcher navigating uncharted statistical waters, equipped with nothing but your trusty compass and a healthy dose of curiosity. Bear witness as we unravel the intricate web of correlations and coefficients, unearthing the undeniable link between the rustic allure of Nicaraguan biomass power and the cold, hard reality of US tax revenue.

But hold onto your pocket protectors, for it's not all dry calculations and mind-numbing spreadsheets in this rollercoaster of research. Our findings promise to tickle your intellectual fancies while simultaneously leaving you contemplating the profound implications for energy policy and fiscal responsibility.

So, dear readers, buckle up as we embark on a scholarly odyssey rife with unexpected twists, groan-worthy puns, and a dash of academic humor. Brace yourselves for a tale of "Biodolla$," where sustainable power meets financial prowess. Let the adventure begin!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Biomass power generated in Nicaragua and US Annual Tax Revenue. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Biodolla$: The Biomass Bridge Between Nicaragua and US Annual Tax Revenue"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In the realm of renewable energy, the relationship between biomass power generated in Nicaragua and US annual tax revenue has long been a source of speculation. This study aims to shed light on this enigmatic connection and its potential impact using a dataset spanning four decades. Through rigorous statistical analysis, a captivating correlation coefficient of 0.9093268 with a p-value less than 0.01 was revealed, unveiling an intricate link between the two seemingly disparate domains. Our findings not only add a touch of biomass-based humor to the dry world of tax revenue research but also provide valuable insight for policymakers and energy enthusiasts alike. Join us as we venture into the fascinating world of "Biodolla$" and uncover how sustainable power in Nicaragua might just fuel the financial future of the United States.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
"Good morning, afternoon, or evening, fellow academics, and welcome to the enlightening yet unexpectedly entertaining world of "Biodolla$." Today, we embark on a journey to explore the curious connection between biomass power in Nicaragua and its whimsical dance with US annual tax revenue.
For decades, scholars and enthusiasts alike have pondered the mysterious bond between these two seemingly incongruent entities. But fear not, dear readers, for the veil of ambiguity shall be lifted as we delve into the depths of data, statistics, and a generous sprinkling of puns.
As we skeptically set sail on this maiden voyage, envision yourself as the intrepid researcher navigating uncharted statistical waters, equipped with nothing but your trusty compass and a healthy dose of curiosity. Bear witness as we unravel the intricate web of correlations and coefficients, unearthing the undeniable link between the rustic allure of Nicaraguan biomass power and the cold, hard reality of US tax revenue.
But hold onto your pocket protectors, for it's not all dry calculations and mind-numbing spreadsheets in this rollercoaster of research. Our findings promise to tickle your intellectual fancies while simultaneously leaving you contemplating the profound implications for energy policy and fiscal responsibility.
So, dear readers, buckle up as we embark on a scholarly odyssey rife with unexpected twists, groan-worthy puns, and a dash of academic humor. Brace yourselves for a tale of "Biodolla$," where sustainable power meets financial prowess. Let the adventure begin!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Renewable Energy and Taxation: An Intercontinental Odyssey" by Smith et al., the authors find a notable association between the generation of biomass power in Nicaragua and the fluctuations in US annual tax revenue. This correlation provides a compelling impetus for further exploration into the interplay between sustainable energy practices and fiscal outcomes on a global scale. Building upon this foundation, Doe's comprehensive study, "Biomass Power Dynamics: A Transnational Perspective," delves into the nuanced mechanisms underpinning the export-import dynamics of biomass power and its potential impact on the tax revenue streams of industrialized nations.

In the realm of non-fiction literature, books such as "From Sugarcane to Civil Gains: Nicaragua's Energy Transition," and "The Green Dollar: Renewable Resources and Economic Potential" offer insights into the real-world implications of biomass power generation and its potential impacts on tax revenue. Meanwhile, fictional works like "The Biomass Conspiracy" and "Taxation Troupe: A Fiscal Fable" provide a creative lens through which to ponder the intertwining of sustainable energy and financial fortitude.

Venturing outside the traditional academic canon, the authors also stumbled upon unorthodox sources bearing unexpected relevance to this inquiry. Remarkably, the backs of shampoo bottles in certain Central American hotels purportedly whispered secrets about the fiscal alchemy of biomass power, albeit in a language too slippery for textual analysis. While not conventionally scholarly, these unconventional sources underscore the pervasive intrigue surrounding the enigmatic relationship between Nicaraguan biomass power and US tax revenue.

Undoubtedly, the intersection of biomass power from Nicaragua and US annual tax revenue presents an intellectually appetizing tableau, blending statistical intrigue with a delightful smattering of renewable energy humor.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Biomass power generated in Nicaragua and US Annual Tax Revenue. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and About.Com . You used data from 1980 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Biodolla$: The Biomass Bridge Between Nicaragua and US Annual Tax Revenue"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In the realm of renewable energy, the relationship between biomass power generated in Nicaragua and US annual tax revenue has long been a source of speculation. This study aims to shed light on this enigmatic connection and its potential impact using a dataset spanning four decades. Through rigorous statistical analysis, a captivating correlation coefficient of 0.9093268 with a p-value less than 0.01 was revealed, unveiling an intricate link between the two seemingly disparate domains. Our findings not only add a touch of biomass-based humor to the dry world of tax revenue research but also provide valuable insight for policymakers and energy enthusiasts alike. Join us as we venture into the fascinating world of "Biodolla$" and uncover how sustainable power in Nicaragua might just fuel the financial future of the United States.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
"Good morning, afternoon, or evening, fellow academics, and welcome to the enlightening yet unexpectedly entertaining world of "Biodolla$." Today, we embark on a journey to explore the curious connection between biomass power in Nicaragua and its whimsical dance with US annual tax revenue.
For decades, scholars and enthusiasts alike have pondered the mysterious bond between these two seemingly incongruent entities. But fear not, dear readers, for the veil of ambiguity shall be lifted as we delve into the depths of data, statistics, and a generous sprinkling of puns.
As we skeptically set sail on this maiden voyage, envision yourself as the intrepid researcher navigating uncharted statistical waters, equipped with nothing but your trusty compass and a healthy dose of curiosity. Bear witness as we unravel the intricate web of correlations and coefficients, unearthing the undeniable link between the rustic allure of Nicaraguan biomass power and the cold, hard reality of US tax revenue.
But hold onto your pocket protectors, for it's not all dry calculations and mind-numbing spreadsheets in this rollercoaster of research. Our findings promise to tickle your intellectual fancies while simultaneously leaving you contemplating the profound implications for energy policy and fiscal responsibility.
So, dear readers, buckle up as we embark on a scholarly odyssey rife with unexpected twists, groan-worthy puns, and a dash of academic humor. Brace yourselves for a tale of "Biodolla$," where sustainable power meets financial prowess. Let the adventure begin!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Now, let's delve into the nitty-gritty details of how we untangled the intricate relationship between hazy Nicaraguan biomass power and the tantalizing allure of US annual tax revenue. Our research approach was as carefully crafted as a barista's latte art, aiming to extract the most robust and flavorful results from the rich brew of data available to us.

Data Collection:
We embarked on a cybernetic treasure hunt, scouring the vast expanses of the internet for datasets that would quench our thirst for knowledge. Our expedition led us to the hallowed halls of the Energy Information Administration, where we unearthed a trove of information on biomass power generation in Nicaragua. To complement this, we also sought wisdom from the oracle of About.Com, where nuggets of tax revenue data awaited our eager grasp. Armed with information spanning from 1980 to 2021, we set sail on our scholarly endeavor.

Statistical Analysis:
To squeeze every drop of insight from our rich dataset, we employed a combination of time series analysis, regression modeling, and correlation calculations. Our statistical arsenal included the formidable Pearson correlation coefficient, wielding its calculating prowess to unveil the subtle dance between biomass power and tax revenue. With our p-value threshold set firmly below 0.01, we were prepared to sift through the noise and discern the melodious harmony of "Biodolla$."

Cross-Cultural Verification (Or, The "Biomass Diplomacy" Phase):
Recognizing the cross-border nature of our investigation, we ventured into the realm of biomass diplomacy. We engaged in spirited discussions with experts in Nicaraguan energy policy and tax revenue aficionados from the US, seeking validation and elucidation of our findings. This phase of our research not only broadened our perspectives but also added a touch of international flair to the otherwise tranquil fields of academic inquiry.

Quality Control:
To ensure the robustness and reliability of our findings, we subjected our data analysis to rigorous quality control measures. We meticulously cross-checked our calculations, tested the sensitivity of our models, and even subjected them to the merciless scrutiny of peer review.

Ethical Considerations:
In our relentless pursuit of knowledge, we upheld the sacred tenets of research ethics, ensuring the anonymity and confidentiality of the data sources. We also made a solemn oath to wield our newfound insights for the greater good, championing the cause of sustainable energy and fiscal prudence with unwavering dedication.

In summary, our methodology was a tapestry woven from the threads of diligent data collection, robust statistical analysis, cross-cultural validation, quality control, and ethical principles. We embraced the convoluted journey of scientific inquiry with open minds and a keen sense of humor, infusing a dash of whimsy into the formidable domain of academic research. Onward we sailed, navigating the choppy seas of data with the tenacity of intrepid scholars and the occasional chuckle at a well-timed pun.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Biomass power generated in Nicaragua and US Annual Tax Revenue. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and About.Com .

For the time period 1980 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9093268, r-squared of 0.8268752, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Biodolla$: The Biomass Bridge Between Nicaragua and US Annual Tax Revenue"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In the realm of renewable energy, the relationship between biomass power generated in Nicaragua and US annual tax revenue has long been a source of speculation. This study aims to shed light on this enigmatic connection and its potential impact using a dataset spanning four decades. Through rigorous statistical analysis, a captivating correlation coefficient of 0.9093268 with a p-value less than 0.01 was revealed, unveiling an intricate link between the two seemingly disparate domains. Our findings not only add a touch of biomass-based humor to the dry world of tax revenue research but also provide valuable insight for policymakers and energy enthusiasts alike. Join us as we venture into the fascinating world of "Biodolla$" and uncover how sustainable power in Nicaragua might just fuel the financial future of the United States.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
"Good morning, afternoon, or evening, fellow academics, and welcome to the enlightening yet unexpectedly entertaining world of "Biodolla$." Today, we embark on a journey to explore the curious connection between biomass power in Nicaragua and its whimsical dance with US annual tax revenue.
For decades, scholars and enthusiasts alike have pondered the mysterious bond between these two seemingly incongruent entities. But fear not, dear readers, for the veil of ambiguity shall be lifted as we delve into the depths of data, statistics, and a generous sprinkling of puns.
As we skeptically set sail on this maiden voyage, envision yourself as the intrepid researcher navigating uncharted statistical waters, equipped with nothing but your trusty compass and a healthy dose of curiosity. Bear witness as we unravel the intricate web of correlations and coefficients, unearthing the undeniable link between the rustic allure of Nicaraguan biomass power and the cold, hard reality of US tax revenue.
But hold onto your pocket protectors, for it's not all dry calculations and mind-numbing spreadsheets in this rollercoaster of research. Our findings promise to tickle your intellectual fancies while simultaneously leaving you contemplating the profound implications for energy policy and fiscal responsibility.
So, dear readers, buckle up as we embark on a scholarly odyssey rife with unexpected twists, groan-worthy puns, and a dash of academic humor. Brace yourselves for a tale of "Biodolla$," where sustainable power meets financial prowess. Let the adventure begin!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis of the relationship between biomass power generation in Nicaragua and US annual tax revenue during the period from 1980 to 2021 yielded some captivating results. The Pearson correlation coefficient revealed a remarkably strong positive correlation of 0.9093268 between these two variables. Moreover, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) stood at an impressive 0.8268752, indicating that a substantial proportion of the variability in US tax revenue can be attributed to the fluctuations in biomass power generation in Nicaragua. With a p-value of less than 0.01, we can confidently reject the null hypothesis and assert the presence of a significant relationship between these intriguingly linked phenomena.

In a display of data-driven artistry, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that vividly depicts the robust correlation between biomass power generated in Nicaragua and US annual tax revenue. This visually appealing representation serves to underscore the unmistakable connection between these seemingly distant domains.

While the correlation we uncovered may seem surprising at first glance, consider this: Nicaragua's contribution to sustainable power echoes across the borders, potentially infusing the financial veins of the United States with a dose of renewable energy ingenuity. As the saying goes, "From biomass in the tropics, financial gains are no topic" – or at least, that's what we'll be saying at our next academic soiree.

In conclusion, our findings not only provide empirical evidence of the intertwining dance between biomass power and US tax revenue but also contribute a dash of humor to the typically sobering realm of tax research. We're delighted to offer a brief respite from the monotonous drone of theoretical models and policy analyses, injecting a bit of biomass-induced levity into the dialogue surrounding sustainable energy and fiscal policy. After all, who said statistical analyses can't have a sense of humor?

Stay tuned for our upcoming "Biodolla$: Part II – The Economic Ecosystem Continues to Flourish" for more puns, unexpected twists, and scholarly shenanigans!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Biomass power generated in Nicaragua and US Annual Tax Revenue. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Biodolla$: The Biomass Bridge Between Nicaragua and US Annual Tax Revenue"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In the realm of renewable energy, the relationship between biomass power generated in Nicaragua and US annual tax revenue has long been a source of speculation. This study aims to shed light on this enigmatic connection and its potential impact using a dataset spanning four decades. Through rigorous statistical analysis, a captivating correlation coefficient of 0.9093268 with a p-value less than 0.01 was revealed, unveiling an intricate link between the two seemingly disparate domains. Our findings not only add a touch of biomass-based humor to the dry world of tax revenue research but also provide valuable insight for policymakers and energy enthusiasts alike. Join us as we venture into the fascinating world of "Biodolla$" and uncover how sustainable power in Nicaragua might just fuel the financial future of the United States.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Renewable Energy and Taxation: An Intercontinental Odyssey" by Smith et al., the authors find a notable association between the generation of biomass power in Nicaragua and the fluctuations in US annual tax revenue. This correlation provides a compelling impetus for further exploration into the interplay between sustainable energy practices and fiscal outcomes on a global scale. Building upon this foundation, Doe's comprehensive study, "Biomass Power Dynamics: A Transnational Perspective," delves into the nuanced mechanisms underpinning the export-import dynamics of biomass power and its potential impact on the tax revenue streams of industrialized nations.
In the realm of non-fiction literature, books such as "From Sugarcane to Civil Gains: Nicaragua's Energy Transition," and "The Green Dollar: Renewable Resources and Economic Potential" offer insights into the real-world implications of biomass power generation and its potential impacts on tax revenue. Meanwhile, fictional works like "The Biomass Conspiracy" and "Taxation Troupe: A Fiscal Fable" provide a creative lens through which to ponder the intertwining of sustainable energy and financial fortitude.
Venturing outside the traditional academic canon, the authors also stumbled upon unorthodox sources bearing unexpected relevance to this inquiry. Remarkably, the backs of shampoo bottles in certain Central American hotels purportedly whispered secrets about the fiscal alchemy of biomass power, albeit in a language too slippery for textual analysis. While not conventionally scholarly, these unconventional sources underscore the pervasive intrigue surrounding the enigmatic relationship between Nicaraguan biomass power and US tax revenue.
Undoubtedly, the intersection of biomass power from Nicaragua and US annual tax revenue presents an intellectually appetizing tableau, blending statistical intrigue with a delightful smattering of renewable energy humor.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the relationship between biomass power generation in Nicaragua and US annual tax revenue during the period from 1980 to 2021 yielded some captivating results. The Pearson correlation coefficient revealed a remarkably strong positive correlation of 0.9093268 between these two variables. Moreover, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) stood at an impressive 0.8268752, indicating that a substantial proportion of the variability in US tax revenue can be attributed to the fluctuations in biomass power generation in Nicaragua. With a p-value of less than 0.01, we can confidently reject the null hypothesis and assert the presence of a significant relationship between these intriguingly linked phenomena.
In a display of data-driven artistry, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that vividly depicts the robust correlation between biomass power generated in Nicaragua and US annual tax revenue. This visually appealing representation serves to underscore the unmistakable connection between these seemingly distant domains.
While the correlation we uncovered may seem surprising at first glance, consider this: Nicaragua's contribution to sustainable power echoes across the borders, potentially infusing the financial veins of the United States with a dose of renewable energy ingenuity. As the saying goes, "From biomass in the tropics, financial gains are no topic" – or at least, that's what we'll be saying at our next academic soiree.
In conclusion, our findings not only provide empirical evidence of the intertwining dance between biomass power and US tax revenue but also contribute a dash of humor to the typically sobering realm of tax research. We're delighted to offer a brief respite from the monotonous drone of theoretical models and policy analyses, injecting a bit of biomass-induced levity into the dialogue surrounding sustainable energy and fiscal policy. After all, who said statistical analyses can't have a sense of humor?
Stay tuned for our upcoming "Biodolla$: Part II – The Economic Ecosystem Continues to Flourish" for more puns, unexpected twists, and scholarly shenanigans!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

The tantalizing tango between biomass power generated in Nicaragua and US annual tax revenue has left us with an abundance of food for thought. Our riveting exploration has unveiled a robust correlation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9093268, supporting the claims put forth in prior research. The high correlation value aligns with the findings of Smith et al., who first hinted at the tantalizing connection between biomass power and the fluctuation of US tax revenue. Indeed, it seems that not only does biomass power sustainably energize Nicaragua, but it also fuels the fiscal future of the United States – talk about cross-border energy synergy!

In nailing down this vibrant relationship, we have heeded the call of unconventional sources, including the whispers from shampoo bottles in Central American hotels. Surprisingly, these unorthodox disclosures seem to have some merit, adding a luscious layer of intrigue to our investigation. As academic researchers, it's not every day that we get to delve into the juicy, sudsy world of shampoo bottles for insights on fiscal alchemy, but hey, the data doesn't lie. Remarkably, despite our initial skepticism, these unconventional sources have further validated our findings by providing an unexpected but plausible perspective on the potential impact of Nicaraguan biomass power on the US tax revenue equation.

Our results further underscore the compelling interplay between sustainable energy practices and economic outcomes, bolstering the claims made in both non-fictional literature and whimsical works of fiction. When juxtaposed with the literature review, the results of our study contribute to a substantive body of evidence connecting the unlikeliest of bedfellows: renewable energy and tax revenue. Who knew biomass power and taxation could form such a captivating duo in the land of academic inquiry!

As we progress on this unconventional journey into the captivating world of "Biodolla$," our thrilling findings not only spice up the dialogue surrounding sustainable energy and fiscal policy but also infuse it with a generous sprinkle of biomass-induced levity. After all, what's a discussion on tax revenue without a dash of humor and a twist of statistical pizzazz?

Join us as we eagerly anticipate "Biodolla$: Part II – The Economic Ecosystem Continues to Flourish," where we'll continue to propagate puns, unexpected twists, and scholarly shenanigans as we unearth the next chapter in this intercontinental saga. So, until next time, remember that with biomass in the tropics, financial gains are no topic!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Biomass power generated in Nicaragua and US Annual Tax Revenue. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Biodolla$: The Biomass Bridge Between Nicaragua and US Annual Tax Revenue"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In the realm of renewable energy, the relationship between biomass power generated in Nicaragua and US annual tax revenue has long been a source of speculation. This study aims to shed light on this enigmatic connection and its potential impact using a dataset spanning four decades. Through rigorous statistical analysis, a captivating correlation coefficient of 0.9093268 with a p-value less than 0.01 was revealed, unveiling an intricate link between the two seemingly disparate domains. Our findings not only add a touch of biomass-based humor to the dry world of tax revenue research but also provide valuable insight for policymakers and energy enthusiasts alike. Join us as we venture into the fascinating world of "Biodolla$" and uncover how sustainable power in Nicaragua might just fuel the financial future of the United States.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
"Good morning, afternoon, or evening, fellow academics, and welcome to the enlightening yet unexpectedly entertaining world of "Biodolla$." Today, we embark on a journey to explore the curious connection between biomass power in Nicaragua and its whimsical dance with US annual tax revenue.
For decades, scholars and enthusiasts alike have pondered the mysterious bond between these two seemingly incongruent entities. But fear not, dear readers, for the veil of ambiguity shall be lifted as we delve into the depths of data, statistics, and a generous sprinkling of puns.
As we skeptically set sail on this maiden voyage, envision yourself as the intrepid researcher navigating uncharted statistical waters, equipped with nothing but your trusty compass and a healthy dose of curiosity. Bear witness as we unravel the intricate web of correlations and coefficients, unearthing the undeniable link between the rustic allure of Nicaraguan biomass power and the cold, hard reality of US tax revenue.
But hold onto your pocket protectors, for it's not all dry calculations and mind-numbing spreadsheets in this rollercoaster of research. Our findings promise to tickle your intellectual fancies while simultaneously leaving you contemplating the profound implications for energy policy and fiscal responsibility.
So, dear readers, buckle up as we embark on a scholarly odyssey rife with unexpected twists, groan-worthy puns, and a dash of academic humor. Brace yourselves for a tale of "Biodolla$," where sustainable power meets financial prowess. Let the adventure begin!"

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the relationship between biomass power generation in Nicaragua and US annual tax revenue during the period from 1980 to 2021 yielded some captivating results. The Pearson correlation coefficient revealed a remarkably strong positive correlation of 0.9093268 between these two variables. Moreover, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) stood at an impressive 0.8268752, indicating that a substantial proportion of the variability in US tax revenue can be attributed to the fluctuations in biomass power generation in Nicaragua. With a p-value of less than 0.01, we can confidently reject the null hypothesis and assert the presence of a significant relationship between these intriguingly linked phenomena.
In a display of data-driven artistry, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that vividly depicts the robust correlation between biomass power generated in Nicaragua and US annual tax revenue. This visually appealing representation serves to underscore the unmistakable connection between these seemingly distant domains.
While the correlation we uncovered may seem surprising at first glance, consider this: Nicaragua's contribution to sustainable power echoes across the borders, potentially infusing the financial veins of the United States with a dose of renewable energy ingenuity. As the saying goes, "From biomass in the tropics, financial gains are no topic" – or at least, that's what we'll be saying at our next academic soiree.
In conclusion, our findings not only provide empirical evidence of the intertwining dance between biomass power and US tax revenue but also contribute a dash of humor to the typically sobering realm of tax research. We're delighted to offer a brief respite from the monotonous drone of theoretical models and policy analyses, injecting a bit of biomass-induced levity into the dialogue surrounding sustainable energy and fiscal policy. After all, who said statistical analyses can't have a sense of humor?
Stay tuned for our upcoming "Biodolla$: Part II – The Economic Ecosystem Continues to Flourish" for more puns, unexpected twists, and scholarly shenanigans!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In the world of "Biodolla$," it turns out that the eco-friendly whims of Nicaraguan biomass power are not just a tropical daydream. Our research has unveiled a compelling connection between this sustainable energy source and US tax revenue, proving that sustainability and financial prosperity can indeed go hand in hand. Who knew that fiery tropical biomass held the key to igniting the fiscal vigor of the United States?

As we bid adieu to this captivating journey, we leave you with a parting thought: Perhaps the next time you pay your taxes, you'll smile knowing that a portion of that financial fuel could be powered by the tropical breezes and abundant greenery of Nicaragua. With "Biodolla$" in play, the phrase "paying taxes" might just acquire a (slightly) less daunting ring to it.

So, dear readers, as we wrap up this inaugural edition of "Biodolla$," we assert with unwavering confidence that further exploration of this extraordinary nexus is unnecessary. Allow our findings to stand as a testament to the intriguing, albeit unexpected, relationship between Nicaraguan biomass power and US tax revenue. After all, when statistical analysis can make you chuckle and ponder the intricacies of energy and finance, who needs more research?

You've been a lovely audience, and we look forward to regaling you with more data-driven puns and scholarly shenanigans in "Biodolla$: Part II – The Economic Ecosystem Continues to Flourish." Until then, stay statistically merry and sustainably bright!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Biodolla$: The Biomass Bridge Between Nicaragua and US Annual Tax Revenue. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Ecological Economics and Sustainable Development


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Biodolla$: The Biomass Bridge Between Nicaragua and US Annual Tax Revenue. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Global Sustainable Energy Institute


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Biodolla$: The Biomass Bridge Between Nicaragua and US Annual Tax Revenue with an abstract of In the realm of renewable energy, the relationship between biomass power generated in Nicaragua and US annual tax revenue has long been a source of speculation. This study aims to shed light on this enigmatic connection and its potential impact using a dataset spanning four decades. Through rigorous statistical analysis, a captivating correlation coefficient of 0.9093268 with a p-value less than 0.01 was revealed, unveiling an intricate link between the two seemingly disparate domains. Our findings not only add a touch of biomass-based humor to the dry world of tax revenue research but also provide valuable insight for policymakers and energy enthusiasts alike. Join us as we venture into the fascinating world of "Biodolla$" and uncover how sustainable power in Nicaragua might just fuel the financial future of the United States.

ChatGPT:

"Biodolla$", Nicaragua, US, biomass power, renewable energy, tax revenue, statistical analysis, correlation coefficient, policymaker, sustainable power

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Biomass power generated in Nicaragua
Detailed data title: Total biomass power generated in Nicaragua in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Biomass power generated in Nicaragua

US Annual Tax Revenue
Source: About.Com
See what else correlates with US Annual Tax Revenue

Correlation r = 0.9093268 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8268752 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 82.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., US Annual Tax Revenue) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Biomass power generated in Nicaragua) over the 42 years from 1980 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 8.03E-17. 0.0000000000000000802643925750
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.91 in 8.03E-15% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 12,458,824,740,567,098 random variables You don't actually need 12 quadrillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 41 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 41 because we have two variables measured over a period of 42 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.84, 0.95 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Biomass power generated in Nicaragua (Billion kWh)0.0340.0320.03400000000000000.0140.0140.0360.0330.0330.0340.0960.130.130.20.190.240.3380.3630.3850.3730.4510.4820.5190.4550.5330.6640.7020.8480.7390.744889
US Annual Tax Revenue (Trillions of Dollars)0.5170.5990.6180.6010.6660.7340.7690.8540.9090.9911.031.051.091.151.261.351.451.581.721.822.031.991.851.721.882.152.42.572.522.12.162.32.452.783.023.253.273.323.333.463.424.05




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.034,0.032,0.034,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0.014,0.014,0.036,0.033,0.033,0.034,0.096,0.13,0.13,0.2,0.19,0.24,0.338,0.363,0.385,0.373,0.451,0.482,0.519,0.455,0.533,0.664,0.702,0.848,0.739,0.744889,])
array_2 = np.array([0.517,0.599,0.618,0.601,0.666,0.734,0.769,0.854,0.909,0.991,1.03,1.05,1.09,1.15,1.26,1.35,1.45,1.58,1.72,1.82,2.03,1.99,1.85,1.72,1.88,2.15,2.4,2.57,2.52,2.1,2.16,2.3,2.45,2.78,3.02,3.25,3.27,3.32,3.33,3.46,3.42,4.05,])
array_1_name = "Biomass power generated in Nicaragua"
array_2_name = "US Annual Tax Revenue"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation rating is out of this world!


Correlation ID: 3427 · Black Variable ID: 23864 · Red Variable ID: 507
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0