about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,363 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of microbiologists in Illinois and the second variable is Nuclear power generation in Iran.  The chart goes from 2011 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

As the number of microbiologists in Illinois grows, so does their love for deep dish pizza. This leads to a spike in demand for mozzarella cheese. To meet this demand, dairy farms across the country ramp up production, inadvertently increasing the need for electricity to power their operations. Unbeknownst to them, this surge in power usage ends up indirectly boosting the nuclear power generation in Iran through a complex series of international energy exchanges and power grid connections. It's a gouda example of how cheese, scientists, and nuclear power can all be interconnected in a wheely bizarre way!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: "Generate an image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie, depicting a laboratory in Illinois with fewer microbiologists and bacterial cultures, leading to a scene in Iran where nuclear power generation is being utilized as an alternative source of energy. Ensure the illustration is colorful and clearly portrays the transition from the laboratory to the nuclear power generation facility." The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of microbiologists in Illinois and Nuclear power generation in Iran. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Voxel art Scalar art a funny image macro a funny image macro An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of microbiologists in Illinois and Nuclear power generation in Iran, in the following situation: Because as the number of microbiologists in Illinois decreases, there are fewer experts available to promote the importance of bacterial cultures. This leads to a shortage of cultures, forcing Iran to turn to nuclear power generation as an alternative source of energy.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a laboratory in Illinois, fewer microbiologists are present, and there are fewer bacterial cultures being promoted. Consequently, the shortage of cultures leads to a scene in Iran, where nuclear power generation is being utilized as an alternative source of energy.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie ] and depicting this scene: In a laboratory in Illinois, fewer microbiologists are present, and there are fewer bacterial cultures being promoted. Consequently, the shortage of cultures leads to a scene in Iran, where nuclear power generation is being utilized as an alternative source of energy. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: "Generate an image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie, depicting a laboratory in Illinois with fewer microbiologists and bacterial cultures, leading to a scene in Iran where nuclear power generation is being utilized as an alternative source of energy. Ensure the illustration is colorful and clearly portrays the transition from the laboratory to the nuclear power generation facility."

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in The number of microbiologists in Illinois caused Nuclear power generation in Iran to increase. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Microbiologists and Nukes: Illinois Strikes, Iran Reacts

The Journal of Nuclear Microbiology

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of microbiologists in Illinois and Nuclear power generation in Iran. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9042304 and p < 0.01 for 2011 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Microbiologists and Nukes: Illinois Strikes, Iran Reacts

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we explore the seemingly offbeat relationship between the number of microbiologists in Illinois and nuclear power generation in Iran. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we delved into the statistical connection between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena. To our surprise (and perhaps the delight of conspiracy theorists), we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9042304 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2011 to 2021, suggesting a strong relationship between the two variables. Our findings raise eyebrows and prompt further investigation into the hidden ties between the microbial world and nuclear energy, a marriage of science that could indeed be atomic!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of microbiologists in Illinois and Nuclear power generation in Iran. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Microbiologists and Nukes: Illinois Strikes, Iran Reacts

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we explore the seemingly offbeat relationship between the number of microbiologists in Illinois and nuclear power generation in Iran. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we delved into the statistical connection between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena. To our surprise (and perhaps the delight of conspiracy theorists), we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9042304 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2011 to 2021, suggesting a strong relationship between the two variables. Our findings raise eyebrows and prompt further investigation into the hidden ties between the microbial world and nuclear energy, a marriage of science that could indeed be atomic!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Greetings, esteemed colleagues and curious minds alike! Welcome to a world where bacteria and bombs, microorganisms and megawatts, converge in a most unexpected dance of correlation. We embark on a voyage to unveil the enigmatic connection between the number of microbiologists in the Land of Lincoln and the nuclear power generation in the majestic realm of Iran.

To the uninitiated, this peculiar pairing might sound like the plot of a whimsical science fiction novel – picture tiny microbes scheming alongside uranium atoms in a blockbuster tale of microscopic espionage. However, what might seem like a whimsical premise proves to be a stunning reality as we dissect the empirical evidence and unravel the statistical tapestry that links these two disparate domains of science.

Ladies and gentlemen, prepare to be dazzled as we navigate the treacherous waters of data analysis, wielding the mighty tools of statistical inference to discern patterns amidst the seeming chaos. Our tale unfolds against the backdrop of professional intrigue and research riddles, infused with the delightful quirkiness that is inherent to the scientific pursuit.

As we embark on this quest, we implore you to don your thinking caps, unleash your inner statisticians, and brace yourselves for the unexpected – for the landscape we traverse promises to be both scientifically enlightening and, dare we say, entertaining. So, buckle up and get ready to explore the astonishing correlation between microbiologists and nukes; it's bound to be a wild ride through the wondrous world of empirical inquiry!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of microbiologists in Illinois and Nuclear power generation in Iran. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Microbiologists and Nukes: Illinois Strikes, Iran Reacts

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we explore the seemingly offbeat relationship between the number of microbiologists in Illinois and nuclear power generation in Iran. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we delved into the statistical connection between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena. To our surprise (and perhaps the delight of conspiracy theorists), we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9042304 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2011 to 2021, suggesting a strong relationship between the two variables. Our findings raise eyebrows and prompt further investigation into the hidden ties between the microbial world and nuclear energy, a marriage of science that could indeed be atomic!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Greetings, esteemed colleagues and curious minds alike! Welcome to a world where bacteria and bombs, microorganisms and megawatts, converge in a most unexpected dance of correlation. We embark on a voyage to unveil the enigmatic connection between the number of microbiologists in the Land of Lincoln and the nuclear power generation in the majestic realm of Iran.
To the uninitiated, this peculiar pairing might sound like the plot of a whimsical science fiction novel – picture tiny microbes scheming alongside uranium atoms in a blockbuster tale of microscopic espionage. However, what might seem like a whimsical premise proves to be a stunning reality as we dissect the empirical evidence and unravel the statistical tapestry that links these two disparate domains of science.
Ladies and gentlemen, prepare to be dazzled as we navigate the treacherous waters of data analysis, wielding the mighty tools of statistical inference to discern patterns amidst the seeming chaos. Our tale unfolds against the backdrop of professional intrigue and research riddles, infused with the delightful quirkiness that is inherent to the scientific pursuit.
As we embark on this quest, we implore you to don your thinking caps, unleash your inner statisticians, and brace yourselves for the unexpected – for the landscape we traverse promises to be both scientifically enlightening and, dare we say, entertaining. So, buckle up and get ready to explore the astonishing correlation between microbiologists and nukes; it's bound to be a wild ride through the wondrous world of empirical inquiry!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "A Microscopic Affair: Exploring the Unlikely Union of Microbiology and Nuclear Power" by Smith et al., the authors find a surprising positive correlation between the number of microbiologists in Illinois and the level of nuclear power generation in Iran. This connection, though initially scoffed at as the punchline of a microbial-themed joke, has sent shockwaves through the scientific community, prompting a collective head-scratching of epic proportions.

Doe et al., in "Microorganisms on a Mission: The Unseen Hand in Nuclear Energy Production," delve into the microbial world's not-so-secret love affair with nuclear power. Their findings highlight the subtle influence of microbiologists on the delicate balance of nuclear reactions, painting a picture of microscopic orchestrators behind the scenes, reminiscent of an off-Broadway production titled "Phantom of the Nuclear Reactor."

Jones et al., in "Nuclear Fission and Microbial Division: A Surprising Symbiosis," present evidence of a symbiotic relationship between the abundance of microbiologists and the performance of nuclear power facilities. Their work has left many in the academic realm pondering the implications of such an unexpected partnership, prompting whispered speculations reminiscent of a spy thriller set in a laboratory.

Turning to non-fiction books related to the topic, "The Microbiology of Nuclear Energy Production" by Dr. E. Coli Smith provides a comprehensive overview of the potential impact of microbial activity on nuclear power generation. Meanwhile, "Nuclear Reactors and Bacterial Resilience" by Dr. Salmonella Doe dissects the intricate dance between bacterial species and nuclear reactors.

In the realm of fiction, the novel "The Atomic Microbes' Conspiracy" by A. Ion Jones imagines a world where microscopic organisms hold the fate of nuclear power plants in their tiny, yet surprisingly powerful, hands. Additionally, "The Unseen Enzyme: A Microbial Adventure" by Penelope Pathogen weaves a thrilling tale of microbial espionage and subterfuge amidst the backdrop of a nuclear power facility.

On a lighter note, various TV shows such as "Breaking Bacteria," "The Microbiologists," and "Nuclear Reactor Diaries" have inadvertently shed light on the multifaceted intersection between microbiology and nuclear power generation (Disclaimer: These TV shows may or may not exist, but it would be really cool if they did).

As we wade deeper into the empirical ocean of microbial mystery and nuclear anomalies, one cannot help but marvel at the unexpected twists and turns that this peculiar journey has taken. The findings presented in the literature not only raise intriguing questions but also infuse a touch of whimsy into the usually serious world of scientific inquiry, proving that even the most unlikely pairings can spark a sense of wonder and amusement.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of microbiologists in Illinois and Nuclear power generation in Iran. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2011 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Microbiologists and Nukes: Illinois Strikes, Iran Reacts

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we explore the seemingly offbeat relationship between the number of microbiologists in Illinois and nuclear power generation in Iran. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we delved into the statistical connection between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena. To our surprise (and perhaps the delight of conspiracy theorists), we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9042304 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2011 to 2021, suggesting a strong relationship between the two variables. Our findings raise eyebrows and prompt further investigation into the hidden ties between the microbial world and nuclear energy, a marriage of science that could indeed be atomic!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Greetings, esteemed colleagues and curious minds alike! Welcome to a world where bacteria and bombs, microorganisms and megawatts, converge in a most unexpected dance of correlation. We embark on a voyage to unveil the enigmatic connection between the number of microbiologists in the Land of Lincoln and the nuclear power generation in the majestic realm of Iran.
To the uninitiated, this peculiar pairing might sound like the plot of a whimsical science fiction novel – picture tiny microbes scheming alongside uranium atoms in a blockbuster tale of microscopic espionage. However, what might seem like a whimsical premise proves to be a stunning reality as we dissect the empirical evidence and unravel the statistical tapestry that links these two disparate domains of science.
Ladies and gentlemen, prepare to be dazzled as we navigate the treacherous waters of data analysis, wielding the mighty tools of statistical inference to discern patterns amidst the seeming chaos. Our tale unfolds against the backdrop of professional intrigue and research riddles, infused with the delightful quirkiness that is inherent to the scientific pursuit.
As we embark on this quest, we implore you to don your thinking caps, unleash your inner statisticians, and brace yourselves for the unexpected – for the landscape we traverse promises to be both scientifically enlightening and, dare we say, entertaining. So, buckle up and get ready to explore the astonishing correlation between microbiologists and nukes; it's bound to be a wild ride through the wondrous world of empirical inquiry!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To uncover the mysterious relationship between the number of microbiologists in Illinois and nuclear power generation in Iran, our research team embarked on a scientific escapade that would have made even the most intrepid explorers of yore green with statistical envy. Our quest began with the procurement of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, where we salvaged numerical treasures that spanned the decade from 2011 to 2021 – a time period ripe with fascinating glimpses into the microbial and nuclear realms.

Armed with this treasure trove of data, we initiated our study by engaging in a series of statistical acrobatics that would have impressed even the most stoic of mathematicians. First, we conducted a thorough inspection of the datasets, carefully scrutinizing each digit and decimal point as if it held the key to an arcane cipher. This initial perusal served as the bedrock upon which we constructed our analytical edifice, laying the groundwork for the statistical revelations that awaited us.

Next, we invoked the sacred rites of correlation analysis, summoning the powerful deities of Pearson and Spearman to guide our expedition through the labyrinthine corridors of data interpretation. With our trusty calculators in hand and our minds alight with statistical fervor, we proceeded to calculate the correlation coefficient, casting a net over the disparate variables and capturing the elusive essence of their relationship.

In addition to this, we also took measures to control for potential confounding variables, ensuring that our quest for correlation was not besieged by the wily specters of extraneous influences. This involved weaving a complex tapestry of regression analysis and statistical modeling, wherein we meticulously crafted a framework to disentangle the web of interconnected variables and isolate the true essence of the microbial-nuclear nexus.

As our statistical peregrinations reached their zenith, we arrived at the fabled land of p-values, where the cosmic dance of significance testing unfolded before our awestruck eyes. Here, we engaged in fervent calculations and rigorous hypothesis testing, challenging the very fabric of chance itself to reveal the true significance of the relationship between microbiologists in Illinois and nuclear power generation in Iran.

Once we had emerged victorious from this statistical odyssey, our findings stood before us like a grand tapestry of empirical revelation – a correlation coefficient of 0.9042304 and a p-value of less than 0.01, heralding the existence of a robust and significant relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. With these statistical triumphs in our grasp, we emerged from the labyrinth of data analysis, emboldened by the knowledge that we had illuminated a hidden thread in the rich tapestry of scientific inquiry.

In conclusion, our methodology stands as a testament to the heights of statistical prowess and the boundless frontiers of empirical exploration. Our journey through the realms of microbiology and nuclear energy has not only yielded intriguing correlations but also underscored the inexhaustible wonders of the scientific pursuit.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of microbiologists in Illinois and Nuclear power generation in Iran. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2011 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9042304, r-squared of 0.8176326, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Microbiologists and Nukes: Illinois Strikes, Iran Reacts

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we explore the seemingly offbeat relationship between the number of microbiologists in Illinois and nuclear power generation in Iran. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we delved into the statistical connection between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena. To our surprise (and perhaps the delight of conspiracy theorists), we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9042304 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2011 to 2021, suggesting a strong relationship between the two variables. Our findings raise eyebrows and prompt further investigation into the hidden ties between the microbial world and nuclear energy, a marriage of science that could indeed be atomic!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Greetings, esteemed colleagues and curious minds alike! Welcome to a world where bacteria and bombs, microorganisms and megawatts, converge in a most unexpected dance of correlation. We embark on a voyage to unveil the enigmatic connection between the number of microbiologists in the Land of Lincoln and the nuclear power generation in the majestic realm of Iran.
To the uninitiated, this peculiar pairing might sound like the plot of a whimsical science fiction novel – picture tiny microbes scheming alongside uranium atoms in a blockbuster tale of microscopic espionage. However, what might seem like a whimsical premise proves to be a stunning reality as we dissect the empirical evidence and unravel the statistical tapestry that links these two disparate domains of science.
Ladies and gentlemen, prepare to be dazzled as we navigate the treacherous waters of data analysis, wielding the mighty tools of statistical inference to discern patterns amidst the seeming chaos. Our tale unfolds against the backdrop of professional intrigue and research riddles, infused with the delightful quirkiness that is inherent to the scientific pursuit.
As we embark on this quest, we implore you to don your thinking caps, unleash your inner statisticians, and brace yourselves for the unexpected – for the landscape we traverse promises to be both scientifically enlightening and, dare we say, entertaining. So, buckle up and get ready to explore the astonishing correlation between microbiologists and nukes; it's bound to be a wild ride through the wondrous world of empirical inquiry!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The moment of truth has arrived! Our data analysis has unearthed a remarkable correlation between the number of microbiologists in Illinois and nuclear power generation in Iran for the period spanning 2011 to 2021. With a dazzling correlation coefficient of 0.9042304 and an r-squared value of 0.8176326, the strength of this relationship is nothing short of electrifying! Our p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies the significance of this unexpected association.

Fig. 1 showcases the visual embodiment of this jaw-dropping correlation, depicting a scatterplot that leaves little room for doubt. The points on the plot form a strikingly linear pattern, akin to a microbial symphony playing in resonant harmony with the atomic orchestra. We can almost envision the microscopic critters dancing to the rhythm of nuclear fission, their tiny flagella swaying to the beat of uranium decay.

This outcome not only defies conventional wisdom but also challenges the boundaries of scientific exploration, beckoning us to delve deeper into the mysterious interplay between microbiological pursuits in the American heartland and the generation of nuclear power on the Iranian terrain. It seems that when it comes to data analysis, curiosity truly does not kill the cat - instead, it unveils astonishing relationships that defy the norms of conventional scientific domain.

In conclusion, our results prod us to reconsider the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate scientific disciplines, inviting speculation, inquiry, and, of course, a touch of whimsy as we embark on the next phase of this enthralling scientific escapade. So, buckle up, fellow researchers, for the journey ahead promises to be a fusion of statistical rigor and scientific bemusement that is sure to tickle the intellectual palate and defy the conventional bounds of scholarly pursuits!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of microbiologists in Illinois and Nuclear power generation in Iran. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Microbiologists and Nukes: Illinois Strikes, Iran Reacts

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we explore the seemingly offbeat relationship between the number of microbiologists in Illinois and nuclear power generation in Iran. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we delved into the statistical connection between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena. To our surprise (and perhaps the delight of conspiracy theorists), we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9042304 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2011 to 2021, suggesting a strong relationship between the two variables. Our findings raise eyebrows and prompt further investigation into the hidden ties between the microbial world and nuclear energy, a marriage of science that could indeed be atomic!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "A Microscopic Affair: Exploring the Unlikely Union of Microbiology and Nuclear Power" by Smith et al., the authors find a surprising positive correlation between the number of microbiologists in Illinois and the level of nuclear power generation in Iran. This connection, though initially scoffed at as the punchline of a microbial-themed joke, has sent shockwaves through the scientific community, prompting a collective head-scratching of epic proportions.
Doe et al., in "Microorganisms on a Mission: The Unseen Hand in Nuclear Energy Production," delve into the microbial world's not-so-secret love affair with nuclear power. Their findings highlight the subtle influence of microbiologists on the delicate balance of nuclear reactions, painting a picture of microscopic orchestrators behind the scenes, reminiscent of an off-Broadway production titled "Phantom of the Nuclear Reactor."
Jones et al., in "Nuclear Fission and Microbial Division: A Surprising Symbiosis," present evidence of a symbiotic relationship between the abundance of microbiologists and the performance of nuclear power facilities. Their work has left many in the academic realm pondering the implications of such an unexpected partnership, prompting whispered speculations reminiscent of a spy thriller set in a laboratory.
Turning to non-fiction books related to the topic, "The Microbiology of Nuclear Energy Production" by Dr. E. Coli Smith provides a comprehensive overview of the potential impact of microbial activity on nuclear power generation. Meanwhile, "Nuclear Reactors and Bacterial Resilience" by Dr. Salmonella Doe dissects the intricate dance between bacterial species and nuclear reactors.
In the realm of fiction, the novel "The Atomic Microbes' Conspiracy" by A. Ion Jones imagines a world where microscopic organisms hold the fate of nuclear power plants in their tiny, yet surprisingly powerful, hands. Additionally, "The Unseen Enzyme: A Microbial Adventure" by Penelope Pathogen weaves a thrilling tale of microbial espionage and subterfuge amidst the backdrop of a nuclear power facility.
On a lighter note, various TV shows such as "Breaking Bacteria," "The Microbiologists," and "Nuclear Reactor Diaries" have inadvertently shed light on the multifaceted intersection between microbiology and nuclear power generation (Disclaimer: These TV shows may or may not exist, but it would be really cool if they did).
As we wade deeper into the empirical ocean of microbial mystery and nuclear anomalies, one cannot help but marvel at the unexpected twists and turns that this peculiar journey has taken. The findings presented in the literature not only raise intriguing questions but also infuse a touch of whimsy into the usually serious world of scientific inquiry, proving that even the most unlikely pairings can spark a sense of wonder and amusement.

[[RESULTS]]
The moment of truth has arrived! Our data analysis has unearthed a remarkable correlation between the number of microbiologists in Illinois and nuclear power generation in Iran for the period spanning 2011 to 2021. With a dazzling correlation coefficient of 0.9042304 and an r-squared value of 0.8176326, the strength of this relationship is nothing short of electrifying! Our p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies the significance of this unexpected association.
Fig. 1 showcases the visual embodiment of this jaw-dropping correlation, depicting a scatterplot that leaves little room for doubt. The points on the plot form a strikingly linear pattern, akin to a microbial symphony playing in resonant harmony with the atomic orchestra. We can almost envision the microscopic critters dancing to the rhythm of nuclear fission, their tiny flagella swaying to the beat of uranium decay.
This outcome not only defies conventional wisdom but also challenges the boundaries of scientific exploration, beckoning us to delve deeper into the mysterious interplay between microbiological pursuits in the American heartland and the generation of nuclear power on the Iranian terrain. It seems that when it comes to data analysis, curiosity truly does not kill the cat - instead, it unveils astonishing relationships that defy the norms of conventional scientific domain.
In conclusion, our results prod us to reconsider the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate scientific disciplines, inviting speculation, inquiry, and, of course, a touch of whimsy as we embark on the next phase of this enthralling scientific escapade. So, buckle up, fellow researchers, for the journey ahead promises to be a fusion of statistical rigor and scientific bemusement that is sure to tickle the intellectual palate and defy the conventional bounds of scholarly pursuits!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our study, delving into the unexpected correlation between the number of microbiologists in Illinois and nuclear power generation in Iran, has unraveled a web of connections that rivals even the most convoluted microbial networks. It's like we've stumbled upon a microbial soap opera, complete with twists, turns, and more drama than an overgrown petri dish.

As we reflect on our findings, it's impossible to ignore the precedent set by Smith et al. in their work on the improbable connection between these two variables. While initially dismissed as the stuff of scientific tall tales, their audacious assertion has been vindicated by our data, painting a picture of symbiotic harmony between the microbial enthusiasts of Illinois and the nuclear power generators of Iran that is as captivating as a suspenseful laboratory thriller.

Doe et al.'s exploration of the unseen hand of microbiologists in nuclear energy production takes on new significance in light of our results. It's as if they've unearthed a clandestine operation of microscopic maestros orchestrating the delicate dance of nuclear reactions, a revelation that now seems more plausible than ever in the light of our statistical evidence. Who knew that microorganisms could be such hidden power players in the nuclear realm?

Jones et al.'s compelling argument for a symbiotic relationship between microbiologists and nuclear power facilities resonates deeply with our findings, akin to a chorus of bubbling test tubes in scientific harmony. The implications of their work, once met with skeptical furrowed brows, now stand as a beacon of insight into the unexpected partnership blooming amidst the microscopic and nuclear domains.

Now, is it just us, or is there a hint of "Phantom of the Nuclear Reactor" drama in the air? The notion of microscopic protagonists steering the fate of nuclear power plants, as playfully envisioned in "The Atomic Microbes' Conspiracy," feels less like fiction and more like a whimsically plausible plot twist after our revelatory statistical snapshot of this peculiar nexus.

The television shows "Breaking Bacteria," "The Microbiologists," and "Nuclear Reactor Diaries" may exist only in our playful imaginations, but the concept of their existence tickles the funny bone and speaks volumes about the unexpected fusion of microbiology and nuclear power. It's as if science and sitcoms have momentarily joined hands in a fictional dance of scientific amusement.

In light of our results, it seems that the microbial world and nuclear energy have indeed hidden a comedic side, harmonizing their statistical prowess to form a partnership that not only captivates the scientific mind but also infuses an air of amusement into the ostensibly serious world of scholarly inquiry. The unexpected correlations uncovered in our study serve as a delightful reminder that in the vast expanse of scientific exploration, curiosity and a dash of whimsy can lead to truly extraordinary revelations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of microbiologists in Illinois and Nuclear power generation in Iran. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Microbiologists and Nukes: Illinois Strikes, Iran Reacts

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we explore the seemingly offbeat relationship between the number of microbiologists in Illinois and nuclear power generation in Iran. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we delved into the statistical connection between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena. To our surprise (and perhaps the delight of conspiracy theorists), we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9042304 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2011 to 2021, suggesting a strong relationship between the two variables. Our findings raise eyebrows and prompt further investigation into the hidden ties between the microbial world and nuclear energy, a marriage of science that could indeed be atomic!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Greetings, esteemed colleagues and curious minds alike! Welcome to a world where bacteria and bombs, microorganisms and megawatts, converge in a most unexpected dance of correlation. We embark on a voyage to unveil the enigmatic connection between the number of microbiologists in the Land of Lincoln and the nuclear power generation in the majestic realm of Iran.
To the uninitiated, this peculiar pairing might sound like the plot of a whimsical science fiction novel – picture tiny microbes scheming alongside uranium atoms in a blockbuster tale of microscopic espionage. However, what might seem like a whimsical premise proves to be a stunning reality as we dissect the empirical evidence and unravel the statistical tapestry that links these two disparate domains of science.
Ladies and gentlemen, prepare to be dazzled as we navigate the treacherous waters of data analysis, wielding the mighty tools of statistical inference to discern patterns amidst the seeming chaos. Our tale unfolds against the backdrop of professional intrigue and research riddles, infused with the delightful quirkiness that is inherent to the scientific pursuit.
As we embark on this quest, we implore you to don your thinking caps, unleash your inner statisticians, and brace yourselves for the unexpected – for the landscape we traverse promises to be both scientifically enlightening and, dare we say, entertaining. So, buckle up and get ready to explore the astonishing correlation between microbiologists and nukes; it's bound to be a wild ride through the wondrous world of empirical inquiry!

[[RESULTS]]
The moment of truth has arrived! Our data analysis has unearthed a remarkable correlation between the number of microbiologists in Illinois and nuclear power generation in Iran for the period spanning 2011 to 2021. With a dazzling correlation coefficient of 0.9042304 and an r-squared value of 0.8176326, the strength of this relationship is nothing short of electrifying! Our p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies the significance of this unexpected association.
Fig. 1 showcases the visual embodiment of this jaw-dropping correlation, depicting a scatterplot that leaves little room for doubt. The points on the plot form a strikingly linear pattern, akin to a microbial symphony playing in resonant harmony with the atomic orchestra. We can almost envision the microscopic critters dancing to the rhythm of nuclear fission, their tiny flagella swaying to the beat of uranium decay.
This outcome not only defies conventional wisdom but also challenges the boundaries of scientific exploration, beckoning us to delve deeper into the mysterious interplay between microbiological pursuits in the American heartland and the generation of nuclear power on the Iranian terrain. It seems that when it comes to data analysis, curiosity truly does not kill the cat - instead, it unveils astonishing relationships that defy the norms of conventional scientific domain.
In conclusion, our results prod us to reconsider the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate scientific disciplines, inviting speculation, inquiry, and, of course, a touch of whimsy as we embark on the next phase of this enthralling scientific escapade. So, buckle up, fellow researchers, for the journey ahead promises to be a fusion of statistical rigor and scientific bemusement that is sure to tickle the intellectual palate and defy the conventional bounds of scholarly pursuits!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

As we wrap up this extraordinary journey through the realm of microbiologists and nukes, we find ourselves marveling at the unexpected correlation that has unfolded before our eyes. It's as if bacteria and bombs have been engaged in a covert tango, creating an atomic symphony that resonates across borders and disciplines.

Our findings have left us pondering the microbial machinations that could potentially influence the realm of nuclear power generation. Could it be that these tiny organisms wield a microscopic influence on the nuclear landscape, whispering secrets of power production as they go about their minuscule microbial business? It's a tantalizing thought that injects a dash of whimsy into the usually serious world of empirical inquiry.

Nevertheless, as we revel in the charm of our statistical discoveries, it's safe to say that our quest to explore the hidden connections between microbiologists and nukes has unearthed enough scientific delight to satisfy the most curious minds. The dance of data analysis has led us to this moment of revelatory merriment, sparking conversations and sparking the imagination in a manner befitting the most whimsical of scientific endeavors.

In closing, we assert that this correlation between the number of microbiologists in Illinois and nuclear power generation in Iran is nothing short of a scientific marvel. However, we dare say that no further research is needed in this area, for we might risk unraveling the magic and turning this enthralling statistical waltz into a mundane dabble in empirical trivia. With that, we bid adieu to our zany exploration, content in the knowledge that our findings have injected a healthy dose of scientific glee into the pursuit of knowledge.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Microbiologists and Nukes: Illinois Strikes, Iran Reacts. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Nuclear Microbiology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Microbiologists and Nukes: Illinois Strikes, Iran Reacts. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

American Society for Microbiological Warfare Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Microbiologists and Nukes: Illinois Strikes, Iran Reacts with an abstract of In this study, we explore the seemingly offbeat relationship between the number of microbiologists in Illinois and nuclear power generation in Iran. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we delved into the statistical connection between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena. To our surprise (and perhaps the delight of conspiracy theorists), we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9042304 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2011 to 2021, suggesting a strong relationship between the two variables. Our findings raise eyebrows and prompt further investigation into the hidden ties between the microbial world and nuclear energy, a marriage of science that could indeed be atomic!

ChatGPT:

microbiologists, nukes, Illinois, Iran, nuclear power generation, correlation coefficient, statistical analysis, data analysis, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Energy Information Administration, hidden ties, microbial world, atomic science

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of microbiologists in Illinois
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of microbiologists in Illinois
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of microbiologists in Illinois

Nuclear power generation in Iran
Detailed data title: Total nuclear power generation in Iran in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Nuclear power generation in Iran

Correlation r = 0.9042304 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8176326 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 81.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Nuclear power generation in Iran) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of microbiologists in Illinois) over the 11 years from 2011 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00013. 0.0001325247828548801200000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.9 in 0.013% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 7,546 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.67, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
The number of microbiologists in Illinois (Microbiologists)240240490290520750910860670650520
Nuclear power generation in Iran (Billion kWh)0.097981.3283.893673.7243.1985.9246.3666.35.8665.7923.236




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([240,240,490,290,520,750,910,860,670,650,520,])
array_2 = np.array([0.09798,1.328,3.89367,3.724,3.198,5.924,6.366,6.3,5.866,5.792,3.236,])
array_1_name = "The number of microbiologists in Illinois"
array_2_name = "Nuclear power generation in Iran"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Bravo! Your evaluation rocks!


Correlation ID: 3363 · Black Variable ID: 7341 · Red Variable ID: 23740
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0