about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,349 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Sioux City, Iowa and the second variable is Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion.  The chart goes from 1980 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the air became cleaner in Sioux City, Iowa, the local corn fields flourished. This led to an overabundance of corn, causing a surplus in the hotdog production industry. With more hotdogs on the market, the demand for competitive hotdog eating decreased, ultimately leading to a decline in hotdogs consumed by the champion. Looks like cleaner air really took the "dog" out of the competition!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Certainly! Here's an image generation prompt with your request in mind: Generate an image that looks like a scene from 'Star Wars', set in Sioux City, Iowa. The skyline is filled with smog, creating an otherworldly atmosphere. In the center of the scene, the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition stands surrounded by a towering mountain of hotdogs, with the city's pollution seemingly enhancing the hotdog cravings. The champion, with ketchup smeared on his face, eagerly indulges in a "air" dog amidst the amazed crowd, who watch in awe as the unexpected spectacle unfolds. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Sioux City, Iowa and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: a Polaroid photo a Polaroid photo An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' Minimalism Low poly
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars'

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Sioux City, Iowa and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion, in the following situation: The increase in air pollution in Sioux City led to a spike in hotdog consumption at Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition because the smog created a "frankenfurter" effect, causing people to crave more "air" dogs to "ketchup" on their health!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Sioux City, Iowa, the skyline is streaked with smog as air pollution has increased. In the midst of this, the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, surrounded by a mountain of hotdogs, eagerly tucks into a huge "air" dog. The crowd watches in amazement as the champion, with ketchup smeared on his face, indulges in another "air" dog, contributing to the spike in hotdog consumption due to the smog-induced craving.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' ] and depicting this scene: In Sioux City, Iowa, the skyline is streaked with smog as air pollution has increased. In the midst of this, the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, surrounded by a mountain of hotdogs, eagerly tucks into a huge "air" dog. The crowd watches in amazement as the champion, with ketchup smeared on his face, indulges in another "air" dog, contributing to the spike in hotdog consumption due to the smog-induced craving. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Certainly! Here's an image generation prompt with your request in mind: Generate an image that looks like a scene from 'Star Wars', set in Sioux City, Iowa. The skyline is filled with smog, creating an otherworldly atmosphere. In the center of the scene, the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition stands surrounded by a towering mountain of hotdogs, with the city's pollution seemingly enhancing the hotdog cravings. The champion, with ketchup smeared on his face, eagerly indulges in a "air" dog amidst the amazed crowd, who watch in awe as the unexpected spectacle unfolds.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Air pollution in Sioux City, Iowa caused Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion to decrease. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Sizzling Sausages and Smog: A Statistical Study on the Correlation Between Air Pollution in Sioux City, Iowa and Hotdogs Consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion

Journal of Gastronomic Ecology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Sioux City, Iowa and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.6756878 and p < 0.01 for 1980 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Sizzling Sausages and Smog: A Statistical Study on the Correlation Between Air Pollution in Sioux City, Iowa and Hotdogs Consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a comprehensive statistical analysis investigating the potential link between air pollution levels in Sioux City, Iowa and the consumption of hotdogs by the reigning champion of the renowned Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Leveraging Environmental Protection Agency data on air quality and information from Wikipedia on hot dog consumption, our research team conducted a rigorous examination spanning from 1980 to 2022.

Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.6756878 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a robust statistical association between air pollution and hotdog consumption. This unexpected correlation prompts a culinary conundrum and leads to a myriad of comical conjectures regarding the influence of air quality on competitive eating champions. We invite readers to relish in the findings and ponder the possibility of air pollution whetting the appetite for competitive hot dog consumption.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Sioux City, Iowa and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Sizzling Sausages and Smog: A Statistical Study on the Correlation Between Air Pollution in Sioux City, Iowa and Hotdogs Consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a comprehensive statistical analysis investigating the potential link between air pollution levels in Sioux City, Iowa and the consumption of hotdogs by the reigning champion of the renowned Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Leveraging Environmental Protection Agency data on air quality and information from Wikipedia on hot dog consumption, our research team conducted a rigorous examination spanning from 1980 to 2022.

Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.6756878 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a robust statistical association between air pollution and hotdog consumption. This unexpected correlation prompts a culinary conundrum and leads to a myriad of comical conjectures regarding the influence of air quality on competitive eating champions. We invite readers to relish in the findings and ponder the possibility of air pollution whetting the appetite for competitive hot dog consumption.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
Introduction

The relationship between environmental factors and human consumption behaviors has long been a subject of fascination and speculation. In the age of modern statistical analysis, researchers are equipped to unravel the unusual and unexpected connections that exist in our complex world. With this in mind, our study delves into the curious association between air pollution in Sioux City, Iowa, and the astonishing feat of hotdog consumption by the revered champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition.

While some may dismiss the notion of a connection between air pollution and competitive eating as mere whimsy, we took this gastronomic enigma seriously, setting out to determine whether the inhalation of noxious fumes could potentially incite an insatiable craving for frankfurters. Our investigation aims to provide empirical evidence to either substantiate or disprove the far-fetched yet tantalizing hypothesis of air pollution serving as a catalyst for prodigious hotdog consumption.

In undertaking this endeavor, we recognized the need to employ robust statistical methods to scrutinize the pertinent data. The salient variables in our analysis encompassed the levels of particulate matter, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and ozone in the ambient air of Sioux City, as well as the consummate consumption of hotdogs by the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. By harnessing the power of statistical analysis, we endeavored to uncover any discernible patterns that might elicit a correlation, however improbable it may seem at first blush.

Our comprehensive examination of this fascinating phenomenon required a meticulous trawl through decades of air quality data meticulously compiled by the Environmental Protection Agency. Concurrently, we scoured through historical records of hotdog consumption, mindful of the peculiar juxtaposition of these seemingly disparate data sets. Remarkably, the statistical analysis unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient and a compelling p-value, which not only piqued our scholarly curiosity but also tickled our comedic sensibilities.

The unexpected nexus between air pollution and competitive hotdog consumption is not merely a statistical anomaly but a conundrum that teases the boundaries of gastronomic science. The implications of our findings resonate not only within the realm of academic discourse but also beckon to the lively banter found in the intersection of culinary curiosities and statistical serendipities. The seemingly whimsical notion of air pollution prodding the voracious appetite of a competitive eating champion invites us to relish in the unexpected and to savor the enigmatic interplay of gastronomy and atmospheric chemistry.

As we embark on this scholarly odyssey, we invite our readers to embrace the jocund spirit in which this investigation was conducted and to indulge in the idiosyncratic musings that spring forth from this statistical analysis. So, let us embark on a journey that intertwines the complexities of environmental science with the whimsical world of competitive eating, and perhaps, along the way, we may find that there is more than meets the eye – or the palate – in the statistical arena.

In the subsequent sections of this paper, we shall delineate the methodology employed, present the findings of our statistical analysis, and engage in a lighthearted exploration of the implications and potential mechanisms underlying this curious correlation. Join us as we feast upon the statistical feast we have prepared, and as we savor the deliciously curious confluence of air pollution and gastronomic triumph.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Sioux City, Iowa and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Sizzling Sausages and Smog: A Statistical Study on the Correlation Between Air Pollution in Sioux City, Iowa and Hotdogs Consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a comprehensive statistical analysis investigating the potential link between air pollution levels in Sioux City, Iowa and the consumption of hotdogs by the reigning champion of the renowned Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Leveraging Environmental Protection Agency data on air quality and information from Wikipedia on hot dog consumption, our research team conducted a rigorous examination spanning from 1980 to 2022.

Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.6756878 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a robust statistical association between air pollution and hotdog consumption. This unexpected correlation prompts a culinary conundrum and leads to a myriad of comical conjectures regarding the influence of air quality on competitive eating champions. We invite readers to relish in the findings and ponder the possibility of air pollution whetting the appetite for competitive hot dog consumption.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
The relationship between environmental factors and human consumption behaviors has long been a subject of fascination and speculation. In the age of modern statistical analysis, researchers are equipped to unravel the unusual and unexpected connections that exist in our complex world. With this in mind, our study delves into the curious association between air pollution in Sioux City, Iowa, and the astonishing feat of hotdog consumption by the revered champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition.
While some may dismiss the notion of a connection between air pollution and competitive eating as mere whimsy, we took this gastronomic enigma seriously, setting out to determine whether the inhalation of noxious fumes could potentially incite an insatiable craving for frankfurters. Our investigation aims to provide empirical evidence to either substantiate or disprove the far-fetched yet tantalizing hypothesis of air pollution serving as a catalyst for prodigious hotdog consumption.
In undertaking this endeavor, we recognized the need to employ robust statistical methods to scrutinize the pertinent data. The salient variables in our analysis encompassed the levels of particulate matter, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and ozone in the ambient air of Sioux City, as well as the consummate consumption of hotdogs by the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. By harnessing the power of statistical analysis, we endeavored to uncover any discernible patterns that might elicit a correlation, however improbable it may seem at first blush.
Our comprehensive examination of this fascinating phenomenon required a meticulous trawl through decades of air quality data meticulously compiled by the Environmental Protection Agency. Concurrently, we scoured through historical records of hotdog consumption, mindful of the peculiar juxtaposition of these seemingly disparate data sets. Remarkably, the statistical analysis unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient and a compelling p-value, which not only piqued our scholarly curiosity but also tickled our comedic sensibilities.
The unexpected nexus between air pollution and competitive hotdog consumption is not merely a statistical anomaly but a conundrum that teases the boundaries of gastronomic science. The implications of our findings resonate not only within the realm of academic discourse but also beckon to the lively banter found in the intersection of culinary curiosities and statistical serendipities. The seemingly whimsical notion of air pollution prodding the voracious appetite of a competitive eating champion invites us to relish in the unexpected and to savor the enigmatic interplay of gastronomy and atmospheric chemistry.
As we embark on this scholarly odyssey, we invite our readers to embrace the jocund spirit in which this investigation was conducted and to indulge in the idiosyncratic musings that spring forth from this statistical analysis. So, let us embark on a journey that intertwines the complexities of environmental science with the whimsical world of competitive eating, and perhaps, along the way, we may find that there is more than meets the eye – or the palate – in the statistical arena.
In the subsequent sections of this paper, we shall delineate the methodology employed, present the findings of our statistical analysis, and engage in a lighthearted exploration of the implications and potential mechanisms underlying this curious correlation. Join us as we feast upon the statistical feast we have prepared, and as we savor the deliciously curious confluence of air pollution and gastronomic triumph.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The potential correlation between air pollution and hotdog consumption has been a subject of great fascination and, at times, bewilderment. This unconventional association has prompted a diverse array of scholarly investigations and pop culture references alike. In their work, Smith and Doe (2015) ventured into the intricate realm of environmental influences on dietary habits, paving the way for subsequent researchers to explore the quirkier interconnections of gastronomy and atmospheric conditions. Jones (2018) further delved into the nuanced relationship between air quality and culinary preferences, setting the stage for the present inquiry into the whimsical world of competitive hotdog consumption.

While the above studies shed light on the broader context of environmental influences on dietary behaviors, a multidisciplinary approach is warranted to fully embrace the eccentricity of our current undertaking. Books such as "Food and Air: A Tale of Two Compounds" by Culinary Chemist et al. (2012) and "Smoke Signals: A Culinary Mystery" by Flavor Detective (2016) serve as literary companions in this scholarly escapade, intertwining the complexities of atmospheric chemistry with the enigmatic allure of gastronomic indulgence.

In a parallel realm of fiction, works such as "The Sausage Smog Paradox" by Novel Nutritionist (2014) and "Frankfurters in Fog: A Culinary Conspiracy" by Mystery Muncher (2017) playfully speculate on the unforeseen connections between air pollution and prodigious hotdog consumption, affirming the cultural resonance of this peculiar scholarly pursuit.

Furthermore, the vibrant world of children's cartoons and animated shows has not escaped the captivating allure of our subject matter. The whimsical escapades of characters in "Sausages in the City" and "The Airborne Appetite Adventures" reflect the endearing fascination with unexpected connections in the culinary and environmental realms.

Thus, we find ourselves at the intersection of scholarly inquiry and whimsical wonder, poised to unravel the curious correlation between air pollution in Sioux City, Iowa, and the remarkable appetite for hotdogs exhibited by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. As we delve deeper into the annals of whimsy and statistical serendipity, let us embark on a scholarly odyssey that promises to tickle the intellect and the palate in equal measure.

And now, let us feast our scholarly appetites on the methodological feast we have prepared, as we navigate through the statistical gauntlet of our gastronomic odyssey. Bon appétit!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Sioux City, Iowa and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia . You used data from 1980 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Sizzling Sausages and Smog: A Statistical Study on the Correlation Between Air Pollution in Sioux City, Iowa and Hotdogs Consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a comprehensive statistical analysis investigating the potential link between air pollution levels in Sioux City, Iowa and the consumption of hotdogs by the reigning champion of the renowned Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Leveraging Environmental Protection Agency data on air quality and information from Wikipedia on hot dog consumption, our research team conducted a rigorous examination spanning from 1980 to 2022.

Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.6756878 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a robust statistical association between air pollution and hotdog consumption. This unexpected correlation prompts a culinary conundrum and leads to a myriad of comical conjectures regarding the influence of air quality on competitive eating champions. We invite readers to relish in the findings and ponder the possibility of air pollution whetting the appetite for competitive hot dog consumption.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
The relationship between environmental factors and human consumption behaviors has long been a subject of fascination and speculation. In the age of modern statistical analysis, researchers are equipped to unravel the unusual and unexpected connections that exist in our complex world. With this in mind, our study delves into the curious association between air pollution in Sioux City, Iowa, and the astonishing feat of hotdog consumption by the revered champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition.
While some may dismiss the notion of a connection between air pollution and competitive eating as mere whimsy, we took this gastronomic enigma seriously, setting out to determine whether the inhalation of noxious fumes could potentially incite an insatiable craving for frankfurters. Our investigation aims to provide empirical evidence to either substantiate or disprove the far-fetched yet tantalizing hypothesis of air pollution serving as a catalyst for prodigious hotdog consumption.
In undertaking this endeavor, we recognized the need to employ robust statistical methods to scrutinize the pertinent data. The salient variables in our analysis encompassed the levels of particulate matter, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and ozone in the ambient air of Sioux City, as well as the consummate consumption of hotdogs by the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. By harnessing the power of statistical analysis, we endeavored to uncover any discernible patterns that might elicit a correlation, however improbable it may seem at first blush.
Our comprehensive examination of this fascinating phenomenon required a meticulous trawl through decades of air quality data meticulously compiled by the Environmental Protection Agency. Concurrently, we scoured through historical records of hotdog consumption, mindful of the peculiar juxtaposition of these seemingly disparate data sets. Remarkably, the statistical analysis unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient and a compelling p-value, which not only piqued our scholarly curiosity but also tickled our comedic sensibilities.
The unexpected nexus between air pollution and competitive hotdog consumption is not merely a statistical anomaly but a conundrum that teases the boundaries of gastronomic science. The implications of our findings resonate not only within the realm of academic discourse but also beckon to the lively banter found in the intersection of culinary curiosities and statistical serendipities. The seemingly whimsical notion of air pollution prodding the voracious appetite of a competitive eating champion invites us to relish in the unexpected and to savor the enigmatic interplay of gastronomy and atmospheric chemistry.
As we embark on this scholarly odyssey, we invite our readers to embrace the jocund spirit in which this investigation was conducted and to indulge in the idiosyncratic musings that spring forth from this statistical analysis. So, let us embark on a journey that intertwines the complexities of environmental science with the whimsical world of competitive eating, and perhaps, along the way, we may find that there is more than meets the eye – or the palate – in the statistical arena.
In the subsequent sections of this paper, we shall delineate the methodology employed, present the findings of our statistical analysis, and engage in a lighthearted exploration of the implications and potential mechanisms underlying this curious correlation. Join us as we feast upon the statistical feast we have prepared, and as we savor the deliciously curious confluence of air pollution and gastronomic triumph.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the savory mystery of the potential link between air pollution in Sioux City, Iowa, and the astonishing consumption of hotdogs by the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, our research team ventured into the labyrinth of statistical inquiry with an appetite for empirical enlightenment and a pinch of whimsy.

Data Collection:
The first morsel of our methodological buffet involved gathering data from sources as diverse as the flavors in a hotdog condiment bar. Leveraging the treasure trove of information provided by the Environmental Protection Agency, we meticulously collected air quality data spanning from the delectably retro year of 1980 to the tantalizing present of 2022. Particulate matter, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and ozone levels in the ambient air of Sioux City were scrutinized with the precision of a discerning connoisseur examining the quality of a premium mustard.

In parallel, we delved into the annals of history through the omniscient pages of Wikipedia to procure information on the consummate consumption of hotdogs by the esteemed victor of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Such an endeavor required a keen eye for discerning accurate data amidst the sea of anecdotal relishes and speculative sauerkraut of online sources. Our data mining expedition was not merely an exercise in scholarship but an endeavor to distinguish the finest cuts of statistical meat from the chaff of spurious claims and unverified hotdog legends.

Data Analysis:
Our culinary quest for correlation led us to the time-honored arsenal of statistical methods, where we wielded the tools of coefficient calculation, hypothesis testing, and regression modeling with the finesse of a seasoned chef crafting an intricate dish. The phi coefficient, Pearson correlation, and even the delectable delicacy of Spearman's rank correlation were harnessed to ascertain the strength and direction of the potential relationship between air pollution and hotdog consumption.

In the spirit of culinary experimentation, we subjected the collected data to the scorching scrutiny of inferential statistics, allowing us to feast upon the delectable fruits of hypothesis testing. A sumptuous serving of p-values and confidence intervals accompanied by a garnish of effect sizes and confidence levels provided a comprehensive insight into the statistical significance of the unearthed associations.

We acknowledge that our concoction of statistical methodologies may appear as baffling as a culinary fusion experiment gone awry; nevertheless, we assure our readers that every morsel of analysis was meticulously prepared to uncover any potential spice of correlation between air pollution and the alluring allure of hotdog consumption.

Ethical Considerations:
In the tradition of academic probity, our research team upheld the utmost ethical principles in handling the gastronomical and atmospheric data. All data sources were credited with due diligence, and no hotdogs were harmed, wasted, or unduly influenced during the course of our investigation. Our commitment to ethical research practices extended beyond the statistical realm to honor the integrity of the enduring bond between air quality and competitive consumption.

In summary, our methodology partook in a veritable feast of data collection, statistical analysis, and ethical considerations, served with a side of scholarly Scruples and a dash of whimsy. With the stage set for our culinary masquerade, we shall proceed to regale our readers with the sumptuous findings of our statistical escapade in the forthcoming sections. Bon appétit!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Sioux City, Iowa and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia .

For the time period 1980 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.6756878, r-squared of 0.4565541, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Sizzling Sausages and Smog: A Statistical Study on the Correlation Between Air Pollution in Sioux City, Iowa and Hotdogs Consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a comprehensive statistical analysis investigating the potential link between air pollution levels in Sioux City, Iowa and the consumption of hotdogs by the reigning champion of the renowned Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Leveraging Environmental Protection Agency data on air quality and information from Wikipedia on hot dog consumption, our research team conducted a rigorous examination spanning from 1980 to 2022.

Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.6756878 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a robust statistical association between air pollution and hotdog consumption. This unexpected correlation prompts a culinary conundrum and leads to a myriad of comical conjectures regarding the influence of air quality on competitive eating champions. We invite readers to relish in the findings and ponder the possibility of air pollution whetting the appetite for competitive hot dog consumption.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Introduction
The relationship between environmental factors and human consumption behaviors has long been a subject of fascination and speculation. In the age of modern statistical analysis, researchers are equipped to unravel the unusual and unexpected connections that exist in our complex world. With this in mind, our study delves into the curious association between air pollution in Sioux City, Iowa, and the astonishing feat of hotdog consumption by the revered champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition.
While some may dismiss the notion of a connection between air pollution and competitive eating as mere whimsy, we took this gastronomic enigma seriously, setting out to determine whether the inhalation of noxious fumes could potentially incite an insatiable craving for frankfurters. Our investigation aims to provide empirical evidence to either substantiate or disprove the far-fetched yet tantalizing hypothesis of air pollution serving as a catalyst for prodigious hotdog consumption.
In undertaking this endeavor, we recognized the need to employ robust statistical methods to scrutinize the pertinent data. The salient variables in our analysis encompassed the levels of particulate matter, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and ozone in the ambient air of Sioux City, as well as the consummate consumption of hotdogs by the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. By harnessing the power of statistical analysis, we endeavored to uncover any discernible patterns that might elicit a correlation, however improbable it may seem at first blush.
Our comprehensive examination of this fascinating phenomenon required a meticulous trawl through decades of air quality data meticulously compiled by the Environmental Protection Agency. Concurrently, we scoured through historical records of hotdog consumption, mindful of the peculiar juxtaposition of these seemingly disparate data sets. Remarkably, the statistical analysis unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient and a compelling p-value, which not only piqued our scholarly curiosity but also tickled our comedic sensibilities.
The unexpected nexus between air pollution and competitive hotdog consumption is not merely a statistical anomaly but a conundrum that teases the boundaries of gastronomic science. The implications of our findings resonate not only within the realm of academic discourse but also beckon to the lively banter found in the intersection of culinary curiosities and statistical serendipities. The seemingly whimsical notion of air pollution prodding the voracious appetite of a competitive eating champion invites us to relish in the unexpected and to savor the enigmatic interplay of gastronomy and atmospheric chemistry.
As we embark on this scholarly odyssey, we invite our readers to embrace the jocund spirit in which this investigation was conducted and to indulge in the idiosyncratic musings that spring forth from this statistical analysis. So, let us embark on a journey that intertwines the complexities of environmental science with the whimsical world of competitive eating, and perhaps, along the way, we may find that there is more than meets the eye – or the palate – in the statistical arena.
In the subsequent sections of this paper, we shall delineate the methodology employed, present the findings of our statistical analysis, and engage in a lighthearted exploration of the implications and potential mechanisms underlying this curious correlation. Join us as we feast upon the statistical feast we have prepared, and as we savor the deliciously curious confluence of air pollution and gastronomic triumph.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis of the data from 1980 to 2022 yielded a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.6756878, an r-squared value of 0.4565541, and a p-value of less than 0.01. This indicated a statistically significant relationship between air pollution levels in Sioux City, Iowa, and the consumption of hotdogs by the illustrious champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. As shown in Figure 1, the scatterplot revealed a compelling linear trend, illustrating the surprising alignment between these seemingly disparate variables.

This robust statistical association raises intriguing questions about the interplay between environmental factors and competitive eating prowess. Could the scent of industrial fumes on the breeze serve as an unwitting appetizer for hotdog-laden triumphs at Coney Island? Or perhaps, the inhalation of airborne particulate matter may be an undervalued component of training regimens for competitive eaters? While these notions may appear fanciful, our statistical analysis unmistakably points to a meaningful correlation, sparking a culinary enigma worthy of further exploration.

As we delve into the implications of these findings, we are met with a delightful tapestry of whimsy and wonderment. The unexpected connection between air pollution and hotdog consumption not only invites us to contemplate the humorous intricacies of statistical serendipity, but also to explore the potential pathways through which atmospheric variables may influence gustatory feats of grandeur. It is, in many ways, a delightful parade of statistical sizzle and savory surprises.

In our further exploration of these results, we shall partake in a playful examination of the possible mechanisms underpinning this unlikely correlation, aiming to tickle both the academic intellect and the lighthearted sensibilities of our readers. Join us in this scholarly journey as we unravel the delightfully peculiar connection between smog and sausages, and as we savor the flavorful fusion of scientific inquiry and culinary curiosity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Sioux City, Iowa and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Sizzling Sausages and Smog: A Statistical Study on the Correlation Between Air Pollution in Sioux City, Iowa and Hotdogs Consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a comprehensive statistical analysis investigating the potential link between air pollution levels in Sioux City, Iowa and the consumption of hotdogs by the reigning champion of the renowned Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Leveraging Environmental Protection Agency data on air quality and information from Wikipedia on hot dog consumption, our research team conducted a rigorous examination spanning from 1980 to 2022.

Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.6756878 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a robust statistical association between air pollution and hotdog consumption. This unexpected correlation prompts a culinary conundrum and leads to a myriad of comical conjectures regarding the influence of air quality on competitive eating champions. We invite readers to relish in the findings and ponder the possibility of air pollution whetting the appetite for competitive hot dog consumption.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The potential correlation between air pollution and hotdog consumption has been a subject of great fascination and, at times, bewilderment. This unconventional association has prompted a diverse array of scholarly investigations and pop culture references alike. In their work, Smith and Doe (2015) ventured into the intricate realm of environmental influences on dietary habits, paving the way for subsequent researchers to explore the quirkier interconnections of gastronomy and atmospheric conditions. Jones (2018) further delved into the nuanced relationship between air quality and culinary preferences, setting the stage for the present inquiry into the whimsical world of competitive hotdog consumption.
While the above studies shed light on the broader context of environmental influences on dietary behaviors, a multidisciplinary approach is warranted to fully embrace the eccentricity of our current undertaking. Books such as "Food and Air: A Tale of Two Compounds" by Culinary Chemist et al. (2012) and "Smoke Signals: A Culinary Mystery" by Flavor Detective (2016) serve as literary companions in this scholarly escapade, intertwining the complexities of atmospheric chemistry with the enigmatic allure of gastronomic indulgence.
In a parallel realm of fiction, works such as "The Sausage Smog Paradox" by Novel Nutritionist (2014) and "Frankfurters in Fog: A Culinary Conspiracy" by Mystery Muncher (2017) playfully speculate on the unforeseen connections between air pollution and prodigious hotdog consumption, affirming the cultural resonance of this peculiar scholarly pursuit.
Furthermore, the vibrant world of children's cartoons and animated shows has not escaped the captivating allure of our subject matter. The whimsical escapades of characters in "Sausages in the City" and "The Airborne Appetite Adventures" reflect the endearing fascination with unexpected connections in the culinary and environmental realms.
Thus, we find ourselves at the intersection of scholarly inquiry and whimsical wonder, poised to unravel the curious correlation between air pollution in Sioux City, Iowa, and the remarkable appetite for hotdogs exhibited by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. As we delve deeper into the annals of whimsy and statistical serendipity, let us embark on a scholarly odyssey that promises to tickle the intellect and the palate in equal measure.
And now, let us feast our scholarly appetites on the methodological feast we have prepared, as we navigate through the statistical gauntlet of our gastronomic odyssey. Bon appétit!

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data from 1980 to 2022 yielded a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.6756878, an r-squared value of 0.4565541, and a p-value of less than 0.01. This indicated a statistically significant relationship between air pollution levels in Sioux City, Iowa, and the consumption of hotdogs by the illustrious champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. As shown in Figure 1, the scatterplot revealed a compelling linear trend, illustrating the surprising alignment between these seemingly disparate variables.
This robust statistical association raises intriguing questions about the interplay between environmental factors and competitive eating prowess. Could the scent of industrial fumes on the breeze serve as an unwitting appetizer for hotdog-laden triumphs at Coney Island? Or perhaps, the inhalation of airborne particulate matter may be an undervalued component of training regimens for competitive eaters? While these notions may appear fanciful, our statistical analysis unmistakably points to a meaningful correlation, sparking a culinary enigma worthy of further exploration.
As we delve into the implications of these findings, we are met with a delightful tapestry of whimsy and wonderment. The unexpected connection between air pollution and hotdog consumption not only invites us to contemplate the humorous intricacies of statistical serendipity, but also to explore the potential pathways through which atmospheric variables may influence gustatory feats of grandeur. It is, in many ways, a delightful parade of statistical sizzle and savory surprises.
In our further exploration of these results, we shall partake in a playful examination of the possible mechanisms underpinning this unlikely correlation, aiming to tickle both the academic intellect and the lighthearted sensibilities of our readers. Join us in this scholarly journey as we unravel the delightfully peculiar connection between smog and sausages, and as we savor the flavorful fusion of scientific inquiry and culinary curiosity.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The present study has not only peeled back the layers of statistical intrigue but has also marinated in the whimsical world of culinary curiosities. Our findings demonstrate a resounding resonance with prior research, aligning with the scholarly forays into the uncharted territory of air pollution and epicurean endeavors.

Building upon the works of Smith and Doe (2015) and Jones (2018), our investigation corroborates the notion that external atmospheric elements may indeed leave an imprint on gastronomic predilections. The statistically significant correlation between air pollution in Sioux City, Iowa, and hotdog consumption by the reigning champion of competitive eating provides a flavorful validation of our predecessors' scholarly musings.

In this gastronomic odyssey, it becomes abundantly clear that the scientific palate is not without its whimsical indulgences. Just as culinary chemists ponder the alchemical transformations of flavors, we, too, have emboldened our statistical stew with the seasoning of statistical serendipity. The savory allure of our correlation coefficient and the delectable robustness of our p-value beckon us to savor the statistical seasoning that underpins this delightful correlation.

Now, as we wade through the culinary conundrum we encounter, we must acknowledge the comical conjectures that surface. Could the smog-laden breezes of Sioux City serve as gustatory muses for the heroic consumption of hotdogs at Coney Island? Our findings certainly tantalize the imagination, like a culinary riddle waiting to be solved.

The unlikely pairing of air pollution and hotdog consumption teases the intellect and tickles the scholarly palate with an unexpected juxtaposition. It is a conundrum that invites a lighthearted exploration of the whimsical ways in which statistical serendipity intertwines with the savory world of competitive eating.

As we continue to savor the findings and implications of this research, the tantalizing trail of statistical breadcrumbs leads us deeper into the flavorful nexus of atmospheric intrigue and culinary capers. With a nod to the unusual nature of our findings, we are reminded that even the most unexpected statistical connections can yield a bountiful harvest of scholarly amusement.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Sioux City, Iowa and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Sizzling Sausages and Smog: A Statistical Study on the Correlation Between Air Pollution in Sioux City, Iowa and Hotdogs Consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a comprehensive statistical analysis investigating the potential link between air pollution levels in Sioux City, Iowa and the consumption of hotdogs by the reigning champion of the renowned Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Leveraging Environmental Protection Agency data on air quality and information from Wikipedia on hot dog consumption, our research team conducted a rigorous examination spanning from 1980 to 2022.

Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.6756878 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a robust statistical association between air pollution and hotdog consumption. This unexpected correlation prompts a culinary conundrum and leads to a myriad of comical conjectures regarding the influence of air quality on competitive eating champions. We invite readers to relish in the findings and ponder the possibility of air pollution whetting the appetite for competitive hot dog consumption.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Introduction
The relationship between environmental factors and human consumption behaviors has long been a subject of fascination and speculation. In the age of modern statistical analysis, researchers are equipped to unravel the unusual and unexpected connections that exist in our complex world. With this in mind, our study delves into the curious association between air pollution in Sioux City, Iowa, and the astonishing feat of hotdog consumption by the revered champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition.
While some may dismiss the notion of a connection between air pollution and competitive eating as mere whimsy, we took this gastronomic enigma seriously, setting out to determine whether the inhalation of noxious fumes could potentially incite an insatiable craving for frankfurters. Our investigation aims to provide empirical evidence to either substantiate or disprove the far-fetched yet tantalizing hypothesis of air pollution serving as a catalyst for prodigious hotdog consumption.
In undertaking this endeavor, we recognized the need to employ robust statistical methods to scrutinize the pertinent data. The salient variables in our analysis encompassed the levels of particulate matter, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and ozone in the ambient air of Sioux City, as well as the consummate consumption of hotdogs by the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. By harnessing the power of statistical analysis, we endeavored to uncover any discernible patterns that might elicit a correlation, however improbable it may seem at first blush.
Our comprehensive examination of this fascinating phenomenon required a meticulous trawl through decades of air quality data meticulously compiled by the Environmental Protection Agency. Concurrently, we scoured through historical records of hotdog consumption, mindful of the peculiar juxtaposition of these seemingly disparate data sets. Remarkably, the statistical analysis unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient and a compelling p-value, which not only piqued our scholarly curiosity but also tickled our comedic sensibilities.
The unexpected nexus between air pollution and competitive hotdog consumption is not merely a statistical anomaly but a conundrum that teases the boundaries of gastronomic science. The implications of our findings resonate not only within the realm of academic discourse but also beckon to the lively banter found in the intersection of culinary curiosities and statistical serendipities. The seemingly whimsical notion of air pollution prodding the voracious appetite of a competitive eating champion invites us to relish in the unexpected and to savor the enigmatic interplay of gastronomy and atmospheric chemistry.
As we embark on this scholarly odyssey, we invite our readers to embrace the jocund spirit in which this investigation was conducted and to indulge in the idiosyncratic musings that spring forth from this statistical analysis. So, let us embark on a journey that intertwines the complexities of environmental science with the whimsical world of competitive eating, and perhaps, along the way, we may find that there is more than meets the eye – or the palate – in the statistical arena.
In the subsequent sections of this paper, we shall delineate the methodology employed, present the findings of our statistical analysis, and engage in a lighthearted exploration of the implications and potential mechanisms underlying this curious correlation. Join us as we feast upon the statistical feast we have prepared, and as we savor the deliciously curious confluence of air pollution and gastronomic triumph.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data from 1980 to 2022 yielded a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.6756878, an r-squared value of 0.4565541, and a p-value of less than 0.01. This indicated a statistically significant relationship between air pollution levels in Sioux City, Iowa, and the consumption of hotdogs by the illustrious champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. As shown in Figure 1, the scatterplot revealed a compelling linear trend, illustrating the surprising alignment between these seemingly disparate variables.
This robust statistical association raises intriguing questions about the interplay between environmental factors and competitive eating prowess. Could the scent of industrial fumes on the breeze serve as an unwitting appetizer for hotdog-laden triumphs at Coney Island? Or perhaps, the inhalation of airborne particulate matter may be an undervalued component of training regimens for competitive eaters? While these notions may appear fanciful, our statistical analysis unmistakably points to a meaningful correlation, sparking a culinary enigma worthy of further exploration.
As we delve into the implications of these findings, we are met with a delightful tapestry of whimsy and wonderment. The unexpected connection between air pollution and hotdog consumption not only invites us to contemplate the humorous intricacies of statistical serendipity, but also to explore the potential pathways through which atmospheric variables may influence gustatory feats of grandeur. It is, in many ways, a delightful parade of statistical sizzle and savory surprises.
In our further exploration of these results, we shall partake in a playful examination of the possible mechanisms underpinning this unlikely correlation, aiming to tickle both the academic intellect and the lighthearted sensibilities of our readers. Join us in this scholarly journey as we unravel the delightfully peculiar connection between smog and sausages, and as we savor the flavorful fusion of scientific inquiry and culinary curiosity.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has unearthed a robust statistical correlation between air pollution levels in Sioux City, Iowa, and the prodigious consumption of hotdogs by the revered champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. This unexpected connection presents a lighthearted quagmire for contemplation, epitomizing the idiosyncrasies that can arise at the nexus of statistical inquiry and culinary curiosities. While the empirical evidence may seem like a statistical hotdog-eating contest in and of itself, our findings prompt a confluence of comical conjectures and whimsical musings.

The implications of our research tickle not only the academic intellect but also the jocular sensibilities of those entranced by the culinary cabaret of competitive eating. As we marvel at this serendipitous statistical feast, we are tempted to ponder the possibility of particulate matter and nitrogen dioxide acting as inadvertent gustatory stimulants, or even as gustatory gauntlets for the competitive eating elite. This culinary conundrum exudes a zest for statistical serendipity, serving as a delightful reminder of the unexpected humor that can arise amidst the rigors of scientific inquiry.

As we partake in this amusing statistical soiree, we invite readers to relish in the quirky web of connections that underlie our findings and mull over the gastronomic enigma that has emerged from this unlikely correlation. Ultimately, our research presents a lighthearted foray into the realm of statistical whimsy, infusing the fields of environmental science and competitive eating with a dash of scholarly amusement.

In light of these findings, we assert that no further research is needed in this area. Instead, we encourage scholars to indulge in the statistical smorgasbord presented here and embrace the mirthful spirit in which this investigation was undertaken.

To paraphrase Shakespeare's famous line, "If correlation be the spice of life, eat on!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Sizzling Sausages and Smog: A Statistical Study on the Correlation Between Air Pollution in Sioux City, Iowa and Hotdogs Consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Gastronomic Ecology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Sizzling Sausages and Smog: A Statistical Study on the Correlation Between Air Pollution in Sioux City, Iowa and Hotdogs Consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Culinary and Environmental Research Integration (SCERI)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Sizzling Sausages and Smog: A Statistical Study on the Correlation Between Air Pollution in Sioux City, Iowa and Hotdogs Consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion with an abstract of This paper presents a comprehensive statistical analysis investigating the potential link between air pollution levels in Sioux City, Iowa and the consumption of hotdogs by the reigning champion of the renowned Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Leveraging Environmental Protection Agency data on air quality and information from Wikipedia on hot dog consumption, our research team conducted a rigorous examination spanning from 1980 to 2022.
Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.6756878 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a robust statistical association between air pollution and hotdog consumption. This unexpected correlation prompts a culinary conundrum and leads to a myriad of comical conjectures regarding the influence of air quality on competitive eating champions. We invite readers to relish in the findings and ponder the possibility of air pollution whetting the appetite for competitive hot dog consumption.

ChatGPT:

air pollution, Sioux City, Iowa, hotdog consumption, Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, statistical study, correlation coefficient, p-value, competitive eating champions, Environmental Protection Agency data, Wikipedia, statistical analysis

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Sioux City, Iowa
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with moderate or worse air quality in Sioux City, IA-NE-SD
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Sioux City, Iowa

Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion
Detailed data title: Hotdog Consumption by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion

Correlation r = 0.6756878 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.4565541 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 45.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Sioux City, Iowa) over the 43 years from 1980 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 6.6E-7. 0.0000006645705921863913000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.68 in 6.6E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,504,731 random variables You don't actually need 1 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 42 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 42 because we have two variables measured over a period of 43 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.47, 0.81 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1980198119821983198419851986198719881989199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Air pollution in Sioux City, Iowa (Bad air quality days)20.81630.8264460000000000000000026.446326.229537.096826.612936.363623.387132.258131.967224.826.423.013731.506826.301442.349731.506819.7262012.021915.616422.191811.538512.295123.43237.9646
Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion (Hotdogs eaten)9.5111110.59.511.7515.513.51015.51621.519172019.522.2524.51920.25255050.544.553.334953.7566596854626869616270727471757663




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([20.8163,0.826446,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,26.4463,26.2295,37.0968,26.6129,36.3636,23.3871,32.2581,31.9672,24.8,26.4,23.0137,31.5068,26.3014,42.3497,31.5068,19.726,20,12.0219,15.6164,22.1918,11.5385,12.2951,23.4323,7.9646,])
array_2 = np.array([9.5,11,11,10.5,9.5,11.75,15.5,13.5,10,15.5,16,21.5,19,17,20,19.5,22.25,24.5,19,20.25,25,50,50.5,44.5,53.33,49,53.75,66,59,68,54,62,68,69,61,62,70,72,74,71,75,76,63,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Sioux City, Iowa"
array_2_name = "Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the rating guru we've been waiting for!


Correlation ID: 3349 · Black Variable ID: 21265 · Red Variable ID: 500
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0